Diuinity the one e De Verilate of the Truth the other f Pro veritate for the Truth both are coupled together as it were by a sacred Wedlocke and necessary for the through handling of Divinity Wee haue layde downe and confirmed the Doctrine of the Truth or the nature of every common Place by Definition where eyther it might or should be done and an Analyticall Explication of the same by Causes but haue concluded the confutation of falshood with an Appendix or Addition of generall Solutions and Distinctions every one of which wee haue opposed against each Argument of Bellarmine where the place hath beene in Controversie with the Papists in the same order as they are by him laid downe in the places noted And so having passed through the whole course of our fore-determined Iourney we are come at length to the wished Goale and haue finished both the partes of Theology as it were in a Platform One thing remayned that I being privy to my selfe of mine owne Infancy should intreat pardon of my Auditors for mine ignorance and excuse those things which were spokeÌ„ and delivered by me with honest silence so commit and commend them to their private curtesie censure and consideration And I had so done had not both the publicke respect of my Theologicall study and the private conscience of my Duty besides the importunate intreaties of friendes as it were wringed from me the Edition or publication hereof In so great a plenty of so many Theologicall Bookes and common Places the Students of Divinity haue of long time complayned of scarsity and that not without cause for the Writers and Authors of common Places who are in vse amongst young Students doe eyther with their prolixitie delay the speedy longer then is meet or with their overmuch brevity eyther compell them to runne backe the same way of doctrine too often with loathing or barre them from the other which is by way of reprooving with danger Hence it is that the fervour of Study waxeth faint and before it be liuely oftentimes waxeth old It was therefore long ago both my desire and the desire of all that are studious in sacred Theology that both parts of Divinity might be contracted and brought into a compendious Breviary by a Scholasticall and Methodicall discourse which wile I wished and waited for from others who abound both in leysure and Learning it seemed good vnto i me to publish this our Booke as a witnesse of our common desire that as a fore-runner it might invite and provoke those great wittes whereof this age is most fruitefull to accomplish the same Which if I shall obtayne I verily professe that I haue receyved a plentifull fruit of this my labour the meane while I trust if as I would request that those things whereof I am ignorant might bee imparted vnto me without concealing of arrrogancy so it shall be likewise acceptable that I impart those few things which I know vnto them that are desirous thereof Moreover whereas the profession of the handling of common places was committed vnto mee and the explication of them was now at length to be taken in hand againe I thought good not onely to ease my Auditors from a trouble of writing but also to lay forth as in a Table to their memory and eyes what hereafter they ought to expect from me haue withall as a guide in the way with the finger pointed at the matter to shew vnto the studious the way and that the readiest way to the Doctrinall and reprooving Knowledge of Theologie Now vnto you Right Honourable I offer and consecrate of due right and desert these first fruites of my profession such as they are as the young tender seedes of my Theologicall Harvest which first sprung vp in your field and afterwardes through your courteous favour attayned vnto some maturity both that I may testifie and shew some proofe of my thankefull heart by this taske of duety and especially that yee may the more stirre vp your loving favours and my studies and so yeelde your selues to be my forwarders and stout protectors against the barking mouthes of the malevolent And so I hope and trust in the Lord you will vnto whome I pray Right Honourable that he will prosper the course of all your Councels and very long preserue you in a safe and flourishing Estate for the good of this Vniversity and Common-wealth Lugd. Bat. the 7 of August 1604. To your Honors most devoted LVCAS TRELCATIVS L. F. THE TABLE OF the Contents of the First BOOKE OF the Principles of Sacred Divinity Cap. 1 Of the Word of God Cap. 2 Of God and his Attributes Cap. 3 The Contents of the second Booke OF the workes of God or causes of Mans Salvation Cap. 1 Of Predestination Cap. 2 Of Creation Cap. 3 Of Providence Cap. 4 Of the Works of Grace or of Redemption Cap. 5 Of the Person of Christ Cap. 6 Of the Office of Christ Cap. 7 Of the Calling of Man vnto Salvation Cap. 8 Of Mans Iustification before God Cap. 9 Of the Covenant of God Cap. 10 Of Sacraments in Generall Cap. 11 Of Baptisme Cap. 12 Of the Lords Supper Cap. 13 Of the Church Cap. 14 The Contents of the Third BOOKE OF Man and his Divers Estates Cap. 1 Of the State of Man in his Integrity Cap. 2 Of the Corrupted State of Man Cap. 3 Of Sinne. Cap. 4 Of Free-will Cap. 5 Of Faith Cap. 6 Of Good Workes Cap. 7 Of the State of Man after this Life Cap. 8 REader for a Booke of this quantity and quality to bee without faults is almost impossible yet better is it by much that they be noted wherby they may be amenâ—d then that they should cause an error for want of correâ—â—ion Were the Subiect of the Booke light Faults were â—sse materiall but because it concerneth Gods speciall â—ory and mans salvation They are of greater consequence 〈◊〉 point onely or a letter may eyther obscure the meaning 〈◊〉 quite invert it Wherefore as I haue taken paines to colâ—ct the chiefe so I pray thee in thine own booke before thou â—eade it amend them thus Page Line Errata Correction 9 10 or Principles principles 24 19 perfect and more Perfect and no â—bid 24 mediate immediate 33 5 Principle prescriptions Principles 68 3 actuall and actuall And 74 4 are onely one onely 80 2 Beginning of Principles of 88 3 combine continue 102 15 motions notions 212 8 receyved perceyved 231 8 righteousnes vnrighteousnes 237 16 thereof therefore of 241 6 from the for the 351 16 in that That 448 25 followeth floweth Fol. 23 in former inferiour 543 7 and excelent excelent 554 1 doe vnderstand doe not vnderstand A Scholasticall and Methodicall Institution of the common Places of Divinitie INtending to lay open in a briefe and Schoole Methode a Theologicall institutioÌ„ we will premise two thinges in stead of a Preface or introduction thereunto The one of Divinitie it selfe and of the Nature
