Creature now he designing Life for Life therefore he pitch'd upon blood wherein the life did lye The Apostle tells us Heb. 9.22 And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding of blood is no remission and if you look into the Levitical Sacrifices you 'l find what he saith to be true In the Burnt-offering for private Persons there was killing and blood Levit. 1.5 the same in the Peace-offerings Levit. 3.2 8 13. the same in the Sin-offerings Levit. 4.7 16 17 18. and so in the rest And the observation of these commands which run so much upon blood was so necessary that should any of the Priests have dared to have entred into God's presence in any other way than by Sacrifices and the blood thereof he would not have taken it well at their hands yea should they have brought into the Temple never so many Bullocks Rams Goats c. and not have slain them or having slain them had not presented their blood before him according to his Institution they would have done no good either to themselves or others for God to shew his Justice Hatred of Sin c stood upon blood and blood he would have From all this we may infer that those old Sacrifices did not expiate as bare Antecedents or Conditions without which God would not pardon or as the offering of them carried in it some Obedience to God's Commands both of which were common to many other things as well as to them surely there was more in it than so Dr. Stillingfl against Crell p. 516 c. for can we reasonably think that God would have been so positive and so express in his Injunctions about somany Sacrifices so severe in the punishing the neglect of them have ordered the taking away the lives of so many Creatures and have so much insisted upon their death and blood in order to expiation had he look'd upon them only as pre-requisite and remoter Conditions of pardon or common acts of Obedience and that as such only they should be expiatory Certainly had there been nothing in them more than this the merciful Creator would have spar'd the blood of the poor Creatures and would have pitch'd upon some other course which might have seem'd at least more consistent with his Wisdom and Goodness We may conclude them therefore to be Means instituted by God in order to atonement and expiation to the effecting of which by virtue of his own institution and the mevit of the great Sacrifice to come they had a direct and effectual tendency This foundation I have laid for the better understanding of the destroying killing shedding of blood that was in the typical Sacrifices I come now to build upon it with respect to the real Sacrifice Christ Jesus In conformity to them therefore Christ was slain died upon the Cross his body broken his blood spilt c. all which speaks him to be a true expiatony Sacrifice Had he not died and suffer'd he could not have been such but upon that he is not only such a Sacrifice really but eminently the dignity of his Person putting a superlative worth and â—fficacy upon his Death and Sacrifice O what was the death of Greatures to the death of God's Son what was the blood of Beasts to the blood of him who was God Acts. 20.28 for such aâ—person to die to shed his blood for the expiation of Sin here was a Sacrifice indeed And surely one great end of God in ordering the death of the old Sacrifices was to convince the World of the necessity of the death of this far greater Sacrifice by them he designed in ways best known to himself to lead men to a dying and bleeding Christ How much doth the Scripture spake of his blood and though his whole humiliation must be taken in as making up his Sacrifice yet in special what a stress and emphasis doth it put upon his Death and Blood wherein his greatest humiliation lay with respect to their influence upon the good of Sinners Eph. 1.7 In whom we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins Rom. 3.25 whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood c. Rom. 5.9 Much more then being now justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him 1. Joh. 1.7 and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin Rev. 1.5 Vnto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood 1 Pet. 1.19 but with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot Mat. 26.28 This is my blood of the New-Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins Heb. 9.12 c. Neither by the blood of Goats and Calves but by his own Blood he entred in once into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption for us For if the blood of Bulls and of Goats c. Col. 1.14 having made peace through the blood of his Cross Surely there must be some special reason why this blood of Christ is so often mention'd and why the great benefits which Sinners receive by him are in such a way of eminency ascrib'd to it of which some account will be given in the following particular O the severity of God's Justice which nothing could satisfie but the blood of his own Son O the love of Christ who thought not the best blood in his veins too good for Sinners O the truth of his Satisfaction for what could such blood be spilt for but for that what end could be proportionable to such a medium but Satisfaction O the admirable harmony between type and antitype the shadow and the substance Sacrifice and Sacrifice under the Law 't was blood under the Gospel ' t was blood too only that was common blood but this excellent and precious The Fourth Head of the Ends Effects of the old expiatory Sacrifices and how they are applicable to Christ 4. Fourthly if we compare Christ with the Jewish Sacrifices in their Ends and Effects that will further demonstrate him to be a true expiatory Sacrifice What were they atonement and expiation by them God was to be atoned and Sin to be expiated now both of these were designed and admirably effected in and by Christ therefore he was what I am proving That those Sacrifices were of an atoning nature and appointed for that end what can be more plain Here the so often cited Text which indeed is the key to the whole body of the Levitical-Sacrifices doth recur Levit. 17.11 I have given it to you upon the Altar for what end to make an atonement for your Souls where the word used as in very many other places is Caphar which signifies to * This sense of the word justify'd by all Anti-Socinian Writers Franz Disp 15. th 38. Turretin de Satisf p. 208. Grot. de Sat. p. 39. Hoorneb Socin Confut. p. 607. Dr. Stillingfl p. 509. c. pacify
as practical as operative and powerful this this is that knowledge which is to be desired When Paul had spoken so high of the knowledge of Christ * Phil. 3.8 Yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord see how he opens that knowledge of him which he look'd upon as so excellent Vers 10. That I may know him and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto his death 'T is a poor thing to have light about this in the head if that light be not attended with power and efficacy upon the heart and life the clearest notions concerning Christ's death without suitable impressions within and that which in the Sinner himself may bear some analogie and conformity thereunto do not profit O therefore so study a crucified Saviour as to be * Gal. 2.20 crucified with him †Rom. 6.8 dead with him so as to feel the energie of his death in the heavenliness of your affections and holiness of your conversations this is the knowledge which we should study and pray for and aspire after For the Second Christ as a Sacrifice is also much to be meditated upon O how frequent how serious and fixed should our thoughts be upon this how should we be often reviving this upon our minds never suffering it to decay or wither in our memories This is so great and necessary a duty that we have an Ordinance instituted by Christ on purpose and for this very end often to inminde us of his dying as our Sacrifice and to keep it fresh upon our memories for ever * 1 Cor. 11.24 26. Do this in remembrance of me As oft as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye do shew the Lord's death till he come But 't is not enough to think of this just before or at the Sacrament but we should live in daily frequent meditation upon it I say we should do so but alas 't is to be feared we do not so O how little is a dying crucified Christ thought of the dying Friend or Relation is remembred but the dying Saviour is forgotten this proclaims to the world that we have but a low sense of his great love that we see but little in his oblation for surely if we did we should think oftner of it and after another manner than now we do Christians pray be sensible of former neglects and let it be better for the future let not a day pass over you wherein some time shall not be spent in remembring and considering what Christ your Sacrifice upon the Cross suffered for you Upon this also you would reap great advantages for certainly was Christ's death but duly thought of and improved Oh 't would highly imbitter sin effectually wean from the world and the sensual delights thereof mightily encourage and strengthen Hope and Faith strongly engage the Soul to Obedience c. therefore pray be persuaded to think less of other things and more of this And do not barely think of it but think what there 's in it yea labour to go to the very bottom of it and by serious meditation to press out all that juyce and sweetness which is in it the believer should be alwayes sitting upon this flower and sucking comfort from it What 's the full breast to the child that doth not draw it Christ as a Sacrifice for sin is a full breast but yet if Sinners by Faith Prayer and Meditation do not draw from this breast they will be little the better for it He was indeed but once offered but that one oblation is often to be remembred and continually to be improved with respect both to Duty and Comfort how that is to be done the following particulars will shew The Heart in the sense of this to be broken for sin and from sin 2. This should have a very powerful influence upon you to break your hearts for sin and from sin First for sin was Christ indeed made a Sacrifice as such was his body broken and his precious blood poured forth did he undergo such sufferings in his life and then compleat all in his dying on the Cross and all for sin how can this be thought of with any seriousness and the heart not be kindly and thoroughly broken what will cause the hard heart to melt and thaw into godly sorrow for sin if the consideration of Christ's Sacrifice and death will not do it Oh me thinks his blood as shed for Sinners should soften the most Adamantine heart that is Did we but consider our Saviours passion in the matter and quality of it in its bitter ingredients and heightning circumstances and then also consider that our sins were the meritorious cause of it that they brought him to the Cross and laid the foundation of all his sorrows did we I say but consider this certainly we should be more deeply afflicted for Sin than now we are What that I should be accessary to the death of the Son of God that I should bring the nails and spears which should pierce him that I should be the occasion of all his sufferings in Soul and Body what a cutting heart-breaking consideration is this Zech. 12. 10. they shall look upon me whom they have pierced what follows and they shall mourn for him as one mourneth for his only Son and shall be in bitterness for him as one that is in bitterness for his first-born the true penitent cannot look upon a crucified Saviour especially when he considers what he hath done to further his Saviours crucifixion without the highest degree of holy grief But especially this heart-brokenness should be in us when we are at the Sacrament where we have such a sensible and lively representation of Christ's Death and Sacrifice Oh shall we there see his broken body and yet our hearts be unbroken shall we view him there shedding his blood and we shed no penitential tears shall we there behold what he endured and felt for Sin and we yet have no pain no contrition for it how unsuitable is such a frame to such an object under such a representation What was the temper think you of the Women who were * Mat. 27.55 spectators of Christ when he was hanging upon the Cross unquestionably they were filled with inexpressible sorrow why Sirs when you are at the Lord's Table in a spiritual way you see him also as dying upon the Cross he is there before your eyes evidently set forth and crucified among you Gal. 3.1 Oh how should your * Lam. 3.51 eye affect your heart even to fill you with Evangelical sorrow Three things in the Text to set men against Sin But this is not enough therefore 2. there must be brokenness from sin as well as for sin surely after such a thing as Christ's death Sin must be lov'd and liv'd no more the heart must eternally be broken off from it
