apparitions so great similitude in their motions and apparitions so many rules and differences vpon long experience haue beene giuen to discerne them and so great skill cunning is requisite to apply them Sith there be so many and so dangerous wayes to take as of Pagans Iewes Turks Heretikes all differing condemning one another all depending vpon the motions of these spirits Sith such and so high is the excellency of the nature of these spirits to be discerned such and so weake the infirmity of man to discerne them such and so subtile malicious and powerfull is mans enemy the Diuell to deceaue in them by counterfeit dissimulation of piety or by forged illusions insteed of reuelations or by outward apparitions in forme of Saints Angels or God all by verity of examples confirmed Sith so speciall extraordinary so rare and vnvsuall is this gift of discerning these spirits Sith I say all this is so as is proued with what reason and iudgment can any man make this priuat spirit or rather selfe-seeming conceit of his owne braine a competent sufficient and infallible iudge to discerne and decide al these questions and difficulties arising vpon them What braine-sicke madnesse senslesse presumption is it for euery silly simple and vnlearned person man or woman all of which challēg this spirit to assume so much to themselues and presume so farre vpon their owne conceit as to discerne and declare which of euery one of these spirits is of God the deuill or nature which is good or bad which true or false either in thēselues or others and vpon this presumption to ground the certainty of their religion faith and saluation What greater temerity and rashnes can there be then to build a worke so great and important as is the eternity of saluation or damnation vpon no more solid and certaine a ground then is the proper conceit of euery priuate motion of an vncertaine spirit Surely if men were not blind or bewitched and that either willfully or foolishly blinded or bewitched and both so deeply that they eyther will not or cannot see what both sense reason doth dictate to their owne conscience what both authority and testimony of God and holy men doth lay before them what both examples experience of so many ages doth confirme vnto thē surely they could not but often doubt and distruct many tymes stagger and relent their owne iudgment conscience doubtlesse pricking them in this their ostentation of the certainty of their spirit they could not but sometyms enter into consideration yea and feele a sensible touch of trepidation in soule and stand in a wonder and amazemēt at themselues how they dare venture so far and stand so confidently in so weighty a matter vpon the judgement of so vncertaine vnconstant vnwarranted yea corrupted deceitfull and partiall a Iudge as is this their priuate spirit conceit imagination What man of reason and discretion or of care conscience will not hould it farre more secure and safe in these points of eternity with euery good Catholike to ioyne his spirit with the spirit of the Saints and seruants of God now reigning in heauen to subiect his spirit to the spirit of Gods holy Church heere on earth guided infallibly by an infallible spirit of God and by conforming themselues to this spirit to imbrace and follow that Fayth and religion that doctrine and discipline that sacrifice and sacraments which so many Saints and holy men so many Confessours and learned Doctours so many Churches and Councells in all ages throughout all Countryes belieued in their harts professed by their liues defended by their writinges and sealed and confirmed with their liues bloud And thus much for the first reason against the priuate spirit drawne from the difficulty to discerne spirits THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To interprete Scripture and iudge of Fayth confuted by reasons drawne from the true and infallible authority and meanes of interpreting holy Scripture CHAP. V. VVhat Interpretation Authority and meanes are necessary infallible for the sense of Scripture SECT I. SVBDIV. 1. What Interpretation of Scripture is necessary THE better to vnderstand the reasons drawne from the infallible authority and meanes of interpreting of Holy Scripture by which the priuate spirits authority is confuted we may consider 1. What interpretatiō that is which is required as necessary 2. What authority as infallible is required to this intetpretation and in whome it is resident 3. What meanes are to be vsed and followed as certaine by these Interpreters to this interpretation Out of all which may be inferred and proued the insufficiency of the priuate spirit to be eyther authour or meanes of this interpretation of Scripture First therefore when we speake of the sense and interpretation of scripture we speake not of that sense and interpretation which is only probable and credible but of that which is certaine and infallible Not of that which is only for the pulpit and documents of manners or which is for the schooles and subtiltyes of diuinity but of that which is for doctrine of Fayth and articles of beliefe Not of that which is only to confirme and increase vs in that fayth which we already belieue but of that which is to persuade and produce fayth a new eyther in our selues when and why we first belieue or in others whome we persuade first to belieue And this is that sense of Scripture which as it is being rightly vnderstood in the sense which the holy Ghost intended a firme and solide foundation of true fayth so being falsly vnderstood and wikedly peruerted by false teachers it is the Mother or nurse of al heresies For as nothing is persuaded as worthy of beliefe but which is true or vnder the shew of truth and as the scripture is by all granted to be most true so all vse the text of Scripture as a meane to persuade that which they would haue to be belieued as true the true teachers in the true sense the false in the false sense both cyting the wordes and text but the one in that sense and meaning which the holy Ghost intended the other in that which they themselues inuented Which course of false sense as the Diuell first beganne when he would haue by Scripture persuaded Christ to cast himselfe downe headlong saying It is written he hath giuen his Angels charge ouer thee So the members of Sathan follow the same way and labour by the same Scripture to seduce the members of Christ as the faythlesse the faythfull the sacrilegious the religious the Heretikes the Catholikes For the Iewes would by Scripture haue proued that Christ was not only not Messias saying Search the Scriptures and see that from Gallilee a Prophet ryseth not but also that he was a malefactour and such a one as ought to dye saying VVe haue a law and according to our law he ought to dye And the same is continued both by Turkes
datis or graces freely bestowed which are speciall to some persons only and those not alwayes Saints holy men For which we may note that S. Paul 1. Cor. 12.18 of the 9. guifts of the Holy Ghost which there he recounts and of which foure to wit 1. curing diseases 2. working miracles 3. prophecy of future euents 4. discerning of spirits are transeunt motions and fiue to wit 1. Wisedome 2. Knowledge 3. Fayth 4. Kindes of tongues 5. Interpretation of languages are according to Deuines permanent habits of these I say doth S. Paul assigne 5. both them and their proper function to be about the deciding or explicating of matters of beliefe interpreting of holy Scripture that is 1. Wisedome which is to explicate the high mysteries of the Trinity Incarnation predestination and the like 2. Knowledge which is to explicate either matters of manners what we are to do and how to liue or mysteries of fayth by examples comparisons and philosophicall reasons 3. Fayth which is eyther without feare to professe and preach what is belieued or by contemplation to penetrate and explicate the deep mysteries of beliefe 4. and 5. to wit Kindes of tongues interpretation of languages which is to explicate obscure and hard places of Scripture to interprete hymnes and prophecies in strang languages and to translate the Scripture into other tongues All which in their seuerall function and in diuers manners are imployed in discerning iudging and interpreting of mysteries of fayth difficulties of scripture Secondly we may note that these guifts doe not necessarily depend and follow vpon iustifying Grace and so are not common to all faythfull or true children of God but are speciall guifts graces bestowed some vpon one person some vpon another euery one as the spirit of God pleases v. 11. not all vpon euery one This is apparent first out of the text which sayth That to one certes by the spirit is giuen the word of VVisedome to another the word of Knowledge to another Fayth to another Interpretation of languages to another Grace of doing cures of miracles of prophecy of tongues of discerning of spirits v. 8.9.10 c. Againe Are all Apostles as heades Are all Prophets as eyes Are all Doctours as tongues Are all miracles and hauing the grace of doing cures as handes Do all speak with tongues Doe all interprete the Scripture as Maisters no surely For he hath giuen some not all to be Apostles Some not all to be Prophets Other some not all to be Euangelistes Other some not all to be Pastours and Doctours to the consummation of the Saints into the worke of the ministery c. Eph. 4.11 Secondly the same is apparent by the comparison of this mysticall body with a naturall body which also the Apostle vseth v. 14. c for as all members haue not the same operation but some haue one some another the eyes to see the hands to worke the feet to walk the head to discourse so in the mysticall body all and euery one though faythfull haue not the same and all guiftes but some one some another as some haue the guift of cures some of miracles some of tongues so also some haue the guift of Wisedome Science and Interpretation but all haue not euery one of them therfore some must as Maisters teach some as Scholers learne some as heades direct and instruct some as members be directed and instructed so that as all members are not one member so neither hath one member all operations or functions but according to diuision of graces is also diuision of ministrations and operations v. 4. Out of which it doth follow first that the guift of interpretation of holy Scripture and explicating of high mysteryes of fayth is a guift not generall and common to all the faythfull as depending and following necessary vpon Fayth or grace but speciall and particuler to some as gratis giuen to whome it pleaseth God to giue it Secondly that all faythfull and iust persons cannot be directed by this extraordinary guifte in their iudgement of fayth decision of controuersies and interpretation of scripture because it is not giuen to euery iust man as is proued not yet only to the iust but sometymes to the vniust as to those who cast out Diuells in our Sauiours name and yet he knew them not that is did not approue and commend them And out of these I argue thus To interprete Scripture and decide Controuersies of Fayth is a guift not giuen generally to all the iust or faithfull by vertue of their iustification but extraordinarily bestowed vpon some only as a grace gratis data but the priuate spirit according to the Protestant doctrine is a guift giuen to all and euery faithfull by vertue of their iustification not gratia gratis data to some therefore the Protestant priuate spirit cannot be a guift giuen to interprete in euery one the holy Scripture and iudge of all controuersies of fayth The Maior is the doctrine of the Holy Ghost The Minor is the doctrine of the Protestants And so the conclusion following out of both is most certaine Out of Ezech 13. describing in false Prophets this priuate spirit with the effects punishment of it SECT IIII. THE fourth proofe is out of the Prophet Ezechiel who chap. 13. doth describe and decypher to vs 1. This priuate spirit what it is 2. the persons in whome it is 3. the effects which it worketh 4. the punishment which ensues vpon it Therefore he describes that spirit to be the same with this priuate spirit that is The spirit of their owne hart which the Prophets follow v. 3.2 This spirit is in the men-prophets The Prophets of Israell that prophecy v. 2. in the women-prophets The daughters of the people which prophecy v. 17. both of them being the people of God and chosen Israelites 3. The effects of it are 1. Blindnes they see nothing v. 3. 2. Vanity They see vaine thinges 3. Lyes They diuine lyes saying Our Lord sayth whereas I haue not spoken v. 7. chap. 22.28 saying Peace and there is not peace v. 10. 4. Fraud which as Foxes in the desertes v. 4. tyed by the taile of malice and seuered in the heades of doctrine doe destroy the vinyards of Christ Cant. 2. as dawbing of a wall made by the dawbers of clay or morture but without temper of chaffe or straw v. 11. As cushions and pillowes made by delicious women and layd vnder mens heades to lull them in security and catch their soules In both which with faire exteriour shew and hopefull promises they deceaue the people feeding some with a security of future good terrifying others with danger of future euill that they might kill the soules that is denounce that they shall be killed who dye not and viuificate the soules that is declare that they shall liue which liue not lying to the people that belieue lyes v. 19.4 The
THE TRIALL OF THE PROTESTANT PRIVATE SPIRIT VVHEREIN Their Doctrine making the sayd Spirit the sole ground meanes of their Beliefe is confuted By Authority of Holy Scripture Testimonies of auncient Fathers Euidence of Reason drawne from the Grounds of Faith Absurdity of consequences following vpon it against all Faith Religion and Reason The Second Part which is Doctrinall WRITTEN By I. S. of the Society of IESVS Ezech. 23. vers 3. Vae Prophetis insipientibus qui sequuntur Spiritum suum nihil vident Woe to the foolish Prophets who follow their owne Spirit and see nothing Permissu Superiorum M.DC.XXX Tertullian de praescript cap. 4. Qui lupi rapaces nisi sensus Spiritus subdoli ad infestandum gregem intrinsecùs delitescentes Who are rauenous wolues but deceitfull Spirits and senses lying close to molest the flocke of Christ Caluin in 1. Ioan. 41. Multi falsi doctores titulum Spiritus mentiuntur Insurgunt multi fanatici qui se temerè iactant Spiritu Dei praeditos esse Loquuntur priuato suo nomine prodeunt priuato suo nomine proferumt ex proprio sensu Many false Doctours do feigne the title of the Spirit Many mad men do rashly boast that they haue the spirit of God They speake in their owne name they go out in their owne name and they vtter what they say in their owne name TO THE CHRISTIAN READER COVRTEOVS READER This second Part of the Protestant Priuate Spirit like a nevv-borne Infant is at length after long trauaile come to light I may iustly terme it an Agrippa because it vvas hardly brought forth It caused many great and long gripings in the Mothers vvombe in the Conception and Framing but passed difficulties both greater and longer in the Byrth Printing so hard it is for an Israelite among the Aegyptians to conceaue beare such Infants It vvas in danger to haue byn stifled vnder Midvviues hands one vvas long sought for hardly obteyned and farre fetched and yet as a stranger not so skillfull but that many errours are committed If therefore it come to thy vievv maimed imperfect blame not the Authour excuse the Printer Thou vvilt meruaile hovv this second Part gets birth and breath and comes to light before the first The reason is this like to tvvo Tvvins they strugled in the birth and passing the hands of diuers Midvviues this fell to the lott of one more ready and skillfull and so got the precedence of Birth-right vvhich yet in part vvas its due as being first formed composed and that before the other vvas intended For supposing the Aduersary as common knovvne to vvit the Priuate Spirit vvithout discussing the quarrell it assaulted him at the first and so aymed to vvound Heresy in the head But vvherfore then is this called the second the other the first Part Because the matter or subiect so requires this being a Confutation of the Priuate Spirit the ground of all Protestancy the other a Proofe or declaration that the same Spirit is such a Ground to the Protestāts vvhich at the first supposed vvas aftervvard thought fit to be at large proued that therby it may appeare that this Priuate Spirit is by the sayd Protestant Doctrine made not only a Ground but a sole and vvhole Ground of their Fayth and Religion yea that all other true Grounds are for that end by them neglected and reiected Which proofe of being a Ground the order of Doctrine so requiring because it is precedent to the reproofe of the same there fore the other Part though later composed and diuulged claimes the title of the first this of the second Part. In the meane time if this thus hardly brought forth and thus svvadled in the cloutes of many imperfections both of pen and print may giue thee Content thy Content giue Vente and the Vente help on to the birth of the other my hope shal be that as this Part may satisfy thee in the disproofe of this supposed false Ground so the other vvill more satisfy first in the proofe of the true Grounds assigned by Catholikes next in the contempt of the same Grounds vsed by Protestants and that for the establishing of their false Ground vvhich in the first Part is fully performed Of vvhich if eyther the one or both may ground or cōfirme thee in the Truth true Grounds of Truth this thy good shal be the fruite I desire of my paynes and my paynes shall thinke themselues at thy hands sufficiently requited by thy good prayers vvhich I desyre for my selfe and further endeauours all to the Honour of God and good of his holy Church THE CONTENTS Of the Chapters Sections and Subdiuisions of this second Part of the Priuate Spirit as it is Doctrinall and confuted CHAP. I. CERTAINE Considerations of the Meanes of Fayth necessary for the vnderstanding of this Protestant Priuate Spirit Sect. 1. Of six meanes and helps to attaine Fayth Sect. 2. Of the order and necessity of these meanes Sect. 3. How the Protestants want all these 6. meanes of faith Sect. 4. How the Catholikes and Protestants differ in these six meanes and how the Protestants make their Priuate Spirit the only meanes for all CHAP. II. THE Priuate spirits interpretation of Scripture deciding of Controuersies and iudging of Fayth confuted by holy Scripture Sect. 1. Out of the 1. S. Iohn 4.1 S. Paul 1. Tim. 4.11 Act. 20.30 2. Pet. 2. describing this Spirit Sect. 2. Out of 2. Pet 1.20 making the same spirit authour and interpreter of Scripture Sect. 3. Out of 1. Cor. 12.8 prouing the interpretation of Scripture to be a gift gratis giuē not cōmon to al faithfull Sect. 4. Out of Ezech. 13. describing in false Prophets this Priuate Spirit with the effects and punishment of it Sect. 5. Out of Iob 32. declaring in Eliu his friends spirit the manner of proceeding of this Priuate spirit Sect. 6. Out of Tit. 3.10 shewing the Spirit of an Hereticke Sect. 7. Out of diuers places of Scripture condemning the relying vpon our owne iudgment CHAP. III. THE Priuate Spirits interpreting of holy Scripture and iudging of Mysteries of Faith and Controuersies confuted by the testimony of auncient Fathers CHAP. IV. THE Priuate Spirits interpreting of Scripture and iudging of Controuersies confuted by reasons drawn from the difficulty of discerning of Spirits Sect. 1. Of the diuersity of Spirits Sect. 2. Of the difficulty to discerne these Spirits Sect. 3. Of the difficulty and vncertainty of the rules of discerning spirits Sect. 4. Of the subtilty of Sathan in deceiuing by the similitude of spirits Sect. 5. The difficulty to discerne spirits proued by Scripture CHAP. V. THE Priuate Spirits authority to interprete Scripture and iudge of Controuersies confuted by the true infallible authority and meanes of interpreting scripture Sect. 1. What interpretation authority and meanes are necessary and infallible for the sense of Scripture Subd 1. What interpretation of scripture is necessary 2. Who haue authority to make this