God is a substance without composition of matter and forme with out quality good true iust c. without quality or bound exceeding great and incomprehensible without motion or action without passion pittifull without scituation of place most present without time the first and the last without habite or addition the Lord of all thinges for all the properties are affirmed of God Essentially and that both formally and in the abstract because of the individuall perfection of the Essence as also subiectiuely and in the concreate because of the verity of God existing Of these properties some doe note out vnto vs the Essence as it were a Priori partly Negatiuely as Infinitiues and partly Affirmatiuely as simplicity some other as it were a Posteriori and that partly Properly as those thinges which are in GOD principally and by themselues as Power Knowledge Will partly improperly as those thinges which are spoken of God Metaphorically or by way of translation or according to the similitude of a humane passion or affection as Loue Anger c. Those which are in God a Priori are given to God one and onely according to his Essence Action and Vse and they are sayed to be incommunicable as Simplicity Infinitiues Simplicity is in God altogether Indivisible and Absolute admitting no either diversity or composition of parts or accidents neyther in himselfe nor in the persons nor in his workes not in himselfe because God is the same that his Essence is and his Essence is the same that the being of God is m Eph. 5.26 1 Ioh. 1.7 for God is the principall first and pure acte of whom all things are wrought and by whom all thinges doe worke Not in the Persons because the Essence is whole and the selfe same in them as whole and the selfe same abiding in euery one whence we say that the Father is in the Sonne the Son in the Father the holy Ghost in both each one in euery one not in works because the Essence Will and Action are altogether the same thing for as the Essence of God is naturally disposed so it willeth and doth and againe as it willeth and doth so his Essence is disposed Neither do the Act and the thing done differ in God but they are the selfe-same thing so as while one thing seemeth to be done by the Godhead all things are together effected in one thing and while many things one thing is effected in many things By this simplicitie the exceeding great perfection of God is concluded for that which is one and most simple is of all most sufficient and most content with himselfe and therefore is both selfe sufficient for himselfe from himselfe and in himselfe to all things and in all things as also to others a paterne and cause of all perfection Nature grace Infinitnes in God is not a magnitude or multitude which wee may not passe through but an incomprehensible power or an incomprehensiblenes of an act whereby he is neyther from without nor from within finite in himself every where whole or most inwardly in all things by his Essence and power For by his Essence God is every where n Psa 145.3 1. Rin. 8.27 Ier. 23.23 or by speaking more properly hee is every where it selfe that is that selfe same thing which we call every where being in every place without definition dimention or circumscription in every time without changeablenes whole in all thinges whole in each thing whole in himselfe the manner of this Infinitnes is that it be neyther multiplyed norrarified and that the Essence of God be not made diverse but the same whole and one that it be sayed to be present with all thinges and with each thing yet of none contayned according to which manner wee say that God is every where and no where to witte in that hee is contayned of none hee is no where but in that hee contayneth all things he is every where By his power God is every where because by him this o Vniversum whole frame was both perfected and is affected yet so that neyther by perfecting that power of God is weakened for it is vnmeasurable and infinite no time no where failing nor by affecting doth suffer for hee is God of power super-essentiall not onely p Superficies comprehending the outmost partes of all thinges but also with it whole selfe pearcing and passing thorough the depth of all things That which necessarily and as it were by an Issuing forth q Cōsectarium followeth vpon this Infinitenes is immutability that which likewise followeth Immutability is Eternity for hee which is Infinite can neyther bee mooved nor changed according to vtter and inner qualities and whereas he hath in himselfe and from himselfe the fulnesse of perfection r I ac 1.17 Mal. 3.6 Essence and Power hee cannot bee extended neyther concerning Essence nor concerning worke hee which is immutable is not changed into another nature but possesseth the same whole neyther receyving nor ever hereafter about to receyue but without time hee is that hee is and that hee is not hee never may be that is it which we call ſ Psal 90.2 Apoc. 1.8 eternall Those properties which being from that which is the latter are in God bee spoken indeed of God principally and by themselues but yet according to the proportion both of his Act and vse in the Creatures they are communicated vnto them and are t Ex concreto ioyntly vttered of them these therefore are in God most inwardly according to beginning and vnmoueably but in the Creatures Accidentally by participation and after a mooueable manner as are these amongst the chiefest Power Knowledge and Will Power in God is that whereby he perfectly doth all things which he willeth and all thinges which hee can will hee can perfectly doe this is called absolute that actuall And both of them are actiue Now God willeth by act partly Internall and Eternall which act is in God eyther according to beginning limite as the vnderstanding of God or else it is indeede according to beginning in God but according to limitation in another as Providence Predestination and in respect of this Act the actuall power in God is called Immanēt or abiding in partly also by act externall and temporall as Creation Redemption and in respect of this act the actuall power in God is called Trāsient or going forth Hee can Will infinite thinges u Mat. 3.9 as his being is Infinite and so likewise hee can doe infinite thinges which are absolutely possible and yet never shall bee determined to a certain order of things he can then doe more thinges then hee doth if hee will yet he never will do them But as hee cannot will eyther things contrary as evill good or thinges contradictory as to be and not to be so can he not do eyther contrary things which in a nature most simple and incommutable cannot subsist or thinges
