Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n blood_n body_n shed_v 4,580 5 9.5800 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A34420 Monarchy, no creature of Gods making, &c. wherein is proved by Scripture and reason, that monarchicall government is against the minde of God, and that the execution of the late king was one of the fattest sacrifices that ever Queen Iustice had ... / by Iohn Cooke ... Cook, John, d. 1660. 1651 (1651) Wing C6019; ESTC R20620 90,353 192

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

or bad I will punish the people sayes the Lord so long as they have any kings it is not a goverment of my ordination kings are the peoples Idols creatures of their own making if they will have them let them be sure that if the best of their kings doe but out of a little vaine-glory shew his treasures to a Heathen king I le punish them for that transgression The next successor was Manasseh and hee followed the abomination of the Heathens chap. 21. 9. he seduced the people to doe more evill then did the Nations above all that the Amorites did and made Iudah to sinne with his Idolls Is not man a free Agent if he suffer no outward violence hee hath none within him but a kings example is unresistible violence Mercifull God shall thy owne children that one of them before they had a king was worth 10000. Amorites be made worse then the most abominable Heathens onely by having a king ver 12 13 14. therefore thus saith the Lord God of Israel behold I am bringing evill upon Ierusalem and Iudah that whosoever heareth of it both his eares shall tingle and I will stretch over Ierusalem the line of Samaria and the plummet of the house of Ahab and I will wipe Ierusalem as a man wipeth a dish wiping it and turning it upside downe and I will forsake the remnant of my inheritance and deliver them into the hand of their enemies and they shall become a prey spoile to all their enemies this Manasseh shed innocent blood till he filled the streets with it 2 Reg. chap 22. after Manasseh reigned Ammon who was the fathers own son in wickednes and his servants conspired against him and slew the king in his own house and the people slew them and made Iosiah king the hopefull prince who turned not aside to the right hand or to the left but walkt in all the wayes of David his father ver 2. but if the Lord will not turne from the fiercenesse of his great wrath against Iudah because of the provocation of Manasseh as it is 2 Kings 23. 26. will not the Lord be intreated to save the people for good Iosiahs sake no all that the Lord will doe for the best king is to take him away from the evill to come chap. 22. 19. 20. then chap. 25. Ierusalem the glory of the Lord is besieged by Nebucadnezar king of Babylon who built forts against it round about the famine prevailed and there was no bread for the people of the Land the men of warre therein forced to fly the City taken and defaced ver 9. the house of the Lord burnt and all the houses of Ierusalem every great mans house burnt the kings eyes put out and his sons slaine 7. and bound him with chaines as it is more at large expressed Ier. 39. 7. and it is very observeable to teach Gods people how to behave themselves when the people are so mad in contending for Monarchy to bring Gods Iudgments upon them that Ieremiah who in al probability would have been one of the first that had suffered for his faithfulnes in reproving sin so impartially as he did was onely preserved Ier. 39. 11. 12. Now Nebucadnezar king of Babylon gave charge concerning Ieremiah to Nebuzaradan the Captain of the guard saying take him and looke to him and doe him no harme but doe unto him even as he shall say unto thee this same Ieremiah that had mourned in secret for the Court vanities or rather enormities the insanitie and egregious folly of the people to cast off a Rationall just Goverment by worthy Patriots that charge their owne estates as well as others and to establish kings according to the manner of the Heathen for whose sins so many of the people lost their lives God punishes the people for their sins not onely where the kings are wicked and monsters of men but where they are good men and live good lives which yet is very rare yet the people must smart for suffering the kingly office to continue but if that be not a sufficient argument take another If the most desparate Malignant in England or Scotland was but in Ireland to heare of the horrid Massacres that have been committed upon the poore English 154000. barbarously murdered in one Province and to see the miserable effects and sad desolations of so bloody a Rebellion whereof the maintenance of the late Kings pretended prerogative was undoubtedly the first inducing cause he was as sure the Author of it as ever the Divell was the Author or first tempter to sin for without his countenance they durst never have attempted it without question he would be for the Parliament if it were but from the common sence