Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
work_n justify_v law_n moral_a 5,360 5 10.3036 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A69076 A treatise of Christian religion. Or, the whole bodie and substance of diunintie. By T.C.; Christian religion Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603.; Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618. 1616 (1616) STC 4707.7; ESTC S107471 214,101 390

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and hard to be vnderstood and therefore that the reading of them is not to be permitted vnto the common people but vnto those onely that are learned A. The direct contrary is taught by the Apostle when he affirmeth that Timothy was nourished vp in the Scriptures from his infancie For if they be so penned that little children may profitably reade them there is none so grosse which hath the vnderstanding of a man but may profit by them comming in the feare of God and with inuocation of his name to the reading and hearing of them CHAP. 13. Of the parts of Gods Word and of the Couenant of workes in generall The parts of Gods word are the doctrine or Couenant of Workes called the Law of which in Generall Speciall Chap. 14. Grace called the Gospel Ch. 27. GAL. chap. 3. vers 17. to the 25. 17. And this I say that the couenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ the Law which was foure hundred and thirtie yeeres after cannot disanull that it should make the promise of none effect 18. For if the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of promise but God gaue it to Abraham by promise 19. Wherefore then serueth the Law it was added because of transgressions till the seed should come to whom the promise was made and it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator 20. Now a Mediator is not a Mediator of one but God is one 21. Is the Law then against the promises of God God forbid for if there had been a Law giuen which could haue giuen life verily righteousnesse should haue been by the Law 22. But the Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by faith of Iesus Christ might be giuen to them that beleeue 23. But before faith came we were kept vnder the Law shut vp vnto the faith which should afterwards be reuealed 24. Wherefore the Law was our Schoolemaster to bring vs vnto Christ that we might be iustified by faith 25. But after that faith is come we are no longer vnder a Schoolemaster Q. HItherto wee haue heard of the Doctrine of the Scriptures what they are and what are the causes properties and effects of them as being they from whom onely all Doctrine concerning our saluation is to bee drawne and deriued What are the parts of that Doctrine A. Either the doctrine of workes commonly called the Law or of Grace called the Promise and since the comming of Christ the Gospell as appeareth by this Scripture Q. VVhat is the drift of this Scripture A. It sheweth two waies of recouering happines the one by the workes of the Law the other by faith in the promise of grace and that the Law is not that way whereby we can receiue the Happinesse we haue lost Q. How is that shewed A. For that the promise of grace whereby Abraham was iustified was 430. yeeres before the Law and therefore that the Law which commeth after cannot make void the Couenant of Grace which it should doe if a man were iustified by the Law Q. But it may be said that the Iustification by Workes of the Law doth not make void the Promise of Grace when as the matter is so handled as Saluation commeth in part by the Workes of the Law A. Yes verily it is made void notwithstanding for if Saluation were before the Law was onely by Grace and now should be by Works and Grace then the promise giuen to Abraham of Grace onely should bee made void And therefore the Apostle in the 18. verse doth shew that if it bee of the Law it cannot bee by the promise of Grace Yea the Law is so farre from bringing saluation that through the corruption of our nature it encreaseth sinne in vs. Then it should seeme that there is no vse of the Law seeing it doth not iustifie vs either in all or in part A. Not so for it was giuen to shew and discouer sinne and in that regard to terrifie and affright vs and driue vs from all confidence in our selues as also to serue as a rule whereby wee are to direct and amend our liues Q. How is that shewed A. 1. By the testimony of the Apostle saying that by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne 2. By the Rom. 3. 20. manner of the giuing which was with such terror of thunder lightnings and smoke and fearfull sound of the trumpet as the people could not abide the voice of God but were faine to desire that they might not heare the same but that Moses might bee a Mediator to receiue the Law from Gods mouth and that they might receiue it from him Q. VVhat obserue you from that A. That the Law is terrible vnto vs by reason of the guilt of our sins and that it driueth vs to seeke for a Mediator which is Christ alone who is heere figured in the Mediation of Moses Q. If the promise of Grace take away sinne and the Law encrease sinne if it take away the conscience of sinne and this doth cause a conscience and remorse of sinne it seemeth that the Law is contrary to the promise of Grace A. Not a whit for the Law would also take away sinne and the conscience of sin if any man were able perfectly to obserue it for the Law of it selfe causeth no sinne but onely by accident by reason of our corruption Rom. 8. 3. otherwise it is a furtherance to the Saluation which is by Grace Q. Tell vs then how the Law serueth to the helping forward to the Iustification which is by the free Grace of God A. The Law shutteth all men all that is of man vnder Sinne not to this end that they should perish but contrariwise that they might bee saued that beleeue Q. Make that more plaine A. The Apostle compareth the Law to a Iustice of Peace or a Sergeant which arresteth such as transgresse Gal. 3. 23. the same and laieth them in prison not that they should perish there with hunger cold or other annoyances of the prison but that when they feele their miserie and discerne that of themselues and by their owne deserts they cannot get out of it they should thereby be moued the more earnestly to seeke after the free pardon and grace of the Prince And therefore it is not contrary to the promise of grace but a speciall helpe towards the obtaining thereof Q. How is this further cleared A. By this that the Apostle compareth the Law to Gal. 3. 23. a Garrison which is set in a towne to keepe such Inhabitants thereof in awe and seruitude as haue not loyally-affected mindes to their Prince to the end that in time they comming to a iust and dutifull obedience may be freed from the awe and seruitude of the Garrison Q How else A. It is compared to a Tutor or Guardian For as Gal. 3. 24. hee keepeth the child that is vnder age straitly by meanes whereof he hath a desire to bee out
