God shall destroy him with the Spirit of his mouth idest verbo suo Beza God hath consecrated the word to this purpose the end of it is not onely to save but destroy being the savor of death to some and it is a fit instrument for such a worke Antichrists strength is in mens consciences onely this will pierce thither Heb. 4. 12. God useth the word for the destruction of Antichrist these waies 1. It discovers him his doctrine his errours 2. It hardens him 3. It condemneth him and passeth sentence against him CHAP. III. 2. The Bookes of Scripture FRom the Divine flowes the Canonicall authority of the Scripture The bookes of Scripture are called Canonicall bookes say some from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is used 2 Cor. 10. 13. Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 marke the double emphasis this notable Canon because they were put into the Canon by the Universall Church acknowledged to be divinely inspired by it and also are made a perfect Canon or rule of all doctrine concerning religion credendorum agendorum of faith and manners of all things which are to be believed or done toward salvation But Cameron thinks it is not termed Canonicall because it is a rule for that booke saith he is called Canonicall which is put into the Catalogue which the ancients called a Canon of those writings which are esteemed Divine Becanus saith they are called Canonicall both because they containe a rule which we ought to follow in faith and manners and because they are put into the Catalogue of Divine bookes The conditions of a Canon are these 1. It must containe truth or be an expresse form and image of truth which is in the divine mind 2. It must be commanded sanctified and confirmed by Divine authority that it may be a Canon to us in the Church These bookes were sanctified either commonly all of both Testaments by the testimony of the Spirit and Church and Canon it selfe or the books of the old Testament were specially and singularly confirmed by word signes and event as the Pentateuch but the Propheticall books and Hagiographa before their carrying into Babylon by extraordinary signe the cloud and vaile in the Temple 1 Kings 8. 10. Levit. 16. 2. and Gods answer by Ephod Urim and Thummim Exod 28. 30. after their carrying away into Babylon by singular testimonies of events The books of the new Testament are confirmed by the Sonne of God revealed in flesh by his sayings and deeds Heb. 1. 2. and by the powerfull ministery of the Apostles by signes vertues and miracles Marke 16. 20. There is a threefold Canon in the Church Divine Ecclesiasticall and False The Divine Canon is that which properly and by itselfe is called the word of God immediately inspired of God into the Prophets and Apostles This according to the divers times of the Church is distinguished into the old and new Testament 2 Cor. 3. 6 14. this is a common division of the sacred Bible among Christians as in the version of Tremelius and Junius Testamenti veteris novi Biblia sacra and the Geneva gives that title to their Bible La Bible qui est toute la Saincte Escriture du viel novean Testament Austin thinkes they are better called Vetus novum Instrumentum Heinsius Grotius vetus novum Foedus vide Grotii Annotat. in libros Evangelii A Covenant is an agreement between two a Testament is the declaration of the will of one It is called in regard of the forme convention and agreement betweene God and man a Covenant in regard of the manner of confirming it a Testament For 1. in a Testament or last will the Testators mind is declared so is the will of God in his word therefore it is called a Testimony often Psal. 19. 119. l 2. Here is a Testator Christ a Legacy eternall life Heires the elect a writing the Scripture Seales the Sacraments 3. Because it is ratified by the death of Christ Heb. 9. 16 17. The Bookes of the old Testament are the holy Scriptures given by God to the Church of the Jewes shewing them what to believe and how God would be worshipped The new Testament containeth the bookes which treate of salvation already exhibited and Christ already come in the flesh All the bookes of the old Testament were written originally in Hebrew because they were committed unto the Hebrews Rom. 3. 2. except what Daniel and Ezra wrote in the Chaldee The Jewish Church receiving them from God kept them and delivered them to posterity Many grave Authours hold that the Hebrew was the first Tongue and mother of all the rest and it may probably be collected from the names of our first parents It was called Hebrew saith Erpenius not from Heber of the posterity of Sem as Josephus Jerome and others thinke when it is manifest that he rather spake Chaldee then Hebrew because Abraham the Patriarke which drew his originall from him was a Chaldean but it was so called saith Erpenius as all the Rabbines Origen and others testifie from the Hebrews which people arose from Canaan It is honoured with the title of the holy Tongue saith the same Erpenius because the most holy God spoke it to his Prophets delivered his holy will written in it to the Church and because it is very probable from the opinion of great men that holy men shall use it with God hereafter in Heaven vide Buxtorfium de Linguae Hebraeae origine Antiquitate Sanctitate There are many Hebraismes also in the new Testament many words and phrases rather used according to the manner of the Hebrews then the Greeks by which it is mauifest that the same Spirit was the Authour of the old and new Testament The knowledge of the Hebrew much conduceth to the learning of those famous Orientall Tongues the Chaldee Syriacke Arabicke and Aethiopicke by reason of the great affinity which they have with their mother The bookes of the old Testament may be divided severall waies in respect of the stile some were written in prose some in verse in respect of time some were written before their being taken captives into Babylon as Samuel Esay Hâ—sea and many others some in the Captivity and some after as Haggai Zachary Malachy The Hebrewes divide the Bible ex instituto Esdrae into three speciall parts 1. The Law the five Bookes of Moses 2. The Prophets 1. The former Joshua Judges two bookes of Samuel and two of the Kings 2. The latter 1. Greater three 2. Lesser twelve 3. The Hagiographa for want of a more speciall name by which title all the rest are understood and they are eleven Our Saviour himselfe mentions this most ancient distinction Luke 24. 44. calling all the rest of the bookes besides the Law and Prophets Psalmes All the Scriptures of the old Testament in other places are comprised in the Law
Arts and Sciences but they could not learne of them the knowledge of the true God they themselves being ignorant and grosse Idolaters Neither could they erre in that which they delivered for by them the Spirit of Christ and Christ himselfe did speake 1 Pet. 1. 11. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Acts 28. 25. 2 Cor. 13 3. In thâ—ir owne judgement the most holy did erre as 1 San 16. 1 and Nathan 2 Sam. 6. which errour is truly related in the Scripture but when they spake according to the guidance of the Spirit which did ever assist them in the penning of the Scripture they could not erre I have learned saith Austin to Jerome to give this honour onely to the Canonicall bookes firmely to believe that no authour of them erred in writing from all others he expected proofe from Scripture or reason 12. The wonderfull consent singular harmony and agreement of the Scriptures shewes that they came not from men but from God John 5. 46. each part sweetly agreeth with it selfe and with another and with the whole Acts 26. 22. 11. 17. Luke 24 27. John 5. 46. Matth. 4. 4. what was foretold in the old is fulfilled in the new Testament If there seem any contrariety either in numbring of yeeres circumstance of time and place or point of doctrine the fault is in our apprehension and ignorance not in the thing it selfe and by a right interpretation may easily be cleared See Dr. Willet on Gen. 24. 38. These considerations strengthen this argument 1. The length of time in which this writing continued from Moses untill John to whom was shewed the last authenticall revelation which prevents all conceits of forgery since they were not written in one nor yet in many ages 2. The multitude of books that were written and of writers that were imployed in the service 3. That difference of place in which they were written which hinders the writers conferring together Two other arguments may evince this truth that the Scriptures were from God 1. Miracles both of 1. Confirmation which the Lord shewed by Moses Exod. 19. 16. 24. 18. 34. 29. the Prophets 1 Kings 7. 24. Christ himselfe and the Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine such as the devill was not able to resemble in shew The raising of the dead the standing still or going backe of the Sunne the dividing of the Sea and the Rivers the making of the barren fruitfull My works testifie of me saith Christ and believe the workes which I doe if you will not believe me 2. Preservation of the bookes of the Scripture 〈◊〉 the fury of many wicked Tyrants which sought to suppresse and extinguish them but could not As God caused it to be written for the good of his people so by divine providence he hath preserved the same whole and entire Here we have three arguments in one 1. The hatred of the Devill and his wicked instruments against the Scripture more then any other booke Antiochus burnt it and made a Law that whosoever had this booke should die the death yet secondly it was preserved maugre his fury and the rage of Dioclesian Julian and other evill Tyrants Thirdly the miserable end of Julian Antiochus Epiphanes Herod Nero Domitian and Dioclesian and other persecutors of this doctrine The bookes of Salomon which he wrote of naturall philosophy and other knowledge the profitablest bookes that ever were the Canon excepted are perished but those alone which pertaine to godlinesse have been safely kept to posterity which is the rather to be observed since many more in the world affect the knowledge of naturall things then godlinesse and yet though carefull of keeping them they have not been able to preserve them from perpetuall forgetfulnesse whereas on the other side these holy writings hated of the most part and carelesly regarded of a number have notwithstanding as full a remembrance as they had the first day the Lord gave them unto the Church The Roman Empire for 300 yeeres set it selfe to persecute and extirpate this new doctrine and in all these troubles the Church grew and increased mighily Acts 12. 1. Herod killed JAmes with the sword yet v. 24. the word grew and multiplied The miracles wrought in the confirmation of Scripture differ much from the wonders wrought by the false Prophets Antichrist and Satan himselfe Matth. 24. 24. 2 Thes. 2. 11. Apoc. 13. 13 14. they are neither in number nor greatnesse comparable to these 1. They differ in substance Divine miracles are above and against the force of nature as dividing of the red Sea the standing still of the Sunne the others seem wonderfull to those which are ignorant of the cause of them but are not true miracles simply above the ordinary course of nature but effected by the art and power of Satan or his instruments by naturall causes though unknown to men and many times they are but vaine delusions 2. They differ in the end those true miracles were wrought by the finger of God for the promoting of his glory and mans salvations these to seale up falshood and destroy men confirmed in idolatry and heathenisme 2 Thess. 2. 9. Those were not done in a corner or secretly but openly in the presence of great multitudes nay in the sight of the whole world by the evidence of which an unknown doctrine before contrary to the nature and affections of men was believed Bainham said in the midst of the fire Ye Papists behold ye looke for miracles and here now ye may see a miracle for in this fire I feele no more paine then if I were in a bed of down but it is to me as sweet as a bed of Roses The miracles done by our Saviour Christ and his Apostles receved testimony of their most venemous and bitterest enemies they had 2. The Testimony 1. Of the Church and Saints of God in all ages 2. Of those which were out of the Church 1. Of the Church Both ancient and Judaicall and the present Christian Church 2. Of the members of the Church 1. The Church of the Jewes professed the doctrine and received the bookes of the old Testament and testified of them that they were Divine which invincible constancy remaineth still in the Jewes of these daies who though they be bitter enemies to the Christian Religion doe stiffely maintaine and preserve the Canon of the old Testament pure and uncorrupt even in those places which do evidently confirme the truth of Christian Religion 2. The Christian Church hath also most faithfully preserved the old Canon received from the Jewes and now delivered by the Apostles as a depositum and holy pledge of the Divine will 2. Of the members of the Church the constant testimony which so many worthy Martyrs by their blood have given to the truth Rev. 6.