of humanity for feare either of being tormented with the Ghosts and dismall apparitions of those poore Innocents or out of a sad consideration to bethinke himselfe what an astonishment it will be unto him at that great day to heare the cry of all the Innocent blood that hath been shed in the three Nations crying to the Iust God for vengeance vengeance against all those that have in any sort made themselves guilty or accessary to the death of their bodies but to the death of many of their soules as it is to be feared for as the tree falls so it lyes many a poore Creature innocently murdered for ought wee know to the contrary might have lived to repent but the sentence is past and he can but curse all those malignants that had a hand in his death as every one undoubtedly had that hath either warred or pleaded for the late King or his posterity The sum of these and many other Scripturs and reasons that might be alledged to the same purpose is to let you see that not only wicked Kings have brought misery and the wrath of God upon his people but the best men that ever swayed the Scepter of Iudah or Israel have been authors and occasioners of ruine and destruction to the poore people David by numbring the people Solomon by tolleration of Idolatry Iehosaphat by taking part with Ahab Asa for his confidence in the arme of flesh and his severity to the Prophet and Iosiah for his rash and unadvised war with Pharo Neco did all of them though godly men bring wrath upon Gods people which I beseech you observe the Iudges of old never did though Elies offence might be greater then theirs yet the people smarted not for that as for their Kings transgressions and though the Lord was pleased to choose the seed of David and not of Saul that did not justifie Israel but it was because God appointed Christ Iesus to come of Davids race from Iudah therefore there was a stabilitie of Davids throne and his posterity to terminate in Christ and therefore as that Scripture of Genes 49. 10. The Scepter shall not depart from Iudah nor a Law-giver from between his feet untill Shiloh come and unto him shall the gathering of the people
MONARCHY No creature of Gods making c. Wherein is proved by Scripture and Reason that Monarchicall Government is against the minde of God And that the Execution of the late King was one of the fattest sacrifices that ever Queen Iustice had Being a Hue and Cry after Lady Liberty which hath been ravished and stolne away by the Grand Potentates of the Earth Principally intended for the undeceaving of some honest hearts who like the poore Iewes cry give us a King though they smart never so much for it By IOHN COOKE late of Grayes Inne Esquire Chief Iustice of the Province of Munster in Ireland Hosea the 8. and 4. They have set up Kings but not by me they have made them Princes but I knew it not O Israel O England Thou wouldst have destroyed thy selfe but in God is thy help he will be thy King Hos the 13. 9-10 I gave thee a King in mine anger took him away in my wrath Printed at Waterford in Ireland by Peter de Pienne in the yeare of our Lord God 1651. To the Supreame Authoritie of the three Nations the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England Most Renowned Senators who like the Heavenly bodyes having for many yeares been in continuall motion for your Countreyes good have by Gods blessing upon your unwearied labours after so many Hericanes by vertue of the Act of May 9. 1649. brought the Ship of State to Anchor into its desired haven and setled that forme of Government which was appointed for Gods peculiar people who chose a man of every Tribe a head of a house Captaines of Thousands and of Hundreds famous Choyce and mighty men of vallor Chief of the fathers of the Children of Israel to assemble at Ierufalem in publique Councells 1 Numb 4. 2 Chron. 1. 2. and 5. 2. a Commonwealth and free State governed by their Representatives in Parliament and such whom they shall appoint for the good of the People of which blessed Statute 〈◊〉 onely say this that since the Apostles dayes there was never more Divinitie Reason and Eloquence in any writing for as it is said of humility it is not onely a vertue but a ground worke for a vessell that containes all the rest so this Statute is that only Law of the Medes Persians that is unchangeable consequently above the Law makers for a free people may not make themselves subject to any mortall man that rule of my Lord Bacons that the supreme power may not binde but dissolve it selfe being to be understood from Monarchy to a free State but not from liberty to slavery But I observe that few understand the true ground and reason of it looking no further then at the wickednes of Kings their oppressing burdening impoverishing and enslaving the people and so make it an Act of selfe-love to ease themselves in casting their riders as if good Kings might be tollerated who giving the people many good words and some few good Acts of grace enslave