Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	essential_a	part_n	want_v	1,769	5	11.2230	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A73378	An exposition of the lawes of Moses Viz. Morall. Ceremoniall. Iudiciall. The second volume. Containing an explanation of diverse questions and positions for the right understanding thereof. Wherein also are opened divers ancient rites & customes of the Iewes, and also of the Gentiles, as they haue relation to the Iewish. Together with an explication of sundry difficult texts of Scripture, which depend upon, or belong unto every one of the Commandements, as also upon the ceremoniall and iudiciall lawes. Which texts are set downe in the tables before each particular booke. All which are cleered out of the originall languages, the Hebrew and Greeke, and out of the distinctions of the schoolemen and cases of the casuists. / By Iohn Weemse, of Lathocker in Scotland, preacher of Gods Word.; Works. v. 3	Weemes, John, 1579?-1636.	1632 (1632)	STC 25207.5; ESTC S112662	524,931	1,326

〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 182 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 126 ח 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 102 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 132 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid י י minima litera 116 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 86 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 52 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 32 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 74 ב 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 77 ζ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 167 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 128 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 130 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 168 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 168 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 148 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 93 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 44 130 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 138 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 128 מ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 126 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 125 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 60 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 168 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 136 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 176 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 164 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 163 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 168 נ נ 170 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 164 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 80 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 ס 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 173 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 102 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 129 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 120 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 126 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 103 ע 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 32 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 137 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 141 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 41 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ib 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 128 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid ם 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 173 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 46 ק 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 99 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 163 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 30 ר 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 128 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 50 ש 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 162 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 101 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 116 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 ת 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 56 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 182 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 146 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 156 A Table of the Greeke vvords expounded in this Booke α 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 73 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 56 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 77 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 173 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 132 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 142 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 105 β 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 77 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 101 γ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 δ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 56 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 72 ε 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 136 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 127 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 28 ζ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 θ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 75 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 47 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 ι 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 101 χ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 108 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 99 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 23 λ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 141 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 γ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 175 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 u74 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 105 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 131 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 ν 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 104 ο 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 134 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 141 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 48 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 α 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 126 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 137 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 139 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 100 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 28 ζ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 101 σ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 99 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 177 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 162 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 100 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ibid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 181 λ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 176 ν 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 135 φ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 45 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 72 An alphabeticall Table of the principall distinctions and chiefe matters contained in this Booke A Action of the will twofold 20. action of the mind twofold 84. Adam his knowledge before his fall 25 the measure of his knowledge 26 he gave fit names to all the creaturis 30. Adam compared with the most excellent men 28.29 Analogie of faith twofold 179. Angels appeared in the likenesse of men but not of women 45. they appeared more glorious than a man ibid what Angell stirred the poole 60. Apostles considered two wayes 70. they are set in order before the Prophets 82. Arabick translation addeth postscripts to the Evangelists 150. the errour of the Arabicke postscrips Aristophanes keper of Ptolomens librarie in Egypt 144. Ark not alwayes with urim and thummin 54 they turned their faces to the ark when they asked counsell ibid. it was not in the second temple 59 they sang psalmes when it was carried to the temple 168. 169. Assurance twofold 14. B Beginning of things twofold 79. Booke signifieth a relation by word or writ 120 no canonicall booke lost 117 no booke in the scripture wanteth any essentiall part 118 bookes necessarie for the church albeit lost yet they were found or written again ibid. Blood not to be caten a precept given to No●h 41. how this precept is to be understood ibid why the apostles forbid to eat it 42. Breastplate distinguished from Vrim Thummim 51. the letters made not up the answer ibid. the forme of it 52. C Canaan a land blessed of god 2. Chapters and verses not cited by the ancient fathers 176. at the first called titles and the verses were called chapters ibid. Characters in which the scriptures were written first 88. the Samaritan Character and why so called ibid. why Esdras changed the character 89. diverse characters 91. Christ useth the helpe of reason against the Sadduces 16. he excelled Adam in all things 32. the true Salomon 174. the end of the law the prophets ibid. Church compared to Canaan 2. taught by tradition 4. how the pillar of truth 84 not the last resolution of our faith 62. her estate considered three wayes 61. Conscience what 35. a twofold act of the conscience ibid. it is called a painted thing in the Syriack 36. the diverse sorts of conscience 36 37. the good conscience not made up by the light of nature since the fall 37.

