THE RECONCILER OR An Epistle Pacificatorie of the seeming differences of opinion concerning the true being and visibilitie of the Roman Church ENLARGED With the addition of Letters of Resolution for that purpose from some famous Divines of our CHVRCH By Ios Exon. LONDON Printed for NATH BVTTER 1629. TO THE RIGHT HONOVRABLE AND truly religious my singular good Lord Edward Earle of Norwich My ever honoured Lord I Confesse my charity led me into an error Your Lordshippe well knowes how apt I am to be overtaken with these better deceits of an over kinde credulitie I had thought that any dash of my pen in a sudden and easie advertisement might have served to have quitted that ignorant scandall which was cast upon my mis-taken assertion of the true visibility of the Romane Church The issue proves all otherwise I finde to my griefe that the misunderstanding tenacitie of some zealous spirits hath made it a quarrell It cannot but trouble me to see that the position which is so familiarly current with the best reformed Divines which hath beene so oft and long since published by mee without contradiction yea not without the approbation and applause of the whole representative body of the Clergie of this kingdome should now be quarrelled and drawne into the detestation of those that know it not As one therefore that should thinke it corosive enough that any occasion should be taken by ought of mine to ravell but one thred of that seamless coat I doe earnestly desire by a more full explication to give cleare satisfaction to all Readers and by this seasonable reconcilement to stop the flood-gates of contention I know it will not be unpleasing to your Lordship that through your honourable and pious hands these welcome papers should be transmitted to many Wherein I shall first beseech yea adjure al Christians under whose eies they shall fall by the dreadfull name of that GOD who shall judge both the quicke and the dead to lay aside all unjust prejudices and to allow the words of Truth and Peace I dare confidently say Let us be understood and we are agreed The searcher of all harts knows how far it was from my thoughts to speak ought in favour of the Roman Synagogue If I have not sufficiently branded that Strūpet I justly suffer Luthers broad word is by me already both safely cōstrued sufficiently vindicated But doe you not say It is a true visible Church Doe you not yeeld some kinde of communion with these clients of Antichrist What is if this be not favour Marke well Christian Reader and the Lord give thee understanding in all things To beginne with the latter No man can say but the Church of Rome holds some Truths those truths are Gods and in his right ours why should not wee challenge our owne wheresoever we finde it If a verie Devill shall say of Christ Thou art the Sonne of the living God wee will snatch this truth out of his mouth as usurped and in spight of him proclaime it for our own Indeed there is no communion betwixt light and darknesse but there is communion betwixt light and light Now all truth is light and therefore symbolizeth with it selfe With that light therefore whose glimmering yet remaines in their darknesse our clearer light will and must hold communion If they professe three Persons in one Godhead two natures in one person of Christ shall we detrect to joine with them in this Christian veritie We abhorre to have any communion with them in their errors in their idolatrous or superstitious practices these are their owne not ours If we durst have taken their part in these this breach had not beene Now who can but say that wee must hate their evill and allow their good It is no countenance to their errors that we imbrace our owne truths It is no disparagement to our truths that they have blended them with their errors Here can be no difference then if this communion bee not mis-taken no man will say that we may sever from their common truths No man will say that we may joyne with them in their hatefull errours For the former Hee that saith a theefe is truly a man doth hee therein fauour that theefe He that saith a diseased dropsied dying bodie is a true though corrupt body doth he favour that disease or that living carcasse It is no other no more that I say of the Church of Rome Truenesse of being and outward visibility are no praise to her Yea these are aggravations to her falshood The advantage that is both sought and found in this assertion is onely ours as we shall see in the sequell without any danger of their gain I say then that she is a true church but I say withall shee is a false Church True in existence but false in beleefe Let not the homonymie of a word breed jarres where the sense is accorded If we doe not yeeld her the true being of a Church why do we call her the Church of Rome What speake we of or where is the subject of our question who sees not that there is a morall trueness and a naturall He that is morally the falsest man is in nature as truly a man as the honestest and therefore in this regard as true a man