but two Sacraments of the new Testament properly so called and that Confirmation Penance Mariage Orders and Extreme unction be not Sacraments properly pag. 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 c That the Sacraments doe not give grace ex opere operato by the verie vvorke or action done by the Minister but grace commeth and is given another vvay pag. 215 216 T TRaditions not specified in the Scriptures affirmed to be Apostolicall there being no assured proofe that they came undoubtedly and originally from the Apostles be not to be urged or imposed upon the faith of men pag. 57 58 c How men in ancient time vvere deceived by Traditions said and supposed to be Apostolicall See the Preface That these Traditions be needlesse because the sacred and canonicall Scriptures vvithout them be perfectly and completely sufficient for all instruction of truth concerning divine and heavenly matters pa. 57 58.64 c. See also the Preface V THat the Bishop of Rome if hee vvere a good and orthodoxe Bishop is no more the Vicar of Christ then other Bishops are pag. 97 To vvhat Vse and end God gave his Law of the Ten Commandements pag. 151.152 it being impossible to be exactly and perfectly fulfiâ—led by men by reason of the vveâ—kenesse that is in all flesh and â—hat God therein is neither cruell tyrannicall or uniust p. 151 152. and pag. 108 109 c W GOod Workes be the effect and fruite of a iustifying faith and doe not iustifie in Gods sight pag. 101 c. p 112 c There is a reward belonging to good Workes but it is a reward of bountie and grace and not of merit or due desert by men pag. 113 114 c. Good Workes be the vvay that men must vvalke in towards the kingdome of God but they be not the cause of their comming thither pag. 105 c. Good Workes and a good life and godly conversation must be observed but not to purchase or merit heaven thereby for it cost a greater price but for other godly uses and ends pag. 110.111 112 c. pag. 121.122.123 124 pag. 151.152 â—o good Workes in Gods sight and censure before faith received pag 147 â—â—od Works done after faith received do not merit at Gods hands â—or iustifie in his sight pag. 148.149.150 â—orkes of supererogation most abominable pag. 151.152 â—orkes of mens owne invention and devising done for and in the â—way of Gods service and religion not commanded by him nor warranted by his VVord whatsoever good intention is pretended â—e neverthelesse not good nor approved in his sight and censure pa. 145.146 FINIS TABULAE ERRATA PAg 1 in marg 1. Pet. 5.12 for 1. Pet. 5.1 2. pag. 3. l. 1. audiens for erudiens p. 10. l. 6. knoâ— for knew p. 11. l. 17. otger for other p. 27. l. 25. Grantzius for Crantzius p. 74. l. 10. hirdly for thirdly p. 96. l. 19. alwayes to be blotted out p. 109 l. 22. Clesiphontem for Ctesiphoâ—â—â—â— p. 111. l. 29 manifested for magnified p. 116. l 18. reade in this sense p. 128. l. 28. able to dye 〈◊〉 able to doe it p. 130. l. 31. highest for highest p. 139. l. 37. himselfe to be blotted out p. 148. â— marg Psal 3.12 for Phil 3.12 ib. Gal. 5 1â— for Gal. 5.17 p. 159 l 4. sim for sum p. 177. l â— hâ—â—gh for though p. 190. l. 28. bloud for beloved p. 193 l. 1. sinnes for sinne p. 200. l. 14 of to 〈◊〉 blotted p. 207. l. 13. outward for inward p. 211. l 31. end for and p. 212. l. 25 popist for â—â—â—pish p. 216. l. 1. in marg Graces for Grace p 222. l. 7 member for members p. 231. l. 25. Traâ—â—substation for Transubstantiation p. 232. l. 6. aswell sense for aswell as sense l. 7. Transubstaâ—â—tiation for Transubstantiation p 239. l. 30. manet for manent p 43. l 13. ef for of p. 184. â— marg Ioâ— 4.10 for 1. Ioh. 4.10 Ioh. 4.19 for 1. Ioh. 4.19 p. 253. l. 8. it for is and l. 26. â— in good measure to be blotted p 254. l. 26. Espencaelus for Espencaeus p. 256 l. 6. continuaâ—â—â— for câ—â—ntenance p 263. in marg Exod. 23.8 for Exod 32.8 p. 271 l. 28 due for done p. 283. l. â— reade Titus Vespasian and the rest c p. 296. l. 1 althought for although l. 25. Legall 〈◊〉 Regall p. 318. l. 3. fable for fables p. 331. l. 31. Imperio for l. 'imperio l 37. had led for hanâ—â— p. 332 l 1. for for so p. 341. l. 6 no for not p. 343 l. 11. redigerint for redegerint and l. 9 â— qurdringentos for quadringentos l. 23 Empires for Empire p. 361 l 9 Doranus for Dorâ—â—nus p. 380. l. 15 21. et for est p 387. l. 25. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 39â— l 5. Apostles for Apâ—â—stle p. 393 l. 26. or three to be blotted p. 395. l. 1 2. in the Church relation to Antichrist 〈◊〉 whose spirit they speake as S. Iohn affirmeth to be blotted p. 400. l. 20. true-Christians 〈◊〉 true-Christian p. 410. l 22. bni for bin p. 243. l 4. heree for here p. 296 in marg l 6. petrus â—â—â—spondet for unus respondit p. 380. l. 20. Theodorum for medorum p 48 Finis libri primi 〈◊〉 Finis primae partis hujus libri p. 63 l 26. that for the. l. 5. uphold for hold p. 64. l. 37. prâ—â—structae for praestructa p. 27. l. 21. Minister for Ministers p. 69. l. 1. perish for passe p. 119. l â— for not p 16 l. 15. by them for to them p. 88. l. 4. strang for strange p. 100. l. 5 truth for trutâ—â— p. 113. l. 26. to superfluous p. 38â— l. 34. odoravit for adoravit p 345. l 19. velunt for velut 〈◊〉 358. l 24. Apostolici for Apostoli p. 365. l. 3. after peace add and ioy p 375. l. 32. of prohibiâ—â—â—on for of a prohibition p. 40. in marg for Cyprian in psalmo ad quid Iustificationes meas 〈◊〉 assumis Testamentum meum per os tuum read Cyprian lib. 2. Epist. 3. ad Caecilium p. 3â—â— l. 1. howres to be blotted p. 401. l 26. licentiousnes for covetousnes Other faults may also escape in the printing which I desire the Reader to correct witâ— his pen. THE FIRST PART of the BOOKE CAP. I. Concerning the Kings Supremacie and the Oath in that behalfe to be taken HIS MAIESTIES Supremacie is chiefly considerable in two respects namely in respect of Persons and in respect of Things or Causes First then concerning his Supremacy in respect of Persons Ecclesiasticall as well as Civill within his owne Dominions who can iustly denie it him Doth not S. Peter expresly require of all Christians that live within the Dominion of anie King that they should submit themselves unto him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as unto the chiefe or supreame person over them It is evident that hee calleth the King
likewise doth the Church and people of God in Daniels time disclaime all merite and conceite of inherent righteousnes in themselves as appeareth by their praier which they make unto God saying VVee do not present our supplications before thee for our ovvne righteousnesse but for thy great tender mercies O Lord heare O Lord forgive O Lord consider and doe it That holy man Iob likewise speaketh to the same effect If man saith hee dispute vvith God hee cannot answer him one thing of a Thousand And againe he saith If I vvould Iustifie my selfe mine owne mouth shall condemne mee and If I vvould be perfect hee shall Iudge mee vvicked But now although the Protestants doe thus rightly teach Iustification by Faith onely and not by Workes or by anie Inherent righteousnesse in men therewithall condemne the doctrine of mens merits most justly yet doe they confesse that there is a reward in Scripture promised to them that doe good workes But Reward and Merit doe differ and be not all one For it is a Reward not of merit or desert of mens behalfe but of meere grace favour and bountie in God farre above the merits and deserts of anie men and performed given and bestowed for Gods promise sake and for the merits onely and mediation of Iesus Christ. There is Merces ex gratia a Reward counted by favour aswell as ex debito of Debt or Due desert as S. Paul himselfe distinguisheth even in this verie case Yea Saint Paul saith againe that though Christ paid a price and ransome for us yet in respect of our selves vve are Iustificati gratis Iustified frankely and freely without our paying or performing anie thing toward it or in that behalfe What could be spoken more plainely or more forcibly to quell the swelling pride of men and to dash all conceit of their merit at GODS hand It is true which is written in the Epistle to the Hebrewes where it is said thus To doe good and to to Distribute forgett not for vvith such sacrifices God is vvell pleased The Papists translate it for maintenance of their meritts that with such Hosts or Sacrifices God is promerited for so is their Latin Translation Promeretur Deus Which word in Latin as it is not used passively as the Rhemists in their English have translated it so neither is that Latin translation which they follow right in that point being not answerable to the originall in Greeke according whereunto the ancient Fathers would have all translations to be reformed and framed as before is declared for the Greek word in that Text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth as our Translation hath it is wel pleased or is delighted but it importeth no such thing as matter of merit in it And therefore you must hereby learne to take heed of your false translations Yea the Parable in the Gospel of the Servant that did the commandement of his Maister plainlie and purposelie sheweth that we deserue no thankes or recompence at Gods hand for anie duetie or obedience we performe to him For saith Christ doth the Maister thanke that servant because hee did that vvhich vvas commanded him I trow not So likewise yee vvhen yee have done all those things that are commanded you yet say VVe are unprofitable servants vvee have done no more but that vvhich was our duety to doe It is here then verie manifest that no men by anie duetie or obedience they performe to God can possiblie merit or deserve anie benefite at Gods hand much lesse Eternall Heavenlie happinesse And yet you have a conceit that so long as yee acknowledge those vertues and good workes to come not from your selves but from God from his gift ye may repose confidence in them matter of merit but what is this if yee well consider it but plaine Pharisaisme for all that For did not the Pharisee in the Gospel say O God I thanke thee c. acknowledging therein the vertues and workes which he had to come from God and to be of his gift and therefore gave him thankes and yet for reposing confidence therein for being proud of Gods gifts he is disliked and reproved Bernard saith Meritum meum miseratio Domini The merit I relye upon is the Lords mercy Againe he saith Non est quo gratia intret ubi meritum occupavit There is no place for grace to enter vvhere merit hath taken possession Againe he sheweth That men can by no manner of meanes possiblie deserve or merit eternall life and salvation And so teacheth Anselmus likewise and Cusanus Yea both wee and yee be so farre from meriting and deserving salvaon that contrariwise wee all in respect of our owne merits must confesse that we deserve damnation For yee for your parts aswell as wee cannot denie but yee sometimes sinne and goe astray and if you did sinne but once in all your life time yet were that sufficient in the sentence of Gods Law and the severitie of his Iustice to make you subiect to his curse and to throw you down to hell and eternall torments Never therefore sooth nor flatter your selves with that your distinction of some Veniall and some deadlie sinnes For although it be true that some sinnes be greater then other some are and that all sinnes be in respect of Gods mercie veniall that is remissible and may be forgiven except the sinne against the Holie Ghost of which it is directlie said that it shall never be forgiven yet is it also as true that everie sinne even the least that can be named is in his owne nature deadlie and maketh a breach and transgression of Gods Law and consequently deserveth his curse and condemnation for so have S. Paul and S. Iames before instructed us whereunto the rest of the Scriptures doe accord So that even those which you call small and veniall sinnes if they should be laid to your charge and should not be forgiven you through Christ the Saviour and Redeemer they be of weight sufficient to presse you downe to hell there to be everlastinglie tormented And yet it is true that in respect of the quantitie and qualitie of sinnes committed by reprobates and according to the difference of them shall be the diversitie of their punishments in hell some being there to be tormented more and some lesse Doe ye not then all this while perceive in what a wofull and damnable estate they all be that stand upon their owne deservings merits and workes and looke to bee Iustified before Gods tribunall by a righteousnesse inherent in their owne persons and not by the righteousnesse onlie of Iesus Christ apprehended and applied by faith Well therefore did S. Bernard say that Assignata est homini aliena Iustitia quia caruit sua There is assigned to a man another mans righteousnesse because he vvanted his owne Pigghius likewise speaketh teaching that we are Iustified by the righteousnesse of
the earth so are my vvayes higher then your vvaies and my thoughts then your thoughts Yea what are they else but superstitious vvorkes which are done by the will and pleasure of men without the Commandement of God or his rule and direction for so Isidorus giveth the Etymologie of that word superstition to be a thing done supra-statutâ—m more then is appointed by the law of God upon mens pleasures and devisings May not God say in these cases as sometime he spake Quis requisivit haec de vobis VVho hath required these things of you A good Intention therefore is not sufficient to prove or make the worke to be good in Gods sight unlesse it bee a worke or action commanded from God or by his word approoved For King Saul had a good intention or meaning when being sent against the Amalâ—kites and commanded from God to kill both man and woman infant and suckling oxe and sheepe camell and asse hee neverthelesse spared some of the Cattell suffering the people to take Sheepe and Oxen to this intent to sacrifice to the Lord. But notwithstanding this his good intention the fact was odious in Gods sight and because he had thus reiected the vvord of the Lord not suffring his actions to be thereby squared and ruled therfore also did the Lord reiect him from being King over Israel So likewise had Vzzah a good meaning or a good intention when driving the Cart wherein the Arke of God was and the Arke being shaken and in danger of falling hee put forth his hand to the Arke and tooke hold of it to keepe it from falling yet because it belonged not unto him so to doe with the Arke and that he therein did an action not commanded nor warranted unto him from God or his word therefore notwithstanding this his good intention God was offended with him and hee smote Vzzah there for his error and there hee died by the Arke of God The workes then which men doe of their owne heads and devisings without Gods commandement or approbation by his word be not to be accounted amongst the number of good workes in Gods censure what faire shew soever they make amongst men or what good meaning or intention soever they have For that which is highly esteemed amongst men is oftentimes abhomination in the sight of God as Christ himselfe also teacheth and affirmeth 2 But yee have further in the Papacie workes preparative or workes or merits de Congruo as yee call them such as bee done by a man before faith received which ye also account good workes But first How can a man that is not himselfe as yet made good bring forth any good vvorks for The tree must first bee good before it can bring forth good fruit as Christ himselfe teacheth Yea good workes and a sanctified course of life be the fruites of righteousnesse as S. Paul declareth and therefore before that a man be made righteous and iustified by faith hee cannot possibly bring forth these fruites of righteousnesse Againe the Scripture witnesseth expresly that VVithout faith it is impossible to please God How then can the workes of anie man before faith received please God be accepted of him or merit anie grace or favour at his hands The Heart is the fountaine of all mens actions and by faith it is that mens hearts be purified and cleansed as S. Peter witnesseth Vntill such time therefore that mens hearts bee thus clensed and purified by faith in Christ they can bring forth no good cleane or pure vvorkes but works like themselves that is most impure and uncleane For to them that be uncleansed and unbeleevers nothing is pure but even their minde and conscience is defiled as S. Paul also directly affirmeth And so hee saith againe of all the corrupt naturall men in the world untill they bee regenerated converted and iustified in Gods sight by faith they be such as have all gone out of the way they are all become unprofitable there is none that doth good no not one Not without good cause therefore hath S. Augustine before told us that all the workes of Infidels and Heathens and even the Morall vertues of the Philosophers as they were done and performed by them that had no beliefe in Christ were no good workes in Gods sight but Splendida peccata glittering sinnes Yea hee hath told us expreslie that Good vvorkes do follow him that is before iustified and doe not goe before him that is aftervvard to be iustified And againe he saith that faith goeth before that good vvorkes may follow neither are there saith he anie good vvorkes but those that follovv faith going before And therefore touching Cornelius the Centurion whose praiers to God and Almesdeâ—des be much commended before he was baptised whose example the Rhemists and other Papists alledge in this case the same S. Augustine giveth a sufficient answere thereunto saying That hee did not give Almes and Pray without some faith So likewise testifieth Beda and that out of Gregorie that Non virtutibus ad fidem sed fide pertingitur ad virtutes c. Men attaine not to faith by vertues but to vertues by faith as S. Gregorie expoundeth it For Cornelius saith he vvhose almes before baptisme as the Angell witnesseth be praised came not by vvorkes to saith but by faith to vvorkes And againe he saith Hee had faith vvhose prayers and almesdeeds could please God So that at this verie time of his Prayers and Almesdeedes hee beleeved in the Messias albeit most true it is that hee did not then so well know Christ or so firmely beleeve in him as hee did afterward by the ministerie of Peter 3 The merits also de Candigno as the Popish Church calleth them be not to be reckoned in the number of good works yea this conceit and opinion of Merit is it that poysoneth and marreth the vvorkes so that they are not reputed in Gods sight and censure to be good but bad and odious vvorks that be done with that affection and to that end For even those good workes that be done after grace and faith received and by a man regenerate and Iustified doe not merit or deserve salvation or eternall life because in the best works that men regenerate or sanctified persons doe is some humane frailtie defect or imperfection intermingled for which defects they are to crave pardon at Gods hand and not to stand upon the merit of them VVee are all saith Esay as an uncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy raggs If thou O Lord shouldst straitely marke iniquitie saith the Psalmist O Lord vvho shall stand But there is mercie vvith thee that thâ—u maist be feared In many things vvee all offend saith S. Iames And therefore well saith S. Augustine Vae universae iustitiae nostrae si remota misericordia Iudicetur VVoe to all our righteousnesse if it be iudged mercie being laid
