judge hardly But the natural result of what he argues is as I told you He doth not think that Iohn was on the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. keeping the Anniversary of Christs Incarnation nor of his Resurrection No more do I. But why not Because saith he he may say as in the case of Moses's dead body No man knows of his Sepulchre to this day Now as to the Incarnation I am apt to think that no man doth At this day know certainly either on what day of the Year or what day of the Week Christ was born nor is it any matter whether we do or no. But I should rather say no man knows At this day than as he no man knoweth To this day as if no man hitherto had known it for certainly there have been those who knew it heretofore while he was alive though it be now forgotten and at this day no man knows it But will he say so as to the Resurrection I think it is plain that Christ was Crucified on the fourteenth day lay in the Grave the fifteenth and rose again the sixteenth day of the first month And that he rose on the first day of the week no man doubts He should rather have put it thus As no man knows To this day where is the Body of Moses that it might not be worshiped So no man knows At this day which is the Seventh in course from the Creation that we might not contend about it However I am contented to admit if that will please him that the Lords day there mentioned was neither meant of Christmass-day nor Easter-day nor Whit-sunday nor the day of Iudgment but think it to be meant of the first day of the week which is the Christian Sabbath Not of any of those other days mentioned nor of the Iewish Sabbath as he would have it 'T is I think a new notion of his own at least I know none other of his mind that it should be meant of the Iewish Sabbath He grants there is nothing from the Circumstances of the place to determine it to this day Nor doth he pretend to shew that the Jewish Sabbath was ever so called But he thinks it might have been so called For he says God blessed and sanctified the seventh day that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour therefore it might have been called the Lords day and so may as well the Christian Sabbath as the Iews Sabbath That the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath day And so he is of every day in the Week and of the Christian Sabbath when that is the Sabbath as well as of the Iewish That the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord our God that is the Seventh day after Six days of Labour but whether the Seventh day in course from the Creation is no where said That Isai. 58. 13. The Sabbath is called my holy day True on what ever day the Sabbath be First or Seventh of the Week or whatever day God appoints to be kept Holy As for instance the first and seventh day of the Feast of Unleavened bread Ex. 12. 16. The First day shall be a Holy Convocation and the Seventh day shall be a Holy Convocation and each of them was the Lords Holy day on what ever day of the week they happened And the like for other days So Levit. 23. 2 4 7 8 21 24 25 27 28 30 32 35 36 39. and Num. 28. 18 25 26. Num. 29. 1 7 12 35. All the days here mentioned are the Lords Holy days yet I do not take any of them to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And all he can pretend to from these or whatever he produceth is no more but that the Iewish Sabbath while it was the Sabbath might have been so called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day he doth not pretend to shew that ever it was so called Now I would desire this Gentleman if he can but a little while lay aside his prejudice to consider first that the Lords day was the proper name of a day whereby it might be known as distinguished from other days else to what purpose is it said I was in the spirit on the Lords day whereas the proper name of the Iewish Sabbath and of that onely as he would have us think p. 64. was the Sabbath day and there is no appearance of reason why if he meant that day he should not rather have said I was in the spirit on the Sabbath day or the seventh day This therefore must needs be meant of some other day known by another name 2. I would have him next consider that the Lord in the Old Testament is the usual name of God indefinitely without particularizing this or that of the Three persons and the Sabbath of the Lord thy God doth not appropriate it to the second Person more than to the first and third And though I do not deny that our Christ was the God who gave the Ten Commandments for all the three Persons are the same God yet I do not think it to be Christ onely as contradistinguished to the other two And when it is said I am the Lord thy God thou shall have no other God but me the meaning is not I the second Person am so the Lord thy God that thou shalt own no other Person for thy God beside me the second Person But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lord in the New Testament is for the most part applied peculiarly to our Lord Christ God and Man and is understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him As he is called elsewhere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Son of Man And accordingly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be a day peculiarly appropriate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to our Lord Christ which the Jewish Sabbath was not nor that of the Fourth Commandment which is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God that is of God indefinitely for 't is in that notion that God speaks in the Ten Commandments not as one person contradistinct to the other two It is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day in a like sense as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cup of the Lord the Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10. 21 22. 1 Cor. 11. 27. In all which by the Lord is meant the Lord Christ God and Man And because there being a double Sabbath then in use the Iewish Sabbath and the Christian Sabbath and the word Sabbath indefinitely having been a long time applied to the Iewish Sabbath and would be apt to be understood of it therefore by way of distinction that of the Christians though a Sabbath also within the sense of the Fourth Commandment was called the Lords day as being the Day or Sabbath appropriate to our Lord Iesus Christ. And therefore when he tells us so often the World was made by our Lord Iesus Christ and the Law given on Mount Sinai by our Lord
