the whole Channel as before When the Morning appeared When it was light And the Egyptians fled against it They were so frighted by the Light which shone in their Faces and by the Thunder and Hail c. that they turned back and like Men distracted run and met the Waters which came tumbling down upon them And the LORD overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the Sea The Hebrew word imports throwing down with violence and precipitation and may be translated threw them headlong Artapanus in Eusebius L. IX Praepar Evang. c. 27. tell this Story from the Heliopolitans after the same manner that Moses doth only he makes some of them to have been killed with Lightning and the rest drowned Ver. 28. And the Waters returned and covered the Chariots c. The Sea returned to its former depth so that they were swallowed up And all the Host of Pharaoh that came into the Sea after them Some have fancied that all the Host of Pharaoh did not perish but only so many of them as pursued the Israelites into the Sea which they fancy this place intimates some did not But the plain meaning is that they all came into the Sea after the Israelites and were all drowned in it It is a wilder fancy that Pharaoh alone was saved by the Angels Michael and Gabriel because he cried out as he had done heretofore IX 27. The LORD is righteous and I and my People are wicked Thus the Author of Dibre Hajamim or The Life and Death of Moses who says they transported him to Nineveh where he reigned as long as the Israelites wandred in the Wilderness The same is related by other such fabulous Writers who are soberly confuted by Aben Ezra from the following words There remained not so much as one of them and from XV. 4 19. where Moses in his Song plainly makes Pharaoh to have perished among the rest And with him an old Midrash saith that Jannes and Jambres were drown'd who had been the great Instruments of hardning Pharaoh's heart See our Learned J. Gregory Observ c. 15. Ver. 29. But the Children of Israel walked on dry Land c. Or Had walked for it seems to be a meer fancy that they were still in the Sea and had not passed quite through it when Pharaoh and his Host were drowned For which there is no ground but this word walked which may as well be translated in the time perfectly past as in the present And so I doubt not Moses meant that the Israelites were safe on Shore when the Sea returned upon the Egyptians And the Waters were a Wall unto them c. See v. 22. Ver. 30. Thus the LORD saved Israel As he had promised v. 13. That day Which was the XXI st of Nisan and the last day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread which by God's command was to be kept holy XII 16. And now there was a very great reason for it and for that triumphant Hymn which they sung upon this Solemnity Chap. XV. Mr. Mede will have this Day to have been that which they afterward kept for their Sabbath in memory of their Redemption out of the Land of Egypt and the House of Bondage This he gathers from the Repetition of the Decalogue in the Fifth of Deuteronomy where leaving out the reason for this Commandment from the Creation of the World Moses inserts this other of their Redemption out of Egypt as the ground of observing that Seventh day rather than any other v. 15. Therefore the LORD commanded thee to keep the Sabbath namely not for the quotum of one day in seven of that there was another reason from the Example of God in the Creation but for the designation of that day after the preceding six days rather than any other Discourse XV. p. 74. And Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the Sea-shore It may be interpreted that as they stood upon the Sea-shore they saw their dead Bodies floating upon the Waters But it is likely also that by the working of the Sea and by the Divine Providence many of their Bodies were cast on shore that the Israelites might have the benefit of the Spoil and especially of their Arms which they wanted and were now by this overthrow furnished withal This Shore was inhabited by the Icthyophagi among whom the memory of this Recess and Return of the Sea was preserved as I observed upon v. 21. and unto whom the dead Bodies were given for food as the Psalmist saith LXXIV 14. that is to the Beasts and Birds of Prey which peopled the neighbouring Wilderness This was done by the righteous Judgment of the LORD God of the Hebrews who made this proud Prince his States-men and Army a Prey not only to the Fishes and Sea-monsters but a visible booty as Dr. Jackson speaks to the promiscuous sorts of ravenous Creatures which inhabit the Deserts Ver. 31. And Israel saw that great work c. Of making a path for them to walk on dry Ground in the middle of the Sea and then drowning the Egyptians when they followed them in the same path And the People feared the LORD They beholding and considering the powerful hand of God which appeared in this great work it begat in them for the present high and awful Thoughts of him and devout Affections to him For the fear of the LORD includes all Religion Or if we take the word fear in a restrained sense for a dread of the Divine Majesty the meaning is they were sensible how dangerous as well as vain it is to oppose his Authority to set themselves against his Will or slight his Warnings as Pharaoh and the Egyptians did And believed the LORD and his Servant Moses Believed the Promises which God had made them by Moses of bringing them into the Land of Canaan III. 17. looking upon Moses as a Servant of his who faithfully declared the Mind and Will of God unto them CHAP. XV. Verse 1. THen sang Moses and the Children of Israel c. Upon the XXIth of Nisan as I said before which was the last day of Unleavened Bread when they came safe through the Sea and saw the Egyptians drown'd they sang this Song of Praise to God for their wonderful Deliverance So the constant Tradition of the Hebrews is and there is great ground for it This Song Called the Song of Moses the servant of the LORD XV Rev. 3. because he composed it by a Divine Inspiration to be sung by all the People And it is the most ancient Song of which there is any memory Vnto the LORD In praise of the Divine Power and Goodness which remarkably appeared in this Deliverance Josephus L. II. c. ult of his Antiquities saith that this Song is composed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Hexameter Verse which Eusebius represents as the Opinion of many others L. XI de Praepar Evang. c. 3. But I do not see how this can be made out nor what St. Hierom saith concerning such Songs in many
thing for if it had they could not have understood Moses nor known what he meant See what I have noted upon the Second of Genesis where I thought it reasonable to assert That God intended to preserve a Memory of the Creation in six days by appointing the seventh day to be kept holy And therefore the more pious any people were the greater respect they had to this day But when the World grew very wicked before the Flood as they little thought of God so it is likely they neglected all distinction between this day and others And the dispersion of People after the Flood very much blotted it out of their minds as it did many other good things But in the Family of Abraham we may well suppose it was continued though not with such strict abstinence from all Labour as for special reasons was afterward enjoyned Which is the cause why we read nothing of their resting in their Travels upon that day before their coming out of Egypt Where they were under such cruel Servitude that all observation of the seventh day it is likely was laid aside they being pressed day and night by their Task-masters to hard Labour without intermission And therefore when God brought them out of that Slavery he renewed his Command for the observation of the Sabbath with this addition in memory of their Deliverance from the Egyptian Bondage that they should rest from all manner of Labour upon that day Both these Reasons are given by Moses why God commanded it to be observed in memory of the Creation in six days XX Exod. 11. and in memory of their deliverance from the Egyptian Bondage V Deut. 15. Bake that which you will bake to day c. The words to day are not in the Hebrew but are necessary to make the sense plain because they were enjoyned on this day to prepare or make ready all things against the next v. 5. And that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept till the morning From which words some have inferred that there was no prohibition of baking and seething on the Sabbath but the contrary rather is here supposed See Dr. Heylin in his History of the Sabbath Part. I. p. 100. But I do not see how this consists with the further explication of this matter in XXXV Exod. 3. where they are forbidden to kindle a Fire upon this day Unless any one will say that for the present they might do it but shortly after were prohibited which is not at all likely For the plain meaning is that if they would make any baked Meats or boiled with the Manna