aside The vvages of sinne saith S. Paul is death But the gift of God is eternall life through Iesus Christ our Lord. Note that hee calleth Eternall lâ—fe not the wages or merit of Men but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The free gift of God bestowed gratis without anie purchase merit or desert of ours albeit Iesus Christ our Lord purchased it for us and paid a great price for it in our behalfe through vvhom and whose merits it is that we obtaine it Hearing saith S. Augustine that death is the vvages of sin vvhy goest thou about O Thou not Iustice of man but plaine pride under the name of Iustice vvhy goest thou about to lift up thy selfe and to demand Eternall life vvhich is contrarie to death as a vvages due Chrysostome also upon this place speaketh thus Hee saith not eternall life is the revvard of your good vvorkes but eternall life is the gift of God That he might shevv that they are delivered not by â—heir ovvne strength or vertues and that it is not a debt or vvages or a retribution of labours but that they have received all those things freely of the gift of God Theodoret likewise upon this place observeth that the Apostle saith not here revvard but gift or grace for eternall life is the gift of God for although a man could performe the highest and absolute Iustice yet eternall ioyes being vveighed vvith temporall labours there is no proportion And so saith S. Paul himselfe that The afflictions of this life non sunt Condignae are not vvorthy the glorie that shall be shevved unto us It is true that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 merces a revvard is promised to those that doe good workes but it is as before is shewed merces ex gratià non ex debito a revvard of grace or favour and not of debt or desert as even S. Paul himselfe distinguisheth So that God giveth the Crowne of righteousnesse not to the merit or worthines of our workes but to the Merit or Worthines of Christ and as due to us by his promise onely freely made unto us in Christ. The Crowne therefore of eternall life is of mercie and favour in respect of us but of Iustice and desert in respect of Christ who hath purchased it for us by his merits and worthines Wherefore S. Augustine saith well that fidelis dominus qui se nobis debitorem fecit non aliquid a nobis accipiendo sed omnia nobis promittendo The Lord is faithfull who hath made himselfe a debtor unto us not by receiving anie thing of us but by promising all things unto us Againe he saith Non dicimus Deo Domine redde quod accepisti sed redde quod promisisti VVee say not to God Render that O Lord vvhich thou hast received of us but render or give that vvhich thou hast promised Againe he saith That God crovvneth his ovvne gifts not our merits vvhen he crovvneth us What vvorthinesse soever then is in us it is by Gods acceptation and his accounting of us to bee such in through Christ not by reason or in respect of any of our owne personall merits or worthinesse For vvhat hast thou saith S. Paul that thou hast not received and if thou hast received it vvhy dost thou glorie as though thou hadst not received it The gifts and graces of God in a man should make him humble and thankefull and not make him proud as though he deserved them and a great deale more by reason of them If a man give another 100. l. which hee useth well doth hee thereby deserve or can hee therefore claime as of merit or dutie to have at that mans hand 100000. l. Men for good works and benefits done may deserve praise and thankes amongst men but what man by doing of his dutie deserveth praise or thankes at Gods hand or What Servant for doing his Masters service and commandement can thereupon claime to be his Masters heire VVhosoever glorieth should glorie in the Lord as S. Paul teacheth But if men doe merit then have they somewhat of their owne wherein to glorie But God alloweth no matter of glorie in men with him or in his sight neither have they indeed anie matter of glory in them because whatsoever graces or goodnes men have they have received it of God to whom they ought to bee thankefull and for which they stand bound to performe all manner of dutie unto him So that how much merit men take to themselves so much doe they detract from the merits of Christ and so much praise glorie and thankes doe they pull from God to whom all praise glorie honour and thankes rightly and properly belong and are to be rendred Yea the Kingdome of heaven is a reward infinitely above the value of all mens workes and therefore must needes bee given of grace and cannot be merited by men But against mens merits and their workes of satisfaction whereby they intend to satisfie Gods wrath and Iustice for sinnes which is onely satisfiable by the death and sufferings of that Immaculate Lambe Christ Iesus enough hath beene before spoken and therefore I here forbeare to speake anie further of them 4 But in this matter of vvorkes this is not to be passed over or omitted that they also hold workes of Supererogation as they call them whereby they say Men doe more then they are bound unto by Gods Commandements and so doe merit not onely their owne salvation but the salvation also of others or something toward it Can these be accounted good vvorkes or that be held for a good and right religion wherin such monstrous things be taught and maintained It is more then anie meere man is able to doe perfectly and exactly to keepe and performe the vvhole lavv and Commaundements of God for so S. Paul himselfe expreslie affirmeth it to be a thing impossible because of the vveakenesse that is in all sinnefull flesh and so have the ancient Fathers likewise before testified and taught Why then doe these men talke of doing all and more then all the Commaundements of God Indeed if anie thinke to come to heaven by Doeing as he in the Gospell did the Ansvvere which Christ gave in that case is right and fit for him that Hee must keepe the Commandements for Moses describing the righteousnesse vvhich is of the Lavv saith That the man vvhich Doth those things shall live by them But the righteousnesse vvhich is of faith speaketh as S. Paul sheweth on another fashion and consisteth in a firme beleeving in Christ For Christ who performed the law for us it being a thing impossible for us to doe is the End or accomplishment of the Lavv for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth as hee there againe affirmeth And yet must none therefore hereupon conclude God to bee Cruell Tyrannicall or uniust in giveing such a Law as is impossible for men to keepe for at the first
assurance of salvation or in the doctrine of redemption or in any point of the religion of the Protestants but the cleane contrary pag. 99 100 c pag. 153 154. c. pag. 125 c pag. 404 c Lay persons may and ought to reade the Scriptures and thereby to examine and try the doctrines of men vvhether they be right or no pag. 73 74 75 76. c. See also the Preface It is impossible for meere men by and in their owne persons perfectly to fulfill the Law of the ten Commandements and so to be iustified yea the Law vvas given to other uses and ends pag. 108 c No such place as Limbus Patrum pag. 130 131 132 M MIracles signes or vvonders done in the antichristian Church pag. 98 99 pag 306 307 pag 280 281 Mens Merits deserve not salvation but damnation p. 110 111 112 113 c. pag 366 367 N THe Name of Christians the most ancient and the most honourable See the Preface toward the end The Name of Catholicks to vvhom it rightly and properly belongeth pag. 63 64 O THe Oath of Supremacie to the King explaned and declared to be iust and lawfull pag 1 2 3 4 c. to the end of that chapter P THe Pope got his supremacie over Emperors and Kings partly by fraude and partly by force pag. 27 28 The Ecclesiasticall supremacie vvhen it vvas first affected by a Bishop vvas oppugned even by some of the B. of Rome themselves p. 13 14 15. Divers generall Councils also against it p 16 17 The Popes Supremacie vvhat a vvicked founder it had and how vvickedly it is still maintayned and upheld pag. 12 Three Texts of Scripture usually alledged for maintenance of the Popes supremacie abused answered p. 11 12 p. 291 292 c Excommunication and the power of the Kâ—yes abused by the Pope for establishing maintenance of his supremacie p. 299 300 301 Divers vvritings forged under the names of Clemens Anacletus Evaristus and other ancients for the upholding of the Popes new Supremacie pag. 12 The Donation of Constantine also forged for that purpose ibid. Miracles signes or wonders also done for that end p. 341 342 c Poperie is a corruption of the most ancient and Christian Religion and is to the Church as an infection or disease is to the body of a man or as a plague or pestilence is to a Citie pag. 38 Pope and Poperie exclaymed against long before Luther or Calvin vvere borne pag. 42 43 44 45 46 c The Popes excommunications and curses to be contemned pag. 44 45 299 Popes of Rome have erred and may erre even in matter of faith and iudicially pag 51 52 53 54. See the Preface also No such place as Popish Purgatorie pag. 125 126 c. to the end of that chapter That there is a Predestination is confessed both by Protestants and Papists the doctrine vvhereof being rightly understood is verie sweet and comfortable and is so farre from introducing any inconvenience licentiousnesse or impiety as that it inferreth the cleane contrary pag. 153 154 155 156 157 158 Predestination dependeth not upon the vvill of men but upon the vvill of God pag. 178.179 180 c Vocation iustification sanctification and all saving graces be consequents and effects of Election or Predestination to life everlasting pag. 154 c pag. 198 c Predestination dependeth upon Gods foreknowledge and vvhat that foreknowledge is pag. 194 195 196 c Faith foreseene and good vvorkes foreseene be not the cause of Predestination but the effect and a consequent thereunto ibid. The doctrine of Predestination teacheth no dissolutenâ—sse or carelesnesse but the cleane contrary pag 154 155 c. p. 199 200 c Predestination teacheth no man utterly to despaire though he be exceedingly vvicked and impious for the present inasmuch as there is a possibilitie to be converted so long as life lasteth as likewise it teacheth no man rashly or unadvisedly to presume p. 157 158 198 200 c The Popish Masse and Popish Priesthood thereto belonging both abominable pag. 217 218 219 c VVhat maner of Primacie it vvas that Peter had amongst the Apostles pag. 295 296 c Popish Priests be not the Ministers of Christ but of Antichrist and therefore to resort to them as if they had commission or authoritie from Christ to give absolution or forgivenesse of sins is vvicked and in vaine pag. 302. c. Q ALl Questions and controversies concerning faith and religion to be decided and determined by the sacred and canonicall Scriptures pag. 49 50 c. See also the Preface throughout R THat there is a Reprobation aswell as an Election and vvhat it is pag. 165 c Reprobation and Election both at one time and the cause vvhy this man in particular vvus chosen and that man refused is Gods own meere will and pleasure pag. 196 197 198 None can certainly determine of himselfe before-hand that hee is a reprobate though he be for the present exceedingly vvicked and ungodly because God may possibly call and convert him before hee dye p. 157.158 p 199 200 Rome apparantly proved to be the vvhore of Babylon p. 246 o. Bellarmine himselfe other Papists confesse Rome to be the whore of Babylon pag. 247 The evasion they make that onely heathen Rome is there intended is shewed to be very vaine and false pag. 247 248 249 c Some special spiritual whoredomes that is Idolatries of the Romish Church pâ—g 258 259 260 c VVho is the Rock and foundation vvhereupon the Church is builded pag. 292 293. c. S THe Spirit that speaketh in the sacred Scriptures is not a private or humane spirit but a divine spirit even the Spirit of God And by this Spirit speaking in those Scriptures is every spiriâ— speaking in men to be tryed pag. 53 54 Exposition of one place of Scripture must be such as agreeth vvith the rest of the Scriptures pag. 58 59 A rule to kâ—ow vvhen a man speaketh by a private Spirit of his owne and vvhen not pag. 53.54 The true Church to be tried and knowne by the sacred and canonical Scriptures pag. 59 60 61 62 Some bookes held by the Papists to be canonicall Scriptures which the ancient Church held not to be so pag. 65 66 The publicke prayers and Service in the Church should be in such a tongue as the people might understand pag 67 The originals of the Scripture incorrupt and to be preferred before that vvhich is called S Hieromes Translation and all other Translations vvhatsoever pag. 67 68 69.70 The English Translation of the Scripture is rightly iustified against the uniust exceptions of Papists pag. 71 Not any humane learning or private spirit of any man but God only and his Spirit is the opener and unfolder of the true sense of the divine Scriptures pag. 73 74 Lay people may and ought to reade the Scriptures pag. 73 74 75 76 77. See also the Preface That there be
the Protestants concerning iustification by this lively faith and not by anie dead faith is such as you can no way dislike that it is so far from making anie carelesse of doing good works that contrariwise it urgeth abetteth perswadeth and provoketh men unto them if they meane or desire to have such a faith as whereby they may be saved But now although the Protestants doe thus rightly teach that this faith and good workes goe together and be inseparable in respect of the person so that he that hath this faith hath also good workes yet in the point of our Iustification in Gods sight and before his Tribunall they are to be distinguished and to be considered apart and not confusedlie because it is Faith onlie and not Workes whereby we apprehend and applie Christ Iesus unto us as our Righteousnesse To understand this the better you must ever remember that Christ Iesus is in verie deed our Righteousnes for so the scriptures doe plentifullie teach and proclaime Our faith is but the hand or instrument whereby we apprehend and applie that righteousnesse unto us and our good workes be the fruits testimonies and declarations both to our selves and other men of that faith in Christ which iustifieth us before God And therefore it is not enough for a man to say hee hath faith but if hee have that true livelie and iustifying faith which he pretendeth he must declare shew it by his workes for so S. Iames saith Ostende mihi fidem tuam ex operibus tuis shew me thy faith by thy vvorkes And agreeablie hereunto S Paul calleth good workes and a sanctified course of life fructus Iustitiae the fruits of righteousnesse So that wee are first righteous by faith in Christ before wee doe or can bring forth these fruits of righteousnes And so S. August likewise teacheth affirming directly that Opera sequuntur Iustificatum non praecedunt Iustificandum Good vvorkes doe follow him that is formerly iustified and doe not goe before him that is afterward to be iustified And this even Christ Iesus also himselfe declareth namelie that the tree must first be good before it can bring forth good fruit By all which it is verie manifest that good works be not causes but fruits effects and consequents of that faith which iustifieth us before God But this is yet further evident because S. Paul saith expresselie that wee are Iustified by faith and so have peace vvith God Hee further excludeth Workes verie directlie and by name from having anie thing to doe in that act of our Iustification Therefore vve conclude saith he that a man is Iustified by faith vvithout the vvorkes of the Law And againe he saith that God imputeth righteousnes vvithout vvorks Againe he saith It is by grace and not of works Rom. 11.6 And againe he saith It is not of vvorkes Rom. 9.11 And againe hee saith By grace are yee saved through faith and that not of your selves for it is the gift of God and not of vvorkes lest any man should boast himselfe In all which places yee may perceive that how requisite or commendable soever good workes be and what good use soever they have yet they bee directlie excluded from being anie cause of our Iustification and salvation in Gods sight and censure And with this also agreeth that saying of S. Paul in his Epistle to the Galathians where he giveth this conclusion saying Yee are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus And so also testifieth S. Iohn saying That as many as received Christ to them he gave this prerogative to be the sonnes of God even to them that beleeve in his name Where you may observe that beleefe or faith is reckoned as the hand or instrument whereby Christ is apprehended or received Againe he saith That God so loved the vvorld that he gave his onely begotten Sonne that vvhosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life In which words you may observe againe the first and originall cause of our salvation to be the meere grace and love of God Secondly the materiall cause to be Christ the Sonne of God with his obedience and righteousnesse And thirdlie the instrumentall cause to be faith or beleefe in that his Sonne and our Saviour Iesus For he saith the text was sent into the world to this end that vvhosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life But consider that he saith yet further That as Moses lift vp the Serpent in the vvildernesse so must the sonne of man be lift vp that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have eternall life Some of you no doubt remember the storie of the Serpent there mentioned which is in the booke of Numbers for after that the people of Israel had wickedly spoken and murmured against God and against Moses The Lord sent fierie Serpents among the people which stung the people so that manie of the people of Israel died Therefore the people came to Moses and said VVe have sinned for we have spoken against the Lord and against thee pray to the Lord that he take away the Serpents from us And Moses prayed for the people And the Lord said unto Moses make thee a fierie Serpent and set it up for a signe that as many as are bitten may looke upon it and live So Moses made a Serpent of brasse and set it up for a signe and when a Serpent had bitten a man then he looked to the Serpent of brasse and lived As therefore Moses lift up this brazen Serpent in the wildernes to the end that whosoever was stung by those fierie Serpents and did looke upon that brazen Serpent might be cured live and was cured and did live accordingly So was also the Sonne of man Christ Iesus lift up upon the Crosse where he was crucified to the end that whosoever is stung with the deadly stings of sinne or of that old Serpent the Divell and doth with the eies of his faith applying him looke upon Christ Iesus so lifted vp and crucified for him should bee healed and have eternall life Where you may againe perceive that as Christ is compared to that brazen Serpent so is our beliefe or faith in him compared to their looking upon the brazen Serpent so that still it appeareth that faith is as the eie or instrument whereby wee behold apprehend and apply Christ crucified as a salve unto us for all our sores For in him is comprehended whatsoever is necessarie or fit to cure us When therefore wee say and speake in this sort that Sola fides iustificat Faith onely iustifieth wee meane not that this faith is so sole or alone as that it is without good works but that in the act of our iustification before God and in his sight and as it respecteth and apprehendeth Christ the obiect of it it is sole and alone workes having no
