if it were the whole and Iustification reconciliation c. to be comprehended in it as the parts thereof or to follow vpon it as inseperable accidents and infallible consequences thereof or to bee nothing except the way of Adoption Which opinion seemeth most to agree with the Scriptures The special ground wherby the first of these opinions is maintayned is besides other places of Scripture that saying which is in Iohn chap. 1. vers 12. which is as manie as receiued him to them he gaue prerogative to bee the sonnes of God that is to those that beleeved in his name Vpon which place they who defend the former opinion seeme chieflie to rely as though it did import Iustification necessarilie to goe before Adoption because that Christ giveth prerogative to be the sonnes of God to none except such as first have received him and have beleeved in his name But before I either speake of these opinions or yet of this place of Iohn it shall bee first expedient for the better satisfaction of all mindes to lay some groundes vpon the knowledge whereof the light of this point dependeth much in my iudgement Besides other grounds there be five of greatest consequence and most expedient to be knowne for clearing our iudgement in the knowledge of the order of Adoption and Iustification The first is the order of subsisting in the blessed and eternall Trinitie The second is the distinct consideration of the order of Gods gracious love in the three severall obiects in the which it is to be considered The third is the order of our sense and perception of the blessings of God in our selves The fourth is the difference of extent and largenes of one benefite in respect of another amongst themselves by mutuall reference of one to another The fist and last is the consideration of the covenant of grace which God hath made with man in Christ CHAPTER X. THE first ground is most necessarie to be knowne not only to the end that we may know God in him selfe aright but also that we may know his gracious working towards vs aright Wherein by the speciall consideration of the Trinitie three things are to be marked First That every worke of grace is the worke of all three Secondly That the order of their working is according to the order of their subsisting so that in every worke the Father is first the Sonne second the holy Ghost third in order of working Thirdly That in respect of these two former groundes these workes of grace which according to the maner and order of subsisting are most properly attributed to every person according as their maner of working doth chieflie shine and appeare in every worke are to be ordered according to the order of the persons them selves So that the actions attributed to God the Father are in order first the actions attributed to the sonne in order seconde and the actions attributed to the holy Ghost in order third And this consideration of the order of Gods working is no more to be altered then the nature of God it selfe in whom the vnitie of essence is no more essentiall then the Trinitie of persons These three pointes are cleare in the scriptures of God The first when one and the selfe same worke is sometimes attributed to the Father sometimes to the Sonne and sometimes to the holy Ghost to teach vs that not onely these three persons are but one God in nature but further that what thinges the one doth the other doth also according as Christ sayeth My Father worketh vnto this time and I also worke Iohn chap. 5. ver 17. And againe VVhatsoever things the Father doeth the same things doth the Sonne likewise Ihon chap. 5. vers 19. The second of these pointes is likewise manifest in the scripture when in one and the same worke The Father is made in order of working first the Sonne second and the holy Ghost third according to the saying of Christ The Sonne can doe nothing of him selfe except he see the Father working Iohn chap. 5. ver 19. And againe I doe nothing of my self as I heare I iudge Ioh. cha 5. ver 30. And againe The thinges that I speake I speake them so as the Father said vnto me Iohn chap. 12. ver 53. And againe The Spirit he shall not speake of him selfe but whatsoever he shall heare he shall speake He shall glorifie me for he shall receyve of myne and shew it vnto you Iohn chapt 16. verses 13. and 14. By which speeches it is manifest that as the Father subsisteth in order first and so in order possesseth life before the Sonne and the Sonne before the holy Ghost even so in operation of life and all good grace in vs the Father in order worketh before the Sonne and the Sonne before the Holy Ghost According to which order we are taught in the scriptures to worship God praying and giving thankes to the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost according to the order of our accesse vnto God which is vnto the Father through the Sonne by the Spirit Ephe. chap. 2. vers 18. Drawing neare vnto God in our ascending vp to him according to the order of his drawing neare vnto vs. that is we ascende by God in God vnto God who of him selfe and in him selfe and by him selfe worketh all grace in vs. of him selfe as the Father in him selfe as the Sonne and by him selfe as the holy Ghost For no man hath any grace either of him selfe but of God alone and that as he is the Father either in him selfe but in God alone and that as he is the Sonne either by him selfe but by God alone that as he is the Holy Ghost The third point is likewise manifest in scripture When as the worke of creation and of the first beeing and existing of all thinges be it either naturall or spirituall is attributed vnto the first person of whom are all things and the worke of dispensation and redemption is attributed to the seconde person in whom onely we enioye all grace And the worke of consummation and sanctification is attributed to the holy Ghost For according to the distinction that is inward arysing from the inward properties whereby these persons are distinguished there is also a distinction outward in the workes of outwarde dispensation according to the terme in which is the beginning of acting Neither is this only to be considered in the actions of outward dispensation towardes vs but in the actions that are inward in God himselfe according to which ground Christ acknowledgeth that the Father hath given him to have life in himselfe Iohn chap. 6. vers 26. For albeit all operation of blessings in vs proceede from the nature and essence of God as the common beginning and terme in all three yet notwithstāding thy are restrayned in respect of order to one beginning that is to one of those three persons according as in every worke the manner of every persons working either of in
For there is a great difference betwixt these workes of the Father to witt the bringing of vs to the Sonne or giving of vs vnto him or making vs to receyve him which are all one and the same thing and the Fathers iustifying of vs in the sonne whom now we have receyved The first is the proper worke of God calling vs The other is the worke of God after our calling Which evidētly appeares by the speech of Christ him selfe Math. cha 11. ver 28. where first he invites vs to come vnto him and then promiseth to such as doe come that he will give them rest vnto their soules for God iustifieth none who have not first receyved the sonne For who cā be made the righteousnes of God in Christ who is not first ingrafted in him Now the first worke of faith standeth in our receyving Christ and making him to dwell in our heartes in and through whom now receyved and possest by faith the Lord doth thereafter iustifie and glorifie vs. so to make a Man to be iust before he be a sonne is as much as to make an accident or qualitie to be before or without a subiect or to make a Man wise before he be a Man and this ground the Apostle cleers by his owne speech when he coūted all but dongue that he might gaine Christ and be found in him to this end that he might not haue his owne righteousnes but the righteousnes which is by the faith of Christ Phil chap. 3. thereby playnelie he sheweth vs that we must first gayne Christ and be found in him by faith before we can haue the righteousnes that is by the faith of Christ so that to receyve Christ and to be iustified in Christ are in no sorte to be confounded although they cannot be separated For this is the principall cause why Iustification and all remanent blessings are attributed vnto faith because by faith onely we are made one with Christ and ioyned vnto him who onely is the substance of all our blessings as being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1. Corint ahap 1. vers 30 Vpon which vnion with Christ followeth our cōmunion with him both in death and life For being once in him we can not but be pertakers of all blessings in him And of this worke of the Father it is that the Evangelist speaketh in this place which is the first worke