Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n artery_n blood_n vein_n 5,874 5 10.2889 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A67812 Medicaster medicatus, or, A remedy for the itch of scribling. The first part written by a country practitioner in a letter to one of the town, and by him prefaced and published for cure of John Brown, one of His late Majesties ordinary chyrurgeons, containing an account of that vain plagiary and remarks on his several writings : wherein his many thefts, contradictions, absurdities gross errors, ignorance, and mistakes are displayed and divers vulgar errors in cyrurgery and anatomy refuted / by James Young. Yonge, James, 1647-1721. 1685 (1685) Wing Y40; ESTC R27595 92,013 244

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the heart of a person that survived it Matth. Glandorp Spec. Chirurg cap. 33. relates that Rabbits lived many months after they were run through the heart Page 254 261. Sken●kius saith the like of a Stagg and of one in whose heart a piece of an Arrow was found that had long stuck there that a Boy was cured cui os pectoris excisum cor aliquandiu nudum apparuit nam involucrum ejus computruerit the History page 254. which he calls a wound of the Tunicle of the heart was undoubtedly as his Author first thought of the heart it self Page 256. He reports that some have been found without * Miscell curios Vol. 5. obs 25. hearts as doth also Hildanus cent 4. obs 51. Moronus Index page 85. Tillesius rer nat ubi supra my Lord Bacon Mr. Boyle vide Bart holin † Lib. 2. cap. 6. Anat. Reform Editio ultima Rhodius obs 39. cent 2. relates the cure of a large wound of the Pericardium he supposeth that wounds of the heart it self are incurable and saith there was a Stagg who had a small piece of Dart sticking in his heart sine vitae noxa that a Boy was dissected without a Pericardium But what need I say any more when our most agreeable Scribler is his own Confuter for after all his positive Prognosticks page 23 273 c. he very fairly confesseth that superficial wounds here hapning may be c●●red I have taken unusual pains and been very particular on this point partly to refute our Confident partly to shew the incertainty and fallacy of many presages delivered by the first Writers and the vanity of relying on them but cheifly to perswade my Brethren of the Plaister-box that no wound is incurable and beat them out of the contrary discouraging and mischeivous opinion The vital flame in the heart and the airs ingress then and mixing its nitrous particle with the bloud are things much controverted among learned men though positively affirmed by our Author I will say only this that I am sure he understands not that controversy and that many very eminent Anatomists are against the later Hypothesis vide Dr. Harveys Proem to his book de Corde circulatione Dr. Walter Needham format foetu cap. 6. where he declares it the Opinion of Dr. Highmore also Dr. Henshaw Aero chalinos page 62. beside Demerbrook Cornelius c. Page 281. He defines with most of the Ancients an Aneurisma to be a breach of the inner coat of an Artery the blood distending the outer which I know hath been the common Opinion but the absurdity thereof you will find well discovered by Van Horn Microtecne sect 1. paragr 15. page 215. Wiseman lib. 1. cap. 16. Pareus calls it the Rupture of an Artery the Blood extravasating among the Muscles and he himself varieth from his definition in the Histories he gives page 380. of his Book of Tumors where he hath a particular Chapter of this Disease which is of an Aneurism from a wound and saith in that Chapter that the common cause is puncturing an Artery But to be short in this Topick because in all the rest I shall have occasion to evince abundance of his Errours take those brief Instances which I shall but name page 23 29 44 45 273 and many other places he makes the heart the fountain of motion page 309. he calls the stomach a cold Intral and in reckoning the coats omits the crusta * See willis Pharm Rat. part 1. cap. 2. sect 1. villosa page 287. 