them to keepe the lawe from which he himselfe woulde be free For beside this that euery man ought to keepe that Law which he prescribeth vnto other in this yet he offended the more for that hee would compell the Gentils to Iudaisme and he being himselfe a Iew permitted to himselfe libertye For the Law was giuen to the Iewes and not to the Gentils Therfore he vseth an Argumēt a minori ad mains frō the les to the more furthermore this was an hard and a violent coaction that he did renounce vnto the Gentils communion or partaking except they wold receaue the yoke of the law which was an vniust offer conditiō And the whole force of the reprehending cōsisteth in this word * That is the law which of Chrisostom Hierom was not perceiued for the vse of ceremonies was free to edification so that the faithfull were not robbed of their liberty nor necessitie laid vpon thē from the which the gospel hath set thē free 15 We are by nature Iewes I know that to some it semeth to be a figure called Anthypophora in English an obiectiō as thogh Paul did preuēt in the persō of the aduerse party that which he mought obiect that is that the Iewes haue a greater priuiledge as they commonly saye not that they might boast immunitie or freedome from the law for it shoulde haue bene more then vnlikelye for them vnto whome the lawe was giuen to boast of that but because they ought by certayne notable tokens to be distinguished from the Gentils That therfore I neither wholy reiect neyther yet altogether allowe as by and by it shall appeare Some doe vnderstande this as spoken in the person of Paule but in this sence if thou wouldest laye the burthen of the Lawe vppon the Iewes it were more agreeable to reason for it commeth vnto them by inheritaunce but this exposition doth not agree neither It is rather than the seconde parte of the sentence which beginneth with the figure Occupatio Occupatio is a Figure whereby in preuenting our aduersaries Obiections we confute the same for whereas there was a difference betwene the Iewes and the Gentils for that the Gentils were vnholy and vncleane but the Iewes holy as farre forthe as God had adopted them for his people the Iewes might contende as touching this prerogatiue But Paule by preuenting dothe wisely wreste it to the contrarye for seing that the Iewes themselues with all their dignitie were constrained to flie to the faithe of Christ howe muche more behoued it the Gentils to get saluation by faith The mind of Paule than is thus We which seme to excell other which haue bine through the benifite of his couenaunt alwayes nighe God haue neuer the later founde no reason or meane to get saluation but vy beleuing in Christ why than should we prescribe any other meane vnto the Gentils For if the Lawe were necessarie or els could preuaile the folowers thereof vnto saluation it would moste of all haue preuailed vs vnto whome it was giuen and if so be that we haue left it and are gone vnto Christ much lesse are the gentils to be vrged to take it vppon thē The word Sinner doth signifie here as it doth often in other places vnholye or lost and estraunged from God such were the Gentils who had no fellowship with God but the Iewes were by adoption the Children of God and therefore segregate or set apart into holynesse Whereas he sayth by nature hee doth not meane that they are by nature free from the corruption of mankinde for Dauid who discended by lineage from Abraham confesseth that he was begotte of vncleane seede Psa 51.7 but the remedye of grace wherewith they were sanctified didde suppresse the corruption of nature to whiche they were in daunger And because the promise made the blessing an inheritaunce therefore it is called a good thing naturall or by nature So to the Romaynes Chap. 11. ver 16. he sayth they were sprong oute of an holy roote Therefore when hee sayth We are by nature Iewes is as muche as if he shoulde saye Wee are borne holye not by our owne desart but because we are chosen of God to be his people We than which by nature were Iewes what haue we done wee haue beleeued in Christ To what ende haue wee beleeued that by the fayth of Christe we mighte be iustifyed For what cause Because we were conuinced and put oute of doubte that men could not obtayne righteousnesse by the workes of the Lawe Hee than reasoneth after the nature and effecte of faith that the Iewes are not iustified by the Lawe For as they who would establish their owne righteousnesse of workes are not subiecte to the righteousnesse of GOD Rom. 10.3 so on the contrary part they whiche beleeue in Christe doe confesse themselues to be sinners and renounce the righteousnesse of workes Hee is busied here in the chiefest questyon naye rather in the whole summe almost of the controuersie is included in this proposition wherefore it is meete the more dilligently to stande vpon the discussing of this present place Firste and formost this is to be noted that righteousnesse must bee sought by the fayth of Christ because we cannot bee iustified by workes Now it is demaunded what hee meaneth by Workes of the Law The Papistes being beguiled by Origen and Hierome doe suppose that the controuersie is of shadowes onelye nay rather they doe firmely define so and therefore they doe alwaye by the Workes of the Law interprete ceremonies as though Paule didde not dispute of the free righteousnesse which is giuen vnto vs by Christ neyther doe they holde it to be an absurditie that no man is iustified by the workes of the Law Without rime or reason and yet they holde that wee are accounted righteous before GOD through the merite of workes To bee shorte they account no mention to be made of morall workes in this place But the Texte doeth plainelye shewe that the morall law is comprehended also in these wordes for almoste whatsoeuer thinges Paule will afterwarde adde or speake they doe pertayne to the morall lawe rather than to the ceremoniall moreouer he doeth alway set the free accepting or allowing wherewith God doth vouchsafe to accepte vs agaynste the righteousnesse of the law But the aduersaries obiect Obiection That workes shoulde haue bene named without any addition except Paule would restrayne it to some certaine specialtye I aunswere Answere That of this kinde of speaking there is a very good reason for although a man might excell the Aungels in holynesse yet were there no rewarde due for his workes except in this respect because it is promised of the Lorde therefore wheras the perfection or perfect obseruation of the lawe is righteousnes and hath the reward of eternall life laide vp therfore it commeth of God who pronounceth that they shall haue the victory which doe fulfil the same of which matter I will speake more in place
conuenient Moreouer the contention with the Iewes was concerning the Lawe Paule than had rather by fighting with them hande to hande as I may saye wound them within their owne listes than by straing farder to shewe them a kinde of running awaye as though he distrusted his cause therefore hee abideth firmelye in the disputation of the Lawe Secondarily they obiect Obiection that ther was onely a question aboute ceremonies moued the which we graunt also Why than saye they should Paule passe ouer from the particular cause to the vniuersall Answere This was the onely occation of the error of Origen and Hierom for they thought it conuenient that Paule seing the false Apostles contended about ceremonies onely should apprehend or take hold of no more than they spake of But they coÌ„sidered not that this was the very cause why he did so sharply contend with them for that that doctrine did drawe a longer traine than at the first sight it did shewe for it woulde not haue bene so greeuous to Paule to haue had ceremonies obserued as to haue the confidence and glory of saluation ascribed vnto works as whan we contend about the forbidding of eating fleshe except vpon certen dayes we do not respect so much howe great a matter it is to forbid the eating of fleshe as wee are carefull concerning the snare of the conscience Therefore Paule doth not stray beside the cause or matter when as he frameth his disputation of the whole Lawe although the false Apostles did onely contende about Ceremonies for therefore did they vrge Ceremonyes that men should seeke saluation in the keeping of the Law because forsooth they fayned it to bee a meritorious worshipping or seruice wherefore Paule doeth not lay against them the Lawe morall but the onelye grace of Christ Neyther is the whole Epistle spente in this vniuersall contention for he commeth at length to Ceremonies by name but because this was a principall Knot and Doubte Whether righteousnesse happened vnto vs by Fayth or by workes it behooued that it should first be dispatched The Papistes at these dayes because it greeueth them if we wring out of them that men are iustified by fayth only do hardly graunt morall things to be comprehended vnder the workes of the Law yea many of them obiecting the glose of Hierome thinke they haue handled the matter very handsomly but the texte will euidently shewe that he speaketh of the morall law also But by the faith He doth not meane ceremonies only or any maner workes not to suffice except the helpe of fayth be ioyned but vnto the negatiue