Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	call_v	day_n	supper_n	10,399	5	10.1829	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A44802	One of Antichrists voluntiers defeated, and the true light vindicated. In answer to a book called Ignis fatuus, published by one R.I. Wherein he vindicates Edward Dod and Samuell Smith (of the county of Salop) in their lyes, folly, and wickedness, and hath added more of his own, with divers of his false doctrines, lyes and slanders, &c. brought to light, and reproved: As that the law of the spirit of life, is imperfect, and not fit to be a Christian rule, and also, humane nature may be taken for the regenerate part of man, and the soul, &c. And likewise calls idolatry, civillity, and heathernish complements courtesie. His vindication made voyd, and his weapons broken, and he taken captive, and left with E.D. and S.S. among the slime pits of Siddim near Sodom, with his Ignis fatuus. / By F.H., a witnesse to the perfect law, of the spirit of life.	Howgill, Francis, 1618-1669.	1660 (1660)	Wing H3175; ESTC R16812	30,660	33

were buried with him in baptisme baptized into the death and sufferings of Christ such a baptisme as the Priests never administred with their hands and the Spirit of the Lord was wont to be the seal of the Covenant to them that did beleeve but now it must be turned out of doors for visible water hath taken up its place in R. I. his judgement which is corrupted and how doth sprinkling answer to circumcision the Males onely were circumcised and not the Females and why doe you sprinkle Fenales if baptisme must answer to circumcision and if the extent of the one must be as large as the other and as for mortification of the flesh and remission of sins that which mortifies the deeds of the flesh hath life in it and that gives a living testimony within and remission of sins is in the blood of Christ and the seal thereof is by the Spirit unto them that beleeve but this Popish tradition hath a●en up all in R. I. his account if his argument be true Nay the Papists themselves who are as zealous for sprinkling of infants as R. I. or any of his brethren can be yet one of their own Bishops at a Council in France of both Protestants and Papists at Pisoy 15 61. Claudius Espencious saith Many things are to be beleeved by tradition only as the baptisme of infants which cannot be proved from Scripture but this R. I. would have the Scripture to be a Cloak and a cover not only for Popish Traditions but for his own invented imaginations which he hath set forth to blind people withall The next thing that R. I. goes about to vindicate is swearing which their Ministers teach men to sweare which ought to be in righteousnesse and truth and for his proof Deut. 10. 20. he brings and he saith Christ only prohibits rash and vain swearing and superfluous oaths Answ Unto this much hath been said and answered allready by many pens and so that in the answer thereof I shall be brief in the first Covenant it was lawful to swear in truth and righteousnesse and likewise all rash and vain oathes under the Law were forbidden but Christ who is the end of the Law for righteousness who is greater then the Prophets and greater then Moses and Solomon and greater then the Angels unto whom they all worship he saith expressely swear not at all Now whereas R. I. and others have said Christ onely in these words prohibits vain oaths or false oaths then he had reproved nothing but what the Law had reproved but he saith It hath been said of old time thou shalt not forswear thy selfe but Christ saith I say swear not at all so that it is manifest that all oaths are forbidden by him who is the oath of God and why saith R. I. it is not contrary to the Gospel of Christ for to swear and yet doth account the writings which is called the New Testament the Gospel wherein Christ hath expressely forbidden it and therefore those Ministers that teach men to swear are not the Ministers of Christ but teach those things that are repugnant to the Gospel of Christ For he that breaks one of the least of the commands of Christ and teacheth others so to do is least in the Kingdome of God The next thing that R. I. would vindicate is their singing of Davids Psalmes in invented Tunes such as pleaseth the carnal mind and for his proof he brings Matth. 26. 30. They went out and sung a Hymn and Paul and Silas sang in prison and singing is divine worship for the praise of God and the comfort of our soules and it is a soul-ravishing and heart-raising ordinance Answ It is acknowledged and allwayes hath been by us that praises belongs to the Lord and that they that are made alive whose souls are raised out of death can and doth praise the Lord and they that sing with the Spirit and with understanding are acceptable unto God and they that are in the Spirit doth that which the Spirit moves unto and so worships in the truth and is accepted of God and Christ and Paul and Silas and many more praised the Lord and many now doth praise the Lord and he that hath a Psalme may sing but what of all this what doth this prove for R. I. and the rest of