as the articles which are belieued and the reuelation why they are belieued both which are of eternal verity and certainty or Internal as the pious disposition of the will by grace preuenient and the actuall assent to fayth in the Vnderstanding by the infused guift of Fayth both which grace and guift do operate and cooperate to the act of diuine supernaturall and catholike fayth That these I say all and euery one of these meanes are wanting in Protestants to their fayth beliefe I proue And first that they want all testimonies of credibility which may perswade any man prudently to accept of their fayth we may suppose and note that these testimonies or motiues are of three sortes 1. such as may perswade Iewes and Gentils to become Christians 2. such as may confirme Catholikes to continue Christians 3. such as may induce Heretikes to returne to be Catholikes Of the first sort are many alleaged by ancient Fathers Dionysius Areopagita Iustinus Martyr Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius Chrysostome Augustine against the Gentils all cited proued by Valentia As for exāple in respect of Christ the dignity of his person the efficacy of his preaching the verity of his predictions and the vertue of his miracles In respect of Christian doctrine the manner of the propagation of it not by power eloquence nobility or liberty but by the simplicity of simple poore and vnlearned mens preaching and that to a faith aboue reason contrary to the inclination of flesh and bloud The confirmation of it by miracles martyrdome prophecies sanctity of doctrine and order of discipline the opposition of it by the violence and persecution of Iewes and Pagans and by the eloquence reasons of Rethoricians and Philosophers all in vaine In respect of the Scripture the antiquity of it as extant before any writings of any Philosophers the consonancy of it in the agreement of the old testament with the new and of both in themselues In respect of the Professours their excellent wit eloquence learning and vertue in it their conuersions from infidelity to it their wonderfull constancy and fortitude in defending and dying for it All which haue beene vrged as strong motiues against Gentils to conuert them to it Of the second sort which may confirme Catholikes or such as confirmed S. Augustine in his catholike beliefe against the Maniches which he recites to haue beene 1. the consent of people and Nations 2. Authority begun by miracles nourished by hope increased by charity and confirmed by antiquity 3. The succession of Priests from the seate of Peter to the then present Bishop of Rome 4. The name of Catholike neuer vsurped by Heretikes speaking to strangers but vsually attributed by them to Catholikes all which did iustly keep me sayth he in the bosome of the Catholike Church Of the third sort which may reduce Heretiks are such as the Nicen Councell in the Creed S. Augustine and others did alledge to conuince the Heretikes of their tyme that is 1. Vnity of the present Church with the ancient in doctrine and vnity of the partes with the head by fayth vnity among themselues by charity and to their Pastour by obedience 2. Sanctity of doctrine which induceth sinners to holinesse and conuerts Infidells to christianity and sanctity of persons who exercise good workes of piety confirme their doctrine and holinesse by miracles and prophecies 3. Vniuersality in name by which it is called Catholike In place by being or hauing been extended in preaching or professing to all or most Nations at the least successiuely In tyme by being ancient in beginning from the Apostles and constant in continuing from them vntill this present against al persecution of Gentils Iewes or Pagans 4. Succession of Pastours and Prelats who by lawfull succession from some Apostolicall sea or from some who haue authority from it and by lawfull ordination from them who are lawfully ordeined can deriue their succession and ordination from the Apostles These are markes and testimonies which distinguish the true Church of Christ from al conuenticles of Heretikes do conuince euidently that to be the true church where they are to be found and that to be false where they are wanting Which supposed it is to be proued First that the Protestants want all these testimonies of credibility which should make euident the credibility of their fayth and religion either to Pagans to conuert them or to Heretikes to reduce them or to their owne followers to confirme them And first because it will be to tedious to touch euery one in particuler we will select the most principall and for the first sort which may conuert Pagās it is certaine that whatsoeuer of the former motiues the Protestants can alleadge either concerning Christ his doctrine his Scripture or his Professours to proue Christian Religion credible to a Pagā they receaued them all from vs and our Church from which they haue receaued what they haue either of Christ of Scripture of Sacraments of Christian religion in generall therefore what these proue or confirme they proue confirme our Church and doctrine not theirs For the first of the rest if we seeke Vnity of doctrine among them it is not to be found They haue not Vnity either with the Primitiue Church and Fathers whose doctrine they reiect in free Will Merit Iustification Prayer to Saints and most points now in controuersy as in the first part is at large proued nor with any head or supreme Gouernour of which sort they admit none on earth but disclaime all supremacy in any person whatsoeuer for matter ecclesiasticall nor yet among themselues who are diuided into many diuisions and subdiuisions of Sects and Heresies that long agoe the number exceeded a hundreth now are so many that they cannot be numbred In all which as they want all Vnity so they want all meanes to settle any vnity in that they admit no iudge to decide any controuersy and to silence any persons contentious If we seeke for Sanctity either of doctrine or of persons by holynesse of life or miracles it is not to be expected among them for their doctrine which is for example that euery motion though naturall of concupiscence is sinne as well without as with consent that all workes though the best are sinne that no good Workes doe merit that no Iustice is inherent but imputatiue that only Fayth iustifies that the Commandements are impossible that Man hath not Free-will that God ordaines and creates Men to saluation or damnation without respect to their endeauour or workes This doctrine I say is a speciall retractiue to detaine any man from attaining to any sanctity and perfection of life as impossible and not in his power For any kind of Miracles they are so destitute of them to confirme their new doctrine that they disclaime
expounded by their priuate spirit containes all the articles of their fayth We Catholiks do professe to belieue first al that which haue been wrot by the Apostles or Prophets in holy Scripture that in the whole bookes of Scripture as anciently they were by a Councell of Carthage S. Augustine others receaued all in that sense as it was by ancient Church expounded 2. all that which hath been by the same Apostls deliuered to posterity by word of mouth and tradition 3. all that which hath beene declared to vs out of Scripture or Tradition by definition of generall Councells 4. all that which by continuance of practise hath beene by holy Church euer reuealed 5. all that which by vnanimous consent of holy and learned Doctours Fathers and Saints hath beene belieued in this we differ and haue the aduantage for the articles we belieue Secondly for the formall obiect of finall resolution of Fayth they belieue what they belieue eyther for that their sense doth so perceaue it or for that their reason doth so persuade it or for that their priuate spirit doth so suggest it and so they make their sense or their reason or their owne priuate spirit and phantasie the formall motiue and finall resolution of their Fayth We belieue what we do belieue for that God hath reuealed it and that not a new and to some one in particuler but anciently to the Apostles and by them generally to all their successours and by successiō to vs so that our doctrine and our beliefe of it is grounded not vpon any our owne sense our owne reason our owne priuate conceit all most fallible and most subiect to illusion and deceit but vpon Gods diuine reuelation as he is the prime verity and verity it selfe and that not newly but of ancient euer since Christ reuealed that not personal made to me or one alone but Apostolical first reuealed to the Apostles themselues that not priuate to euery one seuerally but generall to all faithfull vniuersally that not interrupted at certaine tymes by fits and to certaine persons made knowne but continued by succession at all times by all faithfull and in all places receaued that not fallible without ground subiect to priuate illusion but most infallibly grounded vpon diuine reuelation and Church proposition subiect neither to be deceaued nor yet do deceaue and in this we differ and haue the aduantage for the meanes of Fayth eternall Thirdly for the inward assistance of Gods grace and the cooperation of it they challenge only certayne motions or flashes of a fickle spirit which whether it be by illumination or illusion whether of grace or nature whether supernaturall of God sensuall of nature or diabolicall of Sathan they haue no meanes to discerne or ground to be certaine and by it as dust by a whirle wind they are carryed vp and downe in a round without freedome reason or operation of their owne to what fancy and conceit it violently wheels and forces them We are assisted and enabled by the diuine guift of an internall and permanent spirit or habit of faith which infused into vs and alwayes remayning in vs is at any instant ready with vs and the cooperation of grace in vs to worke both a pious inclination of the will to dispose it without obstinacy obediently to consent and also an actuall assent of the vnderstanding illuminating and enabling it firmely to assent to what is reuealed and proposed Also we admit and receaue besides this habituall Grace other actuall and diuers motions of grace and of it some either excitant first to excite moue vs or adiuuant to assist vs being moued some either operant which workes in vs without vs and our cooperation or cooperant which workes in vs togeather with vs and our cooperation with it some either sufficient by which we are enabled to be conuerted or efficient by which we are actually conuerted And in this we differ from them and haue the aduantage for the meanes of faith internall both for the will and vnderstanding Fourthly for the credible testimonies and motiues of persuasion which may in reason persuade any man prudently to accept any religion as worthy of credit They haue not any which may either induce any which was neuer of it nor reduce any which are fallen from it or establish any who are entred into it that their faith doctrine and religion is credible as is before proued We haue many those forcible reasons perswasions and credibilities which may in prudence persuade any Pagan neuer admitted to it or Heretike reuolted from it or Catholike setled in it that our faith doctrine religion and Church may and ought prudently to be accepted is credible and worthy of beliefe We haue Vnity with the ancient and primitiue Church with the learned and holy Doctours and Fathers with the holy Saints and Martyrs whose faith and life we professe to imbrace imitate We haue Vnity with one head our chiefe Bishop and Pastour whose definitiue sentence doth resolue our doubts doth decide our controuersies doth end our contentions in faith and manners We haue Vnity of faith among our selues all of vs though distant in place though different in manners though contending for temporall state or dominion yet liuing and agreeing in obedience to one spirituall Superiour in vnity of one faith in conformity of one seruice sacraments and ceremonies We haue Sanctity and Holynesse both of doctrine which giues holy precepts and rules to auoid sinne for the loue of God feare of hel to seeke perfection by mortification internall supressing our selfe-will selfe-loue and selfe-conceit and externall taming our passions affections with pennance of fasting watching discipline and the like And also of Good life by frequent exercise of prayer meditation contemplation by dayly practise of pennance of patience in persecution by perfect resignation to holy Obedience Pouerty Chastity We haue Miracles those frequent apparent of prophesying curing of all diseases raising dead dispossessing of Diuels the like all wrought in confirmation either of our faith or sanctity all for the conuersion of Pagans and Heretikes of which in all ages tymes we haue many memorable of most nations now Christian conuerted to our Religion We haue Vniuersality not only of Name by retayning the title of Catholikes by which we are vsually distinguished from al sects no sect doth vsurpe it to distinguish them one from another but also of Place as being generally dispersed in all the parts of the world Europe Asia Africa America and also of Tyme as being reputed the old Religion and being indeed so old as haue byn yeares since Christ his Apostles who institued and imbraced it We haue continued Succession and Ordination of Prelates and Bishops manifestly orderly deduced
a fountaine incorrupted a Doctour among the Interpreters of Scripture as a Sunne among Planets as the greatest of the Fathers the worthiest Deuine that euer Gods Church had This great Doctour and Saint sayth Heresies haue no other origen then this that euery Heretike prefers his owne opinion drawne from his owne proper spirit before the commō opinion of the Church Againe Nothing makes them Heretiks but this that misvnderstanding the Scriptures they obstinatly defend their owne opinions The holy Scripture is dangerous to these who will wrest it to their owne peruerse hart who whē they ought to liue according to the will of God they liue according to their owne will and they will haue that to be the meaning of Scripture which is their owne when that which is the Scriptures ought to be theirs Againe Thy truth O Lord is neyther myne nor this mans or that mans but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the communiō of it and whereby thou dost terribly admonish vs that we seeke not to haue truth priuate least we be depriued of it for whosoeuer doth challenge to himselfe that which thou dost propose to be enioyed by all and will make that proper to himselfe which is common to all that man is driuen from the common to his owne proper that is from truth to falsehood Wherupō he reprehends the Pelagians because they vnderstood the Scripturs according to their own priuate sense the Donatists because eyther by too much louing their owne opinion or enuying their betters they went so farre vpon their diabolicall presumption as sacrilegiously to separate holy communion and bring in schisme or heresy and the Manichies You see that your worke is to take away all authority from Scripture and make euery mans mind and conceit authour of what is to be belieued or not to be belieued in holy Scripture that is that you will not subiect your selues to Scripture but will make Scripture subiect to your selues Thus doth S. Augustine condemne this spirit for that it doth prefer it selfe and owne opinion before the commō iudgement of the Church doth falsely interprete Scripture doth draw the meaning of Scripture to its owne wil yea the will of God to the same And he condemnes the Pelagians Donatists and Manichies for that by it they expounded Scripture and deuided themselues from the communion of holy Church With S. Augustine agrees Cyrill of Alexandria Heretikes should do well if they would seeke the true sense of Scripture and not turne all according to their owne will And with them both Vincentius Lyrinensis If any would seems a Prophet or Maister that is maister of spirituall thinges let him chiefly desire vnity and equality that is that he do not prefer his owne opinion before others nor doe departe from the generall opinions of all men Because all doe not take the holy Scripture in one and the same sense some do interprete one way others another way the same sentences so that as many senses are made as there be men Therefore it is very necessary by reason of many turninges and windinges of errours that the line of Catholicall and Apostolicall interpretation be directed according to the rule of the Ecclesiasticall and Catholike sense Heere is aduise giuen not to wrest all to our owne liking and spirit but to keep vnity and direct the interpretation of Scripture according to the rule of Catholike sense After all these Venerable Beda the honour of our Nation in the eight age sayth As the Prophets did write deliuer and speake not their owne wordes but the wordes of God so also the Reader of them must not vse his owne proper interpretation least he decline from the sense of the truth Therfore we affirme that no man presume to expound Scriptures according to his owne pleasure What more plaine I will adde to these the testimonyes of Luther and Caluin vttered in confutation of others but against themselues Luther x speaking against Swenkfeldius sayth It must not trouble vs that some do glorify of the spirit and little esteeme the Scriptures But sayth Luther good friend the spirit goes this way that way I also was in spirit and haue seene spirits if I may glory of my owne perhaps more then they shall see in a yeare and my spirit doth shew it selfe in something where theirs is yet in a corner Note that the Swenkfeldians and the Caluinists agree in that both of them rely on the Spirit and make it the ground of their Fayth they differ in that the former refuse scripture and rely only on the spirit these later admit scripture but both for canon and sense of it subiect it to their spirit so that the spirit in the one reiects scripture in the other it censures and Lordes it ouer scripture Whether is worse let any be iudge Caluin also speaking of the same Swenkfeldians sayth If that spirit was good it would be the same with the spirit of the Apostles and ancient faythfull people but their spirit would not be iudg without scripture so say we If Caluins or the Caluinist spirit were true it would be the same with the spirit of the ancient Church and Fathers Also against the Vbiquitarians he sayth Satan hath bewitched their mindes with horrible witchery c. And Satan by turbulent spirits doth endeauour c. Mans hart hath so many secret places of vanity is subiect to so many holes of lyes is couered with so much fraudulent hypocrisie that it often deceaues it selfe Againe Many false Doctours belye or counterfeite the title of the spirit many mad men start vp who rashely make ostentation that they are endued with the spirit of God They are fooles who amazed at the honourable title of the spirit dare not enquire after the matter it selfe Many braggo of the spirit yet speake in their owne priuate name goe out in their owne name vtter out of their owne sense Thus do these Patrons practisers of this priuate spirit wound themselues in thus stabbing the same in their aduersaries For what they affirme against them is verified against themselues But what can these Spiritualists as we may call them say to all these testimonies of Fathers Or rather what shall we say to them about the same I conceaue nothing can be sayd better then that which S. Augustine in the like case of originall sinne sayth against the like Heretikes the Pelagians for hauing cyted most of the Doctours before his tyme both of the Greeke and Latin Church as Irenaeus Athanasius Cyrill Nazianzen Chrysostome Basil Olympius Reticius fourteene more whose workes are not now extant as Eulogius Ioannes Ammonianus Porphyrius Fidus Zozimus Zoboenus Nimphidius Cromatius Iouinus Eleutherius Clematius all greeke Doctours and Cyprian Hilary Ambrose Innocentius yea Hierome of his owne tyme all Doctours of the Latin Church and all to proue originall sinne and