297. he affirms the meseraick Veins convey the Aliment to the gate of the Liver and suck up the nourishment from the small guts page 227. he reckons the ascent and descent of the Cava from the Liver page 194. he suggests that the Heart and Liver are not only the Original of the Veins and Arteries but the Oceans from whence they fetch both their vital and natural blood and spirits page 179. that the Brain is made of sperm and maternal blood that it 's of a cold and moist temper page 198. the chief seat of cold and glutinous moisture that the Nerves are cold in nature and cold in substance Thus as I have said by his Ignorance in the improvement of our Art and injudicious sucking the fallible Principles and Opinions of the Ancients men to whom we are infinitely indebted and from whom it 's no detraction to say they knew not as much as is now known he runs himself into many gross errours and mistakes chiefly in Anatomy Prognosticks and Dogma's of which I shall superadd a few instances more and conclude this Head Page 316. He pronounceth Wounds of the Kidneys in general Mortal and inevitably so if the Pelvis be hurt though Pareus relates the story of an Archer condemned to be hanged and upon Solicitation by some great men who had been troubled with the Stone he submitted to have those Parts opened survived the operation was cured and pardoned We have also a Tradition that our Famous Harvey cut out a Stone from a mans Kidney But his old Friend and constant supplier Schenkius tells him Page 451. Three stories of Wounds of that Part cured and himself notwithstanding his Prognostick subjoins to this Chapter the History of another stoln from Glandorp See also P. Foresius obs Chir. 5. lib. 6. He discovers many errors in his discourse Page 266. of the Lungs and respiration positively presumes to determine the dispute as yet undecided among the best Philosophers and * Thruston Diatribe Mayow de respicar Willis Phar. Ration F. Burtis Epist Barthol Swammardam de Re spir Malpighius Casp Barthoy Dinphr struct Dr. Gibsons Epitom Dr. Needham de foe tu c. Anatomists of the Age viz. What 〈◊〉 the cause and use of Pulmonary respir●tion He saith Page 255 from Gale● that matter heaped up in the Breast pa●ing into the vena sine pari is through t●● vena ava carryed to the right Ventricl● of the Heart and passing thence DOWNWARD by the descending Trunk of the Cava to the Liver pr●mark how he contradicts what 〈◊〉 said Page 277 that the ascent and descent of this Vein was from the Liver It s carryed to the Emulgents Page 254. He delivers that Wounds penetrating the Breast are known by Wind coming through the Orifice Which is a fallible Diagnostick especially when the Wound is made by a small Rapier and the Body deflexed when it s received so that upon returning to a right posture the parts alter and cover one another in discoursing concerning Wounds of the Gullet he commits many mistakes Page 244 he saith that Pipe marcheth on the right side of the Spondyls that Deglutition is helped by the Muscles of the Larinx * Willis Pharm Rat. part 1. cap. 2. attributes nothing thereof to the Gullet whose Anatomy he doth not understand and accounts the Muscles of the Phariax among those of the Larinx He directs to Nutritive Glisters Page 246. Which I doubt do signifie little
writes as erroneously and ignorantly and translates from his Authors as falsly as he is discovered to do in his first Books I will give you a few instances as I discover● them in once looking over that tract for must confess I wanted patience to read oftner his stile is so broken his way of expression so confused and his notion so sill stoln and absurd that it renders a Reade● passage through it as uneasy as traveling the Alpes and as dry and barren 〈◊〉 the Arabian Desarts His errors are too numerous to be r●counted much less confuted in a prefac● that shall be the work of a second part o● this Book except his future modesty suffe● this to suffice In the interim compare hi● with Wharton Diomerbroeck or an new Anatomist and you will presently fin● by them that he understands not the natur● of the Glandules altho it be the subjec● of which he treats is very manifest from his fine and general accounts of them page 4 7 c. he calls them scavengers to suck up the excrementitious humors by which Sperm Chyle Milk and the mos● refined elaborate liquors of the body are a● once thrown to the dunghil page 6. h● defines them among other general qualities to be Friable yeilding an OLEAGINOUS humor thence extilling and do SELDOM leave the body by whic● he discovers himself Ignorant of the commo● ●●stinction into friable and tenacious ●akes tears and a thousand Lympid li●ors more Oyly and suggests as if the ●landules do sometimes leave the ●dy In the same page he affirms Glandules ●●d hair have one use that the latter 〈◊〉 way result from and discover the ●●rmer that neither are to be met in ●●dry part of the body So that he is ●ainly Ignorant of the Glandules of the ●●in and argues as if the scalp were full ●●ere excepting those poor ones mentioned 〈◊〉 Duhamel Malpighius Willis c. ●ere is not one nay he is so inconside●●tely confident against plain and com●on testimony to affirm that the Paro●s which page 50. he confesseth