hee is not called onely the image but also the liuely brightnesse of the Fathers glorye And yet farther to the intent it may bee the better vnderstoode what and how great the difference is wee must note that the world and man are a notable but yet a shadowed representation of those things which they do teach vs cōcerning god And Christ the expresse and liuely fourme in whose inward natural and substanciall brightnesse wee may most euidently behold the infinite power of God and incomprehensible loue towardes vs men Thus therefore when wee thincke vppon God and beholde him in all other thinges suche is our vanitie that immediatly wee decay and come to naught but when wee looke vppon him in Christ wee are quieted and stayed most firmely and substantially Wherefore there ought no comparison bee made betweene these which differ in kinde and manner of representation The xxxiii Chapter Two endes of the worlde not chiefe S. BUT bee ther not also other finall causes of the worlde M. Yeas there bee two but not chiefe S. What bee they M. The first is this to wit the vse of al men For this worlde was created for mans sake and man for god The seconde is for the Church or congregation For the worlde was created to the entent it should bee an house and dwelling place prepared for the Church and congregation that should bee hereafter where in it might remaine of it owne right which congregation God woulde establishe there and afterward bring to heauen S. Howe prooue you this M. First out of the 8. Psalme And secondly by that which S. Paule writeth to the Romanes the 4. Chapter and 13. verse The xxxiiii Chapter Of the meanes and engins whereby God raysed this so great a frame of the worlde and first of the woorde of God which was the meanes whereby this worlde was created S. HEtherto you haue declared the causes of this worlde nowe shewe the meanes and instrumentes wherby it was created And when mention is made of the creation of the woorlde some do demaunde what wedges what tooles and engins were occupied to the rearinge vp of so great a mole and they thinke themselues not satisfied vnlesse aunswere bee made vnto those doubtes of their minde M. Thei that seeke to know with what instruments this worlde was created do verie foolyshly forasmuch as this woorde create doth sufficiently declare that all this whole woorke is plainly miraculous and supernaturall For God vsed no tooles nor engins as carpenters vse to doe thereby to supplie the infirmitie of their strength But all his framing and buildinge and the woorkemanship of thys worlde doeth differ farre from all our meanes and pollices S. Tell mee then what it was M. In declaringe the meanes by which this world was created ther are foure things annexed which we must not pretermit and they perteine to the settinge foorth of Gods glory and omnipotencie wherof the fyrst is this that the worlde was created at the woorde and commaundement of God. S. Howe prooue you that M. Behold a most manifest place of the Scripture in the 33. Psalme 9. verse For hee spake and it was doone hee commaunded and it stoode fast and in the 148. Psalme and 5. verse Hee commaunded and they were created Moreouer Moses in the first chapter of Genesis beefore the creation of euery thing as they were made and created orderly in euery daye so doeth hee plainely shewe that the woord and cōmaundement of God went alwayes before And the Lorde sayde let it bee made c. Yea the Stoikes haue saide that the woorde of God was the efficient cause of the whole nature of thinges as Laertius writeth in his 7. booke in the life of Zeno. S. But there bee twoo impedementes that it can not bee so M. Which bee they S. The fyrst is that which is written in the 45. Chapter and 12. verse of Isay My handes haue stretched foorth the heauens Ergo God made not these things with his woord but with his handes M. Uerily this saiyng conteineth a most manifest Metaphore when hee attributeth handes vnto God and when in respect of the weakenesse of our vnderstanding God is cōpared to an handie craftes man which woorketh with his owne hāds the like wherof there are many authorities to be foūde in y scriptures And whereas this woorde of creating is vsed in the same place it plainly calleth vs backe vnto that diuine and extraordinarie woorke of God and to thinke vppon that meane onely which Moses hath recited M. The seconde impediment is that wheras in another place in like kind of thinges and semblable argument mention is made of the woorde of God notwithstanding Gods secret will is ment thereby whiche is not expressed in any woord or commaundemēt as in the 147. Psalme 15. and 18. verses where he speaketh of Ice Hee sendeth out his woorde and melteth it M. You say well Howbeit in Genesis the verye text also Moses minde teatheth vs that wee must say and thinke otherwise where it is plainly writen that God spake and cōmaunded that to bee which was made Wherfore the only bare and secrete will of God is not there to bee vnderstood and taken but that which is