alledge yâ— auctoritie of scripture and say that this theyr decree is expressed in the scriptures Besydes this they do iniurie and dishonour to Christe in sayenge that meÌ„ by Monastical lyfe do merite eternal lyfe God dothe not gyue this honoure no not to his owne lawe that it shulde merite eternall lyfe as he hym selfe sayth playnly in the .xx. chapitre of Ezechiel I gaue vnto them preceptes that were not good and iudgementes in whiche they shall not lyue Fyrste this is vndoubted that monkyshe lyfe dothe not merite remission of synnes but that we freely receâ—ue it by fayth as it hath ben said before SecoÌ„dly this also is wryten that for Christê sake thrughe mercye is gyuen eternall lyfe to them whiche by fayth receyue remission and pleade not theyr owne merites agaynste the iudgement of god as Barnarde most grauely and wysely dothe say It is necessarye saythe he fyrst of all to beleue that remission of synnes can not be obteyned nor had but by goddes indulgence and pardone Secundarilye that thou cannest haue no good worke onles he gyueth it vnto the. Finally that thou can nest not by no maner workes merite eternall lyfe oneles it also be freelye gyuen Other thynges that folowe concernynge the same senteÌ„ce we haue heretofore recited And Barnarde addeth in the ende these wordê Let no man deceyue hym selfe For if he coÌ„sidre wel he shall fynde without any doubte that he is not able no not with tenne thousandê to mete hym which cometh agaynst hym with twenty thousandes Sythe than it is so that not so moche as by the workes of goddê law we can merite remission of sinnes or eternall lyfe but it is necessary to seke the mercy promysed in Christ moche lesse is suche honour to be gyuen to Monasticall obseruauÌ„ces seinge theyr be nothynge elles but traditions of men that they shulde deserue remission of synnes or eternall lyfe Thus they vtterly destroye and burye the gospell of free remission of synnes and of receyuiÌ„g the mercy ê“mysed in Christ who soeuer teache yâ— the monkyshe lyfe dothe merite remission of synnes or eternall lyfe and they translate the truste whiche is due to Christe vnto those folyshe obseruaunces In the stede of Christe they worshyp thyr owne coulles theyr owne fylthynes And in asmuch as they theÌ„ selues also do nede mercy they do wyckedly in that they fayne meriteâ— of super erogation and sell them to other We speake the more briefly of these thynges because by the matters whiche we haue spoken before of iustification of repentaunce of humayne traditions it is euident ynoughÌ„e that monasticall vowes be nat the pryce for which remission of synnes and eternall lyfe be gyueÌ„ And sythe it is so that Christ him selfe dothe call traditions vnprofitable honours and seruices they be in no wyse euaÌ„gelical perfectioÌ„ But our aduersaries wolde full wylyly seme to moderate the comen ê‘suasion of pefection They wyll nat say that monastical lyfe is perfection but they say it is the state of gettyng perfetion In faythe properly sayde and we remeÌ„bre that this correction is made in Gersones workes For it apperith that wyse men offendid with those vnmeasurable prayses of monastical lyfe because they durst nat vtterly take from it the prayse of perfection they addyd this correction that it is the state of gettyng perfection If we folowe this opinion so shall monastical lyfe be no whyt more the state of perfection than is the lyfe of the plouman or of the carpenter For these be also states of gettyng perfectioÌ„ For all men of whatsoeuer callynge they be oughte to desyre perfection that is to wete to growe and encrease in the feare of god in fayth in louing of thyr neyghbour and in lyke spirituall vertues We reade in histories examples of Eremites saynt Antony and other whiche make the kyndes of lyuyng egal one to another It is wryten that to Antony when he desyred of god to knowe howe muche he had profyted in this kynde of lyuynge there was shewed in his dreame a certayne shomaker dwellyng in the citie of Alexandrie to whom he was compared On the morowe after Antony coÌ„mith into the citye and goeth vnto the shomaker to searche and knowe his exercises and gyftes When he had spoken with the man he hearith nothynge of hym but that he dyd euery mornynge in fewe wordes pray for the hole citie and afterwardê dyd applye his crafte and occupation Here Antony perceiued that iustification is nat to be imputed to that sorte of lyuing whiche he had taken vpon hym and professed But our aduersaries although they now moderate the prayses of perfection yet in very dede they thynke otherwyse For they sell merites and apply them for other vndre this preteÌ„ce that they obserue bothe the preceptes and also the couÌ„sayles Wherfore in very dede they thinke that they haue merites mo then they nede What is to chaleÌ„ge ê‘fectioÌ„ vnto them selues if this be nat Furthermore it is put in the coÌ„futation that religious men labour to lyue more nere vnto the rule of the gospel It doth therfore put perfection in the traditions of men if religious men lyue more neare to the rule of the gospell because they haue nothing propre but all comen because they lyue without wyues because they obey theyr rule in garmentes meates and other lyke trifles Also the confutation sayeth that religious men merite more pleÌ„teously euerlasting lyfe it alledgith the scripture Qui reliquerit domaÌ„ c. Whosoeuer shal forsake house here god wote the scripture gyueth perfection to these counterfaited and fained religious But this place of scripture maketh nothynge for monasticall lyfe For Christe dothe nat meane that to forsake father and mother wyfe or breâ—herne is a worke therfore to be done because it dothe merite remission of synnes and eternall lyfe Yea that forsakyng is a cursed forsaking For it is done with the iniury of Christe if any maÌ„ wyl therfore forsake father or mother or wyfe thaâ— by this selfe worke he may merite remission of synnes and eternall lyfe But there be two maner of forsakynges one is done without callyng and without the coÌ„maundemente of god this forsaking and renouncing Christ alloweth nat For workê chosen of our selues be vnprofitable seruices And hereof it apperith more euideÌ„tly that Christ dothe nat loue this ronnyng away or forsakyng because he speakith of forsaking wyfe and chyldren But we knowe that the coÌ„maundement of god forbyddeth to forsake wyfe and chyldren There is another maner forsakynge whiche is done by the coÌ„maundement of god that is to wete when tyrauntes or they whiche haue auctoritie ouer vs compell vs to denye the gospell or â—o breake goddes coÌ„maundement Here in this case we haue coÌ„mauÌ„demeÌ„t that we shulde rather suffre wronge rather suffre nat onely our goodes our wyfe our chyldren to be takeÌ„ from vs but euen our lyfe also This maner renouÌ„cyng or forsakyng Christ dothe allowe and therfore he addith these wordes for the gospell
meriteth only the fyrst grace and that we theÌ„ by our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe do please and deserue euerlastyng lyfe The mediatour Christe taryeth styll and we must alwaies thynke that for him we haue god pacifyed although we be vnworthy as Paule sayeth By hym we haue an entre to god thorugh fayth For our fulfyllyng of the lawe as we sayde is vnclene sythe our nature is horriblely corrupted Therfore the Psalme sayeth Blessed be they whose synnes be forgyuen Wherfore we haue nede of remission of synnes yea euen when we haue good workê But that remission is alwayes purchased by faythe so Christe remayneth a byshop and mediatour g o ergo that fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth nat of it selfe But because we coÌ„ceiue Christ by fayth and fele that we haue god pacified nat for the lawe but for Christe Fyfthly If we shulde thynke that after baptisme we ought to be accepted nat by fayth in Christ but for our fulfyllyng of the lawe our conscience shulde neuer be quyete but shulde runne into desperation For the lawe alwayes accuseth syth we neuer satisfy the lawe which thyng the hole churche coÌ„fesseth For Paule sayeth Good that I wolde do I do nat but euyl that I wolde nat do I do He also sayeth In mynde I serue the lawe of god but iÌ„ fleshe I serue the lawe of syn For who sufficiently loueth or sufficiently feareth god who paciently ynough susteyneth tribulacions whiche god putteth vpoÌ„ him who doth nat oft doubt whether humane thynges be ruled by goddes prouidence who doth nat oft doubte whether god heareth his prayer who dothe nat oft disdysdayne and grudge that the wycked haue better fortune than the godly people and that the godly be oppressed of the vngodly who is nat angrie with the iudgemeÌ„t of god whan he semeth to caste vs away who doth satisfy his calliÌ„g who loueth his neyghbour as him selfe who is nat ouerthrowen of his concupisceÌ„ce Of these synnes speaketh the psalme sayeng For this euery saynt shal pray to the. Lo here he sayeth that sayntes or holy men desyre remission of synnes They be more then blynde which se nat that the euil affectioÌ„s iÌ„ the fleshe be nat synnes of whiche Paule sayeth The fleshe lusteth agaynst the spirite the spirit agaynst the fleshe The fleshe distrusteth god trusteth in thinges present seketh humane socours in distresse and affliction yea agaynste the wyll of god it fleeth tribulations whiche by the commaundement of god it oweth to suffre it doubteth of the mercy of god The holy spirite in meÌ„nes tencies of the lawe one solution may be gyueÌ„ that the lawe can nat be done without Chryst if any ciuile workes be done without Christ they please not god Wherfore when the workes be preached it is necessarye to be added that fayth is requyred that for faythe they be preached that they be frutes and testimonies of faythe What thynge can be spoken more symply and syncerely thaÌ„ this doctryne For it is necessarie to the knowledge of the benefytes of Christ to discerne the promyses from the lawe Ambiguouse and perilous causes do engender many and sundry solutions But in good and ferme causes one or two solutions taken out of the fountaynes do answere all that maye be obiected Whiche thynge also appereth in thys our cause For that rule whiche I ryght nowe recyted expounneth all the saynges whiche be recited of the lawe and of the workes For we graunte that the scripture otherwhyles doth teache the lawe otherwhyles the free promyse of remyssyon of synnes for Christe But our aduersaries do vtterly destroy the promyse in sainge that fayth dothe not iustifie but teache that for our loue and workes we receyue remission of synnes reconciliation For yf remissyon of synnes shulde hange of the condicion of our workes so were it very vncertayne For we neuer do sufficient workes Then the promyse shall be put out of yre Wherfore we call agayne good myndes to the coÌ„sideration of the promisses and we teache them of the free remyssyon and reconcilement that is made by the faythe in Christe After thys we adde also the doctrine of the lawe nat that by the lawe we shulde deserue forgyuenes of siÌ„nes or that for the lawe we shulde be compted ryghtwyse and nat for Christ but for thys entent because god requireth good workes For we muste wysely distincte the lawe and the promyses It must be sene what scripture gyueth to the lawe and what to the promyses For it prayseth and commaundeth good workes in such sorte that it taketh not awaye the free promyse nor the benefyte that we haue by Christe For good workes are to be done because God requireth them and therfore they be the effectes of regeneration as Paule teacheth We be his worke made by Christe Iesus to good workes whiche God hathe prepared that we shuld walke in them Wherfore good workes ought to ensue faythe as a geuynge of thankes towarde god also that in them faythe maye be bothe excercised and encrease and be shewed to other that by our confessyon other maye be styrred to deuotyon Therfore sayth Paule that Abraham toke circumcisioÌ„ not that for the very worke he shuld be compted ryghtwise but that he might haue a marke printed in his body wherby he myght be brought in rememberaunce and conceyue styll more faythe and more Also to thentente he shulde confesse hys fayth before other and by hys wytnessynge prouoke other to beleue So Abell by reason of hys faythe offered a more acceptable sacrifice for the sacrifice pleased god not for the very sacrifice but bycause Abel by hys faythe was assured that god was pleased with him because of hê mercie And he dyd that worke only to th ende to excercise his faythe and to prouoke other by hys ensample and confessyon to beleue Syth good workes ought after thys sorte ensue faythe men that can nat beleue and determyne in theyr hartes that they be frely pardoned for Christes sake â–ª do vse workes farre an other way These persons when they see the workes of sayntes and holy persons they iudge after a worldly fashoÌ„ that the sayntes by tho workes haue deserued forgiuenes of synnes and that for tho workes they be accompted ryghtwyse before God Therfore they folowe them and thynke that by lyke workes they deserue remyssion of synnes they go aboute to pacifye the ire of God and truste that for suche workes they shall be accompted ryghtwyse These wycked opinions in workes we damne Fyrst because they obscure the glory of Christ when men do propowne to god these workes as a pryce raunsom Thus the honour due to only Christ is gyuen to our workes Secondly because that notwithstandynge all theyr good workes yet the conscyence fyndeth no peace in them but heapynge workes vpon workes in true trobles at laste dispayreth for when it findeth no worke clene ynoughe the lawe alwayes accuseth and engendreth ire Therdly Such neuer atteyne to the knowledge of god when
shuld ouercome synne and dethe that our loue shulde be a purgation for which god shulde be reconciled the medyator Christ omitted that our loue shulde be ryghtwysnes without the mediator Christ For this loue yf any there were shulde be a iustyce of the lawe and not of the gospell which promyseth to vs reconcilement and ryghtwisnes yf we beleue that for Christe our redemer the father be pacifyed and that Christes merites be our satisfaction Therfore Peter a lytle before byddeth vs cum to Christe that we may be buylt vpon Christ and he addeth who beleueth in hym shall nat be confunded our loue delyuereth vs nat from confusion syth god iudgeth and reproueth vs but fayth in Christ delyuereth vs iÌ„ these affrayes because we knowe that we be pardoned for Christes sake Howe be it this sentence of charitie is taken forthe of the prouerbes where the circumstaÌ„ce of the place whiche renneth in contrarieties dothe clearly shewe howe it ought to be vnderstaÌ„de For there thus is it wrytteÌ„ Odium suscitat rixas et vniuersa delicta operit charitas i. Hatred styrreth coÌ„tentions but charitie couereth al faultes Thys sentence teacheth euen the same selfe thyng that the sayeng of Paule takeÌ„ out of the Collossenses dothe whiche is if any dissensions falle they shulde be mitigate and pacified by our owne indifferencie and gentle â—ebauour â–ª Dissentions he sayeth do encreace by â–ª â—aâ—redes as we ofte tymes see that of very lyte offensies most busynes dothe ryse There fell certayne lyte displeasures betwixt Gaius Cesar and Pompeius in which if the one had gyuen place a lytle to the other the ciuile batell shulde neuer haue rysen But whyles eche of theÌ„ pursued hê owne puate hatred of a thiÌ„g of nought rose moste greuous troubles And many heresâ—es haue rysen in the churche only of priuate hatredes of teachers betwixt them selues Wherfore when he sayeth charitie couereth offensies he speketh nat of a mans owne offensies but of other mens as who shulde say although any offensies or displeasures do fall yet loue dissembleth wynketh at them pardoneth them gyueth place doth nat all thynges with extremitie Peter therfore meaneth nat this that loue before god deserueth remission of synnes that it is a redemption of synnes Christe the mediatour excluded that for loue we be accepted and nat for Christ our mediatour but that towardes men it is nat disdaynfull nat roughe nat intractable that it dissembleth the smalle offensies of fryndes and the manners of other yea thoughe they be somewhat ouer boystuous dothe take theÌ„ in worth accordyng to the byddyng of a certayne vulgare sayeng whiche is this Mores amici noueris non oderis .i. Knowe the manners of thy frende hate them nat Nor the Apostles do nat with out cause so ofte admonishe vs of thys office of charitie whiche the philosophers call an Epikee that is to say a moderation or mitigation For thys vertue is hyghly necessarie to the reteynyng of publyk concorde which can nat endure onles they wynke at muche forgyue muche eche to other aswell the pastours as the congregations ⧠⧠Out of saynt Iames they cite Videtis igiturque ex operibus iustificatur homo et non ex fide sola .i. Ye se then that man is iustified by workes and nat by fayth alonly Nor ther is none other place whiche semeth to make more agaynst our opinion then this dothe Howbeit the answere is easy and playne If the aduersaries wolde nat shewe vnto it theyr owne opinions of the merites of workes saynt Iames wordes had no incommoditie But where so euer mencion is made of workê the aduersaries do adde theyr owne wycked gloses that by good workes we deserue remission of synnes that good workê be a raunsum and price for whiche god is recoÌ„ciled vnto vs that good workes before god for theyr owne goodnes be accepted nor nede nat mercie or Christe to be our mediatour But none of al these thynges cam in to saynt Iames mynde whiche all together the aduersaries do nowe defende vnder the pretence of the sayeng of S. Iames. Fyrste therfore this is to be weyed pondered that thys place rather maketh agaynst the aduersaries than agaynst vs. For the aduersaries teache man to be iustified by loue workes but of fayth wherby we receyue our mercystocke Christe they speake nothyng at all yea rather they disproue thys fayth and disproue it nat onely with wordes and sentencies but also they go about to put it away with the swerde and greuous punyshementes Howe muche better teacheth Iames whiche omitteth nat faythe nor putteth nat loue in the place of fayth but reteyneth it lest the mercystocke Christe shulde be excluded in iustification Lyke as Paule when he teacheth the SuÌ„me of the christian lyfe compriseth fayth and loue as when he sayeth The ende of the commaundement is charitie issuyng out of a pure harte and good conscience and fayth vnfayned Secondly The matter it selfe speaketh that here it is spoken of workes which ensue fayth and whiche shewe that fayth is nat deade but lyuyshe and workynge in the harte Wherfore Iames meant nat that we by good workes deserue remission of synnes and grace for he speketh of the workes of them that be iustifyed whiche be alredy reconciled accepted and whiche haue obteyned remission of synnes Wherfore the aduersaries erre when they out of this place gather that Iames teacheth vs that by good workê we haue a cuÌ„myng to god without Christe the mediatour Thyrdly Iames a litle before spake of regeneration that it is made by the gospell For thus he sayeth wyllyngly he generated vs by the worde of trouth to the ende we shulde be the fyrste frutes or the begynnynges of al his creatures WheÌ„ he sayeth that we be regenerate by the gospel he teacheth that by fayth we be regenerate and iustified Thus it appereth thaâ— Iames is nat agaynste vs who in blamyng the ydle and careles myndes whiche dreame that they haue fayth and haue it nat made a distinction betwixt the deade fayth and the lyuyshe faythe He calleth it deade which bryngeth forthe no good workê But he calleth that a quycke faythe whiche bryngeth forth good workes Doubtles we haue oftentymes nowe shewed what we calle faythe For we speake nat of the ydle knoweledge whiche is also iÌ„ deuyls but of the fayth whiche resisteth the fearfull troubles of the conscience whiche erecteth and conforteth the feared hartes Suche fayth is neyther an easy thyng as our aduersaries do dreame nor yet in mans power but a diuine power by whiche we vaynquyshe the deuyll and deathe as Paule to the Colossenses sayeth that fayth is myghty by the power of god and ouercuÌ„meth deathe In whiche ye be sayeth Paule resuscitate by fayth whiche is the myght and efficacitie of god Thys faythe sythe it is a newe lyfe necessaryly engendreth newe motions and workes Therfore Iames doth ryghtly deny that we be iustified by suche fayth whiche
was I am sure of the â—ame mynde that the prophete was of which sayed Lorde enter nat into iudgemeÌ„t with thy seruaunt for no lyuing creature shal be iustifyed in thy syght saynt Barnarde confesseth that hys owne workes be nat worthy eternall lyfe whan he sayeth I haue lyued wretchedly But he comforteth hym selfe and gathereth hope of saluation hereof because he perceyueth that for Christes sake through mercy is gyuen remission of synnes and eternall â–ª lyfe as the Psalme teacheth whiche sayeth Blessyd be they whose iniquities be forgiuen And Paule sayeth Dauid callith the man blessed to whom god imputeth ryghtuousnes without workes Paule sayeth that he is blessed to whoÌ„ ryghtuousnes is imputed by fayth in christe although he haue no good workes With suche coÌ„solations be consciences to be comforted and strengthed that is to say that for Christes sake by fathe is goten remission of synnes reputation of iustice eternal lyfe Nowe if in these places of workes fayth after this maner shal be vnderstande they hurte no thyng our sentence or opinion And verely it is necessary alwayes to put to faythe that we do nat exclude the Mediatour Christe And good workes ought to folowe faythe because faythe without good workes is hypochrisye They haue also in the scholes certayne propre and shorte sayengê agreing to our senteÌ„ce of whiche sorte be these that good workes do please god because of grace and fauour Also that we must truste to the grace of god These sayenges they do nat well interprete For the olde wryters dyd meane that we muste truste to grace that is to wete to the mercy of god promysyng that for Christes sake we be accepted But the wryters of later tyme haue traÌ„slated this trust to our owne worke Theyr opinion is that we muste truste to grace that is to wete to the loue where with we loue god This is a false and a corrupte interpretatioÌ„ For we ought nat to truste to our owne loue forasmuch as it is vncleane smal but to the promise of mercy Thys is also a coÌ„men sayeng a monge them that good workes be of strengthe by the vertue of Christes passion it is wel sayd but there ought to haue ben made mention of faythe in these sentencies For the merite of Christes passion is nat coÌ„municate â—o vs onles we do receiue it by faythe and do set it agaynste the terrours of syn and death For Paule sayeth Christe is a propitiatioÌ„ by faythe Also the churche in all prayers or collecâ—es addeth at the ende Per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum that is to say By our lorde Iesus Christ. Here also men are to be monyshed and to be put in remembraunce of fayth For the church meaneth that our workes and our prayers do plese god if we do beleue that god is gracious for Christes sake the hyghe bysshop Let these thynges suffise at thys tyme coÌ„cernyng this place And we do knowe that this sentence and opinion whiche we defend is consonauÌ„te and agreing to the gospell and dothe bringe moste stronge and sure consolations to godly consciences Therfore let nat godly consciences suffer them selues to be led away from this sentence opinion for cause of the vniuste false and sclaunderous iudgementes of our aduersaries For the scripture â—ophecieth that the tyme shulde come whan 〈◊〉 teachers shulde play mastries in the churâ—â—e â–ª whiche oppressing the iustice of faythe in Christe shulde teache to merite remission of synnes by our owne obseruauÌ„ces and workes And the thynges done in Israel be an ymage and figure of the state that shulde afterwardes folowe in the churche Nowe we do se that the prophetes do euerywhere rebuke this persuasion of the people whiche dyd dreame that they dyd merite forgyuenes of synnes by the sacrifices of the lawe and by the reason of thê opinion dyd heape workes vpon workes and sacrifices vpon sacrifices So in the churche there be many persones whiche haue a false persuasion of theyr owne workes and ceremonies But the scripture hathe taught vs that we shulde nat be troubled with the multytude of wickeâ— and vngodly persones and yet it is no mastrie to iudge the spirite of our aduersaries For we do se that in many of theyr articles the manifest and open truthe is condempned by them And let nat this trouble or offeÌ„d any man that they do chalenge and take vpoÌ„ them selues the name of the churche For the churche of Christe is amonge them whiche do teache the gospel truly nat among theÌ„ whiche do defende wronge opinions agaynst the gospell as the lorde sayeth My shepe do heare my voyce ⧠Of the Churche ⧠THe seuenth article of our confession they dampne in whiche we sayde that the churche is a coÌ„gregation of sayntes or holy meÌ„ And they make a longe proces that euyll persons are naâ— to be segregate or deuided froâ— the churche sythe that Iohan Baptist coâ—â—pared the churche to the floure of the Barnâ— in whiche bothe corne and chaffe be layde together on an heape And Christe compared it to a nette in whiche be caught bothe good fysshes and badde Without doubte it is a trewe sayde prouerbe Agaynst the byting of a sycophaunt or sclauÌ„derer there is no remedy Nothyng can be spokeÌ„ so circumspectly but that a captious sclaunderer shal fynde occasion to depraue it We euen for thys very cause dyd adde the eyght article leaste any man shulde thynke that we seuered the euyll persons and hypocrites from the outwarde societie of the churche or plucked away the vertue from the sacramentes whiche be ministred by hypocrites and euyll men Wherfore here nedeth no longe defense agaynste thys sclaunder The eyght article dothe sufficently purge vs. For we graunt that hypocrites and euyll men be in this lyfe mixed in the churche and be membres of the churche as touchyng the outward societie of the signes of the churche that is to wete of the worde profession and sacrameÌ„tes namely if they be nat excoÌ„municate Nor the sacramentes be nat therfore without vertue because euell men minister them or euyll men receyue them For Paule ê“phecieth that the tyme shulde come when Antichrist shuld sytte in the teÌ„ple of god that is to say shulde haue dominion and beare officies in the churche But the churche is nat only a societie of externe thynges and rites as other polecies or ciuile societies be but principally it is a societie of fayth and of the holy ghoste in mens hartes whiche yet natwithstaÌ„dyng hathe outward notes tokyns wherby it may be knoweÌ„ as the syncere and pure teachyng of the gospell and the ministration of the sacramentes agreable to the Euangel of Christe And this churche only is called the bodye of Christe whiche Christ with his spirite reneweth sanctifyeth and gouerneth as testifyeth Paule sayeng And hym he made head aboue al of the churche whiche is his body that is to say an entiertie or the hole congregation of hym whiche worketh all together in all
shal excuseys to al them that shal come after vs so that it can nat be layde to our charge ne any faute can be put in vs that the auctoritie of bysshoppes is minished and enfebled when men shall reade and heare that we albeit we desyre the bysshoppes nat to vse this vniuste crueltie towardes vs yet can we iÌ„ no wyse obtayne any maner equitie or ryght of them Of mans traditions in the churche IN the .xv. article they receyue the fyrste parte in which we say that those rites and ceremonies in the churche are to be obserued which may be obserued with out any syn and whiche helpe to the keping of tranquilite and good ordre in the churche The seconde parte they vtterly condempne in which we say that mans traditions instituted to appeace god to merite grace and to satisfy for synnes be contrary to the gospell Albeit in our confession coÌ„cernyng the choyse of meares we haue spoken many thynges ynough of traditions yet this natwithstaÌ„ding certayne thingê shal here brefly be repeted For although we thought that our aduersaries wolde for other causes defende the traditions of men yet we dyd nat thynke that euer they wolde haue coÌ„dempned this our article whiche is That we deserue nat forgiuenes of siÌ„nes or grace through the obseruyng of mennes traditions Syth therfore thys article is condempned we haue an easy and a playne cause Now our aduersaries do openly play the Iewes and do openly oppresse the gospell with deuillyshe doctrines For than dothe the scripture call tradicions the doctrines of deuyls wheÌ„ it is taught that they be seruices profitable to deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and grace For then they endymme the gospel they minishe the benefite of Christ they annulle the iustice of faythe The gospel teacheth vs that we through faythe for Christes sake frely receiue remission of sinnes and be recoÌ„ciled to god Our aduersaries coÌ„trary wyse make another mediatour that is to wete these traditioÌ„s For the traditions sake they wyll obteine remission of sinnes by these they wyll appease the wrathe of god But Christe sayth openly They honour me in vayne with the coÌ„maundementes of men We haue herebefore largely disputed that men be iustified throughe faythe whan they beleue that they haue god pacified not for our workes but frelye for Christe This is vndoubtedly the doctrine of the gospell for Paule sayth playnly to the Ephesians Ye be freely saued through faythe and that not of your selues it is the gyfte of god and coÌ„methe not of men Nowe our aduersaries say that men deserue remission of synnes by these humane obseruaunces What other thyng is this than besides Christ to set vp a nother iustifier a nother mediator Paule saythe to the Galathians Ye be fallen from Christ ye whiche be iustified by the law â–ª that is to saye if ye thynke that by the obseruynge of the lawe ye deserue to be accompted ryghtuous in the syght of god Christe shall nothing auayle you For wherunto nede they Christ which thynke them selues to be ryghtuous by theyr owne obseruynge of the lawe God hath set forthe Christe vnto vs that for this mediatours sake and not for our iustices sake he wyll be mercyfull to vs. But these men thynke that god is pacified and made mercyfull for our traditions sake and not for Christê sake They take therfâ—â—e â—om Christ the honour and prerogatiue of a mediator Neyther is there any difference betwyxte our traditions the ceremonies of Moyses law as concernynge this matter Paule therfore condempneth the ceremonies of the lawe of Moyses lykewyse as he condempneth traditions bicause they were iudged to be workes whiche dyd merite iustice in the syght of god by reason wherof the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe were obscured wherfore he putteth awaye the lawe he puttethe awaye traditions and proueth playnlye that not for these workes sake but for Christis sake remission of synnes is freelye promysed so that by faythe we receyue it For asmoche therfore as by faythe ne receyue remission of synnes and syth through faythe we haue god mercyfull and fauourable to vs for Christis sake it is playne errour and heresy to decree that by these obseruauÌ„ces we deserue remission of sinnes If any man do here say that we deserue not by these traditions remission of synnes but that we being alredy iustified do by these traditions deserue grace here agayne Paule cryeth agaynst hym sayeng that Christ shuld be the minister of synne if after iustification it were to be thoughte that afterwardes we be not reputed ryghtuous for Christis sake but that fyrst we ought by other obseruations to deserue to be reputed ryghtuous Also to a testament made by man nothynge ought to be added Ergo to the testament of god whiche promysethe that for Christis sake he wyll be mercyfull vnto vs it oughte not to be added that fyrste by these obseruations we ought to merite to be reputed acceptable ryghtuous Howbeit wherto nedethe any longe disputation No tradition hath ben instituted by the holy fathers for this entent that it shulde merite forgyuenes of synnes but they haue ben instituted for cause of good ordre to be had in the churche and for cause of traÌ„quilitie And though any man wolde institute certeyn workes to deserue remission of synnes or ryghtuousnes howe shall he know that those warkê please god whan he hath no testimonie or witnes of the worde of god Howe shall he make men assured of the wyll of god withoute the coÌ„maundement and worde of god Dothe not god euerywhere in the prophetes forbydde to institute any peculiar maner of honour or seruice without his coÌ„mauÌ„dement In Ezechiel it is wryten thus In the preceptes of your fathers do ye not walke neyther do ye kepe theyr iudgementes ne be ye polluted with the ydoles of them I am your lorde god â–ª walke in my preceptes and kepe my iudgementes and worke ye them If it be laufull for men to institute worshyppyngê or seruice and by the sayde seruices they merite grace â–ª than shall the honourynge seruice of all nations be to be allowed than the honours instituted by Ierohoam other without the lawe shal be to be approued For what difference is there if it hath ben laufull for vs to institute seruices profitable to merite grace or iustice whye was not the same thynge laufull to the gentyles and to the chyldren of Israel But therfore were the honours of the Gentyles and of the Israelites disalowed because they thought them selues by the sayde honours to merite remission of sinnes and iustice and dyd not knowe the iustice of fayth Finally wherby be we made sure that honours or seruices instituted by men without the coÌ„maundement of god do iustifie For of the wyll pleasure of god nothynge can be affermed without the worde of god What if god dothe not accepte ne allowe these seruices Howe than do oure aduersaries afferme that they iustifie sythe this thynge can