because aswell it selfe as all things vnto it selfe are intended the other by it selfe intended but not chiefly or first because it selfe indeed is intended but not all thinges therevnto the intent after the first way is Gods â—race after the second Gods iustice The directing of the means disposed â—s an effectuall bringing of them along â—nto the end by the knowne meanes of Gods wisedome whether revealed or â—idden now this directing of the means 〈◊〉 eyther by it selfe or by accident And this is the manner of generall providence which being layed downe â—here is a more easie way and method â—nto the particular meanes thereof according to the particular nature of the Subiects For first of all the nature of thinges whether generall or particular is subiect â—o Gods providence according to al the meanes both of appointment governing and ordayning l Mat. 10.29.30 Luc. 12.6.7 Pro. 16 33 for the appointment governing and ordayning of things naturall so faree extend themselues as the m Causalitas causing of the first agent extendeth it selfe now it extendeth it selfe as farre as vnto all n Entia beings not only as touching the beings of speciall kindes but also as touching the o Individua particular thinges themselues neyther onely as touching the beginnings of things incorruptible but also of things corruptible Secondly the Accidents of Nature whatsoever they are which are of common Nature in their own perfection are subiect to Gods Providence after the manners already remembred but those which are of particular Nature in their defect are subiect to Gods Providence after the manner of Governing and Ordayning p Gen. 37.28 Iob. 1.21 Esa 10.5.6 c. Act. 2.23 Rom. 8.28 Thirdly all ends of things whatsoever whether meane or supreame are appointed governed and ordayned of God Fourthly those which are meanes whether they bee ordinary or extraordinary the first cause vseth even them according to their owne Nature by appointing governing and ordayning them Fiftly concerning things necessary and contingent that we may see thereinto and in few wordes expound the more difficult points therof three things are to be noted First that the Nature and naturall properties of things as they be are from God and that therefore according to the maner which God hath put into things they are subiect to Gods providence q Iob. 10 10.11 Exod. 15 26. Ps 105.17 And thus stands the maner nature of things that some be necessary some contingent those the order whereof betweene the Cause and the Effect is vnchangeable eyther absolutely by themselues and of their owne Nature or by Supposition and relation to the Causes proposed which neverthelesse may eyther not be or be changed these the order whereof is mutable into both partes of it owne nature indefinite such as are the things of nature or thinges particular which haue the conditions of mutability and contingency infolded among themselues in themselues Secondly that it is an effect of Gods providence that any thing happeneth by what manner soever whether contingently or necessarily and therefore that falleth out necessarily which Gods providence hath disposed to fall out necessarily and that commeth to passe contingently because such is the reason or manner of Gods providence hence God being the vniversall beginning eyther mediately or immediately causeth that the things stand both wayes and that out of causes necessary or contingent Effects and Events necessary and contingent are produced Thirdly of what soever things there is a contingency of these there is also a necessity by supposition and therfore nothing is so contingent which may not two wayes be necessary by supposition one way in it owne existence for what was to be contingent the same froÌ„ whence it proceeded must needs preseÌ„tly haue or formerly had a being The other way by the determined decree foreknowledge of God in respect wherof all thinges come to passe infallibly but to speake properly it is one thing that somewhat falleth out contingently another thing necessarily and another thing infallibly the first and the second inferre the order of the Effect vnto the Cause but the third is more common then both because thinges both contingent and necessary come to passe infallibly yet those contingently these necessarily These things layed down it is manifest that all things both necessary and contingent are every way subiect to Gods Providence 1. of Conservation because both haue being and power froÌ„ God 2. of Governing for of both God disposeth according to the liberty of his will whether effecting or permitting 3. of Ordayning because God also hath prescribed an end vnto them according to their Nature and dâ—sposeth them as meanes wisely and bringeth them vnto the same powerfully Sixtly as concerning Actions Naturall and Voluntary it is to be noted that three beginnings of actions must be considered and proportionally distinguished the one Vniversall is God the other Generall is Nature the third Particular and is eyther a Naturall Inclination or Instinct or Will Electiue Of these beginnings there are particular properties the vniversall beginning is finite the Generall is desining the particular is defined in his Subiects the first is from it selfe and to it selfe the second hath a relation vnto God the third vnto both Whence it commeth to passe that those actions which are from the particular beginning mediately are from God by the generall beginning but those which are from the generall beginning are from God immediately Here it is evident that all actions whether naturall or voluntary are subiect to Gods Providence first by way of Conservation for God conserveth the Natures of thinges and the liberty of will which hee hath given man Secondly by way of governing because God as hee is an vniversall beginning effectually moveth all other beginnings to doe or worke thirdly by way of ordayning because he bringeth and directeth all actions vnto the end which hee hath fore-appointed to them whether Naturall or Voluntary r Psal 139.3 The last thing remayneth concerning good and bad actions and that the manner and efficacy of Gods providenâ—e in evill actions for of the good there is no difficulty might according to the degrees thereof the better be knowne two things are to be premised One is that according to the difference of the beginnings whereof wee haue aboue spoken the one the selfe same action is both good evill good as touching the generall as it is from God and common Nature for both God and Nature of themselues doe alwayes bring forth good actions evil according to the particular respect in man as hee is corrupt for every vitious act taketh the necessity of the vice from the neerest cause which is the will of the offender whence is that of the Schoolemen Å¿ Principalitatem Causalitatis omnis in peccato consistere penes voluntatem quae imperat actum that the chiefty of every procurement in sinne consisteth in the power of the Will which coÌ„mands the Act. The other
