in the divine service of those Priests But it was so obscurely that none could see their beauty and excellency therein If it be used in the latter way then it declares that the substance of what God intended in all his worship was not contained nor comprized in the services of those Priests There were some lines and shadows to represent the body but the body it self was not there There was something above them and beyond them which they reached not unto 4. The things themselves whence they are restrained by this Limitation is expressed of Heavenly things The things intended in these words are no other than what God shewed unto Moses in the Mount and therefore we shall defer our enquiry into them untill we come unto those words This therefore is the meaning of the words The whole ministry of the Priests of old was in and about earthly things which had in them only a resemblance and shaddow of things above And we may observe by the way 1. God alone limits the signification and use of all his own Institutions We ought not to derogate from them nor to take any thing out of them which God hath put into them nor can we put any thing into them that God hath not furnished them withal And we are apt to err in both extremes The Jews to this day believe that the ministration of their Priests contained the Heavenly things themselves They do so contrary to the nature and end of them which the Scripture so often speaks unto This is one occasion of their Obstinacy and unbelief They will imagine that there was nothing above or beyond their legal Institutions no other Heavenly Mysteries of Grace and Truth but what is comprized in them They put more in them then ever God furnished them withal and perish in their vain confidence It hath so fallen out also under the New Testament God hath instituted his holy Sacraments and hath put this vertue into them that they should represent and exhibit unto the Faith of Believers the Grace which he intendeth and designeth by them But men have not been contented herewith and therefore they will put more into them then God hath furnished them withal They will have them to contain the Grace in them which they exhibit in the way of a Promise and to communicate it unto all sorts of persons that are partakers of them Thus some would have Baptisme to be Regeneration it self and that there is no other Evangelical Regeneration but that alone with the profession which is made thereon Every one who is baptized is thereby regenerate The sign and figure of Grace they would have to be the Grace it self Nothing can be invented more pernitious unto the souls of men For all sorts of Persons may be brought to a ruinous security about their spiritual condition by it and diverted from endeavours after that real internal work in the change of their hearts and natures without which none shall see God This is to put that into it which God never placed there Some suppose it to be such a distinguishing or rather separating Ordinance that the Administration of it in such a way or such a season is the fundamental Rule of all Church fellowship and Communion whereas God never designed it unto any such end In the Supper of the Lord the Church of Rome in particular is not contented that we have a Representation and instituted Memorial of the Death of our Lord Jesus Christ in the signes of his Body as broken and his Blood as shed for us with an exhibition of Grace in the word of Promise or the Gospel but they will have the natural Body and Blood of Christ his flesh and bones to be contained therein and to be eaten or devoured by all that partake of the outward signes This is to put that into an Ordinance which God never put into it and so to overthrow it And there are two Grounds or ends of what they do The first is to turn the Wisdom of Faith into a carnal Imagination It requires the Light and Wisdom of Faith to apprehend the Spiritual exhibition of Christ in the Sacrament unto us It is a great Spiritual Mystery not at all to be apprehended but by the supernatural Light of Faith This the vain darkned minds of men like not they cannot away with it it is foolishness unto them Wherefore under the name of a Mystery they have invented the most horrible and monstrous figments that ever befell the minds of men This is easily received and admitted by a meer Act of carnal Imagination and the more blind and dark men are the more are they pleased with it 2. They do it to exclude the exercise of Faith in the Participation of it As they deal with the wisdom of Faith as unto its nature So they do with the exercise of Faith as unto its use God hath given this measure unto this Ordinance that it shall exhibit and communicate nothing unto us that we shall receive no benefit by it but in the actual exercise of Faith This the carnal minds and hearts of men like not It requires a peculiar exercise of this Grace and that in a peculiar manner unto a Participation of any Benefit by it But this under the Notion of bringing more into the Ordinance then ever God put into it they exclude and ease all men of Let them but bring their mouths and their teeth and they fail not of eating the Body and drinking the very blood of Christ. So under a pretence of putting that in the Ordinance which God never put into it they have cast out of the hearts of men the necessity of those Duties which alone render it usefull and beneficial Some on the other side do derogate from them and will nor allow them that station or use which God hath appointed unto them in the church 1. some do so from their Dignity They do so by joyning their own Appointments unto them as of equal worth and Dignity with them 2. Some do so from their Necessity practically setting light or by disregarding the Participation of them 3. Some do so from their use openly denying their continuance in the Church of God The Reasons why men are so prone to deviate from the Will of God in his Institutions and to despise the measures he hath given them are 1. Want of Faith in its principal Power and Act which is submission and Resignation of soul unto the Sovereignty of God Faith alone renders that an alsufficient reason of Obedience 2. Want of Spiritual Wisdom and understanding to discern the mystery of the Wisdom and Grace of God in them 2. It is an Honour to be employed in any sacred service that belongs unto the worship of God though it be of an inferior nature unto other parts of it It is so I say if we are called of God thereunto This was the greatest Honour that any were made Partakers of under the Old Testament that they
dignity and efficacy of all that he did did depend That which the Effect intended is ascribed unto is the Blood of Christ. And two things are to be enquired hereon 1 What is meant by the Blood of Christ. 2 How this Effect was wrought by it 1. It is not only that Material Blood which he shed absolutely considered that is here and elsewhere called the Blood of Christ when the work of our Redemption is ascribed unto it that is intended But there is a double consideration of it with respect unto its Efficacy unto this End 1 That it was the pledge and the sign of all the internal Obedience and Sufferings of the Soul of Christ of his Person He became obedient unto death the death of the Cross whereon his blood was shed This was the great instance of his Obedience and of his Sufferings whereby he made Reconciliation and Atonement for Sin Hence the Effects of all his Sufferings and of all Obedience in his Sufferings are ascribed unto his Blood 2 Respect is had unto the Sacrifice and Offering of Blood under the Law The reason why God gave the People the Blood to make Atonement on the Altar was because the life of the flesh was in it Lev. 17. 11 14. So was the life of Christ in his Blood by the shedding whereof he laid it down And by his death it is as he was the Son of God that we are redeemed Herein he made his Soul an Offering for Sin Isa. 53. 10. Wherefore this Expression of the Blood of Christ in order unto our Redemption or the Expiation of Sin is comprehensive of all that he did and suffered for those Ends inasmuch as the shedding of it was the way and means whereby he offered it or himself in and by it unto God 2. The second Enquiry is How the Effect here mentioned was wrought by the Blood of Christ. And this we cannot determine without a general consideration of the Effect it self and this is the purging of our Conscience from dead works 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall purge That is say some shall purifie and sanctifie by internal inherent sanctification But neither the sense of the word nor the Context nor the Exposition given by the Apostle of this very expression Chap. 10. 1 2. will admit of this restrained sense I grant it is included herein but there is somewhat else principally intended namely the Expiation of Sin with our Justification and Peace with God thereon 1 For the proper sense of the word here used see our Exposition on Chap. 1. 3. Expiation Lustration carrying away punishment by making Atonement are expressed by it in all good Authors 2 The Context requires this sense in the first place For First The Argument here used is immediately applied to prove that Christ hath obtained for us eternal Redemption But Redemption consists not in internal Sanctification only although that be a necessary consequent of it But it is the pardon of Sin through the Aronement made or a price paid In whom we have redemption through his blood even the forgiveness of sins Eph. 1. 7. Secondly In the Comparison insisted on there is distinct mention made of the Blood of Bulls and Goats as well as of the Ashes of an Heifer sprinkled But the first and principal use of Blood in Sacrifice was to make Atonement for sin Lev. 17. 11. Thirdly The End of this Purging is to give boldness in the service of God and peace with him therein that we may serve the living God But this is done by the expiation and pardon of Sin with justification thereon Fourthly It is Conscience that is said to be purged Now Conscience is the proper seat of the guilt of Sin it is that which chargeth it on the Soul and which hinders all approach unto God in his service with liberty and boldness unless it be removed which Fifthly Gives us the best consideration of the Apostle's Exposition of this expression Chap. 10. 1 2. For he there declares that to have the Conscience purged is to have its condemning power for sin taken away and cease There is therefore under the same name a twofold Effect here ascribed unto the Blood of Christ the one in answer and opposition unto the Effect of the Blood of Bulls and Goats being offered the other in answer unto the Effect of the Ashes of an Heifer being sprinkled The first consisting in making Atonement for our sins the other in the sanctification of our persons And there are two ways whereby these things are procured by the Blood of Christ. 1 By its offering whereby Sin is expiated 2 By its sprinkling whereby our persons are sanctified The first ariseth from the satisfaction he made unto the justice of God by undergoing in his death the punishment due to us being made therein a Curse for us that the blessing might come upon us therein as his death was a Sacrifice as he offered himself unto God in the shedding of his Blood he made Atonement The other from the vertue of his Sacrifice applied unto us by the Holy Spirit which is the sprinkling of it so doth the Blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God cleanse us from all our Sins The Socinian Expositor on this place endeavors by a long perplexed discourse to evade the force of this testimony wherein the expiation of Sin is directly assigned unto the Blood of Christ. His pretence is to shew how many ways it may be so but his design is to prove that really it can be so by none at all For the Assertion as it lies in terms is destructive of their Heresie Wherefore he proceeds on these Suppositions 1 That the Expiation of Sin is our deliverance from the punishment due unto Sin by the power of Christ in Heaven But this is diametrically as opposite unto the true Nature of it so unto its Representation in the Sacrifices of old whereunto it is compared by the Apostle and from whence he argueth Neither is this a tolerable Exposition of the words The Blood of Christ in answer unto what was represented by the Blood of the Sacrifices of the Law doth purge our Consciences from dead works that is Christ by his power in Heaven doth free us from the punishment due to Sin 2 That Christ was not a Priest until after his Ascension into Heaven That this Supposition destroys the whole Nature of that Office hath been sufficiently before declared 3 That his offering himself unto God was the presenting of himself in Heaven before God as having done the Will of God on the earth But as this hath nothing in it of the nature of a Sacrifice so what is asserted by it can according to these men be no way said to be done by his Blood seeing they affirm that when Christ doth this he hath neither flesh nor blood 4 That the Resurrection of Christ gave all Efficacy unto his Death But the truth is it was his Death and what he effected therein
confirmation of the Covenant because of the expiation purging and pardon of Sin thereby How these things are proved we shall see in the Exposition of the words There are in the words themselves 1. A Proposition of the Principal Truth asserted ver 18. 2. The Confirmation of that Proposition which is twofold 1 From what Moses did ver 19. 2 From what he said ver 20. 3. A farther Illustration of the same Truth by other Instances ver 21. 4. A general Inference or Conclusion from the whole comprizing the Substance of what he intended to demonstrate In the Proposition there are five things considerable 1 A note of Introduction Whereupon 2 The Quality of the Proposition it is negative neither was 3 The Subject spoken of The first 4 What is affirmed of it it was dedicated 5 The way and manner thereof it was not without Blood 1. The Note of Introduction is in the Particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Apostle frequently makes use of in this Epistle as a note of Inference in those Discourses which are Argumentative We render it by Therefore and Wherefore here Whereupon For it intimates a confirmation of a general Rule by especially Instances He had before laid it down as a general Maxime that a Testament was to be confirmed by Death For thereupon the first Testament was confirmed with the Blood of Sacrifices shed in their Death Wherefore let not any think strange that the New Testament was confirmed by the Death of the Testator for this is so necessary that even in the confirmation of the first there was that which was analogous unto it And moreover it was Death in such a way as was required unto the confirmation of a Solemn Covenant II. The Proposition hath a double Negative in it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither was it without Blood that is it was with Blood and could not otherwise be III. The Subject spoken of is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the first that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Testament or Covenant And herein the Apostle declares what he precisely intended by the first or old Covenant whereof he discoursed at large chap. 8. It was the Covenant made with the People at Horeb. For that and no other was dedicated in the way here described And to take a brief Prospect into this Covenant the things ensuing may be observed 1. The matter of it or the Terms of it materially considered before it had the formal nature of a Covenant And these were all the things that were written in the Book before it was laid on the Altar Namely it was that Epitome of the whole Law which is contained in Chap. 20 21 22 23 of Exodus And other Commands and Institutions that were given afterwards belonged unto this Covenant reductively The substance of it was contained in the Book then written 2. The Manner of the Revelation of these Terms of the Covenant Being proposed on the Part of God and the Terms of it being entirely of his choosing and Proposal he was to reveal declare and make them known And this he did two wayes 1 As unto the Foundation and Substance of the whole in the Decalogue He spake it himself on the Mount in the way and manner declared Exod. 19. 20. 2 As unto the following Judgments Statutes and Rites directive of their walking before God according to the former fundamental Rule of the Covenant These he declared by Revelation unto Moses and they are contained in the 21 22 and 23 Chapters 3. The manner of its Proposal and this also was twofold 1 Preparatory For before the Solemn Covenanting between God and the People Moses declared all the Matter of it unto the People that they might consider well of it and whether they would consent to enter into Covenant with God on those Terms whereon they gave their Approbation of them 2 Solemn in their actual and absolute Acceptance of it whereby they became obliged throughout their Generations This was on the reading of it out of the Book after it was sprinkled with the Blood of the Covenant on the Altar ver 7. 4. The Author of this Covenant was God himself The Covenant which the Lord hath made with you ver 8. And immediately after he is thereon called the God of Israel ver 20. which is the first time he was called so and it was by vertue of this Covenant And the Pledge or Token of his Presence as Covenanting was the Altar the Altar of Jehovah as there was a Representative Pledge of the Presence of the People in the twelve Pillars or Statues 5. Those with whom this Covenant was made were the People that is all the People as the Apostle speaks none exempted or excluded It was made with the Men Women and Children Deut. 31. 22. even all on whom was the Blood of the Covenant as it was on the Women or the Token of the Covenant as it was on the Male Children in Circumcision or both as in all the men of Israel 6. The Manner on the Part of the People of entring into Covenant with God was in two Acts before mentioned 1 In a previous Approbation of the matter of it 2 In a Solemn engagement into it And this was the Foundation of the Church of Israel This is that Covenant whereof there is afterwards in the Scripture such frequent mention between God and that People the Sole foundation of all especial Relation between him and them For they took the Observation of its Terms on themselves for their Posterity in all Generations until the end should be On their Obedience hereunto or Neglect hereof depended their Life and Death in the Land of Canaan No farther did the Precepts and Promises of it in it self extend But whereas it did not disanull the Promise that was made unto Abraham and confirmed with the Oath of God four hundred years before and had annexed unto it many Institutions and Ordinances prefigurative and significant of Heavenly things the People under it had a Right unto and Directions for the attaining of an Eternal Inheritance And something we may hence observe 1. The Foundation of a Church-state among any People wherein God is to be honoured in Ordinances of instituted Worship is laid in a Solemn Covenant between him and them So it was with this Church of Israel Before this they served God in their Families by vertue of the Promise made unto Abraham but now the whole People were gathered into a Church-State to worship him according to the Terms Institutions and Ordinances of the Covenant Nor doth God oblige any unto instituted Worship but by vertue of a Covenant Unto natural Worship and Obedience we are all obliged by vertue of the Law of Creation and what belongs thereunto And God may by a meer Act of Soveraignty prescribe unto us the Observation of what Rites and Ordinances in Divine Service he pleaseth But he will have all our Obedience to be Voluntary
God the Father did order things towards Jesus Christ that he should have a Nature wherein he might be free and able to yield Obedience unto the Will of God with an intimation of the quality of it in having Ears to hear which belong only unto a Body This Sense the Apostle expresseth in more plain terms now after the accomplishment of what before was only declared in Prophesie and thereby the Veil which was upon Divine Revelations under the Old Testament is taken away There is therefore nothing remaining but that we give an Exposition of these words of the Apostle as they contain the sense of the Holy Ghost in the Psalm And two things we must enquire into 1. What is meant by this body 2. How God prepared it 1. A Body is here a Synecdochical expression of the Humane nature of Christ. So is the flesh taken where he is said to be made flesh and the Flesh and Blood whereof he was partaker For the general end of his having this Body was that he might therein and thereby yield Obedience or do the Will of God And the especial end of it was that he might have what to offer in Sacrifice unto God But neither of these can be confined unto his Body alone For it is the Soul the other essential part of Humane Nature that is the principle of Obedience Nor was the Body of Christ alone Offered in Sacrifice unto God He made his Soul an Offering for Sin Isa. 53. 10. which was Typified by the Life that was in the Blood of the Sacrifice Wherefore it is said that he offered himself unto God Chap. 9. 14. Ephes. 5. 2. That is his whole entire Humane Nature Soul and Body in their Substance in all their Faculties and Powers But the Apostle both here and ver 10. mentions only the Body it self for the reasons ensuing 1. To manifest that this Offering of Christ was to be by Death as was that of the Sacrifices of Old and this the Body alone was subject unto 2. Because as the Covenant was to be confirmed by this Offering it was to be by Blood which is contained in the Body alone and the separation of it from the Body carries the Life along with it 3. To testifie that his Sacrifice was visible and substantial not an outward appearance of things as some have fancied but such as truly answered the real Bloody Sacrifices of the Law 4. To shew the Alliance and Cognation between him that Sanctifieth by his Offering and them that are Sanctified thereby Or that because the Children were partakers of Flesh and Blood he also took part of the same that he might tast of Death for them For these and the like reasons doth the Apostle mention the Humane Nature of Christ under the name of a Body only as also to comply with the Figurative Expression of it in the Psalm And they do what lies in them to overthrow the principal Foundation of the Faith of the Church who would wrest these words unto a new Aetherial Body given him after his Ascension as do the Socinians 2. Concerning this Body it is affirmed that God prepared it for him Thou hast prepared for me that is God hath done it even God the Father For unto him are those words spoken I come to do thy will O God a Body hast thou prepared me The coming of Christ the Son of God into the World his coming in the Flesh by the assuming of our Nature was the effect of the mutual Counsel of the Father and the Son The Father proposeth to him what was his Will what was his design what he would have done This proposal is here repeated as unto what was Negative in it which includes the Opposite Positive Sacrifice and Burnt Offerings thou wouldst not have but that which he would was the Obedience of the Son unto his Will This Proposal the Son closeth withal Lo saith he I come But all things being Originally in the Hand of the Father the Provision of things necessary unto the fulfilling of the Will of God is left unto him Among those the principal was that the Son should have a Body prepared for him that so he might have somewhat of his own to offer Wherefore the preparation of it is in a peculiar manner assigned unto the Father a Body hast thou prepared me And we may observe that 1. The Supream contrivance of the Salvation of the Church is in a peculiar manner ascribed unto the person of the Father His Will his Grace his Wisdom his good Pleasure the purpose that he purposed in himself his Love his sending of his Son are every where proposed as the eternal springs of all Acts of Power Grace and Goodness tending unto the Salvation of the Church And therefore doth the Lord Christ on all occasions declare that he came to do his Will to seek his Glory to make known his Name that the praise of his Grace might be exalted And we through Christ do believe in God even the Father when we assign unto him the Glory of all the Holy Properties of his Nature as acting Originally in the contrivance and for the effecting of our Salvation 2. The Furniture of the Lord Christ though he were the Son and in his Divine person the Lord of all unto the discharge of his work of Mediation was the peculiar Act of the Father He prepared him a Body he anointed him with the Spirit it pleased him that all fulness should dwell in him From him he received all Grace Power Consolation Although the Humane Nature was the Nature of the Son of God not of the Father a Body prepared for him not for the Father yet was it the Father who prepared that Nature who filled it with Grace who strengthened acted and supported it in its whole course of Obedience 3. Whatever God designes appoints and calls any unto he will provide for them all that is needful unto the Duties of Obedience whereunto they are so appointed and called As he prepared a Body for Christ so he will provide Gifts Abilities and Faculties suitable unto their work for those whom he calleth unto it Others must provide as well as they can for themselves But we must yet enquire more particularly into the nature of this preparation of the Body of Christ here ascribed unto the Father And it may be considered two ways 1. In the Designation and Contrivance of it So preparation is sometimes used for Predestination or the Resolution for the effecting any thing that is future in its proper season Isa. 30. 33. Matt. 20. 23. Rom. 9. 23. 1 Cor. 2. 9. In this sense of the word God had prepared a Body for Christ he had in the Eternal Counsel of his Will determined that he should have it in the appointed time So he was Forc-ordained before the Foundation of the World but was manifest in these last times for us 1 Pet. 1. 20. 2. In the actual effecting ordering and creating of it