originall Copie what is the reason that Origen setteth it not downe in his Octupla as hee hath done other translations and what is the reason that Hierome never citeth it nor followeth it in his translation if it be the originall Reason 5 Fiftly the manner of the Samaritans writing sheweth that this was not the originall which Moses received from the Lord and delivered to the people of God afterwards as you may perceive in the page following out of Exod. 31. from vers 12. to 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exemplar Samaritanum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebraiè sic Et dixit Iehova Mosi dicendo Latinè sic tu al loquere filios Israel dicendo nunc il la Sabbatha mea serua tote quia signum est in terme inter vos per generationes vestras ad cognoscēdū quod ego Iehova sanctificans vos et observate Sabbathum quia sanc tum erit illis profanātes illud morte morietur quia omnis faciens in illa opus utique excinde turanima il la emedio populorum suorum s ex di ebus opera beris opus in die septimo Sabbathū sabbatulū sanctum Ie hovae omnis faciens o-pus in die illo sabbathi morte morietur observanto filij Israel ipsum sabbathum celebrando sabbathum per generationes suas faedere aeter no interme inter filios Israel signum erit in aeternum quia sex diebus fecit Iehoua caelum et terram in die septimo quievit et respiravit Exod. 31.12 In English thus And the Lord spake vnto Moses saying 13. Speake thou also unto the Children of Israel saying verily my Sabbaths shall ye keepe for it is a Signe betweene me you throughout your generations that yee may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctifie you 14. Ye shall keepe the Sabbath therefore for it is holy unto you every one that defileth it shall surely be put to death for whosoever doth any worke therein that Soule shall be cut off from amongst his people 15. Sixe dayes may worke bee done but in the Seventh is the Sabbath of rest holinesse to the Lord whosoever doth any worke in the Sabbath day hee shall surely bee put to death 16. Wherefore the Children of Israel shall keepe the Sabbath to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetuall Covenant 17. It is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel for ever for in sixe dayes the Lord made heaven and earth and on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed Observe the forme of this writing of the Samaritans and yee shall finde it to be meere Cabbalisticall by which they would finde out the diverse readings in framing the lines words and letters and setting them downe after such a curious forme 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Cabbalists doe by their Gematrija notaricon and temura that is by the number of letters the diverse significations of them and the diverse situation and placing of them they make diverse senses in the Scriptures as by elbham and ethbhash sometimes putting the last letters for the first and the first for the last sometimes reading up and downe sometimes crosswayes and sometimes from the left hand to the right this we may see in this example of the Samaritan Copie where they summe up the observation the breach and punishment of the Sabbath in a round circle which curiosity the Spirit of God never used in writing the holy Scriptures Christ speaking of the originall Text and the perpetuity of the Law which we have he saith One jote or one title of the Law shall not passe in the originall it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 answerable to the Hebrew Iod and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is not properly translated A tittle as if it made a difference betwixt some letters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the top of Daleth from Resh for the Syriacke calleth it Sharat incisura vel incisio the small lines which are in ones hand The meaning is then that not one part of a letter neyther the least letter nor any part of the least letter shall perish hence we may reason from Christs words In that copie whereof the Lord speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Iod must be the least letter but in the Samaritan copie Iod is not the least but the biggest of all the Letters therefore the Samaritan copie is not that copie which Christ spake of י Hebrae but the Hebrew as we may see by the difference of the Letters in the margent here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Samarit hence we may gather that this Samaritan letter was abolished in Christs time and therefore wee ought neyther to imbrace the copie nor the Characters as authenticke or originall The Conclusion of this is Conclusion If the light that is in the body be darkenesse how great is that darkenesse Matth. 6.23 The Scriptures are the light of the Church and if the originall Text were corrupted Instrumenta gratiae conjuncta remota how great were the darkenesse of the body God hath Conjuncta instrumenta remota instrumenta gratiae Remota instrumenta gratiae are the Preachers and their writings and they may be corrupted But Conjuncta instrumenta gratiae are the Prophets and Apostles and their writings these the Lord kept from errour and corruption for the good of his Church EXERCITAT XIII That no Canonicall booke is perished Matth. 