stay out my Quarter yet I did and then a Writ was procured from the Colonels to apprehend and imprison me My offer was To let me have justice and I would justifie what I taught and held and let them see their errours an easie thing to do but they refused Then I went to London with intention to Petition the Parliament but friends who had better intelligence and experience disswaded and deterred me So finding little hope of relief I returned and removed my family into Yorkshire so giving place to their fiery zeal Gentle Reader I have presumed on thy patience in setting down these passages by which it is clear that they seek themselves and not Christ and his Truth and chuse rather to use Club-law as did Cain the false Prophets Pharisees and Hypocrites in all times of persecution to extinguish or suppress the light of heaven then that it should discover their nakedness and shame If thou ask Why are they bent and enraged more against you Antinomians then any other Sect Answ They can tell thee great things and would have thee believe we are unworthy to live in any Commonwealth But the truth is and many of them cannot be ignorant of it we teach onely what is Orthodox and the old-received truths of God And do desire no more favour then what Justice can deny to none viz. leave to speak for our selves before we be condemned Onely they see the inconsistencie of divers of our Tenets with theirs and Dagon or the Ark must fall And how questionable and unjustifiable their assertions are to any indifferent capacity viewing and considering them in the true light and therefore would put out our Candie It would make a Christian face to blush or his heart rather to bleed to hear what stuff they can put off and vent in their Sermons I resorted to their Exercises divers yeers yet never heard one doctrine of Free-grace of Christ Faith or Justification Legal Reformation is taken for Regeneration and Evangelical Sanctification I have spoken with old and zealous prosessors who knew not what it was to be justified by faith except this was the meaning of it That God would accept of them for their good works and duties If any one which yet Nature is principled for be framed and brought somwhat into a Legal way to performances he is judged a true Convert and may set up his rest If they do well they tell you they can believe sufficiently upon their kinde of works they build their faith The Law is not preached as the ministry of death to cast down and to kill that Christ may be the life and spiritual resurrection but the life that most speak of is to live and walk in the Law yet Paul saith I by the Law am dead to the Law that I may live to God Gal. 2.19 I am resolved of this that if people had experience of a sensible death working in them by the Law and that nothing but the curse and wrath could be had in their works and ways and had felt as sensibly a reviving and quickning in the faith and apprehension of Christ there would be little ground of difference remaining but till that be or at least that the Law be preached for death and not for life and peace as too many do how can the controversie be ended But flesh and blood may object What good success can I promise to this my enterprise I go against the full tyde and violent current of humane policie and learning of such a religious multitude all being combined and conspiring against me Are not my adversaries in number infinite rarely qualified admired for sanctity and zeal backed and invested with worldly Authority countenanced by the times and the sole-esteemed pillars of the Church What am I how dare I oppose them Who is my Patron My answer is 1. I do not come forth in mine own name or strength nor measure my self with them for then hope of prevailing is gone But when God is set against them and his invincible Verity so opposed by them how vain and light then are all these powers and excellencies 2. I have been carried against the stream almost these twenty yeers yet they could not prevail by reason of the Lords strength and presence 3. However the voyage fall out I have not much left to lose onely my outward liberty in part and a few days it may be of my natural life can be in jeopardy And hath the sacred Truth of God and the desired good of his Church been so prevalent that for their sakes I have sustained such loss suffered so many things already and shall I now shrink or be unwilling to sacrifice the loan of what is remaining The Lord leave me not to that temptation 4. In all their opposition I see nothing to convince but am rather thereby confirmed They would see a mote in Dr. Crisp's eye but will not see a beam in their own If to my self I were guilty of any their unworthy imputations or of doing or yet offering a hundredth part of that wrong I received from them or if my conscience did not witness with me that I had sought to give unto them all possible satisfaction more then was desired or would be accepted of then I should not have that inward peace and contentment which now I enjoy And 5. lastly why should I desire a Patron and so become injurious to any in engaging them or rendering them to be suspected I know the Truth is able to protect it self and the servant of it and further then I am found in the way of Verity I seek no shelter The Name of the Lord is a strong tower the righteous runneth into it and is safe Prov. 18.10 Thou Lord hast seen it for thou beholdest mischief and spite to requite it with thy hand The poor committeth himself unto thee thou art the helper of the fatherless Psal 10.14 R. Towne Vindiciae Evangelii OR The Vindication of the Gospel from the unjust Censure and all Aspertions of A 〈◊〉 ntinomy Or A Reply to Mr ANTH BURGESSE'S Vindiciae Legis c. SIR YOur other Advantages are many but God and his Truth are with us therefore we may be confident in our just Cause and Quarrel and the Victory is certainly ours Your whole Colledg and Assembly approve of and commend your Book that is I confess cause of sadness and grief to my spirits but not one jot of terror Truth is of more weight and authority with me then the Consent and Judgment of all the Learning and Principalities in the world and as Luther writ to K. H. 8. I prefer one Paul before a thousand Thom. Scotus c. You anticipate our expectation of your future Reply in your Preface to the Reader I hope you will not for I perceive by this that the light of Truth hath almost overcome you a little more glory of it may happily both convince and convert also But your Ground or Reason of not Replying
believing Faith onely is the condition or instrument that doth receive the Covenant but yet that a man believe is required the change of the whole man Answ They qualifie the subject believing in some sense is true but do they qualifie before he believe in believing or after Faith this you should have told us it may be concluded from your words that they must qualifie the subject before he believe and this is your reason because that a man believe is required the change of the whole man as if good works did change the man and so were pre-required to believe I answer 1. That the heart must be first changed I grant for the natural heart is evil and unbelieving And secondly It is a good work to renew and change it yet that is no work of ours but Gods Thirdly Do our good works qualifie towards God Coram judicio Dei as Melanct. or towards others Or to our own sight and sense Is not Christ in us put upon us formed and dwelling in us qualification sufficient for acceptance to salvation M. B. Vse Answ You are still ministring your vain Antidotes Take you heed of that spiritual Anti-Christ within man which strongly maketh head against the true Christ What you preach and profess may be a deceitful flourish you bid reconcile Law and Gospel Justification and holiness c. I know none making such jars between one and the other as doth your self Is the Law then against the Promise Gal. 3.21 That is a blinde conceit Christ was ordained to be the Righteousness of the sinful and lost soul of man and to be received by it in the feeling of the failing and want of all goodness in it self He dwelleth in the poor meek low and broken heart to receive heal and satisfie it We may think and talk of him out of us as held forth in the letter and outward Ministry and all this to small and no effectual consolation or purpose LECT V. 1 Tim. 1.9 Knowing this that the Law is not made for a righteous man M. B. COncerning the righteous man here we must not interpret it of one absolutely righteous but one that is so quo ad conatum desiderium Answ Why may we not understand it as well of one who hath attained to righteousness by Faith which is absolute and perfect as of inherent sanctification which is inchoat and imperfect or why is it that you do altogether exclude this passive and imputed righteousness You do not with the Papists hold it onely to be a putative and not real righteousness And you erre if you take that which is sensible inchoat and so defective to be yet more worthy to give the denomination M. B. pag. 49. The Antinomian and Papist do both concur in this errour though upon different grounds that our righteousness and works be perfect c. and that not only in Justification but in Sanctification also Answ Though the righteousness of Faith in Christ and sanctification by his Spirit which are inseparable in regard of the subject be two distinct things yet they argue not the party to be in a twofold estate towards God for acceptance to favour and life but his estate is peaceable and safe onely by the free grace of Justification You grant your sanctification is imperfect and defective Now sith the sinfulness remaining in us doth dispread it self throughout all the powers of the soul all parts actions and passages of the whole man When you then have gathered and summ'd up all in one do you not bring all your works in the end to yur Justification by your confession of weaknesses wants pollutions c. and so seek forgiveness of the sins of your Prayers Etiam bona opera egent remissione peccati your failings in your Sermons errours of heart and life And this is in effect to have all healed and justified by free justification or the blood of Christ knowing that otherwise all is damnable and in law and justice to be rejected know it and cause also your hearers to learn it that though Justification be one individual act yet the vertue and efficacy of it is necessarily to be extended throughout all the life and wayes of man It purifieth the man and maketh all pure also and acceptable Tit. 1.15 To the pure all things are pure Thus may you see that it is a truth that all are become perfect and the manner also how and lastly that all is in Justification and not in Sanctification and so know your mistake If you receive not this how shall what is imperfect be accepted except either by some mitigation of Gods Justice contrary to that place so much and that without cause urged against us Matt. 5.17 18 or that you will so far be beholding to the new Covenant with the Arminian as to seek for the Grace of it which may pardon or pass by our defects or in effect to deny the extent and continuance of the force and vertue of Justification and Christs blood unto the last end What you charge upon your old Antinomian Islebius I pass by as an Author I never read M. B. As for the latter Antinomian he speaketh very uncertainly and inconsistently Sometimes he grants the Law is a rule but very hardly and seldom then presently kicketh all down again for saith he it cannot be conceived that it should rule but that it also should reign and therefore thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other the damnatory power of the Law is inseparable from it Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and keep it from the damnatory Assert of Gr. p. 33. Answ None can speak more uncertainly and inconsistently then you in these Lectures you make neither to appear in your adversary but he proveth you guilty of both For when you use these expressions Good works are necessary in the justified and then presently They are necessary in him that is to be justified Again onely Faith in Christ is necessary to salvation the promises of life are made to the believer and good works have the promises of life every good work thou canst do hath a promise made to it of eternal life c. you both leave your reader uncertain what your opinion is and these will in no wise consist together besides many other like passages Also here you say he grants it a rule and yet do charge him with the total abolition of it pag. 43. Is not this inconsistency You say he granteth it hardly nay doth it freely without constraint B. And seldom Ans If need require he will do it toties quoties This is not to kick all down again to say the Law if it rule it doth also reign the latter doth not overthrow the former but onely it crosseth and overthroweth your vain and ayry conceit of a Law ruling and not reigning You say he thinks it impossible that one act of the Law should be without the other
grant you repentance Amen Mr. Rutherf pag. 575. There is a twofold keeping in of sinners one meerly legal they care not for Mr. T. Gaole Reply The law is not my Gaole but Gods and both they and you may be made to minde it more then either yet doth you speak too contemptibly Mr. Rutherf Mr. T. will have the believer so free so perfect as the law needs not to teach nor direct him in one stop he doth all without a keeper by the free compulsion of a Spirit separated from Scriptures which is right down A believer is neither under law nor Gospel but a Spirit separated from both guides him Reply When I say the Spirit of the Lord is his keeper do I teach then he hath no keeper 2. He receiveth the Spirit that leads him by the Gospel how false then is your charge who speak or dream of a spirit separated from Gospel and not I. And yet the Spirit breatheth and bloweth in the heart and the voice or sound of it is there heard when there is no sillable of outward Law or Gospel but you have sufficient answer before As for your instances of Joseph and David I ask of you whether it was the Spirit within that kept them from offending or the law T. pag. 5 6. I muse you omit to shew what it is to be under Grace Mr. Rutherf Dr. Taylor did not omit to shew what it is if you did not omit to read his words he is clear to any Reply Before you complained you could not see what was plain before you but now you can see what is not extant this is the fruit of partiality Mr. Rutherf But let your exposition stand you are not under the law as teaching directing regulating believers in the way of righteousness but the Gospel giveth power to subdue sin without any teaching or regulating power of the law But what is the power of subduing sin to the Antinomians not sanctification but justification that is a power to believe that Christ hath obeyed law for me we are obliged to no personal sanctification c. then to be inherently holy is unlawful to Antinomians Reply The exposition is not mine verbatim yet even in your owne expression the light of truth is so clear and convincing on our part that you turn your back on it as afraid to meddle And being disposed to take occasion to wrangle you demand what it is to subdue sin whereas it is set before you even the weakening of the power of sin within us that it domineer not over us Indeed the Prophet Micah 7.19 useth the phrase of subduing by justification and that is a true subduing it in the conscience that it there raign not to death condemnation And yet by your confession this must precede and is the proper cause of subduing it in conversation and then that will necessarily follow issuing out of this faith So that in fine this is but a Papistical cavil That to teach justification is the overthrow of holiness and good works Lastly whereas you tell of obliging to sanctification I answer we are to believe that God will sanctifie us and that throughout and put his Spirit into us to lead us in his wayes and so in that faith desiring and hungering after it to seek to him as a sick man longing for health unto his Physitian and to wait in the use of his ordinances that he may so perform The new Covenant properly requireth nothing of man but God knowing his spiritual poverty and utter disability calleth upon him to seek to him who worketh both the will and the deed of his owne pleasure Open thy mouth and I will fill it Psal 81. Your slanderous conclusion is both against the rule of Gods law and of all humane arts But such extravagancy becometh or still pleaseth Mr. Rutherford T. Assert pag. 6. I deny not the law to be an eternal and inviolable rule of righteousness yet the Grace of the Gospel doth truly and effectually conform us unto it Mr. Rutherf pag. 578. I ask to whom the law is a rule if to Believers then they must be under it 2. That rule the grace conformeth unto we must be under 3. An inviolable rule of justice cannot be violated without sin Then the Believer cannot violate the law and murder but they must sin and violate the rule c. Reply It s true the law is an inviolable rule but not to him as a Believer or in the things of his Faith but here he departs from it for he doth not the Law to be saved but believeth after the rule of the Gospel 2. If you consider him morally I see not but he may be conformed to the rule of the law and yet not under it but under grace and the rule of the spirit which conformeth him 3. In this your moral or civil conception of him you take him quite out of Christs kingdom where grace reigneth And now grant he doth murder and sin It is death and condemnation by the same rule and law so that he must be totally removed out of the limits of the law before he can be freed and secured from either sin or death You leave faith and fall from grace in all your arguments And they are as forcible to maintain the condemning power of the law to believers as the regulating for where the law regulates it may condemn and so it doth the best Saint here if you bring him and his life under it T. Assert pag. 7. Through faith is bred assured confidence lively hope c. M. Rutherf pag. 579. This is a close perverting of the word of truth the Antinomians faith may here be smelt then whoever once wavereth or doubteth are yet under the law of works A doctrine of despair to broken reeds who cry I believe help my unbelief Reply I must commend to you Jam. 1.6 7. But observe good Reader what is here excepted against viz. Through Faith in Christ is bred assured confidence lively hope pure love towards God invocation of his name without wavering fear or doubting not questioning his good will audience acceptance which would never be effected by all the zeal and conscience towards God according to the law of works And now judge impartially what truth can be current with Mr. Rutherf I aske 1. can assured confidence lively hope c. come or be effected any way else then by faith in Christ If there want light at Noon-day Read Heb. 3.9 where your Bible-Note saith That he calleth that excellent effect of faith whereby we cry Abba Father confidence and to confidence he joyneth hope which is termed a lively hope that God begets unto 1 Pet. 1.3 see also Heb. 10.22 23. Rom. 15.13 and 10.14 How shall they call on him on whom they have not believed But it is like this moveth M. Rutherf that it is said that these cannot be attained by all the zeal according to the law of works yet Paul clears it Eph. 2.18 That
