his face so that they could not look stedfastly to the end of his Dispensation The fault of the first Covenant There was some kind of fault as it were in the Law it self so the Apostle tells us Heb. 8.7 For if that first Covenant had been faultless there should no place have been sought for the second What this fault was is commonly known and discoursed and it was the obscurity of it the promises of it were not so plain therefore it is said Christ is the Mediator of a better Covenant establisht upon better promises ver 6. There was a Covenant of works inserted in their Dispensation Else how could the Apostle give you a description of the righteousness of it out of Moses Which he doth both in Rom. 10.5 and Gal. 3.12 And no caveat entred in the place where the Covenant of Works is delivered 'T is true the same Moses describeth the righteousness of Faith too but an inobservant Reader might chance to mistake the Covenant of Works for his way to Heaven as well as take the Covenant of Grace for his way and they might keep in that way all their lives if they were not strict observers of the effects of that way upon their Consciences which was to gall and sting them and weary them out of their very lives till they came to the way of Grace And thus we find the generality of the Jews did mistake and ruined themselves by it so that unless God had by a wonderful hand as he plucked Lot out of Sodom and perhaps by irresistable illuminations and attractions brought a remnant to himself all Israel had been burnt up by the Wrath of God they had been as Sodom and Gomorrah Rom. 9.29 to the end Rom. 10.1.2.3 I might well transcribe every word of these eight Verses Now this was the fault which God found with his first Covenant that though it were a Covenant of Grace yet he is so gracious that he thought it was not plain enough to save the generality of them they would be still mistaking and misconstruing his Covenant it would not make them holy enough nor save enough of them and therefore this Fault the Lord amends in the second â—ovenant in the New-Covenant Heb. 8 9 For finding fault he saith Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will make a new Covenant with the House of Israel not according to the Covenant that I made with their Fathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the Land of Aegypt because here is the reason of the change because they continued not in my Covenant and I regarded them not It was a Covevenant which they brake with me and I brake with them upon there was a fault in that Covenant which seems to be this It had not Grace enough in it to hold them they continued not in it The fault is laid upon the Covenant not so much upon the parties covenanting though they were not free from blame God indeed was free he was ready to give his Grace and Spirit under the first Covenant but the Covenant was not a free channel for conveyance of this precious Water of Life for the Spirit runs freest in the clear promise therefore the Gospel which is full of rich and plain promises is called the ministration of the Spirit and called by the Name of Spirit whereas the Law of Moses was a dead meer out-side literal thing in comparison of it 2 Cor. 3.6 I say the fault was laid upon the covenant which yet was a covenant of Grace Now what other fault it could be then this that the Lord did not think it gracious enough I cannot imagine and I think that is the fault the Scripture pitcheth upon Now because Moses's Dispensation or the first covenant made with the Jews was thus faulty had a covenant of Works in 〈◊〉 and was mistaken by the Jews to be a covenant of Works it might well be called by the Apostle There was the same reason of the Gospel its being added to the Law that there was of the dispensation of Moses to be added to what they knew of God before a killing letter a ministration of death and condemnation and deserve to be abrogated and disannulled if the Lord will make a better clearer more gracious and saving and yet it can by no means be concluded hence that it was truly either in its own nature or in the intention of the Lord who gave it a covenant of Works nay the contrary hereunto is sufficiently evinced Ob. 4. But yet there is a very considerable Objection behind which is thus You have acknowledged that in Moses's Writings there is a covenant of Works described that St. Paul asserts now I will add saith the Objection that it is not onely there described but there commended to the children of Israel as a part at least if not the chiefest part of the Dispensation by Moses and it is given with as great Authority and hath as solemn a Sanction upon it as any part of the Law of Moses for in that place which the Apostle Paul quotes out of Moses viz. Lev. 18.5 for the description of a legal righteousness we have these words Ye shall therefore keep mp Seatutes and my Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. So in the fore-going verses 1 2. And the Lord spake unto Moses saying Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them I am the Lord your God then follow the three verses wherein the covenant of Works is described ver 3. After the doings of the Land of Aegypt wherein ye dwelt shall ye not do and after the doings of the Land of Canaan whither I bring you shall ye not do neither shall ye walk in their Ordinancee Ver. 4. Ye shall do my Judgements and keep mine Ordinances to walk therein I am the Lord your God Ver 5. Ye shall therefore keep my Statutes and my Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. Here I observe 1. The simplicity and plainness of the delivery of these commands which contain the covenant of Works they are delivered without any caveat or caution to the Reader lest he should mistake this for his covenant which he should be saved by 2. I observe the Authority and Majesty they are delivered with even with this addition three several times in the compass of four verses I am the Lord and I am the Lord your God This doth not look like an old antiquated covenant made with Adam about 2000. years before and of use to him but onely for the strst day of his creation I conclude therefore saith the objector That it is a valid covenant and delivered with intention that men should be justified by it And besides I add that which hath great strength in it That even Jesus Christ himself repeats this covenant of Works in Moses his own Words and directs a man to this
covenant for salvation that came to ask of him what he should do to be saved the place is Luke 10.25 26 27 28. And behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life He said unto him What is written in the Law How readest thou Christ sends him to the Law and you shall see it is not to the Law in a large sence as it comprehends both a covenant of Works and a covenant of Grace but to the Law taken strictly for a covenant of Works it follows therefore ver 27. The Lawyer answering said The Law saith Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbour as thy self And Jesus said unto him Thou hast answered right this do and thou shalt live which are the very words of Moses where he describes a legal righteousness From whence I conclude That the Covenant of Works is still good unto Justification the Covenant of Works is still in force else Moses would never have delivered it in that simplicity and with that Authority else Jesus Christ himself would never have directed one unto it to get eternal life by it I answer 1. That Moses indeed did deliver a covenant of Works to the people of Israel as truly as he did a covenant of Grace and that without any caution that I can find in the place where it is delivered and I think I may say also that our Saviour Christ did deliver a Covenant of Works too in that 10. of Luke above-mentioned And 2dly I may add There was very good reason why they might and why they did For that the covenant of Works is still in force all men by nature are under it for it is nothing but the natural law of our creation All men are naturally under a Covenant of works There was indeed a positive Law besides given to Adam but the observing of it needed not have created any trouble to innocent man All men are naturally under a covenant of Works for they are naturally under the Law of their Creation which is the covenant of Works Yea the Saints themselves are not freed from it any further then from the condemning power of it by Christs having suffered the penalty for them That all men are naturally under the Law or under a covenant of Works which are all one appears for that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law Gal. 4.5 which must be meant of the Law strictly taken for a covenant of Works for else none but the Jews and proselyted Gentiles were under the Law as delivered by Moses whereas in that Scripture it is plain that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law therefore it is meant under the Law as a covenant of Works Besides the Apostle in Rom. 7. the first six verses argues thus That the conscience or soul of a man must either be married to the Law as its Husband or to Christ as its Husband and till it is marryed to Christ the Law is its natural Husband but when it is married to Christ the law is its husband no longer therefore till a man come to Christ he is under a covenant of Works therefore all men naturally are under a covenant of Works for no man is in Christ by nature I answer in the third place That it 's true Moses and our Saviour both preached a covenant of Works as well as a covenant of Grace and well might because all men are naturally under it Yet neither our Saviour nor Moses did it with design to make men seek justification by Works but only to burthen mens consciences with insupportable loads of guilt that so they might readily flee to the hope that was set before them in the covenant of Grace which they had together with the covenant of Works in the same Dispensation That Moses did it with this design St. Paul asserts as I have shewn in several places the law entred that the offence might abound and so was a School-Master unto Christ And that our Saviour did it with this design the place quoted in the objection will sufficiently evidence Luke 10.25 to the 28.25 v. Behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life Here this Lawyer came not with a good intention for it is said he stood up and tempted our Saviour made the question rather to see what our Saviour would say then to get any satisfaction to