must freely receiue that which is from aboue of Gods free gift bringing with thee of thine only this one thing namely that thou beleeue Then which words what can more plainly impugne the doctrine of our aduersaries or shew what was the iudgement of this auncient father concerning this point But that consent and consenancy which we find in many of the Fathers as in Origen Hierom Ambrose Isichius Basil Athanasius Primasius Hillary Theodoret Bernard giuing that work to Faith only to saue or iustifie may sufficiently perswade vs how fast they held this old Religion or Romish faith that a man is iustified by faith without the works of the Law I may therfore I trust with Cyprian conclude that If Abraham beleeued God and it was accompted to him for righteousnes Euery one also that beleeueth God and liueth by Faith is found iust and is declared to be alreadie made happy and righteous in faithfull Abraham But the new Romish Religion is this That good works do merite iustification and eternall life So that by their good works they say they can satisfie for their sinnes And for this cause when at shrift they haue confessed their faults their ghostly father for so they terme him will inioine some penance vnto them wherby they tell them that they may satisfie for their sinnes and make recompence to God for them For almes and fasting saith one doth easily carie men into heauen And thus in this their new Religion they do not only expresly set themselues against that old Roman faith wherin we are taught that good workes cannot iustifie before God but also blasphemously they rob Christ of his office who is in truth onely that Lambe of GOD that taketh away the sinne of the world and is the propitiation for the same Who with one offering by offering himselfe a Sacrifice for our sins hath made perfect for euer them that are sanctified CHAP. V. ANd as this ancient faith which was then y e faith of the Romans when their faith was commended doth put vs past hope of béeing saued by our workes sait doth teach vs that this saluation is without our merit fréely bestowed vpon vs that beléeue Wee are saith S. Paule iustified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus Whome GOD hath set forth to be a propitiation by faith in his bloud in declaring his righteousnesse by the forgiuing of sinnes that are past c. In which wordes wee see againe that our iustification is free therefore not for our workes but by grace Wée sée the meanes of this our saluation euen the redenption that is in Christ Iesus We are also taught the meanes how it is applied to vs by faith And that not simply by faith as if it were frée for vs to repose this our faith and confidence according to our owne fancy vpon any helpes that we can deuise but by faith in his bloude Then also we learne héere what is this iustification the forgiuenes of sinnes But is Christ onely profitable to them that were in his time and to vs that haue béene or are since Yes verily He declareth his righteousnes in forgiuing the sins that are past such as his chosen seruantes haue committed since the world began for so both S. Ambrose and their owne friend Tho. of Aquin séeme to vnderstand the sins that are past Which former sins or sins that are past seing it is receiued by so generall a consent of the olde translation and the interpreters I maruell that the Rhemists do leaue it out If we had so done we should haue beene cryed out vpon for falsifyers of the worde of God and deprauers of the same I woulde also aske why in translating into English they would rather retaine the Latin worde Gratis then set downe the English word Freely What was the English so plain that you could not deuise any colour that might seeme plausible to your fauorits for the maintenance of your new heresie If you thought so why giue you not glory vnto God confessing your errour that others might learne by you not to be deceiued any longer If you saw not your misliking why when you should translate and make the worde plaine doe you so hide this light vnder the close bushell of your wordes vnknowen to them that shoulde read your booke For thus our newe Masters of Rheimes do translate Iustified gratis by grace caet what these mean by translating thus let the world iudge But the summe of the auncient doctrine is this that we are iustified fréely without deseruing euen by the forgiuenes of our sinnes through faith in Christ his bloud which is gathered not onely out of the words of S. Paule by me alledged but also through out all his Epistles Which testimonyes I omit because that which is already said is so plaine and my especiall purpose is to shew what hath béene the auncient faith of the Romans As therefore we see what S. Paule taught them so let vs see if S. Peter in that his Epistle which they say he wrote from Rome haue said any thing for that point Hée saith That we are kept by faith vnto saluation And that The reward