answer 1. If Christ died not for such how could such come unto him or believe on him So that there is a sweet harmony yea who else could be saved for what difference is there originally and inwardly though not in outward expressions and out-breakings to the eye of the world the strictest Pharisee is as wicked and unclean as the loosest Libertine God looketh upon the heart But 2. you ask how can an enemy to Christ close with Christ I answer Is it not possible for enemies to be reconciled or for a Rebell convinced of his danger to submit and receive a gracious pardon being offered and when he is receiving it he may rightly and worthily be called a Rebell though afterward he become a true professed Subject 3. Neither the Text alledged nor the Doctor say enemies to Christ but when we were enemies viz. to God his justice and holiness in reference to his law For as God absolutely considered cannot be the object of mans hatred so God in Christ as Mediatour cometh under another Notion as being the onely meanes to slay enmity and reconcile both in himself You say it is more then in some places they allow Ans When you shew some place we may speak to it But how frequently read you in Doctor Crisp these and like expressions If God give thee an heart to come if thou canst believe if now thou have a mind to close with Christ c. which ought to have prevented all these exceptions as annulling the grounds and reasons of them I marvell that any understanding and experienced man should except against his Ministery it tending specially to encourage the poore and troubled soul to come freely and with confidence unto Christ assuring it there is no such force and let as the conscience of sin and his own unworthiness will suggest Oh how hard a thing is it in the feeling and horrour of sin to look up to free-grace and to receive Christ the gift of God without all disputings and reasonings about workes or qualification It is an evill rooted deeply in nature even that opinion which your doctrine maintaineth nourisheth and strengtheneth enough to overthrow the soul in the hour of tentation witness all experience And so the thought and consideration of some conceited goodness doth breed presumption and an unwarrantable perswasion of being the rather accepted If the Doctor had said that Christ is theirs and become their salvation whenas yet they had no heart to receiue or desire him you had some ground of excepting against him M. B. Christ dyed not onely to justifie but to save us Answ 1. Christ hath saved all that are to be saved Tit. 3.5 2. But it followeth not therefore that any can lay hold on salvation without justification or the righteousness of faith although he may so do without the righteousness of works Tit. 3.5 for justification is to life the Antecedent of it Rom. 5.18 M. B. Indeed the grand principle that Christ hath purchased and obtained antecedently to us in their sense will as necessarily infer that a drunkard abiding a drunkard shall be saved as well as justified Answ That Christ hath purchased and obtained all graces as you call them is so clear and fully convincing in the light of the Scripture that you cannot deny the truth of it onely our sense of it is corrupt and erroneous as you say but why do you not tell what our sense is It is out of no love that you conceal it but rather it argueth a minde in you to make the world thinke worse of us then you can make us to appear What you make or how you pervert our sense would be seen but that grand principle will necessarily infer the contrary to the conclusion you make for what Christ purchased for us must necessarily be dispensed and given therefore cannot that grace of Regeneration be withheld from them that are Christs but it cometh to them not in the preceptive way of the Law but through the word of promise which you cannot skill of If any should teach that some graces favour and part of eternal life were left to be purchased and obtained by our obedience and service that doctrine might finde more free passage and better entertainment But I wonder you are so peremptory and unadvised in making such an inference as if justification did leave a man as it found him and there were no vertue efficacy nor health in it nor that pretious faith apprehending it or as if we did teach so as by you we are slandered the contrary still lying under your eyes You need and must be forced to acknowledge that Tot us processus c. the only and whole passage from sin to righteousness from death to life from bondage under wrath and the curse unto liberty and the receiving into favour and felicity is attributed by Scripture and all sound Divines to that article of free justification so that in true and strict sense salvation is inseparable from it Yet that the world may see how the simple intent and sense of Dr. Crisp is misrepresented by you these are his words pag. 66. Christ the only way If a man saith he have a little holiness and righteousness he thinks now that in regard of that he may without presumption close with Christ Christ came not to call the righteous but sinners but it seems a man must be righteous before he have to do with the calling of Christ See now whether this be with or against the Gospel-free-grace therefore even to sinners is it no licentious doctrine nor doth it a jot maintaine the continuance in sin I say therefore that Christ doth belong to a person that closeth with him though he be in his sinfulness Christ indeed doth wash cleanse and adorn a person when he is closed with but there is none clean till Christ himself do enter who makes clean where he doth enter Do not then so misconstrue the Doctor as if his doctrine were inconsistent with the truth All that you can gather and directly conclude from him is that sinners under that very notion and name are called upon in the Gospel to come unto Christ that he is tendered unto them while they are such If God give a heart to a wicked man at this instant willingly to close with Christ he giveth him an absolute and compleat and perfect interest in Christ And these his expressions imply as much as you in truth can require For can there be a heart given to come a real willingness to close with Christ where there is no sight and sense of sin and danger why doth the soul desire Christ believe in him is it not that it may be saved from sin wrath and damnation and obtain righteousness life favor and salvation doth not the hastening unto the City of refuge sufficiently prove the man to be a manslayer so here it argueth a true inward conviction of and a real confession of a guilty estate yea a perswasion that in
Christ a distressed and pursued soul may be safe and in peace but nowhere else M. B. Now these speak of Christs death as an universal meritorious cause without any application of Christs death unto this or that soul Therefore you must still carry this along with you that to that grand mercy of justification somthing is requisite as the efficient viz. the grace of God something meritorious viz. Christs sufferings something instrumental viz. faith and one is as necessary as the other Answ The full bent and chief drift of the Doctors ministery is the application of Christ and the benefits of his death unto the soul who so see any thing cannot but so judge I marvel then at this your so palpable accusation 2. Dr. Crisp speaketh of justification as it is Gods alone gracious act in Christ discharging and acquitting all the Elect in him at the time of his passion and resurrection fully and for ever This was done in fore caeli or as others coram judicio Dei As for the instrumentals whether the word to reveal and publish it or faith to apprehend and rest on it they were neither necessary to that Act of God but onely afterward to give evidence and assurance to the several consciences of all those Elect of what was done for them freely by God in Christ upon the cross For there God was in Christ reconciling them to himself 2 Cor. 5.18 M. B. I will but mention one place more Psal 68.18 Thou hast received gifts even for the rebellious also c. adding Is not all this strange Though the Author press sanctification never much in other places yet certainly such principles as these over grow it Answ 1. Why is it that you think this strange viz. That the loathsomness and hatefulness of this rebellion is transacted from the person upon the back of Christ he beareth the sin as well as the shame c. So that God acquitted his Elect and satiffied his justice in Christ their Sure y and by this means it cometh to pass that God can dwell withthose persons Is this any more then what Paul saith in short and plain words viz. Christ was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 and Ephes 2.14 Christ by his Crosse hath slain enmity and made peace Is not Christ the Communis terminus the bond and mean of union and atonement with God by his only sacrifice while we were sinners enemies in our selves we were reconciled in Christ Rom. 5.10 The ground and reason of your opposing is in that you are of opinion that God commeth unto us by or with or because of some inherent graces or qualifications in us which be as a Load-stone to draw and unite his affection and that Christ is but the meritorious cause of this a Papistical conceit God is in Christ and where Christ is there is God present I am in the Father and the Father in me Ioh. 14.10 he that hath the Son hath the Father also and he that hath not the Son hath not the Father He that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me Ioh. 13.20 God then loveth uniteth himself and cometh to the soule only in and through Christ In whom he makes us accepted Eph. 1.6 and that only of his grace If the presence of good works you so contend for in justification were granted you yet God hath no respect to them but beholdeth us as sinful wretches plunged into all confusion and being moved to pity us he considereth our persons and receiveth us alone in our Lord Jesus Christ yea he only beholdeth as our selves so all our good works in that perfection of his Son else they could not be accepted nor liked saith Mr. Calvin And these are the only true and most powerful and operative principles of all right sanctification though your legally-forced sanctity or reformation may grow and arise out of another natural principle and dead root Lastly as for that conversion and change of the most rebellious by the Ministery it is the product or effect of this doctrine I muse that a man of your parts and Religion should so stumble in so clear a light LECTURE IIII. 1 Tim. 1.8 9. Knowing the Law is good if a man use it lawfully M. B. Having confuted some dangerous inferences that the Antinomian makes from that precious Doctrine of justification Answ Egregiam vero laudem spolia ampla refers tu Review now your elaborate work and you will not finde one syllable of real confutation you may learn palmodiam canere I only intend to defend and vindicate the assertions and cause of your later Antinomians as you are pleased to call them as for Islebius Agricola he is none of my acquaintance I never read him If you wrong him God is his Judg and avenger yea and this also I would have the Reader know thāt I am minded to pass by whatever I shall henceforth meet withall whether positive or controversal if it do not directly touch or reflect upon his three named Antinomians lest all the rest in this book be taken for orthodox or I be accounted an approver of it for many things in it besides are to me unsavoury and unsound M. B. sect 2. They tell us not only of a righteousness or justification by imputation but also Saintship and holiness by this obedience of Christ And hence it is that God seeth no sin in believers Answ If they tell you of such perfection that God seeth no sin they withal in the same place tell you if you had the same ears to hear it that this justification or Saintship is by imputation and not by inherent sanctification If Christ be held forth unto you by God himself as one that hath washed you and cleansed you from all sin and withal it be given you so to apprehend and receive it what think you now of your self and condition while you abide in this light In the Creed you say I believe a holy Church yet the Church it self is no exterior or visible thing that the world can discern though the persons be visible and her holiness is invisible onely faith which is of things not seen Heb. 11.11 can behold this purity of the Church not in the Law nor any work or inherent thing but as she is washed and made clean in the blood and righteousness of her Redeemer The Church is all fair saith August for her filthiness is taken away by Christ and he hath made her fair Look upon the Christians life and there thou maist finde many things that thou blamest If he look within himself the work of renovation there wrought it is also imperfect and not pure but as he is beheld in Christ who hath sanctified him he is altogether pure and holy but faith only seeth this Mark but this one saying of Calvin To the intent that God may no more be an enemy and take part against us who are