taking the spirituall sealing within vs both of Christ himselfe and of his benefites by the Instrument of faith is declared The Eating and Drinking is an outward and sacramentall vse and taking of the signes according to Christes Prescription whereby the inward and spirituall eating and drinking of his body and bloud is sealed by divine ordinance for as first there are two persons administring the Supper the one of the Pastor doing that which is done outwardly and openly the other of Christ effecting by his Spirit that which is done inwardly Secondly as the whole Action of the Lords Supper consisteth in two things the one an earthly bodilie perceyuable for the senses the other heavenly spirituall and intelligible for the vnderstanding of the faithfull Thirdly as there are two partes of man the one the body the other the soule so there are two givings and eatings the one outward which is called Sacramentall the other inward which is tearmed Spirituall yet that was instituted of Christ that it might bee a certaine expresse shape or Image of this The wordes Definitiue and Sacramentall are those which declare the inward matter or thing signified and vtter the same whether it bee of the bread or of the cuppe sacramentally of the bread as This is my body which for you is delivered and broken f Luc. 22.19 but of the cuppe This is my bloud which is shed for many g Mat. 26.28 Both expositions are wont two waies to be considered eyther in each words apart and by themselues considered or in the whole exposition together Being considered apart they note eyther the Subject or the Attributes or the Copula The Subject is the Pronoune demonstratiue this not adjectiuely but substantiuely taken for it doth not signifie h Individuum vagum any singular thing but the verie bread which Christ Tooke Brake and Gaue to his Disciples and the Wine which he held in his hands according as the order of the Text i Mat. 26 26.27 the interpretation of Paul k 1 Cor. 11.24.25 and the Analogy of Faith doe demonstrate The Attribute in the first proposition is the Body of Christ not the mysticall which is the church but the proper and the true which for vs is given and broken and that as it was such a body In the second is the bloude of Christ which for vs is shedde and even that as it was such a bloud according as the other member of these Attributes which is pronounced by an Enallage of the present tense for the future Tense dooth most evidently proue The Copula whereby the Attribute is knit with the Subject is the Verbe Substantiue IS which ought not nor may bee taken Substantially wheras by no meanes at all the vnlike cannot properly and Essentially be affirmed of his vnlike but figuratiuely for a mysticall and Sacramentall Being whereby the thing which signifyeth taketh the name of that thing which it signifyeth because of the Analogy of the one with the other for by that litle word Christ taught not what the bread and wine were by nature or substance but what they were by signification office and vse for by nature they are bread and wine by signification they are the body and bloud of Christ The whole Attribution or Predication is not proper or regular whereas neyther the proposition is Identicall nor the body of Christ can properly be affirmed of the bread to witte wheras the Body of Christ is neyther the Generall nor the Speciall nor the difference nor the property nor the accident of bread but it is Figuratiue and Sacramentall Figuratiue not simply Metaphoricall and Allegoricall but Metonymycall to witte such whereby the name of the thing signified is given to the Signe which Metonymycall speaking is very familiar in the Scriptures Sacramentall because the exhibiting of the thing signified is withall promised and yet there is no swerving from the word spoken or pronounced wheras wee retaine the word spoken being Sacramentall which is altogether different from regular Predications and to bee expounded with an interpretation aunswerable to the nature of Sacraments The Expositiue wordes are these by which Christ expounded or layde open the end of this holy action to witte l 1. Cor. 11 16. the remembrance of his death which is not a naked or idle remembrance of a thing past but an effectuall and healthfull apprehension of Christs merites and an explication of the same privately with our selues or properly vnto our selues and withall a solemne Eucharisticall Thanksgiving in the vse of this Sacrament for so great a benefite and this is the manner of the Efficient Cause being principall or that which instituteth the Supper and of the Institution it selfe The Cause Efficient Administring or Instrumentall are the Ministers of the Church called by lawfull ordination by whome God as by active instruments offereth and representeth vs those things outwardly by the signes of breade and wine which by the inward operation of the holy Ghost hee effecteth in vs. Of these Instruments if you respect the Office it is to administer the Lords Supper with those rites of dispensing them in the very which Christ went before by his owne example If the Quality so they lawfully execute their office in the preaching of the Word the administration of the Sacraments it nothing addeth to or detracteth from the efficacy of a Sacrament sith the authoritie of Sacraments if they bee considered in themselues dependeth not vpon the qualitie of the Minister but vpon the Institution verity and power of Christ The Matter of the Lords Supper is two wayes vsually considered eyther as that which partaketh the Supper or as that which constituteth the Supper whereof the one hath the manner of the Subject the other of the partes The Matter or Subiect partaking the Supper are all they who being by Baptisme made the members of the Church and now being of yeares professe sound doctrine and haue the testimony of a holy life m 1. Cor. 11.20 12.13 From the circumscription of this Subiect are excluded first the dead or they that are departed this life from whome both the power of vsing the Sacrament is taken away and vnto whome all the vse thereof is in vaine ineffectuall as also the vse of the preaching of the Gospell whereof the Sacraments are appendents Secondly the Sicke like to die for Christ would haue this communion not to bee private and domesticall but ecclesiasticall and publicke neyther doth the want but the contempt of the same hurt the partie that doth not communicate though peradventure there bee another respect to bee had concerning them that haue slipped and that are Excommunicated out of the church and concerning prisoners who are to bee punished and are now penitent Thirdly Children and Infants for to speake properly the Supper is meat for the stronger and the further grown in yeares and not for Infants neyther can they yeeld a reason of their Faith nor examine themselues