this you may call Gods making or establishing of it with us if you please though making of the Covenant in the Scripture is applyed only unto its Execution or actual Application unto Persons But this Declaration of the Grace of God and the Provision in the Covenant of the Mediator for the making of it effectual unto his Glory is most usually called the Covenant of Grace And this is twofold 1. In the way of a singular and absolute Promise as it was first declared unto and thereby established with Adam and afterwards with Abraham This is the Declaration of the Purpose of God or the free Determination of his VVill as to his dealing with sinners on the supposition of the fall and the forfeiture of their first Covenant state Hereof the Grace and VVill of God was the only Cause Heb. 8. 8. And the Death of Christ could not be the means of its procurement for he himself and all that he was to do for us was the substance of that Promise wherein this Declaration of Gods Grace and Purpose was made or of this Covenant of Grace which was introduced and established in the room of that which was broken and disanulled as unto the ends and benefits of a Covenant The substance of the first Promise wherein the whole Covenant of Grace was virtually comprized directly respected and expressed the giving of him for the Recovery of mankind from sin and misery by his Death Gen. 3. 15. VVherefore if he and all the benefits of his Mediation his Death and all the effects of it be contained in the Promise of the Covenant that is in the Covenant it self then was not his Death the procuring Cause of that Covenant nor do we owe it thereunto 2. In the additional prescription of the way and means whereby it is the will of God that we shall enter into a Covenant state with him or be interested in the benefits of it This being virtually comprized in the absolute Promise is expressed in other places by the way of the Conditions required on our part This is not the Covenant but the Constitution of the Terms on our part whereon we are made partakers of it Nor is the Constitution of these Terms an effect of the Death of Christ or procured thereby It is a meer effect of the Soveraign Wisdom and Grace of God The things themselves as bestowed on us communicated unto us wrought in us by Grace are all of them effects of the Death of Christ but the Constitution of them to be the Terms and Conditions of the Covenant is an Act of meer Soveraign Wisdom and Grace God so loved the VVorld as to send his only Begotten Son to dye not that Faith and Repentance might be the means of Salvation but that all his Elect might believe and all that believe might not perish but have Life Everlasting But yet it is granted that the Constitution of these Terms of the Covenant doth respect the federal Transactions between the Father and the Son wherein they were ordered to the Praise of the Glory of Gods Grace and so although their Constitution was not the Procurement of his Death yet without respect unto it it had not been VVherefore the sole cause of making the New Covenant in any sense was the same with that of giving Christ himself to be our Mediator namely the Purpose Counsel Goodnesse Grace and Love of God as it is every where expressed in the Scripture It may be therefore enquired what respect the Covenant of Grace hath unto the Death of Christ or what Influence it hath thereunto I Answer it hath a threefold respect thereunto 1. In that it was confirmed ratified and made irrevocable thereby This our Apostle insists upon at large Chap. 9. ver 15 16 17 18 19 20. And he compares his Blood in his Death and sacrifice of himself unto the sacrifices and their Blood whereby the old Covenant was confirmed purified dedicated or established ver 18 19. Now these sacrifices did not procure that Covenant or prevail with God to enter into it but only ratified and confirmed it and this was done in the New Covenant by the Blood of Christ in the way that shall be afterwards declared 2. He thereby underwent and performed all that which in the Righteousnesse and VVisdome of God required that the Effects Fruits Benefits and Grace intended designed and prepared in the New Covenant might be effectually accomplished and communicated unto sinners Hence although he procured not the Covenant for us by his Death yet he was in his Person Mediation Life and Death the only Cause and Means whereby the whole Grace of the Covenant is made effectual unto us For 3. All the Benefits of it were procured by him that is all the Grace Mercy Priviledges and Glory that God had prepared in the Counsel of his VVill and proposed in the Covenant or promises of it are purchased merited and procured by his Death and effectually communicated or applyed unto all the Covenanters by vertue thereof with other of his Mediatory Acts. And this is much more an eminent procuring of the New Covenant than what is pretended about the procurement of its Terms and Conditions For if he should have procured no more but this if we owe this only unto his Mediation that God would thereon and did grant and establish this Rule Law and Promise that Whosoever believed should be saved it was possible that no one should be saved thereby yea if he did no more considering our state and condition it was impossible that any one should so be These things being premised we shall now briefly declare how or wherein he was the Surety of the Covenant as he is here called A Surety Sponsor Vas Praes Fidejussor for us the Lord Christ was by his voluntary undertaking out of his rich Grace and Love to do answer and perform all that is required on our Parts that we may enjoy the Benefits of the Covenant the Grace and Glory prepared proposed and promised in it in the way and manner determined on by Divine wisdom And this may be reduced unto two Heads 1. He undertook as the Surety of the Covenant to answer for all the sins of those who are to be and are made Partakers of the Benefits of it That is to undergo the punishment due unto their sins to make Attonement for them by offering himself a propitiatory Sacrifice for their Expiation redeeming them by the price of his Blood from their state of misery and bondage under the Law and the Curse of it Isa. 53 4 5 6 10. Matth. 20. 28. 1 Tim. 2. 6. 1 Cor. 6. 20. Rom. 3. 25 26. Heb. 10. 5 6 7 8. Rom. 8. 2 3. 2 Cor. 5. 19 20 21. Gal. 3. 13. And this was absolutely necessary that the Grace and Glory prepared in the Covenant might be communicated unto us VVithout this undertaking of his and performance of it the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God would not permit that sinners such as
moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission This is the meaning of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He in his own Person abideth Nor doth the Apostle say that he did not dye but only that he abideth alwaies 3. It followeth from hence that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood A Priesthood subject to no change or alteration that cannot pass away But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sacerdotium successivum per successionem ab uno alteri traditum Such a Priesthood as which when one hath attained it abideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another And this the Apostle seems directly to intend as is evident from the Antithesis The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many and that by reason of death Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession So that when one received it he that went before him ceased to be a Priest And so it was either the Predecessors were taken off by death or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon 1 King 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only because that was the ordinary way and which was provided for in the Law With the Lord Christ it was otherwise He received his Priesthood from none Although he had sundry Types yet he had no Predecessor And he hath none to succeed him nor can have any added or joyned unto him in his Office The whole office of the Priesthood of the Covenant and the entire administration of it are confined unto his Person There are no more that follow him than went before him The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church And they may well be so seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood as Eleazar did unto Aaron So Ribera some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called Successorem non habet nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur si bene circumspectè loqui velit saith Estius But it is openly evident that some of them are not so circumspect as Estius would have them but do plainly affirm that Peter was Christs Successor A Lapide indeed affirms that Peter did not succeed unto Christ as Eleazar did unto Aaron because Eleazar had the Priesthood in the same degree and dignity with Aaron and so had not Peter with Christ. But yet that he had the same Priesthood with him a Priesthood of the same kind he doth not deny That which they generally fix upon is that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer another Sacrifice but are Partakers of his Priesthood and minister under him and so are not his Successors but his Vicars which I think is the worst composure of this difficulty they could have thought upon For 1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction all Vicars as well as Successors unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide yet is he one way or other disabled to discharge his Office 2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered as these Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ did So that still the case is the same between Aaron and his Successors and Christ and his Substitutes 3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still and although the office still continue the same unchangeable So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates yet is himself the Supreme Rector of all But this Pretence is vain also For they do not substitute their Priests unto him in that which he continueth to do himself but in that which he doth not which he did indeed and as a Priest ought to do but now ceaseth to do for ever in his own Person For the principal Act of the Sacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God This he did once and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day as partakers of the same Priesthood with him which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his Successors and to take his Office out of his hand as if he were dead and could henceforth discharge it no more For they do not appoint Priests to intercede in his room because they grant he continueth himself so to do but to offer Sacrifice in his stead because he doth so no more Wherefore if that be an Act of Priesthood and of their Priesthood as is pretended it is unavoidable that his Priesthood is passed from him unto them Now this is a blasphemous Imagination and directly contrary both unto the words of the Apostle and the whole Design of his Argument Nay it would lay the advantage on the other side For the Priests of the Order of Aaron had that Priviledge that none could take their Office upon them nor officiate in it whilst they were alive But although Christ abideth for ever yet according unto the sense of these men and their practice thereon he stands in need of others to officiate for him and that in the principal part of his Duty and Office For Offer himself in Sacrifice unto God he neither now doth nor can seeing henceforth he dieth no more This is the work of the Mass-Priests alone who must therefore be honoured as Christs Successors or be abhorred as his Murderers for the Sacrifice of him must be by blood and death The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination so it is cogent unto his purpose For so he proceedeth That Priesthood which changeth not but is alwaies vested in the same Person and in him alone is more excellent than that which was subject to change continually from one hand unto another For that Transmission of it from one unto another was an effect of weakness and Imperfection And the Jews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure But thus it was with the Priesthood of
blood of the only Sacrifice which belonged unto it Before this was done in the death of Christ it had not the formal nature of a Covenant or a Testament as our Apostle proves Chap. 9. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. For neither as he shews in that place would the Law given at Sinai have been a Covenant had it not been confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices Wherefore the Promise was not before a formal and solemn Covenant 2 This was wanting that it was not the Spring Rule and Measure of all the Worship of the Church This doth belong unto every Covenant properly so called that God makes with the Church that it be the entire Rule of all the Worship that God requires of it which is that which they are to restipulate in their entrance into Covenant with God But so the Covenant of Grace was not under the Old Testament For God did require of the Church many Duties of Worship that did not belong thereunto But now under the New Testament this Covenant with its own seals and appointments is the only Rule and Measure of all acceptable Worship Wherefore the New Covenant promised in the Scripture and here opposed unto the Old is not the Promise of Grace Mercy Life and Salvation by Christ absolutely considered but as it had the formal nature of a Covenant given unto it in its establishment by the death of Christ the procuring cause of all its Benefits and the declaring of it to be the only Rule of Worship and Obedience unto the Church So that although by the Covenant of Grace we oft-times understand no more but the way of Life Grace Mercy and Salvation by Christ yet by the New Covenant we intend its actual establishment in the death of Christ with that blessed way of Worship which by it is setled in the Church 3 Whil'st the Church enjoyed all the spiritual Benefits of the Promise wherein the substance of the Covenant of Grace was contained before it was confirmed and made the sole Rule of Worship unto the Church it was not inconsistent with the Holiness and Wisdom of God to bring it under any other Covenant or prescribe unto it what Forms of Worship he pleased It was not so I say upon these three Suppositions 1 That this Covenant did not disannul or make ineffectual the Promise that was given before but that That doth still continue the only means of Life and Salvation And that this was so our Apostle proves at large Gal. 3. 17 18 19. 2 That this other Covenant with all the Worship contained in it or required by it did not divert from but direct and lead unto the future establishment of the Promise in the Sclemnity of a Covenant by the ways mentioned And that the Covenant made in Sinai with all its Ordinances did so the Apostle proves likewise in the place beforementioned as also in this whole Epistle 3 That it be of present use and advantage unto the Church in its present condition This the Apostle acknowledgeth to be a great Objection against the use and efficacy of the Promise under the Old Testament as unto Life and Salvation namely to what end then serves the giving of the Law whereunto he answers by shewing the necessity and use of the Law unto the Church in its then present condition Gal. 3. 17. 4. These things being observed we may consider that the Scripture doth plainly and expresly make mention of two Testaments or Covenants and distinguish between them in such a way as what is spoken can hardly be accommodated unto a twofold Administration of the same Covenant The one is mentioned and described Exod. 24. ver 3 4 5 6 7 8. Deut. 5. 2 3 4 5. namely the Covenant that God made with the people of Israel in Sinai and which is commonly called the Covenant where the people under the Old Testament are said to keep or break Gods Covenant which for the most part is spoken with respect unto that Worship which was peculiar thereunto The other is promised Jer. 31. 31 32 33 34. Chap. 32. 40. which is the New Gospel Covenant as before explained mentioned Mat. 26. 28. Mark 14. 24. And these two Covenants or Testaments are compared one with the other and opposed one unto another 2 Cor. 3. 6 7 8 9. Gal. 4. 24 25 26. Heb. 7. 22. Chap. 9. 15 16 17 18 19. These two we call the Old and the New Testament Only it must be observed that in this Argument by the Old Testament we do not understand the Books of the Old Testament or the Writings of Moses the Psalms and Prophets or the Oracles of God committed then unto the Church I confess they are once so called 2 Cor. 3. 14. The vail remaineth untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament that is the Books of it Unless we shall say that the Apostle intendeth only the reading of the things which concern the Old Testament in the Scripture For this Old Covenant or Testament whatever it be is abrogated and taken away as the Apostle expresly proves But the Word of God in the Books of the Old Testament abideth for ever And those Writings are called the Old Testament or the Books of the Old Testament not as though they contained in them nothing but what belongeth unto the Old Covenant for they contain the Doctrine of the New Testament also But they are so termed because they were committed unto the Church whil'st the Old Covenant was in force as the Rule and Law of its Worship and Obedience 5. Wherefore we must grant two distinct Covenants rather than a twofold Administration of the same Covenant meerly to be intended We must I say do so provided always that the way of Reconciliation and Salvation was the same under both But it will be said and with great pretence of Reason for it is that which is the sole foundation they all build upon who allow only a twofold Administration of the same Covenant that this being the principal end of a Divine Covenant if the way of Reconciliation and Salvation be the same under both then indeed are they for the substance of them but one And I grant thut this would inevitably follow if it were so equally by virtue of them both If Reconciliation and Salvation by Christ were to be obtained not only under the Old Covenant but by vertue thereof then it must be the same for substance with the New But this is not so for no Reconciliation with God nor Salvation could be obtained by vertue of the Old Covenant or the Administration of it as our Apostle disputes at large though all Believers were reconciled justified and saved by vertue of the Promise whil'st they were under that Covenant As therefore I have shewed in what sense the Covenant of Grace is called the New Covenant in this distinction and opposition so I shall propose sundry things which relate unto the nature of the first Covenant which manifest it
of another sort When these things were thus prepared and ordered they stood not for a magnificent shew but were designed unto constant use in the service of God This the Apostle declares in the same order wherein he had described the parts of the Tabernacle in their distribution into the first and the second the outward and inward Tabernacle As to the first Tabernacle wherein were the Candlestick and the Tables and the Shew-bread he declares the use of it 1. With respect unto the persons for whose Ministry it was ordained 2 Of that Ministry itself 3 Of the time and season of its performance 1. The Persons who administred therein were the Priests They and they alone entred into the Sanctuary All others were forbidden to approach unto it on pain of Excision These Priests who had this priviledge were all the posterity of Aaron unless they fell under exception by some legal incapacitating blemish For a long time that is from the preparing of the Tabernacle unto the building of the Temple they administred in this Sanctuary promiscuously under the care of God and directions of the High Priest For the Inspection of the whole was committed in an especial manner unto the High Priest Numb 4. 10. Zech. 3. 7. Yea the actual performance of the daily service of this part of the Sanctuary was in the first place charged on him Exod. 27 21. But the other Priests being designed to help and assist him on all occasions this service in process of time was wholly devolved on them And if the High Priest did at any time minister in this part of the Sanctuary he did it not as the High Priest but as a Priest only for all his peculiar service belonged unto the most Holy Place In process of time when the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron were multiplyed and the services of the Sanctuary were to be encreased by the building of the Temple wherein instead of one candlestick there were ten David by Gods direction cast all the Priests into 24 courses or orders that should serve in their turns two courses in a month which rule continued unto the destruction of the second Temple 1 Chron. 24. Luk. 1. 5. And he did it for sundry ends 1 That none of the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron might be utterly excluded from this Priviledge of approaching unto God in the Sanctuary and if they were it is likely they would have disposed of themselves into other wayes and callings and so have both neglected and defiled the Priesthood 2 That there might be no neglect at any time in the solemn Ministry seeing that which lies on all promiscuously is too often neglected by all For although the High Priest were to keep the charge to judge the house and to keep the courts Zech. 3. 7. and so take care for the due attendance unto the daily Ministration yet was the provision more certain when being ordained by Law or by divine Institution all Persons concerned herein knew the times and seasons wherein they might and wherein they ought to attend on the Altar These were the officers that belonged unto the Sanctuary The Persons who alone might enter into it on a sacred account And when the Structure of the whole was to be taken down that it might be removed from one place to another as it was frequently in the wilderness the whole was to be done by the Priests and all the holy Utensils covered before the Levites were admitted to draw nigh to carry them so as they might not touch them at all Numb 4. 15. Yet must it be observed that although this were the peculiar service of the Priests yet was it not their only service Their whole sacred imployment was not confined unto this their entrance into the Sanctuary There was a work committed unto them whereon their whole service in the Sanctuary did depend This was the offering of Sacrifices which was accomplished in the court without on the brazen Altar before the door of the Tabernacle which belonged not unto the purpose of the Apostle in this Place This was the great priviledge of the Priests under the old Testament that they alone might and did enter into the Sanctuary and make an approach unto God And this priviledge they had as they were Types of Christ and no otherwise But withal it was a great part and a great means of that state of servitude and fear wherein the People or the Body of the Church was kept They might not so much as come nigh the Pledges of Gods Presence it was forbidden them under the penalty of death and being cut off whereof they sadly complained Numb 17. 12 13. This state of things is now changed under the Gospel It is one of the principal priviledges of Believers that being made Kings and Priests unto God by Jesus Christ this distinction as unto especial gracious access unto God is taken away Rev. 1. 5. Ephes. 2. 18. Rom. 5. 2. Neither doth this hinder but that yet there are and ought to be Officers and Ministers in the house of God to dispense the holy things of it and to minister in the name of Christ. For in their so doing they do not hinder but promote the approach of the Church into the presence of God which is the principal end of their office And as this is their peculiar honour for which they must be accountable Heb. 13. 17. So the Church of Believers itself ought alwayes to consider how they may duely improve and walk worthy of this Priviledge purchased for them by the blood of Christ. 2. The general foundation of the service of these Priests in the Sanctuary was that they went or entred into it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This also itself was a divine Ordinance For this entrance both asserted their Priviledge allothers being excluded on pain of Death and gave bounds unto it Hereinto they were to enter but they were to go no further they were not to go into nor look into the most Holy Place nor to abide in the Sanctuary when the High Priest entred into it which the Apostle here hath an especial regard unto They entred into the first Tabernacle but they went no further Hereinto they entred through the first Vail or the covering of the Door of the Tabernacle Exod. 26. 36 37. Through that vail by turning it aside so as that it closed immediately on their entrance the Priests entred into the Sanctuary And this they were to do with an especial Reverence of the Presence of God which is the principal design of that command thou shalt Reverence my Sanctuary Levit. 19. 30. which is now supplyed by the holy reverence of the presence of God in Christ which is in all Believers But moreover the equity of the command extends itself unto that especial reverence of God which we ought to have in all holy services And although this be not confined unto any Postures or Gestures of the Body yet those that naturally express