necessity of grace against Iulian the Pelagian he speaketh of the Fathers in this manner These Fathers I haue cyted no more least it should be too tedious to read them yet such as are not so light that you may scorne to weigh thē yea so great that you may groane vnder the burthen of them These are they whose so great consent ought to moue you and who are not a conspiracy as you call them of ill tongued men but who flourished in the Catholike Church are sound in doctrine and armed with spirituall weapons who fought stoutly against heretickes and haue passed ouer their labours and slept in the bosome of peace VVho hauing liued holily and ouercome the errours of their tyme and departed gloriously out of this world before you came into it These though they were not then present when this Controuersie began and is now on foot so could not by word of mouth giue a definitiue sentence yet when they wrote and sayd these thinges they were then such as had not any either friendship or falling out with you or vs. They were angry neither at you nor vs had compassion of neither What they found in the Church they kept what they learned they teached what they receaued from their Fathers they deliuered to their children You and we did not plead before these Iudges and yet they decyded our cause neither you nor we were knowne to them and yet we do produce their verdict for vs against you we did not about this matter contend with you and yet they pronounce vs victors That which they belieue we belieue what they teach we teach what they preach we preach yield to them and yield to vs consent with them and consent with vs if you will not by them be a friend to vs yet be not for vs an enemy to them which yet you must be if you remaine in this errour therfore leaue it and leane to them Can Pelagius and Celestius Luther and Caluin so farre preuaile with you that for them you dare forsake so many and so great ancient Doctours and defenders of the Catholike fayth ouer all the world Hath tyme made such a confusion of great and small matters Is darkenes so become light and light darkenes that Pelagius Celestius Iulianus c. do see and Hilary Gregory Nazianzen Ambrose c. are blind VVere it not better to yield to them who are better and stronger and to maister your owne presumption then to insist vpon your owne animosity and conceit which you desire should preuaile because it is your owne VVere it not better to yield to these Christian Doctours or rather to Christ in them and to restore your selfe to them from whome you are departed How gratefull would these be to you if you did belieue the Catholike fayth and how terrible must they needes be against you when you oppugne the same Catholike Fayth which they sucked from the teat which they eate with their meate which for milke and meate they gaue to little ones and great ones which they plainely and stoutly defended against their enemies euen you not then borne By such planters waterers builders Pastours nurses the Holy Church increased therefore stood amazed at the prophane termes of your nouelty and as the head of a serpent abhorred troad vnder foot bruised and kickt away your new opinions which did lurke and crawle to deceaue the virginity of the Catholike Church and corrupt the chastity of it which it hath in Christ as did the Serpent seduce Eue. The Fayth of these is to be defended against you as is the Ghospell against wicked and professed enemies of Christ euen that Catholike and Christian fayth which as it was first deliuered in Scriptures so by these Fathers it hath beene hitherto kept and defended and shall by Gods grace euer be kept and defended Thus S. Augustine against the Pelagians their new doctrine for the Fathers and thus we against the Protestantes and their priuate spirit and new doctrine for the same And this may suffice for the testimonies of Fathers THE PRIVATE SPIRITS INTERPRETATION OF HOLY SCRIPTVRE Deciding of Controuersies and iudging of matters of Fayth Confuted by Reasons drawne from the difficulty of discerning of Spirits CHAP. IIII. Of the diuersity of Spirits SECT I. IN the former Chapters we haue confuted the Protestāt priuate spirit by authorityes of holy Scripture and by testimonies of ancient Fathers it remaines that we doe the like by euidence of reason and in this Chapter by reasons drawne frō the difficulty of discerning of spirits of which if the priuate spirit be not able to discerne and iudge which be good or bad which true or false much lesse is it able to discerne iudge the motions and effects of them that is which Scripture the sense of it is true or false which fayth and doctrine is good or bad For the better vnderstanding of which difficulty of discerning of Spirits we may note first how many sortes of varieties and distinctions of spirits there be 1. According to the nature and property of spirits S. Gregory distinguishes them thus Some are without mixture of body some with mixture Spirits without mixture are either increate as God the Father a spirit God the Sonne a spirit God the Holy Ghost a spirit all one God al one spirit good without quality great without quantity euery where without place alwayes without tyme doing all without action mouing al without motion containing all and contained in nothing and present in all by his essence power and presence and yet aboue all or els create which are either happy in glory as the Angells in heauen which are as administring spirits for vs or els damned in hell as the Diuels who as roaring Lyons seeke to deuoure vs both which doe differ either in specie or kind or at the least in degrees of power and greatnes some being in the highest some in the midle some in the lowest Hierarchy euery Hierarchy hauing his order and euery order his particuler Angels and Diuels belonging to it Spirits mixt with bodies flesh are either such as are mixed with flesh and dye with it as the sensuall soule of birds and beastes or such as are mixt with flesh but dye not with it as the reasonable soule of man which is a meane betweene Angells to whome he is inferiour and beastes to whome he is superiour communicating with the one in the immortality of soule with the other in mortality of flesh 2. According to their estate and condition these spirits are some good as God Angels Saints others bad as Diuels men wicked aliue or damned in hell others indifferēt as the natural spirit of man and sensuall of beastes some are blessed in heauen as Angells and Saints others damned in hell as Diuels and the damned soules others in the way and out of danger as
who receaue both the old and new Testament but interpreted according to Mahomets Alcaron and also by all Heretiks who seek to fill their books not oÌ„ly with words of Scripture but sayth Vincent Lyrin with thousands of testimonies thousands of examples thousands of authorityes out of the Law the Psalmes the Prophets the Apostles which expounded after a new and ill manner would thereby throw downe soules from the tower of Catholike fayth to the pit of wicked heresy being as our Sauiour sayth of them false Prophets or teachers who vnder the garments of sheep that is sayth Vincent Lyrin the wordes of the Prophets and Apostles are rauenous VVolues infesting the fold of the Church and deuouring the flocke of Christ and saying Christ is heere or there that is as Origen expounded it in this or that text of Scripture who thus transfiguring themselues into the shew of Apostles or preachers of Christ do labour to transfer the people into another Ghospell who depraue the Scripture to their owne and others destruction And by the wordes of the Law sayth S. Ambrose impugne the Law and do frame a false sense of the wordes of the Law that they may confirme their owne peruerse opinions by the authority of the Law Against al whome we may note the wordes of S. Hilary saying That Heresy is about the vnderstanding not the text of Scripture the sense not the words is the sinne And of S. Hierome That the Ghospell is not in the wordes but the sense of scripture not in the outward rine but in the inward marrow not in the leaues of wordes but in the root of the sense SVBDIV. 2. Who haue authority to make the Interpretation of Scripture SEcondly this sense and meaning of scripture because it is not facil and easy to be knowne to all by reason of the great obscurity in the wordes the great fecundity in the sense and the great profundity in the mysteries or articles belieued which cannot by euery one nor by any one without the assistance of the same spirit which penned it be vnderstood therfore is necessary some authentical certain and infallible authority for the true vnderstanding of this authenticall certaine and infallible sense of scripture This authority because it is in the Catholike Church chiefly in the Pastours and Prelates of the same for the better gouernement of it in true doctrine vpon whom God hath bestowed the infallible assistance of his holy spirit as is afterward proued therfore their authority is necessary for the finding out the true and certaine sense of scripture Whensoeuer therfore the chiefe Pastour or Pastours of the Church vsing the meanes for it appointed of which in the next proposition do either ex Cathedra or in a Councell confirmed approued or by a generall consent propose deliuer and declare any sense or exposition of scripture as true and to be belieued as an article of faith in any controuersy against heretikes then is that sense to be receaued for their authority as authenticall certaine and infallible From whence ensues that though in matters of Philosophy and reason we must rather attend what is said theÌ„ by whome it is said and respect rather the force then the authority of the person who sayes it yet in matters of faith we must first respect them who preach and the authority and commission of their person and by it iudge of their doctrine preached For if the person be lawfully sent if he haue lawfull commission if he be a lawfull pastour not deuided by heresy or schisme from the whole body then the people are to attend to him and for his commission to receaue his doctrine but if he want mission commissioÌ„ if he teach of himselfe and his owne authority if he produce the doctrine not of the Church-proposition but of his owne inuention let him teach what he wil proue it how he wil he is not to be heard nor belieued by the common and vulgar people to whom it belonges to be obedient subiect to the authority of their Pastour not to iudge of the verity of his doctrine more then in generall whether it be consonant or dissonant from the vniuersally receaued doctrine of the Church for they are to obey their Pastours to remaine in the same rule in the faith first deliuered in that which they heard from the beginning to auoid profane nouelties of words not to receiue any other Ghospel or doctrine but that which they learned and receaued from the beginning leauing the particulars to the testimony of others either equal to their pastour in function or superiour to him in authority Which point is to be noted against the Manichees of old and the Protestants of late who respect not the authority of the Preacher but the force of his reason attend not to the commission of the Pastour who he is that teacheth but to the plausibility of his doctrine what it is and how far it is pleasing to their priuat spirit disposition or iudgment SVBDIV. 3. What meanes are to be vsed to make this Interpretation and of foure Rules of infallible interpreting of scripture Thirdly The meanes which are to be obserued vsed and followed by these Pastours or Prelats for the securing vs of this true sense of scripture are these 1. The rule of faith that is the Catholike and vniuersally receiued doctrine of faith and piety which was deliuered by the Apostles receiued by posterity 2. The generall practise or obseruatioÌ„ custome or tradition of the whole Church in pointes where the doctrine is not certaine 3. The auncient exposition or consent of the holy fathers and doctours of the primitiue Church where the former do not appeare 4. The decrees and definitions of the Councels either generall or prouincial approued by generall and the conformity to them in all expositions doubtfull Thâ—se are as so many rules or conducts according to which the certaine and authenticall sense of scripture is by the Pastours of gods Church to be squared and guided First that the rule of fayth is to be presupposed obserued and followed in the finding out the true sense of scripture is proued 1. This rule of Fayth is by S. Paul who often doth mention it called sometymes a rule which bringeth peace VVho haue followed this rule peace be on them Sometimes a rule in which they are to remaine to auoid dissentions Let vs remaine in the same rule that we may iudge the same Sometymes his rule which he deliuered to them and by which they are to increase in fayth Your fayth increasing according to our rule Sometymes a reason of Fayth according to which is giuen the guift of prophesy or interpretation of scripture Donations or prophesy according to the rule of Fayth And in effect it is no other but the doctrine they receaued the fayth preached through the whole world the disposition
or forme of true doctrine which they had learned and is committed to them The doctrine which they receaued froÌ„ the beginning VVhich was first euangelized to them Or the precepts of the Apostles and ancients Or rather of our Sauiour deliuered by the holy Prophets and Apostles And the word of God which remaines for euer That the knowledge of this rule or doctrine of fayth is presupposed to the true knowledge and vnderstanding of scripture is proued both by scripture and reason By scripture the Prophet Isay sayth as S. Cyprian and S. Augustine do both of them read and vnderstand it Except you belieue you cannot vnderstand that is sayth S. Cyprian the Iewes cannot vnderstand the scripture except they first belieue in Christ S. Augustine sayth There be some of you who vnderstand not and therefore they vnderstand not because they belieue not let vs first adhere by Fayth that we may be reuiued by vnderstanding And in another place Fayth must go before Vnderstanding that the vnderstanding may be the reward of Fayth Therefore Fayth and the rule of fayth is necessary before the vnderstanding of Scripture Secondly the Scripture for the sense is a Booke sealed with seauen seales these seales none can open but he who hath the key of Dauid This key of Dauid is giuen only to them who are faythfull with Dauid therfore the key of faith is requisit to the opening the sense of the booke of scripture which is confirmed by S. Hierome who alleadging the same words sayth The Law is spirituall and requires reuelation that it be vnderstood For proofe of which he produceth the example of the Eunuch who read but vnderstood not the scripture till Philip did expound it to him made him faythfull and so became of a scholler a Maister Thirdly Euery learned Scribe in the Kingdome of Heauen is like to a man the maister of a family who bringeth out of his treasure new and old The Scribes were the Maisters and Interpreters of scripture but they were in the kingdome of heauen that is in the Church by Fayth and so did interprete the new and old Testament which S. Augustine alleadging to the same purpose against the Manichees sayth You vnderstand not because you belieue not as sayth I say for you are not instructed in the kingdome of heauen that is in the true Catholike Church of Christ for if you were you would produce old and new out of the scriptures Therfore one must be a scholler in the Church by fayth before he can come to vnderstand the scripture as a Maister Fourthly S. Paul sayth to Timothy Thou hast learned holy scriptures from thy infancy which are able to instruct thee to saluation by fayth which is in Christ. If the scriptures instruct by Fayth then Fayth is prerequired before we can be instructed by them or vnderstand them Fifthly the holy Fathers and Doctours of the Church haue by the breach of this rule as a signe discerned Heretikes and by the authority of it as a strong argument confuted the same Thus were discerned Marcion Valentinus Câ—rinthus and Basilides by their deprauing the rule of truth witnesse Irenaeus Thus Paulus Samosatenus by his forsaking the Canon of the Church and flying to strange and adulterous doctrine Thus Montanus by his vttering strange words contrary to the custome of the Church deriued by tradition and succession from the Apostles witnes of both Eusebius Thus Nestorius by forsaking the ancient doctrine and introducing of new witnes Socrates And thus all Heretikes by their forsaking the rule of Christianity witnesse S. Augustine They being all esteemed to haue truth on their side who walke according to the rule which the Church receaued from the Apostles the Apostles from Christ witnes Tertullian Thus did S. Hierome confute and confound the heresy of the Luciferians by the light of the Sunne of