Parliament by Writ as Baron such Heir Male omitting the Husband of the Issue of such Heir Female And this also appeareth by a notable Controversie in the time of Henry the Seventh between Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brook and Richard Lord Lattimer for the Barony of Lattimer which in effect was The said Lord Brook did challenge the Barony of Lattimer as Coâ—in and Heir of Elizabeth his Great-grandmother who was Sister and Heir of Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer who died without Issue And hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry the Seventh in Parliament whereunto Richard Lord Lattimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said Title and Dignity The said Richard Lord Lattimer did by his Answer shew That after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer without Issue the said Elizabeth was his Sister and next Heir and married unto Thomas Willoughby Knight second Son of the Lord Willoughby But Henry the Sixth for that the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer was dead without Issue and that the next Heir was Female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second Son of Henry Earl of Westmoreland to be Lord Lattimer as Cosin and next Heir Male of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer which George was Grandfather of the said Richard Lord Lattimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the Question now in hand namely Whether a Barony by Writ may descend to the Heirs Female was advisedly considered of by the King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Lattimer which President doth afford us two Judgments in this point And in the time of Henry the Sixth when the Writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill Knight whereby he was summoned as Lord Lattimer to the Parliament and as Heir Male and not the said Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Elizabeth Heir Female And the second Judgment was given in the time of Henry the Seventh whereby the said Barony was adjudged to the said Richard Lord Lattimer coming out of the special Heir Male against the Lord Brook descended of the general Heir Male. But here in this President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to encounter this Conclusion for there was an Heir Female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the Declaration of King Henry the Sixth was Baron of Dacres in right of his wife And there was also Ralph and Humphrey the Heirs Males before whom the Heir Female was preferred by the censure of Henry the Sixth and Edward the Fourth This Objection is easily answered for although Henry the Sixth through the Princely favour which he bore unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to be Lord Dacres in right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being Heir Male then unto the Lord Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Anno primo Hen. 4. Wherefore the reason why the Heir Male could not be regarded was the said Attainder of the said Raâ—ph and Humphrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey in the 12 th of Edward the Fourth laboured to have the said Attainder Reversed he submitted himself to the Arbitrement of the King who to satisfie both Competitors both having deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed one to be Lord Dacres and the other to be the Lord Dacres of Gillesland And thus much concerning the second Point Whether a Barony by Writ may descend unto the Heir Female The third Point As concerning the third Point admitting such Descent to be to the Heir Female when there is no Heir Male that may claim the same for then doth this Question take place Whether the husband of such an Heir Female shall enjoy the Dignity in right of his wife or no Wherein we are to rest upon a Resolution had and given to this special Question which was in this manner In the time of Henry the Eighth when Mr. Winby took upon him the style of Lord Talbois in right of his wife having no Issue by her The said King assisted both by Civil and Temporal Lawyers gave Sentence That no husband of a Baroness in her right should use that Style and Dignity until he had by her a Child whereby she should become Tenant by Courtesie unto her Inheritance The special Reasons that occasioned this Sentence were two First It should be convenient for her husband this day to be a Baron and a Peer of the Realm and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and without the default of the party Secondly If he had Issue by wife and were entituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie of England of his wives Lands if he shall not also bear the Style and Dignity of his Wives Barony then should the Son after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father be a Baron and Lord without Land for so the father should have the Land as Tenant by Courtesie and the Son the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the Nature Quality and Estate of a Baron by Writ and for the Resolution of the several points and Articles of the Question proposed may suffice CHAP. XII Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former Division of Barons THere is also a fourth means of Creation viz. by Act of Parliament but the first two mentioned and this other by Patent is most usual for the Honour of the King for thereby the Donation doth proceed from his Majesty only as from the Fountain of Honour But when the Creation is by Parliament the King ever is one and may be said to be Donor A Baron therefore by Creation by reason of Letters Patents is that noble Person whom the King or any of his Progenitors Kings of this Realm have created Baron by such their Letters Patents began in the Reign of King Richard the Second This kind of Dignity of a Baron shall be of such continuance in Descent or otherwise as shall be limited in the Habendum in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for term vanter vie as some hold Opinion in the 32 of Hen. 6. for cujus est dare est disponere It may be in special in our general Tayl and this kind of Tayl was usual before the Statute made decimo tertio of Edw. 1. by which Estate Tayl of Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earl of Kent in the time of Henry the Third by these words Habendum sibi haeredibus suis de corpore Margaretae uxoris sui sorors Alexandri Regis Scotiae procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remanere in directis haeredibus dicti Huberti And that Estates intayl are at this Day of Titles of Honour by the said Statute of Westminster the second Question If a
Hen. 1. fol. 3. and so doth Vlpian the Civilian determine And this is one of the three Reasons alledged wherefore by the policy of our Law the King is a Body Politick thereby to avoid the attainder of him that had right to the Crown Coke's seventh part 12. a. lest in the interim there should be an interregnum which the Law will not suffer because of the manifold Incumbrances thereof For it hath been clearly resolved by all the Judges of the Land That presently by the descent of the Crown the next Heir is compleatly and absolutely King without any essential Ceremony or Act to be done ex postfacto And that Coronation is but a Royal Ornament and outward Solemnization of the Descent And this appeareth evidently by abundance of Presidents and Book-Cases Let us take one or two Examples in a Case so clear for all King Henry the Sixth was not crowned till the Eighth year of his Reign and yet divers men before his Coronation were attainted of Treason Felony and the like Crimes and he was as absolute and compleat a King for matters of Judicature Grants c. before his Coronation as he was after Queen Mary reigned three moneths before she was crowned in which space the Duke of Northumberland and others were condemned and executed for Treason which they had committed before she was Queen And upon this reason there is a Maxim in the Common Law Rex nunquam moritur in respect of his ever living and never dying politique capacity In France also the same Custome hath been observed and for more assurance it was expresly enacted under Charles the Fifth That after the death of any King his eldest Son should immediately succeed for which cause the Parliament Court of Paris doth accompany the Funeral Obsequies of those that have been their Kings not in mourning attire but in Scarlet the true Ensign of the never dying Majesty of the Crown Nevertheless certain Cities in France not long since alledged for themselves that because they had not reputed Henry the Fourth for their King and professed Allegiance unto him they were not to be adjudged Rebels Whereupon the chief Lawyers of our Age did resolve That forasmuch as they were original Subjects even Subjects by Birth they were Rebels in bearing Arms against their King although they had never professed Allegiance unto him To conclude this Chapter I shall give you a View of the Ceremonies of the Creation of Henry Prince of Wales which began on the Thirtieth of May 1610. as followeth The Prince accompanied with divers young Noblemen together with his own Servants rode from his Court at St. Iames's to Richmond where he reposed that night on the next day the Lord Mayor Aldermen with the several Companies in their Barges attended his Highness about Barn Elmes where he was entertained with a Banquet and in other places with Speeches by a Neptune upon a Dolphin and a Sea Goddess upon a Whale c. His Highness landing at Whitehall was received by the Officers of his Majesties Houshold according to order viz. by the Knight Marshal and the Serjeant Porter In the Hall by the Treasurer and Comptroller of the Houshold in the great Chamber by the Captain of the Guard and in the presence Chamber by the Lord Chamberlain from whence he went into the Privy Chamber where the King and Queen met him the Saturday after was taken up with the usual Ceremonies of making Knights of the Bath to