first day of the week more than any other Whereas both he and Mr. T. urge that the text only commands that every one should lay by himself not that he should give it to the Deacons Whence Mr. Tilham cavils that if this day had been their sabbath the Apostle would not have directed a survey of their estates how God had prospered them I have shewed before the Apostle commands this survey and a laying by themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 against the first day of the week We ask why against that day more than another but that it was a day when the Church used to meet and they might have an excellent opportunity to bring it in and have their hearts warmed by the duties of that day into a due chearfulness becoming them who give unto the Lord. But M. T. will not acknowledge a collection a Lords day or a sabbath duty For then he thinks the Apostle would not have added that there be no gatherings when I come Verily the mans ignorance is to be pitied Works of piety mercy and necessity are doubtless sabbath duties or our Saviour would never have healed lame persons on that day The Apostles meaning therefore doubtless is That there be no gatherings for these Brethren-strangers when I come But suppose it be yet Mr. T. tells us that a survey of their estates which the Apostle doth implicitly command that they may see how God had prospered them was no sabbath work But there is no need as I have said we should so translate it nor do I think it the sense that the laying aside should be on the first day of the week but against the first day of the week Here 's no survey of estates directed on that day In short say what we will our brethren so fond of this notion will make us believe that the strength of our argument from this text lies that we think that the Apostle here directed a collection on the first day of the week whereas we tell them that if it were so plain as if written with a Sun beam we do not think that would prove it a collection for the saints was a pious and charitable work but might be done or directed on any day But this is that we urge from the text It is plain from holy writ that the Apostles gave a peculiar honour to this day more than to any other day of the week Though on the seventh day the Apostles so long as the Jewish rites were indulged or so long as they had any hopes to convince the Jews when they came where the Jews had Synagogues went in and heard with them yea and preached to them Yet 1. They never met in a perfect Congregation of Christians on that day that we read of but on the Lords day they did Act. 20.7 2. The Apostle ordains their gospel sacrifice their collection for the poor Saints at Hierusalem rather against this day than any other But possibly we may find that as the Apostles unquestionably by direction from their Lord gave more honour to this day than to any other So our Lord himself also did so 1. This was the day on which he rose again from the dead This I am sure they will not deny and verily this is not inconsiderable Let us but here weigh two or three things 1. The Resurrection of Christ was the Lord Christs great work by which he shewed himself to be Lord and Christ and so confirmed the whole gospel and whatsoever he instituted in his worship It was that work of his which gave evidence to the vertue both of his life and death To this end saith the Apostle Christ both died and ROSE again that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living By this he was declared to be the Son of God with power Rom. 1.4 Hence is our justification Rom. 4.25 Hence our peace of conscience Rom. 8.34 Hence our lively hope and the answer of a good conscience 1 Pet. 1.3 It was our great Lords first holy-day as I may say Of the day of Christs suffering he saith THIS IS YOUR DAY and the power of darkness a day in which God hath given leave to the Devil and his instruments to play their pranks But this was His day This was the Lord Christs rest The day in which he rested from the work of Redemption As his Father had done on the seventh day from the work of Creation 2. May we not soberly think that our great Lord should and did choose to lie in his grave on the sabbath day on purpose to let us know that that sabbath died with him and to rise the next day that he might point out unto us the new sabbath which he had made for the new heaven and new earth which he had now created on purpose to rise upon the first day that his Father by the change of the day might have no loss as to the time consecrated by the fourth commandment Our Lord could have ordered his death so as he might have died and risen again on the 2 3 4 or 5 days he chooseth so to dye that he shall be buried during the whole Jewish sabbath and early in the next morning he ariseth Leâ— us in the next place consider what he did when he was risen The Evangelists record not so full a communion of our Lord with the world nor with his