of his gracious dispensatiō when as he maketh vs to beleeve in his onely sonne as is manifest by the Evangelistes owne words interpreting the first phrase that is Those that receyved him by these wordes that is Those that beleeue in his Name The second argument lieth in the third phrase of this description which is Those that are borne of God By which wordes both the two former phrases that is those that receyved him those that beleeved in his Name are interpreted thereby teaching vs that this worke is not the worke of Iustification but of Adoption and of our receiving of Christ himselfe by faith that in vnitie with him we may be the Sonnes of God and not our receiving of his obedience by faith vnto righteousnes For by beeing borne of God we are made the Sonnes of God Which birth especially is performed by the Father when by his Spirit he brings vs vnto the Sōne makes vs to receive him by faith in our hearts so making vs one with him By which Vnitie alone it is that we are made the Sonnes of God For as the Vnitie of Christs humane nature in subsisting and personalitie with his divine nature maketh that Iesus Christ the Man is the Sonne of God so our spirituall Vnitie by faith with Iesus Christ the Sonne of God makes vs also to be the Sonnes of God Thus it is plaine by the third phrase that the former two are not rightly taken when they are expounded of those that are iustified If any man would expound this birth not of our effectuall Adoption it selfe but of the preparation of vs therevnto as some most learned and reverent Divines doe Yet never can it make the former opinion true for our beeing borne of God in the Scripturs can never be showen to be meant of our Iustification And if they take it for our Regeneration or Sanctification to the obedience of God then it will follow that wrongly they make Adoption to be a part of Reconciliation If sanctification which is no part of Reconciliation must goe before For they them selues acknowledge that Reconciliation hath but two parts Iustification and Adoption Besides this distinction of Adoption wil hardlie be warranted by the 9. of the Romanes except men will make the Apostle playnely to contradict himselfe who restrayneth the Adoptiō which he ascribes to the Iewes onely to the seed of Abrahā according to the promise and not according to the flesh Because otherwise the trueth of God in his promise would have failed Which consideration likewise appeareth evidently to destroy that distinction of Adoption albeit first devised by one of the auncient Fathers whereby one Adoption is made Adoption but by figure and resemblance the other in substance and effect But it seemeth that the ground of this opinion in some though not in all is buylded vpon this that they esteeme our Righteousnes to consist in the very act of beleeving which may be more iustly said of our Adoption albeit in a circumspect meaning CHAPTER XVI TOVCHING the benefite it selfe which Christ bestowes vpon those that receyve him although we should grant it to be the same in sense which they expound it to be yet it will never inferre that in this place To receyve Christ and beleeve in his name is to be vnderstood of Iustification but according as some of themselves say of the worke of God in making vs to beleeve Of the which followeth the dignitie and prerogative of being sonnes as the first and immediate fruite of faith in Iesus Christ In which sense we denie not but this place may be commodiously interpreted although it seemeth that the spirite of God doth meane somewhat more For vnderstanding whereof we are first to consider the third point which we have said to be the ground of the mistaking of this place which stands in the not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers worke and the Sonnes in our Adoption although in the same place they bee cleerely distinguished by the Evangelist Which oversight maketh great confusion in knowledge For we are to vnderstand that although the three persons of the Trinitie be neither in subsisting nor working to bee separated yet in both they are still to be distinguished and never to be confounded if ever we thinke to have a cleere and vnconfused sight of these great workes of grace which they performe in vs. Now in this place the worke of the Father and the worke of the Sōne in our Adoption are cleerely and distinctly set down Like as in other parts the worke of the spirit
when he sayeth that Christ did give prerogative to bee the sonnes of God only to those who were borne of God plainelie distinguishinge the Fathers worke in begetting vs to be his sonnes from the worke of the sonne in giving vs the prerogative to bee sonnes which verifieth that to be a sonne by birth and to be a sonne by prerogative are not to be taken in one sense nor for one benefite but for two distinct actions of the first two persons of the Trinitie Which the same Apostle Iohn seemeth playnly to confirme 1. Epist chap. 3. vers 1. 2. When he ascribeth the benefite of being called the sonnes of God vnto the love of the Father and the benefite of the beeing that which the sonnes of God are in prerogative and dignitie vnto the Sonne by whose appearing vnto vs wee are made that which the sonnes of God should bee And therefore in this life according as hee hath appeared vnto vs by the Fathers worke in our calling bringing vs vnto him illuminating our vnderstandinge with the knowledge of him and by faith making vs one withhim so have wee receyved the prerogative to be the sonnes of God in righteousnes and holines with freedome and boldnesse to call his Father our Father but because as yet he is not manifested vnto vs in all the prerogatives of the sonnes of God therefore although wee bee now both sonnes by Adoption and likewise in some measure by prerogative and dignitie yet it is not fully manifested what wee shall be but when he shall appeare in glory then shall wee appeare like him in all things In which likenes either in parte or in whole accomplished in vs standeth the prerogative of the sonnes of God For cleering of which point wee are to observe that saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. chap 1. vers 30. For of him you are in Christ Jesus who is made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption In these wordes two distinct actions are attributed vnto the Father which must needes preceed in order that action of the Sonne whereby he gives vs prerogative to be the sonnes of God The first action of the Father is the making of Christ vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption which are indeed the prerogatives of the sonnes of God The second action of the Father is the making vs to bee in Christ to the end that we may bee pertakers of these blessings which Christ is made of the Father vnto vs. Which action of making vs to be in Christ cannot be distinguished from making of vs sonnes and Adopting of vs. Vpon which two workes of the Father followeth the action of the Sonne who when we are by the Father in him hee maketh vs pertakers of all his own prerogatives dignities glory And after this worke of the Sonne followeth the action of the holy Ghost sealing vp in our hearts both our Adoption or son-ship and the prerogatives belonging to the sonnes of God Of this distinct consideration of the distinct working of the Father Sonne and the Holy Ghost it may easilie appeare that the worke of the Sonne is mistaken in this place when it is interpreted to be Adoption or making of vs sonnes simplie wheras it is to bee vnderstood of a benefite succeeding our beeing sonnes by Adoption which is already accomplished when we are begotten and borne of God the Father after which it is the Sonnes parte to make vs in condition and estate the sonnes of God by communicating with vs the prerogative and dignitie and authoritie which is proper to the sonnes of God Thus fare have we thought good to speake touching the order of the benefits of God in which point we have more largely insisted because it is the speciall ground wherevpon ryseth not only the oversight of good men but also divers heresies of wicked men in this age And we have further labored to cleere that place of Iohn which most misleades men in this matter that thereby it may be manifest that by the Scriptures rightly vnderstood Adoption goeth in order before Iustification CHAPTER XVIII HAVING finished the three first grounds serving to cleere the nature and order of the saving benefites of God Now it rests that wee speake of the last which is touching the speciall distinction and difference of those benefites amongst themselves In which point leaving all other opinions we wil follow that which hath the greatest warrand and cleerest evidence in the truth of God which only in all such thinges wee are to follow as our guide and informer But before we beginne this point there are three things needfull to be considered of vs. The first is the diverse manners wherein the spirit speaketh of them in the Scriptures The second is what things they have common in which they all agree and have no difference The third is the vse that we are to make for our instruction of the preceeding point In these three things wee will be shorter perhaps then their nature requyreth setting them downe in short propositions Touching the first we are to marke that in the Scripture those benefites are set downe two manner of wayes that is either confusedly or then distinctlie The confused manner of speech is likewise two fold First when as in respect of the inseparable coniunction of these blessings and presence infallible of all the rest where one is beeing all lincked together and every one imperting and impleying all the rest the Scripture putteth one for all The second manner is when some one benefite is putt for another and these two sortes of speeches are playne by these places Rom. chap. 8. vers 23. 