vnto them were not onely more secure of their own estate then was for their safety but also despised the Iewes as a people so reiected as if God vnmindfull of his promise would neuer be reconciled to them again Against al which the Apostle in this Epistle teacheth that al people that beleeue of whatsoeuer cuntry or nation are freely iustified by faith in Christ And first he proueth that neither Iew nor gentile vnder which two al are comprehended can be iustifyed by doing the works of the Law because none can fulfil the Law neither the gentiles by that light of nature the Law written in their heart neither the Iewes by that knowledge of the Law that they so much bragged of And this the Apostle performeth as the diligent Reader may obserue from the xvii verse of the first Chapter vnto the xxi of the third chapter So that he flatly concludeth Therfore by the works of the Law shal no flesh be iustified Now this place being so plaine as it is against iustification by works the doctrine of merits is quite ouerthrown if some color be not deuised to auoid the force of this testimony The Romish Catholiks therfore indeuor as much as they can to make vs beléeue that those wordes must haue another sence and vnderstanding then we take them to haue but what sence that is they are not yet resolued For some say that the Apostle by the workes of the Law meaneth the works of the Ceremonial Law and in déed many of the Papists do so expound it But Master Bellarmine liketh not of that answer confesseth in plain termes that not onely the obseruation of the Law of ceremonies but also the kéeping of the moral Law is excluded from iustification but yet he would haue vs to imagine that onely such workes as are done before we beléeue are denied to iustifie vs. As for the workes that we doe after they doe iustifie and merit as they teach vs. And this their absurd opinion procéedeth of their ignorance of the intent and meaning of the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romans For Master Bellarmine in the place before alledged doth affirme that the Apostle there as also in his Epistle to the Galathians goeth about to proue that none can be saued without faith or without Gods mercy which is in déed the trueth but it is not the whole trueth For he is also as carefull to take away the confidence that any had or might haue in their owne workes And because he writeth to them who had faith already for Their faith was published throughout the worlde and teacheth vs that all our reioycing by this iustification by faith in Christ is taken away but where is merit there is reioycing in our selues therfore it is plaine that the Apostle excludeth here from iustifying al works This also appeareth by the setting down the true cause of iustification By faith and remouing the wrong cause in so general termes Without the works of the Law that also the Apostle doth after in the example of Abraham All which may teach vs that S. Paule héere indeuoreth to take from all workes when soeuer we doe them all hope of being saued thereby to the end that our pryde in our owne workes being abated and our boasting taken away He that reioyceth may reioyce in the Lord. For this cause also the Apostle doth afterwards so set workes and merit against grace as if the one of them doth quite ouerthrow the other If by grace not now by workes for then grace is no more grace but if it be of workes then is it now no grace for then worke is no worke We sée then that S. Paule teaching that we cannot be iustified by workes to the end that our Iesus may be indeed a true onely and perfect Sauiour and fully saue vs from al our sins taketh away from all our doings the hope of meriting and deseruing the same And to this end the Apostle S. Peter also in the beginning of his first Epistle doth make mention of Gods aboundant mercy wherby we are not onely begotten to a liuely hope but also Kept by the power of GOD through faith vnto saluation Therefore I say hee teacheth vs that we obtaine this by Gods greate goodnesse because hee woulde not haue vs any thing to trust in our merites but in that God of all grace who will make vs perfect for our workes cannot do that that we may ascribe To him glory and dominion for euer and not to our selues or our goodnes But if any man replie that this doctrine séemeth contrarie to that which Saint Paule writeth to the Romans That God will reward euery man according to his deedes Or to that Saint Mark reporteth that our Sauiour Christ promised That he who in his name gaue a cup of cold water to drink to his seruants should not leese his reward thus I aunswere God in mercie promiseth reward to such as do his will and in mercie he likewise performeth the same not waighing the work but remembring his mercie So that herein wee may rather commend Gods faithfulnesse in kéeping his promise alwaies then estéeme of our works For who will think that a cup of cold water gyuing may be worthy of eternall life And the words of Saint Paule are plaine enough if we wrest them not out of their naturall sence For we denie not that GOD rewardeth men According to their workes And the place proueth not that GOD rewardeth them For their works and that sence onely can establish their doctrine of merites but thapostle saith there onely thus much that good workes shall haue a good reward of eternall lyfe glorie honor and peace Euill workes their due reward of wrath indignation tribulation and anguish So that according to the qualitie of their workes the qualitie I say and not the merite GOD in mercie according to his promise shall giue honour and immortalitie to them that séeke to serue him This therefore standeth still the vndoubted old faith of the Romans That by the workes of the Law there shall no flesh bee iustified in Gods sight For howsoeuer Abraham was iustified by workes before men as others also are Iustified that is declared and accompted before men iust by workes and not by Faith onely For euen Saint Bede expoundeth that place of Saint Iames for the approuing of Abrahams faith or making it to appeare yet I say Before God workes cannot iustifie And this is the auncient Roman faith receiued also and taught of the auncient Fathers both writing of this Epistle to the Romns and else where Chrisostome saith that this righteousnes is called Gods righteousnes because man cannot work it but God only And after That the Sonne hath perfected it wholie with his bloud And in another place verie notablie For thou shalt not obtaine this righteousnes by thy trauels and labours but thou
must freely receiue that which is from aboue of Gods free gift bringing with thee of thine only this one thing namely that thou beleeue Then which words what can more plainly impugne the doctrine of our aduersaries or shew what was the iudgement of this auncient father concerning this point But that consent and consenancy which we find in many of the Fathers as in Origen Hierom Ambrose Isichius Basil Athanasius Primasius Hillary Theodoret Bernard giuing that work to Faith only to saue or iustifie may sufficiently perswade vs how fast they held this old Religion or Romish faith that a man is iustified by faith without the works of the Law I may therfore I trust with Cyprian conclude that If Abraham beleeued God and it was accompted to him for righteousnes Euery one also that beleeueth God and liueth by Faith is found iust and is declared to be alreadie made happy and righteous in faithfull Abraham But the new Romish Religion is this That good works do merite iustification and eternall life So that by their good works they say they can satisfie for their sinnes And for this cause when at shrift they haue confessed their faults their ghostly father for so they terme him will inioine some penance vnto them wherby they tell them that they may satisfie for their sinnes and make recompence to God for them For almes and fasting saith one doth easily carie men into heauen And thus in this their new Religion they do not only expresly set themselues against that old Roman faith wherin we are taught that good workes cannot iustifie before God but also blasphemously they rob Christ of his office who is in truth onely that Lambe of GOD that taketh away the sinne of the world and is the propitiation for the same Who with one offering by offering himselfe a Sacrifice for our sins hath made perfect for euer them that are sanctified CHAP. V. ANd as this ancient faith which was then y e faith of the Romans when their faith was commended doth put vs past hope of béeing saued by our workes sait doth teach vs that this saluation is without our merit fréely bestowed vpon vs that beléeue Wee are saith S. Paule iustified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus Whome GOD hath set forth to be a propitiation by faith in his bloud in declaring his righteousnesse by the forgiuing of sinnes that are past c. In which wordes wee see againe that our iustification is free therefore not for our workes but by grace Wée sée the meanes of this our saluation euen the redenption that is in Christ Iesus We are also taught the meanes how it is applied to vs by faith And that not simply by faith as if it were frée for vs to repose this our faith and confidence according to our owne fancy vpon any helpes that