Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	blood_n	body_n	sacrament_n	22,235	5	7.4969	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28839	An exposition of the doctrine of the Catholique Church in the points of controversie with those of the pretended reformation by James Benignus Bossüet, counseller in the King's counsels, Bishop and Lord of Condom, tutor to His Royal Hyghness the Dolphin of France ; translated into English by W.M.; Exposition de la doctrine de l'Eglise catholique sur les matières de controverse. English	Bossuet, Jacques Bénigne, 1627-1704.; Montagu, Walter, 1603?-1677.	1672 (1672)	Wing B3782; ESTC R30305	47,803	218

perfection of the new man Their diuine institution is extant in the holy scripture either by the expresse words of CHRIST who established them or by that Grace which by testimony of the same scripture is annexed vnto them and inferreth necessarily God's ordayning them By reason that infants can not supply their own want of Baptisme by the acts of Faith Hope and Charity nor by their vows desire of receauing this Sacrament we beleeue that if they doe not actually receaue it they haue no part of communication of the Grace of our Redemption and consequently dying in Adam they haue no part in JESVS-CHRIST It is fitt to obserue here that the Lutherans concurr with the Catholique Church in holding the absolute necessity of Baptisme for Infants and withall wonder that any one hath presumed to deny a truth which no one before Caluin had euer dared to call in question so deeply was it imprinted in the minds of all the faithful Notwithstanding this the Pretended-Reformers make no scruple willfully to lett their children dye as the Infidels doe without bearing any marke of Christianity and depriued of all the grace that belongs to it if the death of the child happen before the day of their Congregation The imposition of hands practised by the Apostles in order to the confirming fortifying the faithfull against persecutions deriuing the principall efficacy from the internall descent of the holy Ghost the infusion of his guifts ought not to haue bin reiected by our Aduersaries vpon this pretext that the holy spirit doth no longer descend visibly vpon vs no more then it is by all the Christian Churches who haue religiously continued it euer since the Apostles and make vse also of the holy Chrisme to demonstrate the virtue of that Sacrament by a more expresse and sensible representation of the interiour Vnction of the holy spirit We beleeue CHRIST IESVS hath bin pleased to ordaine that those who haue subiected themselues to the Authority of the Chruch by their Baptisme and after this engagement haue transgressed the lawes of the Gospel should be bound to vndergoe the iudgment of the same Church at the tribunal of Pennance where she doth exercise the power conferr'd vpon her to remitt or to reteyn sinns The termes of the commission granted to the Churches Ministers to absolue sinns are so large and general that without great temerity the power can not be restreyned only vnto publick and notorious offences and when they pronounce Absolution in the name of CHRIST JESVS since they doe but follow the expresse termes of their commission the sentence is reputed as giuen by CHRIST himself in whose place they are appointed as Iudges It is this inuisible High-Priest who absolueth interiourly the Penitent whilst the Priest exerciseth the exteriour ministery This Penitentiall iudicature being so necessary a curbe for our licentiousnesse so aboundant a spring of pious and prudent aduises so sensible a consolation to soules afflicted for their sinns when Absolution is not only declared to them in generall termes as the Protestant Ministers doe practise but giuen them in particular and the Penitent effectualy absolued by the commission of CHRIST IESVS vpon a perfect examination and a right vnderstanding of the case we can not possibly beleeue that our Adversaries can contemplate so many good consequences without resenting their losse and feeling some shame of such an abusiue Reformation which hath abrogated so holy so beneficial a practise The holy Ghost hauing annexed vnto Extreame-Vnction by the testimony of S. Iames an expresse promise of remission of sinns and ease vnto the sick party there is nothing wanting vnto this most holy ceremony towards the cōstituting it a true Sacrament We must only obserue that according to the Doctrine of the Councel of Trent the sick are more releeued in respect of their soules then their bodyes and the spiritual benefit is alwayes the principal ayme obiect of the new law it is that also we ought absolutely to expect from this holy Vnction supposing we are rightly disposed for it whereas our