being heir in appearance and he is not bound to dis-able himselfe â—â—ministratiâ—â—â—oid and â—â—able 6 If an Ordinary of a Diocesse commits Administration of Goods Co. l. 5. 29. b. 4. in Princes Case Were and Jefferies Case when they are bona notabilia such Administration is méerly void but Administration committed by the Metropolitan when the defunct had not bona notabilia is onely voidable because he hath Iurisdiction in all the Diocesses within the Province and therefore hath sufficient colour to do it Co. l. 6. 65. a. 3. in Sir Moile Finches Case 7 In 41 E. 3. 19. Rich. Tompson had Issue by Joan before mariage one Agnes and after he marries Joan and makes feofment in fée A Bastard takes by yâ— chase and retakes the Estate to himselfe for life remanere inde Agnetae filiae praedict Rich. Johanne and it was agréed that this was a good remainder without any averment that she was known to be their Daughter for albeit by the Common Law she was not their Daughter yet in as much as she had colour by the Ecclesiastical law which saith subsequens matrimonium tollit peccatum procedens this colour is sufficient in Case of a conveyance to make the remainder good and so note the diversity betwixt descent and purchase c. Co. l. 8. 101. per tout in Sir R. Lechfords Case The better opinion per Coke 8 If there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne Mulier beyonâ— sea c. and the Father die seised the Mulier being beyond Sea within age in Prison or of non sanae memoriae and the Bastard enter and continue in peacable possession of the Lands and hath Issue and dies and the lands descend to his Issue here the right of the Mulier is for ever bound because he hath colour of legitimation by the Law of Holy Church and the Common Law respects legitimation before the above-said Imperfections Vide plus ibid. Co. l. 10. 76. b. in the Case of the Marshalsea 9 If a Sheriffe holding his Torne after Michaelmas moneth takes there an Indictment of Robbery it is utterly void Things done by warrant contra being coram non judice But if the Court of the Common Bench in a plea of Debt award a Capias against a Duke Earle or c. which by the Law lyeth not against them and that appeares in the writ it selfe here if the Sheriffe arrest them upon the Capias albeit the writ be against Law yet because that Court hath jurisdiction of the cause the Sheriffe hath colour to do it and shall be excused and herewith accords Dier 60. b. 38 H. 8. So also if a Iustice of Peace make a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice erre in granting the warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that warrant shall not be panished by writ of false imprisonment because the Iustice is Iudge of the Cause Plow 83. b. 1. in Strange and Crokers Case 10 In 9 H. 6. it is said that if I grant to B. Maintenance that if my Tenant for life die during my life that then B. shall have the Land for 10 yeares Here if my Tenant be impleaded B. may lawfully maintaine in respect of the Colour of title he hath to the Land Co. Inst p. 1. 148. b. 4. 11 Entry into Religion and profession of a Disseisor shall not cause a descent to toll the entry of the Disseisée Bastard Mulier because it is the Disseisors owne Act and not the Act of God as death is yet if there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne and the Bastard before claime enter into Religion it is said such a discent shall toll the entry of the Mulier by reason of the colour of title that the Bastard had to the land and such an heire shall also have his age 114 It prizeth the Acts of God and of the Law more then those that are done by the party Co. Inst p. 1. 18. a. 4. 1 Fée-simple being as Littleton saith the largest Estate of inheritance that is Two Fee-simples one Fée-simple cannot depend upon another by the grant of the party as if Lands be given to A. so long as B. hath heires of his body the Remainder over in Fée here the Remainder is void yet in several persons by Act in Law a reversion may be in Fée-simple in one and a Fée-simple determinable in another by matter ex post facto as if a Gift in taile be made to a Villein and the Lord enter the Lord hath a Fée-simple qualified and the Donor a reversion in Fée but if the Lord enfeoffe the Donor now both Fée-simples are united and he hath but one Fée-simple in him â—â—ires female â—ill not take 2 When a man giveth lands to another man and the heirs female of his body dieth having issue a son a daughte◠〈◊〉 daughter shall inherit for the will of the donor the Stat. working 〈◊〉 it Co. ib. 24. b. 3 25. b. 3. 26. b. 4. which is upon the matter an act in law shall be observed but in case of a purchase it is otherwise for if A. have issue a son a daughter a lease for life is made the remainder to the heirs females of the body of A. A. dieth the heire female can take nothing because she is not heire for she must be both heire heire female which she is not because the brother is heire and therefore the will of the giver cannot be observed because here is no gift and therefore the Statute cannot work thereupon so it is if a man hath a son and a daughter and dieth lands are given to the daughter and the heirs female of the body of her father the daughter shall take nothing but an Estate for life because there is no such person she being not heire but where a gift is made to a man and to the heirs female of his body there the Donée being the first taker is capable by purchase and the heire female by discent secundam formam doni â—â—tes may 〈◊〉 altered 3 Regularly Estates cannot be altered from one to another Litt. §. 33. Co. ib. 28. a. unlesse all that have interest joine in the alteration thereof but by the Act of God estates may be changed without any act done by the parties that are interessed as if lands be given to a man and the heirs that he shall engender of the body of his wife here the wife hath nothing and the man is Tenant in special taile therefore in this Case if the Feme die without issue on her body begotten by the Baron the estate in special tail is by the act of God charged into tenancy in tail after possibility of issue extinct â—â—ging of â—â—tes 4 If a feofment in fee be made to the use of a man and his wife for the term
Copyholders holding of a Manor parcel of the Rectory the Court granted a Prohibition to prevent further waste Hâ—b 62. Paâ—row Lâ—wâ—llyn 33 The privat delivery of defamatory Letters was criminal and censurable in the Starr-chamber and now as it seems Star-chamber inditable in the Upper Bench because such quarrellous Letters tend to the breach of the peace and to the stirring of Challenges and quarrels and therefore the means of such evils as well as the end are to be prevented 187 It moderateth the strictness of the Law it self Co. I st part 1 13. â— 1. 1 A Protection Moraturae or Profecturae have these clauses in them Protection Praesentibus minimè valituris si contingat ipsum c. a custodia Castri praedicti recedere Or si contingat iter illud non accipere vel infra illum terminum a partibus transmarinis redire according to the provision of the Statute of 13 R. 2. 16. nevertheless if he return into England and came over to provide Munition Habiliments of warr victuals or other necessaries it is no breach of the said conditional clauses nor against the said Act for that in judgement of Law coming for such things as are of necessity for the maintenance of the warre Moratur he doth stay according to the intention of the Protection and Statute aforesaid Annuity 2 If A. be seised of lands Co. ibid. 144. b. 2. and he and B. grant a rent charge to one in fée this prima facie seems to be the grant of A. and the confirmation of B. but yet the grantee may have a writ of annuity against both Howbeit if two men grant an annuity of 20 l. per annum to another although the persons be several yet he shall have but one annuity but if the grant be Obligamus nos et utrumque vestrum the grantee may have a writ of annuity against either of them but he shall have but one satisfaction Iudgement 3 An action of trespass was brought against Tilly and Woody for five boxes with charters taken c. Tilly pleads not guilty H. 7. E. 4. fol. 31. Title Judgement 50 Pl. Co. 66. b. 3. Dyve and Maningham and Woody makes title to him by a gift and the plaintif traverseth the gift and thereupon they were at issue and Tilly was found guilty and the issue was found for Woody against the plaintif In this case albeit the issue was found against Tilly yet the plaintif had not judgement against him for it was found betwixt the plaintif and Woody that the plaintif had not title and then in as much as it appeared to the Iudges by the Record that the plaintif had not title they ex officio ought to give judgement against the plaintif The like 4 An action of trespass was brought by lessee for years of Cattel taken the defendant saith P. 10 E. 4. fol. 7. Title Office del Court 7. Br. 29. Pl. Co. ibid. that the Lessor held of him by divers services c. and for so much arrear he took the Cattel the plaintif saith there is nothing arrear c. and hereupon they were at issue and it was found for the plaintif And yet per totam Curiam the plaintif shall not have judgement for albeit the defendant admitted the writ good yet the Court did abate it because it appeared unto them that the defendant was Lord against whom an action of trespass lyeth not Marbr 3. for the Statute saith Non ideo puniatur dominus c. Appeal 5 In an appeal by a feme of the death of her father Pl. Co. ibid. albeit the defendant affirm the writ yet the Court ex officio ought to abate it for it appears to the Court that no feme may have an appeal of the death of any save of her husband by the Statute of Magna Carta cap. 34. which was in affirmance of the Common Law Non est fâ—ctuÌ„ 6 In debt upon an obligation Pl. Co. 66. b. 4. if the defendant conclude his plea with Iudgement si action whereas his plea should have been non est factum yet if the Iustices find that it was not his deed so as the plaintif had no cause of action they ought ex officio to give judgement against the Plaintif Vide 11. 9. Attaint 7 The Statute of 23 H. 8. 3. Dyer 201. 65. 3 El. â— of Attaints lyeth as well against executors as the party himself albeit the party that recovers upon the false verdict be only named in that Statute for that Statute being made in mitigation of the rigor of the Common Law shall be taken by equity and the words against the party that hath judgement are superfluous for it lyes against any that enjoyeth the thing lost 188 Verba semper accipienda sunt in mitiori sensu Slander 1 If one say to another that he is perjured Co. l. 4. 15. b. 1. in Stâ—nhop Blithes case or that he hath forsworn himself in such a Court by these words an action may be maintained for by these words it appears that he hath forsworn himself in a judicial proceeding but to charge another generally that he hath forsworn himself is not actionable because he may be forsworn in usual communication And benignior sententia in verbis generalibus seu dubiis est praeferenda Vide 178 11. Co. l. 4. 15. b. 3. in Yeamans case 2 Yeamans charged Hext being then a Iustice of Peace in these words For my ground in Allerton Hext seeks my life Slander These words being taken in mitiori sensu were not actionable 1. because he may seek his life lawfully upon just cause and his land may be holden of him 2. seeking of his life is too General and for seeking only no punishment can be inflicted by the Law Co. l 4. 17. b. 4. in Iames Rutleches case 3 In an action upon the case for words Slander as an Innuendo cannot make the person certain which was uncertain before so neither can an Innuendo alter the matter or sense of the words themselves as to say that such an one was full of the Pox innuendo the French Pox this Innuendo doth not perform his proper office for it strives to extend the general words the Pox to the French pox by Imagination of an Intent which is not apparent by any precedent words unto which the Innuendo may referr And the words themselves shall be taken in mitiori sensu Co. l. 4. 20. a. 1. in Barhams case 4 Barham brings an action upon the case against Nethershall Slander the words were these Mr. Barham did burn my barn innuendo a barn with corn with his own hands and none but he And it was adjudged that they were not actionable for it is not felony to burn a barn unles it be parcel of a Mansion-house or full of Corn And in this and the like
goods and chattels for the great regard that the Law hath to the life of a man Howbeit if Thieves assault a mans house to robb or murther him and the owner or his servants kill any of the Thieves in defence of himself and his house this is not felony neither shall he lose any thing thereby And with this agrées 3 E. 3. Tit. Corone 303. 305. 26 Ass pl. 23. So likewise it is held in 21 H. 7. 39. that a man may justifie to assemble his friends and neighbours to defend his house against violence but not to go with him to the Market or elsewhere to guard himself from violence And all this to establish quiet and tranquillity in the Commonwealth Co. l. 5. 125. a. 2. in the cases of Libels 14 Every Libell which is called famosus Libellus Libels seu infamatoria scriptura is made either against a privat man or against a Magistrate or publique person if it be made against a privat person it deserves a severe punishment for albeit the Libel be only made against one yet it invites all of the same family kinred or society to revenge and so tends by consequence to quarrels and disturbance of the peace and quiet of the Commonwealth and may be the cause of effusion of bloud and of great inconvenience If it be against a Magistrate or other publique person that is yet a greater offence for this concerns not only the breach of the peace but the scandal of Government because what greater scandal can there be to Government than to have corrupt and wicked Magistrates to be substituted by the King to govern his Subjects under him Neither can there be greater imputation to the State than to permit such corrupt men to sit in the sacred seat of Iustice and to have any medling in or concerning the administration of Iustice which conceit being fixt in the minds of the people may be a cause of tumults and sedition to the great disturbance of the quiet and repose of the Commonwealth F N.B. 81. d. 15 Albeit Iustices of Peace have not express authority given them by their Commission to take recognizance for the keeping of the peace yet the Law gives them thereby that power ex congruo in order to the publique quiet of the Commonwealth for that they are thereby Constituted to be Conservatores Pacis and impowred to cause men to kéep the peace and to hear and determin offences committed against the peace and quiet of the Realm The Common Law giveth also power to the Sheriff either upon a writ of Supplicavit or without such a writ to take a Recognizance for the kéeping of the peace because he also is Conservator Pacis and to that end and purpose hath the guard and custody of the County committed to him for the time that he continues Sheriff as appears by the words of his Commission and Patent Rex c. Commissimus vobis Custodiam c. And what the Iustices or he do in that behalf is matter of Record and so ought to be déemed for that it concerns the Publique peace and tranquillity of the Commonwealth A man may go beyond sea 16 By the Common Law any man may go out of the Realm to imploy himself as a Merchant or to undertake a pilgrimage F.N.B. 85. a. or for any other cause at his pleasure without demanding license of the King neither shall he incurr any punishment for so doing Howbeit because every man in right is bound to defend the King and his realm and to preserve the publique repose and tranquillity of the Common-wealth from forein invasions from abroad and intestine sedition and insurrection at home the King may at his pleasure command by his writ De securitate invenienda quod se non divertat ad partes exteras sine licentia Regis under the Great Seal Privy Seal or Signet that he shall not go beyond sea without the Kings license And if he do he shall be fined for disobeying the Kings command Vide 3. Uses 17 In case of a Feoffment or other conveyance Co. Inst pars 1. 