them faster as the Sun sooner takes away the travellers cloake then the winde like those which we call good witches that seeme to cure one that they may without suspicion bewitch twenty whereas if any man shall aske why hath the Parliament abolished the Kingly office in England and Ireland the answer is because God commanded them so to doe that it was not out of any affection of change nor yet onely for the ease of the People but from a Divine precept and consciencious principle in the faithfull discharge of their duty to God and man that for any people willingly to suffer Monarchy is to make themselves wiser then God who hath told us that there are no Lawes so righteous as those which it pleased him to give to his Elech People to be governed by Deut. 4. 7. For what Nation is there so great that hath Statutes and Iudgement so righteous as all this Law that I set before you this day the very first of which Lawes was that wise men and understanding knowne to be such among the Tribes should be Rulers and heads of the people Deut. 1. 13. An Elective Aristocracie being a principle in nature for wise men to governe ignorants as parents their little children that cannot order themselves for I can finde no other ground whereon the conscience of a Christian can rest with any satisfaction but the Law of God hee whose Conscience beares him witnesse that he would have had no hand in the Kings Death no finger in the change of the goverment but in a dutifull conformity to the Law of God from the Divine authority which not to have done had been flat Rebellion against God and a contempt of his holy Law sleeping and waking will be at rest that to have made an agreement with him had been but to put a Crowne of Gold upon him and a Crowne of thornes upon Iesus Christ the saving of him had been the beheading of all holines and righteousnes the sparing of him would have been of far more mischievous consequence then the sparing of Agag and if the life of the Parliament and therein the lives of all honest people had not gone for his Certainely never can any true Christian that would have taken in his interest be quiet in his Conscience without repentance Iudge Fortescue chap. 5. hath a story of a Gentlewoman at Salisbury who being accused by her owne man for murdering her husband was upon his oath without any further proofe condemned and burnt to ashes but within a yeare after it was discovered that the Accuser was the murderer who cleered his Mistris though too late but the Iudge who suffered the Iury to finde her guilty upon a single proofe not informing them what proofe was necessary the Law of God requiring two witnesses at the least in such cases Num. 35. 30. who so killeth any person the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses but one witnesse shall not testify against any person to cause him to dye was so troubled in minde that he confessed that he should never be able to cleere his conscience of that fact You that professe your selves to be Christians and yet would have taken in the Interest of a murderer who was the principle Author Contriver Abettor and Countenancer of the effusion of somuch Innocent Blood Rapines devastations depredations and desolations in England Ireland and Scotland for an unjust prerogative read the next verse 31. yee shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer which is guilty of death but he shall surely be put to death and know that it is onely the blood of Iesus Christ which cleanseth us from all sin that can purge you from that sin which calls for repentance in all sorts of people Levit. 4. 2. 27. And certainly if that Iudge was haunted with the Ghost of that Gentlewoman for an omission in his dutie in manner as aforesaid or per adventure for not giving strict charge to the Iury to enquire
alive in love but reproved him in his fury that others which should be borne after might see the vagabond and fugitife and magnifie the Iustice of God upon him the branding feare and shame that he underwent being farre worse then death and so the first King was not unaccomptable but lost all for a murder so true it is that many a man marries a widow that would gladly be rid of her traine of children and whereas many have instanced in Davids case that he was a man of blood in the murder of Vriah and yet not put to death the answer is easy that David ought by the Law of Man to have suffered death though he was a Monarch and Nathan caused him to be his owne judge 2 Sam. 12. 5. As the Lord liveth that man that hath done this thing shall surely dye then Nathan said to David thou art the man and if he had said no more there must have been some Executioner found out to have taken away the life of David it being against the law of Nature to make any man his owne executioner but be pleased to observe how Nathan aggravated the sin verse 8. 