in our estimation The three persons in the sacred Deity God the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost their Trinity in Unity and Unity in Trinity The three-fold state of man to wit deformed reformed and transformed corrupt regenerate and glorified The three-fold coming of Christ in the flesh by his Spirit and at the day of judgement Those three grand enemies of mans salvation the flesh world and the devil The three Theological graces Faith Hope and Charity The three principal duties of Religion Prayer Hearing and Almes are plainly set before us in this parcel of Holy Writ Nay yet once more Those three things which every Christian man ought to be acquainted with for his souls health to wit the Creed the Lords Prayer and the Ten Commandments are here at least summarily comprized Our blessed Saviour telleth us the whole Law is reducible to these two great Commandments the love of God and our neighbour both which are here amply taught us The Lords Prayer is intimated in that we must aske according to Gods will which cannot be unlesse according to that patterne yea in that we are called sonnes of God it teacheth us to cry Our Father and that chief Petition in it Forgive us our sins is once and again inculcated Finally if you please we may out of this Epistle compile a Creed not much unlike that of the Apostles no lesse justly then commonly heretofore received amongst us though now almost forgotten by us in these or the like words I believe in God the Father invisible just holy pure and faithful who knoweth all things and is no lesse Almighty to do all things who is love it self whereby he vouchsafed to make the heaven and earth And in Jesus Christ his only begotten Son who came in the flesh to wit by being conceived of the Holy Ghost and borne of the Virgin Mary and laid down his life for us being crucified dead and buried and having life in himselfe rose from the dead and ascended to heaven where he sitteth at Gods right hand is our Advocate with the Father and at that day of judgment shall come and appear again to wit to judge the quick and dead I believe in the Holy Ghost the fellowship or communion of Saints the forgiveness of sins and eternal life By this time you cannot but see beloved what a body of divinity what a treasury of spiritual knowledge this Epistle is well might Fâ—rus say Ipsam Evangelicae Doctrinae summam brevissimam complectitur the summe of Evangelical Doctrine is succinctly and yet distinctly comprehended in it and now me thinketh every one is ready to say with that Father Adoro plenitudinem sacrae Scriptura I adore and admire the fulnesse of Holy Scripture wherein every drop is as it were a rivulet every rivulet a great river and river an Ocean every branch a tree every tree an orchard an orchard a field I mean every Verse as it were a Chapter every Chapter an Epistle every Epistle a Volumne for the abundance of precious truths contained in them and yet more particularly by these considerations sufficient reason cannot but appear as for my discussion so your attention and thus this discourse serveth to make way for the following But before I begin I have one request to make to you and that from my very soule that as I hope you have not are not so you will not be wanting in your requests to God for me and what you should aske for me I shall not go out of this Epistle to tell you even that unction from the Holy One whereby we may know all things that anoynting which teacheth us all things and is truth and no lie Let this be the matter of your prayer both for me for your selves that it may teach me how to expound apply you how to hear receive both you me how to understand and obey the sacred saving truths which are delivered to us in this First General Epistle of St JOHN I shall not at this time enter upon the Epistle it self only in a few words take notice of the Title which is prefixed wherein we have two things considerable Namely The pâ—nman John and the writing which is set down for the nature of it to be an Epistle for the order the first and for the extent of it a general Epistle First The Epistle is asserted to be St. JOHNS Indeed we do not finde him setting down his Name in any part of the Epistle the other Apostles are express in this particular Iames and Peter and Iude and Paul in all Epistles except that to the Hebrewes but Saint IOHN in this Epistle is altogether silent in the other two he only giveth himself the common title of an Elder when he hath any occasion to mention himself in his Gospel and that in things much tending to his dignity it is done in a third person by way of circumlocution only in his Apocalypse he specifieth his Name but that without any addition of honour or dignity It lets us see in general the humility of this holy Apostle who thought so meanly of himself that he accounts himself not worth the naming Indeed on the one hand though it s often too true of many who arrogantly affect to blazon their own names and titles we are not to imagine that when the other Apostles prefixe their namâ—s and most of them their high calling that it is done out of vain glory But on the other hand we may justly conclude it a testimony of great humility in this Apostle that he suppresseth his Name his Office by silence Thus whilest he was high in Christs he became lowly in his own eyes whilest he was rich in grace his veâ—y Name carrying as it were grace as Benjamines sack did money in its mouâ—h he was poor in spirit scarce thinking himself worthy of a name Oh let us learn by his pattern not to affect our own praises nor speak high things of our selves ever remembring that as artis est celare artem it is an art to conceal our art so to neglect our own names and honour is the best way to true honour and a good name Besides this notion of humility it may further be conceived and not improbably that this concealment of his Name was an act of prudence especially considering the time when it is most rationally conjectured to be written to wit as the learned English Annotatour hath observed to my hand not long before the destruction of Ierusalem when as the Church was under a sharp persecution occasioned no doubt by those many Antichrists then arising in which S. IOHN was peculiarly involved yea of which he warneth those to whom he writeth and therefore wisely forbeareth to publish his Name which might have been prejudicial to him There is no doubt a policy consistent with piety which as all Christians so Ministers may use in persecuting times It was that our Saviour at least allowed his