part with it in that apprehensive facultie Where also you may understand how S. Iames S. Paul be cleerly reconciled between whom neverthelesse there neither is nor ever was anie variance being rightly understood namely even by that evident common and knowne distinction that CHRISTVS iustificat effectivè Fides instrumentaliter sivè apprehensivè Opera declarativè CHRIST is he that iustifieth in verie deede effectually Faith iustifieth instrumentally or apprehensively and workes iustifie declaratively that is they doe declare or shew forth unto men the goodnesse and livelinesse of that faith whereby as by an instrument apprehending Christ our righteousnesse wee are iustified in the sight of God And this is the reason that S. Iames spake in that sort before mentioned viz Declare or Shew me thy faith by thy vvorkes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes In which sense also he further saith that Abraham was iustified that is was shewed or declared to be iust by his workes when he offered Isaac his sonne upon the Altar Likewise hee saith that Rahab the harlot vvas iustified that is was shewed or declared to be iust through workes when she received the messengers and sent them out another vvay So that to bee iustified by workes in S. Iames is nothing else but thereby to be shewed or declared to be iust For all S. Iames his dispute in that place if you well observe it is directly and expresly against a Dead faith which hath no good workes with it and against that vaine man that shall say or thinke that he hath a faith good enough to save him when as being without workes it was indeede but an idle brag and conceite and not a lively or saving faith but like a bodie without a soule as he there resembleth it for that it hath not the action of a living thing appearing in it The iustification therefore by faith without workes whereof S. Paul speaketh and the iustification by workes and not by faith onely that is when faith onelie is pretended or alledged which is destitute of good workes whereof S. Iames speaketh appeare to have no contradiction or contrarietie at all but a verie plaine evident and cleare consent and agreement For both those Apostles doe teach alike and concurre in this that the iustifying and saving faith is not an idle or dead faith but such a one as is livelie and operative working by love and bringing forth the fruites of good workes And therefore doth also S. Paul aswell as S. Iames require of all beleevers in Christ that they be carefull to shew forth good vvorkes and of as manie as be redeemed by him and iustified by faith in him that They should bee zealous of good vvorkes Yea although hee teacheth that wee are iustified in Gods sight and saved by grace through faith and not by workes yet he further addeth and saith neverthelesse that VVee are his vvorkemanship created in Christ Iesus unto good vvorkes and that God hath before ordained those good vvorkes that vvee should vvalke in them So that good workes be as S. Bernard also witnesseth of them Via regni non causa regnandi The way vvherin men must vvalke tovvards Gods kingdome but they be not the cause of their raigneing or of their comming thither As for that they obiect touching the Heresie of faith only iustifying or saving which S. Augustine saith was held by some in the Apostles time the same S. Augustine himselfe there plainely declareth that the heresie was of them that thoght they might be iustified or saved by such a faith as was void of good works which is indeed an heretical or erroneous opinioÌ„ which nothing toucheth us yea which we likewise condemne detest as much as anie ever holding with the same S· August with S. Paul S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures that a iustifying or saving faith will produce good workes and a care to live well and in obedience to all Gods commandements Here then you may see the unsoundness of that distinction which the Rhemists and other Papists use viz. that workes done before Faith received that is whilst men be Infidels and unbeleevers do not indeed Iustifie but works done after faith received that is after that men be beleevers do say they iustifie in Gods sight For doth not S. Paul in that his dispute concerning Iustification expressely mention the example of Abraham as being the father of the faithfull in that case And doth he not say of that beleeving and godlie man Abraham that his Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse before God and not his Works And doth he not further say that David likewise describeth the blessednesse of a man to consist not in anie workes or inherent righteousnesse of his owne but in remission of his sinnes and in Gods not imputing sinne unto him yea unto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes as he there directlie speaketh Was not S. Paul also a godlie and faithful man and one that had received grace from God and done manie good workes after that faith and grace received and yet he saith thus of himselfe Doubtlesse I thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledg sake of Christ Iesus my Lord for whom I have counted all thiâ—gs lâ—sse do iudge them to be dung that I might win Christ might be found in him that is not having mine owne righteoâ—snes vvhâ—ch is of the Law but that righteousnes which is through the faith of Christ even the righteousnes which is of God through faith In which words ye see that S. Paul thogh a godly man yet disclaimeth all his own works and inherent righteousnesse whatsoever accounting it as Dung and altogether unmeet to stand in Gods presence and before his Iudgement seate to claime Iustification by that all his ioy delight and desiâ—e was to goe out of himselfe and to be found In hâ—m that is in Christ and so to have his righteousnesse and not his owne imputed to him For in Christ it is that the Father is vvell pleased and in Christ it is and for his sake and not for our owne that vvee are accepted As hee likewise saith againe There is no condemnation to them that be in Christ Iesus And againe he saith God hath made him to bee sinne for us vvhich knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnesse of God in him Where you also see that Christ Iesus our most kinde Suertie and most loving Saviour though hee had not anie the least speck or spot of sinne but was most holie most pure and in all compleate fulnesse and perfection righteous in himselfe had neverthelesse our sinnes imputed to him that wee might be made the righteousnesse of God In him as this Text speaketh and not in our selves As Christ then became sinne in respect of the imputation of our sinnes unto him so are we iudged righteous in Gods sight not by
he speaketh of the whole Booke of the Law saying that It is written Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that be vvritten in the booke of the Law to doe them doth not this extend to the Morall Law or can these words be restrained only to the Ceremoniall Yea when he further saith thus I had not knowne sinne but by the Law for I had not known lust or concupiscence to be sinne except the Law had said Non concupisces Thou shalt not covet or Thou shalt no lust doth not everie one hereby most plainly perceive of what Law it is that he chiefly speaketh meaneth namely that it is principally of the Morall Law that is of the Decalogue or Law of the Ten Commandements For to what other end else is it that he there expresly and by name rehearseth and bringeth in one of those ten Commandements But yet further he sheweth that there be but two waies of righteousnesse namely the righteousnes that is of the Law and the righteousnes which is of faith and saith that Moses describeth the righteousnesse which is of the Law in this sort viz. That the man vvhich doth those things shall live by them But the righteousnesse vvhich is of faith speaketh after another manner and he sheweth it to consist not in anie doubtfull questioning but in a firme beleeving in Christ vvho is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth When therefore he here againe saith touching the vvorkes of the Law and the righteousnesse compassable that way That the man that doth those things shall live by them is it his meaning thinke you that hee that observeth the workes of the Ceremonial Law only without observing or doing anie of the workes of the Moral Law shall live thereby and enioy everlasting happinesse I presume none can be so absurd or unwise as to thinke it It is then a thing verie manifest that hee speaketh not onely of the workes of the Ceremonial Law but of the workes also of the Morall Law and of these chiefly excluding aswell the works of the one as of the other from being anie cause of our Iustification in Gods sight And this is so much the more evident because S. Paul yet further in that his dispute of Iustification excludeth not only the Iewes but the Gentiles also from all hope of Iustification by the Law teaching that they both are to expect iustification in Gods sight Not by the vvorkes of the law but by faith in Iesus Christ. Now yee know that the Gentiles be not bound to the observation of the ceremonial law as the Iewes were but the Gentiles aswell as the Iewes bee bound to the observation of the moral law of the ten Commandements When therefore S. Paul teacheth that aswell the Gentiles as the Iewes are to expect Iustification not by the workes of the law but by faith in Christ it is apparant that he must needes meane to exclude herein aswell the workes of the Moral law whereto the Gentiles are bound as the workes of the Ceremoniall law whereto the Iewes onelie were bound and not the Gentiles for otherwise you will make him a verie vaine and idle disputer in this point as in respect of the Gentiles 5 Howbeit being thus repulsed from this hold they then retire and returne to their old wonted and ordinarie nold wherein they seeme to repose their greatest strength and that is the same which is before mentioned namely that S. Paul when he excludeth workes from being anie cause of Iustification in Gods sight meaneth it of vvorkes done before faith received and whilst a man is an unbeleever and not of workes done after faith received Which works done by a beleeving person doe as they suppose Iustifie before God and in his sight This hath beene before sufficiently answered yet because they so often and usuallie urge it I hope it will not be offensive that I also here once againe make answer unto it First therefore it might suffice to call to your remembrance that which hath been spoken concerning those two faithfull godlie men Abraham and David who albeit they had after faith grace received from God lived well and done sundrie good workes for which they might deserve praise and glorie amongst men yet for al that they deserved no praise nor glorie with God as S. Paul witnesseth nor were thereby iustified in his sight Yea as touching Abraham he saith that notwithstanding all that he did not his vvorkes but his Faith vvas imputed to him for righteousnesse before God And as touching David though he were a man likewise verie faithfull and godly and did manie good workes yet by his godlie life and good workes he never thought to be iustified before Gods tribunall but found all the godlines and goodnes that was in him to bee too defective and to come too short for that purpose and therefore also he crieth out thus unto God saying Enter not into iudgement vvith thy servant for in thy sight shall no man living be iustified Yea hee discribeth the blessednesse of everie man even of the holiest man that liveth to consist not in his owne sanctitie or righteousnesse but in this that His sinnes be forgiven or not imputed to him And so doth S. Paul inferre and teach out of this example of David That God imputeth righteousnesse vvithout vvorkes So that neither the workes which David did nor the workes which Abraham did nor consequently the workes that anie other godly or holie man doth after grace and faith received be sufficient to Iustifie in Gods presence For I knovv nothing by my selfe saith S. Paul yet am I not thereby iustified I might here further desire you to call to your remembrance that holie man Iob and that holy Prophet of God Daniel yea all that godlie companie and Church of God in Daniels time and Esaies time who all did as themselves testifie renounce all their owne inherent righteousnes as too insufficient and unmeet to stand before Gods most pure eies to claime Iustification thereby in his sight Yea if God should looke narrowlie to see what is said done amisse and to recompence it in the rigor and severitie of his Iustice according to mens merits and deserts VVho as the Psalmist speaketh should bee able to stand or to abide it Yea I might here moreover desire you to remember whatsoever is conteined in the former Chapter touching this matter For not the workes even of a iust man doe iustifie in Gods sight as S. Paul prooveth by an expresse testimonie out of the Prophet Abacuk where he saith even of the iust man that He liveth by his faith and not by his Workes And this he urgeth and enforceth againe in his Epistle to the Galathians saying thus But that no man is iustified by the lavv in the sight of God it is evident for saith he The iust shall live by
faith And thus himselfe being otherwise dead did live or had life in him namely by faith in the Sonne of God and not by the workes of the law Yea he further excludeth even the workes of righteousnes in expresse termes saying thus Not by the vvorkes of righteousnesse vvhich vve have done but according to his mercie he hath saved us Observe that he here directlie affirmeth of himselfe of all the rest that shall be saved that they are saved not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by vvorkes done by them in righteousnes but of Gods meere mercie and grace through Christ Iesus And againe observe that speaking not to unbeleevers but to beleevers Saints and sanctified people living in Ephesus he saith thus By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of vvorkes lest anie man should glorie for vvee are his vvorkemanship created in Christ Iesus unto good vvorkes vvhich God hath before ordained that vvee should vvalke in them Heere also you see infalliblie that workes though done by such as be sanctified and regenerate persons be neverthelesse excluded from being anie cause of their salvation yea by the verie words themselves of the text you perceive that he speaketh expresly and by name of good vvorkes vvhich God hath before ordained that vvee should vvalke in them denying them neverthelesse to be anie cause of salvation But here why doe they speake of anie good workes done by Infidels or before faith received For to speake properlie and truely none doe or can doe good workes so allowed to be in Gods censure but beleeving persons onely inasmuch as the best workes of Infidels and before a man hath received faith be not allowed for good in Gods sight but bee as S. Augustine affirmeth of them Splendida peccata Glittering sinnes Howbeit here remember that although those which be Saints upon earth that is which bee regenerate and sanctified people be thus expresly affirmed to be saved by their faith and not by their good workes yet have they neverthelesse these good workes appointed for them to walke in so long as they live in this world for so this text to the Ephesians directlie sheweth to the end their faith should not be idle but working through love as S. Paul speaketh in another place and that so it might appeare to bee not a vaine and a dead faith but a sound and a lively faith and such as will save a man as S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures have also before declared Yea this point even Christ Iesus also himselfe by his last Iudgement in the end of the world doth declare namely that the iustifying and saving faith is not voide of good workes but furnished with them and yet that Gods people doe not relye upon them For thus will hee say to his faithfull and elect ones Come ye blessed of my father inherite yee the kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the vvorld for I vvas hungrie and yee gave me meate I was thirstie and yee gave me drinke I was a stranger and yee tooke mee in naked and ye clothed mee I vvas sicke and yee visited mee I vvas in prison and yee came unto me But now observe that although these elect and righteous persons had these good workes yet doe not they so much as take notice of them much lesse stand upon the merite of them and therefore doe they answer and say Lord when savv vvee thee hungrie and fed thee or thirstie and gave thee drinke vvhen saw vvee thee a stranger and tooke thee in or naked and clothed thee sicke or in prison and came unto thee Reade further the rest of the Chapter to the end of it And by all of it considered together ye may verie easilie perceive first that they bee not the elect and righteous people but the reprobates that stand upon their workes obiect their workes to plead for them And secondlie that Christ their Lord taketh notice of the good works of the elect although themselves take no notice of them nor doe so much as once mention or alledge them Where Christ by alledging their good works would have the world also to take notice and to be advertised that it was not a vaine idle or dead faith but a iustifying and saving faith which these men had For their good workes be there mentioned as testimonies fruites and declarations of their faith and as being Via regni non causa regnandi The vvay vvherein they walked toward this kingdome but not as being the cause of their enioying of that kingdome as S. Bernard also himselfe hath before taught affirmed Yea in verie deede the primarie and original cause of their enioying of that most happie kingdome is there delivered in the former words where Christ calleth them the Blessed of his father and telleth them moreover directlie that they are to possesse this kingdom not by anie purchase or desert of their owne but by way of Inheritance for the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Inherite yee or possesse yee it by waie of Inheritance And further he there telleth them that this kingdom was prepared for them long before they were borne or had done anie good workes at all namelie even from the foundation of the world So that this glorious and heavenlie kingdome is given them of Gods meere bountie and grace and is unto them a Revvard according to their vvorkes as the Scripture speaketh but not for their workes as though their workes deserved it or were the meritorious cause of their salvation Yea it is a reward of grace and favour and not of debt or due desert as S. Paul hath also before testified and a revvard of Inheritance as the same S. Paul againe expresly affirmeth it In vaine therefore also is that your distinction of the first Iustification which you make to be by faith without vvorkes and of the second Iustification which you say is by workes and by living an holie and godlie life for the Scriptures speake but of one Iustification in Gods sight availeable to salvation As for that which you call the second Iustification consisting in doing good workes and in holinesse of life and conversation it is as I said before more properlie and rightly to be tearmed as the Scripture calleth it Sanctification it being an effect declaration fruite and consequent of that Iustification we have before by faith as S. Iames and S. Paul and the rest of the Scriptures doe manifestly teach CHAP. V. That Christ is our onely and all-sufficient Redeemer and hath fully satisfied Gods Iustice for our sinnes and the punishment thereto belonging against mens merits and satisfactions in that behalfe and against Popish Purgatorie And that there is no licentiousnesse in this doctrine but the cleane contrary BVt they further accuse our Religion to be licentious because relying wholly upon Christ our