237. a. 2. whereby the feoffée or grantée c. is in by the Common Law a Proviso for a power of Revocation is meerly repugnant and void but in a voluntary conveyance which passeth by raising of Vses being executed by the Statute of 27 H. 8. 10. and now become very frequent by such a Proviso it is lawfull for the Covenantor at any time during his life to revoke any of the said Vses c. And these revocations are alwaies favourably interpreted bâ—cause now to interrupt that Course would disturb the Publique quiet of the Realm many mens Inheritances depending thereupon Warranty collateral 18 In 50 E. 3. Rot. Parl. 77. it was attempted in Parliament to have a Statute made Co. ibid. 373. b. 1. that no man should be barred by a warranty collateral but where Assets descend from the same Ancestor but it could never take effect because it would weaken common assurances and by consequence disturb the peace and quiet of the Commonwealth Remainders 19 For as much as in coveyances Co. Inst pars 1. 299. a. 2. limitations of Remainders are usual and common assurances it is dangerous by conceipts and nice distinctions to bring them in question as hath of late time been attempted lest thereby the quiet repose of the Commonwealth may be interrupted Descent to toll Entry 20 The Statute of the 32 Hen. 8. 33. concerning descents to toll entries shall be understood of a descent upon any disseisin Dyer 219. 7. 5. Eliz. albeit the words are of entries with strength And this large interpretation of the words is given for the better preservation of the peaâ—e and quiet of the Country By the Opinion of all the Justices Descent of the Royal line 21 In the Starre-Chamber the Countesse of Shrewsbury was fined 1000 l. and committed to the Tower Hob. 235. for that being called to the Council Table and Interrogated what she knew or had heard or thought of a supposed child which was rumored that the Lady Arrabella should have had she refused obstinately to make any answer because it was judged that this was a question of State and proper for the Council Table to take cognizance of for there is not one thing that doth more concern the peace and quiet of a kingdom than the certainty of the Royal line c. 201 Conventio seu beneficium privatorum non potest publico juri derogare Vide supra 198 29. Co. Inst pars 1. 166. a. 4. Littl. §. 244 1 No privat contract or agreement Partition which varies from the ordinary course of Law and sounds in prejudice of the Commonwealth or Common right shall be deemed good in Law as if a Castle that is used for the necessary defence of the Realm descend to two or more Coparceners and they by agreement choose
default yet may the tenant give evidence and the Recognitors of the Assize may find for the tenant And therefore in these or the like cases the tenant or defendant non amittit per defaltum as the Statute and Littleton speak and they cite F.N.B. in the point Littl. Sect 674 675. West 2. c. 4. Fitz. 155. e. Neverthelesse others do hold the contrary because albeit in the writ of wast judgement is not given only upon the default yet the default is the principal and the cause of awarding the writ to enquire of the wast as an incident thereunto and the Law alwayes hath respect to the first and principal cause of a thing from whence it takes the first rise and being Co. ibid 364. a. 4. 10 H. 6. 10. 31 H. 6. Entry congeable 54. 22 Where Ioyn-tenants or Coparceners have one and the same remedie if the one enter the other shall enter also Joyn-tenants and tenants a common but where the remedies be several there it is otherwise As if two Ioyn-tenants or Coparceners joyne in a real action where their entry is not lawfull and the one is summoned and severed and the other pursueth and recovereth the moity the other Ioyn-tenant or Coparcener shall enter and take the profits with her because their remedie was one and the same But where two Coparceners be and they are disseised and a descent is cast and they have issue and die if the issue of the one recover her moity the other shall not enter with her because their remedies were several and yet when both have recovered they are Coparceners againe So if two Ioyn-tenants seised of lands the one of full age the other under age be disseised c. And the disseisor die seised and his issue enter the oâ—e of the Ioyn-tenants being still under age And after that he comes to full age the heir of the disseisor lets the lands to the same Ioyn-tenants for their two lives This is a remittor of the moity to him within age because his entry was congeable but the other Ioyn-tenant hath but an estate for life in the other moiâ—y by force of the Lease because his entry was taken away Lit. l. § 656. c. as you shall find it in Littleton Sect. 696. If A. and B. Ioyn-tenants in fée be disseised by the father of A. who dieth seised his sonne and heire entreth he is remitted to the whole and his companion shall take advantage thereof Otherwise here in the case of Littl. for that the advantage is given to the infant more in respect of his person than of his right whereof his Companion shall take no advantage But if the Grand-father had disseised the Ioyn-tenants and the land had descended to the father and from him to A. and then A. had died the entry of the other would have béen taken away by the first descent and therefore he should not have entred with the heir of A. c. Warranty that begins by disseisin 23 If A. de B. be seised of an house Littl. § 368. and F. de G. enter into the same house clayming it to him and his heires and make a feofment thereof with warranty to certaine Barrettors in the Country to be maintained by them by reason whereof A. de B. dare not stay in the house but goes out This is warranty that beginnes by disseisin because that feofment was the cause why A. de B. left the possession of the same house Tenant in tail the reversion in the King 24 If a subject make a gift in tail Co. ibid. 372. b. 3. the remainder to the King in fée Albeit the words of the Statute of 34 H. 8. cap. 20. be whereof the reversion or remainder at the time of such recovery had shall be in the King c. yet séeing the estate taile was not originlly created by the King the estate taile may be barred by a Common recovery So likewise if Prince H. sonne of H. 7. had made a gift in taile the remainder to H. 7. in fée which remainder by the death of H. 7. had descended to H. 8. So as he had the remainder by descent yet in this case also a Common recovery would have barred the estate taile No fine before admitance 25 Popham Chief Justice said that it was adjudged in Sands his case Co. l. 4 28. a. 3. Copihold cases Hubbert and Hamons case that no fine was due to the Lord either upon surrender or descent untill admittance For the admittance is the cause of the fine and if after the tenant denie to pay it that is a forfeiture And so it was also resolved by Wray and Periam in a case betwixt Sir Nich. Bacon and Flatman The cause must be shewed why the Bishop refuseth to admit 26 If a Clerke be presented to a Bishop to be admitted to a Benefice and he refuseth him in pretence of insufficiency or other defect Co. l. 5. 58. a. â— Specots case In a Quare impedit the Bishop ought to alleadge some particular crime or cause why he did not admit him and not generally quòd non est idoneus quod est criminosus schismaticus inveteratus or the like For although it belongs not to the Kings Court to determine schismes or heresies yet the original cause of the suit being matter whereof the Kings Court hath conusance the cause of the schisme or heresie for which the presentée is refused ought to be alleadged in certaine to the intent that the Kings Court may consult with Divines to know whether it be schisme or no and if the party be dead may thereupon direct the Iury which is to try it Felons goods for flying cannot be forfeited by prescription 27 If a man flie for felony his owne goods are not forfeited Co. ibid. 109. b. 1. Foxlâ—yes case untill it be found by the indictment before the Coroner in case of death or otherwise lawfully found upon record that the felony was the cause of his flight For if the goods of any shall be forfeited onely by reason of this flying without more then a man may have such goods so forfeited by prescription as he may have waifs estrayes treasure trowe c. but in as much as bona fugitivorum are not forfeited untill the flight be lawfully proved upon record and because things forfeited by matter of record cannot be claymed by prescription which is a matter in suit for this cause they cannot be claymed by prescription 28 Deodands are the goods which caused the death of the party killed by misfortune Co. ibid. 110. b. 4. and are not forfeit Deodands not forfeited by prescription in England untill it be found upon record that they were the cause of his death and therefore they cannot be claimed by prescription no more than bona fugitivorum for which Vide suprà 27. M. 30 31. El. Co l. 6. 47. b. Dowdales case Co. Inst pars 1
accession of the estate for life Co. l. 8. 142. b. 1. in Doctor Druries case 47 If a man hath judgement in a Quare Imepedit Quare Iâ—â—dit Errour and hath a Writ to the Bishop and the Bishop refuseth to admit his Clerk Here the Plaintiff upon this collateral matter of refusall may have a Writ of Quare non admisit but if the Defendant reverse the Iudgement by a Writ of Error and after the Plaintiff in the Quare Impedit brings his Quare non admisit the Defendant may plead no such record and so bar the Plaintiff of bringing that Writ Vide 26 E. 3. fol. 75. per Wilby and Hill In like manner Execution Errour Escape if A. be taken by the Sheriffe in execution at the suit of B. upon an erroneous Iudgement and after make an escape and after the judgement is reversed by a Writ of Error the action upon the escape is lost c. Ibid. the principall case 48 If the return of an Exigent be erroneous Exigent â—â—neous the Outlawry which is grounded thereupon is erroneous also because the Writ of Exigent is the warrant by which they proceed to the Outlawry Vide Proctors case 5 Eliz. Dyer 223. Ibid. 143. b. 2. 38 H. 6. 4. 12. 49 One that had cause of priviledge in Banco is arrested in London Priviledge Supersedeâ— and delivers a Supersedias notwithstanding which the Recorder gives judgement and he is taken in execution and is thereupon removed in Banco by a Corpus cum causa And here because after the Supersedeas delivered there was a Nullity in the proceeding and judgement the Court without Writ of Error awarded that he should be discharged of the Execution c. Ibid. 143. a. 1. 50 If two Iudgements are given Two judgements The first dâ—feated and the last depends meerly upon the first as upon his foundation there if the first fundamental judgement be reversed by Writ of Error or Attaint the last which appears in the Record to depend upon it shall be reversed also as in Assise and Redisseisin so of a judgement upon the original and another judgment in a Scire facias so also of a judgement against the Tenant and another against a Vouchee and the like c. Conusee of a Statute 51 The Conusee of a Statute Staple in a writ of Detinue of the same Statute upon garnishment recovers by erroneous Iudgement against the Garnisee and hath the Statute delivered unto him Ibid. 142. b. 7 H. 6. 4â— a. the Garnisée brings a writ of Error Garnishment and the Conusee sues execution upon the Statute and hath it Here albeit the Garnisee reverse the judgement yet inasmuch as the Statute was executed that execution shall not be avoided by the reversall of the judgement because the judgement was onely to have the Statute delivered Judgement Execution and the Execution upon the Statute is a thing executed not at all depending upon the judgement And yet in this case by the opinion of Coke Chiefe Iustice the Garnisee shall have remedy upon the reversal of the judgement by an Audita quaerela Audita Quaerela because the cause and ground of the Collateral Action is disproved and annulled by the reversall of the first judgement and the first Plaintiff restored to his first action upon which he may have his first and due remedie Executors have execution The Will annulled 52 Executors have judgement in account Ibid. 143. b. 4. per Coke chief Justice and for the arrerages have the Defendant in execution and afterwards the Testament was annulled because the Testator was an Idiot and the Record spirituall was removed into the Chancery by Writ and then sent into the Kings Bench where the Action was brought And hereupon the Defendant brought an Audita quaerela Audita Quaerela for that the Testament was disproved and it was resolved in the Exchequer Chamber an 35 H. 8. that the Audita quaerela would well lie A Melius Inquirend erroneous 53 It was found by Mandamus 2 Jac. that P. S. held the Mannor of O. in Soccage of Qu Co. l. 8. 168. a. Paris Slaughters case Eliz. as of her Mannor of N. In 7 Jac. a Melius Inquirendum was awarded reciting the former office to enquire whether the Mannor of O. at the time of the death of P. S. was holden of the King in Capite c. whereupon an office was found that at the time of the death of P. S. the said Mannor of O. was holden of Qu Eliz. by Knight service as of her Mannor of N. and that at the taking of the inquisition it was holden of the King c. In this case the Melius was repugnant in it selfe because it was impossible for the Iury to finde the Mannor holden of King James at the death of P. S. which was in the fourth year of Qu Eliz. for then it must needs be holden of the Queen King James being then King of Scotland c. Now therefore albeit the Iury by the Inquisition had rightly found the tenure of the Mannor and that their finding thereof in that respect was good and according to the truth of the case yet because it was not warranted by the Melius which was the ground of their Inquisition all was adjudged insufficient and void and a new Melius inquirendum was awarded An Idiot examined in Chancery 54 A man that is found an Idiot from his nativity by office Co. l. 9. 31. b. 4 in the case of the Abbot of Strata Mercella may come into the Chancery and pray to be examined or by his friends he may pray to be brought thither and if it be found upon examination that he is no Idiot the office thereof found and all the examination which was by force of the Writ or Commission are utterly void without any traverse monstrance de Droit or any other suit Assumpsit deâ—eaâ—â—d 55 An Executrix in consideration Co. lib. 9. 94. a. 4. Will. Banes case that the Plaintiff will forbeare till Michaelmas to sue for a debt due by the Testator to the Plaintiff upon lone promiseth to pay it at Michaelmas and in an Action upon the case brought against her upon that promise pleads non assumpsit here the consideration of forbearance is good because although it be no benefit to the promiser yet is it damage to the Plaintiff And yet in this case if in rei veritate the debt were not due debt Per Coke chief Justice or the Executrix had not assets at the time of the promise she may give that in evidence and shall be thereupon ayded for then in truth there was not any consideration upon which the assumpsit might be grounded because to forbeare a debt which was not due or wherewith she was not chargeable could be neither benefit to the Defendant nor damage to the Plaintiff Co. l. 9. 139. a. 3.
