Selected quad for the lemma: world_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
world_n	death_n	sin_n	sin_v	14,462	5	10.3751	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47576	The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preach'd upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.	Keach, Benjamin, 1640-1704.	1700 (1700)	Wing K73; ESTC R7556	176,774	438

chiefly because to them were committed the Oracles of God Now Stephen shews by the Oracles of God are meant the Ten words Act. 7. 33. who told the Jews Their Fathers received on Mount Sinai the lively Oracles to deliver them saith he to us i. e. us Jews Now I argue thus If the Gentiles had the same lively Oracles or Oracles of God given to them then in this the Jews had not the advantage above the Gentiles He doth not speak of the Advantage the Jews had as to the clearest Revelation of those Oracles to them above the Gentiles but of the giving of them to the Jews and not to the Gentiles 3. Again two or three times Paul expresly affirms that the Gentiles had not the Law and were without the Law For when the Gentiles which have not the Law c. Rom. 2. 14. What is more plainly expressed The Gentiles he saith had not the Law that is as given by Moses tho they had the Law written in their Hearts So elsewhere he says 1 Cor. 9. 21 22. Vnto the Jew I became a Jew that I might gain the Jews to them that are under the Law as under the Law c. to them that are without the Law as without the Law being not without Law to God but under the Law to Christ that I might gain them that are without the Law Three times he here affirms the Gentiles are without the Law Object He means the Ceremonial Law Answ True they were without that Law as well as the Decalogue Law but he cannot here refer to the Ceremonial Law because it is such a Law as the Gentiles were under to Christ or as it is in the hand of Christ which must intend the Moral Law for no Gentile Believer or Unbeliever was under the Ceremonial Law to Christ because utterly abolished but so is not the Moral Law in which sense we are without the Law to God but under the Law to or as it is in the hand of Christ 4. Take this Argument The Gentiles shall not be judged by Moses's Law That Law which the Gentiles shall not be judged by they were never under but the Gentiles shall not be judged by the Law of Moses therefore they were never under that Law For proof of the major Proposition see what Paul saith Rom. 2. 12. For as many as have sinned without Law shall be judged without Law and as many as have sinned in the Law shall be judged by the Law By the first he means the Gentiles and by the latter the Jews And from hence the Apostle proceeds to evince that as the Gentiles shew'd the Works of the Law written in their Hearts they should be judged by that Law but not as that Law was formerly written by Moses in two Tables of Stone ver 15. As to the minor Proposition can any suppose that if the Gentiles had been under Moses's Law yet they should not be judged by it Sure none can Obj. If the Gentiles were not under the Law Christ came not to redeem them for he came to redeem none but such as were under the Law Gal. 4. 5. Answ The old World was under the Law and Covenant of Works and the Curse thereof in the first Adam it was his first Transgression that brought all the World under the Curse of the Law or breach of the first Covenant and not the Law as given by Moses tho that Law 't is true pronounceth that Curse afresh on those that continued not in all things contain'd therein For by one Man's Offence Death reigned by one Rom. 5. 1● 17 18. c. By one Man Sin entered into the World and Death by Sin Therefore as by the Offence of one Judgment came upon all Men to Condemnation c. Thus we were all under the Law of the first Covenant and as the Law is written in our Hearts but we were not all under that Ministration of the Law given by Moses Obj. If all the World became guilty by the breach of Moses's Law then all the World was under it but this Paul affirms Rom. 3. 19. Now we know whatsoever things the Law saith it saith to them who are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the World may become guilty before God Answ Paul in the precedent Chapter and what goes before in this had proved that the Gentiles were under Sin and were all guilty before God for violating the Law written in their Hearts See Chap. 2. 12. and 3. 