disciples after the resurrection for forty dayâ— he was seen of them In that time counting the day on which he rose were seveâ— Christian sabbaths or first days of the week We read only of our Saviours appearing the two first of them 1. On the day of his resurrection he appeareth to Mary Magdalene looking in the grave for him and to some disciples goiâ—â— to Emaus Luk. 24.13 and to the Eleveâ— met at Hierusalem Luk. 24.36 Joh. 20 1â— and again 2. After eight days saith St. Joh. 20.26 We read but of two apparitions more thâ— one at the Sea of Tiberias Joh. 21. Thâ— other in Galilee which St. Matthew littâ— more than barely mentions Mat. 28.16 17 We do not think Christs appearing made sabbath but Christs owning his disciple meetings on these dayes by appearing theâ— to them speaks not a little in the case especially if it be observed that nothing of any worldly discourse is mentioned as passing at these times but our saviour at the Sea of Tiberias talks with them in their art freely But say our brethren zealous for the old sabbath 1. If the disciples of our Saviour had kept that day as a sabbath he or they would not have gone such a journey as 60 furlongs almost eight miles 1. Beza saith either Josephus is mistaken or some error is crept into the copy for he it is but 30 furlongs 2. The length of their furlongs we know not For our Saviour it was now no laâ—our to him to move Certain it is the way was so short as Luk. 24.33 in that 〈◊〉 hour they could return
Christs Nativity but it will pose them to prove that it was then known or so early taken notice of For those that dream of Easter-day above an hundred years after this this was in dispute when it should be kept Mr. Tilham and Mr. Brabourn both think and they do but think so that it was the seventh day but why should that be called the Lords day because he that day lay in the Grave think we God indeed in the Old Testament called it his Sabbath but was it ever so called in relation to Christ did Christ ever institute that Now why the first day of the week should be called the Lords day reason offers it self plentifully 1. In opposition to his suffering day of which he saith to his Persecutors This is your day and the power of darkness 2. It was the Day when he triumphed over Sin Death and Hell 3. It was the Day when he was with power manifested to be the Son of God Rom. 1.4 4. In all probability it was the day he instituted for the Christian Sabbath and therefore called the Lords day as the Sacrament is called the Lords Supper because he instituted it 5. Finally take all the Ancients from Ignatius who lived nearest the Apostle downward they all understood by the Lords day the first day of the week and accordingly kept it holy unto the Lord. Now let all these be laid together and I beseech our Brethren laying aside alâ— partiality prejudice and saction seriously to consider whether they will not amounâ— to as good a proof as we have for many other things that the Lord Christ hath instituted the Lords day for the Christian Sabbath though it be not in the Gospel proclaimed in so many words And in good earnest I think those of our Brethren who will not judge it sufficient if their Consciences weigh all Gospel Truths in the same ballance will be in no small danger of being warped in other and those very weighty Truths of the Gospel from a perversion in which the good Lord keep them and us all for his mercy sake CHAP. VI. That the Seventh Day is repealed I Suppose I have said enough to justifie the discharge of the Old Sabbath The â—cense which the fourth Commandment gives us to labour six dayes in the week â—vinceth us under no Obligation to keep more than one Sabbath Now if the first day of the week as we have proved be the Sabbath to be sanctified reason tells us the Jewish Sabbath is discharged Though the Scripture no where saith to us you shall not keep the Passeover nor you shall not circumcise yet we understand our selves discharged of both by the substitution of two other Gospel Sacraments It is the Lord will according to the fourth Commandment we should not be under an obligation to keep two dayes in each week and it is the Lords will as we have proved wâ— should keep the first day of the week whaâ— need we any further witness But yet it be needfull I think it is not hard tâ— evince it 1. The Jewish Sabbath as I have already proved was never primarily requireâ— in the Morall Law but only by thoâ— ceremonial or temporary Laws given to thâ— Jews which all acknowledge determine by the death of Christ and the extinction of the Jewish Polity and fell of couâ— when that fell The Ordinance for tâ—â— particular day of the week was but an Oâ—dinance given to hold untill the time Reformation but to add yet a little morâ— it hath been told our Brethren and I heartly wish they would deliberate upon it Thâ— the Apostle Rom. 14.5 blameth the â—mans that amongst them One man esteemâ— one