and Prophets Matth. 5. 17. 7. 12. 11. 13. 20. 40. Acts 13. 15. 24. 14. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 3. 21. or Moses and the Prophets Luke 24. 27. 16. 29. or in the Scriptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26. or the Prophets alone Luke 1. 70. 24. 25 27. Rom. 1. 2. Heb. 1. 1. the name Prophet being taken as it is given to every holy writer The Jewes and the Ancient reckon 22 Bookes in the old Testament according to the number of the Letters of the Alphabet for memory sake Ruth being joyned with the Booke of Judges and the Lamentations being annexed to Jeremy their Author Hebraeis sunt initiales medianae literae 22 finales quinque Quamobrem V. T. modo in 22. modo in 27. libros partiuntur All the bookes of both Testaments are 66. 39 of the old and 27 of the new Testament Some would have Hugo Cardinall to be the first Authour of that division of the Bible into Chapters which we now follow No man put the verses in the Latine Bibles before Robert Stephen and for the new Testament he performed that first being holpen by no Booke Greeke or Latine Vide Croii observat in novum Testam c. 7. This arithmeticall distinction of Chapters which we have in our Bibles was not from the first authours Of which that is an evident token that in all the quotations which are read in the new Testament out of the old there is not found any mention of the Chapter which would not have been altogether omitted if all the Bibles had then been distinguished by Chapters as ours distinguishing of the Bible into Chapters and Verses much helpes the reader but it sometimes obscures the sense Dr Raynolds gives this counsell to young Students in the study of Divinity that they first take their greatest travell with the helpe of some learned interpreter in understanding St Johns Gospell and the Epistle to the Romans the sum of the new Testament Esay the Prophet and the Psalmes of David the summe of the old and in the rest they shall doe well also if in harder places they use the judgement of some godly writer as Calvin and Peter Martyr who have written best on the most part of the old Testament The Bookes of the old Testament are 1. Legall 2. Historicall 3. Poeticall 4. Propheticall 1. Legall which the Hebrews call from the chiefe part Torah Deut. 31. 9. 33. 4. the Grecians from the number Pentateuch the five Bookes of Moses Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deuteronomy all written by Moses as it is commonly agreed except the last Chapter in the end of Deuteronomy concerning his death written by Joshua In which five Bookes are described the things done in the Church from the beginning of the world to the death of Moses The Sadduces as some say received no other Scripture but these five Bookes of Moses therefore Christ Matth. 23. 32. proves the resurrection of the dead which they denied out of the second Booke of Moses but Scultetus saith that they rejected not the Prophets l. 1. exercit evang c. 22. Anciently it was not the custome of holy writers to adde Titles to what they had written but either left their workes altogether without Titles or the first words were Titles the Titles now in use as Genesis Exodus were prefixed according to the arbitrement of men and the like is to be thought of those before the historicall bookes of the new Testament as Matthew Marke Luke John With the Hebrews the Titles of bookes are taken sometimes from the subject matter or argument as in the bookes of Judges Ruth Kings Proverbs and others of that kinde sometimes from the Authors or amanuenses rather as in the bookes of Joshua and the Prophets sometimes from the initiall words with which the bookes begin which Jerome followes The Bookes of Moses are denominated from the initiall words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. in principie i. e. Genesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. Haec nomina h. e. Exodus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. vocavit h. e. Leviticus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. in deserto i. e. Numeri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 5. verba sive Deuteronomium These are subdivided againe into 54 Sections that the reading of them may be finished in so many Sabbaths which is signified Acts 15. 12. Junius Ainsworth and Amama with Calvin Cornelius a Lapide and Piscator have done well on the Pentateuch 1. Genesis in Hebrew Bereshith the first word of the book by the Septuagint it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which appellation the Latine Church retained because it sets forth the first generation of things Ch. 2. v. 4. and of Adam or mankind Gen. 5. 1. It consists of 50 Chapters and containes a History of 2368 yeeres from the creation of the world to the death of Joseph The best Expositors of this booke are Mercer River Pareus Caelvin Peter Martyr on 40 Chapters Willet Ainsworth Origen upon the Canticles and Jerome upon Ezekiel say that the Hebrewes forbad those that had not attained to the age of the Priesthood and judgement viz. 30 yeeres to reade in three bookes for their profundity and difficulty that is the beginning of the world which is contained in the three first Chapters of Genesis the beginning and end of Ezekiel since that treats of the Cherubins and the Divine Majesty this of the structure of the third Temple and the Song of Songs in which those things which ought to be understood of the Divine Authour are easily through youthfull affection elsewhere drawne and wrested This booke of Genesis is not onely profitable but very necessary for doctrine as Moses is the Prince and as it were Parent of Divines so Genesis is the foundation and excellent compendium of all Divinity propounding evidently the chiefe parts of it 2 Exodus The second booke of Moses is called in Hebrew Shemoth in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word the Latines have retained It consists of 40 Chapters and containes a History say Junius and Tremelius of 142 yeeres viz. from the death of Joseph even to the building of the Tabernacle The best Expositors of it are Rivet Willet Calvin Ainsworth 3 Leviticus in Hebrew Vaiicra in Greeke and Latine Leviticus from the matter which it handleth because it treats especially of the Leviticall Priesthood and the Leviticall or Ceremoniall Lawes in it It consists of 27 Chapters and containes a History of one Moneth viz. of the first in the second yeere after their going out of Egypt The best Expositors of it are Calvin Ainswarth and Willet 4 Numbers in Hebrew Vaie dabber in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Latine Numeri in English Numbers because it begins with declaring the number of the people and because many numberings are reckoned up in this booke It containes a History of 38 yeeres and consists of 36 Chapters The
best Expositors of it are Calvin Attersoll Ainsworth 5 Deuteronomy in Hebrew Haddebarim from the first words in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latine retaines because it containes a second repetition of many necessary points of the Law It consists of 34 Chapters and containes a history of the two last moneths of the yeere Some say concerning the 34 Ch. 10. that part of it was written by Ezra contemporary with Malachy The best Expositors of it are Calvin Ainsworth Wolphius Cornelius a Lapide 2 Historicall 1. Before the Captivity Joshua Judges Ruth Samuel Kings 2 After the Captivity both the Chronicles Ezra Nehemiah The sixth Booke in the old Testament is called Joshua because it containes a History of things done by Joshua the servant of Moses which he by the will of God put in writing it being all written by him except some of the last Chapter where mention is made of his death and thought to be written by Samuel It consists of 24 Chapters and containes a History of 18 yeeres viz. from the death of Moses even to the death of Joshua The best Expositors of it are Masius and Serarius for Papists Drusius and Lavater of Protestants The seventh booke is called Shophetim Judges because it containes things done under the government of the 12 Judges There is nothing certaine of the authour of this Booke though some would have Samuel but he rather collected and compiled into one Volume what was written by many It describes the state of the government of Israel from the death of Joshua even to the Priesthood of Eli. It consists of 21 â—â—hapters and containes a History of 299 yeeres say some of 300 at least saith Spanhemius The best Expositors of it are Peter Martyr Drusius Lavater Serrarius The eighth is Ruth the authour of which booke is unknowne many thinke it was written by Samuel who added this as a part or conclusion of the booke of Judges It consists of foure Chapters and is an History concerning the marriage and posterity of Ruth The best Expositors of it are Deusius Wolphius Lavater Topsell The ninth in order are the two bookes of Samuel which containe in them an History of 120 yâ—eres The first beginning an History of 80 yeeres of 40 under Eli 1 Sam. 4. 18. and of 40 under Samuel and Saul Acts. 13. 21. and consists of 31 Chapters The second Booke is a History of 40 yeeres even from the death of Saul to the end of Davids Kingdome and consists of 24 Chapters These two Bookes in the Originall have two severall Titles The one is the first and second of Kings the other the first and second of Samuel The former Title it hath received as it stands in relation to the two next Bookes and in opposition to that of Judges for as in that Story the Regiment of Judges was described in one Booke so in this Story of which these two are but one part the Regiment of Kings is described this is the reason of the first Title The other likewise of the first and second of Samuel is given unto it 1. Because there is very frequent mention made of Samuel therein he being a principall subject of the first part thereof 2. Because it continueth the narration so farre till the infallible truth of Samuels principall Prophesie which seemed to remaine in great doubtfulnesse at least when he ended his daies was fully accomplished in establishing the Kingdome upon the person and family of David the sonne of Jesse The best Expositors of both the Samuels are Peter Martyr Drusius Willet also hath expounded them but not so well as he hath other Bookes of Scripture The tenth is the two Bookes of the Kings in Hebrew Melachim is Greeke and Latine the third and fourth of the Kings from the subject matter of them because they relate the Acts of the Kings of Israel and Judah This History was written by divers Prophets but who digested it into one Volume is uncertaine many ascribe it unto Esdras The first Booke consists of 22 Chapters and containes a History of 118 yeeres The second Booke consists of 25 Chapters and containes a History of 320 yeeres The best Expositors of both the Kings are Peter Martyr and Gaspar Sanctius The eleventh Booke is the two Bookes of Chronicles which is called Dibrei Hajamim verba dierum because in them the deeds of the Kings of Israel are particularly described The Greekes and Latines divide it into two with the Greekes it is called liber 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 q. d. praetermissorum because he summarily explaines somethings either omitted or not fully described in the Pentateuch the bookes of Joshua Judges Samuel and the Kings Of the Latines liber Chronicorum q. d. Chronologicum which appellation Luther retaines in the Dutch version of the Bible There is nothing certaine of the authour of these Bookes though Esdras be thought to be the authour The first Booke consists of 29 Chapters and containes a History of 2985 yeeres viz. from the creation of the world even to the Kingdome of Salomon The second consists of 32 Chapters and describes a History from the beginning of the Kingdome of Salomon even to the returne out of the captivity of Babylon The best Expositor on both the Chronicles is Lavater Twelfthly the two Bookes of Ezra they are counted for one Volume with the Hebrewes the Greekes and Latines devide them into two Bookes and assigne the first to Ezra the second to Nehemiah Ezra was so called from the Authour which was a Scribe most skild in the law of God as appeares in the 7 Chap. 1 6 11 verses The best Expositors of it are Junius and Wolphius Nehemiah It is called by the Latines the second Booke of Ezra because the History begun by Ezra is continued in it but usually Nehemiah because it was written by him and also because it containes the re-edifying of the City of Jerusalem caused by Nehemiah It consists of 13 Chapters and containes a Hiâ—tory of 55 yeeres viz. from the 20 yeere of Artaxerxes to the Kingdome of the last Darius The best Expositors of it are Wolphius and Pilkinton The next Booke is Esther called in Hebrew the Volume of Esther Many of the Jewes thinke this Booke was written by Mordechai which those words in the 9 Chap. v. 20. 23. seem to favour Isidore saith Esdras is thought to have written Esther but some say it was composed after by another Moses Camius saith it was written by the men of the great Synagogue Philo Judaeus saith Joachim a Priest of the Hebrewes sonne of the hight Priest was the composer of it and that he did it at the intreaty of Mordecai the Jew It consists of ten Chapters and containes a History of 10 or as others will of 20 yeeres concerning the preservation of the Church of the Jewes in Persia by Hester Drusius Serrarius and Merlin have done well on this Booke 3.
Poeticall Job Psalmes Proverbs Ecclesiastes Canticles to which some adde the Lamentations Those parts of Scripture wich set forth strongest affections are composed in verse as those holy flames of Spirituall love betweene Christ and his Spouse in the Canticles of Salomon The triumphant joy of Deborah after deliverance from Sisera's Army of Moses and Miriam after the destruction of Pharaoh the afflicting sorrowes of Hezekiah in his sicknesse and the Lamentations of Jeremy for the captivity of the Jewes The Booke of Psalmes is as it were a throng of all affections Love joy sorrow feare hope anger zeale every passion acting a part and wound up in the highest stâ—â—ines by the Spirit of God breathing Poeticall eloquence iâ—to the heavenly Prophet So the Booke of I b whose subjâ—ct is sorrow hath a composure answerable to the matter Paâ—lion hath most scope in Verse and is freest when tied up in numbers Job There is great varieiy of judgement about the Authour and Penman of this Booke some say it was one of the Prophets but they know not who some ascribe it to Salomon some to Elihu many to Moses Hugo Cardinall Suidas and Pineda conceive that Job himselfe was the authour of this book and it is thus proved because when any Booke is inscribed by the name of any person and there appeares no urgent reason wherefor it could not be written by him such a person is to be thought the authour and not the matter of the Booke as is manifest in the Booke of Joshua and those of the greater and lesser Prophets The Arabicall speeches with which it abounds note that it was written by some man living neere Arabia as Job did Neither doth it hinder that Job speakes of himselfe in the third person for Canonicall writers are wont to doe this out of modesty Num. 12. 3. John 21. 24. It is conceived to be the first piece of Scripture that was written if Moses wrote it it is probable that he wrote it before the deliverance of the people of Israel out of Aegypt while he was in Midian The maine and principall subject of this booke is contained in 34 Psal 19. Many are the afflictions of the righteous but the Lord delivereth him out of all We may divide the Booke into three parts and so it sets forth 1. Jobs happy condition both in regard of externals and internals in the first five verses 2. Jobs fall his calamity from that to the seventh verse of the 42 Chapter 3. Jobs restitution or restoring from thence to the end Beza Mercer and Pineda have well expounded it The Psalmes are called in the Hebrew Sepher Tehillim a booke of divine praises in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called from a Muâ—call instrument which name the Latines have retained It containes sacred Songs to be fitted for every condition both of the Church and members It is called in the new Testament the Booke of Psalmes Luke 20. 42. 24 44. Acts 1. 