worke it may holde her handes from murdre from adulterie from thefte Sythe there is lefte in the nature of man reason and iudgement of thynges sensible there is lefte also a choyse of these thynges and a libertie and power to worke ciuile iustice For yâ— doth the scripture cal the iustice of the flesshe whiche iustice carnal nature that is to say reason dothe worke by her owne selfe withoute the holy ghooste howbeit the strength of concupiscence is so greate that men do more often obeye and folowe lewde affections than the ryght iudgement And the deuyll who hath greate power ouer wycked persones as saynt Paule saythe dothe not ceasse to styrre and prouoke this weyke nature vnto diuerse and sondry synnes These be the causes wherfore euen ciuile iustice also is so seldome a thynge amonge men that as â—e do see not the philosophers them selues haue attayned it whiche seme to haue greately desyred it But this is a false sayeng to say that man doth not synne whiche dothe the workes of the coÌ„maundementê out of grace And they adde also more that remission of synnes and iustification is due of necessitie to suche maner workes For the hertes of men without the holy ghoste be without feare of god without trust towardes god they do not beleue that they be herde of god that theyr synnes be forgyuen that they be holpen and saued of god Therfore they be wycked But so it is that an euyll tree can not brynge forthe good frutes And without faythe it is impossible to please god Wherfore although we graunt vnto frewyll libertie and power to worke the outwarde workes of the lawe yet we graunt not to frewyll power to worke spirituall workes that is to witte to drede god truelye to beleue and truste in god truelye to decree with it selfe truelye and to thynke that god dothe loke vpon vs doth heare vs dothe forgyue vs. c. These be the verye workes of the fyrst table whiche maÌ„nes herte can not worke without the holye ghooste as Paule saythe The naturall man that is to saye man vsynge onely his naturall powers dothe not perceyue those thynges whiche be of god And this may be iudged if men consydre howe the hertes do thynke of the wyll of god whether they do verelye decree with them selues that they be fauoured and herde of god This fayth it is an herde thyng euen for holy men also to kepe and holde fast ergo moche lesse it is in wycked men and it is receyued as we sayd before whan hertê thrughly made affrayde do heare the gospell and do take consolation and conforte This distribution therfore or diuision is profitable in whiche ciuile iustice is assigned and gyuen to frewyll spirituall iustice to the gouernauÌ„ce of the holy hhoste in them that be regenerate and borne agayne in Christe For so is kepte and reteyned good ordre and discipline For all men ought to knowe bothe that god dothe require that ciuile iustice and that we be able after a certeine maner to ê‘fourme fulfyll it And yet neuertheles there is shewed the diuersitie betwyxte ciuile iustice and spirituall iustice betwyxte philosophicall iustice and the doctrine of the holy ghoste and it may be ê‘ceiued where we haue nede of the holy ghoste Neyther is this diuision fyrst inuented by vs â–ª but the scripture dothe moste euideÌ„tly teache it Augustine also treateth of the same and of late dayes it was very well handeled of Wyllyam of Parrhise but it is vngraciously and wyckedly troden vnder foote and oppressed by them whiche haue dreamed that men may obeye the lawe of god without the holy ghoste And that the holye ghoost is gyuen there where is respecte of merites ⧠Of the cause of synne THe .xix. article our aduersaries receyue in whiche we confesse that althoughe one god alone hath created made all nature and doth conserue and kepe all thingê that be yet that notwithstandynge the cause of synne is in the deuyll and men a wyll turnynge it selfe awaye from god accordynge to the sayenge of Christe of the deuyll Cum loquitur mendacium ex propriâ—s loquitur Whan he speaketh a lye he speaketh of his owne ⧠Of workes IN the .xx. article they put these wordê expressely that they do reiecte and disalowe our sayenge that men do not merite forgyuenes of synnes by good workes This article they do saye openly and playnly that they do reiecte disalowe What is to be sayd in a matter so manifest Here the workmaysters of the confutation do openly shewe and declare with what spirite they be moued and ledde For what is more certein vndoubted in the churche thaÌ„ that forgyuenes of sinnes coÌ„meth freely for Christê sake that Christe is the mercy stocke for our synnes not oure workes as Peter sayth To hym all the prophetê beare witnesse that in his name al they that beleue in hym do receyue remission of synnes To this churche of the prophetes let vs assente and agree rather than to these vngratious writers of the coÌ„futation whiche so boldely without shame blaspheme Christe For although there haue ben certein writers whiche haue thought that after the remission of synnes men be ryghtuouse in the syghte of god not by fayth but by the selfe workes yet dyd they neuer thinke this that the remission of synnes doth come for our workes sake and not freelye for Christis sake Therfore this blasphemye is not to be suffred that the honoure of Christe be gyuen translated to our workê These diuines be ashamed of nothiÌ„g if they dare pronounce suche maner sentence in the Churche And we do not doubte but that the Emperours maiestie and the mooste parte of the princis wolde in no wyse leaue this place remaynynge in the confutation if they were admonyshed ⧠⧠We coulde in this place recite infinite authorities and testimonies of the scripture and of the fathers but we haue sayd many thynges alredye of this matter heretofore And there is no nede to reherse many testimonies vnto hym whiche knowethe wherfore Christe was gyuen vnto vs and whiche knoweth that Christ is the mercy stocke for our synnes Esaie sayth The lorde hath layde on hym the iniquities of vs. Our aduersaries do teache the coÌ„trary that god dothe laye our iniquities not on Christe but on our owne workes Neyther it lustethe me here to tell what maner workê they teache We do se an horrible decree to be made agaiÌ„st vs whiche shulde feare vs a greate dele more if we dyd stryue aboute doubtfull or tryflynge matters But nowe for asmoche as our consciences do vnderstande and knowe that oure aduersaries condempne the manifeste truthe the defence wherof is necessarye to the hole churche and dothe amplifie and set forth the glorie of Christ we easyly despise al terrours and punyshementes of the worlde and with a bolde mynde we shall abyde and suffre if any thyng is to be suffred for the glorie of Christ and for
of the applicacion whiche they fayne to merite vnto others remission of synnes In dede it may be called an oblation because there be offered prayers thankes gyuyng and all that hole ceremonie lykewyse as it is called Eucharistia But neyther the ceremonies neyther the prayers be ê“fitable by the owne vertue without fayth How be it here we dispute not of the prayers but properly of the souper of the lorde The Greke canon also speaketh many thingê of oblation but it declareth openlye that it speaketh not properly of the body bloud of our lorde but of the hole masse of yâ— prayers and thankes gyuynge For the Greke worde maye be thus translated in to oure englysshe tongue And make vs worthye to offre vnto the o lorde prayers supplications and sacrifices vnbloudy for all the hole people If this be ryght vnderstaÌ„de there is no hurte in it For it desyrethe that we maye be made worthy to offre prayers and supplicatioÌ„s and vnbloudy sacrificê for the people It calleth the very prayers vnbloudy hostê or sacrificê Likewise as a lytle after it sayth Yet we offre vnto the this reasonable vnbloudy honour For they expounde it folyshelye who soeuer had rather expounde this place for a reasonable hoste applye it to the body of Christ whan the canon speakethe of the hole seruice of the Masse And Paule vsethe this worde reasonable honour agaiÌ„st yâ— worke wrought meanynge by it the seruice of the mynde that is to say feare inuocation thankes gyuynge But where our aduersaries defende the application of the ceremonie for the delyuerynge of soules oute of Purgatorye by the reason wherof they gette infinite lucre and money they haue no testimonies nor coÌ„mauÌ„dmentes out of the scripturê And it is no small synne to ordeyne suche ceremonies or seruicê in the churche without the coÌ„maundemente of god or any example of the scripture and to applye vnto deade men the souper of the lorde whiche was ordeyned for a remembraunce and to be preached amonge quicke men This is to abuse the name of god agaynste the seconde coÌ„maundemente for fyrst it is iniurie and dishonour to the gospell a man to thynke that the ceremonie by vertue of the worke that is wrought without faythe is a sacrifice reconcilyng god and satisfienge for synnes It is I say an horrible abominable sayenge that the worke of the preest is of as moche streÌ„gth as is the deathe of Christe Secondarily syn and deathe can nat be ouercomeÌ„ but by faythe in Christe as Paule teacheth we iustified by faythe haue peace ergo the payne of Purgatory can nat be ouercomen by the applyenge of another mannes worke We wyll passe ouer here what maner testimonies our aduersaries haue of Purgatorye what maner paynes they iudge the paynes of Purgatorie be what maner causes the doctryne of satisfactions hathe whiche doctrine we haue here before shewed to be moste vayne This thyng only we shall laye agaynst them it is moste certayne and vndoubted that the souper of the lorde was ordeyned for the remission of the gylte for it offereth remission of synnes in whiche case we muste nedis by it vnderstonde the gylte and yet neuertheles it satisfieth nat for the gylte for than the masse shulde be egall to the deathe of Christe Neyther remission of the gylte can â—e otherwyse receiued then by faythe wherfore we may coÌ„clude that the masse is no satisfaction but a promyse and sacrifice requiringe faythe And forsothe all good and godly men can nat but be sore greued in theyr hartes if they shulde thynke that the Masse for the moste parte is translated and applyed to deade men and to satisfactioÌ„s for paynes This is to take away contynual sacrifice out of the churche This is the kyngdome of Antiochus whiche hathe translated the moste holsome promyses of remission of synne and of faythe vnto the moste vayne opinions of satisfactions This is to defyle the gospell to corrupre the vse of the sacramentê These be they whom Paule sayde be gyltie of the body and bloud of the lorde whiche haue oppressed the doctrine of faythe and remission of synne and vnder the preteÌ„ce of satisfactioÌ„s haue abused the body bloude of the lorde to moste cursed lucre But they shall one day suffre for this abominable sacrilege Wherfore we and all good consciences muste take hede that we approue nat the abuses of our aduersaries But let vs retourne to our matier Forasmoche as the masse is nat a satisfaction neyther for punyshement nor for syn by the vertue of the worke wrought without faythe it foloweth that the applieng of it for deade men is vnprofitable Neyther do we nede here any lenger disputation For it is vndoubted that these applicatioÌ„s for deade meÌ„ be nat grounded vpon the scriptures And it is ieoperdous to institute any honour or seruice to god without auctoritie of scripture That if we shall se nede at any tyme we shall speake more largely of this matire For wherunto shulde we braule nowe with our aduersaries whiche neither vnderstande what sacrifice is nor what a sacramente is nor what remission of synnes is nor what faythe is Neyther dothe the Greke canon applye the oblation as a satisfaction for deade men for it applyeth it indifferently to all the blessed patriarches prophetes apostles It appereth therfore that the Grekes offre it as a thaÌ„kes gyuing and applye it nat as a satisfaction for punyshementes Howbeit they speake nat of the onely oblation of the body and bloude of the lorde but of the other partes of the masse that is to wete of prayers thankes gyuing For after the consecration they praye that it may profite them that receyue it they speake nat of other men Afterwardê they adde these wordes in theyr tongue We offre also vnto the this reasonable seruice for them that reste in the faythe our fyrste fathers patriarches prophetes and apostles c. But reasonable seruice dothe nat here betoken the verie hoste but signifieth the prayers and al thinges that be done there Nowe where our aduersaries alledge the fathers as concerning oblation for deade men we knowe that the olde fathers speake of prayer made for deade men whiche we wyll nat forbydde but the applyeng of the souper of the lorde for deade men because of the worke wrought this we disalowe Neither the olde fathers defeÌ„â—e or aduersaries iÌ„ theyr opinion of the worke wrought And thoughe they haue neuer somuche the testimonies of Gregorie and of other writers oâ— late time for them we sette agaynste them moste open and moste vndoubted scriptures Nowe there is greate vnlyknes and diuersitie betwixt scripture and fathers They were men and myghte erre Howebeit if they were nowe alyue saw theyr owne sayenges made a buckler and defense to those open lyes whiche our aduersaries teache of the worke wrought they wolde expoune theyr owne sayengê farre otherwyse Our aduersaries also falsely alledge agaynste vs the condempnation of one
fauour and that theyr synnes be forgyuen for Christes sake who with his dethe hath satisfyed for our synnes Thys faythe god reputeâ—h and taketh in stede of ryghtwysnes before hym As Paule teacheth in the thyrde fourth chapiters to the Romans To the obteynynge of this fayth was ordeyned the ministerie of teachynge the gospell and gyuinge the sacramentes For by the worde by the sacramentes as by instrumentes is gyuen the holy gost who worketh fayth wher and whan it pleaseth god in them whiche heare the gospel that is to wyt that god nat for our own merites but for Christe iustifyeth those whiche beleue that they be receiued into fauour grace for Christes sake They dampne the Anabaptistes other which thynke that the holy gost cuÌ„meth to men without any eâ—terne or outwarde worke by there owne preparations and workes Also they teach that this faythe ought to briÌ„ge forth good frutes that men ought to do good warkes coÌ„maunded by god because of goddes wyll and pleasure but nat that we shulde truste that by tho workes we deserue to be iustifyed in the syght of god For the forgyuenes of synnes and iustification is purchased by fayth as testifyeth also Christ which sayth WheÌ„ ye haue done al these thinges yet say we be vnprofytaâ—le seruauntes The same thynge the olde wryters of the churche do teache For. S Ambrose sayth Hoc constitutum est a deo vt qui credit in Christum saluus sit sine opere â–ª so la fide gratis accipiens remissionem peccatorum That is to saye That is ordeyned and instituted of god that who beleueth in christ is saued without worke only by fayth freely receyuynge forgyuenes of synnes Also they teache that one holy Church shall continually remayne The churche is a congregation of holy persons in whiche congregation or company the Gospell is ryghtly taught and the sacramentes ryghtly ministred Aâ—d to the true vnitye of the churche it is ynoughe to consent of the doctryne of the gospell and ministration of the sacramentes Neyther is it requisite that in euery place be lyke humane traditions rytes or ceremonies ordeyned and instituted by men As Paule sayth one faythe one baptyme one God and father of all cÌ„ All thoughe the church properly be a congregation of holy parsons and of true beleuers yet neuertheles sythe in this lyfe many hypocrites and euyll parsones be myxt amonge the good it is lawefull to vse the sacramentes whiche be ministred by euel men accordynge to the sainge of Christe The scribes and phariseis syt in the chayre of Moyses cÌ„ And the Sacramentes and word because of thordinaunce and coÌ„maundement of Christ be effectual not withstandynge they be ministred by euyll parsons They dampne the Donatistes and suche lyke whiche denyed it to be lawfull for vs to vse the ministerie of euyl men in the church and which thought that the minysterie of euyll men was vnprofytable and of none effecte Of baptyme they teache that it is necessarye to saluation and that by baptyme is offered the grace of god that chyldren are to be baptized whiche by baptyme beynge offered to god be receyued into the fauour and grace of god They daÌ„pne the Anabaptystes which disalowe the baptyme of Chyldren and saye that chyldren be saued without baptysme Of the souper of the lorde they teach that the bodie and blode of Christe be verely present and he distributed to the eaters iÌ„ the souper or mauÌ„dy of the lorde and dysproue them that teache other wyse Of confession they teache that priuate absolution in churches ought to be retayned kepte althoughe in confessyon the rehersall of all the sines be not necessarie For it is vnpossyble according to the psalmist Delicta quis intelligit who vnderstandeth his synnes Of penaunce they teache that they which after baptysme be fallen agayne into synne maye be forgyuen of theyr synnes what tyme so euer they turne and repente And that the churche to suche which returne to repentaunce ought to gyue the benefyte of absolution And penaunce standeth properly in these two partes that is to say in contrition whiche is a feare dryuen in to the conscience after that synne is espied And in faythe whiche is conceyued by the gospell or absolution and whiche beleueth that for Christes sake the sinnes be forgeuen and comforteth the conscience and delyueteth it from terrours feares After that muste folowe good workes whiche be the frutes of penaunce They dampne the Anabaptistes whiche denye that they which be ones iustifyed may lose the holy ghost Also those whiche contende that to some men so greate perfection do chaunce iÌ„ this lyfe that they can nat synne They daÌ„pne also the Nouarâ—ans whiche wolde nat assoyle those that were fallen after baptyme came agayne to repentaunce They reiecte and disalowe also those which teache nat that remission of sinnes is gyuen by faythe but that it cummeth by our owne loue and workes They be also disallowed and reiected whiche teache that the Canonical satisfactions be necessarie to redeme euerlastynge paynes or paynes of purgatorie Of the vse of the sacramentes they teache that the sacramentes be ordeyned and instituted nat only that they shulde be cognysauncies badges or markes by whiche Christyan men are discerned and knowen frome other people But rather that they shulde be sygnes and testymonyes of the wyll of god towarde vs to styrre vppe and to conferme faythe in vs which vse them so propowned Wherfore we muste so vse the sacramentes that faythe be added and putte vnto them to th entent we maye beleue the promyses whiche be exhibyted and shewed by the sacramentes They dampne therfore those whiche teache that sacramentes euen by theyr owne proper vertue do iustifye which teache not that fayth is requyred in the vsynge of the sacramentes which fayth may beleue that sinnes be forgiuen Of the Ecclesiasticall order they teache that no man ought openly to teache in the churche or congregatyon or mynistre the sacramentes onles he be duely and lawefully there vnto called and appoynted Of the rytes of the churche they teache that such rytes ought to be kept which may be kept without syn and whiche be ê“fytable to a tranquillitie and good order in the churche as certayne holy dayes feastfull dayes and lyke yet neuertheles of such rytes and ceremonies men be admonyshed leste theyr consciencies be combred as thoughe such ceremonies be necessarie to saluation They be also admonyshed that mans traditions ordeyned to pacifye god to deserue grace and to satisfye for synnes be contrarie to the gospel and doctrine of fayth Wherfore vowes and traditions of meates so forthe ordeyned to purchase grace and to satisfye for synnes be vnprofytable and agaynst the gospell Of politik or ciuile thynges they teache that lawful ordinauncies for a publyke weale be the good workes of god and that it is lawfull for
Christian men to bere officies and authorities to excercise iudgementes to iudge thinges accordinge to themperours lawes or other preseÌ„t lawes of kynges and rulers to execute due punyshmentes by the lawe to holde batel or warre by the lawe to be a soudiour to coÌ„tracte or bargayn by the lawe to holde a thiÌ„ge in proprietie to take an othe when officers do lawefully require it to mary a wyfe to take an husbande They condempne the Anabaptistes whiche inhibite forbydde these ciuile offyces to christen men They daÌ„pne also those whiche do not putte the perfection of the gospell in the dreade of god and faythe but in leauynge forsakynge or gyuynge ouer of polytike and ciuile offyces For the gospel teacheth the eternal rightwisnes of the harte So that it destroyeth not the politike and ciuile gouernaunce but chiefly requireth the conseruation of the same as good ordenauÌ„ces of god to exercise and practise charitie in suche ordenaunces Therfore necessariely Christen men ought to obey theyr gouernours and their lawes saue wheÌ„ they commaunde sin for then they be rather bounden to obey god thaÌ„ man as it is sayed iÌ„ the fyfte chap. of the Actes Also they teach that Christ shal appere iÌ„ the ende of the worlde to iudge and shall rayse vp agayne all that be deade and shall gyue to the godly and electe people euerlastynge lyfe perpetuall ioyes but the wycked men and deuilles â—e shal condeÌ„pne to be tormeÌ„ted with out ende They daÌ„pne the Anabaptistes which thinke that the payne of euyl men and of deuylles shal haue an ende They dampne also other whiche nowe a dayes do sowe abrode iudaâ—cal opinions that before the ResurrectioÌ„ of the deade the wicked shal be oppressed in euery place the good men shal occupy possesse the kingdome of the world Of fre wyl they teache that mans wyll hath some libertie to worke ciuile outwarde rightwysnes and to chose out thinges subiecte vnto reason but it hath nat myght without the holy goste to do the ryghtwisnes of god or spiritual ryghtuousnes â—or a man lefte to the power of his owne soule whoÌ„ Paule calleth animalem hominem perceyueth not the thynges that be of the spirite of god but this ryghtwisnes is framed and made in the hartes wheÌ„ the holy gost is coÌ„ceyued by the worde This sayeth Austyne with lyke wordes iÌ„ his thyrde boke of hypognosticon We graunt sayth S. Austyne that euery man hauynge reasonable iudgement hathe free wyll not that he is able in thiÌ„ges perteyning to god without god ether to begyn or at the leste waye to make an ende but only in the warkes of this preseÌ„t life aswele good as euyl In good warkes I say which do issue forth of the goodnes of nature as to wyl to labour in the felde to wyll to eate and drynke to wyll to haue a freÌ„de to wyl to haue clothiÌ„ge to wyl to make a house to wyll to marye a wyfe to noryshe beastes to learne a crafte of diuerse good thinges to wyll whatsoeuer good thynge apperteyneth to thys presente lyfe of the whiche thinges none hathe beinge without the gouernaunce of god yea of hym and by hiÌ„ they be and began to be Euyll workes I say as to wyll to honour an Image or Idolle to do manslaughter cÌ„ They dampne the Pelagians other which teache that without the holie ghoste onely by strengthe of nature we may loue god aboue all thinges do the preceptes of god as touching the substaunce of the actes as they cal it For though nature can some what do the outwarde workes for nature maye kepe her hande frome killinge of meÌ„ yet she caÌ„ nat worke the inwarde motyons as the dreade of god the trust in god chastite pacience cÌ„ Of the cause of syn they teach that although god doth create conserue nature yet the cauâ—â— of synne is the wyll of them that be euyl that is to say of the deuyll of the wycked men which wyll when god helpeth not turneth it selfe froÌ„ god as Christ sayth in the eyght chap. of IohnÌ„ when he speaketh a lye he speaketh of hiÌ„ selfe Our techers be falsely accused that they prohibite and forbidde good workes For their writynges whiche go abrode of the .x. commaundementes and other of lyke matter do witnes that they haue taught profytably of all kyndes of lyuinge offices as what kyndes of lyuinge what workes do please god in euery callinge Of which thiÌ„ges prechers heretofore spake but litle only they magnifyed and did set forth chyldishe and vnnecessary warkes as certeyne holy dayes certayne fastinges fraternities guyldes or brotherhedes pylgrymages worshippynges of sayntes rosaries entringe into relygion and such other lyke Our aduersaries throughe our monition do nowe vnlearne leaue thys gere so that they preach not these vnprofytable workes so moche as they dyd before Furthermore they beginne to make mention of faythe of the whiche nowe this great while hathe bene meruelous sylence all though they cease not to obscure and darken the doctrine of faythe in that they leaue mens coÌ„sciences in a doubt bydding theÌ„ purchase remission of synnes with warkes But they teache not that throughe Christe by only faythe we may be sure to haue remyssyon of synne For as moche therfore as the doctrine of faythe whiche ought to be the chiefeste and principal in the churche hath lyen so longe vnknowen as we muste all nedes confesse that of the ryghtuousnes of faythe most depe and profounde sylence hath bene in preachinges that allouly the doctrine of workes hath bene exercised and coÌ„uersauÌ„t in churches therfore I say our teachers haue warned monished the churches of faythe in thys wyse as foloweth fyrste that our workes can nat reconcile god vnto vs or deserue remyssyon of synnes and grace and iustifycation but thys we gette only by faythe beleuynge that only for Christes sake we be receyued into fauour who only is sette forth and purposed vnto vs a mediatour a mercy stocke by whoÌ„ the father is reconciled and his fauour goten agayne Therfore he that trusteth to deserue fauour or grace with workes despyseth the meryte grace of Christe and seketh a way and cummynge to God with mannes power without Christ where as Christe sayde of hymselfe I am the waye the truthe and the lyfe This doctryne of fayth is euery where treated in Paule as to the Eph. 2. by grace ye are made saâ—e throughe faythe and that not of your selfe it is the gyft of god not of workes cÌ„ But here leste peraduenture a man wolde make cauillations and craftely lay for hym selfe agaynst vs that we haue deuised and founde out this newe interpretatyon of Paule I saye that all thys cause or matter hath for the mayntenance of it the authoritie and witnes of olde and aunciente fathers For S. Austyne in many volumes defendeth grace rightuousnes of fayth agaynst merites of workes
And S. Ambrose doth teache lyke thynges in the boke intituled of the callynge of the geÌ„tilles and other For in the boke of the callinge of the gentilles he sayeth in this wyse The redemptyon of the bloude of Christ were but vyle and lytle wrothe neyther the prerogatyue of mannes workes shulde gyue place to the mercy of god yf ryghtuousnes whiche is made by grace were due to the merytes goinge before so that it shulde not be the gyfte of the gyuer but the rewarde of the worker But nowe althoughe thys doctryne is contempned and lytle sette by of theÌ„ that be ignoraunt and lacke knowledge yet good feareful conscyences do knowe by experyence howe confortable it is for conscyences can not be made quiet and at reste by any workes but allonly by faythe and that is when they be assured decre for a certayntie that throughe Christe god is appeased lyke as Paule teacheth Ro. 5. sayng When we be made ryghtuous by fayth we be at peace with god Al this doctrine is to be referred to the conflicte or batayll of a troubled conscience and without this conflycte it can nat be well vnderstaÌ„de wherfore men without knowledge and whiche be vnlerned in the scriptures do iudge a mysse of this matter whiche dreame that christian ryghtuousnes is nothing els but ciuile and philosophicall ryghtuousnes In tymes passed coÌ„sciences were vexed with the doctrine of workes but they harde not the conforte out of the gospell Some theyr coÌ„science drawe out inâ—o wyldernes into Monasteries and places of religion trustynge that there they shulde meryte get grace with solitary and monasticall lyfe And dyuerse men founde out dyuerse workes to wynne grace and to make satisfactyon for theyr synnes Wherfore it was greatly nedefull to teache and to renewe thys doctryne of fayth in Christ lest feareful consciences shuld lacke comforte and that they myght learne that grace remission of sinne and iustifycation may be atteyned throughe faythe in Christe Also men be monished warned that here the name of faythe doth not signifye only the knowledge of the historye suche as is the faythe in wycked men and deuylles but doth sygnifye the faythe that beleueth not only the history but also the effecte of the historye that is to say this artycle remyssion of synnes I meane to speake more planly that thorough Christ by Christes merytes and for Chrystes sake we maye haue grace ryghtuousnes and remission of synnes Nowe he that knoweth that through Christe he hathe the father mercyfull and fauorable to hiÌ„ he truly knoweth god he knoweth that god is careful for hiÌ„ he loueth god and calleth vpon hym and shortly to conclude he is nat without god as the Gentilles be for deuylles wycked men caÌ„ nat beleue this artycle remission of synnes Therfore they hate god as an enemy they call not vpon hym they loke for no goodnes of hym Austyne also dothe warne the reader of the name of fayth after lyke maner teacheth that this worde fayth in scrypture is takeÌ„ not for knowledge suche as is in wycked men but for truste whiche doth comforte and rayse vppe fearefull and tremblynge myndes Furthermore our meÌ„ teach that it is necessarye to do good workes not that we shulde truste to deserue grace by them but because it is the wyl of god that we shuld do them Remission of sinnes and peace of conscience is taken allouly by faythe And because the holy goste is taken throughe faythe therfore forthwith hartes are renewed and endued with newe affectyons so that they maye brynge forthe good workes for so sayth Ambrose that fayth is the mother and brynger forthe and getter of good wyll and of iuste and ryghtuous doynge For mannes power without the holye ghoste is full of wycked affections and more weake and feble then that it can do workê that be good before god More ouer it is vnder the dominion of the deuyl which driueth meÌ„ violently to diuerse siÌ„nes to wicked opinions to manifeste and open crymes as we may see in philosophers whiche although they endeuoured theÌ„ selues to lyue honestly yet they coulde not bryng it to passe but were contaminate polluted with many open crimes Such is the imbecilitie and feblenes of man when he is without faythe and the holy ghoste and gouerneth hiÌ„ selfe allouly with his owne streÌ„gth By this it is open inough that this doctrine is not to be accused as prohibitynge good workes but moche rather to be lauded and praysed as shewyng vnto vs howe we may do good workes for without faythe the nature of man can in no wyse do the workes of the fyrste and of the seconde precepte without fayth a man maketh not inuocation to god he loketh for nothyng of god be bereth nat the crosse but seketh for maÌ„s helpe trustinge in mans helpe So in the harte reygneth all maner of lustes and desyers and humane counselles when faythe is a waye and truste towarde god wherfore Christe also sayde that without me ye can nothinge do IohnÌ„ 15. and the churche syngeth without thy influence nothinge is in man nothinge is vngyltye Of honorynge of saintes they teach that the memorie or rememberaunce of sayntes may be purposed or set forth to thentente that we may folowe theyr fayth and theyr good workes accordynge to our vocatyon and callynge as the Emperour may folowe the ensample of Dauyd in holdynge batayll to dryue a waye the Turke from his couÌ„tray for eyther of them is a kynge but scrypture teacheth nat to call vpon sayntes or to aske helpe of sayntes for scripture setteth forth vnto vs Christe allone as a meane a pacifyer or a Byshope and an Intercessour he is to be prayed vnto and he hathe promysed that he wyl heare our prayers he chiefly alloweth this honor that is to say that he be called vpoÌ„ in all afflyctions 1. IohnÌ„ 3. yf any man syn we haue an aduocate with god and so forth This is all moste the some of the doctryne with vs in whiche as euery man may see there is nothing that varyeth from scripture or from the catholyke and vniuersal churche or from the churche of Rome so farre forth as it is knowen of writers The whiche thynge sythe it is thus these felowes iudge vngently and cruelly which require our men to be had reputed and taken for heretykes There is no dissensyon but aboute certayne abuses which haue cropeÌ„ inâ—o the churches without sure auctorytie In yâ— which also yf there shulde be any dissimilitude yet it myght beseme byshoppes to be of suche leâ—ite and myldues that for thys confession whiche we haue nowe rehersed they wolde suffer our men For the verie Canons them selues be not so harde ne so strayt to require the selfe same vsages and rites to be euery where Nor there was neuer in any tyme lyke rytes in all churches all though with vs the olde rytes for the most part are dyligently obserued and kept For it
