Manna but when he had ended the worke of creation it followeth that then he sanctified Consider againe that in Exod. 16. mention is made of the sabbath as a time of rest appointed before vers 23. To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the Lord. Vers. 25. To day is a sabbath unto the Lord. Vers. 26. But on the seventh day which is the sabbath They had neglected or were forced to neglect that day in Egypt where they were not suffered to rest on that day and therefore he putteth them in minde of it and exacteth the observation of it which was now neglected of other nations Consider againe that soone after when the decalogue was promulgate upon mount Sinai the reason given for the observation of the sabbath was not that the Lord rained Manna six dayes and desisted the seventh which concerned onely the Iewes but that hee created all in six dayes and rested the seventh which concerned all mankinde Were it not ridiculous to imagine that God spent six dayes in creating the world and rested the seventh onely for the Iewes to whome hee was to intimate the sabbath 2453. yeares after But ye will say what needed Adam a sabbath-sabbath-day in the state oâ— innocencie I answer because the dressing of the gardâ—n was committed to him and he was to live an animall life which would draw with it some distraction Therefore the Lord would have a day appointed wherein he might be wholy sequestrat from other affaires Further howbeit Adam was in the state of innocencie yet his state was mutable Whereas it is alledged that there was no positive precept given to Adam in paradise but the eating of the forbidden tree I answer none meerly positive but that But this is not meerly positive but determinative of the indefinit time required by the law of nature which urgeth a time for sequestration Some thinke that Adam fell the same day that he was created and therefore that the sabbath was sanctified after his fall But the imposing of the names upon the creatures the precept concerning the forbidden tree the tentation of Adam and Eve c. move others to thinke otherwayes Lyd at agreeth not either with too short time or yet three yeares which were too long but with those who alledge eight moneth wanting a week that hee might be the more sensible of his fall and defection after hee had for a certaine space enjoyed the pleasures of that estate But suppose Adam fell upon the sixt day yet the sanctification of the sabbath after was for all mankinde and not the Iewes onely But yet we have no mention made that the Patriarchs observed it What then It is sufficient that it was instituted howbeit the observation had beene neglected But wee must judge more charitably of the holy Patriarchs that they were observant of the institution receaved by tradition from Adam They receaved the law of sacrifices and other positive lawes by revelation by oracle and by dâ—vine inspiration saith Doctour Francis White in his treatise of the sabbath Is it likely then they observed not a set day or wanted direction what day to observe or that the Lord would havâ— set any other day for ordinarie Some gather the observation from Noahs sending forth the dove the seventh day after her returne and againe the seventh day That it is likely Noah was taken up with holy exercises every seventh day hee sent forth the dove and that he sent it forth rather then then any other time because hee was craving and expecting good successe But I will not stand upon this Junius approveth the opinion of the Hebrew Doctours who all agree that there passed seven dayes betweene the going of the people out of Egypt and the drowning of the Egyptians in the red sea and therefore there were seven dayes appointed for the feast of the passeover He confirmeth their opinion with his owne reckoning in his annot upon Exod. 12. Vpon Deut. 5. he noteth that is was the sabbath that day Pharaohs hoast was drowned and the people of Israel sang that song of triumph Exod. 15. The Apostle in the Epistle to the Hebrewes chap. 4. proveth that there is a sabbatisme me or keeping of a sabbath yet remaining for the people of God and all beleevers whereinto the incredulous were not to enter and to this purpose citeth a passage out of the psalmes There the incredulous are threatned to be excluded from rest which was to come For there were two rests already past in Davids time the one beginning at the rest of God from his workes which were finished from the foundation of the world and the other when Josue brought the people into the land of Canaan The Apostles enumeration had not beene sufficient if the sabbath day had not beene observed from the beginning for he maketh not mention of another sabbatisme past before Davids time but two whereinto man entred There was no othâ—r sabbath then in Davids time beside that rest in Canaan except that which was from the beginning and consequently the sabbath observed in his time was all one with that which was observed from the beginning The rest of the sabbath is called Gods rest or sabbath because God was the instituter of it gave exemple himselfe to man and appointed it for his owne worship Levit. 