proposition he doth counterset the exclusiue as if he should say Not by workes but by the onely fayth of Christ Otherwise it were an vnapt sentence cleane came from his purpose for the false Apostles did not refuse christ nor yet faith but they required that ceremonyes should be ioyned with theÌ„ If Paul would haue allowed such a maner of ioining there had bene a full agreement betweene theÌ„ and than Paule had in vain troubled the Church with so hateful a contention Let this than remain determined that in this place there is an exclusiue proposition That we are not iustified otherwise than by faith or That we are not iustified but by faith vnto the which this is equiualent We are iustified by faith only Wherby it appeareth how childishly the Papistes at these dayes doe dote brawling with vs aboute the worde Onely as though it were oures but forsooth the Papistes Diuinitie was vnknowne to Paule they saye a man is iustifyed by faith but they place part of the iustifiing in works Paule was ignoraunt of such halfe iustifying for whan hee teacheth that we are righteous through faith because wee cannot be so by works he taketh it as a thing graunted which is also true that we are capable of Christs righteousnesse no otherwise than if we be in our owne righteousnesse pore and needy Therfore eyther nothing or all oughte to bee ascribed to fayth or workes As touching the word righteousnesse or iustifying and in what maner fayth is the cause thereof afterwarde shall bee seene All flesh shall not be iustified Hee hath afore cited the conscience of Peter and of other to be witnesse nowe he doeth more confyrme it by pronouncing that it is so that is Not one mortall man shall obtaine righteousnesse by the workes of the law This is the foundation of free righteousnesse when we are made naked and bare of our own righteousnesse Finallye in denying any mortal man to be iustified is as much as if he should say that all men are shut out from the righteousnesse of the law nor that it can be that any man should attayne therevnto 17 Farthermore if we seeking to be iustified in Christ are our selues found also sinners is Christ therfore the minister of sinne God forbid 18 For if I build those thinges agayne whiche I haue destroyed I make my selfe a trespasser 19 For I by the law am dead to the lawe that I might liue to God with Christ I am crucified 20 And I liue noâ— any more but Christ liueth in mee in as much as I liue now in the flesh I liue in the faith of the sonne of God which hath loued me and giuen himselfe for me 21 I cast not away the grace of God for if righteousnesse be by the Lawe than Christe hath dyed * Gratis in vayne for nothing 17 If we seeking He returneth his talke now to the Galathians lest any man shoulde ioyne this sentence with the former as though it were a part of the communication hadde with Peter for to what ende shoulde these thinges neede for Peter Although this bee nothing or a very little to the matter therfore let euery man choose whether of them he list Furthermore some read it affirmatiuely among whome is Chrisostome and they make this the sence If we seeking to be iustified in Christ are not yet fullye iust but are as yet vncleane neyther yet Christ doth suffice vs vnto righteousnesse it followeth that Christ is the minister of doctrine which leaueth men in sinne as though hauing propounded this absurditie Paule should accuse of blasphemie those who doe attribute parte of iustification to the law But because the word absit which is God forbid doth by and by follow which Paule is not accustomed to vse but after interrogations or questions I suppose it is rather spoken to remoue the absurditie which seemed to followe of it According to his custome than by asking the question he vseth the figure Occupatio as in the person of his aduersaries If sayeth he the righteousnesse of fayâ—h doe bring this that we whiche be Iewes and sanctified from our mothers wombe should be deemed guiltie and polluted shall we saye that Christe is the authour of sinne as he which maketh the power of sinne to flourish in his Thereof sprang this doubt for that hee had sayde that the Iewes by beleuing in Christ had giuen ouer the
whether they bee all equall among themselues If all must decrease that only Christ may encrease vnfruitfull is the contention about the dignitie of men Moreouer this maye bee demaunded why he compareth himselfe to the other Apostles for what controuersie had he with Peter and Iames and Iohn to what purpose then did it belong that those who were of one mynde and good friendes among themselues shoulde be at oddes against themselues I aunswere that the false Apostles who had beguiled the Galathians to the end they might the better aduaunce themselues pretended the names of the Apostles as though they had ben sent of them This was a notable shouldring in of thēselues for that they were beleeued to be the Apostles deputies and spake as it vvere out of their mouth and in the meane while did pluck away from Paule the name and right of an Apostle For they did obiect that he was not chosen of the Lord one of the twelue that he was neuer acknowled to be such an one by the colledge of the Apostles and that not only hee had his doctrine not from Christ but not so muche as from the Apostles so came it to passe that not onelye the authoritie of Paul vvas diminished but that he was as some one of the multitude much baser then themselues If the matter had bene concearning persons only it had bene no great matter for Paule to haue bene reputed some common Disciple but vvhen he did see his Doctrine thereby beginne to grow out of credite and to be set lesse by he ought not to holde his peace but stoutlye speake against it This is the wylinesse of the Deuill vvhen he dareth not assayle the Doctrine manifestly vvith crooked mynes to hurle down the maiestie therof Let vs remember than that in the person of Paule the truth of the Gospell vvas assaulted for if he had suffred himselfe to be spoyled of the honour of Apostleship it followed that he had vsurped more hitherto than vvas his right and this false boasting woulde haue made him bene suspected in other thinges also And therupon also did hang the estimation of his doctrine in that it should haue the beginning and was receaued not as proceeding from an Apostle of Christe but from some common disciple On the otherside hee was ouerwhelmed with the maiestie of great names and stiles For they wheras they boasted them of the title of Peter and Iames and Iohn did chalenge to themselues Apostolicall authoritie And had not Paule manfully resisted this boasting he should haue geuen roome for a lye and moreouer should haue suffered in his owne person the truth to haue bene trodden downe Therefore doth he seriously contend about both namely that he was an Apostle appointed of the Lord and also that he was nothing inferiour to the rest but that he was of like right and dignitie as they euen as he had like name with them He might haue denied either that they were sent by Peter and his felowe Apostles or that they had any commandement from them but this defence hath much more waight that he geueth not place to the Apostels themselues for if he had shunned that he should haue bene thought to haue distrusted his own cause Ierusalem in those dayes was the mother of all Churches for that the Gospel did flowe from thence into the whole worlde and it was as it weare the principall seate of the kingdome of Christe Whosoeuer came from thence into other Churches he vvas reuerently receiued and not vvithout good cause But many were swolne vvith a foolish glory because they vvere familier vvith the Apostles or at the leastwise instructed by their teaching Therfore nothing liked them but that which they saw done at Ierusalem all other rites or vsages not there vsed they not only reiected but hardily also condemned Such vvaywardnesse is a plague very euill vvhen vvee vvill haue the fashion or custome of one Church to stand as a generall law And it riseth of a preposterous zeale vvhen vve are so vvedded to some teacher or place that vvithoute vvaying the matter vve vvould bynde all places and all persons to the sence and vvill of one man and to the orders of one place as to a generall or common rule although ambition is alway mingled to it yea rather ouermuch vvaywardnesse is full of ambition But to returne to these false Apostles if onely vpon an ill emulation they had assayed in euery place to thrust in the vsage of the ceremonies which they saw kept at Ierusalem in so doing they had done no small offence for it is iniurious of a custom straight vvay to make a rule But there vvas more euill in their Doctrine being vngodly and pernicious for that they vvould holde the consciences bounde by a religion for that they placed righteousnesse in the obseruation thereof Nowe vve perceiue vvhy Paule vvas so stoute in the avouching his Apostleship and vvhy he doth set himselfe by way of comparing against the other Apostles And that doth he til the ende of the second Chapter vvhere he maketh away ouer vnto the handling of the matter namely that vve are iustified freely before God not by the workes of the law For he vseth this argument If ceremonies haue not power to iustifie then the obseruing