the Church Gregorius Nazianzen the same by the doctrine abhorring the same S. Basil the Eunomians by the vnwritteÌ„ tradition of the Church Athanasius the Arians by the authority of the Orthodoxe Church and his ancestors opposite to them and abhorring their doctrine S. Epiphanius the Melchisidechians by the tradition of the Apostles and succession of doctrine The Millenarians by their transgressing the limits of the holy Church of God and the hope of Propheticall and Apostolicall tradition in fayth and doctrine And the Demerâ—s and other Heretikes by the style of Christianisme and the phrase of the Apostles receaued from the Fathers S. Augustine the Pelagians by the grounded custome of the Church hastening to baptisme infants By the most ancient knowne and vndoubted rule of Fayth truth And by the authority of the Church so commended in scrâ—pture The Donatists by the authority of the Church and by apostolicall Tradition And both Irenaeus Origen and S. Augustine did confute all Heretikes by the tradition of the Apostles manifest to the whole world in the Church sayth Irenaeus By the Ecclesiasticall tradition dissented off by none sayth Origen By the Catholike Church whose not receauing any opinion is sufficient sayth S. Augustine to confound any heresy Therfore the doctrine and practise of the ancient Fathers was to discerne and confute all Heretikes by this rule of Fayth Sixthly the same is proued by Reason because the scripture is the booke of the faythfull not the faithlesse therefore as it was writ to the faythfull as the conuerted Iewes Romans Corinthians c. so it is vnderstood truely only by the faythfull as the Christians not by the Infidels as the Iewes Turkes and Heretikes who haue and read the wordes but vnderstand not the sense meaning because the veile is yet ouer their eyes in the reading of it for want of fayth therefore the letter that is the words and reading of it doth kill them and is to them a ministration of death and only the spirit that is the vnderstanding of it doth giue life to them who haue fayth Of which necessity of Fayth prerequired to the vnderstanding of Scripture see Stapleton de principijs Doctrinalibus where the same is further proued out of the ancient Fathers testimonyes to wit S. Augustine Irenaeus Origen Athanasius Cyrill of Alexandria Theodoret and Vincentius Lyrin who sayth that the holy and learned men did interprete the holy Scripture according to the traditions of the Catholike Church and the rule of Catholike fayth And againe That the line of propheticall and Apostolicall interpretation must be directed according to the rule of the Catholike and Ecclesiasticall sense Which and much more he alleadges against the custome of Heretikes who haue alwayes the Scripture in their mouth and out of it do confirme their errours Out of which may be inferred how vntruly and fraudulently the Protestants do generally auerre that in the scripture the spirit of God is and is to be sought
from the departure till the diuision of the land and also 40. of Samuel and Sauls raigne 40. of Dauids togeather with 4. of Salomons raigne which in all make 134. as they are collected out of Scripture there remaines from the departure out of Aegypt till the building of the Temple not 450. years as S. Luke relats but only 345. 3. About the raigne of Ioram King of Iuda and Ochozias his sonne after him for Ioram began to raigne when he was 32. years old raigned 8. years which for his whole life is 40. yet Ochozias his sonne who succeeded him is sayd to haue beene 42. yeares old when he began to raigne 2. Para. 22.2 by which he being 42. yeares old when his Father dyed being but 40. should be two years elder then his Father who begat him a question to S. Hierome inexplicable 4. About the raigne of Ioachim or Iechonias King of Iuda who is sayd 2. Paral. 36.9 to haue beene but eight yeares old and 4. Reg. 24.8 to haue beene eighteen years old both of them when he began to raigne 5. About Ioram King of Israel who is sayd to haue begun his raigne 4. Reg. 1.17 in the second yeare of Ioram King of Iuda and yet 4. Reg. 3.1 to haue begun the same in the eighteen yeare of Iosaphat who was Iorams Father and raigned 25. yeares 6. About the supputation of tyme as it is counted by the raigne of the Kings of Iuda and of Israel for from the beginning of the kingdome of Israel in the first of Roboam King of Iuda till the end of the same in the sixth of Ezechias when Samaria was taken are 260. yeares according to the raigne of the Kinges of Iuda and yet in the same tyme according to the raigne of the Kinges of Israel are only 240. yeares To all which if we adde the difficult places which according to S. Peter are in the Epistles of S. Paul as for example how are to be interpreted that of 1. Cor. 3.11 Gold siluer hay stubble the day of our Lord fire and to be saued by the fire That of 1. Cor. 15.29 How to be baptized for the dead That of Hebr. 6.4 It is impossible for those that fall to repent If we adde the difficult places which in the Euangelists are hard as for example in S. Marke who cites the Prophet Esay for Malachy In S. Matthew who cites Ieremy for Zachary In S. Luke who adds a generation of Cainam to the same cyted by Moyses and makes 40. Generations from Dauid to Christ where S. Matthew makes but 28. In S. Iohn who maks the day of Christs Passion the day before the festiuall day the rest of the Euangelists the day of the feast If we add the difficult places of which many holy and learned men of ancient time doubted sent for explication some to S. August as Marcellinus a Noble man and Martyr Volusianus gouernour of Rome and Paulinus Simplicianus Euodius and Honoratus all Bishops Some to S. Hierome as Marcella and Principia Suna and Fratella Hebidia and Algasia noble and religious women as Vitalis Dardanus Euagrius Damasus holy and learned Bishops And lastly if we adde all those places which all ancient and moderne Heretikes haue in so many articles of fayth abused and corrupted for the establishing of their new inuented heresies If I say we adde all these to the former it will by them appeare that the priuate spirit in euery man can be neither a competent nor yet a sufficient meanes to expound and interprete the true certaine sense of Scripture neither in places difficult to be vnderstood nor in points necessary to be belieued And this is the first kind of reason drawne from the nature of scripture against the priuate spirits interpretation of it SVBDIV. 2. By reasons drawne from the priuate spirit which should expound Scripture SEcondly other reasons are drawne from the nature and condition of the priuate spirit which whether it be in a priuate person who wants lawfull ordination and authority or in publike Doctour Pastour or Bishop who diuided by heresy or schisme doth not conforme his spirit to the comon spirit of Gods Church and generall rule of Fayth yet that it cannot be a competent Iudge of fayth and decider of controuersies is proued by these reasons First because this priuate spirit is excluded as vnable and vnfit to interprete the scripture and that by scripture it selfe for S. Peter hauing commended the propheticall word or the wordes of Scripture made by the Prophets as being a candle shining in a darke place doth giue this Caueat as principally to be vnderstood that the sense of it is not to be made by any priuate interpretation that is though the scripture be a light yet as it is a light not to Gentils Iewes or Infidels who vnderstand it not so it is not a light to Heretikes who by the priuate spirit make a priuate interpretatiō of it why Because by mans will Prophesy was not at any tyme brought but the holy men of God spake inspired by the holy Ghost that is as the holy men of God the Apostles inspired by the holy Ghost spake and dictated the word of God when it was made so the interpreters of the same word ought not to bring in any exposition of the same word of God vpon their owne will and sense but vpon the inspiration of the same holy Ghost when by them it is interpreted so that we should receaue the sense of scripture from the same spirit from which we receaued the text of Scripture As therefore no priuate spirit but one and the same spirit of the Prophets and Apostles of Christ made the scripture so no priuate spirit but the common spirit of Pastours and Prelates of Christs Church should determine and iudge of the sense of Scripture Of which place and others see more in the first Chapter Secondly because as truth and faith is not priuate to one nor singular in any but common to all and generally receaued by all the faithfull for so saith S. Augustine Thy truth O Lord is neither myne nor this mans or that mans but all mens whom thou callest publickly to the Communion of it terribly admonishing vs not to haue it priuate least we be depriued of it for whosoeuer will challenge that as proper to himselfe which is giuen as common to all and will haue that only to himselfe which is for all men that man is driuen from the common to his owne that is from truth to falshood so also the spirit of truth is not priuate to any one but common to all the faithfull for if the spirit of the teacher be not common with the spirit of all teachers it is not a spirit as it ought to be which is one keeping an vnity of spirit in the bond of peace making mē of one mind in one spirit labouring together
it be contained among the chief articles of the Creed or plainly expressed in scripture 9. So sufficient that it be able to explicate determine all articles and doubtes in religion 10. So complet that it containe virtually be able to resolue plainly all questions and conclusions of Faith which may at any time vpon any occasion arise All which are necessary for such a rule and foundation vpon which so important a matter as faith and religion is grounded And this is the first thing to be obserued for the properties and conditions both of the Iudge and his rule of faith The whole body of the Church cannot be this Iudge SECT II. SECONDLY We may note that this infallible authority to iudge of controuersies of faith is giuen neither to the whole body and congregation of the Church of God as the rigid Lutherans with Brentius do hould nor to the secular Princes and Parlamentes as all the Lutherans at first and the State-Protestants of England do yet defend nor to the lay-people and priuate persons as Caluin and the Caluinists do maintaine nor yet is it residing in the wordes and text or scripture as the ordinary preachers pretend but only is giuen to the Pastours and Prelates of the Church of Christ who are lawfully by authority from Apostolicall succession ordained and Catholickly continue without diuision of heresy or schisme in the same and among them principally to the chiefe head and Pastour the successor of Peter and Bishop of Rome All which concerning euery one shall be briefly proued First therefore although the whole body of the Church collected haue the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost that it cannot erre or be deceaued in faith yet hath it not the same assistance that it may ought to be iudge determiner of faith For as in a naturall body the soule doth informe and giue life to the whole body and euery member of it but doth not discourse and giue vse of reason to the whole or euery part but only to the head so the spirit of God assistes the whole Church with the priuiledge of freedome from errour in faith but doth not likewise giue to it the priuiledg◠of authority to teach and iudge of faith and direct others in the same for which cause God hath giuen a measure of donation diuisions of graces and ministrations and made some not al Apostles Doctours Prophets that some may rule others be ruled some teach and others be taught some be superiours to iudge and direct others be inferiours to be iudged and directed and so an order and subordination a peace and vnity may be obserued and kept in the whole body among the members of Christs Church Whereof see more in the next fourth Section Secular Princes cannot be this Iudge SECT III. THIRDLY That this infallible authority is not in secular Princes or their Assemblies and Parlaments either as particuler members of the Church against Melancthon or as Princes and Superiours among the rest against Brentius so that they can and may lawfully and infallibly iudge of Controuersies make ecclesiasticall lawes giue authority to preach and prescribe a forme of doctrine a manner of seruice and an order of Sacraments and sacrifice though it be largely by many proued against the supremacy of Princes in causes Ecclesiasticall and requires a treatise more large yet in briefe it shall by these reasons be proued First because Kinges and Princes are in the Church of God and spirituall affaires as sheep to be ruled and ordered not as sheepheardes to rule and gouerne they are Lambes to be fed by Peter Sheep of the fold of Christ Members of the Church of God and seruants of the family of Christ Thus did the ancient and holy Fathers freely tell and admonish them and the Christian and good Emperours themselues acknowledged it S. Gregory Nazianzen told Valentinian That the law of Christ did subiect them Emperours to his power and Tribunall and that they were holy sheep of his holy fold S. Ambrose told Theodosius the Great that he was a sonne of the Church and that a good Emperour is within not aboue the Church Theodoret sayes of Constantine the Great that as a louing sonne he did propose busines to the Bishops and Priests as Fathers Constantine himselfe cōfesses that God gaue Priests power to iudge of Emperours witnesse Ruffinus that they were bishops within the Church he without it witnes Eusebius Valentinian the elder confesses that he as a laye man might not interpose himselfe in Church affaires but the Bishops and Priestes had care of such affaires witnes Sozom. And that himselfe was to submit himselfe to them witnes Paulus Diaconus And Theodosius the Great obeyed S. Ambrose his excommunication departed out of the Chancell at his command and cōfessed that thereby he had learned to know what difference there was betweene an Emperour and a Bishop witnes Theodoret and Nicephorus Secondly because the offices of the Bishops and Emperours are diuers and distinct the one of bodyes and goods the other of soules and fayth the one of life and death for offences against the King and common-wealth the other of sinnes and sacraments belonging to Gods lawes mans conscience the one is temporall of the kingdome and common-wealth the other is spirituall of the Church flocke of Christ which the hereticall Emperours forgetting were stoutly and zealously admonished and reprehended by the holy Bishops vnder them for the same As for example Cōstantius the Arian 1. by Hosius of Corduba willing him not to medle with Ecclesiasticall affaires nor to commaund them but to learne of them because to him God had committed the Empire but to them the Church 2. By Leontius of Tripolis because being ruler of military and politicke affaires he should not rule in thinges that belong only to Bishops 3. By S. Hilary of Arles wishing him to writ to Iudges of Prouincies that they should not presume or vsurpe to intermedle with the causes of Clergy men 4. By S. Athanasius of Alexandria that he and such who will be Presidents in ecclesiasticall iudgments who will make the Tribunals of the Court the seales of deciding ecclesiasticall causes themselues Princes and Authours of Church affaires are the abomination of desolation yea euen Antichrist himselfe Valentinian the yonger seduced by his wife was told by S. Ambrose of Milane That he had no Imperiall right in thinges that are diuine for the Court doth belong to the Emperour but the Church to the Priest And being called by the Emperour to reason with Auxentius the Arian he answered That if a conference was to be made of fayth it was to be made by the Priestes as it was vnder Constantine who prescribed no lawes but gaue free iudgement to Priests That it was neuer heard that in a cause of fayth Lay
this preaching is deriued frō Mission according to that of S. Paul How shal they belieue him whom they haue not heard how shall they heare without a preacher how shall they preach except they be sent So that faith it by hearing hearing is by preaching of Pastours and preaching is by mission from the authority of Superiours Of which the reason is because faith is an argumēt or proofe of things that do not appeare either to our sense or reason but are aboue our vnderstanding and capacity therfore we cannot attaine to it by euidence of reason but by credit of authority To this authority that we may giue credit we must conceaue and heare it this hearing that we may be obliged to accept it must by Church-Pastors be proposed and preached to vs and this preaching that it may the better secure vs of it must be from lawfull mission by ordinary succession deriued and so lawfull mission from apostolical authority infallible preaching or proposition of Pastours and a pious disposition in vs to heare and belieue what is thus proposed are the meanes by which according to S. Paul true faith is attained But this priuat spirit quite ouerthrowes all this excellēt order and subordination ordayned by Christ Iesus proposed to vs by the holy Ghost For first it alone without any disposition of hearing without any proposition or preaching of Church Pastours without any authority of apostolicall mission and ordination teaches and directs in particuler euery one man woman or child which is true Scripture which is true sense of it and which is true doctrine collected out of it therfore euery one thus made faithfull by this spirit stands need neither of disposition to heare what is to be belieued nor of preaching to belieue what they heare nor of mission and ordination to secure them of what is preached because this spirit supplies the effect of all both ordination proposition and disposition of hearing therfore all order and discipline all subordination and subiection all sacraments or preaching are needlesse yea fruitlesse in Gods Church As this spirit secures alone so without Sacraments it sanctifies alone As it instructs all in faith so it corrects all in errours against faith And as it is directed by none but God so it is subordinate to none but God alone obliged to none obedient to none it is immediate as they which haue it imagine from God it wil be subiect only to God it will be directed only by God it alone inspires all what they are to belieue alone works all what they are to do and alone secures all that they cannot faile of their end and saluation and so alone to all is all in all that is the beginning progresse and end of all grace and goodnesse Thus is the spirit to them if you will credit them Secondly It alone hath warrant and commission power and authority in whomsoeuer it is whether he be yonge or old simple or wise vnlearned or learned secular or spirituall to examine censure to giue sentence and iudgment in any cause or Controuersy ouer any Pastour or Prelate vpon any Councell or Church particuler