23. 1. and 28. 2. Jesa 56. 4. Ezech. 20. 20. Exod. 16. 23. If the words of the Apostle were taken only for Gods owne proper rest or sabbath the Apostles reasoning had not beene pertinent for David maketh mention of a rest whereinto men might enter and were exhorted to enter in but men cannot be said to enter in Gods owne proper rest The sabbatisme which is to come is called Gods rest and yet men are said to enter in it Further if the first rest were so called only because it was Gods owne peculiar rest it would folâ—ow the thy sabbath enjoyned to man had beene omitted and the Apostles induction had beene unsufficient Requies sâ—bâ—ati dicitur â— ei tum foâ— maliter quia in die septimo quiâ— vit Peus à creatione tum exemplaâ—â—ter efficienter quiâ— quies hominum in sabbato cultus sabbati institutus est à Dâ—o ad exemplar quietis Dei in sabbato saith Cornelius a Lapide a professour in Lovaine And a little before after hee hath opened up the three restâ— the rest of the sabbath enjoyned to man the rest of the people of God in the land of Canaan and the eternall rest in heaven hee inferreth that the rest of the sabbath was in use before the law of Moses even from the beginning of the world or else the Apostles reasoning cannot hold Hinc satis clarè elicitur evincitur sabbati cultum requiem in usâ— fâ—isse apud homines ante leâ—em Mosis ab origine 〈…〉 licet id neget Abulensis in c. 23. Levit. 4. 3. ut sâ—â—i eâ—diem septimum homines colerent eoque à laboribus quiâ—sâ—râ—nt in
the time or to serve God because it is a holy time After I had finished this worke of reexamination there came to my hands some unsound tractats upon the sabbath Whereupon I thought good to insert in this place as the most pertinent this short disconrse following OF THE SABBATH THe light of nature leadeth a man acknowledging that there is a God and to be worshipped to acknowledge also that timâ—s should be set a part for his worship and not onely that but also competent and sufficient times But nature cannot lead us without further direction to setle upon one of the seven dayes more then upon one of eight ten or twelve The Lord set downe one in the circle of seven to bee observed perpetually and universally by all that were to worship him In his wisedome he could best discerne what time might be spared In respect of this perpetuity and universality this determination participateth of the nature of a law morall For this cause it was placed in the decalogue among the precepts purely morall and participated with them of the same prerogatives It was delivered by God himselfe written in tables of stone and preserved in the arke as the rest were The determination of such a seventh day in particular was made also by the Lord. Both the determinations are divine positive the first unchangeable the second changeable but yet only by divine authoritie The ten precepts of the decalogue are called ten words Deut. 4. 13. that is as one expoundeth ten sentences or as Vossius addeth Soultentiae praecipientes preceptive sentences And yet there are fourteene sentences for precepts in the decalogue How then are there but ten words hee answereth there are ten chiefe and principall the rest are secundarie and like appendicles Primum istud in confesso est quamâ—is quatuiordeâ—im inveniantur sententâ—â— in decalogo quibus aliquid praecipiatur tamen decâ—m esse duntaxat primarias principes Caeteras secundarias altarum quasi appendices Vnde Moses decem verba Graci 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appellarunt In the fourth commandement there are three preceptive sentences The first is the principall Some reason after this manner The Lord saith not Remember thou keepe holy the seventh day but Remember thou keepe holy the sabbath-day and in the end he sanctified the sabbath-day hee saith not that seventh day from the creation howbeit it was so for the time But that seventh was to be changed and the sabbath was to be fixed upon another seventh day But to come nearer to the purpose that this commandement requireth not directly the seventh day from the creation but the seventh day in generall appeareth by the reason which enforceth not necessarly the seventh day from the creation that wee should rest the same day that the Lord rested but that wee should rest from our workes the seventh day as hee rested from his Which seventh as under the law he appointed to be saturday so under the Gospell sunday the substance of the commandement remaining See Master Cartwrights Catechisme But to come yet nearer The Lord might have created the world in six houres as easily as in six dayes Hee might have done it in a moment or have taken eight ten or twelve dayes The Lord would do neither the one nor the other but conformed himselfe to that space of time which in his wisedome he thought sufficient for man to doe all manner of workes of his owne This paterne doth not concerne his peculiar people of the Jewes onely but both Jew and Gentile