attend his Highness at his Creation which were Five and twenty in number Upon Monday following these Knights of the Bath met in the Queens Closet where they put on long Purple Satten Robes lined with white Taffata and a Hood like a Batchelor of Law about their Necks and in a Barge prepared for them went before the Prince to Westminster Palace where his Highness landed and proceeded to his Creation thus First the Heralds Next the Knights of the Bath Then the Lords that were imployed in several Services Garter King at Arms bearing the Letters Patents The Earl of Sussex the Robes of Purple Velvet The Earl of Huntington the Train The Earl of Cumberland the Sword The Earl of Rutland the Ring The Earl of Derby the Rod. The Earl of Shrewsbury the Cap and Coronet The Earl of Nottingham and Privy Seal supported his Highness being in his Surcoat only and bareheaded to the Parliament Chamber The King was already set with all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in their Robes of State all the Knights and Burgesses of the lower House present as also the Foreign Ambassadors the great Ladies of the Realm and the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of London seated upon Scaffolds The Procession entring in manner aforesaid made three several low Reverencies to his Majesty and when they came to the Throne Garter King at Arms kist the Letters Patents and gave them to the Lord Chamberlain who presented them to the King who delivered them to the Earl of Salisbury Principal Secretary of State who read them the Prince kneeling all the while before the King and at the words accustomed the King put on the Robe the Sword the Cap and Coronet the Rod and the Ring The Patent being read the King kist him on the Cheek and the Earl Marshal with the Lord Chamberlain placed him in his Parliament Seat viz. on the left hand of the King which Ceremony being ended they returned to the Palace Bridge in manner as followeth First the Masters of the Chancery the King's Council and others then the Officers of Arms the Knights of the Bath next twenty Trumpets before them then the Judges and after them all the Members of Parliament in order the Barons Viscounts Earls and Marquisses having Coronets on their Heads then Norroy and Clarenceaux King at Arms going next before the Lord Treasurer and the Lord Chancellor then Garter next before the Sword and then the Prince and King They took Barge at the Palace Stairs and landed at Whitehall Bridge where the Officers at Arms the Members of Parliament and the Lords being first landed attended the King and Prince and went before into the Hall and so into his Majestie 's Presence Chamber whence the Prince descended again into the Hall to Dinner himself seated at the upper end of a Table accompanied with the Lords that attended him at his Creation who sate on both sides of the Table with him At another Table on the left hand sate the Knights of the Bath in their Robes along one side attended by the King's Servants At the second Course Garter with the Heralds came to the Prince's Table and after due reverence proclaimed the King's Style with three Largesses viz. King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. And then proclaimed the Prince's Titles viz. Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Rothsay Earl of Rothsay Earl of Chester and Knight of the Garter with two Largesses Then with Feasting Masques and all sort of Courtly Gallantry that joyful
those ancient Fees in the time of Henry the Third and Edward the Fourth at this day do amount unto most men are not unskilful in Coke's seventh part 33. And in Cases of Decay of Ability and Estate as Senatores Romani amoti Senatu so sometimes they are not admitted to the Upper House of Parliament though they still keep their Title and Dignity Sir Thomas Smith de Republica Aâ—glorum 22. and by the Statute made 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. the Lords have their places prescribed after this manner as followeth viz. These four the Lord Chancellor the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Council and the Lord Privy Seal being Persons of the Degree of a Baron or above are in the same Act appointed to sit in Parliament and in all Assemblies and Councils above all Dukes not being of the Blood Royal viz. the King's Uncle Brother and Nephew And these six viz. the Lord Great Chamberlain of England the Lord High Constable of England the Lord Marshal of England the Lord Admiral of England the Lord High Steward of his Majesties Houshold and the Lord Chamberlain also of his Mâ—jesties Houshold by that Act are to be placed in all Assemblies of Council after the Lord Privy Seal according to their Degrees So that if he be a Baron than he is to sit above all Barons or if an Earl above all Earls And so likewise the King's Secretaries being Barons or Earls have place above all Barons or Earls PRIVILEDGES Incident to the NOBILITY According to the Laws of England CHAP. XIII WHEN a Peer of the Realm and Lord of the Parliament is to be Arraigned upon any Trespass or Felony whereof he is indicted and whereupon he hath pleaded Not Guilty the King by his Letters Patens shall assign some great and sage Lord of the Parliament to be High Steward of England for the day of his Arraignment who before the said day shall make a Precept to his Serjeant at Arms that is appointed to serve him during the time of his Commission to warn to appear before him Eighteen or Twenty Lords of the Parliament or Twelve at the least upon the same day And then at the time appointed when the High Steward shall be set under the Cloth of Estate upon the Arraignment of the Prisoner and having caused the Commission to be read the same Serjeant shall return his Precept and thereupon the Lords shall be called and when they have appeared and are set in their places the Conâ—â—able of the Tower shall be called to bring his Prisoner to the Barr and the High Steward shall declare to the Prisoner the cause why the King hath assembled thither those Lords and himself and perswade him to answer without fear and then he shall call the Clerk of the Crown to read his Indictment unto him and to ask him if he be Guilty or not whereunto when he hath answered Not Guilty the Clerk of the Crown shall ask him How he will be tryed and then he will say By God and his Peers Then the King's Serjeant and Attorney will give Evidence against him whereunto when the Prisoner hath made answer the Constable shall be commanded to receive the Prisoner from the Barr to some other place whilst the Lords do secretly confer together in the Court and then the Lords shall rise out of their places and consult amongst themselves and what they affirm shall be done upon their Honour without any Oath to be ministred upon them And when all or the greatest part of them shall be agreed they shall retire to their places and sit down Then the High Steward shall ask of the youngest Lord by himself if he that is Arraigned be Guilty or not of the Offence whereof he is Arraigned and then the youngest next him and so of the residue one by one until he hath asked them all and every Lord shall answer by himself And then the Steward shall send for the Prisoner again who shall be led to the Barr to whom the High Steward shall rehearse the Verdict of the Peers and give Judgment accordingly The Antiquity and Original of this kind of Tryal by the opinion of several Authors is grounded from the Statute of Magna Charta so called not in respect of the quantity but of the weight of it Coke to the Reader before his eight part fol. 2. cap. 29. beginning thus Millus liber homo c. nec super eum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parium suorum But I take it to be more ancient than the time of Henry the Third as brought into the Realm with the Conqueror being answerable to the Norman and French Laws and agreeable with the Custom Feudale where almost all Controversies arising between the Sovereign and the Vassal are tryed per Iudicium parium suorum And if a Peer of the Realm upon his Arraignment of Treason do stand mute or will not answer directly Judgment shall be given against him as a Traytor Convict and he shall not be prest to death and thereby save the forfeiture of his Lands for Treason is out of the Statute of Westminster 1. chap. 12. 15. Ed. 4. 33. Dyer 205. But if he be Arraigned upon Indictment of Felony he may be mute This priviledge hath some restraint as well in regard of the person as in the manner of proceeding As touching the person first the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realm although they be Lords of the Parliament if they be impeached of such offence they shall not be tryed by the Peers of the Realm but by a Jury of Knights and other substantial Persons upon their Oaths the reason thereof alledged is so much as Archbishops and Bishops cannot pass in the like cases upon Peers for that they are prohibited by the Common and Ecclesiastical Laws to be judged of Life and Blood Reason would that the other Peers should not try them for this Tryal should be mutual forasmuch as it is performed upon their Honours without any Oath taken And so by the way you may see the great respect the Law hath to a Peer of the Realm when he speaketh upon his Honour even in a case concerning the life of a man and that of a Peer and therefore ought they much more to keep their Words and Promises in smaller matters when they engage their Honour for any just cause or consideration Secondly as touching these persons no Temporal Lords but they that are Lords of the Parliament shall have this kind of Tryal and therefore out of this are excluded the eldest Son and Heir apparent of a Duke in the life of his Father though he be called an Earl And it was the case of Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent to Thomas Duke of Norfolk in 38 Hen. 8. which is in Brook's Abridgment Treason 2. Likewise the Son and Heir apparent of an Earl though he be called a Lord. And all the younger Sons of Kings are Earls