of them is not necessarie although he speaketh not of ceremonies alone but reasoneth generally of vvorkes or else all his argument vvere caycolde If this seeme vnto any to bee farre fetched he must consider two thinges First that hee could not otherwise dispatche the question but by taking the generall principle which is We be iustified by the mere grace of God vvhich excludeth not ceremonies onlye but also other vvorkes Secondly that Paule made not so muche adoe concerning ceremonies as about the vvicked opinion of getting saluation by vvorkes Lette vs marke then that Paule beginneth not at the egge as they say but he sheweth of necessitie the very spring head that the readers maye know that contention is not moued here about the shadow of the asse but about the greatest matter of all namelye By vvhat vvay vve shall get saluation They are beguiled than vvho thinke that the Apostle keepeth himselfe in the compasse of the perticuler question concearning ceremonies for he could not vvinde him out of it by it selfe We haue the like example Act. 15.2 Strife and contention vvas moued about ceremonies vvhether they vvere necessary to be kept about discoursing vvherof the Apostles preach Of the yoke of the Law not able to be borne Of the free remission of sinnes To what purpose are these thinges for it seemeth to be an absurde digressing from the purpose but it is not so for the perticuler errour could not otherwise be soundlye confuted but by taking in hand the generall principle As for example If I must reason about the forbidding of eating flesh I vvill make mention not onely of meates but I vvill arme my selfe with the generall doctrine how farre mans traditions ought
that doth passe ouer this right to Peter doth confound the ordinaunce both of God and man The figure Metonymya in the wordes circumcision beeing meant for the Iewes and vncircumcision for the Gentiles is sufficiently knowen and therefore I passe it ouer 8 He that was effectuous He affirmeth the charge giuen vnto him by right to haue belonged vnto him because the Lord had shewed foorth his power in his ministerie Such manifestation of God his working or efficacie as we haue often seene is as it were a seale to seale the certentie of doctrine and to confirme the office of teaching But it is doubtfull whether Paul do referre the efficacie of God to the successe of his preaching or to the graces of the holy Ghost which then were giuen vnto the beleeuers I do not take it to be ment of the bare successe but of the spirituall energie or effectuall working of which he maketh mention 1. Cor. 2.4 The summe is it was no vayne couenaunt that the Apostles had among them selues but a iudgement sealed of God 9 And when they did know the grace In displeasure doth he defame their proude disdaynfulnes who made little account of the grace of God which drue the principall Apostles to haue him in admiration and reuerence For their winking was not to be borne withall if they would pretende that they knew not that which the Apostles in the beginning did manifestly see Here are we admonished to giue place to the grace of God wheresoeuer it is seene except we meane to warre agaynst the holy Ghost him selfe who will not haue his gyftes to be ydle and fruitlesse Therefore the grace which the Apostles did see to be giuen to Paul and Barnabas did prouoke and moue them to establish their felowship in the ministery Iames Cephas I haue afore shewed that this Iames was the sonne of Alpheus neither could he be the brother of Iohn which Herode had a litle afore slaine and that he should be one of the disciples which should so much excell the Apostles in my iudgement is very vnlikely And that he I meane Iames was a principall among the Apostles Luke also doth shew who doth attribute vnto him the conclusion and the defining of the cause in the Councell Act. 15.13 and 21.18 he sheweth that all the Seniors of the Church of Ierusalem were gathered together vnto him That they seemed to be pillers he speaketh not it in contempt but he alleageth the cōmon opinion because thereof it followeth that that which they did might not be refused or reiected rashly or lightly Seeing that the question is here touching dignitie it is maruell that Iames is preferred before Peter it may happe that it was because he was ruler or bishop of the Church of Ierusalem As touching the name Piller we know that the nature of things doth so beare or suffer that they which excell in wit in wisedome or in other giftes are also superiors in authoritye In the Church of God the matter standeth thus that as euery one excelleth in greater grace so the more honour shoulde bee giuen vnto him For it is vnthankfulnesse naye rather impiety not to worship the spirite of God wheresoeuer he appeareth in his giftes Moreouer as the people cannot lack a Pastor so euery company of Pastors doth require some moderatour or ruler But let that alwayes be in force that he whiche is chiefe of all be as though he were Minister Mat. 23.11 10 Only that he should It appeareth that the Bretheren which were in Iury were very pore otherwise they would not haue burdened other Churches That mought happen partlye for because of the sundrye calamities of the whole nation partly for that they were spoyled of their goods theire owne countreymen cruelly raging against them It was meete that they should be ayded with the releefe of the Gentils who were indebted to them for the Gospell a treasure indeede incomparable Paule doth saye that he hath faythfullye performed that which the Apostles required of him and therefore hee taketh awaye from his aduersaries the pretence or coloure whiche they sought 11 And when Peter was come to Antiochia I manifestlye resisted him because he was worthy of reprehension 12 For before that there came some from Iames he did eate meat together with the Gentils but when they were come he conuaied himself away and seperated himselfe from them fearing those which were of the Circumcision 13 And the other Iewes did dissemble also with him in so much that Barnabas also was led away into their simulation 14 But when I saw that they went not forwarde Recto pede .i. with a right foote rightly to the truth of the Gospell I sayd to Peter before them all If thou seing thou art a Iew doest liue like a Gētile and not like a Iewe why compellest thou the Gentils to playe the Iewes 15 We by nature are Iewes and not sinners of the Gentils 16 Knowing this that man is not iustified by the workes of the Lawe but by the faith of Iesus Christ and wee haue beleeued in Christe Iesus that wee might be iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the workes of the lawe because that all fleshe shall not be iustified by the law No fleshe shall be iustified 11 When Peter was come Whosoeuer shal prudently way al circumstances shall agree to me as I hope that this happened before the Apostles had pronounced that the Gentils should not be molested about ceremonies For Peter woulde not haue bene afrayde to offende Iames or those whiche were sent from him seeing that that determination proceeded from his iudgement but nowe Paule is caried further for that he auoucheth his gospell agaynst the simulation of Peter In the beginning he said that the certentie of his Gospell did not hang vppon Peter and the Apostles that by their arbitrement it should stande or fall Secondarily he sayde that it was approued of all without any exception or gaynesaying specially of them which by all mens consentes were the principall Now as I haue sayd he goeth farther shewing that Peter was reprehended by him because he enclined to the contrary part by which occasion also he entreth in to the handling of the cause it selfe And hereof it appeareth howe sounde his doctrine is of which he hath not onely obteined a voluntary subscription or consent but also howe constauntly he hath auouched it agaynst Peter and howe in the controuersie he was superiour What more doubt dothe there then remayne that it should not be receiued for a certaine and an inuincible trueth That slaunder also is beaten downe That Paule was a common disciple farre distaunt from the degree of Apostleship For this reprehension is a signe of equalitie I graunt that the highest are reprehended of the lowest and that by right and so it followeth not that they which reproue any man be straightways equals vnto them For this libertie is of God permitted the inferiours toward their betters but the