9. as if it were a farr greater sin for David to commit a murder then for a private man because it is a double sin murder and breach of trust it is the highest treason for a King to murder his Subjects and there can be no greater honor to any people in the world then to doe Iustice upon a murderous King but vers 13. David confesseth his sin I have sinned against the Lord in killing Vriah the Hittite with the sword and slaying him with the sword of the Children of Ammon though David never toucht the weapon that shed the blood of Vriah 2 Sam. 11. 14. therefore it is an impotent argument that the late King never killed any man with his owne hands and as weake to say that there was no malice in him which formally denominates and distinguishes murder from man-slaughter but a Martiall contending for his owne right upon such probable grounds that if a plaintif in Chancery were non-suited he ought not to pay any costs for that he had a probable cause of litigation for if there was not a prepenced and precogitated malice against all publique spirited men against whom he breathed out so many threatnings wishing that they had but one head that they might be taken off at a blow as another Nero yet there was malice in Law and malice implyed to kill every man that should stand in his way of an absolute unaccountable domination which certainely is a clearer malice then a thiefe hath that kills a man that will not loose his purse the thiefe hath no desire to hurt the honest man wishes him at his owne house in safety if he would but leave his purse behind him for I appeale to every sober man whose judgement is not corrupted by preingaged affections which is more hainous murder and offence in the sight of God for a poore man to rob a rich man of ten pound and in case of resistance to kill him or for a Prince that for the maintenance of his Pretogative which himselfe sayes is to be accountable for his actions to none but God alone shall grant Commissions of Array and raise Armies to put a whole Land into a Combustion and flame to the pillaging plundering massacring and destroying many thousands of poore innocent people And Nathan said to David the Lord hath put away thy sin thou shalt not dye No man can pardon murder but God alone so that the reason why David was not put to death for that murder was not for the authority that he had as a King but out of Gods pure mercy to him there being a supersedeas to the Execution from the Court of Heaven thereby to make him and Manasses in the old Testament and Paul in the new patternes to such as should believe not only of Eternall but of Temporall salvation he that may command Abraham to sacrifice Isaac may pardon David for killing Vriah that however the good Thiefe was put to death and if a godly man commit a murder he ought as well regularly to suffer death as the most impious the Law of man bearing a correspondency with the Law of God that he that never sins till seventy if he then kill a man must then suffer death not only Temporall but Eternall if he be under the Law Galat. 3. 10. 1 Pet. 4. 5. Let no beleever suffer as a murderer thiefe or evill doer proves that if any such be murderers they ought to suffer and the next verse holds forth to me more then what is ordinarily observed yet if any man suffer as a Christian not for his Religion only for then it should signify no more then verse 14. but if a Saint should through the strength of a temptation and malice of Satan commit a murder as the best man living may possibly commit any sin but the sin against the holy Ghost in such a case let him suffer legall punishment as a Christian let not him be terrified so much at the present death as rejoyce that he is goeing to his fathers house to Eternall happines let him be more affected and afflicted that Religion should suffer by his fault then for his owne sufferings let him take a kinde farewell of faith which shall presently be turned into vision and of repentance for that all teares shall instantly be wiped from his eyes let him feele by the spirit how all things worke together for his good even his great sin for which he suffers it being the occasion to bring him soonet to his Crowne of glory I say though this be regularly true that if a godly man commit a murder the Law will take hold of him 1 Tim. 1. 9. 10. yet if the Lord worke hearty Contrition in his soule for the offence as in the case of David I have sinned the heart be kindly touched with godly sorrow which did not appeare to be the Case of the late King it seemes to me that they which carry the sword may in some speciall cases save such a man alive where happily the Lord hath so sanctified that affliction to him that he is thereby become a new creature and is not the same man that offended and may be more serviceable and instrumentall for the Publique then his death would have been advantage to the people in point of exemplary Terror without any violation or infringement of that preceptive fundamentall law of Gen. 9. 6. the reason whereof being perpetuall so long as men are made after Gods Image it can never be abrogated though any one should extraordinarily be saved by the equity of the Law as in Davids Case who certainely were it not for some speciall reason as a King did more deserve death then for a private person to commit a murder as he that is a Scholler and knowes the Law ought in reason rather to be hanged for stealing