and not for a time onely but to the end of the world as if the Lord would reason after this manner with mankinde What needed me to have spent six dayes in creating the world for I might have done it in one or wherefore stinted I my selfe at six I might have taken ten you may easily then consider wherefore I have done it I did it that thou may doe the like Do all thy workes and businesse in six dayes and rest the seventh The imitation lieth in this then not so much that wee rest upon such a seventh day as upon a seventh There is equitie in it indeed that seeing the Lord hath granted us six dayes to worke wee should rest the seventh but the force of the reason lieth chiefly in this that the Lord purposly tooke six dayes and rested the seventh to be a paterne to men howbeit with all in setting downe that paterne he considered that equity That the precept concerning the sabbath concerned not the Jewes onely but all mankinde appeareth also by this that it was given to Adam in the beginning Gen. 2. 2 3. Whereas some would have here an anticipâ—tion and the words to be referred to the time when the Lord rained Manna and forbad his people to gather upon the seventh day Exod. 16. as if the sabbath had never beene institute or observed before This were a strange anticipation to make mention of the blessing and sanctifying the seventh day without so much as an inckling of the proper time which is assigned by them which fell not forth till 2453 yeares or thereabout after the weake of the creation Next the words are knit together by the same copulative with the present historie Hee ended his worke on the seventh day and herested on the seventh day and he blessed the seventh day and he sanctified it The blessing and sanctifying then were not destinate to bee done 2453 yeares or thereabout afterwards but presently when he had ended all his worke of creation hee blessed and sanctified that is by blessing sanctified that is separate to a holy use as the minister blesseth when he separateth bread and wine from a common to an holy use at the Lords suppeâ— Or he blessed and sanctified that is praised it and sanctified For the originall word signifieth also praising or rejoycing as Gomarus himselfe bringeth exemple of praising out of Psal. â—8 27. And Philo Judaeus expresseth it by praising Every dayes workes had the owne commendation but now looking upon the whole frame the order and harmonie of it he rejoyced and praâ—sed it and sanctified that day After he had perfited the worke in six dayes he added honour to the seventh day following 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Philo â—udaeus that is Which when hee had praised or commended incontinent hee deinzed to call it holy as Gelenius translateth Further there is no mention of blessing the seventh day Exod. 16. Gomarus alledgeth that twice as much Manna fell on the sixt day as upon any other day there is no warrant for it but onely that they were commanded to gather twice as much that day Suppose his conjectute were true that were a blessing of the sixt day and not of the seventh But as I have said there is no mention of blessing in that place But so it is thâ—t when he blessed he sanctified And seeing wee reade not that he blessed it when he ceased from raining
memoriam gratiarum actionem creationis 〈◊〉 sui quam totius mundi quam Deus complevit die septimo alioqui enim vim non haberet discursus argumentum Pauli ut patet exdictis Howbeit scripture bee sufficient for confirmation of this truth I will adde for superaboundance some footsteps of the first institution which were found among the Gentiles Whence came the name of Septimane weekes to be receaved among the Ethnicles of old Not from the Jewes for they abhorred their customes and derided their sabbaths Not from Astrologians for distinction of dayes by weekes was more ancient then the imposing of the names of the planets upon the dayes of the weeke Or Ptolemâ—â— his time who wrote about the yeare of our Lord 140 as Rivetus proveth by the testimonie of Georgius Syncellus and Philoponus The ancient Greek Poets cited by them for the name of weeke I omit I onely adde the testimonie of Scaligâ—r 〈…〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ex diebus dicitur septimanâ— res omibus quidem orientis populis ab ultima usque antiquitaâ—e usâ—ata nobis autem Enrop eis vix tandem post Christianâ—smum recepta Hee saith from the upmost antiquitie his systeme of dayes in a weeke was in use among all the orientall nations But that was the part of the world which was first planted and where the holy Patriarches lived Whereas he saith this colection or distinction of dayes in weekes was not receaved in Europe till Christiani 〈◊〉 entred testimonies of Ethnick Poets alledged by â—â—vetus make good that the name of weekes was more ancient even among the Latines I adde also that place in Genes 29. 