priviledge allowed unto him to keep in his Family the number of six born Strangers By the Statute 14 Hen. 8. cap. 13. a priviledge was granted to the Nobility according to their degrees concerning Apparel but because by a Statute made in the first of the King that now is chap. 15. all Laws and Statutes concerning Apparel are taken away Whereas by the Statute 2 Hen. 5. Parl. 2. cap. 1. it is ordained That the Justices of the Peace in every County named of the Quorum shall be resident in the Shires wherein they are Justices there is a Proviso whereby the Lords and Peers of the Realm named in such Commissions are excepted By the Statute 1 Edw. 6. cap. 12. amongst other things it is enacted That in all and every Case and Cases where any of the King's Subjects shall and may upon his prayer have the priviledge of the Clergy as a Clark Convict that may make purgation in all the Cases and every of them and also in all and every Cases of Felony wherein the priviledge or benefit of Clergy is taken away by this Statute wilful Murther and poysoning only excepted the Lords and Peers of the Realm having place and voice in Parliament shall by vertue of this Act of Common Grace upon his or their requests and prayer alledging that he is a Lord or Peer of this Realm claiming the benefit of this Act though he cannot read without burning in the Hand loss of Inheritance or corruption of Blood be adjudged taken and used for the first time only to all constructions intents and purposes as a Clark Convict which may make purgations without any other benefit of Clergy to any such Lord or Peer from thenceforth at any time after for any cause to be allowed adjudged or admitted any Law Custome Statute or other thing to the contrary notwithstanding By this Statute a Lord of the Parliament shall have the benefit of his Clergy where a common person shall not viz. for breaking open an House by day or night or for robbing any on the High-way and in all other Cases excepted saving in wilful Murther and Poysoning but in all other Cases wherein Clergy is taken away by any Statute made since the said Statute of 1 Edw. 6. he is in the same degree that a common and inferiour person but the Court will not give him the benefit of this Statute if he doth not require it If a Lord of the Parliament do confess his Offence upon his Arraignment or doth abjure or is Outlawed for Felony it seemeth that in these Cases he may have the benefit of this Statute viz. his Clergy for that by the Statute 18 Eliz. cap. 18. he nor any other need to make his purgation but shall be forthwith delivered out of Prison by the Justices By the Imperial Constitutions Nobiles non torquentur Nobiles non suspendentur sed decapitantur and so it is almost grown into a Custome of England by the favour of the Prince for it is rare to have a Nobleman executed in other form Yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in the 23 th of Henry the Sixth and the Lord Sturton in the fourth of Queen Mary were hanged At the Common Law it was lawful for any man Noble or Ignoble to retain as many Chaplains as they pleased for their instruction in Religion But by a Statute made 21 Hen. 8. cap. 13. a restraint was made and a certain number only allowed the Nobility And such Chaplains for their attendance have Immunities as by the Statute at large may appear viz. every Archbishop and Duke may have six Chaplains whereof every one may have and purchase Licence of Dispensation and take receive and keep two Parsonages or Benefices with Cure of Souls and that every Marquiss and Earl may have five Chaplains every Viscount or other Bishop four Chaplains and every Baron and Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplains whereof every one of them may purchase License of Dispensation and take receive and keep two Benefices with Cure of Souls And forasmuch as the retaining of Chaplains by Lords and Peers of the Realm is ordinary and nevertheless some questions have been concerning the true understanding of the said Statute Law I think it not unnecessary to set down some subsequent Resolutions of the Judges touching some matters If a Bishop be translated to an Archbishoprick or a Baron be created an Earl yet in this case they can have but only so many Chaplains as an Archbishop or an Earl might have for although he hath divers Dignities yet he is still but one person to whom the attendance and service should be done So if a Baron be made a Knight of the Garter or Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports he shall have in all but three Chaplains sic de similibus And if such an Officer allowed by the Statute to have one two or more Chaplains do retain accordingly and after he is removed from his Office in this case he cannot be now Nonresident nor accept a second Benefice of his Complement which was not full before his removing and in that case it behoveth the Chaplain to procure a Non obstante otherwise he may be punished for his Nonresidence So if any Earl or Baron do retain a Chaplain and before his advancement his Lord is Attainted of Treason as it was in the Case of the Earl of Westmoreland after the said Attainder such a Chaplain cannot except a second Benefice for though his Lord be still living according to Nature yet after the Attainder he is a dead person by the Law and therefore out of the case to have priviledge for himself or for his Chaplains If a Baron have three Chaplains and every of them have two Benefices and after the Baron dieth they shall enjoy those Benefices with Cure which were lawfully settled in them before But in this case although the said Chaplains be resident upon one of his Benefices yet now he is become punishable for being resident upon the other for Cessante causa cessat effectus The same Law is if the Baron be attainted of Treason or Felony or if any Officer be removed from his Office sic de similibus So if a Lord do one time retain more Chaplains than are allowed by the Law the lawful number only shall have priviledge and in this case which of them be first promoted shall have priviledge and the rest are excluded for aequali jure melior est conditio possidentis If a Nobleman doth retain Chaplains above his number at several times if any of his Chaplains die the next that was retained shall not succeed for his first retainer was void and therefore in this case it behoveth him to have a new retaining after the death of the predecessor and before his advancement for quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalescit If a Noble person retain such a number of Chaplains as is by the law allowed him
lawfully do by Office that is to say The Steward of the King's Houshold notwithstanding the Liberty of any other although in another Kingdom when the Offender may be found in the King's Houshold according to that which happened at Paris in the Fourteenth year of Edward the First when Engelram of Nogeut was taken in the Houshold of the King of England the King himself being then at Paris with silver Dishes lately stoln at which deed the King of France did claim Cognizance of the Plea concerning that Theft by Jurisdiction of that Court of Paris The matter being diversly debated in the Council of the King of France at length it was Ordered That the King of England should use and enjoy that Kingly Prerogative of his Houshold who being Convicted by Robert Fitz-Iohn Knight Steward of the King's Houshold of the Theft by consideration of the said Court was hanged on the Gallows in St. Germans Field And here by the way may be noted from those recited Books alledged That the person of the King in another King's Dominions is not absolutely priviledged but that he may be impleaded for Debt or Trespass or condemned for Treason committed with in the said Dominions For it is the general Law of Nations that in what place an Offence is committed according to the Law of the said place they may be judged without regard to any priviledge Neither can a King in any other Kingdom challenge any such Prerogative of Immunity from Laws For a King out of his proper Kingdom hath not merum Imperium but only doth retain Honoris titulos dignitatis so that where he hath offended in his own Person against the King in whose Nation he is per omnia distringitur etiam quoad personam And the same Law is of Ambassadors ne occasio daretur delinquendi That Ambassadors are called Legats because they are chosen as fit men out of many and their Persons be sacred both at home and abroad so that no man may injuriously lay violent hands upon them without breach of the Law of Nations and much less upon the person of a King in a strange Land Bracton a Judge of this Realm in the Reign of King Henry the Third in his first Book and eighth Case saith There is no respect of Persons with God but with men there is a difference of Persons viz. the King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Lords Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take the Name from the County or from the word Sociati who also may be termed Consules of Counselling for Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the People of God ordaining into great Honours Power and Name where they do gird them with Swords that is to say Ringis gladorium Upon this cause were the Stations and Encampings of Arms called by the Romans Castra of the word Castrare since they ought to be Castrata vel Casta. In this place ought a good General to foresee that Venus Delights be as it were gelded and cut off from the Army So Sir Iohn Fern's Book entituled The Glory of Generosity Ring so called quasi renes girans circundans for that they compass the Reins of such that they may keep them from Incest of Luxury because the Luxurious and Incestuous persons are abominable unto God The Sword also doth signifie the Defence of King and Country And thus much in general of the Nobility of England Now followeth a more particular Discourse of each particular Degree and first of his Majesty the Fountain from