to feare the Lord his God to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes to doe them ver 20. that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren and that he turne not aside from the Commandement to the right hand or to the left to the end that he may prolong his dayes in his Kingdome he and his Children in the midst of Israel And they read those words I will set a King over me which is spoken by the people Thou shalt set a King over thee as if God had commanded a Kingly Goverment in Canaan which was only permissive as the sin of Adam let them have a King at their owne perill saith the Lord The Lord foresaw that the Israelites would rebell and cast off a happy Goverment by the heads of the people and Iudges and God permits it and Moses speakes of the election and dutie of a King the election is from the people they will have a King whether the Lord will or no where by the way wee may take notice how bold many have beene and poore deluded Royalists still are to wrest the Scripture for the advancement of Monarchy when men dare say that in the Hebrew it is that Moses commands them to elect a King which the holy Scripture reproves in them as the greatest insanity madnes in the world that when they may have honest Religious men to go in out before them that will not oppresse them nor exalt themselves above their brethren that they will notwithstanding inslave themselves to the Arbitrary and lawlesse Iusts of one man and his posteritie whether they be Idiots Children knaves Theeves Murderers Fornicators Gluttons Drunkards Idolators or Women which though never so wise Religious and mercifull as by reason of the tendernes of their spirits and want of temptation I believe there are more godly women then men in the world yet it is against the law of God and Nature to make Millions of men subject to the commands of a woman but blessed be God that the knowledge of the Hebrew language is not necessary to bring an English man to heaven Iosua had the honour to conduct them into Canaan and they tooke it into possession but there was a remnant of the Canaanites left unsubdued to prove them as the law is Deut. the 20. from the 16. 10 the 18. which I the rather mention for the Illustration of the equitable proceedings in Ireland the Lambe Iudges and makes war in Righteousnes Revel 19. 11. Every Souldier hath been as a Iudge to execute the Iudgment written Psal 149. 9. farre be it from Gods servants to slay the righteous with the wicked Genes 18. 23. No such beatificall sight as to see a Murderer that hath imbrued his hands in the effusion of Innocent blood to suffer the most painefull and shamefull death that can be imagined but the Children of those Murderers ought not to be put to death for their originall sin as we read in the case of Amaziah 2 Kings 14. 5. 6. And it came to passe as soone as the Kingdome was confirmed in his hand that hee slew his servants which had slaine the King his Father But the Children of the Murderers he slew not according unto that which is written in the booke of the law of Moses wherein the Lord commanded saying the Fathers shall not be put to death for the Children nor the Children be put to death for the Fathers but every man shall be put to death for his owne sinne Deut. 24. 16. And many that by reason of their wicked principles and adherence to the Pope are not fit to be trusted in Garisons yet receive rents for their houses or estates there Ezek. 18. 20. The soule that sinneth it shall dye the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the Father neither shall the Father beare the iniquitie of the Son the righteousnes of the righteous shall be upon him and the wickednes of the wicked shall be upon him Now by the equitie of that law Deut. 20. 16. where Gods people shall reside they being chief in Command may and ought for their owne securities expell delinquents and malignants out of London or any Garrison in England or Ireland for a time or for ever as may conduce to the Weale publique and their owne safeties whose lives are so precious in the Lords esteeme But here I meet a Goliah in the way that threatens much but the spirit of God is not in it and therefore it is but as a statue that God had given the land of Canaan by promise to Israel and therefore they might justly maintaine a warr to destroy the Canaanites Hittites Amorites Perizites Hivites and Iebusites and there being no command to destroy the Gibeonites Deut. 20. 