blood of the Sacrifice and offering it by fire on the Altar he plainly declared the imputation of the guilt of their sins unto the Sacrifice its bearing of them and the expiation of their guilt thereby By carrying of the blood into the Holy Place he testified his acceptance of the Atonement made and his reconciliation unto the People And hereon the full remission and pardon of all their sins no more to be had in remembrance was manifested in the sending away of the scape Goat into the wilderness Hence the Jews have a saying that on the day of expiation all Israel was made as innocent as in the daies of creation How all this was accomplished in and by the Sacrifice of Christ must be afterwards declared 4. As to the nature of this service the Apostle tells us that is was not without blood He so expresseth it to shew the impossibility of entring into the Holy Place any otherwise And from hence he takes his ensuing argument of the necessity of the Death and blood-shedding of the Mediator or High Priest of the new Testament Not without blood as he might not do it otherwise so he did it by blood And this was the manner of the service After the High Priest had filled the Holy Place with a cloud of Incense he returned to the Altar of Burnt-offerings without the Tabernacle where the Sacrifice had been newly slain And whilst the blood of the beast was fresh and as it were living Heb. 10. he took of it in his hand and entring again into the Holy Place he sprinkled it seven times with his finger towards the Mercy-seat Lev. 16. 11 12 13 14. And there is as was said an Emphasis in the expression not without blood to manifest how impossible it was that there should be an entrance into the gracious presence of God without the blood of the sacrifice of Christ. The only Propitiation of sins is made by the blood of Christ and it is by saith alone that we are made Partakers thereof Rom. 3. 25 26. 5. This blood is farther described by the use of it which he offereth Where or when he offered it is not expressed In the Holy Place there was no use of this blood but only the sprinkling of it But the sprinkling of blood was always consequential unto the offering or oblation properly so called For the oblation consisted principally in the atonement made by the blood at the Altar of burnt-offerings It was given and appointed for that end to make atonement with it at that Altar as is expresly affirmed Lev. 17. 11. After this it was sprinkled for purification Wherefore by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Apostle here renders the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used in the Institution Lev. 16. 15. which is only to bring and not to offer properly Or he hath respect unto the offering of it that was made at the Altar without the Sanctuary The blood which was there offered he brought a part of it with him into the most Holy Place to sprinkle it according unto the Institution 6. The Apostle declares for whom this blood was offered and this was for himself and the People first for himself and then for the People For he hath respect unto the distinct Sacrifices that were to be offered on that day The first was of a Bullock and a Ram which was for himself And this argued as the Apostle observes the great imperfection of that Church-state They could have no Priests to offer Sacrifices for the sins of the People but he must first offer for himself and that the blood of other creatures But the true High Priest was to offer his own blood and that not for himself at all but for others only He offered for himself that is for his own sins Lev. 16. 6. Wherefore the Vul. Lat. reads the words pro suâ et Populi ignorantiâ very corruptly changing the number of the substantive but very truly applying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Priest as well as unto the People Others would supply the words by adding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and so repeat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the Apostle expresseth the words of the Institution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which for himself leaving the application unto the series of the context and the nature of the service For himself that is his own sins 2. The blood was offered also for the People that is the People of Israel the People of God the Church the whole congregation And as the High Priest herein bore the Person of Christ so did this People of all the elect of God who were represented in them and by them It was that People and not the whole world that the High Priest offered for And it is the elect People alone for whom our great High Priest did offer and doth intercede 7. That which he offered for it was their errors or their sins The Socinians some of them not for want of understanding but out of hatred unto the true sacrifice of Christ contend from hence that the Anniversary Sacrifice on the great day of expiation the principal representation of it was only for sins of ignorance of imbecillity and weakness But it is a fond Imagination at least the argument from these words for it is so For besides that the scripture calls all sins by the name of errors Psal. 19. 12. Psal. 25. 7. and the worst the most provoking of all sins is expressed by erring in heart Psal. 95. 10. and the LXX frequently render to sin by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Chron. 16. 9. 1 Sam. 16. 22. Hos. 4. 16. c. Besides I say this application of the word elswhere unto all sorts of sins in the enumeration of those errors of the People which the High Priest offered for they are said to be all their iniquities and all their transgressions in all their sins Lev. 16. 21. Wherefore to offer for the errors of the People it is to offer for all their sins of what nature soever they were And they are thus called because indeed there is no such Predominancy of malice in any sin in this world as wherein there is not a mixture of error either notional or practical of the mind or of the heart which is the cause or a great occasion of it See 1 Tim. 1. 13. Matth. 12. 31 32. Here indeed lies the original of all sin The mind being filled with Darkness and Ignorance alienates the whole soul from the life of God And as it hath superadded prejudices which it receives from corrupt affections yet neither directs nor judgeth aright as unto particular acts and duties under all present circumstances And what notions of good and evil it cannot but retain it gives up in particular instances unto the occasions of sin Wherefore 1 spiritual illumination of the mind is indispensably necessary unto our walking with God 2 Those who would be preserved from sin
that he did not do it by the blood of Goats and Calves and this is introduced with the disjunctive negative 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither which refers unto what was before denied of him as unto his entrance into the Tabernacle made with hands He did not do so neither did he make his entrance by the blood of Calves and Goats A difference from and opposition unto the entrance of the High Priest annually into the Holy Place is intended It must therefore be considered how he so entred This entrance is at large described Lev. 16. And 1 It was by the blood of a Bullock and a Goat which the Apostle here renders in the plural number Calves and Goats because of the annual repetition of the same Sacrifice 2 The order of the Institution was that first the Bullock or Calf was offered then the Goat the one for the Priest the other for the People This order belonging not at all unto the purpose of the Apostle he expresseth it otherwise Goats and Calves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Goat a word that expresseth Totum genus Caprinum that whole kind of Creature be it young or old So the Goats of his offering were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kids ver 5. that is young He-Goats for the precise time of their age is not determined So the Bullock the Priest offered for himself was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 juvencus ex genere bovino which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it expresseth genus vitulinum all young Cattel Concerning these it is intimated in this negative as unto Christ that the High Priest entred into the Holy Place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by their blood which we must enquire into Two things belonged unto the office of the High Priest with respect unto this blood For 1 He was to offer the blood both of the Bullock and the Goat at the Altar for a sin-offering Lev. 16. 6 11. For it was the blood wherewith alone Atonement was to be made for sin and that at the Altar Lev. 17. 11. so far is it from truth that expiation for sin was made only in the Holy Place and that it is so by Christ without blood as the Socinians imagine 2 He was to carry some of the blood of the Sacrifice into the Sanctuary to sprinkle it there to make Atonement for the Holy Place in the sense before declared And the enquiry is which of these the Apostle hath respect unto Some say it is the latter and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here is put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by for with He entred with the blood of Goats and Calves namely that which he carried with him into the Holy Place So plead the Socinians and those that follow them with design to overthrow the Sacrifice which Christ offered in his Death and bloodsheding confining the whole expiation of sin in their sense of it unto what is done in Heaven But I have before disproved this surmise And the Apostle is so far from using the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 improperly for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to frame a comparison between things wherein indeed there was no similitude as they dream that he useth it on purpose to exclude the sense which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with would intimate For he doth not declare with what the High Priest entred into the Holy Place for he entred with Incense as well as with blood but what it was by vertue whereof he so entred as to be accepted with God So it is expresly directed Lev. 16. 2 3. Speak unto Aaron that he come not at all times into the Holy Place with a young Bullock for a sin-offering and a Ram for a burnt-offering shall he come Aaron was not to bring the Bullock into the Holy Place but he had Right to enter into it by the Sacrifice of it at the Altar Thus therefore the High Priest entred into the Holy Place by the blood of Goats and Calves namely by vertue of the Sacrifice of their blood which he had offered without at the Altar And so all things do exactly correspond between the Type and the Antitype For 2. It is affirmed positively of him that he entred by his own blood and that in opposition unto the other way 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but by his own blood It is a vain speculation contrary to the Analogie of faith and destructive of the true nature of the oblation of Christ and inconsistent with the dignity of his Person that he should carry with him into Heaven a part of that material blood which was shed for us on the earth This some have invented to maintain a comparison in that wherein is none intended The design of the Apostle is only to declare by vertue of what he entred as a Priest into the Holy Place And this was by vertue of his own blood when it was shed when he offered himself unto God This was that which laid the foundation of and gave him right unto the administration of his Priestly office in Heaven And hereby were all those good things procured which he effectually communicates unto us in and by that Administration This Exposition is the Center of all Gospel-Mysteries the object of the Admiration of Angels and Men unto all eternity What heart can conceive what tongue can express the Wisdom Grace and Love that is contained therein This alone is the stable foundation of faith in our access unto God Two things present themselves unto us 1. The unspeakable Love of Christ in offering himself and his own blood for us See Gal. 2. 20. Rev. 1. 5. 1 Ioh. 3. 16. Ephes. 5. 26 27. There being no other way whereby our sins might be purged and expiated chap. 10. 5 6 7. out of his infinite Love and Grace he condescended unto this way whereby God might be glorified and his Church sanctified and saved It were well if we did always consider aright what Love what Thankfulness what Obedience are due unto him on the account hereof 2. The Excellency and Efficacy of his Sacrifice is hereby demonstrated that through him our faith and hope may be in God He who offered this Sacrifice was the onely begotten of the Father the Eternal Son of God That which he offered was his own Blood God purchased his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. How unquestionable how perfect must the Atonement be that was thus made how glorious the Redemption that was procured thereby This is that which the Apostle mentions in the close of this Verse as the effect of his Blood-shedding Having obtained eternal Redemption The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is variously rendered as we have seen The Vulgar Latin reads Redemptione aeterna inventa And those that follow it do say that things rare and so sought after are said to be found And Chrysost. inclines unto that Notion of the word But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
that was the ground of his Resurrection He was brought again from the dead through the blood of the Covenant And the efficacy of his death depends on his Resurrection only as the evidence of his acceptance with God therein 5 That Christ confirmed his Doctrine by his Blood that is because he rose again All these Principles I have at large refuted in the Exercitations about the Priesthood of Christ and shall not here again insist on their examination This is plain and evident in the words unless violence be offered unto them namely that the Blood of Christ that is his suffering in Soul and Body and his obedience therein testified and expressed in the shedding of his Blood was the procuring cause of the expiation of our Sins the purging of our Consciences from dead works our justification sanctification and acceptance with God thereon And There is nothing more destructive unto the whole Faith of the Gospel than by any means to evacuate the immediate efficacy of the Blood of Christ. Every opinion of that tendency breaks in upon the whole mystery of the wisdom and grace of God in him It renders all the Institutions and Sacrifices of the Law whereby God instructed the Church of Old in the Mystery of his Grace useless and unintelligible and overthrows the foundation of the Gospel The second thing in the words is the means whereby the Blood of Christ came to be of this efficacy or to produce this effect And that is because in the shedding of it he offered himself unto God through the eternal Spirit without spot Every word is of great importance and the whole Assertion filled with the mystery of the wisdom and grace of God and must therefore be distinctly considered There is declared what Christ did unto the End mentioned and that is expressed in the matter and manner of it 1 He offered himself 2 To whom that is to God 3 How or from what principle by what means by the eternal Spirit 4 With what qualifications without spot He offered himself To prove that his Blood purgeth our Sins he affirms that he offered himself His whole Humane Nature was the Offering the way of its Offering was by the shedding of his Blood So the Beast was the Sacrifice when the Blood alone or principally was offered on the Altar For it was the Blood that made Atonement So it was by his Blood that Christ made Atonement but it was his Person that gave it efficacy unto that end Wherefore by Himself the whole Humane Nature of Christ is intended And that 1 Not in distinction or separation from the Divine For although the Humane Nature of Christ his Soul and Body only was offered yet he offered himself through his own eternal Spirit This Offering of himself therefore was the Act of his whole Person both Natures concurred in the Offering though one alone was offered 2 All that he did or suffered in his Soul and Body when his Blood was shed is comprised in this Offering of himself His Obedience in Suffering was that which rendred this Offering of himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savor unto God And he is said thus to offer himself in opposition unto the Sacrifices of the High Priest under the Law They offered Goats and Bulls or their blood but he offered himself This therefore was the Nature of the Offering of Christ It was a Sacred Act of the Lord Christ as the High Priest of the Church wherein according unto the Will of God and what was required of him by vertue of the eternal Compact between the Father and him concerning the Redemption of the Church he gave up himself in the way of most profound Obedience to do and suffer whatever the Iustice and Law of God required unto the expiation of Sin expressing the whole by the shedding of his Blood in answer unto all the Typical Representations of this his Sacrifice in all the Institutions of the Law And this Offering of Christ was proper Sacrifice 1 From the Office whereof it was an Act it was so of his Sacerdotal Office he was made a Priest of God for this end that he might thus offer himself and that this Offering of himself should be a Sacrifice 2 From the Nature of it For it consisted in the sacred giving up unto God the thing that was offered in the present destruction or consumption of it This is the Nature of a Sacrifice it was the destruction and consumption by Death and Fire by a sacred Action of what was dedicated and offered unto God So was it in this Sacrifice of Christ. As he suffered in it so in the giving himself up unto God in it there was an effusion of his Blood and the destruction of his Life 3 From the End of it which was assigned unto it in the wisdom and sovereignty of God and in his own intention which was to make Atonement for Sin which gives an Offering the formal Nature of an Expiatory Sacrifice 4 From the way and manner of it For therein 1. He sanctified or dedicated himself unto God to be an Offering Iohn 17. 19. 2. He accompanied it with Prayers and Supplications Heb. 5. 7. 3. There was an Altar which sanctified the Offering which bore it up in its Oblation which was his own Divine Nature as we shall see immediately 4. He kindled the Sacrifice with the fire of Divine Love acting it self by zeal unto God's Glory and compassion unto the souls of men 5. He tendred all this unto God as an Atonement for Sin as we shall see in the next words This was the free real proper Sacrifice of Christ whereof those of old were only Types and obscure Representations the Prefiguration hereof was the sole cause of their Institution And what the Socinians pretend namely that the Lord Christ offered no real Sacrifice but only what he did was called so Metaphorically by the way of allusion unto the Sacrifices of the Law is so far from truth as that there never had been any such Sacrifices of Divine Appointment but only to prefigure this which alone was really and substantially so The Holy Ghost doth not make a forced accommodation of what Christ did unto those Sacrifices of old by way of allusion and by reason of some resemblances but shews the uselesness and weakness of those Sacrifices in themselves any farther but as they represented this of Christ. The Nature of this Oblation and Sacrifice of Christ is utterly overthrown by the Socinians They deny that in all this there was any offering at all they deny that his shedding of his Blood or any thing which he did or suffered therein either actually or passively his obedience or giving himself up unto God therein was his Sacrifice or any part of it but only somewhat required previously thereunto and that without any necessary cause or reason But his Sacrifice his Offering of himself they say is nothing but his appearance in Heaven and the Presentation of himself before
Divine Nature But I shall leave the Reader to chuse whether sense he judgeth suitable unto the scope of the place either of them being so unto the Analogy of Faith The Socinians understanding that both these Interpretations are equally destructive to their Opinions the one concerning the Person of Christ the other about the Nature of the Holy Ghost have invented a sense of these words never before heard of among Christians For they say that by the Eternal Spirit a certain Divine Power is intended whereby the Lord Christ was freed from Mortality and made Eternal that is no more obnoxious unto death By virtue of this Power they say he offered himself unto God when he entred into Heaven than which nothing can be spoken more fond or impious or contrary unto the design of the Apostle For 1 Such a Power as they pretend is no where called the Spirit much less the Eternal Spirit and to feign significations of words without any countenance from their use elsewhere is to wrest them at our pleasure 2 The Apostle is so far from requiring a Divine Power rendering him immortal antecedently unto the offering of himself as that he declares that he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit in his death when he shed his blood whereby our consciences are purged from dead works 3 This Divine Power rendering Christ immortal is not peculiar unto him but shall be communicated unto all that are raised unto glory at the last day And there is no colour of an opposition herein unto what was done by the High Priests of old 4 It proceeds on their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this matter which is that the Lord Christ offered not himself unto God before he was made immortal which is utterly to exclude his death and blood from any concernment therein which is as contrary unto the truth and scope of the place as darkness is to light 5 Wherever there is mention made elsewhere in the Scripture of the Holy Spirit or the Eternal Spirit or the Spirit absolutely with reference unto any actings of the Person of Christ or on it either the Holy Spirit or his own Divine Nature is intended See Isa. 61. 1 2. Rom. 1. 3. 1 Pet. 3. 18. Wherefore Grotius forsakes this Notion and otherwise explains the words Spiritus Christi qui non tantum fuit vivus ut in vita terrena sed in aeternum corpus sibi adjunctum vivificans If there be any sense in these words it is the rational Soul of Christ that is intended And it is most true that the Lord Christ offered himself in and by the actings of it For there are no other in the Humane Nature as to any duties of obedience unto God But that this here should be called the Eternal Spirit is a vain conjecture For the spirits of all men are equally eternal and do not only live here below but quicken their Bodies after the Resurrection for ever This therefore cannot be the ground of the especial efficacy of the blood of Christ. This is the second thing wherein the Apostle opposeth the Offering of Christ unto the offerings of the Priests under the Law 1 They offered Bulls and Goats He offered Himself 2 They offered by a material Altar and Fire He by the Eternal Spirit That Christ should thus offer Himself unto God and that by the Eternal Spirit is the center of the mystery of the Gospel An attempt to corrupt to pervert this glorious Truth are designs against the Glory of God and Faith of the Church The depth of this mystery we cannot dive into the height we cannot comprehend We cannot search out the greatness of it of the wisdom the love the grace that is in it And those who chuse rather to reject it than to live by Faith in an humble admiration of it do it at the peril of their souls Unto the Reason of some men it may be Folly unto Faith it is full of Glory In the consideration of the Divine Actings of the Eternal Spirit of Christ in the offering of himself of the holy exercise of all grace in the humane nature that was offered of the nature dignity and efficacy of this Sacrifice Faith finds life food and refreshment Herein doth it contemplate the wisdom the righteousness the holiness and grace of God herein doth it view the wonderful condescension and love of Christ and from the whole is strengthned and encouraged Thirdly It is added that he thus offered himself without spot This Adjunct is descriptive not of the Priest but of the Sacrifice it is not a qualification of his Person but of the Offering Schlictingius would have it that this word denotes not what Christ was in himself but what he was freed from For now in Heaven where he offered himself he is freed from all infirmities and from any spot of mortality which the High Priest was not when he entered into the Holy Place such irrational fancies do false Opinions force men to take up withal But 1 There was no spot in the mortality of Christ that he should be said to be freed from it when he was made immortal A spot signifies not so much a desect as a fault And there was no fault in Christ from which he was freed 2 The Allusion and respect herein unto the legal institutions is evident and manifest The Lamb that was to be slain and offered was antecedently thereunto to be without blemish it was to be neither lame nor blind nor have any other defect With express respect hereunto the Apostle Peter affirms that we were redeemed with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1. 18. And Christ is not only called the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world John 1. 29. that is by his being slain and offered but is represented in the worship of the Church as a Lamb slain Rev. 5. 6. It is therefore to offer violence unto the Scripture and common understanding to seek for this qualification any where but in the humane nature of Christ antecedently unto his death and blood-shedding Wherefore this expression without spot respects in the first place the purity of his Nature and the holiness of his Life For although this principally belonged unto the necessary qualifications of his Person yet were they required unto him as he was to be the Sacrifice He was the Holy One of God holy barmless undefiled separate from sinners he did no sin neither was guile found in his mouth he was without spot This is the moral sense and signification of the word But there is a legal sense of it also It is that which is meet and fit to be a Sacrifice For it respects all that was signified by the legal institution concerning the integrity and perfection of the Creatures Lambs or Kids that were to be sacrificed Hence were all those Laws fulfilled and accomplished There was nothing in him nothing wanting unto him that
the infallible connexion of these things the blood of Christ and the purging of the Conscience that is in all that betake themselves thereunto It shall do it that is effectually and infallibly 2. Respect is had herein unto the generality of the Hebrews whether already professing the Gospel or now invited unto it And he proposeth this unto them as the advantage they should be made partakers of by the relinquishment of Mosaical Ceremonies and betaking themselves unto the Faith of the Gospel For whereas before by the best of legal Ordinances they attained no more but an outward sanctification as unto the flesh they should now have their Conscience infallibly purged from dead works Hence it is said your Conscience Some Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our But there is no difference in the sense I shall retain the common reading as that which refers unto the Hebrews who had been always exercised unto thoughts of Purification and Sanctification by one means or another For the Explication of the words we must enquire 1 What is meant by dead works 2 What is their relation unto Conscience 3 How Conscience is purged of them by the blood of Christ. 1. By dead works sins as unto their guilt and defilement are intended as all acknowledge And several Reasons are given why they are so called As 1 Because they proceed from a principle of spiritual death or are the works of them who have no vital principle of holiness in them Eph. 2. 1 5. Col. 2. 13. 2 Because they are useless and fruitless as all dead things are 3 They deserve death and tend thereunto Hence they are like rotten bones in the Grave accompanied with worms and corruption And these things are true Howbeit I judge there is a peculiar reason why the Apostle calls them dead works in this place For there is an allusion herein unto dead bodies and legal defilement by them For he hath respect unto Purification by the Ashes of the Heifer And this respected principally uncleanness by the dead as is fully declared in the institution of that Ordinance As men were purified by the sprinkling of the Ashes of an Heifer mingled with living water from defilements contracted by the dead without which they were separated from God and the Church so unless men are really purged from their moral defilements by the blood of Christ they must perish for ever Now this defilement from the dead as we have shewed arose from hence that Death was the effect of the Curse of the Law wherefore the guilt of sin with respect unto the Curse of the Law is here intended in the first place and consequently its pollution This gives us the state of all men who are not interessed in the Sacrifice of Christ and the purging vertue thereof As they are dead in themselves dead in trespasses and sins so all their works are dead works Other works they have none They are as a Sepulchre filled with bones and corruption Every thing they do is unclean in it self and unclean unto them Unto them that are defiled nothing is pure but even their mind and conscience is defiled Tit. 1. 15. Their works come from spiritual death and tend unto eternal death and are dead in themselves Let them deck and trim their carkases whil'st they please let them â—end their faces with paintings and multiply their ornaments with all excess of bravery within they are full of dead bones of rotten defiled polluting works That world which appears with so much outward beauty lustre and glory is all polluted and defiled under the eye of the most Holy 2. These dead works are further described by their relation unto our persons as unto what is peculiarly affected with them where they have as it were their seat and residence And this is the Conscience He doth not say purge your souls or your minds or your persons but your conscience And this he doth 1 In general in opposition unto the purification by the Law It was there the dead body that did defile it was the body that was defiled it was the body that was purified those Ordinances sanctified to the purifying of the flesh But the defilements here intended are spiritual internal relating unto Conscience and therefore such is the purification also 2 He mentions the respect of these dead works unto Conscience in particular because it is Conscience which is concerned in peace with God and confidence of approach unto him Sin variously affects all the faculties of the soul and there is in it a peculiar defilement of Conscience Tit. 1. 15. But that wherein Conscience in the first place is concerned and wherein it is alone concerned is a sense of guilt This brings along with it fear and dread whence the sinner dares not approach into the presence of God It was Conscience which reduced Adam into the condition of hiding himself from God his eyes being opened by a sense of the guilt of sin So he that was unclean by the touching of a dead body was excluded from all approach unto God in his worship Hereunto the Apostle alludes in the following words That we may serve the living God For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly denotes that service which consists in the observation and performance of solemn worship As he who was unclean by a dead body might not approach unto the worship of God until he was purified So a guilty sinner whose Conscience is affected with a sense of the guilt of sin dares not to draw nigh unto or appear in the presence of God It is by the working of Conscience that sin deprives the soul of peace with God of boldness or confidence before him of all right to draw nigh unto him Until this relation of sin unto the Conscience be taken away until there be no more conscience of sin as the Apostle speaks Chap. 10. 2. that is Conscience absolutely judging and condemning the person of the sinner in the sight of God there is no right no liberty of access unto God in his service nor any acceptance to be obtained with him Wherefore the purging of Conscience from dead works doth first respect the guilt of sin and the vertue of the blood of Christ in the removal of it But 2dly there is also an inherent defilement of Conscience by sin as of all other faculties of the soul. Hereby it is rendred unmeet for the discharge of its office in any particular duties With respect hereunto Conscience is here used Synecdochically for the whole soul and all the faculties of it yea our whole spirit souls and bodies which are all to be cleansed and sanctified 1 Thes. 5. 23. To purge our Conscience is to purge us in our whole persons This being the state of our Conscience this being the respect of dead works and their defilement to it and us we may consider the relief that is necessary in this case and what that is which is here proposed 1. Unto