against the Lord by whom he is anointed and he that offereth any indignity unto them that have fellowship with the Father and his Son offereth it to the Father and the Son with whom these have fellowship and therefore must in due time expect the sure vengeance of the Almighty upon so great impiety 2. Great is the dignity of Beleivers who have fellowship not with Kings the best of men not with Angels the best of creatures but with God himself the Father and his Son Jesus Christ and therefore let them not debase this dignity dishonour this fellowship by conversing too much with creature-comforts When Augustus the Roman Emperour saw Saracen Ambassadours sporting with dogs he asketh them if there were no women in their countries when wicked men see Beleevers swallowed up of earthly contentments will they not question whether there be any such divine fellowship as is pretended since then we have a fountain of living waters why do we digge to our selves broken Cisterns and if we have fellowship with God let us scorne to be familiar with the world rather let us say with David Whom have I in heaven but thee and there is none on earth I desire in comparison of thee Oh blessed Trinity Father Son and Holy Ghost to converse with 3. How amiable and desireable must this fellowship needs be which is with the Father and his Son and therefore to be earnestly endeavoured after for this it was Christ prayed in the behalfe of his Church and not onely of them but all that should beleive in his name that they all may be one as thou Father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in us and surely this we both may and ought to pray for in our own behalf 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that you may have was S. Johns desire for these to whom he wrote and it ought much more to be our desire and endeavour for our selves that we may have and if we have attained any degree already that we may have yet greater measure of this fellowship This is the note of Lapide upon the Text that you may have that is that you may continue to have and have more fully this communion because he writeth to Beleivers in whom this was already begun indeed this participation being qualitative doth Suscipere magis minus admit of degrees All have fellowship with God and Christ as well as the Apostles but not in the same degree Christ tells the Jewes I come that they may have life and that they might have it more abundantly So doth S. John write to these that they might have fellowship and have it more abundantly in the same fulnesse that the Apostles had If then as yet thou art a stranger now labour to acquaint thy self with God and be at peace and if thy acquaintance be begun endeavour that it may grow to an indeared intimacy indeed who would not hunger and thirst after who can be sufficiently satisfied with this fellowship Fellowship in it self is a thing very delectable the wise man much enlargeth in the commendation of it when he saith two is better then one and pronounceth a vae soli woe to him that is alone indeed as the Greek Proverb runs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one man is no man and as Euripides one hand can make but a weak defence in all undertakings society is helpful Fellowship is amiable to all creatures even the dove will mourn when she hath lost her Mate but especially to man who is therefore called by the Philosopher 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a creature born for society indeed for this reason banishment is accounted next to death because it depriveth of civil society it is observable how sadly this hath been bemoaned not onely by a Cain Thou hast this day driven me out from the face of the earth but by a Iob I am a companion to owles and a brother to Dragons and by a David I am as a Pelican in the wilderness and an owle in the desert I am as a sparrow alone upon the house top And if fellowship be so lovely to all men how much more religious fellowship to good men if fellowship with men be delightful how much more this fellowship with God himself the Father and the Son This this beloved is the only good fellowship There is indeed a fellowship called by that name which is the cover of many enormities the devourer of large patrimonies the bane of many hopeful wits yet is the darling of a great number in the world I mean the riotous fellowship of luxurious companions But alas how unlike are the thing the name how catachrestical an expression is it when drunkenness is stiled good fellowship Oh turn in hither behold that which truly deserveth this name this fellowship with God and Christ in which there is all good of honesty utility and of jucundity a fellowship in which all safety liberty pleasure and contentment is to be found no wonder if the Psalmist saith Blessed is the man whom thou choosest causest to approach unto thee that he may dwell in thy Courts he shall be satisfied with the goodnesse of thy house even of thy holy Temple This is that fellowship to