reuealed by the prolation and vtteringe of some woorde of his and commaundement Which opinion of mine is confirmed by an interpretation which the Scripture it self maketh noting that this was doone by vttering of some woorde or voyce For in the 33. Psalme and 6. verse after that it is declared that these things were made by the woorde of God for true exposition sake it is added by the spirite of his mouth For a voice is made by the breathing foorth of aire which is doone by the mouth S. But by this meanes feigning that God hath a tōgue roofe of the mouth and teeth with out whiche instruments no voyce can bee vttered you seeme to reuoke againe out of Hell the abominable errour of the Antropomorphites M. God forbid that I should thinke so wickedly of the infinite and omnipotent maiestie of god But like as the Lorde spake so as he might bee heard and vnderstoode when hee gaue the law in mount Sinai which no man can deney as likewise when hee spake to Moses whē he gaue answere by Vrim Thumim y Lord spake vttered a voice in the hearing of the people yet not withstāding we must not feigne y god hath a tongue a mouth a palate of the mouth teeth So in the beginning creation of the world when it is sayd that God spake his diuine shape was not chaunged intoo an humane fourme but it came to passe by a speciall prouidence and pollicie For the Lord tooke vpon him for a tyme suche meanes as were necessarie for the bringing foorth a cleare and audible voice wherof afterward hee left the vse S Doe you thinke then that the Lord spake plainly and distinctly M. Yea verely Howbeeit I am not ignorant what S. Augustine thinketh
thinges are especially tearmed visible for that our sight is the most certaine most excellent and most noble of all the senses of our bodie and for that also the actions of euery lyuinge thinge and the argumentes whereby we perceiue them to bee aliue are chiefly gathered by the sence of seeinge as moouing and breathinge Finally that bodily thinges are more exactly discerned by the eye than by tastinge or hearinge so that to saye that a visible creature is the matter and subiect of Naturall Philosophie is as much as to meane that wee wold haue euery creature whiche is sensible of it owne nature to be the true proper obiect therof whether the same be bodies as are the substaunces of thinges or whether they bee not bodies as are the vertues properties qualities motions and actions which vnto all corporall thinges by nature and their first creation and beeginning either cleaue vnto them without or are engraffed in them within All these kindes are as I haue sayd naturall thinges and created by God. S. I UnderstaÌ„d these things But tell mee now by how many maner of meanes doeth a Christian Naturall Philosopher handle and consider of these creatures M. Onely twoo waies the first to wit as they are all generally conteined in one and all comprehended as it were within the compasse of one bodie whiche incloseth them all which is called the world Or else euerie one in his kinde which are sundrie wherein the creatures are distincted and seperated one from another Whiche the particular Historie of the creation in the six dayes setteth downe vnto vs. S. How prooue you that M. In that the Scripture many tymes reciteth vnto vs all thinges created and visible vnder the name of the world as in Isay the 38. chapter and 11. verse Iohn the 1. chapter the 9. verse and the 9. chap. the 39. verse And many tymes the Scripture reciteth them distinctly and seuerally thereby the more to set foorth the wounderfull wisedome of God as in the 104. and 147. Plalmes and 8. verse and the 149. Psalme Wherfore wee muste also entreate of them after both these manners that sutch thinges as may bee gathered learned out of these creatures apperteinyng to the knowledge of God and setting foorth of his glorie according as the Scripture teacheth may bee by vs abundantly vnderstoode so that at the length wee may beecome perfect Christian naturall Philosophers S. With whiche of these twoo Methodes must wee first beegin M. Euen with that treatice which proposeth vnto vs all thinges generally comprehended in that one bodie which is called the world S. And why with that M. Bicause that way of teaching is more generall and more easie For whole thinges are better knowne than their partes for a man shal with more ease beehold an whole house than bee able too distinguishe or comprehend in his minde euerie part thereof And moreouer that whiche shal bee saied concernyng the whole world wil open vnto vs the way and entrance too the handling of the particular kindes of thinges For it shal bee as a foundation to the residue that shall ensue The viii Chapter What the world is S. DIscourse then of the world M. I will. S. What is the world M. The signification of the worlde is diuerse and manifold as the Philosophers doe teache vs as Laertius in his 7. booke and Plutarche in his first booke of the Philosophers opinions whiche signification wee must first distinguishe least beeing deceiued