are made to Christ He saith not The promises be made to seeds as of many but to his seed as of one that is Christ Gal. 3.16 therefore the collection of the scattered promises is in Christ onely and by union with him we come to have in terest and right to them all and not by our works M. B. Though God be not a debtor to thee yet he is to himself to his own faithfulness Answ God is a debter to whom he made the promise which is not to himself but to Christ whom he hath ordained and given for a covenant to his people Isa 49.8 M. B. You add O Lord It was free for thee before thou hadst promised whether thou wouldst give me heaven or no but now the word is out of thy mouth Answ 1. If God were free and at liberty not to give you heaven untill he saw some of your good works to promise it unto Then 1. there is no firm decree in the minde of God or purpose to save you from eternity Or 2. It is not founded upon grace but works foreseen but now he hath written your name in the book of life and it is now become his will to give you the Kingdome for you have so pleased him with your holy duties that you have moved him to make you a promise of it This is your way I would beloath to wrong you neither is it a pleasure to me to let any see your nakedness but onely you have forced me to let you see how you publish your own errours or failings while you seek the shame of others Further was it not as free for God whether he would have made a promise to Adam for the recovery of life and felicity and whether it should be of meer grace or of works 2. The Papists now do disclaim proper merit and claim all as belonging to works ex vi promissionis 3. If you look for a promise of life to your works then is not Christ the Gospel Faith Doctrina Evangelii apud Paulum to spectat ut Chirographum deleat illam naturalem opinionem ac sententiam legis exanimo tollat inseribat aliam de Deo opinionem c. and free-grace denyed or excluded and the way is not with you Believe and thou shalt live or be saved as Act. 16.31 nor yet believe and then work I believed therefore I spake but be holy and do good first and upon that ground well laid make claim to the promise and build thy faith and hope of Salvation but Christ is become our righteousness our onely foundation and hope of glory 1. Cor. 3.11 Col. 1.27 Your divinity and way be to your self Alas Sir What other fruits can this teaching bring forth in your hearers but to confirm and maintain that legal and natural opinion men have of God and to make them despise true Faith Grace Christ and his Gospel M. B. God is faithful therefore saith David I will make mention of thy righteousness that is faithfulness onely and then marke what the Apostle saith of this speech This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance c. Answ It is true God is faithful and so all that walk in in the steps of Abrahams faith do judge him to be Rom. 4.20 Heb. 11.11 but that covenant of sure mercies and peace is founded on the rock Christ and not on the sandy ground of works 2. To that of David Bernard understandeth it of imputed and passive righteousness which he saith also is ours by the gratious act of free donation when we were yet sinners as it is said Rom. 5.15 the gift of righteousness 3. That faithful saying of Paul 1 Tim. 1.13 is that Christ came to save sinners directly against you who teach that our good works have the promise then must we be good our selves first before we can do good and so not sinners and that salvation is not for sinners but the godly Lastly the faithful labour and suffer shame because they know and are assured aforehand by their faith in Christ entitling them unto it that they have in heaven an enduring substance that glory and kingdome laid up and reserved in Christ will more then countervail all their labour and loss for his names and truths sake 1 Cor. 15. ult Heb. 10.33 With a bleeding heart pitying you and the people under your Minister I write this M. B. Object Is then the Gospel a covenant of works I shall answer that afterward Answ Indeed you overthrow the Gospel and do strangely shuffle and confound grace and works how weak your answer is and ineffectual to free and clear you from these thoughts you are so sensible of will be seen in its place M. B. They are testimonies whereby our election is made sure 2 Pet. 1.10 Answ Calvin saith upon that place If it should be so that our vocation and election for the stability of them should be founded and relye on good works it would follow it did depend upon us against all Scripture which teacheth first that our Election is grounded upon the eternal purpose of God then that of Gods free pleasure and goodness our vocation is both begun and perfected If it be understood of certainty to others there is no absurditity in it but if we should refer that assurance unto conscience it so ought not saith he in my judgement as if the faithful thereby should before God acknowledge themselves to be elected and called but simply I take the meaning to be that by their holy life their calling may firmly appear and so they be discerned from Reprobates Now this is but to taste and know the inward and hidden goodness of the tree by the fruits and so to judge and determine of it but he that hath no surer and cleerer testimony within himself will still be uncertain and wavering for how can works certifie me of my estate further then I know see assuredly that they a rise come from true Faith then we must first know that we have Faith which hath a cleer evidence in it self Heb. 11.1 and yet is Faith more out of question when we feel it work by love Gal. 5.6 and 2 Cor. 5.14 The love of Christ constraining us feelingly and effectually to all good for his Names sake M. B. They are a condition without which we cannot be saved A. It was taught and received among the learned and Orthodox Anâ—ea justificati reconsiliati salvi libere operamur before you were born that being first justified reconciled saved we then work and that freely which before we cannot Christ is no sooner our righteousness then he is our salvation also I muse what your Faith is or what treasure or pleasure at all it bringeth into your soul you may as well and truly say Our works are conditions of our righteousness or justification as of our salvation if salvation be by Grace works are excluded as Eph. 2.8 Rom. 11.6 and if grace be free it is without
eternal love to us and why should you or any other think that Hezekiah so approved and commended a long time for a truly-Religious King should now call his spiritual estate into question or doubt no circumstance in the Text arguing any such thing and if it had been so he had gone far about to fetch his comfort and assurance from his works and life and it would have been very uncertain and weak when he had done And so this makes nothing at all against Doctor Crispe who would have all to derive their comfort and peace from the pure fountain even Faith in the satisfaction discharge and atonement made by Christ as the most direct neer and infallible way and not from works which must be first carryed to our Faith or assurance that our state is good there to be proved to be good and so at best can but secondarily and weakly seal that comfort formerly had by believing I think Hezekiah might be reproved and condemned Linguae impiorum est quotidiena sornax Aug. as by Rabshakeh so others neerer unto him for his zeal in demolishing Idolatry whereupon he going to God maketh him the witness of the righteousness of the things done and of the integrity of his heart in doing them Notitia nostri certior intue As David many times did being wrongfully charged by Saul and others and as it is our case who are falsly slandered as Antinomians and yet can and dare boldly go and appeal to God before whom all things are naked saying Thou knowest O Lord we are no Antinomians no Libertines Non est plâ—x ponderis in alieno convitio quam in nostro testimoiro Teachers of licentious Doctrine c. and so the testimonie of Hezekiahs Davids and our Consciences being cleer of such things in the presence of God is a great support a sure defence and an effectual comfort against all those calumnies censures and false aspersions This is my rejoycing saith Paul being misreported to be what he was not the testimony of our Conscience that in simplicity and godly sincerity not with fleshly wisdom but by the Grace of God we have had our conversation in the world 2 Cor. 1.12 But now all this is touching things controverted between man and man where our innocency such as it is is and ever will be the best Buckler plea and comfort and it is not pertinent to what Doctor Crispe entreateth of or if this satisfie not I could add that as the Churches estate was then servile Gal. 4.1 2. and as servants not having the promised Spirit of Adoption they did all things rather ex timore then amore out of fear more then love so Hezekiah having discharged the office of a godly chief Magistrate and now being called upon by death to lay it aside presenting himself before the Lord hath his own thoughts to witness his integrity touching the generality of the course of his life and so they excusing and comforting him in that case do give him some boldness even as it is with a servant who hath answered the requirings and done the commands of his Master in the day of his accounts Thus it is one thing to be comforted from the inward testimony of my Conscience reflecting with an impartial eye upon my conversation in this world and finding it to be unblamable and in all integrity of heart especially when adversaries do accuse and speak evil of me Terret me tota vita mea nam apparet mibi aut petcataem aut tota florilitas Aus and another thing to fetch my peace and comfort thence concerning my spiritual estate and atonement with God he that is exercised with inward consticts and temptations will easily perceive how dangerous a thing it is to have the eye and consideration of the soul taken off Christ and his righteousness and to be set upon any work or qualification of our own then nothing but Christ all is accounted as dung and loss else our own righteousness as unclean and filthy rags Phil. 3.8 9. Isa 64.6 But without spiritual buffetings of Satan the Doctrine of Faith of Christ our righteousness our reconciliation and peace cannot be prized learned nor purely taught M. B. 11. They are necessary in respect of God c. a Leah though blear-eyed yet when she was fruitful in children said Now my husband will love me so may Faith say Now God will love me when it abounds in the fruits of righteousness Answ God is not as man his love to man is not begotten or caused by any thing he seeth in us he loveth before and without works even while we were enemies our mindes being in wicked works Rom. 5.8 Colos 1.21 thus the Word testifieth and Faith receiveth it what good he worketh in us or frameth and inableth us to work are they effects and fruits of his love not causes of it M. B. 12. In regard of others c. 1 Pet. 3.1 It is an exhortation to wives so to walk that their husbands may be won to the Lord So that thy life may convert him By the Word the Apostle meaneth the publike preaching Answ You rather make more obscure then cleer the sense and drift of the Apostle while you are minded to plead for good works you attribute too much to them Faith in Christ and conversion to God is by hearing of the Word Rom. 10.17 If the husband were an Idolatrous Ethnick or prophane yet by the sweet humble and dutiful carriage and vertuous life of the wife Maritos preparent ad amplexandam Christi fidem Calv. he might happily be gained to approve and like well of her Religion which had wrought such a sensible alteration and brought forth so plentiful and pleasant fruits in her and so be moved to give ear and attention to the Doctrine of the Christian Faith thus his minde becometh prepared and more ready to embrace that which did not so well please or perhaps was an offence before This is all that can be meant or intended in those words M. B. Obj. If good works be still necessarily requisite why then is not the Covenant of Grace still a Covenant of Works c. A. Although good works be requisite in the man justified or saved yet it s not a Covenant of Works but of Faith because Faith onely is the instrument to receive Justification and eternal life Answ I see no difference in effect between the Arminian Doctrine and yours in this you hold good works to be imperfect so they and you make all the promises of eternal life to belong and to be made unto them and what do they more 2 You Answer Although they be requisite in the Justified or saved before you said in a man to be Justified and saved yet it is a Covenant of Faith Answ Where do you finde it to be called a Covenant of Faith it is a Covenant of Grace and so it is entire without our Faith M.B. Good Works are to qualifie the subject
it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he
could not save by faith and salvation now not to be sought by grace onely in Jesus Christ saith the Margent But we believe through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ to be saved even as they Fathers do Learned Zanchy stateth the question between Paul and the false teachers to be An praeter Christum c. whether besides Christ good works also be necessary to salvation Mr. B. And if this should be the sense of the Text then it was clear that the Galatians were not made partakers of Gods spirit by the corrupt doctrine that was taught them of late by their Seducers but before while they did receive the pure doctrine of Christ and therefore it was their folly having begun in the spirit to end in the flesh this may be a probable interpretation Answ Yet these exceptions may be against the latter part 1. The question made by the Apostle is divisive whether they received the Spirit by the doctrine of faith or by the other for by one they must needs have it And not whether they received the spirit by both doctrines conjoyned and confounded so that you mistake the form of the question 2. They begun in the spirit while they abode in the doctrine of Christ for righteousness and salvation onely and their folly in ending in the flesh was in that besides the righteousness of faith they would have also works of the law for salvation for this is to end in the flesh that is in themselves having begun in Christ by the spirit or as saith Piscator this is called an ending in the flesh because it is a way both heavy and impossible Mr. B. That which I shall stand upon is this The Jews and false Apostles when they went furthest joyned Christ and the observance of the moral Law equally together for justification and salvation whereas the Law separated from Christ did nothing but curse and condemn not being able to help the soul at all Answ It is as probable if not more as I said that they held Christ sufficient to justifie but not to save without works 2. They joyned Christ and the Law for justification and salvation say you And you joyn them for sanctification and salvation so no such great difference 3. If the Law separated from Christ did nothing but accuse and condemn then it seemeth if it be joyned with Christ it will acquit and justifie or you think it hath left that power to condemn being joyned to Christ Came Christ to take that power from the Law or to mitigate and meeken it by uniting it to himself or to redeem his elect from under the Law to live and abide where no Law is to accuse Rom. 8. Who can lay any thing to their charge Is not Christ also our sanctification and redemption as well as our justification without the Law 1 Cor. 1.30 This doctrine is of God saith Paul there but yours is but of man Also you disclaim that the Law of it self is able to stirre up the least Godly affection in us but Christ and Law together can and not Christ without it If the soul be married to Chist her husband he cannot make her to bring forth fruits to God but Moses the former dead husband must be raised up again and so the beleiver hath two husbands to make him fruitfull and both at one time a thing utterly against the Law and the Ordinance of Mariage civill or spirituall for as in the civill two are thereby become one flesh so they that are joyned to Christ are one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 Mr. B. More places of Scripture are brought against this but they will come in more fitly under the notion of the Law as a Covenant Answ It 's true there are many more pag. 165. of the Assert unto which as many might be added but you have enough of these the rest you reserve to a more fit occasion And I had thought to have enlarged this point but that it is lost labour and I may ill spare any Mr. B. Thus therefore I shall conclude this point acknowledging that many learned and orthodox men speak otherwise and that there is a difficulty in clearing every particular about this question but as yet that which I have delivered carrieth the more probability with me Answ I thank you for your ingenuous and free acknowledgement I am not alone in this my opinion as yet I think you are in yours for any thing I mean that can be read in the Orthodox for otherwise the whole Colledge would not have given you such hearty thanks and your book so superlative commendation if they inclined not your way 2. Whereas you find difficulty that is because you have taken the staffe by the wrong and worst end contending against the clear truth I will not say against the light and checks of conscience But the more difficult the more fit for one of your quality and parts to encounter with that so your victory might happily have been more glorious Yet you have brought it no further even in your own thoughts but to be questio probabilis and you found it in as perfect condition and state when you entred upon it nay I say more I never read that it was controverted by any Protestant till now but your words imply that you may be of another mind to morrow The Lord instruct and establish us Mr. B. And I will give one Text more which I have not yet mentioned that is Act. 7.38 where the moral Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the lively cracles that is not verba vitae but verba viva vivificantia so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 giving life not that we could have life by vertue of obedience to them but when we by grace are inabled to obey them God of his mercy bestoweth eternal life Answ Before you were onely defensive sheilding your self as busily as you could against those Scriptures that fought against you but now you are disposed to give your adversary one stroke and yet the arm or weapon rather will not serve to fasten one blow either to hurt or fright this is but a childish skirmish or flourish It is granted the moral Law may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lively oracles or words and so it is in its own nature yea and in the Ministry of it life is propounded as Deut. 30.19 I have set before you life and death and Levit. 18.5 Ye shall keep my statutes and my judgements which if a man keep he shall live in them but this life it promiseth to give is upon such tearms and impossible conditions that as yet none was quickned by it but contrarily it brought death upon all by reason of that poysonfull enmity and maliciousness of our common nature whereupon Paul is bold and peremptory to affirm that all that are of the works of the Law are cursed Gal. 3. this inbred enmity is discovered but not cured by