whence all these Rivulets and swelling Streams of Honour's Spring The most high and mighty Monarch CHARLES the second by the Grace of God King of Great Britaineâ— France and Irelandâ— Defender of the faith ca. The Effiges of the most high and mighty Monarch CHARLES the second by the Grace of God King of Great Britaine France and Ireland Deâ—ender of the faith câ—â— OF THE KING OR MONARCH OF Great Britain CHAP. II. MONARCHY is as ancient as Man Adam being created Soveraign Lord of the Universe whose Office was to govern the whole World and all Creatures therein His Posterity after his Death dividing into Tribes and Generations acknowledged no other Dominion than Paternity and Eldership The Fathers of Nations were instead of Kings and the Eldest Sons in every Family were reverenced as Princes from whence came the word Seignior amongst the Italians and French and Seignories for Lordship and Dominion of which Seneca makes two kinds viz. Potestas aut Imperium power to command Proprietas aut Dominium Property or Dominion These Empires in the Golden Age were founded upon natural Reverency and Piety their Power was executed with the soft Weapons of paternal perswasions and the greatest penalties that they inflicted upon the most Capital Criminals was the malediction of their Primogenitors with an Excommunication out of the Tribes But as Men and Vice began to increase Pride and evil Examples overshadowed Filial Obedience and Violence entred upon the Stage of the World the mighty Men truâ—ling in their own strength oppressed the Feeble and were at length forced to truckle under the tyranny of others more Gygantick than themselves which necessitated them to submit to Government for self-preservation many housholds conjoyning made a Village many Villages a City and these Cities and Citizens confederating established Laws by consent which in tract of time were called Commonwealths some being governed by Kings some by Magistrates and some so unfortunate as to fall under the yoak of a popular Rule Nam Plebs est pessimus Tyrannus The first Chiefs or Kings were men of Vertue elected for their Wisdom and Courage being both Reges Duces to govern according to their Laws in Peace and to lead them forth to Battel against their Enemies in time of Hostility And this Rule proving more safe for the people honourable amongst men and â—â—rm in it self than the other most Nations followed it approving the Sentence of Tacitus Prâ—stat sub Principo â—alo esse quam nulle Lamentable Experience the Mistress of Fools in some and of Wisdom in others in the Ages sequent necessitated them again to quit the â—orm of Election and to entail the Soveraign Power in the Hereditary Loyns of their Kings to prevent the fatal consequence of Ambition amongst equal pretenders in popular Elections Thus the beginning of an Empire is ascribed to reason and necessity â—ut 't was God himself that illuminated the minds of men and let them see they could not subsist without a Supream in their human affairs Necessitas â—st firmum judicium immutabilis providentiae potestas This Island of Great Britain when Barbarism was so happy as to submit to a Regal Power as Caesar in his Commentaries witnesseth then divided into many Kingdoms under which Government of Kings with some small alterations according to the necessity of times and pleasure of Conquerors it hath flourished descending from the British Saxon Danish Norman and
Scotch Kings to our gracious Soveraign Charles the Second into whose Veins all those several streams of Royal Blood are conjoyned to unite those jarring Nations into one Body under a Head unto which each one may justly claim an interest God hath thus restored our ancient Government and seated our Soveraign in the Throne of his Ancestors giving him a power just and absolute as well to preserve as curb his people being not only Major singulis but Major universis and his power is super totam Rempublicam which I thus prove Either the whole power of the Commonwealth is in one or not if not then he is no absolute King or Monarch but if he be as all must yield a Monarch I ask if there be a power in the Commonwealth which is not in him Is it subordinate to his power or not If subordinate than his power is above that power and so super totam Rempublicam Major universis if it be not then there are a simul semel to Supream Civil Powers in the same individual Kingdom and Gubernation and yet divided against it self which is most absurd and impossible This in Answer to a monstrous Pamphlet which the lasciviousness of our late unhappy Wars produced which asserted Rex minor universis But the Divine Providence hath I hope put a period to all such Trayterous Tenents and concluded such Disputes by Acts of Parliament so that no person for the future shall dare to question who hath the right of making Peace or War the power of Militia by Land and Sea all strong Holds and Forts c. being the inherent right of the English Monarchs by their Prerogative Royal. The King is God's Vicegerent and ought to be obeyed accordingly If good he is a blessing if bad a judgment and then against whom we are to use no other weapons but prayers and tears for his amendment He is styled Pater Patriae Caput Reâ—publicae and because the protection of his Subjects belongs to his care and office the Militia is annext to his Crown that the Sword as well as the Scepter may be in his hand The Parliament then all Roman Catholicks in the behalf of Henry the Eighth writ to the Pope declaring that his Royal Majesty is the Head and the very Soul of us all his Cause is the Cause of us all derived from the Head upon the Members his Griefs and Injuries are ours we all suffer equally with him Camden in his Britannia fol. 100. calls the King the most excellent part of the Commonwealth next unto God He is under no Vassuage he takes his Investure from no man Rex non habet Superiorem nisi Deum satìs habet ad poenam quod Deum expectat ultorem In England France Spain c. Kings are styled Dei Gratia c. and as the French King is said to be Rex Francorum Christianissimus the most Christian King of France The King of Spain the most Catholick The Emperour the Defender of the Church So the Kings of England by a Bull from Pope Leo the Tenth sent to King Henry the Eighth for a Book of Controversie written by him against Luther have the Title of Defenders of the Faith and by Act of Parliament he is declared Supream Head of the Church of England It is the manner also for Kings to write in the plural Number which is God's own style Mandamus Volumus c. and in the Scripture we find them called Gods in which sense they may be styled Divi or Dii quia Dei Vicarii Dei voce judicant Our Lawyers also say Rex est persona mixta cum Sacerdote habet Ecclesiasticam Spiritualem Iurisdictionem This shews the King's power in Ecclesiastical Causes being anoynted with Oyl as the Priests and afterwards the Kings of Israel were which signifies his person to be both Sacred and Spiritual And therefore at the Coronation hath put upon him a Priest's Garment called the Dalmatica or Colobium and other such Vests And before the Reformation the King as a Spiritual person received the Sacrament in both kinds He is capable of holding Tithes all Extra-Parochial Tithes some Proxies and other Spiritual profits belong to the King The Ceremonies at the Coronation of the King are many and with us in England more than in many other Countries As the Anoynting with Oyl which is proved by Mr. Selden to be of above one thousand years standing the Crown set upon his Head with many Religious Ceremonies besides the Ensigns of Regality which are a Ring to signiâ—ie his Faitâ—fulnes a Bracelet for Good Works a Scepter for Justice a Sword for Vengeance Purple Robes to attract Reverence and a Diadem triumphant to blazon his Glory It was the saying of Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury Inunguntur Reges in Capiâ—e etiam pectâ—re brachâ—is quod significat gloriam sanctitatem forâ—â—nâ— inâ—â—n King's are Anoynted on the Head to signiâ—â—e their Glory on the Breast to Emblematize their Sanctity and on their Arms to declare their power He is crowned with an Imperial Crown the Crown set on his Head by the Arch-bishop of Canterbury a prerogative belonging to that See as it is in Spain to Toledo in France to Rheims and in Sueden to Vpsalia But this Imperial Crown hath not been long in use amongst us though our Kings have had Imperial Commands as over Scotland Ireland Man and other Isles being in a manner like that of an Earls now Neither is it found that any such thing as a Diadem was at all in use until the tune of Constantine the Great For before the distinction was some kind of Chaplet or rather a white silk Fillet about the Head which was an ordinary way to distinguish them And we read that Alexander the Great took off his white Diadem to cure the madness of Seleucus The first King that was crowned with this Imperial Crown floried and arched was Henry the Third but some say Henry the First and indeed it is left in dispute However it is very probable and plain That the ancientest Ensign of Regal Authority was the Scepter which is every where spoken of both in Scripture and Prophane History There is another Ensign of their Authority which is a Globe or Mound with a Cross which hath been in use amongst us ever since Edward the Confessor's time which is placed in the left hand as is seen in most of their Coyns The Cross denoting his Faith the Globe his Empire by Sea and Land as 't is said of Iustinian the Emperor who was the first that ever used it The Office of the King of England according to Fortescue Pugnare bella populi sui eos rectissime judicare to fight the Battels of his people and to see Right and Justice done unto them or more particularly as is promised at the Coronation to preserve the Rights and Priviledges of Holy Church the Royal Prerogatives belonging to the Crown the Laws and Customs of the