by the ambiguitie of the woord either wee do mocke the reader in this whole disputation or else deceiue him S. How many significations therefore are there of this woord world M. Three speciall First the world is taken for the creatures themselues whereof this whole visible frame and woorke consisteth So is it taken in Iohn the first chapter the 10. verse so likewise in the 2. Epistle of S. Peter the 3. chap. and 6. verse And moreouer for the corrupt and miserable condition of this world which falling vnto all these thinges by meanes of mannes transgression now hangeth vppon them whereby there is a most manifest confusion and a great disorder in al thinges So sayth S. Ihon in the 2. chap. and 16. verse and likewise the 5. Chapter and 19. verse Finally it is taken for one parte of the worlde and that the most noble and excellent to wit for men only and manye times for all men as to the Romanes the 5. chapter and 12. verse Ihon the 3. chapter the 16. verse and oftentimes for the faithfull and regenerat as in the 1. Epistle of S. Ihon the 2. chapter and 2. verse and at another time also for the reprobate and vnbeleeuinge as in the 1. Epistle to the Corinthians the 1. chapter and 21. verse and S. Ihon the 14. chapter the 17. and 22. verses Otherwise also if a man would call the definition of this woorde worlde vnto certaine chapters and speciall pointes wee maye saye that vnder the name of the worlde sumtime the place it selfe sumtime the substance of the thinges sumtime the men as the principall part thereof and sumtime the corruption of the same part that is to say of men is to be vnderstoode S. But the worlde was by the Latins called Mundus for the most beutifull order of all things therein coteined like as it was also tearmed by the Grecians Kâ—smoâ— of the cumlynesse thereof which reason of the name truely is repugnant vnto that signification whereby you saye that confusion of thinges and vice is sumtime signified by the name of the worlde M. Uerily you haue alleaged a true definition of thys woorde worlde from which notwithstandinge afterwarde the vse both of the Greeke and Latine tongue hath deflected For men vnderstoode that rebellion corruption and disorder was generally in all things and partes of the worlde they called the same by the name of the worlde bicause it is inseperably distributed throughout the whole aâ—d ingraffed as it were within the marrowe of euery singulare thinge By which meanes men are many times tearmed to bee the common destinie and miserie of men The Hebrues in their tongue call the worlde Gola which woorde the Apostles doe translate Euerlastinge as to the Hebrues the 11. chapter and 3. verse the 1. chapter and 2. verse to the Ephesians the 2. chapter and 2. verse not of eternitie as if the worlde had beene alwayes and from euerlastinge but rather of the fixed and certeine order thereof which the Lorde God hath established in it after that he had created the things that are in it which wee beholde to bee in it to continue in it euen vnto this daye as are the risinge and settinge of the Sunne and the chaunge and alteration of the foure quarters of the yeare And this shall indure so longe as this state of thinges shall continue as it appeareth in the 8. chapter of Genesis the 22. verse the 9. chapter the 9. or 10. verse Iob the 26. chapter the 10. verse
Ecclesiast the 8. chapter and 11. verse Wherfore wheÌ„ this age and figure of this worlde is past this order of thinges shall perishe also the 1 â–ª to the Corinthians the 7. chapter and 30. verse the 1. Epistle of S. Peter the 3 chapter the 4. and 7. verses but it shall continue vntill that time For the Hebrues themselues do plainle signifie that this worlde shall one day haue an end callinge the same worlde by the name of Chadel Psalme 39. verse 5. S. By which definition therefore or by whiche of those three significations muste the worlde bee taken in this disputation M. By the fyrst S. What is the worlde M. The worlde is not onely a certeine comprehensyon and heapinge togither of all these visible thinges but also a most orderly and wise distinction ordeined by God in euery kinde and space whereof hee made heauen and earth to bee the extreame partes S. Whence doe you prooue this your definition M. First out of the verie same places of the scripture by whiche I prooued that all thinges visible and whiche can bee seene are the matter of this Arte and also by that the scripture for the most part vseth to tearme the most excellently and beutifully ordered frame of thys whole worlde by the name of the worlde as in Genesis the 24. Chapter and 22. verse the 2. Chapter the 4. verse Mathew the 11. Chapter the 25. verse and in other places also almost infinite S. Why haue you comprehended both these pointes in your definition to wit that the worlde is not onely a general compreheÌ„sion of al things togither but also of them seuerally distinguished M. Bycause if wee wil conceiue in our minde confusedly all thinges whereof this world consisteth and is