Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n great_a place_n see_v 2,893 5 3.1798 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A80626 A modest and cleer ansvver to Mr. Ball's discourse of set formes of prayer. Written by the reverend and learned John Cotton, B.D. and teacher of the Church of Christ at Boston in New-England. Published for the benefit of those who desire satisfaction in that point Cotton, John, 1584-1652. 1642 (1642) Wing C6444; ESTC R212884 45,765 95

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

forms or manners of worship which are not instituted in his word Hence conformity to Idolaters in cutting their hair and beards is forbidden Levit. 19.27 Hence preaching in the wisdome of words or in carnall eloquence is forbidden as a painted Image against the second Commandement 1 Cor. 21. Hence Prayer towards the East falleth under the same reproof Hence the incense of Uzzia the strange fire of Nadab and Abihu the striking of the rock by Moses in the Wildernesse of Sin the Love-Feasts brought into the Lords Supper And many more such like forms and manners of Gods worship are forbidden in the Word as divers from the rule and pattern held forth in the second Commandement as it is opened and illustrated by these and such like examples in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles we are not ignorant that there is also a sinfull form and manner of worship which is forbidden in the third Commandement as when we worship God unreverently or droufily but that is rather Ro. modus colendus then modus cultus To apply then to this Rule and Commandement of God these set forms of Prayer devised by men and prescribed to be read out of a Book and so taken up by one Church from another as the forms of their worship and the helps of their devotion We find no Commandement nor Pattern for them in the Word nor any promise for their acceptance They are injoyned for helps and means of Gods worship which God hath not sanctified and for forms of worship which God hath not acknowledged and therefore we know not how to excuse them from sin against the true meaning of the second Commandement Object If it be said that it was granted before in stating the Question that in reading a Prayer penned by another man say one of Calvins Prayers after his Lectures a man may be so affected with it as that his heart going along therewith he may convey his own desires and Petitions to God in reading thereof and so make it his own Prayer though devised by another and read out of a Book Answ We grant that a man may make use of another mans penned Prayers read in private not only for an example or instruction how to pray but also occasionally for his present Prayer If he find the Petitions sutable to his present occasions Yea we grant further that in case one Church should send letters to another Church and in the end thereof should conclude with some Prayer suitable to the state of the Church to whom they write we doubt not but that the Church to whom the letters are sent finding the Petitions suitable to their condition may lawfully go along therewith in spirit and in the end say Amen thereto and so make it their own Prayer But yet here be two things different from the case in hand First They that penned such Prayers did not prescribe them as forms of Prayer for the brethren to use left them freely to their liberty 2. They that take them up occasionally for their present use and make them their Prayers they do not set them apart to be read for their ordinary Prayers either in publique or in private which seemeth to us a matter of weighty consideration and maketh a great difference in the cause in hand to clear it by a familiar instance A man passing through a burying place may see a dead mans scalp cast up and thereby take occasion from the present object to meditate for the present on his mortality and to prepare for like change but if he shall take up and keep that dead mans scalpe in his Closet or Bed chamber to be an ordinary help to him to put him in mind daily of his mortality Now in so doing he maketh an Image of it to himself by setting it a part to be an help to him in Gods worship which not being sanctified and set a part by God for that end it now becomes a sin to him against the second Commandement in the former case he took occasion to fall into a present good meditation of mortality by the present sight of an object of mortaliy as it was set before him occasionally by Gods providence wherein he did well according to the second Commandement not to passe by such a passage of Gods providence in vain But in the latter case in setting it a part to be an ordinary help to him in such meditations or injoyning the same to others He in so doing maketh it to him and them an Image it not being instituted or sanctified by God but devised and set apart by man for such a spirituall end which is forbidden in the second Commandement If it be said again when I read Prayer and sind some Petitions therein that sute well with my estate I may not only then use them for my present Prayer but may again and again ordinarily make use thereof in my own Prayers Answ We deny not that but it is one thing to take up a Petition or two or more and to insert them here and there into mine own Prayers and another thing to take up a whole intire prayer or form of prayer and use it ordinarily as mine own see the like in Preaching I may make use of a sentence or two or more here and there out of another mans Sermon and it may be inculcate the same again and again in many Sermons together of my own But I may not therefore take up a whole Sermon penned by another and preach it for mine own though it were never so fit for my Text and for mine own Congregation Whence also another reason and in our apprehension of just weight may be alledged against the ordinary use of set forms of Prayers devised by others If every Minister be to edifie the Church by the dispensation of his own tallents and gifts as well in prayer as in preaching Then he may not pray another mans penned prayer no more then preach another mans penned Sermon but the former is true 1 Cor. 12.7 Acts 6.4 Eph. 4.8.11 12 13. therefore the latter 3. Let me adde a third reason If I may worship God in the congregation with a set form of prayer read out of a book then I may bring into the Church another book besides the book of God to be read ordinarily for the publique edification of the Church But we know no warrant for the use of any book in the Church to be read ordinarily for the publique edification of the Church besides the book of God to bring into the Church any other book besides Gods is like the bringing in of another Altar into the Temple of the Lord and set it up besides the Altar of the Lord which did in time thrust the Altar of the Lord to stand behind and give place and at length to be laid aside 2 Kings 16.14 15. I need not apply it experience goeth far enough in applying of it If it be an unsanctified way of preaching to fill a Sermon with