20. No bookes in the old Testament are oftner cited in the new then Esay and the Psalmes that 60 times this 64. They are in all 150 in Greeke 151. Austin and Chrysostome ascribe them all to David as the Authour so doe Theophylact Ludo vicus de Tena Some thinke that after the Captivity Esdras collected these Psalmes dispersed here and there into one Volume There are ten Authors whose names are put in the Titles of the Psalmes viz. David Salomon Moses Asaph Etham Eman Jeduthun and the three sonnes of Corah Odae istae Davidis dicuntur quod is multas veteres collegerit multas ipse Psallendi sciens addiderit aut per homines idoneos addi fecerit Grotius The Hebrewes divide the Psames into five Bookes or parts The first Booke hath the first 41 Psalmes the second 31 from 42 to 73 the third 17 from 73 to 90 the fourth 17 from 90 even to 107 the fifth 43 from the 107 to 150. Vide Genebr in Psal. 1. v. a. 1. Tituli sunt Psalmoeum claves the Titles are Keys as it were of the Psalmes saith Jerome The best Expositors on the Psalmes are Musculus Mollerus Muis Calvin The Scripture is the choicest booke the Psalmes the choycest piece of Scripture and the 119 Psalme the choicest part of the Psalmes Among 176 verses in that Psalme there are scarce foure or five at most wherein there is not some commendation of the word Proverbs The booke of Proverbs is compared to a great heape of Gold rings rich and orient severally and every one shining with a distinst sence by it selfe but other contexts of holy Writ to Gold chaines so enterwoven and linked together that they must be illightned and receive mutuall illustration one from another It consists of 31 Chapters it was written by Saomon saith Austin 17 Ch. of his 20 booke de oivitate Dei and Josephus in the 8th Booke and 2d Chapter of his Jewish Antiquities and it is proved 1 Kings 432. though there indeed it is said onely he spake them yet it is likely also he wrote them Prov. 1. 1. they are called the Proverbs of Salomon It is a Treatise of Christian manners touching piety toward God and justice toward our neighbours The best Expositors on it are Mercer Cartwright Dod Lavater Graece dieitur hic liber 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nimirum Hebraeum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proprie comparationem significat quia ex comparationibus curtatis plerumque fiebaut Proverbia inde coepit sumi in significatione 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grotius Ecclesiastes in Hebrew Coheleth the feminine hath respect either to wisdome or to the soule the nobler part The Authour of this booke was Salomon who either at his Table or in his familiar conference propounded these doctrines to his Courtiers as may be collected out of 1 Kings 10. 8. Many of the Hebrews say that this Booke was written by Salomon to testifie his repentance of his ill led life It consists of twelve Chapters The summe and scope of the whole Booke is explained in the last Chapter viz that all things in the world are vaine therefore that nothing is more profitable and necessary then to feare God and keepe his Commandements The principall parts of it are two The first concerning the vanity of humane matters and studies in the world the latter of the stability and profit of godlinesse and the feare of God The best Expositors on it are Mercer Cartwright Mr Pemble Granger Canticles are called in Hebrew Shirha Shirim by the Latines Cantica Cantieorum The Song of Songs that is a most excellent Song the Hebrews having no Superlatives Salomon was the Authour of it 1 Kings 4. 32. Many of the Ancients refer it to the spiritual marriage betweene Christ and the Church or every faithfull soule It consists of eight Chapters and perpetuall Dialogues The Jewes had this Book in such reverence and account that before thirty yeeres of age none would
Chapters Obadiah He was almost contemporary to Jeremy It is but one Chapter Doctor Rainolds hath well expounded this prophesie The destruction of the Enemies of the Church is handled in the 16. first verses the Salvation thereof by the Ministery of Pastors in the five last Jonah He prophesied in the time of Jeroboam 2 King 14. 25. Jerome proves by the authority of the Hebrewes that he was contemporary with Hosea and Amos. It consists of foure Chapters Abbots and King have both commented well in English on this prophesie Micah Humiliatus sic dictus Propheta ab insigni miranda humilitate He prophesied in the times of Iotham Achaz and Hezechiah Kings of Judah as appeares by the inscription Ch. 1. v. 1. and was almost contemporary with Isay with whom he agreeth in many things He exceeds all the Prophets in this one thing that he determines the place of Christs Birth 5. Chap. 2. v. It consists of 7. Chapters Daneus and Chythraeâ—s have done well on it Nahum It is probable that he lived before the Babylonish captivity and was contemporary to Micha but 90 yeares after Jonah It consists of three Chapters which containe both a prediction of the destruction of the Assyrians Ch. 1. and also an Explication of the causes of it Chap. 2. and 3. Daneus is the best Expositor of this Book The Hebrews think that both Nahum and Hibacuc wrote in the times of Manasseth Both the order in which these bookes were Anciently placed and the things themselves which are contained in their writings doe intimate as much Grotius Habacue Luctator It is probable that he lived about Jeremies time or a little before It consists of three Chapters Grineus and Daneus have done well on him Zephanie He prophesied in the times of Josiah King of Judah and was contemporary to Jeremy He prophesieth especially of the overthrow of the Kingdome of Judah It consists of three Chapters Daneus hath done well on this prophesie Haggai Chag signifieth a Feast in Hebrew his name signifieth Festivus laetus aut festum celebrans vel diligens quòd templi Hierosolymitani aedificationem post Captivitatem maximè urserit He began to prophesie after the Babylonish captivity in the second yeare of Darius King of Persia Esd. 5. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Grineus and Daneus have done well on this Zacharie He prophesied after the Babylonish captivity and followed Haggai within two moneths he handleth the same subject it consists of 14. Chapters His Booke is more large and obscure then any of the 12. Prophets Daneus hath done well on the whole and Master Pemble on 9. Chapters Malachie Nuncius seu Angelus meus Mal. 4. 4. 5. He was the last Prophet of the old Testament See Grotius of him Tertull. cals him the limit land-marke of both Testaments limes inter vetus novum Testamentum It consists of foure Chapters Daneus and Polanus and Stocke have commented well on this Book So much concerning the severall Books of the old Testament CHAP. IV. THe new Canon is that which the Christian Church hath had written in Greek from the time of Christ and his Apostles and it summarily containes the word published by Christ and his righteous acts The History of which is in the foure Bookes of the Evangelists the examples in the Acts of the Apostles the exposition in the 21. Epistles and lastly the prophesie in the Revelation All the Bookes of the new Testament were written in Greeke for divers reasons First because that tongue in the time of Chist and his Apostles was the most excellent of all among the Languages of the Gentiles Secondly because it was then most Common as Latine is now Tullie shewes orat pro Archia poeta how farre the Greeke Tongue spread Thirdly because in this tongue all the Philosophie and Sciences of the Gentiles were written The Greeke tongue by the writing of Philosophers Orators Historians and Poets was fraught with the best learning which Heathenisme afforded It came to passe by the singular providence of God that this Testament was written in one tongue onely for what Nation else would have yeelded to another that the Scriptures in their tongue were authentique and so the seeds of debate might have beene sowne amonst them All almost agree in this that all the Bookes of the new Testament were written in the Greeke tongue it is onely doubted concerning three of them the Gospell of Matthew Marke and the Epistle to the Hebrewes many affirm that the Gospell of Matthew was written by Matthew in Hebrew or rather in Syriacke the Language used by Hebrewes in the time of Christ and his Apostles that the Epiâ—â—le to the Hebrews was written in Hebrew Mark in Latin It is certaine that the Primitive Church from the first times used the Gospell of Matthew written in Greeke and counted it authenticall If any one say that the Latine Edition of Marke in the vulgar is not a version but the first Copie he may easily be refuted from the uniforme stile in it with other Latine Gospels and it will appeare to any Reader that the Gospell of Marke which the Roman Church useth is later then the Greeke and that the Latine was made from it For the Epistle to the Hebrewes though many among the Antient thought it was written in Hebrew yet all agree that the Greek Edition was in use thence from the first times of the Church Glassias saith Matthew wrote his Gospell first in Greek for his stile agrees with Marke Writers acknowledge that there is an Ancient Hebrew Copie of Matthew but upon good ground deny that it is the originall truth for besides that by received Tradition it is held otherwise Matth. 1. 23. and other such like places doe evince it for why should he writing in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to them which understand that Language Hieron in quatuor Evangelia and Salmasius hold that Matthew was written in Hebrew Evangelium Matthaei Hebraicè ab auctore scriptum esse nemo non veterum tradidit Hebraeum illud Syriacum esse quod in usu tunc temporis in Judaea fuit Hieronymus docet qui Evangelium Matthaei scriptum fuisse testatur Chaldaicâ— Syroque Sermone Salmas de Hellenistica Erasmus Cajetane Calvin Junius Whitaker Gomarus Causabone Gerhard deny that Matthew was written in Hebrew Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 1. saith we have the new Testament in Greek for although some contend that the Gospell of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Hebrew yet saith he it is very uncertaine and so propius falso I thinke saith Rivet that the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Greeke a tongue then most common and which was used by many Hebrewes which were called Hellenists That Marke should be written in Latine originally is improbable many of the reasons alleaged to prove that Matthew was not written in Hebrew are of force here also the Jewes at
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
authority as you may see in his Euchirid lib. 1. c. 8. and l. 10. de civitate Dei cap. 5. Beza Hemingius Aretius leave it in medio Calvin and Marlorat deny that it was Pauls The reasons saith Cartwright in his confutation of the Rhemists moving us to esteeme it none of Pauls are first that his name is not prefixed as in all the epistles undoubtedly knowne to be his Another reason is that this writer confesseth that he received the doctrine of the Gospell not of Christ himselfe but of those which heard it of Christ Heb. 2. 3. whereas Paul received his doctrine immediately from Christ and heard it himselfe of Christ and not of them that heard it from him To the first objection by Fulke it is easily answered the diversity of stile doth not prove that Paul was not the authour of this epistle for as men have written divers things in divers stiles in respect of matter and persons to whom they wrote as Tully his offices orations and epistles so the Spirit of God could and might inspire one and the same man to pen in a different manner 2. The other argument also against it being Pauls because his name is not prefixed hath but little force in it 1. If it be not Pauls because his name is not prefixed then it is nones because no mans name is prefixed so Jerome and from him Beza and Bellarmine both thus answer 2. The Authour of this epistle did conâ—eale his name that thereby he might not offend the weake Jewes to whom he wrote with whom he knew his name was hatefull 3. Beza saith he found Pauls name added to this epistle in all ancient Greeke copies one excepted Other bookes have no name prefixed as the first epistle of John hath not his name prefixed and yet certainly believed to be his For the last Objection Beza answers that he reckons himselfe among the hearers of the Apostles to avoyd the envy of Apostleship see 1 Pet. 4. 3. All the Grecians and many of the more famous of the Ancient Latines as Austin Ambrose Gregory and many moderne writers of note as Beza Bellarmine Gerhard Capâ—llus Martinius Walter Cornelius a Lapide hold it was written by Paul and for divers reasons 1. The Authour of this Epistle commends a certaine famous Disciple Timothy Chap. 13. v. 23. but none had such a one but Paul 2. He remembers his bonds Chap. 10. v. 34. which is a usuall thing with Paul Phil. 1. 7. Col. 4. 18. 2 Tim. 2. 9. Philem. v. 9. 10. 3. He hath many of the same axomes with Paul compare Heb. 1. â— 3. with Col. 1. 14 15 16 17. Heb. 5. 12 13. with 1 Cor. 3. 1 2. and divers other places Paul saith by that signe his Epistles may be known and distinguished from others viz. that subscription the grace of our Lord 2 Thes. 3. 18. which clause is found in the end of this Epistle Chap. 13. 4. Pauls zeale for the salvation of the Hebrews Rom. 9. 3. makes it propable that he would write unto them Some thinke it may be gathered from that place 2 Pet. 3. 15. Beza having alledged foure reasons urged by some why this Epistle 〈◊〉 not be written by Paul saith Opponitur his omnibus que scribuntur 2 Pet. 3. 15. quae certe videntur hanc Epistolam velut intento digito mâ—nstrare Beza concludes the matter very modestly let the judgements of men saith he be free so we all agree in that that this Epistle was truely dictated by the holy Ghost and preserved as a most precious treasure in the Church Vide Wâ—ltberi officinam Biblicam Whitakeri controvers 1. quest jam de Script cap. 16. Some thinke as I have touched it before that this Epistle was originally written in Hebrew but the stile and phrase of this Epistle doe Graecam redolere eloquentiam non Hebraeâ—m 2. If it was written in Hebrew the Hebraismes would appeare in the Greeke version which yet are rarer here then in other Epistles 3. The Scriptures of the old Testament are cited in it not according to the Hebrew fountains but according to the version of the Seventy 4. The Apostle Ch. 7. interprets the Hebrew name Melchisedech King of righteousnesse and Salem peace which he would not have done if he had written in Hebrew Junius in his paralels holds it to be Pauls and written in Greeke Ribera and Ludovieus a Teâ—a two Papists have written on this Epistle Pareus and Dixon have done best on the whole Booke and Mr Dearing on six Chapters Vâ—etius much commends Gâ—marus There is a good English Expositor on this Epistle lately put forth called the Expiation of a Sinner Those seven Epistles written by JAmes Peter John and Jude have unfit Titles prefixed before them in that they are called sometime Canonicall specially of the Latine Church and sometime Catholicke chiefly of the Greeke Church neither of which were given them by any Apostle or Apostolicke writer Yet though this title Catholicke cannot be defended it may be excused and tolerated as a Title of distinction to distinguish them from the other Epistles Also they may have this Title Canonicall set before them as some bookes of the old Testament were termed Hagiographa by the Jewes not because they were of greater authority then other holy writings but to shew that they ought to be esteemed of and imbraced as Divine howsoever in former times they were unjustly suspected Vide Bezam The second inscription of Catholique is as unsit as the former therefore the Rhemists unjustly blame us for leaving out that Title in our English Bibles for it is well knowne that that Title is not given by the Holy Ghost but by the Scholiast who tooke it from Eusebius Generall is a meere English term of no doubtfull signiâ—ication Catholicke is both Greeke and by their saying of double and therefore doubtfull signification The Syriack interpter hath this inscription of these Epistles as Tremellius sheweth Tres Epistolae trium Apostolorum ante quorum oculos Dominus noster se transformavit id est Jacobi Petri Johannis For the Syrians doe not esteem the second of Peter nor the second and third of John nor the Epistle of Jude Canonicall The Apostles JAmes Peter John and Jude have publisht seven Epistles as mysticall as succinct both short and long short in words long in sence and meaning JAmes For the difference which seemes to be between Jam. 2. 21 22. and Rom. 4. 2. 3. 28. most likely this booke was doubted of in ancient times as Eusebius and Jerome witnesse But yet then also publiquely allowed in many Churches and ever since received in all out of which for the same cause Luther and other of his followers since him would againe reject it Erasmus assents to Luther and Musâ—ulus agrees with them both in his Comment upon the fourth of the Romans both they of the Romish and we of
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