or end of our faith is the saluation of our soules And againe that Christ was shewed in these last times for your sakes saith he which by his meanes doe beleeue in God And whosoeuer shall mark how the Apostle S. Peter in that first Chapter of his first Epistle doth set forth the excellency of our hope and the redemption that we haue in Christ which is the end or reward not of our workes but of our faith yea how that Christ is shewed for vs that beléeue and that the Apostle in speaking of our saluation doth not make our workes any cause thereof but on the contrary ascribeth it wholly to Gods mercy euen to his abundant mercy apprehended by faith he must needs confesse that S. Peter hauing so good occasion to haue spoken of iustification by works yet not hauing once mentioned the same had not any purpose to deliuer that doctrine that our own works may iustify vs. But our new Romish Rabbies that haue nothing to vant themselues of but the rotten ruines of auncient Rome can abide no doctrine worse then this that wee are iustified by faith in Christ his bloud It is heresie with them to say that wee obtayne forgiuenesse of our sinnes by faith in Christ But to attribute that which onely Christes merites by his death and bloudshedding and faith apprehendeth to holy bread holy water pardons Agnus deis blessed graynes pilgrimages monkes bookes and cowles candels crossings and such like trifling trash is good deuotion and sound religion That which they call heresie we teach word for word out of the auncient doctrine of the Romans But that which they would haue the people beleeue concerning these toyes S. Paul S. Peter and S. Marke
birth of Tamars children For Zarah being first néere the birth yet Phares his brother came forth before him So these godly motions béeing first thought vpon yet euen in Gods good and obedient children such corrupt and vngodly affections will first shew themselues Of which dangerous battell commeth this troublesome effect troublesome I say to Gods children that their loue eyther of God or man is not without want their faith not without feare their obedience not without blemish their seruice not without negligence to be shorte in any good thing that we will attempt we shall not be without euil to hinder the same Which thinges being well considered of I trust it wil easely appeare that our will though it be good in the regenerate yet is not at any time altogether free to doe as it would in respect of these corrupt lusts of the flesh And that this is the auncient faith of the Romans that was in S. Paules time it is more plaine then that with any good shew of reason it may be denied For the Apostle teacheth the Romans thus much euen by his own example Who féeling within himselfe this spirituall battel betwéene the spirit and the flesh which onely Gods children do féele so by experience being taught that when he had done what he could he was notable to doe that which willingly he would haue done he plainely confesseth The good that I would do I not but the euill which I would not that do I. Now I trust no man will answere that he speaketh not of that he could doe but of that he did I trust no body wil imagine but that the Apostle did what he could to doe good and not to doe euill and yet when he had striuen therein to the vttermost his regenerate and godly will was not of power to performe his godly desires But if any man would iudge so grosly of S. Paule as that he might haue done more then he did to stand against sinne yet would they be sufficiently confuted by that which the same apostle addeth almost immediately whereby he sheweth by what meanes it came to passe that he was so driuen and drawen to doe against his will Euen because There was a Lawe in his members rebelling against the Lawe of his minde and leading him captiue to the Lawe of sinne although concerning the inward man he had delight in the Lawe of God Now if S. Paule had not free will as no doubt in these wordes he plainely teacheth the Romans that hee had not to doe good shall we imagine that we who are much lesse fréed from corruption of sinne then he was haue any such fréedome or power in vs Shall we that are in comparison drye stumpes and fruitlesse plantes deceiue our selues in this vaine conceit that we are better able to bring forth the fruit of good works then he was God forbid No I am verily perswaded that whosoeuer doth but consider what a good work is according to that I haue before said especially in the viii Chapter and on the other side how weake wee are of our selues because our regeneration is not heere perfected and how stirring and striuing our lustes are whereby we are hindred in our good indeuours he wil vtterly detest that deceitfull doctrine of mans free will to doe good and abhorre it as a proud presumption And hee will not onely with Saint Paule humbly confesse his owne weakenes but with S. Peter also heartely giue thankes