a compleat relief in this condition two things are necessary 1 A discharge of Conscience from a sense of the guilt of sin or the condemning power of it whereby it deprives us of peace with God and of boldness in access unto him 2 The cleansing of the Conscience and consequently our whole persons from the inherent defilement of sin The first of these was typified by the blood of Bulls and Goats offered on the Altar to make Atonement The latter was represented by the sprinkling of the unclean with the Ashes of the Heiser unto their purification Both these the Apostle here expresly ascribes unto the Blood of Christ and we may briefly enquire into three things concerning it 1 On what ground it doth produce this blessed effect 2 The way of its operation and efficacy unto this end 3 The Reason whence the Apostle affirms that it shall much more do this than the legal Ordinances could sanctifying unto the purifying of the flesh 1. The grounds of its efficacy unto this purpose are three 1. That it was Blood offered unto God God had ordained that Blood should be offered on the Altar to make Atonement for sin or to purge Conscience from dead works That this could not be really effected by the Blood of Bulls and Goats is evident in the nature of the things themselves and demonstrated in the event Howbeit this must be done by Blood or all the institution of legal Sacrifices were nothing but means to deceive the minds of men and ruine their souls To say that at one time or other real Atonement is not to be made for Sin by Blood and Conscience thereby to be purged and purified is to make God a Lyar in all the Institutions of the Law But this must be done by the Blood of Christ or not at all 2 It was the Blood of Christ. Of Christ the Son of the living God Mat. 16. 18. whereby God purchased his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. The dignity of his Person gave efficacy unto his Office and Offering No other person in the discharge of the same Offices that were committed unto him could have saved the Church and therefore all those by whom his Divine Person is denied do also evacuate his Offices By what they ascribe unto them it is impossible the Church should be either sanctified or saved They resolve all into a meer Act of Sovereign Power in God which make the Cross of Christ of none effect 3 He offered this Blood or himself by the eternal Spirit Though Christ in his Divine Person was the Eternal Son of God yet was it the humane nature only that was offered in Sacrifice Howbeit it was offered by and with the concurrent actings of the Divine Nature or Eternal Spirit as we have declared These things make the Blood of Christ as offered meet and fit for the accomplishment of this great effect 2. The second Enquiry is concernig the way whereby the Blood of Christ doth thus purge our Conscience from dead works Two things as we have seen are contained therein 1 The expiation or taking away the guilt of sin that Conscience should not be deterred thereby from an access unto God 2 The cleansing of our souls from vicious defiling habits inclinations and acts or all inherent uncleanness Wherefore under two considerations doth the Blood of Christ produce this double effect First As it was offered so it made Atonement for Sin by giving satisfaction unto the Justice and Law of God This all the expiatory Sacrifices of the Law did prefigure this the Prophets foretold and this the Gospel witnesseth unto To deny it is to deny any real efficacy in the Blood of Christ unto this end and so expresly to contradict the Apostle Sin is not purged from the Conscience unless the guilt of it be so removed as that we may have peace with God and boldness in access unto him This is given us by the Blood of Christ as offered Secondly As it is sprinkled it worketh the second part of this effect And this sprinkling of the Blood of Christ is the communication of its sanctifying vertue unto our souls see Eph. 5. 26 27. Tit. 2. 14. so doth the Blood of Christ the Son of God cleanse us from all our sins 1 John 1. 7. Zech. 13. 2. 3. The Reason why the Apostle affirms that this is much more to be expected from the Blood of Christ than the Purification of the Flesh was from legal Ordinances hath been before spoken unto The Socinians plead on this place that this effect of the death of Christ doth as unto us depend on our own duty If they intended no more but that there is duty required on our part unto an actual participation of it namely Faith whereby we receive the Atonement we should have no difference with them But they are otherwise minded This purging of the conscience from dead works they would have to consist in two things 1 Our own relinquishment of sin 2 The freeing us from the punishment due to sin by an act of power in Christ in Heaven The first they say hath therein respect unto the blood of Christ in that thereby his doctrine was confirmed in obedience whereunto we forsake sin and purge our minds from it The latter also relates thereunto in that the sufferings of Christ were antecedent unto his Exaltation and Power in Heaven Wherefore this effect of the blood of Christ is what we do our selves in obedience unto his doctrine and what he doth thereon by his power and therefore may well be said to depend on our duty But all this while there is nothing ascribed unto the blood of Christ as it was offered in Sacrifice unto God or shed in the offering of himself which alone the Apostle speaks unto in this place Others chuse thus to oppose it This purging of our consciences from dead works is not an immediate effect of the death of Christ but it is a benefit contained therein which upon our faith and obedience we are made partakers of But 1 This is not in my judgment to interpret the Apostles words with due reverence he affirms expresly that the blood of Christ doth purge our conscience from dead works that is it doth make such an Atonement for sin and Expiation of it as that conscience shall be no more pressed with it nor condemn the sinner for it 2 The blood of Christ is the immediate cause of every effect assigned unto it where there is no concurrent nor intermediate cause of the same kind with it in the production of that effect 3 It is granted that the actual communication of this effect of the death of Christ unto our Souls is wrought according unto the method which God in his sovereign wisdom and pleasure hath designed And herein 1 the Lord Christ by his blood made actual and absolute Atonement for the sins of all the Elect. 2 This Atonement is proposed unto us in the Gospel Rom. 3. 25. 3 It
the best works of men antecedently unto the purging of their Consciences by the blood of Christ are but dead works However men may please themselves in them perhaps think to merit by them yet from death they come and unto death they tend 6. Justification and Sanctification are inseparably conjoined in the design of God's grace by the blood of Christ. Purge our Consciences that we may serve the living God 7. Gospel-worship is such in its spirituality and holiness as becometh the living God and our duty it is always to consider that with him we have to do in all that we perform therein VER XV. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. Et ideo and therefore Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propter hoc For this or propterea itaque ob id And for this cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He himself was the Mediator He is the Mediator Heb. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A man coming between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. ut morte intercedente by the Interposition of death The Syriac reads the passage who by his death was a redeemer unto them who had transgressed against the first Testament probably to avoid the difficulty of that Expression For the Redemption of transgressions The Aethiopic corrupts the whole Text. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In Redemptionem eorum praevaricationum Vul. Ad Redemptionem eorum transgressionum properly for the Redemption of transgressions or those transgressions which were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. Syr. That they may receive the promise who are called to the eternal Inheritance But in the Original and in the Vulgar eternal inheritance is joyned unto and regulated by the Promise the promise of an eternal Inheritance VER XV. And for this cause he is the Mediator of the new Testament that by means of death for the Redemption of the transgressions under the first Testament they who are called might receive the promise of eternal Inheritance THe things which are to be considered in this verse are 1 The note of Connexion in the Conjunction And. 2 The Ground of the ensuing Assertion For this cause 3 The Assertion itself He is the Mediator of the new Testament 4 The especial Reason why he should be so For the Redemption of Transgressions under the first Testament 5 The way whereby that was to be effected By the means of death 6 The End of the whole That those who are called might receive the promise of eternal Inheritance But before we proceed unto the Exposition of the whole or any part of it a difficulty must be removed from the words as they lie in our Translation For an enquiry may be justly moved why we render the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by a Testament in this place whereas before we have constantly rendred it by a Covenant And the plain reason of it is because from this verse unto the end of the Chapter the Apostle argues from the nature and use of a Testament among men as he directly affirms in the next verse Hereby he confirms our faith in the expectation of the Benefits of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Covenant or Testament We may answer he doth it because it is the true and proper signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is properly a Testamentary disposition of things as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Covenant For in the Composition of the word there is nothing to intimate a mutual compact or agreement which is necessary unto a Covenant and is expressed in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 However there is a great affinity in the things themselves For there are Covenants which have in them free Grants and Donations which is of the nature of a Testament And there are Testaments whose force is resolved into some Conventions Conditions and Agreements which they borrow from the nature of Covenants So there is such an affinity between them as one name may be expressive of them both But against this it will be replied that what the Apostle speaks unto is in the Hebrew called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a Covenant and no where signifies a Testament so that from thence the Apostle could not argue from the nature of a Testament what is required thereunto and what doth depend thereon Hereunto it is answered that the LXX constantly rendring 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Berith by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Apostle made use of that Translation and that signification of the word But this will not solve the difficulty For it would resolve all the Apostles arguings in this great and important Mystery into the Authority of that Translation which is fallible throughout and at least as it is come to us filled with actual mistakes We must therefore give another answer unto this Objection Wherefore I say 1 The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 could not be more properly rendred by any one word than by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For it being mostly used to express the Covenant between God and Man it is of that nature as cannot properly be termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is a Covenant or Compact upon equal terms of distributive Iustice between distinct parties But Gods Covenant with man is only the way and the declaration of the terms whereby God will dispose and communicate Good things unto us which hath more of the nature of a Testament than of a Covenant in it 2 The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is often used to express a free promise with an effectual donation and communication of the thing promised as hath been declared in the foregoing chapter But this hath more of the nature of a Testament than of a Covenant 3 There is no word in the Hebrew language whereby to express a Testament but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only Nor is there so in the Syriack Their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Hebrews express the thing by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to order dispose give command concerning the house or houshold of a dying man Isa. 38. 2. 2 Sam. 17. 23. But they have no other word but Berith to signifie it and therefore where the nature of the thing spoken of requires it it is properly rendred a Testament and ought so to be Wherefore there is no force used unto the signification of the word in this place by the Apostle But that which makes the proper use of it by him evident in this place is that he had respect unto its signification in the making of the Covenant with the people at Sinai For this he compares the New Testament unto in all its causes and effects And in that Covenant there were three things 1. The Prescription of Obedience unto the People on the part of God which was received by their consent in an express compliance with the Law and Terms of it Deut. 5. 14. Herein the nature of it so far as it
was a Covenant did consist 2. There was a Promise and Conveyance of an Inheritance unto them namely of the Land of Canaan with all the Priviledges of it God declared that the land was his and that he gave it unto them for an Inheritance And this Promise or Grant was made unto them without any consideration of their previous Obedience out of meer love and Grace The principal design of the Book of Deuteronomy is to inlay this Principle in the foundation of their obedience Now the free Grant and Donation of an Inheritance of the Goods of him that makes the Grant is properly a Testament A free disposition it was of the Goods of the Testator 3. There was in the confirmation of this Grant the intervention of Death The Grant of the Inheritance of the Land that God made was confirmed by death and the Blood of the Beasts offered in sacrifice whereof we must treat on v. 18 19 20. And although Covenants were confirmed by Sacrifices as this was so far as it was a Covenant namely with the Blood of them yet as in those Sacrifices death was comprised it was to confirm the Testamentary Grant of the Inheritance For death is necessary unto the Confirmation of a Testament which then could only be in Type and Representation the Testator himself was not to die for the establishment of a Typical Inheritance Wherefore the Apostle having discoursed before concerning the Covenant as it prescribed and required Obedience with Promises and Penalties annexed unto it He now treats of it as unto the Donation and Communication of Good things by it with the Confirmation of the Grant of them by death in which sense it was a Testament and not a Covenant properly so called And the arguing of the Apostle from this word is not only just and reasonable but without it we could never have rightly understood the Typical Representation that was made of the Death Blood and Sacrifice of Christ in the Confirmation of the New Testament as we shall see immediately This difficulty being removed we may proceed in the Exposition of the words That which first occurs is the Note of Connexion in the Conjunction And. But it doth not here as sometimes infer a Reason of what was spoken before but is emphatically expletive and denotes a progress in the present Argument As much as Also Moreover 2. There is the Ground of the ensuing Assertion or the manner of its Introduction For this cause Some say that it looks backward and intimates a Reason of what was spoken before or why it was necessary that our Consciences should be purged from dead works by the Blood of Christ namely because he was the Mediator of the new Covenant others say it looks forward and gives a reason why he was to be the Mediator of the new Testament namely that by the means of Death for the Transgressions c. It is evident that there is a reason rendred in these words of the necessity of the death and Sacrifice of Christ by which alone our Consciences may be purged from dead works And this reason is intended in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For this cause And this necessity of the death of Christ the Apostle proves both from the nature of his office namely that he was to be the Mediator of the new Covenant which being a Testament required the death of the Testator and from what was to be effected thereby namely the Redemption of Transgressions and the purchase of an eternal Inheritance Wherefore these are the things which he hath respect unto in these words For this cause But withal the Apostle in this verse enlargeth his discourse as designing to comprehend in it the whole dispensation of the will and Grace of God unto the Church in Christ with the Ground and Reason of it This reason he layeth down in this verse giving an account of the effects of it in those that follow Hereunto respect is had in this expression For the exposition of the words themselves that is the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost and nature of the things contained in them we must leave the order of the words and take that of the things themselves And the things ensuing are declared in them 1 That God designed an eternal Inheritance unto some persons 2 The way and manner of conveying a Right and Title thereunto was by promise 3 That the Persons unto whom this Inheritance is designed are those that are called 4 That there was an obstacle unto the enjoyment of this Inheritance which was Transgression against the first Covenant 5 That this obstacle might be removed and the Inheritance enjoyed God made a New Covenant because none of the Rites Ordinances or Sacrifices of the first Covenant could remove that Obstacle or expiate those Sins 6 The Ground of the Efficacy of the New Covenant unt o this End was That it had a Mediator an High Priest such as had been already described 7 The way and means whereby the Mediator of the New Covenant did expiate Sins under the Old was by death nor could it otherwise be done seeing this New Covenant being a Testament also required the death of the Testator 8 This Death of the Mediator of the new Testament did take away sins by the Redemption of them For the Redemption of Transgressions All which must be opened for the due Exposition of these words 1. God designed unto some an Eternal Inheritance And both the Reason of this grant with the nature of it must be enquired into 1 As unto the Reason of it God in our first Creation gave unto man whom he made his Son and Heir as unto things here below a great Inheritance of meer Grace and Bounty This Inheritance consisted in the use of all the Creatures here below in a just Title unto them and dominion over them Neither did it consist absolutely in these things but as they were a Pledge of the present favour of God and of mans future blessedness upon his Obedience This whole Inheritance man forfeited by sin God also took the forfeiture and ejected him out of the possession of it and utterly despoiled him of his Title unto it Nevertheless he designed unto some another Inheritance even that should not be lost that should be eternal It is altogether vain and foolish to seek for any other Cause or Reason of the preparation of this Inheritance and the designation of it unto any person but only his own Grace Bounty his sovereign Will and Pleasure What merit of it what means of attaining it could be found in them who were considered under no other Qualifications but such as had wofully rejected that Inheritance which before they were instated in And therefore is it called an Inheritance to mind us that the way whereby we come unto it is gratuitous Adoption and not purchase or merit 2 As unto the Nature of it it is declared in the Adjunct mentioned it is eternal
be done by that Covenant against which the Sins were committed neither by the Priests nor Sacrifices nor any other Duties of it Therefore had he promised the Abolition of it because of its weakness and insufficiency unto this end as also the introduction of a new to supply its defects as we have seen at large in the Exposition of the foregoing Chapter For it became the Wisdom Goodness and Grace of God upon the removal of the other for its insufficiency to establish another that should be every way effectual unto his purpose namely the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called But then the Enquiry will be How this Covenant or Testament shall effect this end what is in it what belongs unto it that should be so effectual and by what means it might attain this end All these are declared in the words And Sixthly In general all this arose from hence that it had a Mediator and that the Lord Christ the Son of God was this Mediator The dignity of his Person and thereon both the Excellency and Efficacy of his Priestly Office whereunto alone respect is had in his being called here a Mediator he had abundantly before demonstrated Although the word in general be of a larger signification as we have declared on Chap. 8. 6. yet here it is restrained unto his Priestly Office and his acting therein For whereas he had treated of that alone in the foregoing Chapter here declaring the Grounds and Reasons of the necessity of it he says for this cause is he the Mediator And proceeding to shew in what sense he considers him as a Mediator doth it by his being a Testator and dying which belongs to his Priestly Office alone And the sole end which in this place he assigns unto his Mediatory Office is his death That by means of death Whereas therefore there were Sins committed under the first Covenant and against it and would have been so for ever had it continued which it was no way able so to take away as that the called might receive the Inheritance the Lord Christ undertook to be the Mediator of that Covenant which was provided as a Remedy against these Evils For herein he undertook to answer for and expiate all those Sins Whereas therefore Expiation of Sin is to be made by an Act towards God with whom alone Atonement is to be made so as that they may be pardoned the Mediation of Christ here intended is that whereby suffering death in our stead in the behalf of all that are called he made Atonement for Sin But moreover God had a further design herein He would not only free them that are called from that death which they deserved by their Sins against the first Covenant but give them also a Right and Title unto an Eternal Inheritance that is of Grace and Glory Wherefore the Procurement hereof also depends on the Mediation of Christ. For by his Obedience unto God in the discharge thereof he purchased for them this Inheritance and bequeathed it unto them as the Mediator of the New Testament The Provision of this Mediator of the New Testament is the greatest Effect of the infinite Wisdom Love and Grace of God This is the Center of his Eternal Counsels In the womb of this one Mercy all others are contained Herein will he be glorified unto Eternity 1 The first Covenant of Works was broken and disannulled because it had no Mediator 2 The Covenant at Sinai had no such Mediator as could expiate Sin Hence 3 Both of them became means of Death and Condemnation 4 God saw that in the making the New Covenant it was necessary to put all things into the hand of a Mediator that it also might not be frustrated 5 This Mediator was not in the first place to preserve us in the state of the New Covenant but to deliver us from the guilt of the breach of the former and the Curse thereon To make provision for this End was the Effect of Infinite Wisdom Seventhly The especial way and means whereby this Effect was wrought by this Mediator was by death Morte obita facta interveniente intercedente by means of death say we Death was the means that whereby the Mediator procured the Effect mentioned That which in the foregoing Verse is ascribed unto the Blood of Christ which he offered as a Priest is here ascribed unto his death as a Mediator For both these really are the same only in the one the thing it self is expressed it was death in the other the manner of it it was by blood in the one what he did and suffered with respect unto the Curse of the first Covenant it was death in the other the ground of his making Expiation for Sin by his death or how it came so to do namely not meerly as it was death or penal but as it was a voluntary Sacrifice or Oblation It was therefore necessary unto the End mentioned that the Mediator of the New Testament should dye not as the High Priests of old dyed a natural death for themselves but as the Sacrifice dyed that was slain and offered for others He was to dye that death which was threatned unto Transgressions against the first Covenant that is death under the Curse of the Law There must therefore be some great Cause and End why this Mediator being the onely begotten of the Father should thus dye This was say the Socinians that he might confirm the Doctrine that he taught He dyed as a Martyr not as a Sacrifice But 1 There was no need that he should dye unto that End For his Doctrine was sufficiently confirmed by the Scriptures of the Old Testament the Evidence of the Presence of God in him and the Miracles which he wrought 2 Notwithstanding their pretence they do not assign the Confirmation of his Doctrine unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead Neither indeed do they allow any gracious Effect unto his death either towards God or men but only make it something necessarily antecedent unto what he did of that kind Nor do they allow that he acted any thing at all towards God on our behalf Whereas the Scripture constantly assigns our Redemption Sanctification and Salvation to the death and blood of Christ. These Persons 1 deny that of it self it hath any influence into them wherefore 2 they say that Christ by his death confirmed the New Covenant but hereby they intend nothing but what they do also in the former or the Confirmation of his Doctrine with an addition of somewhat worse For they would have him to confirm the Promises of God as by him declared and no more as though he were God's Surety to us and not a Surety for us unto God Neither do they assign this unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead But suppose all this and that the death of Christ were in some sense useful and profitable unto these Ends which is all they plead
