either Civill or Naturall or Written in the word I say these Particulars only notwithstaÌ„ding this Commandement are permitted to men to appoint or to change againe at their discretion In this text then there are 3. points to be noted 1. The matter 2. The Author 3. The respect due from vs vnto the matter heere contained The matter is the whole spirituall Meanes of worshipping the true God And namely the Outward spirituall meanes that is Gods Visible Church his Ministery his whole Outward Worship and Service 2. The Author of all this is precisely determined viz. God himselfe and no Man 3. Such Inventions of men must haue from Gods people no reverence but Gods owne ordinances must And thus this 2. Commandement is truly vnderstood To this effect likewise â—re many other places of Scripture excellent expositions and interpretations of this maine Commaundement As “ Deu. 12 32 Whatsoever I commaund you take heed that you do it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom * Isa 30.21 This is the way walke ye in it turne not to the right hande nor to the left “ Psal 19.7 The Law of the Lord is perfect § Psal 119.113 I hate vaine inventions but thy lawe doe I love “ Nomb. 15.39 Yee shall have fringes that when ye looke vpon them ye may remember all the commandements of the Lord and do them and that yee seeke not after your owne heart nor after your owne eyes after the which ye go a whoring * Matt. 15.13 Every plant that my heavenly father hath not planted shal be rooted vp “ 2. Tim. 3.16.17 The whole Scripture is given by inspiration of God making the man of God perfect vnto every good worke * Ioh. 16.13 The holy Ghost shall lead you into all trueth “ Gal. 3.15 No maÌ„ adde to any thing to a mans Testament much lesse may we adde vnto Christes Testament Which is only the holy Scriptures of the Apostles and nothing els in the world Lastly * Rom. 16.17.18 Marke them which make schismes and offenses “ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 scâ— Gal. 1.8 1. Cor. 3 1â— Besides the doctrine which you haue learned and avoid them For such seruenot the Lord Iesus Christ c. With manie other mo places to the same purpose Out of all which this doctrine remaineth cleare and firme that all Humane inventions or Vnwritten Traditions Ecclesiasticall are directly contrarie to Gods woord Yea being but Beside the Scripture they are flatly contrarie to it in these places And therfore Gods owne word which is only the holy Scriptures as was before noted ought to be religiouslie beleeved and held to be for vs as a most perfect and absolute demonstration of all things whatsoever being properlie and simplie Ecclesiasticall or religious Which was the speciall end and vse they were given for As likewâ—se they were given vnto the Iewes even to be so absolute and perfect for them ever since God did give them any holy Scripture From which groundes principall places of Gods worâ—e thus declared we will now conclude and frame our first Reason Reason 1 IF we have Diocesan and Provinciall Churches vsing governement Ministeries or Offices proper to them and also Ceremonies that is Rites now in controversie all which are Inventions Traditions vtterly without the Scripture Vnwritten Traditions then we have some reputed Churches as touching their outward visible forme and ministeries and Ceremonies contrarie to Gods worde But we haue Diocesan Provinciall Churches vsing government their proper Offices viz. the Provinciall Diocesan * viz. as they inflict Ecclesiasticall Censures high Commission Provinciall and Diocesan Ruling Bishops also controverted Ceremonies which are all Ecclesiastical vnwritten Traditions no wayes contained in but cleane beside the Scripture Therefore they are contrarie to these places of Gods word they are simply evill of necesitie the other viz. the Parish Churches in England ought to bee reformed freed and cleered of them all Where it is first to be noted Note 1 that alâ— those forenamed matters Ecclesiasticall or any other els which may or can be lawfull are and ought to be coÌ„taineâ— in the Scripture either expreslie or by necessarie consequence Otherwise we affirme they are meerely Humane Inventions Traditions contrarie to the Scripture Note II Reputed Visible Churches of divers kindes Againe it is to be noted that in the esâ—imation of men a Visible Church that is which is indued with power of Spirituall outward governement is of diâ—ers formes and natures Nevertheles in trueth and in veâ—ie deed Christ hath ordeined for vs only one kinde of a Visible Church in his worde And this only ought to be allowed and believed to be a true Church by all Christians For who is it that can or ever could make any societie of people to be a Visible Church but Christ onely Some men esteeme the Vniversal nomber of professed Christians in the world to be one visible Church calling it the Catholike or Vniversal visible Church And the Catholikes taking holde hereof do conclude that likewise there is ought to be one Catholike and vniversall governement Ecclesiasticall vnto which all other Churches and their governments must be subordinate But in Gods worde there is no such visible Church nor governement anie where to be found This is meerly devised by the witte and will of men Againe men esteeme a whole Nation professing the Gospell to be one visible Church and they call it a National church Likewise a Province a Provincial church and a Diocese a Diocesan Church But none of these likewise can be found in the whole new TestameÌ„t of Christ Only a Particular ordinary constant Congregation of Christians in Christes Testament is appointed and reckoned to be a visible Church Particular Parishionall Churches are the onely true Visible Churches And therefore so standeth the case now heere with vs in England also and so we ought to esteeme it The which that it may more clearelie appeare to be true I have thought good to sett downe this brief Table following wherein all the divers and sundrie senses of a Church in the * We speak not of the Iewes churche vnder the Law which wee knowe was Nationall only one in the world vnder one High Priest Which were Figures and are ceased Such also was that One Church in the wildernes Acts 7.38 which was yet nevertheles but one particular Assembly aâ—â—o in one plate gathered to geather so neere as such a multitude could be Exod 19 11 c. New Testament are plainlie distinctlie shewed And yet none of the 4. forenamed visible Churches as some do repute them are any where there to be found A Table briefly shewing all the divers and sundry significations in the New Testament of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which coÌ„monly we translate a Church Wherein we may easily see which is the onâ—â—e true and