5.18 Heaven and earth shall passe one jote or one tittle shall no wayes passe from the Law till all be fulfilled WHen a thing wanteth an essentiall part this is the greatest want Secondly when it wanteth an integrall part this is likewise a great defect Defectus Partis essentialis partis integratis ornamenti accidentalis And thirdly when it wanteth accidentall ornaments When the soule is separated from the body here is a separation of the essentiall parts When a man wanteth a hand or a foote then he wanteth an integrall part And when hee wanteth his cloathes hee wanteth some ornaments No booke in the Scripture wanteth any essentiall part There is no booke in the Scripture that wanteth any essentiall part for the Law and the Gospel which are essentiall parts Vide Iunium in Iudam and Perkins reformed Catholike are found in every booke Secondly the Scripture wanteth no integrall part since the Canon was sealed before the Canon was sealed they had as much as served for their infancie but after that it was sealed the whole Canon was compleate and none of those Bookes perished Gods care in preserving the Scriptures Great was the care which the Lord had to preserve the Scriptures First hee commanded the Levites to take the booke of the Law written by Moyses and to put it in the side of the Arke of the covenant of the Lord Deut. 31.26 Secondly the Lord commanded

the Kingdomes of the Countries But these words cannot be understood of the bookes of Samuel for wee reade not in these bookes what David did abroad in these Countries therefore some other bookes must be understood here written by Gad and Nathan which are not extant Ans Not onely the things which David did in Israel are set downe in the booke of Samuels but also the things which he did abroad in other Countries as against Zoba King of Hadadezzar Hierom. in Esa 13. against the Moabites and against Tobh King of Hemath And where it is sayd over all the kingdomes of the countries it is the manner of the Scripture as Hierome marketh by the whole Countries to understand the next adjacent countries whereof it speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and therefore in the originall it is Haaratzoth Of that carth Ob. 2 Chro. 33 19. The prayer of Manasseh and how God was intreated of him and all his sinne and his trespasse and the places wherein he built high places and set up groves and graven images before he was humbled behold they are written among the saying of the Seers or Hosai But in the whole booke of the Kings there is no mention made of his affliction or of the cause which mooved him to repent or of his prayers which he made to God in time of his affliction then this booke of the prophet is not now extant So the acts of Baasha Zimri and Omri are they not written in the Bookes of the Chronicles of Israel 1 Kings 16.5 27. But nothing concerning their actes are found in the bookes of the Kings or in the Chronicles therefore those bookes are perished when the Scriptures remit us to those bookes it giveth us to understand that these bookes are worthy to be trusted as written by the Seers of God neyther doth the Scripture cite them as it doth some short sentences out of the Heathen Poets The Apostle saith of those Poets that they sayd the truth Tit. 1.13 But the Spirit of God remitteth us to these bookes that we may be fully instructed by them in the whole truth of the Acts of those Kings Answ First we must know that there were many Prophets who prophesied whose prophesies were never written as the prophesies of the children of the Prophets Some prophesies of the Prophets were not written and the prophesies of those who prophesied from the dayes of Eli to David as some of Asaph Heman and Ieduthun Secondly all the things which were written by the Seers were not written by them as Seers Salomon wrote many things which he wrote not as a Prophet and so did David Thirdly Something 's written by the Prophets profitable for the Church then but not profitable now many things which they wrote then as Seers and were profitable to the Church for that time were not profitable for the Church now and the Spirit of God remitted them then to the civill records and to some prophesies which were then extant but are perished now because now they were not necessary for the Church but all these things which the Lord endited to them by his Spirit and which he thought to be necessary for his Church to be the Canon and rule of our faith all those the Lords watchfull eye hath kept and preserved that none of them are perished The Conclusion of this is Conclusion The bookes of Emperours and Kings are lost yet the Lord hath kept the register of the little Kings of Iuda and Israel both in whole and in parts although they were but Shepherds and banished men And the Church would rather spend her best blood then shee would part with that pretious Iewell or any part of it therefore they called those who delivered the booke of God to the persecuting Tyrants Traditores EXERCITAT XIIII That the points were not originally with the Letters from the beginning Neh. 8.8 So they read in the Booke the Law of God distinctly and gave the sense and caused them to understand the reading of the Law WE have showne that the Scriptures are not corrupt and that no essentiall or integrall part is wanting in the holy Scriptures Now it resteth to show that the Points the accidentall ornaments were not from the beginning The Iewes who are faithfull keepers but bad interpreters of the Scriptures interpret