Iesus Christ upon which Notions he seems to lay great stress though it be nothing to the purpose I think it is a mistake For our Lord Iesus Christ is God and Man but he was not God and Man when the World was made or the Law given but onely God 'T is true Christ as God according to his Divine Nature is the same God who made the World and gave the Law for we have no other God but one but not as God and Man For Man he was not at that time but in the fulness of time became Man The Sabbath of the Lord our God in the fourth Commandment with equal respect to all the Three Persons doth not signify the same as The Sabbath of our Lord Iesus Christ God and Man The Lord our God there not the same with our Lord Iesus Christ in the New Testament But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Supper is the Supper of our Lord Iesus Christ God and Man the Founder of our Christian Religion And accordingly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day is the day of our Lord Iesus Christ a day appointed by him 3. I would have him consider further that the Lords day dominica or dies dominicus hath been all along in all ages of the Christian Church used as the proper name of what we otherwise call the Christian Sabbath and not for the proper name of any other day and therefore till somewhat do appear to the contrary I shall take it to be the same with what is called the Lords day in Scripture There is in the New Testament a place called Rome and there is at this day a place in Italy called Rome and which hath been so called all along ever since neither do I know of any other eminent place of called Therefore till somewhat do appear to the contrary I shall presume our Rome to be the same place with that which in the New Testament is called Rome We find in scripture there is an Island of the Mediterranean Sea called Melita or Malta where St. Paul suffered Ship-wrack not far from another Island called Crete Now we know also there is in the Mediterranean Sea an Island called Malta at this day and another not far from thence called Crete or Candy and we do not know of any other Islands so called then or at any time since and therefore we may safely presume till somewhat do appear to the contrary that those Islands now so called are the same Islands with those which were then so called And in like manner that Day which hath been ever since called the Lords-day as by its proper name we may and ought to presume to be the same day which was by St. Iohn so called as by its proper name in Rev. 1. 10. when he wrote the Book of the Revelation till it can be shewed that he did by that name mean some other day And we have the more reason so to presume because we find it so called by others very soon after St. Iohn's time and by those whom we have great reason to believe to have been well acquainted with St. Iohn's meaning and his manner of speech The first I shall name is St. Ignatius who was not onely Contemporary with St. Iohn but was a Disciple or Scholar of St. Iohn Now St. Iohn according to the best account we can have from Chronology wrote his Revelation in Patmos whither he was banished by Domitian in or about the year of our Lord 96 after which he wrote his Gospel upon his return from Patmos to Ephesus And Died in the Year 98 or 99 under Trajanus And Ignatius died a Martyr under the same Emperour Trajan in the Year of our Lord 107. So that there is no great distance in time And if we should miss a year or two it is not material How long before his death Ignatius wrote his Epistle to the Magnesians we are not sure nor is it material Now in that his Epistle to the Magnesians even according to the genuine Edition published by Bishop Usher out of an ancient Manuscript not that which is justly suspected to be interpolated he doth earnestly exhort them not to Iudaize but to live as Christians Si enim usque nunc secundum Iudaismum vivimus confitemur gratiam non recepisse And as to the Sabbath in particular Non amplius Sabbatizantes sed secundum Dominicam viventes in qua vita nostra orta est Not any longer observing the Iewish Sabbath but the Lords Day on which Christ our Life 〈…〉 is manifest therefore that within 8 or 10 years after 〈…〉 writing the Lords day did not signify the Jewish Sabbath but the first day of the week on which our Saviour Rose again and that it was then observed in contradistinction to the Jewish Sabbath I forbear to mention his Epistle ad Trallianos where again we have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 applied to the first day of the week on which Christ rose again because it is in that Edition which is suspected to be Interpolated I might to this add the Testimony of Polycarp who was also a Disciple of St. Iohn and collected and published these Epistles of Ignatius and may be presumed to understand what St. Iohn meant by the Lords day But I shall add in the next place that of Iustin Martyr whom though I cannot call a Disciple of St. Iohn because he was not converted to the Christian Religion till about the Year of our Lord 129 about Thirty years after St. Iohn's Death yet he lived so soon after that he could not be ignorant of the Christians Practise and what they understood St. Iohn to mean by the Lords Day And how that day was observed in Iustin's time he tells us in what is called his Second Apology 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and a little after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On that day commonly called Sunday there is held a Congregation or a general Meeting together of all Inhabitants whether of City or Country and there are publickly read the Memorials or Monuments of the Apostles or the Writings of the Prophets c. And again The day called Sunday we do all in common make 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the meeting-Meeting-day for that the First-day is it on which God from Darkness and Matter made the World and our Saviour Iesus Christ did on the same day rise from the dead In which places though it be not called dominica but dies solis yet how it was then solemnly observed in memory of our Lord Christs Resurrection is evident 'T is manifest therefore that the Lords day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominica or Dies Dominicus was the known name of a day so called when St. Iohn wrote his Revelation That it was a day of Religious Worship contradistinguished to that of the Iewish Sabbath so observed and so called by St. Iohn's Disciple Ignatius within 8 or 10 years at most after St. Iohn's writing that Book Which he would not have done if he
cases than in all other Prudential Acts. So when the Fourth Commandment requires us to keep holy the Sabath-day it may yet in many cases depend much upon Prudence or Humane Laws which day shall be reputed the Sabbath And if this Author tell us it must be the Seventh in course from the Creation We are never a whit the nearer For though he take great pleasure on all occasions to exclaim against Tradition yet he must admit a great deal of Tradition to intervene before he can prove this or that day to be a Seventh in course from the Creation I am apt to think also that when he hath well consider'd the case of Sr. Francis Drake and many more since that time who sailing round the world as he did have lost a day he will come to one of these two Resolutions Either that when he comes back to England he must continue to call that Saturday which on his account was so and then his saturday-Saturday-Sabbath will be the same with our Sunday Or else that his account must be somewhere rectified in his Voyage by skipping a day and then and there beginning to call Sunday what just before he was to call Saturday Now because there is nothing in Nature to determine where this must be nor is there any thing of divine Institution that I know of to determine where it shall be It seems to me to be Prudential or most rational if nothing intervene to counterbalance it to be at what we call the first Meridian from whence we reckon the Degrees of Longitude East-ward 1 2 3 c. and so onward till we come round to 360 at the same Meridian again and thence begin to reckon onward 1 2 3 c. as before for another round This first Meridian in Ptolemy's time was accounted to be about the Western part of the African shore as being the most Western part of the World then known Of later times Geographers have been pleased to remove it more West about the Islands called Azores or the Flemish Islands But all agree to place it between our Continent and that of