could not save by faith and salvation now not to be sought by grace onely in Jesus Christ saith the Margent But we believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they Fathers do Learned Zanchy stateth the question between Paul and the false teachers to be An praeter Christum c. whether besides Christ good works also be necessary to salvation Mr. B. And if this should be the sense of the Text then it was clear that the Galatians were not made partakers of Gods spirit by the corrupt doctrine that was taught them of late by their Seducers but before while they did receive the pure doctrine of Christ and therefore it was their folly having begun in the spirit to end in the flesh this may be a probable interpretation Answ Yet these exceptions may be against the latter part 1. The question made by the Apostle is divisive whether they received the Spirit by the doctrine of faith or by the other for by one they must needs have it And not whether they received the spirit by both doctrines conjoyned and confounded so that you mistake the form of the question 2. They begun in the spirit while they abode in the doctrine of Christ for righteousness and salvation onely and their folly in ending in the flesh was in that besides the righteousness of faith they would have also works of the law for salvation for this is to end in the flesh that is in themselves having begun in Christ by the spirit or as saith Piscator this is called an ending in the flesh because it is a way both heavy and impossible Mr. B. That which I shall stand upon is this The Jews and false Apostles when they went furthest joyned Christ and the observance of the moral Law equally together for justification and salvation whereas the Law separated from Christ did nothing but curse and condemn not being able to help the soul at all Answ It is as probable if not more as I said that they held Christ sufficient to justifie but not to save without works 2. They joyned Christ and the Law for justification and salvation say you And you joyn them for sanctification and salvation so no such great difference 3. If the Law separated from Christ did nothing but accuse and condemn then it seemeth if it be joyned with Christ it will acquit and justifie or you think it hath left that power to condemn being joyned to Christ Came Christ to take that power from the Law or to mitigate and meeken it by uniting it to himself or to redeem his elect from under the Law to live and abide where no Law is to accuse Rom. 8. Who can lay any thing to their charge Is not Christ also our sanctification and redemption as well as our justification without the Law 1 Cor. 1.30 This doctrine is of God saith Paul there but yours is but of man Also you disclaim that the Law of it self is able to stirre up the least Godly affection in us but Christ and Law together can and not Christ without it If the soul be married to Chist her husband he cannot make her to bring forth fruits to God but Moses the former dead husband must be raised up again and so the beleiver hath two husbands to make him fruitfull and both at one time a thing utterly against the Law and the Ordinance of Mariage civill or spirituall for as in the civill two are thereby become one flesh so they that are joyned to Christ are one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 Mr. B. More places of Scripture are brought against this but they will come in more fitly under the notion of the Law as a Covenant Answ It 's true there are many more pag. 165. of the Assert unto which as many might be added but you have enough of these the rest you reserve to a more fit occasion And I had thought to have enlarged this point but that it is lost labour and I may ill spare any Mr. B. Thus therefore I shall conclude this point acknowledging that many learned and orthodox men speak otherwise and that there is a difficulty in clearing every particular about this question but as yet that which I have delivered carrieth the more probability with me Answ I thank you for your ingenuous and free acknowledgement I am not alone in this my opinion as yet I think you are in yours for any thing I mean that can be read in the Orthodox for otherwise the whole Colledge would not have given you such hearty thanks and your book so superlative commendation if they inclined not your way 2. Whereas you find difficulty that is because you have taken the staffe by the wrong and worst end contending against the clear truth I will not say against the light and checks of conscience But the more difficult the more fit for one of your quality and parts to encounter with that so your victory might happily have been more glorious Yet you have brought it no further even in your own thoughts but to be questio probabilis and you found it in as perfect condition and state when you entred upon it nay I say more I never read that it was controverted by any Protestant till now but your words imply that you may be of another mind to morrow The Lord instruct and establish us Mr. B. And I will give one Text more which I have not yet mentioned that is Act. 7.38 where the moral Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the lively cracles that is not verba vitae but verba viva vivificantia so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 giving life not that we could have life by vertue of obedience to them but when we by grace are inabled to obey them God of his mercy bestoweth eternal life Answ Before you were onely defensive sheilding your self as busily as you could against those Scriptures that fought against you but now you are disposed to give your adversary one stroke and yet the arm or weapon rather will not serve to fasten one blow either to hurt or fright this is but a childish skirmish or flourish It is granted the moral Law may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lively oracles or words and so it is in its own nature yea and in the Ministry of it life is propounded as Deut. 30.19 I have set before you life and death and Levit. 18.5 Ye shall keep my statutes and my judgements which if a man keep he shall live in them but this life it promiseth to give is upon such tearms and impossible conditions that as yet none was quickned by it but contrarily it brought death upon all by reason of that poysonfull enmity and maliciousness of our common nature whereupon Paul is bold and peremptory to affirm that all that are of the works of the Law are cursed Gal. 3. this inbred enmity is discovered but not cured by
faith to the everlasting Kingdom You thus swerve from the truth and the old and good way LECT XXII ROM 3.31 Do we then make void the Law Here you tell us It is hard to set up Christ and grace and not thereby to be thought to destroy the Law But it is easie with who was never suspected 2. You say Your Antinomians still are mistaken in this point and plunged into a dangerous errour You should make your words good and discover the errour if not help them out we expect this from you 3. But now like blind Sampson unto whose fact you allude you have raised a doctrine which will lead you to lay your hands on the chiefe pillars of the Antinomian edifice Mr. B. The question then at this time to be discussed is whether the Law be abrogated or no by Christ to the believers under the Gospel Answ Who would question it for Christ came not to destroy the Law but taught that every Apex or lota of it is imperishable Matth. 5.17 18. Indeed your doctrine is the Law is deprived of all power to justifie accuse or accurse but who can receive it If these be no tittle or part of the Lawd understand nothing And yet you tell us often of promises of great rewards for your legall obedience and good works cherefore there is a power to justifie command and bless established by you or else which I rather think your tenets be inconsistent and mutually overthrow each other Mr. B. If we would speak exactly and properly we cannot say in any good sense that the Morall Law is abrogated at all Answ If you would keep there denying according to the truth of the Scripture any mitigation at all either totall or partiall we might soon agree shake hands and lay down our weapons Mr. B. We may say it is mitigated Answ It is then because your Tongues are your own or that you will speak before God say so and so without your Warrant Such teaching of mitigating and Evangelizing the Law of Gods accepting the will for deed c. hath occasioned such dangerous confusion of Law and Gospel these sad controverfies in the Church much instabilitie and many mistakes in the peoples minds c. Mr. B. But you must still distinguish when we speak of the Law some parts of it from the whole Some parts of it may be abolished and yet not the whole nature of it for there are in the Law these parts 1. Commands 2. Promises of life to him that doth them 3. The threatnings of eternal death to him that faileth Now the Morall Law although it be abrogated in respect of the two later to a believer yet in respect of the former it doth still abide yea and will continue in Heaven it self as we have already proved that one part of the Law may abide when the other doth not Answ Like Foundation like Building This makes all your opposition dispute and discourse so weak and soon annihilated in that your ground is so faulty and failing 1. Why are you so inconsiderate thus to distinguish where God doth not and so audacious as to mutilate his good Law which he delivered and would have still to be preserved entire and perfect 2. All this tendeth to nothing but to make the Kingdom and way of the Law so easie and tolerable that the soul may here find a requiem where to settle her abode and never enjoy nor come to Christ and dwell under his shadow and Kingdom where Grace through his righteousness reigneth to eternall life Rom. 5.21 3. What is the reason your discourse is so loose and improper did you not even now tell us that to speak properly and exactly we cannot say in any good sense the Morall Law is abrogated and have you so soon forgotten what you said or are you regardless of any good sense or propriety of words You make three parts I would know what parts they may be called Homogeneal all of them truely law as a drop of the Ocean is as verily water as the whole Sea or Heterogeneal as Timber and Stones be parts of a House but not of the same kinde and nature in themselves and the Soul and Body be two essential parts constituting the man yet the one as flesh the other as spirit and not of one of these alone but the compositum of both is the man So here I demand when you tell us we must distinguish some parts of the Law from the whole Whether these parts be essentiall and requisite to the making or constituting of the whole Law If these three be all parts then to take away two will mutilate if not destroy the whole Law the whole consisting but of three cannot be entire and perfect having lost two And the rather I ask this because pag. 139. you say but prove not for it is not your manner your Disciples and so all other must be jurati in verba Magistri that the Law most strictly taken is meer Mandative without any promises at all Now if the meer Mandative be a Law why do you call the other two there excluded as not needfull parts of it and not rather with Dr. Tailer appendices to it 4. To distinguish between part and part may be granted and usefull but as to distinguish between soul and body between Christ and his Church or between the signe and grace in the Sacrament but to separate and sunder one part from the the other you know here its intoleable and destructive and you so distinguish that you plainly separate and cut off two parts from the third as abolished And yet the whole nature of the Law remaineth if we can believe you not abrogated to the believer you have often put your Adversarie to reconcile his tenets when there was no such cause as you see here is to agree yours The Law in regard of the threats and promises say you is abrogated a very bold assertion which never can be made good When you promise eternall life unto every good work a believer doth as pag. 40. is it not a legall and conditionall promise so as no good work no eternall life and how then can you here say that the promises of the Law be abrogated to a believer And when a believer with Noah David Lot c. doth fall into open and scandalous offences do you not threaten and terrifie him that he may be moved and stirred up if he be secure to seek for healing by faith in the blood of Christ And doth not this also convincingly argue that the reproofs and threats of the Law are of force and not abrogated Lastly if the preceptive part continue in Heaven you cannot say that justice there shall be without power for the two other also what though it doth not actually condemn any Is God without power to make another World because he maketh it not And whereas you say That you have already proved two parts to be abrogated and one still abiding you either forget
curse and condemn yet it hath power to rule command and direct 4. The Law with the preface and promise added to it was given as a Covenant of Grace 5. The Law is taken most strictly for that is meer mandatory without any promise at all 6. God doth use his Law as he doth his whole word to beget and to increase the life of Grace 7. While a Minister is preaching any commandment he doth thereby mould and new-frame the heart 8. I suppose that Christ hath obtained of God by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth in the Ministery that whether it be Law or Gospel the souls of men may be healed and converted thereupon 9. I cannot yeild to that that the Law worketh only preparatorily 10. There was never in the Church of God meer pure Law or meer pure Gospel 11. Onely two things go to the essence of a Law 1. Direction 2. Obligation 12. In the Moral Law is required justifying Faith Repentance and our Sacraments be commanded in the second Commandment 13. The Moral Law containeth more then the Law of Nature 14. Good works are necessary to Salvation in regard of the presence of them 15. Our holy duties have a promise of pardon and eternal life not because of their worth but yet of their presence 16. To every godly action thou dost there is a promise of eternal life 17. Goods works be conditions without which a man cannot be saved 18. Good works are in their owne nature a defence against sin and corruption 19. Our good works be a motive moving God as a King that preferreth one that saluteth him 20. The State of reparation cannot be absolutely said to be better then that in innocency 21. We are not by Christ more righteous then Adam was or imputed righteousness though infinite in Christ is only imputed to us for that we lost and ought to have and we need no more 22. The Gospel makes known Christ and then the Law thus as it were illightned by the Gospel doth fasten a command upon us to believe in Christ Mr. Rutherf 23. Gods decree of grace in the execution of it may be broken in a linke by some great sin but Christ cannot but soder the chain and raise the fallen sinner 24. The Law hath power to convert by the Spirit 25. Sinners remaining in that damnable state are not to believe but as thus qualified that is humbled wearied self-condemned onely 26. Yet though thou were upon the borders of hell the Gospel excepts thee not from the duty of believing and coming