yet what use and advantage was it of with respect unto them that he should dye an accursed death under the Curse of the Law and a sense of God's displeasure Hereof the Socinians and those that follow them can yield no reason at all It would become these men so highly pretending unto reason to give an account upon their own Principles of the death of the onely begotten Son of God in the highest course and most intense Acts of Obedience that may be compliant with the wisdom holiness and goodness of God considering the kind of death that he dyed But what they cannot do the Apostle doth in the next words Eighthly The death of the Mediator of the New Testament was for the Redemption of Transgressions and for this End it was necessary Sin lay in the way of the enjoyment of the Inheritance which Grace had prepared It did so in the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God Unless it were removed the Inheritance could not be received The way whereby this was to be done was by Redemption The Redemption of Transgressions is the deliverance of the Transgressors from all the Evils they were subject unto on their account by the payment of a satisfactory price The words used to express it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of no other signification Here it must answer the purging of Conscience by the blood of Christ. And he calls his life a Ransom or Price of Redemption And this utterly destroys the foundation of the Socinian Redemption and Expiation for Sin For they make it only a freedom from Punishment by an Act of Power Take off the covering of the words which they use in a sense foreign to the Scripture and their proper signification and their sense is expresly contradictory unto the sense and words of the Apostle He declares Christ to have been the High-Priest and Mediator of the New Testament in the same Acts and Duties They teach that he ceased to be a Mediator when he began to be a Priest He affirms that the Blood of Christ doth expiate Sins They that he doth it by an Act of Power in Heaven where there is no use of his Blood He says that his death was necessary unto and was the means or cause of the Redemption of Transgressions that is to be a price of Redemption or just Compensation for them They contend that no such thing is required thereunto And whereas the Scriptures do plainly assign the Expiation of Sin Redemption Reconciliation and Peace with God Sanctification and Salvation unto the Death and Blood-shedding of Christ They deny them all and every one to be in any sense Effects of it only they say it was an antecedent sign of the Truth of his Doctrine in his Resurrection and an antecedent condition of his Exaltation and Power which is to reject the whole Mystery of the Gospel Besides the particular Observations which we have made on the several passages of this Verse something may yet in general be observed from it As 1. A New Testament providing an Eternal Inheritance in Sovereign Grace the Constitution of a Mediator such a Mediator for that Testament in infinite Wisdom and Love the Death of that Testator for the Redemption of Transgressions to fulfil the Law and satisfie the Iustice of God with the communication of that Inheritance by Promise to be received by Faith in all them that are called are the substance of the Mystery of the Gospel And all these are with wonderful wisdom comprised by the Apostle in these words 2. That the Efficacy of the Mediation and Death of Christ extended it self unto all the called under the Old Testament is an evident Demonstration of his Divine Nature his Pre-existence unto all these things and the Eternal Covenant between the Father and him about them 3. The first Covenant did only forbid and Condemn Transgressions Redemption from them is by the New Testament alone 4. The Glory and Efficacy of the New Covenant and the Assurance of the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance by vertue of it depend hereon that it was made a Testament by the death of the Mediator which is farther proved in the following Verses VER XVI XVII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the death of him is declared shewed argued or proved Mors intercedat necesse est Necesse est mortem intercedere Ar. Necesse est mortem ferri which is not proper in the Latine Tongue however there is an emphasis in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more than is expressed by intercedo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him that made it of the Testator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him that is dead in mortuis among them that are dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vulg confirmatum est and so the Syriac ratum est more proper 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no use profit or benefit in it Ar. nunquam valet quandoquidem nunquam valet nondum valet it is not yet of force For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be brought in the death of the Testator For a Testament is firm or ratified after men are dead otherwise it is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth There is not much more to be considered in these verses but only how the Observation contained in them doth promote and confirm the Argument which the Apostle insists upon Now this is to prove the necessity and use of the death of Christ from the Nature Ends and Use of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator For it being a Testament it was to be confirmed with the death of the Testator This is proved in these Verses from the Notion of a Testament and the only use of it amongst men For the Apostle in this Epistle doth argue several times from such usages amongst men as proceeding from the Principles of Reason and Equity were generally prevalent among them So he doth in his discourse concerning the assurance given by the Oath of God Chap. 6. And here he doth the same from what was commonly agreed upon and suitable unto the reason of things about the nature and use of a Testament The things here mentioned were known to all approved by all and were the principal means of the preservation of Peace and Property in Humane Societies For although Testaments as unto their especial Regulation owe their original unto the Roman Civil Law yet as unto the substance of them they were in use amongst all Mankind from the foundation of the world For a Testament is the just determination of a Man's Will concerning what he will have done with his Goods after his decease Or it is the Will of him that is dead Take this power from men and you root up the whole foundation of all industry and diligence in the world For what man will labour to increase his substance if when
he dyes he may not dispose of it unto those which by Nature Affinity or other obligations he hath most respect unto Wherefore the foundation of the Apostles arguing from this usage amongst men is firm and stable Of the like nature is his observation that a Testament is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth the nature of the thing it self expounded by constant practice will admit no doubt of it For by what way soever a man disposeth of his Goods so as that it shall take effect whil'st he is alive as by Sale or Gift it is not a Testament nor hath any thing of the nature of a Testament in it For that is only the Will of a man concerning his Goods when he is dead These things being unquestionable we are only to consider whence the Apostle takes his Argument to prove the necessity of the death of Christ as he was the Mediator of the New Testament Now this is not meerly from the signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which yet is of consideration also as hath been declared but whereas he treats principally of the two Covenants it is the Affinity that is between a Solemn Covenant and a Testament that he hath respect unto For he speaks not of the death of Christ meerly as it was death which is all that is required unto a Testament properly so called without any consideration of what nature it is but he speaks of it also as it was a Sacrifice by the effusion of his blood which belongs unto a Covenant and is no way required unto a Testament Whereas therefore the word may signifie either a Covenant or a Testament precisely so called the Apostle hath respect unto both the significations of it And having in these Verses mentioned his death as the death of a Testator which is proper unto a Testament in the 14th Verse and those that follow he insists on his blood as a Sacrifice which is proper unto a Covenant But these things must be more fully explained whereby the difficulty which appears in the whole Context will be removed Unto the confirmation or ratification of a Testament that it may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sure stable and of force there must be death the death of the Testator But there is no need that this should be by blood the blood of the Testator or any other Unto the consideration of a Covenant blood was required the blood of the Sacrifice and death only consequentially as that which would ensue thereon but there was no need that it should be the blood or death of him that made the Covenant Wherefore the Apostle declaring the necessity of the death of Christ both as to the nature of it that it was really death and as to the manner of it that it was by the effusion of his blood and that from the consideration of the two Covenants the Old and the New Testament and what was required unto them he evinceth it by that which was essential unto them both in a Covenant as such and in a Testament precisely so called That which is most eminent and essential unto a Testament is that it is confirmed and made irrevocable by the death of the Testator And that which is the excellency of a Solemn Covenant whereby it is made firm and stable is that it was confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices as he proves in the instance of the Covenant made at Sinai v. 18 19 20 21 22. Wherefore whatever is excellent in either of these was to be found in the Mediator of the New Testament Take it as a Testament which upon the Bequeathment made therein of the Goods of the Testator unto the Heirs of Promise of Grace and Glory it hath the nature of and he dyed as the Testator whereby the Grant of the Inheritance was made irrevocable unto them Hereunto no more is required but his death without the consideration of the nature of it in the way of a Sacrifice Take it as a Covenant as upon the consideration of the Promises contained in it and the Prescription of Obedience it hath the nature of a Covenant though not of a Covenant strictly so called and so it was to be confirmed with the blood of the Sacrifice of himself which is the Eminency of the Solemn Confirmation of this Covenant And as his death had an Eminency above the death required unto a Testament in that it was by blood and in the Sacrifice of himself which it is no way necessary that the death of a Testator should be yet it fully answered the death of a Testator in that he truly dyed so had it an Eminency above all the ways of the confirmation of the Old Covenant or any other Solemn Covenant whatever in that whereas such a Covenant was to be confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices yet was it not required that it should be the blood of him that made the Covenant as here it was The consideration hereof solves all the appearing difficulties in the nature and manner of the Apostles Argument The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereunto respect is here had is as we have shewed of a large signification and various use And frequently it is taken for a free grant and disposition of things by promise which hath the nature of a Testament And in the Old Covenant there was a free grant and donation of the Inheritance of the Land of Canaan unto the people which belongs unto the nature of a Testament also Moreover both of them a Covenant and a Testament do agree in the general nature of their confirmation the one by blood the other by death Hereon the Apostle in the use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth diversly argue both unto the nature necessity and use of the death of the Mediator of the New Testament He was to dye in the confirmation of it as it was a Testament he being the Testator of it and he was to offer himself as a Sacrifice in his blood for the establishment of it as it had the nature of a Covenant Wherefore the Apostle doth not argue as some imagine meerly from the signification of the word whereby as they say that in the original is not exactly rendred And those who have from hence troubled themselves and others about the Authority of this Epistle have nothing to thank for it but their own ignorance of the design of the Apostle and the nature of his Argument And it were well if we all were more sensible of our own ignorance and more apt to acknowledge it when we meet with difficulties in the Scripture than for the most part we are Alas how short are our Lines when we come to fathom the depths of it How inextricable difficulties do appear sometimes in passages of it which when God is pleased to teach us are all pleasant and easie These things being premised to clear the scope and nature of the Apostles Argument we proceed unto a brief Exposition of
sprinkled the Blood on the Altar ver 6. After which when the Book had been sprinkled with Blood as it lay on the Altar it is said he took the Book that is off from the Altar and read in the audience of the People ver 7. The Book being now sprinkled with blood as the Instrument and Record of the Covenant between God and the People the very same words which were before spoken unto the People are now recited or read out of the Book And this could be done for no other Reason but that the Book it self being now sprinkled with the blood of the Covenant it was dedicated to be the Sacred Record thereof 4. In the Text of Moses it is said that he sprinkled the People in Explanation whereof the Apostle affirms that he sprinkled all the People And it was necessary that so it should be and that none of them should be excluded from this Sprinkling For they were all taken into Covenant with God Men Women and Children But it must be granted that for the blood to be actually Sprinkled on all individuals in such a Numberless Multitude is next unto what is naturally impossible wherefore it was done in their Representatives and what is done towards Representatives as such is done equally towards all whom they do Represent And the whole People had two Representatives that day 1 The twelve Pillars of Stone that were set up to represent their twelve Tribes and it may be to signifie their hard and stony heart under that Covenant ver 4. Whereas those Pillars were placed close by the Altar some suppose that they were Sprinkled as representing the twelve tribes 2 There was the Heads of their Tribes the Chief of the house of their Fathers and the Elders who drew nigh unto Moses and were Sprinkled with blood in the Name and Place of all the People who were that day taken into Covenant 5. The words which Moses spake unto the People upon the Sprinkling of the Blood are not absolutely the same in the story and in the Repetition of it by the Apostle But this is usual with him in all his Quotations out of the old Testament in this Epistle He expresseth the true sense of them but doth not curiously and precisely render the sense of every word and syllable in them 6. The last Difficulty in this context and that which hath an appearance of the greatest is in what the Apostle affirmes concerning the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it namely that Moses sprinkled them all with Blood And the Time which he seems to speak of is that of the Dedication of the first Covenant Hence a twofold Difficulty doth arise First as unto the Time and Secondly as unto the Thing it self For at the Time of the Dedication of the first Covenant the Tabernacle was not yet made or erected and so could not then be sprinkled with Blood And afterwards when the Tabernacle was erected and all the Vessels brought into it there is no mention that either it or any of them were sprinkled with Blood but only anointed with the Holy Oyl Exod. 40. 9 10 11. Wherefore as unto the first I say the Apostle doth plainly distinguish what he affirms of the Tabernacle from the Time of the Dedication of the first Covenant The manner of his Introduction of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and moreover the Tabernacle doth plainly intimate a Progress unto another Time and occasion Wherefore the words of ver 21. concerning the sprinkling of the Tabernacle and its Vessels do relate unto what follows ver 22. and almost all things are by the Law purged with Blood and not unto those that precede about the Dedication of the first Covenant For the Argument he hath in hand is not confined unto the use of Blood only in that Dedication but respects the whole use of the Blood of Sacrifices under the Law which in these words he proceeds unto and closeth in the next verse And this wholly removes the first Difficulty And as unto the second Expositors generally answer that Aspersion or Sprinkling with Blood did commonly precede Unction with the Holy Oyl And as unto the Garments of the Priests which were the Vessels or Utensils of the Tabernacle it was appointed that they should be sprinkled with Blood Exod. 29. 21. and so it may be supposed that the Residue of them were also But to me this is not satisfactory And be it spoken without offence Expositors have generally mistaken the nature of the Argument of the Apostle in these words For he argues not from the first Dedication of the Tabernacle and its Vessels which for ought appears was by Unction only But making as wee observed before a Progress unto the farther use of the Blood of Sacrifices in purging according to the Law he giveth an Instance in what was done with respect unto the Tabernacle and all its Vessels and that constantly and Solemnly every year and this he doth to prove his general Assertion in the next verse that under the Law almost all things were purged with Blood And Moses is here said to do what he appointed should be done By his Institution that is the Institution of the Law the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it were sprinkled with Blood And this was done Solemnly once every year an account whereof is given Levit. 16. 14 15 16 18 19 20. On the Solemn Day of Attonement the High Priest was to sprinkle the Mercy-seat the Altar and the whole Tabernacle with Blood to make an Attonement for them because of the Uncleannesses of the Children of Israel the Tabernacle remaining among them in the midst of their Uncleannesses ver 16. This he takes notice of not to prove the Dedication of the first Covenant with what belonged thereunto with Blood but the use of Blood in general to make Attonement and the impossibility of Expiation and Pardon without it This is the Design and Sense of the Apostle and no other Wherefore we may conclude that the Account here given concerning the Dedication of the first Covenant and the use of Blood for Purification under the Law is so far from containing any thing opposite unto or discrepant from the Records of Moses concerning the same things that it gives us a full and clear Exposition of them The second thing to be considered is the nature of the Argument in this context and there are three things in it neither of which must be omitted in the Exposition of the words He designeth 1. to prove yet farther the necessuy of the Death of Christ as he was the Mediator of the New Testament both as it had the nature of a Testament and that also of a Solemn Covenant 2. To declare the necessity of the Kind of his Death in the way of a Sacrifice by the effusion of Blood because the Testament as it had the nature of a Solemn Covenant was confirmed and ratifyed thereby 3. To manifest the Necessity of shedding of Blood in the
Language which the People understood and commonly spake And a Rule was herein prescribed unto the Church in all Ages if so be the Example of the Wisdom and Care of God towards his Church may be a Rule unto us 3. God never required the Observance of any Rites or Duties of Worship without a previous warranty from his Word The People took not on them they were not obliged unto Obedience with respect unto any positive Institutions until Moses had read unto them every precept out of the Book 4. The writing of this Book was an eminent Priviledge now first granted unto the Church leading unto a more perfect and stable condition then formerly it had enjoyed Hitherto it had lived on Oral Instructions from Traditions and by new immediate Revelations the evident Defects whereof were now removed and a standard of Divine Truth and Instruction set up and fixed among them 3dly There is the Rule whereby Moses proceeded herein or the Warranty he had for what he did According to the Law He read every Precept according to the Law It cannot be the Law in general that the Apostle intends for the greatest part of that Doctrine which is so called was not yet given or written nor doth it in any place contain any Precept unto this purpose Wherefore it is a particular Law Rule or Command that is intended According unto the Ordinance or Appointment of God Such was the Command that God gave unto Moses for the framing of the Tabernacle See thou make all things according to the Pattern shewed thee in the Mount Particularly it seems to be the Agreement between God and the People that Moses should be the Internuntius the Interpreter between them According unto this Rule Order or divine Constitution Moses read all the words from God out of the Book unto the People Or it may be the Law may here be taken for the whole Design of God in giving of the Law so as that according unto the Law is no more but according unto the Soveraign Wisdom and Pleasure of God in giving of the Law with all things that belong unto its Order and Use. And it is Good for us to look for Gods especial warranty for what we undertake to do in his service The second thing in the words is what Moses did immediately and Directly towards the Dedication or Consecration of this Covenant And there are three things to this purpose mentioned 1 What he made use of 2 How he used it 3 With respect unto what and whom 1. The first is expressed in these words He took the Blood of Calves and Goats with water and Scarlet-wool and Hyssop He took the Blood of the Beasts that were offered for Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings ver 5 6. Unto this End in their slaying he took all their Blood in Basons and made an equal Division of it The one half he sprinkled on the Altar and the other half he sprinkled on the People That which was sprinkled on the Altar was Gods Part and the other was put on the People Both the Mutual stipulation of God and the Congregation in this Covenant and the Equality of it or the Equity of its Terms were denoted hereby And herein lies the principal force of the Apostles Argument in these words Blood was used in the Dedication of the first Covenant This was the Blood of the Beasts offered in Sacrifice unto God Wherefore both Death and Death by blood-sheding was required unto the Confirmation of a Covenant So also therefore must the new Covenant be confirmed but with Blood and a Sacrifice far more precious than they were This Distribution of Blood that half of it was on the Altar and half of it on the People the one to make Attonement the other to purifie or Sanctifie was to teach the two-fold Efficacy of the Blood of Christ in making Attonement for Sin unto our Justification and the purifying of our Natures in Sanctification 2. With this Blood he took the things mentioned with respect unto its Use which was Sprinkling The manner of it was in part declared before The Blood being put into Basons and having water mixed with it to keep it fluid and aspersible He took a bunch or bundle of Hyssop bound up with Scarlet wool and dipping it into the Basons sprinkled the Blood until it was all spent in that Service This Rite or way of Sprinkling was chosen of God as an expressive token or sign of the effectual Communication of the Benefits of the Covenant unto them that were sprinkled Hence the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ unto Sanctification is called the Sprinkling of his Blood 1 Pet. 1. 2. And our Apostle comprizeth all the effects of it unto that end under the name of the blood of Sprinkling chap. 12. 24. And I fear that those who have used the expression with some contempt when applyed by themselves unto the sign of the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ in Baptisme have not observed that Reverence of Holy things that is required of us For this Symbol of Sprinkling was that which God himself chose and appointed as a meet and apt token of the Communication of Covenant-Mercy that is of his Grace in Christ Jesus unto our Souls And The Blood of the Covenant will not benefit or advantage us without an especial and particular Application of it unto our own Souls and Consciences If it be not as well Sprinkled upon us as it was offered unto God it will not avail us The Blood of Christ was not divided as was that of these Sacrifices the one half being on the Altar the other on the People but the Efficacy of the whole produced both these effects yet so as that the one will not profit us without the other We shall have no Benefit of the Attonement made at the Altar unless we have its efficacy on our own Souls unto their Purification And this we cannot have unless it be sprinkled on us unless particular Application be made of it unto us by the Holy Ghost in and by an especial Act of Faith in our selves 3. The Object of this Act of Sprinkling was the Book it self and all the People The same Blood was on the Book wherein the Covenant was recorded and the People that entred into it But whereas this Sprinkling was for purifying and purging it may be enquired Unto what end the Book it self was sprinkled which was holy and undefiled I Answer There were two things necessary unto the Dedication of the Covenant with all that belonged unto it 1 Attonement 2 Purification and in both these respects it was necessary that the Book it self should be sprinkled 1 As we observed before it was sprinkled as it lay upon the Altar where Attonement was made And this was plainly to signifie that Attonement was to be made by blood for sins committed against that book or the Law contained in it Without this that book would have