Redeemer and his satisfaction we make no satisfaction our selves for our sinnes to the Iustice of GOD. Howbeit yee are first of all to know that this doctrine and faith of ours concerning Christ his redemption and satisfaction all-sufficient made to Gods Iustice for our sinnes inferreth no such matter as licentiousnesse but the cleane contrarie For wee are redeemed not to the end to live dissolutely or carelesly but to the end wee should for so great and unspeakeable a benefite obey and serve God in holinesse and righteousnesse before him and that all the dayes of our life as the Scrâ—ptures teach And secondly as touching the truth of this matter Saint Peter telleth us that Christ his owne selfe bare our sinnes in his bodie on the tree Againe S. Iohn saith that the blood of Iesus Christ the Sonne of God doth purge us from all sinne and clense us from all iniquity S. Paul also saith VVee have redemption through his blood even the remission of sins Yea this the Scriptures doe almost everie where teach and testifie How then can your conceit of mens satisfactions to Gods Iustice for sinnes be otherwise accounted of then as a thing apparantly iniurious to that satisfaction and redemption and consequently to that free and full discharge and remission of all our sinnes and of the guiltinesse and punishment thereto belonging which we have in Christ For guiltinesse being taken away the punishment also is taken away saith Tertullian And so also saith S. Augustine that Christ by taking upon him the punishment and not the fault hath done away both the fault and the punishment And in all reason it must be so that when a fault or sinne is forgiven the punishment thereto belonging is forgiven also for to what other end else is the fault or sinne forgiven and remitted But against this they alledge the example of King David and of other the children of God who notwithstanding that they had their sins forgiven them had neverthelesse afflictions chastisements sent them from God even in this life Whereunto they have beene often answered that God sendeth not these chastisements and afflictions upon his children to that end thereby to satisfie his wrath and iustice for their sinnes for his wrath is appeased and his Iustice satisfied in their behalfe another way namely in the passion and obedience of Iesus Christ but by that meanes to put them in remembrance of their sinnes formerly committed and to bring them to repentance for the same and to make them stand in more feare and awe of God for the time to come and to walke more warily circumspectly and with better obedience before him as the Psalmist declareth So that these be sent of God for other ends and purposes and come from him not as from an angrie and revengefull Iudge but out of his kinde provident care and fatherly affection and love toward them Which thing S. Paul also witnesseth shewing that these corrections and chastisements be sent upon them to the end they might thereby be advertised to call themselves and their sinnes to a better remembrance even so farre as to Iudge and condemne themselves for the same and so be admonished not to runne anie longer a riotous and wicked course with the damnable world The same is further testified in the Epistle to the Hebrewes for there it is said thus VVhom the Lord loveth he chasteneth and scourgeth every sonne that he receiveth And hee saith againe If yee endure chastening God offereth himselfe unto you as unto sonnes for vvhat sonne is it vvhom the father chasteneth not And againe he saith If therefore ye be vvithout correction vvhereof all sonnes are partakers then are ye bastards and not sonnes Moreover saith he vve have had the fathers of our flesh vvhich corrected us and wee gave them reverence should vvee not much more be in subiection unto the father of spirits that vvee might live for they verily for a few dayes chastened us after their owne pleasure but he chasteneth us for our profit that vve might be partakers of his holinesse The like speaketh S. Augustine saying Prosunt ista mala quae fideles piè perferunt c. These evils or afflictions vvhich faithfull people in godly wise suffer doe profite eyther to the amendment of their sinnes or for the exercise and triall of their righteousnesse or to shew the misery of this life That that life vvhere there shall be true and perpetuall blessednesse indeed both may more ardently be desired and more instantly be sought after It appeareth then that chastisements and afflictions be sent of God in this life upon his children out of his Love and not out of his furie and unappeased displeasure so that they serve not to anie such end as to have the severitie of his wrath and Iustice to be by such meanes satisfied and appeased yea how can the greatest afflictions or miseries that be or can be imagined in sinfull men during this life satisfie Gods heavie and infinite wrath and justice for sinnes Or how can they merit heaven and heavenly glorie when S. Paul himselfe saith expressely thus I suppose that the afflictions of this present time are not vvorthy of the glory that shall be shewed unto us But yet for all this such is the strength of error they strangely suppose that they doe Christ no wrong because it is through his merits as they say that they be enabled to merit and to make this satisfaction to Gods iustice for their sinnes Howbeit this is but a meere conceit and imagination For there is no word of God to warrant or prove it nay the Scripture teacheth that Christ died not for our good workes to make them able to merit at Gods hand but for our sinnes that they might be pardoned Againe it is said that Christ hath by himselfe and not by us or in our persons purged our sinnes He is our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 platamentum propitiatio reconciliation and propitiation Yee are bought vvith a price saith S. Paul therefore glorifie yee God both in your bodie and in your spirit for they are Gods Christ is hee that paide this price for them as S. Peter also sheweth And therefore not VVee but Hee is affirmed to be our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 price the price of Redemption paide for us and that we are for our parts Iustified gratis that is franckly and freely and for nothing by us paide 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the redemption vvhich is in Christ Iesus and not in us or in our persons Yea in that Christ was to come downe from heaven and to be incarnate for this purpose and to suffer and so to satisfie Gods wrath and Iustice in our behalfe he sufficiently sheweth that none of us were able in our owne persons to performe so great a worke Yea they may by
love Non quia futuros tales nos esse prâ—scivit sed ut essemus tales per ipsam Electionem gratiae Not because he foreknevv that vve should be such but that vvee might be such by the verie election of grace saith S. Augustine By all which you cleerely may perceive that not foreseene or foreknowne faith in Christ not anie foreseene good vvorkes the fruites of the same faith nor anie sanctitie or obedience that men have or performe unto God bee the cause of their predestination to eternall life but a consequent and an effect of it And this S. Paul also yet further and fully sheweth where he maketh mens effectual Calling and Iustification and consequently Sanctification and Glorification also it selfe to depend all upon this that God hath predestinated them And even this predestination likewise he maketh to depend upon his fore-knovvledge that is upon his fore-purposing of them to this eternal glory in his owne secret approbation of them and Counsell had with himselfe before the world was made And againe S. Paul yet further declareth it saying that God hath saved us and called us vvith an holy calling not according to our vvorkes but according to hâ—s ovvne purpose and grace vvhich vvas given to us through Christ Iesus before the vvorld vvas Be not these words most plaine direct and expresse for this purpose But yet againe he saith There is a remnant through the election of grace and if it be of grace it it is no more of vvorkes oâ—hervvise grace vvere no more grace But if it be of vvorkes then is it no more grace othervvise vvorke vvere no more vvorke Yea againe speaking of the two Children of Rebecca Iacob and Esau he saith that the one was loved and the other hated and that before they vvere borne and vvhen they had done neither good nor evill That the purpose of God according to election might stand and not of workes c. What would you have more For by all these Texts and sundrie other which might bee cited if neede were it is abundantly manifest that not future faith or future good workes but the meere good pleasure and will of GOD and his owne most free purpose and Counsaile had with himselfe otherwise termed his fore-knovvledge was and is the first primarie and original cause of mens predestination to eternal life And consequently you may withall perceive that not future unbeleefe or future bad works but Gods owne meere pleasure vvill and purpose was and is likewise the original cause of the Reprobation or refusal of them that were refused or not elected For the Election of the one sort from the rest and the reprobation that is the preterition or refusall of the rest that were not elected being done both at one time must needs both have one and the selfe same primarie and originall cause namely the free and uncontrollable vvill purpose and pleasure of the Almightie 9 For indeed beside the will of God which is ever Iust and the highest and supreame cause of all things what cause or reason can be shewed on mens behalfe why God should Elect and choose that particular man to salvation and refuse this why he should choose Iacob and refuse Esau or why hee should choose Paul and refuse Iudas Iscariot If you answer and say that originall sinne was and is the cause of that difference Doe you not consider that Iacob had original sinne aswell as Esau and that Paul had it aswell as Iudas and that all the Elect have it aswell as the Reprobate So that if Original sinne wherewith all are infected alike had beene the cause of Reprobation then should all have beene reprobated one aswell as another And this even Bellarmme himselfe saw affirming that the cause why God hated Esau before he was borne was not original sinne for if that had beene the cause he should for that cause saith he aswell have hated Iacob as Esau. Yea Gods electing of some and consequently his reprobating or refusing of the rest whom he did not elect was in respect of the purpose and decree of it before the foundations of the world were laid howsoever in respect of the manifestation of it it was not til after the Creation and fall of Adam How then could anie sinne either Orâ—gâ—nal or Actual be the cause when at the time of the purposing of this reprobation as also of Election neither men nor Angels nor world was made nor anie sinne committed If you answer that although sinne were not then committed yet God foresaw it should afterward bee committed and that sinne thus foreseene was the cause of the decree or purpose of reprobation you know that God did foresee sinne aswell in the Elect as in the Reprobate and therefore if sinne foreseene should be che cause of the purpose or decree of reprobation then again should all have beene purposed or decreed to bee reprobated in as much as sinne was foreseene to be in all the people of the world If you reply and say that although sinne was foreseene in all yet it was with a difference because some namely the Elect were foreseene to bee beleeving and repentant sinners new Creatures mortified regenerated iustified and sanctified persons and so were not reprobates I answer that this faith repentance effectuall calling mortification regeneration iustification sanctification and all saving graces whatsoever were so foreseene in the Elect not as antecedent causes but as consequents and effects of that their predestination and election and as dependants thereupon for so is it before proved and apparant and therefore the Reprobats on the otherside must be deemed to have their occecation and obduration in their sinnes and their vnregeneration unmortification unsanctification uneffectual calling and the absence defect or want of saving graces not as Antecedents but as Consequents likewise and Events following that Decree of their not Election otherwise called their Reprobation And this will be yet the more evident if we enquire search whence this difference of sinners ariseth namely that some bee mollified repentant regenerate iustified and sanctified persons and that some others be not so Is it not because God doth bestowe those his saving graces upon the one sort and not upon the other And why doth hee bestow them upon the one sort and not upon the other Is it not because the one sort be Elect and the other Reprobate And why be the one sort Elect and the other Reprobate can anie other reason be yeelded for it but Gods owne meere will and pleasure You see then that in the conclusion you must bee forced in this case to have recourse to the meere pleasure and will of God and to make that as indeed it is the true highest and supreame cause why God chooseth this man and refuseth that man and accordingly giveth his sanctifying and saving graces to the one and not to the other It is true neverthelesse that Reprobation hath an eye
things Yea this kinde of fasting without praier and without other divine exercises ioyned therewith is nothing else but a meere bodilie diet and altogether a corporal and no spirituall exercise But were fasting never so truly and rightly performed yet why should you account it meritorious or of merit sufficient to take away sinnes or to satisfie Gods Iustice for your sinnes Did it not cost more to redeeeme soules and to satisfie Gods Iustice for them then so have wee not beene often told that it is the Sonne of God and our all-sufficient Saviour and Redeemer that hath with his most bitter suffrings and most perfect obedience satisfied Gods Iustice for our sinnes which wee for our parts were never able to satisfie But againe yee know that true right and christian fastings prayers humiliation mortification and all other duties of obedience wee owe unto God as a debt And how then can the payment or performance of these debts be a satisfaction to Gods Iustice for other debts which wee did likewise owe and have not performed Yea moreover all the duties of obedience which wee owe unto God wee performe with much weakenesse and imperfection ioyned and mixed therwithall and therfore even all our best works and actions bee so farre from meriting or deserving anie grace or â—avour at Gods hands that contrariwise in that respect we had neede to crave mercie and forgivenesse of him even for those defects frailtie weaknesse and imperfections that is intermingled in them 5 As for Christ his fasting fortie daies and fortie nights hee eating nothing all that while as S. Luke testifieth it was Miraculous and therefore not to bee made an example for Christians to imitate For what christians can fast in that sort and live The Rhemists from hence would deduce the Lent Fast or Fast before Easter calling it an Apostolical tradition But this opinion is confuted first by Eusebius who in the fift booke of his historie reciteth an Epistle of Irenaeus to Victor Bishop of Rome mentioning how diversly of divers persons it was observed in that ancient time There bee some saith he vvhich thinke they must not fast but one day others there bee that fast two daies some more and some forty hovvers day and night And this diversitie of fasting saith he commendeth the unitie of faith and religion Dionysius Alexandrinus also sheweth that some fasted sixe dayes before Easter some two daies some three some fower some none S. Basil in his two Sermons of fasting speaking of the fast before Easter telleth us often that this fast lasted not aboue five dayes S. Ambrose in his 34 Sermon saith That in his time there were some which made their Lent to last twentie daies other thirtie by interchangeable weekes But the Church disputing against the Montanists in the tenth chapter of Tertullians Booke of fasts saith That those daies in the Gospel are marked out for fasting daies in which the Bridegrome was taken away that is to say the daies in which Iesus Christ suffered and was in his grave and that all other dayes bee in a mans owne libertie Againe Socrates saith that At Rome they did not â—ast but three weekes before Easter excepting Saturday and Sunday That in Sclavonia Greece and Alexandria they fasted six That in other places they fasted three times five dayes at three several times and that yet neverthelesse they did call this Lent everie one alledging a divers reason That there was also a difference in their fasting touching their meat some absteyning from all living creatures others feeding upon fish onely others eating fowle together with fish and some abstaining from the fruites of trees and from Eggs and some which tied themselves to eate nothing but bread and some that eate no bread at all Whence hee collecteth and inferreth that this fasting is a matter voluntarie and left free to bee used at such times and in such order as everie man shall thinke best and fittest His words for this purpose bee these Since no man can shew anie expresse commandement as concerning this It is evident that the Apostles did leave it to every mans ovvne vvill and pleasure to the end everie man might doe good but not through feare or by constraint And so S. Augustine likewise teacheth and testifieth saying thus I see vvell that fasting is commanded in the Evangelical and Apostolicall vvritings and throughout all the nevv Tastament But upon vvhat dayes vvee should fast or not fast I see no commandement for this neither of Christ nor of his Apostles And so also did the Catholikes tell the Montanists in ancient time saying The Law and the Prophets lasted but till Iohn after which time men fasted as they thought best not for that they vvere so commanded by the Imposition of a new discipline but according as everie man saw his occasion and that the Apostles used to doe thus imposing no burden of solemne and set fasts Yea Montanus the hereticke as Eusebius also noteth out of Apollonius was the first that prescribed Lawes of Fasting You see then that this Lent-fast or fast before Easter is neither a divine ordinance nor an Apostolical tradition Yea Damasus Bishop of Rome in his Pontifical affirmeth that Telesphorus Bishop of Rome did institute it and Telesphorus also himselfe in his Decretal Epistle testifieth the same 6 But touching this matter the storie of Spiridion related by Sozomen is also not unmeet to be remembred to whose house a stranger comming suddenly upon him he commanded his daughter to cover the Table and to set something upon it for the stranger to eate and shee at that time setting certaine flesh-meate upon the Table for him to eate hee answered that he would not as then eate of it because hee was a Christian Then Spiridion replied saying that for this reason he should the rather eate of it for God saith Vnto the cleane all things be cleane and he did eate thereof himselfe to give the other an example to follow Hee did not say eate of it for I have nothing else in the house and so necessitie may excuse you but he alledged a Text of Scripture to assure him of the lawfulnesse to eate of it as being no offence against the Christian Religion and hee himselfe in eating thereof did likewise declare so much The Text which this godly man Spiridion cited is S. Pauls in his Epistle to Titus who saith accordingly that Vnto the cleane all things be cleane But the Rhemists take upon them to answer this Text and say that S. Paul speaketh not of their Churches abstaining from meates which is not for anie uncleanenesse in the creatures but for chastening their bodies and that hee speaketh against the Iewish superstition who now being Christians would not for all that cease to put difference of cleane and uncleane according to the old Law But first whereas they say that this abstinence from flesh-meate in their Church is and serveth for chastisement of their
good ends and purposes and not to satisfie the severity of his Iustice by that meanes for their sinnes and the punishment thereto belonging p. 125. c There is no iust cause to be shewed vvhy the pretended Catholicks should refuse to take the oath of Supremacy or refuse to come to our Churches Their obiections and reasons answered p. 1 2 c p. 407 c. See also throughout the vvhole booke for this purpose Concerning auricular Confession and to vvhom confession of sinnes is to be made and that it ought to be free and voluntarie and not forced or compelled pag. 302 303 c. pag. 253 254 D FOr vvhom Christ Dyed and to vvhom hee is a Redeemer pag. 187 188 189 c Every sinne Deadly in his owne nature although all sinnes be also veniall and remissible in respect of Gods mercie grace and bounty except the sinne against the holy Ghost pag. 114 115 E THe Emperor in ancient time had the Supremacy and not the Pope pag. 30 The Emperor in times past had power to place and displace Popes pag. 27 The Emperor in ancient time banished imprisoned and otherwise punished aswell Bishops of Rome as other Bishops pag. 22 Hee did make Lawes concerning Ecclesiasticall causes and religion pag. 24 As also Commissioners in an Ecclesiasticall cause and the B. of Rome himselfe vvas one of those Commissioners pag. ibid. An appeale to the Emperor in an Ecclesiasticall cause pag 24 Generall Councils in ancient times called by the Emperor and his Authoritie pag. 24 The Christian Emperor did and vvas to meddle in matters of the Church and concerning Religion pag. 25 The Christian Emperor in ancient time did nominate and appoint Bishops of Diocesses and Provinces and even the Bishop of Rome himselfe pag. 25 Emperors in ancient time did ratifie the decrees of Councils before they vvere put in execution pag 28 Miltiades Leo and Gregory all Bishops of Rome in their severall times subiect to the Emperor and at his command pag 24.26 Ancient Fathers Popes of Rome and Councils aswell generall as provinciall may erre even in matter of faith aswell as in matter of fact pag. 49 50 51 52. c See also the Preface for this point The Romane Empire dissolved ever since the Emperors have ceased to have the soveraigne command and rule of Rome and that the Popes have gotten to be the heads and supreme Rulers of that City and to be above the Emperors pa. 331.332 and pag. 391.392.393 The Pope of Rome hath no power or authoritie from Christ to Excommunicate any pag. 299 c Excommunications be they never so iust and lawfull be by Gods law and appointment of no force to depose from Earthly kingdomes or to dissolve the dutie and allegeance of subiects pag. 299 300 301 c F OVr Forefathers and ancestors not to be followed in any vices or errors they held pag 34 35 Foretold in the Booke of God that an apostacie from the right faith and a mysterie of iniquitie otherwise called an Antichristianisme should come upon the Church and that so the Church by degrees should grow corrupted and deformed pag. 35 36 280 Foretold also how long the Church should lye in those her corruptions and errors and vvhen she should begin to be clensed and reformed pag. 35 36 VVhat is to be thought of our Forefathers that lived and dyed in the time of Popery pag 39.40 41 42 Foretold that a strong delusion to beleeve lyes shouâ—d possesse them of the Antichristian Church