these words Nehe. 8.8 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after this manner vaijkren bassepher betorath They read in the booke of the Law this they expound to be the litterall sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Ezra gave Mephorash distinctly that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adding the Points and distinctions Veshom Sh●cel Appenentes intellectum and gave the sense that is he added the Targum or paraphrase to it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vajabhinu bammikra and caused them to understand the reading of the Law that is he added the Kabbala But this is a false Glosse Ezra read the Law to them gave them not onely the grammaticall sense but also the spirituall and true meaning of the words he neither added points nor Targum or Kabbala to it The points were not then from the beginning as may be seene by these reasons following Reason 5 The first reason is taken from the Samaritan Character The Iewes acknowledge that the letters of the law which they have now are not the ancient Characters in which Moyses wrote the Law But to these ancient Characters there is no vowell subjoyned as we may see in the forme of the Shekell set downe by Arias Montanus Beza and Villalpand upon Ezekiel Reason 2 The second reason is taken from the first exemplar of the Iewes which they kept in their Synagogues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and they have most exactly written and rouled up this booke which is the cheefe booke in their estimation and whereof they account more then of any other Hebrew Bible yet there is neyther Poynt nor Accent in this booke but onely Consonants This may be seene also in their ancient billes of divorce wherein are neyther Points nor Accents Therefore the Points were not from the beginning Reason 3 The third reason is taken from the names of the Points and Accents which are Chaldee names therefore they were imposed after the captivity Object But they who maintaine that the Poynts were from the beginning say that this reason holdeth not for the names of the Moneths are Chaldee names imposed after the captivity and yet the Moneths were from the beginning So the Points may be from the beginning although the Chaldee names were given to them after the captivitie Answ As the Moneths were from the beginning and had Chaldee names given unto them after the captivity so the value of the Points were from the beginning but the figures and the names of the Points were set downe a long time afterwards Reason 4 The fourth reason is taken from the translation of the Seventy for when the Seventy read the Hebrew Text wanting the

the King when he should sit upon the Throne of his kingdome to write a Copie of this Law Deut. 17.18 and the Iewes adde further that he was bound to write out two copies one which he should keepe in his treasurie and another which he should carry about with him and they say moreover if Printing had beene found out then yet hee was bound to write them out with his owne hand Thirdly the Lord commanded the Prophets to write their visions upon Tables 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocant Graeci and to make them plaine Habak 2.2 Esay 8.1 and the Seventy read it to be graven upon the bush tree which is a sort of wood that corrupteth not and it will preserve that which is written upon it and it were to the worlds end Bookes necessary for the Church albeit lost yet they were found againe Fourthly when any booke which was necessary for the use of the Church was lost the Lord had a care that that booke should be found againe as the booke of the law found by Hilkiah 2 King 22.8 Or the Lord endited it anew againe when it was lost as when Iehojakim cut the roule of the lamentations of Ieremie yet the Lord inspired him a new againe to indite this booke to his Scribe Baruch Iere. 36.32 because he thought it necessary still for the Church therefore he would not have it to perish Fiftly in that generall destruction which the Babylonians made at Ierusalem burning their houses and robbing them of their goods The Israelites kept the musicall instruments in the captivity to put them in minde of the worship of God yet as Hierome and Basil observe well it was a speciall providence of God that they should leave to those captives their instruments of Musicke wherewith they used to serve God in the Temple that they might preserve some memorie of their former worship they brought these instruments to Babel with them Psal 137.2 we hung our harpes on willowes If the Lord had such a care of these instruments to have them preserved for his praise much more care had he to have the Scriptures preserved which taught them to worship and he who had a particular care of the parts of the Scripture before it was compleate and numbreth the haires of our heads Matth. 