the Masse-house-singers and what doth this prove as to the singing of them that is void of understanding who sometime sing I go mourning all the day long and just at that moment are singing and what doth R. I. think it cannot be a Psalme unlesse it be in Meeter or doth he think it is not accepted except it hath a Tune with so many stops and to sing Davids prayers and call it praises is this with understanding and even to return R. I. his words upon himselfe A more ungrounded opinion was never invented by the Devil For them to sing or to pretend to praise God whose soules lyes in death and do not know what it is to partake of Gods benefits neither the unsearchable gift This kind of singing and imitation doth not comfort the soule but burden it and this doth not raise the witnesse but kills it and you make merry over it and this kind of singing must be turned into howling and lamentation And saith R. I. Our worship doth not differ neither in whole nor in part in matter or manner from the Saints worship in the Primitive times Answ. This mans confidence or rather impudence is in opposition to knowledge and wisdome for it were easily proved that it neither in whole nor in part neither in matter nor manner agreeth with the Primitive times as for example it is no where recorded in the Scripture that any Apostle Minister or Ministers did take a little water and did sprinkle a few drops on a childs face and call'd this an ordinance of God and say it is a seal of the Covenant and mortification and remission of sins neither any such doctrine did they declare neither did any of the Ministers and Apostles of Christ cause people to buy them bread and wine and then give it the people back again a bit of bread and a sup of wine at the middle of the day and call this the Lords Supper or a great Sacrament neither had they bels in their Churches to call people together neither had they soft cushions and pulpits and a hour-glasse hanging by them neither did the primitive Churches prohibit or limit the Spirit of the Lord God amongst any but if any was moved to speake any thing or had any thing revealed from the Lord the first was to hold his peace These and many more things you differ in both in matter and manner which largely hath been declared by other pens and so in this I shall be briefe neither had the Ministers of the Gospel their maintenance by force neither had they Easter Reckonings Midsummer dues Mortuaries money for Churching of women Marriages nor for the burials of the

ONE OF Antichrists Voluntiers DEFEATED AND THE True light vindicated IN Answer to a Book called Ignis fatuus Published by one R. I. Wherein he vindicates Edward Dod and Samuell Smith of the County of Salop in their lyes folly and wickedness and hath added more of his own with divers of his false doctrines lyes and slanders c. brought to light and reproved As That the Law of the Spirit of life is imperfect and not fit to be a Christian Rule and also humane Nature may be taken for the regenerate part of man and the Soul c. And likewise calls Idolatry Civillity and heathenish complements Courtesie His Vindication made voyd and his weapons broken and he taken Captive and left with E. D. and S. S. among the slime pits of Siddim near Sodom with his Ignis fatuus By F. H. a witnesse to the perfect Law of the Spirit of Life The wicked are estranged from the womb they goe astray assoone as they be borne speaking lies LONDON Printed for Thomas Simmons at the Bull and Mouth near Aldersgate 1660. ONE OF ANTICHRISTS VOLUNTIERS DEFEATED AND THE TRUE LIGHT VINDICATED AMongstall the opposers of the truth that yet hath appeared among the black army of the old Dragon who like the Philistims hath alwayes defied Israels God and also their camp through their ostentation and boasting and with their clamorous loud cryes in the ears of the people like Rabshekah to dishearten and dismay Israel none hath appeared more out-ragious and virulent then one who subscribes himselfe R. I. who in vindication of his brethren in iniquity Edward Dod drunkard and Samuel Smith an unprofitable talker otherwise called a Minister at Cresige who hath preached that which he calls the Gospel there divers years and yet sees no fruit at all and yet this impudent R. I. whom I beleeve to be another dreamer like him for his language do manifest him to belong to mistery Babilon the great City the mother of Harlots he saith One may minister and preach the Gospel and the people not be profited at all as Samuel Smith hath done at Cresige And he saith farther that they are barren professors yet saith R. I. that S. S. need not be abashed at it And for instance he saith Was Pauls preaching of less credit because there were many Runnagates in the end shewed themselves hypocrites yet this comparison will not excuse S. S. neither E. D. nor R. I. who would cover them with an old patched Cloak some peices he hath scraped up out of Aesop's Fables a book full of lies and altogether compacted and patched up of fictions and some out of Ovid Seneca Heathens in their own account the like frivolous stories and Plato and Diogenes