they know all benefites to be sanctified by the promises of God they acknowledge him in them to be a father So it commeth to passe that they bee alwayes directed to the hope of eternall life because they begin from the foundation that is from the faith of their adoption Abraham then was not iustified because hee beleeued God touching the multiplication of his seede onely but because he embraced the grace of God vsing the Mediator promised in whom all the promises of God are Yea and Amen 2. Cor. 1.20 as also in another place Paule teacheth the same 7 Know ye therefore or Ye knowe for the greeke worde agreeth to both waies but because one sence remaineth it skilleth not much whether waye you reade it but that the olde translation which I haue followed hath more pith To be short he sayth that they are of faith which renouncing the confidence of their workes rest in the onely promise of God If any man aske who is our Authour that wee so expounde it forsoth euen Paule himselfe for thus he writeth to the Romaynes To him that worketh it is not giuen freely but a rewarde is rendred Rom. 4.4 and whereas nothing is due to him that hath no worke saith is to him imputed for righteousnesse Therefore to be Of faith is to place their righteousnesse and confidence of saluation in the mercy of God He inforceth out of the former sentence that suche are the Children of Abraham for if Abraham be iustified by faith whosoeuer will be his children muste in like maner stand faste and stay themselues in faithe He passed ouer that which was easilye vnderstanded namely that there is no place for any in the Church who is not the childe of Abraham 8 The scriptures because he did foresee That whiche before he had spoken indefinitely nowe by name hee stretcheth to the Gentils for the calling of the Gentils was a thing both new and vnaccustomed Therefore it was doubted of the maner how they should be called Circumcision and the obseruing of the Law seemed requisite or else that they should be shut out from the partaking of the couenaunt But Paule on the contrary parte teacheth that they attaine or come to the blessing by faith and that by fayth they are of Abrahams housholde Howe proueth he that because it is sayd In thee shall al nations c. these wordes without doubt hath this meaning Like as Abraham so must all be blessed for he is a common example nay rather a rule and he got the blessing by fayth faith is than the way whereby all get it There is therefore a great emphasis or force in the worde Faithfull for it is as much as if he should say Not with Abraham circumcised or endowed with the workes of the law or an Hebrew or staying himselfe vpon his owne worthinesse but with Abraham that obtayned the blessing by fayth only for no qualitie of the person is here accounted off but faith only The word blessing is diuersly taken in the scriptures but in this place it is taken for the adoption into the heritage of eternall life 10 For whosoeuer are of the workes of the Law are vnder the curse for it is written Cursed is euery man that doeth not thorowlye abide in all thinges that are written in the booke of the Law that hee maye doe them 18 And that no man is iustified before God in the Law it is manifest because the iust shall liue by faith 12 But the law is not of faiâ—h but The man that shall do these thinges shall liue in them 13 Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law being made for vs a curse for it is written cursed is euerye one that hath hanged on a tree 14 That the blessing of Abraham mighte come vpon the Gentils by Christ Iesus whereby we maye receaue the promise of the Spirite by faith 10 Whosoeuer are vnder the workes It is an argument or reason of contraries for out of one fountaine doth not spring hote colde The Law doth shut in all men vnder the curse in vayne than out of it is blessing sought He calleth them that are vnder the workes of the Law those that doe place their confidence of saluation in them for these maners of speaking oughte alwayes to be referred to the state of the question for we know that he disputeth or reasoneth here of the cause of righteousnesse They therefore that will be iustified by the workes of the law he pronounceth them all to be vnder the curse but how doth he proue it It is the sentence of the lawe That all they whiche transgresse any part of the law are accursed Deu. 17.16 Now let vs see whether there be any one man that satisfieth the law but it is euident that there is not one found neyther can be found therefore all small and greate are in this place condemned Here want the Minor and Conclusion of the agreement for this were the whole Syllogismus Maior Whosoeuer shal faile in any part of the law is accursed Minor But all are holden guilty in this poynt Conclusion Therefore all ar cursed Furthermore this argument of Paule would not stande if our strength would serue to fulfill the law for straight waye in the Minor there would be giuen an instance Therfore either Paul doth reason foolishly or else it is impossible for men to fulfil the law by and by the aduersary would catch hold say I graunt That all transgressors are accursed but what than there shall be found those that obserue the law for men haue free choyse of good and euill But Paule doth put in this place out of controuersie that which the Papistes at these days doe account as an accursed opinion namelye that men shoulde bee destitute of strength to obserue the law And so boldly he concludeth that al are accursed because it is commaunded vnto al to keepe the lawfully and wholly that is to say because abilitie fayleth them in this corruption of nature Hereof wee gather in as muche as the law accurseth it doth it accidentlye but that accidentall is perpetuall and cannot bee seperated from vs for the corruption and faultinesse of our nature doth seperate vs from the blessing that the Law setteth forth vnto vs and therefore the curse only remayneth 11 And that no man is iustified in the Law Agayne hee reasoneth by comparing of contraries after this sorte If we be righteous by fayth than is it not by the law but we are righteous by fayth and therefore not by the Law He proueth the Minor by the testimony of Habacuc the which he also alleageth 1. Rom. 17. Hee proueth the Maior by the diuers or contrarye meane of iustification For the law doth then iustifie when as a man doth fulfill whatsoeuer it commaundeth but Faith doeth iustifie them which being destitute of the merites of workes do rest vpon Christ only These two cannot come together at once To be iustified by our owne deserte
must bee expounded by the circumstaunce of the place Finally it is euident that we are all accursed by nature the blessing was promised vnto all nations in the hand of Abraham but doe all without acception come vnto it no truelye but they only who are gathered vnto Messias for then are they one people when vnder the guidaunce and conducting of Messias they are gathered together into one body Whosoeuer therefore setteth apart contentiō and enquireth after the truth will easilye acknowledge a cause to be noted in this place and not a naked comparison wherof it followeth That Paule not without cause doth saye That the couenaunt was begonne in Christ or in respect of Christ 17 The Law whiche began If we hearken to Origen and Hierome and all the Papistes there will be nothing adoe to ouerthrow this reason For thus Paule reasoneth The promise was giuen to Abraham foure hundered and thirtie yeres before the Law was giuen therefore the law which came after could not put away the promise and thereof he concludeth that ceremonies are not necessarie Obiection If any man would make exception saying the Sacraments are giuen for the preseruatiō of faith and why doth Paule than sunder them from the promise hee doeth so sunder them that he contendeth about them Aunswer Therefore he doeth consider a certayne higher matter in ceremonyes as the effect of iustification which the false Apostles atttributed vnto them and the binding of the consciences naye rather by occasion of ceremonies hee discourseth of fayth and workes throughly to the vttermoste For were it not for the controuersie aboute obtayning of righteousnesse aboute merite of workes and snaring of the consciences ceremonies would wel stande with the promise What meaneth than this putting awaye of the promise agaynst which the Apostle contendeth because the deceauers did denye saluation to haue bene promised freely vnto men and to be obtayned by fayth but they vrge ceremonyes as things necessary to deserue saluation as by by shall be seene I returne to the wordes of Paule The Lawe sayth he is after the promise therefore it maketh not it voyd for a couenaunt once confirmed ought to abide inviolate and vnbroken Agayn I repeate it Except you vnderstand the promise to be freely giuen the sentence is more than needes for the law and the promise disagree not sauing in the cause of iustification because the lawe maketh a man righteous by the deseruing of workes and the promise giueth righteousnesse freelye and he doth playnelye expounde hymselfe when he nameth the couenaunt to haue his foundation in Christe Obiection But here the Papistes will be in our toppe for they can readilye scoffe oute this argument We saye they doe not any more require the old ceremonies let them be iogging yet neuerthelesse a man is iustified by the morall law for this went before the couenaunte of GOD with Abraham as being created together with man so either the reasoning of Paule is friuolous or in vain or else it is of force against ceremonies only I aunswere Answer That Paule considered the thing as it was namely that no rewarde is due vnto workes but by the couenante of God so although we graunt that the law doth iustifie yet neuertheles before the Lawe men could not deserue saluation by their workes because there was no couenaunt I affirme nothing which the schole Diuines graunt not for they teach that works merite not saluation by an inward worthinesse but by the acceptation of God as they speake it by reason of the