because they received not the love of the truth extant in the divine Scriptures pag. 307 308 Men are iustified in Gods sight and before his tribunall by Faith only and good vvorkes be the fruits and declarations of that faith pag. 99 100 101 c. to the end of that chapter and pag. 116 117 118 c. to the end also of that chapter G God is not the author of sinne pag. 168 169 c. H NOt Protestants but Papists be the Heretickes pag. 72. and Schismaticks pag. 37 38. pag. 413.414 c Not the Pope but Christ onely is the Head of the universall militant Church as well as of the triumphant pag 94 95 96 97 98 I VVHo is to be the infallible Iudge of controversies in religion or vvhich commeth all to one effect in the conclusion vvhat is the infallible Rule vvhereby men must iudge and be directed for the finding out of truth in those controversies pag. 49 50 51 c. See also the Preface for this matter The Implicita fides of Papists reproved pag 78 79 80 K KIngs have the Supremacie over all maner of persons aswell Ecclesiasticall as Civill vvithin their own Dominions pa. 1. to p. 5 Their Supremacie in all kinde of causes aswell Ecclesiasticall as Civill pag. 5 c Kings and Princes although they have the Supremacie yet thereby claime not nor can claime to preach to minister the Sacraments to excommunicate absolve or to consecrate Bishops or to doe any other act proper to the function of the Ecclesiasticall ministers pag. 32 c Kings and Princes be notwithstanding their Supremacies under God and subiect to him and his vvord pag. 33 Even heathen Kings may command and make Edicts and Proclamations for God and his service pag. 7. c Christian Kings and Queenes are by Gods appointment to be nursing fathers and nursing mothers to his Church and Religion p. 7. The authoritie of a Christian King in respect of contemptuous disorderly and unruly persons requisite and necessary in the Church as vvell as in the Common-weale pag. 6 c Kings and Princes may command and compell their subiects to externall obedience for God pag. 6 7 8 9 10 Christian Kings may make lawes about matters Ecclesiast p. 7 8.24 Hee may make Commissioners in Ecclesiasticall causes pag. 24 He may have Appeales made unto him in a cause Ecclesiastical ib. He may nominate and appoint Bishops of Diocesses and Provinces pag. 27. Councels and Convocations to be assembled by his authoritie and the decrees thereof by him to be ratified and confirmed before they be put in execution pag. 26 27 28 Christian Kings doe punish offendors in Ecclesiasticall causes not Ecclesiastically but Civilly pag. 6 7.32 Subiects ought not to rebell against their Kings and Princes though they be adversaries to the Christian Religion and though subiects have power force enough to do it pa. 20 21 22.299 300 Kings of Rome did sometimes send the Bishops of Rome as their Ambassadors pag. 22 How thankefull subiects ought to be unto God for Christian Kings and Princes pag. 33 The power of the Keyes most grossely abused by the B of Rome to vvorke his owne exaltation above Kings and Princes pag 299 300 301 c The Keyes of the kingdome of heaven no more given to S. Peter then to the rest of the Apostles pag. 292 293 294 295 L NO Licentiousnesse or impiety in the doctrine of Iustification by faith or in the doctrine of predestination or
Regem non est Crimen loesae Maiestatis quia non est subditus Regis The Rebellion of a Clergie man against the king is no Treason because he is not the kings subiect And so likewise saith Bellarmine Non sunt amplius Reges Clericorum Superiores Kings be no longer Soveraignes or superiors to Clergie men Doe not these appeare to bee most grosse disloyall and detestable opinions But thus a New King is raised over the Popes Clergie that the Scripture might be fulfilled which saith They have a King over them vvhich is the Angel of the bottomlesse pit who in Hebrew is called Abaddon and in Greeke Apollyon that is in English a Destroyer namely the degenerate Bishop of Rome that grand 〈◊〉 as 〈…〉 proved who hath thus bereaved and robbed Kingâ— of 〈◊〉 naturall borne subiects and of their ancient Supremacie and most rightful authoritie over them 2 That the King is a Governour within his owne kingdomes and dominions is a matter so evident as that it needeth no proofe for he is called Rex à Regendo â— King in respect of his rule and governement And S. Peter agreeing hereunto teacheth that not onely the King but even other Magistrates also that be under the King be Governours and instituted for the punishment of evill doers for the praise of them that doe well S. Paul also speaketh the like of Princes or Governours that beare the sword that They are not to be feared for good vvorkes but for evill vvilt thou then be vvithout feare of the power Doe vvell saith hee so shalt thou have praise of the same for he is the minister of God for thy good But if thou doe evill then feare for he beareth not the sword in vaine for he is the minister of God to take vengeance on him that doth evill You here then cleerely perceive that Kings and Princes bee Governors and 〈…〉 before that they be supreme which being put together necessarily concludeth them to be under God the supreme Governors within their owne Dominions Now that their governement and authoritie extendeth to causes Ecclesiasticall as well as 〈…〉 is a thing likewise verie manifest for as there is here no exception of anie person so is there also no exception or difference put of anie cause but whosoever transgresseth or offendeth or doth evill be it in what kinde of cause soever hee is here made subiect to this sword power and authoritie of Kings and Princes and punishable by it And doth not verie reason it selfe also perswade this For even in Christian States it is possible for Bishopâ— and other Ecclesiasticall ministers to transgresse and offend as touching the execution and administration of their Ecclesiasticall offices and functions as well as other men may in their offices and places As for example If they or anie of them would not suffer a childe or anie other to bee baptized which were not to be denied baptisme or if they should excommunicate anie upon meere spleen and malice without anie iust cause or if after a iust excommunication the person excommunicate should afterward publiquely testifie his repentance and thereupon desire to be reconciled and received againe into the Church and yet for all that should most uniustly be held out and be denied absolution or reconciliation Do not these and such like offences though committed by Ecclesiasticall persons and in causes Ecclesiasticall deserve punishment by the Civill Sword and authoritie of a Christian King If you say That such an offendor may be censured by such as be Clergie men and have Ecclesiasticall authoritie over him That hindreth not but that a King may neverthelesse punish him also civilly especially where the Lawes of the kingdome do so permit or appoint For in such cases without anie wrong or iniurie may one and the selfe same offence be punished both wayes viz. both Civilly and Ecclesiastically Your selves doe know that Bishops and Clergie men cannot by vertue of that their Ecclesiasticall office and authoritie punish anie offendors civilly but onely Ecclesiastically as namely by deprivation or excommunication or such like censures of the Church But Kings and Princes punish offendors in ecclesiasticall causes after another sort namely not ecclesiastically as Bishops doe but Civilly as by corporall imprisonment pecuniarie punishment and such like temporall paines belonging to their authoritie So that both Civill and Ecclesiasticall authoritie doe and may well stand together without doing anie wrong yea as friends and helpers the one to the other But to illustrate this matter yet further Admit Clergie men have excommunicated a man or sentenced him to be deprived or pronounced him to be an Hereticke or done all they can against him by the power of the keyes and of the Church censures and that neverthelesse he still and evermore persisteth a scorner and contemner of all that they can doe against him Is it not meete and requisite thinke you that such a one should be punished civilly and by the Kings authoritie For what other remedie is there left in such a case You see then how expedient and necessarie the governement and authoritie of a Christian King is even in respect of the Church and Church affaires as well as of the Common-weale and Common-weale causes and that in respect of offendâ—rs in Ecclesiasticall causes that be unruly wilfull obstinate and contemptuous the Church hath as much neede of him as the Common-weale Whilest therefore the king punisheth offendors in Ecclesiasticall causes not ecclesiastically and by Church censures as Clergie men doe but civilly and by a regall power and authoritie it is such a cleere evident a right as none can with anie colour of reason gainsay or disallow Yea even Heathen and Pagan Kings have this power and authoritie to make lawes and proclamations for the worship and service of the true GOD and to inflict punishment upon the breakers violaters of those their lawes and proclamations although they doe not alwayes put that their power and authoritie in execution for God as they ought but most commonly abuse it against him And yet sometime we see they doe extend it and put it in execution for God as it is evident in the examples of Artashast King of Persia Nebuchadnezar King of Babell and Darius King of the Mâ—des as also by some other Heathen Emperors mentioned in Eusebius If then as is manifest Heathen and Pagan kings have this power and authoritie albeit they doe noâ— alwaies extend it and put it in execution for God by what right or reason can it be denied to Christian Kings and Princes so to doe Yea by Gods owne most gracious providence Christian Kings and Queenes are to be nursing fathers and nursing mothers to his Church and Religion for so the Prophet Esay directly witnesseth And therefore is it that they not onely may make Lawes for Christ for so S. Augustine likewise saith that Serviunt reges Christo leges ferendo pro Christo Kings serve Christ
signes or vvonders wee say that those which were done by Christ and his Apostles and in those ancient and primitive Churches be sufficient for the confirmation of that most ancient primitive Christian and Apostolicke faith and religion conteined in the booke of God which wee professe Yea now in these daies saith S. Chrysostome the vvorking of miracles is ceased and they be rather counterfeit miracles saith he vvhich be found amongst them that be false Christians Againe he saith There be some that aske vvhy men vvorke not miracles novv in these dayes If thou bee beleeving saith he as thou oughtest to be and if thou lovest Christ as he should be loved thou needest no miracles for signes be given to unbeleevers and not to beleevers Againe S. Cyrill saith that to vvorke miracles maketh not a man one iot the more holy seing it is common to evill men and to such as he obiects or reprobates For so the Lord himselfe witnesseth saying Manie shall say unto mee in that day Lord Lord have not vvee prophesied in thy name and in thy name cast out divels in thy name done manie great vvorks And yet will he neverthelesse professe unto them I never knevv you depart from me ye vvorkers of iniquitie And on the other side working of no miracles hindereth not a mans holinesse for Iohn wrought neither signe nor miracle and yet was this no derogation to his holinesse for amongst them that are borne of vvomen arose there not a greater then hee as Christ himselfe testifieth Yea that miracles signes or wonders may be done by false Prophets and false teachers is further manifest for even Christ himselfe saith that There shall arise false Christs and false Prophets and they shall shevv great signes and vvonders so that if is vvere possible they should deceive the very Elect. S. Paul also directlie testifieth that in the Antichristian Church there shall be the vvorking of Sathan vvith all power and signes and lying VVonders Which saith S. Augustine be called lying signes and VVonders for this cause that either mens senses be deceived thinking that to be done which revera is not done or else because if they be done in deed they draw men to beleeve that they could not be done but by the power of God whereas they know not the power of the Divell For S. Iohn in the Revelation mentioneth spirits of Divels vvorking Miracles to deceive those that be of the Antichristian Church By all this then you see that the Miracles wrought in Poperie be no argument or proofe that therfore it is the right or true Church or that the Teachers therein be the right and true Teachers for they may be false Prophets and false Teachers and the Popish Church may be as indeed it is the false and Antichristian Church all these their Miracles notwithstanding But hereof I shall have occasion to speake more fullie afterward when I come to speake of Antichrist and his Miracles In the meane time concerning this point thus much may suffice CAP. III. Of Iustification by Faith onely The right sense and meaning of that position and of the truth of it And that being rightly understood it excludeth not good workes nor importeth anie licentiousnesse at all in it but the cleane contrarie IT is a thing well knowne how busie and earnest Popish Teachers be not only by word of mouth but by their books writings also to perswade you all that ever they can against ours the most ancient most pure and only right Religion and amongst other their bad devises which they plot contrive for their owne advantage and behoofe this is not the least that they accuse our Religion to be a doctrine and religion of much licentiousnesse and that in sundrie points which therefore must be answered And manie there be also that be too hastie and over credulous to beleeve them as if all that they speake and write were to be held for undoubted truth and oracles without further enquirie or examination But howsoever they thus boldly presume they for all that be not able to take anie iust exception against our Religion or to shew or prove it in anie point whatsoever to be an allower of anie the least impietie or licentiousnesse if it be rightly understood It is true that sundrie that professe Protestancie live licentiously and wickedly and so doe manie also that professe Poperie likewise live wickedly licentiously If therefore they allow not this for an argument sufficient to convince their religion of wickednesse licentiousnesse which is taken from the wicked lives manners and conversations of men Why will they be so unequall as to make it of anie force against our religion Wise men can easily distinguish inter vitium rei personae betweene that which is the fault of the thing and the fault of mens persons For the religion may be good though some persons that professe it live not answerably thereunto yea the Protestant that is the Christian Religion which we professe is so good godly divine holy and pure as that it neither alloweth nor tolerateth the filthie Stewes nor anie other impuritie nor anie treasons or rebellions nor perjuries nor lying or deceitfull equivocations nor anie other wickednesse or impietie whatsoever but utterly condemneth them all So that for true pietie puritie integritie and all manner of good life and godly conversation the religion of Poperie commeth farre short of it and is in no sort to be compared with it If then anie professing our religion live wickedly or licentiously as too manie do it is the fault of the men that live so dissolutely and not of the religion which requireth and commandeth the cleane contrarie at their hands But for all that they persist and say that even the Protestants religion it selfe is licentious because it teacheth and holdeth that men are justified in Gods sight and before his Tribunall onely by faith in Iesus Christ which doctrine say they maketh men licentious and carelesse of doing good workes Howbeit both they and you must understand that when the Protestants doe say or have said at anie time that Faith onely iustifieth in Gods sight it is and ever was meant and intended howsoever some seeme purposely to mistake it not of anie dead faith which hath no life in it to bring forth anie good workes but of a true and lively faith which is accompanied with good works and is fruitfull and working by love as S. Paul and S. Iames and S. Peter and the rest of the holy Scriptures cleerly declare Whilst therefore they teach both in their Sermons writings with S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures That the faith that is vvithout vvorks is dead and that such a faith cannot save or iustifie a man but that it must be a true and lively faith that is such a faith as produceth bringeth forth good workes I hope you sufficiently perceive that the doctrine of
of the afflictions of Christ in his flesh for Christs bodies sake vvhich is the Church that is whatsoever yet wanted or remained for him to suffer in whose sufferings or afflictions Christ himselfe is said to suffer and to be afflicted and persecuted for what affliction or persecution is done to anie of his members hee accounteth it as done to himselfe all those sufferings and afflictions whatsoever they were that yet remained for him to beare he was readie willingly to undergoe for Christs bodie sake which is the Church that is for the profit and edification of the Church that it might thereby receive encouragement comfort confirmation strength and boldnesse in the profession of the Gospel I say all this being thus to be intended and understood how iniurious and impious be the Rhemists and other Papists which wrest this Text of S. Paul to prove that one man may merit and satisfie for the sinnes of another supplie his defects in that point As though the sufferings of Christ in his owne person for our sinnes had anie want defect or imperfection in them or as though the sufferings of S. Paul or of S. Peter or of anie other Saints or Martyrs and their bloudshed could or did doe that which the bloud and sufferings of Christ could not or did not doe Is it not a shame and a most monstrous shame for anie so to speake thinke or teach 7 But they here alledge that praier for the dead is mentioned in the booke of Macchabees and consequently that they be tormented in Purgatorie for why else should they be praied for I answer first that praying for the dead is there mentioned as the fact of one particular man onely namely of Iudas which can make no generall law or rule in this case And secondly there is likewise mentioned as by way of approbation in the same booke of the Macchabees the fact of one Razis that killed himselfe and yet for all that it is not of anie godly man to be followed or imitated And therefore as the one is disallowable so likewise may the other be disallowable notwithstanding the Approbation of it in that booke Thirdly Iudas himselfe did not there pray for the dead as thinking their soules to be punished and tormented in Purgatorie there is no such thing mentioned or appearing in the text but to shew that he had hope that they which were slaine and dead should rise again for to that end it was as the Text it selfe declareth But fourthly I answere that the book of the Macchabees is not canonicall Scripture and therefore is not of authoritie sufficient to prove a point of faith necessarily to be beleeved because that booke speaketh it That it is not canonicall appeareth before by the testimonie of the old Church and it doth also appeare by the testimonie even of the Author himselfe that wrote the Booke in that in the end of it he excuseth himselfe and as it were craveth pardon if he have written slenderly meanely Which apparantly sheweth that hee wrote by an humane and not by an undoubtedly divine spirit For the spirit of God is not wont nor needeth to crave pardon nor to excuse himselfe as though he wrote slenderly or meanely Lastly against that your conceit of tormeÌ„ting Purgatorie grounded out of that Booke I may and doe oppose the Booke of VVisedome where it is said directly The soules of the righteous are in the hand of God and no torment shall touch them If no torment shall touch them then doe they not come into anie of your supposed Purgatorie torments Yea although S. Augustine praied for his mother and some other also for their friends departed it is no proofe of your Purgatory inasmuch as such praiers do manie times proceed out of natural humane affection only be used as a token of love wel-wishing to friends departed without anie such beleefe of Purgatorie Which may doth appeare even by S. Augustine himselfe who though he praied for his mother beleeved neverthelesse that she was in peace and rest free from all paine and torment S. Ambrose likewise praied for Theodosius Valentinian and Gratian whom neverthelesse he beleeved to be in peace and rest and in heavenly happinesse You see then that praying for the dead is no prooâ—e for your Purgatorie Howbeit this praying for the dead hath also no commandement example or warrant for it in anie of the canonicall Scriptures and besides it appeareth by the premisses that it can doe the dead no good and therefore it is in vaine in respect of anie good thereby to be done to the dead As for the apparitions of soules which they likewise somtimes alledge to prove their Purgatorie it is a verie Toy and a fable For S. Chrysostome saith it is not the soule of anie dead person but a Divel which faineth himselfe to be the soule of such a one to deceive those to whom he appeareth and he calleth them Vetularum verba Pâ—erorum ludibria Old womens Tales and Childrens toyes And so S. Augustine likewise telleth you that it was not Samuel in verie deed but a Divell in his likenesse which appeared to the witch in King Sauls time And therfore he pronounceth of these things that they be either the Cousenages of Deluding men or vvonders of Deceitfull Devils with which therefore none ought anie longer to be bewitched or deluded CAP. VI. Of workes done upon a good Intention as they be called without a commandement or warrant from God or his word Of workes de Congruo and de Condigno And of workes of Supererogation and how unpleasing they all bee in Gods sight and censure howsoever in respect of men that have use and profit by them they be and may be called good and beneficiall workes SVndrie there be who thinke anie worke of their owne Invention or of others devising to bee a good worke acceptable to God and a point of good service performed to him so long as they have a good meaning or a good intention in it though the worke bee not commanded from God nor warranted by his word But God will not have everie man to doe what seemeth to himselfe good or right in his owne Eyes But vvhatsoever I command you that saith he observe to doe Yea that and That onely must yee doe as your owne latine Translation is Againe he saith I am the Lord your God vvalke yee in my statutes and kâ—epe my iudgments and doe them And nothing doth he more dislike or condemne in his service or worship then when men will be so presumptuous as out of their owne imaginations to suppose and devise what shall bee well pleasing to him For what is this else but for people to goe a vvhoring vvith their ovvne inventions as the Scripture speaketh My thoughts are not your thoughts nor your vvayes my vvaies saith the Lord for as the heavens are higher then