vnto our gratious God who hath Kept vs by his power not by the power or free wil that we haue vnto saluation So that we see we to acknowledge this weaknes in our selues yea although we be regenerate to doe good and the power whereby we are preserued to saluation that we should not quite fall from it to be from God and in him is the Catholicke doctrine that then when these Apostles taught was receiued at Rome According to the which also the fathers in the Auraâ—ican counsell did affirme That many good thinges are wrought in man which man worketh not But man doth no good at all but that God giueth power that he may worke it And Theophilact most plainely speaking of the workes that we doe after baptisme wherein the papistes especially brag of their fréewill Our will saith he is dead but his that is Christes liueth and doth gouerne this our life If then our life be gouerned by Christes will where is the power of our owne will which our aduersaries so much extol I said saith FulgeÌ„tius that thou wast preuented not onely with that loue wherewith GOD loued thee but with that also which hee freely powred into thee that he might be loued of thee Therefore all euen whatsoeuer holy loue thou hast towardes thy husband thou hast it in deede in thee but not of thy selfe Much might be alledged out of the fathers to this ende whereby it might appeare how they did follow this ancient faith of the Church of Rome but I will take my leaue with Arnobius his wordes You saith he repose in your selues the saluation of your soules and hope to be made Gods by your owne inward indeuour But we promise not to our selues any such thing of our infirmitie seeing our nature to be of no strength and that it is ouercome by the affections thereof whensoeuer it striueth But now would they teach vs to speake with new tongues not the wonderfull workes of God but the straunge strength that is in vs to serue God straunge I say because we haue neither seene it in the godly nor heard it in the pure and auncient Roman Church nor can finde or feele it in our selues vnlesse it be when wee are past feeling that wée feele not our selues But thus they teach vs that being once stirred vp and holpen for these are their owne termes by grace man hath afterwardes such power that hee is freely moued to God to dispose and prepare himselfe to obtaine the grace of iustification Yea that our lustes or desire of sinne are subiected to reason and free will with such subiection as scarsely there can be any greater And thus whereas God because the olde heart of man is naught and hath nothing in it that will further nay that will not hinder vs to walke vprightly in the wayes of godlinesse promiseth to giue vs another heart A newe heart saith God will I giue you and a newe spirite will I put within you they woulde make vs beleeue that this olde hearte of ours will serue with a little chaunge And yet that wee may know that to stirre vp and to helpe our olde heart will not serue the turne God by Ezechiel in the place alledged saith I will take away the stony heart out of your body and I will giue you a heart of flesh By which wordes of giuing a newe hearte taking away that we haue of stone giuing vs one of fleshe God woulde haue vs to learne that
vnto them were not onely more secure of their own estate then was for their safety but also despised the Iewes as a people so reiected as if God vnmindfull of his promise would neuer be reconciled to them again Against al which the Apostle in this Epistle teacheth that al people that beleeue of whatsoeuer cuntry or nation are freely iustified by faith in Christ And first he proueth that neither Iew nor gentile vnder which two al are comprehended can be iustifyed by doing the works of the Law because none can fulfil the Law neither the gentiles by that light of nature the Law written in their heart neither the Iewes by that knowledge of the Law that they so much bragged of And this the Apostle performeth as the diligent Reader may obserue from the xvii verse of the first Chapter vnto the xxi of the third chapter So that he flatly concludeth Therfore by the works of the Law shal no flesh be iustified Now this place being so plaine as it is against iustification by works the doctrine of merits is quite ouerthrown if some color be not deuised to auoid the force of this testimony The Romish Catholiks therfore indeuor as much as they can to make vs beléeue that those wordes must haue another sence and vnderstanding then we take them to haue but what sence that is they are not yet resolued For some say that the Apostle by the workes of the Law meaneth the works of the Ceremonial Law and in déed many of the Papists do so expound it But Master Bellarmine liketh not of that answer confesseth in plain termes that not onely the obseruation of the Law of ceremonies but also the kéeping of the moral Law is excluded from iustification but yet he would