* 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 2. p. 97. PORPHYRY's Objections against Sacrifices in general viz. they would encourage men to be wicked All to labour after an interest in Christ's Sacrifice and in the benefits thereby procured 3. Thirdly I would excite you to labour after and to make sure of a personal interest in this great Sacrifice and in the benefits resulting from it For 't is a thing to be resented with the greatest sadness imaginable that where â—ere is such a Sacrifice so at first offered up to God and now so revealed to men that yet so many millions of Souls should perish and as to their spiritual and eternal state be little the better for it because they regard not as to themselves either the thing or the good that flows from it My Brethren I beseech you if you have any love for your Souls let it not be so with you but let it be your greatest care to secure an interest in this Sacrifice and to partake of the blessings procured by it be often considering and questioning with your selves here 's a Sacrifice for expiation and atonement but what 's this to us here 's a dying Christ but did he die for us shall we be ever the better for his death if this propitiatory oblation be not ours what will become of us Under the Law the Gentile-strangers were to offer Sacrifices as well as the born-Jews see Numb 15.14 15. Lev. 17.8 and amongst the Jews the poor as well as the rich with respect to which difference in mens outward condition God accordingly appointed different Sacrifices Lev. 14.21 but yet something or other both were to Sacrifice and in their offerings for the ransome of their Souls all were to give alike Exod. 30.15 The rich shall not give more the poor shall not give less than half a Shekel Now all this was to shadow out two things about Christ's Sacrifice 1. its equal extent to all men notwithstanding all national or civil differences be they Jews or Gentiles rich or poor 't is the same Christ to all if they believe for there is no difference Rom. 3.22 2. the equal obligation lying upon all men to look after make sure of and rest in this one and the same all-sufficient Sacrifice none in order to remission justification atonement eternal life need to carry more to God by Faith and Prayers and none must carry less Sirs let us all put in for a share in Christ's offering and in the benefits purchased thereby for if we should come short of that we are lost eternally Are not reconciliation with God the expiation of sin eternal redemption c. things most necessary and most desireable if so where can we hope to have them but in a sacrific'd Redeemer but in the imputation of the merit of his death and Sacrifice And I add do not only make sure of the thing objectively considered but labour also after the subjective assurance of it Oh when a Christian can say Christ dy'd for me * Gal. 2.20 gave himself for me his body was broken and his blood shed for me he took my guilt and bare my punishment how is he filled with †1 Pet. 1.8 joy unspeakable with | Phil. 4.7 peace that passes all understanding what a full-tyde of comfort is there in his Soul This is the receiving of the atonement as some open it and that is very sweet Rom. 5.11 And not only so but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ by whom we have now received the atonement This is to be ey'd and only rely'd upon 4. In the actings of Faith eye Christ as a Sacrifice for sin and there let all your hope and confidence be bottom'd I say in the actings of Faith eye Christ as a Sacrifice for indeed this grace hath to do with him mainly and principally as dying and sacrific'd the Apostle speaks of Faith in his blood Rom. 3.25 't is a bleeding crucified Saviour that is the great and most proper object of Faith true it takes in a whole Christ all of Christ his Nativity holy Life Resurrection Ascension Intercession c. but that which it primarily and chiefly fixes upon is his death and passion When a Soul is brought into Christ to close with him in the way of believing what of him is first in its eye in that act is it a Christ as ascending as sitting at the right hand of God as interceding no thus it beholds him for the after-encouragement and support of Faith but that which it first considers is a Christ as dying upon the Cross and so it layes hold upon him And no wonder that 't is so since all the great blessings of the Gospel do mainly flow from Christ's death they are assur'd and apply'd by his Resurrection Ascension and Intercession but they were procur'd and purchas'd by his death as the Scriptures abundantly shew Rom. 5.9 10. Eph. 1.7 et passim now tnat which hath the most causal and most immediate influence upon these that deserves to be first and most eyed by Faith Here 's the difference 'twixt Faith and Love this chiefly looks to the excellencies of Christ's Person but that to the merit and efficacy of his Sacrifice When the Apostle Gal. 2.20 had spoken so high of his Faith in the Son of God he tells you in what notion he did therein consider him by adding who loved me and gave himself for me The stung Israelite was to look upon the brazen Serpent as lifted up and so he was healed do you desire to find healing redemption salvation by Christ O look upon him as lifted up upon the Cross so all good shall come to you Further I say let all your hope and confidence be bottom'd here this is that firm rock which you must only build upon for pardon peace with God salvation for all Oh take heed of relying upon any thing besides this Sacrifice Gal. 6.14 God forbid that I should glory save in the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ he that glory 's or trusts in any thing besides that his glorying is vain The forlorn undone Sinner should be alwayes clasping and clinging about this Cross resting upon the merit of Christ thereon and upon that only for all that hope will be but dying hope which is not solely bottom'd upon a dying Saviour The * Quum sis ipse nocens moritur cur victima pro te Stultitia est morte alterius sperare salutem Heathens could not believe that ever the death of Sacrifices should do the guilty person good they look'd upon it as folly to hope for life by anothers death but blessed be God we see that which they did not we firmly believe and steadily hope for expiation and Salvation by Christ's one offering of himself and lay the sole stress of our Faith and happiness upon that which they counted folly But let us be sure we do not mistake here I mean let us indeed
what could there be in them to pacisie an angry God or to to purifie a guilty Sinner what was the blood of a Beast as considered in it self to expiate the sin of a Man The Apostle plainly tells us Heb. 10.4 It is not possible that the blood of Bulls and Goats should take away sin therefore he sayes there was no perfection by the Levitical Priesthood Heb. 7.11 and the Law made nothing perfect Heb. 7.19 in which were offered gifts and Sacrifices that could not make him that did the service perfect as pertaining to the Conscience Heb. 9.9 So that whatever virtue those Sacrifices had further than the taking away of civil guilt ritual uncleanness securing from Church and State-penalties it wholly depended upon the institution of God and the merit of Christ The brazen Serpent heal'd such as were stung yet not from any intrinsick power in it self but only as God was pleas'd to give that power and efficacy to it and so 't was here in the case of the old Sacrifices These four things I have laid down both to clear up the Sacrifices themselves and also because they are of great use to set us right in our conceptions about Christ the great Sacrifice which must be opened by them Answerably now to these two great Ends and Effects of the Mosaical Sacrifices the same were designed to be done and were actually done by the Lord Jesus when he offered up himself to God upon the Cross whereby he also 1. atoned God 2. expiated the sin of the Elect. As God was angry and offended with the Sinner so Christ by his death procur'd atonement pacification reconciliation as the Sinner lay under guilt so Christ brought about the purgation or expiation of his guilt both of these were done by him and that too not only really but in a much higher way than what was done by the old Sacrifices therefore he was a true proper expiatory Sacrifice yea the most eminent expiatory Sacrifice Of atonement and reconciliation by Christs Sacrifice 1. For atonement or reconciliation By Adams Fall a sad breach had been made 'twixt God and Man Sin had greatly incens'd the holy God against his sinful Creatures nay there was a mutual and reciprocal enmity contracted between them Things being in this dismal state the blessed Jesus interpos'd himself in order to the appeasing of an offended God and the reconciling of him and the Sinner the two parties that were at variance For the effecting of which he did not only as a bare Internuntius treat with both or only offer up prayers to the one in which respect Moses atoned God Exod. 34.10 11 12 13 14. and intreaties to the other 2 Cor. 5.20 and so proceed by some verbal interposures but when nothing else would do it he was willing even to lay down his own Life to die as a Sacrifice upon the Cross by this means to bring God and Man together again in amity and love By which death of Christ the offended God was perfectly atoned and reconciled to the Sinner so as that now upon the satisfaction made to him therein he could without any injury to his Justice and Holiness receive the Sinner into his favour and not inflict upon him that wrath and punishment which he had made himself obnoxious unto this is the true notion of atonement and reconciliation by Christ and all that we * Non statuimus Deum irato propriè factum esse propitium sed Christi Satisfactione causas irae divinae obliteratas esse ut salvâ justistiâ suâ possit gratiam exhibere Essenïus p. 253. mean by it But that this was thus done by him what one thing is there in all the matters of Faith wherein the Gospel is more clear and full 1 Joh. 2.2 And he is the propitiation for our sins 1 Joh. 4.10 Herein is love not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his blood c. Rom. 5.10 11. For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life And not only so but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ by whom we have now received the atonement 2 Cor. 5.18 19. All things are of God who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself Col. 1.20 21. And having made peace through the blood of his Cross by him to reconcile all things unto himself c. And you that were sometimes alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works yet now hath be reconciled in the body of his flesh through death So Eph. 2.13 14 c. Isa 53.6 the chastisement of our peace was upon him i. e. by his penal sufferings our peace was made with God 'T is true which our * Socin de Serv◠p. 1. c. 8. Adversanies would fain improve to their purpose that all along in these Scriptures the reconciliation is said to be on Mans part as if Sinners were reconcil'd to God not God to them but there 's a special reason for that viz. * Baxters Life of Faith p. 189. because they were the first in the breach they fell out with God before he fell out with them as also because the averseness to reconciliation is on their part wherefore if they be willing to be reconcil'd to God and are actually reconciled to him there 's no question of it but that he is willing to be reconciled to them and is so actually Some would have the reconciliation as on God's part to be spoken of Heb. 2.17 that he might be a merciful and faithful high Priest in things pertaining to God to make reconciliation for the sins of the people where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is according to the Hebrew Enallage as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as * De Satisf p. 93. Grotius well observes Howerver supposing that this Text doth not so expresly hold forth the thing yet there is enough in those convincing Reasons Arguments and Consequences which the Word elsewhere affords to prove the reconciliation to be mutual as is fully proved by divers Which reconciliation you see was accomplished by Jesus Christ yea by his death and blood so that he exactly answers to the first effect of the Jewish Sacrifices Of the Expiation of Sin by Christ's Sacrifice 2. The for the Second the expiation of sin that also was done with great advantage by Christ his death carried indeed a Sin-expiating virtue in it and was most truly of an expiatory nature Let us a little look into the Scripture see what it saith about this and that we shall find not only to assert the thing but so to assert it as withal to set down and determine the nature and true notion of it I mean this