2 Cor. chap. 5. vers 19. Eph. chap. 1. vers 7. Col. chap. 1. vers 14. Rom. chap. 5 vers 9. 10. 11. c. The distinct manner of speech is when these benefites are both in name and signification specially distinguished one from another as namely Rom. chap. 8. vers 30. 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 30. This we thought good first to marke because there is great probabilitie that in not consideration of the spirites different manner of speaking is the speciall ground and cause of many mens mistaking of the speciall difference and true order of these saving benefites of God As speciallie when Iustification and Adoption are made partes of reconsiliation which beeing properly taken doeth in order according to the Scriptures succeed to them both As also when one benefite is defined by the propertie of another which error many doe fall in Wee are therefore to take heed that wee put a speciall difference betwixt one and the same benefite according as it is vsed by the spirit of God in proper or improper manner of speech when either it is put in the owne proper signification or when it is put particularly for another benefite then it selfe or generally for all Touching the second point there be six special things wherein all the saving benefites of God agree The first is in their originall or
or by doth most cleerely shine And as they are thus restrayned so also they are in order to bee considered So that whatsoever workes of grace are chieflie attributed to the Father must needes in order of dispensation bee first And what workes are chieflie attributed to the Sonne must needes in order bee second And the workes chieflie attributed to the H. Ghost must needes in order bee third Of this it will follow that adoption being chiefly the action of God the Father for none save he who beares the person of a Father can properly bee said to adopt any to be Sonnes for the Father and the Sonne are relative must in order goe before our redemption which is chiefly the action of the Sonne for he only dyed to redeeme vs and he only bought vs by his blood vnto God Revel chap. 5. vers 9. And seeing our Iustice or righteousnes consisteth in the action of our redemption for as sayeth the Apostle Rom. chapter 3. vers 24. we are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption which is in Christ Iesus Therefore it must follow that iustification in order of dispensation must follow adoption For albeit all blessings be bestowed vpon vs of the Father in the Sonne in whom alone wee are adopted iustified and glorified c. Yet still the former respect of order must perpetually be kept For which cause it is that in the Scriptures the Decree of God or his predestination is defined from the benefite of adoption as the first and chiefest of all blessings and the first fruite of the love of God in the first Person that is the Father vnto Mankinde And for this same cause is it that in the Scriptures wee are said first to bee the Fathers and to bee given by him vnto the Sonne for as the Sonne hath nothing of himselfe but of the Father so he hath not vs of himselfe but of the Father Therefore sayeth he Thyne they were and thou gavest them vnto me Iohn chap. 17. vers 6. And againe Behold I and the Children whom God hath given mee Esay chap. 8. vers 18. and Hebr. chap. 2. vers 13. Thirdly it is for the same respect that in the Scriptures the first of all the workes of grace in vs which is the bringing of vs vnto Christ is still attributed vnto the Father as his speciall worke For no man commeth vnto the Sonne but by the Father Iohn chapter 6. verse 65. Neither can any man come to mee sayeth Christ except the Father which hath sent mee drawe him Iohn chapter 6. vers 44. Vpon which worke dependeth two other principall workes of grace The first is our embracing and receyving of the Sonne according to the saying of Christ All that the Father giveth mee shall come vnto mee Iohn chapter 6. vers 37. The second is the infalliblenes of Christ his saving of vs. according to his owne saying This is the Fathers will that hath sent mee that of all which hee hath given mee I should loose nothing but should rayse it vp againe at the last daye Iohn chapter 6. vers 39. For whatsoever we have of Christ whether it be righteousnes sanctification or life c. it wholy dependeth vpon this worke of the Father his giving and bringing vs vnto him For as the Sonne hath vs not of himselfe but of the Father so he dispenseth nothing to vs of himselfe neither is hee redeemer to vs of himselfe but according to the will of the Father For according to the order of the persons so becomes God our God in order And therfore according to that order are we baptized in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost God sealing vs vnto himselfe and his blessings vnto vs according to the order that he is our God and in which he dispenseth his blessings vnto vs. Thus by this first ground it is manifest that the benefite of sonne-shipp which is the proper worke of God as he is the Father must in order be first of all and next the benefite of freedome and christian libertie by redemption and so consequentlie of righteousnes must be second in order seeing it is the work of the Sonne For If the Sonne make vs free we shal be free in deed saith Christ Iohn chap. 8. ver 36. and that the worke of sanctification or glorification in the which it comprehended sanctification must be third in order of dispensation seeing it is the worke of the Holy Ghost And this order the Apostle plainly confirmeth in setting downe the order of Gods working in the execution and accomplishing of his Decree Rom. chap. 8. verse 30. saying VVhom he predestinated them also he hath called and whom hee hath called them also he hath iustified and whem he hath iustified them hee hath also glorified The whole execution of Gods Decree beeing comprised in these three workes our calling our iustification and glorification according to the number of the persons and order of their working For as we haue marked two speciall blessings in Gods Decree or Predestination are ordayned vnto vs. The first and principall is our adoption or making vs sonnes through Christ according as is manifest by the definition of predestination set downe by the Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. verse 5. The second which is included and implyed in the first is The making vs now being sonnes to be like to the Image of the Sonne of God as is cleere by the definition of predestination set downe by the Apostle Rom. chapter 8. vers 29. Both these blessings are accomplished in the execution of this Decree The first blessing which is adoption is chieflie performed in our calling when as we are brought by the Father to the Sonne and are given vnto him and haue it given vnto vs to come vnto him that is to beleeve in him or to receyve him which are all one in effect The second blessing which is the making of vs like to the image of the Sōne of God is performed in the other two points that is in our iustification and glorification For the Image of God consisteth in righteousnes and holines of truth which begunne in this life is the beginning of our glorie wherein wee shall be perfited in the life to come CHAPTER XI THE second ground followeth which consisteth in the beholding of Gods saving grace in the several obiects wherin it is to be considered which are three The first is God himselfe in whom our life is hid Colloss chap. 3. vers 3. Who is the Father of lightes from whom every good giving and perfect gift commeth downe to vs. lames cha 1. vers 17. For our grouth in blessednes is nothing els but A filling of vs with a greater fulnes of God Eph. chap. 3. vers 19. Vntill at last he be all in all 1. Corinth chap. 15 vers 28. The second obiect is Christ God and Man as Mediator betwixt God and vs in whom it pleased the Father that all fulnes should dwell Coll. chap.