haue vs to imagine that onely such workes as are done before we beléeue are denied to iustifie vs. As for the workes that we doe after they doe iustifie and merit as they teach vs. And this their absurd opinion procéedeth of their ignorance of the intent and meaning of the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romans For Master Bellarmine in the place before alledged doth affirme that the Apostle there as also in his Epistle to the Galathians goeth about to proue that none can be saued without faith or without Gods mercy which is in déed the trueth but it is not the whole trueth For he is also as carefull to take away the confidence that any had or might haue in their owne workes And because he writeth to them who had faith already for Their faith was published throughout the worlde and teacheth vs that all our reioycing by this iustification by faith in Christ is taken away but where is merit there is reioycing in our selues therfore it is plaine that the Apostle excludeth here from iustifying al works This also appeareth by the setting down the true cause of iustification By faith and remouing the wrong cause in so general termes Without the works of the Law that also the Apostle doth after in the example of Abraham All which may teach vs that S. Paule héere indeuoreth to take from all workes when soeuer we doe them all hope of being saued thereby to the end that our pryde in our owne workes being abated and our boasting taken away He that reioyceth may reioyce in the Lord. For this cause also the Apostle doth afterwards so set workes and merit against grace as if the one of them doth quite ouerthrow the other If by grace not now by workes for then grace is no more grace but if it be of workes then is it now no grace for then worke is no worke We sée then that S. Paule teaching that we cannot be iustified by workes to the end that our Iesus may be indeed a true onely and perfect Sauiour and fully saue vs from al our sins taketh away from all our doings the hope of meriting and deseruing the same And to this end the Apostle S. Peter also in the beginning of his first Epistle doth make mention of Gods aboundant mercy wherby we are not onely begotten to a liuely hope but also Kept by the power of GOD through faith vnto saluation Therefore I say hee teacheth vs that we obtaine this by Gods greate goodnesse because hee woulde not haue vs any thing to trust in our merites but in that God of all grace who will make vs perfect for our workes cannot do that that we may ascribe To him glory and dominion for euer and not to our selues or our goodnes But if any man replie that this doctrine séemeth contrarie to that which Saint Paule writeth to the Romans That God will reward euery man according to his deedes Or to that Saint Mark reporteth that our Sauiour Christ promised That he who in his name gaue a cup of cold water to drink to his seruants should not leese his reward thus I aunswere God in mercie promiseth reward to such as do his will and in mercie he likewise performeth the same not waighing the work but remembring his mercie So that herein wee may rather commend Gods faithfulnesse in kéeping his promise alwaies then estéeme of our works For who will think that a cup of cold water gyuing may be worthy of eternall life And the words of Saint Paule are plaine enough if we wrest them not out of their naturall sence For we denie not that GOD rewardeth men According to their workes And the place proueth not that GOD rewardeth them For their works and that sence onely can establish their doctrine of merites but thapostle saith there onely thus much that good workes shall haue a good reward of eternall lyfe glorie honor and peace Euill workes their due reward of wrath indignation tribulation and anguish So that according to the qualitie of their workes the qualitie I say and not the merite GOD in mercie according to his promise shall giue honour and immortalitie to them that séeke to serue him This therefore standeth still the vndoubted old faith of the Romans That by the workes of the Law there shall no flesh bee iustified in Gods sight For howsoeuer Abraham was iustified by workes before men as others also are Iustified that is declared and accompted before men iust by workes and not by Faith onely For euen Saint Bede expoundeth that place of Saint Iames for the approuing of Abrahams faith or making it to appeare yet I say Before God workes cannot iustifie And this is the auncient Roman faith receiued also and taught of the auncient Fathers both writing of this Epistle to the Romns and else where Chrisostome saith that this righteousnes is called Gods righteousnes because man cannot work it but God only And after That the Sonne hath perfected it wholie with his bloud And in another place verie notablie For thou shalt not obtaine this righteousnes by thy trauels and labours but thou