17. therefore the league with them was lawfull Ios 9. wherein the warr may be judged lawfull on both sides for Iosua to fight having a command from God and the Canaanites to defend their possession not knowing of any such command but is there the same reason to destroy ancient Monarchyes when they oppose Iesus Christ and wil not suffer his people to enjoy their liberties which he hath purchased for them by his precious blood Answer Yes doubtlesse there are as evident promises for the Churches of Christ in this age of the world to be redeemed out of Antichristian bondage by the Moseses Iosuas Sampsons Gideons Iepthahs and Samuels which the Lord shall raise up to be instruments in his hand to save his people as there were in Moses and Iosuas ages that the Church of Israel should be delivered from the Egyptian slavery and reason to me cleerely makes it out that if a promise of an earthly Canaan were a ground of the Churches Warre much more their spirituall liberties that if I may defend my house by force from theeves and robbers certainly I may defend my selfe in the exercise of my spirituall liberties which are ten thousand times deerer to me if I may fight for a peece of glasse may I not engage for a precious pearle that is invalluable The Kings of Canaan might have pleaded antiquity succession and the peoples consent which no King can plead against Gods people in the matter of their spirituall priviledges God will have the Monarchs of the world know that whatever Civill right they may pretend to their Kingdomes where they have by force or flattery gained the peoples consent as the honest man parts with his purse to save his life yet they must not upon paine of forfeiting their Royalties persecute his friends and servants Kings that stile themselves Defenders of the Faith if they prove offendors of the faithfull God will take away their Kingdomes in a way of Iustice and righteousnes when any of the 10. Kings having formerly given their power and strength to the beast Revel 17. 12. shall afterwards cut off his head as Henry the eight used the Pope in taking away his supremacy and making himselfe head of the Church by Act of
shall reap the same ver 8. 9. those to whom the newes of the murder of the Innocent is as sweet as a plentifull harvest is agreable to the husbandman shall not be able to avoid the stroke of Iustice but be like high trees that are planted upon the mountaines shall be made a sport and pastime for the windes and tempests But the poore Gibeonits case before wee leave it affords us an excellent document how Gods Israelites ought to carry themselves towards Ismaelits and Canaanits that would have destroyed them viz. to be very sparing in promises and protection towards them but haveing once conditionated with them and received them into favour to be very liberall in performances towards them and not to violate faith given in a title though the conditions were obtained by craft and deception And now I humbly intreat you to observe what little esteeme David had of Sauls Royall seed to hang up seven of them for what offence does not appeare but very probable that they had given Saul bad councell to destroy the poore Gibeonites and yet David had sworne to Saul not to cut off his seed after him 1 Sam. 24. 20. 21. And now behold I know well that thou shalt surely be King and that the Kingdome of Israel shall be established in thine hand Sweare now therefore unto me by the Lord that thou wilt not cut off my seed after mee and that thou wilt not destroy my name out of my fathers house and David swore unto Saul With these two arguments I doe in the name of the Lord Challenge all the Royalists in England Ireland and Scotland to answer them if they can or rest satisfied with Scripture and reason 1. That no oath of Allegiance or Supremacy can be any ground to any people not to doe Iustice upon a King for murder David a man after Gods owne heart that never offended but in the matter of Vriah therefore did not erre in delivering up Sauls seven sons to execution would not make his oath to Paul a ground not to doe Iustice for the Spirit of God in David argued thus I am by the Law of Nature as I am a creature a poore worme bound to the holy and just Law of my Creator which is unchangeable and undispensable God can no more dispense with my loving and obeying of him then hee can cease to be God by reason of his Infinite goodnes which Law is that blood requires blood Genes 9. 6. It is a fundamentall Law without which there can be no conservation of human society and I finde in the Law of God that my eye must not pittie him that sheds blood Deut. 19. 11 12 13. But if any man hate his neighbour and lye in wait for him and rise up against him and smite him mortally that he dye and fleeth into one of these Cities then the Elders of the City shall send and fetch him thence and deliver him into the hand of the avenger of blood that he may dye ver 5. thine eye shall not pittie him but thou shalt put away the guilt of Innocent blood from Israel that it may goe well with thee paralell whereunto is 2 Kings 14. 