your self or your ipse dixit must suffice you said so much indeed pag. 139. but proved not one syllable there nor here Much more might be added to discover the vanity and errour of your opinions and exceptions against us but this shall be all at this present Mr. B. Those that say the Law is abolished as it is foedus but not as it is regula say true The Law may be considered as it is a Covenant or as it is an absolute Rule requiring conformity unto it Now it may be granted that the Law is abolished in the former notion though not in the later Answ Those that say the Law as it is foedus is also regula and where it doth regulate there it is foedus a Covenant and that the Law is neither abolished as foedus nor regula say most truly and properly according to the Scripture If you look upon the Law and consider it as God propounded it you never find an absolute rule where it is not a Covenant we want your scriptum est Though God deal with his people in a Covenant of meer mercy it followeth not that his justice in his Law is abrogated or any whit diminished beside Christ having once answered and fully satisfied that hath also made a clear way for this manner of Gods dealing but this is onely the object of the faith of the Elect. 2. You are ready to grant what liketh you to any one save the truth to the favourers of it In your last page Law was not abrogated at all in any good sense say you but now it may truely be granted thus you play fast and loose as you please In whom now is inconstancy You promise to shew but take time for it and till then we will wait that the Law given by Moses was a Covenant of Grace If you understand it of the Morall Law it will be denied therefore look well what you affirm Mr. B. Whosoever expecteth life and justification by the Law he sets up the Covenant of works again nor is it any advantage to say These works are the works of grace and wrought by the spirit Answ 1. By the Law you must needs understand the Law of nature or as it was given to Adam for your opinion is that the Law given by Moses was a Covenant of grace by which then till it was antiquated it seemeth the Church might expect life and justification so that when God said by Moses Whosoever doth these things shall live in them herein they were to seek righteousness and life and not by faith I know not how you can evade but leave it to your second thoughts 2. You set up the Covenant of works again when you teach that salvation is due to good works by vertue of Gods promise though not of merit this doth none other but set up mans righteousness and the Law as foedus yet in words you would seem sometime to deny it And remember also your own words viz. It is no advantage to these works or works of grace for still it is by doing 3. And by this now we may learn what you mean when you say the Law instrumentally regenerateth and converteth for it did so in Davids time and in the old Testament that Law by your opinion was not the Law of works but the Covenant of grace But seeing you say withall that that Covenant of grace is now abrogated then it is not now to be used to quicken and convert It was of use and force in Davids time but not now say you therefore the Argument is inconsequent Or may we take you thus Christ hath obtained that the Law given to Adam may be instrumentall for the Spirit but how is it then that you bring no other Scripture but Psal 19. and 119. which you grant to be meant of the Law comprehensively that is as here for the Covenant of grace you see this will not prove the Law of works to be a converting word Thus you are found further from the truth and at great variance with your self here is much need of reconciling and salving Mr. B. The Law is a rule to walk by though not a Covenant be justified by Answ The just both liveth and walketh by faith 2 Cor. 5.7 then not by the Law 2. If the Law by Moses be a Covenant of grace then it was to be justified by If you object you mean the Law largely taken for the whole dispensation of Commandments Morall Judiciall and Ceremoniall I reply you cannot make all these of one nature so not all to make a Covenant of grace 2. To say the denomination is given to the better part I answer as no text warranteth this so the natures of the Laws is not thereby changed If you say of the whole heap in the floore It s as Corn that maketh nor proveth not chaffe to be Wheat Also so the judiciall which was for the government of the Jewish Commonwealth is as much the Covenant of grace as the Morall Law But this is to decline the question and to confound what you should keep distinct Mr. B. The Antinomian distinction of the Law abolished as a Law but still abiding in respect of the matter is a contradiction The Law saith the Antinomian in the matter of it was not denied to be a rule according to which a believer walketh and liveth Answ You much wrong your Adversary and more endanger your self if there be any evill in a false accusation as the ninth command for he saith not the Law is abolished as a Law but that it is inviolable and for ever Neither can nor yet would any man so conclude from his words but you his words are as you say The Law in the matter of it is not denied c. but what ground is here to inferre an abolition And where he saith A believer walketh according to the rule of the Law yet it is not by vertue from the Law regulating him but from another power within renewing and disposing the heart thereunto He is like the honest Traveller who keepeth the high way freely of his own accord and taketh pleasure in so doing And yet the work here is so imperfect and he cometh so far short of what is in that Law that he findeth and acknowledgeth a power therein threatning and condemning for it so that his free justification by grace is his continuall Rocke and refuge and his faith therein the sole preserver of his peace and safety But by your doctrine there should be no more need of justification Christ or faith after conversion for the Law hath onely a Mandative power say you but none to condemn or curse I muse that your own experience doth not convince you of your errour Thus we reach and say The Law or more properly and plainly that there may be no evasion God in his Law obligeth and bindeth unto that rule of perfect righteousness and also to the curse inevitably for every failing and disobedience You tell of a
dispense them as he pleased more sparingly then then now LECT XXVI Rom. 3.27 Where is beasting theu c. WHatever your reason or ends may be for it yet I see not any good or warrantable ground thus to take and handle the Law and Gospel in a large sense as you say and when you have done I would know what of the Gospel you conceive to be legall and how much Law you take to be Evangelicall Also you prefixe a Text as your foundation but the discourse you erect doth not touch it is not at all supported by it but stands like a Castle built in the Air. Neither do I find the Lutherans posing the Calvinists about the Law in this for both affirm the Law to be a Covenant of works and superadded to the promise holding forth all favour and peace upon such hard conditions to the Jews that they might experimentally be convinced of their folly in seeking it by their own righteousness You must go over it again else what is done will not serve to prove Moses Law a Covenant of grace Indeed we grant the godly Jews did enjoy what Christ premised but it was by such Ordinances as were of grace and not of works as is the Law they eyed or looked at Christ in the promises and not in precepts And as you began so you proceed laying down differences not between the Law and Gospell but between Gospel and Gospel I mean the administration of grace before and now of which others have writ more particularly plainly and profitably Then you tell us They Jews had a twofold consideration 1. as being servile another as being Sons but under age Now that is it that we say As Sons they were free for they were so by Christ promised but their condition was servile and their immunities and priviledges were in a great part vailed and kept from them But note that the Mosaicall pedagogy is antiquated what need was it to handle law or Gospel otherwise then in their strict and proper sense To run over every thing is long and tedious What is said by you of these differences may be granted with these two exceptions first that the law strictly taken is not as you say onely for those who have a perfect and holy nature Paul doth directly cross and contradict it saying The Law is not made for the righteous but for the Lawless and disobedient 1 Tim. 1.9 And Adam was not charged with this law in his integrity but had a Law touching a thing in its own nature indifferent for the keeping of this law was then naturall to him as is flying to a Bird and bearing fruit to a Tree or Hearbe Also it is clear that the law was added because of transgression Gal. 3.19 as if there had been no sinne there should have been no occasion of giving the law And this contradicts your self elsewhere affirming the Law to be an effectuall instrument to regenerate and sanctifie Now who needs to be regenerated and sanctified he that hath a perfect and holy nature or he that is a sinner and impure if you think otherwise what a deceiver are you when you would perswade the filthy and the vile that they may be changed and renewed by the Law of works And thus as your fourth difference is utterly false so your third is found to be defective and not plenary for all is of grace It is the Gospel or word of grace that justifieth and sanctifieth God in that ministration we live under is a free giver and man a meer receiver for God having discovered and made bare the root and heart of man so as he seeth his spirituall poverty and wretchedness by his Law doth then open his graciousness and his bountifull hand by his Gospel that the believing soul may be satisfied with his goodness in every kinde So that now as a Beggar he must live by Almes of Divine liberality being thus made to walk humbly with his God Open thy mouth and I will fill it Psa 81. 2. And in your last difference you set up and pull down say and unsay At first you tell us The Law is conditionall but the Gospel absolute but this is too clear a ground for you to abide upon therefore presently you say I finde this question a troublesome one Thus you trouble your self and others without cause Repentance and faith are no Gospel-conditions but are said to be the reason and end of the preaching of the Gospel It is preached that men may repent and believe Rom. 16.26 Luk. 14.47 yea and that they may be holy too Tit. 2.12 Ephes 4.22 Secondly The Gospel is the seed of them all as is to be cleared afterward they all grow and arise out of the doctrine of grace how then can they be conditions of it for what is a condition but that which is necessarily required that a thing may be so so that it will follow It is no Gospel where there is no faith or repentance or at least none preached to me What am I called upon to believe then The Gospel is the object of faith and in believing are we said to receive and obey it 2 Thes 1.8 The Gospel offereth pardon favour and eteruall life to sinners that they may come receive and partake of all freely yea beseeches men to be reconciled And doth not bid them go and get repentance and faith and holiness elsewhere as they can and then upon condition they bring these they shall be forgiven all their sins be reconciled and saved by the Gospel Indeed where God maketh the Gospel to be effectual there it bringeth forth these fruits there is repentance and saith to believe and it giveth no peace nor consolation to any but the believing soul so as faith is after the hearing of the Gospel so comfort is after faith Rom. 15.13 The God of all hope fill you full of peace and joy in believing In order one precedes another Gospel is preached before Faith that men may believe and then comes peace and consolation upon believing But who would argue hence that Faith is a condition of the Gospel or Peace a condition of Faith They denote a certaine Order that God is pleased to set and observe in his works and dispensations As for Mortification and Sanctification you speak of they are the effects of the Gospel for the soul thereby called and implanted into Christ beginneth to dye unto all things and to live only unto Christ and God in him so increasing with the increasings of God Col. 2.19 And Repentance admitteth of divers considerations in regard of some whereof it is Legall and of others Evangelical but of this next Lecture LECT XXVII Rom. 3.27 Where is boasting It is excluded c. IF this Question Whether the Gospel preach Repentance or no be as you affirme the foundation of Antinomanisme It then much concerneth you in this to play the man that the foundation being razed all may fall to confusion and this the rather also
to affirm and maintain it and with a smal touch he there passeth it over And here he saith The Law it self converts not No more doth the Gospel it self as he often saith without the spirit This is as if with Mr. Burgess he meanes that either Law of Gospel is the Spirits instrument for conversion and that we may preach either for that end Mr. Rutherford is unwilling to speak out Loquere ut videam 3. If the Spirit by the Gospel conform us to the rule of the Law It s then true that the Law is a passive rule but not active as actuating to effectuate this thus you grant what I asserted and oppose without cause But at last you tell us the Apostle never speaks of our freedom from the Law as it doth regulate direct and lead us Reply Now this overthroweth what you said even now viz. That the Spirit by the Gospel doth direct and lead us in the way of the Law for then the Law doth not actively lead us Mr. T. pag. 9. What freeth a believer from the curse but because he is a new Creature Mr. Rutherf That new creation is sanctification 2 Cor. 5.17 not justification If any be in Christ that is if he be justified he is a new creature that is sanctified or else by the Antinomian gloss the meaning must be If a man be justified in Christ he is justified in Christ Paul speaks not so non-sense Reply This new creature is the man changed in himself and his state Sanctification is not a new creation but a new qualifying of a man It begets him not nor recreates him not to God nor yet delivereth him from under the curse makes him not the child of God restoreth him not into favour nor doth make him Heir Co-heir with Christ c. See your errour 2. To be justified and to be in Christ is not all one as your gloss is they differ as the cause and the effect or as the antecedent and consequent To be in Christ imports union which is before justification Or it is insition that work of the Father Joh. 15.1 that being ingrafted into him he may partake of his righteousness and holiness both imputatively and inherently if I may use the Aristotelian word More sound or probable is their judgement who teach that regeneration includeth both justification and sanctification Mr. Rutherf How shall it follow that Christ hath loosed us from all debt of active obedience because he hath loosed us from a necessity of perfect active obedience but the Law is spiritualized and lustred with the Gospel Law and free-grace and drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace requires not nor exacts upon perfect obedience under pain of losing salvation It requires obedience as the poor man is able to give it by the grace of God that the man may enter in the possession of eternal life Reply I Reply You can shew no text nor reason why Christ looseth not from imperfect as well as perfect obedience and that from active as well as passive Nay if from prefect much more may we argue from imperfect 2. If our state and case be well considered we are spiritually so poor that we are as unable to pay pence as pounds It is all one to a dead man whether life be tendered unto him upon condition of moving his least finger or the removing of a great Mountain and this is our case Again you can produce no Law 1 That requires not perfect obedience 2 That calls not for obedience as a proper condition of life Do and live 3 That threatens not death upon the least failing in any Iota But you let all see your new divinity 1 I must obey but not perfectly 2 The Law is spiritualized c. drawn down to a Covenant of free-grace 3 No more is required of the poor man then he can give c. Vltra posse viri non vult Deus ulla requirt Thus grace is abrogated promise made void and faith is of no effect Mr. Rutherf Paul sheweth what Law we are freed from of sinne and death and saith Christ died for this end Rom. 8 4. That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Whence I argue Those that ought to fulfill the righteousness of the Law by walking after the Spirit and mortifying the deeds of the flesh are not freed from the Law as a rule of righteousness Reply The strength of sinne is the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 2 Christ dyed that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us imputatively or grant inherently yet if this be the end and fruit of Christs death as you say then the Law is no active cause of it but the power of Christs death effecteth it And though this righteousness be for matter one with the Law yet still the Law is but a rule passively according to which the believer is conformed and regulated it not actively regulating Also active walking in the Law is but the expression and effect of sanctification and not properly sanctification it self Adam made holy lived accordingly from that inward form his holy life made him not holy Neither is our holy life to procure or preserve peace favour life as the Law propoundeth requireth it for these consist in faith alone which findeth and enjoyeth Christ to be such a true fulness and All-sufficiency to the soul that self by him and with him is satisfied and so needs no ends of its own in working and obeying Joh. 6.35 He that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst Mr. Rutherf We are freed from the Law being once justified so the Antinomians whatever we do is not against a Law or rule the law gives a dispensation to do those things being justified which the unjustified cannot do but in doing it they sinne because the unjustified are under the law as a rule of justice which we are not under We have an Antidated dispensation to sinne Reply You straine your wit if not conscience to make quidlibet ex quolibet But I say Take justification in the full latitude and extent of it or consider a Christian still as justified and so he is freed from under the Law but if you speak of or consider him in his active righteousness of works so as you bring him under the Law so he sinneth yea and is judged and condemned by the Law and you must raise him and bring him up to his justified state ere he can be free and secure from the curse Justification extends to all sins at all times throughout the whole life But it s false that I give an Antidated dipensation that is your indirect inference If you put the believer under the Law as he sinneth like the unjustified so the Law threatneth and curseth both equally Though you tell us unwarrantably of your bare word that the Law hath power to rule where it hath no power to condemn then we may live securely in sin or the works