and vestures These obseruations had by longe prescription of time won them selues a very hyghe an honeste tytle for they onely were called the spiritual lyfe perfecte lyfe But in the meane season the preceptes of god executed accordinge to a mans vocation and callynge had no laude nor prayse as that the father and good man of the house brought vp his children that the mother chylded that the prynce gouerned the comen welthe these thynges were thought to be worldly workes and vnperfect and farre worse then those shyninge and glitteringe obseruations And thys errour dyd greatly vexe greue wel disposed consciencies which were sory that they were holden in an vnperfecte kynde state of lyuinge as in mariage in gouernaunce and in other offices ciuile ministrations On the other syde they magnifyed and had in hyghe reputation the Monkes and such lyke cloisterers whiche call them selues religious parsons and thought though vntruly that theyr obseruations dyd a greate dele more deserue remission of synnes and iustifycation than the symple lyfe of a christian man dyd Thirdly traditions brought greate parell and daunger to consciences for it was impossible to kepe al traditions and yet men iudged these obseruations to be necessary worshyppynges and honoryng of god Gerson writeth that many dyd fall into desperation and that some also dyd kyll them selues for because they thought that they coulde not satisfye the traditions and in the meane season they harde no comforte of the ryghtuousnes of fayth and of grace We see makers of Summes and diuines to abbridge and gather traditions and to seke Epikees that is to say moderations or fauorable interpretations tâ— th eÌ„tent to ease consciences and yet they bringe not theyr purpose sufficiently to passe but some tymes they snare and tangle consciences more and more And in gatheriÌ„ge together of traditions scoles and sermones haue bene so occupied that they haue not had leiser once to touche scripture and to seke the more profitable doctrine of fayth of the crosse of hope of the worthines of ciuile or politik thinges of coÌ„forte of conscience in most bytter temptations Therfore Gerson and certayn other diuines haue greuously complayned that they were so combred and entangled with these paynfull traditions that they coulde not occupy them selues in a better kynde of doctrine And Austine dothe inhibite to charge consciences with such obseruations and ful wysely doth admonishe and warne Ianuarie his frende that he shulde knowe that they be to be obserued and kepte indifferently for this is his terme Wherfore men ought not to thynke that our learned men haue touched thys matter without cause why or for hatred of byshoppes as some men falsely do thynke There was greate necessitie to warne the churches of these errours whiche were spronge out of traditions amysse vnderstonden For the gospell compelleth to promote and sette forthe in the churches the doctryne of grace and the ryghtuousnes of faythe whiche neuertheles can not be vnderstonded if men do thinke that they do meryte remission of synnes and iustification by obseruations of their owne electyon Therfore they taught on this wyse that by obseruation and kepyng of mannes traditions we can not get remission of synnes and iustifycation and therfore it is not to be thought that such obseruations be necessary honours of god They adde authorities of scripture Christe accuseth the apostels whiche kepte not the customable and vsed tradition whiche neuertheles semed to be a thinge not vnlawful but a meane thinge and to haue a certayne affinitie or neyberhode with the baptismes and wasâ—hinges of the lawe and sayeth They honour me in vayne with commaundementes of men Ergo he requireth not an vnprofytable honor And a lytle after he addeth all thinge that entreth into the mouthe dothe not inquinate nor deâ—yle man Paule also to the Roma sayeth the kingdome of god is not meate nor drinke Also to the Collette no man iudge you in meate drinke sabboâ— daye or holy daye Also a lytle after he sayth yf ye be deade with Christe from the elementes of the worlde why as thoughe ye were lyuinge in the worlde do ye kepe decrees touche thou not taste thou nat haÌ„dle thou nat Peter also in the actes sayeth why do ye tempte god layeng a yoke vpon the neckes of the disciples whiche neyther we nor our fathers were able to beare but we beleue to be saued aswell as they by the grace of our lorde Iesu Christ. Here Peter forbyddith to charge consciences with many rites and ceremonies either of Moyses or elles of others And iÌ„ the firste epistle to Timothe Paule calleth ê“hibition of meates the doctrine of deuilles for it is againste the gospell to institute or do suche workê that by them we may merite and gette remissioÌ„ of synnes and ryghtuousnes or that christianite coulde not be without suche an honouring of god Here our aduersaries obiecte lay agaynste vs that our men do ê“hibite discipline and mortification of the flesshe as Iouinian dyd but the contrary shal be knowen by the writing of our lerned men for they haue alwayes taughte of the crosse that it behoueth Cristen men to suffre tribulacions or afflictions For this is the true the earneste the vnfayned mortificacioÌ„ I meane to be exercised with diuerse afflictions to be crucified with Christe Moreouer they teche yâ— euery christeÌ„ maÌ„ ought so to exercise subdue hym selfe with corporall exercises labours that saturitie and fulnes of metes and drinkes or slothfulnes do not ê“voke and pryck hym forwarde to synne but not that we can deserue by these exercises remissioÌ„ of sin or pardon of eternal deathe And it behouith to sette forth this corporall discipline at all tymes not alonly at a fewe certein daies ordeyned to the same purpose as Christe coÌ„mauÌ„dith Cauetâ— ne corda vestra grauentur crapula .1 beware that your hertes be not greued with surfaiting Also Hoc genus demoniorum non eiicitur nisi oratione et ieiunio .1 this kynde of diuelles is not cast forth but with fasting and prayer and Paule saieth Castigo corpus meum et in seruitutem redigo .1 I chastice my body bring it into seruitude bondage where he shewyth clerely yâ—â—e dyd chastice his body not to deserue by that discipline remission of syn but to haue his body in boÌ„dage and apte to spirituall thynges and to do his calling Therfore the fastingê theÌ„ selues are not coÌ„deÌ„pned but the traditions which prescribe and appointe certain daies certein meates with peâ—yl of coÌ„science as though those maner of workes were necessary honouringes of god Yet many traditioÌ„s be kepte with vs which helpe to this that thynges be doone orderly in the Churche as the ordre of the lessons in the Masse and the chief holydayes be kepte styll But in the mean season men be warned that suche an honour dothe not iustifie or make rightuous before god ne that
determine vpon a perpetuall lyfe Another Canon grauntynge yet more libertie to the weakenes of man addeth mo yeres inhybityng a vowe to be made before the age of .xviii. yeres But whether of them so euer we folowe certes the moste parte hathe a very lawfull and iuste excuse why they shulde forsake theyr monasteries because they vowed before those ages Finally yea although the violacion and breakyng of the vowe coulde be reproued yet it shall nat forthwith folowe that the mariagê of suche persones as haue agaynst theyr vowe maried ought to be dissolued and broken For saint Augustine denyeth that they ought to be broken .27.9.1 capt Nuptiarum Whose auctorite is nat lyght I although other men afterwarde thought other wayes But though goddes commaundemente of mariage may be thought to delyuer many from theyr vowes yet our men bryng also another reason concernyng vowes that they be frustrate and vayne for euery honouryng of god ordeyned chosen of men without the coÌ„maundemente of god to deserue remission of synne and iustification is wycked as Christe sayth They honour me in vayne with coÌ„maundementes of men And Paule teacheth euery where that ryghtuousnes is nat to be sought of thobseruations and honours deuised by men but that it coÌ„mith by faythe to them that beleue that they haue god pacified and mercyfull through Christe nat for any our merites But clere hit is that monkes and freers haue taught that these fayned and made religious deserue remission of synnes and iustification and that they make amendes for synnes I pray you what thynge elles is this but to detracte and plucke awaye from the glorie of Christe and to darken yea to denye the ryghtuousnes of feythe Ergo yt folowith of necessâ—â—e that these accustomed and vsuall vowes be wycked honourynges of god wherfore they be vayne of none effecte For yâ— vowe which is wycked agaynst the coÌ„maundement of god is nothyng worthe for no vowe ought to be a bonde of wyckednes as the Canon it selue saieth Paule saieth ye be auoyded from Christe ye be fallen from grace whiche be iustified in the lawe that is to wytte they that thynke to deserue remission of synnes with theyr owne warkes and to please god for their owne fulfillyng of the lawe and whiche do nat fele that for Christe they frely take by feythe remission of synnes gyuen them by the mercy of god and that for Christe they please god these lose Christe for the truste due to Christe and to the promyse of god they remoue away applie to warkes Also they plede agaynst the wrathe of god nat Christe the mercy stocke but theyr owne warkes so that the honour due to Christ they apply to their warkes But it is clere that monkes and religious persons teache this I meane that they deserue remission of synnes with theyr obseruacions and that they haue god mercyfull vnto them for this cause Wherfore they teache men to trust in theyr warkes nat in the ê“piciacion mercyfulnes of Christe This truste is vngodly wycked and contrary to the gospell and in the iudgemente of god it shal be founde voyde for our workes may nat be pleded agaynste the wrathe and the iudgement of god The wrathe of god is mitigated and swaged only whan we conceyue and take by feythe the fre mercy promysed through Christ. Therfore they lose Christe whiche put theyr truste nat in Christ but in theyr owne warkes Furthermore the Monkes freers religious men dyd teache theyr kynde of lyuynge to be a state of ê‘fection because they kepte nat alouly the preceptes but also the counselles This errour is most repugnaunt to the gospell because they haue fayned them selues so to haue fulfylled the commaundementes that they no more also then they be bounden to And out of this hathe spronge an horrible errour in that they fayned themselues to haue merites of supererogation that is to say more then they were bounden to haue These merites they haue applied for other to be satisfactions for other mennes synnes These thynges if any man were disposed odiously to handle howe many thynges myght he reherse of whiche euen the religious ê‘sons â—hemselues be nowe asshamed Yt is no lyght sclaunder in the churche to purpose set forthe to the people any honourynge of god deuysed by men without the coÌ„maundemente of god and to teache that suche an honour dothe iustifie men make them ryghtuous For the ryghtuousnes of feythe iÌ„ Christ whiche chiefly ought to be taughte iÌ„ the church is thus obscured and darkened whyles these wonderfull angelicall religions as this fayned pouertie this cloked humilitie this hypocriticall chastite be caste before the eyes of men Furthermore the preceptes of god and the true honour of god be darkened obscured defaced whan men do heare that only Monkes freers chauoÌ„s and nunnes be in the state of ê‘fection For the very perfection of a christen man is an other thyng It is earnestly to dreade god and agayne to conceyue faythe and to truste that we haue god pacified contented for Christes sake to aske of god and surely to loke for helpe in all thynges that we haue to do accordyng to out callyng And iÌ„ the meane season to do good workes outwardly and to serue our vocacion In these thynges is the true perfection true honour of god and nat in the vnmaried lyfe or in beggynge or in vile fylthy cotes Also the people conceyue many noysome and perilous opinioÌ„s of those false praysinges of the Monkishe lyfe They heare chastite for so these religious persons â—al it praysed without measure therfore the people do leade theyr lyfe in mariage with offence and grefe of conscience They heare that only beggars be perfecte therfore they kepe possessions and occupy the worlde with an inwarde remorse of conscience They heare that it is a counsell of the gospell nat to auenge therfore priuate persones hearing this be nat affrayed to auenge for they heare that it is but a counsell and naâ— a coÌ„maundemente Other there be which iudge that al rule and ciuiâ—e offices be vnmete for christen men as though they coulde nat stande with good christian .ii. There be redde examples of men whiche forsakynge mariage and forsakyng the administration and rule of he comâ—n wealthe haue hydde themselues in abbeyes or monasteries and this called they to fle out of the worlde and â—o seke a kynde of lyuyng that shulde more please god Nether dyd they see that god ought to be serued in those precep es whiche he hym selfe dyd gyue and teache nat in coÌ„maundemeÌ„tes deuised by men It is a good and a ê‘fecte kynde of lyuyng whiche hathe the precepte of god for it It is necessary to admonishe warne men of these thing And before this tyme also Gerson rebuketh the errour of religious persons as touchynge perfeâ—â—ion and witnesseth that to say the monkisshe or religious lyfe to be a state of perfecâ—ion was
but a newe founde halydaye and a straunge sayeng euen in his tyme. So many wycked opinioÌ„s hang in vowes as that they deserue remission of synnes iustification that they be the christian perfection that they kepe the counselles and the coÌ„maundementes that they haue super fluiâ—e of good workes All these thynges syth they be false and coÌ„trary to Christes doctrine make vowes to be vayne and of none effecte Of the power of the churche GReate disputacions haue ben of the power of bisshoppes iÌ„ which many men haue confusely mengled togyther the power of the churche and the power of the swerde Of this confusion great batailles greate vnquietnes haue proceded whiles bysshoppes bâ—arynge themselues bolde vpon the power of the keys nat allouly haue institute and begonne newe honours of god nat only haue burdonned consciences with reseruation of cases and with violente excoÌ„munications and cursynges but also haue translated and remoâ—ed the kyngdomes of the worlde and gon aboute to take awaye thempire from themperours Well disposed and learned men haue reproued these vices in the churche longe sythen Therfore our preachers to thentente to conforte coÌ„sciences were constrayned to shewe the difference of the ecclesiasticall power and of the power of the swerde haue taughte that eyther of them because of goddes coÌ„maundement is to be had in greate reuerence and honoure as hyghe benefites of god vpon earthe And thus our lerned men thynke this is theyr opinion that the power of the keys or the power of bysshoppes accordyng to the gospell is a power or coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of god to preache the gospell to remitte and retayne lose and bynde synnes and to ministre sacramentes For with that coÌ„maundement Christe sendeth forthe his apostles sayeng as my father hathe sente me euen so I sende you Take the holy ghoste whose synnes ye remitte they be remitted whose synnes ye holde styll they be holden styll Also in the gospell of Marke he saythe Go preache the gospell to euery creature cÌ„ This power is put in execution only by teaching or preachyng the gospell and by ministryng the sacramentes eyther to a multitudeê or elles to one man by hym selue accordyng to his vocation and callyng for here be graunted nat corporall thynges but eternal thynges as eternal ryghtuousnes the holy ghoste eternall lyfe These thynges can nat chauÌ„ce or come but by ministration of the worde and of the sacramentes as Paule saythe The gospell is the power of god to saluation vnto all that beleue therfore sythe the power of the churche graunteth eternall thynges and is exercised only by ministration of the worde it lettith nat ciuile administracion Lyke as the crafte of singynge nothyng lettith ciuile or politicall administration for politicall administration gothe about other thynges then dothe the gospell For the gouernour or ruler defendeth nat myndes but bodies and bodely thynges agaynste manifeste iniuries and restreyneth men with the swerde and corporal paynes to thentente to kepe ciuile iustice and peace Therfore the power of the churche the ciuile power may nat be mixed and confounded together The power of the churche hathe his coÌ„maundemente to teache the gospell and to ministre the sacramentes Let it nat breake into anothers office let it nat translaâ—e altere the kyngdomes of the worlde as the byshops of Rome haue done let iâ— nat abrogate and defete lawes of princes let it nat take awaye due and laufull obedience of the subiecte to his prince let it nat interrupte iudgementeâ— of any ciuile ordenaunces or contractes let it nat prescribe ne appointe lawes to gouernours of the fourme and facion of the comon welthe as Christe saythe My kyngdome is nat of this worlde Also in an other place he sayth Quis me constituit iudicem aut diuisorem super vos that is to say Who made me iudge or deuider ouer you And Paule saith to the PhilippiaÌ„s Our policye or coÌ„uersation is in heuen And to the Corinthes The armure or wepons of our cheualry be nat carnall but mighty through god to destroy cogitacioÌ„s and thoughtes cÌ„ After this sorte do our men diuide they offices and dueties of bothe these powers and teache to honour them bothe and do acknowlege that eche of them is a gyfte benefite of god If byshops haue any power of the swerde that power haue they nat as bysshoppes by the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of the gospel bu by mannes lawe gyuen to them of kynges and emperours to the ciuile ministration of theyr owne goodes So that this is another office thaÌ„ is the ministratioÌ„ of the gospel Therfore when soeuer question is made of the iurisdiction of byshopps the empyre and temporall power ought to be deuided and distincted from the ecclesiastical iurisdiction Undubtedly after the gospell and after goddes lawe no iurisdiction belongeth to byshoppes that is to saye to them to whom is coÌ„mitted the ministration of the worde and of the sacrameÌ„tes saue only this power to remitte and lose siÌ„nes and also to discerne and iudge doctrines and to reiecte a doctrine contrary to the gospel and to exclude and shytte out froÌ„ the coÌ„munion of the church wyckedmen whose wickednes is knowen and this muste be with the worde without mannes violence In these thynges the congregations or churches owe of dutie and be by the law of god bounden to submitte them selues and to shewe obedience accordyng to that sayeng of Christe who hearith you hearith me But when they teache or ordeyne any thynge agaynste the gospell then the congregations haue a coÌ„maundemente of god prohibitynge obedience As this beware of false prophetes and Paule to the Galathians If an aungell from heuen wolde preache or shewe any other gospell accursed be he Also to the Corinthes we can nothynge do agaynste the truthe but for the truthe Also in another place he sayeth Power is gyuen to vs for edification and nat for destruction So also do the canon lawes coÌ„maunde 2. D. 7. cap. Sacerdotes et cap. Oues And. S Austine against the epistle of Petilian sayeth If catholique by shoppes be deceiued any where by chaunce and thynke any thyng agaynst the canonical scriptures of god we ought nat to consent vnto theÌ„ If byshops haue any other power or iurisdictioÌ„ as in cognisauns of plee or in determinynge of certayne causes as of matrimony or of tythes they haue it by mans lawe wherin when the ordinaries fayle to do theyr dueties because eyther they wyll nat or can nat prynces be compelled yea whether they wyll or nat to see the lawe ministred to theyr subiectes for peace to be hodde amongest them Moreouer it is disputed whether byshops or pastours haue ryght and auctorite to ordeyne ceremonies in the churche and to make lawes of meatê of holy dayes and degrees of ministers or orders c. They that ymagin this auctorite to be in byshops alledge and bryng for them this testimonie and auctoritie of scripture Yet
eodem ¶ The .12 arti of penauÌ„ce or repeÌ„tauÌ„ce fo eod ¶ The .13 article of the vse of the sacramentes Fo. eodem ¶ The .14 article of order ecclesiastike fo eod ¶ The .15 article of rytes or vsages of the churche Fo. eodem ¶ The .16 arti of politike or ciuile mats fo ix ¶ The .17 article of the resurrection Fo. eod ¶ The .18 article of frewyll Fo. eodem ¶ The .19 article of the cause of synne Fo. x. ¶ The .20 article of good workes Fo. eod ¶ The .21 article of honoriÌ„g of saiÌ„tê Fo. xiii ¶ The articles in whiche are rehersed certeine abuses chaunged Fo. xiiii ¶ Of bothe kyndes Fo. eodem ¶ Of the mariage of prestes Fo. xv ¶ Of the Masse Fo. xvi ¶ Of confession Fo. xix ¶ Of diuersities of meates Fo. xx ¶ Of monasticall vowes Fo. xxiii ¶ Of the power of the churche Fo. xxviii ¶ Finis Tabule ⧠Imprynted at London in Fletestrete by me Robert Redman dwellynge at the sygne of the George nexte to saynt Dunstones Churche 1536. CVM PRIVILEGIO REGALI The Apologie that is to say the defense of the confessyon of the Germaynes made by Philip Melancthon and translated by Richard Tauerner at the commaundement of his mayster the ryght honorable mayster Thomas Crumwell chefe secretarie to the kyngê hyghnes CVM PRIVILEGIO ¶ Philip Melancthon to the reder sendeth gretynge AFter that the confessyon of our prynces was in open audience solempnely redde certaine diuines friars prepared a confutation of our wryting whiche whan the Emperours maiestie had caused to be solempnely red in the assemble of the prynces he requyred theÌ„ to assent vnto it But our prynces hearynge that many articles were there disproued whiche to renounce without grudge of conscieÌ„ce they coulde nat demauÌ„ded that a copy of the coÌ„futacion myght be to them exhibited to the entent that they myght bothe see what theyr aduersaries condempned and also refute their reasons And in suche cause whiche apperteyned to chrysten faythe and instruction of the conscience they thought that the aduersaries wolde nat haue made it straunge to exhibite theyr wrytyng But our rulers coulde in nowyse obtayne it onles they wolde haue bouÌ„de them selues to moste perelouse and vnegal coÌ„dicions whiche they coulde nat do excepte they wolde caste them selues into a manifest daunger After this there was publyshed a pacification in whiche appered that our hedes refused no burdayne were it neuer so payneful so that it myght be susteyned without offence of conscience But the aduersaries obstinatly required vs to allowe certaine manifest abuses and errours which thyng whan we myght nat do agayne the emperours maiestie requyred our prynces to assent to the confutacyon whiche to do our prynces vtterly refused For howe shulde they assent in a matter touchinge the faythe to the thynge that they neuer red And they herde that certayne articles were there coÌ„dempned in which thyng they coulde nat allowe the iudgement of the aduersaries without offence There were also certayne other whiche required me to make an Apologie or defense of the coÌ„fessyon in which shulde be expouned vnto themperour the causes why we receyued nat the confutacyon and the thinges soluted whiche the aduersaries obiected For there were certayne of vs whiche when theyr confutacion was red noted the suÌ„me of theyr places and argumentes This Apologie they offered at laste vnto the emperours maiestie to the entent that he myght knowe that most graue hyghe causes letted vs to allowe theyr confutacyon Howe be it the emperour receyued nat the boke that was offered hym After this cam forthe a proclamacion in whiche our aduersaries do triuÌ„phe that they haue confuted by scripture our confessyon Nowe therfore o gentle reader ye se our Apologie in whiche ye shall perceyue aswele the iudgemeÌ„t of our aduersaries for we haue faythfully reported it as theyr condempnacyon of certayne articles agaynst the manyfest scripture of the holy ghoste so farre be they wyde from defetyng our opinions by scriptures But all be it that in the begynnynge I made onely an Apologie yet nowe in my settyng it forthe in prynt I haue added other thynges And for that purpose I haue put to my name bycause they shulde make no cauillacion that the boke was published without any authour certayne This alway hathe bene my custome in suche controuersies that so muche as I myght lawfully do I wolde retayne the fourme of the vsed and accustomed doctryne to the entent that we myght the soner agre together Nor I do nat muche vnlyke at thys tyme all be it I myght iustly wade further in dissuadynge the people from the opinions of our aduersaries But our aduersaries do so haÌ„dle theyr matter that they shewe them selues neyther to seke trouthe nor concorde but to sup vp our blode Doubtles I haue nowe also wrytteÌ„ as soberly and moderately as I can but yet if any thyng shal seme to be spokeÌ„ ouer sharply I here protest that I contende with the diuines frears and nat with Cesar or the prynces whome as my dutie is I haue in hyghe estimacyon and regarde But I sawe lately theyr confutacion whiche I haue marked to be wrytten so capciously and slaunderously that in certaine places they may dysceyue yea the ware and cyrcumspecte readers Natwithstandyng I haue nat medlyd with all theyr cauilacyoÌ„s for that were an infinite worke but I haue comprised the chefe maters to the enteÌ„t that amonge all nacyons a testimonie of vs maye appere that our iudgement is ryght godly of the Euangel of Christe Discorde pleaseth nat vs. Nor our owne priuate peryll dothe nothinge moue vs whiche howe greate it is by reason of the vehemeÌ„t hatredes of our aduersaries kyndled agaynste vs we easely perceyue But we may nat renounce the manifest veritie and necessarie to the edificacion of the churche wherfore we thynke that all incommodities and peryls are to be susteyned and suffered for the glorye of Christe and profite of his churche trusting that God wyll allowe and accepte thys our office endeuour and moreouer we hope that our posteritie and successours shal haue of vs here after a better opinion and a more indifferent iudgement For it can nat be denyed but that many places of Christes doctryne which are moste necessarie to be notified and knowen in the churche be of vs and ours opened and clerely set forthe which here to fore with howe greate and perelouse opinions they were suppressed and hydde through deceitful friars lawyers and sophisticall diuines it lusteth me nat here to recite we haue the open testimonies of many good men which cease nat to rendre thankê to god for this most hyghe benefite that nowe many ryght necessary matters be better opened by vs than they were by our aduersaries here tofore taught or preached wherfore we shal commeÌ„de and coÌ„mytte our cause vnto Christe who shall another day iudge these debates and coÌ„trouersies whom we also humbly beseche to caste his tendre eyes vpon the afflicte
reason as ciuile workes and they fayne that reasoÌ„ without the holy ghost may loue god aboue al. For so long as mans mynde is ydle nor feleth nat the yre or iudgement of god it may feyne that it wyll loue god that it wyll do wele for god After this wyse they teache that men deserue remission of synnes by doyng that in them is that is to say if reason sorowyng for his syn fetcheth out an elicite acte as they cal it of the dilection of god or worketh wele for god And thê opinioÌ„ because naturally it flattereth men hath engeÌ„dered encreased many ceremonies in the churche vowes of monasticall lyuyng abuses of the Masse and euery daye more and more sum or other haue through this opinioÌ„ inuented newe cerimonies and rytes And to nouryshe and encreace the truste in such workes they haue affyrmed that god necessaryly geueth grace to suche workers by necessitie nat of coaction but of immutabilitie In thys opinion many greate and pernicious errours do stycke whiche to recount it were to longe Let the prudent reader only ponder thys if this be the cristian ryghtwysenes what diuersitie is betwyxt philosophie and the doctryne of Christe If we deserue remission of synnes by these elicite actes what neded Christe or regeneracyon And throughe these opinions the thyng is nowe ronne so farre that many do scorne vs bycause we teache that another iustice is to be sought besyde the philosophicall iustyce we haue herde some in the pulpyt settyng apart the gospell preache Aristotles Morals Nor they dyd nat amys if it be trewe that the aduersaries defende For Aristotle of the ciuile manners hath wryten so excelleÌ„tly that he can nat be amended we se bokes putte forth in whiche be conferred certayne sayngê of Christ with the sayengê of Socrates Zeno and of other as though Christe cam for thys purpose to teache vs certayne lawes by whiche we myght deserue remyssioÌ„ of synnes and nat receyue it frely through his merites wherfore if we allowe here the doctrine of the aduersaries that we deserue by the workê of reason remyssyon of synnes and iustificacyon there shal be then no difference betwixt the iustice of the philosophers or at leaste of the pharisees and the Christian iustice And albeit the aduersaries because they wyll nat clene put Christ out of theyr bokes requyre the knowledge of the historie of Christe and attrybute vnto it yâ— it doth merite vnto vs acertayne habite or as they them selues call it the fyrste grace whiche they vnderstande to be an habite inclynynge vs to loue god the easylyar yet very lytle it is that they attribute vnto this habite for they fayne that the actes of â—ylle is bothe before that habite and after of al one sorte They fayne that the wyl may loue god but yet that habite styrreth it to do the same more freely And they byd vs purchase thys habite fyrste by precedent merites and after they byd vs purchase by the workê of the law an increase of that habite lyfe euerlastinge Thus they bury Christe that men shulde nat vse hym for a medyatour nor thynke that for him they receyue frely remissioÌ„ of synnes and recoÌ„ciliacyon but dreame that by theyr owne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be reputed iust before god where as in dede the lawe is neuer satisfied sythe reason dothe nothyng but certayne ciuile workes and the whyles neyther feareth god nor beleueth truly that god careth for him And although they speake of that habite yet without the iustice of faythe the loue of god can neyther be in men nor it can nat be vnderstande what it is And where as they fayne a differeÌ„ce betwixte Meritum congrui and Meritum coÌ„digni they do but daly because they wolde nat seme openly to play the PelagiaÌ„s For if god necessarily gyueth grace pro merito congrui so is there nat Meritum condigni Howbeit they wote nat what they saye After the habite of loue obteyned they fayne that man dothe merite de condigno And yet they byd vs doubte whether we haue that habite or no. Howe do they then knowe whether they merite de congruo or de coÌ„digno But all this thiÌ„g is fayned of ydle felowes whiche knowe nat howe remission of synnes is atteyned howe in the iudgemeÌ„t of god and in the affrayes of conscience the truste of workes is plucked from vs. Careles hypocrites alwayes iudge that they merite de condigno whether they haue that habite or nat For naturally men truste to theyr owne propre ryghtwysenes but the affrayed and troubled conscience wauereth and doubteth and euermore seketh and hepeth vp other workes to the entente it maye be quyeâ— Thys troubeled conscyence neuer feleth that it meriteth De condigno but runneth in to despayre onles it heareth besyde the doctryne of the lawe the Euangell of free remission and of the iustice of faythe Thus the aduersaries teache nothiÌ„g but the iustice of reason or at leaste of the lawe vpon whiche they loke euen as the Iewes dyd vpoÌ„ the couered face of Moses and in these careles hypocrites whiche thynke them selues to satisfye the lawe they kyndle a presumpcyon and vayne truste of workes and a coÌ„tempte of the grace of Christe On the contrary parte they dryue the feareful coÌ„sciencies in to desperacion whiche sythe they worke with doubtyng can haue no experience of faythe nor of the vertue therof thus at laste they vtterlye despayre But thys is our opinion of the iustyce of reason that god requyreth it and that for the commauÌ„dement of god honest workes are necessarely to be done whiche the Decalogie commaundeth accordynge to Paules saynge the law is a tutour Also the lawe is geuen to the vngodly For god wyl that the carnal persons be kept within the boundes by thys discipline and to the mayntenaunce of thys he hathe geuen lawes letters doctryne rulers punyshmentes And thys iustyce maye reason after a maner perfourme of the owne proper powers although ofteÌ„tymes it is ouer ceptes of the seconde table whiche conteyne cyuile iustyce whiche reason vnderstandeth And coÌ„tented herewith they thinke that they satysfye the lawe of god In the meane whyle they se nat the fyrste table whiche commaundeth vs to loue god to beleue verely that god is dyspleased with synne and truly to dreade god and to thynke surely that god hereth vs. But mans mynd without the holy gost eyther retchlesly despyseth the iudgement of god or in payne fleethe hateth god his iudge wherfore it obeyeth not the fyrste table when then in mans nature stycketh the contempt of god and the doubtynge of goddes worde and of hys threatnynges and promyses men in dede do syn ye wheÌ„ they do honest workes without the holye gooste bycause they do them with a wycked harte accordynge to thys sayeng of Paule ☞ what so euer is not of faythe is synne ☜ For such do worke with contempt of god lyke as Epicure thiÌ„keth not that god careth for him regardeth him or heareth