corporal eases and releifs in our infirmitys are afforded vs only as relating to our eternal health according to the secret and hidden dispositions of Diuine Prouidence and the seueral degrees of preparation and faith which are already acting in the soules of the faithful When we shall seriously cōsider that IESVS-CHRIST hath induced a new forme into the state of Marriage reducing this holy society vnto two persons immutably indissolubly vnited when we shall reflect that this inseparable coniunction is made the signe of his Eternall vnion with his Church we shall find little difficulty to comprehend that the Marriage of the faithfull is accompanied with the Grace of the holy Spirit we will easily praise the Diuine goodnes which hath bin pleased to sanctify in this manner the spring and deriuation of our birth The imposition of hands which the Ministers of holy matters receaue being accompanied with so present and actual a virtue of the holy Ghost and so intire an infusion of Grace is duly reckoned in the number of the Sacraments and we must confesse that our Aduersaries doe not absolutely exclude the Consecration of Ministers but they reiect it only from the number of the Sacraments which are common to the whole Church We are now at last come to the question of the Eucharist or Blessed Sacrament wherein it will be requisite to explaine more amply our Doctrine and yet not passing farr beyond the bounds which we haue prescribed to our selues The reall presence of the Body and Blood of our Lord in this Sacramēt is solidy established by the words of the institution which we vnderstand litterally and there is no more reason to aske vs why we tye our selues to the proper litterall sence then to question a traueller why he followeth the great high-way It is their part that resort to figuratiue senses and choose such by-paths to shew a reason of this their deuiation As for vs who perceaue nothing in the words which CHRIST IESVS vsed for the institution of this Mystery that obligeth vs to take them in a figuratiue sense we conceaue this reason sufficient to settle and determine our receauing them in their proper and litterall signification But we find our selues yet more strictly tyed vnto it when we considerately examine the intention of the sonne of God in this mystery which I will explaine in the cleerest and easiest termes I can possibly and by such principles as I conceaue our Aduersaries can not disagree in I say then that these words of our Sauiour Take and eate this is my Body giuen for you shew vs that as the ancient Iews did not simply vnite themselues in spirit vnto the immolation or killing of the victimes which were offered for them but did effectually eate of the Sacrificed flesh which was a signe

word doth not allow vs any doubt of it Our Aduersaries did well discerne that simple figures and bare signes of the Body and Blood would not satisfy Christians vsed accustomed to the Grace and Goodnesse of a God who giues himself so Really to vs. So that vpon this ground they seeke to decline the being taxed with their denying a Substantiall and Reall participation of IESVS-CHRIST in the Communion They affirme with vs that he makes vs partakers of his proper Substance They say that he feedeth vs with the Substance of his Body and his Blood and conceauing that his shewing vs by some signe that we did partake of his Sacrifice would not be sufficient they declare expressely that the Body of our Sauiour which is giuen vs in the Communion doth ascertaine vs of it These words are so important as we will presently examine them Now then we see the Body and Blood of CHRIST present in our Mysteries by the grant of the Caluinists for what is communicated according to the proper Substance of it must needs be Really present True it is that they explaine this Communication saying it is effected by the Spirit and by Faith but it is also certain that they will haue it to be Reall and because it is not possible to render this intelligible that a Body communicated to vs only in Spirit by Faith should be imparted to vs Really and in its proper Substance they haue not bin able to remain fix'd in both parts of a Doctrine of such a Contradiction and so they haue bin forced to grant two things which the Catholique Church teacheth The first is that CHRIST IESVS is giuen vs in the Eucharist in such a manner as doth not sute either with Baptisme or Preaching the Gospel but is peculiarly proper to this Mysterie We shall discerne presently the consequence of this principle but lett vs first consider how it is allowed granted by the Pretended-Reformers And in this point I will not alledge the testimony of any particular Authour but the very words of the Catechisme in that place