day above another Gal. 4.10 he blamâ— them that they observed dayes and month and times and years That the Apostle â—al 2.16 cautioneth the Christians That â— man should judge them as to meat or drink â— in respect of an Holy-day or a New-moon â— the Sabbath-day That these Texts are â— to be understood of the Lords day is â—dent 1. Because as we have proved the Apoâ—es themselves and the Christian Churches â—en observed it 2. Because the fourth Commandment â—d perpetually established 1. A Day 2. A â—venth Day to be sanctified Now the â—postles words must be interpreted so as â—t to lose us one of the ten Commandâ—ents 3. Because to interpret those Texts of all other Jewish Holy-dayes with an exâ—tion only to the weekly Sabbath seemâ— both an unreasonable interpretation too short for the terms of the Texts Vnreasonable it is an usual rule Vbi lex â— distinguit non est distinguendum we â—e no reason to distinguish where the rule â—es no distinction nor can any pretence reason be for limiting the sense in that â—â—oner but to reconcile the Apostles Preâ—t with the fourth Commandment which may quickly be without such a restriction according to what we have proved thâ— sense of it A Sabbath may remain though that Sabbath be abolished 2. It seems also too short The Apostle to the Galatians useth four terms Dayes Months Times Years Suppose by the years be meant thâ— yearly Feast of Atonement or the years â— Jubile by Moneths the New Moons bâ— Times their Feasts of the Passeover Pentecost c. still we want an interpretation for thâ— term Dayes which certainly must be understood of the Jewish seventh Dayes or Sabbaths returning every week 4. What Mr. Warren observes is also very considerable that all these Epistles werâ— wrote to Churches much leven'd with Judaism and under great temptations to it so that undoubtedly it was the Apostles intention by that term to declare the Christians freedom from the old Sabbath which also as it is plain from Deut. 5.15 haâ— something of a Type annexed unto it Buâ— enough hath been said to prove the olâ— Sabbath out of doors if not by repeal yeâ— by expiration as being a temporary Ordâ—nance and by the appointing of anothâ— Sabbath in the stead of it CHAP. VII To insist upon the old Sabbath is to Judaize and non-communion our selves to all Christian Churches in the World both in this and former Ages FRom what hath been said must needs follow that for us now to insist upon the old Sabbath hath a double guilt attending upon it 1. The first is Judaizing 2. The second is declining communion with all the Churches of Christ that are or ever were in the world Judaizing signifies a tenacious adhering to the Jewish Rites and Customs after that Christ hath established a New Heaven and a new Earth This was the Jews great sin It was one piece of our Lords errand into the world To change the customs which Moses delivered A Truth asserted by the first Christian Martyr and for it he was accused Acts 6.14 That this was one of those customs is plain if it were not commanded in the fourth Commandment which we have proved it was not Nor doth it hinder that it begun before Moses so did Sacrifices and Circumcision yet they were the
it should be in the performance of his more direct and solemn worship 2. As to the effect or fruit of worship that is the impression of it which it leaves or the soul for I shall here speak nothing as to our pleasing God by the acts of homage which we perform which is the effect of i◠in reference to God We are commanded to desire the sincere milk of the word that we may grow thereby and certainly there is no serious Christian that goes out to hear a Sermon but doth propound to himself the increase of the knowledge of God the increase of faith in God the increase of the fear o◠God the increase of love to God and other graces None goes to a Sacrament but propounds to himself for his end the meeting of God in the Ordinance and receiving som◠blessing from him either as to spiritual life comfort or strength Now I appeal to th◠reason of Christians whether in order 〈◊〉 this end they had not need spend all the Sabbath time after the performance of their solemn acts of worship meditating of what they have heard in the word what they have seen and heard and done in a Sacrament you know the parable of the sower The thorns which our Saviour expounds the cares of the world choaked the word The fowls of the air pickt up the seed which fell by the way side worldly thoughts worldly discourses worldly business immediately after hearing immediately after a Sacrament are like thorns choaking the word or Birds of the air picking up the seed So as if we had no other argument than this yet it were in this case not inconsiderable But Fifthly methinks it should something prevail with us to consider how much stress God laies upon it How many times doth he inculcate the precept with how many additional precepts doth he hedge