we can deuise but by faith in his bloude Then also we learne héere what is this iustification the forgiuenes of sinnes But is Christ onely profitable to them that were in his time and to vs that haue béene or are since Yes verily He declareth his righteousnes in forgiuing the sins that are past such as his chosen seruantes haue committed since the world began for so both S. Ambrose and their owne friend Tho. of Aquin séeme to vnderstand the sins that are past Which former sins or sins that are past seing it is receiued by so generall a consent of the olde translation and the interpreters I maruell that the Rhemists do leaue it out If we had so done we should haue beene cryed out vpon for falsifyers of the worde of God and deprauers of the same I woulde also aske why in translating into English they would rather retaine the Latin worde Gratis then set downe the English word Freely What was the English so plain that you could not deuise any colour that might seeme plausible to your fauorits for the maintenance of your new heresie If you thought so why giue you not glory vnto God confessing your errour that others might learne by you not to be deceiued any longer If you saw not your misliking why when you should translate and make the worde plaine doe you so hide this light vnder the close bushell of your wordes vnknowen to them that shoulde read your booke For thus our newe Masters of Rheimes do translate Iustified gratis by grace caet what these mean by translating thus let the world iudge But the summe of the auncient doctrine is this that we are iustified fréely without deseruing euen by the forgiuenes of our sinnes through faith in Christ his bloud which is gathered not onely out of the words of S. Paule by me alledged but also through out all his Epistles Which testimonyes I omit because that which is already said is so plaine and my especiall purpose is to shew what hath béene the auncient faith of the Romans As therefore we see what S. Paule taught them so let vs see if S. Peter in that his Epistle which they say he wrote from Rome haue said any thing for that point Hée saith That we are kept by faith vnto saluation And that The reward or end of our faith is the saluation of our soules And againe that Christ was shewed in these last times for your sakes saith he which by his meanes doe beleeue in God And whosoeuer shall mark how the Apostle S. Peter in that first Chapter of his first Epistle doth set forth the excellency of our hope and the redemption that we haue in Christ which is the end or reward not of our workes but of our faith yea how that Christ is shewed for vs that beléeue and that the Apostle in speaking of our saluation doth not make our workes any cause thereof but on the contrary ascribeth it wholly to Gods mercy euen to his abundant mercy apprehended by faith he must needs confesse that S. Peter hauing so good occasion to haue spoken of iustification by works yet not hauing once mentioned the same had not any purpose to deliuer that doctrine that our own works may iustify vs. But our new Romish Rabbies that haue nothing to vant themselues of but the rotten ruines of auncient Rome can abide no doctrine worse then this that wee are iustified by faith in Christ his bloud It is heresie with them to say that wee obtayne forgiuenesse of our sinnes by faith in Christ But to attribute that which onely Christes merites by his death and bloudshedding and faith apprehendeth to holy bread holy water pardons Agnus deis blessed graynes pilgrimages monkes bookes and cowles candels crossings and such like trifling trash is good deuotion and sound religion That which they call heresie we teach word for word out of the auncient doctrine of the Romans But that which they would haue the people beleeue concerning these toyes S. Paul S. Peter and S. Marke
his scholler would haue been ashamed to haue taugh it to any Christians CHAP. VI. SAint Paul hauing planted and proued this doctrine of iustification by faith in Christ as he doth in the fourth chapter of this Epistle to the Romans and else where in many places hee then teacheth that in respect of this grace we should be so far from being imboldened to sin that on the contrary we are the more bound therby to holines of life For whosoeuer is dead to sin must not liue to sin But we if we be not baptised into Christ are dead to sin Therfore such as are baptised into Christ may not liue to sin or in sin Yea it is good reason that the seruant obey his Master but we are Gods seruants by promise in baptisme therefore him we must obey then we cannot obey him which God hateth forbiddeth and punisheth but we must serue God our Master in holines and righteousnes And whereas no man euer more plainely taught our frée iustification in Christ without our workes or merites or any inherent righteousnesse euen by the forgiuenes of our sinnes then the Apostle S. Paul both in this epistle and else where yet no man more earnestly and effectually then he exhorteth to holines of life good workes and all Christian duties sinne and security haue not a sharper enemie then he is S. Peter also teacheth vs that Christ his Owne selfe bare our sinnes in his body vpon the tree Whereby he sheweth the satisfaction that he hath made to be the attonement betwéene God and vs and that without vs he hath done it himselfe I say in his owne body hath paid that price and taken away the condemnation due to the sinne that we haue committed Hee hath done it vpon the trée by his death and passion purchasing thereby eternall redemption What can the Apostle say more plainely to teach vs that the satisfaction for al our sinnes is alreadie perfected so in and by Christ that our owne workes can be nothing auayleable to satisfie for them or that there is not to that vse any neede of them What then Séeing he beareth our sinnes shall we lay loade vpon him and by our sinne and vngodly life doe what wee can to make his burthen heauier No no he hath done all this that wee who by this benefite of Christ are dead to sinne should liue to righteousnesse For if GOD bee our God wee must be his people If hee bee our louing Father hee looketh that wee shoulde be his obedient children If he bee our gratious Lorde and Master we must not be vngracious but duetifull seruantes For as God doth couenant with vs to bee our God so do we also by vowe and promise binde our selues vnto him to bée his seruantes And this also doth the Apostle Saint Peter teache vs who in the first Chapter hath plentifully set forth Gods greate merrie towardes vs euen in this question of our free iustification as also in this place he hath done and yet wil not in any wise that any Christian duties should of vs be vnperformed but exhorteth vs to bee occupied in them as we may see Chap. 4. 1. 2. 3. 4. and to accompt them as a debt that we owe vnto God and must pay him For we are Gods workmanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath before ordained that we should walke in them Saint Marke reporteth vnto vs that our Sauiour Christ preachd often forgiuenes of sinnes as in his third and fourth Chapters it may appeare which forgiuenes of sin doth quite ouerthrow that inherent righteousnes and iustification by worke that the papistes striue to establish And yet the same S. Marke doth register and record among many other godly exhortations that our Sauiour Christ made to his disciples this necessary caueat Take heed watch and pray for you know not when the time is By all which this doth appeare that sanctification and holines must followe iustification and forgiuenes of sinne for we are washed that we should not againe defile our selues with the filth of sin and that Gods loue doth more effectually tie vs to obey him and to indeuour our selues to doe his will And looke howe much the more we are instructed and assuredly perswaded of the free loue of God so much the more will our inner man be inflamed with loue to him againe I say euen with such loue as will thrust vs forwardes to walke in good workes And this is notably proued by our Sauiour Christ who gathereth that the sinfull woman in S. Luke felt That many sinnes were forgiuen her because she loued so much And thus we sée that the auncient Roman faith was this that such as haue receiued and felt Gods free grace in forgiuing their iniquities as in trueth they are so in duety they must be alwaies ready to serue him So that I may boldly say with S. August It can hardly bée that he that beléeueth well should liue euil But our popish spiders out of this sweete flower doe gather their poyson They burtheÌ„ this doctrine which in expresse words is taught by S. Paul and the effects of it by S. Peter also that we are iustified by faith without the workes of the Law with this slaunder that it is a doctrine of liberty and occasion of licentious life a hinderance to good workes And thus this doctrine which they cannot confute with reason they couer with shame and reproches And that which they cannot with all their learning proue false by this shameles shift they seeke to make odious Far otherwise did the ancient fathers both speak write Iustinus Martyr lerned of the Apostle S. Peter to say that faith profiâ—eth our hearts Ciprian saith to cease from sin that beginneth of faith Tertulian affirmeth that faith sheweth vs the way whither to licentious life No but by which we must come to God Basil ascribeth vnto it great force to allure draw and perswade the mind because as in another place he telleth vs it strengheneth the powers of the same it obtayneth getteth indeuour in vs and Gods helpe which both are necessary in al our works Epiphanius writeth that it preserueth euery faithful man he meaneth from euil no doubt And Theophilact telleth vs that faith in Christ is truely a holy and perfect worke and doth sanctifie or make holy him that hath it And on the other side that such as lead an vncleane life are not truely faithfull who professe that they know God but in workes they deny him By all which it is plaine to see that these holy fathers did thinke that faith doth both quench all the firie dartes of the wicked and nourish or maintaine within vs the good motions of the spirit and so is as it were the fountaine from whence doth spring whatsoeuer good work we can performe But the papistes would beare the worde in hande that the more