27. where Laban saith to Jacob Fulfill her weeke Whither he meant a weeke of dayes or as others interpret a weeke of yeares it is all one For seven yeares was never called a weeke of yeares but where seven dayes was called a weeke of dayâ—s Whence then could this so ancient a circuit or circle of dayes come but from the Patriarches who observed that circle because of the seventh-dayes-sabbath or from the first weeke of the creation it selfe Wee have not onely the traces of weekes among the ancient Ethniks but also of the seventh day in speciall I pretermit the testimonies cited by Rivetus out of Homer Linus and Callimachus who make mention of the perfiting of the worke of creation the seventh day I content mee with the testimonies alledged for observation in some sort of the seventh day by Casaubon commencing upon that place of Suetoniâ—â—â— Diogenes grammaticus disputare sabbutis Rhodi solitus vententem ut se extra ordinem audiret non admiserat ac per servaluâ— suum in septimâ—â— diem disâ—ulerat Where he bringeth in Lucian making mention of resting dayes granted every seventh day to children who were at schoole Vulâ—atius Gallicanus that souldiers exercised themselves upon the seventh day in archerie and armes Dampridius that Alexander Severus went up to the Capitoll upon the seventh day when hee was in Rome and frequented the temples In this same place Suetonius reporteth of Diogenes the Grammarian that if any were desirous oâ—heare declamation or discourse he differred them to the seventh day Eusebius saith That almâ—st all as well phâ—losophers as Poets understood that the seventh day was more sacred then other dayes Philâ— Judâ—eus 〈…〉 cited saith It was an holy day not of one 〈◊〉 region only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but of all And in another place he sâ—ith Our law admonisheth all of duetie 〈◊〉 Grecians the inhabitants of the â—les and the continent 〈◊〉 the orientall people the Entropâ—cans and the 〈…〉 even the whole habitable world to the uttermost coasts for who doth not honour that holy day returning every weeke Buxtorsius telleth us that the Jewes at this day thinke Christians and others shall bee phnished because they keepe not their sabbath And this I beleeve they thinke not of their other holy dayes I will close this point concerning the first institution of the sabbath with pointing at the testimonies both of ancients and neotericks Tertullian reporteth that the Jewes hold that the Lord sanctified the seventh day from the beginning and that thereupon when the law was given the Lord said Remâ—mber Gen 〈◊〉 ardus in his chronologie affirmeth that the Hebrew Doctours taught so Peter Martyr citeth Rabbi Agnâ—â— Broughtoun in his concent alledgeth Rambam and Aben-Ezra Philo Judaeus his consent ye had a little before Cyprian de Spiritu sancto Chrysostome hom 10. in Genes 2. Epiphanius contra heresin Anoetâ— haeres 51. The doretus 〈◊〉 est in Genesin Augustine epist. 86. ad Casulannm Waleus in his dissertatio de sabbatho citeth Luther Calvine Zwinglius Beza P. Martyr Bullinger Zanchius Vrsinus Gualtor Aretius Bertramus Mercerus Antoniuâ— Faius Juntus Paraeus Alstedius Rivetus in his dissertatio de origaine sabbathi addeth other Neoterikes Danâ—ws Hoâ—pinianâ—s Chimnitius Gerardus Marloratus with some others and popish writers Eugubinus Genâ—brardus Cornelius à Lapide and Emanuel Sa. A diligent reader may easily finde moe affirming that the sabbath was instituted at the beginning Seeing the sabbath was observed from the beginning it was not instituted in the wildernesse but only renewed to the people of God and enjoined to them with solemnitie both because of their owne neglect or forced prophanation in Egypt as also because it was neglected among other nations who observed it not or not in the right manner but rather prophaned then sanctified it The question ariseth whether it was then onely morall or partly morall partly ceremoniall But the question should bee stated other wayes For there is a difference betweene these two questions whether the sabbath of the Jewes was partly morall partly ceremoniall or whether the fourth precept as it standeth in the decalogue was partly morall partly ceremoniall That the Iewish sabbath was partly morall partly ceremoniall is the commun and receaved opinion which for mine owne part I would be loath to contradict even taking ceremoniall for typicall and profigurative of our 〈◊〉 purchased forus by Christ. But it followeth not that the fourth precept as it standeth in the decalogue is partly morall partly ceremoniall in that scene that is typicall and prefigurative There is nothing in the 〈◊〉 precept as it was promulgat upon mount Sinai ranked among the rest of the morall precepts placed in the midst and written with Gods owne finger in â—ibles of stone that soundeth any way to typicall ceremonie At other times when the ceremonies of the law were intimated then were typicall and ceremoniall precepâ—s delivered It is true when the fourth precept was promulgated it was accommodated to the state of man after his fall â—or strangers within our gates must cease that day from all manner of workes which might give offence to Gods people which needed not to be enjoyned in the state of innocencie or if mankinde had continued in the bosome of thâ— Church and had not made defection falling in a