Realm to do Justice shew Mercy keep Peace and Unity c. The King is enabled to perform this great and weighty Office by certain extraordinary powers and priviledges which he holds by the Law of Nations by the Common Law of England or by Statutes The Regalia were anciently called Sacra Sacrorum as his Lands are called in Law Patrimoniâ—â— Sâ—câ—â—â— now commonly Royal Prerogaâ—ives The King being Principium Capâ—â— â—inis Parliâ—menti may of his meer will and pleasure Convoke Adjourn Remove and Dissolve Parliaments He may to any Bill that is passed by both Houses of Parliament refuse to give his Royal Assent without rendring a Reason and without his Assent a Bill is as a â—ody without a Soul He may at his pleasure encrease the number of the Members of both Houses by creating more Peers of the Realm and besâ—owing priviledges upon any other Towns to send Burgelles by Writ to Parliament and he may refuse to send his Writ to some others that have sate in former Parliaments He hath alone the choice and nomination of all Commanders and Officers for Land and Sea-service the choice and election of all Magistrates Counsellors and Officers of State of all Bishops and other Ecclesiastick Dignities also the bestowing and conferring of Honours and the power of determining Rewards and Punishments By Letters Patent his Majesty may erect new Counties Universities Bishopricks Cities Boroughs Colledges Hospitals Schools Fairs Markets Courts of Judicature Forests Chases Free Warrens c. The King by his Prerogative hath power to enfranchise an Alien and make him a Denison whereby he is enabled to purchase Lands and Houses and to bear Offices He hath the power to grant Letters of Mart or Reprisal to grant safe Conducts c. He hath at all times had the right of Purveyance or Preemption of all sorts of Victuals within the Verge viz. Twelve miles round of the Court and to take Horses Carts Ships or Boats for the Carriage of his Goods at reasonable rates Also by Proclamation to set reasonable rates and prices upon Flesh Fish Fowl Oats Hay c. sold within the limits of the Verge of the Court in the time of his Progress Debts due to the King are in the first place to be satisfied in case of Executorship and Administratorship and until the King's Debts be satisfied he may protect the Debtor from the Arrest of other Creditors He may disâ—rein for the whole Rent upon one Tenant that holdeth not the whole Land He may require the Ancestors Debt of the Heir though not especially bound He is not obliged to demand his Rent according to the Custome of Landlords He may distrein where he pleaseth and sue in any of his Courts No Proclamation can be made but by the King No protection for a Defendant to obstruct the course of the Law against him if he be not one of his Majesties Menial Servants In case of loss by Fire or otherwise his Majesty granteth Patents to receive the Charitable Benevolences of the people No Forest Chase or Park to be made nor Castle Fort or Tower to be built without his Majesties especial Licence Where the King hath granted a Fair with Toll to be paid yet his Goods shall be there exempted from the said Duties of Toll His Servants in Ordinary are priviledged from serving in any Offices that require their Attendance as Sheriff Constable Church-warden or the like All Receivers of Money for the King or Accomptants to him for any of his Revenues their Persons Lands Goods Heirs Executors and Administrators are at all times chargeable for the same for Nullum tempus occurrit Regi His Debtor hath a kind of Prerogative Remedy by a Quo minus in the Exchequer against all other Debtors or against whom they have any cause of personal Action supposing that he is thereby disabled to pay the King and in this Suit the King's Debtor being Plaintiff hath some priviledges above others In doubtful Cases semper praesumitur pro Rege no Statute restraineth the King except he be especially named therein The quality of his Person alters the descent of Gavelkind the Rules of joynt Tenancy No Estoppel can bind him nor Judgment final in a Writ of Right Judgments entred against the King's Title are entred with Salvo Iure Domini Regis That if at any time the King's Counsel at Law can make out his Title better that Jugment shall not prejudice him which is not permitted the Subject The King by his Prerogative may demand reasonable Ayd-money of his Subjects for the Knighting his Eldest Son at the Age of Fifteen years and to marry his eldest Daughter at the Age of Seven years which Ayd is 20 s. for every Knights Fee and as much for every 20 l. per annum in Soccage Moreover if the King be taken prisoner Ayd-money is to be paid by the Subjects for his Redemption The King upon reasonable Causes him thereunto moving may protect any of his Subjects from Suits of Law c. In all Cases where the King is party his Officers with an Arrest by force of a Process at Law may enter and if any entrance be denied may break open the House of any man by force A Benefice or Spiritual Living is not full against the King by Institution only without Induction although it be so against a Subject None but the King can hold Plea of false Judgments in the Courts of his Tenants The King by his Prerogative is Summus Regui Custos and hath the Custody of the Persons and Estates of such as for want of understanding cannot govern themselves or serve the King that of Ideots to his own use and that of Lunaticks to the use of the next Heir So the Custody or Wardships of all such Infants whose Ancestors held their Lands by Tenure in Capite or Knights Service were ever since the Conquest in the King to the great honour and benefit of the King and Kingdom But abuses which too often happened made the people complain thereof which was the cause of its laying aside His Majesty is Vlâ—imus Haeres Regni and is as the great Ocean is of small Rivers the Receptacle of all Estates for want of Heirs or by Forfeiture Revert or Escheat to the King All Spiritual Benefices for want of presentation in due time by the Bishop are elapsed to the King All Treasure Trove that is Money or Gold and Silver plate or Bullion found and the owners unknown belongs to the King So doth all Waifs Strays Wrecks not granted away by him or any former Kings All waste Ground or Land recovered from the Sea All Lands of Aliens dying before Naturalization or Denization and all other things whereof the property is not known All Gold and Silver Mines in whose Ground soever they are found Royal Fish as Whales Sturgeons Dolphins c. Royal Fowl as Swans not mark't and swimming at Liberty on the River belong to the King In the Church the King's prerogative and power is
disinherited imprisoned and murthered by their cruel Uncle the Duke of Glocester who being both a Tyrant and Usurper was justly encountred by King Henry the Seventh in the Field So infallible is the Law of Justice in revenging Cruelties and Injuries not always observing the present time wherein they are done but often calling them into reckoning when the Offenders retain least memory of them But as the saying is Ex malis moribus bonae leges oriuntur so their Tragical and Miserable Combustions have occasioned that the Law hath established more certain Resolutions in all these cases and pretences against the right Heir to the Crown than before For first though a common Opinion was conceived that a Conqueror might freely dispose of the Succession of that Estate which he had obtained by the purchase of his Sword which was the Title pretended for William Rufus yet now in our Books this difference is taken for Law viz. between the Conquest of a Kingdom from a Christian King and the Conquest of a Kingdom from an Infidel For if a King come to a Christian Kingdom by Conquest seeing he hath Vitae necis potestatem he may at his pleasure alter and change the Laws of that Kingdom but until he doth make an alteration thereof the ancient Laws do stand and therefore the case of Rufus the ancient Law of this Realm being That the eldest Son should inherit and that a King in possession cannot devise the same by his last Will or by other Act therefore the said William Rufus was no other than a Usurper But if a Christian King should Conquer a Kingdom from an Infidel and being then under his subjection there ipso facto the Laws of the Infidels are abrogated for that they be not only against Christianity but against the Law of God and Nature mentioned in the Decalogue and in that case until certain Laws be established amongst them the King by himself and such Judges as he shall appoint shall judge them and their causes according to natural Equity in such sort as Kings in ancient times did within their Kingdoms before any certain municipal Laws were given And if a King have a Kingdom by Title of Descent there seeing by the Laws of that Kingdom he doth inherit the Kingdom he cannot change those Laws of himself without consent of Parliament Also if a King have a Christian Kingdom by Conquest as King Henry the Second had Ireland after that King Iohn had given unto them being under his Obedience and Subjection the Laws of England for the Government of that Country no succeeding King could alter the same without Parliament In Succession of Kings a question hath been Whether the King who hath had Sons both before and after he came to the Crown which of them should succeed he that was born before as having the prerogative of his Birthright or he that was born after And for each Reasons and Examples have not been wanting For Xerxes the Son of Darius King of Persia being the eldest Son after the enthroning his Father carried away the Empire from his Brother Arthemones or Artobazanes who was born before his Father came to the Royal Possession thereof So Arceses the Son of another Darius born in the time of his Fathers Empire carried away the Garland from his Brother Cyrus born before his Father came to the Empire So Lewis Duke of Millain born after his Father was Duke was preferred to the Dukedom before his Brother Galiasius born before the Dukedom But notwithstanding these Examples