the Scripture doth not only in general speak of Christ's taking away or expiating of Sin but it shews in what manner he did it and wherein the nature of that expiation did consist as namely that he did expiate it in that way which was agreeable to what was done in and by the old Sacrifices and that according to the notion proper to their expiation so his must be understood For in speaking thereof it uses those expressions which point to those Sacrifices and to their expiation thereby noting 1. that Christ did expiate in that very way wherein they did and 2. that therefore his expiation in the nature of it must run parallel with theirs Take a few Instances Heb. 9.13 14. For if the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh How much more shall the blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purge your Conscience from dead works to serve the living God Vers 22 23. And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding blood is no remission It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the Heavens should be ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purified with these but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices than these Heb. 1.3 When he had by himself * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purged our sins or as 't is in the Greek he having by himself made purgation or expiation of our sins 1 Joh. 1.7 and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cleanseth us from all sin by which cleansing the Apostle meant the expiation or remission of sin for Vers 9. he puts them together he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness Heb. 10.22 having our bearts * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sprinkled from an evil Conscience and our bodies †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 washed with pure water Revel 1.5 Vnto him that loved us and ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 washed us from our sins in his own blood Now pray observe from these Scriptures 1. That the expiating of sin under the terms of purifying purging cleansing washing sprinkling is expresly attributed to Christ 2. That he as being a Sacrifice by dying and shedding his blood so did expiate sin 3. That the proper and primary effect of his death and blood was the expiation of sins guilt and as a consequent thereof its remission Matth. 26.28 This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins Eph. 1.7 In whom we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins So Rom. 3.25 4. That as the Jewish Sacrifices were truly expiatory they in their way taking off sins guilt and the punishment due thereupon wherein the formal nature of their expiation did consist so answerably Christ Jesus was a true expiatory Sacrifice he in his way too taking off sins guilt c. wherein the formal nature of his expiation did and must consist also This I ground upon a twofold consideration 1. Because by those very Words which were proper to those Sacrifices and by which their expiation of sin was seth forth I say by those very Words the Sacrifice of Christ and the efficasy thereof is described therefore it must be as truly expiatory of sin as they were this is sufficiently proved in the places that have been cited And I might further add that the words there used are the very same with those which the Greek prophane Authors do always use when they are speaking of their expiatory Sacrifices and of the effect of them of which many instances are given by the * Stuck de Sacrif fol. 148. Grot. de Sat. p. 128 129. with many Others Learned 2. Because the Apostle who most uses these words and in the place too where he most uses them I mean in his Epistle to the Hebrews doth professedly draw a parallel 'twixt Christ and the Law-Sacrifices shewing there was a great analogie and resemblance betwixt them True he asserts a greater excellency and efficacy in the one than in the other and as to the manner of working he shews there was a vast difference between them but yet as to the great effect of a Sacrifice expiation of sin in that so far as the nature of the things would admit of they did agree Well then if they did purifie and expiate so must Christ and as they did purifie and expiate in taking away guilt by death and blood so must Christ otherwise where would the analogie be between them was it not thus there would be expiation in the type and none in the antitype and one way of expiation in the type and another in the antitype both of which are directly contrary to the Apostles scope and design in the forenamed Epistl◠Some possibly will ask why I multiply so many words and stay so long upon this point I 'le tell them I do it to vindicate both the reality and also the true notion of our Saviours expiatory Sacrifice For the SOCINIANS who have not left us one fountain of Evangelical Comfort un-poyson'd herein deal with their usual subtilty very fair words are spoken by them as though they were for and did own Christ's * Socin de Serv. p. 2. c. 11.13 14 16 17. Crellius contra Grot. cap. 10. sect 2. expiation of sin but when they come to open it and to shew what they mean by it they make it a quite other thing than what indeed it is they keep the Word but quit the Scripture-sense thereof Christ say they did expiate sin but how why by begetting Faith in the Sinner by working repentance in him by turning and drawing him off from sin by delivering from the effects of it by declaring the Will of God about remission and the way thereunto as his death was an antecedent to his exaltation in Heaven where say they he only expiates sin c. in such things as these but not in Christ's undergoing the punishment due to the Sinner and dying in his stead they make his expiation of Sin to lie Now though much might be and * Grot. de Sat. p. 136. Hoorneb p. 581. c. Franz p. 207. 450. Dr. Stillingst against Crell c. 6. p. 507. c. Turret p. 202. c. Jacob. ad Portum p. 464. c. is said against each of these particularly yet that which I have in the general insisted upon is a sufficient confutation of them all viz. Christ must expiate sin in that way and sense wherein the Sacrifices under the Law did now did they expiate any other way than as they were substituted in the Offenders room and as they dy'd in his stead therefore that must be the way wherein Christ our Sacrifice doth expiate also
occur in Scripture 2 King 3.27 2 King 17.31 2 King 23.10 2 Chron. 28.3 Jer. 7.31 Jer. 19.5 Jer. 32.35 Psal 106.37 38. Levit. 18.21 Levit. 20.2 In other things the Heathens borrowed from the Jews in this the Jews from the Heathens Upon the whole then it appears that Scripture and Nature do both concur in that notion of expiatory Sacrifices which I have insisted upon and surely in the applying of it to Christ the grand expiatory Sacrifice the Gospel is exceeding clear So that when we assert his substitution in the stead of Sinners his dying for them his atoning God and expiating Sin by his death and blood we say nothing but what Jews and Heathens in their expiatory Sacrifices apprehended believed and acted upon They then who differ in these things as to the general nature use and end of such Sacrifices they differ not only from us but from all mankind of whom it might be expected they would better agree with Heathens since they do so ill agree with Christians Of the Second Enquiry when and where Christ was this expiatory Sacrifice I have dispatch'd the First Enquiry What a kind of Sacrifice Christ was the Second follows when and where he was such a Sacrifice To which I answer when he was here on earth and especially when he died upon the Cross then and there he was this expiatory Sacrifice All are not of my mind herein the Enemy who way-lays me in every step I take in these great Truths is upon me again and forces me to defend my self or rather the Truth I have laid down * Socin de Serv. p. 2. c. 12 15. Smale de Divin Christi c. 23. Gatech Racov. de Mun. Christi Sacerd. Quaest 2. He saith Christ's being thus a Sacrifice points to his being in Heaven and to what he there doth that his death here was but a preparation to his Sacrifice as there to be made or but an antecedent Condition to his having of power there to expiate sin with much more to that purpose Here then lies the difference between us and S we say Christ's being the expiatory Sacrifice belongs to that part of his Priestly-Office which he executed here upon earth they make it to refer to that part of his Priestly-Office which he now executes in Heaven we time it in Christ's dying upon the Cross they in his sitting upon the Throne Now that I may at once prove what is true and also confute what is false I argue thus 1. It appears that here Christ's Sacrifice was exhibited or that here he made his expiatory Offering because the Scripture speaks of it as a thing that is past and antecedent to his exaltation and glory and therefore it must be done here on earth and not in Heaven Eph. 5.2 and hath given himself for us an Offering a Sacrifice to God for a sweet smelling savour Heb. 1.3 when he had by himself purged our sins he sate down on the right hand of the Majesty on high mark it the Sacrifice-purgation or expiation of sin was over and done and then Christ's exaltation in Heaven followed after Heb. 9.12 Neither by the blood of Goats and Calves but by his own blood he entred in once into the holy place having obtained not to obtain eternal redemption for us Heb. 10.12 But this man after he had offered one Sacrifice for sins for ever sate down on the right hand of God he did not first sit down on the right hand of God and then offer up his Sacrifice for sins but he first offered and then he sat down on the right hand of God 2. When the Scripture speaks of Christ's expiation of sin by the Sacrifice of himself it speaks of it as a thing done but once therefore it must refer to his death which was but once not to his intercession or any other act in Heaven which is a * Heb. 7.25 continued repeated and reiterated act Heb. 9.26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Vers 28. Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many Heb. 7.27 this he did once when he offered up himself Heb. 10.10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all Doth this once agree with any thing that he now doth in Heaven 3. If Christ had not dispatch'd his expiatory work at his death why did he then say * Joh. 19.30 It is finished if his expiating of sin was yet to come and to be done in Heaven how could he with truth have spoken these words that all was finished when the great thing was yet undone 4. That of the Apostle is pertinent to our purpose Heb. 10.5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world he saith Sacrifice and offering thou wouldst not but a body hast thou prepared me c. wherefore did Christ come into the world why to be a Sacrifice and to do that which the old Sacrifices could not God was e'ene weary of them could no longer * Heb. 10.8 take pleasure in them he will have Christ the better Sacrifice to come into the world which accordingly he did I but what was the world into which he came surely it must be this lower world for it must be understood of that world into which he came to do the Will of God as appears Vers 7.9 now that was this World below rather than that above for where do we reade that Christ ascended into the upper World to do the Will of God especially this Will of God referring to his assuming a body and offering up that body Vers 5.10 these were things to be done only on this lower stage of earth whence then it follows that here his Sacrifice was made 5. There was as hath been observ'd to be an analogie and resemblance 'twixt Christ's Sacrifice and the Levitical Sacrifices and he was to expiate in that way wherein they did expiate but if you do not place his Sacrifice in his death where will that analogie be or how will he expiate in that way wherein they did What is there in Christ as in Heaven that carries any resemblance to the killing slaying shedding the blood offering of the Levitical Sacrifices There he sits in great glory puts forth his Regal power is Head of Church c. but what 's all this to suffering dying pouring out his blood wherein he was to answer to those Sacrifices Doth the Scripture lay so much upon his death and blood for expiation and yet shall that be done where there is none of these 'T will be said there 's this in Christ in Heaven to carry resemblance to the old Sacrifices their blood was carried by the High-Priest into the Holy of Holy's and there sprinkled by him towards the Mercy-seat upon which expiation and atonement followed now parallel to this Christ