they must serve for a covering if it will to the two former opposers of truth but stay R. I. Did Paul stay seven years in any place and saw no fruit And though there were many unbeleevers among the Jews notwithstanding the publication of the word and the miracles of Christ yet some beleeved and though the Apostles and Ministers of Christ laboured in the work of the Lord yet some beleeved and clave unto them but there is no fruit at Cresige at all but they are barren professors as R. I. saith but if this will not serve take another of R. I. his arguments That God sends his word sometimes for the hardning of people and upon this account S. S. teaching and Ministry must be kept in credit A sad thing for the people of Cresige that they should hire a man for seven years together and pay him wages for hardning of their hearts and for counting them barren professors yet I judge S. S. E. D. R. I. counted them fruitful and abounding in zeale and fervency to God when they came into the meeting of the Quakers some ringing Pans some Candlesticks and Frying pans and throwing water like people void of understanding and saith this R. I. these yeelded a better sound then the Quakers So that thou may see what will not this R. I. vindicate and what wickednesse as can be acted and spoken here they may look for a shelter rather then they shall want a Guardian as Pictures images crosses cuffs ribons lace and such other like things invented by the Devil to draw people from serving and worshipping the living God R. I. will patronize them all being brought forth and when they are not brought forth he will reach forth his hand to help to elevate iniquity and to under-prop the Devils kingdom which is exalted in the children of disobedience as all along may be seen in his Fabulous Scrole called Ignis Fatuus when like his two brethren before him he goes about to vindicate Idolatry Images Hirelings Mass-houses Cuffs and Ribons Tithes Flattering Titles and vain Customs and Popish practices Pride Persecution and lying all those things he pleads for and hath used many vain arguments and false interpretations of Scripture so that the two former it may truly be said they have done wickedly but this R. I. exceeds them all who is so stout hearted against the truth and power of God that whatsoever he can invent in his corrupt heart against it and gathers up the rest of the Priests lies that they have vomited up before and cast in the face of truth and tenders them as good proof and some Scriptures perverted with Aesop's Fables and Ovid and Diogenes stories and upon such materials he hath framed his book called Ignus Fatuus which he hath writ in vindication of E. D. his book called A pair of Spectacles for a dark-sighted Quaker and S. S. Malice striped and whipt three Pamphlets whole Title will discover what the substance of their matter is and whose work they drive on so that I need not say much some of them vindicating persecution and incouraging the rude behaviour of the people another mocking at innocency and scorneth them who trembles at the word of the Lord and last of all R. I. who hath made a Fortresse for both the other and hath cast up a heap of confused darknesse to guard his brethren he mocks at the light within and calls it Ignis Fatuus and the law which is light which God hath promised to write in his peoples hearts this he calls an imperfect thing and therefore to be ruled and not fit to be a rule of the Saints as may be seen in the 55 page of his book and so ha●h spoken contrary to the Spirit and Scripture of truth Prov 6. and the law of the Lord which is the law that endureth for ever this saith R. I. is imperfect and the letter or law without written is perfect and is a standard as R. I. saith for all controversies then if it be so perfect and so fit to decide all controversies why doth R. I. borrow his proofs and raise his arguments from Aesop's Fables Ovids stories Plato and Diogenes discourses and to omit Seneca because R. I. saith Ambrose hath

I would have R. I. to understand that here was 17. yeares that he preached publickly before that and where was his ordination Many of the Brethren who was scartered abroad in the persecution that was at Jerusalem went every where preaching the word of God and when or where was these ordained and who ordained the Brethren that was persecuted after Stephens being put to death who travilled as far as Phenecia and Cyprus and Antioch preaching the word and the hand of the Lord was with them and a great number beleeved and turned unto the Lord Acts 17 19 20 21. Yet these things I bring not as to deny but that many went out with the consent of the Church and many were ordained Elders who were grown up in the truth and established who had received the Holy Ghost by whom many was confirmed and strengthned in the faith but what is all this R. I. to your ordination and who ordained you the Pope a Bishop or a Councell or a Parliament and what are they you irdaube such as learnes the art of speech seaven yeares at Oxford who hath read Homer and Aristotle Plato and Diogenes and learned to play on a Fiddle These