10. Well what of this the Gentiles then were cast and found guilty that way yet they were not all but part of the whole World And from hence he in this 19th Verse comes again to speak of the Jews who were under Moses's Law and saith What the Law that is Moses's Law saith it saith to them who are under it meaning the Jews and what the Consequence of this is he shews i. e. that every mouth might be stopped not the mouths of the Gentiles only but the mouths of the Jews also that so all the World that is both Jews and Gentiles might become guilty before God I hope all are and will be convinc'd that this is directly the meaning of Paul if they consider the scope and coherence of the Text. And thus I have clearly proved that the Law of the Decalogue or Moses's Law was not given to any but the Jews and proselyte Strangers and therefore from that it cannot be the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Object But it is again objected That the Apostle James injoineth the Royal Law upon believing Gentiles and the Royal Law is the Law of the Decalogue therefore all were under the Law of the Decalogue which forbids Adultery Murder c. Answ 1. It is a hard case that Men Jam. 2. 8 10 11 12. about fulfilling the Royal Law opened to prove their fond Notions should put such an Interpretation on a Text of Scripture as is directly contrary to other plain Texts for unless they can prove we mistake those Scriptures newly mentioned which say that Moses's Law was only given to the Jews and not to the Gentiles besure they urge this to no purpose but mistake the sense of the Apostle as others do about what he says concerning Justification 2. We never deny'd but readily grant that all believing Gentiles are oblig'd to keep the whole moral Law or all simple moral Precepts as they are in the hand of our Lord that one Lawgiver of which this Apostle speaks but I have proved that the precise Seventh-day Sabbath is not a simple moral Precept nor any part of the Morality of the fourth Commandment and therefore not intended here Therefore it followeth that Man may fulfil the Royal Law according to the Scripture and yet not observe the Seventh-day Sabbath 3. The Apostle James clears the matter himself So speak and so do as they that shall be judged by the Law of Liberty ver 12. He

for no day at all and what then would become of the publick and private Worship of God That Notion therefore that every day is alike is most hateful to God no doubt for as soon as he established a visible Church giving a stinted stated Worship Laws and Ordinances he appointed himself the precise time of Worship under the Law and the equitableness as well as the Divine Authority of one day in seven is as I have proved perpetually obligatory upon all his People For the further clearing of this pray consider that 1. Christ is Lord of the Sabbath and of that Day God would have observ'd under the Gospel and tho he hath dispensed with the observance of the seventh Day or abolished that yet as Lord and Lawgiver he hath instituted a weekly day of Rest for his People and for his solemn Worship in Gospel-times And none have this Power but himself alone For shall the Servant appoint what precise time his Master's business shall be done or set the times when his Master's Family shall have their distinct Meals or be fed No certainly Therefore Christian Sabbath p. 127. as Reverend Dr. Twiss observes if any pretend that Christ hath delegated this Power of his to his Church it stands upon them to make it good What times God himself took to work in or to rest after Creation the same proportion of time as Dr. Lake hints did he assign to Men and made his Pattern a perpetual Law So then of our time God reserves a seventh part for his Service The reserving saith he a seventh part I hold to be God's Ordinance who is not variable in his choice but as everlasting as the World And so should the hallowing of the Seventh-day from the Creation have been had it not been for Sin for what could have altered it but a new Creation 2. But Man having sinned and so abolished the first Creation de jure tho not de facto God was pleased to make by Christ an instauration or renewal of the World he means as I conceive God so abolished the old Creation that no precise Day remains to be observed in the remembrance of it and by Christ in redemption hath made a new Heaven and a new Earth and old things being passed away all things are become new Yea every man in Christ is a new Creature or of the new Creation And as God when he ended his Work of the first Creation made a Day of Rest and sanctified it So Christ when he ended the Work of Redemption made a Day of Rest and sanctified it not altering the proportion of Time which is perpetual but taking the first of seven for his portion because it sutes with his new Creation and with his entring into it thro him that old being a Legal Rite and suting with the Covenant of Works which is abolished with the Covenant it self but the new the first of seven remains for ever 3. For the further clearing of this matter consider that under the first Creation God required one Day in seven for himself The equity of Precepts may abide But the precise Seventh-day being a Judicial Law is gone yet the equity or equitableness of one Day in seven as due to God to be improved to his Glory for ever remains 4. God then gave poor Servants and Cattel Servants and Cattel still have one day in 7. to rest in one Day of Rest in seven the last