his scholler would haue been ashamed to haue taugh it to any Christians CHAP. VI. SAint Paul hauing planted and proued this doctrine of iustification by faith in Christ as he doth in the fourth chapter of this Epistle to the Romans and else where in many places hee then teacheth that in respect of this grace we should be so far from being imboldened to sin that on the contrary we are the more bound therby to holines of life For whosoeuer is dead to sin must not liue to sin But we if we be not baptised into Christ are dead to sin Therfore such as are baptised into Christ may not liue to sin or in sin Yea it is good reason that the seruant obey his Master but we are Gods seruants by promise in baptisme therefore him we must obey then we cannot obey him which God hateth forbiddeth and punisheth but we must serue God our Master in holines and righteousnes And whereas no man euer more plainely taught our frée iustification in Christ without our workes or merites or any inherent righteousnesse euen by the forgiuenes of our sinnes then the Apostle S. Paul both in this epistle and else where yet no man more earnestly and effectually then he exhorteth to holines of life good workes and all Christian duties sinne and security haue not a sharper enemie then he is S. Peter also teacheth vs that Christ his Owne selfe bare our sinnes in his body vpon the tree Whereby he sheweth the satisfaction that he hath made to be the attonement betwéene God and vs and that without vs he hath done it himselfe I say in his owne body hath paid that price and taken away the condemnation due to the sinne that we haue committed Hee hath done it vpon the trée by his death and passion purchasing thereby eternall redemption What can the Apostle say more plainely to teach vs that the satisfaction for al our sinnes is alreadie perfected so in and by Christ that our owne workes can be nothing auayleable to satisfie for them or that there is not to that vse any neede of them What then Séeing he beareth our sinnes shall we lay loade vpon him and by our sinne and vngodly life doe what wee can to make his burthen heauier No no he hath done all this that wee who by this benefite of Christ are dead to sinne should liue to righteousnesse For if GOD bee our God wee must be his people If hee bee our louing Father hee looketh that wee shoulde be his obedient children If he bee our gratious Lorde and Master we must not be vngracious but duetifull seruantes For as God doth couenant with vs to bee our God so do we also by vowe and promise binde our selues vnto him to bée his seruantes And this also doth the Apostle Saint Peter teache vs who in the first Chapter hath plentifully set forth Gods greate merrie towardes vs euen in this question of our free iustification as also in this place he hath done and yet wil not in any wise that any Christian duties should of vs be vnperformed but exhorteth vs to bee occupied in them as we may see Chap. 4. 1. 2. 3. 4. and to accompt them as a debt that we owe vnto God and must pay him For we are Gods workmanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath before ordained that we should walke in them Saint Marke reporteth vnto vs that our Sauiour Christ preachd often forgiuenes of sinnes as in his third and fourth Chapters it may appeare which forgiuenes of sin doth quite ouerthrow that inherent righteousnes and iustification by worke that the papistes striue to establish And yet the same S. Marke doth register and record among many other godly exhortations that our Sauiour Christ made to his disciples this necessary caueat Take heed watch and pray for you know not when the time is By all which this doth appeare that sanctification and holines must followe iustification and forgiuenes of sinne for we are washed that we should not againe defile our selues with the filth of sin and that Gods loue doth more effectually tie vs to obey him and to indeuour our selues to doe his will And looke howe much the more we are instructed and assuredly perswaded of the free loue of God so much the more will our inner man be inflamed with loue to him againe I say euen with such loue as will thrust vs forwardes to walke in good workes And this is notably proued by our Sauiour Christ who gathereth that the sinfull woman in S. Luke felt That many sinnes were forgiuen her because she loued so much And thus we sée that the auncient Roman faith was this that such as haue receiued and felt Gods free grace in forgiuing their iniquities as in trueth they are so in duety they must be alwaies ready to serue him So that I may boldly say with S. August It can hardly bée that he that beléeueth well should liue euil But our popish spiders out of this sweete flower doe gather their poyson They burtheÌ„ this doctrine which in expresse words is taught by S. Paul and the effects of it by S. Peter also that we are iustified by faith without the workes of the Law with this slaunder that it is