are no Mechanicks but gifted men indeed and quallified and fit to be ordained and made Ministers Pastors and Elders to carry a broad the Traffique of Mistery Babylon but this R. I. is very peremptory and saith it is utterly unlawfull for any that are gifted to preach the word Contrary to the Apostles doctrine who saith as every one hath receiveth the gift so let him administer and not such as R. I. would have to be Ministers who hath learned an art to speak and this must be called a gift and a quallification and a fit man to be a Pastour and thus they have ordained one another and hath set up a trade of preaching and with their confused stories hath fill'd the world with darknesse And as concerning an infallible Spirit saith R. I. None except Christ who was without sin can challenge it or lay claime to it and I may say of such runnagates and wandering starrs as this F. H. and the Quakers are as John did 1 Joh. 2. 9. They are gone out from us because they were not of us Answer However this R. I. hath cleared himselfe and the rest of his brethren for being Ministers of Christ for they doe not only deny an infallible Spirit neither look to be made partakers thereof but quite shut out all the Saints from enjoying it and though in Christ the fullnesse of the Godhead dwelt who was full of grace and truth he is the Root from whence all that believe come to be made partakers of his virtue and so many of his members may lay claime to it as they have received it by a free gift according to the promise of Christ I will send you the Spirit of truth which shall lead you into all truth and the Apostle had received the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus who had freed him from the Law of sin and death and the sons of God had received it and they were led by it and the Ministers of Christ was made Ministers of it who hath made us able Ministers as it is written not of the letter but of the Spirit and that Spirit was infallible and true and that Spirit which they declared of was an unerring Spirit and as they were led by it they erred not but were kept by it that the evill one touched them not and they spoke from it and ordered the Church in it in the wisdome of God But what doth these men minister from who waits not to be made partakers of this but denyes that ever any had it or even shall have and so are but a company of dreamers and tells their dreame that they dreamed in the night or at best steales the words from their neighbour and saith Thus saith the Lord when God hath never spoken to them And though thou may say we are runnagates because we sit not dreaming over 30 or 40 families 20 yeares but travills from city and from country to country to publish the word of truth freely as the Apostles and Ministers of Christ did We must by such as this R. I. and his Brethren who hath gotten holes and nests in the earth to creep into be counted as runnagates and though John said they are gone out from us because they were not of us this he spoke of them who went out of the light in which he and the rest of the Disciples had fellowship with God and one with another and they that went out from this went into the spirit of the world and you are such as they that are gone out already and blasphemously calls the light of Christ Ignis fatuus and so all that fear the Lord will come out from you and out from Babylon where the blood of the prophets hath been shed and the witnesses kill'd you who deny an infallible Spirit is like to be in blindnesse and follow the spirit of errour for you have nought else to cleave unto And further R. I. saith When the Lord said by Joell that he would pour out his Spirit upon all flesh and his sons and daughters should prophesie the prophet speaks not of a ghostly power to open the Kingdome of Heaven given by Christ to his Apostles and Successors but of an extraordinary measure of enlightning grace and a more copious effusion of the Spirit and also to pastors to whom more is given more is required and this Text doth not prove that all sheep shall be Pastors and all schollars Teachers Answer Nay this Text doth not prove all Sheep to be Pastors neither all that are taught to be teachers for all are not Prophets neither Pastors nor teachers for as Christ said the Labourers are but few but this man is afraid that there should be too many and indeed there are too many hireling loyterers that are ready to supplant one another for filthy lucre and though many may be said to beleeve yet all have not received the Spirit of prophesie or a gift to be pastors but onely they to whom it is given of the Lord for the worke sake yet notwithstanding they who have received it ought not to be limitted either Son or daughter for them who doe quenches the Spirit and despises prophesie as this R. I. doth and how should he doe otherwise seeing he hath denyed the infallible Spirit from which all the Ministers ministred and all the prophets prophesied and spoke as they were moved by the holy Ghost But R. I. saith the Prophet spoke not of a ghostly power to open the Kingdome of heaven if by ghostly power he meane the Spirits power as I beleeve he will not deny then was it not by a spirituall power sons and daughters prophesied and did not this power open the Kingdome of Heaven and if it be a more Copious effusion of the Spirit which is given under the Gospell then