which God calleth us in his Gospel and of which by Faith in the Gospel we participate Indeed as Beza well observeth upon the text This is the very scope of the Gospel to make God and us at one and as Naogorgeus appositely Faith is the key which opens the door and admits us into the presence-chamber of the King of Glory Oh therefore let us cordially embrace the Gospel and daily strenghen our faith in it so as we may have and that every day more and more of this heavenly fellowship till at last we come to heaven where our faith being turned into sight we shall have the greatest reason to say in the language of the Apostle truly our fellowship is now not onely with Saints and Angels with Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Martyrs but with the Father and his Son Iesus Christ. THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 4. part last And these things write we unto you that your joy may be full I Am now come by divine assistance to the end of the beginning the conclusion of the Exordium of this Epistle namely the last clause of the fourth verse a close full of sweetness the subject whereof is that sweet Monosyllable joy the sound of which cannot but charm our eares and ravish our hearts indeed the thing which this word expresseth is the wheel upon which all mens projects and motions turn the mark at which all their designes and endeavours ayme Those various designâ—s of men in getting wealth grasping honour purchasing lands building houses planting vineyards do all meet in this one center of joy and contentment the truth is this is that prize for which all run and yet to which few attain
is Christ. 2. But further the speech of the lips is that to which most properly this term word belongs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coming from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dico to speak and truly there wants not a fit analogy in this metaphor it is true there are many things wherein this external word is unlike to Christ as its extrinsicalness to the person its temporary continuance and the like but there is one thing wherein it seemeth aptly to shadow forth Christ to us for as a man maketh known himself to others by his word so is the Father by Christ revealed unto the world some observing the various acceptance of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have taken hold of the signification of definitio and applied it to this present purpose for as the definition doth explicate the thing defined so doth Christ make known the Father but the common signification of the word seemeth sufficiently to illustrate the same truth and so accordingly is taken notice of by the Fathers Irenaeus and Augustine who tell us he is therefore called the Word because by him the Father is made known and through him we come to the saving knowledge of God in this respect it is that Christ is called by the Author to the Hebrews the brightness of his Fathers glory and express character of his person and again by St. Paul the image of God quia patrem suum nobis conspiciendum praebet because he manifesteth his Father to us And yet more particularly as that which a man maketh known of himself by his word is his will intent and purpose so hath the Father by Christ imparted to the world his eternal purpose and counsel concerning mans salvation It is observable that Christ is called the power of God and the wisdom of God and the word of God in Scripture and all fitly he is the wisdom of God because Gods decrees and counsels are as it were made by him the power of God because they are made good and accomplished by him and the word of God because they are made known and promulged by him this is Epiphanius his notion of word he is called saith he the word because he is the interpreter of his Fathers counsels and minde to men and that we may expound Scripture by Scripture me thinketh that of the Author to the Hebrews is a Comment upon this title when he saith God in these last dayes hath spoken to us by his Son who therefore is the word because God by him hath spoken and that most clearly to us It is a distinction not unusual nor irrational which is made between sonus vox and verbum a sound a voice a word a sound being any kinde of noise a voice an artiâ—ulate sound and a word a significant voice The application of it to this present business is very fit the Prophets of the Old Testament they were as a sound Iohn Baptist Christs immediate forerunner was as a voice he is called so the voice of one crying in the wilderness but it is Christ and he onely who is the word distinctly and fully signifying to us the will of God concerning our salvation How great is our happiness beloved who live in these last dayes and how great will be our misery if we be deaf to the word by which in these last dayes God speaketh to us and therefore let that Apostolical counsel be acceptable See that you refuse not him that speaketh rather let us hearken to him learn of him and seek from him divine knowledge The truth is brethren thus the case now stands Eternal life to wit the only way to it is to know the onely true God and Iesus Christ whom he hath sent no man knoweth the Son but the Father nor the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son will reveal him This onely begotten Son who is in the bosom of the Father he hath declared him Yea he counselleth us to buy of him that eye salve by which onely we may see and the voice from heaven chargeth us with This is my welbeloved Son in whom I am well pleased hear ye him and therefore as Peter said to Christ Lord to whom shall we go thou hast the words of eternal life So let us say Blessed Iesus whither shall we go whom should we hear but thee thou art the word of life 2. I have done with the metaphoricall a