Retraxit cannot be acknowledged by an Attorney Co. lib. 9. 75. b. 4. Combes case 10 There is a diversity betwixt a general and absolute power and authority as owner of the land Surrender by Attorney and a particular power and authority by him which hath but a particular interest as a Copiholder being owner of the land according to the custome may surrender his Copihold land by Attorney but if A. be Tenant for life the remainder in taile c. And A. hath power to make leases for 21 yeares rendring the ancient rent c. he cannot make a lease by letter of Attorney by force of his power because he hath but a particular power which is annexed to his person And so it was resolved in the Lady Greshams case at the Assises in Suffolk 24 Eliz. by Wray and Anderson Chiefe Iustices and Iustices of Assise there Co. lib. 9. 76. a. 1. Combes case 11 Some things are so inseparably annexed to the person of a man Villein that he cannot do them by another as the making of Homage and Fealty So it is holden in the 33 E. 3. tit Trespass 253. that the Lord may beate his Villein for cause or without cause and the Villein shall have no remedy but if the Lord command another to beate his Villein the Villein shall have an action of Battery against him that so beats him Co. Ibid. 12 If the Lord distrain the Cattle of his Tenant Wrongful â—â—â—stresse when nothing is behind the Tenant for the respect and reverence which belongs to the Lord shall not have an Action of Trespass vi armis against the Lord but if the Lord in that case command his Bailiff or Servant to distrain him when nothing is arrear the Tenant shall have an Action of Trespasse vi armis against the Bailiffe or Servant c. 2 H. 4. 4. 11 H. 4. 78. 1 H. 6. 6. 9 H. 7. 14. Fitz. N.B. 25. c. 13 It séems that before the Statutes No Attorney allowed by the common Law which grant that a man may make an Attorney c. the Iustices would not suffer either Plaintiffe or Defendant Demandant or Tenant to make attorney in any suit or in any Court c. because the words of the Writ command the Defendant to appear which ought alwayes to be understood in proper person and at this day also a mans reall suit at a Leet or Sheriffs turne cannot be done by Attorny but ought always to be in proper person c. Howbeit before those Statutes the King by his Prerogative might have granted to a man to make an Attorney in every action or suit as well to the Tenant or Defendant as to the Demandant or Plaintiff and might have directed his writs or letters to the Iustices for that purpose c. F.N.B. 25. d. 14 If the Tenant for terme of life be impleaded in a praecipe quod reddat No receipt by attorney he in reversion may pray to be received to defend his right in default of the Tenant or upon his faint pleading but in this case he cannot pray by his Attorney to be received without a Writ out of the Chancery directed to the Iustices for that purpose upon some cause alleadged in the said Writ c. 22 E. 4. 34. Finch 16. 15 A man cannot excuse himselfe of a contempt as of not serving the Kings processe Answer of a contempt peâ—sonal of rescuing a Prisoner from the Sheriffe or other Officer or the like by Attorney but he ought to appeare thereupon in proper person c. Co. l. 9. 96. b. 4. Sir George Reynels case 16 The office of Marshal of the Marshalsie cannot be granted for years because it is an office of great trust annexed to the person The office oâ— the Marshâ—â— personal concerns the administration of Iustice and the life of the Law which is to kéep such as are in execution in salva arcta custodia to the end they may the sooner pay their debts And this trust is individual and personal and therefore cannot be transferred to Executors or Administrators For the Law will not confide in persons unknown for the ordering of Matters which concern the administration of Iustice c. 45. 6. â—ersonal serâ—â—ce not apâ—ortioned or â—ultiplyed 17 If a man hold land by the personal service of being Sewer Co. l. 8. 105. b. 4. in John Talbots case Carver Butler c. to his Lord or when the Tenant is bound by his tenure Ad convivandum Dominum suum familiam suam semel in anno or ad aequitandum cum Domino suo in Com. N. sumptibus suis propriis vide 10 E. 3. 23. in John de Bromptons case by alienation of parcel of the land the service shall not be apportioned or multiplyed because such services are personal and are to be personally performed by one man only Howbeit purchase of parcel by the Lord shall extinguish them â—ilizers office â—ersonal 18 The office of Filizer cannot be extended upon a Statute Dyer 7. b. 28 H. 8. 10. or Elegit albeit it is a Franktenement for which an Assise lyeth because it is an office of trust and personal â—everal torts â—everal actions 19 An action upon the Case was brought by two Dyer 19. 112. 28 H. 8. for that the Defendant called them two false Knaves and Thieves Here the action was not well brought joyntly for that the wrong done to the one was not the wrong done to the other and therefore they ought to have severed in actions as in case of false imprisonment A thing in action cannot â—e transferred 20 The reason why a thing in action cannot be transfered or granted over to another is because it is so annexed to the person Dyer 26. a 16â— 28 H. 8. 282. 28. 11 Eliz. 300. 36. 13 Eliz. that it cannot be severed from him nor by any meanes prosecuted but in his name as an Obligation Statute Recognizance or the like So if a man hath an Advowson and when it is void the Patron grants proximam nominationem Presentationem Institutionem cùm primò proximè vacuerint In this case the Grantée shall not have that Presentation because it is a thing in action which the Patron could not transfer but the next to it he shall have which was the first that could be granted 45 They cannot be granted or transferred over as matters of pleasure ease trust and authority To hunt way â—o dyet c. 1 A licence to hunt in my Parke to go to Church over my ground 12 H. 7. 25. 7 H. 4. 36. to come into my house to eat and drinke with me cannot be granted over So of a way granted for life over my ground Finch 17. Personal offices of trust 2 The Patentée for life of an office of trust 11 E. 4. 1. as to be a Chamberlain of the
temporary and a disability absolute and perpetual As if a man be attainted of Treason or Felony this is absolute and perpetual disability by corruption of Blood and shall barre any of his posterity to claime any hereditament in Fée-simple as heire unto him or to any other Ancestor paramount him But when a man is onely disabled by Parliament without any attainder to claime any dignity for his life this is a personal disability for his life onely and his heire after his death may claim as heire to him or to any of his Ancestors above him c. And upon this diversity Thomas Lord De la ware Anno 39 Eliz. was restored to the place in Parliament originally belonging to his Family Wast by Baron 11 Where a lease is made to the Baron and Feme for terme of life or yeares the Feme shall not be punished for Waste F.N.B. 59. â— committed by the Baron after the Barons death M. 3. E. â— Battery 12 When a corporal hurt or damage is done to a man 12 H. 8. 12. as to beat him c. if he or the party beaten die the action is gone Finch 17. Covenant by Lessor 13 The Lessor covenants to pay quit-rents during the terme 1 2 P.M. 114. Finch 17. and dieth his Executors shall not pay them for it is a personal covenant which dieth with the person Debt against Executors 14 In debt against Executors who plead fully administred Dyer 32. 2 28 29 H. 8. and they gave in evidence to the Inquest that they had paid divers debts upon contracts made by the Testator whereas this suit was upon an obligation whereupon the Plaintiff demurres And it séemed to the Iustices that there was no cause to delay it because they were not compellable to pay such debts for that they die with the person and the Plaintiff had judgement de bonis testatoris Quit-rents 15 The Lessor covenants with the Lessée to pay and beare all quit-rents c. not naming his Executors or Assignes If the Lessor die Dyer 114. a. 60 1 2 P. M. his Executors are not bound according to the opinion of divers Iustices Tamen quaere Covenant implyed and expresse 16 If there be Tenant for life remainder in fée Dyer 257. 13. 9 Eliz. and Tenant for life demise for 15 yeares and die he in remainder enters and the termor brings covenant against the Executors of the Lessor upon the Demise onely which is but an implyed covenant and it was adjudged it would not lie albeit the lease were by Indenture unlesse it had béen broken in the life of the Testator it is otherwise also of an expresse covenant But an implyed covenant is personal and dies with him Vide Stat. 32 H. 8. 34. Note that if the heire out the termor of the father covenant lies against him upon the demise for the privity Vide Max. 55. Licence to retaile wines 17 Quéen Mary grants to one licence to sell Wines by retaile with a non obstante the Statute of 7 E. 6. 5. and doth not limit how long Dyer 270. 22. 10 Eliz. but there is a commandment in the Patent to the Officers to permit him to do it during his life And it was held by Dyer and Sanders that it was durante bene-placito onely and that the pleasure determined by the death of the Quéen the commandment ceased also by her death Warden of the Fleet. 18 Whitacres brings an action of Debt against the Executors of the Warden of the Fleet upon an escape in the life of the Testator Dyer 322. 25. 15 Eliz. and it was adjudged it would not lie because the offence was but trespasse which died with the person And by the Common Law debt did not lie against the Warden but an action upon the Case until the Statute of 1 R. 2. 12. which gives debt against the Warden but speaks neither of Heire or Executor It is otherwise where the recovery is in the life of the Warden 48 Things do enure diversly according to the diversity of the time Purchase by Inhabitants 1 The Parishioners or Inhabitants or probi homines de Dale Co. Inst pars 1. 3. a. 2. or the Church-wardens are not capable to purchase lands but goods they are unlesse it were in ancient time when grants were allowed to passe by such names Grant to commoners 2 An ancient grant by the Lords to the Commoners in such a waste Co. ibid. that a way leading to their Common should not be straitned was good but otherwise it is of such a grant at this day And so in ancient time a grant made to a Lord hominibus suis tà m liberis quà m nativis or the like was good but they are not of capacity to purchase by such a name at this day c. Co. l. 9 28. a. 3. in the case of the Abbot of strata Marcella 3 When an ancient grant is general obscure or ambiguous A charter interpreted as the Law was when it was made it shall not be now interpreted as a Charter made at this day but it shall be construed as the Law was taken at the time when such ancient Charter was made and according to the ancient allowance upon record Vide ibid. many authorities in the point Vide suprà 25. 22. Co. Inst pars 1. 21. b. 3. 4 If the Donor give lands in liberum maritagium reserving a rent Frankmarriage the fifth degree this reservation shall take no effect till the fourth degrée be past but after that time the rent shall be paid according to the reservation Littl. Sect. 19. Finch 18. Co. ib. 147. b. 1. 5 If a man grant a rent out of Black-acre to one and to his heires Rent-charge and seck and grant to him that he may distrain for this in the same acre for term of his life this is a rent charge for his life and a rent seck afterwards Diversis temporibus Co. l. 7. 24. b. 3. Buts case Co. ib. 171. a. 3. 6 Judicis officium est ut res ita tempora rerum Quaerere quaesito tempore tutus eris Co. ib. 178. a. 4. 7 A gift in Frankmarriage was before the Statute of Westm 2. Frankmarriage out of use a Fée-simple and since that Statute a Fée-taile So as it is true that the gifts do continue as Littleton saith Sect. 271. but not the estates for the estate is changed as appeares in the same Author Cap. Fee-taile And albeit Littleton saith Sect. 271. that such gifts have béen alwayes since used and continued yet now they are almost grown out of use and serve now principally for Moot-cases and questions in law that thereupon were wont to rise Co. l. 5. 119. b. 1. in Whelpdales case 8 When an obligation was once a deed Non est factâ—â— when a deed was and is no deed and after before
before the more remote though great estate in fée c. And with this accords 24. E. 3. 32. in Pierce Grimsteads case Co. l. 11 99 a. 4 in James Baggs case 5 If a Major and Aldermen of a Town corporate Upon a faâ— return the Court caâ—â—â— proceed which have power by Charter or presciption to dis-infranchise do dis-infranchise one of their members and upon motion in the Kings Bench the Iudges there do award a writ unto them to restore him or otherwise to signiffe the cause c. and they certifie sufficient cause to remove him but it is false In this case the Court cannot thereupon award another writ to restore him neither yet can any issue be taken thereupon because the parties are strangers and have no day in Court Howbeit the party grieves may well have an Action upon the special matter against those that made the certificate and aver that it is false And if it be found for him and he obtain judgment against them so that if may appear to the Iustices that the causes of the return are false then shall they award a writ of restitution and not before and this is proved by the reason of the Book in 9. H. 6. fol. 44. where it is holden that upon a Corpus cum causa if the cause returned be sufficient but indéed false the Court ought to remand the prisoner and he is thereby put to no mischief for if they had no authority to imprison him or that the cause certified be false he may have a Writ of false Imprisonment against them c. Vide Fitz. Tit. corpus cum causa p. 2. the case of 9. H. 6. well abridged F. N. B. 19. i. 6 In a Writ of false Judgment upon a Writ of right patent No errour bâ—fore all câ—â—fied c. or a Writ of right close the plaintiffe shall not assign his errors before all the Record be certified viz. not onely the original but likewise all the residue of the Record F. N. B. 20 e. 22 f. 7 In a Writ of Error when the Record is removed When erroâ— are to be â—signed the Plaintiffe shall assign his Errors before he shall have a Scire facias against the Defendant ad audiendum errores c. Howbeit he shall have a Scire facias before the Record shall be entred for it shall not be entred before the parties have day by the Scire facias c. F. N. B. 38. o. 8 Vpon a Quare Impedit if the Sheriff return tardè and the Defendant appears and the Plaintiff is demanded and comes not in Upon a 〈◊〉 return no 〈◊〉 to the Bishâ—p in this case the Defendant shall not have a Writ to the Bishop c. because no Writ was served against him for he ought to have the Writ served against him before he can have that priviledge c. F. N. B. 39. e. 9 When a man sues a Quare Impedit against another A Certificâ— of an accâ— before 〈◊〉 admittaâ— and after they hanging the suit he sues a ne admittas to the Bishop c. and after they accord in the Co. Pl. to present by turn to that advowson in this case a special Writ shall issue out of the Chancery to the Bishop to admit the Clerk of him who ought by that accord and composition to present to the first turne but first the King ought to send a Certiorare to the Iustices of the Com. Pl. to certifie him in his Chancery of the accord there and upon that Certificate the King shall send his Writ to the Bishop as aforesaid c. A Writ de secunda super oâ—eratione 10 In a Writ de admensuratione pasturae F. N. B. 126. 1. all the Commoners shall be admeasured viz. as well those that were not parties to the writ as those that were but yet if any of them which where not parties c. surcharge the Common after admeasurement they shall not forfeit their cattel nor yet the value of them which were in the pasture above the due number because they were not parties to the first writ neither shall the party that complains recover dammages against them in that writ for such surcharge for a writ de secunda super oneratione lieth not save onely against him against whom the first Writ was sued c. 11 In an Assise of Fresh-force in London against Jekef Foxley and Agnes his wife Matter of fact first to be found and then that in Law to be resolved and eleven other whereof ten appeared by Baily Pl. Co. 91. a. 1. in the Case of the Fresh-force in London against Foxley and others and plead No such Agnes the wife of Foxley in rerum natura and demand judgment of the plaint quod inquiratur per Assisam si c. Nul tort nul diss c. and the others plead the same plea by Attorney And the Plaintiffes as to the plea in abatement of the Plaint demur in law and as to the other plea they pray the Assise And whether the writ should abate or not was argued at Guild-hall by the Councel of both parts before the Assise was taken but afterwards the Councel of the Plaintiffs perceiving that the matter was argued before time for the Assise ought first to have inquired all the matter and if they had found the exception and had also found a disseisor and tenant then would it have been time to have disputed what the Law have determined in that case and not before they therefore prayed the Court when the Assise was sworn that they might first inquire of the matter pleaded in abatement of the Plaint which was done accordingly c. for the course formerly run was preposterous and not suitable to such orderly procéeding as the Law requires And so it was found that there was no such Agnes c. and yet the writ did not abate for the rest c. 75 A digniori fieri debet Denominatio Resolutio Quod ei deâ—rceat for teâ—ant in Dowâ—r and by the â—ourtesie 1 It hath been a question in our Books Co. Inst p. 1. 353. a. 4. whether upon a Recovery had by default in an Action of Wast against tenant in dower or by the Courtesie a Quod ei deforceat lyeth by the Statute of West in cap. 4. For some have holden that in an Action of Waste although it be brought against a tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie that have a Frée-hold yet the damages are the principal because they were recoverable against the tenant in Dower and by the Courtesie by the common Law and the Statute of Glocester gave the place wasted but for a penalty so as the nature of the Action say they remaineth still to be personal for that the dammages are the principal c But the best opinion is conceived to be that albeit in that Action the dammages may be the more