A Comparison betweene the auncient fayth of the Romans and the new Romish Religion Set foorth by Frauncis Bunny sometime fellowe of Magdalen College in Oxforde MATTHEW 15. 13. Euerie plant which my heauenly Father hath not planted shalbe rooted vp Printed by Robert Robinson for Raph Jackeson 1595. To the Right Honourable my verie good Ladie Katheren Countise of Huntingdon Frauncis Bunny wisheth increase of honour here and euerlasting life elsewhere * ⎠* IF trueth shame not more of anie thing then when she is hid as Tertullian truely writeth then it behooueth her friends to do her that fauor that by all meanes possible they will earnestly indeuor to bring her to light that shee may be seene of them that seeke her and knowen of them that loue her And although this may perchance seeme a hard attempt in these our dayes wherein falsehoode maketh so fayre a shew and hath so great appearaunce of that it is not and euery man claimeth to the trueth be their doctrines neuer so diuers yet since God hath giuen vs meanes to driue awaye those thicke cloudes of errour and ignoraunce that the sunne of trueth may shine vnto the worlde I haue indeuoured in this short treatise to take away that colourable shewe of trueth from the Church of Rome that the vndoubted trueth of the Church of Christ may the better appeare For we haue a touchstone the word of God that cannot lye a rule that cannot deceaue by which whatsoeuer we trie and examine it wil soone bee seene whether it bee true or false Truth also is a thing that is auncient and hath bin alwayes sayth Tertullian and like the good corne that was first sowen but errour is that bad seed which was cast after into that field by the enuious man Seeing therefore that is true that was first and what so euer commeth after is false howe easie a matter is it for such as search to see the light and for them that inquire after her to finde the trueth For if it bee true that the Scriptures teach that onely then al that is not agreable to that truth must needs bee false And if that onely be nowe true which in the Apostles times was true no number of dayes or yeares shall prooue that not to bee false nowe which then was not true Therefore for the benefite of all such as loue the truth I haue in this treatise set downe the doctrine which was first taught and preached at Rome in the Apostles dayes whereof no man doubteth but that it must bee the infallible worde of God and Christian religion Then also I haue added thereunto that which is nowe holden for the Romishe religion and Catholicke fayth there And because these two doe verie much differ as hee that readeth will soone see for indeede they are nothing like and wee are assured that that which Gods worde deliuereth and was first must needes bee currant that which hath no warrant in the worde and commeth after must needes be counterfeite I haue endeuoured to bee short because I hoped it woulde be the more willingly read and the better remembred And for that cause I haue not aunswered the argumentes which the Romish Catholickes vse for defence of their opinions and the rather because it is performed in an other treatise But I trust in this it will appeare that hee that will imbrace the Catholicke Fayth that was then when the faith of the Romans was commended whereof the Papistes make greate bragges must needes detest that Romish fayth that is now and accompt it most blasphemous This little worke I haue beene bold to dedicate vnto your good Ladiship not onely as a discharge of my duetie of thankefulnesse toward your Honour to whome you bounde mee long since by manie vndeserued courtesies but also because that then I knewe your great zeale and feruent desire and loue to the trueth and your Christian care to augment your knowledge of the will of GOD Whereof I nothing doubt but the Lorde hath giuen vnto you great and happie increase To whose abundant mercies in Christ I commit your good Ladishippe alwayes praying that hee will here confirme you in his trueth and continue all his good graces tovvardes you vntill hee shall take you out of this vale of miserie to raigne vvith him in endlesse glorie Amen A Comparison betweene the auncient faith of the Romans and the new Romish Religion set forth by Frauncis Bunny sometime fellow of Magdalen Colledge in Oxford CHAP. I. IT is a daungerous stombling blocke which the Church of Rome hath cast in the waies of the ignorant whereby they are made to fall into the déepe dungeon of Popish heresies and superstitions when they beare the worlde in hand as much as they can that the Apostle in commending the faith of the Romans that then was or rather in testifying that it was published through the world doth approue the faith also that now is there taught True it is that onely they that are starke blind would stumble at that stone for hée that is but halfe sighted may plainely sée that the Apostle speaketh but of the faith of the Romans that then was and doth not promise or prophecy that it should be so alwaies In the beginning God planted true Religion the feare of him in the hearts of men and women but in continuance of time that plant of the Lords own plaining was so ouergrowen with the wéeds of wickednes of life and superstitions seruing of God that it was hardly to be séene emongst men In so much as of the times of Enos it is written as if the world had for a long time forgotten that there is any God that then he began to call vpon the name of the Lord. Yea that which was at the first deliuered from God as a perfect rule of life and written in the heart of man Yet was by the corruption of man so blotted out and by the darknes of our minds so defaced that God was forced as it were to write it a new that it might the better be remembred in the tables of stone Yea and such is the force of our naturall and hereditary infection that we cannot long kéep the truth sincerly deliuered vnto vs without mingling or mangling of the same And therfore Tertulian teacheth vs truly that the trueth must be before heresy euen as the body is before the shadow And he proueth it by that parable of our Sauiour Christ wherin the good séed is said first to be sowen after the â—ares And so concludeth that that doctrine is from the Lord true that is first that which commeth after is false and strange And Ciprian also confirmeth the same when for reformation of any error he teacheth vs to haue recourse to the fountain Which rule of Ciprian S. Augustin also commendeth vnto vs as a very good rule and worthy to be followed And Vincentius Lirinensis in his
wee teach them to beleeue the wider we open them a doore to sinne But woulde you in deede finde out that doctrine that doth let loose the raynes of lycentious life and giueth liberty to doe what you will Looke then to our newe Romish religion that selleth sinnes for money and pardons for faultes both past and to come also Faith whereby wee apprehend this free iustification is Gods gift and therefore not easie for vs to get seeing wee cannot haue it at all vnlesse hee will giue it increase whereof the Apostles themselues craued of God because of themselues they coulde not get it But as much mony as will buy a pardon is not harde to come by Especially rich men might by their doctrine be bolde to sinne because money woulde buy pardons enowe Nowe whether the auncient faith of the Romans or this new Romish religion giue greater liberty to licentious life let the indifferent Reader iudge CHAP. VII BVT this our doctrine of iustification by faith in our Sauiour Christ Iesus without the workes of the Lawe that it may both the better be vnderstoode and more throughly be deliuered from the vniust reproches of such slaunderous spirits It shall not I suppose be amisse but verie necessary to declare what maner of persuasion this Faith is by the doctrine of the Apostles if any thing may out of these their writinges which doe any way concerne the Romans be brought to teach vs the same First therefore this Faith is not only a generall persuasion of Gods power mercie and such other things but euen a particular confidence and trust wherby we do not onely giue our assent or consent that GOD is mighty and mercifull but also we do with comfort applie particularly