himself and in the 29. ver it is said This Lawyer was willing to justifie himself Now how could the pride of this tempting Lawyer be better repressed then by sending him to the Law to a covenant of Works which if he would but set himself in earnest to keep would quickly prick the bladder of his pride and let out that wind with which he was so swoln as to dare come and tempt Christ and justifie himself But now our Saviour takes another course with the Woman of Canaan who after she was tryed with a knock or two with some harsh words so as to be called Dog yet continuing humble and submissive had her faith extolled by our Saviour and is strengthened with the highest consolations as we have the story Matt. 15. from ver 22. to ver 29. Thus God resisteth the proud he hath a Covenant of Works to oppose them withall but he giveth Grace and sheweth Mercy to the humble he hath a covenant of Grace to comfort them with Obj. 5 There is one objection yet more concerning the ceremonial law which I did not mention at the first and it is this Certainly it appears from the ceremonial law that the law of Moses was given to them for a covenant of Works else why had they such multitude of ceremonies imposed upon them if they were not to have life for the observation and doing of them together with the duties of the moral Law And it is very observable that in that place of Leviticus which the Apostle quotes as containing the righteousness of the law the ceremonies are as strictly enjoined as the moral duties of the law are with this badge of the law of works upon them The man that doth them shall live in them Lev. 18.4 5. Ye shall do my Judgements that is say Commentors my judicial Laws and keep mine Ordinances that is say they either moral or ceremonial so in ver 5. You shall therefore keep my Statutes and Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. Now hence I argue saith the Objector Here you have acknowledged is a covenant of Works described Now here is their whole Dispensation by Moses of laws moral ceremonial and judicial contained therefore their whole Dispensation was a covenant of Works besides if the Law moral alone which you have called the law of Nature he of it self a covenant
of Works as it seems to have been to Adam who had but a few other commands besides viz. such as we call Positive and if every man by Nature be under a covenant of works though a stranger to the Old-Testament or New as having never heard of either being under the law of his creation how much more were the Israelites under a covenant of Works who besides the moral law had the judicial and ceremonial added for them to observe and altogether given them vvith this language of a covenant of Works these ye shall observe which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. I shal add onely one observation more to strengthen the objection and it is this That when St. Paul disputes against the Galatians for embracing a covenant of Works most of his Work lyes in beating them off from the ceremonial law vvhich they were exceedingly addicted to as looking upon the lavv of Moses to be very much of the nature of the covenant of Works and the ceremonial law as a great sign of it there being so much vvork cut out for them in it and verily believing that if they vvere pretty strict in keeping the ceremonial law God vvould justifie and save them Therefore it is very probable that the law of Moses was given to them as a covenant of Works for this reason as well as others that there were so many ceremonies appointed for them to observe most of which it is more then probable the greater number did not understand and so must take up und satisfie themselves with the Work done then which vvhat can look more like a covenant of vvorks for men to do a great many things which they did not understand meerly because God had commanded them Now for answer to this objection and I shall give it in several particulars A. 1 I confess that the ceremonial law proved a great snare and a stumbling-block unto the careless Jews and so to the Galatians for when they found such a great task of ceremonies set them they cared not much to study the meaning of them but took up with the doing of them which to do did not much trouble their hearts or consciences and so placed themselves by it under a covenant of vvorks in their treating with God for Justification 2dly I grant that the ceremonial law was a great burthen and an unsupportable yoke even to those that were good amongst the Jews Acts 15.10 and it is a great piece of the liberty of the Gospel to be freed from it 3dly I grant that the laws moral judicial and ceremonial were given altogether and are included in that place where a covenant of vvorks or the righteousness of the Law is said to be described by the Apostle and I grant in this particular that though the law of nature alone is a covenant of vvorks to those that are in a state of nature though they never received any positive law from God yet that it is possible for a ceremonial lavv or a law consisting of many ceremonies or positive laws to be a part of a covenant of vvorks as we find in Adam's covenant of works there was a Sacrament as some reckon it of the Tree of life and there was a positive law concerning the forbidden fruit which vvere neither of them branches of the law of Nature and he might have been as well forbidden as allowed all the trees save one if the Lord had pleased he might have had a systeme of positive and ceremonial laws inserted in his covenant of vvorks if the Lord had thought good and no wrong had been done him for he was able to have kept them 4thly Yet here I deny that the ceremonial law was any part of a covenant of works though brought in near that place where the righteousness of the law is said by the Apostle to be described and that for this reason which fully answers the objection That the ceremonial law did contain Gospel in it which cannot be said of any branch of the covenant of works I allowed indeed above that the law taken strictly for a covenant of works did preach the Gospel virtually or by consequence as it burthened the sinners conscience and so made him seek further for a righteousness but I said then it is the law taken in a large sence onely as it contains the whole Old-Testament or at least a considerable part of it that teacheth Christ and the Gospel formally and expresly VVhy now the ceremonial law teacheth Christ in many perhaps in all the parts of it if wel understood VVhat could the shedding of so much blood for remission of sins signifie but the shedding of Christs blood for them and us all which is the great mysterie of the Gospel Now if any say they understood it not and yet must do it and so it was all one to them as if it had not singnified any thing at all and therefore must still pass with them as a covenant of works I answer 1 in the words of the Apostle Rom. 3 3. What though some did not believe did not understand must their unbelief and ignorance make the Faith of God that Doctrine of Faith which the ceremonial law preached of none effect or signification But you will say they could not see the blood of Christ in the blood of a sacrifice having no clearer discoveries then they had of Christ I ans I confess I cannot say they could see so much though still so much was contained in it as now we well understand But yet if they could not see so much yet somewhat they might have learned for certainly God appoints no idle useless insignificant ceremonies in his Worship therefore I suppose they might have learnt thus much by their ceremonies and particularly by their sacrifices which I suppose was known even amongst Heathens in their sacrifices that when they killed a Beast for attoning the anger of God here life went for life and God might as well have taken their lives from them as accepted the life of that Beast and so by this they might see that their lives and salvations did depend purely upon the Mercy and Grace of God now this sufficiently weaned them from the law or covenant of works which had no Grace or Pardon in it it was therefore the grossest mistake of all to understand the ceremonial law for a part of the covenant of Works when it was greatly intended to be a Gospel to them 5thly and lastly If yet it were dark and did confound them with the multitude of duties which it imposed Why might it not herein do the good turn that a covenant of Works did for them Which was to make them study and search and long for the pure and clear discoveries of that rich Grace which we now see in the dayes of the Gospel I have now done with this objection also which I of purpose kept out from the rest in which I only considered the moral law as a
is also called the Promise Faith then is made void the Promise made of none effect Rom. 4.14 And lastly to mention no more the Promises is the Law then against the Promises of God Gal. 3.21 the verbs To him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted unto him for righteousness Having given this Muster-Roll as it were of both parties I come now to some other Positions the first was this viz. 1. That there are but these two ways imaginable of fication there are but two sorts of Righteousness and so but two ways by which men do or with pretence of reason can seek Justification in else there had been more mentioned by the Apostle The second position is this 2. That these two wayes are quite opposite one to the other and inconsâ—stent one with the other that is as to the Justification of the same man at the same time nay if a man doth but seek to be justified by the one he cannot be justified by the other at the same time This opposition I have argued out for me expresly by the Apostle Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace but if it be by works then it is no more of Grace oâ—herwise work is no more work Rom. 4.4 5. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of Grace but of Debt but to him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted for righteousness 3d. Position is this The way of works was once and still in its own nature is a way of justification Rom. 7.10 The Commandment was ordained to be unto life yea this way was the ancient and the first of the ways of God in his dealing with man and seems to be natural and necessary to the primitive Estate of mankind For God made made man upright in his own Image of knowledg righteousness and true holiness and gave him the Law though not written in Tables of stone yet in his heart which was better else it had not been sinne to have committed Murther Adultery Stealth false-witness bearing Perjury Idolatry and what not in the Estate of innocency for where there is no Law there is no transgression God gave man a Law and surnished him with ability to have hept it to a tittle so that if he would he might have had the works of the Law to shew for himself The way of Justification by the â—aw unsolded and aâ—gued to be the first natural way of juslification at what time soever the Creator should have called him to account and all the time he and others had kept themselves innocent and holy they must have been acceptable to God he would have had respect to them and their works and they would have obtained this Testimony from God that they pleased him which was all that Enoch who was too good to live in the World had to shew for his justification And this had been enough for Adam or any other man to have produced for their Justification if Satan had at any time turned Accuser And thus living according to the Will of God they should have continued in the favour of God and perhaps after some term of years have been translated to some more happy an estate Then they might have gloryed without sinning that is they might have pleased themselves with such thoughts and speeches as these Happy are we that we took heed and care to please God and kept our selves innocent for now have we obtained a glorious reward we might have ruined our selves as we see the Angels have done We had a Power to have started aside from God but we have kept our selves from that mischief Such an innocent glorying as this and no higher glorying can I imagine lawful even in such a state was not forbidden by the Law of Works it was not excluded Rom. 3.27 Thus we see Justification is a a thing feasible and attainable by works by the Law if a man have the works of it Our Saviour and the elect Augels were justified by the Law Yea our Saviour Christ had the Works of the Law and the Law justified him and the Angels that kept their first estate they were doubtless approved by the Law of their Creation and had all the Apostate Angels turned Devils and false Accusers of them as they are of the Brethren their Works would have justified them in the sight of God Not that the good Angels had no other reward but what a Covenant of Works would allow and before the world though I say not that the good Angels have no other reward but what a Covenant of works allots But I doubt not to affirm That the good Angels were justified and rewarded by a Covenant of Works in as much as there was a full trial made when the other Angels fell of their voluntary obedience So that the Law in it self hath not only a power to justifie and reward but hath actually rewarded the observers of it those that had the righteousness of it Yea all the Work of our redemption by Christ was brought about onely with the good leave of the Law Christ must make a recognition and publikely own the Authority and Majesty that was still remaining in the Law acknowledgement must be made how that that had been offended and some reparation must be made unto the glory of God which was much impaired as it is a revenue from us in the transgression of the Law And this was the onely way decreed by God that the Law must satisfie it self upon him whosoever would undertake our Redemption and then the Law must justifie him all which it did upon our Saviour Which proves the unquestionable Power and Authority that the Law had in it to justifie man had he but the works of it But now let any man or Angel but sin If the â—aw be once broken in a tittle it can justifie no longer and the Law can justifie him no longer if he have but the least failing in obedience the Law can onely condemn this person Man or Angel whoever he be but I shall limit my self to mankind For this take that Scripture Gal. 3.10 Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them So that if a man hath once sinned and yet seeks to be justified he must not seek justification by the righteousness of the Law any longer there comes a necessity of Grace Pardon Mercy which the Law hath not in it the Law hath no such thing as Grace or Pardon in it The Law onely saith He that doth them shall live in them and he that doth them not is accursed Now this Grace Mercy and Pardon which a man comes to have a necessity of upon his first breach of the Law is in the way of Faith which I have proved to be the opposite way of Justification to that of the Law It is of Faith saith the Apostle
covenant of Works for these two reasons 1. For that the ceremonial law neither was nor could be a part of the covenant of Works which the moral law both was and is to all that are under a covenant of works 2dly and consequently I therefore kept off from any consideration of the ceremonial law in my discourses about the law its being given by Moses that so I might have my discourse run clear in the business of the covenant of works and draw a line in it from Adams estate in innocency to the very days of the Gospel which with any mixture of discourse about the ceremonial law would have been broken and disturbed VVhereas now you see the law taken strictly for a covenant of works might have justified Adam but could not justifie the children of Israel and therefore though added to the promise given to Abraham and that in the language of a covenant of works yet was never given with design that they should accept it for such unto Justification which appears from this double demonstration as I may call it a priori a posteriori A priori for that before the law was given there was a covenant of Grace which the law could not come in to disannul and a posteriori for that the very same Moses that brought their law from God out of the Mount did not more truly acquaint them with the nature of a legal righteousness then he did with the righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart c. being a text quoted out of the same Moses Deut. 30.11 which make this argument vvherefore should Moses first describe to you a legal righteousness and tell you as appears by clear consequence out of him that ye cannot attain unto that righteousness and then describe unto you the righteousness of faith but for this end that ye might forgo the one cleave to the other And there are infinite places in other Scriptures of the Old-Testament which give their testimony to Christ and the Righteousness of Faith which sufficiently argue that the Old-Testament never went about to establish a way of Justification by the Law And here I think it may be of great use to search into this place of Moses which the Apostle asserts to contain the description of the righteousness which is by faith that so we may find both that it is so and what this righteousness of faith is The place is Deut. 30.11 to 15. quoted and paraphrased by the Apostle Rom. 10.6 7 8 9. An inquiry into the sense of Deut 30 11 12 in Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend into Heaven c. clearly referring to Deut. 30.11 12 as any may see in the Margent of their Bibles Now let us go to that place in Deut. and see what Gospel there is in it and how evident it is that there is Gospel in it The words are these For this commandment which I command thee this day it is not hidden from thee neither is it far off it is not in heaven that thou shouldest say who shall go up for us to Heaven and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it Neither is it beyond the Sea that thou shouldest say Who shall go over the Sea for us and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it but the Word is nigh unto thee in thy mouth and in thy heart that thou mayest do it This is the whole Paragraph in which the covenant of Grace or the righteousness of Faith is described according to the Apostle Paul But how is the Gospel or righteousness of Faith described here First of all I must separate that which doth not seem to look like Gospel from that which is pure Gospel in this place And here we may observe That the matter of the Gospel spoken of is the law or commandment which he had delivered to them This Commandment which I command thee this day the same which is spoken of as I think there being no visible difference as to matter in Lev. 18.5 the place asserted by the Apostle to contain a legal righteousness it was for matter the law of Moses This Commandment saith he which I command thee this day Again I think it will appear to be meant of the ten commandments because it is added That Commandment which I command thee is not far from thee but is nigh thee even in thy heart and mouth Now the ceremonial law was not written in their heart neither had all the children of Israel nor the generality of them to whom yet this is spoken been taught the law effectually by the Spirit of God so as that should be the sense of these words This Commandment is in thine heart and indeed that is the promise of the new Covenant not of this by Moses but the effect of the Moral law was in their heart for it was in the heart of Heathens If it be objected as perhaps it may by some that the matter of the Commandment which Moses commanded them that day was not likely to be the ten commandments nor that chiefly nor to be the same with that in Lev. 18. because this is in Deuteâ—â—româ— which very word signifies a second Law or a second Edition and giving of the Law and had more Gospel in it then the Law in the first giving of it had I answer 1. by concession That there were indeed two several Covenants which the Lord is said to have made by Moses with the children of Israel Deut. 29.1 These are the words of the Covenant which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the Land of Moab be ides the Covenant which he made with them in Hoâ—eb which a as a Mountain adjoining to if not a part of Mount Sinat 2. That perhaps in this Deutetonomy or second Covenant by Moses there 〈◊〉 mâ—â—â— promises and more of Gospel then in the first Edition of the Law there was But 3dly This doth not hinder but the commandment mentioned in Deut. â—0 might be chiefly for matter of it the moral Law or ten Commandments 't is true there were promises added to encourage unto the keeping of them and there were also terrible threatnings unto the breaking of them all the twelve tribes being divided into two equal parts the one half placed upon Mount Gerizim to bless the people that were obedient to the Law the other half upon Mount Ebal to curse all that brake it Deut 27.11 12 13 But that commandment for the sake of which these promises and threatnings were added was the Law of the ten words or two tables which were twice given to Moses in Sinai and again repeated in this Covenant in the Land of Moab as we may see in Deut. 5. and the very word Deut. signifies a second Law or a second giving of the Law