or generall present or past late or auncient For as Caluin and Kemnitius for example by the prerogatiue of this their spirit tooke vpon them to censure and correct by their Examine and Antidote not only the late generall Councel of Trent but also the auncient generall Councels of Nice Constantinople Chalcedon and Ephesus yea the whole Church of God and all Doctours in it for many ages togeather as is before shewed so euery bible-bearing Ghospeller who hath got but a tast of this spirit and can but read the Scripture in English will by the same prerogatiue of this spirit assume to himselfe the same authority to examine the same examiners to censure the same censurers and to iudge the spirit of the former iudges yea to examine censure and iudge all Pastours Doctours Fathers Councells and Churches and to determine which of them haue erred what sense of Scripture is to be preferred and what Fayth and Religion is to be imbraced All which as these new Protestant Maisters first practised vpon the ancient Fathers so these their new discipls haue learned to practise the same vpon them their maisters and do as well censure them as they did their Predecessours and that worthily for what they taught and practised against their Fathers is a iust punishment that their children should learne and practise the same against them That it cannot be a meanes of fayth which requirs credible testimonies SECT VI. FIFTHLY this fayth as it is obtained by piously hearing the infallible preaching of Pastours lawfully ordained and sent so also it requires besides diuine reuelation reasons and motiues of credibility forcible to moue the Vnderstanding to accept as probable this doctrine of Fayth thus by preaching proposed and by God reuealed for as before He that giueth credit quickly is light of hart And reasons of credibility such as are miracles sanctity vnity conuersions of Nations and such like before mentioned doe make a true fayth more credible according to that of Dauid Thy testimonies are made too credible But that this priuate spirit cannot giue any such credible testimonies or produce any probable motiue to conuince any one that it is a true spirit of God or a certaine meanes of faith is proued Because it cannot alledge any consent of people and nations nor any authority of miracles to vse S. Augustines words nourished by hope increased by charity and confirmed by antiquity such as confirmed S. Augustine in his faith it cannot alleadge any vnity which it causeth either with the head Christ or with his body the Church not any sanctity which it worketh by works memorable for piety or miraculous for power and vertue not any consent of vniuersality by which it hath been imbraced in all places at all times by all nations and persons no not in ancient time by any persons renowned for holinesse and learning not any succession of Pastours prelates doctours or saints who haue relied themselues their faith saluation vpon it it cannot produce any one euident either authority of holy scripture or any one tradition of apostolicall time or any one practise of auncient Church or any one decree of generall Councels or any one testimony of learned Doctours or any one probable much lesse conuincing argument of reason that either all or any one man must or may settle his beliefe in it interprete the Scripture by it rely his saluation vpon it deduce all resolutions of fayth all questions of Controuersies all doubts of Religion from it and giue peremptory iudgment and sentence of all Pastours and Prelates of all Saints and Doctours of all Churches and Councells of all doctrine and religion according to the suggestion of it which yet the precise Protestāts do both in doctrine professe and in practise performe That it cannot be a
meanes of fayth which obliges all to belieue and accept it SECT VII SIXTHLY fatyh to whome it is by God reuealed by Church proposed and by credible testimonyes conuinced obligeth them to accept it and to giue credit and testimony to it to be directed and ordered by it and to submit their iudgement in obedience of fayth vnto it according to that of S. Paul bringing into Captiuity all vnderstanding vnto the obedience of Christ and as children of obedience receauing grace for obedience to the fayth Whereupon it is sayd He that doth not belieue shal be condemned Because when it is sufficiently deliuered declared what we are to belieue and do they who by negligence do not imbrace and follow it are inexcusable and so deserue damnation And as they who are obliged to attaine to the end are obliged to vse apply the meanes necessary for that end without which the end cannot be attained so because we Catholikes for our part do hould a pious disposition to heare that which is authentically preached and proposed by Pastours lawfully ordained And because the Protestants for their part do hold the motion and suggestion of the priuate spirit to be a necessary meanes for the attaining vnto fayth it followes that as the one is bound to giue audience and obedience to al preaching of Pastours lawfully sent and proposition of Church defining what is to be belieued and practised so the other is bound to heare and obey euery motion and suggestion of this their priuate spirit speaking in them and inspiring them what to do and belieue But that this spirit cannot vnder any precept naturall or diuine oblige any one much lesse all men to accept credit and rely vpon it and to make it their rule and foundation their iudge and vmpier the assurer and securer of their scripture-sense their fayth their religion and their saluatioÌ„ as it is of it selfe more euident so by these reasons it is confirmed First because as it is often before touched no man hath any certaine meanes or ground wheron to build a certaine resolution of the certainty either of this spirit or of euery motion of it that it is of God not of nature or Sathan 2. Because no such precept is intimated in any Scripture Tradition Councel or Church-command 3. Because it would follow that men should be obliged to belieue and follow spirits contrary and motions of them contrary and so senses of Scripture contrary Fayths and Religions contrary and opinions of saluation contrary for as Luther had one spirit and one motion of it Caluin another spirit and a contrary motion of it Osiander a third spirit and an opposit motion of it so â—n like manner Swenkfeldius Rotman Seruetus Quintinus Dauid-george Moore Hacket and an hundred more Sectaryes had euery one of them distinct spirits and contrary motions of them in the sense of Scripture which they expounded in the articles of their fayth which they belieued and in the certainty of their saluation vpon which they presumed so euery one being obliged to belieue and follow their owne spirit the motion of it in the Scripture-sense fayth and saluation diuers should be obliged to belieue and follow contrary spirits and contrary motions of contrary spirits and so contrary senses of Scripture contrary faithes and religions and contrary certainty of saluation which is as absurd as in religion absurd may be Also because as the wind blowes so the spirit moues sometymes one way sometymes another sometymes to this thing sometymes to to the contrary suggesting now one meaning of Scripture now another now one Fayth then another and sometymes doubts of all Faith and suggests no fayth at all often dispaires of all grace and leaues no hope of assurance of any saluation at all It would likewise follow that men should be obliged sometimes to belieue no fayth at all sometymes to dispaire of all grace goodnes and saluation and sometymes to haue as deep a conceit of their damnation as other tymes they haue of their saluation Whereby still following a wauering spirit and tottering motions of it they should wauer and totter betweene vncertaintyes and contrarietyes and remaine alwayes vncertaine in themselues and contrary to others and so be like Cloudes without water carryed with euery ayre like waues of the Sea tossed with euery wind foaming out their owne confusion like wandering stars to whome a storme of darkenesse is reserued for euer And thus much of reasons drawne from the nature and properties of Fayth which may suffice to conuince that this priuate spirit and the motion of it are so farre from being any necessary meanes of Fayth and Religion that they cannot so much as consist with any but are opposite to all true Fayth and Religion THE PRIVATE SPIRITS AVTHORITY To iudge of Fayth confuted by circular absurdities which follow thereupon in the groundes of their Fayth CHAP. VIII Of the nature of a Circle and the differences of Circles SECT I. NOTHING doth make more plâ—ine to a plaine vnderstanding the absurdity of this priuate spirit then the absurdities which doe follow vpon it against both faith reason These absurdities are of two sortes The one Circular inuoluing an absurd manner of proofe proceeding by way of a Circle condemned by all principles of Philosophy and Diuinity The other Doctrinall as we may tearme them inferring a doctrine absurd and dissonant from all principles of Fayth piety and reason In this Chapter we will shew the Circular absurdities in the next the Doctrinall which doe follow vpon this priuate spirit and the Protestants doctrine taught by it For the Circular absurdities we may note 1. Of a circle what a Circle and a Circular proofe is 2. The difference betweene a circular proofe lawfull vnlawfull 3. therby iudge and make an estimate of the Catholike and Protestant mutuall obiection the one against the other in this kind First therefore Aristotle in his demonstrations hauing proued that in euery demonstration we must come to some principles or propositions imediatly knowne of themselues and not demonstrable by another medium or proposition disproues two sortes of Philosophers the one affirming that there can be no demonstration of any thing at all the other contrariwise affirming that there may be demonstrations of euery thing eueÌ„ of the first principles or propositions which by a circular demonstration say they may be demonstrated by the conclusion as the conclusion is demonstrated by the premises admitting therby a Circular demonstration of the conclusion by the premises and of the premises againe by the conclusion This latter errour of Circular proofe he coÌ„futes by three reasons 1. Because it would be petitio principij or the begging of the question which as before in his former bookes of Resolution he resolued was when the medium or proposition prouing any thing is either the same which is to be proued or more obscure or as obscure or
persons and the sinners themselues being only as instruments to effect this sinne himselfe only being the chiefe worker of sinne wherby man hath no power but to sinne no meanes of Christs merits to helpe him out of sinne no benefit of vocation faith or grace possible to cure his sinne and so vpon necessity do what he will he must sinne be damned and go to hell for his sins Out of this doctrine which in expresse wordes is Caluins his fellowes follow many absurdityes both in respect of man who sins and is damned also in respect of God who makes him sinne damnes him In regard of man two absurdities follow the one whereby some are made meere polititians and of no Religion at all but libertines of any another wherby others are made desperate without any hope or care of saluation by any meanes in any Religion at all The first absurdity of Politicians is this God from all eternity hath appointed and determined of vs without any respect of vs or our workes whether we shal be saued or damned If we shall be saued he will saue vs if damned he will damne vs both which as he hath decreed without vs so both he will effect without vs. Infallibly therfore as God hath decreed without vs so shal we be saued or damned do what we can What therefore haue we to do with eternity of saluation or damnation VVhat with fayth or Christ the meanes thereunto but leaue that to God and his ordination let vs follow our temporall commodities and imbrace our sensuall pleasures which are in our power let vs cast off all consideration of heauen or hell and leaue that to God as he ordained disposed and reserued to his owne will and power Thus may they reason that consequently out of the former principle and thus haue both Libertins Politicians reasoned and thereupon inferred that with Catholikes they may be a Catholike with Lutherans a Lutheran with Caluinists a Caluinist with Iewes a Iew with Turkes a Turke and so with any may be of any Religion Vpon this ground sprung Atheisme which acknowledges neither any God nor any religion Paganisme which worships many Gods and is of any Religion Samaritans who made a religion mixt of Iewes Gentills Turcisme which obserues a Religion mixt of Iewes Gentills and Christians Libertines in S. Augustines tyme who made no important difference betweene the Religion of Catholikes and Donatists and many both Libertins and Politicians in this tyme who admit saluation in any Religion and profession and thereby inferre and practise a contempt of all piety and religion a liberty of all sinne and dissolution of life and a carelesnesse of heauen all heauenly cogitations All which as fruit of one tree do by necessary sequell follow out of this doctrine of predestination which the priuate spirit inuented Caluin diuulged Machiauell confirmed and the Diuell by all liberty of sinne and rebellion hath increased and propagated The second absurdity which is of men made desperate by this doctrine which is the mother of desperation is this reason and consequence by which they infer thus I am either predestinate or reprobate if predestinate it auails nothing to liue wel or ill because necessarily I shal be saued if reprobate it auailes as litle to liue well or ill because certainly I must be damned necessarily therefore liue I well or ill I must be saued or damned VVhat therefore need I care or do but enioy my lust and liberty sith neither good life can hinder hell or help to heauen if I be reprobate nor bad life hinder heauen or further hell if I be elect if therefore I be reprobate necessarily shall I be damned what hope therefore can I haue of saluation Thus out of this ground did a Religious man of S. Augustines Monastery in his tyme reason by the force therof foorsooke his Cloister returned to the world liued wickedly and dyed desperatly Out of the same motiue did Lewis a Lands-graue in Caesarius tyme liue wickedly and reason thus desperatly If I be predestinate no sinnes can barre me of Heauen if reprobate no good workes can help me to heauen if I be appointed at a certaine day to dy I can neither by good life make longer my life nor by bad life preuent my death And he was in danger to haue dyed thus if a wise Phisitian had not in his sicknesse by this reason cured his soule If your day be come certainly you must dye if not you need not my help Vpon which the Landsgraue yet pressing him for help of phisicke he further inferred If you can preserue your life by phisicke though your day be appointed why can you not saue your soule by Contrition though your end be predestinate By which reason the Landsgraue saw his errour and was brought to Contrition and confession and that perhaps with better successe then if he had answered as a Diuine might and should thus That if you be predestinate to saluation by meanes appointed by God then certainly you shall be saued if you vse and apply those meanes as by Gods grace you may and if you be reprobate and appointed to be damned it is for your sins freely committed then certainly you shal be damned if you commit these sinnes which you may auoid if you will By which solution as a iust man cannot presume so a sinner needes not despaire but both with feâ—re and trembling ought to worke their saluation howsoeuer by God they be predestinate Thirdly It followes because a man is thus by the decree and hand of God necessitated to do what God hath by his immutable and ineuitable will determined and appointed that he hâ—th no freedome of will freedome I say not of grace as iust by which he is freed from the seruitude of all sin nor of glory as blessed by which he is freed from the miseries of this life both which are in the next not in this life but no freedome of nature by which his wil hauing al things prerequired to do may yet freely do or not do No freedome either in things naturall as to speake or to be silent to walke or stand or in things morall as to giue or not giue almes or in things supernaturall as by grace to loue God or not loue him to sinne or not sinne against God No freedome either of contradictioÌ„ or quoad exercitium by which he may do or not do any action as to moue or not moue or of contrariety and quoad specificationem by which he may prosecute any obiect good as to loue his neighbour or bad as to hate him It followes I say that a man hath no freedome or liberty either of contradiction or of contrariety either in things naturall morall or supernaturall And as man hath no freewill at all in any action which both followes from their positions and they grant so it followes that in vaine is all labour in man either to