is a Visible Church of Christ truly and properly Seeing each true Visible Church hath evermore from Christ power and right of governement in it selfe as before is noted Let this therefore be well declared what is a true Visible Church and we shall soone agree We affirme that every particular ordinarie Cōgregation is and ought to be allowed for such a Church And heerevpon do we stand I am not ignorant of the common and vulgar phrase of speach among men both ancient and of late both vnlearned and learned who have vsed to call everie of those other a Church as a Diocesan Church a Provinciall a National and also a Vniversall Church meaning it seemeth that everie of these may be trulie and rightlie called a Visible Church But this is only the custome of speach among men And * Mos trium literatum tyrannus Bez. Annot. in Luc. 23.17 Custome is a Tyrant as a Reverend Father saith well It is no warrant nor ground for any thing in Religion The word of God alone must suffice vs heerein Yea we consider not what advantage we give the Heretike Catholikes against vs by acknowledging a Catholike Visible Church It followeth from this necessarilie that there is ought to be on earth a Catholike or Vniversall governement Ecclesiasticall This is a Conclusion wherevnto M. Hooker setteth down expreslie * Hook 3. Sect 1. both the Proposition and Assumption viz. Everie Visible Church Pag. 132. truly and properly so called ought to have a correspondent Ecclesiasticall governement But there is a Catholike or Vniversal Visible Church on earth Pag. 126. and 132. To which Premisses everie childe now can quicklie adde the Conclusion Ergo There is and ought to be on earth a Catholike or Vniversall governement Eccle siasticall And I am perswaded that this oversight or error among vs hath caused Thousandes to turne Catholikes that is members of Antichrist and enemies to the true Churches and servants of Christ For if there be properlie one Visible Church and governement Ecclesiasticall throughout the world then this must be in some one place eminently For some whither we must go when Christ biddeth vs Tell the Church Now there is no place in all the world so likelie as Rome is to be the Visible seat and spring-head of the Vniversall governement of the Catholike Church if in deed there be any Therfore most easilie mē are drawen to be Roman Catholiks whē this is not denyed that there is a Catholike Visible Church Which selfe same advantage we give also to our Pontificall Hierarchie in England against the true estate and due governement of Christes Visible Churches heere For while we grant them whether by error or by oversight that there is may be truly and properly a Diocesan Visible Church they will easilie conclude that then there may ought to be a correspondent Diocesan governement Which as before I observed overthroweth quite the proper being and governement of each particular or Parishionall Church But we because Christ and his Apostles throughout all the New Testament have appointed every were allowed the Parishionall Assemblies as to be cleerely absolutly distinct in themselves so to be Visible Churches truly properly and withall a correspondent Ecclesiasticall governement to be in each of them as before hath bene shewed therefore heerevpon do we stand this do we vrge that the Institution of Christ and the Apostles practize ought to be a rule for Christian Churches as every where so heere in England vpon this do our Consciences rest assuredlie Because as before I said who is it that may presume to ordaine any forme of a Church save Christ only Especiallie overthrowing that forme of a Church and governement which Christ hath ordeyned as these Diocesan and Provinciall Churches with their proper Ministers do Ecclesiae nomine armamini contra Ecclesias dimicatis You arme your selves with the name of the Church and fight against the true Churches In this place I can not forget how some thinking thēselves deepe Politicians do imagin that they see our Groūds to be directlie against a Monarchie or Kingly State For this Ecclesiasticall governement being Popular say they it wil require the Civill governement also to becom conformed to it Also they thinke it can never bee menaged without trouble and tumult First we absolutelie denie that any manner of Ecclesiasticall Governement requireth the Civill Governement to becom conformed to it This is a most false conceite The bounds of either Governernement are distinct and cleerlie severed the one from the other albeit each doth ayd succour the other But what should I reason heereof This their insimulation is against none other then Christ him selfe and his blessed Word wherein he hath instituted no other state of a Church Visible but a particular Congregation only Shall we impugne and accuse the true Church of Christ Nay shall we accuse Christ him selfe and his Gospell that heerein he yeeldeth vs not the true right or best forme of a Church And therefore we will of our owne heades devise and constitute a better God forbid that any Christians should so do and wilfully maintaine this doing also But they think this maner of governement will becom tumultuous and troublesom in the State and so it will proove hurtfull to the Prince I would demaund why thinke they that the Church government as we desire it will be troublesom tumultuous They will answere because we require of necessitie that Elections of Ministers and Excommunications c. must be Popular Which can not but bring with them commonly tumult and much trouble if not confusion and perill to manie Wherevnto I replie that this were verie true in deed viz. much trouble and tumult would commonly follow and perhaps perill to divers if we desired or sought for popular Elections of Diocesan Bishops Such as we read of finde to have ben vsed in many places vnder Christian Princes from 300. yeres after Christ hitherward for a long time As for example at Antioch Alexandria Rome Constantinople c. In these and other Cities verie great stirres tumultes and confusions among the People have risen in deed not seldom times even in and about such their Elections The Ecclesiasticall Histories are full of examples to this purpose But such running togeather of a whole Citie or Dioces such voice-giving of such multitudes of people we desire not neither do we any wayes allow it It was a corrupt remainder in deed of the Peoples auncient free voice-giving to the Election of their Parishionall Pastors or Bishops For such all ordinarie Bishops and Pastors were primitively in the Apostles dayes and such every where they were left by them as before we have shewed Every ordinarie Bishop then I say was only of a Parish as the Ancients call it that is of one particular Congregation only and no greater And so their Elections were accomplished by the free consent and voyce-giving only of the People of each of these
particular ordinarie Congregations or Parishes Now it is true indeed we acknowledge we allow and do desire such Elections and Excommunications by the People Neither is this to bee reckoned anie Popularitie which can be either prejudicious to Princes or tumultuous in it selfe No it can not be an inconvenient order but most reasonable for any place or people in the world Namely seeing we do expresly hold this assertioÌ„ no otherwise and we hartilie pray that it may bee noted but as it is grounded on 4. Circumstances Power Circumstances wheron the fitnes of the Peoples coÌ„sent staÌ„deth 1 1. In regard that it is as we are well assured a Divine order and ordinance instituted for each Church by Christ and his Apostles the trueth whereof we hope hath evidently appeared in this 2 2. Reason last handled Considering that we allow the Peoples consent and voice-giving in Elections Excommunications c. to be done only by the Christian People of one Parish that is of one particular ordinarie Congregation only and by no greater nor larger number of People by any meanes as before hath bene likewise shewed 3 3. Considering that in the maner heereof we hold this only to be necessarie ordinarie that the Ecclesiasticall Guides there apart froÌ„ the People do first by themselves prepare and determine the whole matter namely in such sort that the People may not neede to do ought afterward but only Consent with them and freelie signifie their consent it it 4 4. If anie where it should fall out that this People thus guided being so few will yet presume to be in their Church-Elections