to be ●●der the ears are covered with ●air Page 1 2. He admires the advantage 〈◊〉 this age and the defective knowledge 〈◊〉 the former in Anatomy and yet not ●●ly pursues the absurd results of their short ●●ill and sets up their exploded doctrines 〈◊〉 his Theory of the evil but Anatomy of ●●e Glandules affirming that the Paro●●s suck in ALL the excrements which ●ome from the brain the Axillary ●lands those which come from the heart and the inguenal they of th● Liver Page 5. He makes all effects 〈◊〉 the Glands to be Struma or Scrophula● which deseases he defines to be a repletio● from the Arteries collected from a●● the parts of the body so that the Brai● and Nerves accused by others are by hi● excused Willis de coreb c. 20. Page 21. This Plexus arising from th● lower posterior parts of those ventricles which the branch of the Caroti● Arteries do either ways enter th● which do constitute the Retu mirab● for the Glandula Pituitaria by th● Plexus is carryed the Arterial bloud for making of the Arterial Spirits th● is a riddle to Oedipus Page 66. H● saith The Tonsils have four uses a●lowed by Wharton when in truth th●●● uses he mentions are quoted by the Doct●● to confute them page 80. he saith th● Salival Juice manifestly appears to pr●ceed from the head which is manifest● false for it s strained from the Arteri● by those Glands as Diemerbroeck a●● Sylvias could have told him page 9 97. he saith the Lacteal Vessels covery the Milk to the Breasts altho t● promoters of that Hypothesis viz. E●● Diemerbroeck c. do not make it cle●● de facto and himself page 155. of Tumors saith the way is not yet found out Page 120. He maketh Tumors to result from afflux of matter only that in dead bodies we meet no such Tumors because in them a Fluxion ceaseth Thus ignorant is he that inflation fermentation restitution of spungy body's when the parts compressing them are loosened by corruption or other cause will make a Tumor without an afflux of matter as appears by the instance he gives to the contrary viz. That of dead bodies which often times swell nay I have known an emaciat Corps bloat in 24 hours at a prodigious rate Page 198. He calls the Testicles the mansion of a Gonorrhea by which he not only contradicts what he said in the same Chapter viz. That the prostatae are the feat thereof but discovers his wretched Ignorance of an hernia Humoralis for he saith to prove his assertion that the Tumor following a sudden stoping of Gonorrhea is of the stones where as it s of the coats and adjacent vessels distended by the matter of a Gonorrhea which begets this Tumor and that spewed out of the Arteries for that desease seems to me I speak with submission to be a critical separation and rejection of the bloud and other liquors tainted with the venerea● Lues insinuated in Coitù and thrown out a●● the place where it s received thus I have sometimes seen that matter which usually issues through the Urethra glees from between the Glans and preputium though no solution of unity were there to give it way but as it was insinuate● per poros cutis so it s in part extruded The Gonorrhea in women page 199● he affirms to proceed from their testicles which is a most egregious error an● inexcusable in a man who hath seen ne● Authors of Anatomy all which agree that their testicles are Ovary's that i● coitù one of those Eggs is tumbled into th● womb but no moysture by this I perceiv● he is not so well acquainted with de Grae● as he pretends page 131. he saith non● of the Chyle is sent out of Guts into the pancreas but sent thence int● the Guts 140. the peristaltick motio● of the Guts drives the nourishmen● from the pylorus to the ductus pancreaticus which is but four fingers breadt● below it 168. in the kidneys the serum mixeth it self with the bloud 122. th● cure of the Scrophula is for the mos● part by Topicks Page 17. The passages ●n man are narrower than in women 18 ●corbutick Rheumatick pains fall from the head 26. the Saliva cometh from the brain are all erroneous positions which need no other refutation than barely to recite them more of which you may find Page 10 12 15 and 16. in his discriptions of the Tongue which together with the Brain Testicles Liver Spleen Kidnies c. He impertinently reckons among Glandules In many places a man cannot understand what he would mean thus page 6. and here as natures general maxim is we shall find that the moist parts of the Body do declare their chief abode for we ●hall find the hairs of the body as readi●y taking up the moisture which is sent ●nto the Glands and discharging it which arrives at the exteriour parts thereof as the Glandules do take the same into