10.30 and the starres of the heavens Psal 147.4 will he not have a speciall care that none of these Bookes should perish which are canonicall That fable of Esdras then is to be rejected lib. 4. The fable of Esdras rejected cap. 4.23 So cap. 14.21 to the 24. verse he sheweth how the booke of God was lost in the Captivity and that Esdras the Scribe by holy inspiration wrote it all anew againe but this is false see we not how Daniel read out of the prophesie of Ieremie how long the captivitie should last Dan. 2.9 The booke of God then was not lost in the captivity and written anew againe by Esdras Esdras wrote nothing of the Scriptures but onely set the bookes in order but onely he set the bookes in order after the captivity nihil ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fecit sed ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hee did nothing in correcting the booke of God but onely set it downe in order But we reade often times in the Scriptures of many Bookes wanting now which were extant before as the Bookes of the battels of the Lord Ans Num. 21.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By this it cannot bee inferred that any canonicall booke is perished for this word Sepher signifieth a relation as well by word as by write Secondly although wee grant that it was a written booke yet it will not follow that it was a holy Booke Thirdly although we grant that it was an holy booke yet it will not follow that it was a canonicall booke The bookes of the Chronicles of the Kings of Iuda and Israel were but civill records Some things written by the Prophets not as they were Prophets and belonged nothing to the canon of the Scriptures Secondly some bookes that were written by the Prophets were not written by them as they were Prophets Salomon wrote of Hearbes Trees and Plants 1 King 4.33 But what bookes were these They were but bookes of things which were under the Moone and of things corruptible and because they served not for the edification of the Church afterwards Hezekiah buried Salomons bookes of physick therefore the Lord suffered them to perish Suidas saith that the booke which Salomon wrote of Physicke was affixed upon the gate in the entrie of the Temple and because the people trusted too much in it neglecting the Lord as Asa put his trust in the Physitians 2 Chro. 13. therefore Hezekiah caused to pull away this booke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and bury it And the Talmud saith that Hezekiah did two memorable things First Ganaz Sepher rephuoth Abscondit librum medicinarum He hid the bookes of Physicke which Salomon had written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And secondly Cathath nahhash hannehhushoth shegnashe Moshe Comminuit aeneum serpentem quem fecerat Moses He brake the brasen Serpent which Moyses made Salomon spake three thousand Proverbes 1 King 4.32 yet of all these Proverbes scarce eyght hundred are put in the Canon Some of these Proverbes the servants of Hezekiah King of Iuda copied out Prov. 25.1 And as they saw the King their master bury Salomons booke which he knew was hurtfull to the Church Salomoni Proverbs and Songs which were not profitable to the Church perished so those servants copied out these Proverbes which were profitable for the Church whereas the rest perished So Salomon wrote a thousand and five Songes of all which Songes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est utriusque numeri quae vel quod the Lord made choyse but of one to be insert in the Canon which is called the Song of Songes or canticum canticorum quae Salomonis rather then canticum canticorum quod Salomonis it was the most excellent Song of all Salomons Songs rather then the excellentest Song compared with other Songes But all bookes written by thē for the whole Church none of them are perished as the Prophesies of Nathan Ahija and Iddo For Burgensis observeth well upon 1 Chro. 29. That the first booke of Samuel is holden to be written by Samuel himselfe So the second Booke of Samuel and the second booke of the Kings were written by Nathan and Gad who lived with David and Salomon and wrote untill the death of Salomon then Iddo and Ahija wrote the historie following of Ieroboam interlacing somethings of Salomon and Rehoboam Object 1 Chron. 29.29 Now the acts of David the King first and last behold they are written in the booke of Samuel the Seer and in the booke of Nathan the Prophet and in the booke of Gad the Seer with all his reigne and his might and the times that went over him and over Israel and all

translated out of the Greeke The first translation of the New Testament was into the Syriacke tongue The first translation of the new Testament was the Syriack Marcke is holden to be the Author of this translation hut he was martyred in the eight yeare of Nero and the Fathers who lived in Egypt and Palestina make no mention of this Syriack translation as Origen Clemens Alexandrinus and Athanasius and therefore it seemeth to be latter and not so soone after the Apostles The Syriack translation which was heretofore in our Churches was defective The Syriack translation which was here to fore wanted many things and wanted many things which were in the originall as it wanted the last verse of the seventh Chapter of Iohn and the history of the adulterous woman Ioh. 8. So the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistle of Iohn the Epistle of Iude and the booke of the Revelation all these were wanting in it But that Copie which is brought lately from Syria wanteth none of these as Ludovicus de Deiu testifieth in his Syriack translation which hee hath now published and the Arabicke translation which Erpeneus had by him hath all these places which the former translation wanted Wee will subjoyne here the postscripts which are found in the Syriack and Arabick translations after the Evangelists The postscript of the Evangelist St. Matthew