they must do it upon the sixth day though what they did not then bake nor boil they might safely keep till the next day and it should not breed Worms nor stink But what they so kept was to be eaten without baking or boiling as it well might being a food prepared in Heaven for their eating without any need of further Art And therefore called Bread even when they gathered it v. 22. Ver. 24. And they laid it up until the morning c. Without any Preparation of it by baking or boiling and it kept the whole seventh day without any putrefaction Ver. 25. And Moses said Eat that to day Simple as it is without baking or boiling For to day is a Sabbath unto the LORD The frequent repetition of this in this Chapter v. 23. and again v. 29 30. hath led the Jews into this mistake that the Sabbath was not ordained by God till they came out of Egypt directly contrary to what we read in the Second of Genesis that it was instituted from the beginning And therefore Moses here only gives an account why this Precept was renewed at their coming out of Egypt when there was a new Religious observation added to it which was not necessary before viz. resting wholly from all manner of work There is an excellent Discourse on this Subject in a late Learned Author J. Wagensiel in his Confutation of R. Lipman's Carmen Memoriale p. 559 c. who well observes that this Precept having a peculiar respect to the Jews we are not bound to observe the rest of the Sabbath with such strictness as they did but only as the Patriarchs did before the giving of the Law p. 564. As for the translation of the day from the seventh to the first day of the Week it is impossible for the Jews to prove that the day they observe is the seventh from the Creation And besides that the whole World cannot be tied to the circumstance of time precisely for in some parts of it the Sabbath will fall eighteen hours later than in Palestine as he evidently shows p. 572 c. To day you shall not find it in the field This Moses said to them as Abarbinel thinks in the Evening of the Sabbath which was in effect a Prohibition to them not to go out to gather it on that day Ver. 26. Six days ye shall gather it c. The same Author thinks this is repeated to signifie that as long as they continued in the Wilderness they should gather it six days in a Week as they did now but never find any on the seventh There shall be none As you rest saith he from doing any thing about the Manna so God will cease from sending it unto you Upon which he makes this pious reflection That in this World we must work for our Souls if we would be happy in the next World which is an intire Sabbath or Rest For he that labours in the Evening of the Sabbath shall eat on the Sabbath To the same purpose Origen long before him Hom. VII in Exod. Ver. 27. There went out some of the people on the seventh day to gather c. The same wicked disposition remained in them which made them on other days keep it till next Morning v. 19 20. Ver. 28. And the LORD said unto Moses how long refuse ye to keep my Commandments c. These chiding words are full of indignation and yet signifie the long-suffering Patience of God with an untoward Generation Abarbinel expounds this passage as if upon this occasion he upbraided them with all their other Transgressions saying You kickt against me at the Red Sea and believed not my words at Marah also you murmured and uttered very discontented words at Elim Nay after I had given you Manna you violated my Precept in reserving it till the next Morning And now you break my Sabbath what hope is there that you will observe any of my Laws Refuse to keep my Commandments and my Laws He speaks thus say some of the Jews because that in which they now offended is a thing upon which the whole Law all his Commandments depend So the same Abarbinel Because the Sabbath instructed them in the Creation of the World upon which all the Law depends therefore he saith My Commandments and my Laws Ver. 29. See Consider For that the LORD hath given you the
with an Oath that which they knew not to be true For so the word Schave frequently signifies in Scripture a Lie This relates not to their giving a Testimony before a Judge upon Oath of which he speaks afterward in a distinct Commandment but to their Intercourse and Commerce one with another For an Oath saith R. Levi of Barcelona ought to establish every thing and thereby we declare our selves to be as much resolved concerning that which we swear as we are concerning the Being of God Heathens themselves accounted an Oath so sacred a thing that it was capital for a Man to forswear himself as Hen. Stephanus in his Fontes Juris Civilis p. 7. observes out of Diodorus Siculus L. I. and the reason he gives of it is this that such a Man committed two heinous Crimes by violating his Piety to God and his Faith to Men in the highest degree But besides this both Jews and Christians always understood swearing lightly upon frivolous occasions or without any necessity to be here forbidden R. Levi before-mentioned saith this Precept may be violated four several ways besides swearing that which we mean not to perform And Salvian aplies this to the trivial naming of God and our Saviour upon all occasions and sometimes upon bad occasions Nihil jam penè vanius quam Christi nomen esse videatur c. Every body then swearing by Christ he would do this or that though of no consequence whether he did it or no or perhaps a thing which ought not to be done L. IV. de Gubern Dei p. 88. edit Baluz They that understand this of Swearing by false Gods which are called vain things in Scripture do but trifle that is condemned in the foregoing Commandment it being a piece of Worship to swear by them For the LORD will not hold him guiltless c. If Men did not punish the false Swearer the LORD threatens that he will And so Mankind always thought as appears by the Law of the XII Tables mentioned by Hen. Stephanus in the Book quoted above Perjurij poena divina exitium humana dedecus The Divine Punishment of Perjury is utter Destruction the Humane Punishment is Disgrace or Infamy And Alexander Severus was so sensible of this that he thought Juris jurandi contempta Religio satis Deum ultorem habet The contempt of the Religion of an Oath hath God for a sufficient Avenger For an Oath is the strongest Bond that is among Men to bind them to Truth and Fidelity as Cicero speaks L. III. de Ossic c. 31. Witness saith he the XII Tables witness our Sacred Forms in taking an Oath witness our Covenants and Leagues wherein we plight our Faith to Enemies witness the Animadversions of our Censors qui nulla de re diligentius quam de jurejurando judicabant who judged of nothing more diligently than of an Oath Nor was the other sort of vain that is light and idle Swearing without any just occasion suffered to go unpunished for Mr. Selden observes out of Maimonides L. II. de Synedr c. 11. p. 497. that if any Man was guilty of it he that heard him Swear was bound to Excommunicate him what that was he shows in the first Book and if he did not he was to be Excommunicated himself And there is great reason for these Civil Laws which have provided a Punishment for this Crime not only because it is a great disrespect to God to use his Name so lightly on every trivial occasion but because such contempt of the Divine Majesty makes Men fall into the fearful Sin of Perjury Ver. 8. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy Be mindful of the day called the Sabbath to make a difference between it and all other days so that it be not employed as they are Ver. 9. Six days shalt thou labour and do all thy work This is not a Precept requiring Labour but a Permission to employ six days in a Week about such worldly Business as they had to do Which Permission also God himself abridged by appointing some other Festival days as all Governours may do upon some special occasions But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God Appointed by his Authority to be a day of Rest from your Labours In it thou shalt not do any work Herein the peculiar respect to the Seventh day consisted on all other days they might work but on this they were to cease from all manner of work In which very thing was the sanctifying of this day it being hereby separated and distinguished from all other days in a very remarkable manner But then it naturally followed that having no other work to do they should call to mind the reason why it was thus fanctified or set apart from other days And the reason say the Jews themselves was That having no other business they might fasten in their minds the belief that the World had a beginning which is a thred that draws after it all the foundations of the Law or the Principles of Religion They are words of R. Levi of Barcelona Besides which there was another reason which I shall mention presently But by this it appears that the Observation of this day was a Sign or a Badge to whom they belonged A profession that they were all the Servants of Him who created the Heaven