vnto our selues whatsoeuer greatnes and goodnes in generall persuasion we yéeld to be in God And this is plainly proued by thapostle vnto the Romans setting forth the faith of Abraham before our eyes as a perfect patterne of true faith in that he beléeued not onely in generally that God could or would do such a thing but euen particularly that he would and could performe his promise that he made vnto him concerning Isaac So shall thy seed be And so it came to passe that neither he considered his owne bodie now dead when he was almost a hundred yeares old neither yet the deadnes of Saraes womb But contrary to hope beleeued in hope that he should be the father of many nations Now this constancie of Faith cannot possibly be in any man or woman vnlesse they haue besides a generall persuasion and historicall assent to this that they heare that God is good a particular application and an inward féeling whereby they may say as their old translation bringeth in Iob saying This hope is laid vp within my brest Faith also must be if it be true and such as is required a constant confidence without doubting Not because that we can héer attaine to that perfection that our faith should haue no infirmitie but that all weaknesse in faith doth argue great want in the same Such was that Faith that héer the Apostle commendeth vnto vs in the example of Araham For Abraham was Fully persuaded assured or certified that what GOD had promised he was able to performe Now fully to be persuaded of a thing and to doubt of it are contrarie And Saint Peter willeth vs To trust perfectly in that grace that is brought vnto vs. wherby he doubtlesse meaneth nothing els then thapostle S. Iames when he opposeth Doubting or wauering against true faith Let him aske in faith nothing doubting But that faith must haue these properties that is that it must be a confidence and trust wherby assuredly and particularly we applie vnto our selues the comfort of Gods promises or of the examples of his mercie Thapostle in this Chapter doth farther teach vs I meane Saint Paule in the fourth to the Romans teaching circumcision to be A seale of the righteousnes of Faith A seale is set to the writing to take away all occasion of doubting from the same So are the Sacraments added to Gods promises if it were possible to make vs without all wauering in Faith And the writings whervnto seales are affixed contain for the most part particular benefits bestowed vpon them to whom they are made and sealed Euen so the Sacraments are to the godly assurances not onely that God loueth mankind or Christ is a Sauiour that taketh away sinnes and maketh attonement with God for them but also that God loueth vs and Christ saueth vs I say euery particular man and woman if they be faithfull haue within them this faith Which application of this benefit of Christ to themselues and to their consciences is beléeuing And they that can attaine to this haue attained to Faith and this their particular faith is sealed vp to them in the Sacraments But an assent to the historie hereof we may yéeld without comfort or consolation For so do the Diuels beléeue and tremble Yea let vs sée what an example of Faith thapostle in the viii of this Epistle setteth forth himself to haue I warrant you we shall find it neither mingled with doubtfulnesse nor resting onely vpon Gods generall promises But in wonderfull assurance he findeth and confesseth in himselfe to his vnspeakable comfort Gods great mercy in iustifying and sauing him For he is not only assured that none can lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen because God iustifieth and none can condemne because Christ died and rose againe and at Gods right hand maketh intercession for vs but also that nothing can separate vs from that loue wherwith God loueth And this he saith he is sure of This then is the auncient faith of the Romans That euery one should be fully perswaded in their owne mind for if in meates this perswasion must be then much more in the cause of our iustification and Trust perfectly without doubting on Gods grace Yea the auncient Fathers do not know any other faith for a true faith but onely this assurance and particular persuasion of the heart Ciprian calleth it A confidence of good things to come and proueth that it must so be S. Basil saith it is An approbation of that which is said with assent and without wauering with full assurance that it is true Which confident persuasion is manifestly against popish doubting neyther can it be without particular application of the promises to our selues which in their grosse diuinitie they finde to bee néedelesse Hilary will haue no doubt at all in our faith Neyther can a generall faith without applying particularly to vs Gods promises make vs abstaine from euill and doe that is good which Chrysostome saith is the worke of faith And this doth S. Ambrose plainely teach by the similitude of a phisition who although bee promise to heale all yet they that will haue helpe must seeke to
the phisition And why Is it not euery one that standeth in neede may haue the medicine applyed yes verily For it will not otherwise doe them any good Now saith he faith giueth vs this spirituall health which vnlesse the minde receiue withall the heart it doth no good but rather hurt As therefore it doth no good to a diseased body to know that he may haue helpe vnlesse the physicke be ministred to him euen so in these sicknesses of our soule the assaultes of sinne without this particular applicution there can be no helpe Let therefore Master Bellarmine tel vs if he will that his fellow Catholickes of the Romish stamp do hold it rather a presumption then faith To be assured of the promise of speciall grace or mercy yet will we rather holde fast that auncient faith of Rome approued also by sundry fathers then wander with them in their wauering opinion and desperate doctrine But our new Romish teachers can abide nothing lesse then that we should teach men to assure themselues by faith of their saluation And therefore they teach this faith to be but an assent not a confidence and that it may be a generall knowledge not a particular and vndoubted persuasion or trust that we are iustifyed by Christ They take for a patterne of their faith that faith that the diuels haue as before out of Saint Iames I taught that they beleeue yea feare and tremble And while they make faith to be but a bare assent they thinke it an easy matter to beleeue for in deed the most wicked may haue such a fayth by this meanes it commeth to passe that they speake euill of our doctrine which they knowe not For wee doe not teach that popish faith doth iustify which is but an historicall assent to those thinges that are spoken of GOD but we say that that assured persuasion which Sainte Paul commendeth in Abraham and whereof himselfe reioyceth And whereby we are kept by the power of GOD vnto saluation wee teach that that doth not onely iustifie vs before God because it apprehendeth and taketh holde of him by and in whom onely wee are accompted righteousse in Gods sight but God by it doth also purifie our heartes Because it cannot be but that wee will haue a delight in Gods commaundementes if once this assured and vndoubted persuasion of Gods eternall goodnesse towardes vs be planted in our heartes Although therefore we still teach constantlie with our Sauiour Christ his Apostles that fayth without workes doth iustifie speaking of a true fayth and an assured confidence which was the olde Roman fayth yet we wil also say with the new Romanistes that the fayth of the nowe Church of Rome or that fayth which the diuels may haue cannot iustifye But this doth nothing hinder our cause for wee accompt not that bastard Roman faith worthy the name of faith So that in this latter assertion wee yeelde to them And in the former wherein we affirme that faith as it is an assured confidence taking holde of Gods mercy in Christ doth iustifie I would they also woulde yeelde vnto the trueth CHAP. VIII WEe haue séene then the most auncient doctrine of iustification by faith grounded vpon the first promise of the womans seede that shoulde breake the head of the serpent taught by the Apostles who yet ment not thereby to open a gap to licentious life because they speak not there of a deuelish faith a popish faith a dead faith that may be fruitlesse but of such a persuasion and so assured a confidence setled in the heart of the faithfull as will not suffer them to be idle or vnoccupied in godly workes as occasion shall bee offered And if wee looke further into the doctrine taught by the Apostles we shall also learne out of it not onely that it is necessary to doe good works but also howe and to what ende wee shoulde doe them For if our affection in doing them be not sincere if our direction and rule be not Gods holy word if our intention and ende be not Gods glory and the performance of our dutifull obedience vnto our Lord and Lawgiuer whatsoeuer our worke be called in name or seeme in shew it is not in deede a good worke First therefore for our affection not onely our Sauiour Christ who is a heauenly and true teacher of all trueth telleth vs that the trée of our heart cannot bring forth good fruite vnlesse it I meane the tree be good it selfe but