to Christ They that sin against the holy Ghost are condemned for unbelief 27. Saving humiliation is conjoyned with Christ Dr. Tayeler A man may get from under his dangerous state by the attaining and exercise of three saving Graces Faith Repentance and inchoate obedience Repentance wipes off old scores repealeth all the actions of the Law getteth all sins cast into the bottom of the Sea Inchoate obedience hath promise of acceptance and is accounted as full and compleat obedience to the Law The way to escape the yoke and coaction of the Law is to become a cheerful and free observer of it That these are not of the substance of the Law but circumstances appendce and consequences viz. 1. That the Law yoaketh every man to a personal performance of it 2. To exact personal and perfect obedience upon pain of eternal death 3. To urge and force it self upon the conscience with fear and terror 4. That no life or salvation must be expected by the Law but by keeping it wholly and exactly 5. That the Law arraignes and condemnes the sinner and is the Ministery of death Without the law no man can know what God is nor his worship nor how to perform duties Good works be conditions of blessedness Mr. Bedford Christ hath freed us provided that men by faith lay hold on Christ keep close to him and walk according to those rules of holiness that he hath prescribed for in so doing we obtain what the Law promised life and salvation Believers are not under that condition of full and perfect obedience but under a condition of sincerity of obedience The Law as circumstantial viz. as it is a covenant of life and death is abolishod Mr. Bl. in serm Christ came to save none but holy ones Setting up of Familiy-duties like the sprinkling of the blood of the Paschal lamb will keep out the destroying Angel Mr. All. sem As Christ was glorified because he first glorified his Father so we must first glorifie God by our obedience and serve him if we will be saved There is a general equity that if God save any he save them that serve him To be glorified of God is to be received into communion have acceptance peace of conscience joy in the holy Ghost Adoption and the inheritance these we shall have by honouring and serving of God here so that by honouring God we do good to our selves Mr. No. The law is the word of Grace that bringeth salvation Grace cometh by the Law as well as by Gospel And so expounded those Texts Tit. 2.11 2 Cor. 6.1 Act 20.32 Mr. H. God made man for happiness and the Law must be his rule and guide unto it The Covenant of Grace is not absolute and free but upon condition of our good works or works are considerations or Causa sine qua non as when a great treasure is promised for going a hundred miles The Covenant of works requireth perfect obedience and the condition of the covenant of Grace is at least a purpose and endeavour to keep the Commandments The Lord give us a good understanding in all things and make us rightly to discern between things that differ To God belongeth glory for ever Amen FINIS Monomachia OR A Single REPLY To Mr. RUTHERFORD'S Book CALLED Christ's dying and drawing of Sinners Vindicating and clearing onely such Positions and Passages in The Assertion of Grace as are palpably mistaken and perverted and so mis-called ANTINOMIAN Wherein also it appeareth that the Adversaries dealing is neither just nor candid By Robert Towne Luke 6.22 23. Blessed are ye when men hate you and when they separate you and revile you and cast out your name as evil for the Son of man's sake Rejoyce ye in that day c. for after this manner their fathers did to the Prophets Joh. 9 39. And Jesus said For judgement I am come into this world that they which see not might see and they which see might be made blinde James 3.14 15. If ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts glory not and lye not against the Truth This wisdom descendeth not from above c. Qui aliorum verba calumniantur illi arte alium fingunt ac formant sermonem quà m ab co quem calumniantur est dictus Moll Jac. 3.14 Aemulationem dixit amaram quia non regnat nisi dum veneno malignitatis infecti sunt ut omnia in amarulentiam
Ministery and how Jerusalem the valley of vision zealous in a religious way yet did not know the things of her peace Luk. 19.41 but erred in her heart not knowing God way of peace and life Psal 95.3 In what a dangerous and deep temptation many a poor distressed soul lyeth plunged sore for want of this doctrine and consolation of free-grace 4. And that the relieving enlarging and saving of such a soul is much to be preferred before conversation of life And 5. Lastly As Luther saith That there is no danger in preaching faith free-grace without works for good works will follow where that is truely received but in preaching works and the Law so as it may be done and obeyed is much danger lest free-grace be obscured destroyed unknown men rest in the way of the Law and the gate of eternal life never be opened c. If I say you had considered these and the like you would never have condemned the innocent There be also divers things exceptable in your supposed disputable questions and some that reflect on your self as being inconsistent with what you hold at other times and confirming what you oppose but we may not dwell on what is Cursory Mr. B. pag. 31. Let us see what prejudicial inferences they gather from this doctrine of justification denying them good works to be a way to heaven Thus Doctor Crisp in page 6 c. Answ Methinks that expression of the Doctor is so clear and fully satisfactory that you should not quarrel with it and to me your language is so confused that I cannot skill of it but do fear it will lead the Reader out of the right way Let Christ be the way and good works our imployment or business in the way as he saith and then I see no error nor danger If you do truly good works you do them in Christ abiding in him Ioh. 15.4 in whom you are alive and walk continually by faith doth the soul go out of Christ or leave him when or while it worketh As ye have received Christ Jesus so walk in him Colos 2.6 Now the soul cannot walk in Christ nor have union with him save by faith the believer also walketh in the way of the Law of works but this is his way on earth amongst men and Christ is his way to God and heaven Let me add Christ is set forth so to be our way that he is our salvation also so that in him the soul is at her journies end and need not work to go further for attaining life as if it were a far off and good works were a way to carry and bring us unto it Eternal life is in the Sonne He that hath the Sonne hath eternal life also Joh. 3.36 1 Joh. 5.11 12. Also the words of Bernard are Viaregni not ad regnum of which difference see more in the Assertion of Grace M. B. Thus Matth. 7.17 Strait is the way that leadeth to life What is this way but the work of grace and godliness Answ I might here put you in minde of a threefold work of grace as you will have it First Angusta est via oportet te fieri tenuem si vis per eam venire Caeterum qui operibus onerati sunt sicut cōnchylibus onustos videmus Jacobi peregrinos ii non toterant penetrare Si veneris cum magnis saceis operum plenis depenere oportebit c. Ger. which God hath wrought in and by Christ for man 2. That which he worketh in man 3. And that which man worketh by vertue of his grace Now I need not ask you which of these you mean for it 's seen by your words you take to the third and last which as I conceive cannot be the meaning of the place and I could give reasons for it But I incline to Musculus with others which Authors I have been forced to part with who expound it so That the Doctrine of Christ and faith is the straight way which few indeed do finde and the broad way is false Doctrine and error of all sorts which leaveth the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 13.3 There is a broad way common to the religious Iews Papists and deceived Protestants which leadeth to destruction As for the way of downright wickedness all know that is the way to hell And as many in a blinde zeal are carried to damnation as by prophaness and actual outward sinning And this is a strong inducement to me thus to understand it as that to believe is the straightest way of all others and fewest finde and walk in that way with an upright foot so because Christ is there speaking of Teachers and their Doctrine and not of mans life and manners so that it is doctrine he meaneth to be the straight way for it is doctrine true or false that guideth and carrieth the soul one way or other to heaven or hell and that is either the righteousness of faith or the righteousness of works He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved he that believeth not shall be damned and no good work can help to save him Mr. B. 2. Denying the presence of them good works in the person justified for thus saith the Author expresly speaking of that of Paul therefore we conclude that a man is justified without the works of the Law Here saith he the Apostle doth not only exclude works from having any power operative to concur in the laying iniquities upon Christ but excludes all manner of works man can do to be present and existent in persons when God doth justifie them And he instanceth of a general pardon for thieves Now one man may take the pardon as well as another Answ Your charge is heavie but I finde no evidence or proof What doth he deny the presence of good works in the person justified or after his justification did he not grant and say that they are our business and imployment in the way your words may be taken as if he denyed that ever a justified person should do good works Bona opera non precedunt justificandum c. Solis ortum sequitur aeris calafactio Melancth Cum peccata remitti constet etiamsi adhuc plena sit natura peccatis Melancth Deus nos in ca persectione in qua Christus resurrexit imactur If with Austine he hold good works do not go before a man to be justified I hope it is no error The air becometh warm not before but after the rising of the Sun Perhaps your meaning would be while justification is in fieri in doing not in facto after it is done yet your words are otherwise And this is to you so dangerous that to your charity it is inexcusable yet your great reading might tell you of divers Orthodox who speak and write as much and the Scripture will warant the same when you come professedly to handle the point hereafter Besides you cannot but know that the Doctor speaks of the sinners justification
Answ Here you wrong your adversary he speaks of a power and you of an act The Law may actually condemn where and when it cannot actually justifie as it condemneth every transgressor but can justifie onely the innocent and yet the power for to do both is equally in it as a Law Why do you not answer the ensuing Question viz. Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and yet keep it from under the damnatory The Law bids you love your neighbour though your enemy and presuppose you are obedient thereunto yet do you do it so perfectly that the Law hath no power to reprove and condemn you in that particular If the Law condemn you not away with humiliation Confession Repentance Justification and all living by Faith in Christ For now you can so walk according to the rule of the Law that it cannot subject you to the curse and death you are not reproved and judged in your self for any thing your peace and safety is by your just life the Law being curbed and restrained or rather exauthorized or dis-invested of all power to condemn and your life and comfort is not by your Faith in the Son of God who loved you and gave himself for you as Gal. 2.21 There is no condemnation unto you not because you are in Christ as Rom. 8.1 but the reason is in that the Law though a rule yet wanteth power to reign to death We often meet with this groundless and false assertion and now see what is the chief stone that you stumble at Let this now suffice M. B. The same Author again pag. 5. He dare not trust a believer to walk without his keeper c. they are onely kept within compass by the Law but are no keepers of it Answ The word they relates not to believers if you look the place as here you do intimate You onely repeat what we write but confute nothing M. B. The same Author at another time calls it a slander to say they deny the Law who can reconcile such contradictions Answ I see no contradiction nor shew of any you might tell your Reader wherein it lyeth for all are not so quick-sighted as your self But is not this a contradiction in you who say that we grant the Law to be a rule and that a believer is a free keeper of it and yet that we hold and teach the abolition of it Here the task to reconcile is now yours Also that we deny the Law abideth still a slander for which the Law is against you See the the ninth Commandment The Lord layeth it not unto your charge M. B. p. 52. The second interpretation is of the damnatory and cursing power of the Law the Law is not made to a believer so as he should abide under the cursing and condemning power of it Answ You might remember that right now you said The Law a believer is under hath no power to condemn and curse what need he or how can he then be freed from the cursing power See your own instance If the fire had no power to burn what need was there that God should hinder the act You would saign such a fire as is without all power to burn and tell us of such a Law as wanteth power to condemn who will now fear either or rather who can credit such vain words Your sword cuts the throat of the owner for from the removal or restraint of the act or operation the Argument doth not hold for the removal of the thing or the power to condemn but rather on the contrary it strongly and necessarily inferreth and concludeth that there is such a condemning power in the Law in that it is restrained and hindered from the actual doing of it But secondly here is no such miracle wrought upon the Law as was there upon the fire which kept it from burning the three worthies Dan. 3.23 25. though more abundant mercy be shewed for Christ was made under the Law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.4 Not to take the curse from the Law but to redeem us In what sense and to what end Christ was under as our surety in the same sense are we freed but he was under both the rule and raign of it Yet it will not follow that believers are in no state of subjection and obedience or being enlarged and set at liberty do not run the way of Gods Commandments For they do it though by another efficient from a new principle and for a different end then that of the Law Do and live They are under Christ and moved and led by his Spirit who is the head and husband of his Church But of this more afterwards M. B. Consider some parallel places of Scripture Gal. 5.23 speaking of the fruits of the Spirit Against such there is no Law the Law was not made to these to condemn them Answ And if you refer it to the fruits of the Spirit the Spirit produceth his fruits of himself and of his own accord no outward Law commanding and directing M. B. And if because the godly have an ingenuous free Spirit to do what is good he need not the Law directing or regulating it would follow as well he need not the whole Scripture Answ You would still bear men in hand that we are against the use of the Law which yet we do stand for if lawfully used as your Text requireth and that in all the Authority and Offices of it and this we can and are ready to make good upon occasion yet since this is so often inculcated by you I wish you would give satisfaction in these few things First If the Spirit make the will and affections free to what is good doth it alter and enlighten the understanding also to know what is truth and good and effectually encline move guide and lead aright without the direction and regulating of the Law doth the Spirit which is light and giveth all light and directive power to the Law need the Law in his work 2. You are to prove and cleer better then yet you have done that the Law is instrumental to the Spirit in the works and ways of sanctification 3. Where do you finde that the moral Law doth give help or power unto any jubet non juvat 4. Whereas you say we are flesh and not all spirit c. It may be replyed that by Scripture and all experience sin the wickedness of our nature is rather irritated and strengthened by the Law then weakned and mortified It is such a desperate disease that it makes head more strongly against any legal plaister and application Rom. 7.5 c. M. B. You say it will follow as well that he needed not the Gospel to call upon him to believe Answ Your reason is much unlike for first the Doctrine of the Gospel is not onely the object of Faith but the outward instrument and ordinary means the Spirit useth both to implant faith and to increase it to