diforderly heaped togither or lyinge one vpon an other not yet disposed into any order but as it were the rubbishe of some house that were fallen downe or as it were stuffe prepared to build some house withall such an heape of thinges can not yet bee called a worlde It is rather that whiche the Grecians both Poetes others tearmed by the name of Chaos the Hebrues call the same Bohu that is to say a disordered heape from whiche some thinke the woord Chaos was deriued by a smal chauÌ„ge to wit of the letter B. into C. as though the Grecians beeing disdainfull hearers and vnskilfull Schollars had vnderstoode the woord rather after that maner Hereof that phrase and maner of speaking in the Latine toungue is knowne whiche Verrius the learned Grammarian hath noted that in the olde tyme the auncient people called the world Cohum and from thence this woord inâ—hâ—are to beeginne and leaue vnperfect was deriued But by the Apostle in the Epistle to the Hebrues the 3. chapter and 4. verse the worlde is called an houshold and compared to a familie well and orderly disposed neither is it a disordered heape in deede The. ix Chapter Whether the world may truely and Christianly bee called an vniuersalitie S. BUt in that this world is by some Latine Writers called vniuersitas an vniuersalitie and by the Grecians all and the whole doo you allow of it M. Although I know that so proud a name as that is doth scarce please well some very well learned and godly men notwithstanding forasmuche as graue auctours and also Ecclesiasticall Fathers and writers haue vsed that woorde truely I iudge that it is not to bee reiected For S. Augustine in his Enchirid the 10. chapt and in the 8. booke and 25. chapt of Genesis accordyng to the Letter and Tertullian also in some place and Ireneus likewise in the 2. booke and 12. is not afeard to vse this woord for the world that I may not also commende vnto you in this respecte S. Ambrose and S. Basill whose opinions perhaps may bee confirmed out of the 3. chap. and 4. verse of the E. pistle to the Hebrues For although besides this visible world there bee other creatures of God and those also many very excellent beutifull as are the Angels and the seates of the Sainctes and blessed men and this name vniuersalitie seemeth to bee an arrogant and bold name yet all men knowe in what sense they call it so and how wee ought to vnderstand it to wit that the worlde is an vniuersalitie not of all Gods creatures but of those onely that can bee seen and are corporall S. Hetherto concernyng the name of the world now let vs come to the thing it self M. Yes for so the order of the disputation requireth The. x. Chapter Whether the worlde and the thinges that are conteined therein bee sound bodies or certeine shadowes onely S. WHat things therfore may there bee taught out of holie Scripture concernynge the world M. Many thinges truelie and those all moste woorthy too bee knowne whiche apperteine too the praise and admiration of God the Creatour wherof some declare the nature of the world and othersome the causes of it S. Whiche bee they that declare the nature of the world and of this whole vniuersalitie M. Those questions for the most part whiche are diuersly tossed either by Heretikes or by Philosophers S. Which is the first of them M. Whether this world and the thinges therein conteined bee substances that is to say certaine sound bodies and natures truelye and in deede subsisting or whether thei bee certeine shadowes onely and the representations and images of thinges S. How should they bee so M. Bicause not onely Plato will haue all thinges that are here to bee the images of certein ideae or patterns and the shadowes onely of true natures whiche are in heauen and remaine in Gods minde but also the Valentinian heretikes contend that whatsoeuer thinges are in this world are onely the meere imagies of their Eternities and representations and transitorie shadowes of them In confirmation of whiche their opinion they alleage the testimonie of S. Paule the 1. Epistle the 7. chap. and 31. verse to the Corinthians The figure of this world saith hee passeth away as though they were but vaine shewes and no sound bodies whatsoeuer thinges wee beeholde here with our eyes what manner thing that was which the Poet described in these woordes And but his learned guide instruct hym did to let go by Those flittering teÌ„der fourmes not to touch those shapes that fly Whiche nothing bin but life and substance none but likenesse thin Hee would with them haue fought and did in vaine to beate beegin S. Can you answere vnto this M. Yea. S. How I praie you M. Firste as touching Plato let vs bid hym farewell for that hee is not onely an Academike and doubtfull of minde and vncertein in euery thing but also an Ethnike and nothing beelonging vnto vs Christians for the thinges that are without beelong not vnto vs as S. Paule sayeth But as touching the Valentinians who would bee called Christians they are sufficiently confuted and most sharply reprooued by S. Ireneus in the 2. booke and 7. chap.