and the Earth as God himself teaches them to ununderstand it XXXI 13 17. And that their Minds might be possessed with this sense he ordered this Solemn Commemoration of the Creation of the World to be made once in Seven days For as if there had been quicker returns of it their Secular Business might have been too much hindred so if it had been delayed longer this sense might have worn too much out of their minds Thou nor thy Son nor thy Daughter c. They might no more employ others in their worldly Business on this day than do it themselves But their Children though they understood not the reason were to rest that in time they might learn this great Truth that all things were made by God Nor thy Cattle Their Oxen and Asses and all other Creatures wont to be employed in their Labours were to enjoy the benefit of this Rest as well as themselves V Deut. 14. Which was absolutely necessary it being impossible for their Servants to rest as is here also required if they were to set their Cattle on work Nor thy stranger that is within thy gates No stranger who by being Circumcised had embraced the Jewish Religion But other strangers might work who only dwelt among them having renounced Idolatry but not taken upon them the Obligation to observe their whole Law Yet if any such Person was a Servant to a Jew his Master might not imploy him on the Sabbath day in any work of his but the Man might work for himself if he pleased being not bound to this Law See Selden L. III. de Jure N. G. c. 12. Ver. 11. For in six
days the Lord made Heaven and Earth There were two reasons for the Sanctification of this day One was because God rested from his Work of Creation on the Seventh day which is mentioned here the other was because he had given them rest from their Labours in Egypt which he mentions in the Vth of Deuteronomy There is no body hath explained both these better than Maimonides More Nevoch P. II. c. 31. There are two different Causes saith he for this Precept from two different Effects For when Moses first explained to us the cause of this Celebration in the Promulgation of the X. Commandments he saith it was because in six days the LORD made Heaven and Earth But in the repetition of them he saith Remember that thou was a servant in Egypt c. therefore the LORD thy God commanded thee to keep the Sabbath day V Deut. 15. The first Cause is the Glory and Magnificence of this day as it is said Therefore the LORD blessed the seventh day and sancified it II Gen. 3. This was the effect of that Cause for in six days he made Heaven and Earth this was the reason he means of the first Institution of the Sabbath but that he gave this Precept of the Sabbath unto us i.e. the Israelites and commanded us to observe it was from the other Cause which followed the first Cause because we were Servants in Egypt All which time we could not serve according to our own Will and Pleasure nor had any Rest or observed a Sabbath And therefore God gave us this special Precept of Resting and Cessation from Labours to joyn together these two Reasons viz. the belief of the beginning of the World which presently suggests to us the Being of God and then the memory of Gods Benefits unto us in giving us Rest from our intolerable Burdens in Egypt Wherefore he blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it In the beginning of the World he blessed the Seventh day II Gen. 3. and now particularly chose this Seventh day for a Sabbath which he ordered them to observe in memory of their coming out of Egypt on that day as I observed XVI 5 23. By which he preserved in their minds that singular Benefit which he had bestowed upon them and most manifestly saith Maimonides in another place P. III. c. 43. procured great ease to all sorts of Men by freeing a seventh part of their Lives from wearisom Labour Which hath another Blessing in conjunction with it that it perpetually preserved and confirmed that most precious History and Doctrine concerning the Creation of the World Ver. 12. Honour thy Father and thy Mother In another place they are commanded to fear them XIX Lev. 3. and as here the Father is put before the Mother so there the Mother is put before the Father to show as Maimonides takes it in his Treatise called Memarim c. 6. that we ought not to make any difference between them but they are both equally to be honoured and reverenced Which is a Duty of such great concernment that we are taught by the placing of this Commandment immediately after those which peculiarly relate to God's Worship that next to his Majesty our Parents are to be honoured with that reverence love obedience and maintenance which is due to them And therefore notorious disobedience to them is threatned with death as well as Apostacy from God Wherein this honour or fear doth consist is taught in all Books of Religion and Mr. Selden hath named a great many things wherein the Jews place it as the Learned Reader may see L. II. de Synedr c. 13. p. 558 c. I shall only add that this was a Law among the Heathens mentioned by Saleucus Charondas and others in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let Children honour their Parents And thus Vlpian expresses it Filio semper honesta sancta persona Patris videri debet And afterward Filium Patrem Matrem venerari oportet With much more that Hen. Stephanus hath collected in his Fontes Rivi Juris Civilis That thy days may be long in the Land c. As disobedience to Parents is by the Law of Moses threatned to be punished with death so on the contrary long Life which is the greatest worldly Blessing is promised to the Obedient and that in their own Country which God had peculiarly inriched with abundance of his Blessings Heathens also gave the very same incouragement saying that such Children should be dear to the Gods both living and dead So Euripides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this famous Senarius mention'd by the fame Henr. Stephanus with many other notable Passages 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thou shalt live long or as long as thou canst desire if thou nourish thy ancient Parents Whence children are called by Xenophon and others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ver. 13. Thou shalt not kill After the Command about the respect due to Parents naturally follows the regard we ought to have to all other Men who spring from them And the greatest injury we can do another is to take away his Life whereby he is deprived of all the Enjoyments of this World and Humane Society it self is also wounded which cannot subsist if its innocent Members cannot be safe Innocent I say for this Commandment doth not hinder Men from defending themselves from violence XXII 2. nor forbids Magistrates to punish those with death who commit Crimes worthy of it for this is to preserve the Lives of other Men XXII 18 19 20. Ver. 14. Thou shalt not commit Adultery Next to a Man's self his Wife is nearer to him than any other Person they two being one flesh Which makes the injury done to him in her Person a breach of Humane Society next to Murder Nay the LXX place this Commandment before the other Thou shalt not kill Vertuous Woman valuing their Chastity more than their Lives and the Crimes to which meer Pleasure tempts Men being more grievous in the opinion of the great Philosopher than those to which they are stimulated by anger Whoredom is also forbidden in the Law of Moses and Incest as Wounding any Man is as well as Murder but in these X. Words which are a short Abridgment of their Duty it was sufficient only to mention the principal things of every kind which were hateful to God and injurious to Men. Ver. 15. Thou shalt not steal This was to injure Men in their Goods and Possessions either by open Rapine or by Craft and Cheating against which God intended to secure them by this Precept Several sorts of this Sin are afterwards mentioned in particular Laws Ver. 16. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy Neighbour As our Neighbour is not to be injured by us in Deeds so not in Words by giving a false Testimony against him before a Judge which is the chief Sin of this kind This is both an injury to our Neighbour and an affront to God in whose place