God and man yet wee must not stay in the very signes neyther are the eyes of faith to be lifted vp to the place of the bread but vnto heaven x Col. 3.1 That this popish Adoration is Idolatrous both in it selfe and in the Adiunct Ceremonies wee proue divers waies In it selfe by three Arguments drawne from the cause from the manner and from the kindes of Adoration for seeing the cause of the Adoration of Christ is proper in his God-head for nothing is properly to bee adored but that which is God the worshipping eyther of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be translated to the outward signs theÌ„selues without manifest sacriledge then seeing the manner of Christs adoration requireth that neyther the person be divided nor the natures equalled or the difference of them takeÌ„ away the bread cannot at all bee worshipped or the bodie in the bread but either the nature and the properties thereof should be confounded while the presence of Christs bodie is judged to bee in the bread or that which is not fitte for a humane nature but in regard of the person should Idolatrously bee attributed not onely vnto him simply and as touching himselfe but also vnto his Sacrament Lastly seeing there are two kindes of Adoration Praying Thanksgiving neyther of them can be applyed to the bread neyther properly nor Sacramentally whereas both belong to Christ as being God and man In the Ceremonies it is idolatrous whether you respect the reserving of Reliques the inclosing or carrying about or the Elevation of the Eucharist for albeit there were certain beginnings of these ceremonies in the ancient church yet seeing they were prescribed neyther by Christ nor his Apostles or observed in the most ancient and purest church they were for the good cause taken away in the churches of the Gospell OF THE LORDS Supper The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Interpretation and signification of the NAME I. THe Supper of the Lord signifieth eyther the signe or the action that is eyther it is taken Relatiuely or Absolutely Being Relatiuely it signifyeth the Symboles or Signes of Gods grace Absolutely taken 〈◊〉 signifyeth the whole Action comâ—â—sed of the visible and corporall 〈◊〉 â—ing of the Signes and of the invisible and Spirituall receiving of Christ and his benefites II. THe Lords Supper is considered eyther abstractly as touching it selfe or applyedly in the lawfull vse this way it is properly called a Sacrament that way it is not but abusiuely and improperly III. THere are fowre formes of speaking concerning the Supper of the Lord the sense whereof and manner of vnderstanding them is the same the First is wherein the Name of the thing signified is layed on the Signe as the Supper is the New Testament The 2. wherein the thing signified of the Supper in respect of the effect and efficacy thereof is given to the Signe as the Supper maketh vs partakers of the new Testament Thirdly wherein the offices of the signes are expounded in their proper signification as the Supper is the signe of the Covenant The fourth when in the lawfull vse of the Supper the Sacrament is conjoyned with the promise of grace as he which receiveth the bread and wine worthily shall eate the body and drinke the bloude of Christ Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause principall and First for the Subiect of Predication against Bellar. Lib. 1. De Sacra Euchar. Cap. 10. I. THe Pronounes demonstratiue and Relatiue aswell with the Greekes as Latines doe not alwayes according to rule agree with the substantiue following but sometimes also with that which goeth before and contrariwise not alwayes with that which goeth before but with that also which followeth Moreover the thing which is only a note in the vniversall and not in the particular according as bread was in the Supper is most vsually vttered by a Nowne vniversall of the Neuter gender II. THose things which are to be vnderstoode Tropically according to the nature of a sacrament ought not or may not be properly and simply taken Now there is a double Trope in the proposition touching the cuppe for by a Synechdoche the cuppe is put for the wine in the cuppe and by a Sacramentall Metonymy the Effect of the thing signified is given to the Signe In Defence of the whole Predication to Cap. 9. I. THe Stile of Scripture doth most manifestly proue that the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament as also Testaments compacts and covenants are found to haue beene instituted in Figuratiue wordes and the precepts to haue beene vttered Figuratiuely II. AN Argument drawne from a Figuratiue speaking to the obscurenesse of the same is inconsequent for it followeth not that if it be Figuratiue therefore it is not perspicuous or on the contrary if it be perspicuous that therefore it is not Figuratiue III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers are Sacramentally to be taken that is to bee expounded according to the maner and Trope which is agreeable to Sacraments Whence it is that they all haue judged that Christs words are to bee expounded not according to the Word spoken but according to his meaning IIII. THe appellation of the Word spoken or the sence of the wordes is taken sometimes in a larger and sometimes in a straiter signification in a strayter in regular Predications in a larger in those which are Figuratiue Wherefore in the very wordes of the Supper we retayne the very word spoken but sacramentall wherein not so much the letter and the sound of the words as the sure and certaine meaning thereof is to bee followed to wit that which may agree with the nature of a Sacrament Of the Wordes of Consecration against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 13. I. THe wordes of the Institution of the Lords Supper are of two partes some are the words of the Evangelists and some of Christ himselfe those are not onely recited as a history but doe admonish as well the Ministers as the Communicants what Christ did what he commaunded likewise to bee done of both These serue for consecration yet so that neyther the rest ought to bee omitted nor consecration bee circumscribed with foure or fiue wordes onely or lastly Prayers and Thanksgivings bee excluded seeing as well the former as the latter words of the Institution doe finish the consecration and the Substance of Bread and Wine is not changed by a certaine hidden vertue of those few wordes but on the contrary the consecration which is made in the Eucharist is called in the Scriptures a hallowing with thankesgiving II. THere was a double respect of the Apostles in that first Supper one of Pastors and dispensers of Gods misteries but the other of the church or the vniversall company of the faithfull which they represented in the first respect the commaundement to Doe ought to bee referred to all that which Christ did concerning the bread and wine in the second to all that which the Communicants ought to