him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
promyse that free and the merytes of Chryst as a raunsom and redeÌ„ption Promyse is receiued by fayth this worde fre excludeth our merites signyfyeth that only by mercye is offered the benefyte of Chryst the merytes be the rauÌ„som for there must be some certaine redeÌ„pcion for our siÌ„nes The scripture oft times cryeth for mercy And the holy fathers many tymes say that we be saued by mercy So oft then as mencioÌ„ is made of mercy it is to be knoweÌ„ that fayth is ther requyred which receiueth the ê“mise of mercy And agayn so oft as we speke of faith we wyll that the obiecte be vnderstaÌ„de that is to say the promised mercy For faith doth not therfore iustify or saue because it is of it selfe a worthy worke but only because it receyueth the mercy promysed And thê seruice thêlatria is most highly coÌ„mended in prophetes psalmes wher as the law teacheth not fre remissioÌ„ of sinnes But the fathers knowe the promyse made of Christ that God for Christ wolde remyt synnes wherfore when they vnderstode that Chryst shuld be a pryce and raunsome for our synnes they knewe that our workes were not a raunsome of so great a thyng Therfore they receiued by fayth fre mercy and remissyoÌ„ of siÌ„nes lyke as the holy fathers of the newe testament do Here vnto belong tho oft repetycyons of mercye and faythe in the psalmes and prophetes as here Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine c. Yf thou markest iniquities o lorde lorde who shall susteyne Here he coÌ„fesseth hys synnes and yet he alledgeth not hê merytes He addeth For with the is mercyfulnes Here he lyfteth vp him selfe with the truste of the mercye of God And cytethe the promyse Sustinuit anima mea in verbo eius sperauit anima mea in domino My soule is susteyned in hys worde my soule hathe trusted in the lorde that is to saye because thou haste promysed remyssyon of synnes by thys thy promyse I am susteyned And Paule cyteth the hystorye of Abraham Abraham beleued God and it was recompted vnto hym for ryghtwysnes That is to wytte Abraham perceyued that God was vnto hym mercyful only for hys promyse sake He assented to the promyse of God nor suffered not hym selfe to be plucked away frome it all thoughe he sawe hym selfe vnclene and vnworthye He perceyued that God performeth hys promyse for hê owne truthe and not for our workes or merytes Trulye the affrayed hartes can haue no rest if they shulde thynke that for theyr owne workes or owne loue or fulfylliÌ„ge of the lawe they shulde please God for in the fleshe stycketh synne whiche alwaye accuseth vs. But then the hartes haue rest wheÌ„ in such affrayes they assure them selues that we therfore please God be cause he hathe promysed and that God perfourmeth hys promyse for hys owne truthe and not for our worthynes Thus Abraham herde thys saynge Feare thou not for â–ª I am thy protector Here he raysed vp him selfe and felte God mercyful vnto him not for hys owne deseruynge but because the promyse of god must nedes be iuged true this faythe therfore is imputed to hym for ryghtwysnes that is because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconsilement he is nowe truelye iuste and accepted vnto God not for hys owne workes but bycause he taketh the free promyse of god Thys auctoryte of Genyses pleased Paule not without cause we se howe he layth on howe ernestlye he taryeth vpon that poynte because he sawe that the nature of fayth myght in that poynt be easaly espyed He sawe that the recorde of the imputacyon of iustice was added not with out a greate skyll He sawe that the lawde of desernynge iustyfycacyon and of pacyfyenge the conscyence was taken away from workes â–ª when Abraham is therfore pronounced ryght wyse because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconcilement he pleadeth not in barre of goddes ire hys owne merytes or workes wherfore thys place dylygently consydered may plenteouslye instructe godlye myndes in thys matter whiche shall so be vnderstonde yf the affrayed myndes haue it before them and assure theÌ„ selue that they ought to assente to the free promyse For otherwyse they can not be quyete onles they presuppose that they haue god theyr good lorde because he hath so promysed and not bycause our nature lyfe and workes be worthye Therfore also the fathers were iustifyed not by the law but by the promyse and fayth And it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes do make so lytle of faythe syth they se it throughe out al scrypture praysed for the moste hyghe seruyce as in the .49 Psal. Call on me in tyme of trybulacyon and I shal delyuer the. Thus wyll god be knowen thus he wyll be worshyped by receyuynge benefytes of hym and receyuynge them for hys mercyes sake and not for our owne demerytes Thys is the moste ample consolacyon in all afflyctyons And such consolacyons our aduersaryes go about to destroye and putte out of vre in that they make faythe so lytle a seruyce and onlye â—eache men to contende with god by our owne workes and merytes ¶ That the only faythe in Chryst iustyfyeth FYrste leste a man wolde thynke that we speake of the ydle knowledge of the Hystorye we wyll shewe howe faythe cummeth After we wyl shewe that it iustyfyeth and howe thys must be vnderstande then we wyll assoyle thobiections of the aduersaryes Chryste in the last of Luke coÌ„maundeth his dyscyples to preache repentaunce in hys name and remyssyon of synnes For the gospell argueth euery man to be vnder synne and to be gyltye of eternal ire and deth and offereth for Chryst remissyon of sinnes iustificacion which is receyued by fayth Preaching of penauÌ„ce which reproueth vs dothe fray the conscyence with true ernest afrayes In these the hartê ought agayne to conceyue consolacyon which shal be yf they trust to the promyse of Chryst that for hym we haue remyssyon of synnes Thys faythe erectyng and comfortynge vs in those affrayes takethe remyssyon of synnes iustyfyeth and viuifyeth For that consolacion is a newe and a spiritual lyfe These be plaine and open and the godlye maye vnderstande them also the churche haue recorded the same The aduersaryes neuer shewe truly howe the holye gost is gyuen They fayne that the sacramentes gyue the holye gooste ex opere operato sine bono motu accipientis euen of the verye worke it selfe without any good motyon of the receyuer as thoughe the geuynge of the holy goste were an idle thynge But where as we speake of suche faythe whiche is not an idle thought but which deliuereth from dethe and createth a newe lyfe in our hartes and nedeth the holy gost it standeth not with mortall synne but so longe as it is present it bryngeth forthe good frures as we shall say here after what can be spoken of the conuertynge of the vngodly or of the maner of regeneratynge more sympely and more
their hartes wherfore after that by faith we be iustified and renewed we begyn to feare god to loue god to craue loke after socoure of god to gyue thankes vnto hym to preache hym and to obeye him in afflictions we begyn also to loue our neybours because our hartes haue spiritual and holy mocions These thinges can not be done onles after that we be iustified by fayth and regenerate we receyue the holye goste fyrste because the lawe can not be done without christe also the lawe can nat be done without the holye goste But the holye goste is receyued by faythe accordinge to the saynge of Paule That we may receyue the promyse of the spirite by faythe Also howe can mans harte loue god so longe as he feleth hym greuously dyspleased with vs and to oppresse vs with temporall and perpetuall calamities but the lawe alwayes accuseth vs alwayes sheweth that god is angry God therfore is not loued vntyl we haue receyued mercy by fayth So at laste is made an amiable obiect Althoughe therfore cyuyle workes that is to saye thexterne workes of the lawe without Chryste and with out the holy gost may be in some parte done â–ª yet it appereth by that which we haue sayde that the thinges which be properlye apperteynynge to the diuyne lawe I meane thaffectyons of the harte towarde god whiche be commaunded in the fyrste table can nat be done without the holye goste But our aduersaryes be plesaunt diuynes They beholde the seconde table and the polityke workes but the fyrst table they nothinge regarde as though it pertayned nothynge to the purpose or at lest waye they requyre only externe workes That eternall lawe and farre put aboue the sence and vnderstandynge of al creatures whiche is Thou shalte loue thy lorde God with all thy harte they vtterly not consyder But Chryste was for thys ende gyuen vnto vs that for him remission of synnes the holy gost shulde be graunted vs which myght create in vs a newe and euerlastynge lyfe and an euerlastynge ryghtwysnes which myght fyrste of al shewe vnto vs Chryst as it is wrytten He shall notirize me for of myne he shal take and shewe it vnto you And after brynge also other giftes as loue inuocation thankes gyuynge chastitye pacyence cÌ„ wherfore the lawe can not be truely perfourmed onles we fyrste receyue the holy goste by faythe Therfore Paule saythe that by faythe the lawe is establyshed and not abrogate or auoyded For then or els neuer is the lawe fulfylled when the holy gost is in that man And Paule teacheth that the vayle with whiche the face of Moyses was muffled can nat be take awaye but by fayth in Chryste by which is receyued the holy gost For thus he sayth But vntyll thys daye when Moyses is red the vayle is put ouer theyr hartes But when they shal be conuerted to God the vayle shall be take awaye The lorde is a spirite and where the spirite of the lorde is there is lybertye By the vayle vnderstaÌ„deth Paule an humane opinion of the hole lawe of the Decalogie and ceremonyes that is to saye that hypocrites do thynke that externe and ciuile workes do satysfye the lawe of god and that sacryficies and ceremonies euen of them selfe do iustyfye before god But then thys vayle is plucked from vs that is to say this errour is taken away when god sheweth to our hartes our vncleÌ„nes and greatnes of synne There fyrst we se our selues to be farre from the fulfyllynge of the lawe There we acknoweledge howe that the fleshe beinge idle and careles feareth not god not thynketh verely that god regardeth vs but that we be casually borne and vanyshe away lyke brute bestes There we fynde thexperyence that we beleue not that god forgyueth vs and heareth vs but when we hearynge thevangell and forgyuenes of synnes begynne to lyfte vp our selues by faythe we conceyue the holy goste so that nowe we may thinke ryghtly of god and dreade god and beleue hym cÌ„ By this appereth that without Chryste and without the holy gooste the lawe can not be done wherfore we professe that we muste neades inchoate or begynne to fulfyll vnto our powers the lawe and euer more attempte to do it more and more And we compryse here bothe two aswell the spirituall mocyons as the outwarde good workes wherfore the aduersaryes do falsly calumnyate vs in reportynge that we teache not good workes sythe we nat only requyre them but also shewe howe they maye be done The very proufe of the thyng doth condeÌ„pne and bewraye the ypocrites whiche attempt by theyr owne powers to do the lawe that they can nat perfourme the thyng that they attempt For the nature of man is farre to weke of the owne powers to resyst the deuyll who hath al in his holde as captiues prisoners which be nat delyuered by fayth The powers of Christ is requisite agaynst the deuyll and therfore because we knowe that for Christe we be herde receyue a promyse it is requisyt that we pray that the holy ghoste may gouerne vs and protect vs lest we fortune to erre deceyuyng our selues and leaste by wycked impulsion we take vpon vs any thyng agaynste the wyll of god As the Psalme teacheth He led captiuitie a captiue he gaue gyftes to men For Christ hath veynquyshed the deuyl and hathe gyuen vnto vs a promyse and the holy ghoste to the ende that we may also vaynquyshe by yâ— socoure of god And IohaÌ„ sayeth To this intent appered the son of god that he myght losen the workes of the deuyll Furthermore we teache nat only how the law may be done but also howe the thynge that is done may please god which is nat because we satisfy the lawe but because we be iÌ„ Christe as it shal be sayde a lytle here after So it is euideÌ„t that we requyre good workes yea we adde also that it is impossible to seuere the loue of god though it be lytle from faythe For by Christe we approche to the father and after the receite of remissioÌ„ of synnes we be assured that we haue god that is to say that we be regarded of god we make inuocacion we gyue thankes we feare we loue as Iohan teacheth in the fyrst epystle we loue hym quod he because he fyrst loued vs meanyng because he gaue for vs his son and remitted our synnes Thus he signifyeth that fayth goeth before and loue foloweth Also the fayth of whiche we speake â—s declared in penaunce .i. it is conceyued in â—eares of the coÌ„scieÌ„ce which feleth the wrath of god kyndled against our synnes and seketh remission of synnes and a gayle deliuery from synne And in suche feares and other afflictions this fayth oweth to encreace and be confirmed wherfore it can nat be in them whiche lyue after theyr fleshe whiche delyte in theyr lustes and obey them Therfore Paule sayeth There is no condempnacion nowe to these whiche be in Christe Iesu
whiche walke nat after theyr fleshe but after the spirite Also we be dettours nat to the fleshe that we shulde lyue after the fleshe For if ye lyue after the fleshe ye shall dye But if in spirite ye mortifye the actes of the bodye ye shall lyue Wherfore this fayth whiche receyueth remission of synnes in the troubled and affrayed herte and fleyng synne dwelleth nat in them whiche folowe theyr lustes nor staÌ„deth nat with deadly synne Out of these effectes or operacions of fayth the aduersaries pycke out one and that is loue â–ª and teache that it iustifyeth Thus it manifestly appereth that they only teache the lawe They reache nat fyrste that we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes by fayth They teache nat of the mediatour Christe that for Christe we haue God our good lorde but for our owne loue And yet what maner of loue that is they tell nat nor can nat tell They bragge glory that they fulfyll the lawe where as this glory is properly due to Christ and they lay the affiaâ—Ì„ce of theyr owne workes to the iudgemeÌ„t of god for tâ—ey say that they deserue grace eternall lyfe de condigno .i. of theyr owne worthynes This is vtterly a wycked and a vayne affiaunce For in this lyfe we can nat satisfye the lawe because the carnall nature ceaseth nat to bryng forth euyll affections al though the spirite in vs resysteth theÌ„ But a man may demaunde of vs a question sythe that we also confesse that loue is the worke of the holy ghost and syth it is ryghtwysnes for it is the fulfyllyng of the law why do nat we teache that it iustifieth â–ª To this we answere Fyrst it is certayne that we receiue nat remission of synnes neyther by loue nor for or loue but for Christ by only fayth Only faythe whiche loketh to the promyse and is assured that god forgiueth because Christ dyed nat in vaine ouercometh the feares of synne of death If a man doubteth whether hys synnes be forgyuen hym he disworshyppeth Christe sythe he iudgeth hys synne greater or stronger then the death and promyse of Christe where Paule sayeth that grace surmounteth synne that is to say that mercye is aboue synne who thynketh that he attayneth remission of synnes because he loueth dishonoreth Christ and he shal fynde in the daye of gods iudgement this affyaunce of his owne propre iustice to be wycked voyde Ergo fayth must recoÌ„cile make of the iniust iust And as we receiue nat remissioÌ„ of synnes by the other vertues or for the other vertues of the lawe as for pacience chastitie obedieÌ„ce towarde the superiours cÌ„ and yet these vertues must ensue so we neyther receyue remissyon of synnes because of the dilectioÌ„ of god Howbeit it is a commune fourme of speakyng otherwhyles to comprise in one worde bothe the cause and the effect by a figure called Synecdoche as in the seuenth of Luke Christ sayeth Many synnes be forgyueÌ„ her because she loued muche For Christ expouneth him selfe wheÌ„ he addeth Thy fayth hathe saued the. Christ then meant nat that the woman by that worke of loue shulde deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and therfore he clearly sayeth Thy faythe hathe saued the. But fayth is the thyng which conceiueth mercy for the worde of god freely If ye deny that thê is fayth ye vtterly knowe nat what faythe meaneth The very historye of it selfe sheweth sufficiently what he calleth loue in this place The woman cam brynging with her this opinion of Christe that in hym â–ª she shulde fynde remission of synnes This worshyp is the most hyghe worshyp of Christ she coulde gyue no greater worshyp vnto hym This is the trewe fashyon of acknowledgyng Messias to seke at hym remission of synnes And to conceiue this opinion of Christ thus to worship him is rightly and truly to beleue But this worde loue Christe vsed nat to the womaÌ„ but to the Pharisee for he coÌ„pared the hole worshyppyng of the Pharisee with the hole worshyppyng of the woman He chydeth the Pharisee because he acknoweledged hym nat to be Messias although he dyd vnto hym these externe officies as vnto a straunger and an holy greate man he poynteth to the woman and commendeth her worshyppyng her oyntment â—eares cÌ„ whiche all were sygnes of fayth a certayne coÌ„fession that at Christ she sought remission of synnes Undoutedly this was a greate example which nat without cause moued Christe to chyde the Pharisee whiche was a wyse and an honest man but one that beleued nat This impietie he vpbraideth him and instructeth him by the example of the woman signifieng that it was a shame yâ— where as an vnlerned woman beleued god he a doctour of the lawe beleued nat and acknowleged nat Messias nor sought nat at hym remission of synnes saluacion So theÌ„ he prayseth the hole worshyppyng as it is ofte done in scripture that in one worde we shuld coÌ„prise many as here after we shall shewe more at large in lyke places as in this saying Gyue almes and all shal be clene he requyreth nat only almesdedê but also the iustice of faythe so also here wheÌ„ he sayeth Many synnes be remytted vnto her because she loued muche that is to saye because she hath worshypped me truly by fayth and excercises and signes of fayth he coÌ„pryseth the hole worshyppyng but in the meane seasoÌ„ yet he teacheth thys that properly remission of synnes is receyued by fayth althoughe loue confession and other good workes do necessaryly ensue wherfore he meaneth nat this that those frutê be a recoÌ„pense or raunsum for whiche remission of synnes is gyuen whiche may reconcile vs to god we dispute of a greate thing euen of the honour of Christe and from whens the godly myndes may fetche a sure ferme consolacion whether our truste is to be put in Christe or in our workes If so be that we owe to set our trust in our workes then we must plucke from Christe the honour and title of a mediatour and redemer And yet we shall fynde in the iudgement of god that this confidence is vayne and that the conscience from thens shall ruÌ„ne into despayre That if remission of synnes and reconciliacyon chaunseth nat frely for Christ but for our loue and merites no man shal haue remission of synnes but where he fulfylleth the hole lawe for the lawe iustifieth vs nat so longe as it can accuse vs. It is euident then syth iustificacion is reconciliacion for Christ that by fayth we be iustified for it is most certayne that by only fayth is receyued remission of synnes Nowe therfore let vs answere to the question afore proposed why loue iustifyeth nat The aduersaries thynke ryghtly that loue is the fulfilling of the lawe And doubtles the obedience towarde the lawe were ryghwisnes if we coulde do the lawe But we haue here tofore shewed that the promisses were therfore gyuen because we coulde nat do the lawe And for this selfe cause denyeth Paule
that we be iustifyed by the lawe Thaduersaries be deceiued because in this hole coÌ„trouersarie they haue respecte only to the lawe For humane reason can none otherwise iudge but that iustificacion is to be sought for in the lawe because the obedience towarde the lawe is iustice But the Euangel calleth vs away from the lawe to the promises and teacheth that we be reputed iuste nat for the obedience of the lawe for we satisfye nat the lawe but because that reconciliacion is gyuen vnto vs for Christ whiche we only receyue by fayth wherfore before we do the law we must by fayth receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion O Lorde god with what face dare these men name Christe with what countenaunce dare they beholde the EuaÌ„gell which deny that we obtayne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for Christe by only fayth SecoÌ„dly this selfe fulfyllyng of the lawe whiche foloweth renouacion is both smal and vnclene For though renouacion be attempted sumwhat begunne yet the dregges of synne stycke styl in nature alway accusyng vs onles by fayth in Christe we obtayne remission of synnes knowe that we haue a cummynge to god nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but for Christe Therfore that fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat accepted for it selfe but for faythe Wherfore when Paule sayeth that the lawe is stablyshed by fayth nat only this must be vnderstaÌ„de that they which be regenerate by fayth do conceyue the holy ghoste and haue mocions consentyng to the lawe of god but moste of all it is requysite to adde this that we owe to thynke that we be farre from the perfectioÌ„ of the lawe Wherfore we may nat affyrme that before god we be reputed iust for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe but we muste thynke that we be recouÌ„pted iust or acceptable for Christe and nat for the lawe or for our workes and that this imperfecte or inchoate fulfyllyng of the lawe pleaseth god because we be in Christe and also that for the fayth in Christ the lackyng of fulfyllyng the lawe is nat imputed vnto vs. Thys teacheth Paule saying Christe redemed vs frome the malediction of the lawe beyng made for vs a curse that is to saye the lawe condempneth all men But Christe because he voyde of synne susteined the penaltie of synne and was made an hoste for vs he toke away the rigorous power of the lawe so that it shall nat accuse nor coÌ„deÌ„pne the beleuers in him for he is our propiciacion for whiche we be nowe accoÌ„pted ryghtwise In lyke seÌ„tence he wryteth to the Colossenses In Christe ye be consummate or perfyte as who shuld say although ye be yet farre from the perfeccion of the lawe yet the dregges or leauynges of synnes do nat condempne you because ye haue for Christ a certayne and ferme reconciliacion so that ye beleue natwithstandyng that synne stycketh styl in the fleshe For the death and the satisfaccioÌ„ of Christe gyuen for vs ought to be set farre aboue the very lawe to th ende that we may be assured that through the satysfaccyon we haue god mercifull vnto vs and nat for our fulfyllyng of the lawe wycked is that truste whiche is put in our fulfyllyng of the lawe But that trust is necessarie which is put in the satisfaccyon for Christe ☞ ⧠⧠☜ Thyrdly Only that thyng iustifieth before god whiche pacifieth the conscience For so longe as the conscience fleeth the iudgement of god and is angry with god we be nat ryght wyse nor viuifyed But only faythe pacifyeth the conscience accordynge to this of Paule Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace Also The ryghtwyse man shal lyue by fayth that is to say by fayth he veynquysheth the feares of death by faythe he is susteined and conceyueth ioye and lyfe And this bringeth fayth nat because it is a worthy worke of it selfe but onely because it reuiueth the offered promyse nothiÌ„g regardyng the owne propre worthynes Only therfore fayth iustifyeth and good workes do please by reason of fayth what can the aduersaries brynge agaynste thys reason what can they inuent agaynst the manifest trouth For the Minor is moste certayne that our workes can nat pacifye the conscience sythe god iudgeth and reproueth vs and sheweth vnto vs our vnclennes And that the scripture dothe oftentymes inculcate dryue into our hedes As the Psalme Non intres in iudicium cuâ— seruo tuo quia non iustificavitur in conspectu tuo 〈…〉 that is to say Enter nat into iudgement with thy seruaunt for no lyuyng creature shal be iustified in thy syght Here he quyte taketh away from all yea and from the saynctes and seruauntes of god the glorie of iustice if god dyd nat pardon but wolde iudge and detecte theyr hertê For where as in other places the Psalmist doth glorie of hys owne ryghtwysenes he speketh of his quarel or cause agaynst the persecutours of the worde of god and nat of hys personal clennes and he desyreth that the quarell and glorie of god may be defeÌ„ded As in the seuenth Psalme Iudica me domine secundum iusticiam meam c. i. Iudge me lorde accordyng to my ryghtwysnes And in another place Iudge O lorde my cause But on the other parte he teacheth that no man can susteyne the iudgemeÌ„t of god if he obserueth our synnes For thus he sayeth Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine domine quis sustinebiâ— If thou woldest marke o lorde the iniquities of men who can o lorde endure And Iob sayeth Vâ—rebar omnia opera mea .i. I feared all my workes Also if I were washed euen as it were with waters of snowe and my handes dyd shyne as moste pure cleane yet thou wylt embrewe me with fylthynes And Prouerb 20. Who can say my hert is cleane And .1 Ioan. 1. If we say that we haue nat synne we seduce our selues and trouth is nat in vs. Also in the Pater noster the holy men desyre remissioÌ„ of synnes â— holy men also haue synnes In the boke of Numer And the innocent shal be no innocent And Zacharie sayeth Silâ—at a facie domini omnis caro .i. Let euery man holde his tongue in the lordê preseÌ„ce And Esaye Euery fleshe is haye and all hys glorie is lyke a flower of the felde The haye wythereth vp and the floure fadeth because the spirite of the lorde hath bloweÌ„ in it that is to say the fleshe and the iustice of the fleshe caÌ„ nat abyde the iudgement of god And Ionas sayeth in the seconde chapiter In vayne they obserue vanities which leaue mercy .i. Al trust is voyde saue the truste of mercye Mercy saueth vs our owne merites our owne propre endeuours saue vs nat These and semblable sentencies in scriptures testifie that our workes be vncleane haue nede of mercie Wherfore workes do nat pacifie the conscience but mercie conceyued by faythe Fourthly Christe ceaseth nat to be a mediatour styll after that we be renewed For they erre which say that he