a mans children or sunnes are beegotten of the fathers seede and substance Moreouer whatsoeuer is said to spring and come of another ought not by and by to be called the sunne of that from whiche it springeth For Lice doe breede out of a mannes fleshe yet are thei not called the sunnes of men or of their fleshe To cōclude since the comparison and respecte of GOD vnto the worlde is rather like the woorkeman to the woorke than like the Father to the Sunne truely the worlde may bee termed the woorke and perfected labour of God but by no meanes called his Sunne The. xxi Chapter What God created first to bee the matter for thinges that were created afterward S. HEtherto you haue discoursed of the efficiēt cause now saye sumwhat concernyng the materiall cause of the world M. What matter can I name vnto you since there was none at all as I haue sufficiently disputed and proued beefore as this woord Create declareth if you haue regarde to it owne proper signification Neither do I thinke it woorth the traueill to confute the opinions of the Philosopers who haue almoste euerie one of them stūbled at this block or else to conuince the heresie of the Hermogenians who reuoked that errour whiche was nowe long since extinguished in the Churche of God out of the scooles and opinions of the Stoikes and chose rather to learne how the world beegan at the handes of naturall Philosophers than of true Christians and out of Gods woord Al whose argumentes Tertullian hath confuted in a noble and profitable woorke whiche is now abroade in mens handes and is most worthie to bee read S. I doe not require after that which was not but this rather whether that among those thinges whiche God created of nothing there were any thing disposed prepared and brought foorth that afterward serued the turne and stoode in steede in the creation of other things out of which God did afterward facion and fourme al thinges else that remained to be made M. You mooue mee to enter into a difficult question which consisteth both of like number of weightie reasons and of auctorities of graue writers For among the learned auctours some thinke that Heauen and earth of whiche in the 1. chapt of Genesis and 1. verse it is writen In the beginnyng God made heauen and earth were made by God of nothyng howbeit first and before all thinges to the intent that they might be the prepared matter of all other thinges that were to be afterward created And therfore they say that God did nothyng the other daies following but onely distinguysh this matter and masse which was first confusedly brought foorth and conteined in it the seedes of all other thinges into the proper kindes and elementes and that euerie thing should be trimmed foorth in it owne kind and gouerned by it owne lawe Other dooe suppose otherwise that these thinges were only set downe in the beginning as it were in maner of a preface or supposition of some discourse that should ensue to the end that the summe of the whole matter following might be the better vnderstoode and the boundes of so great a frame as the world is bee drawne foorth In like maner cunning Carpenters when they are about to build some goodly and large house they firste drawe out a platfourme in certeine proportions and lines conteining the fourme of the whole woork that shal bee to the intent they may point out and place the other roomthes of the buildyng within that circuite so conteine themselues within those limites Thus say they heauen and earth are proposed by Moses and that in the beeginning of his Narration to the ende wee might vnderstande what limites the discription following and the whole woorke should haue Like as he also repeateth again those limites after the narration of the creation concludeth the whole woorke whiche hee set foorth after the same manner Genesis the 2. chapter and 1. verse Wherefore In the beginnyng God created heauen and earth that is to saye firste of all the summe of all Gods woorkes is layd beefore vs to bee thought on Moreouer Ireneus in his 2. booke the 10. 11. and 16. chapters sheweth that GOD is not like men as not hauing neede of any matter that hee had created or prepared before hand to finish or make his other woorkes of S. Howe then doe you thinke otherwise M. Truely the interpretation and opinion of the fyrste sorte seemeth vnto mee the more probable which hold that the heauen and earth in suche maner as thei are there spoken of were firste created by GOD of nothing howbeit as it were a rude matter of the whole woorke and bewtie that shoulde folowe out of which God by his mightie power brought foorth all the residue Although almightie God lacked no matter to create firste heauen and earth with all neither yet to bring forthe the woorkes of the other daies like as at this day also he needeth not the seede of man to bryng foorth men of if hee lust to doe otherwise notwithstanding in these questions wee must not enquire how much hee was able to doe sayeth S. Augustine in his 