word of the metonymical construction and so Christ is called the Word in as much as he is the subject matter of the word and this we shall finde true both in a general and a speciall consideration 1. In general The whole word either mediately or immediately in a proxim or remote way points at Christ to him all the Prophets as well as the Apostles give witness the Scriptures are as the field and Christ is the treasure hid in this field they as the ring and Christ as the diamond of great price which giveth the lustre to it he is the center in which all the lines in holy writ do meet and this word of life is the very soul and life of the word oh let us in the reading of this sacred book break the bone that we may suck the marrow crack the shell that we may feed on the kernel open the Cabinet that we may finde the pearle search the Scriptures that we may meet with Christ in them since as that devout Antient said he found no relish in Tullies Oratorical writings because he could not read Iesus there So the very sweetnes and excellency of the Bible lyeth in this that we may read Iesus as it were in every line of it But 2. In special word is as much as promise when Synecdochically taken and thus as the spirit is sometimes called the promise so Christ is called the word quasi eum dicas de quo locâ—tus vel quem pollicitus est dominus to wit he of whom God speaketh or whom he promised should come into the world in this respect those words of St. Paul fitly explicate the phrase where he tells Agrippa I continue witnessing no other things than those which the Prophets and Moses did say should come Christ is therefore the word because it is he whom they say should come or to use Zachary his expression he is that horn of salvation which God raiseth up in the house of David as he spake by the mouth of all his holy Prophets which have been since the world began Moses his great Prophet Balaams star Esaiahs tender plant Jeremies branch Zacharies horn Malachie his Sun are all of them mystical Prophecies and promises of the Messiah It lets us see at once both the goodness and faithfulness of God his goodness in that before he gave his Son he gave the promise of him he was promissus priusquam missus first assured verbally then sent actually and his faithfulness in that as he promised so
that which they did declare now upon these considerations it was most requisite these planters of Christianity should be bold and resolute in declaring and defending what they declared Rationally much less religiously bold they could not be unless strongly and undoubtedly confirmed in and assured of the truth of those things they did declare this confirmation they could not have by a better way than sensible demonstration Hence it is that the Apostles give this as the reason of their resolvedness we cannot but speak the things we see and hear and St. Luke calls those proofs which the Apostles had of Christs resurrection by seeing and coversing with him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which our translation not unfitly rendereth infallible proofs by which therefore they were no doubt strengthened in their faith and animated with courage To apply this to our selves in severall particulars 1. Here is matter of confutation and that both direct and collaterall 1. This directly confuteth a double heresie 1. That of the Marcionites and Manichees whereof St. Austin saith Cerdo was the author who assert all things Christ did were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 only in appearance denying that he was truly man But surely when we read that he was not onely heard but seen and handled we must needs acknowledge him reall man an apparition may indeed deceive the sight but it cannot the feeling Christ was not onely seen but felt hence it is that this is his own argument to his disciples when they doubted whether he were not a spirit handle me see me for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me to have 2. That of the Nestorians who assert two persons the one the Son of God the other the Son of Mary but were it so St. Iohns words could not be verified they saw and handled the word of life for it was onely the man-hood they saw and handled and if the man Christ were a distinct person from the word of life they could not be said to handle the one when they handled the other and therefore we do from these and such other like places strongly assert a unity of the two natures in one person it being one and the same person who as God was invisible and as man visible as God was from the beginning as man had a beginning as God was immateriall and as man palpable 2. This collaterally confutes that error of the Papists who assert the flesh and blood of Christ to be corporally present in the holy Sacrament so as that the bread and wine are by a miraculous work transubstantiated into it indeed from this very clause a strong argument may be drawn and that two wayes 1. To prove that Christs flesh and blood is not there corporally present because then it must be visible it is an undoubted maxime in Philosophy omne corporeum est quantum quantity is inseparable from corporiety and being so it cannot but be visible and palpable nay since it implyeth a contradiction for a thing to be a body and not to be visible because it is as much as to be and not to be a body it is that which Omnipotency it self cannot do and therefore in vain is a miracle pretended 2. To prove that the bread and wine in the holy Sacrament are not transubstantiated but remain bread wine still because it is a clear axiome bodies are such in their own nature as they present themselves to the sence when it is every way disposed and fitted for the object now that which at the holy table offereth it self to the view and taste