death he might give a further proof or evidence thereof Besides if this was the main thing designed and effected thereby then in the remission of sin reconciliation with God c. we should owe as much to Christ's Miracles as to his Death than which nothing can be more repugnant to the whole tenour of the Word 2. This would take away the peculiarity or speciality of Christ's death For if there was nothing in it more than bearing witness to the truth or confirmation of the Gospel-doctrine then all the Apostles and Martyrs who ever died did the same in as much as they by dying bore witness also to the truth and confirmed the Gospel-Doctrine then as he saith to us * Matth. 5.47 What do ye more than others we may say the same to him What blessed Jesus dost thou more than others and would not this be a fine question Certainly the death of the Mediator and the death of the Martyr are two different things not only quoad gradum but quoad speciem but if it was as this sort of Men would have it there might be a gradual difference betwixt them but nothing more Must Christ's dying for us amount only to his dying as a Martyr for the truth here 's the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but where 's the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paul laid down his life upon this account and yet saith he * 1 Cor. 1.13 Was Paul crucified for you 3. Nay thirdly if Christ had dy'd only upon this ground and for this end then several of the Martyrs had gone beyond him How readily and chearfully did many of them die how desirous were they of laying down their lives for the Gospel they did not fear death all their fear was that God would not so far honour them as to call them out to suffer it for his sake And when they came to die what abundance of inward peace and comfort had they how were their Souls brim-full of heavenly consolation they had as much thereof as ever heart could hold so much that all their outward torments were nothing to them But was it thus with Christ true he was very ready and willing to die yet there was a time when he pray'd again and again that the Cup might pass from him * Matth. 26.39 42 44. Father if it be possible let this cup pass from me and he had an innocent sinless fear of death for be was heard in what he feared Heb. 5.7 And had he such raptures and extasies of joy at his death as several of the Martyrs had O no! his Soul was * Matth. 26.38 exceeding sorrowful he was under bitter †Luk. 22.44 agonies and conflicts had great terrors in his Spirit c. Now had he dy'd only as they did meerly to have borne his testimony to the truth and for the confirmation of the Doctrine of the Gospel would it have been thus what Saints so full of joy and God's own Son so full of sorrow Saints in their sufferings to have such a mighty presence of God with them and God's own Son to cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Surely there must be something special and extraordinary in his death above theirs and so there was for he had the guilt of all Believers upon him lay under the wrath of God bare the punishment due to Sinners was under the curse of the Law c. these were the sad ingredients in his death which put such a bitterness into it Had there been nothing more in it than bare Martyrdom or what is proper to that how would he have been said to be * Gal. 3.13 a curse for us what singular thing would there have been in his †Phil. 3.8 being obedient to death even the death of the Cross 2. Secondly 't is said Christ dy'd for this end that he might set before men an example of obedience patience submission to God's Will zeal and the like I answer that this was one end is very true but that this was the only end is very false Christ did not design his death to be only exemplary to us but that it should also be satisfactory to God he had in his eye the expiation of our sin as well as our imitation of his example Christ saith the Apostle also suffered for us leaving us an example that we should follow his steps 1 Pet. 2.21 but was that all no Vers 24. who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree here was substitution in our stead susception of our guilt as well as the propounding of an example If Christ should further the happiness of Sinners only in this exemplary way what then would become of the Fathers and of all those who liv'd before he came and dy'd in the flesh who therefore could reap no benefit by his example And this would make the effects of his death to terminate wholly in us and not at all to reach to God whereas he is a Priest in things pertaining to God Heb. 2.17 3. They say Christ dy'd for this end that by his death he might strengthen and encourage faith and thereby raise up men to the assurance of the remission of sin freedom from eternal death the possessing of eternal life c. Answ We grant that Faith receives eminent support and encouragement from this that it gives the highest satisfaction that is possible as to the certainty of Gospel-blessings yet this must not be look'd upon as the primary much less as the only end of Christ's death For 1. the blessing must be procur'd before there can be any assurance of it the thing must be suppos'd to be before persons can be sure of it now how was that brought about but by the death of Christ and if so then the only end thereof was not assurance but there must be another antecedent end viz. the purchasing or effecting of the thing which was to be the matter of that assurance And by that the Scripture mainly represents Christ's death Matth. 26.28 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins mark it 't was shed for the procuring of this great blessing not for the assuring persons of it 2. This assurance is as much if not more the effect of Christ's resurrection as of his death Indeed for him to die that contributes very much but 't is his dying and rising again that hath the greatest influence upon it 1 Pet. 1.3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by what by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead As to purchase and impetration we owe more to Christ's death than to his resurrection but as to assurance and subjective certainty we owe more to his resurrection than to his death therefore the Apostle brings this in with a rather Rom. 8.34 It is Christ
do you think of this are you able to bear it Alas * Is 33.14 who among us shall dwell with devouring fire who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings this made the Sinners in Zion afraid and filled Hypocrites with fearfulness and will it not sooner or later have the same effect upon you who are out of Christ If this Condemnation or eternal Death was total abolition or annihilation as some * See Calov Socin proflig de morte aeternà Contr. tertia p. 11 13. Cloppenb Compend Socinian cap. 8 p. 134. c. With many others Socinians make it to be it would not be so bad this would be a great allay to it for surely whatever some learned men may say to the contrary no being would be more desirable than such a being but 't is not so 3. The Condemnatory Sentence being once past it will be irreversible and irresistible When 't is once out of the Judges mouth there 's no reversing of it as the Penalty is intolerable so the Sentence is irreversible The poor condemned Sinner will presently fall upon his knees and most earnestly beg mercy but all in vain all his intreaties beseechings tears wringing of hands will avail nothing time was when he would not hear Christ and now Christ will not hear him Now to be sure the season of Grace is over once condemned and ever condemned there 's neither appealing from the Judge nor repealing of the Sentence And then too I say 't is irresistible as soon as 't is past Christ will have his Officers by him who shall see it put into execution his Guard and retinue of Angels shall be ready for this service these * Matth. 13.30 Reapers shall gather the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them and who shall be able to resist The Judge amongst the Jews was to see the Offender punished before his face Deut. 25.2 Christ will not only pass sentence but he himself will see execution done Luke 19.27 Those mine enemies which would not that I should reign over them bring them hither and slay them before me And as there will be no turning of him so neither will there be either flying from him or making resistance to him When man condemns God can save but who can save when God condemns If the Three Children be thrown into the fire God can take them out but when the Unbeliever is thrown into Hell-fire or to be thrown into Hell-fire who then can either hinder or deliver O come to Christ and get into Christ betimes if you defer till the Sentence be past you must suffer it and there is no remedy As God says * Is 43.13 I will work and who shall lett So when he condemns and will have his Sentence executed who shall lett what can man do to defend himself or to hinder God! Job 31.14 What shall I then do when God riseth up and when he visiteth what shall I answer him 4. The Vnbeliever and Christless person will not only be condemned by God but he will also be condemned by himself Self-condemnation will accompany Gods condemnation and that is very miserable Next to being condemned by God nothing so sad as to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemned by ones self When the poor Sinner shall be upon his Trial Conscience will accuse as well as the Law and condemn as well as the Judge And as soon as ever the Judge shall have passed Sentence Conscience will fall upon the guilty condemned person and say is not this just and righteous hast not thou * Jer. 2.17 procured this to thy self must not such a course have such an end is not this the fruit of thy sin This will highly justifie God for the more the Sinner condemns himself the more he acquits God but greatly heighten his own misery You read how at the great day there shall be * Per apertionem librorum significatur ut unicuique conscientia sua nec enim opus erit testibus externis suggestura sit omnem suam vitam Voss de Extr. Judicio the opening of the books Rev. 20.12 these books are mainly two the book of Scripture and the book of Conscience As to the latter men keep it shut here but God will open it to some purpose then and Sinners shall be forced to look into it and read over the sins of their lives written there in very legible characters And what a sad time will it then be when as God condemns without and above so Conscience shall condemn below and within Such as are out of Christ will feel all this to be true to their inexpressible grief and torment if it be not prevented by timely repentance 5. I might add which indeed will be but a more particular explication of the former Head this condemnation will be the sadder especially to such who live under the Gospel because they will lye under the sense and conviction of this that they have foolishly and wilfully brought all this misery upon themselves For and their hearts will tell them of it Christ offered himself to them from time to time but they refused to close with him he tendered pardon to them but they slighted it and who will pitty the Traitor that dyes for his Treason when his Prince offered him a pardon and he scorned to accept of it they might have been saved as well as others would they but have hearkened to the free gracious hearty often repeated invitations which in the Gospel were made to them how often would Christ * Matth. 23.37 have gathered them as the Hen gathers her Chickens but they would not and therefore now their Souls are lost forever O Sinner * Hos 13.9 thy destruction is of thy self and the consideration of this will sadly gnaw upon thy Conscience forever this is the worm that never dyes The Jews when they had adjudged a Malefactor to dye the Judge and the Witnesses used to lay their hands upon him and to say thy blood be upon thy own head in imitation of which the Murderers of our Saviour said * Matth. 27.25 His blood be on us and our children Thus Christ when he shall have pass'd the dreadful Sentence of eternal Death upon the impenitent and unbelieving he 'll say Your blood be upon your own heads Now is not here enough if the Lord would please to set it home upon the Conscience to awaken and terrifie secure Christless Sinners You who are out of Christ pray believe me as sure as God is and is a just and righteous God as sure as his Word is true so sure are you if you go out of the world before you have got into Christ to be condemned forever And will you not lay this to heart before it be too late is it not high time for you to think of these things will nothing awaken you but only the feeling of everlasting flames will you not mind the damned state till you