been unto the People like that given to Ezekiel that was written within and without and there was written therein Lamentations and Mourning and Woe Chap. 2. 10. Nothing but Curse and Death could they expect from it But the Sprinkling of it with blood as it lay upon the Altar was a Testimony and Assurance that Attonement should be made by blood for the sins against it which was the Life of the things 2 The Book in it self was Pure and Holy and so are all Gods Institutions but unto us every thing is unclean that is not sprinkled with the blood of Christ. So afterwards the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it were purified every year with blood because of the Uncleannesses of the People in their Transgressions Levit. 16. Wherefore on both these accounts it was necessary that the Book it self should be sprinkled The blood thus sprinkled was mingled with water The natural Reason of it was as we observed to keep it fluid and aspersible But there was a Mystery in it also That the blood of Christ was typified by this blood of the Sacrifices used in the Dedication of the Old Covenant it is the Apostle's Design to declare And it is probable that this mixture of it with water might represent that Blood and Water which came out of his side when it was pierced For the Mystery thereof was very great Hence that Apostle which saw it and bare Record of it in particular Joh. 19. 34 35. affirms likewise that he came by water and blood and not by blood only 1 Epist. chap. 5. ver 6. He came not only to make Attonement for us with his blood that we might be justifyed but to sprinkle us with the efficacy of his blood in the communication of the Spirit of Sanctification compared unto water For the Sprinkler it self composed of Scarlet wool and Hyssop I doubt not but that the Humane Nature of Christ whereby and through which all Grace is communicated unto us for of his fulness we receive and Grace for Grace was signified by it But the Analogie and Similitude between them are not so evident as they are with respect unto some other Types The Hyssop was an humble Plant the meanest of them yet of a sweet savour 1. Kings 4. 33. So was the Lord Christ amongst men in the days of his flesh in comparison of the tall Cedars of the Earth Hence was his complaint that he was as a worm and no man a reproach of men and despised of the People Psal. 22. 6. And the Scarlet wool might represent him as red in the blood of his Sacrifice But I will not press these things of whose Interpretation we have not a certain Rule Secondly The principal Truth asserted is confirmed by what Moses said as well as what he did VER XX. Saying This is the Blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you The Difference between the words of Moses and the Repetition of them by the Apostle is not material as unto the sense of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Behold in Moses is rendred by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This both demonstrative Notes of the same thing For in pronouncing of the words Moses shewed the Blood unto the People And so Behold the Blood is all one as if he had said this is the Blood The making of the Covenant in the words of Moses is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath cut divided solemnly made This the Apostle renders by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath enjoyned or commanded you And this he doth partly to signify the Foundation of the People's Acceptance of that Covenant which was the Authority of God enjoyning them or requiring them so to do partly to intimate the nature of the Covenant it self which consisted in Precepts and Injunctions principally and not absolutely in Promises as the New Covenant doth The last words of Moses Concerning all these words the Apostle omits For he includes the sense of them in that word which the Lord commanded you For he hath respect therein both unto the words themselves written in the Book which were Precepts and Injunctions as also the command of God for the Acceptance of the Covenant That which Moses said is This is the blood of the Testament Hence the Apostle proves that Death and the shedding of blood therein was necessary unto the consecration and establishment of the first Testament For so Moses expresly affirms in the Dedication of it This is the blood of the Covenant without which it could not have been a firm Covenant between God and the People Not I confess from the nature of a Covenant in general for a Covenant may be solemnly established without Death or Blood but from the especial end of that Covenant which in the confirmation of it was to prefigure the confirmation of that new Covenant which could not be established but with the blood of a Sacrifice And this adds both force and evidence unto the Apostles Argument For he proves the Necessity of the Death and Blood-shedding or Sacrifice of Christ in the confirmation of the New Covenant from hence that the Old Covenant which in the Dedication of it was prefigurative hereof was not confirmed without Blood Wherefore whereas God had solemnly promised to make a new Covenant with the Church and that different from or not according unto the Old which he had proved in the foregoing Chapter it follows unavoidably that it was to be confirmed with the Blood of the Mediator for by the blood of Beasts it could not be which is that Truth wherein he did instruct them And nothing was more cogent to take off the scandal of the Cross and of the sufferings of Christ. For the Enuntiation it self This is the blood of the Covenant it is figurative and Sacramental The Covenant had no blood of its own but the blood of the Sacrifices is called the blood of the Covenant because the Covenant was dedicated and established by it Neither was the Covenant really established by it For it was the Truth of God on the one hand and the stability of the People in their professed Obedience on the other that the establishment of the Covenant depended on But this blood was a confirmatory sign of it a Token between God and the People of their mutual engagements in that Covenant So the Paschal Lamb was called Gods Pass-over because it was a sign and token of Gods passing over the houses of the Israelites when he destroyed the Aegyptians Exod. 12. 11 21. With reference it was unto those Sacramental Expressions which the Church under the Old Testament was accustomed unto that our Lord Jesus Christ in the Institution of the Sacrament of the Supper called the Bread and the Wine whose use he appointed therein by the names of his Body and Blood and any other Interpretation of the words wholly overthrows the Nature of that holy Ordinance Wherefore this Blood was a confirmatory Sign of the Covenant And it was
it was the Rule of the Government of the Nation And in this sense for such sins as were not Politically to be spared no Sacrifice was allowed 2 That real Spiritual Forgiveness and gracious Acceptance with himself was to be obtained alone by that which was signified by this blood which was the Sacrifice of Christ himself And whereas the sins of the People were of various kinds there were particular Sacrifices instituted to answer that variety This variety of Sacrifices with respect unto the various sorts or kinds of sins for which they were to make Attonement I have elsewhere discussed and explained Their Institution and Order is recorded Levit. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. And if any Person neglected that especial Sacrifice which was appointed to make Attonement for his especial Sin he was left under the sentence of the Law Politically and Spiritually there was no Remission Yea also there might be there were sins that could not be reduced directly unto any of those for whose Remission sacrifices were directed in particular Wherefore God graciously provided against the Distress or Ruine of the Church on either of these Accounts For whether the People had fallen under the neglect of any of those especial ways of Attonement or had contracted the Guilt of such sins as they knew not how to reduce unto any sort of them that were to be expiated he had gratiously prepared the great Anniversary Sacrifice wherein publick Attonement was made for all the Sins Trangressions and Iniquities of the whole People of what sort soever they were Levit. 16. 21. But in the whole of his Ordinances he established the Rule that without shedding of blood was no Remission There seems to be an Exception in the case of him who was so poor that he could not provide the meanest offering of blood for a Sin-offering For he was allowed by the Law to offer the Tenth part of an Ephah of fine flower for his Sin and it was forgiven him Levit. 5. 11 12 13. Wherefore the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 almost may be here again repeated because of this single case But the Apostle hath respect unto the general Rule of the Law And this exception was not an ordinary Constitution but depended on the Impossibility of the thing it self whereunto it made a gracious Condescension And this Necessity oft-times of it self without any Constitution suspends a positive Law and gives a Dispensation unto the infringers of it So was it in the case of David when he eat of the Shew-bread in his hunger and as to works of Mercy on the Sabbath day which Instances are given by our Saviour himself Wherefore the particular exception on this consideration did rather strengthen then invalidate the general Rule of the Law Besides the nearest approach was made unto it that might be For fine flower is the best of the bread whereby Mans Life is sustained and in the Offering of it the Offerer testified that by his sin he had forfeited his own Life and all whereby it was sustained which was the meaning of the Offering of Blood The Expositors of the Roman Church do here greatly perplex themselves to secure the Sacrifice of their Mass from this destroying sentence of the Apostle For a Sacrifice they would have it to be and that for the Remission of the sins of the living and the dead Yet they say it is an unbloody Sacrifice For if there be any blood shed in it it is the Blood of Christ and then he is Crucified by them afresh every day as indeed in some sense he is though they cannot shed his Blood If it be unbloody the Rule of the Apostle is that it is no way available for the Remission of sins Those that are sober have no way to deliver themselves but by denying the Mass to be a proper Sacrifice for the Remission of Sins which is done expresly by Estius upon the place But this is contrary unto the direct assertions contained in the Mass it self and razeth the very Foundation of it Now if God gave them so much Light under the Old Testament as that they should know believe and profess that without shedding of Blood is no Remission how great is the Darkness of Men under the New Testament who look seek or endeavour any other way after the pardon of sin but only by the Blood of Christ. 2. This is the great Demonstration of the Demerit of sin of the Holiness Righteousness and Grace of God For such was the Nature and Demerit of Sin such was the Righteousness of God with respect unto it that without shedding of Blood it could not be pardoned They are strangers unto the one and the other who please themselves with other imaginations And what Blood must this be That the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin was utterly impossible as our Apostle declares It must be the Blood of the Son of God Rom. 3 24 25. Act. 20. 28. And herein were glorified both the Love and Grace of God in that he spared not his only Son but gave him up to be a bloody Sacrifice in his Death for us all VER XXIII In the following Verses unto the End of the Chapter the Apostle makes an Application of all that he had discoursed concerning the Services and Sacrifices of the Tabernacle with their use and efficacy on the one hand and the Sacrifice of Christ its nature use and efficacy on the other unto his present Argument Now this was to demonstrate the Excellency Dignity and Vertue of the Priesthood of Christ and the Sacrifice of himself that he offered thereby as he was the Mediator of the New Covenant And he doth it in the way of Comparison as unto what there was of Similitude between them and of opposition as unto what was singular in the Person and Priesthood of Christ wherein they had no share declaring on both accounts the incomparable Excellency of him and his Sacrifice above the Priests of the Law and theirs And hereon he concludes his whole Discourse with an Elegant comparison and opposition between the Law and the Gospel wherein he comprizeth in few words the substance of them both as unto their effects on the Souls of men That wherein in general there was a Similitude in these things is expressed Verse 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no Difference of Importance in the Translation of these words by any Interpreters of Reputation and singly they have been all of them before spoken unto Only the Syriack renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Similitudes not unaptly VER XXIII It was therefore necessary that the Patterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices then these An Entrance is made in these words into the comparison intended For as unto both sorts of Sacrifices compared it is here granted in general that they purged the things whereunto they were applyed But there is a
otherwise The Covenant the Book of the Law and the Tabernacle with all its Vessels were purified in their sacred Dedication unto God and his service Thus were all the Heavenly things themselves purified Christ himself was Sanctified Consecrated Dedicated unto God in his own Blood He Sanctified himself Joh. 17. 19. and that by the Blood of the Covenant Heb. 10. 29. even when he was Consecrated or made perfect through sufferings chap. 2. 10. So was the Church and the whole worship of it dedicated unto God made holy unto him Ephes. 5. 25 26. And Heaven it self was dedicated to be an habitation for ever unto the Mystical Body of Christ in perfect Peace with the Angels above who had never sinned Eph. 1. 10. Heb. 12. 22 23 24. But yet there was moreover a real Purification of the most of these things The Church or the Souls and Consciences of Men were really Cleansed Purified and Sanctified with an internal Spiritual Purification Eph. 5. 25 26. Tit. 2. 14. It was washed in the blood of Christ Rev. 1. 5. and is thereby cleansed from Sin 1 Joh. 1. 7. And Heaven it self was in some sense so Purified as the Tabernacle was because of the sins of the People among whom it was Levit. 16. 16. Sin had entered into Heaven it self in the Apostacy of Angels whence it was not pure in the sight of God Job 15. 15. And upon the sin of man a state of Enmity ensued between the Angels above and Men below so that Heaven was no meet Place for an habitation unto them both until they were reconciled which was done only in the Sacrifice of Christ Eph. 1. 10. Hence if the Heavenly things were not defiled in themselves yet in Relation unto us they were so which is now taken away The Summ is As the Covenant the Book the People the Tabernacle were all purified and dedicated unto their especial ends by the Blood of Calves and Goats wherein was laid the Foundation of all gracious entercourse between God and the Church under the Old Covenant So all things whatever that in the Counsel of God belonged unto the New Covenant the whole Mediation of Christ with all the Spiritual and Eternal Effects of it were Confirmed Dedicated unto God and made effectual unto the ends of the Covenant by the Blood of the Sacrifice of Christ which is the spring from whence Efficacy is communicated unto them all and Moreover the Souls and Consciences of the Elect are Purified and Sanctified from all defilements thereby which work is gradually carried on in them by renewed Applications of the same Blood unto them until they are all presented unto God Glorious without spot or wrinkle or any such thing And we are taught that The one Sacrifice of Christ with what ensued thereon was the only means to render effectual all the Counsels of God concerning the Redemption and Salvation of the Church Eph. 1. 3 4 5 6 7. Rom. 3. 24 25 26. Of these Heavenly things it is said that they were purified with better Sacrifices than these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is added to encrease the signification All sober Expositors agree that here is an Enallage of Number the plural put for the singular The one Sacrifice of Christ is alone intended But because it answered all other Sacrifices exceeded them all in Dignity was of more Use and Efficacy than they all it is so expressed That one Sacrifice which comprized the Vertue Benefit and Signification of all other The Gloss of Grotius on these words is intolerable and justly offensive unto all Pious Souls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he quia non tantum Christi perpessiones intelligit sed eorum qui ipsum sectantur unà cum precibus operibus Misericordiae Is it possible that any Christian should not tremble to joyn the Sufferings of Men and their works with the Sacrifice of Christ as unto the same kind of Efficacy in purifying of these Heavenly things Do they make Attonement for Sin Are they offered unto God for that end Are they sprinkled on these things for their Purification 4. The Modification of the former Proposition belongs unto this also It was necessary these things should be thus purified 1 As that which the Holiness of God required and which therefore in his Wisdom and Grace he appointed 2 As that which in it self was meet and becoming the Righteousness of God Heb. 2. 10. Nothing but the Sacrifice of Christ with the everlasting Efficacy of his most precious Blood could thus purifie the Heavenly things and dedicate the whole new Creation unto God The last thing we shall observe hereon is that it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that this Dedication and Purification is ascribed unto Now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a slain Sacrifice a Sacrifice as slain a Sacrifice by Mactation Killing or shedding of blood so is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 also Wherefore it is the Sacrifice of Christ in his Death and Blood-shedding that is the Cause of these things Other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him there was none he offered none For the vindication hereof we must examine the Comment of Schlictingius on this Place His Words are Licet enim non Sanguinem suum Christus deo obtulerit sed se ipsum tamen sine sanguinis effusione offerre se ipsum non potuit neque debuit Ex eo veró quod diximus sit ut Autor Divinus Christum cum victimis legalibus conferens perpetuò fugiat dicere Christi sanguinem fuisse oblatum et nihilominus ut similitudini serviat perpetuò Christi sanguinis fusionem insinuet quae nisi antecessisset haud quaquam tam plena tamque concinna inter Christum victimas antiquas comparatio institui potuisset Ex his ergo manifestum est in illa sancta celestia ad eorum dedicationem emundationemque peragendam victimam pretiosissimam proinde non sanguinem hircorum vitulorum imò ne sanguinem quidem ullum sed ipsum Dei filium idque omnibus mortalis naturae exuviis depositis quo nulla pretiosior sanctior victima cogitari potuit debuisse inferri Ans. 1 The Distinction between Christ offering his Blood and offering himself to God the Foundation of this Discourse is coyned on purpose to pervert the Truth For neither did Christ offer his Blood unto God but in the offering of himself nor did he offer himself unto God but in and by the shedding and offering of his Blood There is no Distinction between Christ offering of himself and offering of his Blood other then between the Being of any thing and the Form and manner of its being what it is 2 That he could not offer himself without the antecedent effusion of his Blood seems a kind concession but it hath the same Design with the preceding Distinction But in the offering of himself he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a slain Sacrifice which was in and by the effusion of his Blood in the very shedding of
interpret the meaning of his words but directly to oppose his whole design For it is not a fancied framed Comparison that the Apostle insists on but a Declaration of the Typical Significancy of legal Institutions and his Purpose is to manifest the Accomplishment of them all in Christ alone Lastly The End of this Sacerdotal Entrance of Christ into Heaven is expressed Now to appear in the Presence of God for us A farther Degree of Opposition between our High Priest and those of the Law is expressed in these words They entred into the Holy Place to appear for the People and to present their Supplications unto God But this was only in an Earthly Tabernacle and that before a Material Ark and Mercy-Seat In what is here ascribed unto Christ there are many differences from what was so done by them 1. In the Time of what he did or doth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now At this present Season and always What those others did was of no continuance But this NOW is expressive of the whole Season and Duration of time from the Entrance of Christ into Heaven unto the Consummation of all things So he declares it in the next Verse He never departs out of the Sanctuary to prepare for a new Sacrifice as they did of old There is no moment of Time wherein it may not be said He now appeareth for us 2. In the End of his Entrance into this Heavenly Sanctuary 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to appear Absolutely his Entrance into Heaven had other Ends but this is the only End of his entring into Heaven as Gods Temple the Seat of the Throne of Grace as our High Priest And the whole Discharge of the remaining Duties of his Sacerdotal Office are comprized in this word as we shall immediately demonstrate 3. In that he doth thus appear 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vultui Conspectui Faciei Dei That is the immediate Presence of God in opposition unto the Typical Symbols of it in the Tabernacle before which the High-Priest presented himself The High Priest appeared before the Ark the Cherubims and Mercy-seat composed into the Form of a Throne Christ enters into the real Presence of God standing in his sight before his Face and this expresseth his full Assurance of his Success in his undertaking and his full discharge from that Charge of the Guilt of Sin which he underwent Had he not made an end of it had he not absolutely been freed from it he could not have thus appeared with Confidence and Boldness in the Presence of God Lastly This is said to be done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For us This referrs only to Appear to appear for us that is as we shall see to do all things with God for us at the Throne of Grace that we may be saved The words being Opened the Nature of the thing it self namely of the present Appearance of Christ in Heaven must be farther enquired into And it may be declared in the ensuing Observations 1. It is an Act of his Sacerdotal Office Not only He who is our High Priest doth so appear but he so doth as the High Priest of the Church For such was the Duty of the High Priest under the Law whereby it was typified and represented His Entrance into the Holy Place and Presentation of himself before the Mercy-seat was in the discharge of his office and he did it by Vertue thereof And this is one principal Foundation of the Churches Comfort namely that the present Appearance of Christ in the Presence of God is a part of his Office a Duty in the Discharge of it 2. It is such an Act and Duty of our High Priest as supposeth the Offering of himself a Sacrifice for Sin antecedent thereunto For it was with the blood of the expiatory Sacrifices offered before on the Altar that the High Priest entred into the Holy Place It hath therefore regard unto his antecedent Sacrifice or his offering himself in his death and blood-shedding unto God Without a supposition hereof he could not as our High Priest have entred into the Sanctuary and have appeared in the Presence of God Wherefore 3. It supposeth the Accomplishment of the Work of the Redemption of the Church His words in this Appearance before God are expressed Joh. 17. 4. I have glorified thee on the Earth I have finished the work thou gavest me to do and now I come unto thee He was sent of God into the World on this great Errand for this great Work and he returned not unto him he appeared not in the Presence of him that sent him until he had fulfilled it and was ready in all things to give an Account of it unto the eternal Glory of God 4. In this his Appearance he presents himself unto God as a Lamb that had been slain Rev. 5. 6. He is now alive and lives for ever But there must as unto Efficacy in this Appearance be a Representation of his Sacrifice his Suffering his Death his Blood of himself as a Lamb slain and offered unto God And this was to be so in Answer unto the blood of the Expiatory Sacrifice which the High Priest carried into the Holy Place For he was himself both the Priest and the Sacrifice the Offerer and the Lamb. And as that Blood was sprinkled before the Ark and the Mercy-seat to apply the Attonement made unto all the sacred pledges of Gods Presence and Good Will so from this Representation of the Offering of Christ of himself as a Lamb that had been slain in this his Appearance before God doth all the Application of its Benefits unto the Church proceed 5. He thus appears for us He is therein therefore the great Representative of the Church or he represents the whole Church of his Redeemed unto God There is more in it then meerly for our Good It is as it were the Appearance of an Advocate a Law-Appearance in the behalf of others So is it declared 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. He will at the end of all present his whole Church unto God with the whole work of his Love and Grace accomplished towards them He first so presents it unto himself and then to God Eph. 5. 26 27. Now he presents them as the Portion given unto him of God out of fallen Mankind to be Redeemed and Saved saying behold I and the children which thou gavest me thine they were and thou gavest them to me I present them unto thy Love and Care holy Father that they may enjoy all the fruits of thine Eternal Love all the Benefits of my Death and Sacrifice 6. This is the great Testimony of the Continuation of his Love Care and Compassion towards the Church now he is in the height of his own Glory Love Care and Compassion belong unto him in an especial manner as he is an High Priest which we have declared on many occasions They are the spring of all his Sacerdotal actings