America And if from that Meridian from whence we reckon the beginning of Longitude we reckon also the beginning of Days then the last of Saturday must there end and the first of Sunday must there begin And therefore at that Meridian the sailers round the World should rectify their account calling it Saturday on the one side of it and Sunday on the other that being the latest of Saturday and the soonest of Sunday He will tell me perhaps that by this account if We keep our Sabbath on Sunday those in New-England must be said to keep theirs on Monday as being on the other side of that Meridian And 't is true it would so follow And therefore I did interpose if nothing else do intervene to counterbalance it And this is what I did at first intimate as disputable whether we and they in New-England are to be said to keep our Sabbath on the same day But it is the same case as to the whole Continent of America And the same resolution will reach all And therefore the thing being once settled by the common consent of all I would by no means advise to change the day For the placing the first Meridian is purely Arbitrary It might as well have been placed beyond America if men had so pleased and that America had been known in Ptolemy's time as on this side And we might have numbred our Degrees of Longitude Westward as now we do Eastward And may be so reputed now if men so please as it is now reputed about 10 or 15 degrees more to the Westward than it was in Ptolemy's days And it is purely Arbitrary where to begin to change the name of the day which is to be so called whether at the First Meridian or else-where And consequently 't is purely Arbitrary or Discretional whether in America such day shall be called Sunday or Monday There is nothing in the fourth Commandment nor in the Word of God to determine it But it so happening that America hath been peopled from Europe traveling Westward from hence without taking notice that we cross the first Meridian we have reckoned the days and so named them according as they appeared to those upon their Voyage who went thither Whereas if it had been peopled I mean as to the Christians there from Asia and the East-Indies by people coming thence to the other side of America what there is now called Sunday would for the like reason have been called Monday and the Fourth Commandment equally observed either way And upon a like account Christians in the East-Indies and in China and Iapan traveling Eastward from hence thither do call their days there according as they appeared to fall out to them in the course of their Voyage Now 't is true that some part of the day which we here call Sunday is coincident with some part of what is so called in Iapan and also some part of our Sunday though not the same part is coincident with part of theirs in America But very little of theirs in the East of Iapan with theirs in the West of America About Eleven a clock at night in the one or yet later before it begins to be one a clock in the morning in the other scarce an hour in common according to our ancient Maps Our later Maps make it somewhat more as if it might be Ten at night in the one when it begins to be Two in the morning at the other Yet these pass for the same sunday And 't is well enough so to reckon But it is Prudentially so Because the chief Trade and intercourse of America is with Europe not with Asia And therefore it is considered as lying West from Europe rather than as East from Iapan And accordingly it is so placed in our Maps And though we continue to reckon our Longitude as from a Meridian between Us and America yet the account of our days we begin as from a Meridian beyond it between America and Asia Which is not said to raise new scruples as if I would advise an alteration of a received computation which is well enough as it is and I know not how to mend it But to shew there is an unavoidable Necessity of leaving much to Prudential considerations What day shall be reputed sunday and what the sabbath in this or that place And therefore it cannot reasonably be thought the design of the fourth Commandment to confine us to such Circumstantial Niceties which do not at all influence the substantials of Worship The fourth Commandment requires the seventh day of Holy Rest after six days of ordinary Labour But of a Seventh day in course from the Creation to be so observed it saith nothing Nor is it possible for us to know The Iews observed a seventh day in course from the first raining of Manna but I do not know how that concerns us or if it did how we shall know which is that day for this Gentleman will not allow Tradition to be a good proof We observe a seventh day in course from what we think the Apostles did observe If we mistake our reckoning which I think we do not it is not a Culpable Ignorance for it is according to the best Light we have This day we are in possession of and the Christian Church hath so been for many Hundred years And he that would dispossess us of it must shew a better Title The old rule is Possidentis potior est ratio To change meerly for change sake is Foolish If he would lay a Divine Necessity on us to observe the Iewish Sabbath from the first raining of Manna if at least that be the day by them observed in our Saviours time he must make it clear to us which is that day by a better argument if he can than Tradition And that we are of necessity obliged to that day which was himself acknowledges a distinctive sign of them from other Nations as Circumcision also was And if this distinctive mark when the partition wall is broken down do as much cease as that did 'T is as truly superstition now to put a necessity upon it as upon Circumcision Which though the Apostles would for a while permit to the Jews to whom it had once been a Law till they should be better satisfied Yet would by no means allow to the Gentiles to whom it had not before been a Law And I think the case is just the same of the Iewish Sabbath as contradistinguished to the Lords day I am Yours c. FINIS
A DEFENSE OF THE Christian Sabbath In Answer to A TREATISE of Mr. Tho. Bampfield Pleading for SATURDAY-SABBATH BY IOHN WALLIS D. D. And Professor of Geometry in the University of OXFORD OXFORD Printed by L. Lichfield and are to be Sold by Chr. Coningsby at the Golden Turks-Head over against St. Dunstan's Church in Fleet-street LONDON 1692. Imprimatur IONATH EDWARDS Vice-Can OXON Sep. 17 t. 1692. A DISCOURSE Concerning The Christian Sabbath SIR Iune 12. 