Synedris c. 6. The sense is this in short He that violates a Negative Precept as they call it either doth it secretly which is most frequent or openly which happens seldom unless a Man be one of those profligate Wretches whom we call Apostates Now him that secretly brake the Sabbath the Scripture threatens with cutting off viz. by the hand of God according to what is written here in this place In like manner incestuous and unlawful Conjunctions are threatned XVIII Lev. 29. because they were wont to be committed secretly But if any Man did any Work openly on the Sabbath so that there were Witnesses of it he was to be stoned according to what is said XV Numb 35. Though if he did it out of mistake either secretly or openly he was only to bring a Sacrifice for his Errour And if he offended against any of the Decrees of the Wise-men about the Sabbath he was to be beaten Or if there was no Court of Judgment in the place as now in their present Condition then all such Transgressors were left to God to punish them of whatsoever sort they were Ver. 15. Six days may work be done but in the seventh is the Sabbath of rest holy to the LORD So it is called also XXXV 2. and XXIII Lev. 3. And so the Sabbath wherein the Land rested is likewise called XXV Lev. 4. But the Hebrew words Schabbat Schabbaton Sabbath of Rest properly signifies Sabbath above all Sabbaths i. e. the greatest Sabbath on which a rest was to be most punctually observed from all manner of Work which the Jews as de Dieu notes call the weighty Sabbath as if other days of rest were but light in comparison with this According to that saying of R. Josee Great is Circumcision because the weighty Sabbath gives place to it that is admits of this Work though the Rest on this Sabbath be so very great Shall surely be put to death As an Idolater who did not acknowledge the Creator of the World See before v. 14. Ver. 16. Wherefore the Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath to observe the Sabbath throughout their Generation for a perpetual Covenant The most litteral Interpretation of this Verse seems to me to be that of Lud. de Dieu The Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath by making the Sabbath a perpetual Covenant throughout their Generations That is by never suffering it to be interrupted they made it a perpetual Covenant between God and them throughout all Ages Ver. 17. It is a sign between me and the Children of Israel for ever A Badge and Livery that they were the Servants of the most High who made the Heavens and Earth A Mark of their being devoted to him and continuing in Covenant with him no less than Circumcision For in six days the LORD made Heaven and Earth In memory of which the Sabbath was first instituted to preserve perpetually and establish that most precious History and Doctrine of the Creation of the World as Maimonides speaks More Nevoch P. III. c. 43. And on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed Delighted in the Contemplation of all his Works which he saw were very good I Gen. 31. The same Maimonides observes that the word jinnaphash which we translate was refreshed comes from nephesh which among other things signifies the intention of the Mind and the Will and therefore the sense of this Phrase is All the Will of God was perfected and brought to a Conclusion his whole good Pleasure was absolutely finished on the seventh day More Nevoch P. I. c. 67. Ver. 18. And he gave unto Moses when he made an end of communing with him upon Mount Sinai When he dismissed him having said all that is before related during his forty days stay with him in the Mount he delivered unto him two Tables of Testimony to carry down with him to the People Two Tables of Testimony Wherein God testified to them his Mind and Will in the principal things which concerned their Duty See XVI 34. Tables of stone That what was written upon them might be more durable There is no ground to think that these Tables were made of some precious Stone as the Author of the Book Cosri and other Jews fancy for the word Eben in the Hebrew simply signifies any sort of Stone and is wont to have some other joyned to it when precious Stones are meant as in 2 Sam. XII 30. 1 Kings X. 2. 2 Chron. III. 6. Written with the finger of God i. e. By God himself Just as the Heavens saith Maimonides are said to be the work of his fingers VIII Psal 4. which he interprets in another place XXXIII 6. By the word of the LORD were the Heavens made Therefore written by the singer of God is as much saith he as by the word that is the Will and good Pleasure of God More Nevoch P. I. c. 66. In short this Phrase signifies that God employed neither Moses nor any other Instrument in this Writing but it was done by his own powerful Operation For all things that we do being wrought by our hands and our fingers these words are used to express God's power See XXXII 16. This was a thing so notorious in ancient times and so much believed by those who were not Jews that many other Nations pretended to the like Divine Writings that they might gain the greater Authority to their Laws Thus the Brachmans report in their Histories That the Book of their Law which they call Caster was delivered by God to Bremavius upon a Mount in a Cloud and that God gave also another Book of Laws to Brammon in the first Age of the World The Persians say the same of those of Zoroaster and the Getes of Xamolxis Nay the Brachmans have a Decalogue like this of Moses and accurate Interpretations of it in which they say there is this Prophecy That one day there shall be one Law alone throughout the World This evidently shows how well the World was anciently acquainted with these Books of Moses and what a high esteem they had of them See Huetius L. II. Alnetan Quaest c. 12. n. 19. CHAP. XXXII Verse 1. AND when the People Not the whole Body of the Congregation but so many of them that the rest durst not appear to oppose their desires Saw that Moses delayed to come down out of the Mount The Jews fancy that he stayed beyond the time that he had appointed for his return to them But that is not likely for he himself was not told how long God would detain him there See XXIV 14. The meaning therefore is that he stayed longer than they expected so that they did not know what to think of it And having as yet received no Directions about the Service of God for which they were called out of Egypt VII 16. and other places they thought it was time to desire Aaron to set about it in such a way as other People served their Gods The people gathered themselves
that according to the Hebrew Doctors no Man was to be admitted a Proselyte to partake of the Paschal Lamb unless his whole Family was Circumcised with him both Children and Servants Ver. 45. A Foreigner The Hebrew word Toschab literally signifies a Dweller or Inhabitant by which Name those pious Gentiles were called who renounced Idolatry though they did not embrace the Jewish Religion because they were permitted to settle among them and dwell in their Country which was not allowed to other Foreigners who continued Idolaters See Selden L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 3. c. 5. Where he observes Maimonides makes this Exception That no such Persons might dwell in Jerusalem because of the singular Holiness of that City but any where else they might with the Profession of Judaism And no hired Servant Some of them were Servants to the Jews and so dwelt in the same House with them and were called Hirelings when they bound themselves to serve their Masters for three years as the Jews gather from XVI Isa 14. Ver. 46. In one House shall it be eaten c. In the first Night wherein this Sacrifice was slain they were enjoyned not to stir out of Doors v. 22. and therefore not to carry forth ought of the Flesh abroad into another House Besides they were in such haste that they had no time to send Messengers from one House to another which Maimonides makes the ground of this Precept More Nev. P. III. c. 46. In after-times also that Law being in force v. 4. that lesser Housholds who had not Company enough to eat the Lamb up should joyn with some other it is here explain'd that for maintenance of Friendly Society they should not divide the Lamb and carry half of it to another House but all meet together in one and feast upon it Which the ancient Fathers looked upon as a Figure of the Unity of the Church of Christ This seems to be the most natural Interpretation that it should be eaten under one Roof But R. Simeon saith That God only bound them to eat in one Company or Society not in two but it was lawful for that Family or Society to eat it in two places if they pleased Halicoth Olam P. IV. Sect. 3. Neither shall ye break a Bone thereof The Jews fancy this Law doth not speak of the lesser Bones but only of those in which there was some Marrow So Maimonides in his Treatise on this Subject c. 10. sect 1. And indeed being eaten in haste they could not have time to break the Bones and suck out the Marrow which in the place before-named in his More Nevochim he makes the Foundation of this Precept Which was exactly fulfilled in the true Paschal Lamb of which this was a Figure when he was offered for us as St. John observes XIX 33 36. Ver. 47. All the Congregation of Israel shall keep it Women and Children as well as Men. In after times indeed only Men were bound to come up at the three Feasts XXIII 17. XXXIV 23. XVI Deut. 16. But devout People were wont to carry up their Wives and Children with them as appears by Elkanah 1 Sam. I. 3 4. and by Joseph who went up with the Blessed Virgin II Luke 41. And that place in Samuel informs us that their Sons and Daughters did eat of the Sacrifice Ver. 48. When a Stranger shall sojourn with thee and will keep the Passover c. See v. 43 44. No uncircumcised Person shall