4. And also for the Innocent blood that he shed for hee filled Ierusalem with Innocent blood which the Lord would not pardon And therefore when I take an oath of Allegeance or Supremacy it must be saving that faith which I owe unto my Creator as in Iustice Littletons case when any man did Fealty to his Lord it was with a saving that faith and dutie which he owed unto the King and those other Lords which he held land of by Priority of Tenure which if it were not expressed it is implyed in Law 2. Thus I argue that if it were just to put Sauls sons to death for their fathers sin wherein hee was principall and they but accessaries at the most doubtlesse it had been just to have recompenced it upon the head of their father it could be no sin to put Saul to death for killing the Gibeonites where it was lawfull to execute his sons which might have made many pleas that what they did was Sauls command they had the Kings Commission of Array and warrants from Saul to raise forces to secure the Countrey and under pretence of keeping the peace to plunder and destroy whom they pleased but observe what a glorious sight it was in the eyes of heaven 1 Sam. 21. 14. when those seven sons were executed God was intreated for the Land It may be the common Law would have acquitted those seven gentlemen because regularly where the principall is dead the accessory cannot be tryed but the Law of God makes all principall in murder whether present or absent as the Law of man makes all principall in the highest offences of Treason and the lowest offences of trespasse nor did David question what shall I shed the blood of the seed Royall for the Gibeonites who were strangers and bondmen hewers of wood and drawers of water upon which Eternall Law of Righteousnes Major Ottoway and Cornet Grant were shot to death for murdering an Irish-man at the siege of VVaterford who having leave to goe into VVaterford to receive some money and to returne was at his coming backe murdered by their Orders or Command for which by the Councell of Warre they were justly condemned and the execution was a most famous peece of justice for had not zeale and love to Iustice preponderated and out-voted all private affections much might have been said for the vallor Gallantry and hopefulnes of the Major and Cornet I could not in faithfulnes but mention it as being a case so parallell to that 1 Sam. 21. That Sauls sons should be executed for murder of the Gibeonites and out of my dutifull respect to beare witnesse to the exemplary and exact discipline of the Army where vice is punisht vertue rewarded whereof I was sometimes Advocate and count it more honorable to be a member of an Army fighting for Christ then to be head of an Antichristian Empire But before we leave David let me but observe how the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel for Davids one sin of numbring the people what had the poore sheep done that 70000. men from Dan to Beersheba should dye by the Pestilence in three dayes Did not God thinke you therein reckon with them for their Kingly goverment you will have a King saith the Lord to them whether I will or no you shall now smart for your wickednes for your great wickednes for unmanning your selves making your selves lesse then men to make one man equall with God to doe what he pleases I will not endure it in my owne people Eli sinned yet the people not punisht for he governed the people according to the minde of God but you will have a King sayes the Lord as the Heathens have be it so but if he sin I le punish you not only with the famine but by a
where is there any Monarch in the world that assumes a power of accompting onely to God but hath in him the sensuallitie of a swine the filth and uncleanenes of a Leopard the crueltie and inexorablenes of a Tiger Beare or Lion the subtiltie and craft of a Fox the skittishnes and stubbornes of a Mule or an Asse and in what things they have common together with beasts they are worse then beasts for beasts will not be druncke with their drinke as the drunkard corrupts himselfe in his drinke Iude 10. they speake evill of that they know not and what they naturally know as brute beasts in those things they corrupt themselves if it would be such a judgement that a man would be willing to endure any misery in the world rather then to have his body turned into the fashion of a beast and if our Ancestors have been so diligent to destroy Woolves and such noxious creatures that whosoever should bring in the head of a Woolfe was to have a reward for it what a madnes or lethargie is it in men that would be counted rationall not onely to suffer Tirants and mysticall Woolves to domineere with a rod of iron when God gives them an opportunitie of extirpation root and branche but to contend against their brethren to set up a Tirant to rage like the waters because they cannot bring in an overflowing Tide and streame to breake downe the banks of honestie and equitie what was it that made David wish Psal 55. 6. compared with Ier. 9. 