adulterate corrupted by the addition of certaine bookes written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. l. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. sect 21. Tertul. in Apol. c. 19. They are called Apocryphall i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknowne by that reason Judges and Ruth should be Apocryphall but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonicall bookes but secretly and in private by private persons or because their authority was obscure and doubtfull with the Ancient These bookes our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine inspiration for these reasons All the Canonicall bookes of the old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these bookes were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jewes was Malachy Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and John Baptist came no Prophet Marke begins with the same words almost with which Malachy ended a good argument to prove that the new Testament is next to the old But these Bookes were written by such who lived most of them after Malachy 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jewes understood but the Fathers affirme and Papists acknowledge that most of these bookes were written in Greeke ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonicall 2. All the bookes of the old Testament were committed to the Jewes and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jewes for corrupting the sence of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those bookes which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them John 5. 39. Eâ—ras after the captivity is reported to have gathered all the Bookes of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jewes should have rejected or not received any bookes being Canonicall they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirme Yea there should have been some Canonicall Bookes which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jewes at that time there was none in the world The Canonicall Bookes of the old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalmes with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3 There are two waies to know a booke to be Canonicall one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certaine testimony of them which did live when the booke was published who did witnesse that the booke was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these bookes are known to be Canonicall neither of these waies they were rejected by the Jewes who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Bookes unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine All the Canonicall Bookes in generall John 5. 39. 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26. Luke 16. 29 31. Ch. 24. v. 25 27 44. The most of all in speciall Genesis Matth. 19. 4 5 6. Exodus Matth. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Joshâ—a Heb. 11. 30 31. Judges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Matth. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Matth. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luke 4. 27. First of Chronicles Matth. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Job 1 Corinth 3. 19. Psalmes Acts 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Esay Matth. 1. 23. Jeremy Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezechiel Matth. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. 15. 15 16. Hosea Matth. 12. 7. Joâ—l Acts 2. 12. Amos Acts 15. 16. Jonah Matth. 12. 40 41. Micha Matth. 10. 35. Naâ—um Rom. 10. 15. Habacuc Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21 5. Malachy Luke 1. 16 17. These bookes were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their doctrine Ob. If they be not Canonicall therefore because they are not cited then Naâ—um and Zephany are not Canonicall Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonicall because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Sol. They are not therefore not Canonicall onely because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2 Nahuâ— and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the bookes of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonicall but the Apostle applied himselfe to his hearers who did much esteeme their authority Some have well coucluded from Acts 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonicall Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4 Those bookes which containe manifest untruths coutrary to the Word of God and the books of holy Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his word John 17. 17 sweetly agreeeng with it selfe and every part with other these bookes commend false things as true and approve things evill as right Judith chap 9 v 2 commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Mac. 14. 42. Razis is commended for killing himselfe the fact is not onely related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Authour thereof was not inspired of God when the Donatists out of this booke urged that it was lawfull for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge that the authority of this booke was uncertaine and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest fables are told in some of them for true histories as that of Toby Judith Bell and the Dragon If any desire a particular conâ—utation of the severall Bookes of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first 500 yeeres after Christ rejected the same bookes which we doe Jerome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Bookes in the generall is that the third Councell at Carthage the
extoll this Latine edition and contend that it is not onely far better than all the Latine versions but then the Greeke it sele which is the Prototype Before we come to defend our owne or disprove that opinion of the Papists it is necessary first rightly and fully to state the question and to premise some things concerning the severall versions and Translations of the Scripture We deny not that part of Daniel and Ezra which was written in the Chaldee dialect to be authenticall because we know the Lord was pleased that in that language as well as the Hebrew some of his Divine truth should be originally written 1. For the more credit of the stories the Lord bringeth forth forraigne Nations and their Chronicles for witnesses least any of them should doubt of the truth thereof 2. The Lord would have some part of those stories come to the knowledge of the Heathen and it was requisite that the Chaldeans should know the sinnes and impieties of that Nation and the judgements that should befall to testifie unto all the truth of God therefore in generall the alteration of the terrene States and Kingdomes is shadowed forth and published in the Chaldee tongue that the Gentiles might take knowledge thereof but the particular Histories of the comming of the Messias of his Office and Kingdome and of the calamities and afflictions which should befall the people of God are set forth in the Hebrew tongue as more especially concerning them Likewise it pleased God for the better credit of the story that the History of those things which were said and done in Chaldea should be written in the same Language wherein they were first spoken and therefore the Epistles and rescrips of the Kings are delivered in the Chaldee speech as taken out of their publique Acts and Records and that the History in Daniel set forth in the Chaldee speech gaining him respect with the Chaldeans might stirre up the Jewes to receive Daniel as a Prophet of God whom the Heathens admired If there be any footsteps of the Chaldee and Arabique in Job as some learned say we doe not exclude them from authentique authority for we say the whole old Testament for the most part in Hebrew and few parcels in Chaldee are the authentique edition of the old Testament The Greeke copies of the new Testament are also from God immediately the very dialect wherein those Prototypes were which the Pens of the Evangelists and Apostles did write For the Gospell of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrews being written in Hebrew and Marke in Latine we have refuted that opinion already the Greeke edition of those three Bookes as well as of all the other of the new Testament is authenticall The versions of the Scripture are either the Chaldee and Greeke of the old Testament the Syriacke and Arabicke of the new the Latine Italian French and English of both Testaments All the versions of the sacred Scripture have so far divine authority as they agree with the originall tongue and to say that any Translation is pure and uncorrupt and that the very fountaines are muddy is both a foolish and impions blasphemy The tongue and dialect is but an accident and as it were an argument of the Divine truth which remains one and the same in all Idiomes therefore the faith of the unlearned depends on God not on men although the Translations by benefit of which they are brought to believe be perfected by the labour of men Gods providence and care of the Church is such that he would never let it be long destitute of a fit Translation which being publisht by learned men and approved of by the Church how ever it failed in some things yet following the truth constantly in the more principall and necessary things might be sufficient to all for wholsome instruction The versions differ often much among themselves Arias Montanus differs much from Pagnin a learned Translator and Vatablus from both from all these Luther and from him againe the Vulgar Osiander LXX varie The Chaldee Edition of the old Testament is not a Translation done word for word but a Paraphrase and so called the Chaldee Paraphrase by the Jews Targum though some conceive that there is some kind of distinction to speake accurately between the Chaldee Paraphrase and Targum Targum being a generall word signifying an Interpretation or Paraphrase though it usually now by an excellency denoteth the Chaldee Paraphrase There were three authors of it as it is reported according to the threefold difference of the Hebrew bookes Rabbi Achilam or Aquila who is vulgarly called Onkelos upon the five bookes of Moses Rabbi Jonathan the sonne of Vziel upon the former and later Prophets Rabbi Joseph coecus or as some will a certaine Anonymus upon some of the Hagiographa Those Paraphrases of Onkelos and Jonathan are the ancienter and certioris fidei that upon the Hagiographa is far later and lesse certaine it being doubtfull both who was the authour and in what age it was made The common opinion concerning Onkelos and Jonathan is that one wrote a little before Christ the other a little after him Capellus lib. 1. de punctorum Hebraieorum antiquitote cap. 1. Helvicus de Chaldaicis Paraphrasibus ◠2. These Paraphrases among the Jewes saith Helvicus sunt autoritatis plane aequalis ipsi Scripturae Hebraicae neque 〈◊〉 habent illis contradicere Quorunt Paraphrasin nemo doctus non suspicit saith Capellus of Onkelos and Jonathan The use of them is very great 1 to illustrate the Hebrew Text by circumstances or a more full explication of it 2. To confirme the integrity of the Hebrew text Gen. 3. 15. 3. In controversies against the Jewes In controversiis Judaicis praecipuum robur obtinent saith Helvicus Gen. 49. 10. The Chaldee Paraphrasts both of them most excellently expound the place which themselves understood not being like therein to Virgils Bees which make Honey for others and not themselves First Onkelos interpreteth it in this manner A Magistrate exercising authority of the house of Juda shall not depart nor a Scribe of his posterity for ever till Christ come to whom the Kingdome pertaineth and him shall the people obey The other called the Interpreter of Jerusalem thus Kings of the house of Juda shall not faile neither skilfull Law-teachers of his posterity unto the time wherein the King Christ shall come unto whom the Kingdome pertaineth and all the Kingdomes of the Earth shall be subdued unto him If Christ came when authority was gone and authority went away at Jerusalems fall needs must one comming of Christ be referred to the overthrow of that City The Talmundici and latter Rabbines Rabbi Sal. Jarchi Rabbi Dav. Kimchi expound it of the Messiah as Buxtorf shews There are many profitable explications in that Paraphase on the Pentateuch but it is too late to be of authentique authority and the other Chaldee Paraphrases that excepted
us to the Scripture to learn the doctrine of salvation Luke 16. 29. and proveth his doctrine out of Moses and the Prophets Not after Christs coming then the Testimonies cited 〈◊〉 Christ and his Apostles would have been expunged by them and the speciall prophesies concerning Christ But they are all extant The Jewes have and yet still doe keep the holy Text of Scripture most religiously carefully which may appeare since as Johannes Isaac contra Lind in l. 2. a Learned Jew writeth that there are above 200 arguments against the Jewes opinion more evident and expresse in the Hebrew Text of the old Testament then there be in the Latine translation From the dayes of our Saviour Christ untill this time the Jewes keep the Scripture with so great reverence saith the same Isaac ut jejunium indicunt si illa in terram ceciderit they publish a Fast if it fall upon the ground This Testimony of Isaac Levita is the more to be esteemed because he was Lindans own Master and professor of the Hebrew tongue in the university of Coolen and hath written 3. Bookes in the defence of the Hebrew truth against the cavils of his Scholler Arias Mâ—ntanus for his rare skill of tongues and arts was put in trust by King Philip to set forth the Bible in Hebrew Greek and Latine wherein he hath reproved that Treatise of Lindan and disclosed his folly Muis who hath written a Commentary on the Psalmes a great Hebrician and learned Papist hath written against Morinus about this Subject The most learned Papists Senensis Bannes Lorinus Pagnine Brixianus Valla Andradius and Bellarmine hold that the Jews did not maliciously corrupt the hebrew text Josephus l. 1. contra Appian who lived after our Saviour saith that the Jewes did keep the holy Scripture with so great fidelity that they would rather dye then change or alter any thing in it Euseb. Eccles. Hist. l. 3. cap. 10. teacheth the same thing The Stupendious diligence of the Massorites in numbring of the words and Letters with the variations of pointing and writing lâ—â—st any place or suspicion should be given of falsifying it seemes to be a good plea also against the Jewes wilfull depraving of Scripture Paulo post Hieronymum confecta est massora quam utilissimum thesaurum Arias appellaâ— Chamierus If Origen or Jerome the two chiefest Hebricians among the Fathers had had the least suspicion of this they would never have bestowed so much time in the learning of this tongue nor have taken such indefatigable paines in translating the Bibles out of Hebrew Yet Morinus would seeme to give answer to this viz. that we might convince the Jewes out of their own Books Jerome doth in a thousand places call it the Hebrew truth fontem limpidissimum and preferres it before the translation of the Septuagint and all other versions whatsoever He cals the Hebrew in the old and Greek in the New Testament fontes veritatis Farther if the Jewes would have corrupted the Scripture they could not for the Books were dispersed throughout the whole world how could the Jewes then being so farre dispersed themselves conferre together and corrupt them all with one consent The Books were not onely in the hands of the Jewes but of Christians also and in their Custody and they would never have suffered the Books of the old Testament which are the foundation of faith and life to be corrupted Adde if the Jewes would have corrupted the Scripture they would have corrupted those places which make most against them concerning Christs person and office as that prophesie 9. of Dan. of the Messiahs coming before the destruction of Jerusalem that Hag. 2. 9. which setteth out the glory of the second Temple to be greater then the glory of the first in regard of the presence of the Lord in it that Gen. 49. 10. who is such a stranger in the Jewish controversies as to be Ignorant how stoutly and pertinaciously many of the Jewes deny that by Shilo there is understood the Messias but the threefold Paraphrase there hath expressely added the word Messias and stops the mouths of the Jewes who must not deny their authority so that they feare nothing more then to contest with those Christians who read and understand the Chaldee Paraphrases and interpretations of the Rabbines See Master Mede on that Text. Psalme 2. 12. where the vulgar Latine hath apprehendite disciplinam quae lectio nihil magnificum de Christo praedicat the Hebrewes read osculamini filium which is more forcible to prove the mystery of Christs Kingdome and celebrate his ample dominion over all That place 53. of Esay containes both the prophesie and whole passion of Christ in it selfe Yet what is wanting there in the Hebrew Text is there a letter taken away or altered to violate the sense of the mysteries Isaac Levita saith that this Chapter converted him that he read it over more then a thousand times and compared it with many translations and that more of the mystery of Christ is contained in it than in any translation whatsoever He addeth further that disputing with five Rabbines at Frankford he urged this Chapter against them and thereby brought them into those straights and so stopped their mouths that they could not reply to his arguments We have the second Psalme the 21. the 110. and all others entire and complete in which there are most manifest prophesies concerning Christ. There are many besides the Papists who have stood for the uncorrupt truth of the fountaines and have defended the Jews faithfulnesse in preserving the Hebrew Copies as Whitaker Lubbertas Junius Ames Rivet and others But none hath performed more for the vindicating of particular places which are either suspected or openly charged of corruption by certain Papists then Salomon Glassius a most learned man who in his Philologia sacra hath vindicated 72 places of the Old Testament and 20. of the New All know that that place in the 7th of Esay a virgin shall conceive was constantly objected to the Jewes from the beginning and yet they have left it untouched Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 4 Objections of the Papist against the purity of the Hebrew Text in the old Testament Bellarmine onely produceth 5. places of Scripture in which he indevours to prove not that the Hebrew text is corrupted by the labour or malice of the Jewes that opinion he evidently and solidly refutes yet that it is not altogether pure and perfect but hath its errours brought in from the negligence of the Scribes and Ignorance of the Rabbines Cotton saith the originals are miserably corrupted and that there is a multitude almost incredible of depravations and falsifications made by the Rabbines and Massorites But Bellarmine who was more learned than he and from whom he hath stollen a great part of his Book against the Genevah translations doth sufficiently confute him Ob. Ps. 22. 16. There is no Christian but