à Lapide joyneth both together Christ and his Apostles Vnde à Christo Apostolis festum à sabbato in dominicum est translatum Some saith Dow ground the institution of the Lords day upon the fourth commandement some upon the sanctification of the seventh day at the creation other seeke for authority out of the new Testament but all these three agree in one For the fourth commandement was but a renovation of the first institution after the creation The substance of the commandement is to observe a seventh day the renewing the appointment of that seventh day of the first weeke was a circumstantiall point and therefore it was changeable like as for some types and ceremonies annexed to it it behoved to bee changed The institution of the Lords day was but a substitution of another day to that which was the substance remaining to wit that the seventh day of a weeke be sanctified For as I observed before the force of Gods example alledged in the fourth commandement lieth in this chiefly that God purposly tooke six dayes to create the world whereas he might have done it in six houres and rested upon the seventh not in this that he created in those six dayes and rested upon that seventh day which followed immediatly after for the Lord saith for in six dayes not for in those six dayes God made choise of that seventh day at that time to sanctifie it to bee a memoriall of his rest from the worke of creation that seventh day When Christ rose from the dead and a new creation as it were of a new world was begunne there was greater reason to sanctifie that day howbeit there had beene no types and ceremonies annexed to the former farre more seeing it behoved to bee abolished The seventh day in the precept is to be considered materially as it were or formally As it is considered formally and in generall it is of the substance of the command but consider it materially as the seventh from the creation it is not of the substance of the commandment The seventh day may bee considered both the wayes Septimuâ— autem dies intelligi potest vel ille qui est septimus dâ—es à creatione numerando à primo die creationis que dici potest veluâ—imaterialis numeratio vel potest dici septimus quasi generatâ—m seu formaliter ille qui est ultimus in septenario numero dierum sicut Aristoteles dixit ultimam unitatem esse formam numeri The institution then of the Lords day is nothing els but a substitution of another seventh day to the former seventh day considered materially These are the common phrases of divines that the old sabbath was changed into the first day of the weeke that the glorie and excellencie of the old sabbath was translated into that day that that day succeeded or was substitute to the old sabbath What can these phrases import but that vis praecepti the force of the precept yet remaines and only the materiall numbring for great respects was changed Philoâ— Judaeus in his booke de opificio mundi in the place above cited upon occasion of the sabbath discourseth at large upon the mysteries of the sacred septenarie as hee calleth it or number of feven Peter Martyr saith that God delighteth in the number of seven and hath closed up great and wonderfull workes within the compasse of the number of seven Scaliger saith that the number of seven dayes is instituted by a divine power because it is so commodious for all the course of the year called Solar and hath into it some divine thing Divinitus igitur institutus est numerus dierum septenarius qui ad omnem civilis anni Solaris rationem commodissimus est ut dixi nescio qui 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 habet But in the institution of the sabbath God had not an eye to the mysteries or hid vertue which is in the number of seven but to the abilitie of man The sabbath was made for man and not man for the sabbath Our reason theÌ„ for the perpetuity of a sevenths day sabbath to be sanctified that this order cannot be changed that it is of the substance of the fourth commandement are these First if by vertue of the fourth precept of the decalogue wee bee not bound to sanctifie one day of seven then we have no divine precept for any certaine circle or circuit of dayes for the sanctification of a certaine day for no where in scripture have we any precept for any other revolution of dayes to observe one of them Without a certain and set systeme of dayes there would arise great confusion and division in the Church of God some judging one of ten others perhaps one of twenty or thirty suffiâ—ient c. It behoved thâ— Lord therefore by his supreme authoritie to sâ—int the time to exeeme all Scruples out of mens mindes and to prevent all confusion and disorder No humane authoritie could have bound mens conscience to the observation of it The Lord no where hath done it but in the fourth precept Next the reason in the precept concerneth us all for as I have said before the Lord tooke six dayes to creat the world no