his book I muse that men of wisdom and parts will so fight and contend against so mnnifest truths You grant the believer sinneth dayly and that every sinne yea least omission is Hell by the Law and thus he is dayly brought under reverence of Divine justice now how can that be and yet no condemnation or curse left in the Law Hell is but a fiction or a painted fire the man need not fear it though he sinne nor he need no Faith nor Christ to preserve and secure him Thus one of your Tenets cutteth the nerves of another 5 Exception same pag. Mr. Rutherf They object That holiness and good works be not the way to salvation Answ There be three things 1. the will of God to save 2. Jus or Law-right to salvation 3. Actual salvation Now touching this last holiness is the way to it Reply 1. The way by which we can onely go and enter into Heaven is that New living way dedicated by blood Heb. 10.20 21. In which way the soul can onely walk and continue by believing Hence it is said That through faith they inherite the promises Heb. 6.12 He that walketh in Christ is holy and walketh holily but he walketh not in Christ by his holy life As ye have received Christ so walk in him Colos 2.6 In walking or living holily we as it were move in another sphere by faith we live and walk in Christ and in the way of peace and life which is by his righteousness by love we walk the legal way of our own active righteousness saith Luther Doth not the Scripture call us to come to Christ to be found in him to abide walk and continue in him All which can only be effected by faith In this way the soul meeteth with the most and strongest temptations and oppositions which it resisteth and overcometh by faith alone 1 Pet. 5.8 9. 1 Joh. 5.4 You tell us what the faith of Libertines is It may be you know it and what your own is to you but if you censure and asperse them for Libertines who are not so whose condemnation is that be not so rash in judgeing they stand and fall to Christ not to you Rom 14.4 And if your faith which should elevate and carry up the soul unto Christ and the way of free justification by his grace for continual peace favour acceptance and everlasting salvation do yet let you seek and labour to receive all in the way of your own works and obedience it may well then be questioned Gal. 2.19 20 21. Further your expression is not home but falleth short when you say that Christ onely giveth a right to salvation Christ and salvation cannot be parted you would place Christ in the beginning salvation in the end and your good workes maketh the way and leadeth and guideth from Christ to salvation this is your divinity But eternal life is in Christ He that hath Christ hath life 1 Joh. 5.11 12. You may as well say A believer hath not Christ but onely hath a right to him now Christ dwelleth in the heart by faith Eph. 3. And his Kingdom is in you which is in righteousness peace and joy in the holy Ghost Rom. 14.17 I am sure if you find and walk in a holy and clean way it is by faith or rather the blood of sprinkling cleanseth and maketh your way undefiled before God and no perfect obedience of yours But spiritual things are spiritually discerned Mr. Rutherf In answer to the fifth object The principle of Love and Law are not contrary Reply To work from a Law-principle is to work as a servant for hire Do and live but love is free and seeketh not her own 1 Cor. 13.5 You adde that the Law directing is not abolished by Grace or by Love Rep. True no more is the Law condemning for any thing you have yet or can shew We must still bear your indignities cast on us in your way but know full well that all your logick cannot number us amonst your old Libertines You delight your self in your witty expressions if you understand them it is well 6 Exception Of the Law converting the soul Reply In this you are one with Mr. Burgess also Read your answer there and study a second reply with him A legal reformation is no Gospel-conversion nor Christian sanctification Unto your answer of 6 Object I say I leave it to the Author because he is living and able also to satisfie you 7 Exception against Dr. Crisp Mr. Rutherf Dr. Crisp objects Christ putteth forth a general proclamation to all Answ It 's true the Gospel excepteth no man from pardon but the promise of the Gospel is not simply universal as if God intended all and every should be actually redeemed and saved 2. It 's most untrue that Christ belongeth to sinners as sinners for then Christ should belong to all unbelievers how obstinate soever Nay Christ belongs onely to sinners elected to glory and to believing sinners as believing in regard of actual union 3. It 's false that sinners as sinners receive Christ so should Judas receive him Onely believers receive him 4. It 's false that sinners as sinners believe in Christ This way of Libertines is a broad way for Sorcerers Theeves c. remaining in that damnable state to believe where as sinners as thus qualified are to believe that is humbled wearied self-condemned onely Reply You know that Dr. Cr. speaks onely of the proclamation and Gospel-tender which is to every creature Mark 16.15 and not of Gods intention which he granteth is onely to gather and save the elect Also you said a little before That the obligation of believing lyeth on all yea though they be damned so then the Gospel is to be preached indiscriminatim unto all for the obedience of faith Rom. 16.26 2. You here again pervert and restrain his meaning for he speaks of the free tender of Christ unto all and you say he is intended onely to sinners elected to glory This argueth a minde disposed to cavil and to let nothing pass without a Carp how pure soever Christ in the dispensation is to be preached and made known to unbelievers that they may become believers Gospel findeth not men believers it is well if it leave them so Faith cometh by hearing and after faith comes actual union To your 3. If sinners as sinners do believe then as sinners they receive Christ For what is it to believe but to receive Christ Joh. 1.12 Your expression is Christ belongs to believing sinners To receive is to take a thing offered or given as Joseph took unto himself Mary Matth. 1.30 So Rom. 5.11 To your 4. If sinners be wearied and self-condemned are they not sinners still Because they are sensbly so are they less so or not formally sinners Prove that further And though all be not so prepared or qualified yet it 's plain by your own confession before that they are bound to believe the obligation lieth on them 2. In
or Ministers forth to call men in that they may see the salvation of their God know all things are made ready fit down and rest securely comfortably and contentedly in the apprehension and injoyment of it Neither touching this matter can you finde more high expressions in Luther as you tearm them then in the New Testament see Matth. 22.4 All things are prepared Luk. 2.30 31. Mine eyes have seen thy salvation which thou hast prepared before the face of all people Eph. 2.8 9. He hath saved us By grace ye are saved not by works lest any man should boast It is you that are too low of Stature who cannot reach to salvation by simple believing and receiving it unless you be heightened and the hands of your faith be lengthened by good works and there is no fault in the highness of the expression I would learn of you how good works can be present when a lost sinner layeth hold on salvation or on Christ that he may be saved or what the presence of them can availe him or what good work was required of the Jaylor or found in him when trembling as truly wretched and undone and crying what he might do to be saved Paul bade him to believe in the Lord Jesus and he should be saved Act. 16.31 but of this more hereafter as occasion will be given M. B. S 3. If this were their ground of many unsavoury assertions among them c. Answ If you were not too dainty nice and quick in mis-apprehension our assertions would not effend you but be as savoury and acceptable as they be to others of as good judgment as your self M. B. That there may be injudiciousness in them as a cause in part of some their erroneous passages will appear in that they frequently speak contradictions Answ If you have greater perfection in judgment and other parts shame not nor disdain them that want neither be arrogant in your self you have nothing but what you received 2. In the undertaking and managing of this quarrel you bewray great weakness of judgment as all may perceive 3. If speaking of contradictions do argue injudiciousness this is more then evident in you I could give instance in many passages which I observed You condemn that assertion It 's no Law if it have no power as to command so to curse and yet with the same breath do say that a Law is alway condemning potentially though not actually If it be condemning potentially alway then it hath alway power do you not see your contradiction If it do not actually it is not because lex non est damnaus but for want of occasion And the like may be seen in your expressions about the Law and salvation by grace and by works c. Mr. B. ibid. This is a passage often but very dangerous That let a man be a wicked man even as high as enmity it self can make a man yet while he is thus wicked and while he is no better his sins are pardoned and he justified Yet in other passages Though a man be never so wicked yet if he come to Christ if he will take Christ his sins are pardoned Now what a contradiction is here To be wicked and while he is wicked and while he is no better and yet to take Christ unless they hold that to take Christ or to come to him be no good thing at all Answ 1. If you wanted not charity towards your Adversary you might have tolerated and accounted of such-like passages as you do of those high expressions in Luther and you pass by great mountains in Dr. Tayler as if no error were in him and are thus strict to finde out a mole-hil or mote in Dr. Crisp and yet can shew none This is out of no love to truth or hatred of error 2. Many things we say are tolerated in Luther for many special reasons and it is clear to me that the same grounds of toleration were in this Author you so except against 3. The injudiciousness seemeth here to be in you who see not to put a difference between a wicked mans disposition and his condition while he is thus wicked and no better to wit in his state and condition If he will come to Christ take Christ that argueth a change in disposition and will a minde to be delivered and freed from that so cursed and dangerous condition he is in 4. To come to Christ to take Christ be good for the wicked man for he hath no way else left for salvation but first he may thank him from whom that motion and perswasion came who gave him that heart and ability to come None can come to me unless the Father draw him Ioh. 6.45 And 2. If this be all the good you so plead for to come to Christ then he is wicked and no better nor otherwise till he come or begin and have a heart to come and so much his words import which might have prevented this wrangling if you pleased 5. Will you teach a man that this act of comming or taking Christ is a good thing in him to be looked at by him or that it is any whit satisfactory to the justice of the Law or available to the recovery of his lost soul and estate that he may put this act in and reckon it towards his discharge or justification or you will teach and tell him that Christ is all this unto whom he therefore cometh forthat purpose If a notorious Malefactor condemned to dye have a pardon put into his hands or have it for going to the King can he plead his going or doth any account him less wicked or guilty for that Also In the same page 30. and Sect. you are offended with the Authors Rhetorical expressions as is also Mr. Geree Ans But what doth not offend a weak and crazie stomach where the minde is prejudicate and sinister nothing can please else where or when may he better use it then in Christs cause or work and it is to as much if not better purpose then a great deal of reading you shew in this Book making little or no use of your alledged Authors but only for a flourish like him that lighteth a candle and presently puffeth it out If he had his weakness so have we The high-Priest of old being compassed himself with infirmity was thereby to be moved to have compassion on the ignorant and them that were out of the way Heb. 5.2 And you impute it ibid to his injudiciousness that your adversary doth minde onely the promissory part of the Scripture and stand little upon the mandatory Answ Be it so I hold it judiciousness and wisdome in him For 1. There be ten for one yea a hundred for one who are wholly for the Mandatory 2 Besides every mans conscience naturally preacheth the Law of works within him Rom. 2.15 but is unprincipled in grace and the free promise 3. If you did consider what little pure Gospel-light is in the general