it how severely doth he punish the violators how often is it mentioned as the very head of Religion yea as the whole of it I say first how often doth God inculcate it Exod. 16.23 which text argueth it given before the law promulged in Sinai Exod. 20. Exod. 31.14 Lev. 23.3 Deut. 5.14 Lev. 19.3 and in abundance of other texts With how many additional precepts did God hedge it which though some of them but temporary yet argued Gods eye on the observation of his Sabbath such as those for not stirring out of doors to gather Manna Not kindling the artificers fire How sharply did God himself order the punishment of that poor wretch that gathered sticks on that day in pursuance of which the writers of the Jewish antiquities tell us Sabbath-breakers were wont to be stoned to death as Idolaters Blasphemers false Prophets c. incestuous Persons Sodomites Buggerers burners of their children in sacrifice to Molech Witches cursers of Parents and such as were rebelious against Parents We read of none else stoned to death For I count inticers to idolatry accessaries to these under their principals The righteous God appointed the same punishment to the Sabbath-breaker as to the vilest and worst of men which letteth us see what magnitude this sin of the violation of the Sabbath hath in the Lords eye And if we look considerately we shall find that the sanctification of the Sabbath is by God looked upon as a duty of the first and highest sort It is made one of his moral and perpetual precepts it is ushered in with a word of remark◠Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day The observation of it in the Precept is more particularly directed Thou shalt do no manner of work thou nor thy Son nor thy Daughter nor thy man-servant nor thy maid-servant nor the Cattle within thy Gates It is joyned with the most natural necessary and momentous duties Lev. 19.3 Fear every man his Father and keep my Sabbaths It is mentioned in Scripture as the head of all Religion and therefore chosen out by God to express all Religion by and where the violation of all Religion is taxed it is ordinarily taxed under this notion of not keeping or profaning the Lords Sabbath Ezek. 20.13 16 21 24. ch 23.38 and supposing the Promises made to the strict observation of the Sabbath to be Synechdochicall and to be understood of such as keep close to and are strict in all pieces of instituted Worship yet Gods choosing of this part of Worship to express the whole by it is sufficient to let us know how much God ever laid upon the strict observation of the Sabbath as much as if God had told us that without it we do nothing in Religion It is worth the observing how cross men are to God in this thing tything mine and annis and cummin and making light of this far more weighty thing We read indeed under the Jewish Poedagogy of musick and singing and garments used in the worldly Sanctuary as the Apostle calls it but we no where read of any Promises made to these more external rites and little observances of bowing c. we see many men zealous for these things but oh how careless in this great thing not only violating the Precept but of so debaucht consciences as to teach men so to do which saith our Saviour is to make men least in the Kingdom of God Math. 5. But certainly Christians we should look as God doth and lay the stress of our practice where he layes it The Precept of the fourth Commandment is one thing the Argument is another who so saith the Precept or any thing in that is ceremonial leaves us but nine Commandments contrary to the faith of all the people of God from the very beginning of the world and they who will argue the Precept temporary because the argument had but a temporary obligation make a fair way to blot out the first Commandment because the Argument in the letter of it only concerned the Jews who were the only people God brought out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage I say in the letter of it I know we are also by Christ brought out of a spiritual Egypt out of a spiritual bondage and if we can thus blot out the first Commandment and the fourth and the Papists blot out the second which they do and interpret the third only to prohibit false swearing as some others have done we have fairly quitted the first Table and have nothing to get quit of but the second and we leave the whole world as a generation of Belial without any yoke at all 6. After this it may not be amiss for us to consider the Promises made to those that keep the Lords Sabbaths and the threatnings against the violaters of them The first I shall instance in shall be that Jerem. 17. from the 20. to the 24. v. their not observing the Sabbath according to the Command is made their great crime from the 24. v. is a Promise made to the better observation of it v. 27. a threatning denounced in case of neglect