miracle is vnwonted and vnusuall but those which are cited were eyther devised of superstitious men or false and put forth to deceyue the simple or lastly brought forth by the helpe and furtherance of the Devil according as Christ and Paul foretold of Antichrist Against the Communion vnder one kinde onely Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 24. I. TO reason from the Signes and Sacraments of the olde Testament which differ in the outward adjunctes in the circumstance of time in the maner of signifying and in the quality and number of the Signs to the Sacraments of the New Testament is inconsequent neyther is it needefull to require both kindes in those which eyther were not capable of both or in the lawfull vse whereof there is not extant a commaudement for both II. FRom a particular indefinite propositioÌ„ we badly conclud exclusiuely for albeit in some places there bee mention made of eating the other kinde therefore is not necessarily excluded for there is else where mention made of flesh and bloud together of eating and drinking the same yea foure times in the selfe same chapter III. THe consideration of meate and ordinary bread and of the mysticall and Sacramentall bread is altogether different not as touching the naturall substance quantity or quality but as touching the vse and office Now there was both in that miracle of the feeding of the people and in the Supper at Emaus not a Sacrament of Grace but a feast of nature Neyther haue the Fathers interpreted the bread concerning the true and naturall body of Christ but concerning the mysticall that is the church IIII. SYnecdoche is that which by name of the part compreheÌ„deth the whole very familiar in the Hebrew tongue wherein by the breaking of bread they are wont to signifie a dinner supper any feastes whatsoever from which feastes notwithstanding as drinke neyther ought nor can bee excluded so neyther may it from this Sacramentall feast whereof mention is made in the cited places whence it is also that the same Paul to whome this breaking is attributed expounding the Lordes institution teacheth that this Supper consisteth of bread and of the cup. V. IT is true that the Manichees communicated vnder the one kind of breade onely for they thought that the wine was the gall of a Dragon but that the ancient Church did not therefore reprehend them it is most false even those very men doe proue the contrary whom the adversary would haue to stand on his side to witte Leo the Bishoppe and Gelasius the Pope the former wherof called this mangling a sacrilegious counterfeiting and the latter a great Sacriledge VI. THe Consequence is of no force which is from examples whereof the former is of doubtfull credit as of which Chrisostome himselfe maketh no mention and because of the cunning and craft of a womanish wit ridiculous but the latter of a false and contrary credite as being that which by most certain proofe evidently sheweth that the communion was vsually and necessary vnder both kindes VII FRom extraordinary cases of necessity and those particular there is no conclusion to that which in lawfull ordinary and publicke celebrations of the Eucharist ought to bee observed Adde further that in all those rites and ceremonies though not alwayes yet for the most part there was vse of both kindes according as the constitution and custome of the Primitiue church doth most manifestly proue VIII TO reason from the authority of the Councels and Fathers for the establishing of some error is inconsequent Adde further that in the Primitiue Church the Communion for a long time was retained vnder both kindes even in the monasteries vntill the thousand three hundred yeare the mangling or maiming thereof was first by a publicke decree brought in by the Councell of Constance in the yeare 1484. IX FRom discommodities or inconveniences an argument concludeth nothing both because they leane vpon superstition and because the collection is faultie drawne from particulars and lastly because they being foreseen by Christ and the Apostles hindered not the Institution of the communion vnder both kindes In Defence of the Forme against Transsubstantiation Bellar. Lib. 3. Cap. 19. FRom a bad and insufficient Enumeration of the partes a false conclusion is drawn for every change is eyther Essentiall of the very Substance that is of the naturall matter and forme or Sacramentall of the office condition vse of the Elements both are true but after their manner that true Essentially by the manner of nature but this Sacramentally by the manner of Grace Now whatsoever change is in the Supper it is not essentiall or naturall but Sacramentall that is a Consecration appointment and setting apaâ—t of the Signes from a common to a holy and mysticall vse To the Testimonies of the Fathers which by Bellarmine are cited in the 20. and 21. cap. of the third booke and the whole second Booke I. THose Fathers who called the Eucharist the body and bloud of Christ vsed a Sacramentall manner of speaking wherby it commeth to passe that the names being changed the signe or Symbole is called by the tearme of the thing it selfe Now they vsed this for three causes First that they might declare whereto Christ had ordayned the Eucharisticall bread SecoÌ„dly that they might expresse the Analogy betweene the Signes and the things signified Thirdly That by the change of the names they might teach that there is a most true and indivisible conjunction of the things signified with the signes themselues in the lawfull vse II. THe Fathers who haue called the Eucharist the precious body the reverend mysteries the pledge of Salvation our ransome spake Hyperbolically of the very bread sanctified and not of any other body present by transubstantiation Now they vsed those Hyperbolicall Phrases for three causes First that they might extoll the dignity of the mystery Secondly least eating they should sticke in the outward signes Thirdly that with a great affection of godlinesse and reverence they might approach to that holy Communion III. THe Fathers which affirmed that the Body of Christ is touched seen and chewed with the teeth spake Figuratiuely For there is a double signification of the Sacrament and body of Christ to bee held for as a Sacrament is sometime taken Figuratiuely for one part and sometime properly for both parties so also is the body of Christ sometime properly and somtime Figuratiuely for the outward signe onely and â—n this sense by a figured and Metonymycall vse of speech the Fathers haue affirmed that the body of Christ is touched and seene that is the signe of his body IIII. THe Fathers who spake of the changing of the bread and wine in the Eucharist treated of the Sacramentall change whereof wee haue spoken in the first distinction and therefore willed and taught that their wordes should bee taken Figuratiuely and effectiuely V. THe Fathers who taught that our bodies are cherished nourished and fed with the body and bloud of Christ vsed a