is without workê And where he saieth that we be iustified by fayth and workes suerly he meaneth nat that we be renewed or regenerate by workes nor he meaneth nat that partly Christ is our redemer and partly that our workê be our redemption Nor he describeth nat here the maner of iustifycation but he describeth what manner of persones the iuste be after they be ones iustified and renewed And thys worde iustificari i. to be iustifyed signifyeth here nat to be made of the iniust iuste but after an outwarde fashion to be pronounced rightwyse â–ª as it is taken in thys sayeng Factores legis iustificabuntur .i. The doers of the lawe shal be iustifyed Lyke therfore as these wordes haue no incoÌ„uenience the doers of the lawe shal be iustified so thynke we of the wordes of Iames man is iustified nat only by fayth but also by workes for vndoubtedly men be pronounced iuste hauynge fayth and good workes For good workes in holy men and women as we sayde before be iusticies of the lawe whiche be accepted bycause of the faythe and nat bycause they satisfye the lawe Men then be iustified by faythe and workes nat bycause of the workes but by cause of the faythe whiche yet good workes muste nedes folowe For Iames speaketh of tho workes whiche folowe faythe as he wytnesseth when he sayeth fayth helpeth his workes so we muste take The doers of the lawe shall be iustified that is to saye they whiche beleue and haue good frutes be pronounced ryghtwyse For the lawe is satisfied if we beleue and it pleaseth bycause of the faythe and nat bycause the workes do satisfye the lawe Thus we se that in these sentencies is no inconuenience but the aduersaries depraue and corrupt them addyng theyr owne gloses For it is nat sayde that workes deserue remission or that men for theyr workes be accepted and reputed ryghtwyse before god nat for Christ and that the workes do pacify the hartes and ouercum they re of god and that workes nede nat mercie None of all these thynges sayeth saynt Iames whiche yet the aduersaryes asscribe to his wordes ☞ ⧠There be cyted also agaynst vs other sentencies of workes as Daniel 4. Redeme thy synnes with almes dedes And Esay 58. Breke thy bread to the hungrye then pray and god wyll heare the. Luke 6. Forgyue and ye shal be forgyuen Matth. 6. Blessyd be the mercifull for they shall obtayne mercye To these sentencies and semblable of workes fyrste we make thys answere whiche hathe be made before that the lawe is nat trulye wrought without fayth Neyther dothe it please but for faythes sake in Christe accordyng to that sayeng of Christe without me ye can do nothyng Also without faythe it is impossible to please god Also by Christe we haue coÌ„mynge or way to god through faythe Therfore as often tymes as workes be required and praysed the gospell of Christe is to be put vnto Secondarily these textes which I haue a lytle here tofore recited be well nere sermons or preachynges of penaunce for they be made of two partes They haue in the begynnynge preaching of the lawe whiche rebuketh synne and commaundeth good workes Afterwade there is added a promyse But this is moste certein and vndoubted that in preachynge of repentaunce it is nat sufficient to préache the lawe whiche dothe comonly trouble and condeÌ„pne the coscience But it is requysite that preaching of the gospell be added that synnes be frely forgyuen for Christe and that by faythe we obtayne remission of synnes These thynges be so certayne and so clere that if our aduersaries wolde vary from them and exclude Christe and faythe from the preachyng of repentaunce they were worthy to be reiected as persones blasphemous agaynst Christ. Wherfore the sermon of Daniel ought nat onely to be applyed to almose deades but faythe also is to be requyred in it The sermon of Daniel is farre vnlyke the speache of Aristotle who wryttyng vnto his kynge Alexander doth also exhorte hym to liberalite and counseilleth him to vse his power to the comen vtilite and to the welth of al the people and nat to pride For thus he wrytteth to Alexander wherfore assay and endeuour your selfe to vse apply your Empiere and dominion nat to any contumely or pryde but to munificence and liberalite For sothe thys was a very honest sayeng and there coulde nothiÌ„g be sayde better touchiÌ„g the duetie of a greate prynce But Daniell instructeth and teacheth his kyng nat only of his office or calling but also of repentaunce of loue and deuotion towardes god of remission of synnes and of those greate thynges whiche be clene aboue philosophy Nat only therfore almouse deadê be to be requyred here but also faythe And that the texte dothe declare where it sayeth that the kyng was conuerted nat only to gyuing of almouse but muche rather to faythe For there remayneth yet the excellent confession of that kynge and prayse of the god of Israel There is none other god whiche can saue in this wyse So then there be two partes of the sermon of Daniel The one parte is the preachyng of repentauÌ„ce whiche rebuketh synnes and gyueth monition of a newe lyfe sayeng Redeame thy synnes with ritghtuousnes thy wyckednes with benefites towardes yâ— pore For so speaketh Daniell in his owne tongue where it appereth sufficieÌ„tly that he gyueth nat only instruction of almes dedes but of all iustice .i. of the knowlege of god fayth For he sayth Redeme thy sines by rightuousnes Nowe iustice toward god is fayth by whiche we beleue yâ— god forgyueth vs. Afterward Daniel giueth iÌ„struction of benifites towardê pore men whiche is that he shuld nat gouerne proudly nor cruelly but prouide diligeÌ„ly se for the profetê of his subiectê the other parte of his sermoÌ„ promyseth remission of siÌ„nes Lo thy sines shal be healed Hierome here besydes yâ— purpose puttith to a dubitatiue particle forsitaÌ„ muche more vnwysely he disputeth in hys coÌ„mentaries that remission of synnes is vncertayne But let vs remembre that the gospell vndoubtedly promyseth remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes And he is to be iudged to disannull abrogate the gospell whosoeuer thynketh that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes is vncertayn Let vs therfore nat regard Hierome in thys place Nowe for asmuche as here is a promyse euidently put doubtles faythe is required for a ê“myse can nat be receyued but by fayth Howbeit eueÌ„ there also he sheweth yâ— remissioÌ„ might chauÌ„ce wheÌ„ he sayth Redeme thy siÌ„nes And thys promyse of remissioÌ„ of synnes is a verie prophetical and an euangelical sentence which doutles Daniel wold to be receyued by fayth For Daniel knewe that remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes was promised for the sede that was to come that is to wyt Christ and that nat only to the Israelites but also to al nations For els he coulde nat haue promysed to the kynge remissyon of synnes For it belongeth nat to man namely in the affrayes of
synne to decre determyne of the wille of god without some assured worde of god that he wyll cease to be angry Therfore syth here is a promyse put it appereth sufficiently that faythe is requyred for a promise caÌ„ nat be receyued but by fayth Yf thê fayth shuld depende vpon the coÌ„dition of workes then were remissyon vncertayne Therfore such maner fayth is required which dothe trust on the mercy of the worde of god and nat vpon our owne workes And where he sayth Redeme thy synnes by iustyce and by almes deades It is as moche as if he had sayde Redeme thy synnes by repentaunce For by penauÌ„ce or repentaunce the gylte is taken awaye Neyther is it to be reasoned here of that god dothe forgyue for workes folowynge but he forgyueth because of hys promyse suche persones as do receyue hê promyse We haue shewed plainly that iÌ„ the oration of Daniel fayth is requyred wherfore they do iniury to thys place who so euer do conclude therof that remission of synnes commeth for our owne workes and nat by fayth for Christes sake It is a philosophicall poynte in the sermon of Daniel to require nothyng but an exhortation of gouernynge hys Empyere wele and it is a pharisaâ—call poynte to fayne vnto it that for that selfe worke remyssyon of synnes dothe come But thus it cometh to passe workes naturally do runne into meÌ„s eyes for mans reason neyther perceyueth neyther consydereth fayth and therfore it dreameth that those workes deserue remission of synnes This opinioÌ„ naturally cleaueth in the myndes of men and can nat be shaken of oneles we be other wyse taught by the worde of god We ought to call our selues backe from this carnall opinion to the gospell and to the promyse of mercye in which is freely exhibited remission of synnes for Christes sake So in al places of penauÌ„ce faythe is râ—â—uisite For it were most hyghe iniury agaynste Christe to seke remission of synnes without Christ. Some men do interprete Daniel to speake of remission of payne when he sayth Redeme thy synnes with almose Admyt it were taken so yet Daniell shulde make nothynge agaynste vs howe be it it is no doute but that he speaketh of the remission of the synne For the remission of ponyshement is sought in vayne onles the hart fyrst by fayth hathe receyued remission of the synne Nowe yf they wyll graunte that remission of the syn commeth freely by faythe We wyll afterwardes not sticke to graunt them that the paynes or ponishementes wherwith we be chastised be mitigated and aswaged with good workê and with hole repentance accordynge to the saynge of Paule Yf we wolde iudge our owneselues doutles we shulde not be iudged of the lorde And Hieremie Yf thou wylte be turned I wyll conuerte and turne to the. Also Zacharie Turne ye to me and I wyll turne to you And in the .xlix. Psalme Call on me in the daye of trouble and I shall delyuer the. c. Euen in lykewyse it is to be iudged of thys place also Forgyue and ye shal be forgyuen For it is wel nere a lyke sermon of repeÌ„tauÌ„ce The fyrste parte requireth good workes The latter parte addeth and putteth to a promyse nether it is to be resoned that our forgeuinge of our neyghboure by the vertue of the warke wrought dothe deserue that our synnnes be forgyuen vs for Christ dothe nat say so But lyke wyse as to other sacramentes Christe ioynith and knitteth to a promyse of remissioÌ„ of synnes euen so dothe he also knitte a promyse to good workes And lyke wyse as in the supper of the lorde we obtayne nat remissyon of siÌ„nes without fayth by the very worke that is wrought euen so no more do we in thê worke yea the forgyuinge of our neyghbour is no good worke but wheÌ„ it is done of them which be reconciled Therfore our forgiuing which is acceptable and pleasaunt to god foloweth goddes forgiuynge Nowe Christe is wonte after suche sort to ioyne together the lawe the gospell that he dothe teache bothe two I meane the doctryne of fayth and the doctrine of good workes to th end he shuld admonishe vs that it is but hypocrisy and a faynynge of repentance onles good frutes do folowe also to th entent we myght haue many outwarde sygnes of the gospell and of remission of synnes whiche shulde put vs in rememberaunce and comforte vs and yâ— we myght many wayes excercise faythe After thys wyse therfore it is necessary to vnderstonde suche places leste we shulde abrogate the gospell of Christe and pleade our workes agaynste God as a raunsome and pryce reiectynge Christe Also leste remissyon of synnes be made vncertayne yf it be taught to hange vpon the condition of our workes There is alledged also thys texte out of Tobie Almose dede delyuereth from all maner synne and deathe We wyl nat call thys an hyperbolicall or excessiue maner of speakinge howe be it it ought so to be taken that it plucketh nothynge awaye from the dewe prayses of Christe whose proper benefites and offyce is to delyuer from synne and deathe But we must haue recourse to this rule that the lawe without Christe auayleth not Those almoses therfore please god whiche folowe reconciliation nat those which go before So then they delyuer from synne and death not by the vertue of the worke that is wrought but as we sayde a lytle here to fore of repentaunce that we ought to ioyne fayth with frutes so lyke wyse it is to be iudged of almose deades that fayth with the frutê pleaseth For Tobie preacheth nat only of almose dedes but also of faythe saynge At all tymes blesse god and desyer of hym to directe thy wayes But thys thiÌ„ge properly belongeth to the faythe wherof we speake whiche feleth god gratious and fauorable for hê owne mercy desireth that he wyl kepe and gouerne vs. Besydes this we grauÌ„t â–ª that almose dedes do merite many benefytes of god and delyuer nat from the synne that is present for they ouer come nat the wrath and iudgement of god nether make they quiet the consciences but they deliuer from synne that is to come I meane they do meryte that we maye be defended in the perilles of sinnes and deth This is the symple vnderstandynge agreyng to the other scriptures For alwayes the prases of warkes of the lawe be so to be vnderstanded and taken that they do nat mynyshe the glorye of Christe and of the gospell The saynge also of Christe is alledged out of the gospell of Luke Gyue ye almose and lo all thynâ—es be cleane vnto you Undoutedly our aduerâ—aryes be starke deeffe so ofte tymes hathe it ben sayd that the lawe without Christ dothe nat auayle for whose sake good warkes do please and be accepted But they in all places excludynge Christe teache that the warkes of the lawe deserue iustifycation This place yf it be brought forthe hole and perfecte shall shewe that faythe also is requyred
I pray you what incoÌ„uenience ensueth of the opinioÌ„ of our aduersaries if it shulde be thought that Christe dyd onely meryte the fyrste grace or fauoure as they cal it and afterwardes we be accepted for our owne fulfyllinge of the lawe and do deserue eternall lyfe when shall conscyencies be quiete when shal they be assured that they haue the fauour of god for the lawe alwayes accuseth vs as Paule sayeh Lex iraÌ„ operatur the lawe worketh wrathe So shall it come to passe that yf the conscyence shal fele the iudgement of the lawe they shall runne in to desperatyon Paule sayth All that euer is not of fayth is synne But these persons wyl neuer worke any thynge by faythe yf they shuld neuer thynke them selues to haue god gracyous and louinge vnto theÌ„ but when they haue fulfylled the lawe yea rather they shall euidently perceyue that they haue nat satisfyed it And therfore they shall neuer determyne within them selues that they haue goddes fauour and that theyr prayer is hard â–ª and consequently they shal neuer loue they shall neuer truly worshyppe god Suche maner of hartes and myndes what other thynge be they but very helle it selfe syth they be ful of desperatyon and of the hatred of god and yet in thys hatred they do cal vpon god and do worshype god as Saule dyd worshyppe hym Here we prouoke appele to godly mindes and skylled of spirituall thynges These can testifye that those forsayd evyls ensue of that vngodly persuasyon of our aduersaryes who thynke that we be reputed iuste in the syght of god for our owne fulfyllinge of the lawe and bydde vs nat trust in the promyse of mercie frely gyuen for Christê sake but rather in our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe It is therfore expedient to determyne with our selues that vndoutedly after renewinge we be rightwise or acceptable to god and yâ— we haue peace in yâ— sight of god through mercy for Christ and also that such incoÌ„plete beginninge of the lawe in vs is not worthy of eternal lyfe but that lyke wyse as remission of synnes and iustifycation is imputed throughe mercy for Christ and nat for the lawe euen so eternal lyfe with iustificatioÌ„ is offered nat for the lawe and for the perfection of our workes but throughe mercy for Christê sake as christ him selfe sayth This is the wyl of my father who hathe sente me that euery one which seth the son and beleueth in hym shall haue euerlastynge lyfe But let vs enquyre of our aduersaryes what counsell they gyue vnto them that be at the poynte of deth whether they do bydde them thinke that they be compted iust and to loke after euerlastynge lyfe for theyr owne workes or els for the mercy of god for Christê sake Certes nether Paule nether LaureÌ„ce wyl say that they are to be compted ryghtuouse for theyr owne clennes or that euerlastinge lyfe is to theÌ„ due for theyr owne workes or fulfyllynge of the lawe but they wyl thynke them selues to be reputed iust to receyue eternal lyfe for Christê sake throughe mercy Nether can godly myndes be armed againste desperation onles they thinke that through mercy for Christes sake they haue assuredly bothe ryghtuousnes and euerlastyng lyfe and nat for the lawe Thê sentence comforteth setteth vp and saueth godly myndes Wherfore thaduersaryes when they auaunce extolle meritum condigni .i. the merite of worthynes they quyte put away yâ— doctrine of fayth and of the medyator Christe dryue conscience to desperation But some happely wyll saye if we are to be saued by mercy what diuersitie is there betwyrt them to whoÌ„ saluation chaunseth and them to whom it doth nat chance Shal both good men bad meÌ„ egally hope and trust after mercye This argumente semeth to haue moued the schole men to seke meritum condigni .i. the meryte of condignitie or worthynes For there must nedes be some diuersity betwixt those that shal be saued those that shal be dampned And fyrste of all we say that with iustifycation is offered euerlastynge lyfe or that they whiche are iustifyed be the sonnes of god and coinheritours with Christ accordynge to thys sayinge of Paule Whome he hathe iustyfyed the same he hathe also gloryfyed Therfore saluatyon chaunceth to none saue to those that be iustifyed And lykewyse as iustifycation shuld be vncertayne yf it dyd haÌ„ge vpon the condition of our workes or of the lawe and were nat frely receyued for Christes sake thrugh mercie So yf hope dyd leaue to our workes then in dede it shulde be vncertayne because the lawe dothe alwayes accuse conscyence Nether can there be any hope of eternal lyfe except the conscyence be at peace and reste For the conscience that is in doute flâ—eth the iudgement of god despayreth but it is necessary that the hope of eternal lyfe be certayne and vndouted and therfore that it may be vndouted and certaine we must thinke that euerlastinge lyfe is gyuen frely throughe mercy for Christes sake and nat for our owne fulfyllyge of the lawe In courtes and in the iudgementes of men ryght or deuty is for the most parte certaine vndouted but the mercy of the Iudge is vncertayne But here in the sight of god the thinge is farre otherwyse for mercy hath the playne and euident commaundemente of god for the gospell is that same coÌ„maundement which byddeth vs beleue that god is wyllinge to forgyue and to saue vs for Christes sake accordynge to that sayenge of Christe God hath not sent hys son into the worlde to iudge the worlde but that the worlde shulde be saued by him whosoeuer beleueth in hym is not iudged As often tymes therfore as mention is 〈◊〉 of mercie it is to be vnderstondeâ— that faythe is required And this fayth maketh the â—â—â—erence betwixte them that shal be saued them that shal be daÌ„pned betwene them that â—e worthy â–ª and them that be vnworthy For eternal lyfe is promysed to theÌ„ that be iustifyed And fayth iustifieth whensoeuer men do receyue it And we ought to labour and striue al our lyue longe that we maye gette and establyshe thys fayth for thê fayth as we haue sayd before is won in repentaunce nat in theÌ„ which walke after the fleshe â–ª And it ought to encrease al our lyfe longe amonge ieoperdies and temptations And whosoeuer haue goten this faythe those be borne agayne that they maye worke well and that they may do the lawe Therfore lykewyse as we require repentaunce through out all our lyfe tyme so we do also reâ—uyre good workes all thoughe our workes be nat suche that for them eternall lyfe is due lykewyse as Christe sayde in lyke sentence When ye haue done all thynges saye we be vnprofytable seruauntes And Barnarde sayeth ryght well thus It is necessary fyrste to beleue that thou canst not haue remission of synnes but by the onely indulgence and pardon of god Secondarily that thou canst haue no maner good
worke at all onles it also be frely gyueÌ„ vnto yâ— And a lytle after he sayth Let no maÌ„ therfore begile hym selfe for yf he wyl consyder wel he shall fynde with out doute that he is not able to go forthe with tenne thousande agaynste hym whiche commeth to hym with twenty thousande c. We therfore to th entent that consciences shulde retayne a sure and vndouted consolation and hope do cal men backe agayne to the promise of Christe and do teache that it is necessarye to beleue that god for Christes sake and nat for the lawe dothe forgeue synnes doth iustifye and dothe gyue eternall lyfe accordynge to that saynge Who so euer hath the son hath lyfe But it is a worlde to heare howe our aduersaryes do dally and elude thê sayinge of Christ. When ye haue done all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes In the confutatyon thus they corupt it fyrst they go about to coÌ„found vs with our owne reason by a fourme of argument which is called antistrephon in this maner If when we haue done al thinges we must saye we be unprofytable saruauntes g o ergo moche rather when we haue beleued all thynges we maye say that we be vnprofitable seruauntes Marke I praye you howe greatly our aduersaryes be delyted in vanities and in chyldishe sophistrie But albeit these folyshe trifles be nat worthy to be refuted and dysproued yet neuertheles we shall make answere to them in fewe wordes Theyr argumente called antystrephon is vicious and nothynge worth For our aduersaryes be deceyued in thys worde faythe which yf it betokened the knowledge of the historye or yf we had sayde that faythe of her owne worthines had saued then shulde the symylytude be of moche more strengthe that we be vnprofytable seruauntes thoughe we had beleued But we do speke of the fayth and truste of the promyse and of the mercy of god And thys faythe dothe graunte that we be vnprofytable seruauntes yea thys is the verye voyce and saynge of fayth that our workes be vnworthy and that we be vnprofytable seruauntes And for thys only cause we speke of faythe and seke mercie because we knowledge our selues to be vnprofytable seruauntes For faythe dothe therfore saue because it receyueth mercie or the promyse of grace all thoughe our workes be vnworthy And after this vnderstandynge the antystrephon dothe nothynge hurte vs when ye shal haue beleued all thynges yet say ye we be vnprofytable seruauntes it is well sayde yf it be onely vnderstonded that worthynes is taken from workê But agayn on the contrary syde yf it be thus vnderstonded that faythe also is vnprofytable then the symilitude is nothynge worthy to say when ye shall haue done al thynges do nat truste to your workes So whan ye shall haue beleued do not trust the promyse of god These thynges do not agre together for they be verie fare vnlyke Unlyke causes vnlyke obiectes of confydence and truste be in the fyrst proposytion and in the latter Truste in the fyrst proposytion is the trust of our owne workes Truste in the latter proposytion is the trust of goddes promyse Nome Christe condempneth confydence and truste in our owne workes but he dothe nat disalowe the trust in his owne promyse he wyllith nat that we despayre of the grace and mercie of god he rebuketh our warkes as vnworthy but he rebuketh not the promyse whiche frely offereth mercy And Ambrose speketh excedyngly wele in thê poynte thus Grace is to be knowen but nature is not to be knowen we muste truste to the promyse of grace and not to our nature But our aduersaries folowe there accustomed maner They do vngraciously wrest the sentence that maketh for fayth agaynst the doctrine of fayth For this cauillation dothe abrogate the gospel to say â–ª when ye shall haue beleued all thynges saye that fayth is vnprofytable Doth nat the gospell promyse remission of synnes and saluatioÌ„ euen vnto them whiche haue no good workes at all so that they wyll be conuerted and nat despayre but by fayth in Christe obtayne remission of synnes Do our aduersaryes bydde them despayre whose consciences fynde no good warkes whiche they may plede agaynst the iudgement of god Wyl they say vnto theÌ„ that faythe is vnprofytable God gyue these sophisters a myschefe with such cauillations whiche do subuerte the hole gospell whiche do abrogate the free remyssyon of synnes whiche do take awaye from godlye conscyences ferme and sure consolatyons But that cauillatyon amonge other is vtterlye childishe wher as they interprete the seruauntes to be vnprofytable because the workes be vnprofitable to god but profitable to vs. But Christ speketh of yâ— vtilitie and profet whiche maketh god dettour to vs of grace Howbeit it is besyde the purpose here in this place to dispute of vtilitie or inutilitie For vnprofitable seruauntes betoken vnsufficient or vnable seruauntes for no man feareth god so muche no man loueth so muche no man beleueth or trusteth god so muche as he ought to do no man fulfilleth the lawe But let vs nowe passe ouer these vayne cauillations of our aduersaries of whiche howe men wyll iudge if at any tyme they shal be brought forthe in to lyght Wyse men may easely gesse In wordes moste playne and euident they haue fouÌ„de a starriÌ„g hole But who seeth nat that in this place is reâ—uked the confidence and truste of our owne workes But our aduersaries do crye agaynst vs that eternall lyfe is due of worthynes for our owne god workes bycause eternal lyfe is called a rewarde We wyll make a shorte and a playne answere Paule calleth eternall lyfe a gyfte because when we be reputed ryghtuous for Christes sake we be also made the sonnes of god and coinheritours with Christ. But in another place it is wrytten Plentuous shal your rewarde be in heuen If our aduersaries do thiÌ„ke that theâ—e thinges be repugnaunte the one to the other let them selues dissolue the doubte But they be none indiffereÌ„t iudges For they leaue out this worde gyfte they leaue out also the fountaynes of the hole busynes that is to saye in what wyse men be iustified and that Christe is contynually a Mediatour In the meane season they pycke out thys worde rewarde And that they do most bytterly interprete nat only agaynst the scripture but also agaynste the custome and vsuall maner of speakyng Hereof they reason because it is called rewarde that therfore our workes are suche whiche ought to be the pryce for which eternall lyfe is dewe Uerely thys is a newe kynde of logyke We hear thê worde rewarde ergo our workê do satisfy and fulfyl the lawe Ergo we be accepted to god for our owne workes and nede nat the mercy of Christ the propitiatour or faythe receiuiÌ„g mercy And they cumulate a greate heape of argumentes one vpon another after the maner of Chrysippus Good workes be the pryce for whiche eternal lyfe is due Good workes do
satisfy the laâ—e of god And besydes ther may be done â—orkes of superogation Therfore men maye nat only satisfy and fulfyll the lawe of god but also do more theÌ„ fulfyl it And because Monkes and Freers do more than fulfyl the lawe therfore they haue merites more then they nede them selues And because it is liberalalite to gyue vnto other of that whiche thou haste aboue thyne owne necessitie therfore they may gyue those merites to other men They deuise also a sacrament that is to say a wytnes and a marke of this gyuyng for wheÌ„ men be deade they put about them the habites of theyr relegious men to witnesse that other mens merites be applyed vnto them With suche coaceruatioÌ„s our aduersaries do deface the benefite of Christe and the iustice of faythe ⧠We do nat here rayse vp vayne pratyng about the worde But we stryue about a greate thiÌ„g that is to weâ—e wherof godly myndes ought to conceyue sure and vndoubted hope of saluation whether good workes maye set consciences at peace and quyetnes Whether they ought to thynke that eternall lyfe is so gotteÌ„ if they do set theyr good workes agaynste the iudgement of god orels they ought to thynke that through mercy for Christes sake they be reputed ryghtous do obtayne eternall lyfe These thyngê do come into controuersie whiche onleâ— the coÌ„science do discusse and iudge it can nat haue any stronge and sure consolation But we haue declared euideÌ„tly ynough that good workes do nat satisfie the lawe of god but that they haue nede of mercye that by faythe we be accepted with god for Christê sake also that good workes do nat set the coÌ„science at reste and peace Of all these thyngê it foloweth that we ought to thynke that for Christes sake through mercy and nat for the lawe they that be iustified do obtayne eternal lyfe What shall we say then as touchyng the name of rewarde Fyrste if we shulde say that eternall lyfe is called a rewarde because it is due to them that be iustified by reason of the promyse we shulde nat speake any thynge amysse For these gyftes be ordered among theÌ„ selues as AugustiÌ„ne sayeth Dona sua coronat deus in nobis .i. God crowneth rewardeth hys owne gyftes in vs. But the scripture calleth eternal lyfe a rewarde nat because it is due for our workes but because it dothe recompense the affections and workes albeit yet it is gyuen for another cause Lykewyse as the inheritaunce commeth to the good mans sonne of the howse nat for his owne workes or seruice and yet neuertheles it is a rewarde and recoÌ„pense of the warkes and seruice of the son It is sufficieÌ„t therfore that the name of rewarde dothe for thys cause agre to eternall lyfe be cause eternall lyfe dothe recompence good workes and afflictions Eternall lyfe therfore is nat a rewarde because our workes be sufficient or because it is due for workes but consecutiuely because although it be due for another cause yet neuertheles it dothe recompense good workes and afflictions ⧠Besydes thys we do graunte that workes be in very dede meritorious nat of remission of synnes or of iustificatioÌ„ for workes do nat please but in theÌ„ that be iustified and that because of faythe Neyther be they worthy of eternall lyfe For as iustification commeth by faythe for Christes sake so dothe viuificatioÌ„ but they be meritorious of other rewardê corporall and spiritual whiche are gyuen partly in this lyfe and partly after thê lyfe For god differreth the most parte of hys rewardes vntyll he dothe glorifie sayntes after thys lyfe because he wyl that they be excercised in this lyfe to mortifye the olde man The gospell dothe frely set forth and exhibete the promise of iustification and viuification for Christes sake But in the lawe rewarde is offered and is due nat frely but for workes For asmuche therfore as workê be a certayne fulfyllyng of the lawe they be well called meritorious and it is well sayde that rewarde is due vnto them And this rewarde engendereth degrees of rewardes accordyng to that sayeng of Paule Euery man shall receyue rewarde accordynge to hys owne labour These degrees be rewarde of warkes and of afflictions But our aduersaries do contende and styffly affyrme that eternall lyfe is only due for workes because Paule sayeth He shall rendre to euery man accordynge to hys work In the fyfthe of Iohan. who so euer haue wrought well shall ryse agayne to the resurrection of lâ—fe In the .xxv. of Mathewe I was hungry and ye gaue me meate In all these places in whiche workes be commeÌ„ded and praysed it is necessary to haue recourse to the rule a boâ—â—remembred that is to saye that workes please nat without Christe nor that Christe the mediatour is nat to be excluded Wherfore when the texte sayeth that eternal lyfe is gyuen to warkes It meaneth that it is gyuen to them that be iustified For good workê do nat please god but in them that be iustified that is to say in them whiche thynke them selues accepted to god for Christes sake And they that be iustified do necessarily bryng forthe good workes or good frutes as I was hungry and ye gaue me meate Here when it is sayde that eternall lyfe is giuen to these workes the meanyng is that it is gyuen to ryghtuousnes Therfore he coÌ„prehendeth fayth when he nameth the frutes And the scripture nameth the frutes to shewe that god requyreth nat hypochrisy but iustice whiche is full of efficacitie and workyng and a certayne newe lyfe bryngynge forthe good frutê Neyther do we couet here any vayne or vnfrutful subtilite For they be very wayghty causes for whiche we do dispute these thyngê For if we do graunt to our aduersaries that workes do deserue eternall â–ª lyfe anone they adde these false and inconueniente thynges that workes satisfie the lawe of god that they haue no nede of mercy that we be ryghtuous that is to saye acceptable in the syght of god for our owne workes and nat for Christê sake â–ª that men maye do more then fulfyll the lawe So all the doctrine of the iustice of faythe is quyte ouerthrowne And vndoubtedly it is necessary that the pure doctrine of the iustice of fayth be reserued in the churche Wherfore we be compelled to rebuke the phariseicall opinions of our aduersaries bothe to the entent that we may set forth the glory of Christ and also that we maye set forthe vnto consciences ferme and sure comfortes For howe shall the conscience conceyue certayne hope of saluation whan it shal perceyue that in the iudgement of good workes be vnworthy Onles it knoweth that men be reputed ryghtuous and saued throughe mercy for Christê sake nat for our owne fulfyllyng of the lawe Dyd S. Laurence lyeng on the grydyron thinke that through the worke he satisfyed the laweof god and that he was voyde of syn and neded nat Christ the Mediatour nor the mercy of god No verely he