moe no fewer and rested the seventh to be a paterne to man many hundred yeares before the Iewes became a nation and in that precept which was a renewing of the institution commandeth us to follow that paterne Thirdly the proportion betweene the six dayes for man to doe his owne businesse and the seventh to be dedicated to God is so just that it cannot bee altered without prejudice for to give man but five were an heavie burthen to give him seven or eight or moe the time set apart for God would not be sufficient Vnlesse wee will thinke God exacted more then was sufficient when he required the seventh But we must acknowledge that God is good and wee professe equity in his precept in that he hath given us six dayes and taken but the seventh to himselfe And who was so wise as to finde out this proportion without prejudice either to God or man Aquinas distinguisheth morall precepts in three rankes The first are such as naturall reason doth yeeld to incontinent The second are of such as need the more subtile consideration of the wiser sort considering sundry circumstances A third sort are of such as need divine instruction to help mans reason to judge and condescend These of the first ranke are absolutâ— de lege natura simply or absolutly of the law of nature the rest are attained unto by humane discipline and instruction as these of the second ranke or â—vâ—ne inseâ—uctioâ— as these of the third And to this ranke may this proportion bee referred But wee are content to urge it onely as divine positive but unchangeable as the rest of the morall precepts are So that the fourth precept is partly divine naturall that God must have a time set for his worship partly
them and not spoken so generally Chamieraom 3. l. 19. c. 6. embraceth a more generall exposition that the Apostle condemneth both Iewish and Ethnick observation of dayes Non est verisimile Apostol um adeo incautâ— locutum ut generaliter observationem damnare videtetur si aliquam excipiebat saith Chamierus Or is it likely that the dayes appointed by God himselfe being abolâ—shed the Apostles would have brought in other in their roome Is it reason then that others should bring them in Zanchius confesseth That it is more agreeable to the first institution and writings of the Apostles that one day of the weeke onely bee san ctified Magis consentaneum est cum prima institutione cum scriptis Apostolicis ut unus tantum dies in septimana sanctificetur There was but one day observed in the Apostles times and called the Lords day If other dayes had beene dedicated to Christ they should all have beene the Lords dayes Beatus Rhenanus in his annotations upon Tertullian De corona militis observeth that in the primitive times the word Lord was more familiar and frequent in the mouthes of Christians then the name of Christ. So it was as much as to say Christs day The Lords day then was Christs day and Christ had no other dayes of nativitie passion c. Eusebius treading unknowne footsteps as himselfe confesseth in the beginning of his storie filleth up his booke with some old fables Among the rest he maketh mention of an epistle of Polycrates bishop of Ephesus to Victor bishop of Rome wherein he reporteth that hee and his predecessours even upward to John the Evangelise celebrated Easter upon the fourteenth day of the moone That epistle may be marked for a counterfite for it beareth that Iohn was a priest and bare in his forehead the petalum that is the golden plate like that of the high priests The Doctour calleth such gay tales Rhetoricall flowres But saith Scaliger Neutrum concedet qui sciverit nullum Christi Apostol um sacerdotem fuisse nulli praeterquà m summo sacerdoti petalum gestare licuisse Augustine who lived in the fift age after the Apostles could not resolve upon the originall of our five festivall dayes but floated betweene two opinions and not one of them sure For they were neither instituted by the Apostles nor by generall Councel Socrates in his historie commeth nearer to the point I am of opinion saith â—e that as many other things crept in of custome in sundrie places so the feast of Easter to have prevailed among all people of a certaine privat custome and observation in so much that not one of the Apostles hath any where prescrived so much as one rule of it to any man A little after They that keepe Easter the fourteenth day of the moneth bring forth Iohn the Apostle for their Authour Such as inhabite Rome and the west parts of the world alledge Peter and Paul for themselves that they should leave such a tradition yet there is none of them that can shew in writing any testimonie of theirs for confirmation and proofe of that custome It hath beene an old refuge when any countrie or province could not finde the beginning of their customes to father them upon the Apostles A notable exemple whereof wee had in this same I le when there was hote contention about the formes of shaven crownes Hierâ—â—â— himselfe saith Vnaquaeque provincia pracept a majerum leges Apostolicas arbitretur Let every province esteeme the