a doctrine of liberty and occasion of licentious life a hinderance to good workes And thus this doctrine which they cannot confute with reason they couer with shame and reproches And that which they cannot with all their learning proue false by this shameles shift they seeke to make odious Far otherwise did the ancient fathers both speak write Iustinus Martyr lerned of the Apostle S. Peter to say that faith profiâ—eth our hearts Ciprian saith to cease from sin that beginneth of faith Tertulian affirmeth that faith sheweth vs the way whither to licentious life No but by which we must come to God Basil ascribeth vnto it great force to allure draw and perswade the mind because as in another place he telleth vs it strengheneth the powers of the same it obtayneth getteth indeuour in vs and Gods helpe which both are necessary in al our works Epiphanius writeth that it preserueth euery faithful man he meaneth from euil no doubt And Theophilact telleth vs that faith in Christ is truely a holy and perfect worke and doth sanctifie or make holy him that hath it And on the other side that such as lead an vncleane life are not truely faithfull who professe that they know God but in workes they deny him By all which it is plaine to see that these holy fathers did thinke that faith doth both quench all the firie dartes of the wicked and nourish or maintaine within vs the good motions of the spirit and so is as it were the fountaine from whence doth spring whatsoeuer good work we can performe But the papistes would beare the worde in hande that the more
take any thing therfrom But that they may seem to be full fraught with good workes they esteeme euerie thing wherein they tye themselues to any strait rule although with neglect manie times of sundrie Christians dueties or bestow their goodes for the most part verie superstitiously or make any shewe of Religion glorious in the eyes of the world this I say and such like deuises they accompt for good workes And what should I speake of the end where vnto they haue especiall regard in doing of these good workes Let the practise of the Church of Rome at this daie wheresoeuer her deceites are not yet knowen or her blasphemies abhorred let their owne consciences I say testifie heerein what they think what their Priests do teach them Do they not inioine them penance to satisfie for their sinnes do they not teach therby to merite eternall life Yea what do the most deuout of them all their life long but toyle themselues to kindle to themselues a fire in the sparkes whereof they also walk for a time who yet shall in the end lie downe in sorrow That is they seek by their owne workes to make for themselues peace with God and procure an attonement with him But when God shall ryse vp and lay open to their owne consciences their foolish waies that they haue found out then shall their owne wickednes correct them and their turnings back reproue them Yea their plague shall be the fruit of their owne imaginations because they haue not taken heed saith the Lord vnto my words nor to my Law but cast it off And because they are not persuaded that euer they can be so sure of heauen now when they are once brought to think that by worke they must get it they buy Masses and trentals both quick and dead they build places wherein they may alvaies be prayed for that by that work they may be holpen to Heauen They hire Pristes and Friers to sing and say for them They spare no cost they refuse no trauell They impouerish themselues and their posteritie to purchase if by any meanes they may pardon for their offences according to that good Fryer-like and Catholike verse Vestris nostra damus pro nostris vestra rogaâ—us Part of our prayers your friends shall haue Your goods for recompence we craue But in the mean time while Christians are so busied as themselues imagine to saue their soules by workes where is there any time or space to think of Gods glorie or of our owne dutie and performing of our humble obedience We see then how the Romish Catholikes doe all that they doe not in respect of dutie but for reward not for loue but for payment And therfore with them no wages no work no pennie no pater noster Whereas on the contrarie we are so far from denying that it is necessarie for Christians to do good workes that we rather affirme that they are not a good tree that in due season will not bring forth good workes But these our workes must be directed to Gods glory and must proceede from an earnest loue that we haue to be occupied in doing of his will and keeping of his commaundementes In so much as though there were no promise of reward no hope of recompence yet because God hath shewed his mercy That we being deliuered out of the handes of our enemies might serue him without feare in holines and righteousnes all the daies of our life and hath commaunded vs to doe good workes wee will therefore earnestly indeuour to doe