flesh and bones of his bones in that he did give himselfe to death for them to this end that hee might iustifie them For as the bonde of Mariage doth oblige the husband to a particular and speciall love to his wife wherein he is obliged to none other even so the Lord Iesus did submitt himselfe vnto the Fathers will to lay downe his life for none but such as were given him of the Father and made members of his body and his spirituall spouse And if any will obiect that this place of the Apostle is to be vnderstood of the order of Christ his doing according to the eternall purpose and Decree of God and not according to the Dispensation of God towards vs in tyme. It is easie to be answered that the order of God in both is one and the same For as the Lord doth particularly predestinate men to Adoption before he give his Sonne to the death for their iustification even so in tyme he doth Adopt vs that is effectuallie call vs bring vs to his Sonne and make vs one with him before he iustifie vs. Moreover this shall yet be more manifest if we shall marke this one distinction of the fruites of faith to wit if we can discerne betwixt the immediate fruite of faith and the mediate fruites The mediate fruite we call that which is wrought by God in vs even by the very working of faith in our heartes together and at once and that is our verie vnion and coniunction with Christ For by faith Christ dwelleth in our heartes and this is the worke whereby we are made the sonnes of God For as sayeth the Apostle If we be Christes we are the seed Gal. chapt 3. vers 29. The mediate fruites of faith I call those which by vertue of this vnion as the necessarie forerunning meane faith produceth in vs such as is our iustification sanctification c. so that in a manner we can distinguish betwixt these benefites and our faith but more hardly betwixt our faith and Adoption seeing our abyding in Christ and Christes abyding in vs is all one thing with our beleeving in Christ That saying therefore of these learned Divines that GOD cannot acknowledge vs his sonnes before he iustifie vs is not simplie and absolutelie to be vnderstood but by comparison relation that is because God powreth in our heartes after our iustification a more lively sense of his love and a cleerer sight of our Adoption then we receyved in our calling And this maner of speach the spirit of God vseth familiarly in the scriptures which is comparatively to be vnderstood as Iohn chap. 7. vers 39. For the holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified Which is not to be vnderstood as though the holy Ghost had not bene at all but only that he was not in that measure that he was therafter to be given Likewise in that of Iohn ch 16. Christ sayeth touching his Disciples hetherto have ye asked nothing in my name which were great prophanes in vs to vnderstand simply of those holy men of God who knew Christ to be the Christ Sonne of the living God and who were directed in their prayers by the spirit of God who inditeth none but in the name of Christ albeit more darkely and obscurely manifested in our hartes then after the comming of the holy Ghost in greater measure Even so it may bee iustly saide of our Adoption that God doeth not acknowledge vs his sonnes before hee iustifieth vs because that which in small measure and darkely was manifested to vs in our calling is more fully and clearely revealed in our Iustification because then the spirit of Adoption is more aboundantly shed abroad in our heartes for the sealing of our Adoption For as we haue saide before although our Adoption be begunne in our Calling before our Iustification yet hath it the clearer manifestation and fuller accomplishment in and through all the rest of the benefites following our Calling For as sayth Iohn in his first Epistle chapter 3. verse 2. VVe are now the sonnes of GOD but yet it is not made manifest what wee shall be Therefore are we who are already called Iustified and Sanctified still saide to wayte yet for our Adoption Rom. chapter 8. verse 23. Not as though we were not already Adopted but because our Adoption is not fully accomplished vntill our bodies bee redeemed and fully glorified So that with as good reason wee may saye that God doth not acknowledge vs to be his sonnes whylest our bodyes are yet vile and corruptible seeing we must Waite for our Adoption vntill our bodyes be redeemed CHAPTER XV. THE second ground wherevpon this opinion is builded is the testimonie of Iohn Which not the lesse in my iudgemēt makes not much for it if it be wel wayed For it would appeare that that place is mistaken by many that especially in three things The first is in mistaking the right sense of that description wherein the propertie of these to whom Christ gives this benefite is set downe The second is the mistaking of the benefit it self givē by Christ The third is the ground of both the former two in not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers part and the Sonnes in that worke of our Adoption Touching the first the description of those persons is set downe three maner of wayes I. Those that receyved him II. Those that did beleeve in his Name III. Those that are borne of God Of these three the first two are interpreted to signifie Iustification of which sense that place well marked doth give no warrant seeing in scripture these phrases may as wel be interpreted of Adoptiō as of Iustificatiō For as by faith in Christ we are iustified so by faith in Christ we are the sonnes of God Gal. 3. 26. and therefore to restrayne beleeving in Christes name receyving of him vnto the benefit of iustificatiō is an oversight which easily may breed mistaking of the true sense not onely of this place but divers other places of scripture so they take it for granted which in it self is questionable Moreover the place it selfe and the very words of this description doe yeelde two sufficient arguments to prove that heere adoption by these phrases is rather designed then iustification The first argument lieth in the first wordes of the description which is Those that receyved him Which phrase is in the scripture still meant of the worke of the Fathers Calling of vs vnto the Sonne and not of his iustifying of vs in him For no man sayeth Christ can come vnto mee except the Father that hath sent me drawe him Iohn chap. 6. ver 34. Now to come vnto Christ to receive Christ are both one as is manifest by Ioh. cha 5. where that wherwith in the 40. verse Christ chargeth the Iewes vnder these words but you will not come vnto me is in the 43. verse interpreted by Christ him selfe in these wordes And you receyved me not
in the same Adoption is distinguished from both The worke of the Father is our Vnion with Christ when he brings vs vnto him and makes vs to receive him by beleeving in his name And this is our comming to the Sonne Which is the proper worke of the Father For none can come vnto the Sonne except the Father drawe him And this is the principall act of our Adoption which most properly is to be called Adoption and as we have said consisteth chiefly in our calling For seeing most properly it is the worke of the Father to adopt certayne it is that our Adoption most properly must consist in the action of the Father For which cause the Fathers worke in making vs to receyve the Sonne that is to beleeve in his name is in this place expounded by way of similitude in a borrowed speech that is to be borne of God For the begetting and working of faith in our hearts is the chiefe and principall part of our spirituall birth beeing the roote ground of all that followeth The worke of the Sonne is next subioyned which stands in giving to those who have receyved him prerogative or as some do render the word dignitie as others authoritie and as others power to bee the Sonnes of God Of all which significations of the word there is none which doth not fitt this place without giving any advantage vnto the Papists in their forged sense of the word power Which benefite proceeding from the Sonne is alwayes to bee distinguished in our Adoption from our Vnion and communion with him by faith which is the worke of the Father vpon which as the cause dependeth the other as the effect for to those whom the Father doth give to the Sonne to be his brethren and in vnitie with him to be the Sonnes of God the sonne doth give the prerogative the dignitie the authoritie and the power belonging to the sonnes of God And this work consisteth in the sonnes bringing vs to the Father For none can come to the Father but by the Sonne for Christ suffred for vs that he might bring vs to God 1. Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. And this is that which is so often spoken of in scriptures by Christ himselfe that to those whom the Father giveth him to those he giveth eternall life and that he giveth the glorie that the Father hath given him vnto those that beleeve in him For whatsoever prerogative dignitie c. the Father hath given vnto the Sonne the same doth the Sonne impart to vs that are his brethren For the prerogatives and priviledges of sonne-ship appertayne onely to Iesus Christ as the onely sonne of God and therefore it belongeth to him alone to communicate those prerogatives to such as the Father doth first by Adoption make his brethren For the prerogative of a sonne is a dignitie depēding not vpon the essence and nature of our Redeemer but vpon his subsisting and personalitie For as the prerogative of a father is proper to the first person so the prerogative of a sonne is proper to the second person and therefore as we doe holde that to adopt is the prerogative of the first person because he onely is the Father so to communicate the prerogatives belonging to those who are adopted to bee children is the prerogative of the second person because he only is the Sonne And therefore is it said if the Sonne make vs free wee shall bee free indeed Iohn chap. 8. ver 36. for freedome is the prerogative of a Sonne and not of a servant And therefore the whole libertie and freedom bee it from ignorance Sathan sinne or death which the saints enioy in Christ is called by the Apostle the libertie of the Sonnes of God in which libertie is comprehended both our wisdome righteousnes sanctification and redemption Which prerogatives when we doe enioy them then may we bouldly esteeme our selves the Sonnes of God And this is that which it seemes the spirit of God doeth meane when he sayeth that Christ doth give vs the prerogative to be the Sonnes of God that is that he bestowes vpon vs such priviledges and blessings or such authoritie and power over all our spirituall enemies as may make vs not only to glorie in God the Father of Christ as our God and our Father but also to carrie our selves in our whole conversation as becommeth the sonnes of God For we do esteeme that to be adopted or made sonnes and to receyve prerogative to be sonnes are two distinct benefites of the two first persons of the Trinitie For a man may bee a Sonne and yet wante the prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a Sonne For as saith the Apostle Gallath chap. 4. vers 1. 2. The heyre while hee is a childe differeth nothing from a seruant though he be Lord of all but is vnder Tutors and Governours vntill the time appointed of the Father Which custome of men the Apostle applyeth to the Church of God to let vs know that it is a thing to be considered in the children of God aswell as in the children of men so the oversight standes in the not distinguishing betwixt the being of a sonne simply which comes by procreation and birth and the being of a sonne in prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a sonne which comes by age and fulnes of time appointed by the Father For every child is a sonne to his Father as soone as he is borne yet longe after he receyveth not the prerogative of a sonne but still is in condition as a servant But when the time appointed for his freedome commeth he who was before a sonne by birth but a servant in condition becōmeth to be a sonne likewise by condition aswell as by birth when as the prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be a sonne in estate is given vnto him And in this sense is this place to be vnderstood if it be rightly taken that is that vnto them who were borne of the Father and so which were sonnes by the Fathers begetting of them Christ the sonne did give prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be sonnes in cōdition and state For as we have said before the benefit of being sonnes simply by begetting or birth or by adoption is the proper worke of the Father but to make vs sonnes in the condition and estate belonging vnto sonnes is the proper worke of the Sonne For we have no boldnes to call the Father our Father nor have wee any accesse vnto him as vnto our Father but through Christ alone Neither have we the libertie of the sonnes of God from sinne either by righteousnes or sanctification nor any part of the glory of the sonnes of God but frō Christ alone in whom doth all fulnes dwell and out of whose fulnes we all receyve and by whom only we come vnto the Father And this distinction of these two works of the Father and of the Sonne shineth cleerly in the wordes of the Evangelist
for vs but as sayth Iohn cha 10. vers 18. He receyved this commandement from the Father to laye downe his life And the Apostle Peter Acts chap. 2. ver 23. sayeth plainly That he was delivered by the determinate counsell and foreknowledge of God And the scriptures doe witnes Hebr. chap. 3. ver 2. Hebr. chap. 5. ver 5. that Christ did not take this office to him selfe to be either King Priest or Prophet of the house of God but that the Father did give it him and as he receyved it from the Father so doeth he performe it not according to his owne will but according to the will of the Father that sent him that is hee layes downe his life for none but such as the Father willeth that is the sheep which the Father giveth him that he should give them eternall life Ioh. chap. 10. 14. 15. 16. compared to Ioh. chap. 17. ver 2. and Esay chap. 8. ver 18. compared with Hebr. chap. 2. ver 13. 14. and 15. 16. 17. neither doth he make intercession for any but for such as the Father had given him but secludeth all who were not given him of the Father from al benefite of his intercession and fruit of his death Ioh. cha 17. ver 9. Thirdly he manifesteth the name of God and giveth the wordes and the glorie which the Father hath given him to no others saving those alone whom the Father had given him In the same chapter 6. vers 22. and 26. Fourthly he giveth eternall life to none but such as the Father hath given him Iohn chapter 6. verses 37. 38. and 39. And Iohn chapter 10. vers 26. 27. 28. 29. And Iohn chapter 17. vers 2. for the worke which he performed on earth the Father did give it him that hee should doe it as he him self witnesseth Iohn chapter 17. and verse 4. Wherefore also in the performing thereof when the bitternes of that cuppe which the Father had given him to drinke maketh him in his agonie to will If it were possible that it might passe from him He rangeth his owne will in order and submitteth him selfe to the will of his Father saying But not my will but thy will be done Mathew chap. 26. vers 39. and 42. Of all which groundes it evidently followeth that what Christ is as Mediatour and what he doeth as Mediatour and to whom he doth any thing by Mediaton and intercession is all by the will and appointement of GOD according to his good pleasure Whose Decree and free election according to his will boundeth and limiteth IESVS Christ the Mediatour in his suffering intercession and whole performance of his office and dispensation of all blessings vnto righteousnes and life as is cleare in the 11. chapt to the Romanes verses 5. and 7. Of all that is spoken touching either the substance or cause of Gods Decree we may easilie perceyve that the whole Decree of God in all the substance of it dependeth vpon nothing but onely vpon the will of God so that he predestinates because it is his will and he predestinates so many and no moe because it is his will And hee predstinates them to adoption because it is his will and he predestinates this adoption to be thorough Iesus Christ because it is his will Whilest men in humble reverence doe not acknowledge this and acquiesce in it as the trueth of this matter they not onely fall in blasphemouse errores against God but involve themselves in the daunger of that curse pronounced by the Prophet Esay chapt 45. vers 10. Woe be to him that striveth with his Maker Woe vnto him that sayeth to his Father what hast thou begotten Or to his Mother What hast thou brought foorth Which surelie they doe which search for a reason of this will of GOD as though the Lord could not be iust in ordayning some vnto adoption and not others vpon his onely will but that some cause there must be in the creatures of this difference of his will what is this else but to buyld the equitie of Gods doeings vpon the creature and not vpon God the Creator him selfe making things iust not because he willeth them but because he willeth them according to that which he findeth in the creature and which in the iudgement of man seemeth to be a iust reason why God should doe so even as though the Potter of one the same lumpe of clay did not freely according to his owne will make one vessel to honor another to dishonor without any respect of any worthines or any reason whatsoever taken frō the clay Surely it is a wretched Divinitie which doth not simply acknow ledge all things iust which God willeth evē because he willeth thē although they not only passe the capacitie but also appeare most cōtrary to humane reason For are not his iudgements vnsearchable his wayes past finding out who thē shal finde out the reason of his counsels and declare the causes of his will We will conclude this point with the saying of Augustin touching these mē lib. pri ca. 2. de Genes cont Manich. They seeke to know the causes of Gods will when as the will of God it selfe is the cause of all things that are for if the will of God have a cause there is something that goes before the will of God which is not lawfull to beleeve The vse we are to make hereof in the doctrine of iustification is great for first heereby wee learne that Gods Decree is not buylded vppon our righteousnes as the cause thereof but by the contrarie that our righteousnes is builded vpon Gods Decree For God doeth not predestinate vs because of our righteousnes but he maketh vs righteous because he hath predestinate vs so that whether our righteousnes consist in Christ and his sufferings or as some doe thinke in workes or as others doe esteeme in faith yet it still holdeth that this righteousnes is never the cause why God predestinateth vs. Secondly wee learne of this point that whatsoever be our righteousnes we must goe aboue our selves aboue our righteousnes to search the cause why it is ours For it is not any thing in vs nor any thing in that that is our righteousnes but the will of God in God himselfe which is the ground of our enioying it Thirdly we learne heereby that whatsoever we seclude from the Meanes of our righteousnes iustification and life yet Christ can never be secluded seeing God Decrees to doe all what he decrees thorough him alone Thus much concerning the Decree of God and the nature thereof CHAPTER VIII NOW followeth the second point which standeth in the knowledge of Christ as he is Mediatour Whereof because divers things have bene already spoken we wil be the shorter The mayne point chieflie to be considered in this head is this that no man is made that vnto the which GOD doth predestinate him in him selfe and through him selfe but in and through another which is IESVS