lyfte vp and coÌ„forte hym selfe with the gospell and the promise of Christe For faythe sheweth the diuer site betwene the contrititioÌ„ of Iudas and the contrition of Peter But our aduersaryes make theyr answere by the lawe that Iudas loued nat god but feared punyshementes but when shall a troubled and frayed conscience namely in these earnest true and greate terrours whiche be described iÌ„ the Psalmes and the prophetes and whiche those men do vndoubtedly taste whiche be truely conuerted when shall I say suche a troubled conscieÌ„ce be able to iudge whether he feareth and dreadeth god truly and for him selfe or whether he dothe but flee euerlastiÌ„g paynes These great motions and trobelouse may be haply discerned or disseuered by letres and vocabules but they can nat be depted so in suÌ„dre iÌ„ very dede as these swete sophisters do dreame Here we call vpon the iudgementes of all good wyse men They vndoubtedly wyl coÌ„fesse graunt that these disputations amonge our aduersaries be very darke doubtfull perplexe and intricate And yet here they be in hande with a moste wayghty matter and with the chief and principall place of all the gospell I meane coÌ„cernyng forgyuenes of synnes All thys hole doctrine concernynge these questions whiche I haue rehersed amonge our aduersaries is full of errours and hypocrisie and defaceth obscureth and endymmeth the benefyte of Christ the power of the keyes and the iustice of faythe These thynges be done in the fyrst acte or parte of the playe But what wheÌ„ they be come vnto confession What infinite and greate busines is there in that endles rehersall numbryng and reckenyng vp of synnes Whiche neuertheles for a greate parte is speÌ„t and consumed in mans traditions and lawes And because that the good and deuoute myndes myght be the more vexed they fayne and ymagen that this rehersall and iuste reckeniÌ„g of the synnes is commaunded by goddê lawe And though they do exacte and require thys rehersall of all the synnes vnder the pretence of the lawe of god yet in the meane season of absolution whiche is in dede of the lawe of god they speake full slenderly and full coldly They fayne that the selfe sacrament Ex opere operato that is to say euen of the very worke that is wrought gyueth and conferreth grace without any good mocion of the vser But of faythe who receyueth the absolution and coÌ„forteth the conscience is made no mencio nat all This is euen accordyng to the prouerbe Ante mysteria discedere that is to say to depart before the mysteries are begonne Nowe resteth and remayneth the thyrde acte or parte of the play whiche is of satisfactioÌ„s And thê acte hathe very confuse disputacions They fayne that euerlastynge paynes be chaunged into the paynes of purgatorie and that parte of these be relesed by the power of the keyes and parte they teache to be redemed with satisfactions They adde moreouer that satisfactions must be workes of suê‘erogation and them they set and put in moste folyshe obseruaunces whiche haue not the coÌ„maundement of god to beare them as in pylgrymages rosaries and lyke obseruatioÌ„s whiche be maynteyned by no coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god Furthermore lykewyse as· they redeme Purgatorye with satisfactions so hath there ben a crafte deuised of redemynge satisfactions whiche hath ben a very gayngfull profytable crafte and hath broughte in moche lucre For they sell pardones whiche they do interprete to be releasemeÌ„tê of satisfactioÌ„s And this gaynes coÌ„meth in not onely by them that be alyue but moche more largely by them whiche be deade And not onely by pardons but also by the sacrifice of the masse they redeme the satisfactions of deade men Finally the matier of satisfactions is endeles Amonge these sclaunders and offendicles of conscience for we be not able to reherse all and doctrines of deuyls the doctrine of the iustice of faythe in Christe â–ª and of the benefite of Christ lyeth oppressed ouerwhelmed Wherfore all good men do perceiue that the doctrine of Sophistes and Canonistes touchynge repentaunce or penaunce is by vs profitably and godly rebuked For these articles and poyntes folowynge be openly false and not onely disagreyng mere repugnant to the holy scriptures but also dissonauÌ„t variable from the holy fathers of the churche These be their articles ¶ That to the takynge awaye of synne onely the detestation hatred of sinne is sufficient ¶ That for our contrition not by faythe in Christe we do obteyne remission of synnes ¶ That we deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes by goddes couenaunt by good workes done without grace and obteyne it not by faythe that is to wite freely by the truste of mercy ¶ That the power and auctority of the keyes auaileth to the remission of siÌ„nes in the syght of the churche but nat in the syght of god ¶ That by the power of the keyes synnes be nat forgiuen before god but that the power of the keyes was instituted to chaunge eternall paynes into temporall and to lay vpon conscieÌ„ces certayne satisfactioÌ„s to institute newe sacrifices and ceremonies and to bynde consciences to suche maner satisfactions and ceremonies ⧠⧠¶ That the nombering or rekening vp of sinnes in confession of the whiche our aduersaries do teache is necessary by the lawe of god ¶ That canonicall satisfactions be necessary to redeme the payne of Purgatory or els be availlable as a recompensation to take awaye synne For so vnlerned men do vnderstande and take it ¶ That the receiuynge of the sacramente of penaunce by the vertue of the worke that is wrought without the faythe in Christe gyueth grace ¶ That by the power of the keyes soules be deliuered out of Purgatory by pardons ¶ That in reseruation of cases nat onely the canonicall payne but also the synne ought to be reserued in him whiche is truly conuerted ⧠We therfore to the enteÌ„t to deliuer godly and wel disposed coÌ„sciences froÌ„ these comberous and endles mases of sophesters do make two partes of penaunce that is to wytte contrition and faythe Yf any man lusteth to adde the thyrde I meane worthy frutes of penauÌ„ce that is to say good workê folowyng coÌ„uersion we wyl nat saye agaynste hym And we knowe well ynoughe that thys worde penitentia in latine that is to saye repentaunce amonge GraÌ„marious doth betokeÌ„ to mislyke and disalowe that thynge whiche before we dyd lyke and alowe This propertye is more agreinge to contricion rather then to faythe But we in this place to th entent to expresse and sette forthe the thynge before mens eyes do vnderstande by penauÌ„ce the hole coÌ„uersion in which there be two termes mortification and viuification whiche we call by the vsuall and accustomed names contrition and faythe As concernynge contrition we do cutte awaye those ydle vnfrutful and endles disputations as to dispute when we be sory throughe loue of god and when through feare of payne But we say that coÌ„trition is the true feares and terrours of conscience whiche perceiueth feleth
se what confession auayleth without absolutioÌ„ But if they do nat seperate the receyuing of absolution from confession they muste nedes thynke that faythe is a parte of penauÌ„ce For absolution is nat receiued but by fayth And that absolution is nat receiued but by faythe it may be proued by Paule whiche teacheth that the promyse can nat be receiued but by faythe Howe absolution is the promyse of the remission of synnes Therfore it dothe necessarily require faythe And we do nat se howe he can be sayde to receiue absolution whiche dothe nat assente and agre to it And what other thyng is it nat to agre to the absolution then to accuse god of a lye If the barte dothe doubte it thynketh that those thynges be vncerteyne vayne whiche god dothe promise Therfore it is wrytten in the epistle of Iohan whosoeuer beleueth nat god maketh hym a lyer because he dothe nat beleue in the testimonye whiche god hathe witnessed of his sonne Secondaryly we suppose that our aduersaries do graunt that remission of synnes is eyther parte or the ende or terminus ad queÌ„ as they vse to speake of penauÌ„ce or repentauÌ„ce ergo that thyng wherby remissioÌ„ of synnes is receyued is of ryght added to the partes of penaunce But most certayne it is most vndoubted although al the gates of helle wolde crye agaynste it that remission of synnes can nat be receiued but only by fayth whiche beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christê sake according to that sayeng of Paule to the Romaines whom god hathe set forthe a propitiator by faythe in the bloude of hym Also in the fyfthe to the Romaynes By whom we haue waye throughe faythe into grace c. For the troubled arraryed coâ—icence can nat plede nor laye agaynste the wrathe of god theyr owne workes or loue but so is only the conscience made quiete when it receiueth the mediatour Christe and beleueth the promises gyuen for hys sake for they do nat perceyue what remission of synnes is or howe it cometh to vs which dreame that hartes be set at peace without faythe in Christe Peter alledgeth out of Esaye thys sayeng whosoeuer shall beleue in hym shall nat be confounded or ashamed â–ª Wherfore hypocrites muste neues be confounded which truste that they receiue remission of synnes for theyr owne workê and nat for Christes sake And Peter sayth in the actes To him all the prophetes beare witnes that al whiche beleue in him do receiue remission of synnes throughe his name It coulde nat be spoken more manifestly than yâ— he sayth throughe his name And he addeth all that beleue in hym We do only therfore thus receiue remission of synnes through the name of Christe that is to wete for Christes sake â–ª and nat for any meritê or workes of our owne And this is so done when we beleue that synnes be forgyuen vs for Christes sake Our aduersaries crye out that they be the churche that they do folowe the coÌ„sent of the church But Peter here in thys our cause alledgeth also the coÌ„sent of the churche To him sayth he al the prophetes beare wytnes that by his name they receiue remission cÌ„ Undoubtedly the consente of the prophetes is to be iudged the consente of the vniuersall churche We do neyther grauÌ„t to the byshop of Rome neither yet vnto the church power or authoritie to decre agaynst this coÌ„sent of the ê“phetes But the Bulle of Leo byshop of Rome do openly condempne this article of remission of sinnes our aduersaries do also coÌ„dempne it in theyr confutation By whiche thynge it appereth what maner churche theyr churche is to be iudged whiche not onely with decrees disalowe this sentence that remission of synnes is purchased by faith not for our workes but for Christ but also coÌ„maunde to destroy that sentence and opinion with violence and with the swerde They coÌ„mauÌ„de also with all kynd of crueltie to destroye the good men whiche be of the same opinion and mynde But they wyll saye that they haue greate and famous authours for them as maister Duns Gabriel â–ª and other lyke the sayenges also of fathers â–ª whiche be recited in the decrees but maymed and vnperfecte Certes if we shulde falle to numbring of testimonies they haue the better bande For there is a great rablement of tryfelyng wryters vpon the mayster of the Sentencies whiche do euen as it were conspire to gether in defendyng these figmentes lyes of the merite of attricion and of workes and the thynges whiche we haue here to fore recyted But let no man be moued with the multitude of them For thauctoritie is not greate of the late wryters whiche were not the fathers of theyr owne wrytynges but onely embesylyng and robbyng the olde fathers dyd shyfre and turmoyle opinions forth of one boke in to an other They vsed no maner iugemeÌ„t but only after the fashyon of the Senatours whiche were called Pedarij without any wordes allowed the errours of them that had writen before whom they perceyued not We therfore wyll not be afraide to set this sayenge of Peter who allegeth the consente of the prophetê agaynst the legions of sententiaries be they neuer so manye And to this preachynge of Peter is added the testimonie of the holy gost For thus sayth the texte Adhuc loquente Petro uerba haec cecidit spiritus sanctus sup omnes qui audiebant uerbum .1 And as Peter was yet speakynge these wordes the holy ghoste lyghted vpon al them which dyd heare the worde Let all good godly consciences therfore knowe that this is the coÌ„maundement of god that they shulde beleue theyr synnes to be freelye forgyuen them for Christes sake and not for our owne workes And with this coÌ„maundement of god let them strengthen and susteyne them selues agaynst desperation and agaynst the terrours of synne and of deathe And let them knowe that this senteÌ„ce opinion hath always remayned in the churche amoÌ„ge holy and good men sythe the begynnynge of the worlde For Peter dothe clearely alledge the consent of the prophetes And the writynges of thapostles testifie that they were of the same mynde we haue also testimonies of the fathers For Barnarde sayth the sawe in playn and open wordes Necesse est enim primo omnium credere quod remissionem peccatoruÌ„ habere noÌ„ possis nisi per indulgeÌ„tiam dei sed adde adhuc ut credas hoc quod per ipsum peccata tibi donantur Hoc est testimonium quod ê‘hibet spiritus sanctus in corde tuo dicens dimissa sunt tibi peccata tua Sic enim arbitratur apostolus gratis iustificari hominem per fidem .i. For it is necessarye fyrste of all to beleue that thou canste not haue forgyuenes of synnes but by the indulgence of god but adde yet hereunto so that thou doste beleue this also that by hym thy synnes be forgyuen the. This is the testimonie which the holy ghost heareth in thy herte
the lawe not of the gospell whiche doth fayne and imagine that man is fyrste iustified by the lawe before that he be reconciled by Christ to god notwithstandyng that Christe hym selfe saythe Without me â—e can do nothynge Also I am the true vine and ye be the braunches But oure aduersaries do imagine that we be the braunches not of Christ but of Moyses For they wyll fyrst be iustified by the law and offre theyr loue workê vnto god before that they be reconciled to god by Christe before that they be braunces of Christe Paule contrarywyse sayth playnly that the law can not be wroughte nor fulfylled without Christe Therfore the promyse is fyrst to be receyued that by faythe we maye be reconciled to god for Christis sake or that we worke the lawe These thynges we do iudge to be clere euident ynough to godly coÌ„sciences And herof they shall playnely ê‘ceyue the cause why we dyd heretofore holde opinion professe that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue For we muste plede agaynst the wrathe of god not our loue or our workes nor truste in our loue and workes but Christe the mediator and we muste fyrste receyue the promyse of remission of synnes or euer we worke the lawe Finally Whan shall the conscience be set at reste if we do receyue remission of synnes because we loue or worke the lawe For the law wyll always accuse vs bicause we neuer satisfie the lawe of god accordyng to the sayenge of saynte Paule Lex iram operatur The lawe worketh wrathe Chrisostome asketh the question concernyng penaunce wherby we be assured that our synnes be forgyuen vs our aduersaries also in the senteÌ„ces do aske the question concernyng the same thynge This can not be declared neyther consciences can not be made quiete onles they know that it is the coÌ„maundement of god and the very gospell that they shulde be assured that for Christes sake synnes be freely forgyuen and that they shulde not doubte but that they be freely forgyuen vnto them selfes If any manne dothe doubt he as IohnÌ„ sayth accuseth the diuine promyse of a lye This certeyntie and assuraunce of faythe we teache is required in the gospell But oure aduersaries leaue mennes conscieÌ„ces vncertayne and in a doubtfulnes Nowe coÌ„sciences do worke nothyng by fayth whan they do coÌ„tinually doubt whether they haue remission Howe can they in this doubtfulnes call vpon god Howe can they ê‘suade them selues be assured that they be herde Thus all theyr lyfe is without god and without the very true honoure and worshyppynge of god This is it that Paule saythe that what soeuer is not done of faythe is synne And bicause they continue alwayes in this doubtfulnes they neuer haue experieÌ„ce what faythe is So it coÌ„meth to passe at the laste that they fall in to desperation Suche is the doctrine of our aduersaries euen a verye doctrine of the lawe a dissanullyng and an aâ—rogation of the gospell and a doctrine of desperation Nowe we do gladly permitte vnto all good men to gyue iugement of this place concernyng penaunce for it is playne ynoughe without any maner of obscuritie and to pronounce whiche of vs haue taughte the more godly and more holsome doctrine for consciences whether we or our aduersaries Certes these dissensioÌ„s in the churche do nothyng delyte vs wherfore if we had not great and necessarie causes to dissent from our aduersaries we wolde with ryghte good wyll holde our peace Nowe sith it is so that they condempne the manifest and open veritie it standeth not with our profession neither is it laufull for vs to leaue this cause vndefended whiche is not ours but Christê cause and the cause of the churche We haue shewed for what causes we haue put these two partes of penauÌ„ce contrition and faythe And we haue done it so moche the rather bicause there be borne aboute many sayenges concernyng penaunce whiche be alledged of the fathers but maymed and vnperfecte whiche our aduersaries haue detorted wrested to the defacynge of faythe As for example Penaunce is to sorowe bewayle the offeÌ„ces coÌ„mitted and not to coÌ„mitte agayne whiche thou oughteste to bewayle and sorowe Also penaunce is a certeyne punyshement or vengeaunce of the sorower aueÌ„gyng in hym selfe the offence whiche he is sorye that he hath coÌ„mitted In these sayenges is no mention of fayth no not so moche as in the scholes whan they do interprete and declare them is any thyng at all added of faythe Wherfore we to th entent that the doctrine of faythe myght be the better espied haue nombred faythe amonge the partes of penauÌ„ce For those sayenges whiche do require coÌ„trition or good workes and whiche make no mention of faythe that iustifiethe the very thynge it selfe shewethe that they be very perylous And doubtles it may be thoughte and that not without cause that those men lacked a poynt of prudence wysedome whiche haue heaped together these peced and patched rablemeÌ„tes of sentences and decrees For where as the fathers in diuerse other places do speake of the other parte of Penaunce it shulde haue bene profitable to haue pyked out the sentences of both partes â–ª and to haue ioyned them together not only out of one parte For Tertulliane speakethe ercellently of faythe amplifienge the othe of the lorde whiche is in the prophete â–ª Viuo ego dicit dominus nolo mortem peccatoris sed ut conuertatur et uiuat .i. I lyue saythe the lorde I wyll not the deathe of a synner but that he be conuerted lyue For in as moche as the lorde dothe sweare ther he wyll not the deathe of a synner he shewethe and declareth that credence fayth is required by whiche we shuld beleue his othe surely reken with our selues that he dothe forgyue vs. The promyses of god ought to be of greate auctoritie with vs although they be made without any othe put vnto them at all But this ê“myse is also coÌ„fermed and bounde with an othe Wherfore if any man doth not surely reken with hym selfe that he is forgyueÌ„ he denyeth that god hath sworne a true othe whiche is so great a blasphemie that there can none be imagined more haynous For thus saythe Tertulliane He calleth vs to saluation with a reward swearyng also in that he saythe I lyue and couetethe that we gyue credece vnto hym O blessed be they for whose cause god sâ—â—eareth O moste wretched be we if we beleue not the lorde whan he also sweareth And here it is to be knowen that this faythe oughte to thiÌ„ke that god freely forgyueth vs for Christis sake bicause of his owne ê“myse and not because of our workes or contrition confession satisfaction or loue For if faythe shulde leane vnto these workes be grounded vpon them anone it is made vncerteine and doubtfull For the fearefull coÌ„science doth se that these workes be vnworthy Therfore saythe Ambrose very
perfecte confession In the bokes of doctours of the churche mention is made of coÌ„fession but they do not speake of this rekenynge vp of secrete synnes but of the ceremonies and maner of open penauÌ„ce For bicause that synners and persones of euyll fame were not receyued agayne in to the churche without certeyne satisfaction therfore suche maner persones made confession vnto the preestes to th entent that accordynge to the quantitie of theyr offences satisfactions myght be enioyned vnto them All this matter is no poynte lyke to this rekenynge vp of synnes wherof we nowe speake That confession than was made nat because that without it there could be no remission of synnes before god but because satisfactions coude not be enioyned onles the kynde of the synne were fyrst knowen For accordynge to the diuersitie of synnes sundry canons and constitutions were made And of that vsage maner of open penauÌ„ce we haue nowe onely the name lefte of satisfaction For the holy fathers wold not receiue agayne synners euyll famed persones onles they had fyrst knowen and proued the repentaunce of them so moche as myghte be And of this thiÌ„g there appereth to haue ben many causes For it was a good ensample to cause other to beware to chastise and correcte them that had offended as the glose teachethe in the decrees and it was an vnsemelye thynge and not coÌ„uenient to receyue notorious synners forthwith to the coÌ„munion These maners and customes haue ben laide down many yeres ago Neyther is it requisite to set them vp agayne for they be not necessary to remission of synnes before god Neyther was this the mynde opinion of the fathers that men shulde merite remission of synnes by suche vsages or suche workê How be it those sightê and spectacles of open peniteÌ„tes be rum onte to begyle the vnlerned vnskylled men in that that they thrughe this occasion thynke that by those workê they merite remissioÌ„ of synnes before god But if any man hath so thought he had a Iudaicall and an hethen thoughte For hethen men also had certeyne purgatioÌ„s and satisfactions of synnes by whiche they imagyned them selues to be recoÌ„ciled to god But now the custome and vsage beinge sayde downe and put away the name of satisfaction dothe remayne and a certeyne steppe token of the custome whiche is that in coÌ„fession be enioyned certeyne satisfactions whiche they call define to be workê not of duetie we call them canonicall satisfactions And of thys our opinion is lykewyse as it was of the rehersall of synnes that canonical satisfactioÌ„s be not necessarie by the lawe of god to the remission of synnes no more thaÌ„ these olde spectacles shewes of satisfactions in open penauÌ„ce were necessary by the law of god to the remission of sinnes For that senteÌ„ce concernyng faythe must be reteyned and kepte that by faythe we obteyne remission of synnes for Christis sake and not for any workes of ours eyther goynge before or folowynge And for this cause principally haue we disputed of satisfactions lest they shulde be receiued to the defacynge and obscurynge of the iustice of fayth lest men shulde thynke that for those workes they obteyne remission of synnes And this errour is encresed by many sayengê whiche be comenly vsed in scholes as for example when in the definition of satisfaction they put thys particle clause that it is done to pacifye the wrathe and displeasure of god But yet our aduersaries grauÌ„t that satisfactions do nat auayle or helpe to the remission of the sinne or offence but they ymagine that satisfactions be auaylable to redeme the paynes eyther of Purgatorie or els other For thus they teache that in the remission of syn god forgyueth the offense And yet because it is conuenient to the iustice of god to punyshe syn he chauÌ„geth the payne eternal into payne temporall transitory They adde moreouer that parte of that temporall payne is released by the power of the keyes and the residue is redemed by satisfactioÌ„s And it can nat be perceiued what paynes they be of whiche parte is released by the power of the keyes onles they do say that parte of the paynes of Purgatory be released of whiche thynge it shulde ensue that satisfactions be only paynes redemyng Purgatory and these satisfactioÌ„s they say to be of streÌ„gth also though they be done of them whiche be fallen agayne into deadly synne as who shulde say that the wrathe and displeasure of god might be appeased by them whiche be in deadly syn All this is but a fayned matter lately imagined without auctorite of scripture and of the olde doctours of the churche and nat somuch as Peter Lombard dothe speake after this maner of satisfactioÌ„s The schole men sawe that there were satisfactions in the churche but they perceyued nat that these open shewes and spectacles of penitentes were instituted partely for cause of example and partely to proue and trye them which desyred to be receyued of the churche Brefely they dyd not perceyue that it was a discipline and a matier vtterlye and mere politicall And therfore they superstitiously imagined those satisfactions not to be auaylable to discipline in the syghte of the churche but to be of power and strength to appease the diuine wrathe And likewyse as in other thingê they haue often tymes mengled together spiritual matiers and politike or ciuile matiers euen so the same hath happened also in satisfactions But the gloose in the canon lawes doth other whyles wytnesse that these obseruances ceremonies were iÌ„stituted for cause of discipline good ordre to be had in the church And see I praye you after what maner in the coÌ„futation whiche they haue presumptuously offered vnto the emperours maiestie they ê“ue these theyr fayned imagitioÌ„s They alledge many sayenges of the scriptures to begyle them whiche be vnlerned as thoughe this thynge had his auctoritie by the scriptures whiche in the tyme of Peter Lumbarde was as yet vnknowen They alledge these sentences Worke ye the worthy frutes of penaunce Also Gyue your membres to serue ryghtwysenes Also Christe preacheth penaunce sayenge Do ye penaunce Also Christe byddethe his apostles to preache penaunce And Peter preacheth penauÌ„ce in the seconde chapitre of the actes After this they alledge certayne sayenges of fathers canones And they conclude with these wordes Satisfactions in the churche be not to be put away coÌ„trary to the expresse wordes of the gospell and to the decrees of councels and of the fathers but rather they that be assoyled of the preest ought to ê‘forme and fulfyl theyr penauÌ„ce enioyned folowyng that sayenge of Paule He gaue hym selfe for vs to redeme vs from all iniquitie and that he myghte clense to hym selfe an acceptable people the ensuer and folâ—wâ—r of good workes Howe I â—â—â—eche god to destroy these wycked sophisters whiche so mischeuously do detorte wrest the worde of god vnto theyr most vayne dreames What
good man wolde not be greued to se this theyr so shamefull demeanour Christ sayth do ye penaunce and the apostles preache penaunce ergo Euerlastyng paynes be redemed with our satisfactions Ergo the keyes haue auctoritie and a warraÌ„t to release parte of the paynes of Purgatorie Ergo satisfactions do redeme the paynes of Purgatory Who taughte these asses this maner logyke But this is neyther logyke nor sophistrie but it is playne falsehed decepte and a sycophantical arte For to this purpose they alledge this sayenge do ye penaunce that whan vnlerned men do heare suche a sentence alledged agaynst vs they shulde conceyue an euyll opinion in vs that we shulde take away repenâ—auÌ„ce all together By these sleyghtes and craftes they go aboute to turne the myndes of men from vs and to kendle hatred agaynst vs to this onely purpose that the vnlerned men shulde crye agaynst vs that suche myscheuous heretikes as we be shulde be ryd out of the worlde whiche do improue and disalowe penauÌ„ce But we certaynly hope that amonge good men these false accusatioÌ„s shall lytle preuayle And god wyll not longe sufâ—re so greate a â—oldnes malyce Neyther doth the â—yshoppe of Rome profitably prouide for hys owne dignitie in that he dothe vse suche maner defenders that he dothe suffre these sophisters to gyue iugemeÌ„t of so greate a mater For where as we in our confession haue comprised â—elnere the summe of the hole christen doctrine there ought suche men to haue bene made iudges for to haue gyuen sentence of these so greate so many and so dyuers matiers whose doctrine and faythfulnes hadde bene knowen and approued of good men And this thynge it became the o Cardynall CaÌ„pege accordyng to thy wysedome to haue prouided that these sophisters shulde not wryte any thyng in these so greate wayghty matiers whiche eyther noâ—e in this tyme or els in tyme to come myght seme to be an occasion to mynyshe the auctorite and reputation of the see of Rome If the see of Rome doth iudge it ryght that all nations shulde knowe her for mastres teacher of faythe she ought to gyue diligence that lerned vertuous and discrete men shulde haue the determination and handliÌ„g of matters touching the christen religion For what shall the worlde iudge if at any tyme the wrytynge of our aduersaries shal be brought forthe in to lyghte what shall they that shall come hereafter iudge of these false erronious iudgementes Thou seest Campege that these be the last days in which Christ prophecied before that moche ieoê‘die shulde happen to his religion Ye therfore whiche ought to syt on hygh and to gouerne the christen religion it was semynge for you nowe in these dayes to vse both singular wysedome also diligeÌ„ce There be many signes whiche if ye looke not well aboute you do threten a chauÌ„ge to the Romaine estate And thou art farre deceiued if thou thynkest the coÌ„gregations are to be holden kepte styll only by violeÌ„ce force of armes Men desyre to be taught instructed of theyr religion Howe many thinkest thou be there not only in Germany but also in EnglaÌ„de in Spayne in Italye in Fraunce yea euen in the citie of Rome also whiche bicause they perceiue se coÌ„trouersies to be rysen euen of the verye greateste matters do begyn to doubte in some thinges and in theyr myndes be angrye because ye refuse in due forme to knowe and to iudge these so wayghtie matters and because ye do not delyuer and set at large combred and doubtefull consciences and because ye onely commauÌ„de vs to be oppressed and destroyed with violence and force of armes And there be many good men whom it wolde greue lesse to suffre deathe and all kyndes of tourmentes than as they do to suffre this ambiguitie and doubtfulnes Neyther dost thou sufficiently consydre and waye howe greate a thynge the christian religion is yf thou thynkeste that good men be but lytle payned at what tyme they begynne to doubte of any opinion or article And this doubtefulnes can not but engendre merueylous bytter hatredde agaynste them whiche where as they oughte to fynde helpe and remedy for consciences do let that the matter can not be opened and playnly declared We speake not here howe greately ye ought to feare the punyshement of god For the byshoppes of Rome regarde this thynge but lyghtly which syth they them selfes beare the kayes may be ye sure whan they lyste open heuen vnto them selues We do speake of the iudgementes of men and of the close and secrete hertes of all nations whiche doubtles at this tyme do require that these matters might be in suche wyse knowen ordered and determined that good myndes myghte be healed and delyuered from doubtefulnes For what shall come of it if it fortune ones that these hatredes coÌ„ceyued in mennes hertes agaynst you do brast out thou mayst by thy wysedome easely iudge But with this benefite ye maye bynde all nations vnto you whiche all wyse men do iudge to be an hygh and a very greate benefite if ye wyll heale the doubtefull waueryng coÌ„sciences We haue not spoken these thynges to this purpose that we do doubt of our confession For we knowe certaynly that it is true godly and profitable to good consciences But it is a thyng lykely that there be euerye where many men whiche doubte of no smal matters and yet do not here any mete teachers whiche may heale theyr coÌ„sciences But let vs retourne agayne to our purpose The scriptures alledged of our aduersaries do speake nothynge at all of canonicall satisfactions of the opinions of schole men for asmoche as it is euidently knowen that these thynges haue spronge vp and begonne but of late tyme. wherfore it is nothynge elles but pure falsehed and lyenge that they do wreste applie scriptures vnto those theyr opinioÌ„s We say that after penauÌ„ce that is to say after coÌ„uersion or regeneration there ought to folowe good frutes and good workes in all our lyfe Neither can it be any true conuersion or true contrition where mortifications of the flesshe and good frutes do not folowe The true feares and true dolours of the mynde do not suffre the bodye to gyue it selfe to pleasures and true faythe is not vnkynde to god neyther dothe it despise the coÌ„maundementes of god Finally there is none inwarde repentaunce oneles it dothe engendre and brynge forthe also outwardly chastisementes and punyshementes of the flesshe And this we saye to be the mynde of IohnÌ„ Baptiste whan he saythe Eacite fructus dignos penitentiae Do ye the worthye frutes of repentaunce And also of Paule when he sayth Gyue your membres to do seruice vnto ryghtuousnes Lyke wyse as he saythe in another place Gyue your bodyes a quicke and an holy sacrifice c. And whan Christ saythe Do ye penaunce doubtles he speaketh of hole penauÌ„ce of hole newnes of lyfe and of frutes He speakethe not of those