eat thereof Which is the reason some have thought why they observed no Passover as far as we can sind after that in the very next year that followed their coming out of Egypt because they were generally Uncircumcised But this seems to relate to Men of another Nation who though they were not admitted to eat of the Lamb unless they received Circumcision yet having renounced Idolatry the Jews say they might eat of the unleavened Bread and of the bitter Herbs Ver. 49. One Law shall be to him that is home-born c. Nothing could be more equal than this that no Man should enjoy this Priviledge who was not of their Religion but whosoever embraced it should partake of the same Benefits Ver. 50. Thus did all the Children of Israel They kept this Passover and afterwards another by a special direction IX Numb but afterward during their stay in the Wilderness they seem to have omitted it because they omitted Circumcision without which v. 48. they were not capable to partake of it As the LORD commanded Moses and Aaron so did they Observed it according to all the Rites here enjoyned though in future Ages several of them were omitted as peculiar to this time Ver. 51. And it came to pass the self same day c. On the day after they celebrated the Passover they began their March out of Egypt Which was a thing so notorious that the memory of it was preserved in Nations far distant from them though the Story was much corrupted for want of the Knowledge of these Sacred Records For Strabo mentions it to name no more but saith the Report was that the Jews were descended from the Egyptians which might be believed by Strangers because they dwelt so long in that Country and that Moses was an Egyptian Priest who had a certain part of that Country but being dissatissied with the present state of things forsook it and many Worshippers of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 followed him For he affirmed and taught that the Egyptians had not right Conceptions who likened God to wild Beasts and Cattle nor did the Asricans or Greeks conceive of him better who represented him like to Men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For there is but this one only God that which comprehends us all and the Earth and the Sea which we call Heaven and the World c. In which words he makes Moses not so foolish as the Egyptians and other Nations but attributes a sensless Opinion to him that the World which we see is God if this be the right reading of his words But I rather think the place is corrupted and it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. For this is Moses his true Opinion with which he begins his Books that he only is God who made the Heaven and the Earth And this perfectly agrees with what follows in Strabo That no Image can be made of this God and therefore a Temple without any Image must be erected to him c. Which is not true if we take the visible World to be God for the Image of the Heaven and the Earth may be made as well as of a Man or a Beast However it is true which he adds That Moses perswaded many good Men and brought them into that Country where Jerusalem is the chief City where they lived a long time happily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doing justly and being sincerely Religious Which is a notable Testimony from a Pagan to be noted aureis literis with Letters
Sabbath therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread of two days You have no reason to seek it on the Sabbath being provided before-hand with as much as is sufficient for that day Let no man go out of his place The Jews say that a Man went out of his place if he went above Two thousand paces from his dwelling That is if he went beyond the Suburbs of his City XXXV Numb 5. Ver. 30. So the people rested on the seventh day The Reprehension which God gave them by Moses v. 28. and the solemn renewal of the Precept v. 29. wrought so much upon them that for the present they rested upon this day And they not having been used to this rest God did not immediately punish their Disobedience in going abroad to gather Manna though afterward he ordered a Man to be stoned for gathering Sticks on this day for he had often repeated this Law to them before that time Ver. 31. And the House of Israel called the name thereof Manna This is repeated again to show that the name which they gave it at first v. 15. continued to it afterward being so apt and proper to signifie God's Providence over them that they could find no better And it was like Coriander Seed Of a round sigure like that Seed v. 14. White Being like Bedolach as Moses saith XI Numb 7. which signifies Pearl as Bochartus shows in his Hierozoic P. II. p. 678. where he observes the Talmudick Doctors in the Title Joma expresly say it was like Margalith or Margarith i.e. Pearl The taste of it was like Wafers made with honey All things of a pleasant relish are compared in Scripture to Honey Whence those words of David XIX Psalm 11. CXIX 103. Onkelos saith Manna tasted like Escaritae which was a delicious Food at Rhodes as Bochart observes out of Julius Pollux between Bread and Cake like our Bisket I suppose which was so grateful that they who did eat it were never satiated but still desired more In the XI Numb 7 8. Manna is said to taste like fresh Oyl Which doth not contradict this for as Abarbinel and others observe the meaning is that when it first fell before it was prepared it tasted like Honey-wafers but when it was baked then it tasted like fresh Oyl And so the words XI Numb 8. plainly import they took it and beat it in a Mortar and baked it c. and the taste of it i. e. thus prepared was like the taste of fresh Oyl Nay the Jewish Doctors commonly say it had all manner of pleasant savours according to Mens different Palates and thence they fancy it is called v. 29. the Bread Mischne which we translate of two days because it was changed according to the diversity of those that did eat it Children young men and old Which conceit the Author of the Book of Wisdom follows XVI 20 21. Ver. 32. And Moses said This is the thing which the LORD commandeth I have this further Command to deliver from God concerning the Manna Take an Omer of it Just so much as was assigned to every one for his daily Bread v. 16. To be kept for your Generations For your Posterity in future Ages That they may see the Bread wherewith I have fed you c. For seeing with ones eyes saith Isaac Aramah mightily confirms a thing and leaves one in no doubt of it And he took care they should see both the Manna it self and the measure which he bountifully allowed to every one of them Ver. 33. And Moses said unto Aaron What God commanded Moses he now commands Aaron to do Take a Pot. He saith nothing of the matter of this Pot or Vrn which some say was an Earthen Pot others say of Lead Brass or Iron and Abarbinel thinks it was of Glass that one might see what was within But the Apostle hath setled this Controversie by calling it a Golden Pot IX Hebr. 4. and so do the LXX in this place And indeed all the Vessels of the Sanctuary being of Gold it was but reason that this which contained such a precious Monument of God's Mercy should be of the same Metal Lay it up before the LORD i.e. Before the Ark of the Testimony as it is explained in the next Verse Which shows that this Command was given after the building of the Tabernacle and is here mentioned because it belongs to the same matter which Moses relates in this Chapter Others suppose it was spoken by way of Prolepsis which seems not to me so probable Ver. 34. So Aaron laid it up When the Tabernacle was built Before the Testimony This is the same with before the LORD in the foregoing Verse For the Divine Glory dwelt between the Cherubims which were over the Ark which is commonly called the Ark of the Testimony XXX 6. XL. 3 5. But here and XXV 36. is simply called the Testimony by an Ellipsis or leaving out the first word which is very usual in other Instances For thus it is called the Ark of God's strength 2 Chron. VI. 41. but elsewhere the first word being omitted it is called only his strength LXXVIII Psalm 61. CV 4. And therefore the Ark is called the Testimony partly because there God gave them a special Token of his Dwelling among them and partly because the two Tables of Stone were in the Ark which are called the Testimony XL. 20. Where it is said Moses put the Testimony into the Ark and then immediately v. 21. he calls it the Ark of the Testimony Ver. 35. And the Children of Israel did eat Manna forty years Within a Month which wanted to make compleat forty years For it begun to fall just XXX days after they came out of Egypt on the XVth of April and ceased to fall on the XVth or XVIth of March the day after the Passover which they kept in the Fortieth year V Josh 11 12. Now in all Writers some days under or over are not wont to be considered when there is a round Number But there are those who fancy these words were put into this Book after Moses his death for which I can see no ground For it is certain he lived the greatest part of the Fortieth year after they came out of Egypt and brought them to the Borders of Canaan within sight of it I Dent. 3. XXXIV 1 2 c. And therefore may well be supposed to have added these words himself to this History as he did the foregoing v. 32. that all belonging to this matter might be put together in one place Vntil they came to a Land inhabited i. e. To Canaan or the Borders of it as it here follows For these words saith Aben-Ezra have respect to the Wilderness in which they now were which was not inhabited Vntil they came unto the Borders of the Land of Canaan That is saith he to Gilgal which was the Borders when they had passed over Jordan when they did eat of the Corn of the Land and had no