urge them or at least only concerned the Jews in that time not afterward The fire forbidden to be kindled must necessarily be understood 1. Either in reference to the making the Tabernacle of which he there speaks or 2. more largely of any trade-fire kindled for men to work with to get a livelihood not such as is kindled for dressing of meat refreshing us in cold weather or when we are sick 1. It is not probable there was no fire in the Jews houses that made the feast at which our Saviour was Luk. 14. besides we find works paralell to this justified in Scripture Though going out of their doors on the Sabbath must be understood to gather manna Exod. 16.29 or upon other ends than in order to actions of piety neâ—ssity or preservation and mercy for that â—â—stance Numh. 15.32 33. The Scripture so shortly relates that story of the mans being put to death for gathering sticks on the Sabbath day as to the cause of it that it is hard to give a satisfactory answer Stoning to death was a punishment used in the highest cases as that of blasphemy c. with which our reason would not judge such a violation of the Sabbath as gathering sticks was to be put in the ballance but in the Judgement there could be no error for it was given by the Judge of the whole Earth who cannot err in appointing punishments to sins That he gathered sticks on the Sabbath and this was the matter of his guilt is plain but whether it was after some special command of Moses to the contrary which the scripture saith not or to assert a profane liberty and his not regarding the commandment of God when he had no need to it Or whether it was in order to kindle some fire for labour contrary to the precept Exod. 35.3 Or what other circumstance fell in to aggravate the action to such a degree of guilt we cannot tell Suppose it was to kindle a necessary fire yet we are sure it might have been done before the Sabbath so as it was an unnecessary labour as to any necessity but what a former neglect had created something was doubtless in it more than we have in the story It is certain Moses brings this example next after the Law against presumptuous sinners Num. 15.30 31 32. Nor do we read afterwards of any such examples of sevâ—rity But enough is said to shew how the Sabbath should be kept as a rest from labour 2. But this is not all it is called an holy rest the rest of the holy Sabbath and the commandment expresly saith Remember to keep it holy Now an holy rest certainly stands distinguished from a rest meerly natural when our bodies cease from action and worldly labour 2. A rest that is profane By which I understand not only a sinful rest unlawful on any day but a rest from recreations and pastimes lawful enough on other dayes We read not in the old Law of any toleration for sports on the Sabbath we read on the contrary that it was to be an holy rest kept holy c. To which sports cannot contribute It seems unreasonable to think that labour should be forbidden in order to our more serious and solemn service of God and yet sports should be allowed which every way as much distract and unfit the Soul for acts of solemn worship But the prophets are best interpreters of the Law Now the prophet Isaiah Isa 58.13 expounding this Law saith If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath from doing thy pleasure on my holy-day and call the Sabbath a delight the holy of the Lord honourable and shalt honour him not doing thine own wayes nor finding thy own pleasure nor speaking thy own words Then shalt thou delight thy self in the Lord and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the Earth and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it There is a precept v. 13. and a promise annexed to the due observance of that precept v. 14. The precept is directive for the sanctification of the Sabbath which is called the Sabbath the Lords holy day The end of the Sabbath for which God instituted it and which every one ought in the observation of it to aim at and shalt honour him the honouring and glorifying of God that is the end Then you have the manner directed how you should honour God in it 1. By a reverent esteem of it calling it Honourable 2. By a free and chearful entertaining it calling it a delight 3. By an abstaining from our own pleasure our own words our own wayes and turning our foot from it Our own pleasure word wayes certainly signify such pleasure such words such wayes as we meerly serve and gratifie our selves by and bring no immediate honour and glory to God Now whether this be not as exclusive of all recreations sports pastimes c. as of all laborious actions other than those before excepted by warrant from the word of God I leave to every conscientious and sober Christian to consider with himself and judge I shall only further add that what Divines truly say of all other moral precepts must be true of this That where an action is in any precept forbidden all words and thoughts relating to it are also forbidden and this is also