the last Besides the common daily blessings which the Discourser instanceth in as faith patience meeknesse love sanctification of Gods name Coming of Christs Kingdome the state of these things doth ever and anon vary and to bind a mans selfe daily to a set form of prayer for such things as the state whereof is so daily varied will bring in a loose and Incongruous kind of prayers fit only for those that do not discern or are not affected with the present state of things either in themselves or others When it is said if it be lawfull to pronounce a set form of prayer then to read it If the meaning be to read it for a prayer the consequence is not firm for though as the Discourser saith the reading of prayer is not impure Yet the praying of read prayers is the using of such a Crutch to pray as he speaketh which God hath not appointed and that maketh such reading impure And though pronouncing cannot make an evill matter good nor simply reading make a good matter evill yet reading to such an end reading a set form of prayer prescribed to me for my prayer maketh to me a Will-worship of that which he that conceived the prayer might lawfully have pronounced The pronouncing of a good Sermon by him that made it is a good and acceptable service to God and his Church But to read a Sermon as my preaching which was made by another maketh it neither so acceptable to God nor to his Church yea the reading of a mans own Sermon instead of preaching will much detract from the life and power of it and make a man of God unserviceable for his place Though reading and pronouncing of a thing be both of them adjuncts and common adjuncts too to that which is pronounced or read yet according to the ends and subjects to which they may be applyed the one may be lawfull the other not indifferent but sinfull the reading of a Sermon for preaching is a sinfull manner of preaching The difference will ever hold between the word read and preached They are two distinct Ordinances CHAP. IX Answering unto the eight Reason THe Jewes before the coming of Christ used a prescript form of Prayer as it is probable and the learned note in the celebration of the Passover and that which they used as is very probable was approved by Christ himself Answ That the Jewes before the coming of Christ did use certain Rites in keeping the Passover It doth appear by the Testimonies alledged as also by Causabon and others And that some forms of Prayer they used according as the severall passages of the Passeover required But it doth not at all appear that they used any set forms of Prayer but onely to that and the like effect and that not by Prescript or Injunction from one to another but leaving every father of a family at his liberty therein much lesse will it appear that our Lord Jesus Christ took up any set forms of Prayer by their example and least of all from their Injunction CHAP. X. Giving Answer to the ninth Reason Disc ALL the reformed Churches at this day do not only tollerate but approve a set form of Liturgie c. Answ We count it a safe course to bewail our own sins and the sins of our fathers whereby we have polluted the holy things of God more or lesse rather than to justifie our own alterations from the rule by their presidents ●reat cause we have to blesse the Lord for the ●reat light which the instruments whom God ●●ed in reforming all Protestant Churches brought into the dark world and left behind them and yet it is well known in some thing or other all of them more or lesse failed and it is more wonder they should see so much truth out of the midst of darknesse then that they who saw so much should fail in any thing but whereinsoever they failed the generation that have come after them have too closely and ungodly stuck to their examples yea and have been more zealous in the defence thereof than have sought to perfect what they less defective yet this we may truly affirm that we know none of all the reformed forraign Churches that do prescribe a set form of Prayer with necessity to be observed but leave their Minister at liberty to use the same or some other form to the like effect at their own direction which taketh off a great part of sin and burthen of set forms God knoweth how to passe by the remnant of iniquity of the transgression of them that seek him in truth although all the high places be not taken away 2 Chron 15.17 The Lord did not so look at their high places as to reject his people for Idolaters or Superstitious Persons when they sought him in truth of heart though in high places neither yet would he justifie their high places to after Ages by the example and authority of their Ancestors farre be it from us to censure the present Churches of obstinacy who have persisted in the presidents left by our holy ancestors those first reformed yet neither may we be so unfaithfull as to sowe Pillowes under the Elbows no not of publique Churches who knoweth not they have all been more studious and tenacious of what form the doctrine and worship and discipline was left unto them then inquisitive after farther light yea sometimes more inclinable to look back into Aegypt than to hasten towards Canaan it is true we have cause to suspect our selves of error rather than so many glorious lights of former and present times to wit if our faith were built upon our selves we should prefer their judgements and testimony before our own but seeing our faith resteth only on the word of the Lord and his Spirit breathing therein and the Word hath promised more and more light shall break forth in these times till Antichrist be utterly consumed and abolished we shall sin against the Grace and Word of truth if we confine our truth either to the Divines of present or former ages Disc Be that all the Churches may erre in this yet I hope no moderate man can censure them of obstinacy as men not willing to consent to the truth shewed and manifested how then cometh it to passe that none of them hitherto have subscribed to this opinion and to the practice of our brethren of the Separation The true Churches of God cannot erre fundamentally nor obstinately against knowledge but how can they be freed from one of these let the opposites themselves judge Answ Though we do not believe as you do that the true Churches of Christ cannot erre fundamentally but doe conceive for a time they may as the Church of Israel in the golden Calfe and afterwards more dangerously in the crucifying of Christ and many Christian Churches almost all in that time when Hierome complaineth the whole world was become an Arian yet we do not look at the reading of devised prescript forms as a