heard 3. True prayer is for the fulfilling of his promise in his own way and not in ours M. B. If the Ceremonial Law the Sacraments and Sacrifices were blessed by Gods Spirit while they were commanded to be used for the strengthening and increase of grace notwithstanding the deadly nature of them now then the Moral may be blessed c. seeing it stands still in force Answ While those ordinances were in use they were effectual to increase faith and so to quicken confirm and cheer the heart against inward temptations from sin Satan the fear of death of judgement c. for they were instituted for that purpose and fitted also in that they held forth and shadowed Christ Crucified the body and substance life and thing signified If you can prove that the moral law was either ordained or so fitted for that end you say something else water is not so weak as is this Argument M. B. Let the use of them be c. Answ The Lord let you see your error and failing and give you a right use of what is said Indeed the law is holy yet it is manifest that maketh neither heart nor life full of holiness though you abound in legal performances M.B. What is regeneration but the working of the moral law in the heart that is the Image of God Answ Regeneration giveth a new being birth and estate as well as a new Image It maketh us both Sons and also like our heavenly Father but the law is the instrument for neither but the word of truth which is the Gospel of salvation Jam. 1.18 as is cleared before You seem to have a zeal but not according to knowledge and so would lead and hasten on your hearers in a wrong way LECT XXI Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law c. M. B. Let us consider a great mistake of the Antinomian Author in the Assertion pag. 171. where he makes the very ground why they are charged with Antinomianisme to be because they do not hold the law to be used by God instrumentally for the conversion of men certainly this is a great mistake for there are many learned men who hold the work of the law to be no more but preparatory Answ Sir It is no mistake at all for both Dr. Tailor and many others upon that ground have so concluded and condemned us And if your words will sufficiently satisfie the world that this our Opinion and Tenet is so Orthodox and free from Antinomianism as you are enforced to do lest otherwise you should unavoidably as you see and say bring many yea all the learned into the same condemnation with us except your self who yet in so doing might put your owne neck into the coller I doubt not then but the truth will also clear and free us in all other out assertions And so in despight of all ill-will our innocency which hath so unjustly suffered and been so unworthily aspersed a long time by you and others will at last come to light and we shall mirabile dictu stand recti in curia Plead thou our cause O God of our righteousness M. B. Yet for all that they do peremptorily maintaine the use and obligation of the law in respect of believers therefore they are not in that respect condemned for that error Answ Surely if I understand any thing neither they nor yet your self will be so peremptory as to maintain the use and obligation of it to believers quatenus tales To faith or in the state or things of faith there is no obligation nor use of the law If the law be useful to the working Abraham as Luthers phrase and distinction is yet here they all and you also must do so at the last unanimously confess that the law hath power actually to condemn him in all his works and wayes so that by his faith he ever retireth in spirit and returneth to Christ his righteousness that so he may enjoy and preserve his peace freedom life and comfort your best performances need remission of sins much more you for these your Lectures Again if the learned be not condemned for this errour in this respect yet you account it an errour in them and cannot prove it so or else how is it so intolerable in us are you become partial and inequal judges M. B. The question is not whether by the power of the law we come to obey the law but whether Grace may not use the precepts or law preached for the inflaming of our affections so in love with the things commanded that we are thereby made more holy And thus I interpret those Authors that deny the law to be instrumental to holiness that is not animated by Gods Spirit or separated from it An. Now you should address your self to encounter and you begin to shrink in diffidence doubtless of your cause which you perceive so unjustifiable that no advocate will be found to patronize it for did not you in pag. 187. say that you suppose Christ Jesus hath obtained by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth of the ministery that whether it be law or Gospel the souls might be healed and converted And now you seem to be no longer of that minde that by the power of the law we come to obey the law which as you mean it is all one with conversion If we come not by the power of the law to obey then it is by the power of the Gospel onely and so we agree If you reply You mean by no power inherent in the law I say There is no inherent or physical vertue neither in the Gospel to effect our conversion 2. Now the question must be onely whether Grace may not use the law c. This is the liberty you can allow your self to alter and to state the question as best liketh you If you misliked the form and terms wherein you found it why became you opponent And now your expressions in this be so uncouth and improper as that grace may use the precepts c. and your meaning in the residue so obscure and doubtful and I so unwilling to wrong you the least jot that I had rather forbear then meddle any further I shall deliver my minde how pertinent to your question or satisfactory to your self it shall prove I know not thus This word of God which revealeth the riches of grace and exceeding kindness in giving righteousness and salvation to the soul is the true and proper instrument for the inslaming of the affections in love both to God his law and all the things of God and the law neither maketh to love God nor its owne commands And here you so mince it that your expression onely is to make us more holy as if already you granted now that the law doth not instrumentally initiate or work sanctification at first but increase it afterward consider this well Lastly Those Authors you mean are not beholden unto you for your so gross and
it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he
to meddle with by-matters You then shew what a Covenant is And as here you say You find much difference of judgement so I say You are unhappily perswaded to incline to the most unlikely unfound and palpably erronious opinion of all others if yet you have any to travel and go with you in your way but you love cross and by-wayes that you may be better noted to become famous or infamous Mr. B. The Law as to this purpose may be considered more largely as that whole doctrine delivered on Mount Sinai with the preface and promises adjoyned and all things that may be reduced to it or more strictly as it is an abstracted rule of righteousness holding forth life upon no terms but perfect obedience Now take it in the former sence it was a Covenant of grace take it in the later it was not of grace but of works Answ This is first to be premised and we take it as granted by you that however you consider the Law yet you mean onely the moral Law Yet you will not be contented with the simple and entire law as it is an absolute law in it self but do take in also unto it the preface promises and all things reduceable your extent of it is now become large indeed and to me indefinite What you draw in and reduce to it who knoweth But I smell some feare and diffidence in this great enterprize your own thoughts being apprehensive of the unjustifiableness of this strange and bold assertion you would not therefore be too narrowly kept in but will take more scope and ground then is allowable but let this pass and to come to a more particular reply Methinks the Pieface it self should have been sufficient to have stopt you in this your way or opinion Thus it is recorded Exod. 20.2 and Deut. 5.6 I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out c. out of which I collect and it is plain and undenyable That God was their God and Israel his people before the giving of the Law and that he did not in these words express his wilingness and consent to be their God if or upon condition they will keep these his Commandments which you call the first thing belonging to a Covenant therefore he saith Hear I am thy God that is I am now already thy God namely by free promise in the seed of the woman Gen. 3. or as it was made to Abraham and his posterity Gen 12.3 Gal. 3.6 To Abraham and his seed were the promises made And unto this promise or Covenant of grace then which I know no other in simple nature and essence or substance they had given and professed their consent formerly by their faith and externally by receiving circumcifion the signe of the Covenant and so avouched God to be their only God in Christ and themselves his people through him And he being their God and King it pleased him now to deliver unto them his will in this way and form of Government according to which he would rule them and they were to conform themselves to his pleasure herein 2. And this promise given by God and believed on by them so long before this promulgation and solemne delivery of the Law was entire of it self containing perfection of doctrine and holding out a free and clear way to pardon reconciliation and life And therefore it was singly made preached at first to Adam and Abraham with his posterity so that Paul saith Gal. 3.18 God gave the Inheritance that is all the blessedness belonging to a Child bylpromse denying and excluding the Law in this And hence is it that to prevent all objections against the doctrine of free grace Paul saith Rom. 5.20 Moreover the Law entered that the offence might abound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Law entered besides the promise of grace which was the prime and principall doctrine and it entered into the Church or among the people of God and yet neither to disannull nor to adde any thing unto the former Covenant or promise Gal. 3.15 as if of imperfect before it was to be perfected thereby Nor yet as if it were to be mingled with the promise and so to adulterate it but it was to be kept distinct from it as being of another nature and for another end contrary to that of the promise The Law was to uncover sin terrifie the conscience exclude the soul from Gods favour and presence the promise to cover to pacifie and comfort and to admit or give entrance again with confidence through faith in Christs blood The Law was to make sin abound that upon that occasion the ampleness and efficaciousness of the grace promised in Christ might be more abundant And as for the promises of the Law Piscator telleth you That they are to be excluded the Covenant of grace as being of a diverse nature or quality from those promises of grace The promise of grace is Nuda simplex gratuita the legall promises are Conditionales But now we will consider by what Scriptures and Reasons you would confirm it First you say Mr. B. There is nothing more ordinary with Paul in these controversies then to consider the Law so differently as take this instance Rom. 10.5.6 where he descibeth the righteousness of the Law from these words Do and live c. We find this in effect Deut. 30.16 and yet from this very chap. The Apostle describes the righteousness which is by faith And Beza doth acknowledge that that which Moses speaks of the Law Paul applieth to the Gospel Answ We might expect a more plain and clear text then this which is so knotty and difficult that it hath troubled the best commentators if yet you could produce any â—er verbum entelligit M. Legem quam Dominus voce sua promulgavit P. autom ad praedicationem Evangelii quae fuit Legis perfectio accommodat B. but your poor shift and nakedness is manifest If you stand here to Beza his words make directly against you What Moses speaks of the Law Paul applieth to the Gospel saith he Moses said thus of the Law and Paul of the Gospel Thus then by his interpretation 1. The Law is not one with the Gospel nor doth it comprehend it but containeth a doctrine in kinde differing from the Gospel or Covenant of grace 2. He seemeth to be of that judgement with many others that Paul doth but allude to that place in Moses and doth not directly and purposely cite Moses for confirmation and this is most probable in that something is added some left out and something altered Calvin thinkes the knot may easily be untied Sed totam in genere doctrinam quae â—vangelium sub se compreâ—endat c. thus If by the word we understand not the law but the whole doctrine of God in general as it comprehendeth the Gospel for saith he The word of the Law never cometh of it self to be in the