and touch of the most rectifyed organ is not flesh and bloud but bread and wine and therefore if St. Iohns proof here be valid that which he declared was true because he saw and handled it we may with the same validity prove it is bread and wine in the sacrament because by seeing and handling we find it to be such 2. Here is matter of Conviction to perswade us of the verity of the Apostolical writings It is true the chief reason why we are to receive their writings is because they were moved and extraordinarily assisted in the penning of them by the holy Ghost but yet withall this may be a secondary reason of our assent to what they testifyed and wrote because it was no other than that which they had heard nay seen nay handled we all think it just and reasonable to believe a man when he speaketh not by hear-say but personal experience and why then is it not reason that we should believe the Apostles who declare nothing but what they heard saw and handled This was so rational an argument in St. Iohns account that speaking concerning Christs being thrust through with a spear he thus argueth He that saw it bare record and his record is true therefore true because of that which he saw and hence it is that Iohn the Baptist complaining of the Iews infidelity in rejecting Christ useth this aggravation what he hath seen and heard that he testifieth and no man receiveth his Testimony and in the same Chapter Christ himself taketh up the same complaint to Nicodemus verily verily I say unto thee we speak that we do know and testifie that we have seen and you receive not our witness To drive this nail to the head there are but three things that can possibly be objected against this reason which being cleared I conceive it will remain unanswerable and such as may convince a Iew a Pagan if they were not wilfully blind That they say they heard saw and handled what they never did and so were no better than deceivers That they did onely think they saw such things but in truth did not and so were themselves deceived That that which they did hear see handle will not amount to a proof of what they declared namely that Iesus was the Christ. To all which I doubt not but to return a full answer 1. As to the first such an accusation cannot aequitably be charged on any except they either were men of loose and flagitious lives and so not likely to make any conscience of a lye or else that there were some great advantage apparently accruing by such a lye which perhaps might have an influence not onely on a loose but a civil person now neither of these can in this case be alledged For 1. The Apostles were men of holy and exemplary lives men that did shine as lights in the world by their good conversation men whom those grand Apostates and enemies of Christianity could charge with nothing but simplicity and therefore no reason to suspect that they should tell such a gross lye as to say they heard or saw or handled what they never did 2. It is sufficiently manifest that they were not allured to bear this Testimony by any gain either of honour or profit or pleasure nay in stead of gain there was nothing but loss they were
promised afore by his Prophets in the holy Scriptures and Zachary saith the raising up of Christ an horn of salvation is that he spake by the mouth of his holy Prophets which have been since the world began the truth is as God would never have man destitute of a way to come to him so the way for fallen man to come to him hath been one and the same for substance in all ages of the Church and the New Testament is nothing else but the unveiling of Moses his face a breaking of the Old Testament shell a more clear discovery of what was though darkly made known from the beginning 3. And yet to go one step further beyond which we cannot go that which was from the beginning that is before the beginning of the world to wit in the eternal purpose and counsell of God indeed as the permission of mans fall which was in the beginning of time so the effecting of mans redemption which was in the fulness of time was fore-ordained by God before all time so as the Gospel is nothing else but as it were a Copy of that writing which was in the mind of God from all eternity in this respect it is that the Gospel is called the everlasting Gospel and Christ is said to be the Lambâ—slain from the foundation of the world and yet more clearly this eternal life is said to be that which God which cannot lye promised that is purposed before the world began From whence we may profitably infer a double conclusion True Antiquity is a sure mark of verity That Antiquity is true which is from the beginning 1. Would Ministers know what doctrine they ought to declare and the people what they are to receive this is a good rule let it be that doctrine which hath been anciently embraced and maintained by the Christian Church a very seasonable Item in these dayes wherein to use Vincentius Lyrinensis his expression Bene fundata antiquitas scelestâ novitate subruitur well grounded antiquity is overturned by fanatick novelty the cry of the AEgyptian Priest in Plato cited by Clemens Alexandrinus Oh Solon Solon you are alwayes children may fitly be taken up of the men of this Generation they are children pleased with every novell toy and tossed to and fro with every winde of doctrine Not content with the antient Apostolical government universally continued in the Christian Church for many hundred years we have endeavoured to erect new formes which Proteus-like change into several shapes and about which the contrivers cannot tell how to agree Not knowing indeed themselves what they would have not satisfied with nay much offended at the antient devout Liturgie of our English Church which the first compilers extracted as a quintessence