Crown that in the Kings Case they shall go with the Crown to the successor and not to executors as in case of common persons as appears in 7 H. 4. 43. and 44 E. 3. 42. Neither yet doth every warrant serve for the issuing of the Kings treasure for it cannot be done by Parol or by the privy Signet but ought to be done under the Great Seal or Privy Seal It was also further resolved in this Case that albeit Sir VValter had thus received the Quéens treasure to his own use yet inasmuch as he received it without lawful warrant he knowing that it was the Quéens treasure the Law makes privity in the Quéens Case and therefore she might charge him as an Accomptant And so it was also adjudged in the Exchequer in Jurdens Case P. 31. Eliz. Rot. 150. Neither yet is it of necessity that the Kings money or goods should come into the hands of the Testator for if he were onely a mean or Instrument whereby the King was put to loss or damage he shall be charged with so much as he hath so endamaged the King and shall be compelled at the Kings Suit reddere rationem thereof which is in nature of an Accompt for which there is a notable president in M. 30. E. 3. Rot. 6. Porters Case which sée in Co. l. 11. 92. b. in the Earl of Devonshires Case And therefore it was also resolved in Sir VValter Mildmayes Case that the Quéen might either charge the executors of Sir VValter or those that made such unlawful warrant at her election And if they were dead their executors c. for in as much as they were in their life-time chargeable by the Law in that Case if they die before judgement against them without question their executors shall be charged because where the Testator is by the Law chargeable to satisfie the King for losse or dammage done unto him his death shall not dispence therewith but that his Executors shall be also chargeable to the King c. F. N. B. 5. l. 65 In a Praecipe in Capite the Tenant shall not plead Protestaâ—â— that the Tenements are not holden of the King albeit the writ supposeth as much but he ought to take it by protestation and to plead other matter in barre if he have any matter to plead â—ender Di. â—ark 66 In a writ of Right F. N. B. 5. m. the Demandant ought to count of his own seisin or the seisin of his Ancestor c. yet the seisin is not traversable but the tenant may tender a Di. mark to enquire of that seisin c. and if it be found with the tenant that the Ancestor was not seised the Demandant shall be barred Howbeit if the King be party Demandant the Tenant shall not tender a Demy Mark to enquire of the seisin but he ought to plead in bar and there the tenant shall not imparâ— without the assent of the Kings servants The King may â—â—cuse appeaâ—â—nce 67 The King by a writ de warrantia diei may command the Iustices to excuse the Defendant of appearing at the day F. N. B. 17. b. whereunto he was adjourned to appear in proper person And whether the Cause alledged in the writ be true or false it is not material when the King certifies that he is in his service for it séems by the words of the writ that the King by his Prerogative may warrant that default for a day And so also it séemes that if the tenant in a Praecipe quod reddat at the great Cape or petit Cape returned make default that before judgment upon that default the King may command such a writ to the Iustices rehearsing that the tenant was in his service c. and commanding them that his default should not turn to his prejudice And it stands with reason that the King may do it because every one is bound to serve the King in his affairs c. â—â—nipresence 〈◊〉 his Courts 68 If false Iudgment be given for the King in any Action or Suit F. N. B. 21. b. 107. q. Finch 81. the party grieved shall have a writ of Error and assign Errours without suing any Scire facias against the King ad audiend errores because the King is alwayes present in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry in all Suits for the King is Edvardus Herbert Miles Attornatus Domini Regis generalis qui pro domino Rege sequitur venit hic in Curia c. And doth not say Dominus Rex per Edvardum Herbert Attornatum suum c. And therefore it is also that the King cannot be Non-suit that all Acts of Parliaments that concern him are general and the Court must take notice of them without pleading them for he is in all and all have their part in him c. â—ake Attorâ—ys 69 It séems that before the Statutes which ordain F. N. B. 25. c. e. â— 26. a. that a man may make Attorneys c. the Iustices neither would nor could suffer the Plaintiffe or Defendant Demandant or tenant to make Attorneys in any Action or Court whatsoever yet the King by his Prerogative even before those Statutes might grant to a man power to make Attorneys and by his Writs or Letters might command the Iudges to admit and receive them c. and that without any cause shewed in the writ c. â—â—e King canâ—â—t be Jointâ—ant 70 In the Register there is the form of a writ F. N. B. 32. g. wherein a common person is joyned with the King in a Quare Impedit which runs thus Rex vice comiti c. praecipe R. de C. quod justè c. permittat nos P. de T. praesentare c. But Fitz. saith in his N. B. that the common opinion in his time was that the King should have the whole presentment sole and should have a sole Action c. although he séems to hold the contrary himself Ideò quaere â—sent again 71 If the King recover by a Quare Impedit F. N. B. 34. f. and after ratifie the Estate of the Incumbent yet at the next avoidance the King shall present because the Recovery and Iudgement for him were not executed â—â—â—sent by 〈◊〉 72 In a Frée Chappel of the Kings F. N. B. 34. â— where the Dean ought to give the Prebends if he make not collation within six moneths unto them then shall the King present unto them by Laps as Ordinary F. N. B. 34. k. 73 If the Bishop make collation and die before induction Not inducted or instalment and the King seise the temporalties he shall have that presentment because the Church is not full against the King until the Parson or Prebend be inducted or installed F. N. B. 35. a. 74 If the Kings tenant hath title to present to an Advowson Advowson Ward Present which is void
Bedfords case 29 When a Subject is Guardian in Chivalry Voidable Leases he in the right of the heir within age and in his Guard shall avoid voidable Leases for so long time as he hath interest in the Lands by reason of the Wardship but this shall not prejudice the Heir of his election to make the Leases good by acceptance of the Rent c. when he shall attain his full age For Custos statum haeredis in custodia sua existentis meliorem non deteriorem facere potest The Law is also the same when the King is Guardian c. Co. l. 861. b. 4. in Beechers ca. 30 Infants shall not be amercied Amerc Pledges and consequently shall not finde pledges by reason of the weaknesse of their age And therefore in that Case the entry is Ideo in miserecordia sed perdonatur quia Infans Vide 43 Ass Pl. 45. 44 E. 3. tit Amerc 10. 3 E. 3 Enfant 14. 14 Ass Pl. 17. 41 Ass Pl. 14. 17 E. 3. 75. Bracton fol. 254. F. N. B. 195 h. Co. l. 8. 99. b. 4. in Sir Richard Letchfords cas 31 A Custome that the Lord shall seise Copiholds after thrée Proclamations at thrée Courts and non-claim by the heir Copiholds Proclamation Non-claim c. shall not binde the Heir that is beyond Sea extra Maria at the time of the Proclamations made so it is also of an Infant non compos mentis or one in prison because in judgment of Law they are not bound to make claim neither yet by intendment can they have notice thereof for if these four persons were excused by the Common Law though they made not claim within a year and a day after a Fine levied or a Recovery in a writ of Right being matters of record and of extraordinary high esteem in the Law so that they were not barred of their right notwithstanding their non-claim A Fortiori shall not Proclamations made in a base Court and in a private corner be any bar unto them c. Vide 5 E. 3. 222. and 7 E. 3. 335. Also if in a real Action a Recovery by default be had against a man in prison it shall not binde him but he may reverse it by writ of Errour as appears 5 E. 3. 50. b. 4 E. 2. Disceit 51. Littleton 102. b. Co. l. 9. 76. b. 4. in Combes case 32 Where the custome is Custome Feofment Age 15. that an Infant at the age of 15. may make a feofment he cannot do it by Attorney because the Custome that inables any person disabled by the Law ought to be pursued and an Infant cannot make any thing to passe out of him by Attorney Vide 11 H. 4. 33. Co. l. 9. 85. a. â— in Connys case 33 Albeit the tenant of a Mannor that is within age may be distrained for rent arrear and neither in that Case Distrain per quae serviâ— nor in a per quae servitia brought against him when the tenancy descends shall have his age because at first the Lord departed with the land in consideration that the tenant should hold of him pay his rent do his services c. And although upon grant of the Mannor by Fine he may be compelled to Attorn in such a writ and if he Attorn upon grant thereof in pais the Attornment is good yet in a writ of Customes and Services which is a writ of Right in his nature A writ of Custom Serv. Age. and in which Iudgement final shall be given against an Infant that is in by descent he shall have his age although it be upon his own Cesser because he knoweth not what arrerages to tender before judgement and that is a writ of right in his nature and if he make not true tender he shall lose the land And so it was adjudged in 28 E. 3. 99. Vide 9 E. 3. 50. 14 E. 3. Age 88. 31 E. 3. Age 54. 2 E. 2. Age 132. And albeit such an Infant do attorn in a Per quae servitia Attornment that can be no mischief unto him for notwithstanding his Attornment within age he may at his full age disclaim to hold of him or may say that he holds not of him or may acknowledge he holds of him but by lesse or other services And with this seems to accord 26 E. 3. 63. 32 E. 3. Per quae servitia 9. and Age 33. Vide 2 E. 2. Age 77 78. 37 H. 8. Attornment Br. Quid Juris clamat 34 In a Quid Juris clamat brought by an Infant the tenant saith 43. E. 3. sol 5. 32. E. 3. cited per Coke Ch. Justice l. 9 85 b. 2. in Connys Case that he holds the land for term of life of a Lease of the Infants Ancestor who granted that he should not be impeached of waste by déed which he shewed forth to the Court Waste And in this Case because the Plaintiff was within age and so could not acknowledge the déed during his non-age it was adjudged that he should stay untill his full age Neverthelesse in this Case if when the Infant attains his full age the Defendant attorns by judgement of Court Parol Demur No prejudice this shall not any way trench to the Infants prejudice For albeit the Attornment were after his full age yet in as much as there was no Laches in the Infant but that he brought his writ de quid juris clamat to force the tenant to attorn the delay which was till his full age which the Law provided for his benefit shall not turn to his prejudice And therefore by judgement of law which doth wrong to none he shall have as much advantage as well for the arrerages of rent as for waste done as if the Tenant had Attorned at the time of the Plea pleaded Devise Tail Conclusion 35 There was a Clause annexed to an Estate tail devised by will to a Feme sole Co. l. 10. 42. b. 4. in Mary Portingtons Case per Coke Ch. Justice that if she should apparently and willingly conclude and agree to dis-continue the Estate c. that then the land should from thenceforth remain to another c. the Feme takes husband and they two conclude and agrée with J. S. to suffer a recovery of the Land with intention to make void the Estate and thereupon a common recovery was suffered accordingly c. And in this Case Coke Chief Iustice was of opinion Feme covert â—an passe noâ—hing without â—xamination 〈◊〉 writ that such conclusion of a Feme covert was of no force neither yet could be any cause of forfeiture for no Feme covert shall be barred by her confession of her inheritance or frank-tenement but when she is examined by due course of Law 15 E. 4. 8. 44 E. 3. 28. Vide 14 E. 4 5. And none hath power to examine a Feme covert without writ Vide 21 E. 3. 43. John de
Sessions quod non legit Dier 205. b. 3 4 â—l and the prisoner is for some cause reprieved yet he may read at the next Sessions and shall have his Clergy in favorem vitae Vide 36 H. 6. that a Prisoner shall have his Clergy under the Gallows Life goods 44 If two men tilt before the King Hob. 134. Weaver and Ward or two Masters of Defence be playing their Prizes and one of them happen to kill the other this is not Felony because not done animo felonico and besides if it should be questioned as an Offence the life of the Offender which the Law much tenders would be brought into jeopardy there is the same Law also of a Lunatique that kills a man Howbeit in Trespasse which intends onely to give dammages according to hurt and losse it is not so And therefore if a Lunatique hurt a man he shall be answerable in Trespasse So likewise if in training for exercise in re militari one Souldier happen to hurt another he shall be answerable in Trespasse because it extends no farther then to his goods to satiâ—â—e dammages yet if the accident were inevitable he shall be excused c. 93 Things in the Realty more then those in the Personalty In waste the place wasted â— more respect then the dammages 1 It hath béen a question Co. Inst p. 1. 355. a. 4 c. Note that it is holden per Curiam 9 H. 5. 15. that the personalty is the principal Ideo quare Vide Co. l. 2. 68. b. 1. in Tookers case whether upon a Recovery had by default in an Action of Waste against tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie a Quod ei deforceat lieth upon the Statute of West 2. cap. 4. And some hold that it doth not in regard the dammages as they say are the principal and not the place wasted because the dammages were recoverable upon that action against such Tenants at the Common Law and the place wasted was afterwards given by the Statute of Glocester as a penalty so as the nature of the Action say they remaineth still to be personal for that the dammages are the principal c. But in that Case others are of opinion and say that albeit in that Action the dammages may be the more ancient recompence yet the place wasted being in the realty must néeds be the more principal And therefore upon a Recovery by default in such an action a Quod ei deforceat lieth as well as in any other c. And this last séems to be my Lord Cooks opinion because put last according to his own Rule in his Comment upon Littleton â— Lien real â—nd personal 2 There is a diversity betwéen a Lien real and a Lien personal Co. ib. 386. b. 3 11. E. 3. det 7. for a Lien real as a warranty doth ever descend to the heir at the Common Law but the Lien personal doth binde the special heirs as all the heirs in Gavelkind the heir on the part of the mother c. when such an heir being charged by the Obligation or other act of the Ancestor is in by descent c. So if two men make a Feoffment in Fée with warranty and the one die the Feoffée cannot vouch the survivor onely but the heir of him that is dead also Howbeit it is otherwise where two do joyntly bind themselves in an Obligation for if one die the survivor onely shall be charged c. Release of one Joynt-tenant no Bar. 3 In personal actions the one Ioynt-tenant may release all Co. l. 2. 