puft up in his fleshly mind I said unto E. D. that Christ was the seed of David according to the flesh and according to the Spirit the son of God And furthermore said and new saith that Christ is glorified in a spiritual body and incorruptible body and so by incorruptible body and spiritual body according to R. I. his dark understanding must also be understood humane nature and again humane nature may be understood of the soul O dark and fortish man what art thou like to confute who saith the humane nature may be taken for the soul and also it may be taken for flesh and also it may be taken for the regenerate part and thus like a blind man hath lost all aime thou runnest rambling up and down in every by-path but how should thou doe otherwise seeing thou hast denyed that Spirit that doth not erre and also would have all others to deny it and saith that none may lay claime to it although God hath promised it to give the spirit of truth to lead his people into all truth and if into all truth then out of all error but this doctrine of Christ comes too neer perfection for R. I to own which is a doctrine so offensive to him that he cannot endure to hear of it or that ought should be perfect and therefore he hath condemned the law of the spirit of life and saith it is imperfect as may be seen in the 55 page of his book and if flesh and the regenerate part of man and the soul may all be understood by humane nature then they are all one and then the soul is humane and earthly but the soul is spiritual and immortal and flesh and blood inherits not the kingdome of God and the regenerate part is that which is begotten and brought forth by the immortal word of life and that which is born of the spirit is spirit and so the ignorance of this man is made manifest and so R. I. may take his lye home unto himselfe as that F. H. denyes the reall body of Christ for F. H. hath said and now saith againe and that according to knowledge that Christ hath an incorruptible body and a glorious body and a spiritual body and in this body is Christ glorified with the Father and humane nature is no where taken for a spiritual and incorruptible body in the Scriptures account as this R. I. and his blind tribe doth imagine and yet the flesh of Christ is owned and the word that was made flesh the Saints know and doth feed on by which they are nourished up into everlasting life and so I say unto thee as I did to E. D. when thou writes again speak plainly if by humane nature thou intend a carnal body or the same flesh thou art on thou would devide the flesh of Christ from his Spirit would devide Christ Christ is not divided and thus he goes quarrelling on and heaps lye upon lye and saith that F. H. saith Christ hath no real body but his mystical body which thing is thy own and never affirmed by me either in word or writing and so repent of thy lyes and for shame call in thy Book least the judgements and plagues of God be multiplyed upon thee And further saith R. I. How do the Quakers condemn themselves when they so proudly boast themselves as the Pharisees did to be clear from sin who needs not Christs righteousness for their justification how then can they say that Christs righteousness is their justification when they are so righteous in their own eyes for Christ hath not promised to justifie any but those that confess their sins Answ. We have confest our sins and also departed from them and not like you feigned hypocrites who are confessing from year to year with your feigned lips and your hearts never turned to the Lord from iniquity and takes the name of Christs righteousnesse to be a cloak to cover your iniquity withall and we do not say that we have no need of Christs righteousnesse for our justification for if we should say so we should be lyars like thy self for we have need of Christs righteousnesse for he is our life who is called The Lord our righteousness he is our justifier and who art thou that condemns any but the false accuser of the brethren for Christs righteousnesse is our covering and we are not righteous in our own eyes but in the eyes of him who hath made us so and we never said that we have not sinned and so we have not made God a lyar as this vile slanderer would make men beleeve through his false aspertions for we say we were once darknesse but now are we light in the Lord and he who is our light and life is our justification and righteousnesse and his blood cleanseth from all sin and the power of God keepeth us that the evil one toucheth us not and yet all boasting is excluded And the further R. I. goes on the lower he sinks towards the bottomlesse pit and there we shall find him at last before we have done with his book and speaks out of thick darknesse like a man that never saw the Sun who hath altogether taken up his dwelling place in Deaths Region and as though that were the Land of