1. to 6. and Psal 59. Oh that I had the wings of a Dove that I might fly into the wildernes and there abide are not wild beasts in their proper element in a wildernes as fishes in the Sea true but the goverment of Saul and his prerogative creatures was more cruell then the fierce Lion that will either pitie the crouching passenger or not prey upon him till hunger require it and then put him out of his paine in an instant but Tirants and such are all that will not be accomptable to the people keep men in prison many yeares to satisfy their insatiable cruelties and torture poore creatures by lingring deaths denying them the favour of expedition in that kinde therefore David sayes Psal 22. 20. Deliver my soule from the sword my darling from the power of the dog the spirit of God in David calls Saul a dog better sayes David to fall into the hands of a Tiger and wilde beasts then live under a Tirannicall goverment there is a famous story of some Spaniards that being besieged by a Tirant and in danger to be taken the young men first tooke all the old people in the City and let them blood to death and cut off their heads killing them with the fairest and easiest deaths that could be next they tooke all the treasure and riches in the City and set it on fire and then they tooke poyson and poysoned themselves and the survivor opened the gates and killed himselfe so as the enemy had nothing but rubbish and ashes of two evills choosing the least old and yong and all the City to be destroyed together rather then to fall into the hands of a Tirant where no Iustice can be had the Lord cōtinue and increase the same gallantry and noblenesse of spirit in the English nation rather to endure any misery in the world then ever to admit any more of a Tirannicall Goverment for that is to make our selves lower then beasts which are not devoured by those of the same kinde to make one man more then a man with Titles of Sacred Majestie and Gracious Highnes Incompitible with a state of humanity Now I beseech you have patience a little longer to observe what strange creatures the Kings of Israel were and then let every honest hearted man but aske himselfe some such questions as these whether it is not likely that God would give his owne people as good Kings as to any other Nation Secondly if God was so exceedingly wroth with his owne children for desireing a King whether will he not be more angry with us if wee should not take warning by Gods people Note therefore that when King Ahab was dead Iehoram raigned in Israel 2 Kings 3. 1. 6. and because there was a famine in the Land the first newes is that Elisha the Prophet must be slaine 2 Kings 6. 31. 32. then he said God do so and moreover also to me if the head of Elisha the son of Shaphat shall stand on him this day but Elisha sat in his house and the Elders sat with him and the King sent a man from before him but ere the messenger came to him he said to the Elders see yee how the son of a murderer hath sent to take away my head take heed all yee fighters for the son of a murderer in the 8. Chap. ver 15. Hazael kills King Benhadad and Elisha told him what a Tirant he would be against Israel and wept for griefe to thinke how Hazael when he came to be King should oppresse and Tirannize over them then ver 12. sayes Hazael why weepeth my Lord he answered because I know the evill that thou wilt doe unto the children of Israel their strong holds wilt thou set on fire and their young men wilt thou slay with the sword and wilt dash their children and rip up their women with child ver 13 14 15. And Hazael said but what is thy servant a dog that he should do this great thing and Elisha answered the Lord hath shewed mee that thou shalt be King over Syria so hee departed from Elisha and came to his master who said to him what said Elisha to thee and he answered hee told mee that thou shouldest surely recover and it came to passe on the morrow that he tooke a thicke cloath and dipt it in water and spead it on his face so that hee died and Hazael raigned in his steed As if a King should take the Sacrament upon it that hee intends no more hurt to the Parliament then to his owne children and the very same day grant comissions to slay and murder the most saithfull patriots but see what credit there is to be given to such mens vowes and protestations 2 Kings 10. 32. Hazael smote them in all the coasts of Israel Iehu was next made King by the Souldiours and 2 King 9. 24. Iehu drew a bow with his full strength and smote Iehoram betweene his Armes and the Arrow went out at his heart and he sunck down in his Chariot then Iehu followes after Ahaziah King of Iudah and smites him and he died at Megiddo 2 Kings 9. 27. and Iehoahaz succeeds Iehu in the Kingdome of Israel 2 Kings 10. then Chap. 11. Athaliah the mother of Ahaziah arose and destroyed all the seed Royall onely Ioash who with his nurse was hid and peserved from the massacre and was afterwards annointed King and the people clapt their hands and said God save