the death of this Death or that wherein it mainly consists hence though it doth not carry in it any annihilation yea though it be attended with a kind of Life both Soul and Body retaining their physical being existence and union yet 't is called Death because there is in it a separation from the fountain of true Life and of all blessedness upon which account 't is not only Death but the worst Death and this too is the worst part of this worst Death for though there be more included in it than the loss of Gods presence viz. the punnishment of sense eternal torment in Hell-fire yet it might easily be prov'd that herein lies its greatest evil the Mat. 25.41 departing from God is worse than the going into everlasting fire But to apply this distinction to the business in hand How Believers are made free from the Law of temporal death 1. The Law of the Spirit of Life frees the Regenerate from death temporal Not simply and absolutely from death considered abstractly and in it-self for so all must dye Believers themselves are within the compass of the general Statute Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men once to dye Psal 89.48 What man is he that liveth and shall not see death shall he deliver his soul from the hand of the grave but it frees from death as so qualified and so circumstantiated in the language of the Text it frees from the Law of Death How 's that why take a gracious man Death hath not a full right or an absolute power over him so as to keep him under its dominion forever for so I show'd you some open this Law of Death Such an one may dye but he shall live again the grave shall not always hold him he may be thrown into prison for a time but Christ will fetch him out and then death shall never again exercise its power over him after he hath died once he shall dye no more as 't is said of Christ Rom. 6.9 Again Grace frees from the Law of this Death that is from the hurtfulness sting and curse of it Death carries much of a curse in it 't is the result and fruit of the primitive * Gen. 2.17 curse now in this notion sanctified persons are freed from it The nature and property of death is altered to a godly man to him 't is now but the paying of that debt or tribute which is due to Nature but a (a) 1. Thes 4.14 sleep but a (b) Job 14.14 change but a (c) Luk. 2.29 departure or going out of prison but a (d) If. 57.2 going to bed but an (e) 2 Cor. 5.4 uncloathing but a passage into an endless and everlasting life an inlet into the immediate fruition of God O set but sense aside what an harmless innocent thing is this death to such a person the Lion being slain by Christ there 's hony now in the belly of it I allude to that of Sampson Judg. 14.8 1 Cor. 15.55 O death where is thy sting ô grave where is thy victory The sting of death is sin and the strength of sin is the Law but thanks be to God which give thus the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ Christ by death hath overcome death unstung it and taken off its hurtful quality by dying himself he hath expiated Sin vanquished Satan atoned God satisfied the Law secured from Hell purchased eternal life and these things being done where is now the Law of Death Heb 2.14 15 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the Devil And deliver them who through fear of dâ—ath were all their life time subject to bondage How from the Law of eternal death 2. There is that death which is much worse than this viz. eternal death that which indeed is the death incomparably surpassing any other as no life like to eternal life so no death like to eternal death To have the Body separated for a while from the Soul is a thing to Nature very dreadful but what is that to the separation both of Body and Soul from God forever This is sometimes set forth by Death without the addition of any Epethite as Joh. 8.51 If a man keep my sayings he shall never see death Rom. 6.23 8.6 passim Sometimes by the second death and 't is so stiled because it succeeds upon and doth not commence till after the first death Rev. 2.11 He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death Rev 20.6 21.4 This is that death which the * Sicut is qui liberatur a Lege Spiritus vitae permanet in Christo qui est vita ita qui servit Lege peccati permanet in morte quae venit ex damnatione peccati Orig. unconverted and impenitent are obnoxious unto but such as turn to God by true repentance and live and holy life they are freed from it And this deliverance is absolute the former was but in such a qualified sense but this I say is absolute Even such may and shall dye the first death but they shall never dye this second death Rom. 20.6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection on such the second death hath no power You read of the abolishing of this death by Christ 2 Tim. 1.10 eternal death is quite abolished to all regenerate persons But this very much falls in with the No-condemnation in the foregoing Verse of which having there said enough I 'le add nothing more VSE 1. Men exhorted to live in the belief of this that 't is Sin and Death By way of Vse 1. I would exhort you all to live in the steady belief of this and often to revive it upon your thoughts that 't is Sin and Death Especially when at any time Satan and your own hearts sollicit and tempt you to sin be sure then you think of this so as to retort it upon the temptation speedily what shall I sin and dye shall I for the pleasures delights satisfaction of sin which are but * Heb. 11.25 for a season expose my self to death yea to eternal death no that I dare not that I must not do 'T is good to break the force of a temptation by such reasonings as these for though 't is true the great restraints from sin should be taken from the love of God the fear of offending God c. yet it 's good and God allows it to take in the advantage of self-love too and the fear of self-destroying Surely if men did indeed believe or did nor strangely smother and suppress all serious convictions about this that 't is sin and death they durst not sin as they do Where 's the man let him be never so thirsty or let the draught be never so alluring that would venture upon it should he
‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est ipsa Caro etiamsi non cum peccato c. Missus ergo Filius Dei 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. in carne non peccatrice eâdem tamen quae in nobis peccârat five pollutâ non in ipso sed in nobis Naturam Peccati h.e. Peocatorum Dei Filius suscepit puram quidem sed ut nostram quae peccârat expiaret Cum notissimo Hebraismo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 res ipsa dicatur ut cum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ipse Homo dicitur non video cur non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vera sit â—aro cum peccati non ab eo dicatur qui assumsit atque hoc ipso expiavit sed ab eo qui peccando corrupit Heins Expositors the more to weaken the Objection of the Adversaries as grounded upon this Text tell us that the likeness here of sinful Flesh is the sameness of sinful Flesh that Christ took that very Flesh which was and is sinful not that it was so in him but that it is so in us that he assum'd that very Flesh which in man is defil'd by sin yet not as defiled but as true Flesh As when 't is said concerning him that he was in the * Phil. 2.6 7 8. form of God in the form of a Servant in the likeness and fashion of man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 't is the same word with that in the Text the meaning is that Christ was truly God truly a Servant truly Man and as 't is said concerning Adam * Gen. 5.3 he begat a Son in his own likeness that is he begat a Son who was as truly a man and as truly a Sinner as himself so Christ was sent in the likeness c. viz. in just such Flesh or in the very self same Flesh which man hath made in himself sinful and therefore passible and mortal Now though I cannot deny the truth of this Exposition as thus stated nor that it may very well be grounded upon parallel places yet because to some at the first hearing it may seem somewhat harsh I rather incline to that which was laid down before in the opening of the Words 't was the same flesh in Christ and in us in its Physical consideration but it being morally considered it was but the likeness of sinful Flesh But to come to that which I propounded let us consider Flesh in its strict acceptation as it relates to the fleshly and bodily part so I 'le lay down two things about it 1. That Christ was indeed sent in flesh was really incarnate and did verily take flesh upon him And what one thing is there in the whole Gospel wherein 't is plain and positive if it be not so in this Joh. 1.14 And the Word was made Flesh 1 Tim. 3.16 Without controversie great is the mystery of Godliness God manifested in the flesh Heb. 2.14 16. Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the Devil For verily he took not on him the Nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham Rom. 1.3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord who was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. 9.5 Whose are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever Amen Hence he 's said to be made of a woman Gal. 4.4 many such * See the strength of these with other Texts drawn forth and vindicated against Objections by Mr. Tombes in a little Treatise called Emmannel or God-man Sect. 15 16 c. to the end of the Book places might be produced to prove that Christ really assumed Flesh but these may suffice Christ's Flesh was organiz'd And this Flesh wherein Christ was sent was organiz'd and form'd into a perfect body the Apostle doth not only call it his Flesh but the body of his flesh Col. 1.22 In the body of his flesh through death c. Heb. 10.5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world he saith Sacrifice and offering thou wouldst not but a Body hast thou prepared me I Pet. 1 24. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree c. Our Saviour did not assume a confus'd indigested and unshapen mass or lump of flesh that was not his incarnation but he assumed Flesh cast into the very mould and form of our bodies having the same several parts members lineaments the same proportion which they have 2. I adde not as a distinct Head from the former but only that I may more distinctly speak to it then as yet I have done Of the Verity of Christ's Body that as Christ was indeed sent in Flesh so the flesh in which he was sent was Flesh indeed He saith * Joh. 6.55 My flesh is meat indeed and I say his Flesh was flesh indeed as true real proper very flesh as that is which any of us carry about with us 't was as was said before but the likeness of sinful flesh but 't was the reality of physical or substantial Flesh * Vide Aquin. 3. p. Qu. 5. Art 1. Christ's body was no Spectrum or Phantasm no putative body as if it had no being but what was in appearance and from imagination but as real as solid a body as ever any was therefore the Apostle in the * Col. 1.22 fore-cited place calls it a body of Flesh a body to shew the organization of it and a body of flesh to shew the reality of it in opposition to all aerial and imaginary bodies It had all the essential properties of a true body such as are organicalness extension local presence confinement circumscription penetrability visibility palpability and the like Luke 24.39 * Quomodo hanc vocem interpretaris Marcion c. Ecce fallit decipit c. Ergo jam Christum non de coelo deferre debueras sed de aliquo circulatoriò caetu nec salutis Pontificem sed spectaculi artificem c. Tertull. de Carne Christi p. 362. Behold my hands and my feet that it is I my self handle me and see for a Spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have 1 Joh. 1.1 That which was from the beginning which we have heard which we have seen with our eyes which we have looked upon and our hands have handled of the word of life c. He had also those natural †Esuriit sub Diabolo sitiit sub Samaritide lacrymatus est supra Lazarum trepidavit ad mortem sanguinem fudit postremò haec sunt opinor signa coelestia Idem ibid. p. 367. affections passions infirmities which are proper to a body as hunger Matth. 4.2 When he had fasted forty dayes and forty nights he was afterwards an hungred thirst Joh. 4.7 Joh. 19.28 I thirst Sleep Matth.