exercise vertue or to auoide vice In vaine is all penance or mortification to bridle his concupiscence or passion In vaine are all exhortations to piety and deuotion and all disswasions from sinne and iniquity because man hath no freedome of will nor power ability to do either the one or the other or the one rather then the other but all necessarily must be done as God hath appointed and doth worke it It followes that no lawes or precepts of God or man to bid or forbid can be iust No tribunals of Princes or Prelates to punish offenders and reward well-doers can be vpright because they are imposed on them who haue no liberty to do or not do them and leaue neither possibility nor obligation to be performed by man It followes that there can be no vertue in doing well or vice in doing ill no iust iugment in rewarding of good or in punishing of bad no crowne of glory in heauen for iust actions or torment of paine in hell for vniust because in man is no indifferency liberty or freedome to do the one rather then the other but is necessitated by the will of God to do that to which he is ordeined It followes that no contracts of marriage which require a free consent without feare or force can be valid No temptation to sinne against which is no power or liberty can be auoided No lawes against malefactours for any crimes because they are not in their power not to do them can be executed That no difference remaines betweene a man and a beast for where is no free election there is no will where is no will there is no reason where no reason there is no difference betweene a man a beast why therfore are sins prohibited lawes established sermons preached more to men then to beasts sith men haue no more liberty to do or not do to obey or not obey them then beasts Why are actions of lust killing and murdering punished in men not in beasts sith men haue no more freedome to absteine from them then beasts Why is man rather commanded to absteine from concupiscence then the fier is from burning Why more from swearing then the sunne froÌ„ shining Why more from lying and stealing then the sea from ebbing and flowing Why is he commanded to loue God aboue all more then to touch heauen with his fingar to keepe the sabboth from working more then to keepe his yeares from increasing Why not to sinne rather then not to be sicke sith to the one he hath no more power or ability liberty or freedome then to the other Which doctrine how high it blocketh vp the way to all vertue and piety and how wide it openeth the gappe to all vice and liberty shall after be shewed How contrary it is to al authority of holy scripture how iniurious to God preiudicious to man I leaue to be seen in other authours how forcible the coÌ„mon consent of all sortes of people is against it S. Austine shal witnesse who sayes that the sheepheards in the mountaines the Poets on the stages the people in the market the learned in the libraries the maisters in the schooles the Prelates in the pulpits and all mankind in the whole world do blase out the freedome of mans will which is so certaine that saith he if there be sinne there must be freedome because sinne is so voluntary as that it is no sinne if it be not voluntary How euidently euen by common sense and experience it is to be proued I will referre him who will deny it to Scotus his sensible demonstration who with blowes not reasons with cudgels not arguments would haue it proued to him till he confesse he hath liberty and freedome to cease from beating him And how little credit is to be giuen to the teachers of this doctrine in other high pointes of faith aboue reason who so grosly faile in this so manifest both to reason and sense I will referre to the iudgment of the indifferent reader and so passe from the absurdities of this Protestant Predestination touching man to the same as they concerne God and his goodnes SVBDIV. 2. Protestant doctrine of Predestination makes God the authour of sinne HOW iniurious blasphemous this doctrine of Gods absolute Predestination to sinne and damnation is to God and how much it doth derogate from his nature goodnesse and iustice shall by these ensuing sequels and absurdities appeare in that it makes God 1. The authour of sinne 2. Sinfull 3. Only sinfull 4. A lying and dissembling sinner 5. A most cruell tyrant 6. Not a God but the very diuel himselfe All which shal appeare as euidently deduced out of the former doctrine so that if it be true which many of them teach that as we belieue scripture so we must belieue consequences euidently deduced out of it both as points of faith so in like manner as they belieue the former doctrine of Gods absolute and irrespectiue decree of mans Predestination to damnation and sinne they must also belieue these consequences euidently deduced out of the same first That God is made by this doctrine the authour of sinne and not only as the Manichees made him a bad God the authour of bad nor as Florimus did make him the good God the authour of a bad substance but as Simon Magus did make him the authour of al bad actions and wicked works is proued 1. Because God according to the defenders of this doctrine doth by his absolut and irrespâ—ctiue as M. Montague calles it Will predestinate men to eternall damnation 2. Because God by a secret motion doth compell and necessitate the same men to all sinnes that therby he may haue an occassion to condemne and punish them 3. Because God doth commaunde vrge incite the diuell to tempt and induce them to sinne 4. Because that therfore God is the authour of all sinnes which are by these men commited 5. Because God not content with this cruelty doth diuers wayes delude men in shew exteriourly calling and offering his grace but interiourly denying and detaining them from grace 6. Because God for that end to damne them depriues them of freewill that they cannot repent and of all benefits of the merits of Christ and of grace that they can haue no meanes to be saued 7. Because God neuer frees them from originall sinne into which he had cast them but leaues it in them to corrupt al their actions make them sinfull 8. Because God for these sinnes made them vnable to keepe any the least commandement 9. Because from these sinnes God neuer frees them but only couers the sinne imputes the person iust and so saues all the elect All which reasons are positions in expresse words affirmed especially by Caluin cited at large by Becanus by Luther Melancthon Sanctius Martyr Beza VVhitaker Perkins and other prime Protestants cited in their owne words by Doctour Smith and are confessed by
God a Diuell LASTLY that this Protestant doctrine doth transforme God into a Diuell and so doth depriue him of his only and all goodnes and therby transpose him into the greatest and vilest euill that can be shall by these ensuing reasons appeare 1. It is the office or property of Satan to â—empt man to sinne yea as an aduersary to lay traps to ensnare man in sinne for which in greeke he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a tempter or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an entrapper or calumniator and in hebrew Sathan an aduersary and so he is called tempter is said to tempt vs and to temp the hart to lye to the holy ghost But this is more proper to God according to this Protestant doctrine then to the Diuell 1. Because God doth not only tempt and moue a man to sinne but which is more doth will ordaine and predestinate a man to sinne and to al the sinnes which are committed 2. Because God is not only our aduersary to oppose vs but so potently doth oppose vs in so weighty a matter as our greatest good that he directly excludes most from all felicity depriues most of all benefit of it debarres most from all meanes to attaine it entraps most in all the snares which may hinder their progresse vnto it the Diuell is but only his instrument to worke that which he wils and execute that which he before had designed against vs therefore God is more our tempter and aduersary then is the Diuell Secondly The office and property of the Diuell is to sow tares or ill weeds of sinne in the field of our hearts to choake vp all the corne of grace and goodnes the enemy comes and sowes tares But God doth this according to this doctrine more then the Diuell 1. Because God doth worke inwardly in the hearts of sinners doth excecate and obdurate the minds of men doth strike them with a spirit of errour giddinesse and madnesse and that not by permission but operation as Caluin in particuler affirmes 2. Because God doth will command and worke in vs all the sinnes which are wrought as the principall cause and mouer the Diuell being only as the instrument and that not free but forced not mouing but moued and not able to do otherwise then by God he is both commanded and compelled as before therfore the chiefe and principall sower of ill seeds and weeds of sinne is God not the Diuell Thirdly The office and property of the Diuell is to be authour of all sinnes in generall sinne is of the Diuell and of lying in particuler who speakes lies of himselfe and is a lier the Father of lies But this is more proper to God then the Diuell according to this doctrine 1. Because the Diuell did only in Adam by tempting him to eat the forbidden fruit remoue an impediment which did hinder ill to wit originall iustice by which the inferiour part was kept in order without rebellion to the superiour but God did by his will saith Caluin ordaine and decree the fall of Adam the ruine of all his posterity the miserable condition into which we are all fallen Therfore God was more properly the authour of Adams fal then the Diuel 2. Because the Diuell doth only tempt to sinne indirectly medially that is either obiectiuè proposing sinfull obiects to the phantasy that the will may consent and delight in them or dispositiuè by altering tempering the organs of the senses that the appetites may with more facility incline vnto them leauing alwayes a freedome of the will to dissent or assent but God according to Caluin doth not only by his ineuitable immutable decree and ordinance will and commaÌ„d the same but also by his immediate effectual irresistable concourse operation to euery actioÌ„ of sin so works the act of sinne in man that he leaues in man neither any operation at all God working all nor any liberty or freedome God necessitating all who is thereby not only the permitter but the authour of all sinnes the authour as well of the adultery of Dauid the treachery of Iudas the hardnesse of Pharao the cruelty of Achab the incest of Absalom the reproach of Semei the idolatry of the ten Tribes of the Chaldean destruction of Iudea of the Iewes and Pilates condemning of Christ as he is of the conuersion of S. Paul Therefore God is more and truely the immediate worker of sinnes and lyes then the Diuell O diabolicall doctrine SVBDIV. 8. Obseruations vpon the former doctrine VPON good ground therefore did Castalio who as Caluins scholler best vnderstood his maisters mind not only by his writinges but from his owne mouth affirme that this doctrine of Caluin did transfer God into the Diuell and for the same forsooke both him and Geneua and writ against him and this his doctrine Truely did Peter Vermilius a Professour of Tigure affirme that this doctrine of Caluins is a libertine execrable sacrilegious abominable and altogeather diabolicall doctrine Iustly did the Tigurin Sacramentaries anno 1554 accuse Caluin for this doctrine of great impiety cause his bookes writ of this subiect to be rent in peeces by the Hangman and to be burnt publickly in the Market place by special Edict commanded that none should diuulge in their territories any so horrible and detestable opinions Vpon good reason do as yet the Lutherans in Germany so detest this doctrine that to cleare Luther of it they did expunge out of his works these words God doth worke euill in vs. And most worthily doe the same Lutherans generally disclaime both this doctrine and Caluin for it in so much as one of them Heshusius a great Superintendent affirmes that Caluin writ wickedly of the cause of sinne made God the authour of sinne and in his doctrine is horribly contumelious against God pernicious to man and makes not the Diuell but God to be the authoisr of lyes Another of them a Professour auouches that not God but the Diuell is authour of this predestination and the God of the Caluinists Out of which doctrine and sequels vpon it may be obserued 1. That neuer any doctrine of Atheist Pagan Iew or Heretike was so wickedly pernicious and abominable as this of Caluin and his followers is for though some made God idle as Epicurus others impotent as Lucianus others the authour of euill as the Cerdonists Marcionists and Manichees others miserable afflicting himselfe as the Thalmudists others no God at all as the Atheists Yet all these are more tollerable theÌ„ these Caluinists for it is not so ill to be idle as to be doing ill better to make God do nothing then to make him the worker of all wickednesse It is more tollerable to make God vnable to do good then to make him the authour and actour of doing ill to make him vnable to requit good then vniust to punish where
punishing the most for it he might shew his iustice in freeing other some few from it he might shew his mercy The other did only forsee permit suffer the fal of Adam the sin of all his posterity that for the more illustration 1. Of his own goodnes by cōmunicating himself to man 2. Of his power by exalting man to be God 3. Of his mercy by making himselfe a Redeemer of his enemies 4. Of his clemency in suffering all contumelies and iniuries at the hands of his seruants besides the benefit which redoūds to man by the liberty of his will and the benefit of Martyrdome and other sufferings for the honour of God The one doth doth excecate obdurate and harden in sinne those whō he hath thus ordained to sinne and damnation and for that end doth deny to them all freedome of will all benefit of Christs merits all help of grace all meanes of pardon of their sinne of doing good and of attaining to saluation The other doth call inuite and draw men out of sinne doth stretch out his hands knocke at the dore of their harts offer the benefit of Christs merits the light of his fayth the vertue of his grace sufficient and the reward of his glory aboundāt to all that they may be conuerted come to him saue their soules The one not only creates man to sinne and workes in sinne but also leaues him in sinne both original and actuall of which he neuer washes and cures the soules of any euen the iust by infusion of any grace but only couers their sinne with the iustice of Christ and so leauing him sinnefull and corrupted only imputes him for iust and accounts him as cleane The other is so farre from causing him to sinne that he washes cures and sanctifyes him from sinne infuses into him grace sanctity by which he is really cleane from sinne may actually obserue Gods commaūdments fruitfully do good workes meritorious of life euerlasting Lastly the one is the authour and worker of all sinnes is the only sinner is a most cruell sinner and a deluding sinner yea is one who hath all the bad properties and qualities of the Diuell and so is the Diuell himselfe The other is good all good only good and goodnesse it selfe pittifull mercifull gracious and bountifull to all calling all seeking all and drawing al from vice to vertue from sinne to grace from the by-path of hell and damnation to the hye-way of heauen and saluation as much as in him lyes As great therefore as is the difference betweene these two Gods so much different is the God of the Caluinists from the God of the Catholikes and the religion of the Protestants short of the Religion of the Catholikes Of which who will see more may read a Protestāt booke lately set out by a Lutheran the subiect of which is to proue that the caluinists God is not the same with the God of the Lutherans and other Christians Of absurdities which follow against Fayth and the Creed SECT VI. I Haue at large shewed and that more largely then I intended the fecundity of matter still drawing me on that as Idolatry of God made many Gods and that these Gods still begat new Gods till the number of Gods was infinit incredible and absurd so Heresy by one priuate spirit got many priuate spirits still euery priuate spirit begat a new opinion and doctrine till both the spirits and the doctrine or opinions grew so many and so absurd that so many horrible and foule absurdities haue issued from them as neither piety reason nor common sense can endure to heare them One only obseruation of which I would desire the readers patience and that to my iudgment not vnworthy the consideration occurs that is to compile and bundell vp as into one view certaine maine and principal opinions of these Protestants generally receaued which indeed are the chief points controuerted betweene vs and them and to propose to the eye of euery indifferent Reader how smoothly they plaine the way to the downefall of saluation by taking away Fayth Hope and Charity For whereas God created man for himselfe as his end to honour him and all thinges for man as meanes to help him to this end so he gaue him three helpes or meanes one to know him another to desire him and a third to attaine him Man hath the meanes to know God by Fayth to desire him by Hope and to attaine him by Charity those are three Theologicall vertues which haue God their immediate obiect and are as three meanes to prepare man for his iourney to heauen Fayth as the beginning Hope as the progresse Charity as the end and consummation of iustification and as three partes of our spirituall building Fayth as the foundation Hope as the walls and Charity as the roofe of our saluation The Protestant Doctours by their positions and doctrine do oppugne and ouerthrow all these three as in a briefe sūme they are compiled and proposed to vs Fayth as it is deliuered in the Creed which in twelue articles shewes vs what we are to belieue Hope as it is contained in the Pater noster which in seauen petitiōs directs what we are to hope and pray for Charity as it is comprehended in the Decalogue which by ten Commandements instructs vs what to do what to auoid In this and after ensuing Sections therefore we will shew how this doctrine doth oppugne and ouerthrow all fayth in the articles of the Creed al hope in the petitions of the Pater noster and all charity in the ten Commandements and thereby doth prepare the way and loose the reines to all errour in beliefe to all despaire or presumption against Hope and to all liberty of sinnes and loosenes of life and manners against Charity And first we will lay downe briefly the chiefe points and positions of the Protestant doctrine and next out of them inferre the rest First the opinions and doctrine of the Protestants are these 1. That only Fayth doth iustify 2. That this only Fayth makes vs certaine and secure of predestination past iustification present and glorification to come 3. That this Fayth is proper to all the iust and only to them and the elect 4. That this Fayth once had can neuer at any tyme be lost nor by any sinne be expelled 5. That no sinnes how many or great soeuer be imputed to the elect but all couered with the iustice of Christ by apprehension of fayth 6. That this Fayth is obtayned by the priuate spirit in euery man which assures him of his fayth and saluation 7. That all workes of all men euen the iust and best are sinnes and that mortall as infected with originall sinne and as defectiue from perfect obedience and fullfilling the precept 8. That there is no interiour and inherent grace or iustice but all exteriour and imputatiue 9. That the fullfilling of