the consent or opinion of Divines as the best yea sole reason and warrant you have for this whereas you regard not their concurrence in other things 4. Your inference is as strange viz. That there must then necessarily be grace included in the morall Law for suppose your reducement be true yet the same grace was still contained and kept in the ceremoniall as before and it could import no whit of its native vertue or as a physicall ingredient infuse its spirit strength or force to alter and qualifie the Law of works for then grace were no more grace nor works no more works If you make the morall so capacious as to receive into it the other as a greater Orbe the lesser or as your Chest doth a box of oyntment or the Ark the Pot of Manna yet there is no necessity of any influence from one into the other or of any thing to be poured out of one vessell into another but all that grace of remission of sins c. was still preserved and kept in the ceremoniall Law and so no grace in the morall 4. If the Apostle did speak as much against the ceremoniall as morall Law was it not because the people had no further respect then to the act observance or thing done resting in the bare use without faith in Christ the onely treasure hid and propounded in and by them and so they made that to be worke which was grace and so no difference between ceremoniall and morall things Sincere accepâ—â— non sunt proâ—â—ie opera hoâ—â—num sed â—â—ei nam niâ—â—l agimus sed â—â—ferimus nos â—â—eo ad recipiâ—â—ndam ejus â—â—vatiam Cal. And being thus perverted the continuance and use of circumcision and the sacrifices did oppose Christ and grace though they did not so as they were instituted and commanded by God to be used Sacrifices and Sacraments be Gods Ordinances which rightly understood and taken and purely used are not properly mans works but Gods He propoundeth and commendeth thereby unto us his grace and the work of redemption by Jesus Christ the sole object that our faith is to look at and to be exercised about in the use of them If we handle them sincerely we bring no work nothing for acceptation with God but onely are receivers of what he freely giveth unto us It s an easie and too common an errour to turn all into works even Baptism and the Lords Supper whereby the simple nature and verity of them is extinguished and lost Christ profiteth none but such as despairing of Law and works do by faith she onely unto the promise of his grace If a man seek help or comfort in any one act or work he is then bound to seek the same in all the works of the Law and so is a debter to fulfill the whole Law and is quite fallen from grace so is it Gal. 5.2 3 4. Behold I Paul say unto you that if you be circumcised namely in that perswasion that that act will avail you any thing Christ shall not profit you at all c. 5. Lastly This say you hath been alway a strong Argument to perswade you c. And there appeareth no strength in it but it is as weak silly and poor as any and whereas you say alwaies I understand you thus viz. since you entertained that conceit that the Law of works is a Covenant of grace by a mistake herein you might be confirmed in that errour but what bred or occasioned that opinion at first And we now having the same morall Law how is it if the ceremoniall be included in that second Commandment that it doth not bind us also to sacrifice be circumcised c. as it did the Jews else we have not all in the Law Mr. B. This will appear from the visible seal to ratifie the Covenant Argn. 5 which was by sacrifices and sprinkling the people with blood and this did signifie Christ the Mediatour of this Covenant Answ Interpreters vary about the meaning of that Covenant-book or Testament that was sprinkled with blood Exod. 24. If you will contend it was the Law largely taken even for what was delivered on Mount Sinai In which large acceptation that Law blood of sprinkling and other ceremonies then used were typicall and shadows of future good things Heb. 10.1 then you exclude the Morall Law strictly taken as a rule of righteousness for it was not typicall And now what have you gained by making this a Covenat of grace which the Jews lived under or where or what grace is found in the morall Law But when Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people and said Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you Exod. 24.8 your Marginall note telleth you It was to signifie that the Law being broken by us could alone be satisfied by the blood and death of Christ Let Moses be typicall Mediatour yet it followeth not that it was not a covenant of works if you take it for the Law morall but contrarily that it was no other for a Mediator was therefore needfull because by the Law the people were convinced that there was dissention and variance between God and them in that they were proved to be transgressors of that his Law and the enmity was to be slain and abolished and a reconcilement made by a middle person Argn. 6 The residue of this Section I leave as dubious and obscure of whom you mean I know not Mr. B. If the Law was that same Covenant with that Oath God made to Isaac then it must needs be a Covenant of grace But c. Therefore God remembers what he had promised to Abraham Deut. 7.2 It shall come to pass if ye hearken to these judgements and do them that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the Covenant and mercy which he sware unto thy Fathers Answ Nothing is more evident by this place then that the Law requiring these judgements to be hearkened unto and done was a distinct doctrine from that Covenant made with them in their Fathers For 1. God requires of them the doing of the one but promises that he himself will keep the other the Covenant and the mercy so that this wholly rests and relyeth on him 2. He calls and commendeth himself first to be the Lord their God not upon condition of their doing or obedience but before he required it and as the ground of commanding it 3. The Covenant and mercy was made long before and confirmed by Oath in the dayes of their Fathers these stand all in that text fully against you and for us Yet he dealing with them as a Father with his Children is willing to manifest his faithfulness and love in keeping Covenant and promise made long before in that way of their obedience and dutifulness but that he made that Covenant the same with the Law is denied as utterly false If you say to your Child he shall find you a loving and kind
to affirm and maintain it and with a smal touch he there passeth it over And here he saith The Law it self converts not No more doth the Gospel it self as he often saith without the spirit This is as if with Mr. Burgess he meanes that either Law of Gospel is the Spirits instrument for conversion and that we may preach either for that end Mr. Rutherford is unwilling to speak out Loquere ut videam 3. If the Spirit by the Gospel conform us to the rule of the Law It s then true that the Law is a passive rule but not active as actuating to effectuate this thus you grant what I asserted and oppose without cause But at last you tell us the Apostle never speaks of our freedom from the Law as it doth regulate direct and lead us Reply Now this overthroweth what you said even now viz. That the Spirit by the Gospel doth direct and lead us in the way of the Law for then the Law doth not actively lead us Mr. T. pag. 9. What freeth a believer from the curse but because he is a new Creature Mr. Rutherf That new creation is sanctification 2 Cor. 5.17 not justification If any be in Christ that is if he be justified he is a new creature that is sanctified or else by the Antinomian gloss the meaning must be If a man be justified in Christ he is justified in Christ Paul speaks not so non-sense Reply This new creature is the man changed in himself and his state Sanctification is not a new creation but a new qualifying of a man It begets him not nor recreates him not to God nor yet delivereth him from under the curse makes him not the child of God restoreth him not into favour nor doth make him Heir Co-heir with Christ c. See your errour 2. To be justified and to be in Christ is not all one as your gloss is they differ as the cause and the effect or as the antecedent and consequent To be in Christ imports union which is before justification Or it is insition that work of the Father Joh. 15.1 that being ingrafted into him he may partake of his righteousness and holiness both imputatively and inherently if I may use the Aristotelian word More sound or probable is their judgement who teach that regeneration includeth both justification and sanctification Mr. Rutherf How shall it follow that Christ hath loosed us from all debt of active obedience because he hath loosed us from a necessity of perfect active obedience but the Law is spiritualized and lustred with the Gospel Law and free-grace and drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace requires not nor exacts upon perfect obedience under pain of losing salvation It requires obedience as the poor man is able to give it by the grace of God that the man may enter in the possession of eternal life Reply I Reply You can shew no text nor reason why Christ looseth not from imperfect as well as perfect obedience and that from active as well as passive Nay if from prefect much more may we argue from imperfect 2. If our state and case be well considered we are spiritually so poor that we are as unable to pay pence as pounds It is all one to a dead man whether life be tendered unto him upon condition of moving his least finger or the removing of a great Mountain and this is our case Again you can produce no Law 1 That requires not perfect obedience 2 That calls not for obedience as a proper condition of life Do and live 3 That threatens not death upon the least failing in any Iota But you let all see your new divinity 1 I must obey but not perfectly 2 The Law is spiritualized c. drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace 3 No more is required of the poor man then he can give c. Vltra posse viri non vult Deus ulla requirt Thus grace is abrogated promise made void and faith is of no effect Mr. Rutherf Paul sheweth what Law we are freed from of sinne and death and saith Christ died for this end Rom. 8 4. That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Whence I argue Those that ought to fulfill the righteousness of the Law by walking after the Spirit and mortifying the deeds of the flesh are not freed from the Law as a rule of righteousness Reply The strength of sinne is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 2 Christ dyed that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us imputatively or grant inherently yet if this be the end and fruit of Christs death as you say then the Law is no active cause of it but the power of Christs death effecteth it And though this righteousness be for matter one with the Law yet still the Law is but a rule passively according to which the believer is conformed and regulated it not actively regulating Also active walking in the Law is but the expression and effect of sanctification and not properly sanctification it self Adam made holy lived accordingly from that inward form his holy life made him not holy Neither is our holy life to procure or preserve peace favour life as the Law propoundeth requireth it for these consist in faith alone which findeth and enjoyeth Christ to be such a true fulness and All-sufficiency to the soul that self by him and with him is satisfied and so needs no ends of its own in working and obeying Joh. 6.35 He that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst Mr. Rutherf We are freed from the Law being once justified so the Antinomians whatever we do is not against a Law or rule the law gives a dispensation to do those things being justified which the unjustified cannot do but in doing it they sinne because the unjustified are under the law as a rule of justice which we are not under We have an Antidated dispensation to sinne Reply You straine your wit if not conscience to make quidlibet ex quolibet But I say Take justification in the full latitude and extent of it or consider a Christian still as justified and so he is freed from under the Law but if you speak of or consider him in his active righteousness of works so as you bring him under the Law so he sinneth yea and is judged and condemned by the Law and you must raise him and bring him up to his justified state ere he can be free and secure from the curse Justification extends to all sins at all times throughout the whole life But it s false that I give an Antidated dipensation that is your indirect inference If you put the believer under the Law as he sinneth like the unjustified so the Law threatneth and curseth both equally Though you tell us unwarrantably of your bare word that the Law hath power to rule where it hath no power to condemn then we may live securely in sin or the works
stay out my Quarter yet I did and then a Writ was procured from the Colonels to apprehend and imprison me My offer was To let me have justice and I would justifie what I taught and held and let them see their errours an easie thing to do but they refused Then I went to London with intention to Petition the Parliament but friends who had better intelligence and experience disswaded and deterred me So finding little hope of relief I returned and removed my family into Yorkshire so giving place to their fiery zeal Gentle Reader I have presumed on thy patience in setting down these passages by which it is clear that they seek themselves and not Christ and his Truth and chuse rather to use Club-law as did Cain the false Prophets Pharisees and Hypocrites in all times of persecution to extinguish or suppress the light of heaven then that it should discover their nakedness and shame If thou ask Why are they bent and enraged more against you Antinomians then any other Sect Answ They can tell thee great things and would have thee believe we are unworthy to live in any Commonwealth But the truth is and many of them cannot be ignorant of it we teach onely what is Orthodox and the old-received truths of God And do desire no more favour then what Justice can deny to none viz. leave to speak for our selves before we be condemned Onely they see the inconsistencie of divers of our Tenets with theirs and Dagon or the Ark must fall And how questionable and unjustifiable their assertions are to any indifferent capacity viewing and considering them in the true light and therefore would put out our Candie It would make a Christian face to blush or his heart rather to bleed to hear what stuff they can put off and vent in their Sermons I resorted to their Exercises divers yeers yet never heard one doctrine of Free-grace of Christ Faith or Justification Legal Reformation is taken for Regeneration and Evangelical Sanctification I have spoken with old and zealous prosessors who knew not what it was to be justified by faith except this was the meaning of it That God would accept of them for their good works and duties If any one which yet Nature is principled for be framed and brought somwhat into a Legal way to performances he is judged a true Convert and may set up his rest If they do well they tell you they can believe sufficiently upon their kinde of works they build their faith The Law is not preached as the ministry of death to cast down and to kill that Christ may be the life and spiritual resurrection but the life that most speak of is to live and walk in the Law yet Paul saith I by the Law am dead to the Law that I may live to God Gal. 2.19 I am resolved of this that if people had experience of a sensible death working in them by the Law and that nothing but the curse and wrath could be had in their works and ways and had felt as sensibly a reviving and quickning in the faith and apprehension of Christ there would be little ground of difference remaining but till that be or at least that the Law be preached for death and not for life and peace as too many do how can the controversie be ended But flesh and blood may object What good success can I promise to this my enterprise I go against the full tyde and violent