Life but the Instrument and meane to attaine vnto life Neither doe the places which are cited proue any thing else which doe eyther note the quality of them that are to be saved and not the cause of Salvation Heb. 10.1 Tim. 2. Rom. 10. or doe intimate the way of righteousnesse by which men come vnto Salvation Phil. 2. 2 Cor. 4. Or lastly doe treate of the Effects from which as from that which is the a A Posteriori That is from the Effect to the Cause latter judgement both may and should be had of them that are truely justified and hereafter shal be glorified Mat. 25. Iac. 1. 2. Cor. 7. II. NEyther doth the reason alleadged from an absurdity and expressed in the ninth Chapter proue the contrary for Faith alone is sayde to saue vs aequivocally eyther in respect of faith because it is alone or of salvation because it alone saveth Faith is not alone without works but it alone saveth and justifyeth without workes as the eye onely seeth yet not alone but joyned together with the Body That the Law of God is not possible to be fulfilled by vs against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 11. I. THe Testimonies of Scriptures which are alleadged First Ma◠11. 1. Ioh. 5. treate not of the nature of the Law compared with the power of the Regenerate or not Regenerate for the fulfilling of the same but eyther of the burthē of the Crosse which the inward vertue and efficacy of Christs Spirite and the hope of eternal immortality doe ease or of Gods commandements in Generall aswell in respect of Faith as of good workes which are not so farre grievous that by them the faithfull should be oppressed for both the Spirite becommeth conquerour and whosoever beleeveth i◠freed from the curse of the Law Secondly those in Ioh. 14. Ro. 13 Gal. 5. Ioh. 15. doe not treate of our power for the fulfilling of the Law but eyther of our duety or of the effect of our loue towardes God Or lastly of the loue of our neighbour as a most evident Testimony of the whole obedience of the Law Thirdly in Psalm 118. 1. King 14. Act. 18. 1. Kin. 15. 2. King 23. 2. Chron. 15. 11. There is no speech concerning any perfection of the righteousnesse of those who are named righteous absolutely but eyther respectiuely or by relation vnto others or Inchoatiuely as touching themselues or by Imputation in respect of Gods acceptance Or lastly after a sort in respect of their owne sincerity opposed or set against Hypocrisie II. THe reasons which are alleadged Chap. 13. proue not the question in hand Not the First for it is grounded vpon a false presupposall and vpon that which by the Schoolemen is tearmed Petitio Principij Not the Second because it playeth vpon a false consequent for our bond remayneth albeit our weakenesse or want of power bee admitted like as the debt is wont to remaine though the debtor bee not able to pay Not the Third because God hath his reasons First he doth not require a debt in vaine and we are put in mind of our debt Secondly the Principles of nature are not in vaine stirred vp for the convincing of the wicked and the saving of the godly Not the Fourth because the Apostle discourseth Rom. 8. of the right of the Law not of Iustification and that right is not saide to be fulfilled of vs but in vs. Not the Fift because the operations of the Spirit are produced in vs according to the manner of the Instrument and the measure of our Infirmity Not the Sixt because as being Iustified they are born of God they performe the Law but as they are regenerate vnperfectly they performe and fulfil the same vnperfectly OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confirming CAP. VIII ANd this is the State of Mā in this life both according to the condition of his first Originall or Naturall corruption as also according to his regeneration by Grace or the truth of Christian calling Now the other State of Man which shal bee after this life next ensueth the same and it ought two wayes of vs to bee considered and declared eyther Generally in respect both of the godly and vngodly or Particularly in respect of these or those Generally the estate of man after this life is knowne by two degrees by the resurrection of the flesh and the last iudgment The Resurrection of the flesh is an iterated and indivisible coupling of the soule with the body wrought by the mighty power of God that when death shall be conquered men made immortall might liue for euer eyther in glory or in torment The efficient cause principal of the Resurrection is the whole Godhead For the father raiseth the dead the sonne quickneth whome he will and the holy Ghost with the father and the sonne giueth a fulnes of life aswell to the body as to the a 1. Cor. 15.12 1. Thes 4 14. 1. Cor. 15.25 soule but the instrumentall or ministeriall are the Angells the effectuall working of whome the scripture signifieth by a Metaphor of a sounding Trumpet The matter is mans body the same in number as touching the substaunce which wee beare in this life whether it bee of them which are dead or of those which shall bee found aliue at the last day b Dan 12.2 Ioh. 5.26.29 1. Thes 4.16.17 The forme according to the consideration of the matter shal be eyther a Restoring of the dead vnto life or that proportionable and conformable transformatiō of those which shal be foūd aliue This form the changing of the qualities of the body doth accompany being indeed a generall incorruption and immortallity but besides these in respect of the faythful there shal bee a particular glory power and spiritualnes of the bodyes The end principall is the glory of the righteousnes and grace of God Subordinate according to the considerations of the persons that rise agayne eyther the salvation and glory of the Elect or the punishment and casting away of the Reprobate The last or extreame iudgement is a iudiciall act whereby Christ in the last day with greate maiesty and glory shal giue sentence vpon all men vniuersally The efficient cause principall as touching indeed the iudiciall power and authority is God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost but as touching the maner of iudgment or exercise therof Christ is not onely as he is God but also as hee is man both because of the estate of glory which followeth together with the personall vnion of the divine and humane nature as also because of the agreeablenesse and affinitie of himselfe with men c Mat. 24.30 Luc. 21.27 2. Tim. 2.8 The Administring Cause shall bee the Angells whose Service God will vse both in the gathering together and in the separating and singling out of them that shal be judged d Mat. 24.31 1. Thes 4.16 The Matter as it respecteth the subject is the faith or infidellty of every