and the Opinion of sundry Doctors to the contrary common use of Succession in these latter days hath been to the contrary and that not without good reason for that it is not meet that any that hath right to any Succession by the prerogative of their Birthright such as all elder Brothers have should be put by the same And this was the pretence of Henry the First against Robert his eldest Brother Also sundry Contentions have risen in Kingdoms between the Issue of the eldest Son of the King dying before his Father and the second Brother surviving who should Reign after the death of the Father the Nephew challenging the same unto him by the Title of his Fathers Birthright and by way of Representation Cok. part 3. cap. 4. the other claiming as eldest Son to his Father at the time of his death Upon which Title in old time there grew a Controversie between Arcus the Son of Arrotatus eldest Son of Cleomenes King of Lacedemonia and Cleomenes second Son of Cleomenes Uncle to the said Arcus But upon debate of the matter the Senate gave their Sentence for Arcus against Cleomenes Besides Enominus King of Lacedemon having two Sons Polydectes and Licurgius Poyldectes dying without Children Licurgius succeeded in the Kingdom but after he had understood that Polydectes Widow had a Child he yielded the Crown to him wherein he dealt far more religiously than either did King Iohn or King Richard the Third For King Iohn upon the like pretence not only put by Arthur Plantaginet his eldest Brother's Son from the Succession of the Kingdom but also most unnaturally took away his life And King Richard the Third to come to the Crown did most barbarously not only slay his two innocent Nephews but also defamed his Mother in publishing to the World that the late King his Brother was a Bastard Our Stories do obscurely note that Controversie of like matter had like to have grown between King Richard the Second and Iohn of Gaunt his Uncle and that he had procured the Counsel fo sundry great Learned Men to this purpose but that he found the hearts of divers Noblemen of this Kingdom and especially the Citizens of London to be against him whereupon he desisted from his intended purpose and acknowledged his Nephews Right And the reason of the Common Law of England is notable in this point and may be collected out of the ancient Authors of the same Glanvile lib. 7. cap. 1. Bracton lib. 7. c. 30. and by Brittan fol. 119. For they say Whosoever is Heir to another aut est haeres jure proprietatis as the eldest Son shall inherit only before his Brothers aut jure representationis as where the eldest Son dieth in the life of his Father his Issue shall inherit before the youngest Son for though the youngest sit magis propinquus yet jure representationis the Issue of the eldest Son shall inherit for that he doth represent the person of his Father And as Bracton saith jus proprietatis which his Father had by his Birthright doth descend unto him aut jure propinquitatis ut propinqui jus excludit remotum remotus remotiorem aut jure sanguinis And yet Glanvile Lord Chief Justice under King Henry the Second seemeth to make this questionable here in England Who should be preferred the Uncle or the Nephew Also it hath been resolved for Law That the possession of the Crown purgeth all defects
by birth though they have no other Creation but shall not be partaker of these or other Priviledges incident to the Lords of the Parliament Thirdly Those that are Barons and of the Nobility of Scotland or Ireland if upon the like Offence committed in England they be apprehended in England they shall not have this Tryal by Peers no though they were born in England for they received their Dignity from a King of England of other Nations But if the King of England do at this day create one of his Subjects of Scotland or Ireland an Earl Viscount Baron or other Peer of this Realm or by his ordinary Writ of Summons under his Great Seal do call him to the Upper House of Parliament and assign him a place and to have Voice free amongst the Lords and Peers there assembled he shall be partaker with them in all priviledges And thus much concerning the restraint of the Priviledges in respect of the persons 39 Ed. 3. And touching the manner of proceeding it appeareth by the said Statute of Magna Charta chap. 29. That a Peer of the Realm shall be tryed by his Peers only in case where he is indicted at the King's Suit of Treason or Felony for the words of the Statute be Nec super eum ibimus c. But if any Appeal of Murther of Felony be sued by any common person against a Peer of the Realm he shall be tryed by common persons and not by his Peers And so was Fines Lord Dacres tryed in Appeal of Murther The Nobility of this Realm do enjoy this priviledge That they are not to be impannelled on any Jury or Inquest to make tryal or inquiry upon their Corporal Oaths between party and party for they may have a Writ for their Discharge to the Sheriff But it is a Rule in Law Vigilantibus non dormientibus subveniant jura For if the Sheriff have not received any such Writ and the Sheriff have returned any such Lord on Juries or in Assize c. and they thereupon do appear they shall be sworn if they do not appear they shall lose their Issues 35 Hen. 6. and in such case they must purchase a Writ out of the Chancery reciting their priviledges directed to the Justices before whom such Noble persons are so impannelled commanding to dismiss him or them that were so impannelled out of the said Pannel F.N.B. 165. This priviledge hath in two causes not been allowed or taken place 1. If the enquiry concern the King and the Common-wealth in any necessary and important degree or business of the Realm And therefore divers Barons of the Marshes of Wales were impannelled before the Bishop of Ely and other Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer to enquire of a notable outrage committed by Gilbert de Clare Earl of Glocester against Humphrey de Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex and his Tenants in Wales in the Twelfth year of Edward the First where Iohn de Hastings Edmond de Mortimer Theobald Beardmoe and other Barons of the Marshes challenged their priviledges aforesaid and much insisted upon the same But it was afterwards answered by the Court as by the words in the Record appeareth The Barons aforesaid did persist in the Challenge and in the end both the said Earls between whom the said outrage had been perpetrated submitted themselves to the King's Grace and made their Fines Secondly This priviledge hath no place in case of necessity where the truth of the case cannot otherwise come to light for the words in the Writ in the Register are Nisi sua praesentia ob aliquam causam specialiter exigatur c. If any Nobleman do bring an Action of Debt upon Account in case where the Plaintiff is to be examined which is always intended to be upon Oath upon the truth of his cause by vertue of the Statute of the fifth of Henry the Fourth chap. 8. it shall suffice to examine his Attorney and not himself upon his Oath And this priviledge the Law hath given to the Nobility That they are not Arrested upon any Warrant of a Justice of Peace for their good behaviour or breach of Peace nor by a Supplicavit out of Chancery or from the King's Bench For such an Opinion hath the Law conceived of the peaceable disposition of Noblemen that it hath been thought enough to take their promise upon their Honour in that behalf And as in Civil Causes the like Rule doth the Court of Equity observe in Cases of Conscience for if the Defendant be a Peer of the Realm in the Star-Chamber or Court of Chancery a Subpaena shall not be awarded but a Letter from the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper in lieu thereof And if he do not appear no Attachment shall go out against him For in the Fourteenth year of Queen Elizabeth this Order and Rule was declared in the Parliament Chamber That an Attachment is not awarded by Common Law Custome or President against any Lord of Parliament And if he do appear and make his Bill of Complaint upon his Honour only he is not compelled to be sworn But by the Statute 5 Eliz. cap. 1. it is enacted That all Knights and Burgesses of Parliament shall take the Oath of Supremacy and so shall Citizens and Barons of the Cinque Ports being returned of the Parliament before they enter into the Parliament House which Oath shall be according to the tenor effect and form of the same as is set forth in the Statutue of 1 Eliz. Provided always that forasmuch as the Queens Majesty is otherwise sufficiently assured of the Faith and Loyalty of the Temporal Lords of her High Court of Parliament therefore this Act nor any thing therein contained shall not extend to compel any Temporal person of or above the Degree of a Baron of this Realm to take the said Oath nor to incur any penalty limited by the said Act for not taking the same If a Peer be sued in the Common Pleas in an Action of Debt or Trespass and Process be awarded by Capias or Exigit against him then he may sue out a Certiorari in the Chancery directed to the Justices of the Common Pleas testifying that he is a Peer of the Realm For unless the Court be certified by the King 's Writ out of the Chancery that the Defendant is a Peer of Parliament if a Capias or Exigit issue forth against him it is no Error neither is it punishable in the Sheriff his Bailiffs or Officers if they execute the said Process and arrest the body of such a Noble person for it appertaineth not to them to argue or dispute the Authority of the Court But if the Court be thereof certified as aforesaid they will award a Supersedeas which is in the Books of Entries in the Title of Error Sect. 20. And there are two Reasons or Causes wherefore no Capias or Exigit lieth against any Peer one because of the dignity of their persons and the other by intendment of Law