not the faythe of them After that this semblaunce of wysedome and iustice hath begyled men than afterwardes ensue infinite hurtes the gospell is defaced concernynge the iustice of faythe in Christe there succedeth in the steade therof a vayne truste and confidence in suche maner workes Afterwardes the coÌ„maundementes of god be defaced and these workes do chaleÌ„ge to them selues the title of perfecte and spirituall lyfe and be farre preferred before the workê of the coÌ„maundement of god as workes of euerye mannes callynge the administration of the comen weale the administratioÌ„ of household the lyfe of maryed folkes the bryngyng vp of chyldren These thynges in comparison of those ceremonies be iudged to be vnholy and prophane thyngê in so moche that many men do exercise these thyngê with a certeyn doubtfulnes and grudge of conscience For it is vndoubtedly knowne that many men haue forsaken the administration and gouernauÌ„ce of the comen weale and also haue forsakeÌ„ wedlocke â–ª and haue taken them selues to these obseruauÌ„ces as vnto better and more holy thynges Neyther is this yet ynoughe but also whan this ê‘suation is ones fixed in mennes myndê that suche maner obseruaunces be necessarye to iustification the conscieÌ„ces be sore vexed and troubled because they can not perfectely fulfyll all obseruauÌ„ces For what man is aâ—le to numbre them all There be bokes oute of numbre yea hole libraries whiche do conteyn neuer one sillable of Christe or of the fayth in Christe nor of the good workes belongynge to euery mannes vocation but onely do gather traditions and the interpretatioÌ„s or gloses of them by whiche interpretations sometyme they be made more greuous somtyme they be released and made more easye Howe sore is that good maÌ„ Gerson troubled whyles he seketh the degrees and the bredthe of the coÌ„maundementê And yet neuertheles he can not set an Epikee or temperament in a degree certayne In the meane season he dothe sore lament and bewayle the ieoperdies of godlye coÌ„sciences whiche this bytter interpretation of traditions dothe engendre We therfore agaynst thys semblaunce of wysdome and rightuousnes in humaine traditioÌ„s and ceremonies whiche begylethe men let vs arme our selues with the worde of god fyrst lette vs knowe for a suertie that they neyther deserue remission of synnes ne iustification in the syght of god neyther he necessary to iustification we haue alledged certayne authorities and testimonies here before and Paule is full of them Fyrste to the Colossianes he sayeth Let no man iudge you in meate drynke or a set holy day or in the feaste of the newe mone or in the sabbot day whiche be shadowes of thiÌ„ges to come but the body is Christes And here he compriseth bothe the lawe of Moyses and also tradicioÌ„s of men leaste our aduersaries myght by theyr elusions seme to avoyde these authorities and testimonies as they be wonte sayeng that Paule only speaketh of the lawe of Moyses But he here clearely witnesseth hym selfe to speake of the traditions of men Howbeit our aduersaries do nat perceiue what they do say For if the gospel denieth that the ceremonies of Moyses lawe do iustify whiche were instituted by the coÌ„maundement of god howe muche lesse then do the traditioÌ„s of men iustifie Neyther haue the byshoppes power and authorite to institute ceremonies as thingê iustifieng or necessary to iustificatioÌ„ Yea the apostles say in the .xv. of the actê why do ye tempte god layeng on a yoke c. where Petre dothe accuse this counsayle of ladyng the churche as an heynous crime a greate syn And Paule forbyddeth the Galathians to be brought agayne vnder bondage The Apostles therfore wyll that this libertie do abyde in the church leste any obseruaunces and ceremonies of the lawe or of traditions myghte be iudged to be necessarye so as in the lawe the ceremonies were necessary for a certeyn season and this libertie they wolde shulde remayne leste the iustice of faythe myght be defaced if men dyd iudge that those obseruaunces merite iustification or els that they be necessarye to iustification Many men do seke Epikees that is to saye moderations and fauourable interpretations in traditions to thentente to remedye and helpe consciences and yet they fynde not the certayne degrees wy whiche they may delyuer conscieÌ„ces from these bondes and snares But lykewyse as Alexandre dyd by the knot called Nodus gordius whiche because he coulde not vndoe he chopped it a sondre with a swerde so the Apostles do at ones delyuer conscieÌ„ces from traditions namely if they be gyuen to deserue iustification Wherfore to be agaynste this doctrine the Apostles compelle vs bothe by theyr teachynge and also by theyr examples They coÌ„straine vs to teache that traditions do not iustifie that they be not necessary to iustification â–ª that no man ought to make or to receiue traditions with suche opinion that they deserue iustification But if any man obserue them let hym than obserue them without superstition as ciuile maners or customes lykewise as without superstitioÌ„ men of warre haue one maner of apparayle scholers a nother The Apostles do breake traditions Christe doth make theyr excuse For an example was to be shewed vnto the phariseis â–ª that those obseruaunces were vnprofitable Wherfore if our men do leaue the obseruynge of any traditions whiche be not profitable they be excused nowe well ynoughe for asmoche as the sayde traditions be required as though they dyd deserue iustification For suche opinion in traditions is wycked and vngodlye But the auncient traditioÌ„s made in the churche for cause of vtilitie we do gladly obserue and kepe and we interprete them to the beste parte and moste laudable excludyng the opinion whiche thinketh that they iustifye And our aduersaries do wrongefully and vntruely accuse vs that we do abolyshe and take away the good ordenaunces and the discipline of the churche For we may boldely and truely say that the publyke and open facyon of congregations with vs is more honest than it is amonge our aduersaries And if any man wyl truely consydre and way the mattier he shall fynde that we do kepe the canones more truelye than do our aduersaries Amonge our aduersaries the preestes do synge or say masses agaynst theyr wylles hyred with money and for the moste parte only for theyr hyre or wages sake They synge psalmes not to th entent to lerne or praye but because to do honour and seruice to god as though that worke were an honoure to god or at the leaste wyse they do it for theyr wages sake With vs many do vse the souper of the lorde euery Sonday but they be first instructed examined and assoyled Chyldren do synge psalmes that they may lerne the people also syngen them to th entent that eyther they myghte lerne or els pray Amonge our aduersaries there is no instructioÌ„ of chyldreÌ„ at al of whiche thiÌ„g yet the canones do gyue coÌ„mauÌ„dement With vs the pastors ministers of the
congregations be compelled openly to enstructe and to here chyldhod And this ceremonie briÌ„geth forth verye good frutes Amonge our aduersaries in many countreys throughout the hole yere be made no sermones at all sauing only in the lente and yet seldome than But the cheife honour of god is to teache the gospel And wheÌ„ our aduersaries do preache they speake of humayne traditions of the honouryng of sayntes and of suche lyke trifles which the people be wery of and nat without good cause And therfore the people departe and go from them forthwith in the begynnyng after that they haue rehersed the texte of the gospell A certeyne fewe better men do nowe begin to speke of good workes but of the iustice of faythe in Christe of the consolation and comforte of consciences they speake nothynge at all Yea moreouer they do rayle vpon thys moste holsome parte of the gospel Contrariwise in our churches all the sermones be spente in these comen places of the feare of god of faythe in Christe of the iustice of faythe of the consolation of consciences through faythe of the exercises of faythe of prayer what maner one it ought to be that we ought surely to beleue that it is effectuall and that it is herde of the crosse of dignitie of prynces and theyr officers and of the ciuile ordinatioÌ„s of the diuersitie of the kyngdome of Christe or of the spirituall kyngdome of polityke or ciuile thynges of wedlocke of the bryngyng vp and information of chyldren of chastitie of all the offices or workes of charitie By thys estate of churches it may be iudged that we do diligently obserue the ecclesiasticall discipline godly ceremonies and good customes of the churche And coÌ„cernyng mortification of the fleshe and discipline of the body thus we teache as our confession dothe shewe that true vnfayned mortificatioÌ„ is done by the crosse and by suche afflictions wherwith god dothe exercise and try vs. In these we must obey the wyl pleasure of god as Paule sayeth Gyue your bodyes an holt or sacrifice cÌ„ And these be the spiritual exercises of feare and faythe But besydes this mortificatioÌ„ which is done by the crosse there is also a certaine voluÌ„tary kynde of exercise necessary whereof Christe dothe saye Beware that your hartes be nat made heuy through superfâ—uitie of meate and drynke And Paule sayeth I do chastise my body and do brynge it into bondage â–ª cÌ„ And these exercises be to be taken vpon vs nat for that they be honours or seruices iustifieÌ„g vs but to th entent that they may kepe the flesshe vnder leaste fulnes do oppresse vs do make vs recheles and without feare of whiche thiÌ„g it coÌ„meth to passe that men do folowe obey the affectioÌ„s and desyres of the flesshe This diligence ought to be continuall because it hathe a coÌ„tynual coÌ„maundement of god And that precyse forme and maner of certayne meates and tymes prescribed and coÌ„maunded helpeth nothyng at all to the kepyng vnder and subduing of the flesshe For it is more delicate and more costly then be other dyners and suppers And nat so muche as our aduersaries them selues do obserue the forme and maner whiche is taught in the Canones This place of traditioÌ„s hathe many and that harde disputations and we haue proued and founde by very experience â–ª that tradicions ar very snares of the consciences When they be requyred as necessarye they do meruaylously tormente and vexe consciences that forget or leaue eny obseruaunce or ceremony vndone Agayne the abrogation of theÌ„ hathe certayne incoÌ„modities and certayne questions belongyng vnto it But we haue a playne an easy cause because our aduersaryes do condempne vs for that we do teach that traditions of meÌ„ do nat meryte remissyon of synnes Also they do require general or vniuersal traditions as they call them as necessary to iustifycation Here we haue a bolde and a stedfaste defeÌ„der we meane Paule which euery where affermeth that these obseruaunces do neyther iustifye nether be necessary aboue and besydes the iustifycation of faythe And yet neuertheles we do shewe that the vse of libertie in thies thinges is in such wyse to be moderated and measured that vnlearned men be not offended ne for the abuse of the libertie made lesse fauorable vnto the true doctrine of the gospell and that without reasonable and probable cause nothinge be chaunged in the accustomed and vsuall ceremonies but that the auncient custumes be obserued and kepte for the norishment of concorde namely such as may be kept with out synne or without any great hurt or incommoditie And euen in this same present assemble or perliameÌ„t we haue shewed and protested that we wyll for charities sake with good wyl obserue indifferent thynges with other men although they had some incoÌ„moditie in them For the publyk and coÌ„men concorde as far forthe as maye be done without offendyng of consciences we haue iudged to be preferred before all other coÌ„modities or profetes But of thys hole mater we shall speake also nat longe here after when we shall dispute of vowes and of the ecclesiasticall power ⧠Of thynges politike ⧠THe .xvj. article our aduersaries do receiue without any exception in whiche we dyd confesse that it is laufull for a christen man to beare office to excercise iudgemeÌ„tes accordiÌ„g to the lawes of emperours or kynges or according to other pÌ„sent lawes to set appoynte ponishementes by the lawe to kepe warre ryghtfully to make bargaynes by the lawe to kepe somwhat as propre or seuerall to take an othe when it is required of the rulers and gouernours to coÌ„tracte matrimonye finally that laufull ciuile ordinaunces be good creatures of god and the ordinauÌ„ces of god whiche a christen man may saffely vse This hole place of the diuersitie of the kyngdome of Christe and of the ciuile kyngdome hathe bene profitably set forth to lyght by the wrytinges of our learned men that the kyngdome of Christe is spirituall that is to wete begynnynge to worke in thâ— harte knowledge of god feare of god faythe eternall iustice eternall lyfe And in the meane season it doth suffre vs outwardly to vse the ciuile ordinaunces that be lawefull of whatsoeuer nations they be amonge whom we do liue lykewyse as it sufferith vs to vse phisike carpeÌ„ters crafte meate drynke the ayer Nether dothe the gospell make newe lawes of the ciuile state but it commaundeth that we obey the present lawes whether they haue bene made by hethen nat christeined men or els by other and with thys obedience it byddeth vs to excercise charitie For Carolostadius was madde which dyd lay vpon vs the Iudiciall lawes of Moyses Of these thynges our men haue therfore wrytten the more pleÌ„tuously because monkes freers haue sparcled many pestileÌ„t opinioÌ„s in to the churche They called it the euangelicall policie or gouernaunce to haue all thynges in coÌ„mune they sayde that these be counsayles nat to kepe
the vtilitie of the church For I pray you who wolde not be gladde to die in the coÌ„fession of these articles that we do freely obteyne remission of synnes by faythe for Christis sake and that by our workê we do not merite remission of synnes The consciences of godly men shal haue no sure and stronge consolation agaynste the terrours of synne and deathe and agaynst the deuyll temptyng and prouokynge to desperation if they do not knowe that they oughte to be assured and to decree with them selues that they haue remission of sinnes freelye for Christis sake This faythe holdeth vp coÌ„forteth and quickeneth hartes in that moste sharpe batayle of desperation This is therfore a cause worthy wherfore we shulde refuse no maner ieoperdy Thou therfore whosoeuer thou be that doste agre and assent to our confession shrynke nat for any persecutions or punyshementes step forthe the more boldly when the aduersaries go aboute with feares with tormentes with punyshmentes to take from the this so greate consolation whiche is offered and propouned to all the hole churche in this our article If thou sekest thou canste nat lacke testimonies and authorities of scripture whiche shal establishe thy mynde For Paule with full voyce as they say in the thyrd fourth to the Romaynes cryeth out that sinnes be frely forgiuen for Christes sake Therfore sayeth he we be iustified by faythe frely that the promyse shulde be ferme and stable that is for to saye if the promyse dyd hange vpon our workê it shulde nat be firme and stable if remission of synnes were giuen for our workes when shulde we knowe that we had goten remission when shulde the troubled conscience fynde a worke whiche he were assured to be sufficiente to appease the wrathe of god But we haue spoken before of the hole matter and from thens let the reader take testimonies For the vnworthynes and shamefulnes of the thyng hathe enforced and compelled vs to make thys complaynt and be waylyng rather then a disputation because in thys place they haue spoken expressly that they do disalowe our article where we saye that we obtayne remission of synnes nat for our owne workes but by faythe and frely for Christes sake Our aduersaries also do adde testimonies and authorities to theyr condeÌ„pnatioÌ„ And it were good to reherse one or two of them They alledge of Peter Studete firmam facere uocationem uestram .i. Study ye to make your callyng stable sure cÌ„ Thou seest here reader that o r aduersaries haue nat lost theyr labours in learnyng of logyke but that they haue crafte to reason and coÌ„clude of the scriptures euen what soeuer they lyste Make your callyng ferme and sure by good workes ergo workes deserue remission of siÌ„nes Uerely this same shal be a verie feate argument if a man shulde reason thus of one whiche had deserued deathe and were ê‘doned of it The kynge coÌ„maundeth that from hensforthe thou doste holde thy haÌ„des from other mennes goodes g o ergo thou hast deserued pardoÌ„ of thy punishemeÌ„t by thê that thou doste nowe steale none other mennes goodes To reason after this fashyoÌ„ â–ª is to make the cause of that whiche is nat the cause For Peter speaketh of workê folowyng remission of synnes and he teacheth wherfore they ought to be done that is to wete that the calling myght be sure and stable that is for to say that they do nat fal from theyr callyng if they do syn agayne Do good workes that ye may coÌ„tinue in your callyng leaste ye lose the gyftes of callyng which ye had before nat for the workes folowyng but they be nowe retayned and kepte by faythe and faythe dothe nat abyde in them which lose the holy ghoste and whiche do caste away repentauÌ„ce as we sayde before that faythe standeth in repentaunce They adde other authorities hangynge nat muche better together And in coÌ„clusion they say that this opinion was condempned more then a thousande yeres paste in the tyme of Augustine Thys also is a false lye For the church of Christ hathe alwayes thought that remission of synnes coÌ„meth frely But on the contrary syde the Pelagians were condempned whiche dyd stifly affirme that grace is gyuen for our workes But we haue shewed sufficiently here before that we thinke that good workes ought of necessitie to folowe faythe For we do nat sayeth Paule take awaye the lawe but we do establyshe it because syth with faythe we haue receyued the holy ghost there foloweth necessarily the fulfyllynge of the lawe whiche dothe continually encreace more and more as loue patience chastitie and other frutes of the spirite ⧠Of the inuocation of sayntes or prayeng vnto them THe .xxj. article they do vtterly condempne that we do nat require the inuocatioÌ„ of sayntes and in no place do they play the Rhetoricians more largely thaÌ„ here And yet they conclude no thynge els but that sayntes be to be honoured and worshypped Also that sayntê whiche be alyue do pray for other men as who shulde say that therfore it is necessary to pray vnto the sayntes that be deade They alledge Cypriane that he dyd desyre Cornelius being a lyue that when he shulde departe he wolde pray for his bretherne By thys example they proue the inuocatioÌ„ of deade saiÌ„tê They alledge also Hierome agaynst Uigilantius In this matter say they Hierome ouercame Uigilantius more then eleuen hundred yeres ago Thus our aduersaries do triumphe as though they had wonne yâ— felde the warrâ— were all at an ende Neyther do these asses se that in Hieroms writing agaynst Uigilantius there is nat one sillable of inuocatioÌ„ He speaketh of the honours of sayntes nat of inuocation Neyther dyd any of the olde writers before Gregorie make mention of inuocation Doubtles this inuocation with these opinioÌ„s whiche our aduersaries do nowe teache of the application of merites hathe no testimonies ne authorities of olde wryters Our confession dothe allowe the honours of sayntes For these thre maners of honour are to be allowed and coÌ„mended The fyrste is giuing of thankes for we ought to gyue thankê to god that he hath shewed exaÌ„ples of mercy that he hathe gyuen vs knowledge that he is wyllyng to saue men that he hathe gyuen doctours or other gyftê to the church And these gyftes as they be are verie greate so they be to be amplified and extolled and the sayntes them selues be to be praysed whiche dyd vse these gyftes faythfully euen as Christ dothe coÌ„mende the faythful marchauÌ„tes and occupiers of the talentes deliuered to them The secounde maner of worshyp is the coÌ„firmation of our faythe as when we se that to Peter is forgyuen the denieng of hys mayster we also be comforted and lyfte vp to beleue the rather that grace is farre aboue synne The thyrde honour is the Imitation and folowyng fyrste of theyr faythe and then of theyr other vertues whiche euery one ought to folowe accordyng to his callyng These
also do dissolue breake those whiche were alredye contracted And this appereth euidently to be contrary to the coÌ„maundemente of Christe whiche saythe Whom god hath ioyned let no man departe in sondre Our aduersaries cry out in the confutation that to lyue single without wyues is coÌ„maunded by the councelles We do not accuse the the decrees of the councelles For these decrees vnder a certeyne condition do permitte wedlocke but we do accuse the lawes whiche the byshoppes of Rome haue made syns the olde generall couÌ„cels contrary to the auctoritie of the sayde councelles Thus do thÌ„e byshoppes of Rome despise the auctorities of the couÌ„cels whiche they wyll that other men shulde thynke to be mooste holy inuiolable This lawe therfore of perpetuall absteynyng from mariage is onely the lawe of this newe domination of the pope And that not without a cause For Daniel gyuethe this marke and token to the kyngedome of Antichriste that they shall contemne women Fyftelye althoughe oure aduersaries do not defende the lawe because of superstition forasmoche as they se that it is not wonte to be obserued yet neuertheles they sowe superstitious opinions whyles they pretende religion holynes They saye that they require the single lyfe and absteynyng from mariage because it is puritie clennes as who shulde say that mariage were vnclennes and synne or as though single lyfe dyd merite remission of synnes and reconciliation and wedlocke dyd not so And to this purpose they alledge the ceremonies of Moyses lawe that syth in the lawe durynge the tyme of theyr ministration the preestes were seperated from theyr wyues moche more in the newe testameÌ„t the preeste forasmoche as he oughte alwayes to pray ought always to conteine lyue chaste This folyshe vnmete similitude is alledged as it were a demonstration and a most stronge and euident proffe that preestes ought neuer to mary And yet in the similitude it selfe wedlocke is permitted and graunted onelye the vse of the wyfe is forbidden duryng the tyme of theyr ministerie And they be two sundrye thynges to praye and to ministre The holy men dyd praye euen than also whan they dyd not exercise any publike or open ministerie or office Neyther dyd the companyenge with theyr wyues let them that they myghte not praye But we wyll answere in ordre to these fayned tryfles and figmentes Fyrste our aduersaries muste nedes graunte this that wedlocke is pure clene in them that do beleue because it is saÌ„ctified with the worde of god that is to saye it is a thynge laufull approued by the worde of god as the scripture copiously doth recorde For Christ calleth wedlocke goddes ioynyng or couplyng together whan he saythe whom god hath ioyned together And Paule sayth of wedlocke of meatê and lyke thyngê They be sanctified by worde and prayer that is by the word wherwith the coÌ„science is made sure and out of doubt that god dothe approue and allowe it by prayer that is for to saye by faythe whiche vsethe it with gyuyng of thankes as the gyfte of god Also in the fyrste epistle to the Corinthianes he saythe The vnchristen husbande is sanctified by the christen wyfe c. that is to say the vse and companyeng of them together is laufull holy because of the fayth in Christ as it is laufull to vse meate and drynke c. Also to Timothe he wryteth The woman is saued by generation and by bryngyng forthe of chyldren c. If oure aduersaries coulde brynge forthe suche a place of scripture for single lyfe thaÌ„ wolde they make merueylous triumphes Paule saythe that the woman is saued by generation and bryngynge forthe of chyldren What coulde be sayde more honorable agaiÌ„st the hypocrisie of single lyfe than that a womaÌ„ is saued by workê of matrimonie by vse companye coniugale of the one with the other by bryngynge forthe chyldren and by other workes apê‘teinyng to the orderyng of an house And what is Paules mynde Let the reder obserue and marke faythe to be added and not the offices or workes of orderynge an house to be praysed without faythe if they abyde sayth Paule in the fayth For he speaketh generallye of the holle kynde of mothers Therfore he dothe principallye require faythe by whiche the woman receyueth remission of synnes and iustification Afterwardes he addeth a certain worke of callyng Lykewyse as in euery man there ought to folowe after faythe the good worke of a certein vocation This worke pleaseth god because of fayth So the workes of the woman please god because of fayth and the christen woman is saued whiche in suche sorte of workê of her callyng dothe godly seruise These auctorities testimonies do teache that wedlocke is a lauful thyng If thaÌ„ this worde cleÌ„nes betoken that thyng whiche is laufull and approued before god than be wedlockes clene because they be apê“ued by the worde of god And Paule saythe of laufull thynges Omnia munda mundis i. All thynges be cleane to them that he clene that is to saye to them whiche beleue Christe and be ryghtuous by faythe Therfore as virginitie in wycked men is vnclene so wedlocke in godlye men is cleane because of the worde of god and faythe But if this worde cleÌ„nes be taken as a thyng contrary to concupiscence so wedlocke betokeneth clennes of harte that is for to saye a mortified concupiscence because the lawe doth not forbyd wedlocke but coÌ„cupiscence adulterie fornication wherfore single lyfe is not clennes For there maye be more clennes of the herte in a maryed man as in Abraham or Iacob than in very many of those yea whiche be truely continente Finally if in suche sorte they vnderstaÌ„de single lyfe to be cleÌ„nes because it doth merite iustification more then â—edlocke we than playnly with open voyce say agaynst them For we be iustified neyther for cause of virginitie neyther for cause of wedlocke but freelye for Christis sake whan â—e beleue that for his sake we haue god good and gracious to vs. Here peraduenture our aduersaries shal crye out that after the maner of Iouiniane wedlocke is of vs made egall to virginitie But we wyll nat for these rebukes and reuiling wordê caste away the truthe of the ryghtousnes of fayth whiche we haue before declared And yet we do nat make virginitie egall to matrimonye For lykewyse as one gyfte is better then another as prophecy is better then eloquence eloquence is better then carpenters crafte so virginitie is a more excellent gyfte then wedlocke And yet as an Oratour is nat more rightuous before god for cause of hê eloqueÌ„ce then a carpenter because of his carpentrie so lykewyse a virgine meriteth nomore iustification with her virginitie then a wyfe doth with the workes apperteinyng to a wyfe but euery one in theyr gyfte ought to serue faythefully â–ª and to thynke that by fathe for Christes sake they obtayne remission of siÌ„nes and by fayth be reputed ryghtuous before
of the lord dothe nat coÌ„ferre ne gyue grace by the vertue of the worke that is wrought neyther when it is applyed for other men eyther quicke or deade dothe deserue forgyuenes of synnes neyther a culpa as they saye neyther yet a pena And the cleare and stronge probation of thys state is thys because it is impossible to obteyne remissioÌ„ of siÌ„nes for our owne worke by the vertue of the worke wrought but by fayth must the terrours of synne and of death be ouercomen when we comforte our hartes with the knowledge of Christe and thynke â–ª that we be forgyuen for Christê sake and that the merites and iustice of Christe be giuen vnto vs as Paule to the Romaynes sayth Iustificati ex fide pacem habemus that is to say Being iustified by saythe we haue peace â–ª These thinges be so vndoubted and so stronge and sure that they be able to stande agaynste al the gates of hell If we ought to haue sayde asmuch as nede is thaÌ„ is our cause alredy at an ende For no maÌ„ onles he be madde can allowe that pharisaicall hethen parsuasion of the worke wrought And yet this persuasion contynueth and stycketh faste among the people and this persuasion hathe encreased masses to infinite nombre For masses be hyred to appease the wrathe of god and by this worke they wyl obteyne remission a culpa et pena they wyll obteyne whatsoeuer they nede in all thys lyfe They wyl also delyuer deade men This pharisaicall opinion haue freers and sophisters taught in the churche Albeit we haue sufficiently declared our cause alredy yet that natwistaÌ„dyng because our aduersaries do wreste many scriptures folyshely to the defense of theyr errours we shal adde a fewe thynges to this place They haue spokeÌ„ many thynges of sacrifice in the confutation where as we in our confession purposely dyd eschue that name because of ambiguitie and doubtfull takyng of the worde We haue declared the thyng what these men do meane nowe by sacrifice whose abuses we do repreue and speake agaynste But nowe to the entent we may declare the scriptures wroÌ„gfully wrested it is necessary fyrste at the begynnynge to expoune what sacrifice is All these hole tenne yeres our aduersaries haue made almost infinite volumes of sacrifice And yet hathe none of them all hytherto put the diffinition of sacrifice All only they take the name of sacrifice eyther out of the scriptures â—rels out of the workes of the fathers That done they putte dreames of theyr owne ymagination as though sacrifice dyd betokeÌ„ whatsoeuer pleaseth them ⧠⧠What is sacrifice and whiche be the kyndes of sacrifice ⧠SOcrates in the worke of Plato entitled Phaedrus saythe that himselfe was moste desirous of distinctioÌ„s or diuisioÌ„s because without them nothynge can be declared by speakyng ne yet by vnderstanding And if he fouÌ„de any man connyng of diuiding him he sayeth he wayted vpon and folowed hys steppes as though he were a god And he byddeth hym that deuideth to cutte the membres and partê in the verie ioyntes leaste he brouse breake any membre after the fashyon of an euyl coke But these pÌ„ceptes our aduersaries do hyghly despyse and in very dede as Plato sayeth they be naughty cokes corruptyng the membres of sacrifice as it shal be perceyued when we shall reherse and recken vp the kyndes of sacrifice The diuines be wonte and that verie well to put a difference betwixt a sacramente and a sacrifice Let therfore ceremony or holy worke be Genus as the logiciane speaketh yâ— is to say the general terme vnto them bothe A sacrament is a ceremony or an holy worke in which god gyueth vnto vs that thing whiche the ê“myse annexed to the ceremony doth offre as baptisme is a worke nat whiche we offre vnto god but in whiche god dothe baptize vs that is to wete the minister in the stede of god and here god offereth and gyueth remission of siÌ„nes c. accordyng to his promise Qui crediderit baptizatus fuerit saluus erit who soeuer shall beleue be baptised shal be saued On the other syde a sacrifice is a ceremonie or a worke whiche we gyue vnto god to honour and worshyp him with all And there be two nerest kyndes of sacrifice â–ª and there be no mo The one kynde is called sacrificium propitiatorium whiche ye may cal in englysshe a sacrifice of raunsom that is to say a worke makyng satisfactioÌ„ bothe for the offence and the punyshement that is to say reconciling god or pacifieng the wrathe of god or whiche meriteth to other men remission of synnes The other kynde is sacrificium eucharisticon whiche in the englysshe tongue a man may cal a sacrifice of thankes gyuinge whiche deserueth nat forgyuenes of sinnes or reconciliation but is done of them that be reconciled to the entent to gyue thankes or to rendre thankes for remission of synnes and other benefites whiche they haue receyued of god These two kyndes of sacrifice we muste bothe in this controuersie and also in many other disputations haue alwayes in syght before our eyes and we wust with singular diligeÌ„ce take hede that they be nat coÌ„founded and mengled to gether That if the quantitie of this boke wold suffre it â–ª we wolde adde also the reasons of this our diuision For it hathe sufficient authorities and testimonies in the epistle of Paule to the Hebrues in other places And al the leuitical sacrificies may be reduced and brought to these membres as to theyr owne ê“pre houses For they were called in the lawe certayne propitiatorie sacrifices because of theyr signification or similitude â–ª and nat because they dyd merite remission of synnes before god but because they dyd merite remission of synnes as touchiÌ„g to the iustice of the lawe so that they for whom suche sacrifice were made shuld nat be excluded from this polecie or comen weale And therfore Holocaustum pro pâ—ccato and Holocaustum pro delicto that is to saye an hole brent sacrifice for synne and an hole brent sacrifice for a fault or offense these I say were called propiciatorie sacrificies But oblation libation retributioÌ„s fyrst frutes tenthes al these were called sacrificê Eucharistical that is to say sacrifices of thankê gyuyng But in very dede there was but onely one sacrifice propitiatorie in the worlde and that was the death of Christe as the epistle to the Hebrues teacheth whiche sayeth Impossibile est sanguine tauâ—orum et hircorum auferri peccata that is to say It is impossible that synnes shulde be taken away by the bloude of bulles and gotes And a lytle after he sayeth of the wyl of Christ. In whiche wyl we be santified by the oblation of the body of Iesu Christe ones for euer And Esaie interpretith the lawe to the entent that we shulde knowe the deathe of Christe to be verie satisfaction for our synnes or purgatioÌ„ nat the ceremonies of