before the fall and transgression of Adam it was possible and the Impossibilitie that is now of it is not through anie default of the Law or of God the giver of it but through the imbecillitie and weakenesse which men have brought upon themselves by meanes of that Transgression Neither was the law afterward given to anie such end that men should be able exactly and perfectly to fulfill it and by such fulfilling of it to have eternall life but to shewe us how farre wee are fallen from that ability and puritie wee received in our first Creation and to discover and make knowne our sinnes and transgressions both originall and actuall and the wrath and curse of God due unto us for the same and so to drive and bring us unto Christ the Saviour and Redeemer This is one chiefe use of the Law as S. Paul hath before declared Another use of the Law as touching the tenne Commandements is that wee should walke in the obedience of it to the uttermost of our power although we shall never be able during this life fully and absolutely to keepe and performe it by and in our owne persons In all this I am sure there is no crueltie tyrannie or iniustice Yet we must as I said before endeavour to the uttermost of our powers to walke in it and to doe all manner of good workes although not to that end to expect Iustification or salvation by that meanes yet to other ends and purposes as namely first to shew our obedience dutie and thankefulnesse to God for all his favours and benefits bestowed upon us For as S. Paul saith God hath ordained good workes that vvee should walke in them Secondlie that by those good workes and a Godly conversation VVe may make our calling and election sure to our selves as S. Peter teacheth Thirdly that Other men seeing our good workes may thereby be also occasioned and moved to glorifie God our heavenly father as Christ himselfe declareth So that there bee as you see other good ends why men should observe so much as is possible Gods Law and Commandements and why they should doe all manner of good workes though they repose no confidence of merit or hope of Iustification or salvation therein Howbeit the Rhemists endeavour to prove workes of Supererogation First by that which was laid out over and beside the two pence for the recovery of the vvounded man in Luk. 10.35 but the doing of that was cleerely a worke and dutie of Charitie and therefore commanded and consequently could not bee a worke of Supererogation And as touching the other Text of 1. Cor. 9 which the Rhemists likewise alledge where S. Paul would not bee burthensome or chargeable to the Church of Corinth for preaching the Gospell unto them which neverthelesse he might have charged himselfe sheweth the reason why he did forbeare and abridge himselfe of the use of that power and libertie amongst them namely because hee vvould not give anie hindrance to the Gospell of Christ. Vers. 12. and because hee vvould not abuse his povver in the Gospell vers 18. and because a necessitie vvas also put vpon him to preach the Gospell vers 16. whether he had allowance of the Church or no allowance This therefore was also a dutie in S. Paul the Apostle in this case to preach the Gospell thus frankely and freely rather then it should not be preached at all or rather then the Gospell should be hindred or receive obloquy anie way and consequently they appeare to bee intolerable and super-arrogant vvorkes of Supererogation which bee maintained in the Papacie CHAP. VII Concerning Predestination and assurance of Salvation and that being rightly understood they Inferre no manner of Licentiousnesse or Impietie but the cleane contrary BVt they proceede challenging our Religion further to be a religion tending to licentiousnesse for that it teacheth Predestination and assurance of Salvation in some persons which they also call Presumptuous Doctrine But first even the Papists themselves aswell as the Protestants doe teach that there is a Predestination Secondly in the Doctrine of Predestination it being rightly and discreetely delivered there is no danger or inconvenience but much conveniencie sweetnesse comfort and profit comprised Yea why hath God revealed published it in his word but to the end it should be knowne And that no man might carpe against it S. Paul sheweth that which all reason as well as Religion alloweth namely that God the maker of us all hath at least as much authoritie and power over all men his Creatures to doe dispose and ordaine of them at his pleasure as the Potter hath over his Pots or over the clay whereout he frameth or maketh them especially after that the whole lump of mankind was fallen in the transgression of Adam Hath not the Potter saith he povver of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour and another to dishonour And hee further addeth saying VVhat if God vvilling to shevv his vvrath and to make his povver knovvne suffer vvith long patience the vessels of vvrath fitted to destruction and that he might declare the riches of his glorie upon the vessels of mercie vvhich he had before prepared unto glorie In which words yee see that some upon the fall of Adam were left in their sinnes and so bee vessels of vvrath fitted to destruction through their owne sin and corruption and that other some be vessels of mercie and such as God notwithstanding their fall and corruption hath prepared to glorie But to shew this matter further and withall to cleare it of all licentiousnes and impietie doth not S. Paul say thus VVhom God hath predestinated them also hee called and vvhome he called them also he iustified and vvhom he iustified them also he glorified Here you see expresse mention made of Predestination of some unto glorie and withall you see that those which be thus predestinated unto glorie bee the men that be afterward at some one time or other of their life effectuallie called and Iustified and consequentlie sanctâ—fied and at last come to be glorified and therefore they bee and must needs be such as live not a wicked dissolute and licentious but a good godly and holie life after that they bee once so effectually called But yet further S. Paul speaketh thus to the chosen people of God Yee are all the children of light and the children of the day vvee are not of the night neither of darkenesse Therefore let us not sleepe as doe other but let us vvatch and be sober for they that sleepe sleepe in the night and they that be drunken be drunken in the night but let us that are of the day be sober putting on the brestplate of faith and loue and the hope of salvation for an helmet For saith hee God hath not appointed us unto vvrath but to obtaine salvation by the meanes of our Lord Iesus Christ vvhich died
sufficient and abundant to condemne himselfe but if renouncing all confidence in himselfe as he ought he finde himselfe to be a firme beleever in Christ and so consider himselfe as he is in Christ Iesus the Saviour and remembreth withall Gods immutable promise of eternall life to as manie as have that firme true and lively faith in him hee cannot as I said before but rest assured of his salvation except which were most abominable he will make God a liar It is true that even Gods children sometimes are cast into Dumps and very great perplexities and have not their consolation and faith at all times strong alike but yet as God still raiseth them after their falls so doth he also in his good time remove againe all those doubtfull perplexities distrusts and dismayes and maketh their faith at last so strong and eminent as that the power and gates of Hell it selfe be not able to prevaile against it For Gods children which not onely heare the word of God but be carefull also to doe it be by Christ Iesus himselfe likened to the vvise man that built his house upon a Rocke and the raine fell and the floods came and the vvindes blew and beat upon the house but it fell not because it vvas builded not upon the sands but upon a sure Rocke Whereby we see that whatsoever stormes doe arise or windes and tempests doe come upon Gods children yet God supporteth them and maketh them to stand for all that invincible Yea they are in the end more then Conquerors as S. Paul speaketh through him that loved them Howbeit it is a good Caveat and admonition against rash Presumption and arrogant and deceitfull confidence which S. Paul giveth saying Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall for a man may thinke himselfe to stand when he standeth not so may easily deceive himselfe if he take not verie good heed And therefore doe both those Apostles S. Paul S. Peter require a great search triall and examination diligence and endevour to be used in this matter that so men through an overweening conceit or false perswasion deceive not themselves It is true likewise that Gods elect and sanctified people are to vvorke out that is to proceed or to goe on forward in the race of their salvation vvith feare and trembling as S. Paul admonisheth to make them the more carefull and watchfull over themselves but this trembling in the presence of Gods great powerfull and incomparable Maiestie and this awfull feare which they beare and are to beare unto him doth not hinder but doth rather affirme and confirme this assurance of salvation before spoken of within themselves For the feare toward God which all Gods children have and are to have is not a slavish or servile feare such as Reprobates and Divels have which is onely in respect of punishment torments and of condemnation â—nor anie such feare as is ioyned with a continuall distrust and doubting of Gods love but it is a filial feare such as kinde well natured and dutifull children beare to their fathers and such a feare as is mingled with faith and with a sense and feeling of the love even of the everlasting love of God toward them in Christ Iesus For which cause S. Paul saith expressely that They have not received the spirit of Bondage to feare any more but the spirit of Adoption vvhereby they cry Abba Father So that such is the feare ioyned with faith and love that is in Gods Children as that they have neverthelesse in the end Bouldnesse even in the day of Iudgement as S. Iohn expreslie testifieth for if God be on their side vvho can be against them And sith God hath iustified them who can condemne them Yea who can lay anie thing to their charge as S. Paul speaketh and in an holy and heavenly sort exulteth and triumpheth But all this while doe you not perceive how miserable the popish Church is wherein no such faith or confidence is to be found but at the most no better but doubtfull or uncertaine hopes which yeeld a verie poore or no comfort to the soule of a man CHAP. VIII Concerning Reprobation wherein Gods doings and the Doctrine of the Protestants bee justified against Objections Cavills and Calumnies of Adversaries THat there is a Reprobation aswell as an Election is a thing manifest for S. Paul saith of some that God hath delivered them up unto a Reprobate minde to doe those things vvhich are not convenient being full of all unrighteousnes fornication wickednes covetousnes malitiousnes c. Hee saith againe of some that they bee abhominable and disobedient and to everie good worke reprobate And again he saith of some that they be men of corrupt mindes and reprobate concerning the faith Yea if there were nothing else the verie terme of Electing some unto salvation importeth that there is a Reprobation or refusal of the rest that were not Elected For what is Election if you well observe the force and nature of the word but the choosing or singling out of some from the rest so that Reprobation is the opposite or contrarie to Election as Damnation is the opposite or contrarie to Salvation To be a Reprobate then is nothing else but to be refused or reiected as touching salvation or not to bee elected thereunto For the better understanding whereof wee must know that God made Adam good and righteous in the beginning but he afterward through the temptation of the Divell and his owne consent thereunto fell from that his Integrity and puritie and so all Mankind being inclosed in his loynes fell togethet with him and in him for In him all sinned as S. Paul expreslie affirmeth and were all by nature thus corrupted become the Children of vvrath as hee likewise speaketh in another place God beholding this fallen Lumpe of Mankind who by this their sinne and transgression had all alike deserved condemnation was pleased neverthelesse to take elect some of them to salvation in Christ and to relinquish the rest leaving them in that their sinfull estate to goe to condemnation And therefore be the Elect upon whom God was thus pleased to shew mercie called Vasa misericordiae The vessells of mercie as contrariwise the rest which were not so Elected but relinquished and reiected that is to say the Reprobates be called Vasa Irae the vessells of vvrath fitted as S. Paul speaketh through their owne sinne and corruption to destruction So true is it that their perdition or destruction is of themselves and that the salvation of the rest namely of the Elect is of God and of his meere grace and bountie For as the Elect bee elected in Christ and given to him to bee redeemed and to bee saved from Wrath and the curse of the Law and bee therefore in the times appointed of God quickened renevved regenerated iustified and sanctified and so come in the
wills and affections good before they have anie goodnesse in them or readinesse to obey him and before that they can give consent to his motions or walke in his wayes And thus is it a thing evident that Gods Love and good Will toward us is antecedent and goeth before our love and good affection toward him for so Christ Iesus himselfe also witnesseth saying Yee have not chosen mee but I have chosen you And so also witnesseth S. Iohn saying expressely Herein is love not that vvee loved God but that he loved us and sent his Sonne to be a reconciliation for our sinnes And againe he saith expresly VVe love him because he loved us first Now then seeing it is manifest throughout the whole course of mens salvation that Gods love and his good will and working is first precedent and goeth before all good wills and loves of men toward him againe and that mens good wills consents loves and affections towards him are caused wrought and procured by himselfe and come in the second place as a thing following after it must needs be granted that Gods will doth not depend upon mens will as an attendant thereupon to follow it but contrariwise that mens will doth depend upon Gods will for him to order frame and dispose it as pleaseth him And therefore you now perceive I trust that this great matter of Salvation dependeth not upon the will of men for if it did who would be damned but upon the will of God who giveth those his saving graces of a lively faith and of a true Christian repentance and conversion to whom hee pleaseth For as S. Paul saith againe expressely Hee doth all things according to the counsell of his owne vvill Howsoever then men are bidden in the Scripture to repent convert return to walk in Gods wayes and to keepe his commandements and such like yet thereupon it followeth not that men have free will and power of themselves to doe these things for it is before proved unto you that it is God that by his grace and spirit working in men maketh them both willing and able to doe these things and to consent to his divine motions before they can doe it Yea albeit they are bidden to choose life yet it is God that must teach and direct them before they can make a right choyce in that case And therefore doth the Psalmist say Shevv mee thy vvaies O Lord and teach me thy paâ—hes Lead me forth in thy truth and teach me for thou art the God of my salvation And againe he saith VVhat man is he that feareth the Lord Him will he teach the way that hee shall choose But to conclude How can mens salvation depend upon their owne wills when as long before they were borne or had anie being in the world or anie will at all they were with GOD and in his counsell determination and purpose elected thereunto namely even before the foundations of the world as the Scriptures doe clearely and directly testifie 5 But then they further obiect that S. Paul saith thus VVhom God foreknew them hee did predestinate c. moreover whom he predestinated them also he called and whom hee called them also he iustified and whom he iustified them also he glorified Here Gods foreknowledge is mentioned as going in order before his predestination and this his foreknowledge say they sheweth that God did foresee and foreknowe what men would bee and what workes and merits they would doe when they should be living in this world and that according thereunto he made his predestination and so they make not Gods will and pleasure but mens future wills workes and merits so long before foreseene foreknown the Cause of Gods predestinating them to salvation It is true in verie deed that God did foresee foreknow what men would and should bee as likewise hee foresaw and foreknewe whatsoever was afterwards to happen or bee in the world but thereupon it followeth not that the good workes of men which hee so foresaw and foreknew were the original and antecedent cause of his Predestination of them to eternali life for they might be a consequent and an effect of his predestination of them for all that as indeed they were and not the Cause For Christ himselfe saith They vvere ordained to this end to bring forth fruite and that their fruite should remaine And so also testifieth S. Paul that they bee Gods vvorkemanship created in Christ Iesus unto good vvorkes vvhich God had before ordained that they should vvalke in them Neither could God foresee or foreknow any merit of salvation to bee in mens workes whereto no such merit belongeth Neither could hee foresee or foreknowe any free or foreward Will in men after the fall of Adam of their owne naturall abilities for the walking in the waies of God as is also before declared But this he might and did indeed foresee and foreknow namely the fall of Adam whereby all mankinde was in respect of themselves most miserable wretches liable to the wrath of God and eternall condemnation Hee did also foresee and foreknow Christ Iesus his Incarnation Passion Satisfaction Righteousnesse and Obedience and that he should be the Saviour and Redeemer of all his Elect For which cause it is said by S. Paul That they which bee Elected were elected in him that is in Christ the mediatour and their head and appointed Saviour and Redeemer who being the second Adam did interpose himselfe and as their suertie did undertake for them to answer whatsoever Gods Iustice would demaund to be performed by him in their behalfe And as for the rest which were not Elected to salvation but refused they being not so beheld nor considered in Christ but as being out of him and consequently as they were in and after the transgression of the first Adam they lye still in that their most wofull estate as having no Suertie to undertake for them nor Saviour appointed to deliver them from the wrath and curse of God to them for their sinnes in his Iustice belonging And therefore doth the Scripture speake in this sort of them namely that The vvrath of God abideth upon them as being never taken away in Christ. And as they were borne in sinne and live in sinne so Christ Iesus himselfe saith that they die in their sinnes So that they never had nor shall have remission of their sinnes nor deliverance from the curse and wrath of God through the death and satisfaction of Christ Iesus 6 For wheras some here obiect that Christ died for all in a generally the Schoolmen answer it with a distinction namely that Christ died for all sufficienter but not efficienter that is sufficiently but not efficiently that is to say his death in respect of the greatnesse vvorth and value of it hee being the Sonne of God aswell as Man was sufficient for all in a generalitie and is therefore propounded as