in the Syriack is this Scriptum est in terra palestinae Hebraice The Postscript of Matthew in the Syriack and Arabick translations this Gospel was written in the Hebrew tongue in Palestina The Postscript in the Arabick is this Absolutum est Evangelium Matthaei Apostoli quod scripsit in terra Palestinae Hebraice auxilio spiritus sancti octo annis postquam dominus noster Iesus Christus carne in caelos ascendit primo anno regni Claudij Caesaris Regis Romani That is the Gospel of the Apostle Matthew which he wrote in Hebrew by the assistance of the holy Spirit in the land of Palestina was perfected eight yeares after Iesus Christ ascended to the Heavens in the first yeare of the reigne of Claudius Caesar the King of the Romans The error of this Syrack and Arabiack postscript Here observe two things first that the Syriack and Arabick say that this Gospel was written in Hebrew first whereas it was written originally in Greeke Secondly that the Arabick calleth Matthew an Apostle whereas he was an Evangelist The postscript of Marke in the Syriack and Arabiack Translationes The Postscript of the Evangelist Marke in the Syriack is this Absolutum est Evangelium Sancti Marci qui loquutus est Evangelizavit Romae That is here endeth the Gospel of S. Marke which he spake and preached at Rome The Arabick hath it thus Finitum est exemplar Marci quod scripsit in ditione romana occidentali in vrbe Romana anno duodecimo postquā dominus noster Iesus Christus carne in Caelos ascendit quarto anno Claudij Caesaris That is here endeth the exemplar of Marke which hee wrote in the province of westerne Rome in the City of Rome it selfe twelve yeares after our Lord Iesus Christ ascended into heaven in the flesh in the fourth yeere of Claudius Caesar The errour of these two postscripts But this Postscript is not probable for Marke lived in the Church of Alexandria in Egypt therefore it is more probable that he wrote his Gospel there than at Rome The postscript of Lu●● In the Arabiack and Syriack Translation The Postscript of Luke in the Syriack is this Scriptum est Alexandriae magnae quindecem annis a Christi ascensione It was written in the great City of Alexandria fifty yeares after Christs ascention The Arabick is Scriptum est grace in civitate Macedonia vigesimo secundo anno post ascensionem Domini in caelum vigesimo quarto anno Claudij Caesaris This Gospell was written in Greeke in the City of Macedonia twenty two yeares after the Lords ascension into the heavens the twenty fourth yeare of Claudius Caesar Here we may see the difference betwixt these two Postscripts the Syriack saith The error of these two postscripts it was written in Alexandria in Egypt and the Arabick saith it was written in Macedonia in Greece what credite then should wee give to these Postscripts The Postscript of Iohn the Syriack is The postscript of Iohn in the Arabiack and Syriak Translation Iohannes Evangelista hoc Evangelium edidit Grace Ephesi That is the Evangelist set forth this Gospel in Greeke at Ephesus the Arabick is Iohannes filius Zebedaei vnus ex duodecem Apostolis scripsit id graece Incolis Ephesi anno post ascensionem domini in Calos tricesimo imperante Nero. Iohn the son of Zebedaeus one of the twelve Apostles wrote this in Greeke to the inhabitants of Ephesus thirty yeares after Christs ascension in the reigne of Nero. The Syriack translation is read in Syria Mesopotamea Chaldea and Egypt and it was sent first in to Europe by Ignatius Patriarch of Antioche These who translated the Bible in latter times The latter Translaters of the Bible Popish or Orthodoxe were eyther Popish or Orthodoxe Popish the Latine translation established by the councill of Trent Vatablus Arias Montanus Pagninus and Isiodorus Clarius By the reformed as by Munster Ecolampadius by Leo Iuda who dying before the worke was finished Bibliander and Conradus Pellicanus finished it and then they are called Biblia Tigurina And lastly by Iunius and Tremellius Of the Vulgar Latine translation WHen light arose to them who sate in darkenesse and in the shadow of death to the Protestants who lived before in Popery they began to search the originall Text and to looke into the fountaines the Hebrew and Greeke and they charged the adversaries to bring their proofes out of the originall Text in their disputations with them The Church of Rome decreed that the Vulgar Latin translation should be the originall The Church of Rome to obviat this made a decree in the Councill of Trent Anno. 1546. that the vulgar Latine should be holden for the originall which was as base a change as when Rehoboam changed the golden Sheilds in the Temple into Sheilds of brasse 1 King 14.27 So have they changed the originall into the Vulgar Latine translation and made it authenticke which in many places is corrupted After that they had inacted that the Vulgar Latine should be onely the touchstone to try all controversies and that they should use it in their readings and disputations then Sixtus Quintus the Pope tooke great paines about the correcting of this Vulgar Latine Pius the fourth and Pius Quintus had done something before in the correcting of this Vulgar translation but it was Sixtus Quintus that finished it Forty foure yeeres betwixt the act of the Councill and the finishing of the Latin translation Anno 1590. So that there were forty foure yeares betwixt the Act made in the Councill