believe whereas some think it as hard a business to believe as to keep the whole Law 2. They 'l say That I make the Gospel but a Covenant of works in a new dress and substitute Evangelical obedience in the room of Legal as the matter of our Justification 3. They may perhaps add that I leave out the great Gospel-mysterie which according to the Apostle is contained in Deut. and that is Christ That which Moses expresseth thus the Commandment which I command thee is not in heaven that thou shouldst say Who shall ascend for us into Heaven bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it The Apostle Paul expresseth thus Who shall ascend for us into Heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the dead But what saith it The Word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart and leaving out that thou mayest do it he addeth the Word of Faith which we preach that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and shall believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Here we see the Apostle sinds Christ in all that speech of Moses and it was Faith on him that justified therefore it was not a keeping of the Law according to sincerity instead of unerring obedience which Moses meant and so the exposition given of Moses is useless Now I shall answer first this last objection against the interpretation of Moses his Covenant of Grace and then come to the other two objections and I shall do it in the words of truth as I hope I am sure in the words soberness The last objection first answered 1. I do believe all this which the Apostle adds by way of Paraphrase to agree wel with the words of Moses 2. That yet I cannot believe that any ordinary Saint or any other then some mightily inspired by God like an Apostle could have understood all that in Moses his words when they were first delivered viz. That Christ should descend into the deep and after that be raised from the dead and ascend into Heaven because Moses sayes Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend for us into Heaven and bring the Word from thence that we may hear it and do it Or because Moses sayes Who shall go for us beyond the Seas and bring the Word unto us Neither can I believe that it was their duty in Moses's time to confess with their mouth the Lord Jesus or to believe in their heart that God had raised him from the dead a thing which was not at that time true I say I do not think it was their duty to believe it because to us it is contained in the Word of Faith to wit the Gospel which the Apostle preached Neither do I believe that it was a necessary duty of that time so much as to believe that God would raise Christ from the dead and that for this reason For all the Apostles in the dayes of Christ's Flesh were ignorant of this Mystery yea did not believe it or understand it after Christ had told them of it as is very plein in Luke 18. from 31. to 35. The reciting the words of that Text is plain proof enough without urging them by force of Argument 31. Then he took unto him the twelve and said unto them Behold we go up to Jerusalem and all things that are written by the Prophets concerning the Son of Man shall be accomplished Ver. 33. They shall scourge him and put him to death and the third day he shall rise again Now it is said ver 34. that they understood none of these things and this saying was hid from them neither knew they the things that were spoken Therefore certainly these things were not necessary to be known and believed in Moses his time And therefore though there be so much Gospel contained in that Text of Deut. to us now that the Apostle hath discovered it unless we will say they are additional glosses upon that Text of Moses which perhaps may prove no false Divinity I say Permit all that be contained to us in that Text of Deut. which St. Paul hath discovered in it yet by them under the Old-Testament as I think there could be no more understood then this That they were not to lay it upon themselves as absolutely necessary to salvation and so unto Justification to keep the whole Law in the strictness of it but that they were to minde the keeping of it from their heart to turn unto the Lord their God with all their heart and with all their souls and so to keepe his Commandments and his Statutes which are written in this Book of the Law as it is ver 10. immediately preceding those Verses in Deut. 30. where the righteousness of Faith is said to be described and this to do to keep the Law with all their heart sincerely they should find easie and pleasant whenas for a strict Covenant of Works Do this and thou shalt live they would find it an unsupportable yoke and burthen Now I come to answer those other two objections against my interpretation The first answered the first is this That I make Faith too easie athing in comparison of keeping the Law whereas many good men judg it a hard to believe as to keep the whole Law I answer 1. That indeed I do think the way of Faith to be an easier way in it self then keeping the whole Law For I ask any sober man Whether it be not easier to keep the Law in a sincere manner that is to guide my actions onely by the rule of it and honestly to endeavour toconform to it though in some things I fail if this be not easier then the exact keeping the Law to a tittle The question I suppose is answered as soon as made Why then I say I look upon the way of believing to be this Corning to God humbling my self for my sins addicting my self to his service and walking faithfully with him The description 〈…〉 and in this way of well doing seeking for glory honour and â—mmortality In one word It is an Honesty to God upon terms of Grace and I being honest and true to him doubt not of his faithfulness to me for pardoning my sins and providing for me here and saving me here after Erge if this be Faith for proof of which I refer to my interpretation and require a better or fairer in confutation of it I say if this be faith then the way of Faith is easier then keeping the whole Law 2. But yet I have not said that though it be easier yet it is in a mans own power to believe it is not iâ— a man 's own power to move a finger without God and it is equally impossible without God to move a singer and to remove a Mountain yet there is no man in his right
in our own time that is that ceremonies or external services not commanded in the moral Law were invented even whilest there was a ceremonial Law in force and vast numbers since its abolition and both rested upon as also that a superficial performance of Moral Duties is found both in the Scripture and in our own experience to have been rested upon For the latter first How common waâ— it with the Jews in our Saviours time to think that if they kept the Letter of the Law they had discharged their duty contained in that commandment If they did not kill a man they thought they discharged their duty in the sixth Commandment If they did not commit Adultery they had discharged the seventh and so having kept the Law they might expect the Law should justifie them and therefore St. Paul whilst a Pharisee he was touching the Law blameless as he thought which if he had truly been and continued so he might well have expected to be justified by it And so the young Pharisee Matth. 19.20 says of the Commandments All these have I kept from my youth And upon this he rested hitherto I have heard one my self whom I judged a wicked man and so did many others besides me yet sayes he Well I am confident if any Family in such a place have the blessing of God ours hath for we have prayers morning and evening and never a cross or angry word passeth between me and my wife from one end of the week to the other This imperfect obedience to the Moral Law he made the matter of his Justification perhaps even to an explicite opinion of Merit Thus you see men that have any conformity to the Motal Law are apt to place their trust there But now because there are few so strict as St. Paul whilest a a Pharisee was or as the young man was but that there is a consciousness of guilt from the Moral Law therefore they are the lewest Legallists that rest upon their obedience to the Moral Law alone if any do they must help patch up their righteousness with ceremonial observances so that the ceremonial Law whether given by God or invented by men hath most custom and bears up the weight of these mens expectations and I think I may make this assertion at least this guess that there were never any in the world that sought Justification by works but they were much in love with some superstitlons or at least with Ceremonies yea even those who have been most strict in observing the duties of the Moral Law as to the Letter of it yoâ—r greatest Pharisees they are as much for obfervation of Ceremonies as any men in the world How were the Pharisees in our Saviours time addicted to invented ceremonies and superstitions though one would think they had enough ceremonies in their Law already What washings had they invented c. And it is said they taught for Doctrines humane traditions and inventions Mat. 15.9 Wicked men and those that are careless in keeping the Moral Law are for ceremonies to patch up a righteousness Pharisees are for them to have a redundancy of righteousness such as may make sure work yea such as may serve themselves and others too and this cannot well be but by such Works as were not their duty to do and so must be inventions of their own so that however it cometh to pass one way or another both the strict Legalist and looser self-Justitiaries lay the chief stress in pleasing God and seeking his favour upon ceremonious observances I shall instance in one place of Scripture where as I take it there is a ful and lively Description of a Legal-self-Justitiary it is Mic. 6 6 7 8. And wherein is it that he pleaseth himself most or hopes to please God best but in ceremonies that is external services not commanded in the Moral Law and some of those invented Wherewith saith he shall I come before the Lord and how my self before the high God Shall I come before him with