couenant Therfore where there is no couenant of God no testimony of accepting or allowing coms in place no works in like maner shal suffise vnto righteousnesse therfore Paules discourse proceedeth finally There was saith he a double or twofold couenant of God with men the former was couenaunted in the hande of Abraham the seconde in the hand of Moses the former was founded in Christ and therefore free therefore the law stepping in could not bring to passe that men could haue saluation without grace because by this meanes the promise should be made of none effect That the sence is thus euen that whiche followeth nexte of all doth shewe 18 If the inheritaunce be by the law Lest the aduersaries shoulde cauill saying that that which they taught did not belong to the dissoluing or abrogating the couenaunt of God he preuenteth all their shifts affirming these two to be contrarye namely that saluation commeth vnto vs by the Lawe and by the promise who dare expounde this of only ceremonyes seing that Paule doth comprehende generallye all whatsoeuer is agaynste the free promise It is not than to be doubted but that he excludeth all kynde of workes and so he sayth Ro. 4.14 If the inheritaunce be by the Law faith is done away and the promise of none effect Why so because saluation should hang vpon this condition If thou satisfie the Law and therefore hee doth by and by conclude that saluation is of faith that the promise may be certayne Let vs therefore dilligently remember why in the comparing of the promise and the lawe the putting of the one ouerthroweth the other namely because the promise hath respect vnto faith and the Lawe hath respecte vnto workes Faith receaueth that whiche is freelye giuen but vnto workes rewarde is giuen and that is it whiche by and by hee ioyneth GOD gaue vnto Abraham not requiring the like recompence as it were but promising freelye for if you vnderstande it to be conditionally this worde Gaue will neuer agree with it 19 For what is the Lawe than it was added because of transgressiōs vntill the seede should come to which it was promised ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator 20 Furthermore a Mediator is not of one but GOD is one 21 Is the Lawe than againste the Promises of God God forbid for if there had bene a Lawe giuen whiche mought haue made aliue than righteousnesse shold haue bene by the law indeede 22 But the Scripture hath shutte all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ might be giuen to them which beleeue When wee heare that the Lawe doeth nothing auayle to bring righteousnesse by and by diuers cogitations come in oure braynes eyther than that it is vnprofitable or to no vse or contrarye to the Couenaunt of GOD or some such like thing yea rather that mighte come in mynde Why shoulde we not saye that of the Lawe which Ieremie chap. 31. ver 31. hath sayde of the newe Testament that the latter was giuen to correcte the weakenesse of the former doctrine Such Obiections as these bee must Paule aunswere if hee woulde satisfie the Galathians Fyrste than hee requireth what the vse of the Lawe is for in as muche as it followed the promise it seemeth that it oughte to supplye that which was wanting in it and certaynely it was doubted hereof whether that the promise by it selfe were of none effecte excepte it were holpen of the Lawe
to God that forsooth nowe hee liueth not by his owne life but that he is so liued with the hidden vertue power of Christ that Christ may he sayde to liue and to flourish in him For as the soule nourisheth the body with life so also doth Christ inspire life into his membres A notable sentence That the faythfull liue without themselues that is to saye in Christ which cannot be but they must haue a true and a substātiall communicating with him Finally Christ liueth in vs two maner of wayes One life is whan hee gouerneth vs with his spirite and doth direct all our doinges The other is that hee maketh vs pertakers of his righteousnesse that when wee bee not able in our selues yet in him we maye be acceptable vnto God The first belongeth to regeneration or new byrth the seconde belongeth to the free accepting of righteousnesse of the which we may vnderstande this place to meane although if any man had rather vnderstand it of both I willingly will embrace it In as much as I now liue in the flesh There is here almost no sentence which hath not bene torn with sundry expositions as some expounde flesh in this place to be the euil of nature corrupted But Paule doth meane it more simply to be the bodily life For the faithfull by liuing in the flesh doe neuerthelesse not liue after the flesh although it doe also comprehend the infirmities in which wee are now helde enwrapped Or else there had ben another obiection in a readinesse Obiection Thou also liuest a bodily and fraile life where not onely this corruptible bodie doth exercise his offices wheras it is susteined or fed with meat and drinke but also it is in like manner compassed with many vices so that on euery side the face of death doth shewe it selfe this is not the heauenly life of Christ A Paradox is a sentence or opinyon straunge and contrary to the opinyon of the most part Aunswer therfore it is a paradox contrary to all reason that whereas thou doest manifestely liue after the common maner of men yet thou sayest thou haste no life of thine owne Paule aunswereth that it namelye his life consisteth in fayth whereby he auoucheth that it is a misterie hidden from the sence of man The life than whiche wee obtayne by fayth appeareth not to the eyes but it is perceyued within in the conscience by the efficacie of the spirite and therfore the bodily life letteth not but that we maye by fayth possesse the heauenly life Ephe. 1.20 He hath placed vs in heauenly thinges c. Also Now yee are the Citizens of the Saynts and of the housholde of God Ephe. 2.19 Also to the Philippians 3.20 Our conuersation is in heauen Also to the Colossians We are dead and our lyfe is hid with Christ in God to be short Paule is full of such testimonyes whereby hee affirmeth that we doe so liue in the world that neuerthelesse we liue also in heauen not only because there is our head but also that by the right or interest of vnitie we haue a life common with him as S. Iohn speaketh cap. 14. ver 1. In the meane while let vs note that here he bringeth his reason from the nature of fayth that he may teache vs that it is no absurditie if that life bee hid which is graffed or placed in fayth because that thing whiche we hope for doth not yet appeare that fayth maye be named the knowledge of thinges inuisible Which hath loued me These wordes are added to expresse the force of Fayth or else this thought would come into euery mans mynde Whence cōmeth such vertue of fayth that it should shead out vppon vs the life of Christ therefore the hypostasis whereon fayth leaneth Substance or foundation doth declare the loue and death of Christ for thereof is the effecte of fayth to be estimated Howe commeth it to passe than that wee liue by the fayth of Christ because he hath loued vs and giuen himselfe for vs. the loue I saye wherwith Christ hath imbraced vs did cause that he did make himselfe one with vs that hath he done by his death for in giuing himselfe for vs he hath suffered no otherwise than in our person and therfore whatsoeuer faith findeth in Christe of the same it maketh vs partakers Wheras he maketh mention of Loue he meaneth that whiche is taught 1. Ioh. 4.19 Not because we loued him firste but that he hath preuented vs firste with his loue For if he being prouoked with merites had redemed vs the cause therof would haue bene tolde but now Paule ascribeth all vnto loue it is therfore free or without merite For the order must be marked He hath loued vs and giuen himselfe for vs. which is as muche as if he hadde sayde There was no other cause wherefore hee shoulde dye but because he loued vs. and that at such time as we were his enimies as he teacheth Rom. 5.10 And giuen himselfe We cannot wel expresse with any wordes how great a thing this is for who canne declare in wordes howe greate the excellencie of the Sonne of GOD is hee hath appoynted himselfe to bee the price to redeeme vs. Vnder the worde giuen is included the whole commoditie whiche commeth vnto vs by the death of Christe that is to saye that it is the Sacrifice of Purging the Washing Satisfaction c. Neyther haue these wordes for me a small force in them because it was not ynough to consider or thinke that Christ died for the saluation of the worlde excepte euerye one doe challenge priuatelye vnto himselfe the effect and possession of this grace 21 I cast not awaye There is a greate emphasis or vehemencie in those wordes for what and how horrible vnkyndenesse is it to contemne so inestimable grace of GOD and purchase with so greate a price Hee accuseth the false Apostles of this sacriledge whiche is robbing Christe of his honour which being not contence with Christe alone doe thrust in also other helpes of saluation For the grace of GOD is refused excepte that wee renounce all other thinges and embrace Christe alone finallye what hath a man left him after he hath refused the grace of God and made himselfe vnworthye of it For if righteousnes Gratis which I haue translated for nothing is taken for frustra which is in vaine that is there should be nothing much worth in the death of Christ or Christe died for nor reward For this is the rewarde of his death that by purging of our sinnes he hath reconciled vs vnto his Father hereof it followeth that by his grace we are iustified and therfore not by workes The Papists interprete it of the ceremoniall Lawe but who seeth not that it hath respecte to the whole Lawe for it is as muche as Paule shoulde saye If wee our selues deserue righteousnesse than Christe hath suffered in vayne for therefore suffered hee that hee mighte obtayne righteousnesse for vs. and