for holy men wrote as they were moved by Gods Spirit 4. Some thinke it the errour of heedlesse writers who might easily so erre but all the oldest Copies and the most Ancient Fathers have the name of Jeremy 5. Some say that Zachariah being Instructed and trained up with Jeremy did deliver it by tradition from Jeremy and so Jeremy spake it by Zachariah which might be true because it is said in the Text as was spoken by Jeremy not written But sixthly the most compendious and likely way of reconciling is this that Zachary and Jeremy was the same man having 2 names which was very usuall among the Jewes as Salomon was called Jedidiah Iehoiacim Jeconias and Coniah Simon Peter Cephas and Bariona Matthew Levi. So farre Junius and Doctor Taylor See Mr. Robert Baily on Zach. 3. 1. 2. p. 11. and last large Annotat. The best of the Popish writers cannot deny but that the name Jeremy the Prophet is put for Zachary either through the negligence of the Scribes or else it was inserted into the Text out of the Margent the Evangelist saying no more but that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet as both Iansâ—nius and Maldmate in loc doe confesse 1 Chamier distinguisheth of a twofold depravation one of Interpretation herein we excuse not nor defend the Jewes Second of the letter herein they are to be patroniz'd against the Papists who thorow their sides strike at the very Scriptures and labour to overthrow their authority The Hebrew Edition then notwithstanding these and such like frivolous objections is sincere and uncorrupt and if any errours crept in through negligence or Ignorance of the Pennien which Copyed out the Bookes yet Bellarimine himselfe granteth they arâ— of no great moment in matters pertaining to saith and manners saith he there is nothing wanting in the integrity of the Scriptures Haud negare ausim temporum injuria descriptorum iucuria errata quadam sphalmata in textum hebraum irrepsisse Amâ—ma Antibarb bibl What reasons can the Jesuites alledge why the Hebrew and the Greeke which kept their integrity 400 yeares together after Christ amidst as bitter Enemies as ever they had as troublesome and tempestuous times as ever were since should after in time of lesse danger and greater quiet loose not their beauty onely but their Chastity also And we marvell that the Jesuites are not afraid to suffer this blot to fall upon their Popish government which boasteth and saith it is the pillar of truth and yet hath had no better care to preserve the truth Objections of the Papists against the purity of the Greeke Text in the New Testament Ob. They instance in Rom. 12. 11. to be corrupt the Greek hath serving the time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for serving the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sol. Many of the ancient Greek Copies and Scholiasts have also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Salmerond the Jesuite confesseth serving the Lord and it appeareth in the Syriacke translation and who seeth not that it might rather be an oversight of the writer taking one word for another rather then a fault in the Text and the cause of the mistake saith Beza was the short writing of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was taken by some for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereas they should have taken it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If we should admit the other reading we must not understand the Apostle as if he commanded us to be temporizaers or to apply our selves to the corrupt customes and manners of the times but to keep time in all our actions and doe them in the fittest season as Col. 4. 5. Ephes. 5. 16. Ob. Erasmus the best translator of all the later by the judgement of Beza saith that the Greek sometimes hath superstuities corruptly added to the Text of holy Scripture as Matth. 6. The doxologie for thine is the Kingdome the power and the glory for ever and ever He calleth these words trifles rashly added to the Lords Prayer and reprehends Valla for blaming the old vulgar Latine because it hath them not Tertullian Cyprian Ambrose Jerome and Augustine doe expound the Lords Prayer and yet make no mention of these words Beza confesseth it to be magnificam illam quidem sanctificam a most high and holy forme of expression sed irrepsisse in contextum quae in vetustissimis aliquot codicibus Graecis desit it is not to be found in that vetustissimus codex by Beza to the university Library of Cambridge that Copy perhaps was corrupted by the Heretickes It is not presently trifles whatsoever Erasmus or any other man shall reject out of the Greek Copy under that name and yet they doe Erasmus wrong to say that he called that part of the Lords Prayer trifles absolutely for he stiles it so conditionally if it be not part of the Ancient Text. 2. If Erasmus had understood that that passage had beene taken out of the Book of Chronicles written by the penne of the holy Ghost he would no doubt have taken heed how he had called this conclusion of the Lords Prayer trifles for it appeareth manifestly that this sentence was borrowed from David 1 Chron. 29. 11. with some Abridgement of the Prophets words 3. That cannot be superstuous without the which we should not have had a perfect form of Prayer for since Prayer standeth as well in praising of God and thanksgiving as in petitions and requests to be made unto him it is evident that if this conclusion had beene wanting there had wanted a forme of that Prayer which standeth in praise and thanksgiving 4. If to give a substantiall reason of that which goeth before be superfluous then this conclusion may be so 5. For confirmation of this reading we may alleadge besides the consent of the Greek Copies the Syrian interpretation which is very Ancient Chrysostome Theophylact and Euthymius expound it The Lords Prayer in Luke is perfect in respect of the Petitions yet nothing hindereth but that in Matthew might be added the confirmation and conclusion Matthew hath many other things in his Gospell which Luke hath not Salmeron reproves Cajetan for calling this Multilâ—quium since there is a notable confession of 4 properties of God his Kingdome Power Glory and Eternity I should now shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor of the vulgar Latine are authenticall but there are two questions of great moment first to be discussed The first is whether any Bookes of the Scripture be lost The second whether the Scripture of the Old Testament was punctata from the beginning To the first question that we may give a right answer we must distinguish of the Bookes of Scripture some were Historicall Ethicall or Physicall others Dogmaticall The former might perish and fall away but not the latter Therefore that common objection of divers Books mentioned in the Old Testament whereof we finde none so
intituled in the Canon thereof is easily answered Either they were Civill and common-wealth Stories whether the Reader is referred if it like him to read the stories more at large which the Prophets touched shortly or else they are contained in the Books of the Kings which are manifestly proved to be written by divers Prophets in their severall ages wherein they prophesied Salomons Books which he wrote of generall Philosophy fell away but all the other Books of the Scripture do still remain First they are all of God all whose works remain for ever therefore the holy Scriptures being not onely his handy-work but as it were the chief and Master-work of all other must have a continuall endurance Secondly they all are written generally for our instruction and more particularly for admonition and warning for comfort and consolation unlesse we will say that God may be deceived in his purpose and end wherefore he ordained them it must needs be that it must continue whatsoever hath been written in that respect Thirdly if the Lord have kept unto us the whole Book of Leviticus and in it the ceremonies which are abolished and whereof there is now no practice because they have a necessary and profitable use in the Church of God how much more is it to be esteemed that his providence hath watched over other Books of the Scripture which more properly belong unto our times Fourthly let us heare the Scripture it self witnessing of it own authority and durablenesse to all ages Moses thus writeth of it The secret and hidden things remain to the Lord our God but the things that are revealed to us and our Children for ever David also professeth that he knew long before that the Lord had founded his testimonies for ever-more But our Saviour Christs testimony is of all other most evident That heaven and earth shall passe but that his word cannot passe And yet more vehemently that not one jot or small letter prick or stop of his Law can passe untill all be fulfilled Rom 15. 4. therefore none of those which were written for that end are lost Origen in praefat in Cant. Canticorum Augustine l. 18. de civitate Dei c. 38. thought it could not neither stand with the Divine providence nor with the honour of the Church that any Canonicall Books and given for such to the Church should be lost Of this opinion are many worthy moderne Divines Junius Chamierus Tomo 1. L. 9. c. 5. Polanus Wendelinus Waltherus Spanhemius Cartwright Gerardus in exegesi loci primi de Scriptura sacra c. 6. Joh. Camero Tomo 3. in Praelectionibus de verbo Dei Cap. 15. Rivetus in Isagoge ad S. Script c. 6. in Summa Controversiarum Tom. 1. Tract 1. Quaest. 1. Altingi us But Chrysost. and Whitaker also Bellarmine l. 4. de verbo Dei c. 4. Grâ—ther and Becanus hold that some Canonicall Books are lost I rather subscribe to the judgement of the former Reverend Divines who held the contrary The second question is whether the Scripture of the old Testament was punctata from the beginning or whether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or points from the beginning as now it hath Controversiam de punctorum antiquitate vel novitate inter viros eruditos disceptatam non attingo Sententia utraque suos habet assertores magni quidem nominis Cevalerius Buxtorsius Marinus Junius and other very godly and learned men have defended the antiquity of the pricks which to the Hebrews are in stead of Vowels and say that the Bibles were punctata in our Saviour Christs time and that he approved of the same Matth. 5. 18. others hold that the invention of the pricks and the Massâ—reth is to be ascribed to the Tiberian Massorites who flourished about 500 yeares after Christs birth this opinion divers learned men have defended with most weighty reasons as Martinius in Technologia Luther Mercer Scaliger and Drusius Calvin upon the 11. of Zacharie Zuinglius in his Preface on Esay Raynolds in his censure of the Apocryphall Books But above all Capellus in his Book entitled Arcanum punctationis revelatum hath so strongly confirmed that opinion and hath so solidly confuted the reasons which are commonly brought to the contrary that he hath drawn some learned Divines to his opinion which before did stiffely adhere to the contrary opinion and left others very doubtfull He hath well answered that place Matth. 5. 18. l. 2. c. 14. But as Amana saith if any will not be moved from the other opinion that the puncta were invented by the Prophets which many godly Divines doe out of a good zeale stand for suum Cuique liberum sit judicium Vide Fulleri Miscell Sac. l. 4. c. 4. Mercerum ad Gen. 16. 13. Drusium ad difficuliora loca Genes Buxtor fij dissertationem de Ebraeorum literis Our Saviour saith Matth. 5. 18. that not one jot or prick of the Law shall perish whereby it should appeare that the Law and the Prophets for of both he speaketh immediately before had vowels pricks whereunto also belong all those places of Scripture which testifie of the clearnesse and certainty of the Scripture which could not at all be now if it lacked Vowels Yet this is not B. Vshers judgement as himselfe told me Non est improbabile argumentum ex Matth. 5. v. 18. Luc. 16. 17. ubi per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 puncta accentus commodè intelligi posse docti opinantur inter quos Broughthonius in Daniel p. 45. Polanus Syntagm lib. 1. cap. 37. quamvis argumento illi nolimus insistere Voetius Tomo primo disputat de authoritate Scripturae Sine punctis legere saith Drusius paucis hodie Concessum Serarius de Rabbinis saith Elias Hutter a Lutherane writes thus è mille Praedicantibus ne unum quidem esse qui etiam punctatissina possit Hebraea legere nedum absque punctis CHAP. VII NOw I proceed to shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor the vulgar Latine are anthenticall 1. The Greek translation of the Old Testament which is commonly ascribed to the Seventy Interpreters is not Divinely inspired The chiefe Pillars of the Primitive Church ranne into this errour whence sprung many other errours The Greek Fathers who were generally unskilfull both in Hebrew and Latine some few excepted were the lesse to be blamed here since they made use of no other Editions therefore they more confidently affirmed their own to be Authenticall Augustine Tertullian and many of the Latine Fathers whom divers Divines follow ascribed too much to the Seventy Interpreters Yet there was a controversie between Augustine and Jerome concerning their authority as is evident by both their Epistles Bellarmine is large in commending this version saying that it is most certain that those Interpreters did very well translate the Scripture and had the Holy Ghost peculiarly assisting them least they should erre