also S. Paul teacheth vs that the flesh that is that part of man that is not regenerate striueth against the spirit whereby he is brought to that that Hee doth not the good thing which hee woulde but the euill which he would not And that through The rebelling Lawe in his members rebelling I say against the lawe of his mind and leading him captiue vnto the Lawe of sinne which is in his members Nowe if we marke why the Apostle maketh this complaint and addeth that grieuous and pitifull exclamation O wretched man that I am we must confesse that he was forced thereto because that Although he woulde doe good and had delight in the Lawe of God concerning the inner man yet his rebellious fleshe did trouble and molest him so that he could not so freely so holily and sincerely serue God as he shoulde haue done And that is it that in the sixt chapter he perswadeth vs that we ought not to sinne because we are dead to sinne so that we should not any more haue to doe therewith but should haue our affections freed from the same and wholly bent to serue God in holines And for this cause afterwardes when he beginneth to come to exhortations he layeth this as the ground and foundation of al That we must offer vp our selues euen our owne bodies a sacrifice to God For if we beginne not with our selues euen with our owne affections to haue them sanctified whatsoeuer we doe cannot bee holy And therefore S. Peter also who plentifully exhorteth to the performance of Christian dueties yet telleth vs before that we are elect vnto Sanctification For heereby our affections are reformed that in doing of al our works we may do them with a good heart And afterward he saith Seeing your hearts are purified in obeying the trueth through the spirite to loue brotherly without fayning loue one another with a pure heart feruently In which wordes we cannot but see how sincere an effection the Apostle requireth in performance of this dutie of loue which must also bee a patterne for vs to doe all good workes by for thy heart not béeing sincere thy workes are not pure though they seeme good As for the second point which is that our workes if we will that God shoulde accompt them good should be commaunded in Gods word and agréeable to his will it may appeare to be the auncient faith
of the faithfull Romans because S. Paul teaching them to doe good workes seemeth to require nothing of them but loue which he saith is the fulfilling of the Law so that he would haue vs occupied in performing of loue to God and loue to man which God in the ten commandements requireth of vs and then we shall not faile but doe good works But this yet he teacheth more plainely in the shutting vp of that notable discourse in the fourtéenth Chapter Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne In which place Master Bellarmine wil haue vs by faith to vnderstand knowledge as also the Rhemistes teach vs or persuasion of conscience that the thing which we doe is good and lawfull But whatsoeuer we doe for the which we finde not our direction in Gods word what persuasion can we finde for the same in our conscience that God shall recken it among good workes Or rather why shoulde we not alwaies feare least God for such workes of ours should say Who hath required these thinges of your handes in which respect al the fathers in our good workes require faith And is not I pray you our good worke a flower of sweete sauour and a fruite of pleasant taste vnto the Lorde All men wil confesse it is so From what roote then must it come doubtlesse from no other but from that immortall seede that Saint Peter speaketh of The worde of God Whereby hee woulde also haue vs to growe And if S. Basil concerning the precepts of their monkish life doth think they must not be left vndone to take other workes in hand and that specially because that euery one knoweth not what is conuenient for them to doe but may as well choose that may be to his hurt and hinderance as to his helpe and furtherance then how much more should Gods lawes be in such accompt among vs who are by our profession regular hauing an expresse commaundement to doe that onely which God commaundeth that we would not for any thing adde vnto the same our owne inuentions or mingle with the same our owne traditions And if we suppose that one man may better see how to set downe rules of life then another how is it that we are so be sotted that wee giue not that glory to God that he knoweth better I say not then any but then all men what workes they are that please him best Or if we confesse him to haue that wisedom why doe we not follow then this his direction why do we not studie to keepe his commaundementes why doe wee weary our selues in our owne waies and wast our time in doing our owne workes Thirdly in euery good worke God also considereth to what ende it was done And principally we must respect Gods glorie Whether ye eate or drinke or whatsoeuer ye doe doe all to the glorie of GOD. And therefore Saint Paule findeth greate fault with the Romans or rather writing to the Romans that neyther the Gentiles when they knewe God did glorifie him as God and the Iewes by their sinnes dishonored the name of God And for that cause giuing to the Romans a caueat he willeth them to take heede of such as made deuision And why For they serue not the Lorde Iesus Christ but their owne bellies They seeke not to glorifie the Lorde but to pamper themselues Yea both Saint Paul and S. Peter also teach vs this lesson by their owne example giuing to him prayse glory and dominion And this glorifying of GOD is especially performed by consecrating vnto him the good grape of our holy obedience Euen by letting our light so shine before men that they may see our good workes and glorifie our Father which is in heauen Thus then we see that the auncient religion teacheth vs that no good worke can procéede from vs vnlesse the spring of our heart first be purged from the filth of sinne least our affections by that corruption shoulde be mingled like muddie water with sinfull cogitations and withdrawen from sinceritie in our action Then also that such onely are in déede good workes for doing whereof we haue warrant in Gods worde Lastly that in the said worke especially we must seeke Gods glory by seruing him in duetifull obedience for that the worke must be considered according to the ende whereunto it is directed and which we respected in doing the worke Augustine teacheth And if any of these be wanting either a sincere heart which cannot be without faith a direction out of the word or a godly ende the worke is not good whosoeuer worketh it or whatsoeuer shew of goodnes it seemeth to haue in the eies of men As on the contrary that which we doe according to Gods worde with a sincere heart desiring to walk on forward in all holy obedience that is in déede a good worke But it is almost a common receiued opinion of our new Romish Catholicks that the good intent maketh a good work Insomuch as many think it must needs be a good worke that a man or woman doth with a good purpose Neither yet do they measure this their intent or purpose with the true line of Gods worde but with the false measure of their owne imaginations And heereby it commeth to passe that the outward appearance of a good worke is taken of many to be an action acceptable to God although it be not either directed to the right end or commaunded in Gods word or done by him that hath the spirit of regeneration And this maketh them so grosly to teach concerning good workes because they would for the better credit of their workes commend the actions not only of the wicked but of the Infidels also that neuer knew God as if they might be perfect and void of sinne which is a thing as absurde to him that by the light of Gods spirit doth walk in the pathes of Gods word as if they would affirme that a wild vyne whilest it remayneth wild might bring forth a kindly grape a crab tree a good apple or from a foule and corrupt puddle might spring sweet and wholsome waters As for Gods Law because the waies therof are not roomy enough for such reelers and rouers to run in who according to their owne foolish phansies are alwaies hatching some new deuotions as not only the infinite swarues of their Religious orders as they falsly call those irreligious companies but also their innumerable toyes and superstitions whereby they would beare the world in hand that they please GOD and deserue his fauour doe plainley prooue they therefore now in the new Romish Religion commaund vnto vs many things whereof in the Scripture they can find no one commaundment no one example They quite forget the straight charge that GOD layeth vpon his people when he telleth them that They must not doe vvhat seemeth good in their owne eyes and concerning Gods Law That they must ad nothing therto nor