current of humane policie and learning of such a religious multitude all being combined and conspiring against me Are not my adversaries in number infinite rarely qualified admired for sanctity and zeal backed and invested with worldly Authority countenanced by the times and the sole-esteemed pillars of the Church What am I how dare I oppose them Who is my Patron My answer is 1. I do not come forth in mine own name or strength nor measure my self with them for then hope of prevailing is gone But when God is set against them and his invincible Verity so opposed by them how vain and light then are all these powers and excellencies 2. I have been carried against the stream almost these twenty yeers yet they could not prevail by reason of the Lords strength and presence 3. However the voyage fall out I have not much left to lose onely my outward liberty in part and a few days it may be of my natural life can be in jeopardy And hath the sacred Truth of God and the desired good of his Church been so prevalent that for their sakes I have sustained such loss suffered so many things already and shall I now shrink or be unwilling to sacrifice the loan of what is remaining The Lord leave me not to that temptation 4. In all their opposition I see nothing to convince but am rather thereby confirmed They would see a mote in Dr. Crisp's eye but will not see a beam in their own If to my self I were guilty of any their unworthy imputations or of doing or yet offering a hundredth part of that wrong I received from them or if my conscience did not witness with me that I had sought to give unto them all possible satisfaction more then was desired or would be accepted of then I should not have that inward peace and contentment which now I enjoy And 5. lastly why should I desire a Patron and so become injurious to any in engaging them or rendering them to be suspected I know the Truth is able to protect it self and the servant of it and further then I am found in the way of Verity I seek no shelter The Name of the Lord is a strong tower the righteous runneth into it and is safe Prov. 18.10 Thou Lord hast seen it for thou beholdest mischief and spite to requite it with thy hand The poor committeth himself unto thee thou art the helper of the fatherless Psal 10.14 R. Towne Vindiciae Evangelii OR The Vindication of the Gospel from the unjust Censure and all Aspertions of A 〈◊〉 ntinomy Or A Reply to Mr ANTH BURGESSE'S Vindiciae Legis c. SIR YOur other Advantages are many but God and his Truth are with us therefore we may be confident in our just Cause and Quarrel and the Victory is certainly ours Your whole Colledg and Assembly approve of and commend your Book that is I confess cause of sadness and grief to my spirits but not one jot of terror Truth is of more weight and authority with me then the Consent and Judgment of all the Learning and Principalities in the world and as Luther writ to K. H. 8. I prefer one Paul before a thousand Thom. Scotus c. You anticipate our expectation of your future Reply in your Preface to the Reader I hope you will not for I perceive by this that the light of Truth hath almost overcome you a little more glory of it may happily both convince and convert also But your Ground or Reason of not Replying
in Christ when God did lay on him the iniquities of all the Elect and in raising him from death did acquit and justifie both him and all them in and through him of and from all those sins for ever and ever since doth behold and accept them in that perfection and clear estate wherein Christ was raised And Master Pemble had that discretion and charity that by distinguishing between justification in foro Coeli and in foro Conscientiae he did admit of Polanus in the former acception Now when sins were so transacted and Christ rose again wholly discharged of them for our justification Rom. 4.25 how could any of good works be then present or existent Mr. B. He Doctor Crisp concluded that therefore though a man rebel actually from time to time and do practise this rebellion yet the hatefulness thereof is laid upon Christ Is not this such a doctrine that must needs please an ungodly man Answ The Doctor speaketh of the Elect who before calling to the faith of Christ did not cease to practise rebellion and saith that God satisfied his justice even for those wickednesses he is in committing at that time in which Christ did suffer And this will be the only refuge plea and staffe of support and comfort when that soul is in trouble and distress which is the very end he propounded to himself in these so free and absolute expressions of the grace of God as neither you nor any other laying aside all prejudice can otherwise conceive for these be his words pag. 141. I say all the weight and all the burthen and all the 〈◊〉 sin it self is long agone laid upon Christ and that laying it upon him is a full discharge and a general release and acquittance to thee that there is not any one sin now to be charged upon thee Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world Ioh. 1.29 The laying of thy iniquities upon Christ is an absolute and full discharge to thee that there neither is nor can be any iniquity that for the present or for hereafter can be laid to thy charge If the Lord give to any to believe this truth that it is his iniquity the Lord hath laid on Christ Est scopus hujus gravissimae consolationis munire pertene factos qui agnoscant immunditiam imbecillitatem suam ut certo statuant se Deo placere propter Christum c. God himself cannot charge any one sin upon that person pag. 137. You may remember your own rule that all things are to be taken in the Authors sence and as he intendeth it and that of Hilary Ex causis dicendi dictorum intelligentiae sumatur And so it is true that this doctrine must be pleasant and most acceptable to an ungodly heart which travelleth and is weary under the sence and burthen of his sins Comfort ye the hearts of my people c. Isai 40.1 M. B. 3. In denying of gaining any thing by them even any peace of heart or losing it by them Now this goeth contrary to Scripture Ans While you believe that you are justified and accepted in Christ you can want no peace of heart Christ is our Righteousness and our peace Ephes 2.14 Heb. 7.2 If you cease to believe so and fall from faith to purisie Conscience by works you gain nothing but by catching at the shadow lose all true and effectual consolation But you say it is contrary to Scripture and when you shew your Scripture look for a more full and satisfying answer M. B. Thus Doctor Crisp pag. 139. The business we are to do is this that though there be sins committed yet there is no peace broken Answ I finde no such words in that page but I credit you so far that those are his words you tell us of error but show none The peace saith the Doctor is not broken to wit between God and the believer because the breach of peace is satisfied in Christ What more Orthodox or plain He is our Peace-maker If any Conscience lose her peace and be troubled it is because he believeth not and giveth way to sence and the Law but then receive abide in and enjoy Christ as he ought In your Answer you bring in nothing directly against him only you pretend a confutation You bid us especially consider Heb. 12. two last verses Our God is a consuming fire Answ This helps you not because God is so terrible out of Christ in the Law revealing wrath therefore receiving a Kingdome that cannot be removed let us have grace whereby we way serve God acceptably c. Here is an Argument to perswade the wavering Jews to close with God in the Covenant of free-grace in Christ Jesus otherwise his presence and dealing would prove most terrible and not that men should serve God themselves and by that means to make placable and loving and so to avoid the danger which is to deny and overthrow faith in the reconciliation by Christ and the whole grace of the Gospel You infer If the Scripture threaten thus to men living in sin if they do not they may finde comfort Answ 1. You should have said To men that abide in the unbelief of the Gospel dallying with it or not having that grace unto which the Apostle there exhorteth which in effect is this that all those are so threatened who believe not Christ to be the Messiah and the Mediator who hath made and brought in a full and everlasting Atonement whereupon followeth the serving of God acceptably c. The despising or neglecting of this grace doth most displease God and is the main condemnation under the Gospel Ioh. 3.19 And so long as the heart doubteth whether God be pacified and become propitious in Christ it can never please God Heb. 11.6 For no prayer nor worship with this unbelief or doubting in the inward parts can be heard and accepted How can they call upon him in whom they have not believed Rom. 10.14 2. You say If they sin not they may finde comfort Answ In what or Displicet Deo â—ubitatio quaâ—â—e neque coli â—eque in vocari â—cum dubitatione pâ—â—est where 's he that sinneth not and can say my heart is clean So all our comfort lyeth in our discharge by Christ Blessed is the man whose iniquities are forgiven Psal 32.1 M. B. Secondly Our holy duties they have a promise of pardon and eternal life though not because of their worth yet to their presence and therefore may the godly rejoyce when they finde them Answ This is strange teaching among Protestants It is an Assertion gross enough to have fallen from the pen of a Jesuite who now deny any dignity in good works as well as you deserving eternal life only eo vi promissionis by vertue of Gods promise made to good works they expect it I will not write all my thoughts while I consider how such doctrine is countenanced and commended by the President and Fellows of
answer 1. If Christ died not for such how could such come unto him or believe on him So that there is a sweet harmony yea who else could be saved for what difference is there originally and inwardly though not in outward expressions and out-breakings to the eye of the world the strictest Pharisee is as wicked and unclean as the loosest Libertine God looketh upon the heart But 2. you ask how can an enemy to Christ close with Christ I answer Is it not possible for enemies to be reconciled or for a Rebell convinced of his danger to submit and receive a gracious pardon being offered and when he is receiving it he may rightly and worthily be called a Rebell though afterward he become a true professed Subject 3. Neither the Text alledged nor the Doctor say enemies to Christ but when we were enemies viz. to God his justice and holiness in reference to his law For as God absolutely considered cannot be the object of mans hatred so God in Christ as Mediatour cometh under another Notion as being the onely meanes to slay enmity and reconcile both in himself You say it is more then in some places they allow Ans When you shew some place we may speak to it But how frequently read you in Doctor Crisp these and like expressions If God give thee an heart to come if thou canst believe if now thou have a mind to close with Christ c. which ought to have prevented all these exceptions as annulling the grounds and reasons of them I marvell that any understanding and experienced man should except against his Ministery it tending specially to encourage the poore and troubled soul to come freely and with confidence unto Christ assuring it there is no such force and let as the conscience of sin and his own unworthiness will suggest Oh how hard a thing is it in the feeling and horrour of sin to look up to free-grace and to receive Christ the gift of God without all disputings and reasonings about workes or qualification It is an evill rooted deeply in nature even that opinion which your doctrine maintaineth nourisheth and strengtheneth enough to overthrow the soul in the hour of tentation witness all experience And so the thought and consideration of some conceited goodness doth breed presumption and an unwarrantable perswasion of being the rather accepted If the Doctor had said that Christ is theirs and become their salvation whenas yet they had no heart to receiue or desire him you had some ground of excepting against him M. B. Christ dyed not onely to justifie but to save us Answ 1. Christ hath saved all that are to be saved Tit. 3.5 2. But it followeth not therefore that any can lay hold on salvation without justification or the righteousness of faith although he may so do without the righteousness of works Tit. 3.5 for justification is to life the Antecedent of it Rom. 5.18 M. B. Indeed the grand principle that Christ hath purchased and obtained antecedently to us in their sense will as necessarily infer that a drunkard abiding a drunkard shall be saved as well as justified Answ That Christ hath purchased and obtained all graces as you call them is so clear and fully convincing in the light of the Scripture that you cannot deny the truth of it onely our sense of it is corrupt and erroneous as you say but why do you not tell what our sense is It is out of no love that you conceal it but rather it argueth a minde in you to make the world thinke worse of us then you can make us to appear What you make or how you pervert our sense would be seen but that grand principle will necessarily infer the contrary to the conclusion you make for what Christ purchased for us must necessarily be dispensed and given therefore cannot that grace of Regeneration be withheld from them that are Christs but it cometh to them not in the preceptive way of the Law but through the word of promise which you cannot skill of If any should teach that some graces favour and part of eternal life were left to be purchased and obtained by our obedience and service that doctrine might finde more free passage and better entertainment But I wonder you are so peremptory and unadvised in making such an inference as if justification did leave a man as it found him and there were no vertue efficacy nor health in it nor that pretious faith apprehending it or as if we did teach so as by you we are slandered the contrary still lying under your eyes You need and must be forced to acknowledge that Tot us processus c. the only and whole passage from sin to righteousness from death to life from bondage under wrath and the curse unto liberty and the receiving into favour and felicity is attributed by Scripture and all sound Divines to that article of free justification so that in true and strict sense salvation is inseparable from it Yet that the world may see how the simple intent and sense of Dr. Crisp is misrepresented by you these are his words pag. 66. Christ the only way If a man saith he have a little holiness and righteousness he thinks now that in regard of that he may without presumption close with Christ Christ came not to call the righteous but sinners but it seems a man must be righteous before he have to do with the calling of Christ See now whether this be with or against the Gospel-free-grace therefore even to sinners is it no licentious doctrine nor doth it a jot maintaine the continuance in sin I say therefore that Christ doth belong to a person that closeth with him though he be in his sinfulness Christ indeed doth wash cleanse and adorn a person when he is closed with but there is none clean till Christ himself do enter who makes clean where he doth enter Do not then so misconstrue the Doctor as if his doctrine were inconsistent with the truth All that you can gather and directly conclude from him is that sinners under that very notion and name are called upon in the Gospel to come unto Christ that he is tendered unto them while they are such If God give a heart to a wicked man at this instant willingly to close with Christ he giveth him an absolute and compleat and perfect interest in Christ And these his expressions imply as much as you in truth can require For can there be a heart given to come a real willingness to close with Christ where there is no sight and sense of sin and danger why doth the soul desire Christ believe in him is it not that it may be saved from sin wrath and damnation and obtain righteousness life favor and salvation doth not the hastening unto the City of refuge sufficiently prove the man to be a manslayer so here it argueth a true inward conviction of and a real confession of a guilty estate yea a perswasion that in