He may reason and practise thus No good works are meritorious none are necessary none are possible all euen the best being sins and that mortall as infected with originall sinne and defectiue from the law Ergo in vaine do I labour to do good works which are impossible in vaine do I labour to serue and please God by them sith al are sinnes and that mortall Why therfore shall I do rather good workes then bad Why liue I piously rather then wickedly Why do I iustice rather then iniustice make restitution rather then commit rapine Vse praying rather then swearing frequent Sermons rather then Tauerns because neither the one nor the other deserue reward or are pleasing to God and both the one and the other are damnable sinnes and deserue hell but neither are imputed as sinnes but both couered by the Iustice of Christ apprehended by my faith Fourthly He may reason and practise thus Only faith doth iustify iustifying doth infallibly make me as certaine of remission of my sinnes as I am of Christs death and therby certaine of my perdestination and election for none are truly faithfull and iustified but the elect and certaine also of my perseuerance and glorification for faith once had cannot be lost What then need I to feare either for seruil feare any punishment of hell because I am sure of heauen or for filiall feare any offence of God because I am sure that he imputes no sinne or offence to me and that neither he will forsake me nor I can fall from him or for reuerentiall feare any Maiesty and goodnesse of God who wil not be offended for that which is wild wrought by himselfe And because his lawes or precepts are aboue my power and as impossible do not oblige in conscience what need I to make any conscience of any sinne either past or committed or to come and in danger to be committed because I am sure that none shal be imputed that none can take from me Gods grace and fauour that all by faith are couered and that my Baptisme was to me a signe and seale of remissioÌ„ of al sinnes past and to come What need I either contrition or sorrow either pennance or satisfaction either fasting or good workes either prayer or preaching because I am sure that all satisfaction is made for me by Christ that any sinne of myne is impossible that also my prayer penance are sinnes that my sinnes are already forgiuen that I am certainly the sonne of God and so certaine to continue and to come to heauen Fiftly He may reason and practise thus I haue no free-will or liberty either of contradiction to do or not to do or of specification to do good or bad but am by the decree and will of God necessitated to do what I do what God hath ordeined me to do Ergo vnreasonable is God who hath imposed vpon me precepts which I haue no power or freedome to performe vniust is God who punishes me for doing that which he wils me to do in which I haue no freedome of wil to the contrary Impious are magistrats and iudges who punish me for that which God wils coÌ„mands compels me to do Impossible is all vertue and vice in me which can be no more vertue or vice in me then in a beast if I want freedome of will foolish am I who labour to do that which I haue no power or liberty to do In vaine do either lawes terrify me or superiours admonish me or preachers exhoâ—r me to that which I haue no power liberty or freedome to omit or commit to choose or refuse All which followes vpon the want of my freewill and ability to do good Sixtly He may reason and practise thus God hath decreed appointed and predestinated of his owne meere wi without any respect to me or my demerit whether I shal be damned or saued the one or other as he hath appointed In vaine therefore am I solicitous or do I labour for either sith without my care or labour that must be which God hath appointed and not my labour can alter further oâ— hinder either Againe God doth will command and worke as the principall agent all sinne which is wrought in me why shal I therfore detest that which God wils or auoid that which God commands or not do that which God wils commands and works in me Againe if I be an elect God giues all meanes so certaine of saluation that I cannot reiect them if I be reprobate he denies me all meanes necessary either of the merits of Christ offered for me or of grace and faith sâ—fficient for me In vaine therefore is all my labour because if God hath prepared for me meanes effectuall they wil be applied as they are decreed without me if not they will not be obteined by me and my care let therfore all care of heauen or hell be left to God and his ordination and let vs liue merrily fare daintily spend freely feed our sense and appetit fully and leaue all care or cogitation of heauen or hell to Gods decree and ordinance which according to his will not our care will haue the effect which he hath appointed This follows in reason and thus in reason may any one inferre and reason supposing he belieue the aforesaid false principles SVBDIV. 3. To what vices the Protestant doctrine leads SEAVENTHLY For vices in particular how euery one doth receiue life grouth nourishment and encouragement by this their doctrine how men may be whetted and animated to the free exercise of the same vices by vertue of it may by these reasons appeare 1. Slouth which saith the wiseman teaches many euils and is the stepdame saith S. Bernard of vertue the mother of sinne and the root and nurse saith S. Chrisostome of desperation is by this doctrine nourished For who will labour who assures himselfe that his labours works and sufferings haue neither any reward nor make any satisfaction but that they deserue hell and eternall punishment and that by them he can no more please God performe his will or fulfill his commandements then he can reach the starres or leape ouer the seas and that he hath no freedome or liberty of wil but must do as by God he is appointed and compelled and that only faith and apprehension of the iustice of Christ will suffice to his iustification and saluation Secondly Chastity which is commended in scripture as deseruing immortall praise by God man as of more worth then all weight as the fruit of the spirit and as that which maks pages or followers of the lambe Christ Iesus is indeed according to S. Cyprian the ornament of noblemen the nobility of meane men the beauty of the deformed the comfort of the sorrowfull the augmentour of beatitude honour of religion the diminisher of vices the multiplier of vertue and the spouse of the omnipotent
detractiue in euery one And on the contrary how we and our doctrine do honour attribut to the same God and Christ all worthy and due respect of veneration honour in all which as it is affirmatiue in it selfe so it is honourable to God and agreable to reason in all and euery particular point and opinion in controuersy First therfore for God they dishonour and derogate 1. From the blessed Trinity in that as before some of them do deny the distinction of the three persons some the vnity of one nature some the consubstantiality of the Sonne with the Father some the deity of the Sonne from the Father as God of God some the deity of the holy Ghost as God some the prayer Holy Trinity one God haue mercy vpoÌ„ vs. We with the ancient Church acknowledge three persons and one God the second person God of God and consubstantiall with the father and the third person of the holy Ghost proceeding froÌ„ both the father the sonne in them one holy Trinity three persons and one God 2. They and their spirit derogate from the mercy of God in that according to them he is cruell and tyrannicall in that he will not haue all saued will not giue sufficient meanes to all to be saued hath willed appointed and ordained millions of soules to be damned and to sinne that for it he may damne them and accordingly torment theÌ„ for that sinne which he himselfe willed ordained wrought and compelled them vnto We and our Catholicke Church attribute honour to him and his mercy in that according to vs he would haue all saued giues to all sufficient meanes to be saued creates and ordaines all to be saued wils not the death and damnation of any nor doth damne any but those who for their owne fault and sinne by themselues willingly committed against him his good will and goodnesse do deserue 3. They their spirit do derogate from Gods goodnesse in that according to them he who is good al good yet is not pleased pacifyed worshipped or delighted with good works but doth will ordaine commande compell and necessitate bad works and so is the authour of all euill and all euill works in men and doth esteeme impute that which is wicked and sinfull in men for no sinne in them but accounts that which is bad good him that is wicked iust We our Catholik doctrine do attribute due honour to the same goodnesse of God in that according to it God hates detests forbids and punishes all sinne and sinfull actions conuerts sanctifies purifies and make cleane pure and iust all sinners by his grace duely disposing themselues so reputes them as they are become truely iust in that God is delighted pleased pacified and honoured by good workes which he doth will command and reward in man who according to his will by his grace workes them 4. They their priuate spirit derogates from his iustice in that according to their doctrine he is short of iustice in rewarding none who deserue well and do him seruice exceâ—ds all iustice in that he ordaines men to an eternall and intollerable paine who haue deserued none 2. In that he punisheth them for that which he himselfe not only willed and commanded theÌ„ to do but also wrought and effected in them 3. In that he creats and dignifies them with his gifts graces for that end that he may himselfe cruelly torture and torment them and that in hell for no other end but to shew his power iustice ouer them 4. In that he laies precepts vpon them which are impossible for them to performe and commands them to abstaine from that which himselfe forces them to do and wils them to practise that which he giues not power freedome or sufficient meanes to practise We and our Catholicke doctrine do honour and giue due respect to his Iustice 1. In that according to vs he rewards all who deserue well and punisheth none but those who deserue ill 2. In that he punisheth all for their owne fault which they themselues committed and none for that which himselfe willed 3. In that he created all to be saued and gaue them meanes sufficient to be saued in which he shewed his mercy and punisheth with hell those who would not vse those meanes in which he shewed his Iustice 4. In that he gaue precepts and made lawes easy gaue meanes to performe them sufficient punisheth only those who willingly breake them 5. They and their priuate spirit derogate from his omnipotency in that according to their doctrine he is not able to place one body in two places in the B. Sacrament nor two bodies in one place in his natiuity resurrection and ascension nor to draw a Cable rope or camell through a needles eye nor by his absolut power to worke any more theÌ„ already he hath wrought We and our Catholicke doctrine do attribut to his omnipotency that he is able to do all the former and what more he pleases to do which is not either wicked and so is against his goodnesse or not contradictory and so implies in it selfe an impossibility to be done And in these do the Protestants their spirit by their doctrine derogate from God and his Deity from his goodnesse his mercy his Iustice and his omnipotency and impute to him wickednesse cruelty iniustice and impotency In all which we in our doctrine do the contrary Secondly for Christ our blessed Sauiour they their doctrin of the priuate spirit do dishonour him derogate 1. From his felicity beatitude in this life denying him to be viator and comprehensor that is enduring the paine and miseries of mortall men in his body and enioying the felicity and blessednesse of glorious Saints in his soule In which we do honour him belieuing that from the first instant of his coÌ„ception his soule had in his body the same blessednesse as now it enioyes in heauen by the perfect vision fruition of God though by dispensation for our redemption the same did not redound to the glory of his body till after his resurrection 2. From his knowledge they derogate and dishonour him in making him ignorant and defectiue of knowledge in many things and as a scholler to haue profited in his booke and learning of sciences and trades as other children do In which we giue him the honour to haue had all the treasures of knowledge and wisedome to haue vnderstood all the perfection of all sciences and artes and to haue perfectly conceiued all things past present or to come by a diuine infused knowledge from the first instant of his conception in his mothers wombe Thirdly From his primacy and supremacy ouer his Church they derogate and dishonour him in that they deny him as a man sensible and visible to haue beene the head foundation of his Church and to haue had any perpetual visible monarchy
did refuse any subordination to Superiour authority but did it either to the consolation of themselues or to the instruction and confirmation of others and all according to the rule of fayth and common receaued doctrine In which manner any though not yet called and hauing a talent sufficient may as before presume to interprete holy Scripture and deliuer the sense of it to others though he haue not yet the grace of holy Orders nor Pastorall or Episcopall function Secondly That of Rom. 1.26 hauing gifts according to grace which is giuen to vs differēt whether prophecy according to the reason of faith or ministery in administring is not so meant that euery one according to the proportion of his faith hath the gift of prophecy or interpetation of scripture but that euery one who hath these gifts should exercise them according to the talent and guifts bestowed on them not presuming to be wiser then he ought but to be wise vnto sobriety and according to the measure of the donation of Christ and not to intermedle in anothers office and function as to instance in the Apostles example he who hath the ministery proper to Deacons and inferior orders which was to distribute almes and to take care of the poore is not to medle in the function of Bishops which is to preach and instruct in doctrine of faith to conferre orders but euery one according to the reason or measure of faith that is not of his infused and supernaturall faith by which he is disposed to grace but of his gift of vnderstanding of scripture and of high mysteries of beliefe is to proceed in his function to vse that talent bestowed vpon them to the profit of the whole body Which gift also as it is not a property inseparably annexed to grace for many who are in state of grace are destitut of this guift others who are not so holy but for life wicked often haue the benefit of it so it is not vsually bestowed vpon the vulgar and common sort of people but is proper to Ecclesiasticall persons of whose function are two sorts that is Episcopall to preach and explicate holy scripture and Diaconicall to minister in externall function of giuing almes seruing the poore and the rest as is by the Apostle heere expressed in which euery one remaining in his vocation in which he is called is to exercise his owne office and function For as saith S. Hierome It is not for euery one to try gold and expound holy scriptures to tast wine and vnderstand the Prophets and Apostles And as saith S. Paul All are not Prophets nor Apostles nor Doctours but some Prophets some Apostles some Euangelists some Doctours till the consummatiō of the world And so some to whom by their function it belongs not all faithfull of what sort soeuer haue this gift of interpretation of scripture bestowed on them Thirdly those places of 1. Cor. 14. are vnderstood as the whole Chapter is neither of any ordinary and infallible interpretation of holy scripture nor yet of any solemne and publicke office sacrifice or benediction of the Masse much lesse of any guift ordinary common to al euery faithfull person either for vnderstanding of scripture or for hearing the solemne seruice of the Church as all expositours both ancient and moderne do confesse the very words of the text do conuince but of priuate praiers and praisings of God in Hymnes Canticles and spirituall songes and of priuate guifts of speaking with tongues and prophecying or interpreting of holy scripture and exhorting for mutuall consolation and instruction one another All which as they were guifts gratis giuen rare extraordinary singular yea and miraculously bestowed vpon seuerall persons of sundry sorts in the particuler congregations and assemblies of the faithfull in those times and only for that present time and not to continue in the Church so an order and methode is here prescribed in the vse and exercise of these guifts by the Apostle that al may be done honestly and according to order without confusion and to edification specially of Infidels not yet conuerted to whom cōming to heare the exercises of the Christians these were signes and testimonies of the spirit of God among Christians Whereupon it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is thy proper and priuate benediction and the Prophets did speake somtimes in languages which neither themselues nor the auditours vnderstood as v. 13. and 14. is expressed where the speakers are willed to pray that they themselues may vnderstand and the prophecying or interpreting of high misteries is preferred before the vnknowne not vnderstood languages For which we may note out of the auncient writers Iustine Martyr and Tertullian who liued in the age of the Apostles that the times then so requiring it at the first begining of the Church this order was obserued in the meetings of Christiās which were then for the place priuate as in time of persecution that is 1. The Psalmes were sung 2. The Prophecies and scripture was read 3. The sermon was made by the Bishop 4. The sacrifice which consisted in the oblation consecration communion Canon some short prayers was offered 5. The Communion was giuen to all 6. Some did sing Hymnes and Psalmes of praise and thankesgiuing others did Prophecy speake of high mysteries and shew their guift of languages 7. Others more spirituall did as they were inspired by speciall guifts interpret and expound scripture which was vsed euen by women And lastly they concluded all with an Agape or banquet of charity and hymnes of praising God so brak vp the assembly Which practise as it was only for that time and in time when these extraordinary and miraculous guifts were bestowed for it was not obserued in the future setled times of the Church so with the cessation or ending of those guifts the order and manner partly ceased partly was changed into a set order forme for succeding times which conformably is obserued by our present Church in practise as may be seene in Cornelius vpon the 1. Cor. 14. Nothing therfore in this Chapter is intended or spoken of the generall and ordinary power and authority of all the common people and euery persons spirit to interprete scripture and iudge of Controuersies of faith 2. It is answered that the Prophecy heere spoken of is not an interpretation of Scriptures but of languages by which that which was spoken in strange languages to the admiration of Infidels for whose conuersion the guift of tongues was giuē was interpreted by this guift of prophecy in others for the instruction of the faithfull for whom this Prophecy was giuen for languages are a signe to Infidels but Prophecy to the faithfull When therfore the guift of tongues ceased this guift of Prophecy also ceased as being giuen only for the interpreting of tongues 3. The matter and subiect both spoken by tongue and