In the same sense therefore that wee say the Devill is a true though false spirit that a cheater it a true though false man wee may must say that the Church of Rome is a true though false Church Certainely there hath beene a true errour and mis-taking of the sense that is guiltie of this quarrell As for the visibility there can be no question Would God that Church did not too much fill our eie yea the world There is nothing wherein it doth more pride it selfe than in a glorious conspicuitie scorning in this regard the obscure paucitie of their opposers But you say What is this but to play with ambiguities That the Church of Rome is it selfe that is a Church that it is visible that it is truly existent there can be no doubt but is it still a part of the truly existent visible church of Christ Surely no otherwise than an hereticall and Apostaticall Church is and may be Reader whosoever thou art for Gods sake for thy soules sake marke where thou treadest Else thou shalt bee sure to fall either into an open gulfe of uncharitablenesse or into a dangerous precipice of errour There is no feare nor favour to say that the Church of Rome under a Christian face hath an Antichristian heart overturning that foundation by necessarie inferences which by open profession in avoweth That face that profession those avowed principles are enough to give it claime to a true outward visibilitie of a Christian Church whiles those damnable inferences are enough to feoffe it in the true style of heresie and Antichristianisme Now this heresie this Antichristianisme makes Rome justly odious and execrable to God to Angels and
Men but cannot utterly dischurch it whiles those main principles maintaine a weake life in that crazie and corrupted bodie But is not this language different from that whereto our eares and eies have beene inured from the mouthes and pens of some reverend Divines and professors of our Church Know Reader that the streame of the famous Doctors both at home and abroad hath runne strongly my way I should have feared and hated to goe alone what reason is there then to single out one man in a throng Some few worthie Authors have spoken otherwise in the warmth of their zealous contention yet so as that even to them durst I appeale for my Iudges for if their sound differ from me their sense agrees with me that which as I touched in my Advertisement so I am now readie to make cleare by the instance of learned Zanchius whose pregnant testimonies compared together shall plainly teach us how easie a reconcilement may bee made betwixt these two seemingly-contrarie opinions That worthie Author in his profession of Christian Religion which hee wrote and published in the 70. yeare of his age having defined the Church of Christ in generall and passed thorow the properties of it at last descending to the subdivision of the Church militant comes to inquire how particular Churches may be knowne to be the true churches of Christ wherof he determines thus Illas igitur c. Those Churches therefore doe wee acknowledge for the true Churches of Christ in which first of all the pure doctrine of the Gospell is preached heard admitted and so onely admitted that there is neither place nor eare given to the contrarie For both these are the just propertie of the flocke or sheepe of Christ namely both to heare the voice of their owne Pastor and to reject the voice of strangers Iohn 10. 4. In which secondly the Sacraments instituted by Christ are lawfully and as much as may bee according to Christs institution administred and received and therefore in which the Sacraments devised by men are not admitted and allowed In which lastly the discipline of Christ hath the due place that is where both publiquely and privately charitable care is had both by admonitions corrections and at last if need be by excommunications that the Commandements of God be duly kept and that all persons live soberly iustly and piously to the glory of God and edification of their neighbour Thus hee wherein who sees not how directly he aymes both at the justifying of our Churches and the casheering of the Roman which is palpably guiltie of the violation of these wholsome rules And indeed it must needes be said if we bring the Roman Church to this touch she is cast for a meer counterfeit shee is as farre from truth as truth is from falshood Now by this time you goe away with an opinion that learned Zanchie is my professed adversarie and hath directly condemned my position of the truenesse and visibilitie of the Roman Church Have but patience I beseech you to read what the same excellent Author writes in his golden Preface to that noble worke De natura Dei where this question is clearly punctuall decided There you shall finde that having passed through the wofull and gloomie offuscations of the Church of God in all former ages he descending to the darknesse of the present Babylon concludes thus Deinde non potuit Satan c. Moreover Satan could not in the verie Roman Church doe what he listed as hee had