Burnt-offerings with Calves of a year old will the Lord be pleased so as to justifie me with thousands of Rams or with ten thousands of Rivers of Oyle Shall I give my first born for my transgression the fruit of my body for the sin of my soulâ— Here you see the poor man offers very fair in his way if he may have it by ceremonious services he wil do any thing he wil suffer the loss of any thing his Estate his Relations yea his dearest Relations his first-born here the man mixeth Heathenish Sacrifices with Jewish ceremonies but you see the maâ— is willing at least seems willing to do any thing The Papists wil whip themselves Baal's Ptiests wâ—â— cut themselves AFTER THEIR MANNER with Knives and Lances till the blood gush out upon them 1 Ki. 18.28 Any thing but BELIEVING These self Justificiaries are quite out in their guess what wil please God They are ready to think with Naamaâ— when he was to be cleansed of his Leprosie that they must do some GREAT THING to be cured 2 King 5 13. They slightly pass over THIS POOR EUSINESS OF BELIEVING as he did his command of washing in Jordan Are not Abana and Parphar Rivers of Damasous better then all the waters of Israel May not I wash in them and be clean saith he so he turned and went away in arage vor 11 12. So saith the legal Spirit Pish what is this Believing I wonder that is a poor thing what onely Believe I 'le offer to God rich Sacrifices Holoenrists and Hecatombs nay thousands of Rams ten thousands of Rivers of Oyle yea my first-born the fruit of my Body this is better then believing in any man's Judgement Any thing but believing But it is better to hear the Lord to declare himself what he is pleased with than go by our own foolish guesses and therefore see the 8. ver of Mic. 6. and the Lord tells us what it is nay the Lord tells us that we know our selves what it is if we would but consult our own hearts ver 8. He hath shewed thee O man what is good and what doth the Lord require of thee but to do Justice and to shew Mercy and to walk humbly with thy God Alas God doth not require all this operous laborious and costly service which men are apt to put themselves upon He loves nothing but truth in the inward parts Serve God honestly trust in him love thy neighbour do Justice shew mercy and this is better then all whole burnt-offerings and sacrifices Mark 12.33 And this I shall shew anon as I have partly already in the exposition of that Deut. 30.11 is believing that is it contains the great mystery of believing in it Not that I have so little of a Schollar as to say or think that shewing mercy is believing or doing justly is believing except in a figurative sense as we put the Name of the cause upon the effect or the Name of the
where I set my Name at the first and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel Now did God destroy his people at Shiloh for their wickedness the place where God set his Name at the first and cannot he deal as severely with a second place Therefore saith God except ye repent and amend your ways I will do unto this House as I did to Shiloh and I will destroy you as I did my people at Shiloh for all your Temple But here we see how men may dote upon a Temple so as to think themselves secure from God's Judgments though they themselves are ful of wickedness Whysomewhat like this are our people ready to do tho God forbid there should be such a gross thing found amongst us in the dayes of the Gospel as this of the Jews was yet how do many dote upon Churches and consecrated places crying as it were The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord and that after our blessed Saviour hath told us as much as this in my apprehension that one place is no holier then another neither Jerusalem nor Mount Gerizim but men should worship the Father in spirit and truth and in every place saith the Apostle perhaps we might gloss in every place alike men should lift up holy hands without wrath or doubting and yet how are some apt to think that if they pray in a Church though the Assembly be not there that a prayer in a Church is far more acceptable then in their Closet at home Not as if I did not far more prefer publick Worship then private or secret devotion or that I were against a convenient decent Meeting-place Again The Iews gloried in ceremonious services how did this Jewish Legal Carnal righteousness please pride it self in the ceremonial service of Sacrifices and the like but never look at the heart Isa 1.11 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices to me saith the Lord I am full of Burn â—fferings of Rams and the fat of fed Beasts I delight not in the blood of Bullocks or of Lambs or of He-Goats Ver. 13. Bring no more vain Oblations incense is an abomination unto me the new Moons and Sabbaths I cannot away with Not as if all these things were at this time unlawful for they were their duty but here you see they were abundant in these and failed in matters of common honesty and justice as we may see ver 15 16 17. Your hands are full of blood wash ye make ye clean put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes cease to do evil learn to do well seek judgement relieve the oppressedâ— judge the fatherless plead for the Widow These things they ought to have done and not to leave the other undone and when ye have done these things saith the Lord Come now and let us reason together though your sins be as Scarlet they shall be white as Snow c. ver 18. Here was Gospel that if they would mind the true reformation of their hearts and lives they might expect the pardon of their sins but these Legal Jews they never mind this inward holiness no nor common honesty and yet make no question but they shall make God amends very wel by keeping Festivals New-Moons Sabbaths days of solemn Assemblies and by Sacrifices of Rams Lambs Bullocks He-Goats as if God were fed with the blood and fat of these beasts and were migtihly attoned by incense sweet perfumes See Psal 50. from 7. to 14. as if then he must needs smel a savour of rest in all that they did And the Gal. we find were come to this Gal. 3.10 Ye observe days and months times and years that is Jewish Feasts I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain When they once came to observe them there was a great deal of danger and cause for the Apostles sear that they would rest in the observance of them for that this was the reason why they took to observing of them when it was not now any longer the Jews duty so much as to observe them because of their inclination to a Covenant of Works which chiefly expresseth it self in an external service So likewise the Colossians amongst whom the same pestilent Law-Preachers had been they were ensnared to the making conscience of dayes Sabbaths and new Moons and also in the business of meats that some were clean and others unclean which was once the Jews duty to observe insomuch that Peter tells the Lord he had been so strict in the business hitherto that nothing common or unclean meaning of the flesh of unclean Beasts and Fowls had entred into his mouth Acts 11.6.8 But now was not only not their duty any longer but at least to the Gentiles a sin to make any conscience in it for that they could hardly begin such a thing at such a time upon the inticement of false Teachers for none else perswaded the Gentiles to it but from an evil inclination of swerving from the pure Gospel which they had received from the Apostles unto a Covenant of Works thus served out to them by their false Teachers And it argues almost as ill a disposition in the Galatians and Colossians but to take up these things as their duty as it did in the Jews to place so much in them when they were their duty Let no man judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy-day or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath-dayes which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ Col. 2.14 16 17. These things when they were in use and were mens duties were at best but shadows and yet these shadows did men exceedingly glory in and preferred them before true holiness and the spiritual Worship of God yea they thought verily that whilest they did observe these things they might commit all manner of Villanies and yet escape the judgement of God Yea they thought they were delivered to do all sorts of abominations as it is in Jer 7.10 The Apostle finds out such a generation of Jews in his time Rom. 2. from the 17. to the 25. Behold thon art called a Jew and restest in the Law a full expression I think of one that seeks Justification by the Law and makest thy boast of God and knowest his will And the Apostle proceeds to describe a great Lawyer indeed one that thought himself sit to be a Guide of the blind a Light of them that walk in darkness an instructer of the foolish a teacher of babes and one that had the form of knowledge and of the truth in the Law Yet what kind of man is he for his Morals Why he is a Thief an Adulterer a Sacrilegious person what not ver 21 22. Thou therefore which teachest another teachest thou not thy self thou that preachest a man should not steal dost thou steal Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery dost