descent into Hell totidem verbis is not in the Scripture yet it may be deduced thence Acts 2. Wee shall now lay downe some propositions or Theoremes about the sufficiency of Scripture 1. In every Age of the Church the Lord hath revealed so much supernaturall truth as was for that age necessary unto salvation his wayes he made knowne to Moses Psal. 103. 7. and his statutes to Israel Deut. 4. 6. Psal. 147. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Therefore that is an erroneous opinion that before the Law written men were saved by the Law of nature and in the time of the Law by the Law of Moses and since in the time of the Gospel by the Word of grace 2. The substance of all things necessary to salvation ever since the fall of Adam hath beene and is one and the same as the true Religion hath beene one and unchangeable 1. The knowledge of God and Christ is the summe of all things necâ—ssary to salvation John 17. 3. Col. 2. 2. but this knowledge was ever necessary Jer 9. 23. Acts 4. 12. the Fathers indeed saw Christ more obscurely and aenigmatically we more clearely distinctly and perspicuously but yet they knew him and believed in him unto salvation as well as wee John 8. 56. 2. The Covenant of grace which God made with man is an everlasting Covenant therein the Lord hath revealed himselfe to be one and unchangeable as in nature so in will Heb. 13. 8. Rom 3. 29. shewing that as God is one in nature truth and constancy and that as well toward the Gentiles as toward the Jewes so hee would justifie both the circumcision and uncircumcision the Jew and the Gentile by one way of Religion that is to say through faith and belief in his Son Jesus Christ. 3. Christ and his Apostles professed and taught no new Religion but the same which the Scriptures of the old Testament did before instruct Matâ—hew 5. 17 John 5. 39. Acts 10 43 Luke 24. 25 26 27 44. 45. Acts 18 28. 17. 7. 26. 22. 28. 23. Rom. 6. 26. Therefore the beleeving Jewes and the converted Gentiles are sâ—iled the children of faithfull Abraham being justified by Faith as Abraham was Whence wee may conclude that before under and after the Law since the fall of Adam there was never but one true Catholick Religion or way to Heaven and happinesse The Word of God being uttered in old time sundry ways was at length made knowne by writing the Lord stirring up and by his holy Spirit inspiring his servants to write his Will and Pleasure So long as there was any truth in any Age necessary to bee more fully and clearly knowne then was already revealed in the Bookes of Moses it pleased God to stir up holy men whom he Divinely inspired and sufficiently furnished to make the Truth knowne unto the Church thus after Moses during the time of the Law the Lord raised up Prophets who opened the perfect way of life unto the Church of the old Testament more clearely then it was before manifested in the Bookes of Moses the time and Age of the Church requiring the same The Church of the Jewes in the severall Ages thereof was sufficiently taught and instructed in all things necessary to salvation by the writings of Mâ—ses and the Prophets which appeares 1. In that our Saviour being asked of one what hee should doe that hee might inherite eternall life answered what is written in the Law and Prophets how Readest thou Luke 10. 25 26. and out of the Scripture hee declared himselfe to be the Saviour of the World foretold and promised Matthew 21. 44. 26. 31. Luke 4 21. 24 25 26 27 44 John 3. 14. 2. The answer of Abraham to the Rich man sending his friends to Moses and the Prophets sheweth that they sufficed to instruct the faithfull Jewes in all things necessary to salvation Luke 16. 29 30. by them they might learne how to obtaine Life and escape Death when hee saith Let them heare them he meaneth them onely as that place is meant Mat. 17. 5. 3. The Jewes themselves acknowledged the sufficiency of those writings to leade them unto life and happinesse John 5. 39. 5. The Prophets did expound the Law of God and speake more plainely precisely and distinctly touching the comming of the Messias then Moses did but the last full and cleare Will of God touching the salvation of man was not manifested by them that was together and at once to be published and taught by the Messias who also at his comming did establish that order in the Church of God which was to continue therein for ever For 1. Christ was ordained of the Father to bee the great Doctor of his Church a Prophet more excellent then the rest that were before him both in respect of his Person Office Manner of receiving his Doctrine and the excellency of the Doctrin which he delivered 2. This was well knowne not onely among the Jewes but also among the Samaritanes in so much that the woman of Samaria could say I know when the Messias is come he will tell us all things John 4. 25. 3. The time wherein God spake unto us by his Sonne is called the last dayes or the last time Heb. 1. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 20. to note that we are not hereafter to expect or looke for any fuller or more cleare Revelation of Divine mysteries then that which was then delivered 4. Christ is called a mediator of the New Testament or the new Covenant Heb. 9. 15. because all things are established by him as they ought to continue for ever for that which is old decayeth and is ready to vanish but that which is new abideth Heb. 8. 13. 5. It pleased the Lord in great wisdome to reveale the Covenant of grace to the Church that she might not despaire but obscurely at the first that she might earnestly long for the coming of that Messiah who was to make known what he had heard and seene of the Father which dispensation was needfull that the grace of God might not be contemned as haply it would have been if God had fully revealed and made knowne his bounty unto man before he had seen his misery and the necessity thereof Our Saviour Christ for substance of doctriâ—e necessary to salvation taught nothing which was not before in some sort contained in the writings of Moses and the Prophets out of whom he confirmed his doctrine but that which was in them more obscurely Enigmatically and briefely he explained more excellently fully and cleerely the Apostles proved their doctrine out of the Books of Moses and the Prophets Act. 17. 11. and 26. 22. Luke 24. 27. Rom. 1. 2. Act. 28. 23. 6. All things necessary in that manner as we have spoken were taught and inspired to the Apostles by our Saviour Christ and there were no new inspirations after their times nor are we to expect further hereafter which we prove 1. By places
the Evnuch and Luke 24. 45. also the divers expositions of old and New writers The first place is directly against them for teaching that it is the gift of Gods Holy Spirit obtained by Prayer to understand the Scripture the Spirit through Prayer being as well obtained by the simple as learned sort yea rather by them then the others it followeth that the reading of them belongeth to the simple as well as unto the learned The like answer serveth for the place of Luke 24. 45. for by that abuse of the place they may wring the reading of the Scriptures from all men even Ministers or the word commanded to attend the reading of them since they of whom they say that they understood not the Scriptures were Ministers of the word and that in the highest and most excellent degree of Ministery in the world which was the Aposâ—leship The cause oâ— want of understanding then was this the Spirit of God was not given because Christ was not glorified which can have now no place Besides that in saying they understood not the Scriptures concerning the suffering and glory of Christ it must needs be understood comparatively that they did not cleerly paricularly and sufficiently know them For that place in the 8th of the Acts it is to be understood comparatively viz. that a man faithfull and already gained to the truth as this Eunuch was cannot understand the Scriptures by the bare reading of them so well and throughly as when he hath one to expound them The Lord which helped the indeavor of the Eunuch searching the Scriptures by sending of Philip will never suffer those which seek him in carefull reading of his word to goe away ashamed without finding that which they seeke for in directing unto him some lawfull sufficient ministery to instruct him by The mystery of the Gospell then indeed fulfilled remained notwithstanding unpublished to the world by the Apostles which is now by their preaching and writings laid open and made more manifest The Eunuch which professed that he could not understand the Scripture without an Interpreter did notwithstanding busie himselfe in reading of it The multitude of Commentaries was not so necessary because the Scripture might have beene understood without them although they deserve singular respect amongst all those that are desirous to understand the Scripture who write learned and elaborate expositions on the Scripture That was a witty speech of Maldonates on Luke 2. 34. Nescio an facilior hic locus fuisset si nemo eum exposuisset Secondly These Commentaries are publisht that the Scriptures may better and more easiely be understood 3. The Papists confesse that the Articles of the Apostles Creed being necessary for all are easie Yet there are many commentaries of the Ancients upon the Creed as Ruffinus Augustine Cyrill Chrysostome Chrysologus and of Papists also Some Scriptures are hard for the matter which they handle as are the Books of Daniel Ezechiel Zachary or throng of much matter in few words as are in the Old Testament the Poeticall Books wherein no doubt the verse hath caused some cloud and amongst them the Proverbs from the tenth Chapter and the Prophesie of Hosea CHAP. IX Of the Interpretation of Scripture THis question divides it selfe into 3 parts First concerning the divers senses of the Scripture Secondly to whom the chiefe authority to expound Scripture is committed Thirdly what meanes must be used in the interpretation of Scripture 1. Of the divers senses of Scripture The Interpretation of Scripture is 2 fold One of the words which is called version or Translation this hath been handled already 2. Of things which is called explication the finding out of the meaning of any place which is more Theologicall the other being rather Grammaticall And this signification of the thing they commonly call the sence Nehem. 8. 9. Interpreting Scripture is 1. Ancient Nehem. 8. 8. 2. Honourable Marke 4. 34. The Scripture hath often two senses one of which the latter Divines call Literall Grammaticall or Historicall another mysticall or Spirituall The sense of the Scripture is that which God the Author of the Scripture in and by the Scriptures gives to men to know and understand The right expounding of Scripture consists in 2 things 1. In giving the right sense 2. In a right application of the same 1. Cor. 14. 3. The Literall sense is that which the letter it selfe or the words taken in their genuine signification carry And because the genuine signification of the words is that in which the Author useth them whether speaking properly or figuratively therefore the literall sense is subdivided into plaine and simple and figurative which ariseth from the words translated from their naturall signification into another as where Christ saith 10. John 16. I have other sheep which are not of this fold whereby he understandeth other people besides the Jewes The mysticall of spirituall sense is that in which the thing exprest in the literall sense signifieth another thing in a mystery for the shadowing out of which it was used by God The waters of the Floud with which the Arke was upheld signified Baptisme by which the Church is saved under the new Covenant as the Apostle teacheth 1 Pet. 3. 21. that History Exodus 12. it is a Passeover unto the Lord is spoken figuratively the other words properly The mysticall sense is the bones of Christ were no more broken then of the Paschall Lambe which did signifie Christ. The Papists say the literall sense is that which is gathered immediatly out of the words the spirituall which hath another reference then to that which the words doe properly signifie The last they subdivide into Allegoricall Tropologicall Anagogicall they say that the Scripture beside the literall sense may have these also The Allegoricall sense is when the words of the Scripture besides the plaine historicall and literall meaning signifie something in the new Testament which belongs to Christ or the Church as Gal. 4. besides the truth of the story of the bond and free-woman Saint Paul applyeth it unto the two Testaments Tropologicall when the words and deeds are referred to signifie something which belongs to manners as Paul 1 Cor. 9 teacheth from that place Deut. 25. thou shalt not muzle the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the Corne that things necessary are to be allowed to Pastors Anagogigall when words or deeds are referred to signifie eternall life as Psal. 94. I sware unto them they shauld not enter into my rest this is litterally understood of the rest in Canâ—an but applied by Paul 4 Heb to life eternall Becanus saith as there are 3 Theologicall vertues Faith Hope and Charity so there are 3 mysticall sences The allegoricall answers to faith the Anagogicall to hope the Morall to Charity Jerome saith he excelled in the literall sense Ambrose in the Allegoricall Augustine in the Anagogicall Gregory in the Morall The Papists erre three wayes in
they are divided ibid. Authenticall what it is l. 1 p. 91 Which are the Authenticall editions of Scripture l. 1 p. 92 100 101 102 Neither the Translation of the Seventy nor the vulgar Latine are Authenticall l. 1 p. 119 120 121 122 Authority of Scripture is Divine l. 1. p. 8 to 24. 130 131 B BEasts their usefulnesse l. 3 p. 81 to 85 Bees for what they are notable l. 3. p. 80 Bible why so called l. 1. p. 8. m. Who first distinguished the Bible into Chapters and Verses l. 1. p. 46 Blessed God is most Blessed l 2 p. 119 to 126 What Blessednesse is l. 2 p. 120 121 Blindnesse naturall and Spirituall l. 3. p. 42 43 Body taken three waies l. 2. p. 25 God is not a Body l. 2. p. 24 25 Bounty in God what it is l. 2 p. 83 84 85 86 C CAnon why the Scripture is called a Canone or Canonicall l. 1. p. 42 43 The condition of a Canon l. 1. p. 43 There is a threefold Canon in the Church l. 1. p. 43 44 83 84 Some abolish some adde to others diminish the Canone ibid. Which are the Canonicall Bookes of the old Testament l. 1. p. 48 to 60 Which of the New l. 1 65 66 67 Seven Epistles are called Canonicall and why l. 1 p. 77 78 Canticles why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 56 Catholique why seven Epistles are so called l. 1. p. 77 78 Chaldee why some part of the old Testament was written in Chaldee l. 1. p. 93 94 The Chaldee Paraphrast l. 1 p. 94 95 96 Christ is God l. 2. p. 131 132 133 Chronicles why so called and who best expounds them l. 1 p. 51 52 Christall what it is l. 3. p. 53 Church it hath a fourfold office in respect of the Scripture l. 1 p. 29 The true Church hath given testimony to the Scripture in all ages l. 1. p. 20 21 We believe not the Scripture chiefly for the Churches testimony l. 1 p. 26 27 28 29 30 Clemency in God what it is l. 2 p. 77 Cloudes what they are a great worke of God l. 3. p. 47 48 49 Colosse the chiefe City of Phrygia l. 1. p. 74 Who best expound the Colossians ibid. Conclusion whether that of the Lords prayer be true Scripture l. 1. p. 115 Conscience what it is the testimony of it is strong to prove that there is a God l. 2. p. 6 Corinth famous for divers things l. 1. p. 73 Who best interpret â—oth the Corinthians ibid. Councell the Florentine and Trent Councels not lawfull Councels l. 1. p. 89 90 Creation what it is l. 3. p. 13 14 Taken strictly and largely ib. The efficient cause matter form and end of it l. 3. p. 14 17 19 20 Consectaries from it l. 3. p. 20 21 22 The workes of each day l. 3 p. 23 24 25 26 D DAniel why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 58 59 Day what it is and the benefit of it l. 3. p. 40 41 42 Decree what the word signifieth and how it is defined l. 3 p. 2 How far it extends and the properties of it l. 3. p. 3 4 The kinds of it and the execution of it l. 3. p. 4 Devils their names and nature l. 3. p. 105 106 What the sinne of the Devils was l. 3. p. 106 107 Why they fell irrecoverably l. 3 p. 107 108 They are malicious subtill powerfull l. 3. p. 108 109 110 Some questions about the Devils l. 3. p. 110 111 112 113 114 Deuteronomy why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 49 Dew what it is l. 3. p. 52 Divine why John so called l. 1 p. 69 Divinity that it is l. 1. p. 1 2 What it is l. 1. p. 3 4 The severall kinds of it l. 1 p. 2 4 How it is to be taught l. 1 p. 4 5 How to be learnt l. 1. p. 5 The excellency of it l. 1. p. 6 7 The opposites of it l. 1. p. 6 Dominion what it is Gods Dominion l. 2. p. 52 53 E EArth the Creation of it is a great worke l. 3. p. 31 32 It is firme and stable l. 3. p. 32 to 36 Earthquake l. 3. p. 33. m. Ecclesiastes why so called and who best expound it l. 1. p. 55 56 Election the severall acceptions of the word and how it is defined l. 3. p. 6 The object and end of it l. 3 p. 7 8 All are not elected l. 3. p. 9 Consectaries from Gods Election l. 3. p. 11 12 Element what it is and the number of the Elements l. 3 p. 31 32 Elephant whence derived his excellency l. 3. p. 82 83 End the Ends of the Scripture l. 1. p. 128 129 Ephesus a famous City l. 1 p. 73 Who best expounds the Ephesians l. 1. p. 73 74 Epistles why so called l. 1. p. 67 How they are divided and who best expounds them l. 1 p. 70 71 72 In what order they were written l. 1. p. 70 VVhich Epistles were doubted of for a time l. 1. p. 65 Esay an Evangelicall Prophet l. 1. p. 57 How often quoted in the new Testament and who have best expounded it l. 1. p. 57 Esther why so called and who hath best expounded it l. 1 p. 52 53 Eternall God is Eternall l. 2 p. 40 41 42 43 The world was not Eternall l. 3. p. 15 16 17 Evangelists who l. 1. p. 68 How they agree and differ l. 1 p. 64 65 VVho best expound them l. 1 p. 67 Exodus why so called and who are the best Expositors on it l. 1. p. 48 Expositors on Scripture who are the best among the Jewes Fathers Papists Protestants l. 1. p. 183 to 189 Ezekiel why so called and who hath best interpreted it l. 1 p. 58 Ezra why so called and who hath best expounded it l. 1. p. 52 F FAithfull God is faithfull l. 2. p. 97 98 99 Fire the qualities of that Element l. 3 p. 38 Fishes their nature and use l. 3 p. 75 76 77 80 81 Fowles their nature and use l. 3 p. 78 79 80 Frost what it is l. 3. p. 52 G GAlatians the subject of that Epistle and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 73 Ghost the Holy Ghost is God l. 2. p. 135 136 Glorious God is glorious l. 2 110 to 120 God how he is called in severall languages l. 2. p. 1. m. The knowledge of God is necessary profitable and difficult l. 2. p. 1 2 VVe know God three waies and there is a threefold knowledge of him l. 2 p. 2 VVhat the Heathens knew of God l. 2. p. 3 That there is a God l. 2. p. 3 to 16 VVhat God is l. 2. p. 18 19 How the word God is taken in Scripture l. 2. p. 19 The Names of God l. 2. p. 19 20 His Attributes what they be l. 2. p. 20 How they differ from Properties and what rules are to be observed in attributing them to God l. 2. p.