the question he woulde sodaynlye cutte off the occasion of doubt or else the wordes Euen as are referred only to that which is next afore that is to saye that by the hearing of fayth lhey had the ministration of the Spirite and of vertues as if he would say that there shined in the grace giuen vnto them a similitude or likenesse with Abraham Beleeued God With this Testimonie hee proueth as well in this place as in the fourth Chapter to the Romaynes that men are iustified by fayth because Fayth was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse Fyrste brieflye is to be vnderstanded what Fayth in this place meaneth with Paule secondlye what righteousnesse thyrdlye why fayth is deemed the cause of iustification Fayth is not taken for euerye perswasion which men may haue of the truth of God for be it that Caine had a hundred tymes beleeued God when he tolde him he would punishe him he hadde not bene the nere to obtayne righteousnesse Abraham therefore was iustified by beleeuing because whereas he had of God a promise of his fatherly goodnesse he did certaynely and surely embrace the same than Fayth in this place hath a relation and respecte vnto suche a worde of GOD as men hauing it in possession may rest in it and sticke fast to it As touching the worde Righteousnesse the manner of speaking of Moses is to be marked for whereas he sayth It was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse because he beleeued hee declareth thereby that he is righteous that is so taken with GOD. And whereas men haue not righteteousnesse layde vp in themselues they obtayne the same by imputation because GOD doth impute Fayth vnto them for righteousnesse Wee are sayde than to bee iustifyed by Faith not because fayth doth poure into vs an habite or qualitie but because we are accepted before GOD. And why is there so great honour attributed to faith that it is called the cause of our righteousnesse Firste wee must knowe that it is the instrumentall cause onely for to speake properly our righteousnesse is nothing else but a free accepting of GOD in which lieth the foundation of our saluation but because the Lorde in giuing vnto vs a Testimonie of his loue and grace thorowe the Gospell doeth communicate vnto vs that righteousnesse which I haue spoken off therefore we take holde of it by fayth Therefore when we attribute mans iustification vnto fayth wee dispute not of the principall cause but we note onelye the manner whereby men come to true righteousnesse For this righteousnesse is the meere gifte of God and not a qualitye whiche sticketh or is in man but is possessed onely by Fayth neyther yet that by the deserte or merite of Fayth that it should be as a due rewarde but because we receaue by Fayth that which GOD of his owne accorde and good will doth giue therefore all these speeches are of like force That we are iustified by the grace of God That Christe is our righteousnesse That the mercye of GOD is the cause of our righteousnesse That righteousnesse is gotten vnto vs by the death and resurrection of Christ That righteousnesse is giuen vnto vs by the Gospell That we obtayne righteousnesse by Fayth Whereby it appeareth howe childishlye they erre whiche woulde make these propositions agree together Wee are iustified by Fayth and Workes both for hee that is iust by Fayth he being bare and voyde of his owne righteousnesse resteth in the onlye grace of GOD. And this is the reason why Paule to the Romaynes doth conclude that Abraham is destytute of Glorye before GOD because hee hath obtained righteousnesse by Fayth Rom. 4.2 for it is not sayde that Fayth was imputed vnto him for parte of righteousnesse but for righteousnesse simplye without more wordes therefore Fayth was vnto him in the whole for righteousnesse Fynallye Fayth beholdeth nothing beside the mercye of GOD and Christ deade and raysed agayne Therefore all merite of workes is shutte out from the cause of iustification when as all is assigned to fayth For fayth for that it contayneth in it selfe the free goodnesse of God Christ with all his good things the testimony and witnesse of our adoption whiche is giuen in the Gospell is vtterly opposite and set against the law the merits of workes and the worthinesse of men for whereas the Sophisters doe thinke that it is only set agaynst ceremonies the order of the disputation or reasoning shall by and by with small adoe thorowly reproue them We must therefore beare in mind that they that are iust by fayth are iust without themselues that is in Christ whereby also the foolishe cauillation of some which dally with Paule is confuted because say they Moses calleth righteousnesse goodnesse or honesty and so it signifieth nothing else but Abraham was accounted a good man because he beleeued God Such frantike sprites doth Sathan at these dayes rayse vp to ouerthrow the certayntie of the Scripture with crooked slaunders as it were with mynes But Paule who knew that Moses in that place taught not children grammar but that he spake of the iudgement of God did not without cause take the worde Righteousnesse after the maner of a Diuine for we are not deemed righteous before GOD after the like reason wherewith we haue prayse of goodnesse before men but when we bring perfecte obedience of the Lawe For righteousnesse is opposite or sette againste the breaking of the Lawe yea euen in the least iote or tittle but because we haue not it I meane righteousnesse of our selues God doth freelye giue it vnto vs. Obiection But here the Iewes shake vp Paule for that he hath wrongfully wrested Moses wordes to serue his owne turne for Moses there in that place doth not entreate of Christe or of the life euerlasting but maketh mention onely of the earthye promise The Papistes also are not farre off from the Iewes for albeit they dare not reproche Paule yet they do altogether ouerturne Paules intent and purpose Answere I aunswere Paule taketh it for a thing graunted as an vndoubted Principle among Christians that whatsoeuer promises the Lorde gaue vnto Abraham they did appertayne or depend on that firste promise I am thy God Genesis 17.1 Thy rewarde is exreeding greate Gen. 15.1 And in thy seede shal all nations be blessed Gen. 22.17 18. And therfore whē Abraham heard this Thy seed shal be as the sande of the sea c. he stayed not in that word but rather he included it in the grace of adoption as the part in the whole moreouer whatsoeuer promise was giuen he did not otherwise receiue the same than as a testimonye of the fatherly grace of God that thereby hee mighte take sure confidence of saluation For euen in this doe the Children of God differ from the vnbeleeuers for that they in deede haue the vse of God his benefites together with the children of God but yet like beastes they regarde not that which is higher but as for God his Children because
iustifieth is alone but we affirme that it is alwayes ioyned with good works only we contend that it alone auaileth vnto iustification The Papistes themselues like Tormentoures doe teare and rente Fayth miserablye while sometime they make it vnshaped and without charitie and sometime shaped as for vs we holde that true faith cannot be plucked away from the Spirite of regeneration but when we speake of the cause of iustification than we shutte oute all workes As touching this presence place Paule doeth not reason whether charitie worketh with fayth to iustifie but onely sheweth what are now the true excercises of the faythfull least he shoulde seeme to make Christians idle and as it were like to blockes Therefore when you are in hand with the cause of iustification take heede you admitte not anye mention of charitie or of workes but firmelye holde fast that which shutteth them out In as much as Paule here doeth not entreate of iustification nor yet assigneth the prayse thereof to charitie in part we may thereby readilye conclude that by the same reason it should follow that Circumcision and ceremonies did iustifie in time past For as he commendeth faith with charitie in Iesus Christ so before the comming of Christ ceremonies were required But that was nothing to the deseruing of righteousnesse which the Papists also will confesse and therefore we must not thinke so of charitie neither 7 Ye did run wel who did hinder you that you should not obay the truth 8 The Perswasion is not of him who hath called you 9 A little leauen leaueneth the whole lumpe 10 I am perswaded of you in the Lord that you will thinke no other thing he that troubleth you shall beare iudgement whosoeuer he be 11 And I Bretheren if as yet I preache Circumcision why as