1692. I Had a while since a Book sent me by the Carrier I know not well from whom of Mr. Thomas Bampfield which in the Title-Page is said to be Printed for the Author 1692. It is Concerning the Sabbath Which he thinks should rather be Observed on what we call Saturday than on what we call Sunday I should not on this Account give any Disturbance to the Peace or Practise of the Church where I live so that a Sabbath be duly Observed as to the Substantials of it though perhaps not upon what day I should chuse For I do not know and I believe no man living can tell me whether what we now call Sunday be a First a Second a Third or a Seventh day in a continued Circulation of Weeks from the Creation And what it is impossible for me to know I think will be no Crime to be Ignorant of Nor hath this Author any other way than common Tradition on which he is not willing that we should lay weight whereby to guess which is the First or which is the Seventh day in such a Circulation of Weeks either from the Creation or even from Christ's Time I am sufficiently satisfied that we ought to keep a Sabbath that is a day of Holy Rest after Six days of ordinary Labour according to the Fourth Commandment and this in a continued Course or Circulation But I am not certain nor can I be which is a First or a Seventh day in such a Circulation of Weeks from the Creation And therefore shall content my self to observe that day which I find observed in the Church where I live In Old England I observe the Sabbath which here I find And if I were in New-England I would observe the Sabbath which I find observed there Though I think it may be disputable whether they and we may be said to observe the same day the First Meridian passing between them and us And yet I would not advise to have it changed in either Now I can hardly think that God hath laid the great stress of so weighty a Point as whereon the main of Gods publick Worship doth much depend on such a Circumstance as is impossible for us to know and of which we may be modestly ignorant I should rather think that what Christ says of the Place Ioh. 4. 21 23 The hour cometh when ye shall neither in this Mountain nor in Ierusalem worship the Father but the true worshipers shall worship the Father in Spirit and in Truth is in good measure true of the Time also And as it is not so material whether in this or that Place God be Worshiped so he be Worshiped Aright so neither is it so material whether on this or that day as that a Sabbath or day of Holy Rest be duly kept The publick Worship of God was then in great measure confined to the Temple not indifferently in any place within thy Gates but in the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse to put his name there Deut. 16. 6 11 15 16. For which any other place may now be as well assigned that men pray every where lifting up holy hands c. 1 Tim. 2. 8. Privately in private places and Publickly in places appointed for the publick And I do not think we are now more confined to the Iewish Sabbath than to the Iewish Temple This premised I can agree with this Author in many things by him discussed I agree that Our Lord Iesus Christ according to his Divinity was God and is so the true God the God that made Heaven and Earth the God who delivered the Law upon Mount Sinai For though we do acknowledge in the Godhead a Trinity of Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost whereof Christ according to his Divinity is called the Second Person the Son of God or God the Son yet those Three Persons are but One God Nor do I know any other true God but One The God that made Heaven and Earth The Lord Iehovah The God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob The Lord God of Israel The Lord their God who brought them out of the Land of Egypt out of the House of Bondage and besides whom we are to have no Other God The God who delivered the Law to them on Mount Sinai And I do agree that Our Lord Iesus Christ is as to his Divinity this God the True God the onely true God and that he was so before his Incarnation How far each of those Actions are to be ascribed to this or that Person of the Trinity we need not be over solicitous What in the New Testament is more peculiarly ascribed to this or that of the Three Persons is in the Old Testament wont to be ascribed to God indefinitely without such particular application the doctrine of the Trinity being then not so distinctly discovered But I cannot agree that Christ as God and Man in contradistinction to the Father and Holy Ghost did all those things for he was not then Man I agree with him also that God who made the World in Six days Rested the Seventh day Gen. 2. 23. Exod. 20. 11. And that he Blessed the Sabbath day and Hallowed it And that accordingly he hath appointed after Six days of ordinary Labour Man should observe a Seventh day of Holy Rest and this in a continued succession But I should rather say that our Lord Iesus Christ is according to his Divinity that God who Blessed the Seventh day Gen. 2. than that the God who Blessed the Sabbath day is the Lord Iesus Christ as he doth p. 64. and elsewhere very often seeming to lay great stress upon it For he was not then the Lord Christ God and Man nor did he bless it as Christ but as God in Union with the Father and Holy Ghost not as contradistinguished from them I agree also that the Law of the Sabbath is one of the Decalogue or Ten Commandments delivered to Israel on Mount Sinai Ex. 20. But I am willing to think it was a Law before Not only because we find it observed Exod. 16. before the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai Ex. 20. but especially because of that in Gen. 2. 3. God blessed the Seventh day and Sanctified it because in it he rested from all his Work And those who are most averse to the Morality as it is wont to be called or the Perpetuity of the Sabbath or Day of Holy Rest and are yet very zealous for the Holiness of Places would be very fond of it if they could find so clear
the whole time of those Assemblings employed in Religious Exercises Preaching Celebrating the Sacrament Instructing and Blessing his Disciples and giving them Commission for Preaching the Gospel and Planting the Christian Church And again with the same Disciples on that day sen-night assembled with them and in like manner employed It was specially signalized also by the Miraculous Effusion of the Holy Ghost on that day in a great assembly of Iews and Gentiles on the day of Pentecost and the day employed in Preaching and other Religious exercises It was observed in like manner at Troas in preaching the Word Celebrating the Sacrament and other Religious Communion as things there usual on that day It was observed at Corinth not once onely but as a thing of course and so presumed by the Apostle when he gives particular Instructions concerning a Collection for the Saints to be made weekly on that day And in like manner in the Churches of Galatia with a like direction to them And we have no reason to suspect but that in other Churches also there was a like custome of observing that day And it is the onely day of the week unless the Seventh-day in order to the Iewish Sabbath that is so much as Mentioned by name after the Resurrection of Christ. At least I do not at present remember the Second Third Fourth Fifth or Sixth day of the week by name so mentioned Now what we have reason to believe was so generally observed after the Resurrection by Christ himself more than once by his Apostles and by the Christian Churches in their days we have reason to believe was according to Christs direction For we know very well that Christ did after his resurrection give commandments to the Apostles about things pertaining to the kingdome of God and â—â—â—â—ling the Christian Church What those Commandments were in particular we cannot tell but are to presume that what they did therein was pursuant of those commands and this in particular about observing the first day of the week which we call the Christian Sabbath And which in contradistinction to the Iewish Sabbath is called the Lords day Rev. 1. 10. And hath accordingly been so called and so observed ever since Which being so practised by the Apostles and so continued ever since I take to be a good warrant for us to continue it as a thing agreeable to the Will of God As to what he so often objects that there is no express command thereof recorded that is not such a command as our Author demands We are not to prescribe to God in what terms he shall make known his Will any more than the Pharisees Mat. 16. 