in that place as a similitude to represent the neere coniunction betweene Christ and his Church but contrariwise hee bringeth and mentioneth the great love of Christ and the neere mistical coniunction between him and his Church as a similitude and argument to declare and enforce the love that shold be of the husband toward his wife For that is the maine matter scope and point of exhortation the Apostle there aymeth at as is expresse and apparant by the 25. Verse and so from thence to the end of that Chapter 5 Now concerning Orders By Orders wee understand the ordination of Ecclesiastical Ministers to their ministery by Imposition or laying on of hands Here then I would be glad to know why or for what reason they should hold this to be a Sacrament Is it because it is a good worke and an holy action But it is answered before that everie good worke and godly and holy action is not to bee reckoned for a Sacrament Or doe they make it a Sacrament because it hath in it an outward signe of an holy thing accounting the ordination or consecration to the ministerie to bee the holy thing and the imposition or laying on of hands in that action and for that purpose to bee the outward signe But hereunto is answered that everie outward signe of an holy thing or of an holy action is not sufficient to make a Sacrament for then Prayer with lifting up of hands should bee likewise a Sacrament end sundrie such like But it must be an outward signe of this particular holy thing namely of the remission of our sins and of our coniunction and communion with Christ or otherwise it is no Sacrament in that sense of a Sacrament which wee speake of Yea it must bee not onely a signe but a seale also of that our uniting and coniunction with Christ as is before declared which thing because the act of Ordination of Ministers by imposition of hands is not therefore it can be no Sacrament Againe the Sacraments be such as bee common belong to all sorts and degrees of Christians aswell to the lay sort as to Ecclesiasticall Ministers as appeareth by the example of these two confessed and undoubted Sacraments viz of Baptisme and the Lords Supper but these orders be proper and peculiar unto those onely that bee of the Ecclesiasticall Ministerie and extend no further and therefore they can bee no Sacraments in that sense of Sacraments that wee speake of 6 The last supposed Sacrament in the Popish Church is Extreme unction or last anointing or annealing as they cal it But how do they prove this to be a sacrament We reade indeed in Mark 6.13 that the Apostles of Christ being sent abroad did cast out Divels and annointed manie that were sicke with oyle and healed them But wee see this reckoned amongst the rest of the miracles which those Apostles had power given them to doe in those times of the first preaching and planting of the Gospell to win the greater credit unto it Agreeably whereunto it is said that They went forth and preached everie where the Lord working with them and confirming the word with signes following But beside that it is thus reckoned among the rest of the miracles the effect or event did also declare it to bee miraculous because as manie as were in those daies annointed by them were healed as the Text it selfe affirmeth Now can or doe Popist Priests in like sort in these daies by their annointing with oyle cure and heale the sicke and diseased as they in the Primitive and Apostolicke Church miraculously did All men know they neither doe nor can S. Iames likewise saith to the Christians of those Primitive and Apostolicke times in this sort Is anie sicke among you let him call for the Presbyters or Elders of the Church and let them pray for him and annoint him with oyle in the name of the Lord and the prayer of faith shall save the sicke and the Lord shall raise him up and if he have committed sinnes they shall be forgiven him For Sinnes commonly bee the cause of mens sicknesses and diseases And because God pardoneth such as repentantly acknowledge and confesse their sinnes and faults and not such as hide them and will iustifie themselves therein hee addeth further saying thus Acknowledge your faults one to another and pray one for another that yee may bee healed for the prayer of a righteous man availeth much if it bee fervent teaching them hereby that they ought freely to conferre one with another touching their diseases and sicknesses to confesse the sins which bee the cause of them one to another that so they might helpe one another with their praiers unto God for their recoverie for S. Iames doth not say that it was the bare anointing with oyle that did heale or save a man from death or raise him up from that his sicknesse wherewith hee was visited but it was Annointing with oyle in the name of the Lord that is such as had prayer invocation and calling upon the name of the Lord ioyned with it And therfore in the next words he sheweth that praier was added and that it was the prayer of faith that did preserve or save the sicke and that recovered and raised him up againe What then is there in all this to prove this Vnction or the annointing with oyle to bee a Sacrament Is it because in this healing there was used an external ceremonie or an outward visible signe but it is before shewed that that is not sufficient to make a Sacrament yea then might the curing of the diseased by the water of the Poole of Bethesda Ioh 5.2 3 4. c. be called a sacrament the annointing of the blind mans eies with clay made with spittle together with his washing in the Poole of Siloam Ioh. 9.6.7 might also by as good reason bee termed a Sacrament and sundrie other such actions wherin outward visible signes were used should become Sacraments which it were absurd to affirme in that sense of the Sacraments we here speake of But this Vnction or annoynting with oyle in the Apostles times can be no Sacrament in that sense of a Sacrament that wee speake of for sundry reasons First because it served onely for the healing and curing of the bodie For as for the forgivenesse of sinnes there mentioned and prayer used for that purpose they tended all in this case to this end to worke the effect of healing for the cause of the sicknesse which was sinnes being remooved by the prayers of the faithfull the effect which was the sicknesse or disease caused by those sinnes was also remooved Secondly it was a gift of healing that was in those daies miraculous to cure and heale the sicke in that manner which miraculous and extraordinarie power of healing is now long since ceased and because it was a thing miraculous and extraordinarie and is not ordinarie and perpetual it
no mo at once that is watchfull sober apt to teach hath all those other vertues and good qualities mentioned in that Text is the man that is meete to be made a Bishop S. Ambrose in 2. Cor. 11. saith That all the Apostles except Iohn and S. Paul had vvives Chaeremon Bishop of Nilus fled with his wife in persecution Euseb. lib 6. cap. 42. Demetrianus an excellent Bishop of Antiochia had a sonne called Doranus that was made Bishop in stead of Paulus Samosatenus the Heretique Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 30. Spiridion was a famous Bishop in the Councel of Nice that was married and had a daughter called Irene Ruffin lib. 1. cap. 5. Gregory Bishop of Nazianzen was a notable Bishop and father of the other Gregory that succeeded him as appeareth by the Oration he made in praise of his father Gregory Bishop of Nissa was an excellent Bishop and was also married Niceph. lib. 11. cap. 19. S. Germanus was a notable Bishop in Africa and was likewise married having a daughter called Leontia that was afterward martyred by the Arrians Victor Vticens hist. lib. 3. Yea Fabianus and Hormisda Bishops of Rome were married and manie other Bishops of Rome were Priests sonnes as Pope Damasus himselfe in his Pontifical doth testifie And although it be true that manie holy men were unmarried also yet you see it to be untrue which the Rhemists say that no holy men ever used their wives after they were in holy Orders For Socrates further mentioneth divers holy Bishops of the East Church in his time that begat lawfull children of their lawfull wives after that they were Bishops Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 22. And so doth Athanasius ad Dracontium affirme that hee knew manie Bishops unmaried and againe Monkes to be fathers of children as on the other side you may see saith he Bishops to be fathers of children and Monkeâ— that have not sought libertie of generation And good it had beene if this freedome and libertie to marry as it was left by God had so continued to all sorts of men and women without anie restraint or prohibition for be not the Clergie men in Poperie that be thus restrained and prohibited to marrie and likewise the Monkes Friars Nunns and the rest thereby occasioned or may they not thereby be occasioned to be like those old hereticks called Origeniani turpes Filthy Originists Who as Epiphanius testifieth of them Reiected mariage yet lust ceased not amongst them but they defiled their body and minde vvith wantonnesse for some of them be in the habite of Monkes that live solitarily and some of the vvomen are in the habite of women that live solitarily but they are for all that saith he corrupt performing their lust in their bodies And againe he saith of them that They studie not for chastitie but for fained chastitie and that which hath the name onely of Chastitie Clemangis a Doctor of Paris that lived above two hundred yeares agon concerning Monkes and Abbeyes speaketh thus VVhat can I say of them that is commendable they being so slippery indisciplinated dissolute unquiet running up and downe into common and dishonest places And touching Friars hee saith They be worse then the Pharisees ravening VVolves in Sheepes â—â—othing who in words pretend the forsaking of the world and in deedes vvith all possible fraudes deceipt and lying hunt after it making semblance in outward shew of austeritie chastitie humility holy simplicitie but secretly in exquisite delicates and variety of pleasures going beyond the luxuriousnesse of all vvorldly men and though not vvith their wives yet vvith their Bratts filling themselves greedily vvith wine and good cheere and polluting every thing vvith lust whose heate burneth them And concerning Nunnes hee saith Shame forbiddeth me to speake of them lest I should mention not a companie of Virgins dedicated to God but stewed deceiptfull impudent vvhores with their fornications and incestuous vvorkes For vvhat I pray you are Nunneries now-adayes but the execrable Brothel-houses of Venus the harbours of vvanton men where they satisfie their lusts that now the veyling of a Nunne is all one as if you prostituted her openly to be a VVhore So farre Hee 3 The sixt general Councel therefore assembled at Trulla to make Canons hath an expresse ordinance concerning this point of the mariage of Ministers in the 13 Canon in these words Forasmuch as vvee have understood that it hath bin ordeyned for a rule in the Church of Rome that vvhosoever vvill be a Deacon or Priest must first protest that he vvill never 〈◊〉 more after that have to doe vvith his vvife 〈◊〉 following the Apostolical order and discipline vvill that the lawfull marriage of Clergie men be for ever avayleable by no meanes separating them from their vvives nor forbidding them to come together at convenient times VVherefore if any one shall be thought vvorthy to be chosen a Subdeacon Deacon or a Priest let him not be hindred from mounting to this degree because he dwells together vvith his lawfull vvife and let it not be exacted of him in the day of his election to renounce the company of his lavvfull vvife lest by this meanes vvee be constrayned to disgrace mariage vvhich vvas first in instituted by God and blessed by his presence seeing that the Gospel cryes out that no man should separate that vvhich God hath ioyned together The prohibition of mariage then in the Popish Church to such as by Gods law be not prohibited yea which are directly allowed yea which are required and commanded in case they have not the gift of continencie to marrie rather then to burne appeareth verie cleerely to be wicked and abominable and consequently the Popish Church as touching this point must bee concluded to be the undoubted Antichristian Church And so much the rather for that they have made this prohibition in meere hypocrisie they pretending that they doe it for religion sake and that Clergy-men should be the more holy and chaste when the cause thereof indeed is another matter namely the preservation of Church goods and lest a Bishop or Priest if he were married should pare away something from them and employ it to the use of his wife and children for this a Pope of Rome himselfe hath discovered and manifested in the 28. Distinction and Canon de Syracusanis where he saith that the reason why hee did refuse to admit of a certaine Bishop was because hee had a wife and children by whom the Church goods use to be endangered And yet notwithstanding at the urgent request of the people of Syracusa he did receive him upon condition that his wife and children should not have to doe with the goods or profits of the Church Let them not therefore blind the eies of the world anie longer as though care of chastitie sanctitie and holinesse in Clergie-men were the cause of this prohibition when the true cause in verie deed appeareth to be meerely politicke worldly and earthly namely a respect and
respect of his officeâ— though not directly yet indirectly and by way of Consequent and in such manner and forme as becommeth Antichristianisme is before shewed in divers particulars Obiect 5 Antichrist is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in 2. Thes. 2. The man of sinne the Sonne of perdition and the lawlesse person This Greeke article 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth shew him to bee some one singular man or particular person onely and no moe Ans. You are much deceived in so concluding or thinking by reason of the Greeke Article For although it bee true that the Greeke Article there hath his Emphasis or force to point at some certaine thing yet this certaine thing may be aswell a certain kinde of men as namely of Popes going in succesioÌ„ one after another as one singular or particular person Neither doth Epiphanius haeresi 9 quae est samaritanoruÌ„ teach otherwise concerning this Greeke article then other learned men doe For thus he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Vbi enim adiungitur articulus ad unum aliquod definituÌ„ clarissimuÌ„ omnino quaedam Emphasis propter articulum sine verò articulo sumendum est vocabulum indefinitè de re aliqua vulgari Quemadmodum si dixerimus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nomen quidem expressimus sed non perspicuè monstravimus definitum aliquem Regem enim dicimus Persarum Thedorum Elamitarum Sin verò cum appositione arâ—iculi dixerimus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 extra dubium quid significetur subindicatur enim per articulum ipse Rex quaesitus vel de quo sermo fuit vel qui notus est vel qui dominatur in Regione aliqua c. So that it is true that Epiphanius will by the Greeke Article added have some certaine or definite thing to bee noted or pointed out and so say wee also but what that certaine or definite thing is before appeareth Learned men doe wonder that so learned a man as Bellarmine is should so farre bee mistaken in so plaine a matter For doth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Ioh. 10.10 12.13 because of the Greeke Article added denote onely one particular man and no more that is to say but onelie one in all the world to bee a Theese or an hireling or when Christ saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. in Mat. 12.35 doth hee meane that onely some one good mâ—n out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth good things and that onely one evill man out of the evill treasure of his heart bringeth forth evill things or doth hee not rather meane in a generalitie or communitie every or anie good man whosoever or anie evill man whosoever in that case Againe when it is said in Luk. 4.4 that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 liveth not by bread onely but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God It is not meant of one Individuum or singular person onelie but in a generalitie or communitie of anie or every one that hee liveth by that meanes So againe S. Paul would that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the man of God should be perfect instructed to every good work 2. Tim. 3 17 he doth not meane because of the Greeke article added that only one man of God but in a generality or community that everie or anie man of God whosoever should bee so perfect and so well instructed Againe when it is said that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the high Priest alone went once everie yeare into the second Tabernacle it is meant not of one particular high Priest onely but of the whole order of high Priests And so by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the hinderer and that which hindered Antichrist from appearing in his height is not meant because of the addition of the Greeke article that onelie one Emperour but the whole succession of the Emperors of Rome even the State of the Romane Emperors which was then florishing was the hinderer of that his revealing or appearing and so also doe the ancient fathers themselves expound it as is before declared Neither is this anie unwonted or unusual speech For wee speake so commonly and say that the Emperor goeth before Kings meaning thereby not one particular Emperor onely but the whole State and succession of Emperors And when wee say likewise The King goeth before all Dukes and Earles it is not meant onely of this King or that King but generallie of all Kings of the verie State and succession of Kings So also when our Adversaries themselves doe say The Pope is head of the Church they meane not this Pope or that Pope onely in Individuo but generally the whole Order State and succession of Popes And therfore when the grand Antichrist that is the Pope of Rome is thus called The man of sinne c. Thereby likewise is and may verie well bee intended not one singular man onely or this Pope or that Pope in Individuo but generally the whole State Ranke Order of the Popes succeeding one another Obiect 6. Antichrist shall call himselfe in expresse termes god ostendens se 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quod sit Deus shewing himself that he is God as it is in the Greeke Ans. But your latin translation which you hold for the only Authentical which agreeth in sense with our translation is Ostendens se tanquam sit Deus shewing himself as though he were God Howbeit beause you urge the Greeke Text which we ever allow We therunto answer first with Aecumenius that Non ait Dicens sed ostendens hoc est operibus signis ac miraculis nitens ostendere quod sit Deus The Apostles words concerning Antichrist be not as you suppose That hee shall say that hee is God but shewing that is by his workes signes and miracles endeavouring to shew that hee is god And secondly wee answer that the Pope is in expresse termes called god well alloweth of that title and thereby proveth that hee cannot bee iudged by men in the Canon Satis the 96 Distinct. Againe the Glosse of the Extravagant Cum inter hath these words To thinke that our Lord God the Pope the author of the foresaid Decretal of this had no power to decree as he hath decreed would bee iudged an heresie Here likewise you see that they call him Our Lord God the Pope in expresse termes In Italy also upon the gate of Tolentum is this inscription To Paul the third the most high and mighâ—ie God upon earth In the Councell of Lateran and 9 Session in the yeare 1514 one of the Secretaries of the Popes chamber speakes thus to Leo the 10 The lookes of your Divine Maiestie with the beame-darting splendor of which my weake eyes are dimmed Stapleton in the Preface of his Booke of the Principles