2. booke de Genesi but rather what the course of nature in things will suffer and what his pleasure is and what hee hath reuealed vnto vs by his woorde Neither doth this mine opinion want iust and sufficient confirmation either of the auctoritie of men or of reason And as for auctoritie there is none against mee seeing bothe Philo Iudaeus and the Rabbines commonly and the best learned of the Hebrues doe so expounde that place of Moses yea S. Augustine also oftentimes as in the 5. booke de Ge nesi ad Literam the 3. and 5. chapters and the 1. booke the 5. chapter S. Ambrose likewise in Examero and S. Chrysostome and S. Basile with others S. But can you confirme your opinion by any reason M. Yea by twaine And the first is that this exposition doth very well agree with Moses woordes and order and againe that it seemeth to be plainly confirmed by this woord Beeginning and the signification therof For a beeginning is sayd in comparison of other thinges And therefore to the intent hee might shewe how all other thinges were made afterwarde out of those twayne Moses plainly vseth this preface to wit that the same heauen and the same earth were created in the beeginning that is to saye beefore all the other woorkes that God made and also to the vse of all the other that is to saie from whence afterward the residue were taken and as it were made The very footsteppes as it were of whiche opinion howbeeit the trueth beeyng now and then manifestly intercepted do appeare to be exstant in Hesiodus in his Theogonia and Ouid also in that place of the firste booke of his Metamorphosis which is so well knowne Beefore the Sea and Earth c. This reason also may bee alleaged that the thing itself and specially
them somewhat and sum while that they cannot plainely be seene of many Howbeit they do not altogither obscure or wholy take awaie y appearing of those the vertues of God which he hath imprinted in his woorkes And moreouer forasmuch as these confusions as you terme them are the effectes of his iust iudgement if wee so consider of them as wee ought surely they shall the more set foorth the power and wisedome of God and not obscure it The xxxii Chapter What knowledge of God may bee had by the beeholdinge of this worlde S. BUT that knowledge of God which maye bee hadde by beeholding the worlde and the visible creatures is it sufficient of it selfe to get the perfect vnderstanding of him or rather doeth it conteine and deliuer vnto vs certeine principles thereof which wee must more perfectly and at full afterward seeke and learne by some other meanes to wit out of the woorde of God which is written and reuealed vnto vs For by the framinge and creation of the world wee cannot knowe that Christ is our Sauiour and mediatour vnto God for vs. M. You saye well For Sainct Paule aunswereth in the Epistle to the Romanes the 1. chapter and 20. verse that although the knowledge which is had by the worlde bee trewe yet is it not fully sufficient that thereby wee may vnderstande anye thing concerning our saluation through Christ but that it is in this respecte profitable that therby wee are made vnaccusable For it teacheth vs that God is our Creatour but it is not able to enfourme vs y he is also our redeemer thorow Christe For wee are not able to atteine to that knowledge without the preachinge of the Gospell Wherefore wee must not begin with that knowledge of God whereby wee vnderstande that hee is our sauiour but rather that hee is our creatour whereat wee must indeede beeginne and consequently proceed vnto better and higher things For the Heathen people Philosophers who chiefly folowed this knowledge of Naturall thinges neyther perceiued they the reason of mans saluation which is in Christ onely neither were thei theÌ„selues saued bicause they lacked faith It profiteth notwithstanding and it mutch profiteth too that wee seeke the true God that hath created all these thinges and when wee haue founde hym that wee woorship hym and praye vnto hym as farre as hee shall giue vs grace so to doe This much at the leastwise hee wringeth from vs whether wee will or no that he ought both to bee sought and worshipped who hath first created and now gouerneth al this world Wherfore if we neither seeke him neither woorship hym hee maketh vs vnexcusable S. But there bee many that either haue not seene at all that way of finding out God or when they were entred haue not perceiued that glorie of God whereof you spake or else by how muche the more they haue profited in the knowledge of this world and naturall thinges so muche the more securely and boldly haue they dispised God like as in times past did the Epicurian Philosophers and at this day also to many doe M. These are the greate imperfections and vices of men whiche you speake of and a sharpe accusation of the wonderfull frowardnes of mans nature not the woorkmans fault or want of the light of Gods glorie whiche shineth most brightly in his woorkes For that light shineth clearely enough in this world and in sutch sorte as