think the Papists do generally ruine themselves by resting upon externals nay inventions in the service of God So much for the cautions and for the Character as it concerns those that are under predominant Legality Now because the same character that will discover it at this height will discover it also where it is in any less degree and for that I have asserted that there is a mixture of Legality in the services of the best Christians and Saints of God I think it good to improve this character yet further for the discovery of that Legality which may be found in the Saints themselves That Legality of the Saints therefore which is discoverable and reprovable by this Character is 1. That I doubt not but some good men have a Conscience of some superstitious observations and I would not for all the world think the contrary lest I should condemn the generat on of the just and think too hardly of some dear Saints of God And I must needs confess there is too much occasion given men to run into this extream of Superstition by the irreverence of others perhaps good men in the service of God How ordinaâ—ily do many sit at prayers in the Church when they are not necessitated by weakness or any other occasion and with their Hats upon their heads Now how easily may this give occasion to others that take offence at this irreverence out of a fear lest they should not be reverent enough in the service of God to approve of kneeling at the Sacrament which I doubt not but many good men may be very zealous for as also forbowing at the Name of Jesus But yet I reckon that good men are in greater danger of Legality in the matter of Moral duties then in ceremonies and superstitions for though I have acknowledged that some good men may have a conscience of some superstitious observations being misled by the care to be sufficiently reverent yet to be greatly superstitious in Gospel-days is a shrewd sign of a rotten heart and so not so incident to good men 2dly For the duties of the Moral Law good mens Legality lies in two particulars 1. When they have performed a duty rightly and spiritually they are apt to reflect upon it with a spiritual pride and ready to lay too much stress upon it and to think that now God must needs grant the Petitions they have asked whereas perhaps they have answer enough in the very sweetness of the duty it self and the communion with God which they have enjoyed in it and therefore if they are not humbled after such a duty to see their great unworthiness notwithstanding all they have done they are so far guilty of Legality Or which is more usual 2dly The Saints too often content themselves with doing their tale and number of duties praying morning and evening perhaps reading so many Chapters but are not spiritual in what they do watching over their hearts that they worship God in a right manner with those spiritual affections stirring in prayer that attention in reading that should be this is commonly known by the name of resting in duties this is â—egality and yet I think that which is found more or less in all the Saints and so far indulged to themselves by some Saints till at last they have a general deadness and benummedness in all their Graces and then they fall into sad complaints of desertions and run into a maze and a Labyrinth of doubts and troubles of mind which perhaps they get not out of for some years together As for those Saints that pick and choose amongst the Commandments that are high-flown in their notions and yet err grosly in matters of common Justice and honesty that are indeed not only slanderously reported or unworthily suspected to be so disobedient to Magistrates with other like irregular Christians I have nothing to say to them here I refer these to the head of hypocritical Legallists that expect to be justified by a parcial obedience to the Commands of the Moral Law these not being spots of Gods Children There are other miscarriages of the Saints in duties that are to be referred to their Legality of Spirit as for instance if they chance through extraordinary occasions to have missed the time of prayer morning or evening to have missed the reading their number of Chapters or doing any good task which they had laid upon themselves then they have a great fear and terror lest God should be angry and displeased with them though indeed Mercy was at ended instead of Sacrifice but such as these belong to another head or character of a Legal Spirit to wit a Spirit of Bondage which I shall come unto anon I have now perfectly done with the first Character as to its explication proof and application both to Legality predominant and that which is found in a less degree in which I may be thought tedious enough Onely I would not leave so much as a cavil without some endeavour at least of an answer to it Now I am sensible that thoughts may arise in some as if this whole particular were impertinent Obj. Whoever thought before may they chance say that Superstition was Legality that a partial performance of the Moral Law either by the less strict or more strict Morallists was Legality If men would seek to be justified by the Law they would endeavour at least to keep the whole Law and if they knew they fell short of it as those prophane wicked men which you mention out of Isaiah Jeremiah and other places that were very wicked did and yet rested in Ceremonious performances and external Priviledges these indeed deserve the Name of wicked men but not of Legallists or such as seek justification by the Law Now to this I answer and I shall say but little more then what I have said before 1. 'T is true none ought to seek Justification by the Law but those that have perfectly kept it hitherto and undertake to keep it for the future part of their lives 2. If any seek justification any other way they do but be-fool themselves 3. But yet the Jews and Galatians did seek justification by Works by the Law ASIT WERE by the Works of the Law else the Apostle had disputed against no adversary And yet they did not pretend to perfect and unerring obedience So I reckon the objection is answered already that men may seek Justification by the Law that have not nor think they have the exact Works of it But yet to give some overplus of answer There being a generation of men that do seek Justification by the Works of the Law yea forasmuch as all men are apt to seek it this way it must be in some kind of actions or other Now I have shewn that these very men that are taxed for Legality by the Apostle viz. the Jews and Galatians they were also taxed for their being so much in love with ceremonies and superstitions and with external
what other soever actions or acts can be certainly ascribed unto God with relation to his own Essence but with relation to his creatures no other can be conceived but in the way of purposing and decreeing what he would be pleased to do in time 't is very true what that Scripture assirms that known unto God are all his works from the beginning of he world Acts 15.18 that is which he intended to work But that God should be said to do any action adextra that is without himself such as Justification is which is terminated upon another person without the compass of his own Essence when yet there was nothing but himself in being is to me a contradiction God might indeed in the eternal counsel of his own uncontroulable Wil Pleasure PURPOSE to juscifie such and such persons after he had made them but what is this to actual Justification It may be as wel said in my mind that the World was created faom eternity because God purposed in his Eternal Counsels to create the World as it can be said that any were justified from eternity because God purposed from all eternity to justifie them Purpose and Decree is one thing Acting and Performance is another 3. I cannot understand any countenance which this opinion hath from Scripture when the Scripture comes to speak of Justification it expresseth it self as of an action done in time onely Rom. 4.3 What saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness Ver. 10. How was it thon reckoned WHEN he was in circumcision or in uncircumcision Not in circumcision but in uncircumcision that is in the time of his uncircumcision Abraham is not said to have been justified from eternity but upon his actual believing and this actual believing was in the time of his uncircumcision 4. Seeing justification follows onely upon Faith as the Scripture tells us Justification cannot be before Faith Now Faith is onely in time therefore Justification was not in Eternity which was before all time I shall trouble my self with no more as to the answer of the first question Whether Justification be in Eternity or in Time Now follows the second question If it be in time at what time is it And how often is it Once onely or oftner Here are two questions more in one 1. At what time is it Now for answer Seeing that the righteousness of Faith is the righteousness which God alone accepts unto Justification therefore Justification commenceth onely from the time of our believing When was Abraham justified Why when he believed that therefore is the time of Justification its beginning The Question therefore now before us is onely this Whether this one act of Justification which presently follows upon our act of believing serves for the justification of our persons as long as we live or whether there be any repetition of God's act of Justification upon our persons afterwards Now for answer to this which is indeed no contemptible Quest I say 1. That indeed the first act of Justification when Divine approbation comes upon us according to the Law and Statute of the New-Covenant Acts 13.39 That by him all that believe are justified putsi us into a state of favour and if there be no intercision in the state which the Arminians hold there may be this first act is the great and famous act that makes us happy and blessed But yet 2dly I hold that seeing Justification chiefly consists in pardoning of sins according to that Scripture Acts 13.38 39. Be it known unto you therefore men and brethren that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins and by him all that believe are JUSTIFIED FROM ALL THINGS FROM WHICH YE COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED by the Law of Moses every renewed act of Pardon is a renewed act of Justification for though the first act of God's justifying us upon our turning to God do acquit us from all our sins till that moment yet every new sin brings a new guilt for which we might justly be condemned without a new act of justifying grace and though every new sin doth not put us out of the state of justification yet it requires a new act of justifying grace for the continuing the state and this makes the Advocateship of Christ necessary to be continued who when any Saint commits a sin he interposeth with his Father that upon his repentance a pardon may be issued forth in the Court of heaven for that soul as to that sin This I hold necessary even for every sinfull infirmity of any Saint of God that is I hold Christ's intercession and our habitual repentance at least and faith necessary chough many times there cannot be actual repentance and faith for pardon as in the case of secret and unobserved sins But yet even in such cases our habitual and general repentance is necessary together with Christ's intercession and a renewed act of pardon unto our justification * I would not be thought to make this continued justification which consists in continued pardon to be of like consâ—teration with the first act of pardouing justifying grace at first believing I only contend for this That it is true and necessary justification And in extraordinary cases the truth of my assertion will be much more visible for