Selected quad for the lemma: world_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
world_n death_n sin_n sin_v 14,462 5 10.3751 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A54589 The difference between the old and new covenant stated and explained with an exposition of the covenant of grace in the principal concernments of it / by Samuel Petto ... Petto, Samuel, 1624?-1711. 1674 (1674) Wing P1896; ESTC R31110 148,845 372

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

are parallel'd Rom. 5. 6. to the end The day that the first Adam sinned the Law passed a Sentence of Death upon all his Seed ver 12. virtually they all sinned and died there but not actually till they exist or have a being and as none are the Seed of the first Adam actually under his sin and condemnation till they be naturally born of him into the world of sinners so none are the Seed of Jesus Christ the second Adam actually under his righteousness to Justification of Life till they be spiritually born of him into the World of Saints ver 16 18 19. Joh. 1. 12. Gal. 3. 16. the one Seed Christ to whom the Promise is made is not exclusive of infant Seed as to Ordinances but of an adult Seed which fought Justification and Eternal Life by the Works of the Law thus the one seed is that of Faith ver 26. For ye are the Children of God by Faith in Jesus Christ Indeed Representatively we were not only justified but also sanctified and glorified at the Death Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus Christ Ephes 2. 5 6. He hath quickened us together with Christ and hath raised us up together and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus Not that we were the principal actors by him and he meerly our delegate For then we were Self Redeemers Self-Saviours it were more properly our act than his Jesus Christ so represented us as he was the principal actor and owner of all still the Redeeming act was his not ours Gal. 3. 13. Revel 5. 9. Gal. 4. 5. Rom 3. 24 25. the righteousness his Rom. 5. 18 19 21. It is his subjectively he is the S●bject of it objectively ours we the Objects yea he so represented us as all was federally ours in him it was agreed that afterward we should have it all was for us in the Covenant but we are not actually his Seed one moment of time before Faith Rom. 5. 1. To say therefore that we are justified not in our persons but to our persons in Christ is to grant what is desired For men cannot be actually justified but in their own Persons and that cannot be till they actually exist and have personality and seeing after their Nativity their persons are unjustified they cannot at the same time be said to be justified Indeed the persons were determined Jesus Christ had full assurance that he should not die at uncertainties Isa 53. 11. But that doth not argue the immediateness of their Justification that is in the appointed season We must therefore carefully distinguish between Justification it self in the abstract consisting in remission of sins and righteousness prepared and our being justified as Mr. Norton saith Orthod Evang. p. 314. Or distinguish between Justification actually procured and it actually applyed the former is before Faith the latter not so As to the former see Rom. 5. 8 9 10. Our being reconciled was at the death of his Son not at the time of our Conversion Justification in this sense is the Object of Faith and may be before the act thus Heb. 1. 3. When he had by himself purged our sins sate down on the right hand of the Majesty on high so Heb. 2. 17. Remission of sin then purging and reconciliation it self were compleat at the death of Jesus Christ then prepared for us but not conferred upon us till union with Jesus Christ and Faith 4. All are in a state of condemnation till union with Jesus Christ by Faith and so have no actual Justification till then for these are opposite Rom. 8. 33 34. It is God that justifieth who is he that condemneth The same persons then cannot at the same time be both justified and condemned for he proveth immunity from condemnation by their being justified and they are persons in Christ Jesus that only have this immunity ver 1. None out of Christ actually injoy it and no union with him one moment of time before regeneration and Faith for if any man be in Christ be in a new Creature 2 Cor. 5. 17. All unbelievers are condemned already Joh. 3. 18. The wrath of God abideth on them ver 36. Are Children of wrath Ephes 2 3. Even Elect vessels before Faith are here said to be in that state under a Sentence of wrath and condemnation not only naturally de jure quoad meritum as to desent for so are all the sinful actings of Saints deserve wrath whereas here such wrath is intended as differenced their state in time past from what it was since they believed it was inconsistent with present Justification unto Life Though Jesus Christ alone made satisfaction to justice for their sin and was made a Curse for them so as not the least Atome of the Curse formally that is of vindictive wrath shall fall upon them in execution yet not only materially they are under it but the Laws Sentence of condemnation is against them and they are obnoxious to many tokens of wrath not only in their bodies in many sicknesses infirmities and painful diseases but in their Souls by ignorance darkness with many other sinful dispositions and inclinations and in their whole man by subjection and thraldom to Satan Col. 1. 13. Act. 26. 18. 2 Tim. 2. 26. and deprivation of fellowship and communion with God and liability to the terrour of such a state and all these not in the least to make satisfaction but for other ends as that Grace may be the more admired in Salvation out of such a miserable state Ephes 2. 11 12. to humble them c. If it be Objected That our obligation being transferred upon Jesus Christ and he having born our sin and Curse justice and equity requireth that the Elect should upon his death be ipso facto actually discharged their debt being paid it cannot afterward be charged upon principal or Surety It may be Answered More is to be considered in this case than a meer debt for here the person was firstly and principally under the obligation as Dr. O. observeth satisfaction by a Surety being accepted the father might put in what terms he pleased without any shew of injustice and so there is no necessity that the discharge be ipso facto upon his death Also a debt may be charged upon the principal debtor till he obtaineth an actual interest in the satisfaction of the Surety till then though no further satisfaction will ever be exacted from Jesus Christ or the Elect yet the Laws obligation unto wrath may lie against them for other ends as to quicken them to seek deliverance out of that deplorable condition they are in The want of an immediate freedom is not from the defectiveness of the satisfaction made by Jesus Christ but from a present incapacity in those who are to be the subjects of the freedom as a full ransom may be paid for Slaves yet by reason of the distance an after-day may be set for their release So the Elect whilst unborn are uncapable of