Ministery and how Jerusalem the valley of vision zealous in a religious way yet did not know the things of her peace Luk. 19.41 but erred in her heart not knowing God way of peace and life Psal 95.3 In what a dangerous and deep temptation many a poor distressed soul lyeth plunged sore for want of this doctrine and consolation of free-grace 4. And that the relieving enlarging and saving of such a soul is much to be preferred before conversation of life And 5. Lastly As Luther saith That there is no danger in preaching faith free-grace without works for good works will follow where that is truely received but in preaching works and the Law so as it may be done and obeyed is much danger lest free-grace be obscured destroyed unknown men rest in the way of the Law and the gate of eternal life never be opened c. If I say you had considered these and the like you would never have condemned the innocent There be also divers things exceptable in your supposed disputable questions and some that reflect on your self as being inconsistent with what you hold at other times and confirming what you oppose but we may not dwell on what is Cursory Mr. B. pag. 31. Let us see what prejudicial inferences they gather from this doctrine of justification denying them good works to be a way to heaven Thus Doctor Crisp in page 6 c. Answ Methinks that expression of the Doctor is so clear and fully satisfactory that you should not quarrel with it and to me your language is so confused that I cannot skill of it but do fear it will lead the Reader out of the right way Let Christ be the way and good works our imployment or business in the way as he saith and then I see no error nor danger If you do truly good works you do them in Christ abiding in him Ioh. 15.4 in whom you are alive and walk continually by faith doth the soul go out of Christ or leave him when or while it worketh As ye have received Christ Jesus so walk in him Colos 2.6 Now the soul cannot walk in Christ nor have union with him save by faith the believer also walketh in the way of the Law of works but this is his way on earth amongst men and Christ is his way to God and heaven Let me add Christ is set forth so to be our way that he is our salvation also so that in him the soul is at her journies end and need not work to go further for attaining life as if it were a far off and good works were a way to carry and bring us unto it Eternal life is in the Sonne He that hath the Sonne hath eternal life also Joh. 3.36 1 Joh. 5.11 12. Also the words of Bernard are Viaregni not ad regnum of which difference see more in the Assertion of Grace M. B. Thus Matth. 7.17 Strait is the way that leadeth to life What is this way but the work of grace and godliness Answ I might here put you in minde of a threefold work of grace as you will have it First Angusta est via oportet te fieri tenuem si vis per eam venire Caeterum qui operibus onerati sunt sicut cōnchylibus onustos videmus Jacobi peregrinos ii non toterant penetrare Si veneris cum magnis saceis operum plenis depenere oportebit c. Ger. which God hath wrought in and by Christ for man 2. That which he worketh in man 3. And that which man worketh by vertue of his grace Now I need not ask you which of these you mean for it 's seen by your words you take to the third and last which as I conceive cannot be the meaning of the place and I could give reasons for it But I incline to Musculus with others which Authors I have been forced to part with who expound it so That the Doctrine of Christ and faith is the straight way which few indeed do finde and the broad way is false Doctrine and error of all sorts which leaveth the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 13.3 There is a broad way common to the religious Iews Papists and deceived Protestants which leadeth to destruction As for the way of downright wickedness all know that is the way to hell And as many in a blinde zeal are carried to damnation as by prophaness and actual outward sinning And this is a strong inducement to me thus to understand it as that to believe is the straightest way of all others and fewest finde and walk in that way with an upright foot so because Christ is there speaking of Teachers and their Doctrine and not of mans life and manners so that it is doctrine he meaneth to be the straight way for it is doctrine true or false that guideth and carrieth the soul one way or other to heaven or hell and that is either the righteousness of faith or the righteousness of works He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved he that believeth not shall be damned and no good work can help to save him Mr. B. 2. Denying the presence of them good works in the person justified for thus saith the Author expresly speaking of that of Paul therefore we conclude that a man is justified without the works of the Law Here saith he the Apostle doth not only exclude works from having any power operative to concur in the laying iniquities upon Christ but excludes all manner of works man can do to be present and existent in persons when God doth justifie them And he instanceth of a general pardon for thieves Now one man may take the pardon as well as another Answ Your charge is heavie but I finde no evidence or proof What doth he deny the presence of good works in the person justified or after his justification did he not grant and say that they are our business and imployment in the way your words may be taken as if he denyed that ever a justified person should do good works Bona opera non precedunt justificandum c. Solis ortum sequitur aeris calafactio Melancth Cum peccata remitti constet etiamsi adhuc plena sit natura peccatis Melancth Deus nos in ca persectione in qua Christus resurrexit imactur If with Austine he hold good works do not go before a man to be justified I hope it is no error The air becometh warm not before but after the rising of the Sun Perhaps your meaning would be while justification is in fieri in doing not in facto after it is done yet your words are otherwise And this is to you so dangerous that to your charity it is inexcusable yet your great reading might tell you of divers Orthodox who speak and write as much and the Scripture will warant the same when you come professedly to handle the point hereafter Besides you cannot but know that the Doctor speaks of the sinners justification
in Christ when God did lay on him the iniquities of all the Elect and in raising him from death did acquit and justifie both him and all them in and through him of and from all those sins for ever and ever since doth behold and accept them in that perfection and clear estate wherein Christ was raised And Master Pemble had that discretion and charity that by distinguishing between justification in foro Coeli and in foro Conscientiae he did admit of Polanus in the former acception Now when sins were so transacted and Christ rose again wholly discharged of them for our justification Rom. 4.25 how could any of good works be then present or existent Mr. B. He Doctor Crisp concluded that therefore though a man rebel actually from time to time and do practise this rebellion yet the hatefulness thereof is laid upon Christ Is not this such a doctrine that must needs please an ungodly man Answ The Doctor speaketh of the Elect who before calling to the faith of Christ did not cease to practise rebellion and saith that God satisfied his justice even for those wickednesses he is in committing at that time in which Christ did suffer And this will be the only refuge plea and staffe of support and comfort when that soul is in trouble and distress which is the very end he propounded to himself in these so free and absolute expressions of the grace of God as neither you nor any other laying aside all prejudice can otherwise conceive for these be his words pag. 141. I say all the weight and all the burthen and all the 〈◊〉 sin it self is long agone laid upon Christ and that laying it upon him is a full discharge and a general release and acquittance to thee that there is not any one sin now to be charged upon thee Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world Ioh. 1.29 The laying of thy iniquities upon Christ is an absolute and full discharge to thee that there neither is nor can be any iniquity that for the present or for hereafter can be laid to thy charge If the Lord give to any to believe this truth that it is his iniquity the Lord hath laid on Christ Est scopus hujus gravissimae consolationis munire pertene factos qui agnoscant immunditiam imbecillitatem suam ut certo statuant se Deo placere propter Christum c. God himself cannot charge any one sin upon that person pag. 137. You may remember your own rule that all things are to be taken in the Authors sence and as he intendeth it and that of Hilary Ex causis dicendi dictorum intelligentiae sumatur And so it is true that this doctrine must be pleasant and most acceptable to an ungodly heart which travelleth and is weary under the sence and burthen of his sins Comfort ye the hearts of my people c. Isai 40.1 M. B. 3. In denying of gaining any thing by them even any peace of heart or losing it by them Now this goeth contrary to Scripture Ans While you believe that you are justified and accepted in Christ you can want no peace of heart Christ is our Righteousness and our peace Ephes 2.14 Heb. 7.2 If you cease to believe so and fall from faith to purisie Conscience by works you gain nothing but by catching at the shadow lose all true and effectual consolation But you say it is contrary to Scripture and when you shew your Scripture look for a more full and satisfying answer M. B. Thus Doctor Crisp pag. 139. The business we are to do is this that though there be sins committed yet there is no peace broken Answ I finde no such words in that page but I credit you so far that those are his words you tell us of error but show none The peace saith the Doctor is not broken to wit between God and the believer because the breach of peace is satisfied in Christ What more Orthodox or plain He is our Peace-maker If any Conscience lose her peace and be troubled it is because he believeth not and giveth way to sence and the Law but then receive abide in and enjoy Christ as he ought In your Answer you bring in nothing directly against him only you pretend a confutation You bid us especially consider Heb. 12. two last verses Our God is a consuming fire Answ This helps you not because God is so terrible out of Christ in the Law revealing wrath therefore receiving a Kingdome that cannot be removed let us have grace whereby we way serve God acceptably c. Here is an Argument to perswade the wavering Jews to close with God in the Covenant of free-grace in Christ Jesus otherwise his presence and dealing would prove most terrible and not that men should serve God themselves and by that means to make placable and loving and so to avoid the danger which is to deny and overthrow faith in the reconciliation by Christ and the whole grace of the Gospel You infer If the Scripture threaten thus to men living in sin if they do not they may finde comfort Answ 1. You should have said To men that abide in the unbelief of the Gospel dallying with it or not having that grace unto which the Apostle there exhorteth which in effect is this that all those are so threatened who believe not Christ to be the Messiah and the Mediator who hath made and brought in a full and everlasting Atonement whereupon followeth the serving of God acceptably c. The despising or neglecting of this grace doth most displease God and is the main condemnation under the Gospel Ioh. 3.19 And so long as the heart doubteth whether God be pacified and become propitious in Christ it can never please God Heb. 11.6 For no prayer nor worship with this unbelief or doubting in the inward parts can be heard and accepted How can they call upon him in whom they have not believed Rom. 10.14 2. You say If they sin not they may finde comfort Answ In what or Displicet Deo â—ubitatio quaâ—â—e neque coli â—eque in vocari â—cum dubitatione pâ—â—est where 's he that sinneth not and can say my heart is clean So all our comfort lyeth in our discharge by Christ Blessed is the man whose iniquities are forgiven Psal 32.1 M. B. Secondly Our holy duties they have a promise of pardon and eternal life though not because of their worth yet to their presence and therefore may the godly rejoyce when they finde them Answ This is strange teaching among Protestants It is an Assertion gross enough to have fallen from the pen of a Jesuite who now deny any dignity in good works as well as you deserving eternal life only eo vi promissionis by vertue of Gods promise made to good works they expect it I will not write all my thoughts while I consider how such doctrine is countenanced and commended by the President and Fellows of
Sion-Colledge But this I am bold to say that this is not that Law or Doctrine which came first out of Gods Sion Isa 2. If you teach thus then no man can dare to beleive or receive remission of sins through Christs blood till he be sure he finde first the presence of good works and when will that be that a man can finde good works before he believe or what are the good works he must so necessarily finde and unto which the pardon is promised you might have done wisely and it had been a special work of charity to have given instance in some and then to have shewed both how those good works may be done in the state of unbelief and also how they may be certainly known to be good before faith O poor sinful and trembling soul into what an inextricable labyrinth will this bring thee and when thou shalt be deeply plunged into temptation how to prevent thy fearful desperation by this doctrine is utterly impossible 2. By this you will make people look more to good works then to Christ present and formed in the heart the only hope of glory Col. 1.27 And he that hath Christ hath life and he that hath not the Son hath not life whatever works he may pretend to have 1 Joh. 5.12 3. Yea a legal Ministery exhorting to duties performances and conformity to the Law of works will be held sufficient and men need not be bid to examine themselves whether they be in the faith and Christ dwell in them or no 2 Cor. 13.5 but whether they have store of good works and so they may be sure of pardon and salvation But Sir If you will have your Doctrine to have a free passage why do you not prove clear and confirm it your word will not bear and warrant a Tenet of this weighty importance and consequence Where finde you God speaking to the work or not rather to the worker and if the promise be made also to him of pardon or life it is for his faith or rather for Christs sake in whom all the promises are yea and Amon unto the glory of God 2 Cor. 1.20 Gal. 3.16 On that ever such a Doctrine should see the Sun be heard out of any our Pulpits and be suffered to pass the Press and with such applause to be published That good works must necessarily be present when we be justified and God should so respect and love them that he promiseth pardon and eternal life to them or to their presence you mean sure to the man for their presence sake for if they be so good and holy Etiam bona opera egent remissione they need no pardon or if they were not first pardoned by what art become they good If you say yet you will have Christ present too he need but stand as a cypher the promise is not to his presence but to the presence of holy duties Mr. B. Lastly Their ground is still upon that false bottom because our sins are laid upon Christ Answ You need wish to have your words well taken if you dare not build upon it as an infallible verity that your sins are laid on Christ yet others dare and the bottom is firm even a sure Rock when you have done all You add May they not be laid upon us in other respects to heal us and to know how bitter a thing it is to sin against God Answ 1. If the laying of sin on us will heal us what did make us sick or sore the wound is by sin 2. Then our health is not by laying them on Christ and discharging of us or by faith in him by the means of whose stripes we are healed Isa 53.5 2. That phrase of Gods laying of sin upon the justified in any respect is no Scripture-phrase but it is full of danger and most agreeable to the principles of reason a natural conscience and the Law 3. How bitter sin is may best be seen when we see and consider it upon Christ who under the heavy weight of it sweating water and blood cryed so out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me I grant the afflicted conscience knoweth some little of it and if ever God lay sin upon you and let you not see it laid on Christ for your full and final discharge it will then be intolerable Mr. B. 4. In denying them to be signes or testimonies of grace or Christ dwelling in us And here one would wonder to see how laborious an Author is to prove that no inherent grace can be signs c. Answ 1. They can be made no further evidences then it is evident and plain that they arise from true faith and then I must first know that I have faith and be assured I am justified else all such signs will leave me uncertain and may prove to be counterfeits For as this Argument holdeth not Here is light therefore the Sun is up for all light is not from the Sun the Moon and the Candle have proper lights also so all that we call graces and holy duties come not from faith nor are not only found to be in him who is in a justified estate and therefore cannot convincingly argue such an estate VVhat can you instance in being materially good that was not in Paul while he was a Pharisee who was blameless as touching the Law I fear me that it contenteth us that we know teach and profess a Christ crucified and come not to finde Christ truly formed and dwelling in the heart whose presence is the only light peace consolation and rest to the Soul and that is the reason of our eying and requiring of works and graces for testimonies and assurances of a good estate M. B. In answering the Author We may shew briefly how many weak props this discourse leaneth upon 1. In confounding the instrumental evidencing with the efficient Not holy works say they but the Spirit How he doth oppose subordinates Answ The Spirit and works are not subordinate for as is shewed works may be where the Spirit of adoption and faith is not 2. Neither can they be subordinate except the Spirit do infallibly reveal and confirm a good estate by them which you cannot make good Again you say Every man is in darkness and like Hagar seeth not a fountain till his eyes be opened Answ That is true but where do you read that our duties or works do open the eyes and clear this unto us The opening of the eyes is a good work indeed but it is Gods work and not ours Eph. 1.17 M. B. We say that a Christian in time of darkness and temptation is not to go by signs c. Answ And out of darkness and temptation what need is there to put them to that use will you light a candle at noon-day when there is light enough 2. when there is no temptation occasioning the questioning of faith or the estate what need is there to prove either M. B. 3. His arguments go