it cannot bee put out and also is easily seene whoso will lift vp his eyes vnto it and looke vpon it For God hath engrauen in the world greate and wonderfull tokens of his goodnes power and wisedome hee layeth also beefore our eyes most manifest testimonies and documentes that may bee vnderstoode yea by the most ignorant persons Whiche whoso doeth not see let hym accuse hym selfe or his owne sluggishnes and not the hardnes of the booke which God hath sayd before our eyes or the difficultie of the style thereof or the dimnesse of the looking-glasse whiche indeede wee haue a most bright one in the contemplation of this worlde For the 19. Psalme doth sufficiently remooue this slaunder from God and his woorkmanship saiyng that hee hath founded his trueth in the heauens Psalme 89. and 3. verse Who hath distinguished and depainted with liuely colours the other argumentes and tokens of his praise in them as it were by a certein ingrauyng Therefore in that men of olde times haue not seene so manifest signes of God neither see at this day neither doe profit by them towardes the atteining of the knowledge of God it commeth by meanes of their owne fault who by reason of their sinne haue lost the true light of their myndes whiche if it had continued in the firste state of it owne creation truely then should they haue seen these signes not obscurely and fayntly but acknowledged them plainly and perfectly and confessed them too bee great and wonderfull S. How then commeth it to passe that if this world bee the lookinglasse of so great vertues in God and that so bright and so cleare why in another place is man and why also is Christ called the image of God wherin hee setteth himself downe beefore vs to bee seen and knowne It is in vaine that you tell vs of another lookinglasse if this world bee so faire an one as you make it Câ—lâ—sâ— the 1. chapter and 15. verse M. If wee saye that one thing may haue many images and that in sundrie respectes wee shall not graunt any absurditie So that although these three bee called looking glasses wherin God representeth himfelf yet thei be so called in diuerse respects with a large difference The worlde is not called the image of God which notwithstanding is verified of man Christe for the world is onely the looking glasse of Gods vertues as it is their subiect that is to say that wherein they do expresse and shew themselues by sundry meanes and effectes And man is the image of God and not onely the lookinge glasse of his power but also of his nature after a manner for man of all other creatures of the worlde commeth neerest to the nature of God and caried the very fourme of him in the light of his minde and the vprightnes of his will which was in him at his first creation But Christ who is God manifested in the fleshe who was without sinne in whome the Godhead remained who in his whole life and by al meanes shewed foorth the nature similitude fygure of God through his great power wisedome and clemencie is in a farre more excellent respect the image of God than was the first man althoughe hee were sounde and perfect Wherefore the world hath no such similitude and likelinesse with Christ who is vnto vs not onely the ymage and as it were the shadow of the goodnesse Wisedome and Power of God but also the most bright and selfesame representation of the fathers substance Hebrues the 1. chapter and 3. verse And therefore
vpon Mundaye and so shall you haue sixe daies after which followeth the Sabbath which is the seauenth Thus First Sunday then Munday Tuesdaye Wedensday Thurseday Fryday after which followeth the Seauenth whiche are the Sabbath dayes So that the Lorde began his woorke of creating the worlde vpon Sunday which is confirmed to bee true by a counsell holdeÌ„ in Iudaea as Eusâ—bius writeth in the 5. booke of his historie and the 23. and 25. Chapters S. But in what Moneth seemeth it vnto you that the worlde was made M. I will vtter in this poinct that whiche seemeth vnto mee most likely and I craue pardon herein that no man thinke mee to bee curious notwithstanding I muste needes vtter my minde for that this question is demaunded by many Uerily it semeth vnto mee that the worlde was created in that moneth which is called by the Hebrues Tisri and is answereable partly vnto our moneth of August and partly to September for doubtles it began after the Autumnal or Haruast equinoctium So that I doe nothinge agree vnto those that write suppose that the world was made in the Moneth of March and in the Springe S. Can you confirme your opinion by any reason M. Yea and that by diuerse And not onely this that in the time of Autumne or Haruast the earth is most apt to receiue the seedes of good fruites as of Wheat and Barly and such like For at that time it seemeth most meete and fit to conceiue as in the Springe to bring-foorth fruite and in Summer to yelde them vp and as for winter then the earth digesteth and concocteth the seedes that are coÌ„mitted vnto hir and embracing them in the middes of hir bosome frameth