from thence And for proofe héereof let vs looke vpon some good worke and with indifferent iudgement let vs trie whether as it commeth from vs it can be perfect or not And what better worke can we finde then prayer which is that sweet sacrifice of perfume that God delighteth in If any man will say that he can offer vp vnto GOD his sacrifice without any wante or imperfection he proclaimeth thereby vnto the worlde that hee knoweth not what it is to pray or hath no feeling of his owne weakenes I speake not heere of popish prayers which are full of horrible blasphemies both in respect of him to whome they pray and of the mediatours by whome they seeke to obtaine and of the merite which they looke for because they haue numbred vp a certaine number of prayers Let the Church of Rome affoorde vs but one man that iustly and truely can say that he can at any time with sincere heart and vnpolluted lippes so earnestly and confidently as God requireth being lifted vp from earth and earthly cogitations talke with God and sue vnto him for necessarie graces onely or especially respecting Gods glorie without wauering in fayth or wandering in affections or forgetting that hee is talking with GOD and then we will yeelde that our works there may be perfection But if in so holy a worke wherunto our owne wantes may stirre vp vs to be the more sincere yet wee shall alwaies finde imperfection how then can our other workes be voyde of sinne But if any man in his excesse of folly and depth of ignoraunce eyther of that he can doe or of that he shoulde doe woulde make the worlde beleeue that he is able to offer vnto GOD the sacrifice of prayer without faulte or blemish his owne thoughtes will testifie against him his knowledge will accuse him and his conscience will condemne him that hee deceaueth himselfe and that there is no trueth in him For this is the perfection which we can looke for and which Saint Paule desireth to bring the Romans vnto not that they shoulde haue no sinne for that he knewe was impossible but that they should not let sinne raigne in this their mortall body that they shoulde thereunto obey by the lustes of it And that our prayer cannot be altogether voyde of wantes what can be more playne to proue then that which S. Paule himselfe teacheth the Romans that Wee knowe not what to desire as we ought For how can wee performe that perfectly which thing we knowe not howe to doe as we ought The spirit of GOD sendeth vp I confesse in deed requests for vs that is maketh vs to request with groninges vnspeakable But what is that to vs and to our nature to the perfection of our worke We are like bad tooles in a good hand I speake of the regenerate The toole being sharpened by the workeman hath an edge and can cut So we when God hath reformed our will by the spirit of regeneration haue a readines or desire to doe good But this edge if it méete with any thing that is harde as iron or stone is broken and made blunt or dull So is this our willingnesse or readinesse taken away when our carnall affections and desires doe oppose themselues So that although Gods spirite that worketh in vs and by vs is holye yet because it worketh by such euill instrumentes as we are looke howe much wee want of the perfection of our regeneration which heere cannot be perfected for whilest heere we liue we are but children and are not come to our perfect groweth so much must needes our worke want of the cleare light of the minde to direct it or of the sincere obedience of the heart to performe And because the Apostle â—newe thus much therefore that wee shoulde not be altogether discouraged in respect of the imperfection of our actions or the corruption of our nature he telleth vs that The lawe of the spirit of life in Christ Iesus marke that this Law of the spirit of life is in Christ not inherent in vs hath freed vs from the Lawe of sinne and death So that we haue no other remedie for our wantes and imperfections then that that holines which is in Christ shoulde by imputation become ours By the which in the ende that sanctification which by the spirit is heere begotten in vs shall be also fulfilled in vs as is promised afterwards For that righteousnes of the Law that there is spoken of that it is not or cannot be fulfilled of vs so long as we cary about vs this body subiect to sinne and correuption experience teacheth and I thinke the papists themselues that haue any shame will not deny For so long as we haue any lust or concupiscence which so long as we liue we shall haue Admit that lust were not sinne as the patrons of lust the papistes woulde haue vs to beléeue and falsly teach yet whilest that remaineth no body can say that the very righteousnes of the Law or whatsoeuer the Lawe required is fulfilled of vs. For euen themselues confesse that lust is aswaruing from the Lawe and is not according to the direction thereof Whereby it appeareth that these wordes of righteousnes of the Lawe that must be fulfilled in vs are to be vnderstoode of that that shall be performed in vs héereafter and not of that righteousnesse that we can now attaine vnto I cannot therefore but maruell at our Rhemistes that by these wordes woulde prooue that we may fulfill the Law For besides that which I haue said that it must be vnderstood of the perfection which we shall haue the wordes themselues also teach vs that this is done not by vs for we cannot attaine to that holines but in vs now if Christ in vs fulfill the Lawe it is not thereby proued that our selues fulfill the Law or that it is possible that we should attaine to the perfect obedience therof I trust that it appeareth that the ancient faith of the Romans which was commended by S. Paul doth so proclaime our vnworthinesse and debase our owne workes if we will consider them how God in his iustice may iudge of them that we may iustly confesse with the people of God Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnes as filthy cloutes we all doe fade as the leafe and our iniquities as the winde haue taken vs away So that we alwaies haue good cause to pray that God whatsoeuer thing we take in hande should Forgiue vs our trespasses For as saith Saith Bernard we want trueth charitie and courage Yea and the more we looke into and the better we knowe our selues the more plainely shal we see that these will alwaies be heere vnperfect Reason saith hee fayleth through ignoraunce of the trueth will is weake because affection fainteth the flesh is vnable through scante of courage In so much as reason doth not well vnderstande what it
regard to workes eyther before or after and that which the Pelagians did then and the papistes now doe teach he calleth a new presumption But because they like worse then to be thoughte new although in all thinges they are new fangled let vs see what it is that they would haue vs beléeue No doubt the Church of Rome doth as much as they can indeuour to obscure and darken this doctrine that the glory of merits may shine the brighter And therefore euen Master Bellarmine who in as plaine wordes as he can deuise hath before taught that this election is free without any respect to workes yet after as he now repented him of that he had said writeth That by predestination the elect get no right or clayme to blessednes neyther is it due to them but after that by well deseruing they haue gotten the same Can white and blacke be more contrarie then these two sayings are one of them to the other So that whilst he seeketh to establish the opinion of merites he doth not onely gainfay the trueth but euen himselfe also Let vs marke the similitude whereby he will illustrate his meaning A king saith he promiseth a price to the best runner to whome God reuealeth that if they runne vpon horses such a one shall winne in wagons such a one on foote such a one by ship such a one Then he appoynteth them to runne with wagons which he also causeth to be prepared for them Althogh Master Bellarmine may seeme to be runne farre from the trueth when by such fond fictions he would make falshoode carie a shew of sound doctrine yet we may see his meaning is that as the kinge proposeth the price to the best runner and then appoynteth such a kinde of running as he knoweth he shall excell in whom he would haue to winne so God electeth vnto happines such as he would because he knew before that they should merit the same Is this free election Is there in this no regard to workes I suppose it is in our Romish Master verified that is spoken of the Idol makers That they who make the Idols are like vnto 〈◊〉 them Of Idolaters they are become Idols them selues that haue eyes and see not eares and heare not yea wit and vnderstand not but say and vnsay almost with one breath But when they haue done what they can that auncient fayth shall be founde not onely true but also directly against their doctrine If election bee by grace then not of workes if by workes then not by grace And because it seemeth they are not yet resolued whether they shoulde mayntaine the auncient fayth of Rome which sometime they commende or this newe opinion which they had rather follow it were best they woulde settle them selues to stande to the one or the other for they cannot make both agree together Neyther are they content vpon this olde garment to set a newe patch but also as much as they dare they disgrace this auncient fayth and olde religion when they call it a vaine presumption and rash to assure our selues of our election But first that our election is certaine I hope they dare not deny because the free giftes and calling of God are without repentance The question then is whether wee can be assured that we are chosen woulde he that taught vs to call him father haue vs to doubt whether we be his