c. vnrulie and violent then the Princes next dwelling Officers of Iustice may and ought to make them keepe peace and quietnes Which thing how easie it is for the meanest of them to do the simplest may perceaue All which verilie being well considered this Ecclesiasticall Governement questionles is most reasonable yea necessarie And it is childish without all wit to cry out against vs as our Adversaries do Popularitie Anarchie and Enmitie to Princes for this our so wel grounded and so approved an assertion Another thing is heere to be well remembred that M. Hooker and M. Tooker the noble Patrons of Pluralities and Nonresidencie are vtterlie defeated in this their purpose The former * Hook lib. 5. sect vlâ—im maketh this his Reason for them because it is a mistaking saieth he to thinke that the particular Congregations are by Gods ordinance so many distinct proper Churches For as he holdeth there is but one Visible Church properlie and the same Vniversall thorough the whole world As for particular Congregations they are not properlie so many Churches neither distinguished at all by God but only by men And therefore everie Minister is a Minister properlie to the Whole Church but by men according to discretion only is limited to this or that Congregation there to have maintenance made sure to him by Law there to teach till men see it fitt to imploy his giftes in another Benefice or elswhere All which because they are meerly Mens ordinances by men they may be disposed and dispensed with againe as to those in authoritie seemeth good And so both Pluralitie of Livings and Nonresidencie from the same shal be both lawfull and honest This is the effect and drift of his reason And even on the same foundation also buildeth D. Tooker Yea only this ground he hath and none other Where nothing els needeth answere but this his assertion * Fabrike of the Church pag. 45. DistinctioÌ„ of Parish Churches is of meere positive law not of Divine For my part I would graunt this Reason to be in deed sound and good for their purpose and not only for that but also singular and most pregnant to set vp the Romane Papacie too if this their Foundation were not manifestlie contrarie to Gods word But before it hath ben shewed to be cleerer then the light that DistinctioÌ„ of Parishes in some sort that is of particular Churches is by Gods own ordinaÌ„ce in the Apostles Writings and not by the meere positive law of men Wherefore this is evident to be a most vngodly and shameles Defence pleading for or excusing that wretched sinne of soule-murdering Nonresidencie as if it were a thing allowable and not simplie evill It can not excuse this sinne to alleadge that Plurified men may haue their 2. Benefices neare togither perhaps within halfe a myle a myle or 2. myle the one of the other This will not helpe them any more then a man can be excused who taketh keepeth two wives at once though yet by the one he be not drawen farre away from the other Gods law disalloweth that former no lesse theÌ„ this latter Yea I avow There have ben who haue kept two wives at once honester men and more approved of God theÌ„ any Minister now in England having 2. Churches or Charges lying howsoever And yet I acknowledge to have two wives at once is simply against Gods worde Well yet this will not satisfie some neither will they yeeld that every particular Congregation of Christians should be allowed for a distinct and a proper Church Visible and so to inioy their owne Ecclesiasticall governement within themselves Albeit against it they have no reason vnles perhaps this only If it were so they will say yet will not thereby all things becom perfect Somewhat notwithstanding will bee wanting or amisse oftentimes How then shall this be holpeÌ„ or amended Not by Archbishops or Diocesan Ruling or Lord-Bishops I answer Somewhat wil be amisse alwayes in whatsoever Ecclesiasticall governement vpon earth Nevertheles there is no need nor good vse of these nor of anie Ecclesiasticall Vnwritten Traditions in Christes Churches We believe and know Gods Written word to bee sufficient Speciallie seeing these are so directlie contrarie to the only true forme and nature of Christs Visible Churches in his word as hath bene shewed A greater Ecclesiasticall governement then the Churches wee know none There is nothing without the Church above it viz. Ecclesiasticallie and spirituallie Seeing each Church hath her power and governement as before is declared immediatly from Christ Yet it is true beside the Magistrates honorable assistance verie oft there is great and singular yea sometimes in a sorte necessarie helpe to bee had by Synodes Which are meetings of choyse men out of many Churches and these are lesser or greater as occasion requireth Whose counsailles advises and determinations are most expedient and wholesome alwayes But touching any certaine GovernemeÌ„t by Synodes or necessarie imposing of their Synodall Conclusions Decrees or Canons vppon Churches without their particular free consentes this seemeth to be a meere Humane ordinance I can not finde it either expreslie or by necessarie consequence in any part of Christes Testament Thus writeth heereof the Reverend M. Whitaker * Whitak de Concil pag. 44. Quod omnes atttngit ab omnibus
yeares space after Christ vsing this word for a Visibâ—â— Church with order and governement do signifie by it a particular Congregation only And it no where signifieth in them a Diocesan Church c. Where note that the strength of this reason standeth wholy in the proper taking and vsing of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Church Note The Adversaries error hath advantage by the improper and ambiguous vse of it which is Sophisticall Yea if you will their sense is a “ By the Scriptures verdict false sense of it wherein yet it often vsed in Writers and in common speach for want of due regard By which meanes also sundry other errors have crept in heeretofore much prevayled even by mis-vnderstanding of certayne wordes As we may see in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in Latin Meritum Equivocall wordes Poenitentia Crux Sacramentum c. Out of all those Testimonies before alleadged this generall reason may be concluded No Diocesan Church or Bishop was knowen or once heard of in the world till many distinct ordinary Congregations began to be appointed in one Citie But there was no Multiplication nor distinction of many ordinarie and constant Congregations in a Citie till about 200. yeares after Christ Som coÌ„iecture it was long after this No man sheweth that it was before this The truth in deed heereof that for this while generally in each Citie there was but one ordinary constant Congregation of Christians hath ben plentifully shewed in the Proofes of this 2. Assertion before going Therefore till about 200. yeares after Christ there was no manner of Diocesan Church or Bishop knowen nor once heard of in all the Christian world No not the Diocesan Titular Bishop much lesse any Diocesan ruling Bishop Where yet we deny not but that one particular Congregation or Church being populous might occasionally and vncertainly in the time of persecution for their safetie sake assemble in divers smaller Meetings As before we noted pag. 19.20 As also they did we doubt not many times within the space of these 200. yeares after Christ Howbeit yet these smaller Meetings were not so many Churches properly because they were not ordinary sett Companies nor constantly distinct Societies as Churches ought to be and as our Parishes now are Those divers Occasionall and vncertaine meetings made but one Church and