sinners he must be fain to look upon us in our Lord Jesus Christ and his righteousness you like to set the Law as a medium between God and you which presenteth you with sin and wrath c. And why do if not your self yet many others in their prayers say Lord behold us not in our selves but in our Lord Jesus c. If there be no such pure and secure estate why pray we to attain to it and if we be perswaded of the truth of it why wrangle we against it you might inform your self and others 1. what it is to continue of your selves separated or remote from Christ and 2. of the meaning of the phrase God seeth no sin you reserve this till afterward so do I and withal for more full satisfaction I refer the hony-combe of free justification and the Assertion of grace M. B. ser 3. You shall carefully distinguish between these two propositions good works are necessary to beleivers to justified persons or to those that shall be saved and this good work 's are necessary to justification and salvation Answ It 's too evident that your self do not heedfully observe this distinction Besides your sense in the tearms you use is doubtful when you say good works are necessary to justified persons Is it your meaning after justification according to that of Augustine Nulla sunt bona opera nisi quae sequuntur precedente fide In Psal 67. no works are good except they follow faith going before or that they are necessarily required in order to go before so that their presence must be had necessarily when God justifieth as your pleading hath been heitherto I know the tearms or words themselves are plain and distinct but you confound them in your afterprosecution 2. There be many kinds of necessary And if you understand them to be necessary after justification in a right sense you have no adversary But if good works be necessary to those that shall be saved I would ask you what you mean for do you not hold salvation to be the proper next and immediate effect or consequence of justification can a man be said or supposed to be justified and not to be saved if he be justified he hath Christ he that hath Christ hath eternal life Ioh. 3. ult the essence of eternal life or salvation is but one and indivisible You cannot make the full revelation or seasible fruition of it to be any part of it your error is that you will have good works necessary to come in between justification and salvation at least as a cause sine qua non or conditions of it or so requisite that the promise of eternal life is made to them and only by vertue of that their promise eternal life becomes his that doth the works But eternal life is the free gift of God Rom. 6.23 And salvation is in Christ alone Act. 4.12 Ioh. 5.12 He that hath Christ hath life and if he have not Christ he can have no life whatsoever works he have So that as a man may have Christ without works by faith so may he have salvation in order before good works unless you will say either that without Christ a man can do good works or that Christ may be nad as separate and a part from life and salvation Christ and salvation standing at a distance so after he be come unto Christ and have him he must do good works that by them he may come unto it but both these are impossible Works done in this sense with such a minde and for such an end as to help us to salvation as if Christ did not sufficiently content us these works saith Luther cannot be good but whatever they be for the matter of them are and ought to be numbered among the worst of evil works fornication stealing lying c. are not so hanious saith he neither is the danger and fearful effects and fruits of these evils comparable to the evil of such pretended good works While I do good to help me to salvation I in heart deny Christ to be my full and sufficient Saviour I make faith void and the promise to be of no effect I overthrow the whole Gospel of salvation I appropriate the promise of life not to Christ nor saith but to my works And if it be said it is onely the presence of good works that is accounted necessary to those that shall be saved I answer Gratia Dei remissio per justitia vita eterna in solo Christo mediatore proponuntur illum vero non apprehâ—ndimus bonis operibus sed sola fide Gratia Dei in christo 1 Cor. 1 data est quia hoc constâ—u um est a Deo u qui credit in chrisâ—um saluus sil sine opere sola fide Vnum illud asseveâ—averem quod sola fides per se salvum fecit Chrys Evangelium proponit justiti salutem credeâ—â—ibus in Christum gratis sine conditione bonorum operum Ger. Si bona opera sint nessaia tum promissiones Evangeliâ—ae non erunt gratuitae sedâ—onditionales Insidâ—luas solad mnaâ— hoc est repellâ—t Christum una cum Christo vitam eternam quae non misi in Christo offertur Aug. 1. How can they be present when I must have Christ and with him eternal life before I can do any good work 2. Is not the presence of Christ and his righteousness sufficient Why then did Paul desire to be found in Christ not having his own righteousness of works but only that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith Phil. 3.9.3 What comfort or pleasure can they afford or gain when as Calvin saith If God do respect or look upon them we be to us and there cannot be so little a fault or so small a blemish in our works but the same is enough to make them foul and leathsom unto God Thus all Abrahams vertues saith he if they had been examined could have brought him nought but damnation Abraham bad no other help nor comfort therefore but his faith in Christ in whom God did singly consider and accept him Rom 4.1 2.4 If as you affirm the promise of life be made to them and their presence then cannot the soul receive or lay bold of any promise of life till they come into sight And what promise then is made to the righteousness of faith or of Christ Paul was most diligent and faithful in his ministery abounding in the works of the Lord fought a good fight kept the saith finished his course but the crown which was laid up for him and which he certainly expected was the crown of the righteousness of faith 2 Tim. 4.8 See Dr. Foulk on that place against the Rhemists If the crown be not due to that righteousness to what purpose is it and if it belong and be annexed to it will God make promise of it to our good works It is true It shall be said at the
are made to Christ He saith not The promises be made to seeds as of many but to his seed as of one that is Christ Gal. 3.16 therefore the collection of the scattered promises is in Christ onely and by union with him we come to have in terest and right to them all and not by our works M. B. Though God be not a debtor to thee yet he is to himself to his own faithfulness Answ God is a debter to whom he made the promise which is not to himself but to Christ whom he hath ordained and given for a covenant to his people Isa 49.8 M. B. You add O Lord It was free for thee before thou hadst promised whether thou wouldst give me heaven or no but now the word is out of thy mouth Answ 1. If God were free and at liberty not to give you heaven untill he saw some of your good works to promise it unto Then 1. there is no firm decree in the minde of God or purpose to save you from eternity Or 2. It is not founded upon grace but works foreseen but now he hath written your name in the book of life and it is now become his will to give you the Kingdome for you have so pleased him with your holy duties that you have moved him to make you a promise of it This is your way I would beloath to wrong you neither is it a pleasure to me to let any see your nakedness but onely you have forced me to let you see how you publish your own errours or failings while you seek the shame of others Further was it not as free for God whether he would have made a promise to Adam for the recovery of life and felicity and whether it should be of meer grace or of works 2. The Papists now do disclaim proper merit and claim all as belonging to works ex vi promissionis 3. If you look for a promise of life to your works then is not Christ the Gospel Faith Doctrina Evangelii apud Paulum to spectat ut Chirographum deleat illam naturalem opinionem ac sententiam legis exanimo tollat inseribat aliam de Deo opinionem c. and free-grace denyed or excluded and the way is not with you Believe and thou shalt live or be saved as Act. 16.31 nor yet believe and then work I believed therefore I spake but be holy and do good first and upon that ground well laid make claim to the promise and build thy faith and hope of Salvation but Christ is become our righteousness our onely foundation and hope of glory 1. Cor. 3.11 Col. 1.27 Your divinity and way be to your self Alas Sir What other fruits can this teaching bring forth in your hearers but to confirm and maintain that legal and natural opinion men have of God and to make them despise true Faith Grace Christ and his Gospel M. B. God is faithful therefore saith David I will make mention of thy righteousness that is faithfulness onely and then marke what the Apostle saith of this speech This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance c. Answ It is true God is faithful and so all that walk in in the steps of Abrahams faith do judge him to be Rom. 4.20 Heb. 11.11 but that covenant of sure mercies and peace is founded on the rock Christ and not on the sandy ground of works 2. To that of David Bernard understandeth it of imputed and passive righteousness which he saith also is ours by the gratious act of free donation when we were yet sinners as it is said Rom. 5.15 the gift of righteousness 3. That faithful saying of Paul 1 Tim. 1.13 is that Christ came to save sinners directly against you who teach that our good works have the promise then must we be good our selves first before we can do good and so not sinners and that salvation is not for sinners but the godly Lastly the faithful labour and suffer shame because they know and are assured aforehand by their faith in Christ entitling them unto it that they have in heaven an enduring substance that glory and kingdome laid up and reserved in Christ will more then countervail all their labour and loss for his names and truths sake 1 Cor. 15. ult Heb. 10.33 With a bleeding heart pitying you and the people under your Minister I write this M. B. Object Is then the Gospel a covenant of works I shall answer that afterward Answ Indeed you overthrow the Gospel and do strangely shuffle and confound grace and works how weak your answer is and ineffectual to free and clear you from these thoughts you are so sensible of will be seen in its place M. B. They are testimonies whereby our election is made sure 2 Pet. 1.10 Answ Calvin saith upon that place If it should be so that our vocation and election for the stability of them should be founded and relye on good works it would follow it did depend upon us against all Scripture which teacheth first that our Election is grounded upon the eternal purpose of God then that of Gods free pleasure and goodness our vocation is both begun and perfected If it be understood of certainty to others there is no absurditity in it but if we should refer that assurance unto conscience it so ought not saith he in my judgement as if the faithful thereby should before God acknowledge themselves to be elected and called but simply I take the meaning to be that by their holy life their calling may firmly appear and so they be discerned from Reprobates Now this is but to taste and know the inward and hidden goodness of the tree by the fruits and so to judge and determine of it but he that hath no surer and cleerer testimony within himself will still be uncertain and wavering for how can works certifie me of my estate further then I know see assuredly that they a rise come from true Faith then we must first know that we have Faith which hath a cleer evidence in it self Heb. 11.1 and yet is Faith more out of question when we feel it work by love Gal. 5.6 and 2 Cor. 5.14 The love of Christ constraining us feelingly and effectually to all good for his Names sake M. B. They are a condition without which we cannot be saved A. It was taught and received among the learned and Orthodox Anâ—ea justificati reconsiliati salvi libere operamur before you were born that being first justified reconciled saved we then work and that freely which before we cannot Christ is no sooner our righteousness then he is our salvation also I muse what your Faith is or what treasure or pleasure at all it bringeth into your soul you may as well and truly say Our works are conditions of our righteousness or justification as of our salvation if salvation be by Grace works are excluded as Eph. 2.8 Rom. 11.6 and if grace be free it is without