where it explicateh what relateth to the Lord's-Supper It pronounceth in expresse termes not only that CHRIST IESVS is giuen vs Really and truly in the Sacrament and in his own Substance but being asked the question what aduantage we haue by the communication in the Supper aboue that in Baptisme or Preaching they answer although he be truly communicated to vs by Baptisme and by the Gospel yet in them it is but Partly and not Entirely From whence it followes that in the Lord's-Supper they teach he is not giuen vs Partly but Compleatly There is an extreame difference between receauing in Part and receauing Plenarily So that if we partake of JESVS-CHRIST in all other com̄unications of him but in Part and that in the Lord's Supper singly we receaue him Entirely it followeth euen by the Confession of our Aduersaries that we must seeke in the Communion a participation special and peculiar to this mystery which can not appertaine to Baptisme or Preaching and at the same time it followes also that this partaking is not annexed vnto Faith since our Faith spreading extending it self through all the acts of Christianity doth exist and operate in the Preaching of the word and in Baptisme as well as the Lord's-Supper And indeed it is to be obserued that notwithstanding all the earnestnesse the Pretending-Reformers haue expressed to render Baptisme and Preaching equal to the Eucharist vpon this account that CHRIST JESVS is truly com̄unicated to vs by them they neuer durst venture to assert in their Catechismes that CHRIST was giuen vs in his proper Substance either in Baptisme or in Preaching of the Gospel as they haue affirm'd it of the Eucharist So that they haue bin conuinced they could not decline the ascribing to the Lord's Supper such a manner of possessing CHRIST as is peculiar to this Sacrament and that our Faith which is common to all the actions of a Christian could not be that distinct singular manner Now this singular manner of possessing CHRIST IESVS in the Eucharist must needs be Reall since it giueth to the beleeuer the very Substance of the Body and Blood of our Sauiour which is not done by Faith and this is what the Catholique Church holds teacheth The second point granted by the Pretending Reformers is drawn from the Article following immediately what I haue allready cited out of their Catechisme which is this that the Body of our Sauiour in regard it was once offer'd in Sacrifice to reconcile vs vnto God is now giuen vs to assure vs that we partake of that reconciliation If these words haue any meaning in them if they are not an empty sound only a meere vaine amusement they must needs suggest to our vnderstanding that CHRIST JESVS doth not giue vs a simple signe or symbole but his proper Body to assure vs that we partake of his Sacrifice and the Reconciliation of Mankind If then the receauing of the Body of our Sauiour assureth vs of our participation of the fruite of his Death it followes of necessity that this partaking of the fruite must be a distinct thing from the receauing of his Body because the one is the pledge and security for the other from which supposal aduancing further I say that if our Aduersaries are forced to distinguish in the Lord's-Supper the partaking of the Body of our Sauiour from the hauing part in the fruite and grace of his Sacrifice they ought likewise to distinguish the participation of that Diuine Body from all that participation thereof which is conferr'd Spiritually and by Faith for this last partaking namely by Faith will neuer afford them two distinct actions by one of which they receaue the Body of our Sauiour and by the other the fruite of his Sacrifice no body being able to conceaue what difference there is between partaking by Faith of the Body of our Sauiour partaking by Faith of the fruite of his Death They must therefore yeald that besides the Communion by which we partake Spiritually of the Body of our Sauiour and of his spirit coniointly in the receauing the fruite of his Death there is yet an other Reall Comunion of the Body of the same Sauiour which is a secure pledge to vs that the other namely the benefit of his death is assured to vs if we doe not frustrate the effects of so great a grace by our own opposite dispositions This consequence is necessarily included in the principles to which they agree nor can they euer be able to explicate this verity in any solide way vnlesse they returne to the sense of the Catholique Church Who can choose but admire in this point the power of Truth All that is consequent to the principles granted by our Aduersaries is cleerly vnderstood in the sense of the Church euen the least instructed Catholiques easily conceaue that in the Eucharist there is a Com̄uniō