ordinary Congregation Act. 6 1. yea though the whole nomber were too populous for one actual Assembly ordinarily It is true in such case they ought to distinguish and distribut themselves into divers competent set Congregations which should be so many proper and intire Churches But when they are as they were in those primitive times dayly in great perill of cruell persecution they may with reason remaine somwhile vndistinguished not so distribute themselves which in time of peace and safetie they always ought to do Wherin now som Reformed Churches beyond Seas do seeme to offend If any say the troublesomnes of those times or the yong age of the Churches who were not yet growen vp to perfection caused that there were no Diocesan Churches with governement nor Diocesan ruling Bishops then And we take advantage of the special state of those times vrging it to our purpose generally I answer we vrge from the state and order of the Apostolike primitive Churches nothing but what is generall in them and ought to be perpetuall with vs. So that neither the troublesomnes of those times nor the young age of the Churches then do give vs our advantage For notwithstanding these speciall Circumstances the Visible Churches vsing gouernement and the Bishops then might have ben very well Diocesan and Provinciall if Christ had so instituted and the Apostles had so framed and left them Nothing in the world hindereth but they might easily have ben such even in those times But the world knew none such then as I have said And it is impietie to say Christes Churches were vnperfect then as touching their Visible forme constitution their Ministery and the whole lawfull order of worshipping God in them Or that the times since have made them more perfect then they were as the Apostles left them Wherefore this advantage do we stand vpon and this do we vrge viz. the same patterne and forme of Visible Churches vsing governement that was then vniversally practised receaved immediatly from Christ and the Apostles which was Parishionall not Diocesan as hath ben declared The 3. Assertion The Scriptures of the New Testament do containe set forth vnto vs besides the governement by Extraordinarie Offices Apostles Prophets Evangelistes an ordinarie forme of Church-governement vsed then IF in the New Testament one kinde of a Visible Church vsing governement and no other is to be found 1. Reason also if speciall distinct ordinarie Offices for Church-governement and speciall Actions therevnto belonging be sett downe therein then the Scripture contayneth a speciall forme of Church-government which was ordinary then But in the New Testament a See before 1. Asseâ—tion 2. Reason One kinde of a Visible Church vsing governement namely a particular ordinarie Congregation and no other is found also speciall distinct ordinarie Offices for Church-governement are set downe therein as Parishionall b T it 1.5 7 1 Tim. 3.1 2. Ephe. 4.11 Phil. 1.1 Act. 20.28 1 Pet. 5.2 Act. 14.23 Bishops or Pastors and an other sort of not Lay but Ecclesiasticall c 1. Tim. 5.17 compared with Gal. 6.10 1 Tim. 4.10 Rom. 12. â— 1 Cor. 12.28 Iam. 5.14 Adde the ancient Writers Ignat. Epist ad Trall Tars Smyr Tertull. Apol. c. 39. d Baptisme Ambr. in 1. Tim. 5 in 1. Cor. 12.28 Ierom. in Isa 3. August Epist 137. Elders who by their Ordinary office were only to assist in governement Third the special Actions belonging to Church-government are also set downe in the Scripture as Election of Ministers Excommunication of spirituall offendors c. Therfore the Scripture of the New Testament coÌ„tayneth a speciall forme of Church-governement ordinary then Where it is to be noted that in those first times there were also those other Officers in the Churches Note Apostles Evangelistes and Prophetes But they had Calling and giftes immediatly from God the others Calling was alwayes by men They abode not in one Church as the other did Their government and vse was not perpetuall but temporary and extraordinarie They therefore hindered not the other neither can they now hinder The rather sith they do not now remaine but are ceased Also those Parishionall Bishops and those other Elders assisting in government Note did differ in their Ordinary office Yea though they both did somtimes Preach c yet thus they differed notwithstanding But a Parishionall Bishop or Pastor cannot differ in his ordinary office of Preaching c. from an Elder who is also by ordinary office a Preacher c. Therefore he is heere an other Church Elder viz. by ordinary office no
proper visible Church of Christ to which the goverment Ecclesiasticall of iâ—â—â—â—fe doeth alwayes of right appâ—rtaine Ecclesia in the new Testament is taken Ciuilly and originally for a * Act. 19 3â—.39.40 particular Assembly of Citizens in one certaine publike place about matters of the Common wealth Ecclesia in the new Testament is taken Religlouslie for a Church Properly in the next and neerest proportion aunswering to the Originall ciuill vse thereof This is a Particular Visible Ordinary Congregation of Christians meeting for religious Ecclesiasticall actions exercises And this is the only true Visible Church of Christ hauing from him the Spirituall power of order gouernment in it selfe ordinarily The proper Ministers thereof are the onely true ordinarie Ministers of Christ This we read of in the Scripture in 2. respects Definitly This is some certaine known “ Mat. 18 1â— Revel 21. Col. 4.16 Gal. 1.2 â— Thes â— 14 â— Cor. 16.1 19. 2. Cor 8.1 Rom. 16.4.16 particular Congregation in some certaine particular place which we may go vnto consult with and obey Indefinitlie where is vnderstood This or That or * Mat. 3â— â— c. 1. Cor. 12.11 Mat. 6 33. Isa 2.1.2 3. â— Pet. â— 5 any other particular ordinary Congregation in a proportion more remote or further of Such is the Inuisible or Intelllgible Church absolutly Catholike that is the number of †Ephe. 3.10 15 21. and â— 27 all Gods Elect both in Heauen and in Earth Figuratiuely by a Metaphore Such is a holy well ordered Christian “ Rom. 16.5 â— Cor. 16. â—â— familie resembling as it were a very Church though in deed it bee but a part of a true and proper Church Synecdoche viz. of the Visibilitie when the Church it self that is the whole cannot but only some parts of it may be Visible or Sensible at any time to any one man that needeth the vse of it Such is the Catholike Militant Church which is * Mat. 16.18 1. Cor. â—2 28 properly an Inuisible Intelligible Church as it is considered whâ—ly togeather that is as it is one Church Societie as when only the “ Act. 15.4 â—â— People of a particular Congregation hauing Ministers yet without and beside their Ministers are called the Church Whereby it is evident that no Catholike or Vniversall Church Visible is any where in all Christes New Testament to bee found and therefore in no wise is such a Church to be allowed Neither yet any Nationall or Provinciall or Diocesan Church Only a particular ordinarie Congregation is heere found and so is to be held properly and only a true visible Church of Christ Moreover heereby it appeareth and it is likewise to be noted Note III. that the nature and office of a Bishop also is not of one maner but of divers It is as the former word Church very ambiguous and must be likewise necessarily distinguished Bishops of six sortes Six sortes of Bishops have ben and are known in the world 1 1. A Parishionall Bishop who is a Pastor of one ordinary Congregation only Such are all the Bishoppes mentioned any where in the New Testament and also in writers within the space of 200. yeares after Christ 2 2. A