traditions or precepts of their forefathers to bee Apostolicall lawes It will rather follow that the Apostles observed not nor appointed Easter to be observed at all For the Apostle being directed infallibly by the spirit had agreed upon the day as well as upon the thing it selfe and not left occasion of contention to the Christian world Quae aliter atque aliter observabantur non possunt ab Apostolis esse instituta quorum ab eodem spiritu eruditorum non potuit non esse individuus consensus Neque unquam piis fuit persuasum ab Iohanne institutum pascha decima qua ta Luna à I etro autem post eam quomodo jactabant veteres It is well said in the preface to the harmonie of confessions that the old contention about the celebrating of Easter tossed very hotly the space of two hundred yeares or thereabout betwixt the Greekes and the Latines was long since of us thought worthy of laughter Whitaker wondereth at their frivolous contentions and he saith there was no necessitie to observe it any day Chamierus saith Si institutum fuisset ab Apostolus eodem ubique modo fuisset institutum observatum quod falsum esse jam olim observavit Socrates Seeing they have no sooting for the Apostles appointing of the observation of Easter farre lesse will they be able to prove the Christians pentecost and other festivities that came in after as of Christs nativitie ascension c. to have beene instituted by the Apostles Iustinus questions Clemens constitutions some sermons ascrived to Cyprian all suppositious workes are the most ancient proofes they alledge for them THE IIII. REASON IF it had beene the will of God that the severall acts of Christ should have beene celebrated with severall solemnities the holy Ghost would have made knowne the day of his nativitie circumcision presentation to the temple baptisme transfiguration and the like For it is kindly say they to remember opus diei in die suo the notable worke of a day in the owne day Bellarmine saith that Christs acts did consecrat the dayes and times wherein they were wrought Hooker saith that the wonderous workes of God did advance the dayes and times wherein they were wrought There is not a day in the yeare wherein some wonderous worke of God hath not beene wrought All the dayes of the yeare saith Leo are full of Christs miracles If Christs actions advance and consecrate the dayes where on they were wrought they ought to have beene made knowne lest we keep holy such dayes as were never consecrated or advanâ—ed But it is confessed that the day of Christs nativitie and consequently of the rest depending thereupon as of his circumcision presentation baptisme have beene hid from mortall men And therefore the day of Christs nativitie was observed diversly of old by some in one moneth by some in another The 25. of December was grounded upon an erroneous conceat that Zacharie the father of Iohn the Baptist was high priest which errour is yet fostered by observing that day Yee see then as God hid the bodie of Moses for avoiding of idolatrie so hath he the day of Christs nativitie for avoiding superstition And this is sufficient to declare the will of God concerning other notable acts which were knowne to wit that not the act but divine institution maketh a day holy Gods resting upon the seventh day made it not holy but his sanctifying of it and instituting it to
another time But that will not save the maâ—ter For a day is called mystike not onely for shadowing things to come but also for the mysteries solemnely remembred And as for appropriation doe wee not appropriat to the day of Christs nativitie a peculiar kinde of service of epistles gospels collects hymnes homilies belonging to Christs nativitie and thinke it absurd to performe the like service upon another day with the like solemnitie of cessation from worke and supâ—rstitious forbearing of fasting Wee thinke it likewise absurd to performe upon the nativitie day that peculiar service which belongeth to easter Yea the Doctour saith the commemoration appointed to bee made upon the five dayes must not bee omitted on these dayes If it bee absurd to celebrate another day after the same manner with the same service and no other service will serve on these dayes is there not a peculiar service appropriated to our festival dayes as of old among the Jewes That shift is of no weight that a minister may preach or wee may meditate upon Christs passion another day then the nativitie For that is not to celebrate with solemnitie To use another day with the like solemnitie in the place of it or both would be thought very absurd The Jewes themselves without the service appropriated to their feasts might remember these same benefites and mysteries upon other dayes but not with the like solemnitie and peculiar service And so the solemnitie is tyed to the time To observed dayes after this manner is not like the appointing of houres for preaching or prayers on weeke dayes or times for the communion according to the policie and order set downe by everie particular congregation we tye not our selves to them