the lawe and therfore he sayeth After that he shall haue gyuen hys lyfe an hoste or sacrifice for synnes he shal se sede or posteritie of longe contynuaunce c. For the hebrue worde whiche Esaie dothe vse in this place betokenith sacrifice for syn whiche sacrifice iÌ„ the lawe dyd betoken that there was a certayne hoste or sacrifice to come whiche shulde make satisfaction for our synnes and shulde recoÌ„cile god to the ende that men shulde knowe that nat for our owne ryghtuousnes but for the merites of another that is to wete of Iesu Christe god is wyllyng to be reconciled to vs. Paule expoundeth the same hebrue worde to signifie or betoken synne in the viii chapitre to the Romaynes sayenge By synne he condempned synne that is to saye â—e punyshed synne by the hoste or sacrifice offred for synne The signification and strengthe of the worde may be more easely perceiued by the maners of the gentiles whiche we se to haue bene taken of the wordes of the fathers nat ryghtly vnderstaÌ„ded Latine men dyd cal piaculuÌ„ that hoste or sacrifice whiche was offred in greate calamities to pacifie the wrathe of god when god semed to be excedingly angry and sometime they made sacrifice with maÌ„nes bloude because peraduenture they had herâ—e that the sacrifienge of a man shulde in tyme cuÌ„myng appease god to all mankynde The Grekes haue called them in some place Catharmata and in some place Peripsemata Esaie therfore and Paule do vnderstaÌ„de that Christ was made an oblatioÌ„ or sacrifice suche as latine men do call Piaculum that by hys merites and nat by ours god shulde be reconciled Let this therfore remayne and abyde in the cause that onely the deathe of Christe is the very true ê“pitiatorie sacrifice For those leuiticall propitiatorie sacrifices were called so onely to signifie the verie propitiatorie sacrifice that was to come And therfore by a certayne similitude and lykenes they were satisfactions redemynge the iustice of the lawe leste they which had offeÌ„ded shulde be excluded from that comen weale But these sayde sacrifices ought to cease after that the gospel was ones reueled and brought to lyght And because they ought to cease at the tyme of the reuelation of the gospell they were nat verie propitiations sythe the gospell was therfore promysed to gyue and shewe propitiation Nowe remayne only Eucharistical sacrifices whiche be called sacrifices of prayse preachyng of the gospel faythe inuocatioÌ„ thaÌ„kê gyuing confession the afflictions of holy meÌ„ yea al good workes of sayntes These sacrifices be nat satisfactions for the doers of them or satisfactions that may be applied for other folke whiche may meritie vnto them remissioÌ„ of synnes or reconciliation by the vertue of the worke wrought For they be done of them that be alredy reconciled And suche maner sacrifices be the sacrifices of the newe testamente as Peter teacheth in his fyrste epistle sayeng To an holye presthod that ye shulde offre spirituall hoostes and sacrifices Howe spirituall sacrifices be set agaynst as coÌ„trary not onely to the sacrificing of beastes but also to the workes of men whiche be offred because of the worke wroughte For this worde spirituall betokenethe motions of the holye ghoste in vs. Paule teacheth the same whan he saythe Offre your bodyes as a quicke sacrifice holye and a reasonable seruice But by reasonable seruice or honour is betokened that seruice in whiche god is vnderstanded and perceyued in the mynde as is done in the motions of feare and of truste towardes god Therfore it is not onely set agaynst the leuiticall honour or seruice in whiche beastê were slayne but also that honour or seruice in whiche is fayned a worke to be offered by the vertue of the worke wrought The same thynge dothe the epistle to the Hebrues teache whiche saythe By hym let vs offre sacrifice of prayse alwayes vnto god and he addethe the interpÌ„tation that is to witte the frute of lyppes coÌ„fessyng his name He byddeth vs offre prayses that is to say inuocation thaÌ„kes gyuyng confession or knowlegyng of his name and other semblable thynges These thyngê be of strengthe not by the vertue of the worke wroughte but by the meanes of faythe And this teacheth this ê‘ticle by him let vs offre that is to say by faythe in Christe Breuely the seruice and worshyppyng coÌ„maunded by the newe testament is spiritual that is to say is iustice of faythe in the herte and the frutes of faythe Therfore it dothe abrogate the leuiticall sacrifices And Christe saythe The true worshyppers shall worshyppe the father in spirite and truthe For suche worshyppers wolde the father haue to worshyp hym God is a spirite they that â—orshyp hym muste worshyp hym in spirite and truthe This texte clerely condempneth the opinions of all suche sacrifices whiche they fayne to be of strengthe by the reason of the worke wrought And it teacheth also that we muste worshyp in spirite yâ— is to say with motions of the herte and faythe Therfore the prophetê also in the olde testament coÌ„dempne the opinion of the people whiche they had of the worke wrought and do teache ryghtuousnes sacrifices of the spirite For thus sayth the prophete Hieremie I haue not spoken with your fathers nor I haue not gyuen them coÌ„maundement in that daye whan I broughte them out of Aegipte of any sacrifices But this worde I coÌ„mauÌ„ded them sayeng Heare and obey my wordes and I wyll be your god c. After what fashyon shulde we thynke that the Iewes dyd herken receyue this sermon whiche semeth to be clene repugnant and contrarye to the lawe of Moyses For this was vndoubtedly knowen that god had gyuen coÌ„maundement to the fathers of diuerse maner sacrifices But Hieremie condempneth the opinion whiche they had of sacrifices This opinion god dyd neuer teathe them yâ— is to witte that those sacrifices shuld pacifie hym by the worke wrought He addeth also faythe that god had coÌ„maunded it whan he sayth Herken me that is to say beleue me that I am your god that I wyl so be knowen whan I do shewe mercy and whaÌ„ I do helpe and yâ— I haue no nede of your sacrifices truste surely that I wyll be god a iustifier a sauiour not for your workes sake but for my worde and my promyse sake desyre loke for helpe of me truelye and from your hartes The psalme also dothe condempne the opinion of the worke wroughte whiche refusynge the sacrifice of beastes requireth inuocation â–ª and the sacrifice of prayse For thus it sayth Shall I eate the flesshe of bulles of gotes c. Call vpon me in the tyme of tribulation and I wyll delyuer the and thou shalte worshyp and honoure me c. Here he witnesseth that this is the very latria the very true honour if we do hertely call vpon hym Also in the .xxxix. psalme it is wryten Sacrifice oblation thou woldest none of but thou haste made
perfecte opened myn eares that is to say thou hast set forthe and propowned a worde vnto me whiche I shulde heare and thou requirest that I shuld beleue thy worde â–ª and thy promyses whiche be that thou wylte in very dede haue mercy wylte succoure c. Also in the .l. psalme Thou shalte not delyte in the hole brente sacrifices The sacrifice acceptable to god is a troubled spirite A contrite and humbled herte o god thou wylt not despise Also in the .iiij. psalme Sacrifice ye the sacrifice of iustice and hoope ye in the lorde He byddeth here to hope and saythe that it is a rightuouse sacrifice meanyng that other sacrificê be not true nor ryghtuouse sacrifices And in the Cxv. psalme I shall sacrifice the sacrifice of prayse and I shall call vpon the name of the lorde He callethe here inuocation the sacrifice of prayse But what procede we in cytynge these places the scripture is ful of suche testimonies which teache that sacrifices recoÌ„cile not god by the vertue of them selues And therfore it teacheth that in the newe testament the leuitical sacrifices beinge abrogated newe cleane and pure sacrifices shal be made that is to witte faythe inuocation thankes gyuynge confession and preachynge of the gospell afflictions for the gospelles sake and other lyke thynges And of these sacrifices speaketh Malachias the prophete sayeng Ab ortu solis usque ad occasum magnuÌ„ est nomen meum in gentibus in omni loco sacrificatur offertur nomini meo oblatio munda That is to say From the easte to the west my name is greate amonge people nations and in euerye place is offred encense to my name and pure and cleane oblation This place oure aduersaries do wreste and applye to the masse and they alledge the auctoritie of the fathers But the answere is easie for though he spake neuer so moche of the masse yet it foloweth not that yâ— masse iustifieth of it owne selue or that the masse applied to others deserueth vnto them remission of synnes None of all these sayth the prophete whiche yet monkes freers and sophisters do imagyne and fayne full shamefully that he shulde speake But the very selfe wordes of the prophete declare sufficiently his meanynge For fyrste they purpose that the name of the lorde shal be greate this is done by the preachynge of the gospell For by it is notified spredde the name of Christe and the mercy of the father promised in Christe is thus knowen Preachyng of the gospell engendreth faythe in them whiche receyue the gospell these call on god these gyue thankê to god these suffre afflictions in theyr confessyng or preachyng these worke we le for the glorie of Christe Thus the name of the lorde is made greate amonge the gentyles Wherfore sacrifice and a clene oblation signifie not a ceremonie nakedly done but all those sacrifices by whiche the name of the lorde is magnified I meane faythe inuocatioÌ„ preaching of the gospel confession c. And we easely suffre him that lusteth to comprise a ceremonie so that he vnderstandeth not only the ceremonie neither teacheth that the ceremonie is auayllaâ—le of the owne pâ—oore vertue strengthe For lyke as amoÌ„ge the sacrificê of prayse that is to witte amoÌ„ge the prayses of god we comprise the preachiÌ„ge of the worde so a prayse or thankes gyuyng may be the very takynge or receyuyng of the souâ—er of the lorde but not of the owne ê“pre vertue iustifienge vs or appliable to other to thentente to purchase vnto them forgyuenes of synnes But we shall not longe hereafter declare howe a ceremonie also is a sacrifice But because Malachie speaketh of all the sacrifices of the newe testamente and nat onely of the souper of the lorde Also because he furdereth nothyng at al nor defende the pharisaical opinion of the worke wrought therfore he maketh nothyng agaiÌ„st vs but rather maketh with vs. For he requireth the honorynges and sacrifice of the herte by whiche the name of the lorde is magnified and made greate in very dede There is cited also this place out of Malachie Et purgabit filios Leui colabit eos quasi aurum quasi argentum erunt domino offerentes sacrificia in iusticia That is to saye And he shall purge the sonnes of Leui and shall strayne and clense them as it were golde and syluer and they shall offre to the lorde sacrifices in iustice This place expressely requireth the sacrificê of ryghtuous men wherfore it defendethe not the opinion of the worke wroughte Nowe the sacrifices of the sonnes of Leui that is to saye of them that be teachers in the new testameÌ„t be these the preachynge of the gospell and the good frutes of preachynge Lykewyse as Paule sayth to the Romaynes I do sacrifie the gospell of god that the oblation of the gentyles myght be made acceptable beinge sanctified by the holy ghoste that is to say that the gentyles myght be made sacrifices acceptable to god by fayth c. For that kyllyng of beastes in the lawe dyd signifie bothe the deathe of Christe and the preachynge of the gospell by whiche this oldenes of the fleshe must be mortified and the newe and eternall lyfe muste be begoÌ„ne in vs. But our aduersaries do euery where wreste the name of sacrifice to the only ceremonie but of preachynge the gospell of fayth inuocation and other lyke thyngê they speake nothyng yet the ceremonie was instituted for those thynges And the newe testament ought to haue sacrificê of the herte and not ceremonials to be done for synnes after the maner of the preesthode leuiticall They alledge also a coÌ„tinual sacrifice that likewise as in the lawe the sacrifice was contynuall so the masse ought to be the continuall sacrifice of the newe testament â—ur aduersaries be happy and in good case if we do suffre our selues to be ouercomen with allegories But it is knoweÌ„ well inough that allegories make no stronge probations howe be it we for oure parte can be well contented that the masse be vnderstanden to be a continuall sacrifice so that they vnderstaÌ„de the hole masse I meane the ceremonie with preachyng of the gospell and with faythe inuocation and thankes gyuynge For these thinges ioyned together be the continuall sacrifice of the newe testameÌ„t For the ceremonie was instituted because of these thynges and ought not to be disseuered from them Therfore Paule saythe So ofte as ye shal eate this breade shall driÌ„ke of the cuppe of the lord shewe the death of the lord But this thynge doth in no wyse folowe this figure leuitical that the ceremonie is a worke iustifienge by the owne propre vertue or that it is a worke to be applyed for others that it may merite vnto them remission of sinnes c. And the type or figure dothe aptely expresse not only the ceremonie but also the preachiÌ„g of the gospel In the booke of Numeri
is to saye Drawe nere to hym and be assoyled for he is remission of synnes PeradueÌ„ture ye demauÌ„d of me who this is Herken what he sayth his owne selfe I am the breadde of lyfe who so euer coÌ„meth to me shall not be hungry who soeuer beleueth in me shall neuer be thrustye Here he witnesseth that in the sacramente is offered remission of synnes He witnessethe also that it ought to be receyued by faythe A thousande lyke testimonies hauiÌ„g the same sentence that this hath be redde amonge the fathers workes whiche euery of them our aduersaries do yet wreste wrynge to the worke wroughte and to be applied for other men where as the fathers do openly require fayth and speake of the peculiar consolation of euery man particularly and speake not of application for other Besydê this there be redde also sentences of thankes gyuynge as for example that sentence moste swetely spoken of Cypriane concernynge them that in due and godly wyse receiue the sacrament Pietas inter data condonata se diuidens gracias agit tam ubeâ—is beneficij largitori That is to say Pietie or godlynes deuidyng it selfe betwene the thynges gyuen and the thynges forgyuen gyueth thankes to the gyuer of plentifull benefitê that is to say it consyâ—â—â—eth the thingê that be gyuen and the thynges that be forgyuen that is it compareth together the greatnes of the benefites of god the greatnes of oure euylles as of death and of synne and gyueth thankes c. And hereof came vp the name of Eucharistia in the churche Neyther is the ceremonie it selfe a gyuyng of thankes by the vertue of the worke wroughte to be applyed for other men to merite to them remission of sinnes or to delyuer the soules of deade men These thynges be repugnaunt and contrarye to the iustice of fayth as who shulde say that the ceremonie without faythe coulde profete eyther the doer or others ⧠Of the names of the Masse ⧠OUR aduersaries call vs backe agayne vnto graÌ„mer they take argumeÌ„tes of the names of the masse which nede not any loÌ„ge disputation For it folowethe not that the masse although it be called a sacrifice is a worke gyuynge grace by the vertue of the worke wroughte or applied for others dothe merite remission of synnes to them Liturgia the greke worde saye they betokeneth the same that SacrificiuÌ„ doth in the latine tonge And the grekes call the masse Liturgiam ergo c. Why do they here leaue out the old name Synaxis whiche worde shewethe that the Masse was in olde tyme a coÌ„munion and participation of many men But let vs make answere to Liturgia This worde dothe not signifie properly a sacrifice but rather a comen ministerie or seruice and greethe very metelye to our senteÌ„ce that is to witte that one ministre consecratyng dothe exhibete to the residue of the people the body and bloude of our lorde lykewise as one ministre teachyng ministreth and gyueth to the people yâ— gospell of Christ as Paule saythe Let men so iudge vs as of the ministers of Christe distributers of the mysteries or sacramentê of god that is to wit of the gospell and of the sacramentes and in the seconde to the Corinthianes he saythe For Christê cause we execute this Ambassade euen as though god dyd desyre you by vs we pray you for Christes cause that ye be reconciled â–ª c. So the name of Liturgia agreythe very conuenientlye to a ministerie And it is worde vsed in the publyke ministeries And amoÌ„ge the grekê it signifieth comen charges as tribute costes of prepayryng theyr nauie or other lyke thynges as witnesseth the oration of Demostenes whiche he made agaynst Leptine whiche sayde oration he spendeth al together in disputation of the comen offices and liberties where he vseth this worde Liturgia signifienge comen chargê And so they spake also in the tyme of the Romaynes as it appereth in the rescripte of Pertinax themperour in the paragraffe De iure immunitatis in the lawe Semê‘ There also Liturgia is vsed for comen charges And the comentarie of Demosthenes wryteth yâ— Liturgia is a kynde of tributes the costis of the comen plays the costis of prepayrynge theyr shyppes and of suche other comen charges And Paule vsed the same worde for a comen ministratioÌ„ of almoyse in the secoÌ„de epistle to the Corinthes sayenge The office of this comen gyuyng of almoyse not onely suppliethe the nede of the sayntes but also it causethe that the moo do gyue thankes plentuously to god c. And in the seconde to the Philippianes he callethe Epaphrodite Liturgon that is to say a ministre of his necessite in which place without doubte by that worde can not be vnderstaÌ„den a preeste But we shall not nede to brynge forthe any mo testimonies for asmoche as examples do offre them selues euerye where to them yâ— rede Greke auctours in whose workê Liturgia is vsed for the comeÌ„ ciuile charges or offices And because of the diphtoÌ„ge graÌ„marions do not brynge forthe this worde out of Lite whiche betokenethe prayers but it hath his name of the publyke coÌ„men goodê whiche they call Leita so that Leiturgeo is asmoche to say as I do ordre haue yâ— charge and haÌ„dling of the goodê of the comen weale But it is a madde thynge that they do thus reason mention of the altare is made in holy scripture ergo the masse muste nedes be a sacrifice for the parable of the altare is alledged of Paule by a similitude And this worde Missa they fayne to be sayde of an altare in the Hebrue tongue But what nede they to fetche the Etimologie so farre onles it were because they wolde shewe forthe theyr connynge in the Hebrue tongue What neded to seke the Etymologie so farre whan we reade this worde Missa in the boke of Deuteronomie where it signifieth collations or giftes of the people and not the oblation of the preest For euery one that came to the solemne feaste of Easter was bounde to brynge some gyfte for theyr portion shotte towardê the comen souper This maner dyd christen men kepe at the begynnyng Whan they came together they broughte loues of breade wyne other thynges as witnessethe the canones of the apostles Therof a parte was taken to be consecrate The rest was distributed to yâ— poore with this maner they also reteyned the name of collations or shottes And by reason of suche collations it appereth also yâ— the masse otherwhyles is called Agape that is to say a charitie onles ê‘chaunce a man had rather haue it so called because of the comeÌ„ refectioÌ„ or souper But let vs passe ouer these trifles For I woÌ„der that thaduersaries bringe forth so lyghte sclendre coniectures in so greate and wayghtie a matier For though the masse be called an oblation what maketh this word to those dreames of the worke wroughte and
bryngeth the workes of Moyses lawe or of the tenne coÌ„mauÌ„dementes or of Benetê rule or of Austines rule or of any other rules he dothe disanull and take away the promyse of Christe he hath caste away Christe and is fallen from grace This is the sentence and mynde of Paule And consydre O Charles moste mylde and gentle Emperour Consydre ye princes Consydre ye of all ordres and degrees howe greate is the vnshamefastnes of our aduersaries whan we dyd recite the place of Paule conteynynge this sentence They wrote vnto it these wordê They be al wycked whiche be alledged here agaynst Monasticall lyfe And what is more certein vndoubted than that men obteine remission of synnes for Christis sake by faythe And yet these lewde felowes dare call this sentence wycked We doubte not but if ye had ben monished of this place ye wold haue sene this so great blasphemye to haue ben scraped out of the coÌ„futatioÌ„ Nowe for asmoche as it hath ben heretofore largelye declared the opinion to be wycked that for our owne workê we obteine remission of sinnes we wyll be the shorter in this place For a wyse reader may therof easily coÌ„clude that we deserue not remission of sinnes by abbeye workes And therfore that blaspemye also is in no wyse to be suffred whiche is red in Thomas that the profession of religion is â—galle to baptisme It is playne madnes to make the tradition of man whiche haâ—â— for â—t neyther the coÌ„maundement neyther the promyse of god egall to the ordinauÌ„ce of Christ whiche hath for it bothe the coÌ„maundement and the promyse of god and whiche conteyneth the couenauÌ„te of grace of eternal lyfe Secondly obedieÌ„ce pouertie single lyfe so that it be not vncleane be but exercises indiffereÌ„t And therfore holy men may vse them without synne as Barnarde Fraunces â–ª and other holy men dyd vse them And they dyd vse them for a corporall vtilitie that they myght be the more expedite and reâ—ye to teache and to do other holye and vertuous workes â–ª and not because the very workê of them selues â—e seruices which iustifie or merite eternal lyfe Breffely they be of that sorte of which 〈◊〉 speakeâ—h to Timothe â–ª Corporalis exercitacio ad modicum utilis est Bodely exercise is profitable a lytle And it is lykelye ynoughe that somewhere at this day there be good men in Monasteries whiche busye them selues in the ministration of the worde and whiche vse those obseruauÌ„ces without any wycked opinions But to thinke that those obseruauÌ„ces â—e seruicê and honoryngê of god by which we be coÌ„pted ryghtuous before god and deserue euerlastiÌ„g lyfe this is playne contrarye to the gospell of the iustice of faythe whiche teacheth that for Christis sake iustice is gyuen to vs and eternall lyfe It is contrary to the sayenge of Christe Frustra me colunt mandatis hominum .i. In vaine they worshyp me with traditions of men It is contrarye also to this sentence Omne quod non est ex fide peccâ—tum â—st All that is not of faythe is synne But howe can they afferme that these be seruicê whiche god doth approue as a ryghtuousnes before hym whan they haue no warrantise of the worde of god But se the vnshamefastnes of thaduersaries They not onely teache that those obseruauÌ„ces be seruicê iustifieng before god but adde also that they be more perfecte seruices that is to say more meretyng remission of synnes and iustification than be any other kyndes of lyuynge And here runne together in a heape many false poysone opinions They fayne that they kepe bothe the preceptes and counsaylles Afterwardê the liberall men because they â—reame that they haue meritê more than be sufficiente to them selues they selle them vnto other All these thynges be full of pharisaicall vanitie For there can be no greater wyckednes than to thynke that they in suche wyse fulfyll the tenne coÌ„maundementes that they haue merites more than they nede sythe it is so that these preceptes Thou shalt loue thy lorde god with all thy herte Thou shalte not lust accuse euery maÌ„ be he neuer so holy The ê“phete sayth Euery man is a lyer that is to say not hauynge ryght opinion of god not fearynge god sufficientely not beleuynge god sufficiently Wherfore religious men do falselye glorye that in the kepynge of abbeye lyfe the preceptes be fulfylled yea more to This is false also that the obseruauÌ„ces of religious men be workes of the counsaylles of the gospell For the gospell dothe not counsell diuersities of apparayle of meates of renouncynge of theyr owne goodes These be traditions of men of all whiche it was sayde Esâ—a nos non commendat deo Meate dothe not make vs acceptable to god Wherfore neither they be honours and seruices iustifienge neyther be they perfection but rather whaÌ„ they be set forthe cloked with these titles they be the very doctrines of deuylles Uirginitie I graunte is counsaylles but yet only to those ê‘sones whiche haue the gyfte as it was sayd before But it is a verye poysone erroure to thynke that the perfection of the gospell standeth in traditioÌ„s of men For so the religious persones also of the Machometistes myghte boste that they haue the euaÌ„gelical ê‘fection Neyther doth it stande in obseruyng of other thynges whiche be indifferent But bicause the kyngdome of god is iustice and lyfe in the hertes therfore ê‘fection is to encreace the feare of god and the truste of the mercye promysed in Christe and diligence and care to obeye our callyng Lykewyse as Paule describeth perfection we be sayth he transfourmed froÌ„ clearenes in to clearenes as of the spirite of the lorde He sayth not we take vpoÌ„ vs now this now that habite of religion or a suÌ„drye fashyon of shoes or another maner of gyrdle It is a pitiefull thyng that suche pharisaical yea rather mahometical wordes be redde and herde in the churche that is to wit that the ê‘fection of the gospell and of the kyngdome of Christe whiche is eternal lyfe doth stande in these folyshe obseruaunces of garmeÌ„tes of meates and of suche other tryfles Nowe herken oure sadde and discrete iudges howe shameful a senteÌ„ce they haue put in the confutation Thus they say It is expressed in the holy scriptures that the religious lyfe duely obserued kepte which through goddê grace all religious persones may obserue and kepe dothe merite eternall lyfe and that Christe hath promysed it more largely to them which shal forsake house or bretherne c. These be the wordes of our aduersaries in whiche this is fyrste a very shameles lye to saye that it is expressed in holy scripture that Monasticall lyfe dothe merite eternall lyfe For where do the holy scripturê in any place speake of Monasticall lyfe Thus our aduersaries defende theyr cause thus the wretched men alledge the scriptures whan euery man knoweth that Monasticall lyfe is a thynge newly deuised and yet they
Of the humanitie and diuinitie of Christe 4. Of iustifycation 5. Of the obteiniÌ„ge of fayth Heresyes 6. Of good workes Saynt Ambrose 7. Of the holy churche 8. Of the ministers of the Churche Heresyes 9. Of baptyme Heresyes 10. Of the sacrameÌ„t of the Aulter 11. Of confession 12. Of penaunce â—â— repeÌ„tauÌ„ce Heresyes 13. Of the vse of the sacramentes Errours 14. Of order ecclesiastike 15. Of rytes or vsages of the churche 16. Of politike or ciuile maters Heresies 17. Of the resurrectyon Heresyes 18. Of free wyll The wordes of S Austine Heresyes 20. Of good workes Austyne â–ª Ambrose The sygnification of faythe Austyne Faythe after S. Ambrose 21. Of honorynge of sayntes Cyprian Hierome Gelasius The sayenge of Pius byshope of Rome 1. Cor. 7 Mat. 19 Gene. 1. In the begynninge of the churche Prestes were maryed 1. Ti. 4. The wordes of Ciprian Saynte Ambro. Chrisostome * * The Glose Gerson Austine Mat. 15 Mat. 1â—· Ro. 13. Col. 2. Col. 2. Act. 15. 1. Ti. 4. The obiections of the aduersaries Luc. 21. Mat. 17 1. Cor. 9 Ireneê° Grego Historia Tripartita Of the vowe of single lyfe 1. Cor. 7 Gene. 2 * * What thyngê be required in euery laufull vowe The auctorite of saint Austine * * Note this reason Mat. 15 Gal. 5. * * The true perfection of a christian man A newe opinion in Gersons tyme * * The power of the â—eys what Io. 20. Marke xvi Rom. 1. Io. 1â— Luc. 12. Philip. 111. 2. Cor. x Luc. 10. Mat. 7 Gal. 1. 2. Cor. 13. Austine A question Io. 16. Act. 15. The solution A disceitful similitude Col. 2. Tit. 1. Mat 15. Gal. 5. what or denaunces bysshoppes may make 1. Cor. 11. The sabbat day The traditions of Thapostels be nat kepte The intractablenes of bysshops Act. 3. 1. Pe. 5. This is traÌ„slated out of the Duche A distinctyon of Duns The diffinition of fayth Of the commensement orygynal of fayth How the holy gost is gyuen by the schole meÌ„ * * The knowledge that fayth iustifieth is necessary The takynge of this proposytyon onelye fayth iustyfyeth * * The fyrst reason The probation of yâ— minor Howe the aduersaries vnderstande Christ to be our mediatour The seconde reason The .iii. reason The .iiii. reason Authorities of scripture that only fayth iustifyeth Authorities out of saynte Paule * * The trewe interpretacion of Paule Austynes interpretacioÌ„ vpoÌ„ Paule Authorities out of the gospels of Iohan. Authorities out of the Actes of the Apostles * * The prophete Abacuc * * The prophetâ— Esaye Authorites of doctours Saynte Ambrose Saynte Austyns A cauillatyon refuted * * Fayth may better than chariti be called gratia gratuÌ„ facies * * The knoweledge of this faith is necessarye * * The vnhappy councell of the aduersaries Roma 3. Gasa 3. Ioh. 16. 2. Cor. 3 * * The veyle 1. Ioh. 3. A questiâ—Ì„ The solucioÌ„ of the question why loue iustifyeth nat Gal. 3. * * The thyrde reason Psalmâ— 129. Iob. 9. The .4 reason The .5 reason Ephe. â— Abel The first reason The seâ—oÌ„de resoÌ„ The .3 reason * * The Gentels Psal. 49 The sacrameÌ„t of yâ— Aulâ—eâ— An obiectyon An obiection The solutyon An other obiection * * The answere Saynt Ambrose The vncharitable fashons of the aduersaryes * * The poete Horace An argument out of saynte Peter .4 The answere Pro. 10. Cesar Pompey An olde ê“uerbe ☞ ☞ An Epykee An argument out of Iames the secoÌ„de Chapitre The answere The first reason or solution 1. Tim. 1 The .2 reason The .3 reason Other obiectyons Daniell Esaye The answere Aristotle to kynge Alexandre * * The wordes of Dani. after the hebraical trouthe Hieroms tâ—anslatyon reiected Hiere 15 Zacharie An argument out of Tobi. An other obiection * * The solution A scholastical argument The answere A difference betwixte faythe and hope An other of yâ— scholastical argument Saynte Hierome The inconuenience â— hiche ensueth of thaduersaries opinion Saule A questioÌ„ The solution Saynte Barnard An argumeÌ„t whiche they call antistrephon The answere solutioÌ„ of thir argument Sainte-Ambrose The vngracious wrestyng of the aduersaries A childishe cauillation An other obiectiv The solution MoÌ„kes Frears The wordes of merite and rewarde Barnard Apopheg matascho lastica The .vii. article of the coÌ„fession â—â—hat is yâ— church Paules definitioÌ„ Ephe. 5. Why the church is called catholik * * The Glose Hierome Ephe. 2. A parable of Christe Mat. 15. The diffinitioÌ„ ol the churche after Lyre 〈◊〉 diffinitioÌ„ of the churche after the aduersaries Of the vnitie of the churche A vayne distinctioÌ„ A ê“pre similitude Collos. 2 Collos. 2 Rom. 14 The sect of the Audians Howe the aduersaries them selues do breake vniuersal obseruauÌ„ces The .8 article of the ministers of the churche * * The Anabaptistê wold haue al in comune The .9 article of the baptizyng of infauÌ„teâ— * * The Anabaptistes The ij reason The .10 article of the sacrament of the Aulter Cyrilluâ— The .xj. article of absolutioÌ„ ExcoÌ„munication * * The wordes of the Canon The rehersall of synnes in coÌ„fession * * The question De proprio sacerdote Panormitanus The errours of scholemeÌ„ The â—â—ffereÌ„ce betwixt the coÌ„trition of Iudas and the coÌ„trition of Peter Luke the taste Psal. 37 Psal. 6. Esa. 38. The .ij. parte of penaunce or repentaunce Roma 5. The vertue of faythe Filial feare â–ª Seruile feare Mat 26 1 Cor. 11. Mat. xi A general fayth and a special fayth Col. 2. Abac. 2. Collos. 2 In the .2 â—oke of the kingê Authorities forth of scripture 1. Reg. 2. Esa. 2â— Examples Adam Gene. 3. 2. Reg. S. Barnarde The .i. reason Rom. 4. 1. Io. 5. The â—j reason Act. 10. A digression Pedarij be those which iÌ„ a pliament assemble or couÌ„cel do speake nothyng them selues but runne froÌ„ theyr owne place to here other wheÌ„ they speake allowe theyr wordes whiche they lytle vnderstande The .iij. reason Note wel wherfore Christe serueth Ro. iiij Gal. iij. The .iiij. reasâ—n 1. Io. 4. Ro. 14. Saiengê of fathers coÌ„cerning penaunce Tertulliane I lyue is the othe wherby god swereth The wordê of Tertulliane Ambrose An obiection The solution Salomon Iacob 5. The olde custome of the churche That canonicall satisfactions be not necessarie by goddes lawe The doctrine of scholemeÌ„ The reasons of the aduersaries CaÌ„pege Cardinal A digresision Mat. 3. ArgumeÌ„teâ— prouing that the scriptures before alledged apperteyne not to the satisfactions of scholemeÌ„ The first â—eason The .ij. reason The iij. reason Quiâ—quid ligaueris Fastes Pylgrymages Workes of suâ—eâ—erogaâ—ion Note this argumeÌ„t An obiection The solution An other obiection The solution How god punisheth synnes An other obiection of thaduersaries The answere Esa. 28. Iohan. 9 S. Gregorye Esaie What purgatory is by faders Austyne Satisfaction for mortificatioÌ„ Gregory Chrisostome Good frutes * * What were ê‘dons in old time· The very sacramentes The saienge of