upon false grounds 1. That a man cannot distinguish himself from hypocrites 2. That there can be no assurance but upon a full and compleat work of godliness Answ 1. No A man cannot distinguist himself certainly without faith's evidence how would you have discovered Paul having a zealous respect to all Gods Commandments 2. No one nor all your works can bring assurance sufficient I dare say that soul which seeketh establishment and to overcome doubting that way is far from it in the secret bottom of it Imperfections in all whereunto the conscience is privie will more weaken then confirm Semper operum respect nest trepidandi materia M. B. 4. All those Arguments will hold as strongly against faith for are there not many believers for a season or may not a man then know assoon the nature of his heart as the truth of his faith Answ 1. Though true faith fail never yet that is not simply from the nature of faith for there is no gift of grace but of it self it is perishable Constancy and immutability natural be only proper to God therefore Christ prayed that Peters faith might not fail 2. Faith doth not ascertain in that it indureth but in that by it the soul hath an effectual entrance into that grace wherein it standeth irremoveably Rom. 5.2 3. There is not that light of evidence in sincerity which is in faith Heb. 11.1 faith giveth light to those things which otherwise cannot lightly be discerned M. B. Now let us consider their grounds for this strange assertion Answ I cannot say what assertion you mean but it is not much material M. B. Because Rom. 4. It is said God justifieth the ungodly Now this hath a twofold Answer 1. That which our Divines do commonly give that those works are not to be understood in sensu composito c. therefore they compare these passages with those of making the blinde to see c. not that they did see while they were blinde but those who were blinde do now see and this is true and good Answ If you grant that a man is as meerly ungodly till he be justified as a man is blinde till his eyes be opened with those divines the Doctor and you might agree but this answer likes you not though you say it is good and true so well as another viz. Mr. B. 2. But I shall secondly answer it c. Vngodly there is meant of such who are so in their nature considered having not an absolute righteousness yet at the same time believers even as Abraham was So then the subject of justification is a sinner yet a believer Now it is impossible that a man should be a believer and his heart not purified Act 15. Answ So that in few and plain words your opinion is as we see by this and other passages where you call Abraham the ungodly man That a man must be a believer have his heart purified by faith be qualified as Abraham was at least then when it was said his faith was imputed for righteousness before he can be capable of justification here is poor and cold comfort to a distressed conscience who feels himself nothing but a meer compound of sin and misery Do you put men to believe and to know they believe and to be sure faith hath purified the heart but you mean not faith neither but the Law and sanctified them before they come to God who justifieth the ungodly A profound Rabbi O strange Divinity much good do it you You fear infection and so get as far from Doctor Crisp and from Paul's Doctrine as may be yet truth is with you Your Comes individuus to part at and you is impossible You might have named some of those learned men for I know them not But to deal punctually 1. You know that Doctor Crisp speaks of justification as it is Gods only free act absolving and discharging all the Elect of all their sins at once even then when he laid them on Christ Now as God said to Job Where wast thou when I cast the mountains so where was this Faith purity of heart and sanctification then this is no evasion you know but by this all you have said is annihilated he makes faith not to be necessary to justification but the evidence of it in due time for the relieving staying and comforting of the conscience troubled and affected by sin and the Law 2. To draw nearer to you who have thus set your self at this great distance that your longest weapon cannot teach your Adversary to harm him I will grant you that the Scripture setteth forth God as a justifier of them that are of the faith of Jesus Rom. 3.26 but let me then aske whether it be his faith or Gods act in justifying that doth alter him and his condition Israel looked upon the Brazen Serpent but the blessing of health came from God which did effect the cure 2. You say faith purified the heart Act. 15. what before justification or after Calvin and Luther understand that purifying to be by justification Luthers words are Totus purus es ratione hospitis tui because of Christ received by faith the heart becometh pure And when you tell us Abraham is that ungodly man if you mean he was ungodly when he was justified there is no difference But if you consider him otherwise he was then a worker and so the text is fully against you To him that worketh not c. But when Paul saith He believed in God who justifieth the ungodly it is a description of the object of faith or of God on whom faith believeth even that God whose nature property office and promise is to justifie an ungodly man and not a declaration how the subject or man is to be qualified So that the true God of the Gospell findeth men ungodly when he justifieth them but leaveth them not so Or if you will understand the place of Abraham yet there is no circumstance requiring it how ever he was so qualified by faith his heart purified he reported and found to have exellent things in him at that time when it was said his faith was imputed for righeousness Gen. 15.5 yet God in whom he believed is said to justifie them that are without such qualifications even the ungodly M. B. Another place they much stand upon is Rom. 5. Christ died for us while we were enemies while we were sinners But why then do they say that if a man be as great an enemy as enmity it self can make him if he be willing to take Christ c. be shall be pardoned which we say is a Contradiction for how can an enemy with Christ close with Christ So that would seem more then in some places they seem to allowe Answ You doe not surely deny the truth of that Scripture but argue the inconsistency of it with that assertion viz. That such great enemies and sinners closing with Christ can be pardoned this is a Contradiction say you I
sinners he must be fain to look upon us in our Lord Jesus Christ and his righteousness you like to set the Law as a medium between God and you which presenteth you with sin and wrath c. And why do if not your self yet many others in their prayers say Lord behold us not in our selves but in our Lord Jesus c. If there be no such pure and secure estate why pray we to attain to it and if we be perswaded of the truth of it why wrangle we against it you might inform your self and others 1. what it is to continue of your selves separated or remote from Christ and 2. of the meaning of the phrase God seeth no sin you reserve this till afterward so do I and withal for more full satisfaction I refer the hony-combe of free justification and the Assertion of grace M. B. ser 3. You shall carefully distinguish between these two propositions good works are necessary to beleivers to justified persons or to those that shall be saved and this good work 's are necessary to justification and salvation Answ It 's too evident that your self do not heedfully observe this distinction Besides your sense in the tearms you use is doubtful when you say good works are necessary to justified persons Is it your meaning after justification according to that of Augustine Nulla sunt bona opera nisi quae sequuntur precedente fide In Psal 67. no works are good except they follow faith going before or that they are necessarily required in order to go before so that their presence must be had necessarily when God justifieth as your pleading hath been heitherto I know the tearms or words themselves are plain and distinct but you confound them in your afterprosecution 2. There be many kinds of necessary And if you understand them to be necessary after justification in a right sense you have no adversary But if good works be necessary to those that shall be saved I would ask you what you mean for do you not hold salvation to be the proper next and immediate effect or consequence of justification can a man be said or supposed to be justified and not to be saved if he be justified he hath Christ he that hath Christ hath eternal life Ioh. 3. ult the essence of eternal life or salvation is but one and indivisible You cannot make the full revelation or seasible fruition of it to be any part of it your error is that you will have good works necessary to come in between justification and salvation at least as a cause sine qua non or conditions of it or so requisite that the promise of eternal life is made to them and only by vertue of that their promise eternal life becomes his that doth the works But eternal life is the free gift of God Rom. 6.23 And salvation is in Christ alone Act. 4.12 Ioh. 5.12 He that hath Christ hath life and if he have not Christ he can have no life whatsoever works he have So that as a man may have Christ without works by faith so may he have salvation in order before good works unless you will say either that without Christ a man can do good works or that Christ may be nad as separate and a part from life and salvation Christ and salvation standing at a distance so after he be come unto Christ and have him he must do good works that by them he may come unto it but both these are impossible Works done in this sense with such a minde and for such an end as to help us to salvation as if Christ did not sufficiently content us these works saith Luther cannot be good but whatever they be for the matter of them are and ought to be numbered among the worst of evil works fornication stealing lying c. are not so hanious saith he neither is the danger and fearful effects and fruits of these evils comparable to the evil of such pretended good works While I do good to help me to salvation I in heart deny Christ to be my full and sufficient Saviour I make faith void and the promise to be of no effect I overthrow the whole Gospel of salvation I appropriate the promise of life not to Christ nor saith but to my works And if it be said it is onely the presence of good works that is accounted necessary to those that shall be saved I answer Gratia Dei remissio per justitia vita eterna in solo Christo mediatore proponuntur illum vero non apprehâ—ndimus bonis operibus sed sola fide Gratia Dei in christo 1 Cor. 1 data est quia hoc constâ—u um est a Deo u qui credit in chrisâ—um saluus sil sine opere sola fide Vnum illud asseveâ—averem quod sola fides per se salvum fecit Chrys Evangelium proponit justiti salutem credeâ—â—ibus in Christum gratis sine conditione bonorum operum Ger. Si bona opera sint nessaia tum promissiones Evangeliâ—ae non erunt gratuitae sedâ—onditionales Insidâ—luas solad mnaâ— hoc est repellâ—t Christum una cum Christo vitam eternam quae non misi in Christo offertur Aug. 1. How can they be present when I must have Christ and with him eternal life before I can do any good work 2. Is not the presence of Christ and his righteousness sufficient Why then did Paul desire to be found in Christ not having his own righteousness of works but only that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith Phil. 3.9.3 What comfort or pleasure can they afford or gain when as Calvin saith If God do respect or look upon them we be to us and there cannot be so little a fault or so small a blemish in our works but the same is enough to make them foul and leathsom unto God Thus all Abrahams vertues saith he if they had been examined could have brought him nought but damnation Abraham bad no other help nor comfort therefore but his faith in Christ in whom God did singly consider and accept him Rom 4.1 2.4 If as you affirm the promise of life be made to them and their presence then cannot the soul receive or lay bold of any promise of life till they come into sight And what promise then is made to the righteousness of faith or of Christ Paul was most diligent and faithful in his ministery abounding in the works of the Lord fought a good fight kept the saith finished his course but the crown which was laid up for him and which he certainly expected was the crown of the righteousness of faith 2 Tim. 4.8 See Dr. Foulk on that place against the Rhemists If the crown be not due to that righteousness to what purpose is it and if it belong and be annexed to it will God make promise of it to our good works It is true It shall be said at the
last day Come ye blessed of my Father receive the Kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the world For I was hungry and ye gave me meat c. Matth. 25.34 35. but the promise of inheriting is to them in that they were elected to it from eternity and prepared for it by the righteousness of faith were found in Christ and heirs annexed with him and these works in ministering to the necessities of the Saints did flow from their hearts and fervent love unto Christ and declare the truth of their faith and of their Adoption and Election It is for the weak and simple sort that I have been thus large M. B. When we deal with adversaries especially Papists in disputation then we ought to speak exactly Answ You now deal with a friend however you slander and account of us but with whomever you deal or in what case soever you nor I cannot be too exact and careful in our words and expressions nor may we use more liberty at one time then other Yet it is true learned men are found in their disputes more distinct and clear for as the Fan cleanseth the barn-floor so opposition inforceth them unto it and so I think you clearer in these controversal Lectures then ordinary but if we be not distinct clear and soâ—iâ— in every Sermon that so our hearers may be rightly instructed throughly established and well able to answer the objections of the tempter and of his own thoughts which are not so easily satisfied as an adversary of flesh and blood without us a little failing herein may occasion much danger in the time of inward dispute and conflict of conscience One thought of the necessity of a work or of the presence of any thing but Christ may prove the sinking and the casting away of the soule for ever Let me add two more considerations and I have done First That many who have not the true faith and be not of the slock of Christ yet may and do flourish in good works are full of pity and compassion honest and sober in life true and just in their dealings careful in performing duties and zealous in their religious way now if you teach thus as you do in this book 1. That good works are necessary to salvation in regard of their presence 2. Good works are the way to heaven and salvation 3. Our holy duties have a promise of pardon and eternal life 4. There is some kinde of Analogical relation between good works and heaven comparatively with evil works 5. Our goodness is a motive moving God to favor and bless us as a King is moved to prefer one that daily saluteth him 6. To every good action thou doest there is a promise of eternal life 7. Good works be conditions without which a man cannot be saved 8. They are necessary by way of comfort to our selves and the like Will not such Doctrine hearten and encourage them in their way make them bless and speak peace falsly unto themselves and conclude that their case and estate is safe and good to say nothing of a hundred more fearful consequences and dangerous effects of it And Secondly consider how this kinde of teaching doth sute and agree well with the principles of nature and answereth the dictates and requirings of every natural conscience therefore ponder that of Luther Omnibus propria est qui salutis nâ—go io kumanam raâ—ione in consilium adhibent It is saith he the property of all those who consult with reason in the matter of salvation to be offended at the doctrine of the mercy and grace of God for although God himself did preach this doctrine concerning the free promise of his mercy unto our first Parents in Paradise and in ages after did illustrate and confirm it c. yet this cleaveth and sticketh firmly within us that we confess God indeed to be merciful yet reason thus judgeth that they alone do obtain mercy who give themselvs to righteousness or in whom something may be found worthy of some kinde of respect Humana sapiâ—ntia ossâ—nditur eo si gratâ—ae predicatione c. more then is in others and afterward The wisedom of man saith he is offended as if by the preaching of grace the justice of God is abolished and that they were affraid least carnal security and sinful licentiousness would be bred among men So ignorant are we by nature of the true nature and efficacy of the doctrine of heavenly grace and salvation M. B. Good works are necessary upon these grounds 1 They are the fruit end of Christs death Tit. 2.14 Tthere are two things in our sins 1. the guilt and that Christ doth redeem us from 2. the filth and that he doth purifie us from Answ It is the filthiness and loathsomness of sin that maketh us odious and guilty if God abhor us it is because of the vile and evil nature of sin which Christs blood doth cleanse and purifie us from that so a way may be made in divine justice for our reconciliation and acceptance Guilt is an effect of justice in the Law not holding the sinner innocent but binding it over to the curse and death till it be purged and washed Rev. 1.5 He hath loved us and washed us from our sins in his blood M. B. 2. There is some kinde of analogical relation between them and heaven comparatively with evil works so in those places where it is said If we confess our sins he is faithful and also just to forgive us our iniquities 1 Ioh. 1. So 2 Tim. 4.8 A crown of righteousness which the righteous Judge c. Answ You tell of an ordinability of works and say that evil works cannot be ordained to eternal life but good may a very dark expression who ever read of ordination of works to heaven or hell but of the worker and secondly there can be no ordinability in good works nor by them to life unless you can make it to appear that God hath any respect unto them either in ordaining or accepting us unto eternal life but in this case good works and grace are made directly opposite and contrary one to the other If by grace c. not by works Rom. 11.6 the soul is become ordinable by free grace but not disposed by works 2. In your first Scripture 1 Ioh. 1.9 There is mention made of no work but only of confession of sin And is that such a good work Judas confessed that he had sinned If there be any ordinability in it it is not because of any goodness in the act of confession simply but because God hath purposed and promised in that way or after that order to dispence and give his pardon and so this place maketh directly against you for it is by the knowledg and confession of sin and not by any good thing the soule findeth or acknowledgeth in it self that its ordinability is effected And whereas you observe that God is not only faithful but