out of the several praeceding Liturgies both of the Greek Latine Church we have erected a new or rather no way of worship leaving every Minister to the dangerous liberty of an extemporary devotion and the people to the sad slavery of hearing those vain Tautologies nay many times horrid blasphemies which are vented in those kind of prayers And yet once more not willing to be regulated by those ancient doctrinal truths which the Church from and with the holy Scriptures hath delivered to us how many are there amongst us who seek another Gospel vent strange opinions the people heaping up to themselves teachers and the teachers heaping up to themselves auditors who have an itch after novelty not onely in discipline but doctrine Oh my brethren take we all heed lest we be infected with this itch which is the sister of superstition mother of rashness and the daughter of inconstancy rather let the Prophet Ieremy his words take place with us Thus saith the Lord stand ye in the wayes and see and ask for the old paths where is the good way and walk therein and ye shall finde rest for your souls let St. Pauls counsel to Timothy be acceptable serva depositum Hold fast the form of sound words non a te inventum sed tibi creditum which was not invented by thee but committed to thee and according to St. Iudes exhortation let us contend earnestly for the faith which was once delivered to the Saints Finally let St. Hieroms practice be our pattern Meum propositum est antiquos legere a side ecclesiae catholicae non recedere my resolve is to read the ancients and not recede from the faith of the Catholick Church Indeed however it may now be made one of the marks of the well-affected godly party to follow new wayes yet I am sure Lyrinensis sets it down as a continued practise in the Church that the more religious any man was the more zealous he was against factious novelties 2. But further as we must assert antiquity so that antiquity is what was from the beginning for though error may be old yet still that which is from the beginning is truth indeed as crookedness is no other but a deviation from a straight rule so error an aberration from truth and therefore as a crooked line supposeth a straight so error supposeth truth and upon this ground it is that the Fathers rule is veritate manifestâ cedat consuetudo veritati when truth appeareth custome must give way because indeed be the custome never so ancient truth was before it With this it is we must justly answer the Romish plea of antiquity for many of their erroneous assertions that though they have been some of them of many hundred years standing yet they were not known in the pure and primitive times of the Church and therefore as our blessed Saviour in the point of divorce reduceth the Iews to this consideration it was not so from the beginning true indeed it hath been long permitted you for the hardness of your hearts but it was not so from the beginning the first institution giveth no such allowance so we in those points of controversie between us and the Church of Rome reduce them to the beginning of Christian Religion it is true many of their doctrines have been long published but they were not from the beginning they were not taught by Christ or his Apopostles or their Successors in the first Centuries of the Church Whilest therefore the Papists scoff at our Religion as a novell faction as those Athenians did at Pauls doctrine we have this in readiness to retort and are able blessed be God to make it good against them ours is no other than that which was from the beginning and that even at Rome it self preached and professed nor do we differ from them but only in those opinions which since the golden foundation of Christianity was laid by Christ and his Apostles hath been by Babel builders superstructed as hay and stubble fit onely to be cast into the fire The last branch of the Gospels commendation is from the utility of the end Now the end which is here mentioned is double to wit proximus
signifying either communio or communicatio communion and fellowship or communication and partnership and though in some places onely one of those can well be admitted yet here I conceive both may very well consist and the Apostle may be probably thought to intend that intimate communion which believers have with and by vertue hereof the liberall communication they receive from the Father and his Son Iesus Christ. To unlock this Cabinet and shew you the rich pearl contained in it give me leave to consider it both generally and particularly in generall what maketh up this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellowship here mentioned and in particular as this fellowship is expressed to be with two of the persons in the sacred Trinity the Father and his Son Iesus Christ. 1. The substance of the benefit will be discovered in the general dicussion and that you may the more distinctly understand it proceed with me by â—hese four steps which are as so many degrees of this fellowship namely amicable reconciliation effectuall regeneration comfortable association and compleat glorification 1. The rice and inchoation of this fellowship is reconciliation whereby God of an enemy becomes a friend and receiveth us into favour to this purpose is Ferus his paraphrase to have fellowship saith he is to be in Covenant with God to be one of the number of those to whom he vouchsafeth his special love accordingly this phrase may be interpreted by that of St. Paul where he saith we have peace with God and he hath made us accepted The truth is we all by nature are not onely strangers but enemies and where there is hostility there can be no society so that we begin not to have fellowship with till we are reconciled to God This reconciliation of God to