children Or if the spirite it selfe beare witnesse to our spirite that we are the sonnes of GOD shall these newe vpstart Catholickes tell vs that so to doe is rash presumption And why is it called the spirite of Adoption but because it teacheth vs nay it assureth vs our election Or howe can wee attayne to that reioycing in tribulation which Saint Paule and Saint Peter also commend in the godly but because we are sure that howsoeuer God seemeth to handle vs yet he still loueth vs and therfore his chasticements are not bitter to vs because the loue of God is spred abroade in our heartes Let therefore these desperate doctours dececiue such as are deuoted to them let vs reioyce in this assurance of faith that our names are written in the booke of life CHAP. XIII THe Apostle hauing hitherto continued in doctrine especially in teaching vs that we are freely iustifyed in Christ by fayth without works and that this iustification is common both to Iewes and Gentiles He commeth to exhortations mouing vs to offer vp our selues vnto God in sacrifice Giue vp your bodies a quicke sacrafice holy and acceptable to God And that we may be the better instructed in offering our selues aright or as we ought to doe the telleth vs first that we must not Be fashioned like vnto this worlde to follow the corruptions thereof Secondly we must be Renued in the spirit of our minde that hauing our vnderstanding lightened we may proue what is that will of God good acceptable and perfect not following too earnestly our owne affections but submitting our selues and our willes to Gods good will And thus must we sacrifice vp our selues to God Much like is that that S. Peter also writeth of Our spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God through Iesus Christ Nowe none can offer a sacrifice but such as are priestes but all men must offer these sacrifices for the Apostles both of them write not onely to such as were in the ministerie among them but euen to the lay people mouing then to offer these offerings therefore all men are priestes Yea S. Peter in playne words affirmeth that we are A royall priesthoode or as it is in Exodus from whence he borroweth those wordes A kingdom of priestes For there al must be kings and al must be pristes Neither can we reade that there is instituted in the newe testament any other kinde of Sacrifising priestes then these And wee must also marke what our sacrifice is that is heere mentioned The sacrifice not of Christes bodie but of our owne bodies the sacrifising and sanctifing of our selues Now if the Apostles had knowen of any sacricire of the Masse was there not now good occasion to haue mentioned it Yea if it had béene in so greate accompt as the papistes hold it to be how coulde these two Apostles without great impietie haue buried in silence or passed ouer without mentioning so necessarie a seruice of God But then there was no such thing and therefore it is not spoken of by them who can best tell vs what the olde Roman saith was It hath beene long after that time raked out of the verie channell and sinke of superstitions and is so contrarie to that they taught that if this sacrifice of the Masse had beene but once mentioned in their time they would in expresse wordes haue made the verie name of it odious among Gods people Well of this exhortation we learne because we are both the sacrifice and sacrificer the offering and the
our faith so wholy and perfectly agréeing with the Apostles doctrine yet pursued of them with an immortall hatred intollerable rage and tirannicall violence doth plainly proue We say therfore that that auncient faith of the Romans was worthely praysed By it we can and doe confirme our doctrines By it we may and haue disprooued their errors If wee swarne one iot from that faith we craue no credite to our words or writings no presence or accesse to our temples And because they haue forsaken it we hold them as Antichristian Apostates and forsake their wil worshipings and superstitious assemblies according to the prophetes precise and seuere prohibition and thappostles comfortable application thereof Beare not the yoke with vnbeleeuers but come out from among them and separate your selues sayth the Lorde and touch no vncleane thing and I will receaue you and I wil be a father vnto you and you shall be my sonnes and daughters saith the Lord God Almightie Whose assured and vndoubted kindnesse because wee cannot but accept off séeing we know him to be a most louing Father therefore we dare not but detest and hate the seducing wayes of the Church of Rome because shée is a deceauing and a mercilesse stepmother Whose pathes doe lead to death and they that walke in her wayes shall finde destruction the remembrance whereof if it be fearfull to vs the Lord strengthen vs with his grace to striue to auoyde it FINIS Contra valentinianos De virginibus velandis Tertul. de prescriptionibus aduersus Haereticos Rom. 1. â— Gen. 4. 26. De praescrip aduers haereticos Math. 13. 24. Contra epistolam Stephani De baptismo contra Donatist li. 5. ca. 26. Vincient CoÌ„mon Math. 15. 6. Rom. 15. â—â— Ad Romanos Serm. 2. Tho. Aquin. in Rom. lect 5. 1. Thess 1. 7. 8. Devnit eccle Gen. 17. 7. Rom. 1. 11. 12. De Rom. pont li. 2. cap. 2. In Rom. 1. 8. Gods word powerfull and necessarie for all Rom. 1. 16. Gospell 2. Cor. 5. 19. The power of God 2. Cor. 10. 4. 5. Iere. 23. 29. Hebr. 4. 12. Esay 49. 2. Iam. 1. 22. 2. Timot. 3. 16. 1. Pet. 1. 23. Esay 66. 2. Mark 4. 8. 1. Pet. 3. 15. Rom. 15. 14. Philip. 1. 9. 10 Coloss 1. 9. 10. Marke 12. 24. Gods word reproched Iac. 1. 18. Doubtful and not sufficient Ignoraunce mother of deuotion Dangerous Gods word must haue power from man Eckius in encâ—i de auto Eccle. Marke 4 3. What is Gods word Rome 16. 17. 25. Gal. 1. â— 1. Pet. 1. 25. 1. Pet. 5. 12. Rom. 1. 2. Apocrypha traditions added to Gods word Rom 10. 5. Iustification by faith without the works of the Law Rom. 3. 20. Bellarmin de iustif li. 1. c. 19. Concil Trident. Sess 6. Against merit Rom. 1. 8. Rom. 3. 27. 28. 1. Cor. 1. 31. Rom. 11. 6. 1. Pet. 1. 3. 5. 1. Pet. 5. 10. Obiect Rom. 3. 6. Mark 9. 41. Solution Rom. 3. 20. Iames 2. 21. 14. In Rom. Ser. 7. In Rom. Ser. 2. Faith only Rom. 3. 28. Lib. Epist. 2. Epist. 2. Works iustifie Concil Trid. sess 6. can 26. 32. Ioh. Bethel in rationa diuin cap. 65. Iohn 1. 20. 1. Iohn 2. 2. Heb. 10. 14. The maner of iustifying by faith Rom. 3. 24. 25. The Rhemists take from the word Rom. 3. 24. 1. Pet. 1. 5. 9. 20. 21. Iustification taught by Christ and his Apostles heresie Popish iustifications This doctrine of iustification by faith in doctrine of liberty Rom. 6. 2. 3. caet 1. Pet. 2. 24. Ephe. 2. 10. Marke 13. 33. Luc. 7. 47. Detemp ser 237. Romish reproches against this true doctrine Dialog cum Tripho Act. 15. 9. li. 2. Epist 2. Aduers Marce. onem li. 4. In psal 115. Constit. Monâ—st cap. 16. Heresi 76. In Ioh. 6. In Ioh. 3. Tiâ— 1. 16. Eph. 6. 16. What iustifying faith is A particular confidence Rom. 4. 18. 19. 20. Iob. 19. 7. Rom. 4. 21. Iames 1. 6. Rom. 4. 11. A Seale Iames 2. 19. Rom. 8. 33. 34. 35. 38. Rom. 14. 5. 1. Pet. 1. 13. De Mortal Ser. Basil de vera fide Tom. 2. fol. 12. Jn Mat. Can. 5. Ope. Imper. Ho. 39. In cap. 2. 1. Tim Bellarm. de Iustif li. 1. cap. 4. Bellar. de iustif li. 1. ca. 6. 7. Assent or generall knowledge Iac. 2. 15. What faith we say iustifieth Rom. 4. Rom. 8. 1. Pet. 1. 5. Romish saith iustifieth not Gen. 3. 15. How and why good workes must be done Math. 7. 17. Luke 6. 43. 44. Rom. 7. 19. 23. 24. 21. 22. 28. Rom. 6. Rom. 12. 1. 1. Pet. 1. 2. 22. August in psal 77. enarrat Rom. 13. 8. Rom. 14. 23. Degrat libero Arbit li. 5. ca. 10. Esa 1. 12. 1. Pet. 1. 23. 1. Pet. 2. 2. Regulae breu interrogat 119 1. Cor. 10. 3â— Rom. 1. 21. Rom. 2. 23. Rom. 16. 17. 18. Rom. 16. 17. 1. Pet. 5. 11. Math. 5. 16. In Psal 118. Concione 12. Popish good workes Workes not commaunded of God Deut. 12. 8. 32. The end of Popish works Esay 50. 11. Ier. 2. 19. Ier. 6. 19. Buying of helps for sin The true end of good works not regarded Luk. 1. 74. 75. Whether our works can be perfect Ephes 2. 10. Rom. 4. 7. 8. Mar. 2. 5. 3. 18. Mar. 3. 29. Rom. 7. 23. 22. Our prayers not perfect Popish praiers Rom. 6. 12. Rom. 8. 26. Bad tooles Rom. 8. 2. Imputation of Christs holynesse Rom. 8. 4. Esa 64. 6. Ser. in Rogationibus Wisd 9. 15. Retract li. 1. cap. 19. Enar. in ps 38. Perfection in works Andrad Orthod Explic. li. 5 Deut. 6. 5. This commandement is generall to all men heer Deut. 6. 1. Math. 22. 39. Gala. 5. 24. Rom. 10. De tempore ser 48. The newman The old man 1. Pet. 2. 11. Gen. 38. 29. Rom. 7. 19. Rom. 7. 22. 23. 1. Pet. 1. 5. Cap. 20. Aura Concil In Galataâ— cap. 2. Ad probam de Virginitate Arnob. aduersus Gentes li. 2. Trident. Concil Sess 6. cap. 6. Ibi. cap 4. Cens Colonient pag. 33. dial 2. Iere. 32. 39. Ezech. 36. 26. 2. Cor. 3. 5. Rom. 4. 11. 1. Pet. 3. 21. The vse of the SacrameÌ„ts Li. 1. de effect Sacr. cap. 17. li. 2. cap. 3. Rom. 2. 25. Concil Trident. Sess 7. can 6. 7. 8 Math. 1. 21. Iohn 1. 16. Cyprian de baptis Christi In 2. Cor. 3. Contra Crescon grammat li. 2. cap. 21. Predestination free without respect of our works Rom. 9. 11. 12. Rom. 11. 5. 