nourisheth them as a mother doeth hir young whiche notwithstanding shee bringeth foorth in the spring tune when they bee sumwhat growne and in Summer is quite delâ—uered of them as beeinge then ripe and perfecte Wherefore the springe and Summer doe seeme rather to bee as it were midwiues to the earth than to minister vnto it any force or vertue to bringe foorth whiche vertue notwithstandinge Autumne yeeldeth vnto the earth as beeing yet mindefull of the first creation of all thinges and of hir owne bringinge foorth of all manner commodities reteininge vnto this present the force effect and power of the auncient commaundement which the Lorde enioyned at that time So y the Hebrues will haue it that this moneth Tisri shall not be so called of must or newe wine but of iuce wherof the earth is full at that season And these bee the two reasons of mine opinion The fyrst for that as the scripture teacheth in the 28. chapter and 9. verse and so folowinge of Leuiticus this moneth hath beene alwayes since the firste age of man as farre as euer there can bee had any remembrance the beeginninge of the yeare and first moneth And therefore in contractes and bargaines in coÌ„mon and priuate affaires and to bee briefe in supputation of the yeares and age of the worlde which was done by the yeares of Iubilee the yeare euer beegan in this moneth among the auntient Fathers in old time and among the Jewes and ended also in the same So that the yeares age of Adam and the residue of the Fathers whiche liued both beefore the floude and since are to bee reckened from this moneth The seconde reason is this For that the feast of Trumpettes which God commaunded to bee kept vpon the first daye of this moneth seemeth to haue beene specially instituted by God to the intente that the remembraunce of the first originall and creation of the worlde whiche was doone vppon that day might bee holily preserued continued in the Church Truely it was not in vaine that the Lord would haue that day kept holy so great honour reuereÌ„ce attributed vnto these trumpettes Instruments whiche wee reade at that time were so tossed blowne But by that great and pleasant sownd hee ment to admonish and put in remeÌ„braunce men the whole world also of their first natiuitie which as by the special prouision of God it fell vpon the firste daye of this moneth so was it godlily and reuerently renued and remembred in the Church that the world might not bee ignorant of it owne byrth daye Whereby also it came to passe that God coÌ„maunded many feastes and holidaies to bee kept in the seauenth moneth which moneth was called also Aetanim that is to saye the Moneth of strength or strong thinges 1. Kinges the 8. chap. and 2. verse Yea some saye also that our Sauiour Christ was borne the same moneth and not without some reason S. But it is saide in the 12. Chapter and 1. verse of Exodus that Nisan was the first moneth of the yeare answering vnto our monethes of March and April and falling in the Uernall or Springe equinoctium M. You say well But therevnto I answere two waies First that Nisan or March was not alwayes the beeginning of the yeere but at length after that the children of Israell returned out of Egyt in the remeÌ„brance of so great a benefite that is to say for the conseruation of the memorie of the newe founding restoaringe of that people Moreouer Nisan was not the beeginning of the yeere for all things that were done among the people of God but onely in respect of their holie festiuall daies and of the tabernacle For the tabernacle as it had it owne peculiare reuolution and differinge from the common so had it also a proper beginninge of the yeere not agreeing with the order of the Politike yeere to the intent that men mighte knowe that there was a difference too bee put beetweene the Politike and Ecclesiastical gouernment and that the reason of them both is diuerse and their nature separate and distinct S. How many yeeres doe you now accoumpt since the world was first made M. As some doe suppose since the tyme that the worlde was made vnto this present yeere 1578. wherin this booke was written are about 5298. yeeres S. Howe doe you beegin this number or by what meanes doe you gather it M. Euen by this short reckninge FroÌ„ the creation of the world vnto the generall diluge whiche happened in the daies of Noe are numbred in the Historie of the holy Scriptures 1656. yeeres And from the diluge vnto the promise whiche God made firste vnto Abraham and his departing vpon commaundment out of Vr a Citie of the Chaldees and Charris a citie of Mesopotamia are 427. yeeres And from that promise vnto the departure of the children of Israell out of the land of Egypt which was vnder Moses are 430. yeeres as it is written in the 12. chapter and 40. verse of Exodus And from the departure out of the land of Egypt vnto the beginning of the building of Salomons temple which was begun the fourth yeere of Salomons reigne are 480. yeeres as it appeareth the 1. Kinges and 6. chap. And from that tyme