Heraldry written by Iohn Guillim about fol. 18. That Sisters are allowed no differences of Badges in their Coat-Armour by reason that by them the name of the House cannot be preserved but are admitted to the Inheritance equally and are adjudged but one Heir to all intents and purposes whatsoever And the knowledge of this point in these days is worthy to be enquired into for this is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King can advance to Honour whom he pleaseth And therefore whereas Radulph Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioan the younger married to Sir Humphrey Bowcher who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who married the eldest Sister And Hugh Lupus the first and greatest Earl of Chester Habendum sibi haeredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut iple Rex tenuit Angliam per tenorem Hugh died without Issue and the Inheritance of his Earldom was divided amongst his four Sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto herself If a Woman be Noble by Birth or Descent with whomsoever she doth marry although her Husband be under her Degree yet she doth remain Noble for Birth-right est Character indelebilis Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the Text saith thus viz. Women ennobled with the Honour of their Husbands and with the Kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to pass in the Names of their Husbands and into the House and Surname of their Husbands do we translate them But if afterwards a Woman do marry with a Man of a baser Degree then she loseth her former Dignity and followeth the condition of her latter Husband And concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other Books of the Law do agree for these be Rules conceived in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur It was the Case of Ralph Howard Esq who took to Wife Anne the widow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolk by the Name of Ralph Howard Esq and the Lady Anne Powes his Wife and exception was taken for mis-naming of her because she ought to have been named of her Husband's Name and not otherwise and the Exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God she is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignity shall be changed according to the Degrees of her Husband notwithstanding the Courtesie of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like is also in Queen Maries Reign when the Dutchess of Suffolk took to her Husband Adrian Brook Title Brief 54. 6. And many other Presidents have been of later times And herewith agreeth the Civil Law Digest lib. 1. title q. lege 1. In this Case of acquired Nobility by marriage if question in Law be whereupon an Issue is taken between the Parties that is to say Dutchesses are not Dutchesses Countesses are not Countesses and Baronesses are not Baronesses the Trial whereof shall not be by Record as in the former Case but by a Jury of Twelve men and the reason of the diversity is because in this Case the Dignity is accrued unto her by her Marriage which the Lawyers term Matter in Fact and not by any Record But a Noble Woman by marriage though she take to her second Husband a man of mean Degree yet she may keep two Chaplains according to the Proviso in the Statute of 11. Hen. 8. Case 13. for and in respect of the Honour which once she had viz. at the time of the Retainer And every such Chaplain may purchase Licence and Dispensation c. And Chaplains may not be Non-residents afterwards And forasmuch as the retaining of Chaplains by Ladies of great Estate is ordinary and nevertheless some questions in Law have been concerning the true understanding of the said Statute Law I think it not impertinent to set down subsequent Resolutions of the Judges touching such matters So long as the Wife of a Duke is called Dutchess or of an Earl a Countess and have the fruition of the Honour appertaining to their Estate with kneeling tasting serving so long shall a Baron's Widow be saluted Lady as is also a Knight's Wife by the courtesie of England quamdiâ— matrimonium aut viduitas uxoris durant except she happen to clope with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdom do adjudge that a Woman shall lose her Dowry in that as unto Lands Tenements and Justice so doth the Laws of Gentry and Nobleness give Sentence against such a Woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the Husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her Husband out of her mind subjects her self unto another If a Lady which is married come through the Forest she shall not take any thing but a Dutchess Marchioness or Countess shall have advantage of the Statute de Charta Forest. 12 Artic. during the time that she is unmarried This is a Rule in the Civil Law Si filia Regis nubat alicui Duci vel Comiti ducetur tamen semper regalis As amongst Noble Women there is a difference of Degrees so according to their distinct Excellencies the Law doth give special priviledges as followeth By the Statute 25 Edw. 3. cap. 1. it is High Treason to compass or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the King's Companion The King's Response is a sole person except by the Common Law and she may purchase in Feesimple or make Leases or Grants with the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married Woman can do without her Husband All Acts of Parliament for any cause which any way may concern the Queen are such Statutes whereof the Judges ought to take Recognizances as of general Statutes though the matter doth only concern the capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the Subjects of the Realm for every Subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects within his Laws are divided from the King who is Head and Sovereign so that his business concerns all the Realm and as the Realm hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason is the Queen being his Wife A man seized of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knight's Service some by Priority that is by ancient Feoffment holden of others and some other part holden of the King in posteriority the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queen during her life and afterwards the Tenant dieth his Son within Age in this case he shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himself should have had The Queen Consort or Dowager shall not be amerced if she be Nonsuited
Lord Mayor of this City which is evident by the noble Entertainment given to Strangers and by his great attendance both at home and abroad for besides the abundance of inferiour Officers he hath his Sword-Bearer Common Hunt Common Cryer and four Water Bailiffs which by their places are Esquires then the Coroner three Sergeant-Carvers three Sergeants of the Chamber a Sergeant of the Channel four Yeoman of the Water-side the Under-water-Bailiff two Yeoman of the Chamber with divers others The publick Officers belonging to this City are the two Sheriffs the Recorder the Chamberlain the Common Sergeant the Town Clerk and the Remembrancer who by their places are Esquires The Sheriffs who are persons of repute and ability are annually by the Commons that is the Livery-men of each Company in formality chosen on Midsomer-day and the day after Michaelmass the Lord Mayor and Aldermen go with them to the Exchequer-Chamber at Westminster where they are presented and sworn and the two old Sheriffs also sworn to their Accounts On Simon and Iudes day the old Lord Mayor being attended with the Aldermen and Sheriffs in their formalities go to the Hustings Court where the Lord Mayor elect taketh his Oath and receiveth from the Chamberlain the Scepter the Keys of the Common Seal and the Seal of the Majoralty and from the Sword-Bearer the Sword all which according to custom he delivereth to them again On the day following in the morning the old Lord Mayor with the Aldermen and Sheriffs attend the Mayor elect from his House to Guild-hall from whence in their formalities they go to the Vintrey and take Barge to Westminster being attended by the Livery-men of divers of the Companies in their Barges which are bedecked with Banners Pennons and Streamers of their Arms c. which with their Musick makes a pleasing show Being come to Westminster-hall having saluted the Judges they go up to the Exchequer Barr where the Lord Mayor tâ—keth his Oath and after some usual Ceremonies in the Hall and at the Abby in seeing the Tombs they return to their Barges and are rowed back to London being landed go to the Guild-hall in great pomp where a most stately Dinner is prepared as well for the Lord Mayor Aldermen Sheriffs and the several Companies as for the Nobility Judges and Gentry that are invited to the said Feast which oft-times is graced with the Royal Presence of their Majesties the King and Queen and the Duke of York c. The Ceremony of the day being ended the Lord Mayor is attended to his House where he liveth in great grandure during his Majoralty looking after the Affairs of the City to whose fatherly care the Government thereof is committed These with other Ceremonies in the electing and swearing the Lord Mayor and Sheriffs being largely treated of in Stow's Survey and Howel's Londinensis I forbear to speak further of them here but referr the Reader A List of the Names of the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs that for this present year 1678 have the government of this Honourable City with the Names of the six and twenty Wards to which the said Aldermen do belong viz. THe Right Honourable Sir Iames Edwards Kt. Lord Mayor and Alderman of Candlewick Ward Sir Richard Chiverton of the Ward of Bridge without Kt. Sir Thomas Allen of Aldgate Ward Knight and Baronet Sir Iohn Frederick of Coleman-street Ward Kt. Sir Iohn Robinson of Tower-street Ward Knight Baronet and Lieutenant of the Tower of London Sir Iohn Laurence of Queen-hith Ward Kt. Sir Thomas Bludworth of Aldersgate-street Ward Kt. Sir William Turner of Castle-Baynards Ward Kt. Sir George Waterman of Brides Ward within Kt. Sir Robert Hanson of Basingshaw Ward Kt. Sir