as is cleere Rom. chap. 5. 1. In which we have to observe that as the Father by Adoption maketh vs one with the sonne so by Iustification hee maketh vs one with him selfe Conforme to the saying of the Apostle 2. Corinth chapt 5. vers 19. For God was in Christ reconciling the worlde vnto him selfe by not imputing to them their sinnes therefore is our peace and reconciliation with GOD attributed vnto the Crosse of Christ by the which sayeth the Apostle hee killeth hatred Ephe. 2. 16. and also our libertie and boldnes to enter into the most holy place is attributed vnto the bloud of IESVS Heb. 10. 19. Secondly by sanctification the Lord makes vs like to his Son by puritie and holines of nature Thirdly by redemption as it is particularly taken for glorification the Lord makes vs like vnto his Sonne in immortalitie glory and power This order and difference of these benifites is cleere 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 30. where wisdome is put in the first place which specially answeres to our calling wherein consisteth our Adoption In the second place righteousnes In the third sanctification and in the fourth place redemption Which place is specially to be marked for the right knowledge both of the order and difference that is amongst is benefites of God For in other places of Scripture Redemption as likewise Iustification and Reconciliation are taken in a larger sense to signifie the whole freedome of the sonnes of God and every parte thereof in particular And that because all libertie peace and reconciliation whatsoever is given vs of God floweth from the death of Christ in the which standeth our righteousnes peace redemption For which cause it is that in the Scriptures sometymes our Iustification is ascribed to the death of Christ sometymes our Sanctification sometymes our Reconciliation and sometimes our Redemption Because howsoever these blessings as they are imparted vnto vs differ both in order and nature yet they proceed all from one fountayne and are all comprehended only in that one oblation of Iesus Christ vpon the Crosse For cleering our iudgements therefore in this point we are carefully to marke these two senses in the which in the Scriptures Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation and Sanctification are taken Sometymes they are taken for the action of God in Christ for his saints when as God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe according to that which hee had purposed in Christ which was as sayeth the Apostle Eph. chap. 1. vers 10. That in the fulnes of tyme he would gather together all things in Christ Iesus as sayth the same Apostle Coll. chap. 1. ver 20. It pleased the Father to reconcile all things to himselfe by him making peace by the blood of his crosse In this sense God at one tyme by the only one oblation of Iesus Christ in one worke once performed did eternally redeeme Iustifie Sanctifie and Reconcill to himselfe all his ellect that ever were is or shall bee vntill the end of the world For Christ bare all their persons vpon the Crosse and God did lay vpon him the iniquitie of them all and did wound him for their transgressions and breake him for their iniquities and did lay vpon him the chastisment of their peace Esa 53. Therefore sayeth the Apostle Heb. 10. that by that will of God we are sanctified even by the offringe of the body of Iesus Christ once And in the 9. chap. 12. verse hee sayeth that Christ by his owne bloud entered once in the most holy place and abtayned eternall redemption and in that same Chapter ver 28. it is sayd that Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Now in this sense there is neither difference of tyme nor order nor distinction to be made all beeing accomplished together and at once by one worke of one man Iesus Christ the Lord. Sometymes againe they are taken for the worke of God in vs and toward vs in his owne tyme applying that which hee wrough in Christ for vs to every one of vs in particular bringing vs by effectual calling to the knowledge apprehension by faith of our Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation which God accomplished onely in that day of Christ which all the Fathers desired to see howsoever in divers ages and divers tymes they bee applyed by God to these whō then and in that day by the death of his Sonne he did Redeeme Iustifie and Reconcile vnto him selfe And in this sense we speake of these benefites in this treatise not as they were wrought by God in Christ for vs but as in the dispensation of God they are applied vnto vs for whom Christ dyed In which sense the Apostle speakes of them 1. Coll. 1. 21. 22. saying And you also which were in tyme past straungers and enemies having your mindes exercised in evill workes hath he now reconciled in that body of his flesh by death And in this sense it is that both order and difference is to be marked amongst these benefites In consideration whereof how so ever Adoption and Iustification agree in this that they both are benefites bestowed by imputation without inhesion in vs yet as they differ in nature so doe they in order in respect of the grounds wherevpon they are builded whence they flow For Adoption neither dependeth vpon nor floweth from the death of Christ But from his personall propertie of beeing the sonne of God whereas Iustification dependeth vpon floweth from his suffering and therefore as our cōmunion with him in person goeth before our cōmunion with him in his suffrings so doth our Adoption in order goe before our Iustification CHAPTER XX. HITHERTO have we spoken of those groundes whereby both the nature and order of Gods saving benefites are most cleerly knowen So that by these things which are alreadie set downe a modest minde onely searching truth and abhorring contention may sufficiently knowe what Iustification before God is yet notwithstanding for the further contentement of those of weaker iudgement we will speake something more particularly of the benefite is selfe For the clearer vnderstanding whereof and discovering of the trueth which now almost lyeth hid by the manifold opinions of men it were needfull that we should speake of divers things as namely of God him selfe what place he hath in that worke 2. of his grace 3. of Christ and his obedience 4. of faith 5. of man him selfe and of his workes and lastly of the Lawe and of the Gospell For all these points are called in cōtroversie and mens iudgements is divers concerning every one of them in the worke of Iustification but to eschew longsomnes wee will reduce all that we are to speake into these few grounds The first shal be touching the special divers and severall iudgements of men concerning Iustification The second shal be touching the discussing of these pointes controverted which are of greatest moment The third shal be concerning the worke it selfe of Iustification