to be a plain gradation in this Commandment three things being here forbidden if we take the first part of it to signifie that they might not so much as make a graven Image or any likeness of any thing for fear they should be tempted to Idolatry But though this may be supposed to have been a sin yet not so great as the next to bow down to them which was a degree of Honour too high to be paid unto any Image But was not the highest of all which was to serve them by offering Sacrifice burning Incense making Vows to them or swearing by them or consecrating Temples to them or lighting Candles before them For I the LORD thy God am a jealous God This reason shows that this Commandment is different from the first and not a part of it For worshipping of Images is forbidden not meerly because he was their God and there is but one God but because He is a jealous God who could not endure any Corrival or Consort in that which was proper to himself And so the ancient Jews and Christians also before St. Austin took this for the second Commandment The Arabian Christians in later times particularly Elmacinus distinctly name the Ten Commandments in that order which we now do as Hottinger observes in his Smegma Orientale p. 436. Visiting i.e. Punishing with heavy Judgments XXVI Lev. 39. The iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children This was threatned to terrifie them from this sin which would ruin their Families being a kind of High Treason against the LORD of Heaven and Earth Yet Aben-Ezra understands it only of such Children as trod in the steps of their Forefathers for if they repented the Punishment was mitigated XXVI Lev. 40 c. Vnto the third and fourth Generation That is as long as they could be supposed to live which might be to see the third and perhaps the fourth Generation he threatens to pursue them with his Vengeance in their Posterity whose Punishment they themselves should behold to their great grief So great was his hatred to this Sin and so odious were such People to him Thus Maimonides expounds it in his More Nevoch P. I. c. 54. Visiting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children is threatned only against the Sin of Idolatry as appears from what follows that such Sinners are called haters of him And he mentions only to the fourth Generation because the most a Man can live to see of his Seed is the fourth Generation Accordingly God orders saith he that if any City prove Idolaters the Inhabitants should be destroyed utterly and all that was therein XIII Deut. 13 14 15. Fathers Children Grand-children Great-grand-children and the new-born Children were all killed for the Sin of their Parents Hence he saith VII Deut. 10. he repayeth them that hate him to their face which is there twice mentioned Of them that hate me For he looked on them not only as Enemies but as haters of him It is an Observation of the same Maimonides that in the whole Law of Moses and in the Books of the Prophets we shall never find these words Fury Anger Indignation Jealousie attributed to God but when they speak of Idolatry nor any Man called an Enemy to God an Adversary an Hater of him but only Idolaters VI Deut. 14 15. XI 16 17. XXXI 29 c. I Nehem. 2. VII Deut. 10. XXXII Numb 21. XII Deut. 31. XVI 22. See More Nevoch P. 1. c. 36. which he repeats c. 54. No man is called an hater of God but an Idolater according to that XII Deut. 31. every abomination to the LORD which he hateth By which it appears that they counted the Worshippers of Images Idolaters though they did not think these Images to be Gods for no Man in the World ever thought an Image made of Wood and Stone Silver or Gold to be the Creator of Heaven and Earth or the Governour of the World but took them only for things intermediate between God and them as he there speaks This was a Law so well known to the ancient Heathens that the best Menamong them would suffer no Images to be set up in their Temples In particular Numa forbad this to the Romans which he learnt as Clemens Alexandrinus thinks from Moses Insomuch that for the space of an Hundred and seventy years though they built Temples yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they made no Image neither Statue nor so much as a Picture L. I. Stromat p. 304. Plutarch relates the same in the Life of Numa Pompilius and adds this reason that he thought it a great Crime to represent the most excellent Being by such mean things and that God was to be apprehended only by the Mind The ancient Persians pretend to have received the same Law from their Zoroaster who in a number of things is so like to Moses that Huetius thinks not without reason his story was framed out of these Books Ver. 6. And showing mercy unto thousands To invite their Obedience he promises to be kind unto them and their Posterity for many Generations so thousands signifies who were loyal and faithful to him Such is the infinite goodness of God that he delights in showing Mercy more than in Acts of Severity there being such a disproportion between the one and the other as there is between three or four and a thousand Which made the heavy Punishment of Idolaters the more reasonable because they might have enjoyed such great and long continued Blessings if they would have kept close to their Religion Of them that love me Adhered to him alone as the only Object of Worship and Adoration with such an Affection as a chaste Wife bears to her Husband For God now espoused this Nation to himfelf as the Prophets taught them to understand it and therefore all the Idolatry which is forbidden in these Commandments is called going a whoring from him And keep my Commandments Not only professed to be his intirely but proved it by observing his Precepts Which keeping or observing of his Commandments is mentioned here perhaps and not any of the following Commandments because this and the first were the principal upon which the rest depended There being no reason to mind what he said if they acknowledged any other God but him Ver. 7. Thou shalt not take the Nante of the LORD thy God in vain By the Name of the LORD in Scripture is meant the LORD himself and to take or lift up his Name is to Swear by him So this word Nasa sometimes signifies without the addition of God's Name III Isa 7. Jissa he shall lift up in that day which we truly render in that day he shall swear which they did then with the Hand lifted up to Heaven And to take his Name or swear in vain is to swear falsly That 's the principal meaning undoubtedly that they should not call God to witness unto a Lie promising in his Name that which they meant not to perform or affirming or denying
many Exceptions For they would have him make good what was torn by one Wolf alone because they think he might have been able to defend the Cattle against one though not against many If also he put the Oxen or Sheep into a Pasture wont to be infested with wild Beasts or Thieves or if he did not call in the help of his Neighbours c. in these and such like cases he was to make good that which was torn as Maimonides reports their Judgment See Bochart Hierozoic P. I. L. II. c. 44. Ver. 14. If a man borrow ought of his neighbour and it be hurt or die This the Hebrew Doctors think concerns such things as were lent to another out of kindness without any consideration for the use of them About which if there arose any controversie by reason of some maim that it received or its death it was to be determined by the Rule following The owner thereof being not with it he shall surely make it good These words and those in the beginning of the 15th Verse but if the owner be with it he shall not make it good seem to signifie that if the Owner was with the thing that was lent at the time of its hurt or death it was to be presumed he would do his best to preserve it and see it was not ill used and so must bear the loss But if he was not present at that time then the contrary was presumed that the borrower was in fault and therefore bound to make it good Which though it may seem hard was but necessary to make Men careful and do their best to preserve what was lent them in pure kindness R. Levi of Barcelona Praecept LVI interprets it quite another way in this manner That if the Owner was with it at the time it was borrowed