eternal love to us and why should you or any other think that Hezekiah so approved and commended a long time for a truly-Religious King should now call his spiritual estate into question or doubt no circumstance in the Text arguing any such thing and if it had been so he had gone far about to fetch his comfort and assurance from his works and life and it would have been very uncertain and weak when he had done And so this makes nothing at all against Doctor Crispe who would have all to derive their comfort and peace from the pure fountain even Faith in the satisfaction discharge and atonement made by Christ as the most direct neer and infallible way and not from works which must be first carryed to our Faith or assurance that our state is good there to be proved to be good and so at best can but secondarily and weakly seal that comfort formerly had by believing I think Hezekiah might be reproved and condemned Linguae impiorum est quotidiena sornax Aug. as by Rabshakeh so others neerer unto him for his zeal in demolishing Idolatry whereupon he going to God maketh him the witness of the righteousness of the things done and of the integrity of his heart in doing them Notitia nostri certior intue As David many times did being wrongfully charged by Saul and others and as it is our case who are falsly slandered as Antinomians and yet can and dare boldly go and appeal to God before whom all things are naked saying Thou knowest O Lord we are no Antinomians no Libertines Non est plâ—x ponderis in alieno convitio quam in nostro testimoiro Teachers of licentious Doctrine c. and so the testimonie of Hezekiahs Davids and our Consciences being cleer of such things in the presence of God is a great support a sure defence and an effectual comfort against all those calumnies censures and false aspersions This is my rejoycing saith Paul being misreported to be what he was not the testimony of our Conscience that in simplicity and godly sincerity not with fleshly wisdom but by the Grace of God we have had our conversation in the world 2 Cor. 1.12 But now all this is touching things controverted between man and man where our innocency such as it is is and ever will be the best Buckler plea and comfort and it is not pertinent to what Doctor Crispe entreateth of or if this satisfie not I could add that as the Churches estate was then servile Gal. 4.1 2. and as servants not having the promised Spirit of Adoption they did all things rather ex timore then amore out of fear more then love so Hezekiah having discharged the office of a godly chief Magistrate and now being called upon by death to lay it aside presenting himself before the Lord hath his own thoughts to witness his integrity touching the generality of the course of his life and so they excusing and comforting him in that case do give him some boldness even as it is with a servant who hath answered the requirings and done the commands of his Master in the day of his accounts Thus it is one thing to be comforted from the inward testimony of my Conscience reflecting with an impartial eye upon my conversation in this world and finding it to be unblamable and in all integrity of heart especially when adversaries do accuse and speak evil of me Terret me tota vita mea nam apparet mibi aut petcataem aut tota florilitas Aus and another thing to fetch my peace and comfort thence concerning my spiritual estate and atonement with God he that is exercised with inward consticts and temptations will easily perceive how dangerous a thing it is to have the eye and consideration of the soul taken off Christ and his righteousness and to be set upon any work or qualification of our own then nothing but Christ all is accounted as dung and loss else our own righteousness as unclean and filthy rags Phil. 3.8 9. Isa 64.6 But without spiritual buffetings of Satan the Doctrine of Faith of Christ our righteousness our reconciliation and peace cannot be prized learned nor purely taught M. B. 11. They are necessary in respect of God c. a Leah though blear-eyed yet when she was fruitful in children said Now my husband will love me so may Faith say Now God will love me when it abounds in the fruits of righteousness Answ God is not as man his love to man is not begotten or caused by any thing he seeth in us he loveth before and without works even while we were enemies our mindes being in wicked works Rom. 5.8 Colos 1.21 thus the Word testifieth and Faith receiveth it what good he worketh in us or frameth and inableth us to work are they effects and fruits of his love not causes of it M. B. 12. In regard of others c. 1 Pet. 3.1 It is an exhortation to wives so to walk that their husbands may be won to the Lord So that thy life may convert him By the Word the Apostle meaneth the publike preaching Answ You rather make more obscure then cleer the sense and drift of the Apostle while you are minded to plead for good works you attribute too much to them Faith in Christ and conversion to God is by hearing of the Word Rom. 10.17 If the husband were an Idolatrous Ethnick or prophane yet by the sweet humble and dutiful carriage and vertuous life of the wife Maritos preparent ad amplexandam Christi fidem Calv. he might happily be gained to approve and like well of her Religion which had wrought such a sensible alteration and brought forth so plentiful and pleasant fruits in her and so be moved to give ear and attention to the Doctrine of the Christian Faith thus his minde becometh prepared and more ready to embrace that which did not so well please or perhaps was an offence before This is all that can be meant or intended in those words M. B. Obj. If good works be still necessarily requisite why then is not the Covenant of Grace still a Covenant of Works c. A. Although good works be requisite in the man justified or saved yet it s not a Covenant of Works but of Faith because Faith onely is the instrument to receive Justification and eternal life Answ I see no difference in effect between the Arminian Doctrine and yours in this you hold good works to be imperfect so they and you make all the promises of eternal life to belong and to be made unto them and what do they more 2 You Answer Although they be requisite in the Justified or saved before you said in a man to be Justified and saved yet it is a Covenant of Faith Answ Where do you finde it to be called a Covenant of Faith it is a Covenant of Grace and so it is entire without our Faith M.B. Good Works are to qualifie the subject
believing Faith onely is the condition or instrument that doth receive the Covenant but yet that a man believe is required the change of the whole man Answ They qualifie the subject believing in some sense is true but do they qualifie before he believe in believing or after Faith this you should have told us it may be concluded from your words that they must qualifie the subject before he believe and this is your reason because that a man believe is required the change of the whole man as if good works did change the man and so were pre-required to believe I answer 1. That the heart must be first changed I grant for the natural heart is evil and unbelieving And secondly It is a good work to renew and change it yet that is no work of ours but Gods Thirdly Do our good works qualifie towards God Coram judicio Dei as Melanct. or towards others Or to our own sight and sense Is not Christ in us put upon us formed and dwelling in us qualification sufficient for acceptance to salvation M. B. Vse Answ You are still ministring your vain Antidotes Take you heed of that spiritual Anti-Christ within man which strongly maketh head against the true Christ What you preach and profess may be a deceitful flourish you bid reconcile Law and Gospel Justification and holiness c. I know none making such jars between one and the other as doth your self Is the Law then against the Promise Gal. 3.21 That is a blinde conceit Christ was ordained to be the Righteousness of the sinful and lost soul of man and to be received by it in the feeling of the failing and want of all goodness in it self He dwelleth in the poor meek low and broken heart to receive heal and satisfie it We may think and talk of him out of us as held forth in the letter and outward Ministry and all this to small and no effectual consolation or purpose LECT V. 1 Tim. 1.9 Knowing this that the Law is not made for a righteous man M. B. COncerning the righteous man here we must not interpret it of one absolutely righteous but one that is so quo ad conatum desiderium Answ Why may we not understand it as well of one who hath attained to righteousness by Faith which is absolute and perfect as of inherent sanctification which is inchoat and imperfect or why is it that you do altogether exclude this passive and imputed righteousness You do not with the Papists hold it onely to be a putative and not real righteousness And you erre if you take that which is sensible inchoat and so defective to be yet more worthy to give the denomination M. B. pag. 49. The Antinomian and Papist do both concur in this errour though upon different grounds that our righteousness and works be perfect c. and that not only in Justification but in Sanctification also Answ Though the righteousness of Faith in Christ and sanctification by his Spirit which are inseparable in regard of the subject be two distinct things yet they argue not the party to be in a twofold estate towards God for acceptance to favour and life but his estate is peaceable and safe onely by the free grace of Justification You grant your sanctification is imperfect and defective Now sith the sinfulness remaining in us doth dispread it self throughout all the powers of the soul all parts actions and passages of the whole man When you then have gathered and summ'd up all in one do you not bring all your works in the end to yur Justification by your confession of weaknesses wants pollutions c. and so seek forgiveness of the sins of your Prayers Etiam bona opera egent remissione peccati your failings in your Sermons errours of heart and life And this is in effect to have all healed and justified by free justification or the blood of Christ knowing that otherwise all is damnable and in law and justice to be rejected know it and cause also your hearers to learn it that though Justification be one individual act yet the vertue and efficacy of it is necessarily to be extended throughout all the life and wayes of man It purifieth the man and maketh all pure also and acceptable Tit. 1.15 To the pure all things are pure Thus may you see that it is a truth that all are become perfect and the manner also how and lastly that all is in Justification and not in Sanctification and so know your mistake If you receive not this how shall what is imperfect be accepted except either by some mitigation of Gods Justice contrary to that place so much and that without cause urged against us Matt. 5.17 18 or that you will so far be beholding to the new Covenant with the Arminian as to seek for the Grace of it which may pardon or pass by our defects or in effect to deny the extent and continuance of the force and vertue of Justification and Christs blood unto the last end What you charge upon your old Antinomian Islebius I pass by as an Author I never read M. B. As for the latter Antinomian he speaketh very uncertainly and inconsistently Sometimes he grants the Law is a rule but very hardly and seldom then presently kicketh all down again for saith he it cannot be conceived that it should rule but that it also should reign and therefore thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other the damnatory power of the Law is inseparable from it Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and keep it from the damnatory Assert of Gr. p. 33. Answ None can speak more uncertainly and inconsistently then you in these Lectures you make neither to appear in your adversary but he proveth you guilty of both For when you use these expressions Good works are necessary in the justified and then presently They are necessary in him that is to be justified Again onely Faith in Christ is necessary to salvation the promises of life are made to the believer and good works have the promises of life every good work thou canst do hath a promise made to it of eternal life c. you both leave your reader uncertain what your opinion is and these will in no wise consist together besides many other like passages Also here you say he grants it a rule and yet do charge him with the total abolition of it pag. 43. Is not this inconsistency You say he granteth it hardly nay doth it freely without constraint B. And seldom Ans If need require he will do it toties quoties This is not to kick all down again to say the Law if it rule it doth also reign the latter doth not overthrow the former but onely it crosseth and overthroweth your vain and ayry conceit of a Law ruling and not reigning You say he thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other
regenerate to Faith Rom. 10. and to confirm and build up in that way which you nor any can truly affirm of the Law Now this your Rock is passed by without danger M. B. The Swinckfeildeans upon like ground deny the whole Scripture to be needful to a man that hath the Spirit and that which the Antinomian doth limit to the Law that it is a killing letter they apply to the whole Scripture and I cannot see how they can escape this Argument Answ I see with a little help the light may so shine forth that there is hope you will prove ours however we are not here non-plussed See the errour of the Swinckfeild and your own weakness first if we were perfectly holy and happy as in Heaven and Glory we should not need the Scripture no more then the Angels do 2 But we are so onely imperfectly and inchoatly so that the Scriptures are still requisite and needful that we may increase with the increasings of God Ephes 4.12 for the perfecting of the Saints Till we come to the unity of the Faith unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ 3 Again your friend the Antinomian doth not call the Law a killing letter as it is without the Spirit but as it is that instrument or the ministration the Spirit useth to kill and condemn as touching Conscience 2 Cor. 3.9 I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and I died Rom. 7.9 But this may serve now viz. The Law can but direct in the things of the Law where you can finde no Christian estate nature name way life faith nor hope of his Calling nor to speak properly any thing of Christianity How now shall your Law direct in these things M. B. The Law must needs have a directive regulating and informing power over a godly man as will appear by these two Reasons First we cannot discern the true worship of God from superstition and idolatry but by the first and second Commandment Answ Here is a large field Inopem copia facit this requireth a full Treatise it self as for the explicating it in such manner as may satisfie mens minds being concerning this full of darkness and doubts so for the general necessity of some cleer and special light to be held forth for the informing and directing aright a world of people going far wide through want of this true knowledge In brief thus for the present First God was not onely a God unto his people but had made known also himself unto them before the solemn giving of the Law and he gave not the Law that by the observation and works of it he might be their God and they his people nor yet that thereby they might know and conceive of him in their hearts according to that Law of works And therefore is it observable that he beginneth with these words Hear O Israel I am thy God c. Now as he became their God onely by Christ the promised seed in the face of whom the knowledge of his glory is manifested 2 Cor. 4.6 so his redeemed and peculiar were onely to take notice of him as God in Christ reconciling them to himself blessing all in the alone Messiah giving out all peace life through him and vouchsafing all favour and respect onely in reference unto him To this dispensation manner and kinde of revealing himself to mankinde according to that first promise Dem nisi in Christo suo coli aut cognosci nolit Calv. Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpents head and in him shall all the Nations be blessed are all to attend for God will not be known nor worshipped out of his Christ Now mans heart naturally is a shop of idolatry infinite are the forms conceptions and images which we frame and have of God within us And as our inward Notions are under which God cometh to our understanding so we think of him worship him seek to please him and lay a foundation for expecting and receiving some good from him And what inscription the Athenians had on their Altar Act. 17.23 the same may be found on a world of our devotions all being to an unknown God For as Christ said to the woman of Samaria Serviunt Deo qui tantum opinionabiliter non natura est deus for the most part we worship we know not what Joh. 4. for he is onely a God in our opinion and conceit and not in truth and his own nature who accepteth respecteth loveth or blesseth any for any work worth or goodness of theirs but the true reason and ground of all favour is Christ Eph. 1.6 Nam verus naturalis Deus sic loquitur Nulla religio sapientia justiâ—ia c. nisi illa unica qua pater glorificatur per filium c. Thus he that in his thoughts falleth from that true knowledge of Christ and that in him he is well pleased with him pacified towards him receiveth loveth him without and before any actual holiness and work or performance of his he necessarily falleth forthwith into Idolatry because he cannot now but imagine such a God and frame him in his own minde which is nowhere to be found A God out of Christ without a Mediatour not satisfied reconciled at peace with us propitious to us Omnis lomo qui relabitus a cognitione Christi necessario ruit in Idololatriam c. c. but requiring and respecting some duty or holiness in us to move him to grant us access audience and all blessings needful an absolute God clothed with glorious attributes terrible to sinners and not justifying the ungodly through Faith in Christ nor loving us when we were enemies and so by his own hand and work reconciling us to himself without any of ours Rom. 4.5 Rom. 5.8 9. such a God do many set up in their hearts and they frame their devotions works and ways suitable with this their image seeking in their own righteousness and holiness to draw nigh and that some goodness or qualification of theirs should commend and ingratiate them unto him A Fryers Coul a Monks hood holy order pilgrimages a strict and Religious life must speak for one sort Alii â—eâ—unant orant c. his se deum placere putant student quaerut Luth. others Fast Pray Vow Reform c. thinking studying seeking by those to pacifie God and procure his favour Now as we may plainly see that the Preface of the Decologue relateth to the Covenant of Grace of Promise of peace and life in the Messiah in which God did commend and make known himself what a God he would be unto them in what way he would deal with them and give them all their peace so God to keep this light in them to suppress or prevent all Idolatry or spiritual and false conceivings and imaginations of him contrary to that his promise whereunto mans nature is
contrary Yet that both Tree and the Fruit the believer and his work are acceptable in Christ is no new divinity but according to Scripture and all the Orthodox Tit. 1.15 To the pure all things are pure Your Scriptures 1 Joh. 1.8 Jam. 3.2 do speak of works as proceeding from us not as presented in Christ who justifieth and freeth us from all the evil and filth cleaving to them I retort If God can accept of us or our performances out of Christ what need we then continually to deal with God in Christ 1 Pet. 1.6 Heb. 13.15 By him let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually Whatsoever you do in word or deed Do all things in the name of our Lord Jesus giving thankes to God even the Father by him Colos 3.17 But this is open wrong which you do us in saying that we hold works perfect simply in themselves or to be accepted for any worth or inherent dignity in them which is your doctrine rather we teach That Abels sacrifice was accepted by faith that is by Christ believed on and not for any merit in it Heb. 11.4 The Scriptures and Testimonies of the Orthodox which you read in the Assertion might have prevented all this labour if you had been so advised Consider that of Calvin in that l. 3. cap. 17. sect 8.9 Qua jam sequuntur bona opera Sepulto etiam imperfectionis vitio quod bona opera fedare folet quae fiunt a fidelinus b. opera justa confentur c. c. Those good works which follow after justification are esteemed and valued otherwise then by their own desert or dignity for whatever imperfection is in them it is covered with Christs perfection whatever blemish or filthiness in them it is cleansed by his purity lest it should be questioned or examined before Gods judgement seat Therefore saith he the fault of all our transgressions being blotted out whereby men are hindered from bringing forth any thing acceptable to God and the imperfection and defect which is wont to defile all good works being buried all the good works of the faithfull are acknowledged to be just c. Thus may all see how palpably you have mistaken me in this as in the other passages And how indirectly and falsly you do inferre That we may be justified by works or we make them meritorious c. whereas we say plainly that the person is first justified without and before all works and that then they become accepted and pleasing by the same way and reason that the person came into favour For as God stands and appears propitious to us in Christ and so his works and dealings with us and disposals of us be pleasing and welcome to us even so we being received and accepted in Christ what we do through him is pleasant to God but not because of any formal and intrinsecal dignity in the work So that we study to deal with God onely in Christ and are now incouraged unto all good works for who can have a heart to do any good work till he by faith know that he pleaseth God by Jesus Christ So Christ alone is exalted and magnified Salus semel donatur ut oporibus acquirenda non sit To seek Heaven by works and deservings is to wrong yea to shame Christs blood and unto such it is shed in vain When the Gospel is preached unto us we believe the mercy of God and in believing receive the Spirit the earnest of eternal life and be in eternal life already and feel in our hearts already the sweetness thereof and are overcome with the kindness of God and of Christ and therefore love the will of God and of love are ready to worke freely and not to obtain that which is given already and whereof we be heirs by Grace freely Tindall Martyr A brief REPLY to the Exceptions taken by Mr. Rutherford in his Tryal and Triumph of Faith against the supposed Antinomian Errours 1 Exception THe first Exception is against the Assert of Grace pag 112 113. Where it is said That Christ onely did bear our sinnes and the punishment of them so that the justified are not punished for sinne Mr. Rutherf answereth with a twofold distinction 1. Of justice legal and sinne revenging 2. Of a mixt justice which is in a Father and so saith That the sinnes of the Saints are not onely against the legal but also a wrong done against his mixt justice Where God doth punish their sinnes though not satisfactorily to his Law Reply 1. To assert a mixt justice is to temper and mingle Law and Gospel without warrant and to hold forth God in a Covenant made up both of free-grace and works which yet be inconsistent Rom. 11.6 2. Our Divines distinguish indeed between punishment and chastisement and so call these corrections of Children and not punishment properly for that every punishment is in some sort satisfactory And so will that be inferred which by them is objected against the Papists viz. If the Saints be punished for their sinnes temporally then Christ satisfied for pounds and left us to satisfie for pence 3. The true and intrinsecal nature and property of all justice offended requireth satisfaction so that our punishments must be satisfactory also so far as the sinne deserveth else who or what satisfieth doth this mixt justice take its pennyworth and full due out of the flesh and bones of Gods Children so as God neither can cease beating till he hath given all the stripes the fault deserveth and when correction is past then the Fathers justice is quieted 4. And if you put them under the Government of justice tempered with mildness and mercy which is Law Evangelized a new crotchet and dream then the Law of strict justice which is the decalogue is no longer a rule our sinnes must be no longer examined and measured by it but judged as they are offences of this mixt and fatherly justice So now Christ may be set aside we shall no more need him for Advocate neither is there use of faith when we sinne but our sufferings must in this condition pacifie not Christs passion that onely was of use and efficacy to bring us into this state and under this Government Who now are become the total abrogators of the Moral and pure Law yea and as it is a rule to live and walk by Can you tell us how much of justice and what a measure of mercy is in this new rule and Government But the result is That our sins after justification have a double relation and had but one before one to the strict Law and that Christ contented the other is to a milder justice against which our stripes must be opposed that by them we may be healed It s granted during the Mosaical-pedagogie there was some shew yea ground for somewhat but not for all that here you assert for God did in that dispensation veil his Paternity which now in Christ is done away And your Scriptures
of the law and need no more make use of justification nor have Christ for our shadow and protection Mr. Rutherf p. 591. That the Saints are meer patients and blocks in all their holy walking is gross libertinisme Reply But how unjustly do you charge this upon your Adversary who saith onely in the act of sanctification in which the Spirit onely acteth Is not this to pervert what is spoken M. Rutherf No way cryeth to the conscience of the traveller This is the way as the law doth in its directing and ruling power c. Reply The law materially is resembled to the high-way and its true the high-way calleth not to the passenger to keep his way yet the authority of the King doth so call and require so then it is not the law as we consider it and speak of it but God the Author of the law who commandeth to walk in it And if God in so doing convince you of unrighteousness for your going astray Is not his grace in the Gospel your dayly needful refuge and plea or you still are in no danger nor fear because law cannot condemn for God say you is pleased with what the poor man can do or give Thus you live under a law securely which is as weak as your self and will be content with with any thing as you list or can obey Whereas I on the other side say that the law hath lost no power nor part of its perfection Matth. 5.17 18. And therefore it convinceth all of sin and condemneth such as are found under it because in many things we sin all In our best works we are found faulty and judged that we may finde no rest nor safety but in the righteousness of Christ by faith Let the Reader judge who is in the errour But it is no marvel you so mis-call mistake pervert your Adversary and falsly accuse him as you do passion and yet have no check of conscience for it seeing you are so principled that you may transgress and do any thing impure that is Scot-free by your law and are not led by a right-Gospel-Spirit Town pag. 10. The law wrappeth every man in sin for the least transgression Mr. Rutherf pag. 593. Still Antinomians bewray their engine If me say being justified we have no sin we lye 1 John 1.10 then there cannot be a man nyon the earth but he is under the curse of God Antinomians say the justified are freed from the curse then they have no sinne nay they cannot sinne by their Argument for they will have the curse essentially and inseparably to follow sinne which is most false Reply 1. If we be justified from the curse then from the sin which yet we have remaining in us Coram judieio Dei for the cause is taken away before the effect 2. Else by the contrary Christ is not our righteousness in justification which is opposed to sin but onely our blessedness in stead of the curse that was upon us how then is it said he brought in everlasting righteousness Dan. 9.24 And that we are made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 So there is no man indeed but he is under the curse if the blood of Christ have not washed him from his sinne as Rev. 1.5 He hath loved us and washed us from our sinne 3. In order justification is after sinne and it being extensive to all sinnes past present and to come it must presuppose future sinnes also as done before it abolish either sinne or curse due for sinne 4. You say It s most false that sinne and the curse be inseparable but you neither prove nor can shew any thing to the contrary Indeed a carnally secure heart is apt to separate them and is thereby hardened presuming to sinne without danger or fear Deut 29.19 If you allow of his engine as better suiting with your own you may well mislike ours 5. Here you tell us of an unscripture-like and ungrounded distinction of a twofold misery and guilt and so of deliverance c. But I confess I understand not your meaning and would be loth to mistake or pervert you as you do me Your Simile giveth me most light viz. That as the rising of the Sun is the way to the full noon-day c. I answer but so it is no act of ours but of the Spirit sanctifying us throughout till we be perfected in our selves and so it is not simply our repentance and new-obedience which are consequences effects and expressions of that renovation or sanctification And I demand also Is not that blot it self so taken away ut non imputetur as not reckoned to us by the death of Christ though it abide physically or inherently yet in our accounts it is abolished and blotted out Lastly I must that you will except against that expression in Assert pag. 15. The Law of workes is so inwrapt and entwined together that if a man lay hold on any even the least link he inevitably pulleth the whole chaine upon himself And yet what you say is of no force Your repentance and love of brethren if you understand your self do pull the whole Law upon you as they be your acts You cannot oblige your self in part and in some degrees onely as you please Wo to that life most commendably passed over if the grace of the Gospel be not to pardon all imperfections All our righteousnesses are as filthy ragges Isa 64.6 Therefore durst not Paul be found in his own righteousness Phil. 3.9 Mr. Rutherf pag. 595. Our obedience is not full and perfect onely it 's so counted and accepted in Christ Reply If this were all your meaning that our obedience or works as proceeding from us or as we perform them are imperfect yet are accepted as perfect in Christ I could receive it But you explain your self otherwise 1. You say It is not so and yet it is accounted perfec doth not God account it rightly as it is 2. You are against all sound Protestant Divines if you hold of acceptance with God of any work because of any proper formal inherent dignity in it or if you do not make Christ the alone ground reason and cause of all acceptance whether of persons or performances 3. It is true God accounts not us non-sinners in our selves and free from all indwelling sinne for that were an untruth but he both justifieth us by faith in Christ and makes us pure and free from all spot of sinne before his Judgement seat Col. 1.22 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus cleanseth us from all sinne Now you are pleased to expatiate and to amplifie your self needlesly and wilfully to wrest our words as if â— we did not hold the good works of the regenerate to be faulty in themselves 2 As if we meant by the removal as you call it or abolition of finne such an annihilation of sinne in its essence root and branch that it should not dwell in us here whereas you know and read the