alicui persuaderi potuisse valdè mirum esset nisi homines vivi capti dementati essent à Sathanâ c. Dogma tremendum Id. Hom. 8. in 1. cap. Joh. p. 87. Smalcius a very Fable yea Dogma in Christianâ religione ferè monstrosissimum with many other such vile expressions which I either dread or disdain to mention only there 's ‖ Credimus etiamsi non semel atque iterum sed satis crebrò apertissimè scriptum extaret Deum esse hominem factum multo satius esse quia haec res sit absurda fánae rationi planè contraria in Deum blasphema modum aliquem dicendi comminisci quo ista de Deo dici possint quam ista simplicitèr ita ut verba sonant intelligere c. Smalcius Homil 8. in Joh. p. 89. one from this last named Author which out-strips all the rest 't is this We believe saith he that though it should be written not once or twice but very often and that too very plainly that God was made man yet it would be much better this being a thing very absurd contrary to sound reason blasphemous against God to find out some other sense of it which might suite with the Nature of God rather than to take it literally according to what such words do hold forth thereby to expose Religion to scorn O the boldness and even blasphemy of the man 't is a vain thing to argue with these persons either in this or any other Point from the holy Scriptures for let God say there what he will if their Reason as the Supream Judge of what is to be believ'd or not to be believed doth not like it the Divine Revelation let it be never so plain signifies nothing Lord whither will the pride of Reason and the wickedness of the Heart carry men who are given up to themselves But if Scripture-revelation must be thus subjected to humane Reason let 's bid adieu to all Religion saving what is Natural I thought this had been the highest Reason in the world that Creatures should believe what God reveals because he reveals it though they with their poor dimme and shallow reason cannot comprehend what is so revealed by him but I am faln upon another Controversie I hope I speak to those who bear a greater reverence to the sacred Scriptures and surely if these may be believed what can be more clear than this that Christ is not only man but that he who was before the Son of God was afterwards in time made the Son of man Mark the Text God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh where Christ is suppos'd antecedently to be God's Son then as such he was sent and then incarnate So Gal. 4.4 When the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law Joh. 1.14 The Word was made Flesh 't is not only he that is Christ the Personal Word was Flesh but he was made Flesh so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is rendred * Joh. 1.12 1 Cor. 1.30 Rom. 7.13 Gal. 3.13 Rom. 1.3 Gal. 4.4 else-where and the subject matter determines it to be so rendred here also But how was Christ made Flesh was this spoken of him only in respect of his mean afflicted calamitous state and condition here was that all that was meant by it surely no! that was so far from being all that the Evangelist had it not at all in his eye when he uttered these words for he adds and we saw his Glory the Glory as of the only begotten of the Father he joyns his being made flesh with the glory of his Person not with the meanness of his condition and further the Substance must antecede the Adjunct the truth of the humane Nature must go before the abasement and miseries of it So that when 't is said the Word was made Flesh it can carry no other sense than that Christ took the very Nature and Substance of man upon him I say Christ for 't is very evident where men do not wilfully shut their eyes that he is all along set forth by the Word he being the personal essential and substantial Word now observe he was the Word before he assum'd Flesh and he who was so praeexisting he assumed Flesh for 't is the Word was made Flesh plainly implying the antecedency of his being in that notion to this his incarnation SOCINVS is shrewdly pinch'd with this Text insomuch that he is fain to fall upon every word in it with his usual Criticisms and forc'd senses thereby to evade and elude the strength of it but all his attempts are in vain So also for the Word is not sparing in the revealing of this Truth though our * Socin de Nat. Christi p. 7. Smalc Hom. 8. in 1. c. Joh. p. 88. Adversaries are pleas'd to assert the contrary Heb. 2.14 16. Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the Devil For verily he took not on him the Nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham here the Apostle lays it down over and over by taking he took part of the same he took not on him the nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham thereby to note Christ's assuming of the humane Nature and joyning of it to that other Nature which he had before 1 Tim. 3.16 Without controversie great is the mystery of Godliness God was manifest in the flesh c. a Person here must be spoken of and the Lord Jesus must be that Person for the following matter justified in the Spirit seen of Angels preached unto the Gentiles believed on in the world received up into Glory is only applicable to a Person and to Christ as that Person by the way * Erasmus Grotius c. they who alter the reading of the Text putting out 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and putting in ὠand so carrying it from the Person of Christ to the Gospel have done no good service either to the truth in general or in special to that particular Truth which I am upon now 't is not here said only that Christ was manifested in the Flesh but God was c. to shew that he who was incarnate for that 's the manifestation in the flesh here intended was first God or God before and then he was incarnate 'T is a mighty Scripture that in Phil. 2.6 7. Who being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal with God here 's Christ's praeexisting in the Nature of the Godhead and then after this comes his Manhood But made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men 'T would be a long work to draw out the full strength of these and
several other Texts in order to the more undeniable proving of the Proposition before us as also to answer the various replyes evasions misinterpretations about them by such who dissent and yet I could most willingly engage therein did I think such an undertaking would be proper in such a Discourse as this or tend to the advantage of any but the truth is I fear I should but perplex private Christians with things that possibly would be too high for them and I 'm sure I should do that which is needless for Others who know where this is * Arnold Catech. Racov. major p. 27◠Galov Socin proflig p. 285. Cocceius against Socin in cap. 1. Joh. cap. 15. Bisterf against Crellius p. 564. Jacob. ad Portum against Ostorod p. 166. Owen against Biddle ch 13. p. 289. c. done already And indeed the whole matter in this Controversie is by Crellius himself brought into a narrow compass wherein we are very willing to joyn issue with him for he grants if Christ did praeexist before he was incarnate that then his incarnation must needs be believ'd and own'd according to our stating of it but I have * See p. 284. c. already proved and Others do it much more fully that he did so praeexist therefore upon that Concession the thing is clear and I need say no more upon it Only let me leave this one word with our Opposers their Homo Deus factus is the greatest falshood but our Deus Homo factus is the greatest truth 2. Prop. Christ the Second Person only was incarnate The second Proposition is this that Christ the Son of God the second Person in the ineffable Trinity he only was incarnate 'T is here said God sending his own Son in the likeness c. the taking then of flesh was that personal act which was proper to the Son alone and in that so often alledged Text 't is said * Joh. 1.14 the Word was made flesh which Title the Word is never attributed to the Father or to the Spirit but alwayes to the Son and you see he 's the person who was made flesh 'T is true Incarnation was the act of the whole Trinity approbativè but 't was only the Son's act terminativè all the Persons approved of it and * Sola persona Filii incarnata est operante tamen eandem incarnationem totâ Sanctâ Trinitate cujus opera sunt inseparabilia August Quest de Trinit tom 3. p. 1040. Vid. Anselm de Incam Verbi cap. 3. 4. concurred to it but it was terminated only in Christ the second Person The Schoolmen compare Christ's Flesh to a garment made by three Virgin-sisters which yet but One of them only wears A †See Lombard lib. 3. Dist 1. Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book p. 255. Question is commonly here started why the second Person rather than the first or the third was thus incarnate which Some do venture to answer by assigning the Reasons of it I humbly conceive there is too much of curiosity in the Question and too much of boldness in the Answer why Christ was incarnate I can give several Reasons but why he rather than the other Persons there I must be silent 'T is also query'd * Of this see Zanchy de tribus Elohim l. 5. c. 6. p. 546. c. Tilen de Incarn Filii Dei Disp 1. Sect. 20. Aug. Serm. 3. de Temp. there being such an oneness betwixt all the Persons how the Son can be said to assume the Humane Nature and yet the Father and Spirit not assume it to which the Answer is obvious this difference might very well be upon that personal distinction which is betwixt them for this assumption of flesh being not the act of the Nature which is common but of the Person which is limited the second Person might so assume and yet the other Persons not 3. Prop. Christ not incarnate till the fulness of time Thirdly Christ's incarnation was in time and not till the fulness of time He was alwayes God for he that is not alwayes God is never God the Divine Essence admitting neither of beginning nor end but he was not * Neque enim Caro issa quae ex came Virginis nata est semper fuit sea Deus qui semper fuit ex carne Virginis in carne Hominis advenit Cassian de Incar Dom. Lib. 6. alwayes man there never was a time in which he was not God but there was a time in which he was not Man His Generation as the Son of God was eternal but his Generation as the Son of Man was but temporal In the fulness of time God sent his Son made of a woman c. Gal. 4.4 The Evangelist sets him forth in his two Natures Joh. 1. with respect to his Divine Nature he shews that he was from everlasting In the beginning was the Word c. the same was in the beginning with God c. then he comes to his Humane Nature and that he shews was in time the Word was made Flesh he was not so ab aeterno but he was made so in time In such a sense Christ may be said to be incarnate from all eternity viz. in regard of God's eternal parpose and decree as in reference to that he is said to be the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world Rev. 13.8 but as to the actuality of his Incarnation that was but 1600 and odd years ago A double enquiry here will be made As 1. if this was deferr'd so long what then became of those who lib'd and dy'd before Christ was inearnate The efficacy and benefit of Christ's Incarnation to those who lived before it if that was so necessary as hath been shown what became of the Patriarchs of all who liv'd under the Law before that was in being I answer they had the merit virine benefit of the thing though they had not the thing it self for God having decreed it and Christ having covenanted and ingaged to the Father that in the fulness of time he would take flesh the Father all-along look'd upon it as actually done and accordingly dealt with Believers under the Law as though it had been actually done insomuch that they had the same benefit by a Christ in Flesh which we now have Therefore 't is said Rom. 3.25 Whom God set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the trrnsgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Whatever our Lord is now since the actual exhibition of him he was the same before effectively and virtually for 't is Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13.8