68. 24 in Tookers ca. per Popham but if the personalty be mixed with the realty it is otherwise as in an Assise by two the release of all actions personal by the one is no bar against the other for albeit an Assise is an action mixt in the realty and personalty yet omne majus trahit ad se minus as it is adjudged 30 H. 6. Bar 59. Also a Ioynt-tenant shall not prejudice his Companion as to any matter of Inheritance of Frank-tenant but as to the profit of the Frank-tenant the one may prejudice the other for there is a privity and trust betwixt them and therefore if one of them take all the profits of the Land or all the Rent the other hath no remedie c. Things in the Realty may be intailed not those in the Personalty 4 By force of the Statute of West 2. cap. 1. Co. Inst p. 1. 19. b. 4. which createth estates tail under this word tenementa not onely all corporate Inheritances which are or may be holden may be intailed but also all Inheritances issuing out of any of those inheritances or concerning or annexed to or exercisable within the same though they lie not in Tenure as Rents Estovers Commons or other profits whatsoever granted out of land or Vses Offices Dignities c. which concern lands or certain places All these I say may be intailed within that Statute because they savour of the Realty But if the Grant be of an Inheritance meer personal or to be exercised about Chattels and is not issuing out of land nor concerning any land or some certain place such Inheritances cannot be entailed because they savour nothing of the Realty For example in 7 Ass Pl. 12. and 7 E. 6. 1. the Office of the fourth part of the Serjeant of the Common Pleas is liberum tenementum and therefore may be entailed In 18 E. 3. 27. the Office of the kéeping of the Church of our Lady of Lincoln was intailed and a Formedon brought thereupon by the issue intail In 5 E. 4 3. and 10 E. 4. 14. The Office of Marshal of England was intailed In 11 E. 4. 1. the Office of one of the Chamberlains of the Exchequer intailed In 1 H. 7. 28. the Office of a Fostership intailed In 4 H. 7. 10. and 9 E. 4. 56 b. Charters intailed In 19 H. 8. 3 An Vse intailed In 1 H. 5. 1. The nomination to a Benefice intailed c. Co. l. 7. 33. 34 Nevilâ— Caâ—â— 28 H. c. the Lord Vesceâ—â— Case Also the name of Dignity may be intailed within that Statute as Dukes Marquesses Earls Vicounts and Barons because they are named of some County Mannor Town or place In 14 Ass Pl. 2. if the issue in tail in a Formedon in a Descender be barred by false Verdict his release is no bar to his issue albeit the action is at the Common Law The like Law is of a writ of Error 3 Eliz. Dier 188. If a gift in tail be made with warrantie the Donée releases the warranty this shall not binde the issue in tail for to all these Cases and the like the said Statute doth extend But if I grant to a man and to the heirs of his body to be Kéeper of my Hounds or Master of my Horse or to be my Faulconer or the like with a fée therefore yet these cannot be
A. his heires c. pay to B. 100 l. after B. hath issue under age and dies the marriage takes not effect In this case the estate is executed in the heir of B. and shall have relation to the making of the Indenture c. But if the Grantée of a Reversion die no attornment can be done to his heir So it is also where the Devisée dies before the Devisor c. Pl. Co. Brets and Rigdens case 345. Vide Shelleys case where the Indenture bound the land albeit execution was not taken out till after his death for the estate was executed by the Indenture and Recovery before execution which shall have a retro-spect to the Indenture And 11 H. 7. 12. Where the heir shall have execution upon a fine But if the Feoffor or Feoffée die before entry feoffment by livery within view shall not take effect So also in the Rector of Cheddingtons Case Co. l. 1. 155 156 by the death of Tho. the term is not certaine nor can vest in his executors Co. l. 3. 86. a. 1. The Case of Fines 20 If the Bishop or Baron make a Lease for life Bishop Baron and after grant the Reversion in Fée and the Lessée for life die in the life of the Bishop or of the Baron this is a Discontinuance It is otherwise if the Lessée for life survive the Bishop or Baron A thing execuâ—ed unalterable 21 H. recovers 75 l. in B. R. and assignes it by Déed inrolled to Queen El. in satisfaction of a due Debt as Collector of the Fifteens Co. l. 5. p. 2. 9â— Hoes Case provided if the Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer or any two of them dis-allow the assignment c. and revoke it by writing under their hands that then the assignment shall he void after the Defendant brings Errour and the judgment is affirmed and 5 l. Costs given after by Writ of Prerogative the Land of the Defendant was extended and Goods seised to the value of the Debt And afterwards three Barons revoke the assignment after the death of the Plaintiffe because the Plaintiffe had satisfied the Debt and his executor sues a Scire facias for the 75 l. and 5 l. Costs But it was adjudged that after execution had by the Queen which was the effect of the assignment the Revoâ—ation came too late for he that hath power of Revocation cannot revoke a thing lawfully executed So a Letter of Attorney cannot be revoked after it is executed Vide 7 H. 6. 42. and 7 H. 4. 2. The Debtée is out-lawed the Debtor payes to the King the Out-lawry is reversed In this case the Debtor shall recover against the Debtée So if the Goods of an out-lawed person be sold c. he shall have restitution of the Goods Co. l. 8. 96. b 4. in Mannings Case but upon a Fieri facias c. onely the value Vide 3. E. 3. 51. Recompence in value once lawfully executed shall not be devested albeit the title of the Demandant be afterwards dis-affirmed and evicted Remainder executed 22 If a remainder be once executed Co l. 8. 88 a. 1. in Buckmeres Case in a Writ of Formedon in the Descender he shall never speak of that remainder but the general Writ of Formedon in the Descender shall serve in that case and he shall count of an immediate Gift for a Formedon in remainder he cannot have after the remainder is once executed But if a Lease for life be made the remainder in tail to A. the remainder in tail to B. if A. die without issue in the life of the Tenant for life and B. put to his Formedon in the remainder in his Formedon he ought to make mention of the remainder to A. albeit it was determined and spent for the Demandant in the Formedon in remainder ought to make mention of all the precedent remainders in tail because in that case the remainder was never executed by way of descent 〈◊〉 London suit â—opt before â—â—dgment 23 The Mayor of London may alter the course of Iustice in a cause hanging before the Sheriffes viz. to send for the parties Co. l. 8. 1â—6 a 3 in the Case of the City of London and to stop the suit also if he find the Plaintiffe already satisfied but so he cannot do after judgment and this he may do by a custome there Judgment exâ—cuted irrevocable 24 There is a diversity betwixt a thing Collateral executory Co. l. 8 142. a. 1 Doctor Druries Case and executed for when an erronious judgment is given and after the judgment is reversed by Writ of Error Collateral acts executory are barred thereby as if a man hath judgment in a Quare impedit and hath a Writ to the Bishop and the Bishop refuse here the Plaintiffe upon this Collateral matter of refusal may have a Quare non admisit but if the Defendant reverse the judgment in a Writ of Error and after the Plaintiff in the Quare impedit brings a Quare non admisit the Defendant may plead no such Record Vide 26 E. 3. 75. per Willy and Hill So if A. in execution at the suit of B. upon erronious judgment and after escapes and after the judgment is reversed by Error the action upon the escape is gone for he may plead no such Record because without a Record the action is not maintainable but in that case if the Plaintiffe bring an action of Debt against the Sheriffe or Gaoler upon the escape and hath judgment and execution and after the first judgment is reversed yet this judgment upon that Collateral matter being executed shall remaine in force 7 H. 6. 42. a. Notwithstanding such reversal of the first judgment The Conusée of a Statute Staple in Detinue thereof upon Garnishment recovers by erronious judgment against the Garnishée and hath the Statute delivered unto him 4 H. 7. 11. the Garnishée brings a Writ of Error and the Conusée sues execution upon the Statute and hath it Here albeit the Garnishée reverse the judgment yet this execution shall not be avoided thereby because the Statute is already executed Likewise if a man recover by erronious judgment and present to a Benefice or enter into the perquisite of a Villain and after the judgment is reversed by Error yet because these Collateral acts are executed they shall not be afterwards devested Co. l. 11. 40. a. 3 in Metcalfes Cases 25 Vpon an interloqutory award of a Court Error lieth not till after judgment which is not definitive a Writ of Error lyeth not such as are these quod computer that the shall take an Assise in Waste to inquire of the Wasts in trespasse to inquire of damages In partitione facienda quod partitio fiat In admeasurement quod admensuratio fiet that a man shall be ousted of aide and the like upon which the Defendant shall not bring a Writ of Error but after judgment in
because there is not Quid pro quo which ought to be in every contract 46 The servant of A. was arrested in London upon Trespass Assumpsit and two Dier 272. 31. 10 El. who knew his Master bailed him afterwards A. promised them for their friendship to save them harmlesse from the damages and costs c. In this Case if they be afterwards charged an Action upon the Case lyeth not because there was no consideration for the bailing was on their own heads and was executed before the Assumpsit But if the Master had requested it before and assumed after ut supra it séemes to be otherwise As in considerarion that you have married my Daughter at my request I will give you c. This is a good consideration because the marriage ensued my request Hob. 6. 4. 18. 88. 47 Vide Hob. 4. Lané Malorie in Assumpsit Assumpsâ—â— the consideration was the delivery of two Statutes Staple to the Defendant Also Hob. 18. Woolastons Case in Assumpsit the consideration was a longer day And 88 Nichols Raynored the consideration was a promisse for promisse which must be at the same time otherwise they are nuda pacta Likewise 88 Brinsley and Partridge the consideration a former debt promised upon accompt Hob. 118. Shelton 48 Every Rate or modus decimand Tithe by prescription is a discharge of the natural title 109 De minimis non curat Lex Co. l. 5. 56. b. 3. Knights Case 1 In Office by commission under the Exchequer seale is enough to entitle the King to a Chattle Chequer seale Co. l. 6. 42. a. 2 S. Anth. Mildmays Case 2 The Law favours Estates taile in possession but gives no regard to Remainders or Reversions expectant upon an Estate in taile Rev. or Râ— upon an thâ— taile not â—luable for it is adjudged in Caples Case in the 1 Report that if Tenant in taile suffer a Common Recovery that shall not onely barre the Estate taile and the Remainder or Reversion but also a Rent which he in Remainder or Reversion hath granted So likewise was it adjudged in 12 El. betwixt Terling and Trafford in the Kings Bench that a Reversion or Remainder expectant upon an Estate taile shall not be assets to the heire in debt upon an obligation made by his Father Also Hil. 14 El. it was resolved by all the Iustices of C. Pl. in Copwoods Case that if there be tenant in taile the remainder to the right heirs of I.S. and Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery I.S. being then in life this shall barre the remainder albeit it were in abeyance and consideration of Law which the Law usually favours but de minimis non curat lex â—â—se for years â—â—eeble â—â—te 3 If Lessée for yeares pay a Rent seck Co. l. 6. 57. a. 4 Bredimans Ca. it is not seisin required in an Assise against the Tenant of the Frank-tenement in respect of the meanesse and imbecilitie of his Estate For at the Common Law he could prejudice nor draw into question the Estate of the Frank-tenement nor before the Statute of Glocester could be received albeit a recovery were had against the Tenant of the Frank-tenement by agréement neither could he falsifie a recovery before the Statute of 21 H. 8. and all this by reason of the Féeblenesse of his Estate 〈◊〉 attaint 4 In Trespas the Defendant pleads Villenage in the Plaintiffe and he was found frée and had 2 s. damages given him F. N. B. 107. l In this Case the Defendant shall not have an attaint for the finding of the Plaintiffe Frée because the damages are so small â—dition in 〈◊〉 broken 〈◊〉 5 There is a condition in Law annexed to the keep-ship of a Park Litt. §. 378. Co. Inst p. 1. 233. a. 4. viz. that if he do not well and lawfully kéep the Park it shall be lawfull for the Grantor and his heires to enter But this must be understood with a distinction For if the kéeper doth not attend on the Park one two or c. dayes this is no forfeiture of his Office but if in his default any Déere be killed whereby a damage comes to the Lord that is a forfeiture For non-user of it selfe without some special damages is no forfeiture of private Offices but non-user of publike offices which concern the administration of Iustice or the Common Wealth is of it selfe a cause of forfeiture â—â—covery not â—lable by 〈◊〉 outâ—â—y otherâ—â— 6 If a Recovery be had against a man in a praecipe by default when he is out of the Realme Co. ib. 260. b. 3 he shall not as it séemes avoid it by writ of Error for so a man might be infinitely delayed of his Frée-hold and Inheritance whereof the Law hath so great regard But out-lawry in a personal Action shall be avoided in that Case quia de minimis non curat Lex and otherwise he should be without remedy whereas in the other Case the Tenant may resort to his writ of higher nature or a quod ei deforceat for his remedy â—â—â—sion upâ—â— Estate 〈◊〉 of no vaâ—â—â— Law 7 If Lands be given to a man in taile Co. ib. 172. b. 3 who hath as much Land in Fée-simple and he die leading Issue two Daughters who make partition so as the Land in Fée-simple happens to the youngest Daughter Here if the youngest Daughter Alien the Fée-simple Land and die her heire shall enter for a pur part upon the entailed Lands And so it is also if the youngest Daughter had granted her part to another in taile For the Reversion expectant upon an Estate taile is of no account in Law because it may be cut off by tenant in tail â—â—covery 〈◊〉 or deâ—ging of â—â—â—aâ—y 8 If a man be seised of Lands in Fée and hath Issue two Daughters and make a Gift in taile to one of them and die seised of the Reversion in Fée which descends to both Sisters Co. Inst p. 1. 174. b. 1. and the Donée or her Issue is impleaded she shall not pray in ayde of the other Copercener either to recover per rata or to deraigne the Warranty paramount for that the Reversion is not of any estéeme in Law and the other Sister is a Stranger to the Estate Taile whereof partition neither was nor could be made Hob. 214. 9 The Earle of Somerset had obtained a grant of the licence of wines for yeares and tooke it in the name of Sir John Daccombe Wine Licence in trust for him Now the Question was whether or no by the Earles attainder of felony the lease was forfeited And by the opinion of all the Iudges it was forfeited and afterwards it was so resolved also in the Exchequer viz. in Cases of Chattels real and personal and things in Action of that sort 110 In Actions the Law yeeldeth favour when for the doing of them there is