penitent believing sinners is most elegantly and sweetly shadowed forth under the Fathers gracious behaviour towards the returning prodigal no sooner doth his Son set foot forward to come home but his Father saw him there were eyes of love had compassion on him there were bowels of love and ran to him with feet of love and fell on his neck there were armes of love and kissed him with lips of love by all which expressions we may gather what a tender dear affection of amity there is in God towards penitents which is the foundation of this fellowship 2. The concomitant of this reconciliation is regeneration since whosoever is accepted by God hath stamped upon him the image of God and so doth after a sort partake with God To clear this you must know that there can be no fellowship where there is not some similitude in which respect saith one upon my Text This fellowship with God is by likeness to him for this reason at first it was that Almighâ—â— God intending man a creature to have fellowship with â—â—mself made him after his own image nor can we be admitted into this fellowship unless this image be renewed in and restored to us now this image of God is nothing else but the communication of such qualities as resemble those which for this very reason the Schools call the communicable attributes of God such are his holiness goodness mercy justice truth and the like and because holiness is the chief yea after a sort comprehensive of the rest therefore especially in this is the image of God placed and so this fellowship with God is a participation with him in purity and sanctity and may therefore fitly be explained by St. Peters 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 partaking of the divine nature or St. Pauls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 partaking of his holiness 3. The progress of this fellowship is in that sweet communion which believers being thus reconciled and regenerated have with God so that there is though not an aequality far be it from us to make such a blasphemous construction of this phrase yet a neer and intimate familiarity in which respect God and a Christian may be said to walk to talk to feast nay to lodge and dwell together Believers walk with God in a holy Subjection God walketh with believers in affording them gratious protection Believers speak to God in devout supplications God speaketh to believers in spiritual consolations Believers feast God with their graces God feasteth Believers with his joyes Finally Believers inhabit in the secret of the most high and God reposeth himself in the bosome of believers hence occurre those phrases of Gods being with us and our walking with God of our having access to God and his coming down to us of our supping with him and his supping with us of our dwelling in God and God in us we being to speak it with holy reverence as it were convivae his fellow commoners conviatores fellow travellers yea contubernales chamber fellows Adde to this 4. The consummation of this fellowship is in the other world where there shall be a full communication of the image of God to us whereby we shall partake of purity life and immortality of unspotetd holinesse and indeficient happinesse when we shall have the clear vision of God face to face and by vertue of that a full fruition of him so farre as a created nature is capable of and all this without the least interruption intermission cessation This fellowship is that which for the present we have though not re in actual possession yet spe in certain expectation that participation and communion which we have here by grace being an earnest and pledge asring us of that we shall have hereafter by glory and this shall suffice to be spoken in generall of the nature of this fellowship 2. The further amplification of this fellowship is in that here are two persons specified and though it be one and the same fellowship which we have with all the persons yet inasmuch as two of them are severally mentioned it may well admit of a distinct consideration 1. This fellowship is said to be with the Father It is very observable to the understanding of this that the Father being the first person in the Deity is the primary original and fountain of all communication to the creature whence it is that those Acts which the Deity is pleased to exercise towards the creature are though not exclusively yet for the most part expresly assigned in Scripture to the Father thus the Father is said to come and dwell with us the Father is he that hath begotten us agaâ—n to a lively hope finally the Father is said to blesse us with all spirituall blessings No wonder if this fellowship is here said to be with the Father The neerness of this fellowship which we have with the Father is represented by a gradation of allusions in Scripture all which do excellently illustrate this truth There is some kind of participation that a servant hath with his Master yet greater is that which one friend hath with another yet greatest is that which a son hath with his Father