stand before him as in our flesh dying and suffering for it if God will become Man the guilt of meer man shall not be so able to damn as the merit of God-man to save O thou true penitent be thy sins never so many never so great yet do not give way to despairing thoughts Bring out thy sins * Dr. Sibbs on 1 Tim. 3.16 p. 59. saith one weigh them to the utmost aggravation of them and set but this in the other scale God manifested in the flesh to take away sin now will all thine iniquities seem lighter than vanity yea be as nothing in comparison of that which is laid down as a propitiation for them And again saith he What temptation will not vanish as a cloud before the wind when we see God's Love in sending his Son and Christ's Love in taking our Nature upon him to reconcile us by the Sacrifice of his blood But some may object 't is a great while since Christ took flesh and in that flesh made satisfaction to God is not the efficacy and merit thereof impaired by that no not in the least Christ's merits are as fresh and have as great an efficacy now as they had at the first moment of his Incarnation and Passion may not that of the Apostle Heb. 2.16 have some reference to this where he speaks of Christ's taking flesh in the Present Tense as if 't was done but now for 't is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he taketh not on him the nature of Angels but he taketh on him the seed of Abraham I speak this for the comfort of Christians but not so as to give advantage to the Socinian who because the words run in this Tense would therefore have them to be no proof of Christ's Incarnation Do your many defects the imperfections in your Graces and Duties trouble you you have Christ's perfect Manhood his perfect Holiness and Obedience in that Nature to fly unto The Apostle Col. 2. sets down the Hypostatical Vnion Vers 9. In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily well suppose it doth so what 's this to Believers why it follows immediately V. 10. And ye are compleat in him Christ being such a Person so full and perfect a Mediator in him every believer is and must be compleat So that though the sense of imperfections in your selves must humble you yet it must not overwhelm you because in Christ you are perfect Are you afraid notwithstanding all the Calls Invitations Promises of the Gospel yet to close with Christ O do not give way to such fears If you come to him cast your selves upon him will he cast you off he hath assur'd you he will not Joh. 6.37 Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast off Besides his word you have this to secure you he in his Person came from heaven to you and if you by Faith shall go to him do you think he will not give you kind reception I am sure and I will venture my Soul upon it that the gracious promises and encouragements of the Gospel to draw sinners to Christ shall all be made good for since he was pleas'd to take my flesh I have not the least reason to doubt but fully to be assur'd that he is real hearty in good earnest in all of them Many things of this nature might here be spoken unto but 't is full time to put an end to this subject ROM 8.3 4. And for sin condemned sin in the Flesh That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us CHAP. XIII Of Christ's being a Sacrifice and expiating Sin thereby A Fifth Head in the Words discussed viz. the End of God in sending his own c. or the Effect thereof How the Wisdom of God is secured by this End Of the placing of the Words for sin The whole a little descanted upon What the condemning of sin is opened more generally more particularly in three things The condemning of sin for sin opened a twofold interpretation given of it Of the Flesh in which sin is said to be condemned The Observation raised from the Words where 1. Of Christ's being a Sacrifice for Sin How he excels the Old Law-Sacrifices and of their reference to him Six things in those Sacrifices which are all to be found in Christ the true Sacrifice 'T is enquired 1. What a kind of Sacrifice he was proved that he was an expiatory Sacrifice Of the difference and distinction of the Jewish Sacrifices Four Heads insisted upon for the confirming of the main Truth As 1. that our sins were the meritorious Cause of Christ's Sufferings 2. that he did substitute himself in the Sinners stead where two Questions are briefly answered 1 Whether he underwent the same punishment that was due to the Sinner or only that which was equivalent thereunto 2 Whether he took the guilt of sin upon himself or only submitted to the punishment thereof 3. that he was killed and slain and his blood shed in correspondency with the Levitical expiatory Sacrifices 4. this is prov'd from the Ends and Effects of his Death viz. Atonement and Expiation both of which are opened Of the concurrence of the Heathens in their notions about Sacrifices 'T is enquir'd 2. When and where Christ was an expiatory Sacrifice 't is answered when he dy'd upon the Cross 2. Of the Effect of his Sacrifice the condemning of Sin Parallel expressions cited Of the nature of the expiation of Sin Of the extent of it with respect to the Subject and Object Whether were all Sins expiated by the Law-Sacrifices Use 1. I infer from the premises 1. The verity of Christ's Satisfaction 2. The true Nature and principal Ends of his Death 3. The vanity and falshood of all humane satisfactions 4. The true notion of the Lord's Supper 5. The happiness of Believers under the Gospel above theirs who liv'd under the Law 6. The excellency of Christ's Priesthood and Sacrifice 7. The Evil of Sin 8. The severity of God's Justice Use 2. Several Dutys urged from hence as Holiness the Love of Christ c. Use 3. This improved several ways for the Comfort of Believers A Fifth Head viz. the End of God in sending his Son c. or the Effects thereof IN the preceding Words God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful Flesh Four things have been observed and opened in these now read a Fifth Head offers it self to our consideration and that is the Effect of Christ's mission incarnation and of what followed thereupon or God's End in all this Did he pitch upon so admirable a Way and Method surely some high and glorious Effect must be produced thereby and so there was for thereby sin was condemned and surely too therein the Wise God must propound to himself some great and very considerable End to be accomplished and so he did for he aim'd at nothing lower than that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in Believers In the Words then
that died yea rather that is risen again He is said to be delivered for our offences and to be raised again for our justification Rom. 4.25 the Sinners justification was merited by his death but it was manifested by his resurrection thence therefore Faith in its being assured of that priviledge must fetch its main encouragement so that this cannot be the only thing aimed at in his death since it more properly belongs to another Head 3. The old-Testament Saints were high in their assurance and yet they liv'd before the death of Christ 4. His death simply considered gives no such encouragement to faith or ground of assurance consider it indeed as we state it that is as he dy'd in our stead to satisfie God's Justice appease his Father's wrath expiate our sin c. and so 't is highly strengthning to Faith but if you take it in it-self and as our Adversaries state it so there 's but little in it for Faith's advantage What inducement or encouragement would this be to Sinners to believe to set before them the death of Christ unless those Ends and Considerations about it be taken in which our Antagonists oppose without which it would rather draw out mens fear than their faith rather drive them from God than to God for so more of his justice and severity would therein appear to deterre them than of his Mercy to allure and encourage them O did God deal so with his own Son who too was innocent and blameless what then will he do to such vile wretched guilty creatures as we are must Christ so die would not God spare him in the least what then will become of such as we Upon the whole matter the Soc. say Christ's death was not at all intended to be satisfactory to God I 'me sure according to their stating of it 't is not at all consolatory to Sinners 4. They say Christ dy'd for this end that he might have a right and power after his death when he should be in heaven to forgive sin Answ Whilst he was here on earth before his death he had that right or power therefore that could not be any end thereof Matth. 9.2 Son be of good cheer thy sins be forgiven thee and when some murmured at this see how he stood upon the asserting of it Vers 6. That ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins c. 5. 'T is said Christ dy'd for this end that he might procure for himself such and such power dignity and glory But to this we say it was so far from being the main end that it was indeed no end at all it being but the Coâ—â—â—â—â—ent not the End of his death see Phil. 2.8 9. These defective Causes and Ends being remov'd it remains that I set down those which were the chief and principal And they were such as these Christ dy'd to be a Sacrifice for Sin Heb. 9.26 10.12 a Ransom 1 Tim. 2.6 Matth. 20.28 a Propitiation 1 Joh. 2.2 to reconcile God to us and us to God Rom. 5.10 2 Cor. 5.19 Eph. 2.13 14. Col. 1.20 c. to deliver us from the curse of the Law by his being made a curse for us Gal. 3 13. to save from wrath to come 2 Thes 1.10 to justifie and make righteous 2 Cor. 5.21 Rom. 5.9 to procure remission of sin by his blood 1 Joh. 1.7 Eph. 1.7 Matth. 26.28 to overcome death by death Heb. 2.14 to purchase eternal life Joh. 6.51 Heb. 9.12 As he dy'd in our place and stead taking our guilt and bearing our punishment so he died for these ends that he might restore us to God's love and favour and expiate all our sins by his making satisfaction for them these were not only Ends but the supream and primary ends of his Death I do not exclude the former provided that 1. they be taken in conjunction with these nay 2. in subordination to them Christ in his dying might intend this and that as his bearing witness c. but his main and principal intendments were satisfaction reconciliation forgiveness of sin c. in the revealing of which the Holy Scriptures are so express and plain that to me 't is very strange that any opposition much more that so vehement opposition should be made against it Good Lord how are Opposers faine to strain their wit to summon in all their invention subtilty for the finding out of some forc'd and pitiful interpretations of the Texts alledged thereby to evade the true sense and meaning of them how do they set these Scriptures and themselves too upon the rack that they may seem to reconcile them with their hypotheses's but all in vain as is abundantly prov'd The vanity falshood of humane Satisfactions 3. Thirdly from hence I infer the vanity and falshood of all humane Satisfactions Was the Lord Jesus himself a Sacrifice for sin and did he thereby condemn abolish expiate all sin for his members then what needs to be done or can be done further by any Creatures in the way of Satisfactions * Eccles 2.12 What can the man do that cometh after the King I cannot but take notice how whoever will engage in these weighty Points he must tread upon thorns and bryars every step he takes no sooner shall he have got off from one Enemy but there will be some other at hand with whom he must encounter also I find it I 'me sure to be so for no sooner have I quit my self of the SOCINIANS but the PAPISTS in a full body make head against me The former would wholly take away Christ's Satisfaction the latter would add Mans to it the One denies the verity the Other the perfection of it For they tell us 't is very true that Christ did fully satisfie the Justice of God by his being a Sacrifice for sin and fully expiate the sins of Believers in respect of their guilt and of the eternal punishment due thereupon but not in respect of temporal punishments these they say they are yet lyable unto notwithstanding all that Christ hath done and suffered and that too not only in the present but for some time in the future state for the preventing or removing of which satisfaction must be made to God either by themselves or by others this is the ROMISH-Doctrine In which so far as I have gone we have falsities enough but should we go farther to their particular explication and stating of the latter branch mens satisfying by themselves or by others what a mass and heap of ungrounded unscriptural absur'd Opinions should we there meet with for there come in their penances fastings pilgrimages corporal punishments voluntary poverty masses and prayers for them who are in Purgatory Indulgences c. O what a big-bellied Error is this of humane Satisfactions what a numerous train of falsities is it attended with Contrary to this we hold that * See the 31 Article of our Church Christ by the once