not any peculiar service to any of them Wee use time then onely as a circumstance and for order and not as a sacred time let be as a holy festivitie Wee observe dayes after the same manner that the Jewes did howbeit not the same dayes nor with the same kinde of worship The change of the circumstance the day and manner of wotship doth not free us of Judaizing Non sublata sed mutata est significatio dierum saith Bellarmine and so it is with the Formalists Wee doe not say that the anniversarie revolution made the Jewish festivals ceremoniall for in the revolution of time there was no mysterie but the tying of such a peculiar service to the time of anniversarie resolution with such solomnitie To performe the same duty in substance upon the morall sabbath as occasion served had not beene ceremoniall What then they say ought not Christs inestimable benefites and notable acts to be remembred I answer Yes and so they are for where the gospell is preached his acts are published Christ is set forth crucified by the preaching of the word every communion day his passion and death is and will be remembred to his comming againe The Eucharist saith Bellarmine est memoriale omnium miraculorum quasi compendium vitae passionis resurrectionis Domini In the written word sermons prayers creeds catechismes his nativitie passion ascension c. are remembred It followeth not they should bee remembred therefore their memorie should be celebrated severally with the solemnity of a festivall day For the Lord hath appointed an holy day which we call the Lords day and may call Christs day as I said before for publishing all Christs acts and benefites Pope Alexander the 3. gave this reason wherefore the Romane Church doth not observe an holy day to the Trinitie to wit because glorie to the Father and to the Sonne and to the holy Ghost and other like things belonging to the praise of the Trinitie are published daily Ecclesia Romana in usu non habet quòd in aliquo tempore hujusmodi celebrat specialiter festivitatem cum singulis diebus gloria patri filio spiritui sancto catera similia dicantur ad laudem pertinentia trinitatis The Popes ground must bee this Whatsoever is treated on or remembred in the ordinarie divine service needeth not a speciall holy day to celebrat the memorie of the same I assume The nativity passion resurrection ascension of Christ and sending downe the holy Ghost are not only remembred in privat but also in publike and in the ordinarie service specially on the Lords day If all be true that is affirmed by a councell holden at Constantinoplâ— that Christ was borne on this day the starre shined to the wisemen on it Christ fed 5000. persons with five loaves and two fishes on it that hee was baptized rose and sent downe the holy Ghost on it the light was treated on it and which Pope Leâ— affirmeth that the Lords day is consecrated with so many mysteries dispensed on it that whatsoever notable thing was done on earth was done to the honour of this day it appeareth that the Lord would have us to observe only this day as holy and sanctified by himself for the proclaiming of all his worthy acts and not to presume to institute holy festivities upon our owne heads There is no danger but the memorie of Christs nativitie c. will be preserved to the end of the world without observing such solemnities and making holy dayes which lyeth not in the power of man This pretext of remembring and putting in minde hath beene a cloak to bring in crosses images surplices and other popish garments with much other superstition and among the rest these memoriall dayes THE JVDGEMENT OF FORraine Divines I Passe by the Petrobrusians the Waldenses and Wicleffs followers and come to later times Luther in his booke de bonis operibus set forth anno 1520. wished that there were no festivall dayes among Christians but the Lords day only were observed And in his booke to the nobilitie of Germanie he saith Consulâ—â— nesse ut oâ—nia festa aboleantur solo die dominico retentâ— That is It were expedient that all feasts were abolisâ—ed tâ—e Lords day onely being retained Farellus and Viâ—et râ—nâ—â—ed all holy dayes out of the Church of Geneva as Calvine epist. 118. testifieth The same decree which banished Farellus and Calvine out of Geneva brought in other holy dayes In a nationall synod holden at Dort anno 1578. of the Belgick Almaine and French Churches we have these words Optandum forâ—t nostros sex diebus laborare diem solum Dominicum celebrare That is It were to be wished that our countrie people laboured six dayes and celebrated only the Lords day So yee may see festivall dayes are rather tolerated by them because of the wilfulnesse of the magistrates and people then commended or allowed Among the articles agreed upon and concluded concerning ecclesiasticall policie in the Palatinaâ— anno 1602. we have this following Omnes Feriâ— per annum festi dies tollendi è medio All the festivall dayes through the yeare are to be abolished Yee see where they finde the opportunity they abolished them Bucer howbeit not