hinted by the prophet in special in those words not speaking thy own words I am not ignorant that many of our brethren in the other reformed Churches are not of our minds in this point of the Sabbath But 1. It is therefore to be observed that they do not think the Sabbath moral we do and â—rge it as commanded us in the fourth Commandment 2. And secondly upon inquiry we may possibly find that both amongst their Ministers and People those who are most strict in their lives lament the looseness of others of their Brethren in this thing and order their personal demeanours and their Families after another rate However we are to live by rule and not by example I have thus as shortly as I could opened your duty and shewed you how the Sabbath is to be kept as a rest as an holy rest unto the Lord. Let me now plead with my brethren that knowing our Masters will we may do it I will urge a few arguments in the case 1. It is a piece of Religion by which the people of God have formerly more honoured God in these Nations than in most if not than in any other places Professors strict observation of the Sabbath in England hath even from the beginning of the Reformation been their Crown and their Glory Oh let not this Crown in our dayes fall from our heads God hath alwayes had in this Nation a strict Sabbath-observing people in the worst of times There have been of late greater light greater means more preaching more Profession than in former times oh let there not be a less strict Sabbath-keeping
it is said v. 7. Vpon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread So as plainly their designed meeting to break bread was upon the first day ot the week I clearly think the second breaking of bread v. 11. was not any religious duty but a bodily refreshment Paul took before his journey the phrase is so used besides the manner of the phrase methinks in this place plainly enough signifieth it When he had broken bread and eaten and talkt with them When all the Religious duties of the day were over and Paul had refreshed himself with some Victuals and discoursed with his friends he took his journey The sense of the Text is plainly this Paul religiously with them kept the first day of the Week preaching administring the Lords Supper and he being to leave them preached something longer than usually Eutichus falls asleep falls from the window where he was and was taken up dead Paul the duties being done recovers him to life again refresheth himself with Victuals and discourseth with them till break of the day and then departeth Lastly Mr. Titham is mistaken to say St. Pauls once preaching at Troas is so stood upon as canonizing a Sabbath That which is insisted upon is this That Paul staying at Troas seven dayes no mention is made of the Christians there meeting together any other day but on the first day of the week upon which it is evident that they met and met on purpose for the most solemn Gospel-services and brake not up from them till midnight yea and the Holy Ghost mentions their meeting that day as an usual customary thing Mr. Brabourn puts us to too hard a task to prove that they abstained from their servile labour We hope our Brethren will not think that they were at their servile labour whiles Paul was preaching or while they were me◠together to partake of the Lords Supper And it is not very charitable for us to think if they had not kept this day as the Christian Sabbath that so near a solemn service which requireth preparation they should be distracting themselves with secular labour Besides that this will fall as heavy upon our brethren What one Text have our Brethren to prove that Paul or any Christians abstained from all servile labour on the seventh day which was the Jewish Sabbath or that they kept it It is indeed said Acts 13.14 15. That Paul coming to Antioch went into the Synagogue and sate down and after the reading of the Law and the Prophets upon the desire of the Rulers of the Synagogue Paul preacht a notable Gospel-sermon to them to convince them of their errors V. 42. The Gentiles desired that those words might be preached to them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we translate it the next Sabbath and I must ingenuously confess that if that translation were necessary it would have more colour for an argument on our Brethrens side than any place I know in Scripture will afford them that the Christians when the Jews were gone should pitch upon the next Sabbath above other dayes to hear Paul again But as there is no necessity to translate it so so neither is that translation of the particle I think to be justified by any like usage of it We translate it Between generally See Matth. 18.15 Between thee and him alone Matth. 