afterwards 7 This Imagination is destructive of the principal design and Argument of the Apostle For he proves the Imperfection of the Sacrifices of the Law and their insufficiency to consummate the Church from their annual Repetition affirming that if they could have perfected the Worshippers they would have ceased to have been offered Yet was that Sacrifice which he respects repeated only once a year But on this Supposition the Sacrifice of Christ must be offered always and never cease to be actually offered which reflects a greater Imperfection on it then was on those which were repeated only once a year But the Apostle expresly affirms that the Sacrifice which could effect its End must cease to be offered Chap. 10. 2. Whereas therefore by One offering he hath for ever perfected them that are Sanctified he doth not continue to offer himself though he doth so to appear in the Presence of God to make Application of the Vertue of that One offering unto the Church The Expositors of the Roman Church do raise an Objection on this place for no other End but that they may return an Answer unto it perniciously opposite unto and destructive of the Truth here taught by the Apostle though some of them do acknowledge that it is capable of another answer But this is that which they principally insist upon as needful unto their present Cause They say therefore that if Christ cease to offer himself then it seems that his Sacerdotal Office ceaseth also For it belongs unto that office to offer Sacrifices continually But there is no force in this Objection For it belongs to no Priest to offer any other or any more Sacrifices but what were sufficient and effectual unto the End of them and their office And such was the One Sacrifice of Christ. Besides though it be not actually repeated yet it is vertually applyed always and this belongs unto the present discharge of his Sacerdotal Office So doth also his Appearance in Heaven for us with his Intercession where he still continues in the actual exercise of his Priesthood so far as is needful or possible But they have an Answer of their own unto their own Objection They say therefore that Christ continueth to offer himself every day in the Sacrifice of the Mass by the hands of the Priests of their Church And this Sacrifice of him though it be unbloody yet is a true real Sacrifice of Christ the same with that which he offered on the Cross. It is better never to raise Objections then thus to answer them For this is not to expound the words but to dispute against the Doctrine of the Apostle As I shall briefly evince 1. That the Lord Christ hath by the One offering of himself for ever perfected them that are Sanctified is a Fundamental Article of Faith Where this is denied or overthrown either directly or by just Consequence the Church is overthrown also But this is expresly denied in the Doctrine of the frequent Repetition of his Sacrifice or of the offering of himself And there is no Instance wherein the Romanists do more expresly oppose the Fundamental Articles of Religion 2. The Repetition of Sacrifices arose solely from their Imperfection as the Apostle declares Chap. 10. 2. And if it undeniably proved an Imperfection in the Sacrifices of the Law that they were repeated once every year in one place only how great must the Imperfection of the Sacrifice of Christ be esteemed if it be not effectual to take away Sin and perfect them that are Sanctified unless it be repeated every day and that it may be in a thousand Places 3. To say that Christ offereth himself often is expresly and in Terms contradictory to the Assertion of the Apostle Whatever therefore they may apprehend of the offering of him by their Priests yet most certain it is that he doth not every day offer himself But as the Faith of the Church is concerned in no offering of Christ but that which he offered himself of himself by the eternal Spirit once for all so the pretence to offer him often by the Priests is highly Sacrilegious 4. The infinite actings of the Divine Nature in Supporting and Influencing of the Humane the inexpressible Operation of the Holy Ghost in him unto such a peculiar acting of all Grace especially of Zeal unto the Glory of God and compassion for the Souls of men as are inimitable unto the whole Creation were required unto the offering of himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling Savour unto God And how can a poor sinful Mortal man such as are the best of their Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice unto God 5. An unbloody Sacrifice is 1 A Contradiction in it self 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the only Sacrifice which the Apostle treats of is victimae mactatio as well as victimae mactatae oblatio It is a Sacrifice by death and that by blood-shedding other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there never was any 2 If it might be supposed yet is it a thing altogether useless For without shedding of Blood there is no Remission The Rule I acknowledge is firstly expressed with respect unto legal Sacrifices and Oblations Yet is it used by the Apostle by an Argument drawn from the Nature and End of those Institutions to prove the necessity of blood-shedding in the Sacrifice of Christ himself for the Remission of Sin An unbloody Sacrifice for the Remission of Sin overthrows both the Law and the Gospel 3 It is directly contrary unto the Argument of the Apostle in the next verse wherein he proves that Christ could not offer himself often For he doth it by affirming that if he did so then must he often suffer that is by the Effusion of his Blood which was absolutely necessary in and unto his Sacrifice Wherefore an unbloody Sacrifice which is without Suffering whatever it be is not the Sacrifice of Christ. For if he be often offered he must often suffer as the Apostle affirms Nor is it unto any Purpose to say that this unbloody Sacrifice of the Mass receiveth its Vertue and Efficacy from the One Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross as it is pleaded by the defenders of it For the Question is not what value it hath nor whence it hath it but whether it be the Sacrifice of Christ himself or no. To sum up the substance of this whole Controversie The Sacrifice or Offering of Christ was 1 By Himself alone through the eternal Spirit 2 Was of his whole Humane Nature as to the matter of it He made his Soul an offering for Sin 3 Was by Death and Bloodshedding whereon its entire Efficacy as unto Attonement Reconciliation and the Sanctification of the Church do depend 4 Was once only offered and could be so no more from the Glory of his Person and the Nature of the Sacrifice it self 5 Was offered with such glorious internal actings of Grace as no Mortal creature can comprehend 6 Was accompanied with his bearing the
otherwise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He would have been a Debter it would have been due from him Oportebat oportuisset He ought 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. frequenter pati Others saepe saepius passum fuisse to have suffered often more often frequently that is once every year Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 many times and not once only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vul. ab origine mundi Others à condito mundo from the Foundation of the world that is after the entrance of Sin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the end of the World Vul. in consummatione seculorum sub consummationem seculorum towards the Consummation of all things In the fulness of Time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad peccatum abolendum ad abolitionem peccati Vul. ad destitutionem peccati Rhemist the Destruction of Sin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 apparuit patefactus est He was made manifest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Vulgar renders the words per hostiam suam apparuit which the Rhemists translate he hath appeared by his own Host most absurdly both as unto words and sense Syr. At one time he offered his Soul by the Sacrifice or immolation of himself What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth relate unto we must enquire in the Exposition of the Words VER XXVI For then if otherwise must he he ought often to have suffered since from the Foundation of the World But now once in the End of the World in the Consummation of times hath he appeared been made manifest to put away to abolish or for the Destruction of Sin by the Sacrifice of himself There are sundry Difficulties in these words both as to the Signification and Construction of them as also unto their sense and importance with the Nature of the Argument contained in them and the things treated of I shall not repeat the various Conjectures of Expositors most of which are alien from the mind of the Apostle and easie to be refuted if that belonged any way unto the edification of the Reader But I shall only give that Account of the whole and the several Parts of it which according unto the best of my understanding doth represent the mind of the Holy Ghost with perspicuity and clearness There are two Parts of the Words 1. A Reason confirming the foregoing Assertion that Christ was not often to offer himself as the High Priest did offer Sacrifice every year when he entred into the Holy Place For then must he c. 2. A Confirmation of that Reason from the Nature and End of the Sacrifice of Christ as stated in matter of Fact according unto the Appointment of God But now once in the End c. In the first we may consider 1 The note of Connexion and of the Introduction of the Reason insisted on 2 The signification or sense of the Words 3 The Ground and Nature of the Argument contained in them 1. The Note of Connexion is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render for then If it were so namely that Christ should often offer himself Had it been otherwise that Christ had so offered himself so we observed that most translate the Word by alioquin Either way the intention of the Apostle is expressed which is to confirm what he had before affirmed by the Introduction of a new Reason of it 2. From a Supposition of the contrary unto what he had affirmed the Apostle proves not only the Truth but the necessity of his Assertion For then 1 He must He ought he would have been a Debtor as the Syriack speaks it would have been due from him and indispensibly required of him It would have been so necessitate medii which is the greatest in Divine Institutions and Duties There could have been no such thing unless that which he now infers from it be allowed which was utterly impossible 2. That which he ought so to have done is to suffer in the offering of himself All the sufferings of Christ in the whole Course of his Humiliation and Obedience are sometimes expressed by this Word as Chap. 5. 8. But the suffering here intended is that of his Death and the shedding of his Blood therein alone That which accompanied and was inseparable from his actual Sacrifice or the immactation of himself to have died to have shed his blood to have underwent the Penalty and Curse of the Law 3 Often frequently as the High Priest offered Sacrifice of Old once every year 4. Since or rather from the Foundation of the World This expression is somtimes used absolutely for the Original of the World in its Creation For the absolute Beginning of Time and all things measured by it Eph. 1. 4. Mat. 25. 34. Joh. 17. 24. 1 Pet. 1. 20. Sometimes from what immediately succeeded on that beginning Mat. 13. 35. Luk. 11. 5. Heb. 4. 3. Rev. 13. 8. And it is in the latter sense that it is here used From the Foundation of the World that is from the first entrance of Sin into the World and the giving of the first Promise which was immediately after the Creation of it or its Foundation and Constitution in its Original frame This is the first thing on record in the Scripture So God spake by the Mouth of his Holy Prophets since the World began Luk. 1. 71. that is the first Revelation of God unto the Church concerning the Messia with all that succeeded So Christ is said to be a Lamb slain from the Foundation of the World Rev. 13. 8. because of the Efficacy of his Sacrifice extending it self unto the first Entrance of Sin and the Promise thereon immediately on the Foundation of the World Wherefore The Foundation of the World absolutely is in its Creation Before the Foundation of the World is an expression of Eternity and the Counsels of God therein Eph. 1. 4. 1 Pet. 1. 20. From the Foundation of the World is mostly the first Entrance of Sin and Gods Dispensation of Grace in Christ thereon 3. The third thing considerable in the Words is the Nature and Force of the Argument contained in them and it is taken from the most cogent Topicks For it is founded on these evident suppositions 1st That the Suffering and Offering of Christ are inseparable For although abstracted from the present Subject Matter Suffering is one thing and offering another yet the Lord Christ offered himself unto God in and by his Suffering of Death And the Reason hereof is because he himself was both the Priest and the Sacrifice The High Priest of old offered often yet now once sufficed therein For he was not the Sacrifice it self It was the Lamb that was slain that suffered Christ being both he could not offer without suffering no more then the High Priest could offer without the suffering of the Beast that was slain And herein doth the force of the Argument principally consist For he proves that Christ did not nor could
that Death was the Wages of Sin For although there was allowed in them a Commutation that the Sinner himself should not dye but the Beast that was Sacrificed in his stead which belonged unto their Second end of leading unto Christ yet they all testified unto that Sacred Truth that it is the Judgment of God that they who commit Sin are worthy of Death And this was as the whole Law an Ordinance of God to deterr Men from Sin and so put bounds unto Transgressions For when God passed by Sin with a kind of Connivance winking at the Ignorance of Men in their iniquities not giving them continual warnings of their Guilt and the consequents thereof in Death the World was filled and covered with a Deluge of Impieties Men saw not Judgment speedily executed nor any Tokens or Indications that so it would be therefore was their Heart wholly set in them to do Evil. But God dealt not thus with the Church He let no Sin pass without a Representation of his displeasure against it though mixed with Mercy in a direction unto the Relief against it in the Blood of the Sacrifice And therefore he did not only appoint these Sacrifices on all the especial occasions of such Sins and Uncleanness as the Consciences of particular Sinners were pressed with a sense of but also once a year there was gathered up a Remembrance of all the Sins Iniquities and Transgressions of the whole Congregation Levit. 16. 2. They were added as the Teaching of a School-master to lead unto Christ. By them was the Church taught and directed to look continually unto and after that Sacrifice which alone could really purge and take away all Iniquity For God appointed no Sacrifices until after the Promise of sending the Seed of the Woman to break the Head of the Serpent In his so doing was his own Heel to be bruised in the suffering of his Humane Nature which he offered in Sacrifice unto God which these Sacrifices did represent Wherefore the Church knowing that these Sacrifices did call Sin to remembrance representing the displeasure of God against Sin which was their First end and that although there was an Intimation of Grace and Mercy in them by the commutation and substitution which they allowed yet that they could not of themselves take away Sin it made them the more earnestly and with longing desires look after him and his Sacrifice who should perfectly take away Sin and make peace with God wherein the principal exercise of Grace under the Old Testament did consist 3. As unto their especial nature they were added as the great instruction in the way and manner whereby Sin was to be taken away For although this arose originally from Gods meer Grace and Mercy yet was it not to be executed and accomplished by Soveraign Grace and Power alone Such a taking away of Sin would have been inconsistent with his Truth Holiness and Righteous Government of Mankind as I have elsewhere at large demonstrated It must be done by the Interposition of a Ransome and Attonement by the substitution of one who was no Sinner in the room of Sinners to make satisfaction unto the Law and Justice of God for Sin Hereby they became the principal direction of the Faith of the Saints under the Old Testament and the means whereby they acted it on the original promise of their Recovery from Apostasie These things do evidently express the Wisdom of God in their Institution although of themselves they could not take away Sin And those by whom these ends of them are denyed as they are by the Jews and Socinians can give no account of any end of them which should answer the Wisdom Grace and Holiness of God This Objection being removed I shall proceed unto the Exposition of the words in particular And there are Four things in them as a Negative Proposition 1. The Illative Conjunction declaring its respects unto what went before 2. The subject matter spoken of The Blood of Bulls and Goats 3. What is denyed concerning it it could not take away Sin 4. The Modification of this Negative Proposition it was impossible they should do so 1. The Illative Conjunction For declares what is spoken to be introduced in the Proof and Confirmation of what was before affirmed And it is the closing Argument against the Imperfection and Impotency of the Old Covenant the Law Priesthood and Sacrifices of it which the Apostle maketh use of And indeed it is comprehensive of all that he had before insisted on yea it is the Foundation of all his other Reasonings unto this purpose For if in the Nature of the thing it self it was impossible that the Sacrifices consisting of the Blood of Rulls and Goats should take away Sin then however whensoever and by whomsoever they were offered this effect could not be produced by them Wherefore in these words the Apostle puts a Close unto his Argument and reassumes it no more in this Epistle but only Once or Twice makes mention of it in the way of an Illustration to set forth the excellency of the Sacrifice of Christ as v. 11. of this Chapter and Chap. 13. 10 11 12. 2. The subject spoken of is the Blood of Bulls and Goats The reason why the Apostle expresseth them by Bulls and Goats which were Calves and Kids of the Goats hath been declared on Chap. 9. ver 11 12. And some things must be observed conceruing this Description of the Old Sacrifices 1. That he makes mention of the Blood of the Sacrifices only whereas in many of them the whole Bodies were offered and the Fat of them all was burned on the Altar And thus he doth for the ensuing Reasons 1. Because it was the Blood alone whereby Attonement was made for Sin and Sinners The Fat was burned with Incense only to shew that it was accepted as a sweet savour with God 2. Because he had respect principally unto the Anniversary Sacrifice unto the Consummation whereof and Attonement thereby the carrying the Blood into the Holy Place did belong 3. Because Life Natural is in an especial manner in the Blood which signified that Attonement was to be made by Death and that by the effusion of Blood as it was in the Sacrifice of Christ. See Levit. 17. 11 12. And in the shedding of it there was an Indication of the Desert of Sin in the Offerer 2. He recalls them by this Expression of their Sacrifices the Blood of Bulls and Goats unto a due consideration of what effect might be produced by them They were Accompanied with great Solemnity and Pomp of Ceremony in their Celebration Hence arose a great Esteem and Veneration of them in the Minds of the People But when all was done that which was Offered was but the Blood of Bulls and Goats And there is a Tacit Opposition unto the matter of that Sacrifice whereby Sin was really to be Expiated which was the precious Blood of Christ as Chap. 9. 13 14. 3. That which
is denyed of these Sacrifices is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the taking away of sins The thing intended is variously expressed by the Apostle as by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 2. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 1. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 9. 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 9. 26. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 28. To make Reconciliation to purge sin to purge the Conscience to abolish sin to bear it And that which he intendeth in all these expressions which he denies of the Law and its Sacrifices and ascribes unto that of Christ is the whole entire effect thereof so far as it immediately respected God and the Law For all these Expressions respect the Guilt of Sin and its removal or the pardon of it with righteousness before God acceptance and peace with him To take away sin is to make Attonement for it to Expiate it before God by a satisfaction given or price paid with the procurement of the Pardon of it according unto the Terms of the New Covenant The Interpretation of these words by the Socinians is contrary unto the signification of the words themselves and the whole design of the Context Impossibile est saith Schlictingius ut sanguis taurorum hircorum peccata tollat hoc est efficiat ut homines in postcrum à peccatis abstinerent sic nullam amplius habeant peccatorum conscientiam sive ullas corum poenas metuant quam cnim quaeso vim ad haec praestandum sanguis animalium habere potest Itaque hoc dicit taurorum hircorum sanguinem eam vim nequaquam habere ut habeat impossibile esse ut homines à peccatis avocet ne in posterum peccent efficiat And Grotius after him speaks to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod suprà 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est extinguere peccata quod sanguis Christi facit cum quia fidem in nobis parit tum quia Christo jus dat nobis auxilia necessaria impetrandi pecudum sanguis nihil efficit tale 1. Nothing can be more Alien from the Design of the Apostle and Scope of the Context They are both of them to prove that the Sacrifices of the Law could not Expiate Sins could not make Attonement for them could not make Reconciliation with God could not produce the effect which the Sacrifice of Christ alone was appointed and ordained unto They were only Signs and Figures of it They could not effect that which the Hebrews looked for from them and by them And that which they expected by them was that by them they should make Attonement with God for their sins Wherefore the Apostle denies that it was possible they should effect what they looked for from them and nothing else It was not that they should be Arguments to turn them from Sin unto newness of life so as that they should sin no more By what way and on what consideration they were means to deter Men from Sin I have newly declared But they can produce no one place in the whole Law to give countenance unto such an Apprehension that this was their end so that the Apostle had no need to declare their Insufficiency with respect thereunto Especially the great Anniversary Sacrifice on the day of Expiation was appointed so expresly to make Attonement for Sin to procure its Pardon to take away its Guilt in the sight of God and from the Conscience of the Sinner that he should not be punished according unto the Sentence of the Law as that it cannot be denyed This is that which the Apostle declares that of themselves they could not effect or perform but only Typically and by way of Representation 2. He declares directly and positively what he intends by this taking away of Sin and the ceasing of Legal Sacrifices thereon ver 17 18. Their Sins and their Iniquities will I remember no more now where Remission of these is there is no more Offering for Sin The cessation of Offerings for Sin follows directly on the Remission of Sin which is the effect of Expiation and Attonement and not upon the turning away of Men from Sin for the future It is therefore our Justification and not our Sanctification that the Apostle discourseth of 3. The words themselves will not bear this sense For the Object of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which it is exercised about is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is an Act upon Sin it self and not immediately upon the Sinner Nor can it signifie any thing but to take away the Guilt of Sin that it should not bind over the Sinner unto punishment whereon Conscience for sin is taken away But to return 4. The manner of the Negation is that it was impossible that it should be otherwise And it was so 1. From Divine Institution Whatever the Jews apprehended they were never designed of God unto that end and therefore had no Virtue or Efficacy for it Communicated unto them And all the Virtue of Ordinances of Worship depends on their Designation unto their end The Blood of Bulls and Goats as offered in Sacrifice and carried into the most Holy Place was designed of God to represent the way of taking away sin but not by it self to effect it and it was therefore impossible that so it should do 2. It was impossible from the Nature of the things themselves in as much as there was not a Condecency unto the Holy perfections of the Divine Nature that Sin should be Expiated and the Church perfected by the Blood of Bulls and Goats For 1. There would not have been so unto his Infinite Wisdom For God having declared his severity against Sin with the necessity of its punishment unto the Glory of his Righteousness and Soveraign Rule over his Creatures what Condecency could there have been herein unto infinite Wisdom What Consistency between the severity of that Declaration and the taking away of Sin by such an Inferiour Beggarly means as that of the Blood of Bulls and Goats A great appearance was made of infinite displeasure against sin in the giving of the Fiery Law in the Curse of it in the threatnings of Eternal Death should all have ended in an outward shew there would have been no manner of proportion to be discerned between the Demerit of Sin and the means of its Expiation So that 2. It had no Condecency unto Divine Justice For 1. As I have elsewhere proved at large Sin could not be taken away without a Price a Ransome a Compensation and satisfaction made unto Justice for the Injuries it received by Sin In satisfaction unto Justice by way of Compensation for Injuries or Crimes there must be a proportion between the Injury and the Reparation of it that Justice may be as much Exalted and Glorified in the one as it was depressed and debased in the other But there could be no such thing between the Demerit of Sin and the Affront put on the Righteousness of God on the one