though not present at the time of its hurt or death the borrower was free but if the Owner was present at the time of the hurt or death but not at the time of lending he was bound to make it good For the matter saith he depends upon the beginning of it Ver. 15. If it be an hired thing it came for his hire Some make the Hebrew word Sachir which we translate hired thing to relate unto the Person If he be a Mercenary i. e. the Man who lends agrees to let the borrower have it at a certain price c. But this is the same in effect with the sense of our Translation which makes this word relate to the thing it self which if it were borrowed with a Condition to pay so much for the use of it as the Lender demanded then the Man who hired it was not bound to make it good whether the Owner were present or not when it was hurt or died But the Owner was to run the hazard because of the hire which he received for the use of the thing Ver. 16. If a man intice a maid that is not betrothed and lie with her Whosoever lay with such a Maid in the City was thought to have been an inticer only unless Witnesses came and proved that he forced her because it might be well supposed her Voice would have been heard if she had cried out upon the Force in the City But if he lay with her in the Field where no Body could hear it was presumed to be a Rape Thus Maimonides and other Hebrew Doctors He shall surely endow her to be his wife This Law doth not say as the Old Translation hath it he shall ondow her and take her to be his Wife but only endow her to be his Wife that is give her such a Dowry that she might be his lawful Wife So the same Hebrew Doctors understand it who will not have it to be a Command that he should marry her though that was best but only that he should make Satisfaction for taking away her Virginity which was by paying so much in the nature of a Dowry as would render her fit to be his Wife if both of them could agree Yet so that if either he or she or her Father refused for it was in the power of any of these as they say to hinder the Marriage he paid this Mulct as the Dowry of a Virgin to her Father See Selden's Vxor Hebr. L. I. c. 16. There is another Law of this Nature XXII Deut. 28 29. but it speaks of a Virgin deflowred by force of which see there Ver. 17. If her father uiterly refuse to give her unto him Here is mention made only of the Father not of the Man that deflowred her who one would think should have been bound to marry her if she and her Father pleased And so Josephus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But if the Father of the Damosel did not like to give her to him he was to pay as here is directed He shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins That is saith Josephus fifty shekels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a Satisfaction for her Reproach L. IV. Archaeol c. 8. Ver. 18. Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live This Law about Witches follows the other about Virgins because Witches among other practises helpt by â—vil Arts to allure and entice silly Virgins to consent to Mens Solicitations Epiphanius reports from one that saw it such a Magical Operation used by a Jew to procure the Love of a Christian Woman who was preserved from the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power of his Witcheraft by the Seal of Christ as he calls the Sign of the Cross wherewith she fortified her self at the first attempt made upon her Haeres XXX n. 7 8. But such wicked Wretches did a world of other Mischief and therefore were to be put to death whether they were Men or Women The Scripture indeed mentions a Witch only saith the Gemara of the Sanhedrim c. 7. n. 10. because for the most part they were Women who were addicted to Magick So Maimonides also because the greater part of Evil Works are performed by Women therefore the Law saith Thou shalt not suffer MECHAS SHEPHA a Witch to live P. III. c. 37. More Nevochim Where he discourses of the sorts of Witchcraft and in general affirms that there were no Magical Works performed without respect to the Stars For such People held that every Plant had its Star and so had every Animal and all Metals For Example they said Pluck such a Leaf or such an Herb when the Sun or any other Planet is in such a place let such a Metal be melted under such a Constellation or such a Constitution of the Moon and then say such and such words and let a Fume be made with such Herbs or Leaves and that in such or such a form and then this or that will follow This was their Doctrine and such Works as these were the peculiar worship of the Stars who were delighted they fancied with such Actions Words or Fumes and for the sake of them would do
at Marah XV. 25. XVI 23. was that Men and Beasts might rest in remembrance of the rest that God had given them from their Burdens in Egypt See XXXV 2. R. Levi Barzelonita observes that this Precept is repeated in the Law XII times Ver. 13. In all things that I have said unto you be circumspect Be cautious lest you offend in any of the fore-named Particulars but especially in that which follows And make no mention of the names of other gods Such Cautions as these to prevent Idolatry are repeated no less than XLIV times in the Law as the same R. Levi observes And the meaning of this is either that they should not Swear by other Gods or make any Vows in their Names nor consequently enter into Society with Gentiles as the best of the Hebrew Writers understand it and as the Vulgar Latin takes it or that they should not so much as simply name the Gods of other Nations They who are of this last Opinion differ in their Explication of it For some of them say only the calling them by such Names as attribute some Divinity to them is the thing forbidden not calling them by their proper Names of Moloch or Bell or the like and thus Tertullian understood it But there are others who think it unlawful so much as to use any of their Names in common Discourse though there be no mention of their Divinity For Chemosh and Milcom and such like Names they say are not mentioned in Scripture but with detestation and reproach as the Abomination of the Moabites or Ammonites and therefore they think it unlawful to say I invite thee on the Feast-day of such an Idol of the Gentiles or the like Yet some of those who imagine the simple use of their Names to be forbidden except the Names of those mention'd in Scripture So Maimonides The Names of the Idols of the Gentiles which are mentioned in Scripture it is lawful for us to Name as Peor Bell Nebo Baal c. See Selden L. II. de Jure N. G. c. 13. p. 269 c. They say this Precept binds Men and Women in all places and at all times and the Punishment for its violation was beating Neither shall it be heard out of thy mouth i. e. With any respect or reverence to them Otherwise the simple pronunciation of the Name was not unlawful The Sabbath being instituted partly to preserve them from Idolatry some think that the reason why this Precept is joyned to that Ver. 14. Three times shalt thou keep a feast unto me in the year Viz. At the Passover Pentecost and when they gathered all the Fruits of the Earth and dwelt in Tabernacles as it follows in the next Verses The first of which was plainly instituted in memory of their coming out of Egypt The second some think was in memory of their coming into Canaan rather of the overthrow of Pharaoh in the Sea and giving the Law on Mount Sinai And the third in memory of their dwelling so long in the Wilderness and of the wonders which God did there as Maimonides observes in his More Nevoch P. III. c. 43. At these three great Solemnities three things were to be done First they were to make a Feast Secondly to appear before God in the Court of the Temple and thirdly to rejoyce Besides which they were to bring certain Offerings unto God Ver. 15. Thou shalt keep the feast of unleavened bread c. See XII 17 c. XIII 6 7. In the time appointed of the month Abib Or in the Month of new ears of Corn. See XIII 4. For many Learned men particularly Huetius think this word Abib not to be a proper Name but an Apellative as they speak the proper Names of Months being not yet used among the Hebrews who spake of them before the Captivity of Babylon according to the order and number wherein they stood viz. first second third c. Month. See Demonstr Evang. Prop. IV. Cap. de Libro Joshuae n. 2. And none shall appear before me empty The phrase in the Hebrew which we translate appear before me is very remarkable viz. None shall see my face Which doth not signifie that they beheld the External Symbol of his Presence but that they looked directly that way where it was and that they should not be accepted by God unless they brought some Present with them For none approached to an Earthly Majesty in those Countries without a Present as we read in the Sacred Story which was a Token of Love and Affection as well as of Respect and Honour And therefore this Precept did not belong only to this Feast but to all the three