23 35. Luk. 11.51 Between the Temple and the Altar Luk. 16.26 There is a gulf between me and thee Joh. 4.26 In the mean while that is in the time between Acts 12.6 Peter was sleeping between two Souldiers Acts 15.9 betwixt us and them Rom. 2.15 Their thoughts in the mean while or between themselves as it is in the Margent So as to this very Text. The Margent tells you it may be read In the week between or in the Sabbath between If our Brethren will allow the latter which is justifiable there was a Sabbath between that and the next Jewish Sabbath which must be the Christian Sabbath but if they take it in the former sense the Gentiles did not desire Paul to preach the next sevent◠day those words but in the week between so the words are And the Margent of ou◠Bibles tell us the Translators saw thus it might be read nor could any thing lead them to this translation but v. 44. where it is said that the next Sabbath day came almost the whole City together to hear the word of the Lord which they might do yet that not the day which the Gentiles before mentioned desired to hear the same things again Acts 16. Paul comes to Derbe and Lystra quarters very full of Jewes for the Text saith for that very reason Paul circumcised Timothy though his Father was a Greek v. 3. Thence they go to Philippi there v. 13. It is said that on the Sabbath day they went out of the City by the River side where Prayer was wont to be made It is not indeed said it was by the Jews but Lydia is called one that worshipped God who but Jewes in Macedonia should worship God at that time I cannot tell for we never read before that the Gospel was preached in those parts Whereas Mr. Brabourn objects so it is said Cornelius Acts 10 2. was one who feared God with all his house it is true but he lived in Caesarea a place not so far from Hierusalem where the Apostles had so abundantly preacht the Gospel as Philippi in Macedonia was and therefore far more likely to be a Gentile Proselyte than Lydia was but at once to answer this objection of the Apostles going into the Jewish Synagogues and preaching on their Sabbath day either there or elsewhere where they were met 1. It is most evident that the Lord indulged the Christians a time to be satisfied that those things in this Rule of Worship given to the Jews which were ceremonial and temporary had an end during which time it was lawfull for them to observe them Though they all died with Christ yet the Lord allowed them having his own ancient Institution a time for honourable Burial Hence Acts 16. Paul circumcised Timothy as well as kept the Sabbath day and in the first Councel the Apostles injoyn'd the Gentiles to abstain from blood and things strangled and Rom. 14.6 gives a liberty to the Christian to observe the Jewish dayes This liberty did not last long for the Apostle tells the Galatians Acts 15.2 That if they were circumcised Christ should profit them nothing And in this very point of dayes Gal. 4.13 he tells them that he was afraid of them because they observed dayes and months and years It is manifest this Epistle to the Galathians was one of his last it was written from Rome where as he tells us he was then in bonds and as judicious Interpreters think not above two year before his death which was about 65 years after our Saviour That to the Romans was wrote long before so was his circumcising Timothy Acts 16.
If therefore the Apostle did for a time allow the Jewes their Sabbath and go and preach amongst them on that day it was not so much as his circumcising Timothy which yet he did knowing the will of God for indulging his peoples weakness for a time Nor yet is it needfull that we should say the Jewish Sabbath was a Ceremony we say the Sabbath that is one day in seven was Originally morall but the keeping of the seventh from the Creation but a temporary Ordinance for the Jewes therefore Deut. 15. God saith And Remember that thou wert a servant in the land of Egypt and that the Lord brought thee ouâ— thence through a mighty hand and by a stretched out arm therefore the Lord thy God commanded thee to keep the Sabbath day 2. We say Pauls going into the Synagogue or preaching on that day doth not prove that he or the Christians with him had any conscience or reverence for that day more than another they doubtless prayed and preached other dayes 'T is no where said they kept or observed the Sabbath day the Jews would come together no other day at least in no such numbers Prudence taught this great Fisherman to throw his Net where he saw most Fish and Paul had a great zeal and kindness for his Brethren the Jews as appears from Rom. 9.1 2 3. they might indeed have had hearers other dayes but probably no Jews unless proselyted at least no such numbers as on their Sabbath day Mr. Brabourn talks idly to tell us of Pauls calling Jews together at Rome being their Countreyman and a meer stranger as to his Doctrine but v. 29. they quickly went away And for the Jews Acts 19. that came to hear him they were apparently such as the Gospel had wrought upon but it is plain that the Jews who still kept their Judaical Principles