4. were to prescribe to Christ what kind of signs he was to shew to testify his authority 't is sufficient if God do in his own way intimate what is his Will though it be it not with the formality of Be it Enacted And those who are willing to be taught of God will be content so to understand his meaning An approved Practise in the Worship of God frequently Repeated attested by Miracles encouraged by Christs own Example and that of the Apostles and the Christian Churches then and continued in the Christian Church ever since Is to me great evidence of the will of God and that there was a command for it though it be not recorded Like as I believe that there was very early a command from God to worship him by Sacrifice though that Command be not recorded But to that of its being so observed ever since he objects we have nothing but Tradition either that the Christian Sabbath hath been so observed or that it is called the Lords-day And Tradition is what he takes great pleasure to exclaim against If that be admitted saith he where shall we stop Very well I am not over fond of laying too great a weight upon Traditions at least not on all things that are pretended so to be But I pray How can he tell otherwise than by Tradition whether our Saturday or our Sunday be the Seventh day in course from the Creation Or if that be too hard a question whether of the two is the Seventh day of the Iewish week I know nothing but Tradition for it I cannot remember so long Nor have I so long kept so strict account of days as to be sure of it I trust to the common Computation of the world that our Sabbath is a continuation of that Sabbath which the Apostles kept And if so I am safe If not I cannot help it And because I think the Apostles Sabbath was on the first day of the Jewish week therefore I think ours to be so But if theirs was not neither is ours He would not have that of St. Iohn Revel 1. 10. I was in the spirit on the Lords-day to be understood of our Sabbath And why not He tells us 1. Some think it to be Christmass-day 2. Some think it to be Easter-day and 3. Some think it to be the Day of Iudgment And long Discourses we have upon all these Well! But doth he think it to be meant of any of these No. Then to what purpose are these alleged in disparagement of the Christian Sabbath But he seems to have so great displeasure against the Christian Sabbath that whatever he can think of to be Objected though he do not think it to be true he will be sure to Object that he may disparage the Day or perplex the Argument as if he were more concerned to beat down the Christian Sabbath than to set up the Iewish Not considering that by all this he is doing their Work who would have none at all For they know well that the Iewish Sabbath hath been long since laid aside without any great fear of returning and if they can but throw off the Christian Sabbath also 't is what they would have And 't is of a like import what he argues p. 84 for coming to the publick but once a day not twice as our manner is For those who care not to come at all if he dispense with them as to the One they will dispense with themselves as to the Other meeting I should rather think that the whole day being due to the Service of God publick and private it is to be parcelled out as to the number and times of publick meeting as might according to Christian Prudence be judged most conducing in this or that place to those ends and to common Edification and that to make such little Circumstances otherwise than as they conduce to those general ends a matter of Religious Observation or Divine Institution is a like extravagance as that of the Pharisees in laying like weight on their Traditions and that of the Papists on their numerous Superstitious Ceremonies And is as properly superstition as these I do not know this Author who thus argues against observing the Christian Sabbath and against publick meeting on that day more than once And therefore am not willing to
For knowing this to have been a law once and not yet being fully satisfied that it was expired they were content still to observe it And if our Gentleman be of that mind I would not hinder him if a Jew from so doing but neither would I incourage him And I find the Apostles willing to connive at it and even to countenance it Not as a thing necessary but at least allowable And though they did not think fit to bring a new Yoke upon the Gentiles who had not before been obliged to the Jewish Law and therefore would not allow the Gentiles to be Circumcised as appears by S. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians and the Decrees of the Synod at Ierusalem Act. 15. yet he allowed the Iews to practise it to whom it had once been a Law and accordingly Circumcised Timothy Act. 16. because though his Father were a Greek yet his Mother was a Jew but he did not Circumcise Titus Gal. 2. 3. for whom there was not the same reason And he did himself comply with the Iewish ceremonies As Act. 18. 18. Having shorn his head in Canchrea For he had a vow And those of Purification Act. 21. Not that he thought those Laws now obliging but because many of the believing Iews were yet zealous of the Law and thought themselves obliged by it he would not give offense to them For he was satisfied as to himself that Circumcision availeth nothing nor Uncircumcision 1 Cor. 7. 19. Gal. 6. 15. But was content till by time and further instruction they should be better satisfied that each one should be gratified as to their own practise according to their own sentiments as to things yet disputable And accordingly as to eating or not eating things forbidden by Moses's Law his advise was to the Romans many of whom were Jews Rom. 14. 17. Let not him that eateth not judge him that eateth as breaking a Law which he thinks to be yet in force nor let him that eateth despise him that eateth not as a fool that doth not understand his own liberty for the kingdom of God is not meat and drink c. And in like manner those at Ierusalem Act. 15. though they did not think fit to bring a new Yoke of Circumcision upon the Gentiles to whom before it had not been a Law yet do advise them to forbear things strangled and bloud because this had once been a Law to all the Sons of Noah Gen. 9. 4. Not but that this was even now antiquated but to avoid offense because it had once been a Law For I take even those things to fall under these Generals The kingdom of God is not meat and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost Rom. 14. 17. and every creature of God is good 1 Tim. 4. 4. I know and am perswaded that there is nothing unclean of it self But All things indeed are pure Rom. 14. 14 20. Tit. 1. 15. Meat commendeth us not to God for neither if we eat are we the better as making use of our lawful liberty neither if we eat not in compliance with those who be unsatisfied are we the worse 2 Cor. 8. 8. So that the Practise of the Apostles or of the Church at that time in compliance with the Jews as to what had before been a Law but now was not is no argument that the thing was then obligatory as before it had been but onely an argument of their condescension in things of a middle nature rather than to give offense to those who were therein unsatisfied according to that principle of his All things are lawful for me but all things are not expedient 1 Cor. 10. 23. To give no offense either to Iew or Gentile or to the Church of God ver 32 33. To the Iews I became as a Iew To the weak I became as weak I am made all things to all men 1. Cor. 9. 