of the Testament which God hath appointed vnto you Exo. 24. 8. Heb. 9. 20. Nowe it is playne that Iesus Christ in his bloud is our peace and reconciliation with God For no bloud save his bloud alone can purge vs from our iniquities and iustifie vs. And there is no Mediator betwixt God and vs save hee alone For as sayeth the Apostle 1 Timoth. chap. 1. vers 5. There is but one Mediator betwixt God and Man even Iesus Christ the Man Whereby it is playne that none can make a firme and stable covenant of peace betwixt God and vs but hee alone neither can he make this covenant sure by any other meane except his death and blood shedd because no other thing in heaven or earth can purge vs and obtaine remission of sinnes and iustifie vs. Therefore is it said 1 Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. That Christ once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that he might bring vs to God Vpon which respect it is that by him we are said to have accesse to the Father Ephes 2. 18. and 3. 12. Now vpon all these grounds we have to gather of what covenant Christ is Mediator that is whether of the covenant of workes or of the covenant of grace or which is all one thing whether of the covenant of the Law or of the Gospell For God hath never made any other covenant of Peace with man then these two So that in one of these two must consist both our Iustification and Peace with God and of which soever of these covenants hee is Mediator and which of them soever hee hath confirmed by his death in that only must consist our righteousnes and peace But it is manifest by the Scriptures that he is not Mediator of the old but of the new Testam as is cleere by the Apostle Heb. 9. 15. where he sayeth For this cause is hee also the Mediator of the newe Testament And againe Heb. 12. 24. and vnto Iesus the Mediator of the new Testament And this is confirmed by the same Apostle Heb. 7. from the nature of his Priest-hood For as the Apostle there witnesseth in the 12. verse where the Priest-hood is changed of necessitie the Law also must be changed Therefore it must follow that Christ beeing a Priest not after the order of Aaron vnder the which the Law was given but after the order of Melchisedech that he cannot possiblie bee the Mediator of the old Testament that is of the covenant of the Law and therefore in that same chap. ver 22. it is said that Iesus is the Mediator of a better Testament then the Law Herevpon followeth this conclusion that it is not only a vaine opinion but also an impossible that any flesh can ever be iustified by the workes of the Lawe For no covenant whereof Christ is not the Mediator and which hee hath never confirmed by his death can ever possibly serve to our Iustification but of the covenant of workes or of the law Iesus is no wise Mediator neither hath hee died and shed his bloud to confirme it Therefore by the covenant of workes no flesh shall ever bee iustified and have accesse vnto God CHAPTER XXIII NOW for the second and third opinion the discussing of them is coincident with the points following and especially in the next point which concerneth the 4. opinion that is that only Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Whereof now we are to speake which beeing sufficiently cleered is enough to overthrow all other opinions whatsoever Now to make it manifest that in Christ alone is the matter of our righteousnes wee are first to divide this point in two and secondly to set downe the confirmations of both The two partes wherein this point is to be divided be these First that nothing in heaven or in earth in man or without man is the matter of mans righteousnes before God except only Christ The second is touching that wherein in particular Christ is our righteousnes Now for the confirmation of the first point we have these six grounds shortly to be considered First nothing can be our righteousnes but that only which is made by God righteousnes vnto vs. For he is only righteous and the only Author of all righteousnes For as there is no man righteous so there is no man that can make any thing to be righteousnes either to himselfe or to others And therefore wee are to consider what it is that God the Creator and ordayner of all the righteousnes of men hath ordayned and made righteousnes to vs. Nowe in all the trueth of God nothing is ever said to bee made of God vnto vs righteousnes except Iesus Christ alone Neither is there any thing whatsoever that is called our righteousnes whereby wee are iustified by God except Christ alone and his obedience Wherevpon it must follow that he only must be the matter of our righteousnes Therefore is it said by the Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 30. that hee is made of God vnto vs Wisdome Righteousnes Sanctification and Redemption And in the Prophete Ierem. 23 6. This name is given him of God as the name by the which the children of God shall call him while it is said And this is the name whereby they shall call him The Lord our righteousnes And againe chapter 33. vers 16. And hee that shall call her is the Lord ouâ— righteousnes Secondly that only must be our righteousnes which only is all in all things and only filleth all in all things For he that is vnto vs all in all things must needes be our only righteousnes and hee that filleth vs all in all things must needes fill vs likewise in righteousnes Now Christ only in the Scriptures of God hath both these attributed vnto him The first is shewen cleerly Collos 3. 11. And the second is cleerly shewen Eph. 1. 23. Therefore is it that the Apostle Peter Act. chap. 4. vers 12. sayeth That there is not salvation in any other For among men there is given none other name vnder heaven whereby we must be saved And for this same cause doth the Apostle say That we are made the righteousnes of God in him 2 Corinth chap. 5. vers 21. As likewise that in him wee are made perfect or complete Col. chap. 2. vers 10. Therefore also doeth the Apostle blesse God the Father for blessing vs with all spirituall blessinges in Christ Ephes chap. 1. vers 3. And if with all blessinges then also vndoubtedly with righteous in him except wee will denie righteousnes to bee one of the spirituall blessinges of God Therefore the Scripture admitteth nothing to bee ioyned with him neyther hath the Father ordayned any thing to have parte or place with him in the matter of our righteousnes For it hath pleased the Father that in him all fulnes should dwell and that out of his fulnes wee should receyve what soever grace wee receyve from God And this is a parte of that preheminence which Christ
For he died that by his death and sufferinge havinge satisfied the iustice of God for all our iniquities he might have a sufficient ground and matter whereby to make intercession And he rose again thereby putting an end to his owne death and suffering that the satisfaction being finished the ransome fully payed it might be answerable to the iustice of God and be sufficient for our iustification And he ascended vp to heaven as vnto the true Sanctuarie that he might bring into the presence of God the bloud of our sacrifice and there as the minister of the Sanctuarie by his death as the ransome of our iniquities now full and perfect by his resurrection and brought in by him as our high Priest into heaven and presented vnto God might make intercession for vs. And as saith the Apostle obtayne eternall redemption for vs Heb. 9. 12. Therefore is it saide of him in that same Chap. ver 24. that Christ is not entered into the holy places made with handes which are similitudes of the true holy places but vnto heaven it selfe to appeare now in the sight of God for vs. And to this same effect Iohn the 1. Epi cap. 2. ver 1. it is said If any man sinne wee have an Advocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust and he him selfe is the propitiation of our sinnes And so to conclude this point Christs being a Priest many actions done by him as our high Priest are no part of the matter of our righteousnes and yet it is requisit that he both be a Priest performe those actions to our iustification even as the Priests vnder the Lawe were no parte of the attonement For hee that makes the attonement and the actions done by him in making the attonement are to be distinguished from the bloud in the which only standeth the attonement it selfe Now we come to speake of the Altar which likewise is necessarily required for offering of our sacrifice and yet is no parte of our righteousnes but serveth to the qualification of the sacrifice to be righetousnes vnto vs. And as Christ is the Priest and also the offering so also he alone is the Altar Which we shall easilie perceyve if we marke these two groundes First what is the nature of our Priest and of the sacrifice that hee doeth offer and of the Sanctuarie and Tabernacle wherein hee must exercise his Priesthood and of the things which by this sacrifice are purged Secondly if we consider the vse of the Altar wherevnto it serveth in sacrificing Touching the first all are heavenly The Pâ—iest the Lord from heaven the sacrifice heavenly the sanctuarie heaven it self the the tabernacle his body not pight by man but by God and the things that are to be purged all heavenly Heb. 9. 11. 23. 24 Of which it must follow that the Altar also must be heaveÌ„ly For a heavenly sacrifice offered by a heavenly Priest in a heavenly tabernacle for the purging of heavenly thinges can not possibly bee offered but vpon a heavenly Altar This is manifest by the second point which is touching the vse of the Altar that is to sanctifie the offring as is manifest by the words of Christ Mat. 23 19. of which it followeth according to Christs reasoning in that place that the Altar must bee greater then the offering For that which sanctifieth must be greater theÌ„ that which is sanctified by it Of which it is manifest that no Altar of earth of wood of stone or any earthly thing caÌ„ possibly serve in this Priesthood to sanctifie Christ who is the offering But as he him selfe is not of this building so likewise the Altar that sanctifieth him must not be of this building therefore saith he him self For their sakes doe I sanctifie my self that they also may be sanctified Io 17. 