his nativity and thou shalt see Reader by what ensues R. I. saith Though it be said He that commits sin is of the Devill not that the Devill can claime him for his own or that he is in his possession but he is captivated of the Devill and everpowered And for his proof he brings Peter was cryed up to be a Saint and at that same time when he was cryed up to be a Saint Christ called Peter a devill and that must be understood a Saint had sinned Answer He that is captivated by the Devil hath gone from the power of God and he that commits sin doth the Devils work and he may claime him for his workman and he that is overpowered is brought into captivity and he that carryes into captivity hath the Captive in his possession as it is written his servants you are to whom you obey and he that commits sin is the servant of sin And these black confused distinctions R. I. maketh to make people beleeve that they are Saints of God when they are the Devils captives and that they are in the possession of Christ who yet doe the works of the Devill who is an enemy to Christ and thou knows no more of a Saint then thou knows of a devill who saith that Peter at the same time that Christ called him a Saint called him a devil for thou must know that Matthew recorded many things it may be in one Chapter which was acted and done and spoken in many dayes and weeks for when Peter confessed Christ to be the Son of God he was in the faith and Christ said flesh and blood had not revealed that to him but at this time had spoken little

law written in the heart is imperfect and not fit to be a rule but to be ruled contrary to the Apostles doctrine and so this R. I. is tryed by his own infallible standard to be a deceiver who teaches contrary to that which he cals his law and testimony and the Law which is outward is the Law of the first Covenant which made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope did by which we draw nigh unto God Heb. 7. 19. Therefore the Lord said by the mouth of the Prophet Behold the dayes come that I will make a new Covenant with the house of Israel not according to the Covenant I made with you when I brought them out of the Land of Egypt when I was as a husband into them which Covenant they brake but I will write my Law in their hearts and put my spirit in their inward parts I will be to them a God and they shall be unto me a people Jer. 31. 33. Heb. 8. 9 10. Now this blind man who gropes as at noon day saith This is imperfect which is written in the heart and so faulty with him and therefore to be ruled over and the other which is outward is perfect and faultlesse and so ought to be a Rule but saith the Apostle contrary to R. I. If the first Covenant had been faultlesse there had been no place for the second which second the Apostle saith is a better Covenant and stands upon better promises but yet saith R. I. this is not the rule not fit to be a rule And furthermore the Apostle said as many as are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God and this was their rule and the Law of the Spirit of life made the Apostle free from the law of sin and death and was the new creatures rule by which they were led into all truth and as many as did walk in it out of all sin But nay saith R. I. It is not sit to be a rule for this is imperfect and is that thing to be ruled and for his proof brings Psal. 17. 4. By the word of thy lips I have kept me from the path of the destroyer and how doth this prove that the Law in the heart is to be ruled Thou ignorant man who litters forth nothing but deceit and error and so the Scriptures declares against thee for they say The Law of the Lord is perfect converting the soul The Commandement of the Lord is pure enlightening the eyes Psal 19. 7 8. For the Commandement is a Lamp and the law is light Prov. 6. 23. And the Commands of the New Covenant are spirituall and not carnall and they are perfect and fit to be a rule to guide all them that beleeve in a perfect way and not as this R. I. saith unfit to be a Rule because of their imperfection and would in his blind distinctions cast a mist before peoples eyes and all may judge not only of this R. I. his mistake but of his wilfull impudence in preferring that which is visible and outward and may be seen which was given forth in time viz. the Commands outward and the letter outward above the Law of the Spirit of Life which is invisible spirituall and eternall And as I said to S. S. So I may say to thee Leane souls are they like to be who receives such damnable Doctrine as this for Articles of Faith But however Reader thou may take notice of R. I. in his Epistle to the Reader he saith The Quakers money is counterfeit coyne which he hath nailed on the Market post and instead thereof hath tendered other money and that thou may see what kind of other money the Priests is and what Image it hears by the Principles here discovered which is altogether Tin and drosse and Reprobate Silver which will be received by none but them whom the God of this world ha●h blinded the eyes of that they should not see the things that belongs unto their peace