19. In so much that even in those things which he knew to be lawful yet rather than give offense to a weak brother he would forbear If meat make my brother to offend or be an offense to a brother I will eat no flesh while the world standeth left I maâ—â— my Brother to offend And the like I suppose as to the Iewish Sabbath He that regardeth a day regardeth it to the Lord and he that regardeth not the day to the Lord he doth not regard it He that eateth eateth to the Lord for he giveth God thanks and he that eateth not to the Lord he eateth not and giveth God thanks Rom 14. 6. Where 't is manifest that he doth parallel the observing or not observing a day than questionable with the abstaining from meats disputable that is from such as before were unlawful but now ceased so to be though all were not yet therein satisfied And though it be not expresly said what was the Day thus in question yet it is most likely to be that of the Iewish Sabbath For that the first day of the Week or Christian Sabbath was now observed seems very plain and whether the Iewish Sabbath should be observed also was the question And those who were for continuing Circumcision and the Mosaick Ceremonies were doubtless for that also And the Apostles Rule was for a mutual condescension as to the Jews for each to follow their own sentiments therein without censuring one another But as to the Gentiles he seems to be of another mind And therefore to the Galatians who were most of their Gentile-Christians he would not so much as allow the practise of Circumcision which to the Jews he did and tells them that if they be Circumcised Christ profiteth them nothing and he that is Circumcised is debtor to the whole Law Gal. 5. 2 3. For it was a renouncing Christ who had made them Free putting themselves under the Jewish Yoke to which even before they were not subject And therefore to these he speaks more warmly Gal. 1. 6 7. I marvel that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another Gospel Which is not another or there being no other Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where as there is not any other Gospel onely there be some that trouble you and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. And such are those who would bring on them a new Yoke by making that a Duty which God had not made so Where he presseth them to keep close to the Gospel of Christ as by him delivered without any connexion of Moses's Law there being indeed no other Gospel but that and they who teach them otherwise do pervert the Gospel the true Gospel of Christ including no obligation to the Jewish Law either as to Circumcision or the difference of meats or other particulars of that Law as he argues in the second third and fourth Chapters shewing that even those who were before under it are now freed from it and they much more who were never under it And thereupon
them with Bread from Heaven I do presume also that they did from this first raining of Manna continue a circulation of Weeks for a long time and perhaps till the time of our Saviour Yet we are not sure but that it might be intermitted in the seventy years of the Babylonish Captivity and the day forgotten and then restored a-new by Nehemiah from a new beginning Neh. 13. as he restored the Feast of Tabernacles Chap. 8. which had been intermitted from the days of Ioshua the son of Nun to that day But I rather think the memory was preserved by Tradition during those seventy years I agree also that the Church of the Jews was the most visible Church of God but I am loth to say with him p. 79. it was the whole visible Church For I presume there might be many Good men of other Nations who worshiped the true God of whom we have no History though not joined to the Jewish Church nor were that I know of obliged so to be Such was Melchizedek whoever he were not of the seed of Abraham much less of Israel And such was Iob and his Friends from divers Countries of whom were it not for the story of Iob we should have had no knowledge nor are we to think these were the onely persons of those Countries who worshiped the true God And how many such were in other Nations we cannot tell Who might if they had opportunity join as Proselites with the Iewish Church when established But I do not think they were necessarily obliged so to do or to keep the same Sabbath with them For I take it to be true even before Christs coming that God is no respecter of persons but in every nation he that feareth him and worketh righteousness is accepted with him Act. 10. 34 35. Whether Iew or Greek Rom. 2. 10 11. 1 Pet. 1. 17. Which are but Quotations from Deut. 10. 19. Nor do I find that any Nation except the Iews did observe the Iewish Sabbath But I rather take it to be a distinctive sign of them from other Nations Ex. 31. 13 17. as Circumcision and the Pass-over were which when the wall of partition was taken away ceased also Yet as to what was Moral in them the Circumcision of the heart being pointed at by that of the Flesh and the old leaven of malice and wickedness to be put away instead of that of Bread and a rest from Sin of more respect with God than that from Labour we have instead thereof Baptism in the room of Circumcision the Lords Supper in the room of the Pass-over and the Lords Day or Christian Sabbath instead of the Iewish And as that took date from the raining of Manna after their deliverance from Egypt so ours from the Resurrection of Christ the true Manna I agree also that the Apostle and other Christians even after Christs Resurrection did go to the Temple and the Jewish Synagogues on their Sabbath days and did there assist at Prayers and Reading the Law and other services common to Jews and Christians on a like account as when we now meet to hear a Sermon or keep a Fast or Thanksgiving on a Week-day But so they did as to Circumcision and other Iewish Rites As when Paul circumcised Timothy and joined in the Jewish Rites of Purification Act. 21. on account of those believing Iews who were yet zealous of the Law To testify to them that he had been misrepresented by those who said he did teach the Iews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses and that they ought not to circumcise their Children nor to walk after the Customs Whereas indeed he taught that Gentiles ought so to forbear as being a new yoke to which before they were not subject but as to the Iews which were amongst the Gentiles he did allow them if not yet satisfied of their Christian Liberty so to practise For he puts a great difference between the Gentiles and the Iews among the Gentiles of which I doubt our Author doth not take notice else he would not tell us p. 39. of Paul's writing one thing and practising another He preached and wrote against Circumcision as to the Gentiles but allowed it to the Iews and himself practised it As to Timothy a Jew but not as to Titus who was no Iew. And the like we may say as to the Iewish Sabbath on their Seventh day As to what Services were peculiarly Christian as breaking of Bread they did it not at the Temple or Synagogues but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at home or from house to house Act. 2. 46. and on another day the first day of the Week Act. 20. 