as the One is to be filled up so is the Other also The Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying of or for accordingly 't is rendred both wayes Some reading it of Sin as the Old Version Anselme the Greek Interpreters generally c. they making the Words to run thus Of Sin God condemned Sin Parallel to which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is elsewhere so rendred as Joh. 8.46 Which of you convinceth me of sin Joh. 16.8 9. He will convince the world of sin c. Of sin because they believe not on me in all 't is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 just as it is in the Text They who follow this Reading make the sense of the Words to be this God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh in that flesh of his Son as suffering and dying he condemned sin of sin in as much as by that strange and wonderfull course he made it to appear to the world that sin was full of sin highly guilty and criminal * Rom. 7.13 exceeding sinful as the Apostle speaks upon another account Now though I shall not follow this Exposition yet it containing nothing in at but what is true for the matter of it and it being given by some Authors of great repute I will so far insist upon it as to give a double illustration of it 1. As 't is applicable to Sin in the general Take the whole body of Sin or Sin in its utmost extent 't was all condemn'd of sin in Christ's flesh as first assum'd and then crucify'd how why by that it was prov'd and judg'd to be a thing out of measure evil and faulty thereby God let the world see what sin is what an excess of poyson and malignity there is in its nature Did he send his own Son to be incarnate yea to appear in the likeness of sinful Flesh so to be abased suffer and die and was Sin the meritorious Cause of all this was all this done and suffered for the making of satisfaction for the mischiefs and injuries which Sin had been guilty of O what a condemnation was here of Sin Never was there such a demonstration of Sins Evil what an heinous and capital Offender it is as in Christ's being made Man and dying upon the Cross the strangeness of the remedy shows the malignity of the disease the high terms of satisfaction the greatness of the crime God's severity laid upon the Flesh of his own Son in such unparallell'd sufferings made it apparent to the world that sin is a quite other thing than what men generally take it to be had it not been evil desperately evil God had never dealt with Christ as he did therefore in his flesh sin was condemned of sin 2. This may more particularly be apply'd to that sin of killing and murdering the Lord Jesus God did not only condemn sin of sin in the gross but in special that sin which was committed against and upon the Flesh of Christ in the crucifixion of him here 't was the Sin of Sin here Sin was sinful indeed That it should so boldly so injuriously so wickedly fasten upon a Person so near and dear to God so inoffensive and innocent so holy and gracious what an aggregation of Sins and what an aggravation of Sins guilt was there in this Sin never was more sin than in this act here 't was in its highest stature and fullest dimensions this was its master-piece the vilest thing that ever it did all its other crimes were but dwarfish things in comparison of this gigantick and over-grown crime Well! according to its acting and carriage herein so God judg'd it to be very guilty and sinful and accordingly pass'd Sentence upon it And as to those that had an hand in this horrid fact whether Satan to whom some (a) Damnavit peccatum i. e. Satanam de peccato quòd nempe Christum innocentem in Cruce interfeciset Ambros So also Hilarius in Psal 67. apply the Words or the Jews O 't was in all sin full of sin their offence was superlatively great in doing what they did to the flesh of God's own Son Sin in this act did rise exceeding high Now the (b) Vide Chrysost in loc very largely insisting upon this Greek Expositors are very large upon this notion of sin God condemned sin c. that is say they God judged the sin of the Jews according to what it was in its own nature to be very (c) c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oecum great it or rather they were guilty of a most unparallell'd offence (d) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theodoret. high injustice prodigious cruelty inexpressible ingratitude strange impudency upon their crucifying of the Holy Jesus the Lord of Glory And in the pursuance of this Explication these Expositors bring in Sin as a Person as a person arraign'd by God for this particular crime after tryal and process sentenc'd to be highly guilty and accordingly to be dealt with And they also insist upon God's way and method in his dealing with Sin which was not in the way of Power but of Justice he did not down-right subdue it by plain force but he condemn'd it after the hearing of that plea it could make for it self as also upon God's order (e) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost first he condemn'd it and then he punish'd it This Interpretation some (f) Haec Chrysostomi Expositio convenientissima inter omnes accommodatissima videtur Tolet. Haec Graecorum Expositio ita placet ut eam caeteris anteponâ—ndam cum Toleto censeam Estius Vid. Alap Catharin c. latter Writers do fall in with and much applaud Bneer himself at first was taken with it but aftâ—wards he altered his thoughts (g) Haec Expositio nihil aliud est quam subtilis argutia Beza Beza passes a severe censure upon it The truth is the Apostle in the Words seems to look at another thing this was not the condemnation of Sin which he had mainly in his eye viz. the heightening or aggravating or proving of its guilt and then passing sentence upon it according to that no but there was another condemnation which he drove at viz. the abolition and expiation of its guilt God so condemned sin as that it might never condemn the Sinner that 's the Apostles proper and principal scope as I humbly conceive (h) In loco prius citato Austine though he reades it too de peccato condemnavit c. yet he opens it in a different sense he making this of sin to be as much as by sin and so he thus glosses upon it By the sin of the Jews in their putting of Christ to death God abolished and took out of the way all the sin of all the Elect he so over-ruled the matter that even by sin sin was destroy'd by the greatest sin that ever was committed sin it self was condemned had not the blood of Christ been spilt though that in
it self was a most wicked act there had been to believers no remission no expiation as Death was destroy'd by Death so Sin by Sin it condemned Christ but by so doing it was condemn'd it self So much for the first reading of the Words 2. Secondly the Preposition is rendred by For and that rendring of it our Translators according to other * Propter peccatum V. Syr. Propter ipsoâ—n peccatum Tremell Versions and the general current of Interpreters follow and for sin condemned sin c. If we take it so the Words then may carry a threefold sense in them 1. That Sin was the procuring meritorious Cause of all that which God the Father did in a way of severity upon and against Christ He condemned sin in Christ's Flesh fell very severely upon him testify'd great anger and displeasure against him inflicted sharp and dreadful punishments upon him why did such a Father so deal with such a Son what might be the cause that a person so innocent should suffer as he did why 't was Sin not his but ours which brought all this upon him 〈◊〉 had it not been for that God had never sent his Son in Flesh into the world and then have punished him in that Flesh as he did Christ might thank Sin for all his sufferings and lay all the Evils which he sustain'd in Soul and Body at its doors that set his Father against him that laid the foundation of all his sorrows that brew'd that bitter cup which he was to drink that was the meritorious cause of all the miseries that ever befel him 't was for sin that God so condemned sin in his Flesh The Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sometimes used in this sense so Joh. 10.33 For a good work we stone thee not but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for blasphemy and because that thou being a man makest thy self equal with God 1 Pet. 3.18 For Christ also hath once suffered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for sins c. which is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 1.4 Heb. 10.12 2. The for sin may be taken finally Wherefore did God thus condemn sin in his Son's Flesh wherefore was it with Christ as it was O 't was for sin namely that he might take it away acquit the Sinner from its guilt make satisfaction for it over-rule it in all its plea's and power quite destroy it God would deal with Sin in the person of his own Son he having submitted to take the guilt of it upon himself that thereby he might give a through dispatch to it and throughly rid believers of its hurtfulness 1 Joh. 3.5 And ye know that he was manifected to take away our sins and in him is no sin Vers 8. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested that he might destroy the works of the Devil In this final notion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken Matth. 26.28.1 Cor. 15.3 3. It may be understood Materially with respect to Christ's being a Sacrifice for Sin For Sin God condemned Sin how why as Christ submitting to be a Sin-offering was and did that by which this effect was produc'd According to this Interpretation we must reade the words as is noted in the margent thus * Phrasi Hobraeâ peccatum vocat Sacrificium pro peccato Franz Schola Sacrif disp 7. th 56. By a Sacrifice for sin God condemned sin whatever there is 〈◊〉 this condemning of sin and there is abundance in it 't was all brought about by that Sin-offering or Sacrifice which Christ in his flesh offered up to God 't was cut off expiated disabled as to its destructive and damning nature c. all this was effected by Christ's being a Sacrifice So that the words are Elliptical there being in them something cut off and left out which must be supply'd by the inserting or adding of by a Sacrifice or some other such word Which Ellipsis is very usual and common in Holy Writ especially when 't is treating of Sacrifices Levit. 10.17 Wherefore have ye not eaten the Sin-offering so we reade it but in the Hebrew 'tis only the Sin in the holy place c. 't would be tedious to cite the very many places of this nature which do occur in * Levit. 4.3.29.33 5.6 7.9.11 9.22 12.6 8. 14.13 16.16 that Book Ifa 53.10 When thou shalt make his Soul sin we fill it up by an offering for sin Hos 4.8 They eat up the Sin of my people that is the Sacrifices which were to be offer'd up for the people Ezek. 45.19 The Priest shall take of the blood of the Sin we reade it of the Sin-offering * Sicut hostias quae pro peccato offerebant in Lege peccati nomine vocabant cum ipsae delicta nescirent sic Christi caro quae pro peccati nostris oblata est peccati nomen accepit Hieron See Grotius de Sat. Christi c. 1. p. 16. Nothing more usual in the Old Testament than to make the words Chattaath and Ascham to be expressive both of Sin and of the Sacrifice too by which that Sin was to be expiated answerably to which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 us'd in the New 2 Cor. 5.21 He that knew no sin was made sin c. that is a Sacrifice for sin An Ellipsis like to this in the Text you have Heb. 10.6 In burnt Offerings and for Sin thou hadst no pleasure where Sacrifices is left out but must be put in so here in the words which I am upon This now is that Interpretation which is most * Per hostiam carnis suae quam obtulit pro peccante damnavit peccatum in carne suâ Orig. Hostiâ pro peccato damnavit peccatum in Carne Melanch Per hostiam pro peccato Christum Deus abolevit peccatum in hominibus Vatabl. Sed quid fi mittens filium c. vult dicere quidem hostiam pro peccato five ut esset hostia pro peccato Drus Ego adduci nequeo ut nomen Peccati alio sensu hic positum esse existimem quam pro expiatrice victima quae 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicitur Hebraeis ficuti Graeci 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocunt Sacrificium cui maledictio injungitur Calv. For Sin that he might be a Sacrifice for Sin Dr. Ham. To be a propitiatory Sacrifice for Sin Deod To the same purpose P. Martyr Heming Piscat Vorst Lud. de Dieu c. whom I need not cite yet Beza will not admit of this exposition Praepositio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nullâ ratione potest hanc interpretationem admittere neque nunc Apostolus agit de Christi morte nostrorum peccatorum expiatione sed de Christi incarnatione naturae nostrae corruptione per eam sublata Beza generally pitch'd upon which seems best to correspond with other parallel Texts and with the Matter and Scope of this which we have in hand and therefore that only I shall iusist upon and indded the two former