1. p. 74 Preaching whether it be divinely inspired as well as the word written l. 1. p. 25 Predestination what it is l. 3. p. 4 5 Predictions the truth of the Scriptures predictions proves it to be of God l. 1. p. 14 15 The difference betweene the predictions of the true Prophets and those of the Heathen l. 1. p. 15 Prescience what it is in God l. 2 p. 67 Properties of the Scripture l. 1 p. 130 to 171 Proverbs why so called and who best expounds them l. 1. p. 55 56 Providence that there is a Providence l. 3. p. 125 What providence is the extent of it l. 3. p. 125 126 The kinds of it l. 3. p. 127 128 The degrees and parts of it l. 3 p 128 129 Psalmes how called and divided by the Hebrews l. 3. p. 54 55 The chiefest part of Scripture and often quoted in the new Testament ibid. Who best interprets the Psalms ibid. Pure the Scripure is pure and holy l. 1. p. 136 137 138 R RAine what it is the usefulnesse of it l. 3. p. 50 51 52 Rainbow the cause of it and what the colours in it signifie l. 3. p. 52 Reading all are commanded to read the Scriptures l. 1. p. 32 33 What reading of the Scriptures is l. 1. p. 35 36 It may be the instrument of regeneration ibid. How the Scripture is to be read l. 1. p. 36 37 The Papists will not suffer the Scriptures to be read by the people l. 1. p. 303 Religion not a humane invention l. 2. p. 131 Reprobation what and the object of it l. 3. p. 10 Reveale God reâ—â—aled his will three waies to our fathers l. 1 p. 7 8 We must now expect no further revelation l. 1. p. 65 Revelation why so called l. 1. p. 81 The subject of the Booke it is Canonicall l. 1. p. 81 Difficult l. 1. p. 82 83 Who best interpret it l. 1. p. 83 Rivers their originall and use l. 3. p. 59 Romans that Epistle is an Epitome of Christian Religion l. 1. p. 73 Who best interpret it ibid. How we may most profitably read it l. 3. p. 11 Rule the Scripture is the rule of faith and life l. 1. p. 132 133 134 Ruth why so called and who best expound it l. 1. p. 50 S SAmuel why so called and who best expounds both books l. 1. p. 50 51 Scripture the rule of Divinity l. 1. p 7 The rule of faith and life l. 1 p. 132 133 134 VVhy it is called Scripture and the divers Epithites given to it l. 1. p. 8 The authority of the Scripture l. 1. p. 8 to 25 The description of Scripture l. 1. p. 11 It was no device of mans brain l. 1. p. 25 It hath its authority from it selfe not the Church l. 1. p. 25 to 31 The Scriptures are to be read by the common people l. 1. p. 30 to 35 It crosseth humane wisdome l. 2. p. 14 VVho contemne and unreverently handle the Scriptures l. 1. p. 39 40 41 What parts of Scripture have been questioned l. 1. p. 65 66 75 79 80 Some titles and Subscriptions are not part of Scripture p. 66 Whether any bookes of the Scripture be lost l. 1. p. 116 117 Sea the largenesse and usefulnesse of it l. 3. p 60 to 63 Sence of Scripture what it is l. 1 p. 171 172 173 Septuagint Translation l. 1 p. 96 97 Ship the materials and uses of it l. 3. p. 65 Simple God is most Simple l. 2 p. 26 27 Soule its excellency l 2. p. 10 It is Immortall l. 3. p. 117 118 Spirit God is a Spirit l. 2 p. 23 24 Consectaries of it l. 1. p. 25 26 Starres their nature and usefulnesse l. 3. p. 74 Sunne the name nature and usefulnesse of it l. 3. p. 70 71 Syriack Translation l. 1. p. 98 T TEmptation how Gods temptations and Satans differ l. 3. p. 112 Testament why the Scripture is called a Testament l. 1. p. 34 The Scripture is distinguished into the books of the old and new Testament l. 1. p. 44 The Bookes of the old Testament were written in Hebrew ibid. Of the new in Greek l. 1. p. 62 63 The Books of the old Testament how divided l. 1. p. 45 47 The new Testament how divided and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 62 The number of the Bookes both of the old and new Testament l. 1. p. 46 Theology what it is l. 1. p. 2 Thessalonica the chiefe City in Macedonia l. 1. p. 74 Who best interprets the Thessalonians ibid. Thunder what it is l. 3. p. 45 A great worke of God and the use of it l. 3. p. 45 46 47 Timothy what it signifieth who best interprets both the Epistles l. 1. p 74 Titus what it signifieth like the first to Timothy who best expounds it ibid. Traditions what they signifie l. 1. p. 150 151 153 The severall kinds of them p. 155 Reasons against the Popish Traditions l. 1. p. 153 154 The Papists arguments for Traditions answered l. 1 p. 158 159 160 Translate the Scriptures ought to be translated into vulgar tongues l. 1. p. 33 34 Vulgar Translation is very faulty l. 1. p. 122 123 124 Trees their nature and usefulnesse l. 3. p. 68 to 71 Trees of life and of knowledge of good and evill why so called l. 3. p. 122 123 Trinity There are three distinct Persons in the Trinity l. 2 p. 126 to 132 True The Scripture is True and certaine l. 1. p. 131 132 God is True l. 2. p. 94 95 96 97 V VErsion The severall Versions of Scripture l. 1. p. 94 95 96 Vertues what in God and man l. 2. p. 78 79 Vulgar whether the Vulgar Latine be Authenticall l. 1. p. 122 123 It is very faulty l. 1. p. 123 to 127 W WAter the use of that Element l. 3. p. 36 37 Will what it is and what in God l. 3. p. 68 69 Winds are a great worke of God l. 3. p. 53 54 Wisdom what it is God is most wise l. 2. p. 64 65 66 Word why the Scripture is called the Word and why the Word of God l. 1. p. 8 Works the Workes of God divided l. 3. p. 1 2 Wrong sin wrongs God divers waies l. 2. p. 75 76 Z ZEchary why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 61 Zephany why so called and who best expounds him ibid. FINIS * Quia de advisamento â—ssensu consilij nostri pro quibusdam or duiâ—s urgentibus negotijs nos Statum dâ—fensionem Regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae concernentibus â—uoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem Westmonasterium tertio die Novembâ—is proximo teneri ordinavimus Jer. 7. 25. and 35. 15. * Those Gentlemen of the House and others that live neere Westminster may heare 500 Sermons yearly at least one every Morning and foure every Sabbath Foxe in his Booke of Martyrs Speeds Chronicle Chap. 24. p. 858. * Jer. 9. 3. Jude 3. v.
some things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to praise the Saints of God and stirre up others to their vertue wherein they overlash Rainolds against Hart. Of the meanes to finde out the true sence of the Scripture Orationi lectio lectioni succedat oratio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * Act. 9. 22. There must be a comparing of obscure Places with such as are more evident Gen. 11. 35 with Gal 3. 16. of like with like Exod. 12. and 1 Cor. 11. 24. unlike with unlike John 6. 53. with Deut. 5. â—3 * Contra ignota â—igna magnum est remedium linguarum cognitio Latinae quidem linguae homines duabus alijs ad scripturaâ—um cognitionem opus habent Hebraica Graeca Augustinus 2 Tim. 2. 15. Tit. 1. 9. Aug. de doctrina Christiana l 2. * Dr. Feaâ—ely in a 〈◊〉 Psal. â— 10. Logicke teacheth the Preacher to Analize and divide his Text. â— teacheth to collect true and proper Doctrines from it assisteth him in confuting of Haeresies and in resolving all questions * Lexicon Chaldaicum talmudicum rabbinicum opus immensi laboris atque fructus incomparabili multorum annorum industria patriâ— atque filij Johan Buxtorfij elaboratum Bootius * Concordantiae Bibliorum hebraicae editae à Joh. Buxtorâ—io juniore magni patris Majore filio Arnoldus Boatius Henrici Stephani maximae absolutissimae Concordantiae * This Bread is my body 1. the communion of my body The Prophets explaine the Books of Moses and the New Testament interpretes the Old * Analogia fiâ—ei nihil aliud est quam constans propetua semenâ—ia Scripturae in apertis minimâ— obsâ—uris Scripturae locis quales sunt articuli fidei in Symbolo quaeque continentur in oratione Dominica in Decalogâ— Whitakerus Rainoldus de lib. Apoc. Plura Rabbinis debemus nos praeâ—ertim qui accuratum istud interpretandi genus sectamur quam quisquam existimet Drus. observ Sac. l. 15. c. 6. * Censura in exercitat 4. Morini c. 80. Doctissimus Hebraeorum Grammaticus idemque interpâ—es Kimchius Fuller Miscell l. 5. c. 8. vide l. 2. c. 3. l. 3. c. 12. l 4. c. 18. David Kimchius è cujus Grammatica Lexico sive radicum libro tanquam ex equo Trojano prodiit quicquid Grammaticarum Lexicorum Hebraicorum ubique videmus Morinus l. 1. exerciâ— 6. c. 4. Ebraeorum Interpretum Coryphaeus Kimchi Amama Antib Bibl. Aben. Esra meritò audit sapientissimus ebraeorum Mayerus in Philo. Sac. * Quid fuerint Vrim Thummim ne Rabbinorum quidâ—m Principes jam diuscire potuerunt Chamierus See Buâ—â—h on 3. of Hos. 4. * Dexterâ—imus ille literarum sacrarum interpres Glassius Hieronymus solus inter Patres â—uit doctus Hebraeas literas quas quia reliqui ignorabant saepe in v. Testamento explicando lapsi sum Tarnov exercit Bib. * Capellus arcano punctationis revelato * Opus laboriosum divinum maximo ecclesiae damno amissum cujus operis jacturam deplorare possumus compensare nunquam possumus Whitaketus * Vide Whitak de authoritate Script l. 2. c. 1. * Inter antiquos ecclesiasticâ—s auctores Graeci generis non tantum primus sed feâ—èâ—olus Hebraicè â—uit doctissimus Salmasius de mâ—do usurarum Autor non purus ut vix unquam nominari possit in rebus fidei absque praefatione Chamierus * Magnus Augustinus ingenio eruditione sanctitate zelo quae res tantam illi meriâ—â— authoritatem conciliaâ—m ut nemosit amiquorum qui in 〈◊〉 nostris aâ— Pontificijs pluris aestimetur aut aestimari debeat Rainoldes de libris Apocriphâ—â—omo prà e â—9 Augustinus habitus Theologorum veterum acutissâ—imus neque immerito Iâ— Graecoâ—um disâ—ertissimus Chrysostomus Fullerus See a â—reat commendation of Tâ—rtullian in Jack enâ—raging tempest p. 8. Vir profâ—cto acris ac vehemeniis ingenij multa latino 〈…〉 scripsiâ— sed stylo elaborato ac duro propter 〈…〉 vocum novitatom obscuro Sixtus Senensis Da Magistrum Augustmus Copiosus est Hieronymus succinctus Lactantius Ciceronem imitatur Tertullianus obscuritatem amat Chrysostomus ornatus apertus est Nazianzeâ—us pressus acutus Whitakerus de Scripturis Mercerus in Gen. v. 16. * Ex Scriptura ipsa Calvinu ita scripturam interpretatus est ut inter aequos rerum judices doctissimi interpretis nomen jure meritus fit Rivetus in Catholico Orthodâ—xo * Quo neâ—â— aetate sua solidior nervosior Theologus Whitakerus in conciâ—ne ultima * Incomparabilis illa editio Tremellianâ— opera cura doctissimi Theologi Francisci Iâ—niâ—elucubrata expolita plur iâ— busque Scholiâ—â— locupletatae Fulle 1 miscel Sac. l. 2. c. 1. Vide Booâ—ij censuram in Indice Auâ—orum Animadversionibus Sacrâ—â— praefixo In novo Testamento laboravit Erasmus Roterâ—damus non inutiliter cum vertendâ— tum paraphrasi explicando tum annotando Chamierus de Canone l. 12. c. 1. * Papa Innocentus primum lâ—cum tribuit Thomae post scripturas â—eâ—iâ—ò nam melius de Papatu meruit quam omnes Patres-Rainoldus B. Mortons Appâ—ale l. 2. c. â— Sect. â—2 Papistarum Homerus Thomas Aquinas Rainold de lib. Apoc. * Rainolds against Hart. Thomas Aquinas adhuc infans chartam versans imo comedens significabat quam studiosus foret adultior factus Cornel a Lâ—pide in Gen. 25. 22. * Spanhem dub Evang. parte â—ecunda Dub. 34. vide ibid. Dub. 5. p. 132. 133. * Chamierus * Cardinalis Cajetanus omnes Epistolas novi Testamenti Actorum librum recensuit ad veritatem Graecâ—m annotationibus illustravit intra spatium circiter decem mensium Chamierus tomo 1â— de Canone l. 13. c 4. Vir meo judicio quamviâ— Papista tamen candidus plurimumque distans abea pertinacia quam in reliquis deplorare cogimur Idem de Canone l. 12. c. 1. Vide Whitakerum de Scripturis pag 16 17 196. Andradius mentione Cajetani facta suâ—jungit omnes illum aetatis suae longe superasse * Andraeas Masnes Papista quidem at sanior dexterrimus scripturae Sacrosanctae interpres Glassius onomat Pater quidem dixit se orandâ— magis quam sâ—udendo ac legendo in cognitione Scripturarum profecisseâ— Prov. 4. 13. John 7. 17. Deuâ— 6. 6. 7. Praxis ecclesiae Pâ—at um consentiens interpretatio Conciliorum praescripta decreta Regula fidei * Inter Pontifices Romanâ—s multi fuerunt scelerati ex quorum improbâ— vita plus redijt ad Christianos scandali quam ex â—orum autoritate adificationis Non potuit vit humani ingenij non fremere cum legenti Pontificum Romanorum vitaâ—tâ—t occurrerent monstra scelerum Chamierus de Canone l. 3. c. 6. Vide plura ibid. Absit ut unius homuncionis quidem Infirmissiimi arbitrio stare credamus vel eadere veritatem Dei. Chamierus ibid. c. 7. * Plus credendum est simplici laico scripturam proferentâ— quam toti simul Concilio Panormitanus * Mr.