Father Jesus Christ the rightâ—ous wherein there are two things observable The quality what it is we have an advocate The efficacy how prevalent it is in respect of The person with whom the Father The person who Jesus Christ the righteous The first thing to be discussed is the Quality of this Ingredient and to that end we must enquire what this meaneth that Christ is called an Advocate The more clearly to unfold this comfortable truth I shall proceed by these steps 1. The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here used is attributed in Scripture both to Christ and the Spirit but when it is attributed to the spirit it is rendered by comforter when to Christ by advocate and not without reason since the spirits work is to speak comfortably to us and Christs to plead powerfully for us indeed whensoever this title is given to the holy Ghost it is either in respect of the world and then it noteth his pleading for God with men by way of conviction or in respect of beleevers and then it noteth his incouraging them in all their distresses and enabling them by strong groanes to plead with God for themselves but when it is given to Christ it importeth his taking our cause upon himselfe and undertaking to intercede with God in our behalfe 2. This will the better appeare if we consider that advocate is verbum forense a judicial word so that look as in all such proceedings there is the guilty the accuser the Court the Judge and the Advocate so is it here Heaven is the Court man is the guilty Satan the accuser God is the Iudge and Christ the Advocate and look as the advocate appeareth in the Court before the Iudge to plead for the guilty against the accuser so doth Christ before God in heaven to answer whatsoever the devil can object against us 3. But further as Christ is here called an advocate so is he elsewhere a Iudge thus St. Peter saith that Christ commanded the Apostles to preach and testify that it is he whom God hath ordained to be Iudge of quick and dead Indeed both these in respect of different times and his several offices are aptly verified of him 1. Now being ascended to heaven he is an advocate at the last day when he descends from heaven he shall be a Iudge how comfortable is this meditation to beleevers that he who is now their advocate is hereafter to be their Iudge and if he vouchsafe to plead for them at the barre he shall certainly passe sentence for them upon the Bench. 2. There is a twofold office which Christ undertaketh in respect of which these are truly attributed to him the one Regal and the other Sacerdotal as King he shall one day sit as a Iudge as Priest he now stands as an advocate at Gods hand by his Kingly power he shall execute the one but of his Priestly goodnesse he vouchsafeth the other and thus whilest as a King he can and will himself confer yet as a Priest he obtaineth of the Father remission of our sins 4. It is not unworthy our observation that as Christ is here called by S. Iohn an advocate so by S. Paul a Mediator unus utriusque nominis sensus saith Gualter the sence of both is one and the same but yet there is somâ— difference to be observed between them Christ is a mâ—diator both in respect of his person and office both bâ—â—cause he is a middle person and because he mediateth bâ—â—tween God and man whereas he is an advocate onely respect of his office Again he is a mediator in respect of all his offices an advocate only in respect of his Sacerdotal Finally a mediator inasmuch as he doth both deal with God for man and with man for God pacifying God towards man bringing man to God obtaining favour with God for us and declaring Gods will to us but an advocate onely inasmuch as he intercedeth with God and pleadeth our cause in heaven Mediator then is as it were the genus and advocate the species it being one part of his mediatorship that he is an advocate I shall end this with Bezaes distinction who observeth that Christ is called a Iudge in respect of our adversaries a mediator in reference to God and an advocate in regard of us judging our enemies mediating with God and pleading for us 5. We may not unfitly here distinguish between a patron and an advocate between a defender and an interceder the one undertaketh to justifie the fact the other only to prevent the punishment of the fault If any man sinne far be it from Christ to be a patron to defend the fault but he is an advocate to deprecate the guilt In the end of the verse he is called Iesus Christ the righteous and therefore non nisi justam causam suscepit he cannot maintain a bad cause but though he abhorres to plead for the sin yet he will for the sinner and though he dare not excuse the commission yet he intercedes for the remission of the offence 6. Lastly when Christ is said as an advocate to intercede we are not to fancie a supplicating voyce and bended knees no it suiteth not with the Majesty of Christ in heaven But that which Christ doth as an advocate is according to the Apostolical phrase his appearing for us in that coelestial Court as an Advocate doth for his Clyent in humane Iudicatories To open this more fully be pleased to know that the advocateship of Christ consists in a fourefold presentation 1. Of his person in both natures divine and humane his and ours as our Sponsor and Mediator in this respect he liveth in heaven saith the Apostle to make intercession as he lived on earth to dye so he liveth in heaven to intercede for us presenting himself as one that hath made satisfaction for our offences hence it is that there is not only a ptesentation of himself but 2. Of his merit as the High Priest entered into that holy of holies with the blood of the sacrifice so is Christ entered with his own blood and as there was once for all an oblation of it upon the Crosse so there is a continual presentation of it in heaven in this respect his blood is said to speake better things then Abels for whereas Abels blood did from the earth imprecate Christs in heaven deprecates vengeance indeed quot vulnera tot ora how many wounds so many mouths to plead for sinners thus action is the best part of this Oratour who intercedeth by shewing his wounds his pierced hands and feet his opened side his bruised body As a Mother intreating her sonne openeth her dugs and brest so this Son interceding with his Father presenteth his blood and his wounds When AEchylus the tragedian was accused his brother Amyntas coming into the Court opened his garments shewed them cubitum sine manu an arme without an hand lost