and part against him or all or part against one of the Tenants or Defendants and nothing or but part against the other the Demandant or Plaintiff shall be amercied except no default be found in the Demandant or Plaintiff And therefore in Trespasse of Battery against Baron and Feme supposing the Battery to be done by both and the Feme is onely found guilty c. and the Baron acquit yet the Plaintiff shall not be amercied for the Plaintiff cannot have any other Writ in such case and therefore because no default was found in him he shall not be amercied in this case The Kings ward dyes before homage 42. The Kings Tenant in Capite under age is to remaine in Ward Co. l. 8. 172. a. Hales case Prerogativa Reg. cap. 3. and the King is to receive the profits of his land untill he do his homage and that cannot be untill he have sued out his Livery And if at his full age he tender his Livery he is to have three moneths to perfect it Howbeit if after such tender by the Act of God viz. death he is prevented to perfect it the King shall not receive the profits after such tender but the next heire shall have them and after such tender he might in that case sell the Land or any part thereof and the sale shall be good notwithstanding the Kings hands upon it Co. l. 9. 87. a. 4. in Pinchons case 43. It is a Rule in Law Where wager of Law in the Testator Executors not chargeable that where the Testator might have waged his Law his Executors shall not be charged with that duty contra because that advantage is lost by the act of God viz. by death and therefore shall not be imputed to any default of his So debt lyeth not against Executors for the dyet of their Testator because he might in that case have waged his Law and so have freed himselfe thereof which advantage being lost by his death and no fault of his his Executors who represent his person shall not be prejudiced thereby Howbeit if a Prisoner in the Tower for treason receive his diet of the Lievtenant and dye the Lievtenant shall have an Action of debt against his Executors for such diet of the Testator and the reason is because in that case the Testator could not in his life time have waged his Law as it is adjudged in 27 H. 6. 4. b. in Thomas Bodulgats case And the reason why no wager of Law lyeth in such case is because every Goaler ought to keep his Prisoner in salva arcta custodiae and so must of necessity finde him victualls c. Vide pl. ibid. Co. ibid. 87. b. 4. 44. In 14 H. 6. 19. b. R. G. brings a Writ of debt of ten marks against T.T. and others Executors of W. W. and counted The like that the Testator had retained the Plaintiff to be with him for a yeare in the art of limming of Books paying him ten marks per annum and there Martin held that the Action of the Executors was not maintainable And he took a difference betwixt this case of a Limmer and that of a common Labourer for a Labourer shall be compelled to labour and his salary is put in certaine by the Statute and therefore there is no reason that the Servant should lose by the death of his Master being bound by the Law to serve which shall not be said to be his default but the Act of God and the Law Howbeit in the case of a Limmer he was not compelled by the Law to serve And so when he made the Covenant it was his owne act and folly and no act in Law and he might have taken a Specialty And this is good Law but the true reason of that difference is because in the Case of a common Labourer the Testator could not wage his Law but in that of a Limmer he might c. Vide pl. ibid. Co l. 10. 76 b. 2. in the case of the Marshalsey 45. If the Court of Common Bench in Plea of debt award a Writ of Capias against a Duke Earle Erroneous arrests c. which by the Law lyes not against them and this appeares in the Writ it selfe yet if the Sheriff arrest them by force of the Capias albeit the Writ is against Law neverthelesse the Court having Iurisdiction of the cause the Sheriff shall be excused because there is no default in him but in the Court and with this accords 38 H. 8. Dyer 60. b. So it is likewise if a Iustice of Peace makes a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice ers in the Warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that Warrant shall not be punished by a Writ of False Imprisonment because is is not his fault but the Iustices who is Iudge of the cause and with this agrees 14 H. 4 16. Co. l. 11. 27. a 3 in Henry Pigots case 46. If the Obligee himselfe alter the Obligation in any point materiall or not materiall by interlining addition racing or the like An Obligation void or not void by rasure c. that shall make the Obligation void but if a stranger do it without the Obligees privity in a point not materiall that shall not avoid the Deed as if an Obligation be to be made to the Sheriff for apparance c. and in the Obligation after the sealing and delivery thereof these words Vicecom Comit. Oxon are interlined by a stranger without the privity of the Sheriff yet the Obligation remaines good notwithstanding such interlining by a stranger without the Obligees privity in regard it was not conceived to be a point materiall Benedicto Winchcombe his name and sirname being there inserted before and being done by a stranger it shall not in that case prejudice the Obligee Refusall of Clerk 47. Where the Bishop refuseth the Clerke of the Patron for non-ability or crime he shall not present by Laps F. N. B. 35. i. unlesse he have first given notice to the Patron of the insufficiency of his Clerk the Patron neglect to present within the six moneths for in such case after the six months past the Patron shall have a Writ to the Bishop if the Church be void and the Bishop have not in the meane time collated 48. If one sell another a peice of Cloath and warrant it to be of a certaine length in this case if the peice be not of that length F. N. B. 98. k. a Writ of Disceit lyeth against the Vendor albeit the Warranty be but by Parol Custome of Woad uncertaine by tempest 49. In Fogassaes case in the Coment Pl. Com. â— b. 1. in Fogassaes case the storme at Sea being a thing that could by no possible meanes be prevented and that causing the uncertainty of the quantity of the Woad and there being no meanes of knowing the certainty thereof
their Custody to charge him with a Capias ad satisfaciendum to prevent an escape upon the Capias was condemned by all the Court of Starre-Chamber in the Countesse of Rutlands case because by the colour of Law and Iustice they by such feigned meanes do contrary to Law and Iustice and so cause Law and Iustice to be the Author of wrong and Injustice Seisin of rent 30. If A. having a Rent-seck issuing out of the Mannor of D. Co. l. 6. 58. a. 1. in Bredimans case granted unto him but no seisin thereof plots with B. to disseise the Ter-tenant to the end that after such disseisin B. may give him seisin of the Rent this seisin shall not bind the disseisee or he that right hath for the Covin makes it unlawfull Fraudulent Leases 31. The Father leases by Fraud and dyes Co. l. 5. 72. b. in Burrells case the Son knowing of it or not sels the Land in this case the Vendee shall avoid those Leases by the statute of 27 Eliz 4. so it is also where the Father leases to the Son who assignes fraudulently and then sells the Land c. False Deed. 32. If a man deny the Deed of his Ancestor Co. l. 8 60. a. 1. in Beechers case or plead a Deed made to his Ancestor and it is found against him yet he shall not be fined but onely amercied quia de alieno delicto c. But if the Tenant or Defendant plead a false Deed made to him or deny his own Deed and it is found against him or if he relicta verificatione cognoscit actionem he shall be fined for his falsity quia certi debemus esse de proprio facto Co. l. 8. 127. a. 1. in the City of Londons case 33. Where the custome is Inward shop that no Forraigner shall sell in any open Shop in paine to be fined he is a greater offender that trades there in an inward Shop or Chamber for such places are more dangerous and offensive then outward Shops because they may there use deceit and are not subject to search Qui male agit odit lucem omnia delicta in aperto leviora sunt See there likewise the case of the Prior of Dunstable to the like purpose Co. l. 8. 134. Mary Shipleys case 34. If an Executor plead pleni administravit Executor assets and assets be found by the Iury in his hands they shall pay the debt as far as they will answer but if they come short he shall answer the damages of his own goods for his false Plea Co. l. 9. 17. b. 1. in Ann Bedingfeilds case Co. ibid. 19. a. 3. 35. If a Feme having title of Dower do deceitfully detaine the Charters which concerne the Lands Rebutter in Dower out of which she is to have Dower assigned that is a good rebutter of the Action in a Writ of Dower brought by her against the Heire So if she deceitfully conceale and detaine the heire the Guardian in Chivalry may plead it against her in bar of her Dower but he cannot plead detainer of Charters which concerne the heire because they shall not be delivered to him Co. l. 9. 20. b. 4. in the case of Avowry 34. The Law will never suffer falsehood to suppresse truth Avowry and therefore if there be Lord and Tenant by Fealty and Rent and the Tenant make a Lease for years and the Lord distraines when there is no Rent or Services behind the Cattell of the Tenant and avowes upon a meere stranger as his true Tenant with purpose to charge the Plaintiff unjustly In this case the Lessee upon shewing the whole matter in speciall may pray in aid of the Lessor and shall thereby compell the Lord to avow upon the Lessor as his true Tenant and the false Avowry of the Lord upon the stranger who is not Tenant shall not annoy the Lessee against the truth of his case quia veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi Co. l. 10. 110. a. 2. in Arthor Legats case 35. A false suggestion in the Kings Grant being the words of the Patentee makes the Patent void Void Patents upon false suggestion As where the King grants fifteen Acres of Land as concealed whereas they being parcell of a Mannor the profits thereof are duely answered to the King though occupyed by an Intrudor yet because they are onely detained and not concealed but suggested onely to be concealed the Patent is void So in 19 E. 3. tit grant 58. The King by his Letters Patents gives licence to appropriate the Advowson of D. to the Prior of C. Quae quidem advocatio non tenetur de nobis c. and in truth the Advowson was held of the King and the licence was held void for the Book saith that the suggestion was false And in 21 E. 4. 48. if the King grant the Mannor of D. c. Quod quidem manerium ad manus nostras devenit ratione eschaet c. and in truth the Mannor did not come to the King by escheat in this case also the Grant was void and the reason that Hussey cheife Iustice there gives is for that the falsehood comes of the surmise of the party Co. l. 11. 73. b. 4. 74. a. 4. in Magdalen Colledge case 36. A Grant to the Queen by the Master and Fellowes of Magdelen Colledge in Cambridge The like of an House in London rendring 15 l. per annum Rent upon Condition that she should re-grant it to Benedict Spinola Merchant Dâ—nizen and his heires was adjudged void because they made use of the Queens Prerogative to alien the Lands of the Colledge which they were prohibited to do by the Statute of 13 Eliz. within which Statute the Queen is included So if one intending to sell his Land had by Fraud conveyed it by Deed inrolled to the Queene with purpose to deceive the Purchasor and after he sels the Land for a valuable consideration and makes conveyance accordingly in this case the Purchasor shall enjoy the Land against the Queen by the Statute of 27 Eliz. 4. for albeit the Queen is not excepted yet the act being generall and made for suppressing of fraud shall bind the Queen c. vide pl. ibid. Covin in Feoffment Recovery Remitter 37. In Trin. 19 H. 8. fo 12. Br. Remitter 1. Pl. Co. 51. a. in Wimbish and Talboies case ibid. 54. b. 4. If one disseise the Discontinuee in tail by covin to the intent to enfeoff the Issue in tail within age who had no knowledge of the covin he enfeoffs him accordingly in this case by the better opinion the Issue in tail shall not be remitted notwithstanding his good title and the onely cause hereof is the covinous intent for covin may alter the matter where the title is good so if my Ancestor disseise me to the intent to make Feoffment with warranty to bar me here albeit the Warranty be
awarded he comes too late after for non constat Curiae Alien that he is an Alien Spinolaes case 174 Vigilantibus non Dormientibus Leges subveniunt Co. Inst pars 1. 139. b. 1. 1 At the Common Law upon every continuance or day given over before judgement the plaintif might have been nonsuted Non-sute and therefore before the Statute of 2 H. 4. cap. 7. after verdict given if the Court gave a day to be advised at that day the plaintif was demandable and might have been Nonsuted for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. Co. l. 4. 82. b. 3. in Sir Andrew Corbets case 2 A. deviseth land to B. till 800 l. be raised for the preferment of his daughters dies C. the heir of A conceals the will enters dieth Devise Notice In this case B. shall have alloâ—ance for the time that the will was concealed but albeit B. had not notice of the will yet if a stranger had occupied the land the devisee ought to take notice of the devise at his peril for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. And in such case none is bound to give him notice Co. l. 5. 76. a. The Earl of Pembrooks case 3 Where the defendant shewes a deed to the Court Deed entred the plaintif may pray the same Term that it may be entred in haec verba And so he may demurr or take issue at his pleasure But if he neglect to pray it that term he shall never have it so entred afterwards Co. l. 7. 27. b. Sir Hugh Portmans case 4 In a Quare impedit if the plaintif be nonsute after appearance Quare Impedit or discontinue the sute that is peremptory and the defendant becomes Actor and shall immediately have a writ to the Bishop c. Co. l 6. 8. b. 1 in Ferrers case 5 At the Common Law before the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 4. Recovery by default If any had suffered a Recovery in any real action by default if he were lawfully summoned and there were no error in the proceeding he could not have the case of an Infant only excepted any remedy but by writ of right And therefore the writ of Quod ei deforceat was by that Statute given to tenant in tayl by the Curtesie in Dower and for life after recovery had against them by default F.N.B. 20 g. 6 In a writ of Error when the record is come into the Court Error if the plaintif all that Term do not assign his errors and albeit he then assign the errors yet if he do not then also sue out a Scire facias ad audiendum errores against the defendant returnable the same term or the next term following all the matter is discontinued Dyer 232. 9. 7 Eliz. 7 An Infant at full age brings an Audita querela in Chancery to avoid a recognisance in the nature of a Statute staple by him made within age Infant but because his age was to be tried by the inspection of the Court it was adjudged that it did not lie so also it had béen if he had died within age for in such case he should have brought the Audita querela before his full age Dyer 241. 48 7 Eliz. 8 A Quare Impedit issued against the Archbishop of Canterbury Quare Imp. the Bishop of Lincoln and the Incumbent who made default to the great distress whereupon the plaintif made title that he might have a writ to the Bishop and a writ was awarded to enquire de damnis de plenitudine ad cujus praesentationem quantum temporis elabitur a vacatione et quantum Ecclesia valet per annum all which points were returned by inquisition and accordingly Iudgement was given that the plaintif should recover the presentment and should have a writ to the Bishop of Lincoln and damages to the value of the Church by half a year and the defendants in misericordia Error 9 If a writ of Error be delivered to the Chief Iustice of the C. B. or the Clerk of the Treasorie there this is a Supersedeas in Law Dyer 244. 63. 8 Eliz. and a stop to award execution Howbeit if the plaintif do not crave the removal of the record before the return of the writ of Error the Iustices may then award execution Vide 6 H. 7. 16. 175 It favoureth speeding of mens Causes And therefore Protections 1 In antient time Co. Inst pars 1. 130. b. 4. when Noblemen and others purchased by Letters Patents from the King protections either Profecturae or Moraturae to go or remain beyond the Grecian sea or elsewhere they were also by other Letters Patents to purchase licence to make their general Attorneys in all Courts so as no actions or sutes should be thereby delayed which Britton commends to be bien et sagement fait fol. 282. Protection 2 In an Assise of Novel disseisin a Protection is not allowable Co. ibid. 131. a. 1. Co. l. 8. 50. a. 2 in Jehu Webbs case nor yet in a Certificate upon an Assise because an Assise is festinum remedium to restore the disseisee to his freehold whereof he is wrongfully and without Iudgement disseised And therefore in this action the defendant shall not be essoined nor pray in aid but only of the King nor vouch a stranger nor any party to the writ unless he will immediately enter into the warranty there is the same Law also of receipt neither shall the Paroll stay for the non-age either of the plaintif or defendant and in many other respects an Assise is remedium maximè festinum Dower Appeal Assise 3 In Dower Co. l. 9. 30. b. 3. in the case of the Abbot of Strata Mercella or in appeal brought by the feme of the death of her husband or in an Assise brought by a feme which was the wife of B. if the tenant or defendant plead that the baron is in full life the tryal thereof shall not be by the Iury but by the Iustices upon examination made before them and that course is taken for the greater expedition Nonage inspected 4 If the tenant in a real action vouch A. as heir within age Co. l. 9. 30. b. 4. The same case or if the tenant for life be impleaded and pray in aid of A in reversion within age and pray also that the Paroll may demurr c. In both these cases if the demandant reply that he is in full age this shall not be tried by the Country for the great delay of the demandant but a writ of Venire facias shall issue to the Sherif to bring A. before the Iustices to be inspected by them whether he be of age or no. Assise 5 Of all actions an Assise is most favoured in Law Pl. Co. 75. b. 4. Wimbish and the Lord Willoughby because it gives the most speedy remedy And therefore the Statute