them CHAP. IX NOw séeing our works must be such as I haue in the former Chapter declared that first it selfe must be commaunded of God then it must spring from a fountaine by faith santefied that it may be done sincerely Lastly it must be done to such end onely as shall tend to Gods glory and the discharge eyther of our generall duetie of Christianity or the performing of our particular callings seing I say that if in any of all these thinges there be imperfection the worke cannot be called good it is very necessary to examine whether such workes as we doe may haue in them any such perfection that they may in déede bee perfectly good and in all thinges agréeable to the rule before set downe For if it be not perfect it cannot merit And if it might be that we could doe some perfect workes yet considering the multitude of our sinnes we were worse then mad if we would imagine that a few good workes could make satisfaction vnto God for our infinite transgressions But to put this matter out of doubte it is most certaine that there cannot be perfection in any thing that wee can doe so long as we haue this sinnefull bodie For although we may attaine to the first of these three poyntes and may indeuour and earnestly labour to walke in those good workes Which GOD hath ordayned before that we shoulde walke in them Yet in the other two properties of a good woorks if wee bee not partiall in our owne iudgement and blinde in our owne wayes we must confesse our selues to be far short of that which God requireth of vs. And therfore S. Paule describeth the true happinesse of a Christian to consist not in the perfection of our owne workes or that nowe being stirred vppe and holpen by Gods grace wee are able to fulfill the Lawe or doe such thinges as shall be founde righteous and perfect in Gods sight but in the forgiuenesse of our iniquities the couering of our sinnes the not imputing vnto vs our transgressions For out of the Prophet Dauid hee telleth vs that such are blessed men Yea our Sauiour Christ him selfe when hee will haue vs to looke vnto our true happinesse if wee will beleeue him that was say they S. Peters scholler speaketh of forgiuenesse of sinnes And on the other side when he will threaten wrath hee saith sins shall not be forgiuen But perchaunce they will tell vs that in our first iustification we must haue this forgiuenesse of sinnes but afterwardes once being freed by grace we can our selues auoyde the deceites of sinne and doe such thinges as God must accompt meritorious and therefore perfect But Saint Paule a man no doubt regenerate and as perfect a man I suppose all will confesse as euer was since did finde and feele that there was a Lawe in his members rebelling against the Lawe of his minde and leading him captiue to the Lawe of sinne that was in his members yea and that he felt this not onely when hee was carelesse of his saluation or neglected his wayes but euen when hee indeuoured to serue GOD and woulde faine haue done good Euen when hee had delight in the Lawe of GOD concerning the inwarde man Which doth sufficientlie proue vnto vs that the fountaine of our hearte is so troubled with these fowle affections that it is impossible that any cleareâ— water should come
regard to workes eyther before or after and that which the Pelagians did then and the papistes now doe teach he calleth a new presumption But because they like worse then to be thoughte new although in all thinges they are new fangled let vs see what it is that they would haue vs beléeue No doubt the Church of Rome doth as much as they can indeuour to obscure and darken this doctrine that the glory of merits may shine the brighter And therefore euen Master Bellarmine who in as plaine wordes as he can deuise hath before taught that this election is free without any respect to workes yet after as he now repented him of that he had said writeth That by predestination the elect get no right or clayme to blessednes neyther is it due to them but after that by well deseruing they haue gotten the same Can white and blacke be more contrarie then these two sayings are one of them to the other So that whilst he seeketh to establish the opinion of merites he doth not onely gainfay the trueth but euen himselfe also Let vs marke the similitude whereby he will illustrate his meaning A king saith he promiseth a price to the best runner to whome God reuealeth that if they runne vpon horses such a one shall winne in wagons such a one on foote such a one by ship such a one Then he appoynteth them to runne with wagons which he also causeth to be prepared for them Althogh Master Bellarmine may seeme to be runne farre from the trueth when by such fond fictions he would make falshoode carie a shew of sound doctrine yet we may see his meaning is that as the kinge proposeth the price to the best runner and then appoynteth such a kinde of running as he knoweth he shall excell