to enter into the holiest by the Blood of Jesus on these three accounts 1. In that Attonement is made thereby for sin and peace with God so as that he is reconciled unto us All that anger being turned away that did deterr us from any such approach 2. Fear dread and bondage are taken away so as the acting of Faith on God through the Blood of Jesus doth expel them and remove them out of our Mind 3. We receive the Holy Spirit therewithal who is a Spirit of Liberty power holy boldness enabling us to cry Abba Father 1. Nothing but the Blood of Jesus could have given this boldness nothing that stood in the way of it could otherwise have been removed nothing else could have set our Souls at liberty from that bondage that was come upon them by sin 2. Rightly esteem and duly improve the blessed priviledge which was purchased for us at so dear a rate What shall we render unto him How unspeakable are our Obligations unto Faith and Love 3. Confidence in an access unto God not built on not resolved into the Blood of Christ is but a daring presumption which God abhors VERSE 20. Having told us that we have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an entrance into the holiest he now declares what the way is whereby we may do so The way into the holiest under the Tabernacle was a passage with Blood through the Sanctuary and then a turning aside of the Veil as we have declared before But the whole Church was forbidden the use of this way and it was appointed for no other end but to signifie that in due time there should be a way opened unto Believers unto the presence of God which was not yet prepared And this the Apostle describes 1. From the preparation of it which he hath Consecrated 2. From the properties of it it was a new and living way 3. From the tendency of it which he expresseth 1. Typically or with respect unto the old way under the Tabernacle it was through the Veil 2. In an exposition of that Type that is his flesh In the whole there is a Description of the Exercise of Faith in our access unto God by Christ Jesus Having therefore Brethren boldness to enter into the holiest by the Blood of Jesus by a new and living way which he hath Consecrated for us through the Veil that is to say his Flesh. 1. The preparation of this way is by an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by a Dedication The word hath a double signification one in things natural the other in things sacred which yet are of no affinity unto one another In things natural it is to make new so as to be ready for use In things sacred it is to Dedicate or Consecrate any thing at the first erection or making of it unto sacred services The latter sence of the word which we receive in our translation is here to be imbraced yet so as it includes the former also For it is spoken in opposition unto the Dedication of the Tabernacle and way into the most holy place by the Blood of Sacrifices whereof we have treated in the Ninth Chapter So was this way into the holy place Consecrated Dedicated and set apart sacredly for the use of Believers so as that there never is nor ever can be any other way but by the Blood of Jesus Or there is this also in it that the way it self was new prepared and made not being extant before The way of our entrance into the holiest is solemnly Dedicated and Consecrated for us so as that with boldness we may make use of it He hath done it for us for our use our benefit and advantage 2. The properties of this way are two 1. That it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 New 1. Because it was but newly made and prepared 2. Because it belongs unto the new Covenant 3. Because it admits of no decays but is always new as unto its efficacy and use as in the day of its first preparation Whereas that of the Tabernacle waxed old and so was prepared for a removal this way shall never be altered nor changed never decay it is always new 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is Living This Epithet is placed by apposition without any note of distinction or conjunction And it is said to be Living 1. In opposition unto the way into the holiest under the Tabernacle which was 1. By Death Nothing could be done in it without the Blood of the Sacrifices 2. It was the cause of death unto any one that should make use of it the High Priest only excepted and he but once a year 2. It is Living as unto its efficacy it is not a dead thing it is that which hath a Spiritual vital efficacy in our access unto God 3. It is living from its effects it leads to Life and effectually brings us thereunto and is the only way of entring into everlasting Life All the priviledges we have by Christ are great glorious and efficacious all tending and leading unto life This new and living way of our approach unto God is nothing but the exercise of Faith for acceptance with God by the Sacrifice of Christ according unto the Revelation made in the Gospel 3. He shews which way it thus leads to the holiest or what is the tendency of it it is through the Veil The Apostle shews here expresly what he alludeth unto in the Declaration he makes of our entrance into the holiest The Veil here intended by him was that between the Sanctuary and the most holy place whose Description we have given on chap. 9. For there was no possible entrance thereinto but through that Veil which was turned aside when the High-Priest entred What this Veil was unto the High Priest in his entrance into that holy place that is the Flesh of Christ unto us in ours as in the last place is described in exposition of this Type that is his Flesh. For the opening of these words and the vindication of the Apostles application of this Type we may observe 1. The Flesh of Christ the Body of Christ the Blood of Christ Christ himself are all mentioned distinctly as the matter of his Sacrifice See chap. 9. 14 25 28. 2. This is done on various respects to express either the dignity or the efficacy of the Nature and manner of his Offering 3. In the Sacrifice of Christ the Flesh was that which suffered peculiarly as the great token and evidence of his real sufferings 4. The whole efficacy of his Sacrifice is ascribed unto every essential part of the Humane Nature of Christ in that which is either acted or suffered therein To his Soul Isa. 53. his Blood chap. 9. 14. his Body ver 10. his Flesh as in this place For these things were not distinctly operative one in one effect another in another but all of them concurr'd in his Nature and Person which he Offered once wholly to God
exercise not as unto it's radical in-being in the soul. For as I look on this confidence as a Grace so it is not the root but a branch of it Faith is the root and confidence is a branch springing out of it Wherefore it may at least for a season be cast away while faith abides firm Sometimes failing in Faith makes this Confidence to fail and sometimes failing in this Confidence weakens and impairs Faith When faith on any occasion is impaired and insnared this confidence will not abide And so soon as we begin to fail in our confidence it will reflect weakness on faith it self Now unto the casting away of this Confidence these things do concur 1. That it do as it were offer it self unto us for our assistance as in former times This it doth in the reasonings and arguings of faith for boldness and constancy in profession which are great and many and will arise in the minds of them that are Spiritually enlightned 2. Arguments against the use of it especially at the present season when it is called forth are required in this case and they are of two sorts 1. Such as are suggested by carnal wisdom urging men unto this or that course whereby they may spare themselves save their lives and keep their Goods by rejecting this confidence although they continued firm in the Faith 2. From carnal fears representing the greatness difficulties and dangers that lye in the way of an open profession with boldness and confidence 3. A resolution to forgoe this confidence upon the urgency of these arguings 4. An application unto other ways and means inconsistent with the exercise of this Grace in the discharge of this duty And hence it appears how great is the evil here dehorted from and what a certain entrance it will prove into the Apostacy it self so judged as before if not timely prevented And 't is that which we ought continually to watch against For he that was constant in this Grace yet did once make a forseiture of it unto his unutterable sorrow namely the Apostle Peter And it is not lost but upon the Corrupt reasonings which we have now mentioned that aggravate its guilt He that casts away his Confidence as unto his present profession and the duties thereof doth what lies in him cast away his interest in future salvation Men in such cases have a thousand pretences to relieve themselves But the present Duty is as indispensibly required as future happiness is faithfully promised Wherefore the Apostle adds the Reason why they should be careful in the preservation of this confidence which is that it hath a great recompence of reward That which the Apostle as unto the matter of it calls here a recompence of reward in the end of the next verse from the formal cause of it he calls the promise and that promise which we receive after we have done the will of God Wherefore the reward of recompence here intended is the glory of Heaven proposed as a crown a reward in way of recompence unto them that overcome in their sufferings for the Gospel And the future glory which as unto it's Original cause is the fruit of the good pleasure and soveraign grace of God whose pleasure it is to give us the Kingdom and as unto it's Procuring cause is the sole purchase of the blood of Christ who obtained for us Eternal redemption and on both accounts a free gift of God for the wages of sin is death but the gift of God through Christ is Life Eternal so as it can be no way merited nor procured by our selves by vertue of any proportion by the rules of Justice between what we do or suffer and what is promised is yet constantly promised unto suffering Believers under the name of a recompence and reward For it doth not become the Greatness and Goodness of God to call his own people unto sufferings for his Name and unto his Glory and therein the loss of their Lives many times with all Enjoyments here below and not propose unto them nor provide for them that which shall be infinitely better than all that they so undergo See Heb. 6. 11. and the Exposition of that place Rev. 2. 3. Wherefore it is added 3. That this Confidence hath this recompence of reward that is it gives a right and title unto the future reward of glory it hath it in the promise and constitution of God whoever abides in it's Exercise shall be no loser in the issue They are as sure in divine Promises as in our own possession And although they are yet future Faith gives them a present subsistence in the soul as unto their power and efficacy In the times of suffering and in the approaches of them it is the duty of Believers to look on the Glory of Heaven under the notion of a refreshing alsufficient Reward VERSE 36. For ye have need of Patience that after ye have done the Will of God ye might receive the Promise The Apostle in these words confirms the necessity of the Exhortation he had insisted on He had pressed them unto nothing but what was needful for them For whereas there were two things proposed unto them one in the way of Duty namely that they should do the will of God the other in the way of Reward or what they should receive upon their so doing things were so ordered in the soveraign pleasure and will of God that they could believe neither of them not only without the Duty which he exhorted them unto but without a continuance therein And indeed this Exhortation not to cast away their confidence that is to abide in it and to improve it against all difficulties and dangers doth include in it that patience which he affirms that they stand in need of Wherefore there are three things in the words 1. The confirmation of the preceding Exhortation by this reason that they had need of Patience 2. The time and season wherein that Patience was so needful as unto them and that was whilest they were doing the will of God 3. The end whereunto it was necessary which is the receiving of the Promise 1. The rational Enforcement is introduced by the Redditive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For. This is that which you must apply your minds unto or you cannot attain your end 2. That which he asserts in this reason is that they had need of Patience He doth not charge them with want of Patience but declares the necessity of it as unto its continual Exercise 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a bearing of evils with quietness and complacency of mind without raging fretting despondency or inclination unto complyance with undue ways of deliverance In Patience possess your Souls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or confidence will ingage men into troubles and difficulties in a way of duty But if patience take not up the work and carry it on confidence will flagg and fail See chap. 6. 11 12. and our Exposition
to satisfie the Hebrews that there shall be no such delay in what they looked after and expected as should be a just cause of despondencies or weariness in them As if he had said My Brethren faint not be not weary nor discouraged keep up Confidence and Patience you know what you wait for and expect which will be an abundant recompence unto you for all your Sufferings And whatever appearances there may be of its tarrying or delay whatever it may seem to you yet if you have but a prospect into Eternity be it what it will it is but a very little while and so is to be esteemed by you 2. That which is proposed unto them under this Limitation is this that he who shall come will come and will not tarry What the Prophet spake of the Vision he saw the Apostle applies unto the Person of Christ for the reasons before mentioned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He that shall come is a Periphrasis of Christ frequently used and applied unto him Once it is used to express his Eternity Rev. 1. 8. but generally it hath respect unto the Promise of him The Foundation of the Church was laid in the Promise that he should come and he came in his Spirit unto them from the foundation of the World 1 Pet. 1. 11. ch 3. 18 19 20. yet this was he that should come as is expressed John 1. this was his coming in the Flesh. After his Incarnation and Ministry he was now with respect unto them he that was come Yea to deny him to be come in answer unto that promise is Antichristian 1 John 4. 3. Yet after this he was to come again on a double account 1. In the Power of his Spirit and the exercise of his Royal Authority for the setting up and settling his Church in the world whereof there are two parts 1. The Assistance of his Spirit with his miraculous Operations unto the Ministers of the Gospel which were the powers of the world to come John 16. 7 8. This was an illustrious Advent of Christ not in his own person but in that of his Vicar and Substitute whom he promised to send in his stead Hereby he was acquitted from all that dishonour contempt andreproach that was cast on him in the world 2. He was to come for the punishment and destruction of his stubborn and inveterate Adversaries And these also were of three sorts 1. Those that were so directly unto his own Person and by consequence unto his Gospel 2. Such as were directly Enemies unto his Gospel and by consequence unto his Person 3. Such as were declared Enemies to them both 1. Of the First sort were the Jews who slew him who murdered him and cast him out of the Vineyard and thereon continued their hatred against the Gospel and all that made profession thereof He was to come to destroy those murderers and to burn their City which fell out not long after the writing of this Epistle and is properly intended in this place See Matth. 24. 3 27 30. 2 Pet. 3. 4. Jude 14. Rev. 1. 7. Mark 16. 28. James 5. 7 8. For hereon ensued the deliverance of the Church from the Rage and persecution of the Jews with the illustrious propagation of the Gospel throughout the world 2. The Pagan Roman Empire was the Second sort of his Adversaries who were immediate Enemies unto his Gospel and consequently to his Person These after the destruction of the former sort raged with all Blood and Cruelty against the Church for sundry Ages These therefore he promised he would come and destroy and the Faith of the Church concerning this his Coming was that he that should come would come and would not tarry The description of this coming of Christ is given us Rev. 6. 7 8 9 10. 3. After this arose a third sort of Enemies who in words owning his person and Gospel opposed all his Offices and persecuted all that would yield Obedience unto him in the Exercise of them and were thereby consequentially Enemies both to his Person and Gospel This was the Apostate Christian Church of Rome or the New Testament Babylon And in respect of these Enemies of his Christ is still he that is to come and as such is believed in and his coming prayed for by all the Saints For he is to destroy the Man of Sin the Head of that Apostasie by the Brightness of his coming For as the opposition made unto him did not arise suddenly and at once as those forementioned did especially that of the Jews whose destruction was therefore speedy and at once but in a long tract of time grew up gradually unto its height so he will destroy it in like manner And therefore although he hath set his hand unto that work and begun the Execution of his Judgments on the Antichristian State in some degree yet as to the utter destruction of it by those Plagues which shall befall it in one day he is still 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that is looked for he that is to come 2. Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto his coming at the last day unto Judgment This is known and confessed and the business of his coming therein is the Prayer of the whole Church Rev. 22. 20. And it is an Article of Faith whose nature we have described on Chap. 6. 5. It may be now inquired with respect unto whether of these comings it is said here he shall come that he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is generally referr'd by Interpreters unto his last Advent at the day of Judgment I doubt not but that also is included but I dare not exclude the other Comings mentioned as things which were principally suited unto the relief of the Church under it's distress For unto every state of the Church there is a coming of Christ suited and accommodated unto their condition whereby their Faith is kept in continual exercise of desires after it This was the life of faith under the Old Testament as to his coming in the flesh until it was accomplished This faith after his Resurrection they lived on though but for a short season untill he came in the power of his Spirit and his miraculous Operations so to convince the World of Sin Righteousness and Judgment Nor do I understand how the Just can live by faith without a continual expectation of the coming of Christ in a way suited to the Sufferings and Deliverance of his Church in that season For instance the state was such now with those Hebrews that if an end were not put unto it or the dayes were not shortned no flesh among them could have been saved as our Saviour speaks Matth. 24. 22. In this state the Church looked for such a coming of Christ as should work out their Deliverance and he came accordingly as we have shewed Afterwards the Earth was filled with the Blood of Saints and Martyrs by the Power of the Roman Empire In this state those
that were slain and those that were alive appointed unto death cryed How long Lord holy and just doest thou not avenge our blood on them that live on the Earth They exercised Faith also in this word that it was but a little while and he that shall come will come which he did accordingly And the case is the same with those that suffer under the Antichristian Apostasie they live pray and believe in the expectation of the Appearance of the Brightness of that coming of Christ wherewith the Man of Sin shall be consumed and although it seem to tarry they wait for it This is the faith and patience of the Saints Wherefore the End for which this coming of Christ is proposed unto the Church being the supportment and encouragement of their Souls unto Faith and Patience a respect must be had unto such a coming as is suited to their relief in their present state and condition And this unto these Hebrews was then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a literal sence So it is to be accommodated unto all other states of the Church And therein the consideration of the coming of Christ at the last day unto the final and eternal Judgment ought not to be omitted This is that Anchor and great Reserve of Believers in all their distresses and sufferings when all appearance of deliverance in the World absolutely ceaseth to betake themselves unto this that there is a day approaching wherein God will judge the World in righteousness by the Man whom he hath ordained That the Lord Christ shall assuredly come unto that Judgment is that which they principally resolve their Satisfaction into See 2 Thess. 1. 6 7 8 9 10. I. It is essential unto Faith to be acted on the promised Coming of Christ to all that look for his appearance II. There is a Promise of the Coming of Christ suited unto the state and condition of the Church in all ages III. The appearing delay of the accomplishment of any of these Promises requires an exercise of the faith and patience of the Saints IV. Every such coming of Christ hath its appointed season beyond which it shall not tarry V. This divine disposition of things gives a necessity unto the continual exercise of Faith Prayer and Patience about the coming of Christ. VI. Although we may not know the especial Dispensations and moments of time that are passing over us yet all Believers may know the state in general of the Church under which they are and what coming of Christ they are to look for and expect So is it with us who live under the Antichristian state which Christ in his appointed time will come and destroy VII Faith in any Church satisfies the souls of men with what is the Good and deliverance of that state Although a man do know or is perswaded that personally he shall not see it himself nor enjoy it The Faith of this kind is for the Church and not for mens individual persons VIII Under despondencies as to peculiar appearances or comings of Christ it is the duty of Believers to fix and exercise their Faith on his illustrious Appearance at the last day IX Every particular coming of Christ in a way suited unto the present deliverance of the Church is an infallible pledge of his coming at the last unto Judgment X. Every promised coming of Christ is certain and shall not be delayed beyond its appointed season when no difficulties shall be able to stand before it VERSE 38 39. Now the just shall live by Faith but if any man draw back my soul shall have no pleasure in him But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul The Apostle proceedeth in the Allegation of the Testimony taken out of the Prophet and the application of it unto his present purpose And he observeth not herein the order of the words but keeps unto the sence and meaning of them And two things he designeth in these two Verses 1. To declare the Event of the Proposal made unto them of the coming of Christ whereby he confirmed his Exhortation unto Faith and Patience in their suffering condition v. 38. 2. An Application of the different Events mentioned by the Prophet unto these Hebrews v. 39. In the First there are two different events expressed of the Proposal and Exhortation before given and made with the means of them the one is that the just shall live by his Faith and the other which is built on the Supposition if any man draw back that is then my soul shall have no pleasure in him In the First there are to be considered 1. The note of Connexion in the Adversative particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. There is the Qualification of the Person spoken of he is the just 3. The means of his being so or of his obtaining the event mentioned which is by Faith 4. What is the event it self he shall live Three times doth the Apostle in his Epistles make use of this Prophetical testimony Rom. 1. 17. Gal. 3. 11. and in this place The Note of Inference in the Exceptive Particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we render Now as afterwards we render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But. The first proper sence might as well have been retained But in the first place and And afterwards But the difference is of no importance 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is here taken for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Prophet which is oft times exceptive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And in the Prophet the expression is plain because it followeth the description of the contrary frame unto what is here asserted He whose heart is lifted up But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the transposition of the Words used by the Apostle for he first repeats the last clause of the words and then the former afterwards which was more accommodate unto his purpose doth not seem to have the force of an exceptive nor hath it so indeed in respect unto what was affirmed in the foregoing Verse but it hath so unto the difficulty supposed in the case under consideration which are the Sufferings and Temptations which Professors of the Gospel should in common meet withall and in the appearance of a delay as unto their deliverance out of them But saith the Apostle however notwithstanding these things the just shall live by Faith 2. The Person spoken of is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a just person a man really made just or justified by faith every one that is really and truly so I doubt not but this is included in the word and the state of Justification is intended in it To which purpose the words are elsewhere cited by the Apostle But yet that which is here principally intended is that qualification of a Righteous man which is opposed to Pride and haste of Spirit through Unbelief whereon men draw back from God in the Profession of the Gopel The just man he who