yet doe I suffer persecution the offence of the crosse is done away I would to GOD they also were cut away which trouble you 7 Ye did run well He doth of a sette purpose mingle the reproche of their present backsliding with the praise of their former course that being ashamed they maye the more willinglye returne into the way It is a token of wondering that he asketh them who led them away from the right course whereby hee may make them the more ashamed I thought good once againe to turne the Verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to Obay rather than to Beleeue because now alreadie they had embraced the puritie of the Gospell and were caried away from obaying it 8 The perswasion is not of him He contended afore with reasons now at last he goeth to it by authoritie wheras he crieth vnto them that this perswasion came from some other place than from God For this admonitiō should not haue very much waight were it not vpholded by the authoritie of the person But Paule of his owne right mighte so boldlye speake to the Galathians for that hee was a Preacher vnto them of that calling that GOD called them with and therefore hee nameth not GOD but he signes him out by a Periprasis Periphrasis 〈◊〉 fight whē a thing is signified in many words that may be said in one as one that selleth raysons c. for a grocer as if he should saye God is not at controuersie with himselfe hee it is who called you into saluation by my preaching This newe perswasion then came from some other place Therefore if you will haue the calling of God ratified take heede you giue no eare vnto them who bring in amongst you new inuentions Although I confesse the greeke Participle be of the present tence yet because it is taken indifinitely it liked me to turne it thus Which hath called you for to take away doubtfulnesse in the meaning 9 A little leauen I referre it to the doctrine and not to the men for he aduiseth them how hurtfull a thing the corruption of doctrine is least they should not repute it as commonly men doe as a thing of no daunger or else of no great daunger For Sathan creepeth in with this vndermining so that he doth not openlye shake the whole doctrine but infecteth the purenesse thereof with false and forged opinions many because they consider not the greatnesse of the euill are lesse vehement in resisting the same therefore the Apostle here doth crie out that no iote of safetie doth remayne after that the truth of God is corrupted and he vseth the similitude of leauen which although it bee but a little doeth sende out it sharpenesse into the whole lumpe Therefore we must carefully beware that we suffer not any thing to be deuised and put to the pure doctrine of the Gospell 10 I am perswaded Hee doeth agayne turne all his sharpe speeche from the Galathians vnto the false Apostles hee sayeth they were the cause of the euill to them hee threatneth punishmente hee sheweth that hee hath good hope of the Galathians because they will returne readylye and easilye to agree to the truth And that giueth vs a courage when wee heare that wee are well hoped of for wee counte it a foule matter to deceyue the opynyon of them who iudge louingly and friendly of vs. And because it was the worke of GOD to bring the Galathians agayne to the pure Doctrine of fayth from whiche they hadde swarued hee sayeth he hopeth in the Lord whereby he monisheth them that returning or repentaunce is a heauenlye gifte that they also might aske the same of God He that troubleth you It is a confirmation of the sentence going afore because after a sort he layeth a great part of the blame vppon those deceiuers by whome the Galathians were beguiled for looke what reuengement hee denounceth agaynste them from the same for the moste parte doeth hee exempt the Galathians But whosoeuer they be that giue occasion of hurly bulyes to the Church whosoeuer breake the vnitie of fayth whosoeuer make concorde shake and decaye lette them heare and if they bee in their right wits let them shake for feare at this speeche for GOD by the mouth of Paule doeth pronounce that no suche Authoures of offences shall scape vnreuenged This peece Whosoeuer helde hath a force in it for in as muche as the false Apostles by theire greate wordes did terrifie the ignoraunte and vnlearned multitude it behoued Paule on the other side so loftily to extoll his doctrine that hee shoulde spare none whiche durste quetche agaynste him whatsoeuer tytle otherwise they were knowne by 11 And I bretheren An argumente drawne from the finall cause I mought sayth he auoyde the hatred of men daungers and persecutions if I woulde but onlye mingle ceremonies with Christ whereas therefore I contende so greatlye aboute this matter to maintayne the contrarye I doe it not for myne owne cause nor yet for myne owne profite But doeth it therefore followe that it is true whiche hee teacheth I aunswere that the right affection and pure conscience of the Teacher is of no small force to winne credite moreouer it is
destitute of suche Paule for that hee was carefull as touching the preseruation of the Ministerie commaundeth a care and regarde to be had of good and faythfull Pastors Take Woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the Doctrine of godlynesse He monisheth that they are to be nourished by whome we are taught in the Worde by what righte than are nourished in the Papacie eyther the ydle bellyes of dumme men or else mad beastes who haue no fellowship with the doctrine of Christ In all good thinges Not because he woulde haue superfluous aboundance heaped vp without measure but that nothing should be wanting to the necessarie helpes of life For Ministers both ought to be content with a spare liuing and also the daunger of riot and pompe is alwayes to bee preuented as much than as neede doth require let the faythfull haue all that is theirs readye for Godlye and holye Teachers to serue their turne for with what rewarde shall they recompence the inestimable treasure of euerlasting life which they obtayne by their preaching 7 God is not scorned Hee didde put this too to doe awaye excercises wherewith many are wont to be turned away one he laies that he must bring vp his houshold another he saith he hath nothing lefte to bestowe or giue away so it falleth out that but few doe their duetie and they for the moste parte are not enow where so many beside are slacke Paule sheweth that these excuses are but vayne because the matter toucheth or concearneth GOD whiche the world thinkes not neyther is here touched only the liuing of man but how muche Christ and his Gospell is esteemed of vs. This place is a testimonye that the fashion of despising faithfull Pastors began not first in these our dayes but such despisinges shall not fall out scotfree to the wicked For what a man soweth That is to saye that which holdeth vs back from liberalitie because wee thinke that that is quite gone from vs that passeth into another bodyes keeping besides that because we be alwayes afraide for our selues in this life Paule on the contrarye side doeth compare this lyfe to the tyme of sowing and sayth while we doe well we make a seede season whereof is spoken in the seconde to the Corinthians where he did vse the same similitude I woulde this were throughly perswaded vs how willingly we should bestowe our selues and our goods vpon our neighboures bent alwayes vpon the hope of Haruest as husbandmen who doe nothing with better will then sow their Corne But whereas they abide nyne moneths with a patient mynde to gather in a corruptible Haruest we in the wayting for blessed immortalitie doe fainte and shrinke 8 For he that soweth to his flesh This is a distribution of the partes after the generall sentence To sow to the flesh is to prouide and care for the necessities of this present life without any regarde of the life to come They which doe so shall gather such Corne as their sowing deserueth for they shal heape vp that that ill shal perish Others doe expounde To sowe in the fleshe for to cherishe the concupiscences of the fleshe and Corruption for destruction but the former exposition doth better agree with the text In that I haue translated it otherwise than the old interpreter and Erasmus I haue not done it without cause The wordes of Paule in greeke sounde thus sowe into the fleshe and what other thing is that but so to bee addicted to the flesh that thou directest all thy studye to the commoditie and regarde thereof But he that soweth for the spirite I take Spirite for a spirituall life to whiche they are sayde to be sowne who more respecte heauen than the earth and doe so order their life that they aspire to the kingdome of God they therefore shall reape the vncorruptible fruite of spirituall studies in heauen Furthermore he calleth them spirituall studies or excercises of their end howsoeuer otherwise they are outwarde and pertayne to the body of which sort is this very same whereof now he treateth namely to Nourish the Pastors If the Papistes after their maner go about out of these wordes to builde vp the righteousnesse of workes I haue sayde else where how easie a matter it is to confute their follies For it doth not follow hereof if eternall life be a rewarde eyther that wee are iustified by workes or else