of his nonage and to enioy the liberty of a sonne so after the Gal. 4. 2. same manner the Law through the terrour and seueritie thereof moueth vs with the more ardent desire to seeke after Christ Moreouer as a Tutor or Vsher directeth the steps of the child and instructeth him in such courses of life by which hee is afterwards to liue so the Law after it hath brought vs to Christ directeth vs in the way wee haue to walke in this life to life euerlasting so that it hath two notable and worthie effects one as a spurre to chase vs vnto Christ the other as a light to direct and teach vs how to walke when wee are come vnto him Lastly as a Tutor it humbleth vs whiles by means therof we vnderstand how farre wee are from fulfilling the same and consequently how vnable wee are by the workes of the Law which alone are good works to free our selues from the curse of the Law CHAP. 14. Of the Couenant of Workes in speciall The Couenant of Workes or the Law in speciall In which consider Generally How it is defined By what rules interpreted Specially and herein the Preface The Law it selfe The first Table of Gods worship Inward onely 1. Commandement Ch. 15. Outward also More generally 2. Commandement Chap. 16. More particularly cōcerning the Special vse of Gods Name Comman 3. Chap. 17. The speciall time of his worshippe Com. 4. Chap. 18. The 2. Table of our Duties to man ROM chap. 2. vers 14. 15. 14. For when the Gentiles which haue not the Law doe by nature the things contained in the Law these hauing not the Law are a Law vnto themselues 15. Which shew the worke of the Law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughts the meane while accusing or else excusing one another Q. HItherto of the Couenant of Workes in generall it followeth to treat thereof in speciall Where is the Couenant of Workes summarity set downe A. In the Morall Law Q. Doth the Doctrine of the Morall Law goe before the Doctrine of the Gospell A. Yea. Q. Why so A. Because it was before the Gospell for it was giuen to Adam in his Integrity when the promise of Grace was hidden in God Q. Must it therefore be first in vse A. Yea verily as touching the former vse or vertue of the Law which is to shew vs what wee should do and our sinne and the punishment due vnto our sinne Q. VVhy is it said that the Law was not before Moses A. That is to be vnderstood of the Law as it was written whether by Moses or the hand of God otherwise the same Law for the substance thereof was also written in the beginning in the heart of Adam and Eue. Q. VVhat is the Morall Law A. It is a Doctrine commanding the perfection of Godlinesse and Righteousnesse binding vs to eternal Deut. 5. 32. 12. 32. 42. death for our least defect therein which Law is handled at large throughout the whole Scripture but is summarily contriued first into ten words or ten Commandements Deut. 4. 13. 10. 4. Mat. 22. 37. written by Gods owne finger at the first in Tables of stone to signifie thereby not onely the hardnesse of our hearts in which they ought to be imprinted but also the perpetuall vse of them to the Galath 3. 10. very end of the world And after further abridged into two Commandements by our Sauior Christ containing the summe of the whole Law Q. VVhat is the first thing that is necessarily required of vs for our better profiting by the Law A. That wee haue the true knowledge and right vnderstanding of the Law without the which it is vnpossible to reape any of the former fruits For how can a man acknowledge the breach of that Law which he knoweth not or how can he serue him in the endeauour of performance of it vnlesse hee vnderstand his Masters will Q. VVhat rules are there to helpe vs to the right vnderstanding of the Law A. There be chiefly foure whereof the first is that the Law is spirituall reaching to the soule and all the Rom. 7. 14. Deut. 6. 5. Mat. 22. 37. Mark 12. 30. Luk. 10. 27. powers thereof For the Law chargeth the vnderstanding to know euery duty euen all the will of God contained in it It chargeth the iudgement to discerne betweene good and euill betweene two good things which is the better It chargeth the memorie to retaine it chargeth the will to chuse the better and leaue the worse it chargeth the affections to loue things to be beloued and to hate things to be hated Q. Doth the Law require these alike of all A. No but according to the sexe growth in age difference of calling as more of a man then of a woman of a young man then of a child of a publike person then of a priuate man Q. VVhat is the second rule A. That the Law is perfect not onely charging the Psal 19. 7. soule but also the whole soule not onely to know discerne retaine will and follow good but to doe the same perfectly So in condemning euill it condemneth all euill and in commanding good it commandeth all good Q. What is the third rule A. When the Law forbiddeth or commandeth any thing it forbiddeth and commandeth all meanes Mat. 5. 27. 30. occasions and prouocations thereunto Q. What is the fourth rule A. Whatsoeuer the Law commands it forbids the Mat. 5. 21. 23. 24. 25. contrary and whatsoeuer it forbids it commandeth the contrary Q. Why is euery Commandement set forth vnto vs by the second person of the singular number A. God therein wisely preuenteth a common abuse amongst men which is to esteeme that which is spoken to all men to be as it were spoken vnto none As you shall haue it common amongst men to say and confesse that God is iust and mercifull and that hee commandeth this and forbiddeth that and yet they vsually so behaue themselues as though it nothing concerned them that they notwithstanding might liue as they list Q. What learne you from this A. That euery particular man is to iudge and esteeme that God speaketh in the Law to him in particular that he is accordingly to be affected therwith Q. Why are all the Commandements except two set downe negatiuely A. Because the Negatiue bindeth more strongly for the Negatiue precept bindeth alwaies and to all moments of time the Affirmatiue bindeth alwaies but not to all moments of time Q. To come then vnto the words of the Law how are they diuided A. Into a Preface and ten Precepts or Commandements Q. What is the Preface A. I am the Lord thy God that brought thee out of the land of Egypt out of the house of bondage which hath a reference to all the ten Commandements and is a reason to vrge the obseruance of euery one of thē Thus If I be the Lord thy God