Diocesan Titular Bishop who was Bishop of a Diocese in title and in name only in Ecclesiasticall governement having no more power then any other coÌ„mon Pastor He differed not in any essentiall part of the ordinary Pastorall Office but was only President or Moderator coÌ„stantly yet by his fellow Pastors free consent over the Pastors of a Diocese Such perhaps first of all was “ Ann. 190 Iulianus the tenth Bishop of Alexandria In whose time first * Euseb 5.9 mention is made that there were divers Churches in that Citie and he Bishop of them The first sorte of these Bishops we wholy allow The second we do not simply deny They were not much vnlike to the Bishops now lately appointed in Scotland 3 3. There is a Diocesan ruling Bishop He had more power then any of the rest of the ordinarie Pastors though yet not any sole power to rule in his Diocese It may be this began at Alexandria with “ Ann. 260. Dionysius the thirteenth Bishop of that place which seemeth to be Ieroms meaning where he * Ierom ad Evagr. saith that some prioritie in Bishops continued there from Marke to Heraclas and Dionysius At Heraclas it is probable was a period of one sort and with Dionysius began another Prioritie of Order 1. Pariâ—hionall 2. Diocesan 3. Maioritie of rule Diocesan Prioritie of order in one Bishop over a Parish that is one particular compleat Congregation seemeth to haue continued exclusively from Marke vnto Iulianus over a Diocese from Iulianus to Heraclas inclusively and then Maioritie of ruling in the Diocese to haue begun with Dionysius the next Successor after Nothing letteth vs but that thus we may probably thinke Seeing thus Eusebius and Ieroms relation shall well agree How soever it was this is certaine that neither the one nor the other was knowne before these times heere expressed 4 4. A Diocesan Lord Bishop was he who ruled ordinarilie in his Diocese by his sole power This grew vp from the former by litle and litle But it seemeth not to haue ben established in Ambrose Ierome Augustines time though soone after we doubt not it tooke place over the Churches 5 5. A Patriarchall Bishop and they were first 4. in number Of which kinde the Archbishop may be reckoned also viz. at Rome Antioch “ Or els Cae sarea Concil Nic. 1. Can. 7. Ierusalem Alexandria They began by mens voluntarie regarding the Bishops of those principall Cities aboue other sometime before the Nicene Councell But they were by an ordinance established first in that Councell Howbeit yet they were not Lords over the Churches till a long while after In the first Councell of Constantinople an other Patriarch was established at Constantinople 6 6. A Catholike or Vniversall Bishop * Bonifacius was the first began at Rome about 600. yeares after Christ Who also hath had his growinges and increasings and was not perfect Antichrist till some ages after Now all these latter that is the 3.4.5 6. sort are at least Besides the Scriptures yea they are cleane Contrarie to the first which hath place and allowance in the Scripture And therefore these are plainlie contrary to Gods word vtterlie vnlawfull Wherefore also the “ As namelie that in D. Bilsons perpet gouernment pag. 260. coÌ„mon accompts and Catalogues of the succession of Bishops from the Apostles times to our dayes are very deceiptfull and false When as al these are called by one name indifferently Bishops without distinction yet their Offices are exceeding divers and no way like Yea these later directlie contrarie to the first as hath ben said Against this it is * D. Bilson in
This is true in deed God hath given vs in his word this sufficiencie for all Ecclesiasticall or Religious matters necessarie to salvation but not for all Ecclesiasticall matters what soever This is a frivolous exception and most false For first divers of our present matters controverted are necessaric enough They can not be thus reiected as thinges not necessarie viz. the onely true Forme and Constitution of Christs Visible Churches with their due Ministeries proportioned to them According to Gods ordinarie dispensation of grace by his worde there is even Necessitie to enioy these Gods own Ordinances and to bee free from all Traditions of men especially such as are coÌ„trarie to his Touching other things which seeme sinaller and of lesse importance as some esteeme the Rites Ceremonies to be in Gods worship I answere our Argument before laid downe generally includeth all meere Ecclesiastical or Religious things I say All. And where All is included Nothing is excepted Wherefore we still affirme and professe that all lawfull Ecclesiasticall Rites whatsoever are contained now in the Scriptures of the New Testament and not onely thinges simply necessarie to salvation Besides that we must not forget how the wilfull maintayning of small thinges amisse becommeth a great and haynous sinne wherevnto is due a fearfull punishment As may be seene in him who * Num. 15.30 and 32. with a high hande did but gather a few stickes on the Sabbath day Nothwithstanding all this yet it semeth to many that these externall things Ecclesiastical are not matters of Doctrine nor of Faith c. And therefore may bee lawfull though they be not contayned in the Scripture I answere They are all truly properly matters of Doctrine of Faith and of Religion appertayning to the 1. Table 2. Commaundement in the Decalogue to many other places of Scripture as before hath bene shewed It is the error of men not knowing the holy Scriptures proper and full vse or true extent when any do thinke such Ecclesiasticall things as these heere controverted are not coÌ„tained in the Scripture yet that they may be lawfull They are all simply vnlawfull if they bee not contained in the holy Scripture Wherefore even all these things both the lawful vnlawfull contained in the Scripture or not contained Formes of visible Churches vsing Government Ministeries Rites are matters of Doctrine of Faith of ReligioÌ„ viz. true or false So that the one ought as our life to be imbraced the other as the very wayes of death to be avoyded especially when we discerne and see them thus to be Reason 2. EVERY Visible Church of Christ truly and properly so called ought by Gods * Mat. 18 17. expresse word to have and vse the Ecclesiasticall government of it self Bâ—â—â—very particular Congregation of Christians is a Visible Church of Christ truly and properly The true Churches and the false Therefore every particular Congregation of Christians by Gods expresse word ought to have and vse the Ecclesiasticall governement of it selfe viz. according to the order set downe for a Visible Church in Gods word And so in England consequentlie the things that are directlie contrarie therevnto Diocesan and Provinciall Churches vsing government with their Ministers c. are directlie contrarie to Gods word and therefore ought of necessitie to be reformed Heere first lett it be noted A Visible Church that we vnderstande a Visible Church of Christ to be a Societie of Christians whiche any member may and must on occasion have a visible or sensible vse of intirely and wholy togeather the same having the power of Eccle siasticall governement in and for it selfe immediatlie from Christ. I say The Church intirelie and wholie togeather may and must be vsed on occasion Considering that against this there is no text of Scripture in all the New Testament nor anie force of reason appearing Then let vs also observe and marke these 3. pointes Note For proofe of our Assumption last before 1. The Visible Churches of Christ were in number * 1 Cor. 11.16 4 17. c. many divers and not onely one by the