7. Now this is all that he hath to urge for the Iewish Sabbath in particular which he cannot shew to be commanded to all the World but rather to them in particular in contradistinction to the rest of the World nor that it was a Seventh day from the Creation but from the first raining of Manna For the Fourth Commandment saith nothing of this Sabbath in particular but onely of the seventh day after six days of labour As to that Imperious demand p. 40 48 64. Where is there any such Power recorded in Scripture to be given to any Man or Men whatsoever after Christ had said It is finished to alter the Seventh-day Sabbath instituted by our Lord Iesus Christ I doubt he hath forgotten that the same God who gave the Law of the Ten Commandments gave also the Ceremonial Law and if it were the Lord Iesus Christ who gave the one it was he that gave the other also And will he then ask Where is there any power recorded in scripture to be given to any man or number of men to abolish Circumcision and the rest of the Mosaick Rites instituted by the Lord Iesus Christ I know no such power recorded in Scripture to be given as to Circumcision and the rest more than as to the Iewish Sabbath And we find them both put together Col. 2. 11 16. Or will he say Where is any Power recorded in Scripture to be given to any Man or Men after Christ had said It is finished to appoint Elders and Deacons and other Officers in the Christian Church and give Orders concerning it which Christ before he so said had not given Yet we know Circumcision was abolished and such Officers and Orders given So that all this is but Flourish As to that of Christ having said It is finished whatever be meant by that we know that the whole Order and Constitution of the Christian Church was settled after that time And whatever else be signified by it it is not meant that there was nothing to be done further concerning it For if so to what purpose did Christ give Commandments to his Apostles of things pertaining to the Kingdome of God after his Resurrection if nothing were to be further done And if we consider the Apostles deportment We do not find them any where insist Authoritatively upon
that some of the Heathens as Iuvenal and Lucian do laugh or jeer at the Jewish Sabbath recutitaque Sabbata pallent and therefore did know of the Jewish Sabbath But not that they did observe it or so much as divide their Time by Weeks Now if we should admit that in some Families where the true Worship of God was preserved there be a strong presumption for 't is no more that they did observe a Sabbath that is a Seventh day of Holy Rest after Six days of ordinary Labour yet 't is a question whether that were just the Seventh day in a continual succession of Weeks from the Creation And if at any time there chance to be an intermission and the day forgotten it is impossible without a Miracle or a new Revelation that it can be restored again And if from thenceforth they would again keep a Sabbath as we find the Pass-over was revived by Hezekiah and Iosiah which had been long intermitted 2 Kings 23. and 2 Chr. 25. they must begin at adventure and thence continue it Now if we consider that the true Worship of God was oft reduced to some one family as in the time of Noah and perhaps of Abraham and even that Family sometimes corrupt enough as was that of Nahor from whence Abraham for that reason was removed and that of Laban where Iacob sojourned and how oft also the like happened we cannot tell It was very possible the Sabbath might be neglected as himself observes p. 63 it had been before and under the Captivity for a long time and made a Market-day as well as any other day of the Week like as the Temple was become a Market-place Mat. 21. 12 13. Ioh. 2. 14. 16. As was also the Pass-over in great measure from the time of Samuel till that of Iosiah 2 Chr. 35. 18. And the Feast of Tabernacles from the days of Ioshuah to Nehemiah Neh. 8. 17. And Circumcision for Forty years together in the Wilderness Iosh. 5. 5. Now if Circumcision and the Pass-over and the Feast of Tabernacles were thus neglected when they were at Liberty how much more the Sabbath when they were Bond-men in Egypt of which we have not the least mention from God's keeping a Sabbath Gen. 2. 3. till after Israels coming out of Egypt Exod. 16. Nor is there the least mention as I shew'd but now in any History Sacred or Profane so much as of dividing their time by Weeks all that time nor except that of Israel for many Ages after And though the Sun Moon and Stars Gen. 1. 14. are said to be for Signs and for Seasons for Days and for Years yet not a word is there of Weeks Nor could they indeed by their Motions distinguish Weeks as they do Months and Years And therefore though I find Years and Months to have been observed all the World over long ago yet Weeks no where that I know of ancient times but by the Nation of the Iews onely nor by them before their coming out of Egypt So that though I am willing to think the Sabbath ought to have been observed all that while yet there is too much reason to doubt it was not or if at all not without frequent intermissions which would in this case be fatal Now to argue as he doth that Abel and Enoch and Noah and Abraham were good men and are some of them said to walk with God and to keep his Commandments and therefore may be presumed to have kept a Sabbath is but a weak argument as to matter of Fact and to begg the Question For we are not to think them so good as to be guilty of no failings or omissions The Law of Marriage is certainly as Old if not Older than that of the Sabbath the tenour of which was he tells us p. 62. that they Two should be one flesh not they Three Four or Five yet he tells us also that Polygamy or having many Wives was frequently practised from Lamech to Malachi even by some eminent in the Church at that time and by them he supposeth held to be lawful And it may as well be thought the Law for the Sabbath might sometime within that Two Thousand Five Hundred Years be neglected and forgotten as that of Marriage In a time when there was no writing that we know of to preserve it And if once forgotten it could never as to that Seventh day be recovered And I would ask that Gentleman In case the day should chance to have been sometime forgotten as is very possible and not unlikely and that after such time upon finding the Book of the Law as in Iosiah's time 2 Kings 22. 8. which had been lost it did appear that a Sabbath should have been kept but was not as was there the case of the Pass-over Chap. 23. 21. What doth this Gentleman think in such case should be done Must they never Restore the Sabbath because they do not know the day Or must they begin upon a New Account I should think this latter and that it would be warranted by the Fourth Commandment notwithstanding his Objection No other day but the Seventh from the Creation is Commanded No Promise to the Observance of any other nor Threatning for the Omission Indeed in our days when so great a part of the World reckon by Weeks and we be stored with Astronomical Tables adjusted to the Motions of the Sun Moon and Stars and many Celestial Observations as for Instance that such a Year such a Day of such a Month there was an Eclipse on Monday morning or the like 't were more easy to rectify such an intermission But in those days when there was nothing of all this nor so much as the use of Writing that we know of older than Moses There was no way to rectify an interrupted Tradition All which is not said to disparage the Observation of the Sabbath day for which I have as great Veneration as he that pleads for the Saturday Sabbath But onely to shew that we can be at no Certainty and scarce a Conjecture which is the First Second or Seventh day of the Week in a continued Circulation of Weeks from the Creation And consequently I cannot think that the great stress of the Fourth Commandment is to be understood of just that Seventh day in every such Week from the Creation which I doubt cannot be known But rather that there should be a Weekly Sabbath that is after Six days of Work the Seventh should be a Holy Rest and then after another Six days of Work the Seventh should be again a Holy Rest and so continually which is as truly observed in the Sunday-Sabbath as in that of Saturday As when God requires the Tenth of our Increase it is not meant of the Tenth in Order for it should rather be the First in Order for he requires the First-fruits but the Tenth in Proportion So here the Seventh And this Author knows very well that it is signally noted by Expositors on the Fourth