mentioned in the Verse before as appears from XVI Deut. 16. And accordingly there were special Oblations ordained by the Law it self which were then to be made At the Passover when their Harvest began they were to bring a Sheaf of the First-fruits of their Harvest and might not eat any Corn till this was done XXIII Lev. 10 14. At the next Feast they brought two wave Loaves for a second First-fruit of their Wheat-harvest XXIII Lev. 17. and at the Feast of Tabernacles they offered the First-fruits of Wine and Oyl See Mr. Mede Discourse XLVI p. 355. Besides all which good Men brought Free-will Offerings which are often mentioned in the Law Ver. 16. And the feast of harvest Called also the Feast of Weeks XXXIV 22. because it was Seven Weeks after the Passover Mr. Mede in the place now named thinks this was called the Harvest Feast because as Harvest began at the Passover so it ended at Pentecost And thus Bochart also At the Passover they first put the Sickle into the Corn and about Pentecost Harvest was finished and all brought into the Barn Hierozoic P. I. L. III. c. 13. But this seems not to be true for now only the First-fruits were brought which were not offered in the end but in the beginning of Harvest And so it follows here The first-fruits of thy labours which thou hast sown in the field Which is not to be understood of all their Labours but of those Fruits which were first sown in the Ground It being therefore called the Harvest Feast because the principal part of Harvest viz. the Wheat Harvest as it is expresly called XXXIV 22. then began which sort of Grain was sown before Barley as that was before Flax and therefore here called the first-fruits of their labours sown in the field And the feast of in-gathering Called also the Feast of Tabernacles XXIII Lev. 34. Which is in the end of the year By this it appears that their Year anciently began in the Month Tisri about Autumn at which time the World it self began as Scaliger and a great many other Learned Men assert with such Reasons as are not easie to be confuted When thou hast gathered in thy labours out of the field At this Feast their Harvest was compleated the Fruits of the Earth being not only ripe
So that there is scarce any Author who treats of the Sacrifices and the Priests of the Heathens that doth not speak of their Garments also As Moses here in the first Institution of the Priesthood among the Jews to offer peculiar Sacrifices at God's House takes a special care by the Divine direction about their Vestments Which the Hebrew Doctors think so inseparable from the Priesthood that they fancy Adam Abel and Cain did not Sacrifice without them See III Gen. 22. They are called holy because they might be worn by none but them and by them only when they ministred unto God For Aaron thy brother The High Priest had some Garments peculiar to himself which none of the other Priests might wear They were four the Breast-plate the Robe the Ephod and the Plate of Gold There were four more he also wore but they were common to him with the other Priests viz. the Coat the Drawers the Girdle and the Bonnet Their Bonnets indeed and his Miter were of a different form yet they are not considered by the Jews as distinct Vestments being both Coverings of the Head And they make account the High Priest never wore at one time above eight sorts of Garments nor the lower above four This is the universal sense of the Hebrew Writers and I cannot give any account why Grotius mentions only seven Garments of the High Priest reckoning the golden Plate for one which he will have to answer unto the seven Lamps in the Candlestick For it is evident by this very Chapter he wore eight viz. the Ephod v. 8. the Brest-plate v. 15. the Robe v. 31. the Plate of Gold v. 36. the embroidered Coat the Girdle and the Mitre v. 39. which are all ordered for Aaron the High Priest and afterward v. 42 43. Breeches are ordered for him as well as his Sons which make up the number of eight For glory and for beauty To make their Office more respected and strike Men with an awful sense of the Divine-Majesty whose Ministers they saw appear in such grandeur For this and the foregoing Precepts as Maimonides observes were given to render the Sanctuary of God more august and magnificent for which end he magnified the Dignity of those who Ministred there and not only separated them from other Men but ordered them to be clothed in beautiful and precious Garments that they might appear there like Men of Honour More Nevoch L. III. c. 45. unto which R. Levi of Barcelona well adds Praecept XCIX that by these glorious Garments the Priests were put in mind of their Dignity and admonished to perform the Divine Service with a Spirit suitable to the greatness of him unto whom they were Consecrated It may be sit for me also to add That there being two sorts of Garments which the High Priest wore those they called white and these they called golden both of them were very rich and made him look gloriously whether the Materials or the Colours or the Art wherewith they were made be regarded as will appear in the particular account which is given of them in this Chapter See v. 40. Ver. 3. And thou shalt speak unto all that are wise-hearted So the Hebrews call those who had extraordinary skill in any Art according to the ancient Opinion which made the Heart the Seat of the Mind Whom I have filled with the Spirit of Wisdom Indued with singular skill For the word ruaeh in Scripture sometimes signifies a Gift of God whereby they who had it performed what they undertook excellently And Mechanical Arts are called Wisdom as well as higher Sciences So St. Paul calls himself a wise Master-builder Which was the ancient Language of the World before the time of Pythagoras as Cuperus observes in his Apotheosis Homeri p. 119. out of Georgius Diaconus his Preface to Aristotle's Logick and out of Nichomachus Gerasinus whose words are very remarkable When all before Pythagoras were called by the common Name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 even Builders of Houses and Curriers of Leather and Pilots 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in general every one that was skilful in any Art or publick Work that Philosopher denied this Name to them Notwithstanding which some Authors in after times still observed the ancient use insomuch that Aelian calls Fishermen who understood their Art well 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 L. I. de Animal c. 2. and Lucian calls Perilaus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a wise Brasier and Aristotle himself observes that Phidias was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a wise Stone-cutter L. V. Moral ad Eudemum Nor were the Latines Strangers to this Language as Cuperus shows in the same place which is here used by Moses whose intire sense in these words is this That the Men here spoken of hoing very skilful of themselves in their several Arts their skill was so increased by God's special Gift that they became marvellous Artists That they may make Aarons Garments They were first employed in making Garments for Aaron which were the most costly and required most care in the work about them The principal of these excellent Artists were Bezaleel and Aholiab XXXI 1 2 c. To consecrate him To be put on at his Consecration XXIX 5 6 c. That he may minister to me in the Priests office For without these Garments he might not minister Whence that common saying in the Talmud concerning the Priests While they are clothed in their Garments they are Priests when they want them they are not Priests Which Maimonides expresses thus When they are clothed in their Garments their Priesthood is upon them when they are not clothed with them their Priesthood is not upon them That is they might no more perform Divine Service than meer Lay-men Whence it was that under the second Temple when they wanted the holy Oyl to anoint him the High Priest was made meerly by clothing him with the fore-named eight Garments And as they might not minister without these so they might not add any other to them If they did their ministry was unlawful For which reason they might not wear Gloves on their Hands or Shoes on their feet for from their Knees to which their Breeches reached to their feet they were naked only their Coats in some sort covered their Legs But they stood barefoot in the Sanctuary while they ministred We do not find indeed that God any where forbid them to minister in Shoes but they being not commanded when God orders other Vestments particularly Bonnets for their Heads and saith here expresly these are the Garments thou shalt make that Aaron may minister to me in the Priests Office the Jews thence concluded that God intended they should use no other and not so much as any thing on their Feet in the Sanctuary And this out of Reverence to that holy Place as Moses was commanded to put off his Shoes because of the Presence of God in that Ground where he stood Which to me is an Argument that Moses did