and soule so was Christ to suffer and did suffer not only in body by shedding his bloud which as corporall auailed little but in soule also which for the sinnes of the soule was to suffer the paines due to the soule And as man was to suffer the paines of hell in body in soule so was Christ to suffer and did suffer all the same paines of hell which man should haue suffered and so was presented before the tribunall of God for man as guilty of sinne Feared the iudgment of God against this sinne doubted and feared the sentence of his damnation for this sinne and wauered betweene blessing and cursing of God betweene praysing and blaspheming of God vttered wordes not only of inconsideration and perturbation but euen of desperation and at last suffered all the paines and torments of hell in his soule vpon the Crosse which any damned doth suffer or ought to suffer in his soule for the same sinnes in hell In which 1. They deny the fulnesse and perfection of Christs redemption euen of the elect in that they deny the infinite excesse of dignity and value in euery action and passioÌ„ of Christ as proceeding from his diuine person aboue the malice of sinne 2. They doe derogate from the vertue of Christs bloud shed by his passion of which the Scripture affirmes that he iustified vs in his bloud that he redeemed vs in his bloud washed vs in his bloud pacifyed for vs in his bloud purchased vs with his bloud and made his new testâ—ment in his bloud in that they affirme nothing had beene done if Christ had dyed only a corporall death 3. They do extenuate the merit of Christ in that they auerre that in the iudgmeÌ„t of God there is no place of merit for Christ. 4. They do impose vpon our B. Sauiour horrible impiety blasphemy in that they auouch him to haue doubted feared and wauered in his saluation to haue beene ready to curse and blaspheme and to haue despaired and suffered all the torments of the damned in hell In all which as they impose this horrible blasphemy vpon our B. Sauiour Iesus and make him more sinnefull and vncertaine of his saluation then they are of theirs so they do most impiously derogate from the vertue of his death and passion and from the perfection of his redeÌ„ption and in the effect thereof euen in those elect who according to them he only by his death saued redeemed Secondly because to be a perfect and full Redeemer of the elect is requisite that he redeeme them from the seruitude and misery into which by sinne they fell which was the seruitude and misery 1. Of sinne into which being depriued of grace they of themselues cannot but fall and of themselues cannot ryse again you are seruants of sinne 2. Of Sathan to whome by sinne they are made captiue and cannot of themselues resist his will 3. Of sensuality and the law in the members repugning to the law of the mind which of themselues they cannot maister 4. Of the law of workes which of themselues they cannot performe but by it remaine vnder the curse 5. Of hell which for their owne demerit is due to them we haue made a couenant with hell But by this doctrine of sole fayth that Christ did not redeem euen the elect from any of these captiuityes and miseries especially of sinne Sathan sensuality and law of workes nor yet from Hell is proued Not from the seruitude of sin because the best man in his best workes according to Caluin and Luther cannot but sinne as before and because the iust hath no inherent grace or iustice to sanctify him from sinne but only imputatiue couering his sinne and making him seeme and shew iust Not from the seruitude of Sathan because he wants Free-will to resist him and so cannot but yield to his instigation and because he still remaines in sinne both originall and actuall and so by sinne remaines SathaÌ„s slaue Not from the concupiscence because it still remaynes in him infects euery action proceeding from him and because according to Caluin not to haue concupiscence is impossible and according to Luther to haue a VVoman is as necessary for a man as to eate drinke sleep or as to be a man Not froÌ„ the seruitude of the law because the performance of the law and the doing of good workes is impossible and because maÌ„ though iust remaines still guilty of the disobedience of the law Not from the misery of hell because while a man remaines a worker of sinne a seruer of concupiscence a transgressour of the law and a slaue of Sathan as according to the former confessed doctrine euen the iust and elect do he cannot but be subiect to hell and hell be due vnto him therefore if Christ redeeme not euen the elect and iust from the seruitude either of sinne Sathan sensuality the law or hell as by this their doctrine he doth not he cannot be a perfect and complete Redeemer euen of those elect whom only say they he came to redeeme Thirdly that this doctrine makes Christ a bad PhisitiaÌ„ worse Chirurgeon of soules to cure them of their sinnes is proued Because he infuses neither grace into our soares to cure them nor giues strength to our infirmityes to enable vs nor extinguishes the poyson of originall sinne which still infects our actions but only couers our soares and wounds with a faire cloake of his owne iustice presents vs thus couered before God as iust and imputes no sinnes vnto vs though inwardly indeed we remaine vniust and wicked in soule in hart and in all cogitations wordes or actions What doth Christ therfore Surely no more then a Chirurgeon who finding a man wounded and his woundes festered and infecting the rest of the body should only couer the same with a faire cloath produce and shew him to the people thus couered and for this cure accountes both the man safe and sound and also himselfe a perfect Chirurgeon or Phisitian worthy of honour and reward for his paines Such a Phisitian or Chirurgeon according to them is our Sauiour and such a cure doth he worke vpon all his elect whome he cures and redeemes no beter for he cures not by grace infused either the ignorance of the vnderstanding or the malice of the will or the concupiscence of the affections or the infirmity of the exteriour faculties but only couers and hides them with the cloake of his iustice and so imputes them for no sinnes and accounts the persons iust which is all the cure that our Phisitian Christ workes on vs in their new doctrine Fourthly that this doctrine makes Christ either no law-giuer at all contrary to the Prophets who call him a Law-giuer and to his disciple S. Iohn who sayes he gaue a new commandement or els such a law-giuer as makes lawes which are neither iust vpright nor
agreable to reason and equity is manifest for either they hould that Christ made no lawes and was no law-maker at al but a Sauiour only who tyed vs to none but freed vs from all lawes and cleared our conscience from all obligation to all lawes from all obedience to all lawes and from any scruple or punishment of transgressing any law naturall morall or diuine of Church or common-wealth of God or of man and by the liberty of his Ghospell gaue vs freedome to do what we will to omit or comit what we will without condition or obligation but only to belieue and assure our selues that we are sure to be saued Or if they admit any obligation of keeping any lawes as the morall law of the ten Commandement or other they auerre it to be impossible to keep them euen for the iust and perfect though assisted with the help of grace whereby they make God cruell in imposing that vpon vs which we are not able to performe vniust in punishing vs for that which he enforces vs to commit vnreasonable in charging vs aboue our ability in punishing vs for not doing that which we could not do As afterward is more at large shewed Fiftly That this faith doth take from Christ all authority either of iudging at all or of iudging vprightly so makes him either no iudge or an vniust iudge is proued Because in a iudge is requisite 1. That he vnpartially discusse and examine the cause 2. That he duely reward the iust 3. That he iustly punish the offender But this doctrine leaues no place for discussion of sinnes because according to it all works are sinnes as proceeding from originall sinne and infected with originall sinne and all sinnes are a like great as equally forbid by the law of sinne which forbids as well and vnder as great penalty at least in generall of death damnatioÌ„ the theft of a pin as of a pound therfore all discussioÌ„ of this difference is needlesse where no difference among them in greatnesse is admitted 2. It leaues no place for reward of God workes in that it admits neither any workes to bee before God good nor any persons to be inwardly iust nor any merit to be possible by any worke or person nor any reward to be due to any merit but where neither worke is good nor person iust nor merit deseruing there can be no iustice of remuneration in rewarding either good works or iust persons 3. It leaues no place to the iust punishing of the wicked for where all persons are either already iudged and sure to be punished as the Infidels and Pagans are for he that belieues not is already iudged or shall not at all be iudged nor punished as all faithfull Protestants shall not who are sure to be saued where the thing commaunded is impossible to be done or the law commaunding doth not oblige to the doing where God doth ordeine that thing to be doÌ„ne and compels the person to do it where the person commaunded hath neither ability to do the thing commaunded if he would nor yet fredome of will to do it if he could there can be no place of iustice in the lawmaker to punish the fact thus committed or the person committing it But so it is according to the former Protestant doctrine Therfore according to the same Christ cannot at the day of iudgment iudge any or at the least not iustly and cannot be either a iudge or at least not a iust iudge according to euery mans works Sixtly That this doctrine doth bereaue Christ of his priesthood and power of sacrificing and offering for sinnes is proued thus As in all states of nature cerimonall or grace sinnes were committed so in all states were sacrifices ordeined for remission of sinnes and priests appointed to offer for the same In the law of nature the sacrifice was voluntary the priest was the eldest of the family In the law of Moyses the sacrifice was determined to certaine beasts birds and meates and the priests were Aarons posterity and the tribe of Leui. In the law of grace the sacrifice is the body and bloud of Christ and the priests are Christs Apostles and who are consecrated by lawfull orders from them Christ as in persoÌ„ so in his Priesthood and sacrifice he surpassed both the eldest of the family in the law of nature and the Leuiticall priests the sacrifice of both for they were only men he was God man they were men sinfull he was not polluted with sinne they as men and sinners are far distant from God to whom like to men in sinne for whom they offer he as participating of God to whom and of man for whome he offers is one imediate with both They offered often and many times as wanting one full price able to make a full redemption at once he offered once for all and that a full price satisfaction sufficient for all They were annointed with materiall oyle of oliues he with internall oyle of Deity aboue his companions They offered sacrifices many in kind and meane in quality all inferiour to themselues he offered one and that most iust euen himselfe and his owne body bloud of which sacrifice himselfe was 1. The priest annointed by his incarnation to offer 1. The sacrifice ordeined by himselfe an hoast to be offered 3. The temple consecrated to God for his holy offering 4. The Altar in his body which was sprinckled with the bloud of this offering for all which reasons Abraham and the Leuitâ—all priests in him and in his soines as inferiour offered tithes to Melchisedech as superiour and in Melchisedech to Christ figured by him as the chiefe of all The sacrifices Christ offered were of two sorts both of them one and the same in substance to wit his owne body and bloud but diffeâ—ing and diuerse in the manner of offering the one on the Crosse the other at the supper the one bloudy the other vnbloudy the one in his owne forme of man visible the other in the forme of bread and wine inuisible The one once and not reiterated as being a sufficient price of our redemption the other often as the application of the former and that often repeated as sinnes are often committed By the one purchasing to himselfe his Church in his bloud by the other conseruing sanctifiyng the same to himselfe by his grace By the one as a cause meritorious deseruing grace pacifying God and reconciling man to God by the other as an instrument causing grace sanctification satisfaction and actuall remission of sinnes for by it as by Baptisme is wrought remission of sinnes and as by fayth hope charity and other vertues is obteined grace and saluation Now sith it is euident that Christ was 1. a Priest 2. According to the order not of Aaron but of Melchisedech 3. For euer Sith it is euident also 1. That a Priest and sacrifice are correlatiue and so mutuall that
one blow Of Caligula who held that it was lawfull for him to do what he list with any man Of Tiberius who kild the most of the Senatours of Rome and left Caligula his successour because he hoped he would kill the rest and exceed him in cruelty Memorable were the tyrannies of Phalaris of Aegrigentum who tormented men in a fiery bull Of Diomedes of Thrace and of Busciris of Aegypt who gaue their guests to be deuoured by their horses fed them commonly with mans flesh Of Dionysius of Syracusa of Anno of Carthage of Eliarcus of Heraclea of Hyparchus of Athens all who deuised torments the more cruelly to kill their subiects and of the persecuting Emperours who sought all new deuises of tormenting by racke wheels renting brusing and by lingring death the more cruelly to execute the bodyes of the innocent Christians Wherupon the Philosophers sayd Cruelty is hatefull to God a monster of madnesse and misery that cruelty and equity cannot be ioyned togeather that cruelty is a wickednesse not humane but bestiall and which cannot stand with equity But of all crueltyes the most memorable yea horrible and not imaginable if the Diuell himselfe had not inuented and deuised it is this cruelty which they impose vpon God who is a God so good so clement so pittifull and so mercifull that his mercy is aboue all his works and from generation to generation that he disposes all things in mercy and doth with good thinges fill the earth that he shouâ—d not only impose lawes vpon man aboue his ability for the breaking of these laws should inflict hell-paines but also that he should will ordaine decree predestinate yea and create and that certainly ineuitably and immutably as the prime and principal cause only because it was his mâ—ere will and pleasure the greatest parte of mankind that is al who are damned to eternal death destruction and damnation in those intollerable paines of hell-fier for all eternity And that he did will command worke yea and compell and necessitate man to sinne that for this sinne he might punish and damne him eternally in hell This certainly is such a cruelty that if it were true it would follow that this good God was more cruell then the former tyrants euer were for they put men to a temporall death God to an eternal They kild men whom they found in their kingdome God created and made men that he might damne them eternally They puld downe them whom they had exalted God exalted these to his liknesse for that end that he might cast them downe to the deepest hell They murdered a few oÌ„ly of their subiects God the greatest part of the world They kild them against whome they conceiued displeasure or such as had offended them God damnes theÌ„ who haue no way offended him or sinned yea whom he forces to sinne that for that sinne he may damne them They punished with great punishment small offences God with eternall punishment no offences They punished with death men who did otherwise one way or other both deserue death and must dy God damnes them who otherwise then for his will and pleasure were not to be damned as much therfore as the number is greater the punishment more grieuous and the cause of their damnation lesse so much is God by these doctours made more cruel and tyrannicall then any of the former tyrants If it were a horrible cruelty for a King to call thousands of his subiects out of the Country to the Court and there to grace and giue them dignity only for that end that when he had thus graced them he might presently without any fault committed by them torture torment and with all cruelty by his owne hands murder and butcher them alone after another then surely a greater cruelty it is in God to create and bring out of nothing so many millions of soules as are or shal be in hell tormented to exalte them to the dignity of his owne liknesse in memory will and vnderstanding and to enrich them with so many benefits of nature grace only for that end that without any desert or offence in them he may in those intollerable flames eternally himselfe torment them yea to cause compell and force them to commit such acts of sinne that for the same he may thus punish and damne them Surely this is a cruelty â—nd tyranny so great that a greater cannot be conceiued to be in the diuell nor yet be imagined by the diuell himselfe and yet these Protestant doctours do not only impute it vnto God but wil haue it to be a property of God and to stand with his mercy Indeed if to make lawes not impossible to be performed if to oblige men to do thinges impossible to be done if to command men to do a worke and then to deny them meanes to do it if to command and will men yea to force and compel them to do some action and then to punish them for doing the same and that with such horrible paines as of hell If this I say be mercy and mildnesse be grace and goodnes then what can be seuerity iniustice cruelty and tyranny If this be Gods mercy pitty clemency longanimity grace and goodnes to man what is his iustice and seuerity what is or can be cruelty and tyranny If these be his wayes of mercy what are his wayes of iustice If to punish cura condignum and to reward vltra condignum that is to punish lesse and reward more then is deserued be a property of mercy which all attribut to God then to punish without desert yea to cause and force a man to do euill and then to punish him for it is surely no mercy yea no iustice but vnspeakable cruelty and intollerable iniustice Surely if this may be accounted mercy it is a mercy which is mercilesse a mercy which brings all misery and makes millions most miserable A mercy which makes mercy steâ— more then seuere iustice mercy most extreme iniustice mercy and most inhumane cruelty all one for what greater iniustice and cruelty can there be in a tyrant or a diuell then to choose and picke out so many millions of soules and without any cause giuen by them to ordaine appoint and put them into eternall paines of hell-fire there to fry for all eternity and to debarre them of all meanes or ability either of the merits of Christ or of freedome in themselues or of any other helpes or meanes whatsoeuer to auoid the same so that vpon necessity they must sinne and deserue damnation vpon necessity must for that sinne be daÌ„ned O mercilesse mercy O vniust iustice nay O cruell cruelty of all cruelties the greâ—test that cruelty it selfe could conceiue or the Diuel himself can either deuise or execute Far be it from thee O God of mercy who works all in mercy and whose mercy is aboue all thy works SVBDIV. 7. Protestant doctrine of Predestination makes