Chap. 4. 9 10 11. he rebukes them severely that after they had known God or rather were known of God they should turn again to the weak and beggarly rudiments or elements Ye observe saith he days and months and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain 'T is not indeed here said in particular what those days were that are here meant yet it is most likely and scarce to be doubted to be meant of the Iewish Sabbath For though other Observation of Times be here reckoned up there being the same reason of all yet there was no occasion for the others in Galatia For the Jews themselves did not think themselves obliged nor do the Jews at this day to the observation of their other Feasts or Fasts out of their own land But to that of Circumcision and of the Iewish Sabbath and the distinction of Meats they thought themselves obliged even out of their own land And of such we must understand this to the Galatians These being the things there in question not those other which were confined to the land of Canaan But he objects here that though Days be mentioned yet not Sabbath days and fansies it might be meant of some other days not of Sabbaths To gratify him therefore in this also I will proceed to that of Colos. 2. 16. Where Sabbaths are expresly named To the Colossians who were also Christian Gentiles he pursues the same notions Least any one should beguile them with inticing words Col. 2. 4. thereby to bring them under the Mosaick Law He bids them Beware lest any spoil them through Philosophy and vain deceit Whereby I suppose he means the Mosaick doctrines or Philosophy of the Jews which Clemens Alexandrinus doth all along call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in contradistinction to that of the Greeks after the traditions of men after the rudiments or elements of the world and not after Christ ver 8. and that particularly of Circumcision ver 11. in the room of which Baptism is come ver 12. Christ by his Death having blotted out the hand-writing of ordinances meaning the Jewish Law and took it out af the way nailing it to his Cross ver 14. and amongst other things Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink as if some were now clean others unclean as under the Mosaick Law or in respect of an holy day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Festival or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath days 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ver 16. Where by Sabbath must be meant the Iewish Sabbath the day which in common speech was understood by the word Sabbath For this he hath two or three evasions He doth commonly press hard in other places that by Sabbath is to be understood the Jews Seventh-day-Sabbath and no other day The holy Spirit doth call the Seventh-day the Sabbath and no other day of the week both in the Old and in the New Testament throughout p. 46. And I think he is not much out therein that it doth usually so signify where it doth not come with some intimation to direct us to some other sense And why it should not be thought so to signify here I see no reason For though I take our Christian Sabbath to fall as properly under the word Sabbath in the Fourth Commandment as that of the Iews yet the word in common use having by this time become the proper name of that Day which the Jews so called it was necessary to avoid confusion to give the Christian Sabbath another name as that of the Lords Day or the first day of the week And consequently that the Sabbaths here mentioned are to be understood according to the then use of the word of those Sabbaths Not as if all days of Holy Rest where hereby forbidden but onely the nicety of confining it particularly to that day which was then in common speech so called But he would not have it here understood of the Seventh-day Sabbath as every where else but some other Ceremonial Sabbaths but what those are he doth not tell us That there were some other Feasts observed by the Jews which in the Old Testament are sometimes called Sabbaths but very seldome I do not deny nor that those come under the general Words in this place But those do not seem to be here principally intended because it is manifest to be understood of the Sabbath there in dispute Now there was no occasion of a dispute concerning the observance of those other Sabbaths amongst the Gentiles out of the Holy-land These observations being not thought obligatory even to the Jews but in their own Land onely And it is expresly provided Deut. 16. that these were not to be kept in any place promiscuously not within any of the Gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee But in the place which the Lord thy God shall chuse to place his name there So of the Pass-over ver 5 6. So of the Feast of Pentecost ver 11. So of the Feast of Tabernacles ver 15. And of altogether ver 16. And therefore not out of their own Land I do not deny but that they might in private houses eat the Paschal Lamb as Christ did with his Disciples but not Sacrifice the Pass-over For it was to be sacrificed in the Temple onely and the Feast of the Pass-over to be there solemnly kept Not in private houses and much less out of their own Land Nor do I remember that any where in all the New Testament the word Sabbath is used for any such Sabbaths Nor can reasonably be supposed to be here meant of those Feasts because it is put in contradistinction to them Let no man judge you in respect of a Feast of the New-moon or of the Sabbaths Which yet I do not understand as if no Sabbath might now be kept but that the Obligation to that Sabbath was now at an end Another evasion is this He would have 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbata in the plural number to signify Weeks not Sabbath-days The Sabbath-day being called in the singular number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sabbatum For he will rather play at small game than stand out If we should allow him this it would not advance his purpose at all For if the business of Weeks be at an end that we are no longer to distribute our time into Weeks than that of the Sabbath much more which he would have to be the seventh day of the Week But suppose we do allow that one Sabbath is to be called Sabbatum what are we to call two or more Sabbaths Must not they be Sabbata And if this be his meaning then are we not to observe such Sabbaths any longer But what must we then say to Mat. 28. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render In the end of the Sabbath meaning thereby the Seventh day Sabbath then past 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it began to draw towards the first day of the