6. De Gra. lib. arbit li. 2. ca. 10 D. Whitaker contra DuraeuÌ„ lib. 6. pag. 762. Sufficient help August de predest gra cap. 6. Prosper Epist ad Aug. de reliquijs pelag Hilar. Epistela ad August Prosperi Epist apud August De praedestinat Sanct. cap. 18. Degra lib. Ar. li. 2. cap. 15. Ibid. cap. 17. Psal 115. 8. Concil Trident. Sess 6. cap. 12. Rom. 11. 29. Rom. 8. 15. 16. 15. Rom. 5. 3. 4. 5. 1. Pet. 1. 6. Rom. 12. 2. 2. 1. Pet. 2. 5. 9. Exod. 16. 6. The Sacrifice of the Masse In Epist ad Heb. ca. 10. Ho. 18. In Epist ad Heb. ca. 7. Ho. 13 Theophil in Ep. ad Heb. cap. 10. In Cantica serm 22. Priestes Luc. 22. 19. Sacrifices Rom. 3. 24. 35. Heb. 9. 12. Heb. 10. 10. 14. Rom. 12. 6. 7. 8. Gen. 13. 7. 8. Offices in the Church of Rome 1. Pet. 4. 11. Dist 21. cap. Cleros Durand Ration diuin li. 3. Math. 28. 19. Rationat diuin li. 1. Epist li. 1. Epist 8. Greg. Nazian Orat. 4. De temp ser 9. De cura pastorali part 2. c. 4. Obedience to magistrates Math. 22 21. Marke 12. 17. Rom. 13. 1. What subiection is required 1. Pet. 2. 13. 17. Chrisost ser 23. Popes aboue Emperours Rebellion against princes 1. Pet. 5. 1. 2. 3. The spanish tyrant A warning to princes The old Romish fath doth not once mention the popes supremacie 1 Pet. 2. 13. 1. Pet. 5. 1. Mak. 1. 16. Mark 9. 35 Mark 10. 37. Mark 8. 33 Act 2 What are the things indifferent Rom. 14. 14. Exod. 3. 5. 22. 13. 15. 19. 1. Cor. 9. 20. 22. Gala. 2. 11. 1. Pet. 4. 8. 1. Pet. 3. 8. 1. Pet. 5. 5. Ignatius Euseb Hist. eccles li. 5. ca. 3. Euseb Hist. eccles li. 5. ca. 25. cap. 26. Mark 7. 18. 1. Cor. 8. 8. Coloss 2. 21. Iohn 4. 24. Praying to God onely 1. Tim. 2. 5. Rom. 1. 9. Rom. 15. 5. Rom. 16. 20. Rom. 15. 30. Rom. 1. 8. Rom. 16. 27. 1. Pet. 1. 3. Psal 121. 12. Mark 6. 41. Mark 7. 34. Math. 6. 9. Mark 14. 36. Mark 15. 34. Iac. 1. Colloq cum Trypho De prescript ad Haereticos Contra Epistol perueniam Donat. cap. Ier. 2. 13. Vowes to the Saintes Honour to Images Our father to hee Saints shee Saints 1. Cor. 14. 1â— Hayle Mary to Hee Saints Psal 109. 7. Meditat. cap. â— What treasure Saint Paule brought to the Romans Rom. 1. 11. Rom. 15. â—9 The Popes blessings Rom. 16. 18. The Pope doth no duties of the ministerie Epist Iud. 12. Mariage and vouâ—s Marke 1. 30 vpon Math. 8 ver 14. 1. Pet. 3. 7 1 Pet. 3. 7 1. Cor. 7. 5. 2. 1. Cor. 7. Math. 19. 11. 1. Cor. 7. 9. Vowing of single life 1. Pet. 3. 7. 1. Cor. 7 5. Sup. Cant. ser 34 In Psal Qui habitat ser 6 Reuel 17. 2. 18. 3. Reuel 18. 8. Purgatory 1. Pet. 3. 19 20 Math 12. 32 Arg. in Evang. Marci Mark 3. 29. De purgat li. 1. cap. 4. Limbus puerorum Pilgrimages Pardons Agnus deies Blessed graines Crosses Reliques Shrift Satisfactions 7 Sacraments Praying in an vnknowen tongue Psa 52. 11. ver 50. 51. 2. Cor. 6.
their sins they ascribe vnto the Sacraments And that grace which we can finde onely in Christ of whose fulnes we haue all receiued grace for grace they would haue vs to seek for in such visible things as are in truth but pledges of the same Whether saith Cyprian it be Iudas or Paule that baptiseth it is Christ that washeth pardoneth and putteth away sinne And S. Ambrose making a difference between the watering that is by baptisme and the forgiuenesse of sinnes saith that to forgiue sinnes in baptisme and to giue the holy Ghost it belongeth to God only for the spirit hath bin giuen without laying on of hands and the remission of faults without baptisme if we will credit that learned Father Both the good and the bad saith S. Augustine can dip in the water but none but he that is alwayes good can wash the conscience Thus do these agree with the old Romish Faith teaching the outward signe not to giue but to assure vs of the inuisible grace And yet they are not ashamed still to brag that the faith of the Romans was commended by thapostle Although themselues that boast so much thereof as it is easie to see if we compare this auncient Faith with their new deuises do set themselues as sworne enemies to the same to fight against that faith And this I suppose is the effect of that which can be gathered out of these first eight Chapters of this Epistle to the Romans of such things as are in controuersy between vs and the Papists Wherin if they teach that which these Apostles and faithful seruants of God did teach let their doctrine be beleeued But if they haue chaunged that auncient Religion swarued from that old Faith corrupted that worship of God and mingled that pure wine either with the water of their own inuentions or the dregs of Iewish and Heathnish superstitions why do we not detest these deceiuing Doctors as enemies to all truth and hinderers of our eternall saluation CHAP. XII OF the thrée Chapters following I would haue spoken nothing I mean the ix x. and the xi of the Epistle to the Romans but that I think it necessarie out of one principall point of doctrine that is in them handled to note how contrarie to it selfe the doctrine is that the Church of Rome teacheth For out of them it is most plainly and inuincibly gathered that GOD hath predestinate chosen vnto eternal life such as it pleaseth him to take fréely euen in respect of his owne purpose and counsell without any respect vnto good works Which because it is so manifest that themselues are ashamed to denie it I briefly passe ouer without any long confirmation out of the reasons héerin alledged for proofe of the doctrine For Master Bellarmine out of these words When as yet they were not borne or had done any good or euill that the purpose of God might stand not by workes but by the caller it was said to her The elder shall serue the yonger And also out of those The remnant is saued according to the election of grace If of grace not now of workes for then grace were no grace Out of these words I say he concludeth verie plainly and truely not onely that election or predestination is frée but also without any forséeing of the workes that men should do after as his words are And much more pithyly also is this confirmed by the latter end of the last sentence which is with full content left out by the old Translation the Rheimists and the rest of them For although all the Gréek copies but one and the Syrian Translation haue these words But if it be of works then is it now no grace for then work is no more work Yet do they willingly follow the want in the old Translation because the setting of grace against works in such sort as wée sée they are opposed maketh wonderfull strongly against the Popish doctrine of merites But what should I speak of Master Bellarmine Iohn Durey the Scot telleth vs that it is famously holden in all the Vniuersities of the Catholicks That the foreknowledge of merits is not the cause of predestination Although he cannot deny but Pighius was of a contrarie mind And Master Bellarmine indeuoureth in this point to shew his skill to satisfie some that think it cannot be that predestination should be frée if all men haue sufficient help giuen wherby they may be saued And because vpon this sufficient help they establish their merite this is therfore also the summe of that he teacheth that Merites and Predestination may both of them be taught But how he is héerin deceiued his owne words will best declare But in the mean time this is that which Saint Paule did teach and they say that yet they 〈◊〉 that God fréely not hauing regarde to the workes which â—e saw they should doe did chuse a number vpon whom he bestoweth eternall life Which doctrine as it was daungerously impuyned in those dayes of S. Augustine so was it learnedly defended by him in sundry treatises In which it may appeare that the Pelagions then did vse the selfesame obiections against this comfortable doctrine that the papistes now make against the teaching of our free election as that God may same to deale vniustly in that he punisheth the wicked whom he calleth not from their wickednesse Againe that therby all indeuour to liue in Gods feare is taken away vertue is hindred fatall necessity established the doctrine is perilous and such like obiections are reckoned vp of Prosper as also of Hilary who in like manner writing to S. Augustine rehearseth those cauils of the pelagions against this trueth crauing S. Augustine his helpe therein because many as vs saith did much depend vpon the authoritie of men and as Prosper in his Epistle faith they defend their obstinacy by antiquitie alledging that neuer any expounded those places to the Romans after that sorte Which obiections because it is too long to confute in this place I send the reader who is desirous to be further instructed vnto S. Augustine his bookes of the predestination of the Saints which is an aunswere to the two Epistles of Prosper and Hilarie and that other of the vertue of perseuerance and that of predestination and grace which before I spake of Which thing I may I trust be the bolder to doe because these are the slaunders which the pelagians thâ—se knowen and condemned heretickes burthened this doctrine withall and therefore our aduersaries should be ashamed to vse them Now if you long also to know what these heretickes did teach this it is That God foreséeing who should beléeue and continue in that faith did predestinate such to his kingdom Or as S. Augustine saith they taught that God did choose such as he sawe shoulde be holy by the choice of their frée will on the contrary he shewed the election to bée frée without any