Day of seven is gone but the equity or equitableness of one Day in seven for a day of Rest for Servants and Cattel remains for ever 5. God required his People to give his Ministers under the Law the Tenth of all their Increase the Law of Tithes is gone but the equity or equitableness that his Ministers under the Gospel should have as sufficient a maintenance remains for ever 6. Under the Law God required his People to meet together in his material Temple the Temple is gone but the equity or equitableness of assembling together in some place or another for Publick Worship remains for ever 7. Under the Law God's People in their Prayers offered Incense Incense was typical and is gone but the equitableness of our Duty in making our Prayers to God and confessing our Sins remains for ever 8. They under the Law had Instruments of Musick when they sang God's Praises Instruments of Musick were typical and only served the Jewish Worship but the equitableness of the Duty to sing God's Praises with Grace in our Hearts remains for ever 9. Also note that the second Commandment as given by Moses injoined the Jewish Nation to observe the whole Ceremonial Law and all other Precepts of the Mosaical Oeconomy But as the Moral Law is in the hands of Christ the second Command doth not injoyn on us the observance of those Precepts because abolished but it injoyns on us the observance of all Ordinances whatsoever Christ hath commanded us Also that Clause in the second Commandment viz. Visiting the Iniquities of the Fathers on the Children to the third and fourth Generation doubtless belonged to the Covenant of Works and was a temporal Punishment Doth God do thus under the New Covenant Moreover the Promise annexed to the fifth Commandment shews that the Law as given by Moses only appertained to the People of Israel as also the Preface to them all Exod. 20. 2. doth the like 10. So the fourth Commandment as in the hand of Moses injoyned the People of Israel the observance of the Seventh-day But as the Law is in the hand of Christ it doth not injoyn us to observe that day but being a Shadow is abolished But it doth injoyn us to observe the first day of the Week which Christ as the Lord of the Sabbath hath instituted under the Gospel in its room tho not to be observed with that legal strictness and penalty as the old Sabbath which was a sign of the Covenant of Works and gendred to bondage Object But where is there a Divine appointment of the first Day of the Week and by whom was it required Answ This is the cry of our Adversaries and I answer that I doubt not but our Lord and Saviour at this time did institute it and also gave command to his Disciples to observe it I know some others have cryed Where is laying on of hands either upon Elders or baptized Believers as such commanded and so of divers other things as if every Precept of the Gospel must be laid down in express words of command because some of them are 1. But to proceed Let it be well considered that as I have proved from the fourth Command that a Time a sufficient Time for Rest and in the solemn Worship of God is a simple Moral Duty 2. And that God also hath there by an express positive Law laid claim to one Day in seven as perpetually obligatory on his People And as I have also proved that the last Day of seven was only given to the Jews

or People of Israel and that it is utterly abolished it being a sign of the Covenant of Works 3. So I shall now prove that our Lord has appointed the first day of the Week for us to observe under the Gospel For First Consider Jesus Christ the Son of God as Mediator is the only Head Sovereign Lord and Lawgiver to his Church and therefore it may seem strange that the special Day or Time of Gospel-worship in his own Kingdom-state should not be given forth by himself But that Moses should have that Honour ascribed to him and that we should commemorate the glorious Work of the New Creation or Redemption on the old Day which was partly appointed for remembrance of the Work of the first Creation Isa 65. 17. is very strange for the Prophet tells us that upon the creating of the new Heaven and the new Earth the former shall be no more remembred that is as I conceive not in such a way of remembrance i. e. by the observation of that former Day appointed in part on that very account For certainly God's glorious Works of the first Creation shall otherwise be never forgot and 't is evident the Text refers to the Gospel day Jerusalem Paul applys to the New Testament Church Secondly Now in my Text our blessed Lord gives forth his Commission Go and teach all Nations baptizing them c. and then these words are added teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you What many of those Commands were we know not It is also said Acts 1. 