ordinance of God him selse So that it is false whiche is “ Hooker lib 3. Sect. 1. pa. 132. held that there is a Vniversall Visible Church like the Sea which being but one properly is distinguished and called by divers names according to the Countries and places by which it cometh Nay the Visible Churches of Christ were by the Apostles ordination many in number actuallie divided Bodies or Societies The Sea properly and alwayes being but one Continued Body was and is distinguished meerelie by divers names The Vniversall Invisible Church was and is in deed one in number but I have shewed there were many in nomber of the true and proper Visible Churches Againe the Iewish Visible Church according to the Law was in nuÌ„ber only one properlie vnder one High Priest and having one Temple only at Ierusalem But Christ and his Apostles changed that forme and did institute and leave the Christian Churches properlie in number many and divers as I saide Secondly they instituted and left particular ordinarie or constant CoÌ„gregations true and proper Visible Churches Or they left not anie one Visible Church in the whole world constitute and compact of divers ordinarie and constant Congregations Both these points are most manifest and vndeniable in these places of holy Scripture following First that florishing and plentifull Church of Corinth was * 1. Cor. 14.23 but one particular Congregation Whereof the Apostle saith thus When the whole Church is come togeather “ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into one place Which also we may likewise affirme of the Church of * Act. 14.27 Antioch and of ♣ Iusti Martyr Apo. 2 Rome and of “ Act. 15.22 25. Ierusalem and of * Act. 20.28 Ephesus c. in those dayes For though these Cities were great and populous yet being vnbeleeving hatefull enemies to the Gospell each of them had then of faithfull Christians but one particular constant Congregation onely Like as the Protestants are in the Cities at this day vnder the Spanish King or as they were in divers Cities of France before the peace was made as we were heere in London in Queene Maries time Where yet we denie not that then some particular CoÌ„gregations being as that of Ierusalem was * Act. 4.4 before greater then other som did by reason of persecution meet occasionallie and vncertainlie in divers ♣ Act. 12 1â— smaller numbers But these smaller numbers were not so many Churches properlie because they were vncertaine and occasionall A true and proper Church being alwayes necessarilie an ordinarie sett companie and a constant societie Those therefore notwithstanding made but one “ Act. 6.2 particular compleat Congregation or proper Church which in time of peace chieflie they growing yet more populous were to be distributed and divided into sundrie proper and
more a Church then any other though som may be greater som smaller som richer som poorer Yet as Churches they are all equally Churches and one hath as much Ecclesiasticall or spirituall right power authoritie as any other Even so is it with their Pastors being compared I saye togeather as Pastors among themselves Againe as the Apostles were all equall Apostles so surely the Pastors ought to be who are in deed their right proper Successors Pari consortio prediti honoris potestatis As Cyprian * cypr. de vnit Eccles saith The Apostles were indued with equall honor power Therfore the Pastors their Successors ought to be so likewise To which purpose also is that in the same place following “ Ibid. Episcopaius vnus est cuius à singulis in solidum pars tenetur There is but one kinde or nature of the Bishoplie or Pastoral office whereof everie one participateth in whole And in another place * Cypr. in CoÌ„cil Caâ—thag Nemo nostrum Episcopum Episcoporum se facit None of vs maketh him self a Bishop of Bishops or over Bishops Signifying that it was not lawfull for them so to be neither likewise a Pastor over Pastors And to what purpose els is that of Ierome to Evagrius where speaking of Bishops or Pastors saith he “ Icrom ad Evagr. Eiusdem sunt meriti eiusdem Sacerdotij They are all of one and the same preeminence of one and the same Office These sentences are verie memorable tending to allow ordinarie equalitie in all Offices which are of one and the same kinde or nature Howsoever yet a declination from the right and perfect Pastorall office began to come in in the dayes of these men also to get allowance even of the most famous Doctors specially about Ieromes dayes Whereby it is manifest how a paritie of Pastors ought to be held and yet notwithstanding how a paritie of all Ministers ought not to be in any Church But some wil say this is not enough For this nevertheles will be the cause of strife discord in the Churches We answer The cleane contrarie is true Your humane disparitie in the Ecclesiasticall Ministeries both is and ever * Nazianz. in orat post redi hath ben the true cause of discord But our Divine disparitie that which we hold and allow is the true cause of peace and vnitie For where in what place can discord be In every Church we acknowledg a Superior and in everie meeting out of many Churches a Superior likewise Now no other place can be imagined where discord and strife Ecclesiasticall can arise If therefore Superioritie and disparitie will cause peace wee through Gods goodnes and blessing shall both have and keepe peace every where If anie other Superioritie bee required and namely Yours which crosseth yea cutteth of Gods owne ordinance in the Pastoral office we deny that it can ever procure peace And this our present experience doth shew in all the forraigne Reformed Churches compared with ous They all inioying this ordinance of God have most admirable vnitie We only wanting this notwithstanding many sundrie worldly advantages yet do remaine still now these 50. yeeres almost in wofull dissentions desolations and dissipations Neither can the Lordly Prelacie neither will they remedy it If heerein yet men will not be satissied but will hold it still to be speciall wisedom to take away from som Pastors the power of spirituall governement and to give it to som few We answer againe with the holy Ghost It behooveth vs not it is high presumption * 2 Cor. 4.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be wise aboue much rather contrary to that which is written Reason 5. THOSE Elders or Pastors as they couÌ„t themselves stand directlie contrarie to Gods word Lord-Ministers who do rule their fellow-Elders or Pastors and specially manie whole Churches with a Lordly Ecclesiasticall power or sole authoritie also who do rule them Civilly with outward force and compulsive power and who receave Civil Titles and Stiles answering to the worldly honor due to high Magistrates in the world But our Diocesan Bishops in England are such Elders or Pastors and do thus rule and stand by their publike Office or Offices which they hold Therefore our Diocesan Bishops in England even by their publike Office or Offices which they hold stand directly contrary to Gods word The Proposition whereof only there can be doubt is proved by many plaine places of Gods word Christ earnestly forbad his Apostles this whole matter and in them much more all other Ministers their inferiors in these words * Mat. 20.25 Ye know that the Rulers of the Nations haue dominion over them and the Great men exercise authoritie over them But it shall not be so among you But who soever will be great among you let him be your servant Luke hath the same thus “ Luke 22.25 The Kings of the Nations haue dominion or rule as Lords over them and they who exercise authoritie