in whom he would haue to winne so God electeth vnto happines such as he would because he knew before that they should merit the same Is this free election Is there in this no regard to workes I suppose it is in our Romish Master verified that is spoken of the Idol makers That they who make the Idols are like vnto 〈◊〉 them Of Idolaters they are become Idols them selues that haue eyes and see not eares and heare not yea wit and vnderstand not but say and vnsay almost with one breath But when they haue done what they can that auncient fayth shall be founde not onely true but also directly against their doctrine If election bee by grace then not of workes if by workes then not by grace And because it seemeth they are not yet resolued whether they shoulde mayntaine the auncient fayth of Rome which sometime they commende or this newe opinion which they had rather follow it were best they woulde settle them selues to stande to the one or the other for they cannot make both agree together Neyther are they content vpon this olde garment to set a newe patch but also as much as they dare they disgrace this auncient fayth and olde religion when they call it a vaine presumption and rash to assure our selues of our election But first that our election is certaine I hope they dare not deny because the free giftes and calling of God are without repentance The question then is whether wee can be assured that we are chosen woulde he that taught vs to call him father haue vs to doubt whether we be his children Or if the spirite it selfe beare witnesse to our spirite that we are the sonnes of GOD shall these newe vpstart Catholickes tell vs that so to doe is rash presumption And why is it called the spirite of Adoption but because it teacheth vs nay it assureth vs our election Or howe can wee attayne to that reioycing in tribulation which Saint Paule and Saint Peter also commend in the godly but because we are sure that howsoeuer God seemeth to handle vs yet he still loueth vs and therfore his chasticements are not bitter to vs because the loue of God is spred abroade in our heartes Let therefore these desperate doctours dececiue such as are deuoted to them let vs reioyce in this assurance of faith that our names are written in the booke of life CHAP. XIII THe Apostle hauing hitherto continued in doctrine especially in teaching vs that we are freely iustifyed in Christ by fayth without works and that this iustification is common both to Iewes and Gentiles He commeth to exhortations mouing vs to offer vp our selues vnto God in sacrifice Giue vp your bodies a quicke sacrafice holy and acceptable to God And that we may be the better instructed in offering our selues aright or as we ought to doe the telleth vs first that we must not Be fashioned like vnto this worlde to follow the corruptions thereof Secondly we must be Renued in the spirit of our minde that hauing our vnderstanding lightened we may proue what is that will of God good acceptable and perfect not following too earnestly our owne affections but submitting our selues and our willes to Gods good will And thus must we sacrifice vp our selues to God Much like is that that S. Peter also writeth of Our spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God through Iesus Christ Nowe none can offer a sacrifice but such as are priestes but all men must offer these sacrifices for the Apostles both of them write not onely to such as were in the ministerie among them but euen to the lay people mouing then to offer these offerings therefore all men are priestes Yea S. Peter in playne words affirmeth that we are A royall priesthoode or as it is in Exodus from whence he borroweth those wordes A kingdom of priestes For there al must be kings and al must be pristes Neither can we reade that there is instituted in the newe testament any other kinde of Sacrifising priestes then these And wee must also marke what our sacrifice is that is heere mentioned The sacrifice not of Christes bodie but of our owne bodies the sacrifising and sanctifing of our selues Now if the Apostles had knowen of any sacricire of the Masse was there not now good occasion to haue mentioned it Yea if it had béene in so greate accompt as the papistes hold it to be how coulde these two Apostles without great impietie haue buried in silence or passed ouer without mentioning so necessarie a seruice of God But then there was no such thing and therefore it is not spoken of by them who can best tell vs what the olde Roman saith was It hath beene long after that time raked out of the verie channell and sinke of superstitions and is so contrarie to that they taught that if this sacrifice of the Masse had beene but once mentioned in their time they would in expresse wordes haue made the verie name of it odious among Gods people Well of this exhortation we learne because we are both the sacrifice and sacrificer the offering and the