when any Saint commits such a great sin as according to the doctrine of the Remonstrants makes him no Saint for the time here must certainly be repeated a new famous act of Justification according to their doctrine as famous as the first was as well as a new act of conversion Luke 22.32 But I need not go to this Supposition of a Saints falling away for I can shew that this is no absonous or unheard of thing in the Scripture that Justification may be repeated even upon a Saint of God that keeps his standing See that Scripture in James 2.21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he had offered up Isaac his son upon the Altar ver 22. And the Scripture was then fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for righteousness Now when was this Justification of Abraham which is here mentioned Why it was at least thirteen years after Abrahams first famous Justification for that was upon his believing that God would give him a Son this was upon his offering up the Son after he was given when he was grown up to be a stout Lad and could carry the wood for his father up the hill That first act of Justification passed upon him when Abraham himself was in uncircumoision this after he and all his family were circumcised therefore the act of Justification may be repeated over several times upon the same person And for a little countenance for this from the authority of Authors Mr Baxter in his Aphorismes makes mention of a threefold Justification inchoate continued and sinall Thesis 59. pag. 233. Justification is not a momentaneous act begun
and a man is justified without these nay he cannot be justified if he but pretend to these Therefore the Apostle James must speak of another sort of works which whilest a man doth he yet renounces merit in them and these works a man may be in part justified by without any prejudice to the doctrine of Justification by faith This is fully asserted by Mr Baxter Thesis 76. pag. 292. Neither is there saith he the least appearance of a contradiction betwixt this and Paul's doctrine Rom. 3.28 if men did not through prejudice negligence or wilfulness over-look this that in that and all other the like places the Apostle doth professedly exclude THE WORKS OF THE LAW ONLY from Justification but never at all THE WORKS OF GOSPEL as they are the condition of the New Covenant Works therefore justifie as a less principal part of the condition of the New Covenant I am not shy to speak in Mr Baxter's words since I intend much the same thing they do not justifie from their own merit so only legal works justifie but from divine promise and acceptance For proof of this that it is so that works do justifie in the second place besides the express words of the Apostle James I finde the same thing asserted by the Apostle Paul in three several Scriptures * Dr Hammond Par. All that is required to our justification is faith not all that is called by that name but such as is made perfect by addition of those duties which we owe to God and our brethren Gal. 5â— In Jesus Christ that is in the doctrine of Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing that is unto Justification 〈◊〉 uncircumcision but faith whiâ—â— worketh by Love Here faith indeed is â—aid to justifie but it is a faith which worketh by love a working faith But yet more plainly the same expression is used in two places to our present purpose Gal. 6.15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new creature that is saith Dr Hammond the renewed regenerate heart and it may be added a new life 2 Cor. 5.17 If any man be in Christ he is a now creature old things are past away behold all things are become new that is he lives a perfect new life and this new life only availeth unto Justification beyond circumcision or uncircumcision which are meer external Priviledges The third Scripture where the same expression is used is beyond all exception to our present purpose 1 Cor. 7.19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing these are of no consideration in the matter of pleasing God and obtaining his favour What then is why the keeping the commandments of God this is beyond all these considerations of bond and free circumcised and uncircumcised But these are the things with which he compares the new creature and good works he doth not set these above all when he compares them with faith in that place where he mentions faith that is set above works and other graces as the cause above the effect the principal agent above the instrument Neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncâ—râ—umbâ—sion but faith which WORKETH BY LOVE But in these Scriptures we see plainly that work have an influence upon our Justification they are of great availe in order unto it If it be objected that the first Justification passeth upon believing before works I answer with many others that there is in the first faith a rooted disposition unto an universal obedience there is the new creature or new man of the heart there and in continued justification there is the new man of the life and conversation Now the reasons why the Lord would have works in the condition of Justification though he doth not justifie for works only or chiefly may be gathered out of the Scripture to be these The first reason is this 1 Reas Why works are in the condition of Gospel justification For that without works faith it self cannot be accounted a perfect saith Now certainly if faith justifie it must be a perfect compleat faith not a maimed imperfect faith That without works faith is imperfect and by works it is perfected are the assertions of the Apostle James Faith without works is dead James 2.20 26 ver 22. Seest thâ—â— how faith wrought with his works and by works was his faith made perfect What an uselets imperfect dead thing is a power or faculty for action without operation What an useless thing would it be for a man to have eyes able to see only the man hath a continual blinde put before his eyes that he never doth see in all his life Why just such a thing were faith withour action of no worth or use What an imperfect faith had Abraham's been if his works and actions had not attended it Suppose we that when God commanded Abraham to offer up Isaac he had refused and said Lord how then shall there arise of him a great Nation his faith had been exceedingly discredited But when he resolves with himself I will offer him up for I know that God that raised him out of Sarah's dead womb can as well raise him from the dead after I have killed him and offered him up here was a noble faith indeed his faith was perfected by this work here that grace shewed what it could carry men unto When any thing attains its end it receives its perfection Here faith attained its end in carrying Abraham to do so great a work and therein was perfected and so obtained the compleat reward of Justification then the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God if works had not accompanied his faith it had proved but an imperfect dead faith the Scripture had not been fulfilled which faith Abraham believed God No artificer will own any thing to be a true and perfect piece of work which will not attain it's end serve the use it is made for so will not God own that to be faith which will not put us upon acts of confidence in himself and obedience to his commands be they never so difficult For though God knows the heart and so can see into the very principle of our actions yet the Lord is pleased to keep that distance of State and Majesty that he will not seem to know what he doth know till the outward man express what is in the inward man God knew before what was in Abraham's heart but yet he will not seem to know that he was so great a believer till he had put him upon this trial of offering up his son Gen 22.12 Now I know that thou fearest God seeing thou hast not with-heâ—â—â—hy son thine only son from me Now I confess what is here said of works in this reason That faith receives it's perfection from them can only properly and immediately be applyed to the works of faith to other works only remotely as faith may have some kinde of influence even upon all good works but however
the Cross and Christ nailed the Law to the Cross and all this without violence or affront offered to the Law it being but naturally consequent upon what the Law did first to Christ for if the Law set upon Christ as our Surety and do the utmost to him that it can it must needs follow that it hath no strength left against those for whom he undertook and so must die and expire by the same death that our Saviour dyed it being nailed to the Cross which is but a sigurative expression And yet I shall carry the Allegory a little further herein still following the Apostle Paul Is it any wonder now is it any unreasonable thing now that the Law is dead and taken out of the way that we should be married to another husband that we should reckon our selves to be no longer under the Law The woman which hath an husband saith the Apostle Rom. 7.23 is bound by the Law to her husband so long as he liveth but if the husband be dead she is loosed from the Law of her husband So then if while her husband liveth she be married to another man she shall be called an adulteress but if her husband be dead she is free from that Law so that she is no adulteress though she be married to another man ver 4. Wherefore my brethren ye also are become dead to the Law or the Law is become dead to you BY THE BODY OF CHRIST that ye should be warried to another even to him that is raised from the dead that we should bring forth fruit unto God The Law is every soul's first Husband since the fall so every one's actual sin the Law is an intolerable husband there is no living with it it so sets on guilt presseth the soul w th terrors nay instead of producing good works the natural fruit of this Marriage-relation of the Soul to the Law whilest in innocency it now produceth all manner of lusts according to the 5. ver of that 7. chap. When we were in the flesh the MOTIONS OF SINS WHICH WERE BY THE LAW did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death Now God in much mercy to mankinde finding that if the Law and the conscience or soul of man keep together his creature will be lost and himself lose those fruits of good works which the soul was first created for he provides another husband for the soul which is Jesus Christ only Christ must redeem his Spouse from that tyrannical Husband which now it