done in the Easterne to bring all things to such passe as that it should no more have the forme of a Christian Church For in spight of Satan that Church retained still the chief foundations of the faith although weakned with the doctrines of men it retained the publique preaching of the word of God thogh in many places mis-understood and mis-construed the invocation of the name of Christ though joyned also with the invocation of dead men the administration of Baptisme instituted by Christ himselfe howsoever defiled with the addition of many superstitions So as together with the symbole of the covenant the Covenant it selfe remained still in her I meane in all the Churches of the West no otherwise than it did in the Church of Israel even after that all things were in part profaned by Ieroboam and other impious and Idolatrous Kings upon the defection made by them from the Church and Tribe of Iuda For neither doe I assent to them which would have the Church of Rome to have no lesse ceased to be the Church of Christ than those Easterne Churches which afterwards turned Mahumetan what Church was ever more corrupt than the Church of the ten Tribes yet we learne from the Scriptures that it was still the Church of God And how doth S. Paul call that Church wherein Antichrist hee saith shall sit the Temple of God neither is it any Baptisme at all that is administred out of the Church of Christ The wife that is an Adulteresse doth not cease to be a wife unlesse being despoiled of her mariage-ring she be manifestly divorced The Church of Rome therefore is yet the Church of Christ but what manner of Church Surely so corrupted and depraved and with so great tyrannie oppressed that you can neither with a good conscience partake with them in their holy things nor safely dwell amongst them Thus he againe Wherein you see hee speakes as home for me as I could devise to speake for my selfe and as appositely professeth to oppose the contrarie Looke now how this learned Author may be reconciled to his owne pen and by the very same way shall my pen bee reconciled with others Either he agrees not with himselfe or else in his sense I agree with my gainsayers Nothing is more plaine then that hee in that former speech and all other classicke Authors that speake in that Key meane by a True Church a sound pure right beleeving Church so as their vera is rather verax Zanchie explicates the terme whiles he joines veram puram together so as in this construction it is no true Church that is an unsound one as if truth of existence were all one with truth of doctrine In this sense whosoever shall say the Church of Rome is a true Church I say he calls evill good and is no better than a teacher of lyes But if we measure the true being of a visible Church by the direct maintenance of fundamentall principles though by consequences indirectly overturned and by the possession of the word of God and his Sacraments though not without soule adulteration what judicious Christian can but with mee subscribe to learned Zanchius that the Church of Rome hath yet the true visibilitie of a Church of Christ what should I need to press the latitude and multiplicity of sense of the word Church there is no one term that I know in all use of speech so various If in a large sense it be taken to comprehend the
society of all that professe Christian Religion through the whole world howsoever impured who can denie this title to the Roman If in a strict sense it be taken as it is by Zanchius here and all those Divines who refuse to give this style to the Synagogue of Rome for the companie of elect faithfull men gathered into one mysticall bodie under one head Christ washed by his blood justified by his merits sanctified by his Spirit conscionablie waiting upon the true ordinances of God in his pure Word and holie SacrameÌ„ts who can be so shamelesse as to give this title to the Roman Church Both these sentences then are equally true The Church of Rome is yet a true Church in the first sense The Church of Rome long since ceased to bee a true Church in the second As those friendly souldiers therefore of old said to their fellowes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 why fight we Stay stay deare brethren for Gods sake for his Churches sake for your soules sake stay these busie and unprofitable litigations put up on both sides your angrie pens Turne your Swords into Sithes to cut downe the ranke corruptioÌ„s of the Roman church and your Speares into Mattockes to beat downe the walls of this mysticall Babylon There are enemies â—now abroad Let us bee friends at home But if your sense be the same you will aske why our termes varie and why wee have chosen to fall upon that maner of expression which gives aduantage to the Adversarie offence to our owne Christian Reader let me beseech thee in the bowels of Christ to weigh well this matter and then tell me why such offence such advantage should bee rather given by my words than by the same words in the mouth of Luther of Calvin of Zanchie