Christ slept a long time For from the yeare 870 to the yeare 1050 whom doe you see but Necromancers but Adulterers and Murtherers and Infamous persons prâ—ferred to the Papacie Platius in the life of Benedict the fourth speaketh the like and giveth the reason of all this saying thus This libertie of sinning saith hee hath begotten us these Monsters and Prodigies vvho by ambition and corruption have rather usurpt then possest the holy chaire of Peter there being no Prince to represse the vvickednesse of these men Yea Platina though the Popes Servant and Secretarie yet well knowing their vices and the vices of the people under his government doth in a manner speake as if himselfe despaired of their salvation for thus bee his words Our vices saith hee bee grovvne to thaâ— height that they vvill hardly ever finde mercie in the sight of God But observe yet further how horrible and wicked their reproachings slanderings and defamings heretofore have beene and yet still bee of Gods church people their religion calling them usually Heretickes Schismatickes and by such other odious names laying sometimes most notorious slanders and most impious false accusations to their charge perswading as if our religion were a religion allowing licentiousnesse a condemner and disallower of all good works and as though wee approoved of all dissolutenesse and were enemies to the Virgin Marie to all Saints as though we made God the Author of sinne and evill other such like things which we utterly detest dislike and abhorre and which hee cleane contrary to our opinion and to the doctrine of our Religion Yea they not onely thus dishonour wrong the true Church and people of God upon earth but even the Church triumphant and Saints also in heaven For is it not a great wrong and dishonour to the glorified Saints in heaven to turne them into Idols or to make them instruments of Idolatry or of dishonouring God by invocating praying unto them when as Praier and Invocation is a service worship and honour properly and onely belonging to God Againe do they not much dishonour the Saints when they imploy them about base offices commending the keeping of their Hogs to one of their horses to another the curing of the Scurffe to a third c. Yea even concerning that most chast blessed glorious Virgin Mary Doe they not extreamely dishonour her when they make her to favour Immodestie uncleanenesse For there is an Italian book entituled Miracoli dâ—ella gloriosâ— Virgine Maria printed at Millan in the yere 1547 which saith that a certaine Abbesse being with Child the holy Virgin being willing to cover her crime did in her stead present her selfe before the Bishops in forme of the Abbesse and shewed him by an ocular demonstration that shee was not with Child Caesarius also in his seventh Booke Chapt. 35 reports that the Virgin Marie for twelve whole yeares did supplie the place of a certaine Nunâ—â— called Beatrice whilst shee lay in the Sâ—ewes till at last she came backe again to take her place and freed the Virgin from being in her roome any longer But consider yet further the most terrible cruell barbarous and bloodie persecutions of Gods Church and people committed by Papists About 400 yeares since Pope Innocent the third within the space of a few monthes made more then 200000 of the faithfull to bee slaine whom they called Albigenses In S. Bartholomewes Massacre in the yeare 1572 more then 80000 men were slaine in cold blood In a Massacre in France within a few dayes were murthered 70000 persons And how execrable beyond all measure abhominable and damnable was that their late Plot of Gunpowder-Treason for the overthrow of the whole State of England in Parliament at a blow and God knoweth of how many States and Kingdomes beside Yea what meaneth their Holy League as they call it not long since made for the extirpation and rooting out of all Protestancie Doe they not by all these shew themselves to bee utter enemies and that in the worst sort that can bee to all Civill States Kings and Kingdomes which reiect the Popes usurped Supremacie and his depraved and Antichristian Religion Why else also have they decreed that Faith is not to be kept with Heretickes And why else doe they hold that before Hereticall Iudges and Magistrates as they call them it is lawfull for them to sweare with Equivocations and Mental reservations and in a false deluding and deceitfull manner And why else doe they dislike and disallow Subjects not onely to take the Oath of Supremacie but the Oath also of Allegeance when in very deede and of right neither of both ought to bee refused What also meaneth the resort and comming of Popish Priests and Iesuits into Protestant Kingdomes under colour and pretence of Religion Is it not to make a partie for the Pope or some of his confederates against a fit time And doth it not also tend to sedition and treason in a Common-weale What doth the Popes claime to depose Kings and to give away their Kingdomes when and to whom hee list tend unto but to the setting of Princes together by the Eares aswell as Subiects to rebell against their lawfull Soveraignes Doe not all these things tend to the overthrow aswell of civill States and civill Iustice as of Religion and of Kingdomes and Common-weales aswel as of Gods Church and which maketh the matter yet more and indeede most odious all this they doe under pretence of Christianitie and of a Catholicke cause when it is nothing so but cleane contrarywise extreamely divelish and Antichristian Let then everie equal person now judge whether the Pope of Rome that thus wrongeth God his Church and Religion and not onely Bishops but all Kings Princes and Emperors also their People Kingdomes and Common-wealths and that thus intolerably abuseth the whole Christian world and yet for all that inflexibly persisteth therein without anie remorse or repentance shewed yea which with all his power and strength iustifieth upholdeth defendeth all those his wrongs errors abuses and impieties boasting glorying and delighting in them bee not rightly affirmed to be The Man of sin the Sonne of perdition and the verie undoubted Grand Antichrist in all respects THE CONCLVSION to the same pretended CATHOLIKES NOw then it appearing verie cleerely by the premisses that the Pope of Rome whom his blinded followers so much adore and reverence is the verie grand Antichrist and that the Popish Citie of Rome whereof he is the Head and Ruler is undoubtedly the VVhore of Babylon mentioned in the Revelation of S. Iohn What scruple or doubt should you or anie of you conceive to make all the good hast yee may to forsake that grand Antichrist that his Concubine the whore of Babylon and all his Priests Iesuites Bishops Monks Friars Nunns and the rest of that his Antichristian rabble and to betake and apply your selves with us to the embracing and following of Christ and
had deserved that the due judgement of God should have condemned even those that are justified unlesse mercie had relieved them from that which was due that so all the mouthes of them which would glory of their merits might be stopped and he that glorieth might glorie in the Lord. They further taught as S. Augustin did that Man using ill his Free will lost both himselfe it that as one by living is able to kill himselfe but by killing himselfe is not able to live nor hath power to rayse up himselfe when he hath killed himselfe so when sinne had beene committed by freewill sinne being the conqueror freewill also was lost forasmuch as of whom a man is overcome of the same is he also brought in bondage 2. Pet. 2.19 that unto a man thus brought in bondage and sold there is no libertie left to do well unlesse he redeeme him whose saying is this If the Sonne make you free yee shall be free indeed Ioh. 8.36 that the minde of men from their very youth is set upon evill there being not a man which sinneth not that a man hath nothing from himselfe but sinne that God is the author of all good things that is to say both of good nature and of goodwill which unlesse God do worke in him man cannot doe because this good will is prepared by the Lord in man that by the gift of God hee may doe that which of himselfe hee could not doe by his owne free-will that the good will of man goeth before many gifts of God but not all of those which it doth not go before it selfe is one For both of these is read in the holy Scriptures His mercie shall goe before me and His mercie shall follow me it preventeth him that is unwilling that hee may will and it followeth him that is willing that hee will not in vaine and that therefore vvee are admonished to aske that we may receive to the end that what we doe will may be effected by him by whom it was effected that vvee did so will They taught also that the Law was not given that it might take away sinne but that it might shut up all under sinne to the end that men being by this meanes humbled might understand that their salvation was not in their owne hand but in the hand of a Mediator that by the Law commeth neyther the remission nor the removeall but the knowledge of sinnes that it taketh not away diseases but discovereth them forgiveth not sins but condemneth them that the Lord God did impose it not upon those that served righteousnesse but sin namely by giving a just law to unjust men to manifest their sinnes and not to take them away forasmuch as nothing taketh away sinnes but the grace of faith which worketh by love That our sinnes are freely forgiven us without the merit of our workes that through grace wee are saved by faith and not by workes and that therefore we are to rejoyce not in our owne righteousnesse or learning but in the faith of the Crosse by which all our sinnes are forgiven us That grace is abject and vaine if it alone doe not suffice us and that wee esteeme basely of Christ when we thinke that hee is not sufficient for us to salvation That God hath so ordered it that he will be gracious to mankinde if they doe beleeve that they shall be freed by the blood of Christ. that as the soule is the life of the bodie so faith is the life of the soule and that wee live by faith only as owing nothing to the Law that he who beleeveth in Christ hath the perfection of the Law For whereas none might be justified by the Law because none did fulfill the Law but only he which did trust in the promise of Christ faith was appointed which should be accepted for the perfection of the Law that in all things which were omitted faith might satisfie for the whole Law That this righteousnesse therefore is not ours nor in us but in Christ in whom wee are considered as members in the head That faith procuring the remission of sinnes by grace maketh all beleevers the children of Abraham and that it was just that as Abraham was justified by faith onely so also the rest that followed his faith should be saved after the same maner That through adoption we are made the sonnes of God by beleeving in the Sonne of God and that this is a testimonie of our adoption that we have the spirit by which we pray and cry Abba Father forasmuch as none can receive so great a pledge as this but such as be sonnes onely That Moses himselfe made a distinction betwixt both the justices to wit of faith and of deedes that the one did by workes justifie him that came the other by beleeving only that the Patriarches and the Prophets were not justified by the workes of the Law but by faith that the custome of sinne hath so prevayled that none now can fulfill the Law as the Apostle Peter saith Act. 15.10 Which neyther our fathers nor wee have beene able to beare But if there were any righteous men which did escape the curse it was not by the workes of the Law but for their faithes sake that they were saved Thus did Sedulius and Claudius two of our most famous Divines deliver the doctrine of free-will and grace faith and workes the Law and the Gospell Iustification and Adoption no lesse agreeably to the faith which is at this day professed in the reformed Churches then to that which they themselves received from the more ancient Doctors whom they did follow therein Neyther doe wee in our judgement one whit differ from them when they teach that faith alone is not sufficient to life For when it is said that Faith alone justifieth this word alone may be conceived to have relation either to the former part of the sentence which in the schooles they terme the Subject or to the latter which they call the Predicat Being referred to the former the meaning will be that such a faith as is alone that is to say not accompanied with other vertues doth justifie and in this sense wee utterly disclaime the assertion But being referred to the latter it maketh this sense that faith is it which alone or only iustifieth and in this meaning onely doe wee defend that proposition understanding still by faith not a dead carkase thereof for how should the iust be able to live by a dead faith but a true and lively faith which worketh by love For as it is a certaine truth that among all the members of the bodie the eye is the only instrument whereby wee see and yet it is as true also that the eye being alone and seperated from the rest of the members is dead and for that cause doth neyther seâ—
August lib. 2. quaest 3. ad Simplician Aug. de Vnit. eccl ca. 16. Deut. 12.8.32 Ezech. 20.19 Levit. 18.4 Psal 106.39 Esai 55.8.9 Isidor orig lib. 8. cap. 3. Esai 1.12 1. Sam. 15.2 â— 21 22 23 24 25 26. 2. Sam. 6 3 4 5 6 7. Luk. 16.15 Mat. 12.13 Phil. 1.11 Heb. 11.6 Act. 1â— 9 Tit. 1.15 Rom. 3.12 Aug. cont Iulian li. 4. c 3. cont 2. Epist. Pelag. ad Bonif. li. 3. ca. 5. August de fide oper cap. 14. August in Psal. 67. Act. 10.1 2. c August de praed Sanct. lib. 1. c. 7. Introducis hominum genus quod placere Deo possit sine fide Christi lege naturae Hoc est unde vos maximè Christiana detestatur Ecclesia August cont Iulian. Gal. 5 19. Rom. 7.19 20 21 22 23 24. Psal 3.12 Esa 64 6. Psal. 130.3.4 Iam. 3.2 Agust lib. 6. conf Rom. 6.23 Act. 20 28. 1. Cor 6.20 Rom. 8 1â— Rom. 4. â— August in Psal. 83 Aug. in Psal. 32. August in Psal. 101. 1. Cor. 4.7 Luk. 17.7 8 9 10 1. Cor. 1.31 Rom 4.3 Rev. 4.11 Rev. 5.12.13 14 Rev. 19.1.3 Rom. 8.3 Act. 13.38.39 Mat. 19.16 c. Mar. 10.17 c. Luk 10.25 26 27 28. Luk. 18.18 c. Rom. 10.5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Rom 10.4 Gal. 3.19.21.24 Rom. 5.20.21 Rom. 7.13.24 25. Rom. 7.7 8. Rom. 4 15 16. Gal 3.11 12 14 15 16 17 18. 22.24 Rom. 3.31 Matth. 5.17 Psal. 1.1 2. Psal. 119.165 The reasons why men shold do good works and walke in Gods law and commandemâ—nts Ephe 2 8 9 10 2. Pet. 1.10 Mat. 5 16. Luk. 10.35 1. Cor. 9.12.16.18 c. Deut. 29. â—â— Act. 28.27 Mat. 28.20 Rom. 9.21.22 Rom. 9.22.23 Rom. 8.30 1. Thes. 5.5 6 7 8 9 10. 2. Thes. 2.9 10 11 12 13 14. Ephes. 1.3 4 5 6 7 8. c. The end of Predestination is that men should live godly and holy lives and not that they shold live licentiously or as they list Colos. 3.12 13. 1. Pet. 2.9 Luk. 10.20 Ephes. 1.3 4 5 6. â— The right use of the doctrine of predestination Rom. 8.30 Mat. 20.1.2 3.4 5 6 7. The doctrine of predestination teacheth no maÌ„ to despaire so long as life lasteth but to use the meanes which God hath appointed to bring men to salvation Touching assurance of salvation 2. Pet. 1.10 2. Pet. 1.5 6 7 8 9 10. 2. Cor. 13.5 Iob. 19.25 26 27. Rom. 8 35 36 37 38 39. Data sunt signa quaedam Indicia manifesta sâ—lutis ut indubitabile sit cum esse de numero Electorum in quo ea signa per manserint Bernard in Septuag Serm. 1. Rom 8.14 Rom 8 14. Rom. 8.16 1. Ioh. 4.13 1. Cor. 2.12 1. Ioh 3.2 3. 1. Pet. 1.8 Concerning Perseverance unto the end Psal. 37.24 Pro. 24.16 Ezech. 18.24 Luke 8.13 Mat. 13.20 21. Maâ— 4.5 â—6 â—7· Psal. 1.3 Luke 8.15 Matth 13.23 Mark 4.8.20 Coloss. 1.23 Rom. 8.30 1. Cor. 1.8 1 Thess. 5.24 1. Pet. 1.5 Ioh. 10.28 â—9 2. Cor. 5.1 Heb. 10.32 33 34. Rom 8.16 Ephe. 1.13 14. 1. Ioh 5.13 1. Ioh. 5.9 10 11 12. Ioh 3.36 Ioh. 6.47 Deus tibi de hoc mundo recedenti immortalitatem pollicetur tu dubitas fluctuas hoc est Christum credentium magistruÌ„ peccato incredulitatis offendere c. Cypâ— de morâ—al Heb. 6.17 18 19. RegnuÌ„ coeloruÌ„ vult Dominus sine aliqua incertae voluntatis ambiguitate sperari Alioquin Iustificatio ex fide nulla erit si fides ipsa sit Ambigua Hillar in Matth. cap. 5. Iam. 1.6 7. Heb. 10.22 Rom. 4.18 â—9 20 21 c. Presumere non de operatione tua sed de Christi gratia c. bona presumptio Ambr. de Sacram. lib. 5. cap. 4. Tota presumptio tua Deus sit Augâ—st in Psal. 85. Psal. 42.5.11 Psal. 43.5 Rom. 7.24 25. Gal. 5.17 2. Cor 4 8 9 10 c. Ps 46.1 2 3. c Psal 27.14 Matth. 16.18 Matt. 7.24 25. Rom. 8.37 1. Cor. â—0 12 2. Cor. 13.5 2. Pet. 1.5 6 7 8 9 10. Phil. 2.12 Rom. 8.15 1. Ioh. 4.17 Rom. 8.31 32 33 34. c. Rom 1.28 29. c. Tit. 1.16 2. Tim. 3.8 Geâ— 1.26 31. Ecclesiastes 7.31 Gen. 3.1 2 3 4. c. Rom. 5.12 Eph. 2.3 Rom. 9.15 16 17 18. Eph. 1.3 4 5 6. Rev. 20 1â— Rom. 9.22 23. Hos 1â— 9 Lam. 3.22 Eph. 1.4 Ioh 17.6.9 Ioh 6.37.39 Rom. 5 9. Gal. 3.13 Eph. 2.1 2 3 4 5. 2. Cor. 4.3 4. Rom 11.5 6 7 8 9 10. Rom. 11.7 Rom 11.5 Mat. 20.16 Heb. 6.4 5 6. Rom. 2.5 Heb. 12.17 Ioh. 12.37.39.40 Deut. 29.4 Ezech. 36 26.27 Ezech. 18 23. Ezech 33.11 Ezech. 18.13 Ezech 33.9 c. 1. Sam. 2.25 1. Pet. 2.8 2. Pet. 2.12 Pro. 16.4 Iude vers 4. God is not the Author of sin Gen. 1 31. Gen 3.1 2 3 c. Ioh. 13.27 Iam. 1 1â— Ephe. 2.2 2 Tim 2.26 God withholdeth his grace from some but infusâ—â—h not wickednesse into any Iam. 1. â—4 Ephes. 2.3 Rom. 17. Non fâ—cit voluntates malas sed utitur iis ut voluerit libâ— cap. 3.2 Cor 46. Gen 1.2 â— 4. Divinae sapientiae virtutis potentiâ—e est non solum bene facere quae natura Dei est sed etiam illud maximè ut id quod per malos excogitatum est ad bonum aliqueÌ„ fineÌ„ utilum de ducat utiliter iis quae videntur mala utatur Clemens Alexand. strom lib. 1. Si peccaveris ne putes hominem fecisse quod voluit Deo accidisse quod noluit August in Psal. 110.2 2. Sam 12.9 10 11 12. 2. Sam â—6 21 22. Quis non ista iudicia contremiscat in quious agit Deus in cordibus malorum hominuÌ„ quicquid vult reddens eis secundum merita illoruÌ„ Et manifestuÌ„ est Deum operari in cordibus hominum adinclinandas illorum voluntates quocunque voluerit siâ—e ad bona pro misericordia sive ad mala pro meritis illorum Iudicio utique suo aliquando aperto aliquando occulto semper autem Iusto Aug. de gra lib. arb ca 21. Rom. 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30. Intelligendum est Omnia vel adjuvante Domino perfici vel deserente permitti ut intelligas tamen Nolente Deo nihil prorsus admitti August de praedestinatione gra cap. 15. Rom. 1 2◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Verâ—â— 24. Verse 26. Verse 28. 2. Tess. 2 10 11 12. Iob 1.13.17 Iam. 5.11 1 Pet. 4.12.19 1. Pet. 3.17 Rom. 2.5 Matt. 23.14.33 34 35. Iam 3.1 August in Enchir C. 30. de verb. Apost ser. 2. degra lib. arbit Retract lib. 2. cap. 8. c. De perfect Iustie â—at 9. Retract lib. 1. cap. 1. Aug. cont 2. â—p Pel. l. 1. c. 19. Rom â— 16 Rom 9.22 23 Iere 10.23 Pro. 21.1 Ephe. 1.11 Lam. 2.17 Eph. 1.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. c. Psal. 115.3 Psal 135.6 Eph. 3.4 5.9 11