when he was pressed by Bishop Ridly and others to tolerate his Sister Masse in her owne Chapell he would not though importuned yeeld thereto saying He should dishonour God in it but being much pressed by them he burst into teares and they thence concluded that he had more divinity in his little finger then they in all their bodies O that you would study to premote Gods glory and be zealous for his truth since you have had such experience of his mercy and likewise could not but perceive the evill of those dangerous errours which were too much indulged by some of those whom you have cast out I shall now speake of the threefold Subject I handle in my Booke 1. The Scripture 2. God 3. The Workes of God It is reported of Charles the Great that he set his Crown on the Bible and Luther was so zealous to have the Scriptures read that he professed if he thought the reading of his Bookes would hinder the reading of the Scripture he would burne them all before he dyed Alphonsus King of Spaine and Naples read the Bible with Lira's glosse foureteen times over The Emperour Theodosius the second wrote the New Testament out with his owne hand many speake much of new light but the Prophet Esay saith To the Law and to the Testimony if they speake not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Take heed of too much of that new light which the world is now gazing upon so much new light is breaking forth that the old zeale is almost extinct by it saith a Minister of New England The Familists say they are above Ordinances when the body hath no need of nourishment then and not afore will the soule have no need of Ordinances we about Westminster have beene better instructed out of the 20. of Exodus 24. Some talke of Revelations and the Testimony of the Spirit But now the Scripture is compleated I must not expect any immediate Testimony of the Spirit Luther saith if any Spirit should come and speak any thing to him that he brought not Scripture for he would spit in his face The Scripture is the best Cynosure to follow it was Davids Counseller it is a perfect rule of a Perfect Reformation Secondly all Christian States and Persons should labour for an experimentall practicall knowledge of God and Christ Phil. 3. 8. 10. the vision of God in Heaven shall make us perfectly Happye Quid Deus sit ipse tantum novit what God is God himselfe doth onely perfectly know But he hath revealed himselfe to us in his word and workes That place in 34 of Exodus 6. 7. verses is as full a description of Gods Attributes as any in all the Scripture The Lord the Lord God mercifull and gracious long-suffering and abundant in goodnes truth keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity transgression sin that will by no meanes clear the guilty visiting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the children and upon the childrens Children unto the third and fourth generation If God were more known he would be more loved honouâ—ed feared trusted The Heathens extolled the knowledge of a mans self but Christians must chiefely study to know God This is a Noble Subject for a Christian Parliament and a Christian Kingdome to exercise themselves in O that you would all labour to know Gods excellencies and to propagate the knowledge of him to the many darke Corners of the Land Thirdly the workes of God are to be diligently observed by a Christian State One observes that there is a five fold Declaration of the workes of God An Arthnieticall Declaration Psal. 40. 5. Secondly a Logicall Declaration of the workes of God when we shew the severall kinds of them as the workes of Creation the worke of Redemption the worke of Providence and distribute those into workes of mercy or works of Justice Thirdly an Historicall Declaration when we declare the persons acting the places the times the Counsels the mannaging of the severall actions the events and successes Fourthly a Rhetoricall Declaration Fifthly a Declaration purely Theologicall or a practicall Declaration of the works of God We should be lifted up by Gods manifold works to the Consideration of his unlimited greatnesse that is the first cause and author of them all we can turne our eyes no way but exceeding great multitudes of works wrought by God doe offer themselves to our view If we looke upward downeward on the right hand on the left into our selves and other things our minds shall be encountred with diversity of rare Workes of Almighty God These workes are all made with much wisdome Psal. 136. 5. and the serious considering of Gods workes is a great part of the sanctifying of his name Never had any Parliament more reason to magnifie Gods goodnesse for his singular mercies Oh that as many of your deliverances were got with supplication so they might be worne with thankefulnesse and as you have been a Parliament of many Prayers so may you be a Parliament of many prayses which is the earnest desire of Your Honours Devoted Servant EDW. LEIGH To the Christian Reader REader The number of bookes is without number the Presses are daily oppressed with them Yet though the world abound with unprofitable may pernicious Pamphlets there are many excellent subjects which are either not handled or not sufficiently There is a great variety in mens fancies as well as in their faces and bookes the fruit of mens brains are as various as men themselves Some books are to be tasted onely some chewed and some swallowed That saying of Stanchar the Hereticke doth exceedingly please the Papists Plus apud se valere unum Lombardum quam centum Lutheros ducentos Melancthones trecentos Bullingeros quadringentos Martyres quingentos Calvinos That one Lumbard was more esteemed by him then 100 Luthers 200 Melancthons 300 Bullingers 400 Martyrs 500 Calvins Focanus contrarily saith thus of the Schoolmen that one Austin among the Ancients and one Calvin in his Institutions of Christian Religion among the moderne Divines will afford thee more solid Divinity then all the School-Doctors of the Popish Church with all their vaine disputations jejune distinctions quodlibeticall questions and foolish speculations with which saith he Thomas Scotus Lombard Bonaventure Molina Vasquez Suarez à Soto Bellarmine and other Doctors of the Romane Church are full even ad nauseam But the Bible is indeed the Booke of Bookes it signifieth in the Greeke Tongue A Booke in generall and was sometimes taken so largely yet by an Antinomasie or excellency it is now taken for the Booke of the Holy Scripture and is all one with Gods Booke We told you before how much the Papists magnified Peter Lumbard the father of the Schoolmen calling him the Master of the sentences and preferring him before hundreds of ours The next Schoolman after him Alexander
21 22 How the Attributes are divided l. 2. p. 22 23 Goodnesse what it is and what in God l. 2. 79 to 84 Graciousnesse what it is in God l. 2. p. 83 84 Grasse the usefulnesse of it l. 3 p. 67 68 Great God is exceeding great in nature works and authority l. 2. p. 48 to 51 Greeke the Greeke translation is not Authenticall l. 1. p. 119 120 121 H HAbakuk who interprets him best l. 1. p. 61 Haggai why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Haile what it is l. 3. p. 52 Hatred what it is and what in God l. 2. p. 73 74 Heavens the creation of the Heavens is a wonderfull worke of God l. 3. p 26 to 30 Its motion is exceeding swift l. 3. p. 41 Hebrew Text in the old Testament Authenticall l. 1. p. 104 105 VVhether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or Points from the beginning l. 1. p. 116 to 119 Hebrewes whether that Epistle be Canonicall written by Paul and in Greeke l. 1. p. 75 76 77 VVho best interprets it ibid. Herbes their usefulnesse l. 3. p. 65 66 67 High God is most High l. 2. p. 51 52 History is delightfull especially of the Scripture l. 1. p. 16 VVhy some Bookes of the new Testament are called Historicall l. 1. p. 66 Holy God is Holy l. 2. p. 102 to 105 The Scripture is Holy l. 1 p. 136 137 138 Hosea why so called and when he wrote it l. 1. p. 60 Who expounds him best ibid. The chiefest among the small Prophets l. 1. p. 59 I JAmes how it came to be doubted of by same l. 1. p. 78 79 Who best expounds it l. 1. p. 79 Ice what it is l. 3. p. 52 Jeremy when he prophesied and who best interprets him l. 1 p. 58 Jewes corrupted not the Hebrew Text of the old Testament l. 1 p. 103 to 111 Image fourfold l 3 p. 116 Immortall God is Immortall l 2. p. 31 32 The soule of man is Immortall l. 3. p. 119 120 Immutability what it is l. 3 p. 44 God is Immutable l. 3 p 44 to 48 Impossible l. 2. p. 108 Independent God is in Independent l. 2. p. 36 Infinite God is Infinite l. 2 p. 32 to 35 Inspiration what it is l. 1. p. 9 Interpretation of Scripture l. 1 p. 171 172 173 179 180 To whom it belongs l. 3. p. 173 174 Meanes to interpret Scripture l. 1. 180 to 184 Job who the Authour of it and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 54 Joel who best expounds him l. 1 p. 60 When he prophesied l. 1. p. 69 John what it signifieth and what Bookes of Scripture he wrote l. 1. p 69 Who best interprets him why he is called The Divine he hath something more then all the other Evangelists l. 1 p. 69 The second and third Epistles are doubted of by some l. 1 p. 80 Who best expounds them all three ibid. m. Joshua why so called and who best expounds him l. 1 p. 49 Jude doubted of by some l. 1. p. 80 who best interprets him l. 1 p. 81 Judges why so called and who have best expounded that book l. 1. p. 50 Just God is Just l. 2. p. 91 to 94 K KInd God is Kind l. 2 p. 105 Kings why so called and who best expounds both those Books l. 1. p. 51 Knowledge God knowes all things l. 2. p. 60 to 63 L LAmentations why so called and who best expounded them l. 1. p. 58 Latine translation of the Bible l. 1. p 99 100 Legends why so called l. 3. p. 36 Leviticus why so called l. 1. p. 48 49 Who best expounds it l. 1 p. 49 Lexicons which are the best Lexicons for expounding the words both Hebrew and Greek in Scripture l. 1. p. 182 Life Gods life differs from ours l. 2. p. 30 Light what it is and the benefits of it l. 3. p. 38 39 40 Lightning why we see that before we heare the Thunder l. 3 46 Living God is Living l. 3. p. 28 to 31 Long-suffering God is Long-suffering l. 2. 100 101 Love what it is in God l. 2. p. 70 71 72 Luke what he was and who best expound him l. 1. p. 69 M MAlachy why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 62 Man created after Gods Image l. 3. p. 115 116 117 Marke when he wrote l. 1. p. 20 And whether originally in Latine or Greek l. 1. p. 64 68 who best interprets him p. 68. Martyrs divers suffered for the truth l. 1. 21 22 How they of the true Church differ from other Martyrs l. 1 p. 22 23 Matthew when he wrote l. 1 p. 68 Whether he wrote in Hebrew or Greeke l. 1. p. 63 68 Who best expounds him l. 1 p. 68 Meditation what it is l. 1. p. 38 And what in God l. 2. p. 86 to 91 Meteors what they are how divided and of what they consist l. 3. p. 44 45 Metals what they are l. 3. p. 54 Micah why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 60 Miracle what it is l. 2. p. 12 Miracles twofold l. 1. p. 19 The true Miracles differ much from the false l. 1. p. 20 The Divels workes are called lying wonders and why l. 3. p. 109 110 Moone the nature and use of it l. 3. p. 73 Montaines a great worke of God l. 3. p. 56 N NAhum why so called and who best expounds him l. 1. p. 61 Navigation the benefit of it l. 2 p. 61 64 Necessary God is a Necessary Essence l. 2. p. 56 The Scripture is Necessary l. 1 p. 135 136 Nehemiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1. p. 52 Night the benefit of it l. 3. p. 42 43 Numbers why so called and who best interprets it l. 1. p. 49 O OBadiah why so called and who best expounds it l. 1 p. 60 Omnipotent God is Omnipotent l. 2. p. 106 to 109 Omnipresent God is Omnipresent l. 2. p. 36 to 39 Christs body is not everywhere l. 2. p. 39 40 One God is wholly One l. 2. p. 56 to 60 P PAradise not allegorically to be understood l. 3. p. 121 122 What it signifieth and whether it was destroyed by the flood ibid. Patient God is Patient l. 2 p. 99 100 101 Pentateuch why so called l. 1 p. 47 Who have written well on it l. 1. p. 47 48 The Turks honour it l. 1. p. 48 It is often quoted in the new Testament ibid. Perfect the Scripture is perfect l. 1. 138 to 148 God is perfect l. 2. p. 48 49 50 Person what it is in the Trinity l. 2. p. 128 129 130 How the Persons in the Trinity differ l. 2. 136 137 138 Perspicuous the Scripture is plaine and perspicuous l. 1 p. 161 to 171 Peter why those Epistles are called Catholicall l. 1. p. 79 Who hath best expounded both the Epistles the second is Canonicall l. 1. p. 79 80 Philippi the Metropolis of Macedonia who best expounds the Philippians p.