over them are called Gratious Lords But ye shall not be so And Peter an Elder as he calleth himselfe chargeth all Elders that they be not * 1 Pet. 5.8 as Lords over Gods heritage but examples to the flocke And Paul renounceth it for his part saying “ 2 Cor. 1.24 Not that we haue dominion â—ver your faith but are helpers of your ioy Heere it is a silly evasion which som vse or rather a delusion of these manifest Scriptures to say Christ heere forbiddeth his Apostles to expect Civill power authoritie by vertue of their Ecclesiasticall Ministerie or it is heere denyed that Civil power is necessarily annexed to the Ecclesiasticall function And besides this that nothing els iâ— heere denyed by our Savior to his Apostles and Ministers I say this is a vaine shift The Apostles manifestly desired this outward preeminence no other way but by CoÌ„mission from Christ whom they hoped should haue ben a great Prince in the world This * Math. 20.21 Marc. 10. â—7 they simply desired and this Christ simply denied both to them and in them to all true Ministers of Christ for ever Besides Luke also addeth the Magnificent Titles of worldy authoritie and these to be likewise denyed them Which indeed necessarily followeth Finally both Mathew Luke do principally speake of the forbidding of Civill rule to Ministers yet their words are so generall that we must needs grant that Christ there forbiddeth his Ministers simply generally al Lordly rule or domination or sole authoritie whatsoever And therefore Ecclesiasticall domination or sole authoritie in Church matters also Even as it is manifest that Peter and Paul do without controversy in the places before rehearsed It is no better shift to say that Christ heere forbad nothing but Tyrannicall over-ruling of the brethren Or only the ambitious desire of Lordly rule sole power and civill authoritie but not the things themselues But all this D. Bilson
only by his Priestly Office that is only by the Sacrifice of his owne sufferings yet he worketh our Salvation and accomplisheth his Mediation not but by all these 3. his Offices iointly togeather So that it is the error of a nomber who thinke to beleeve only that Christ dyed for vs this is enough to salvation We need not to regard in Christ any more Whereby men coÌ„monlie forget the other partes of Christes glorious worke toward vs viz. his holy compleat Doctrine and Governement But both these also ought to be believed yeelded vnto the person of our Saviour Christ intirely wholy even in respect as he is our Saviour Mediator no lesse then the other that he perfectly suffered for vs as our Redeemer This is well to be considered The Assumption our adversaries do make to be true For they take froÌ„ Christ personally a manifest part of his Propheticall Office and likewise of his Kingly Office It is a part of Christes owne proper Propheticall Office to teach vs with authoritie by him selfe * Proved in Reason 1. pa. 1.2 c. And Heb. 3.2 3 â— 6. Math. 17.5 Iohn 14.6 and 16.13 alone in his owne word and Testament the outward forme nature and constitution which is but one of all his Visible Churches whether in Countries rich or poore Monarchies or Democraties c likewise all the true Ecclesiasticall Offices and Ministeries in them with every kinde of action and thing properly Ecclesiasticall vsed in the Church or where soever els Religiously Also it is a part of his proper Kinglie Office “ Matth. 6.33 and 22.2 c. Luke 19.14 27. Iam. 4.12 1 Cor. 12.5 Mat. 18.17 Iohn 20.23 by him selfe to constitute and inioyne the singular and only true forme of all his Visible Churches and to admit whersoever none other spiritually to rule to guide and to blesse vs in them only by his owne Ministeries and Ordinances instituted by him selfe or by his Spirite in his Apostles and by none other All which the foresaide Diocesesan ruling Bishops c. do take from Christ himselfe personally and do * D. Whit-gift against Mai. Cart-wright pa. 370.376 permit them vnto Men. Saying it is indifferent and somwhere somtimes convenient for Christians thus to do Therefore the Assumption is true It wil be said if this be so then likewise the ancient Writers Austine Ambrose Chrysostome Leo Gregorie c. did erre in faith to salvation and believed not som partes of the fundamentall Offices of Christ our Savior For those ancientes did hold sundry Ecclesiasticall Inventions of men besides that they were theÌ„selves Diocesan ruling Bishops Wherefore by this reason they diminished not a little of our Saviors most holy healthfull Offices both Propheticall and Kingly Which to affirme wil be very hard The same must be saide likewise of our late blessed Martyrs Cranmer Ridley Latimer Ferrar c. I answer we embrace these holy men of God both the elder and later for their other manifolde testimonies of pietie Therefore we iudge them as faithfull servantes of Christ according to that measure of light wherein they lived That is they did generally and indistinctly beleeve and professe soundly all the whole Offices of Christ to salvatioÌ„ Yet true it is they erred in these foresaid external partes pertayning to Christes Prophecie and Kingdome through the common sway of the times then the Mysterie of iniquitie that is Antichrist advancing it selfe daylie very much even by them and by these their errors though they for their partes were vnwitting vnwilling The case thus standing with them we are not to doubt but these their errors though of them selves very great were graciously pardoned in Christ chiefly considering that these matters were not then examined nor any thing looked into which with vs now these 40. yeeres have ben much debated tried and sifted Yea and by Gods worde are so cleerlie discovered that we must needes now say He that is ignorant let him be ignorant stil and he that is perverse let him be perverse still Wherefore the condition of our Diocesan L. Bishops c. in England is farre vnlike at this day and in no sorte to be compared with that of those Bishops then Ours have no excuse which they might have Cyprian saieth well in such another case * Cypri Epi. 2.3 Si quis de antecessoribus nostris vel ignoranter vel simpliciter non hoc observavit tenuit quod nos Dominus facere exemplo Magisterio suo docuit potest simplicitati eius de indulgeÌ„tiâ Domini venia concedi nobis verò non poterit ignosci qui nunc à Domino admoniti instructi sumus If any before vs either ignorantly or simply hath not observed and kept that which the Lord by his example doctrine hath taught vs to do by the Lords mercy his simplicitie may be pardoned but we cannot be forgiven who are now warned and instructed of the Lord. Yet some will say We can not shew any such forme of a Visible Church somtime for many hundreds of yeares togeather Shall we then thinke that this is Christs perpetuall ordinance I answere first for 2. hundred yeares after Christ there is no man can shew any other forme of a Visible Church but this any where in the whole world as in the next Assertion presently God willing we shall further see Which beside the all-sufficient word of God is an excellent testimonie also neither need we looke further into Humane writinges for the perpetuall necessitie heereof Second they who list to search may finde argumentes of divers particular Congregations being intire Visible Churches in all ages I thinke Howbeit what is that to vs Must the Christian faith or any part of it stand or fall by the report of Mens stories Or may we in this case conclude from them Negatively Mens writings mention not such a Church at somtime Therfore then there was none And specially to inferre thus Therefore this is not Christs ordinance alwayes necessarie for vs. To esteeme mens writings so sufficient as that by them we should prove or disprove a matter of Religion I say it is verie foolish at the least Finally our Adversaries will obiect that by these Assertions and defences we detract from the Kings authoritie power namely thus misliking that which he alloweth specially holding an authority Ecclesiasticall not derived from him I answer even so did evill slanderous men accuse the faithfull Christians in the primitive age They cryed that * Act. 17. â—â— These all do against the decrees of Caesar saying that there is another King one Iesus Our reply therefore vnto them for this shall stand in 4. points 1. We most gladlie do * Math. 20.21 give vnto Caesar the things that are Caesars but to God the things that are Gods “ Tertul. ad Scapulaâ—â— 2. Colimus Imperatorem vt hominem à Deo secundum solo Deo minorem We honor the King as