one declared by the effects of both but as concerning the Object are both vniversally all Creatures even the vnreasonable which shall be freed from the servitude of corruption and generally all both Angels and Men and particularly that man of Sinne and Sonne of Perdition Antechrist e Mat. 29.32 1. Thes 4.17 Apoc. 20.12 The Forme is that whole order and proceeding of the most majesticall judgement comprehended in the very preparation both of the Iudge and of the Persons to be judged in the sentēce of the judgement and in the execution of the sentence f Mat. 25.32 1. Thes 4.16.17 The End Supreame is the glory of God himselfe and the accomplishmēt or Christs office Subordinate the iust condemnation of the wicked and the glorious felicity of the faithfull both which the infinitenesse and eternity either of joy or sorrow followeth g 2. Tim. 4 8. Particularly the State of man after this life after the time of that vniversall life resurrection and last judgement is eyther of life or death eternall Life Eternall is the life of glory wherein the Soule ioyned to our body enioyeth God for ever being advanced to the highest toppe and height of her felicity The cause of this life is God to wit the Father the Efficient the Sonne the Meritorious and the holy Ghost the sealing and applying Cause h Ioh. 14 2◠Apo. 21.3 1. Cor. 15.45 Rom. 8.11 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are those good things which neyther eye hath seene nor eare heard nor can the mind of man comprehend i 1. Cor. 15 28. That which is of the Obiect are all the blessed and elect k Apo. 21.3 Mat. 25.24 The Forme is the most perfect knowledge vision and fruition of God himselfe and the exceeding felicity blessednesse of man which accompanieth the same which also consisteth both in the separation and absence of all evill things in the participation and presence of all good things both are both perfect and eternall l Apo. 22.4 Psa 7 15 1. Ioh. 3.2 Psa 16.11 The End is the glory of Gods grace and the glorifying of the elect m Apo. 21.3.5.12.11.17 1. Cor. 15.28 Death Eternall is the vnspeakeable and most miserable condition of the reprobates appointed or decreed of God whereby both their Soule and body are most justly adiudged to eternall punishments The Efficient Cause remote is God the most iust iudge the Instrumentall is Sathan the neerest is Sinne n Mat. 25.41 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are Eternall punishments that which is of the Obiect are the Cursed and the Workers of iniquity o Ioh. 5.29 1. Thes 1 9. The Forme is the perpetuity and the infinitenesse of the punishments in Hell p Apo. 20.15.21.8 Esa 66.24 Mat. 4.42 The End Supreame is the glory of Gods Iustice The Neerest is the iust condemnation and punishment of the wicked OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confuting Touching the Resurrection I. THe Resurrection in the holy Scripture is two wayes taken Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely eyther by a Metonymy it signifieth immortal life or by a Metaphor eyther a deliverance from danger or the regeneration of the Soules which is a spirituall resurrection and is called the First Properly Resurrection signifieth the quickning of the Bodie which shal be done at the last day which also is called the Second II. THere is one Resurrection Vniversall and Finall which no man shall escape an other Particular or foregoing whereof there are particular examples extant in the Scriptures Of the last Iudgement I. IVdgement in the Scriptures signifieth three things eyther the cause of damnation or an vniversall governement or the very Act eyther of condēnation or Iustification II. THere is a two-fold Iudgement of the Lord Particular or Antecedent When God in this life eyther defendeth his people or represseth the wicked Vniversall being the last which shall be done in the last day of the Resurrection III. THe Sonne is sayde to be the iudge of the world not exclusiuely or oppositely but by an appropriation for that by the Sonne in a visible forme the last iudgement shall be executed IIII. THe Sonne is said to be ignorant of the day of iudgement eyther because he would haue vs to be ignorant thereof or as touching his humane nature which by ordinary and naturall knowledge knoweth nothing of this matter or as touching his state of humility which as touching his voluntary dispensation hee hath taken vpon him Of Life Eternall I. THere are 3. kinds or differences of life there is a life of nature which the Apostle calleth Naturall There is a Life of Grace which the Sons of God alone doe enioy in this world there is a life of Glory which consisteth in the vision of God II. LIfe Eternall is two wayes taken Metonymically both for the way to life and for Christ himselfe Properly for the State of the blessed after this life III. THere is one Vision of God Naturall in the thinges created an other Specular or Symbolicall by resemblances and Signes an other of Faith by the doctrine and doings of Christ an other of Present sight or of glory to come when we shall see God face to face Of Death Eternall DEath is fowre-fold First Corporall which in the Scriptures is also called Temporall and the first death in respect of the wicked Secondly Spirituall and that eyther of the faithfull or vnfaithfull that of the faithfull is three-fold of Sinne which is called Mortification of the Law as it is the power of Sin of the world as the world is dead vnto them The death of the vnfaithfull is that which may be called the death of faith or of the soule Thirdly Eternall which is called the second Fourthly Civill death which of the Lawyers is sayde to be of them which are condemned to death FINIS