William Hooker of Cornhill Ward Kt. Sir Robert Vyner of Langborn ward Knight and Baronet Sir Ioseph Sheldon of Bishops-gate ward Kt. Sir Thomas Davies of Farendon ward without Kt. Sir Francis Chaplin of the Vintrey ward Kt. Sir Robert Clayton of Cheap ward Kt. Sir Patience Ward of Farendon ward within Kt. Sir Iohn Moore of Walbrook ward Kt. Sir William Prichard of Bread-street ward Kt. Sir Henry Tulse of Bread-street ward Kt. Sir Iames Smith of Portsoken ward Kt. Sir Nathaniel Herne of Billingsgate ward Kt. Sir Robert Ieffreys of Cordwainer ward Kt. Sir Iohn Shorter of Cripple-gate ward Kt. Sir Thomas Gold of Dowgate ward Kt. and Sir William Rawstorne of Limestreet ward Kt. The Sheriffs for this year are Sir Richard How and Sir Iohn Chapman Knights Having thus in brief treated of the Government of the City with their Immunities Priviledges Courts of Judicature c. in general in the next place we will treat of each particular Incorporated Company as Stems thereof And first with the several Companies of Merchants next with the twelve chief Companies out of which the Lord Mayor is to be Annually chosen and so end with the other Companies as Stars of a less magnitude The East-India Company though not the ancientest yet the most honourable and eminent was first Incorporated in the year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth and since confirmed with divers other Priviledges added to their Charter by succeeding Kings having now power of making Acts and Ordinances so as not repugnant to the Law of the Land or detriment of the King for the good and well government of the said Trade and Company likewise power to hear and decide Causes and to implead fine and punish Offenders as they please to raise and maintain Souldiers in their Factories and to man out Ships of warr for their further security for warr offensive as well as defensive as occasion requireth also the using of a Seal and the bearing of a Coat of Arms as it is depicted in the Escocheon of Arms of the several Companies of Merchants This Company is managed by a joynt stock which makes them potent eminent and rich and is found several ways to be very advantageous to the Kingdom as in their building of Ships in the imploying and maintaining of thousands not only in their Ships but in their Plantations and Factories as at Surat Cambaya Bambay Curwar Baticale Calicut Fort St. George Pentapoli Musulipatan Ougely Gonro Bantam in the Indies Ormus in Persia â— with some other places of less concern And to their Presidents Factors and other Servants they allow good Salaries and are raised to higher preferments with greater Salaries as their merits deserve And the great Trade that they drive to these places exporting such vast quantities of our Manufactures and Commodities and importing so many sundry and rich Commodities cannot but make them to be very beneficial to the Nation This worthy Company for the better negotiation of their Affairs is governed by a Governour Deputy-Governour and Committâ—e consisting of four and twenty who about the midst of April are Annually elected by the Adventurers of the said Company of which there must be eight new ones always chosen and these meet at their House in Leaden-hall-street London called the East-India
and twenty Burgesses for Common-Councel a Recorder c. sâ—nds Burgesses to Parliament The Arms born by this Town is a Castle triple-towred having on the dexter side the Sun in its glory and on the sinister a Crescent on the top of the two fronting Towers stand two Watchmen with this Inscription upon the Ring of the Seal Sigillum Ballivi Burgensium Warwici And notwithstanding this fatal overthrow â—o much of the Town was continued till the Reign of Richard the Second who began in 1377 that it paid to the King in Fee-farm Rent twenty Marks per Annum at 2 d. a Burgage which amounts to two thousand two hundred Burgages besides other Houses But in 1388. as appears by Records die Martis in festo Sancti Stephani Martyris which was about the eleventh of Richard the Second it was so burn'd down and wasted by the Scots that of that Rent upon several Inquisitions found and returned there remained to the King only two Marks per Annum so that nine parts in ten were utterly destroy'd But notwithstanding this great devastation that was never repaired it doth still retain its ancient Priviledges which are in every respect the same with York as appears from the confirmation of Henry the Third in whose time here was an Exchequer called by the Name of Scaccarium de Appleby and King Iohn â—s Charter which I have seen wherein is expressed and firmly commanded That his Burgers of Appleby shall have and enjoy all the Liberties and free Customes which his Burgers of York have well and peaceably freely and quietly fully wholly and honourably with a Prohibition That none shall attempt to disturb them thereof And also That they shall be free from Toll Stallage Pontage and Lestage all England over praeterquam in Civitate London nisi forte Cives Eobor ' quietantias inde habent libertates suas in Civitate London which exception doth very much confirm and strengthen their Priviledges to them The Corporation consists at present of a Mayor with two Bailiffs a Court of Aldermen twelve in number a Recorder Common-Councel and Serjeants at Mace with their Attendants And if the Town were able to bear it might take the same Priviledges with York in every thing according to their Charter which has been confirmed by all the succeeding Kings of England and if any would know what those Priviledges are more particularly I referr him to York where he may possibly meet with satisfaction In the mean time take these which are now in practice at Appleby viz. They have power to Arrest for any Sum without limitation To elect and send two Burgesses to Parliament To acknowledge Statute-Merchant before the Mayor To take Toll both in Fairs and Markets To seize Felons goods Felones de se Waifes Strayes Forfeitures and Escheats all which do belong to the Mayor for the time being who takes place of the Judges of Assize as the Lord Mayor of York is wont to do Their Aldermen are some of them Gentlemen of the Country for the greater honour and credit of the Town who in time of their Majoralty have their Propraetors or Deputies there The present Mayor and Aldermen for the present year are Iohn Thwaites Esquire Mayor Lancelot Machell of Gackanthorp Esq who was first Mayor after the King's return and tore in pieces Oliver's Charter in open Court before he would accept of that Office which he had declined all Oliver's time Richard Brathwate of Warcop Esq and Justice of Peace who contested with the Judges and took place of them Virtute Chartae Robert Hilton of Morton Esquire Justice Jf Peace Edward Musgrave of Askeby Esq oustice of Peace Thomas Warcop of Colby Gentleman Iohn Routlidge of 〈…〉 Gent. Alderman Leonard Smyth Alderman William Smyth Alderman Robert Harrison Alderman Iohn Lawson Alderman Thomas Robinson Alderman Iohn Atkinson which six last are all of Appleby Appleby was very eminent for its Loyalty in the late Civil Warrs and most of the Aldermen except those whom Oliver Cromwell obtruded upon them suffered many imprisonments during his Tyranny and so likewise did most of the Gentry round about for it is the glory of the County of Westmerland that there was not one Person of quality in it who took up Arms against his King and but two or three in Cumberland A TABLE OF THE Contents or Heads Of the several CHAPTERS IN THE TREATISE OF Honour and Nobility FIRST PART HONOVR MILITARY OF Warr and the causes thereof fol. 3 Of Souldiers 4 Of Embassadors or Legats 5 Of Warr and the inclination of the English to it ibid. Of Captains Generals Marshals and other chief Commanders 7 SECOND PART HONOVR CIVIL CHap. I. Of Honour general and particular 11 Of Gentry and bearing of Arms 12 Principles of Honour and Vertue that every Gentleman ought to be endowed with 13 Of precedency ibid. Chap. II. Of the King or Monarch of Great Britain 19 Chap. III. Of the Prince 24 Chap. IV. Of Dukes 32 The form of a Patent of the Duke of York temp Jacobi 33 Ceremonies to be observed in the Creation of a Duke 36 Chap. V. Of Marquisses 37 Chap. VI. Of Earls 39 Chap. VII Of Viscounts 44 Chap. VIII Of Lords Spiritual 45 Chap. IX Of Barons 48 The definition of a Baron ibid. The Etymology of the name of a Baron ibid. The antiquity and dignity of Barons and the sundry uses of the Name 49 The tenor and proper signification of the word Baron ibid. Chap. X. Barons of Tenure 50 Chap. XI Barons by Writ 52 Chap. XII Barons by Patent 56 Chap. XIII Priviledges incident to the Nobility according to the Laws of England 59 Certain Cases wherein a Lord of the Parliament hath no priviledge 65 Chap. XIV Nobility and Lords in reputation only 68 Chap. XV. Of the Queen Consort and of Noble Women 69 70 Ladies in reputation 75 Chap. XVI Of Knighthood in general 77 Chap. XVII Knights of the Garter 79 Chap. XVIII Of Knights Bannerets 84 Chap. XIX Of Baronets 85 The president of the Patent of Creation of Baronets 88 The Catalogue of the Baronets of England according to their Creations 91 Chap. XX. Knights of the Bath 105 A Catalogue of the Knights of the Bath made at the Coronation of King Charles II. 107 Chap. XXI Of Knights Batchelors 108 Observations concerning Knights Batchelors 116 Of degrading of Knights 117 Chap. XXII Knights of the round Table 118 Chap. XXIII Knights of the Thistle or of St. Andrew 120 Chap. XXIV Orders of Knighthood in Palestine and other parts of Asia 121 Knights of the holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem ib. Knights Hospitalers of St. John Baptist in Jerusalem now called Knights of Malta 122 Knights Templars ibid. Knights of St. Lazarus 123 Knights of St. Bass ibid. Knights of St. Katherine at Mount Sinai ibid. Knights of the Martyrs in Palestine ibid. Orders of Knighthood in Spain Knights of the Oak in Navar 124 Knights of the Lily in Navar ibid. Knights of the Band 125 Knights of