their assignation from Christ if they be not surcease that presumption * Pag. 339. If the name of Diocesan Bishop were new and lately invented by men the losse thereof were not great yea retayning the name they must be knowen to be of men and not of God Heerevnto accordeth D. Sutcliffe in his booke intituled O. E. against N. D. where he refuting the calling of the Iesuites saith thus “ D. Suâ—â—liffe or O. K. against N. D. pag. 110. It is not enough to say that they have a rule and learning and live orderly but they must have their Office and calling allowed by Christ Iesus if they meane to take vpon them the office of Pastors Teachers and Governors in Christes Church Wherefore either let them shew themselves to have a lawfull calling or let them not thinke much to be thrust out as intruders We doe not find either in the Epistle to the Ephesians chap 4. or the first Epistle to the Corinthians chapt 12. any such extravagant Friars Thus do both these learned men and our no great friends maintaine with vs singularly The Scriptures perfection even in these outward Ecclesiastical matters Yea further considering the Scriptures phrase maner of speach perpetually signifying that there is not only One Visible Church of Christ properly but Many in number in the world nor only one in a Nation or Province but many as before * Pag. 19. 20. we have declared therefore one of these viz. the B. of Wint. is to be well observed how he avoucheth the holy Scriptures perfection also even for the phrase and maner of speach and how vnlawfull a thing he holdeth it to be to vse any †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 new wordes for religious matters other theÌ„ the very Scripture vseth Thus generally he affirmeth though he applieth it to another point theÌ„ now we speak of Saith he “ The full redemption of man by c. Pag. 41. What I reade in the word of God that I beleeve what I do not reade that I do not beleeve In Gods causes we may not easily leave Gods wordes and with a new kinde of speach make way for a new kind of faith We must learne from God what to beleeve not by correcting or inverting his words teach him how to speake This religious strictnes even touching the words of Scripture is indeed I graunt to be held religiously and perpetually vnderstanding the words to be such as either the Scripture it selfe vseth or may be necessarie consequence be proved and allowed from the very Scripture But now how vniustly are we vsed by them yea how vnchristianly when toward vs they will stand to nothing of all this and yet forsooth all must go still on their side The very Papistes do see and acknowledge this that I say viz. both that these grounds of the Scriptures absolut perfection in all Ecclesiasticall matters whereon we exactly do stand are the true and right principles of the Protestants Religion also that the Diocesan L. Bishops The only true Protestants do and must needes turne away from these principles deny them when they deale with vs and must ioyn plainlie with the Catholikes in their answers if they will maintaine themselves Thus say they when one obiected that * Neâ—ves from Spaine Holland The Puritans as they falsely and maliciouslie call vs would certainly be extinguished if the Queene should live any nomber of yeares Tush saith an other you are deceaved Nay much more possible and likely it is that the Puritan shall overcom the Protestant then the contrarie For that the Puritan buildeth directly vpon the Protestants first grounds in Religion and deduceth thereof cleerely and by ordinary consequence all his conclusions Which the Protestant can not deny by Divinity but only by Policie and humane ordination or by turning “ The Catholikes Supplication An. 1604 hath the like pag. 17. to Catholike answers contrary to their owne principles And it is hard for any man sincerely to be a Protestant but that he will easily passe also on more or lesse to be a Puritan And only they in effect will be against them who are interessed in the other side as Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Canons Notaries Registers Civill Lawyers and the like for not leesing their Commodities c. This do the very Papistes discerne and confesse Wherewithall they prophesie also as it were if the Protestants Religion be not rooted out that the Puritanes profession will finally prevaile both against the common Protestants and the Catholiks also Which som with vs much fearing and vngraciously striving against when they could not endure * Scottizing Genevating for Discipline pa. 31. our hope of one Darius comming to build vp the Temple of God among vs they made it no lesse then a Treasonable mind in vs when we could not conceale in deed such a hope that we had long agoe of this Princes after-comming Wherefore also they maintayned Seminarie Priestes very Traitors in deed publikly to taxe this our most Christian Noble Darius whom God hath of his singular mercy now sent vnto vs as a Puritan King saying “ Quodli pag. 26 27. The Puritans have Princes none at all vnlesse it be one on their side Their malice was thus mooved because they were not ignoraÌ„t of the Kings most holy religious Confession of his faith made long since and published to the view of the world as no other Kinge in Christendom hath don and altogeather agreeable to our Profession Where * Confess of faith At Edingburg Ann. 1580. he detesteth all Rites Signes and Traditions brought into the Church without or against the word of God Promising and swearing by the great Name of our Lord to continue in the obedience of the doctrine and discipline of the Church that is in Scotland and shall defend the same according to his vocation and power all the dayes of his life Which also of late againe he hath in effect renued and confirmed and that even then when there was doubt how his future subiects in England would entertaine his comming Thus lately writeth our worthy gracious King admonishing his Sonne the noble Prince “ Basilicon dôroâ— pag. 43. The doctrine and discipline preserve in puritie according to Gods word †Pag 7. The whole Scripture is dited by Gods Spirit thereby as by his lively word to instruct and rule the whole Church Militant to the end of the world * Pag. 6. The first part of mans service to his God which is Religion that is the worship of God according to his revealed will it is wholy grounded vpon the Scripture “ Pag. 5. Frame all your affections to follow precisely the rule there set downe * Pag. 15 1â— By Superstition I meane when one restraines himselfe to any other rule in the service of God then is warranted by the word the only true square of Gods service The forme established