that workes deserue saluation for that this same verye thing also is freelye giuen because GOD vouchsafeth such workes which hee hath giuen vnto vs worthye suche honour that hee promiseth vnto them a rewarde whiche they deserue not If anye man require a fuller resolution firste I denie that wee haue any good workes which God should rewarde but those which we haue of his grace secondly I say that the good workes which we doe by the guiding and directing of the holy Ghost are the fruites of the free adoption thirdly I say that they are not onely vnworthy of so much as a very small trifâ—ling rewarde but that they are vtterly worthy of damnation because they are blemished and spotted alwayes with many blots and what haue blots to doe with the sight of God fourthly I say that although a thousande tymes rewarde is promised to workes that yet there is no reward due of couenaunt except the whole law bee perfourmed but good Lorde how farre off be wee from that performaunce Lette the Papistes now goe and assay to breake into Heauen by the merites of workes but we doe willingly confesse with Paule and the whole Scripture that those thinges which otherwise wee cannot obtayne but by the meere gift of God yet that the same are repayed to our workes in the name of a reward 9 Let vs not be wery with doing that which is good Good in this place signifieth not the same which right is but benignitie or kindnesse is referred vnto men he monisheth than that we be not wery in helping our neighbours in doing good turnes and in vsing liberallitie A precept that is very necessary for whereas we are by nature more slowe then needeth to doe the duetyes of charitie innumerable stombling blockes come often in the waye whiche holde vs backe when wee are well minded We happen vpon many that are vnworthy vpon many that are vnthankful the great multitude of our owne necessities ouerwhelmeth vs Wee spend all that wee haue with geuing here and there the colde deuotion of others quencheth our beate last of all the whole worlde is full of impedimentes and lets which turneth vs away from a right course Therefore Paule doth doth well when he hartens vs lest we be not weary and sit downe If we faint not That is to saye so at length shall we reape the fruite which God promiseth if wee continue till the ende For they which perseuere not are like vnto loytering husbandmen who after they haue plowed and sowed leaue their worke halfe done whereas harrowing is needefull too least eyther the Byrdes
this place he setteth it against Christe fayth the Gospell and grace that it may be a mere couenaunt of the Lawe hauing the foundation in the merites of workes hereby is apparaunte that whiche I haue already sayde that he speaketh not of Circumcision alwayes one waye but that we must haue regarde of the diuersitie therof I say that Paule whilest he considereth Circumcision in it owne nature doth worthely make it a symbol or badge of grace because so was the institution of God but when he hath to doe with the false apostles who did abuse Circumcision to destroy the Gospel he doth not regarde whereto it was instituted of the Lorde but hee inuadeth the corruption that came from men Wee haue a verye cleare example here in this place When as vnto Abraham was giuen the promise cōcerning Christ concerning true righteousnesse concearning eternall life Circumcision was added also for confirmation therof it was therfore by the ordinaunce of God a Sacrament which serued vnto fayth Now comes the false Apostles and they fayne it to be a meritorious worke and they so sette out the obseruing of the law that they make circumcision a beginning or entraunce in of such a profession The Apostle doth not here touch the institution of God but doth fight agaynst the fayned deuise of the false Apostles But some men will obiect Obiection saying howsoeuer the abuse of the vngodlye is yet for all that it plucketh away nothing from the holy institutions of God I aunswere Answer That Circumcision was commanded of God but for a time that therefore it ceased to be a Sacramente appointed of God after the comming of Christ because Baptisme succeeded in place thereof To what end than was Timothie circumcised not for his own cause surely but only for the bretherens for whose wickednesse sake it was done But that it maye the better appeare howe muche the doctrine of the Papistes agreeth with that which Paul speaketh against it is to be marked That the sacramēts being vnderstāded receiued sincerely are not properly the workes of men but of God For in Baptisme in the Lordes supper we doe nothing but offer our selues vnto God to receaue his grace Therefore Baptisme As actiue is when we we doe so passiue is when a thing is done to vs. in respect of vs is a worke passiue for we bring nothing but faith which hath all thinges laid vp in Christe But what doe the Papistes they imagin a worke wrought whereby men deserue the grace of God and so what else doe they but plainely quench out the trueth of the Sacrament Yet we retaine and kepe Baptisme and the Lordes supper because Christ wold haue the vse of eche of them perpetuall but we sharpely detest those vngodly dotages as meete it is we shoulde 4 Ye are emptied of Christ The meaning is If you seeke any part of righteousnesse in the workes of the law Christ belonges not to you and yee are shut out from grace Neither was their opinion so grosse that they did beleeue themselues to bee iustified by the onelye obseruing of the Law but they did mingle Christ with the lawe otherwise it were in vayne that Paule didde terrifie them with these threatninges What doe you you make Christ vnprofitable vnto you you bring to naught his grace We see thā that there can no small peece of righteousnesse be put in the law but withall we renounce Christ and his grace 5 For we by the Spirite through faith It is a preuention wherewith he preuenteth an obiection for forthwith this cogitation might come into any mans mynde Is there than no profite of circumcision Obiection he aunswereth Aunswer that in Christ it profiteth nothing and that therefore righteousnesse is planted in fayth and that this righteousnesse is obtayned in spirite without ceremonies To loke for the hope of righteousnesse is to groūd in this or that thing their confidence or to determine from whence righteousnesse is to be hoped although withall it bee probable that perseueraunce is noted in these wordes as if he shoulde haue sayde We stande constantlye in the confidence of righteousnesse which by fayth we obtayne In that hee sayth that righteousnesse abideth by fayth that is common to the fathers and to vs both alike for by fayth they all pleased God as the Scripture witnesseth Hebr. 11. but their faith was wrapped vnder the vaile of ceremonies therefore hee maketh a difference betweene vs and them by this word Spirite which is set agaynste the outwarde shadowes Hee meaneth than that it is naked and bare fayth now which suffiseth to obtayne righteousnesse and which is not set forth with the pompe of ceremonies but is content with the spirituall seruice of God 6 Eor in Christ Iesus It is a reason shewing wherfore they might nowe obtaine righteousnes in the Spirite because Circumcision with the appurtinaunces thereof was abolished in Christe that is to say in the kingdom of Christe or in the church of Christe for by a Synecdoche Sinecdoche is a figure where part 〈…〉 who le in the word Circumcision he setteth downe the ceremonies And so he putteth in mynde that there is no roome left for them any more and yet he graunteth that they were not alwayes vnprofitable for he teacheth that they were not abrogated till after that Christe was reuealed And so withall is solued that question why he speaketh heare so contemptuously of Circumcision as though it neuer had anye thing auayled for mention is not made here of Circumcision as in that it was once a Sacrament it is not demaunded of what force it was at that time in whiche it was not as yet growne out of vse but he affirmeth that vnder Christes kingdome it was made all one with vncircumcision namely for that the comming of Christ brought an ende to all the ceremonies of the Law But faith working by loue He setteth agaynst Ceremonies another excercise namely of loue Lest that the Iewes should flatter themselues too much as though they excelled in any notable thing for about the ende of the Epistle in steede of this peece he will vse this A new creature It is as much than as if he had sayde That God will not haue vs at these dayes to be occupied in ceremonies but it is sufficient if wee excercise our selues in charitie In the meane while hee doeth not shut out our Sacraments which are helpes to fayth but briefely hee confirmeth that whiche he hath touched concearning the spirituall seruice of God This place hath no difficultie were it not that the Papistes did slaunderouslye wrest it to builde vp their righteousnesse of workes for when they are minded to refell that saying of ours Fayth onely iustifieth than take they vp this weapon Obiection If that fayth iustifieth which worketh by charitie than saye they it doth not iustifie alone I answere Answer they vnderstand not what they prate muche lesse what wee teach for wee doe not teache that the faith whiche