lives with else the Soul shall be but an Adulteress to pretend marriage to Christ that is the way of grace whilest the Law can make a just claim to her as a wife which it might have done as long as it lived The manner of the rescue I have before declared it was by suffering and yielding to the Law yet so as in it the Law destroyed it self and then is it lawfull for the Soul that was before wife to the Law to be married to another husband and who so fit as he that redeemed her Now the Soul shall have it's forbearance under failings which the Law would not endure and God shall have a kindly and ingenuous Service there will be fruits unto God and this is the passage from Works to Faith from the Law to Grace I though the Law saith the Apostle am dead to the Law that I might live to God Gal. 2.19 that is through what the Law hath done to Christ it hath nothing to do with me But now we are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein we were held that we should serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the Letter Rom. 7.6 One Scripture more to this purpose it is Rom. 8.1 23.4 There is therefore now no condemnation to ohem which are in Christ Jesus who are married to Christ and have accepted the terms of the Gospel who walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit for the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the Law of sin and death this chiefly relates to sanctification that the inward law or power of corruption which was occasionally and accidentally strenghtned by the Law of God was now broken by that inward power spirit and life which is conveyed by the Gospel of Christ and is called the spirit of life which is in Christ Jesus ver 3. for what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh that is it could neither justifie nor sanctifie both these did God bring to pass by sending his Son in the likeness of sinfull flesh when for sin that is Christ's making himself a Sin-offering so answering the Law God condemned Christ in the flesh that is destroyed it both in the guilt and power of it out of us that were sinners so it follows that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit that is that the Law might no longer accuse us being answered by our Saviour and that we might attain to that which is the chief designe of the Law to wit righteousness and holiness which if we had continued under the Law we could never have attained unto What so common now with the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romanes as to tell them that now they are not under the Law but under grace by this means namely the BODY OF CHRIST offered and that therefore there shall be no condemnation and that therefore sin shall not have dominion over them which are the two great effects of the death of Christ though the first chiefly belongs to that subject which I am upon viz. Justification Having given now all these things in an allegorical and mystical dress yet herein only following the Apostle I shall deliver the same thing somewhat plainly and so conclude this first particular The summe of all this is Man was made holy had a Law to live by to which there was a threatning annexed In the day thou eatest thou shalt die the death or shalt surely die * This threatning I take it is due by the Law to intended against all sins according to that of the Apostle The wages of sin is death Ro. 6.23 speaking of sin indefinitly besides wise Adam might have committed any other sin and not have dyed Man did eat and so was to die death accordingly entred by this sin into the world that is a natural death and for eternal death hereafter and the spiritual death of the soul here which consist's in alienations from God both which all men at age are obnoxious unto being sinners as for children I neither affirm nor deny any thing the Lord in mercy designing to deliver men from provided a Saviour who should first live a perfect life that so he might be the more acceptable Sacrifice and his terms of saving men must be these that he must freely offer himself up to
and this was the Commandment which that day Moses commanded them Lastly Another thing in this Paragraph that will not seem perhaps to some to look like Gospel is this That all the comfort of this Gospel by Moses lies in Doing This Commandment saith he is not far off but in thy heart and in thy mouth that thou mayest do it and so obtain life and justification by it This seems to look right like that place in Levitious so often mentioned where Moses is said to describe a Legal Righteousness The man that doth them shall live in them And so in all the Chapter after there is blessing if they do the command and cursing if they do not this to some may not look like Gospel But yet here is the Gospel and therefore wherein doth it lie VVherein is the Gospel expressed in this place of Deut. or how will it appear I have shewed wherein it cannot lie or doth not seem to lie I will shew yet wherein it must be expressed and wherein it is visibly expressed and that is in that easiness which Moses doth so much insist upon in this Scripture of doing the Commandment The Commandment for the matter of it was perhaps the same with the Covenant of Works and Doing partly at least brought in the reward of it that is Justification But is this the Language of a Covenant of Works think you to fallen man such as the Israelites were The Commandment is easie there are no such difficulties in keeping it as you may imagine ye shall not need to climb as high as Heaven after it nor to coast all Lands and compass the Ocean for it propose no such vast undertakings to thy self for the accomplishment of it for thou needest not the Word is nigh thee in thy mouth that is near yea but nearer yet in thine heart that thou mayest do it and thou mayest do it with ease and sweetness No I have shewn at large that the Covenant of Works or the Law taken strictly as a way of Justification serves now to sinners onely to terrifie their Consciences with laying home its charge it hath no such comfortable words in it nay I shewed out of the Scripture that it is an utter impossibility that the Law should be done by a sinner so as to justifie him A man might as well climb up to Heaven or compass the vast Ocean yea to add another impossibility which the Apostle adds in his Paraphras upon this Text in Deut. a man might as well descend into the infernal Abyss and make a resurrection as be justified by the Law This therefore cannot be the Language of the Law But now take the keeping the Law in a Gospel-sence as perhaps that Rom. 8.4 is to be understood where the righteousness of the Law is said to be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit and then the Gospel in this Scripture is obvious it is easie to keep the Law now even that commandment which Moses commanded them even the Moral Law that is to keep it sincerely not exactly to a tittle but in the substance of it This Word therefore which Moses means when he says The word is nigh thee as the Apostle adds in his Paraphrase must be the word of faith which he preached The Word is nigh thee that is not the Word of the Moral law taken in its utmost exactness to be fulfilled to a tittle this is not nigh thee it is as far as Heaven further then either of the Indies further then Hell it self thou sinner canst never attain unto it to do it But yet the Word of the same Commandment in a moderated sense in the gracious acceptation of God where sincere obedience is accepted for unerring observance of it This Word is nigh thee even in thy heart and in thy month that thou mayest do it and it is saith the Apostle the Word of Faith which we preach this the new creature can undertake with the assistance of God even the keeping the Commandments of God in an Evangelical manner through Faith which works by Love Here thou dost not claim thy wages upon thy doings as if they deserved it or as if they answered the letter of the Law and so thou comest not to the Law for thy Justification but though the great Rule of thine obedience be the Law yet thou goest to the Gospel for thy Justification thou comest by Faith to the Promise and Goodness and Grace of God for thy Justification And indeed there is nothing but Faith will encourage thee in such a keeping of the Law as this is The Law strictly taken will dishearten thee that will thus reason the case with thee VVhat are all thy works what is all thy obedience so long as thoughast broken such and such a Commandment hast omitted such and such a duty What is thy sincerity good for What is thy good meaning and real intention worth I must have a full task performed I must have unerring never-failing obedience or else I must curse thee with all the curses which thou findest written against sinners Now the Soul by Faith thus answereth the Law 'T is true were I to stand to thy award it must be all as thou hast said but I am upon other terms with the Lord for my Justification I am upon terms of Grace and Mercy of which there are no footsteps in thy whole way of Justification and though I was born under thy power yet I have a Saviour that hath freed me from under it by suffering the penalty for my breach of it and now I am assured That if I walk faithfully and deal honestly with God endeavouring in sincerity to walk after the Spirit to do all the Wills of God from the heart my sincere obedience will now be as well accepted as unerring obedience would once have been Thus you see Faith bears off from coming to a legal-Justification and Faith bears up the Soul against all expostulations of the Law with it and against all the accusations of Satan in the Conscienc and yet doth keep the soul intent upon the design of universal obedience to the pure and holy Law of God Faith requires thy obedience to the Law the preaching of Faith doth establish the Law and yet the Law in this moderated sense onely observed requires thee to go or rather takes for granted that thou goest to Grace Mercy and Pardon by Faith for that thou art not an exact Doer of the Law So I have shewn how this place in Deut. seems to speak Law yet must be understood to speak Gospel and what Gospel that is which it speaks Yet I may not expect to go off without opposition in this interpretation and I am sensible that these two or three things will be objected against me 3 Objections against the interpretation of Deut. 30.11 12. 1. That I make Faith too easie a business as if those that could not keep the Law are yet able to