and knew any thing of Paul after his conversion were not likely to meet together upon his invitation So that our brethrens argument for the seventh day Sabbath from St. Paul's and others of the Apostles and Primitive Disciples going into the Synagogues or to other places where they were wont to meet upon that day is no better argument than some bring for our Saviours approbation of the Jewish Feast of Dedication of no Divine Institution or at least so supposed because he was that day found walking in Solomons Porch waiting for an opportunity in that great concourse which that day caused to preach the Gospel or than it would be for a Christian Minister at Constantinople if he had leave on Friday their Sabbath to goe and preach the Gospel That therefore he observed the Saracens Festivall In very deed an argument of no force at all to any sober judicious and deliberate Christian Lastly It is worthy of all our observation that although we read that for so long time as the Apostles had any hopes of gaining the Jews and therefore kept a communion with their Church he did take advantage of their Sabbath to preach the Gospel it being as indifferent for him to do it on that day as on any other yet after that the Apostle had made a perfect separation from the Jewish Church of which we read Acts 19.9 when divers were hardned and believed not but spake evil of that way before the multitude he departed from them and separated the Disciples disputing daily in the School of one Tyrannus though this continued for the space of two years v. 10. yet we never read of any preaching by the Apostles on that day or any thing making the least shew of their observation of it The time of indulgence was now out The Christians were now settled in a distinct Church by themselves and now they keep only to Gospel Institutions there was no more hope of Pauls becoming all things to the Jews to gain some of them So that no instance can be given of any meeting of Christians meerly for performance of Religious dutyes upon the seventh day which our Brethren do contend for so that our Brethren in this point are without any one Scriptural President for a Christian meeting on their seventh day Examples of mixed meetings whiles the Jews were most numerous in places and had their Synagogues indeed they have But an example of a pure Christian meeting they have none but in the very next Chapter after the aforesaid separation Acts 19. we have Acts 20.7 of Christians met on the first day of the week on purpose for religious duties It is very true if we may believe other writings not of divine authority and certainly an humane faith may be allowed them we do find that after the Apostles age the Christians in some Churches did meet on the Jewish sabbath and perform some religious duties but putting a vast difference between that and the Lords day As Dr. Young hath noted 1. It was not a custom in all Churches particularly not in that of Rome or Alexandria saith Sozomen Athanasius and Turtullian both great lights in their times tell us they observed it not Epiphanius condemns the Nazarites and Ebionites for Hereticks for their observation of it But in all Churches the Lords day was observed those that in any degree kept the other day were the Eastern Churches among whom the Jews were most the vail before whose eyes a little for a time hindred the Christians seeing so well as they might and ought 2. Neither did they observe any seventh day but made Canons for omission of some but they never dispensed with the observation of the Lords day 3. Nor did they on that day perform all religious duties they indeed read the word prayed and preached sometimes but never administred the Lords supper on that day If we may believe Athanasius Austine Socrates and Chrysostome quoted all by the Learned Dr. Young in this case on his book called Dies Dominica Chap. 3. 4. They left people at liberty to meet or not to meet on that day as we do on lecture dayes But injoyning the observation of the Lords day without indulging any liberty for peoples absence from the religious services of that day 5. They allowed a liberty to labour on the seventh day yea anathematized those who did not labour but on the Lords day they allowed no labour This and much more is said by the incomparably learned Dr. Young whose skill in antiquities is sufficiently known I have but translated it from him for the sake of those who understand not Latine Our Brethren therefore what ever Mr. Brabourn saith cannot prove that the Apostles ever kept the sabbath so much as once though they can prove they went into the Synagogues that day and heard the word read and preached nor so much as that they once on that day received the Lords supper an ordinance peculiar to Christians 2. nor that they did thus in one unmixed assembly of Christians 3. Nor that they chose that day to preach in only upon desire from the Jews did it 4. Nor that