And Edward Dodd being sensible that he all his stuffe or he and all his arguments was carried Captive and become a booty and a prey he is glad that any will step in and rescue him and flatters R. I. and saith I am engaged to you to imbrace you as a precious friend that of so weake principles as mine have raised so perfect a structure so absolute rationall and demonstrative that more need not to be done Answ. R. I. his Vindication hath not redeemed E. D. his principles at all but rather hath laboured in vain and spent his strength for naught and hath brought forth such a birth as sober men will blush at made up of Ignorance Blasphemy Derision and lyes which they that have the lest moderation will abhorre and detest And the Principles of E. D. and R. I. are not only weak and feeble but wicked and impious as is manifest in what hath been declared And the structure that R. I. hath made is but builded with untempered Morter lyes falshood errour false Doctrine which the stormy wind of the Lord will Rent and scatter and confound and exalt his Truth above it all But E. D. saith What can be said to reduce such a people I know not since so many convincing arguments cannot prevaile Alass poor men whether would you reduce us or bring us back to the slime pits of Sodome where E. D. fell with his stuffe or turn us back again to Images Pictures and Crosses to Mass-houses Hirelings and Tythes to Lace Ribons and Cuffes which both E. D. and R. I. hath strongly pleaded for as faithfull Servants to their Master who would not have him loose a foot of his Territories however E. D. hath resolved to continue one in life and death with R. I. who hath shaken hands with the Prince of darknesse and made a Covenant with death which must be broken and though S. S. E. D. R. I. joyne hand in hand yet the wicked shall not goe unpunished for every one shall receive a reward according to their works And so I have done with R. I. his Book called Ignis fatu●● whose arguments false doctrines errours and lies are dissolved into nothing his Vindication made voyd his ignorance made manifest his false Doctrines brought to light and reproved by the word of truth Only I shall returne him a few of his lyes back again for him to review the second time and repent of them and remember the sentence for all Lyars is The Lake that burneth Rev. 22. 15. First That their worship differs not in whole nor in part in matter nor in manner from the Churches in the Primitive times Secondly According to the Scriptures their whole worship is framed Thirdly That Jezabel was never more madder against the Prophets then these Quakers are against Christs Ministers Fourthly The Quakers contemn Magistracy infect the Common-wealth with ●action Fifthly That the Quakers burnt some houses at Oxford Sixthly That Timothy Titus were setled in a Parochial way in their quarters Seventhly That F. H. complains of the darkness of the Sun when the fault is in his own eys Eightly The Quakers deny honour to Superiors to whom it is due and so blaspheme the name of God and his doctrine Ninthly F. H. would never have cryed out of deceit but a purpose to deceive the more Tenthly That the Quakers bid open defiance to the worship of God Eleventhly That I. N. did say That he was as just and holy and good as God Twelfthly That F. H. said That Christ Jesus was not glorified in Heaven with a real body Thirteenthly Humane nature is taken for the regenerate part of man and the soul Fourteenthly That the best men though regenerate bears Nettles Brambles and Pricks Fifteenthly There is an inward law called the law of the Spirit of life which is imperfect and not fit to beare rule but to be ruled Sixteenthly And the Scriptures leads us to the Spirit and enclines our hearts to the obedience of the rule Seventeenthly And F. H. preferreth Ignis Fatuus before the clear light of Gods word Eighteenthly lastly when he hath spoken all these lies publish'd them in Print to the world he blasphemously saith in his Epistle to the Reader Have not so much regard to the authority of the Writer as the truth of the matter written by him who was moved of the Lord thus to declare So all these lyes with many more and all these damnable Doctrines which he hath uttered forth against the truth these things he would fasten upon the Lords motion and so make him the Author of iniquity and a cloak for his ungodly speeches against them who love the truth as it is in Jesus who hath suffered many reproaches for its sake and hath been killed all the day long by this Generation amongst which R. I. is who hath bent his tongue to mischief and his lips to utter forth deceit and as Jannes and Jambres resisted Moses so hath this R. I. resisted the truth being a man of a corrupt mind and concerning the faith reprobate but he shall not proceed much further for in what he hath written his folly will be manifest unto all men and them that fear the Lord will depart out of his foot-steps which leads to the chambers of death and from those dark paths in which R. I. treadeth which leadeth into utter destruction Westmorland the 15. of the 4. month 1660. THE END