2 3. that he was with his Disciples forty days and forty nights having given Commandment to his Apostles whom he had chosen Yet neither in this place are those Commandments expressed only he bid them not to depart from Jerusalem till they received the promised Spirit and were indowed with Power from on high Now no doubt but during these 40 days he fully settled all things appertaining to his Spiritual Kingdom and instructed them in all matters they should both do and teach And can any rationally judg that he did not then command them which day in seven he would have observed as a Day of Rest and solemn Worship Thirdly In the pursuit of what I aim at consider that from the day of his ascension into Heaven till the day of Pentecost there were but ten days during which we do not read they had any special general Assembly for Religious Worship tho on the two first days some were together and on both those days he appeared to them And remarkable it is that there were two Jewish Sabbath-days between his Ascension and the day of their first general solemn meeting Now had not the old Sabbath been gone certainly they had assembled on both those days but no doubt our Lord had told them on what day they should first meet together in expectation of the Gift and Promise of the Father which day he purposed to ratify as the only Day of Gospel-worship by a marvellous effusion of the Spirit To me nothing deserves more to be observ'd than this viz. on what day of the Week the first general Gospel-Assembly was held after our Lord's Resurrection and just upon or soon after his Ascension for no doubt that was the day which Christ did settle in his Gospel-Church And that they were bid to be altogether on this day and to wait till it was come seems plainly implyed in the very words of the Text Acts 2. 1. And when the day of Pentecost was fully come fully come doth not that denote they waited for it Quest Well and what then Answ Why they were all with one accord in one place Certainly this Assembly of the Church on this day was by divine appointment and our Lord might order their first assembling together then I mean on this first day of the Week because Pentecost fell out then and because he knew that great multitudes would be together then to celebrate that Feast And therefore as S. Chrysostom notes God sent down the Holy Ghost at that time of Pentecost because those men that did consent to our Saviour's death might publickly receive rebuke for that bloody Act and so bear record to the power of our Saviour's Gospel before the World This day I say was the first day of the Week and then the mighty effusion of the Holy Ghost came upon the Apostles c. and no less than three thousand Souls were converted on this Day These were two of the most wonderful things that ever were done by our Lord. And thus our Lord first ratified and confirmed the precise Day which no doubt he had command his Disciples to meet upon as the Day of Gospel-Worship before he in any marvellous manner confirmed any Ordinance pertaining to Gospel-worship after his Resurrection The Jewish Sabbath I must tell you never was after so glorious a manner confirmed And remarkable it is that God first gave the Sabbath to the Jews Exod. 16. before he gave any written Laws of Worship they had their Sabbath a month before they came to Mount Sinai where the Law was given So Christ first confirmed the Gospel-day of Worship before he confirmed any Gospel-Ordinance of Worship after his Resurrection Obj. But we deny that Pentecost was the first day of the Week because the Jewish Rabbins suppose that by Sabbath Lev. 23. 11. is not meant the weekly Sabbath but the 1st day of unleavened Bread wherein they are followed by some Christians also Answ I shall prove that Pentecost was the first day of the Week 1. By the Word of God 2. By Universal Tradition 3. By the Testimony of most approved Writers and then what will become of your fabulous Rabbinical traditional Jews or of such Christians who too fondly admire their Writings which contradict the Holy Scripture Now The day of Pentecost the first day of the Week I say the day of Pentecost was not as Tillam and others pretend the seventh-day of the Week or the Jewish Sabbath but the first-day or the Lord's Day But let me premise 1. That Pentecost is the same which is called the Feast of Harvest Exod. 23. 16. and the Feast of Weeks Deut. 16. 10. this all agree in 2. That it is called by a Greek name Pentecost or the fiftieth day because always to be observed on the fiftieth day from the offering of the wave sheaf as we read Lev. 23. 15 16. 3. Now that this day of Pentecost was not upon the Jewish Sabbath but on the day after it is expresly asserted in the last mentioned Text Lev. 23. 11. And he shall wave the Sheaf before the Lord to be accepted for you ●n the morrow after the Sabbath the Priest shall wave it And in ver 15 16. they were commanded to count from thence seven Sabbaths and on the morrow after the seventh Sabbath to keep the fiftieth day or Pentecost The Wave-offering was the morrow after the weekly Sabbath Observe the Sheaf was to