Iunius Plessee Hooker Andrewes Field Crakenthorpe Bedel and that whole cloud of learned and pious Authors who have without exceptioÌ„ used the same language And why more by my words now than twentie yeares agoe at which time I published the same truth in a more ful and liberall expression Wise and charitable Christians may not be apt to take offence where none is given As for anie Advantage that is hereby given to the Adversaries they may put it in their eye and see never the worse Loe say they we are of the true visible Church this is enough for us why are we forsaken why are we presecuted why are we solicited to change Alas poore soules doe they not know that Hypocrites leud persons reprobates are no lesse members of the true visible Church what gaine they by this but a deeper damnation To what purpose did the Iewes crie The Temple of the Lord whiles they despighted the Lord of that Temple Is the sea-weed ever the lesse vile because it is dragd vp together with good fish They are of the visible Church such as it is what is this but to say they are neither Iewes nor Turkes nor Pagans but misbeleevers damnablie hereticall in opinion shamefullie idolatrous in practice Let them make their best of this just Elogie and triumph in this style may we never prosper if we envie them this glorie Our care shall be that besides the Church sensible as Zuinglius distinguisheth we may be of the Church spirituall and not resting in a fruitlesse visibilitie wee may finde our selves livelie limbes of the mystical body of Christ which onelie condition shall give us a true right to heaven whiles fashionable profession in vaine cries Lord Lord and is barred out of those blessed gates with an I know you not Neither may the Reader think that I affect to goe by-waies of speech no I had not taken this path unlesse I had found it both more beaten and fairer I am not so unwise to teach the Adversarie what disadvantage I conceive to be given to our most just cause by the other manner of explication Let it suffice to say that this form of defence more fully stops the adversaries mouth in those two maine and envious scandals which hee casts upon our holy Religion Defection from the Church and Innovation than which no suggestion hath wont to bee more prevalent with weake and ungrounded hearts what wee further win by this not more charitable than safe Tenet I had rather it should bee silently conceived by the judicious then blazoned by my free penne shortly in this state of the question our gaine is as cleare as the Adversaries losse our ancient Truth triumphes over their upstart errours our charitie over their mercilesse presumptions Feare not therefore deare brethren where there is on roome for danger Suspect not fraud where there is nothing but plaine honest simplicitie of intentions censure not where there is the same Truth clad in a different but more easie habite of words But if any mans fervent zeale shall rather draw him to the liking of that other rougher and harder way so as in the meane time he keepe within the bounds of Christian charitie I taxe him not let everie man abound in his owne sense Onely let our hearts and tongues and hands conspire together in peace with our selves in warre with our common enemies Thus farre have I Right Honourable in a desire of peace poured out my selfe into a plaine explication and easie accordance Those whom I strive to satisfie are onely mis-takers whose censures if some man would have either laught out or despised yet I have condescended to take off by a serious deprecation and just defence It is an vnreasonable motion to request mindes prepossessed with prejudice to heare reason Whole Volumes are nothing to such as have contented themselves onely to take up opinions upon trust and will hold them because they know where they had them In vaine should I spend my selfe in beating upon such anviles but for those ingenuous Christians which will hold an eare open for justice and truth I have said enough if ought at all needed Alas my Lord I see and grieve to see it it is my Rochet that hath offended and not I In another habit I long since published this and more without dislike It is this colour of innocence that hath bleared some over-tender eyes Wherein I know not whether I should more pittie their errour or applaud my owne sufferings although I may not say with the Psalmist What hath the righteous done Let mee I beseech your Lordship upon this occasion have leave to give a little vent to my just griefe in this point The other day I fell upon a Latine Pamphlet homely for style tedious for length zealously uncharitable for stuffe wherein the Author onely wise in this that he would bee unknowne in a grave fiercenesse flies in the face of our English Prelacie not so much enveighing against their Persons which he could be content to reverence as their verie places I blest my selfe to see the case so altered Heretofore the Person had wont to beare off manie blowes from the function now the verie function wounds the person In what