of Record the lessee shall lose all advantages which are not so claimed of Record Prisoners Sherif 14 The Law hath so great a regard and care of executions Co. l. 3. 72. a. 2. in Westhies case which are the fruit and life of every sute that notwithstanding they be matters of Record and the Letters Patents granted to the new Sheriff and the writ of discharge and writ of delivery to the old Sherif yet until the prisoners are delivered unto the new Sheriff they still remain in the custody of the former Sheriff and all this to prevent a new sute and trouble for the recovery of that which is already determined by Law Sâ—ander 15 It one exhibit articles to Iustices of Peace against another Co. l. 4 14. b. 1. in Cutler Dixons case containing great abuses and misdemeanors not only touching the petitioner but many others also and all this to procure him to be bound to the good behaviour In this case the party accused for any matter contained in such articles shall not have an action upon the case because therein the party complainant pursues the ordinary course of Iustice and the Law will not permit actions in such cases lest such as have good cause of complaint should be deterred from doing it for fear of sutes and infinite vexation Common 16 In case of Common by reason of vicinage Co. l. 4. 38. b. 1. in Tirringhams case the one may inclose against the other for he that hath such a Common cannot put his cattel into the land of the other but the Cattel ought to be put into the land where they have Common and then if the Cattel stray into the other land they are excused of trespass by reason of the antient usage which the Law permits to prevent sutes which might arise if actions should be brought for every such trespass when there is no separation or inclosure betwixt their Commons Vide Co. l. 7. 5. b. Sir Miles Corbets case Execution of process 17 In all cases when the processe concerns the King Co. l. 5. 92. b. 3. in Semayns case the Sheriff or other officer upon refusal after demand to open the door may break open the door of the house or use other means to get in to doe execution But in case of a common person the Law doth not permit the Sheriff c. upon request made and denyal as aforesaid to break into the house of the defendant to execute any processe at the sute of any Subject for the great inconvenience that might ensue thereupon because if men as well in the night as in the day should have their houses which indeed are their Castles broken open upon pretence thereof great mischief and damage might fall out for by colour thereof upon any feigned sute the house of any man at any time might bâ— broken open when the defendant might be arrested elsewhere and so men should not be in safety and repose in their own houses And albeit the Sheriff be an officer of great authority and confidence yet it appears by experience that the Kings writs are many times executed and served by Bailifs wâ—o are generally persons of little or no value and therefore not to be trusted with the breaking open and ransacking of houses upon every slight occasion See Co. l. 11. 82. a. 4. Lewes Bowles case Co. l. 5. 101. b. 3. in Penruddocks case 18 If a nusance be levied to the prejudice of anothers franktenement Nusance the Law doth permit the party grieved to abate the nusance before he suffer any prejudice thereby and by that means prevent the damage before he be prejudiced by it Per Popham cum tota Curia Co. l. 5. 115. b. 3. in Folâ—ambs case 19 To prevent any further waste Waste Estrepement a writ of Estrepement lyeth in an action of waste at any time as well before Iudgement as after Iudgement and before execution Co. l. 6. 51. a. 3. in Boswels case 20 To prevent Simonie or any thing that might savour thereof Simonie the Plaintif in a Quare Impedit before the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 5. did at the Common Law recover no damages for the Law doth so abhorr Simonie that it giveth to the Patron no recompence either for his presentment or for his disturbance thereof Co. l. 6. 74. b. 2. in Sir Drue Druries case 21 In Sir Drue Druries case in the 6. Report the Iustices said Wardship Knighthood that it did behoove them to have good consideration in all cases depending before them nor only of the present case in question but likewise of the consequences thereof viz. what general prejudice might happen thereupon either to the King or the Subject So if a ward should be knighted after the grant of the wardship under the Great Seal if his knighthood might excuse him from the value of his marriage when he might be knighted not only by the King but likewise by his Lieutenants in Ireland or elsewhere this would tend very much to the damage both of the King and Subject for none would then purchase any wardship upon such uncertainties and therefore in that case his knighthood shall not excuse him from the value of his marriage which was vested in the Lord upon his ancestors death Co. l. 7. part 1. 18. b. 2. in Calvins case 22 The Common Law by inhibiting an Alien born to be capable of Inheritance in England prevents thrée great inconveniences Alien for otherwise 1. The secrets of the Nation might thereby be discovered 2. The revenues thereof being indeed the sinews of warr and the ornament of peace might be taken and enjoyed by Strangers born 3. It might at last bring the Nation to ruine and destruction 1. Tempore belli for then Strangers might fortifie themselves in the heart of the Realm not much unlike the Trojan horse in Virgil 2. Tempore Pacis for they having gotten into their hands a great part of the Inheritance of the Commonwealth and not being capable to serve of Iuries there would be a failer of Iustice c. Co. l. 9. 56. b. 2. in the Poulters case 23 To prevent mischief and oppression in the Commonwealth Conspiracy Conspirators are Inditable by the Common Law albeit they put nothing in execution by any overt act as if they shall be found guilty of conspiring to indict and acquit any though they put nothing thereof in ure Co. l. 9. 69. â— 4. in Mackallyes case 24 To prevent escapes upon arrests Arrests the Law doth not enjoyn a Serjeant or Bailif sworn and commonly known though not by the party arrested to shew his mace or warrant nor a special Bailif to shew his warrant without demand lest in the mean time the party arrested may escape but it shall be warning and warrant enough to say I Arrest you Things in action 25 To prevent multiplication of controversies and
such protections must be therein expressed to the end it may appear to the Court that they are granted pro negotiis regni et pro bono publico And these protections are not allowable only for men of full age but for men within age and for women as necessary attendants upon the Camp and that in thrée cases Quia Lotrix seu Nutrix seu Obstetrix Co. ibid. 131. b. 2. 12 Treasure is one of the chiefest supports of a Commonwealth Protection And therefore the King who is the Head of the Commonwealth is regularly by his prerogative to be preferred in payment of his duty or debt by his debtor before any subject albeit the Kings debt or duty be the later upon which ground it is that the King may grant his debtor a protection cum clausula volumus to protect him from the sutes and actions of other Creditors And the reason hereof is for that Thesaurus Regis est fundamentum belli firmamentum pacis But this Law is somewhat altered by the Statute of 25 E. 3. cap. 19. quod vide Co. ibid. 132. b. 3. If a Monk be a farmer of the King yielding a rent Monk he shall have an action concerning that farm because the Kings revenue is also the revenue of the Commonwealth Co. ibid. 133. a. 4. 13 By the Common Law the wife of the King of England is an exempt person from the King Queen and is capable of lands or tenements of the gift of the King as no other feme covert is and is of ability and capacity without the King to grant and to take to sue and be sued as a feme sole at the Common Law for the wisdom of the Law would not have the King whose continual care and study is for the publique circa ardua regni to be troubled and disquieted with such private and petty causes Co. ibid. 149. a. 2. Co. ibid. 149. b. 2. 14 If the tenant holdeth by fealty and a bushel of wheat Service Tenant or a pound of Cumin or pepper or the like and the Lord purchaseth part of the land there shall be an apportionment as well as if the rent were in money yet if the rent were by one grain of wheat one séed of Cumin one pepper Corn a horse or any other intire service by purchase of part the whole should be extinct Howbeit if such an intire service be pro bono publico as Knight service Castle-guard Cornage c. for the defence of the Realm or to repair a bridge or way to keep a Beacon or to keep the Kings Records or for avancement of Iustice and peace as to aid the Sheriff or to be Constable of England albeit the Lord purchaseth part yet the intire service remains See Bruertons case Co. l. 6. 1. b. 4. Jo. Talbots l. 8. 105. b. 4. Authority 15 If a man make a Letter of Attorney to two to do any act Co. ibid. 181 b. 3. if one of them die the survivor shall not do it but if a Venire facias be awarded to four Coroners to impannel and return a Iury and one of them die yet the other shall execute and return the same because it is for the execution of Iustice and by consequent pro bono publico so if a charter of feoffment be made and a Letter of Attorney to four or thrée joyntly and severally to deliver seisin two of them cannot make livery because it is neither by them four or three joyntly nor by any of them severally But if the Sheriff upon a Capias directed to him make a warrant to four or thrée joyntly or severally to arrest the defendant two of them may arrest him for the reason aforesaid and for the same reason such an act shall be more favourably expounded than a private one for Iura publica ex privato promiscua decidi non debent Tenants in Common and Joyntenants 16 If there be two tenants in Common of a Manor Co. ibid. 200. a. 3. c. to which waif and stray doth belong a stray happens they are tenants in Common thereof And yet if one of them take the stray the other hath no remedy by action but to take it again unless they have a prescription to take strayes by turns Howbeit if there be two tenants in Common of a Dove-house and the one wholly destroyes the flight or of a folding and one disturbs the other to erect hurdles In these cases an action of trespass lyeth against the other because they are offences committed in prejudice of the Commonwealth If two several owners of houses have a River in common betwéen them and the one corrupts the River the other shall have an action upon his case against his companion So if there be two tenants in Common or Iointenants of an house or Mill and it fall into decay and the one is willing to repair it and the other will not he that is willing shall have a writ de reparatione facienda and the writ saith Ad reparationem et sustentationem ejusdem domus teneantur whereby it appeareth that owners are in such case bound pro bono publico to maintain houses and mills which are for the habitation and use of men Offices 17 Non-user of it self without some special damage is no forfeiture of Private offices as the Kéepership of Park or the like Co. ibid. 233. a. 4. But Non-user of Publique offices which concern the administration of Iustice or the Commonwealth is of it self a cause of forfeiture Repair by the lessee 18 In many cases a tenant for life or years may fell down timber to make reparations albeit he be not compellable thereunto Co. ibid. 54. b. 2. and shall not be punished for the same in any action of waste As if an house be ruinous at the time of the lease made if the lessée suffer the house to fall down he is not punishable for he is not bound by Law to repair the house in that case and yet if he cut down timber upon the ground so letten and repair it he may well justifie it And the reason is for that the Law doth favour the supportation and maintenance of houses which were ordained for the habitation of Mankind and are by consequent beneficial to the Commonwealth And therefore if the lessor by his Covenant undertake to repair the house yet the lessee if the lessor doth it not may with the timber growing upon the ground repair it though he be not compellable thereunto In like manner if a man make a lease of an house and land without impeachment of waste for the house yet may the lessée with the timber upon the ground repair the house though he may utterly waste it if he will and so it is in many other cases for the reason above alleged Co. l. 4. 14 b. 1. Cutle◠and Dixons case 19 If a man exhibit articles to Iustices of