19. to shew vs that as he is the Priest the sacrifice tabernacle so he only is the Altar For he is the body of all the shadowes in the law therfore as he is said to have offred by the eternal spirit as the Priest him self as the sacrifice vnto God so is he to be vnderstood by that same eternal spirit as by the Altar to have sanctified him self that is that body by the offering whereof once we are sanctified for evermore And we are to holde this truth most carefully both to eschue the foolish opinion of some who esteeme the crosse to have bin the Altar whereon Christ was offered as also to keepe our selves from falling into that blasphemous errour to thinke that there is any thing greater then the Sonne of God least wee pollute our selves with the abominable idolatrie of the Church of Rome who make their wood and stone greater then Christ make their earthlie Priestes greater then both sacrifice and Altar and give them Priestlie power being in the earth and being of this building and being loaden with sinne in an earthlie tabernacle vpon an earthly and corruptible altar to offer vp and that oft and many times this heavenly sacrifice which is never to be repeated As also to give them power to sanctifie a stocke or stone and to give it power to sanctifie Christ Now concerning the Sanctuarie which is the thirde thing requisite for offering the sacrifice wee have somewhat spoken thereof alreadie in his action of sitting at the right hande of God Neither is it necessarie that we speake much more of it onely we are to knowe that this sacrifice can not be offered els where but in the true Tabernacle that is the body of his flesh Therefore doeth he call his body the Temple Iohn chap. 2. verse 19. neither could the bloud thereof be carried in by our high Priest els-where but in the true Sanctuarie that is Heaven it selfe By all these preceeding thinges we may perceyve that there is a manifold consideration to be had of Christ in the worke of our iustification First as he is our High Priest in which point we are to consider both the Godhead and his Manhoode and the properties of his Manhood qualifying him to bee a meete high Priest Secondly as hee is the Altar that sanctifieth the offering Thirdly as he is the Tabernacle in which the offering is to be made And fourthly as he is the offering and oblation itselfe Now in all these the obedience of Christ to the Father doeth manifestly shine as likewise in all the rest of his actions whatsoever And all these that we have spoken of are necessarily required in the worke of our iustification but are not all to bee included in the matter of our righteousnes For as he is our Priest Altar and Tabernacle he cannot properly be called our righteousnes except it be efficientlie but no wise materiallie For he is our righteousnes materially only as hee is the sacrifice and offering Thus if we shall distinguish Christ him selfe in that thinge wherein he is made our righteousnes from him selfe in these things wherein he is made beside
what faith it selfe is and what is the vse and end of it Concerning the ground and cause of our beleeving if wee carefully marke the scriptures of God it is placed especially in three thinges The first is the will of God and his eternall Decree according to his will as is cleere by Math. chapt 11. vers 26. where Christ attributed vnto the good will and pleasure of the Father that some did beleeve and some did not And Acts chap. 13. ver 48. where it is expreslie said That as many as were ordayned vnto eternall life beeleved And this teacheth vs two things First that faith is no worke depending vpon the will of man nor any power in nature Secondly that it is of the nomber of those blessings not which God did communicate in the first creation but of those which were hid vp in the mysterie of Gods will touchinge the dispensation of life in and through Christ The second thinge wherein the ground and cause of beleeving is placed in Gods free gift accordinge to the sayinge of Christ him selfe Ioh. chap. 6. vers 37. and 65. Which gift of God is there also declared to be two folde The first the giving of our persons vnto Christ according to these wordes All that the Father giveth me shall come to mee The second is the giving vnto vs grace to beleeve According to that other saying No man can come vnto mee except it be given him of my Father For as saieth the Apostle Rom. chap. 11. vers 32. God hath shut vp all men vnder vnbeleefe that he might shewe mercie on all And againe Gallat chap. 3. vers 22. The Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ might be given to them that beleeve And this ground is verified by the saying of Ioh. chap. 12. ver 39. 40. where he giveth a reason why the Iewes for all his miracles not only beleeved not but also why they could not beleeve in Christ saying Therefore could they not beleeve because that Esay saieth Hee hath blinded their eyes c. The third thing wherein the ground and cause of our beleeving is placed is our spirituall birth Therefore saith Iohn 1. Ep. chap. 5. 1. VVhosoever beleeveth that Iesus is the Christ is borne of God Therefore the same Iohn describing who they are that doe beleeve in the Gospell Chap. 1. vers 13. sayeth which ar borne not of bloud nor of the will of flesh nor of the will of man but of God By al these three groundes it is evident that faith is no naturall but a supernaturall gift and therefore the praise of our beleeving is taken from vs and given wholy vnto God as is cleere in the wordes of Christ to Peter Math. chap. 16. ver 17. Flesh and bloud hath not reveiled that vnto thee but my Father which is in heaven Now we come to the propertie that is attributed to faith and which through faith is in every one that beleeveth and this propertie is the power of God according to the saying of the Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. ver 19. Where the Apostle prayeth that they might knowe what was the exceeding greatnes of the power of God in them that beleeve and therefore is it that faith is called the faith of the effectuall working of God Coll. chap. 2. ver 12. and that for two reasons First because no power nor working of any power can ever worke faith in our hearts except the power of God onely and therefore the Prophet Esay doeth put beleeving and the having of the arme of the Lord revealed for one thinge Chapter 53. verse 1. Secondly because the power and the effectuall working of faith in vs is nothing but the very power and the workinge of the power of God him selfe Who as saith Peter by his power through faith keepeth vs 1. Epist chap. 1. ver 5. and for this cause it is not only that faith is compted for the chiefe piece of the armour of God and of the might of his power Ephes chap. 6. but also that to have Christ livinge in vs and to live by the faith of Christ are put for one thinge Gallat chapt 2. ver 20. Thereby shewing vs that the power of faith is not any thinge but the power of GOD and of Christ dwelling by faith in vs. and that faith is the effectuall instrument whereby Christ is powerfull in vs. Vpon which grounde it is that the effectes of Christ him selfe are often attributed vnto faith as in these sayinges of Christ Thy Faith hath made thee whole Thy Faith hath saved thee And when we are saide to bee saved by faith to have our heartes purged by faith to bee iustified by faith c. A cleere example of this wee have Acts chap. 3. ver 16. where the Apostle indifferentlie attributes to the power of Christ and to faith the healing of the Creeple man Which place is carefully to be marked because it giveth a marveillous light in the vse of faith For there it is saide That through faith in his Name his name had made the man sound Which saying doth shew vs expreslie that it was not faith it selfe as it was the worke of that man but the name of Christ in which his faith was that did make him sound so that the power of faith is nothing but the power of Christ embrased by faith and that the worke of faith is nothing but the worke of Christ dwelling in our heartes by faith Which doeth iustifie their opinion who affirme that to be iustified by faith is alwayes to bee vnderstood to bee iustified by Christ For as by faith in his Name his Name made the man sounde even so by faith in his bloud his bloud maketh vs righteous Therefore sayeth the Apostle Rom. chap. 3. vers 25. That God hath set Christ forth a propitiation by faith in his bloud Where reconciling by faith in his bloud is to be vnderstoode in the same sense that making soūd by faith in his name is to be vnderstood in the other place by which it is evident that faith is never rightly taken in our iustification when it is taken for the thing wherein standeth our righteousnes and not for the instrument apprehending that thing which is our righteousnes Thus the power of God working faith and the power of God accompanying faith doeth evidently shewe faith to bee a supernaturall gift being wrought by a supernaturall power and possessing vs with a supernaturall power of God him selfe This is cleerily verified by the third pointe touching these effectes that are attributed vnto faith in the booke of God when it is saide to doe things that are above the strength of all created nature and when Saintes are saide to have done by it such thinges as are supernaturall Of these first sorte are those sayings where in the iustifying of vs the saving of vs miraculous healing of diseases by nature incurable are attributed vnto saith as also the keeping of