Peace against another Slander containing divers great abuses and misdemeanors to the intent to have him bound to the good behaviour In this case the party accused shall not have for any matter contained in such Articles any action upon the case because he hath pursued the ordinary course of Iustice in such case provided And if actions shall be permitted in such cases they who have just cause to complain would not dare to make such complaint Co. ibid. Siâ— R ch Buckleys case for fear of infinite vexation So if a man had exhibited a Bill in the Star-chamber against another containing divers scandalous accusations albeit they were false yet no action upon the case would lie for them if they were examinable in that Court because the procéeding was in a Course of Iustice whereunto the Law giveth favour because it tends to the good of the Commonwealth See Dyer 11 Eliz. 285. pl. 37. Co. l. 4. 37. a. 2. in Tirringhams case 20 In antient time when a Lord enfeoffed another of arable land Tillage to hold of him in Socage viz. per servitium Socae the feoffée ad manutenendum servitium Socae had Common in the wasts of the Lord for his necessary Cattel that gained and compossed the land not only because that liberty was tacite implyed in the feoffment for he could not plow and compass the land without cattel and they could not live without pasture to sustain them but such Common appendant was principally given him for the maintenance advancement of tillage which is much regarded and favoured in Law because it is one of the chiefest supports of the Commonwealth so as such Common appendant is of Common right and began by operation of Law and in favour of tillage and therefore needs not prescription as it was held in 4 H. 6. 22 H. 6. which it ought to have if it were against common right Howbeit it is only appendant to the antient arable Hyde and Gaine and only for horses and oxen to plow the land and for Cows and Sheep to manure it And all this for the melioration and advancement of tillage as aforesaid And with this agrees 37 H. 6. 34. per tot Cur. and 29 H. 8. 4. Co. l. 4. 124 b. 2 in Bâ—verleys case 21 No felony or murder can be committed without a felonious intent and purpose Nam ideo dicta est felonia Non compos mentis quia fieri debet felleo animo And therefore a Mad man cannot commit felony because he cannot have a felonious intent so likewise if a feme Non compos mentis kill her husband it cannot be Petty treason Howbeit in some cases Non compos mentis may commit high treason as if he kill or offer to kill the King that is high Treason For the King est Caput et salus Reipublicae a capite bona valetudo transit in omnes and for that cause their persons are so sacred that no man ought to offer them violence and if he do he is Reus criminis Laesae Majestatis Co. l 5. 63. a 2. in the Chamberlâ—â—n of Londons case 23 The Inhabitants of a Town without any custom may make Ordinances or By-laws for the repair of the Church By-Lawes or of an High-way or any other such thing which is generally for the good of the Commonwealth and in such case the greater part shall bind all without any custom Vide 44 E. 3. 19. Also Corporations may make Ordinances or Constitutions without custom or the Kings charter for things which concern the Commonwealth as reparations of the Church common High-ways or the like Vide 8. E. 2. Assise 413. 21 E. 4. 54. 11 H. 7. 13. 21 H. 7. 20 40. Co. l. 5. 63. â— 4. 23 The Act of the Common Councel of London for bringing of Cloth to Blackwell-Hall to be searched Constitutions and the imposition of a penny for tallage upon every Cloth were adjudged lawfull constitutions because they were beneficial to the Commonwealth and not for any privat profit Constitutions 24 In 37 Eliz. 1695. The Term being appointed to be kept at St. Albons Co. l. 5. 64. a. Clerks case a Constitution was made there for the assessing of a sum of money for the preparing of Courts and other necessaries for the Term and every Inhabitant was enjoyned to pay his respective assesment on pain of imprisonment Clerk an Alderman who also consented to the assessment refused to pay his proportion and thereupon being imprisoned by the Mayor did bring an Action of false Imprisonment against the Mayor and had judgement to recover because the Constitution was against Magna Charta cap. 29. Nullus liber homo imprisonetur c. Howbeit if the Constitution had béen upon a pein of a reasonable sum of money and distress or action of debt for the recovery thereof the Mayor might have justified the distress or action because it was pro bono publico that the Town should make provision for the Term and the rather for that E. 6. who did incorporate them had granted them power to make Ordinances Albeit Corporations within time c. cannot have that privilege but by Parliament when it is pro commodo privato See Co. l. 8. 127. b. Penalties of Statutes not transferrable 25 When a Statute is made by Parliament for the publique good of the Realm Co. l. 7. 36. b. 3. in the cases of Penal Statutes the King cannot give the penalty or benefit thereof to any subject or give him power to dispence with it or to make a warrant to the Great Seal for licenses in such case to be made for when a Statute is made pro bono publico and the King as the head of the Commonwealth and the Fountain of Iustice and Mercy is by all the Realm trusted with it this confidence and trust is so inseparably annexed to the Royal person of the King in so high a point of Soveraignty that he cannot transferr it to the disposition or power of any private person or to any private use because it is committed to the King by all his Subjects for the Common good and if he might grant the penalty of one Act he may also grant the penalty of two and so in infinitum Dangerous to have London too populous 26 The Custom in London that a Foreiner shall not sell by retail Co. l. 8. 127. b. 2. in the case of the City of London was adjudged good because it was beneficial not only for the Citizens but likewise for the whole Commonwealth for that it would prevent the confluence of people from all parts of the realm to London which confluence might produce 3. great inconveniences 1. Impoverishment of all the good Towns in England 2. Depopulation of Towns in every Country 3. Destruction in the end of all trades and tradesmen in every part of the Realm Besides it might be a means to increase
certain of their friends to make partition between them who make partition of the Rooms and Chambers of the Castle assigning some to one and some to another c. this Partition is void because a Castle which is to be kept intire pro bono publico and for the safeguard of the Commonwealth will not admit of any such division albeit such a partition of other lands that are partable had been good in Law and binding to the Coparceners after election of their several Parts Co. ibid. 31. b. 3. Dower Neither shall such a Castle be assigned for Dower albeit the parties consent thereunto because the publique shall be preferred before the privat Co. l. 7. 23. a. 3. Buts case 2 A. seised of black acre in fee Rent out of a lease for years and also possessed of white acre for years grants a rent charge out of both to B. for his life with Clause of Distress c. In this case the estate of the rent being a Franktenement according to the purport of the deed cannot issue out of the term for years but out of the land only which the grantor had in fee-simple because the Franktenement of the rent cannot issue out of a Chattel and the intire rent cannot be Franktenement out of black acre and a chattel out of white acre and to make two rents when one only is granted would be injurious Neither yet can the contract and mutual agreement of the parties charge such a thing with a rent which is not chargeable by Law as out of an Hundred or Advowson 30 Ass Pl. 5. or out of a Fair 14 E. 3. Scire facias 122. The Earl of Kents case Neither can a rent be granted or reserved of any estate of Franktenement out of any other Franktenement which is not mainourable either in possession reversion or by possibility but is only haereditamentum incorporeum for Pacta privata non derogant juri communi And in an Assise they cannot be put in view neither can any distress be taken in them And in the case above albeit white acre be haereditamentum corporeum and mainourable yet in respect of the exility and incapacity of the interest which the grantor hath in it that rent of Franktenement cannot issue out of it but out of the land in fee simple And in that case also in an Assise brought for the rent the land in fee shall be only put in view And if the Grantee should accept a lease or grant of white acre that will not suspend his rent Co. l. 9. 128. a. 4. in Sondayes case 3. Term. Hill 8. Iac. it was resolved by the two Chief Iustices Recovery Title the Chief Baron and the Court of Wards that no condition or limitation be it by act execute or limitation and use or by devise in a last will can barr tenant in tail to alien by a Common recovery for the causes and reasons reported at large in Sir Anthony Mildmayes case in the 6. Report Co. l. 9. 141. b 3. in Beaumonts case 4 If there be Lord and tenant of a Carue of land Confirmation and the tenant hath issue and is attainted of felony and the King pardons him and after the Lord confirms the estate of the tenant and the tenant dies In this case the Lord shall have the land against his own confirmation for the confirmation cannot add to the estate of the tenant a descendible quality to him who was disabled to take the land by descent For Pacta privata juri publico derogare non possunt The like 5 Baron and feme being tenants in special tail Co. ibid. 138. b. 141. b 4. the remainder to the heirs of the Baron the Baron levies a fine to E. 6. who grants to the Earl of Hunt in fee the Baron dies and the Feme enters and the E. of H. confirms her estate Habendum to her and the heirs of the body of the Baron then the Feme dies having issue a son In this case the confirmation is void for it cannot add a descendible quality to the issue in tail who was disabled by the fine to take by descent Again if that confirmation should add to the estate of the feme a descendible quality it would in effect as to that point repeal no less than two Acts of Parliament viz. 4 H. 7. 24. and 32 H. 8. 36. by which the estate in tail is barred as to the issues and the issues are disabled to claim the Land by force of the said estate tail Sed Pacta privata c. Common Recovery 6 Tenant in tail cannot be prohibited by any condition or limitation to barr the issues in tail as also the reversions or remainders Co. l. 10. 38. b. 1. 4. Mary Portingtons case by suffering a Common Recovery much less can he be prohibited to prevent by any such condition or limitation a going about conclusion or agréement to suffer such a recovery for to suffer such a recovery to the purposes aforesaid is an incident so inseparably annexed to an estate tail that it cannot possibly be prohibited by any such condition limitation or other agréement whatsover between the Parties Conventio privatorum non potest c. So likewise Dower or tenancy by the Curtesie cannot be restrained by condition because they are annexed to the estate tail by Law no more than a tenant by the Curtesie or tenant in tail after possibility can be by condition made punishable for waste Also things ordained by Statute cannot be restrained by condition c. as that the tenant in tail shall make no leases according to the Statute of 32 H. 8. 28. or levy a fine according to the Statutes of 4 H. 7. 24. 32 H. 8. 36. to barr the issues for none of these which are incident to his estate by Act of Parliament can be restrained by condition or limitation Auditors of the Wards 7 The King himself cannot do any thing against an Act of Parliament when the subject hath also an interest in it Co. l. 11. 3. b. 4 in Auditor Curles case And therefore albeit the words of the grant to the two persons ordained by the Statute of 32 H. 8. 46. to be Auditors of the Court of Wards be conjunctim divisim et alterius eorum diutius viventis yet that being an office of trust there shall be no survivor thereof for that it being enacted by that Statute that there should be two persons c. which should have a judicial voice the King cannot constitute one only for the Subject by the Act hath interest therein Et securius expediuntur negotia commissa pluribus Howbeit the King may constitute one at one time by one patent and another at another time by another patent And albeit he may so do yet he who is first constituted hath not any judicial voice until the other be constituted also for it is provided by the Statute
Law since the making of the same Act did in the said 12 year of E. 4. give judgment that in such case an estate tail should be barred And in Scholasticaes case in 12 Eliz. Pl. Com. 403. it was not thought fit to stand with the honour and gravity of the Court that the question concerning the restraint of a Common recovery which had béen so often debated and resolved should be once moved Vide supra 6. Co. l. 11. 87. a. 3. in the case of Monopolies 9 The Queen grants to one of the Privy Chamber the only making Monopolies and importation of Cards This was adjudged a Monopoly and therefore void and one of the reasons was because the grant was primae Impressionis for no such was ever seen to pass by Letters Patents under the Great seal to that very day And therefore because it was a dangerous Innovation without president or authority of Law or Reason and the Queen deceived in their grant it was adjudged void Dyer 135. 15. 3 4. P. M. 10 A Dedimus Potestatem was granted to Iustice Saunders to receive an Attorney for the defendant in a Quid juris clamat Quid juris clamat but because there could be found no former president for it it was with much difficulty and after long debate allowed by the Iudges and that upon great necessity and weakness of the party 205 Communis Error facit Jus. Co. Inst 1. 52. b. 2. 1 In a deed of feoffment beginning with Omnibus Christi fidelibus Livery by Attorney c. or Sciant omnes per praesentes c. or the like a Letter of Attorney may be contained for one continent may contain divers deeds to several persons But if it be by indenture between the feoffor on the one part and the feoffee on the other part there a Letter of Attorny in such a deed is not good unless the Attorney be made a party in the deed indented howbeit because it hath been commonly used to insert it in the Indenture without making the Attorny party thereunto it hath been permitted to pass but the other way is safest and more legal Communis Error facit Jus. Co. l. 6. 67. a. 4 in Sir Moâ—â—â—inches case 2 Where it is required by the Statute of 1 H. 5. 5. that in every writ original c. in which Exigent shall be awarded Additions Stat. 1 H. 5. Additions should be given to the defendants of their estate degree mystery c. It so fell out that one who was by birth but a Yeoman was commonly called Gentleman And in that case in such a writ brought against him he may have the Addition of Gentleman albeit in truth he is no Gentleman but only by vulgar reputation for in as much as the intention of the Act is that he should have such a name by which he may be known it is sufficient to satisfie the Act of Parliament for Communis error c. 206 So doth a Custom which is reasonable unreasonable contra Co. Inst â—pars 1. 59 b. 4 1 Of fines due to the Lord by the Copyholder Copyhold fines some be by the Change or alteration of the Lord and some by the Change or alteration of the tenant the change of the Lord ought to be by the act of God otherwise no fine can be due but by the change of the tenant either by the act of God or the act of the party a fine may be due for if the Lord do challenge a Custom within his Manor to have a fine of every of his Copyholders of the said Mannor at the alteration or change of the Lord of the Mannor be it by alienation demise death or otherwise This is a custom both against the Law and Reason as to the alteration or change of the Lord by the Act of the party for by that means the Copyholders may be oppressed by multitude of fines by the Act of the Lord But when the change groweth by the Act of God there the custom is good as by the death of the Lord And this was resolved upon a Case in Chancery by all the Iudges and Serjeants of Serjeants Inn in Fleetstreet Trin. 39 Eliz. and so certified into that Court But upon the change or alteration of the Tenant a fine is due unto the Lord because that custom is reasonable 2 Of fines taken of Copyholders some be certain by custom and some be uncertain The like but that fine although it be uncertain Co. ibid. yet ought it to be rationabilis and that reasonablenesse shall be discussed by the Iustices upon the true circumstances of the Case appearing unto them And if the Court where the cause dependeth adjudgeth the fine exacted unreasonable then is not the Copyholder compellable to pay it And so it was adjudged P. 1 Iac. C. B. rot 1845. for all excessiveness is abhorred in Law 3 In former times it hath been doubted whether or no if a Copyholder had béen ousted by his Lord Copyhold custom he might have any other remedy therein than only to sue to his Lord by petition for it seems Co. ibid. 60. b. 3. Littl. §. 77. that if the Copyholder might have any other remedy he could not be properly said to be Tenant at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the manor But Magistra rerum experientia hath made this cléer and without question that the Lord cannot at his pleasure put out the lawful Copyholder without some cause of forfeiture and if he do the Copyholder may have an Action of Trespasse against him For albeit he be tenens ad voluntatem Domini yet it is secundum consuetudinem manerii And Britton saith speaking of these kind of Tenants Et ascuns gents sont qui tout franks de sank et tenent terre de nous en villeynage et sont proprement nos sokemans Britton fo 163. Co. ibid. 140. a. 3. et ceux sout priviledges en ties manere que nul ne les doit ouster de tiels tene ments taut come ils font les services que a lour tenements appendant et nul ne poit lour services accressre ne changer a faire autres services ou plus autrement que ils ne solaient And herewith agreeth Sir Robert Danby Cl. Inst of the C. Pl. M. 7 E. 4. 19. and Sir Thomas Brian his Successor M. 21 E. 4. 80. That the Copyholder doing his customs and services if he be put out by his Lord shall have an Action of trespasse against him Consuetudo 4 Consuetudo contra rationem introducta potius usurpatio quam consuetudo appellari debet Again Co. ibid. 113. a 4. Consuetudo ex certa causa rationabili usitata privat communem Legem And Consuetudo praescripta et legitima vincit legem Villeinage fine to mary 5 All customs and prescriptions that are against reason are void Co. ibid. 139. b. 4. Littl.