just also to forgive they are arguments to porswade a man to take that course without fear or doubt for man naturally hath that opinion of God that where he sheweth favor unto any it is for some goodness and therefore he dare not come as a naked and meer sinner into Gods sight and presence as is plain in Adam Gen. 3. But if he can bring nothing else he will make promise of amendment in some hope of mercy to be the rather shewed him hence to correct and satisfie our thoughts and to encourage us to take this course to come as we are in our sins making our selves nor our case or matter better then it is he requireth a free and simple confession of sins adding that God is faithful in his promise in which he hath declared a gracious minde to pardon such in his Son and also that his justice the thought whereof in that case chiefly terrifieth is so fully satisfied that now non obstante imò salva justitiae God may in order of his justice forgive and save To that other place 2 Tim. 4.8 I have before shewed how you misinterpret it for that righteousness unto which the crown belongeth is the righteousness of God and not ours Rom. 1.17 Rom. 10.3 of faith and not of works that we have done Tit. 3.5 Rom. 3.22 M. B. Hence some Divines say that though godliness be not meritorious nor causal of salvation yet it may be a motive as they instance if a King should give great preferment to one that should salute him in a morning this salutation were neither meritorious nor causal of that preferment but a meer motion arising from the good pleasure of the King and so much they think that particle for I was an hungry doth imply Answ O how welcome and pleasing is this teaching to mans nature It tendeth to withdraw our eyes and considerations from off Christ unto our selves and from free-grace unto our works whereunto all are most prone by nature If our goodness be a motive moving God 1. Then God seeth something out of himself exciting and moving him to do good and if you hold this foresight of goodness which thus moved him was from eternity you are not far from Arminianisme or Popery and if he was moved at the time of doing good which many of them also hold as the King you instance in then this new and present motion in God to do good is a child of time begot in his minde or occasioned of late and God showeth more kindness then from the beginning he intended Lastly a motive must needs have some influence if not into the act of salvation yet into the minde of God for the salutation worketh upon the kinde nature and heart of the King stirring him up to be so bountiful and the man may thank his salutation in great part for his preferment O happy man I and happy was that time that I met and so saluted the King but the Gospel calleth from all such fleshly rejoycing in our selves that he that rejoyceth may onely so do in the Lord Christ in whom and for whose sake onely God sheweth all favour exalteth and blesseth with all spiritual blessings And why do you bring in and propound this to your hearers and the whole world as now but both because you like and approve of it and would put all upon the like course and practise in hope so to speed But before they had done good or evil it was said Jacob have I loved c. The true God loveth accepteth and saveth freely in Christ without any thing considered in the party M. B. So that God having appointed holiness the way and salvation the end hence there ariseth a relation between one and the other Answ Keep the Law and Works as you told us Luther said here below on the earth and by faith mount up live and converse above in heaven then the way in which the soul walketh to salvation is Christ and his righteousness a way sanctified by his blood Heb. 10.19 20. Believe and be saved and so the relation will be between salvation and Christs righteousness and not our righteousness of works distinguish between believing Abraham and working Abraham as Luther wisely c. Secondly For that place I was an hungry it makes nothing for your purpose For. 1. The kindome was prepared from the foundation of the world therefore God was not moved by works Mat. 25.34 2. It is an argument from the effect of true faith working by love by which faith they being accepted to life eternal did declare and witness the truth of it by such seasonable proper and kindely fruits as is there mentioned all relating to Christ and being expressions of ardent love to him and this is that God may appear to be just therefore he proceedeth to give sentence according to what is manifest to all for faith is hid in the heart and not seen nor known M. B. 3. There is a promise made to them 1. Tim. 4.8 Godliness hath the promises Answ Some by Godliness in that place understand the righteousness of faith by which we become Saints towards God and indeed all true piety is vertually included in it 2. Actual holiness is produced by it and if the promises were to this active righteousness yet not primarily nor yet causally but by reason of justification the sole root and foundation of it There is a secret faith in all that we do saith Luther and unto this God in his promises of any good hath respect and for it or more truely to Christ apprehended by faith is the promise made so that in having Christ we have all the promises else we have none Yet it 's more plaine and direct to take Godliness in that sense it is in 1 Tim. 3.16 Great is the mystery of godliness that is of Christian religion in general but all tendeth to one though this seemeth to me to be the meaning of it Secondly You say That the promises lye scattered up and downe in the word of God so that to every godly action thou doest there is a promise of eternal life Answ If every Godly action have a promise of eternal life then either so many actions so many eternal lives be due as where promise is of twelve pence a day to a labourer and so many dayes work so many twelve pences become due or at least there be so many rights and interests in it as be holy actions But eternal life can but be due to all holy actions joyntly and to no one singly if it should be due to works 2. It is true that promises be so made in the Law wherein there is a concatenation or linking of all in one yet they are upon such hard conditions that it is poor comfort and small or no hope of having any performed it being impossible The Law is weak through the flesh Rom. 8.3 but the New Testament is upon better promises which are sure to faith because they
condition the free gift of God is eternal life Rom. 6.23 All the Orthodox deny the promise of the Gospel to be conditional for if good works be conditions of life in the Covenant of Grace what then are the conditions of the Covenant of works Or wherein do they differ As this is to confound Law and Gospel Nata est in scholis Pseudo Apostolorum thus to distinguish between justification and salvation so it is remarkable that this distinction and question did first come out of the school of the false Prophets who thereby occasioned great disturbance in the Church as Act. 15.1 5. So Gerard c. M. B. Now by the Antinomian Argument as a man may be justified while he is wicked and doth abide so so also he may be glorified and saved for this is their principle that Christ hath purchased justification glory and salvation for us even though sinners and enemies Answ Methinks your face should blush for shame at the framing of this so appareatly unjust charge and accusation doth any say that Justification leaveth a man wicked Nay do not all and every write otherwise let others judge I say no more But that their principle is undenyably true yet your Logick can finde no ground in it for this corrupt and absurd inference If Christ ever purchased glory justification and salvation for us it was when and while we were sinners and enemies or not at all for he purchased nothing since ye became holy and a friend to God or him neither needed to purchase righteousness and life for any but sinners How are you permitted to err and mislead M. B. 6. They are in their own nature a defence against sin and corruption if we consider the nature of these graces Eph. 6.14 16. there you have some graces a shield some a breast-plate c. Answ 1. Graces as you call them or gifts of Grace are improperly put in and reckoned among good works 2. The defence and power they have against sin is especially in regard of their object Christ his righteousness and promises For thence it is that all they are so good and useful armour If you have Faith and hope and ever was in any great conflict you have found that all your defence help stay and victory was onely from and by Christ the object he is the onely refuge plea and sure Rock when all works will fail M. B. 8. They are necessary by debt and obligation Answ The works of the Law are debts required to be payed first that we may have life and favour but the love and works of the Gospel are for life peace and favour first had and obtained M. B. 9. And the Law of God still remaineth as a rule and directory Answ As it ruleth so it reigneth reproveth and condemneth and when you have walked most precisely according to it it will subdue you and your obedience under the Curse Gal. 3.10 for all you can do is too light when it is put into this balance You say The Antinomian teacheth the abolition of all the Commandments He is an Antinomian indeed that doth so but I must you still thus wrong and slander us M.B. 10. They are necessary by way of comfort to our selves And this opposeth many Antinomian passages who forbid us to take any peace by our holiness Answ There be divers kindes of comfort arising from different grounds and considerations The Doctor speaks of that peace and comfort which ariseth from the true and certain knowledge of remission of sins and reconciliation with God the true proper and pure fountain whereof is Christ crucified as for your works they are like puddle-water a blundered and polluted stream or a deceitful brook yea as a broken Cistern that holdeth little or none You say in temptation they fail and are not to be regarded or looked at See this answered also in the third prejudicial inference Lect. 3. M. B. These good works though imperfect may be a great comfort to us as the testimony of Gods eternal love towards us Thus did Hezekiah 2 King 20.3 he is there a thankful acknowledger of what was in him c. Answ The best and most satisfactory testimony and assurance of Gods love is his giving of that dear Son of his love to die that we might live through him Joh. 3.16 1 Joh. 4.9 10. In this he commends sets forth and confirms his love Rom. 5.8 to put it out of all doubt 2 The next testimony is the giving of his Spirit for to reveal the things of Christ the unsearchable riches in him Joh. 16.14 Eph. 3.8 To shed abroad that love in our hearts that so the soul may know it feel the consolation of it c. 3 A third is the delivering and freeing of our hearts and natures from that bondage and pollution of sin by sanctifying us in body soul and spirit yet these are no causes but effects and expressions of his free and eternal love because he loved his own he doth all for them Our works are no causes or motives to him nor yet sure testimonies of Gods eternal love for many a Papist heathen and reprobate for the matter and shew of works exceed divers of them who believe Therefore if you will have them such testimonies and so have comfort from them you must look on them in all their causes especially in 1 The Efficient and the impulsive and moving cause which be neither the light judgement or dictamen of reason and natures principles nor the command coaction and commination of the Law by its rule and authority extorting them from us as being unwilling but they come from a free and voluntary spirit so made by the spirit of regeneration and Adoption moving to do good in love and delight Rom. 8.14 therefore be they called the fruits of the Spirit Gal. 5.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naz. Secondly in the subject that the person be reconciled accepted and in favour through Faith in Christ Jesus Heb. 11.6 Lastly to say nothing of the form or object the end they are to be referred unto is not self-praise or profit to procure nor preserve by them our own peace favour or salvation with God which be the effects of Faith in Christ but simply Gods honour his Churches and our neighbours good even as our love is due also Mat. 22.37.39 And if these circumstances required necessarily to every good work Displicet deo dubitatio quare neque cols neque invocari cum dubitatione â—otest Melanct. be considered the soul will finde little need of works as testimonies and arguments of Gods love For that must be out of doubt first for a doubtful Conscience cannot please God by any work or obedience And your example of Hezekiah cometh nothing neer to make good your Assertion For as Gods works for us are testimonies of his love so our works at the most are but witnesses of our love unto him and therefore cannot be testimonies as you affirm of Gods
Answ Here you wrong your adversary he speaks of a power and you of an act The Law may actually condemn where and when it cannot actually justifie as it condemneth every transgressor but can justifie onely the innocent and yet the power for to do both is equally in it as a Law Why do you not answer the ensuing Question viz. Can you put your Conscience under the Mandatory power and yet keep it from under the damnatory The Law bids you love your neighbour though your enemy and presuppose you are obedient thereunto yet do you do it so perfectly that the Law hath no power to reprove and condemn you in that particular If the Law condemn you not away with humiliation Confession Repentance Justification and all living by Faith in Christ For now you can so walk according to the rule of the Law that it cannot subject you to the curse and death you are not reproved and judged in your self for any thing your peace and safety is by your just life the Law being curbed and restrained or rather exauthorized or dis-invested of all power to condemn and your life and comfort is not by your Faith in the Son of God who loved you and gave himself for you as Gal. 2.21 There is no condemnation unto you not because you are in Christ as Rom. 8.1 but the reason is in that the Law though a rule yet wanteth power to reign to death We often meet with this groundless and false assertion and now see what is the chief stone that you stumble at Let this now suffice M. B. The same Author again pag. 5. He dare not trust a believer to walk without his keeper c. they are onely kept within compass by the Law but are no keepers of it Answ The word they relates not to believers if you look the place as here you do intimate You onely repeat what we write but confute nothing M. B. The same Author at another time calls it a slander to say they deny the Law who can reconcile such contradictions Answ I see no contradiction nor shew of any you might tell your Reader wherein it lyeth for all are not so quick-sighted as your self But is not this a contradiction in you who say that we grant the Law to be a rule and that a believer is a free keeper of it and yet that we hold and teach the abolition of it Here the task to reconcile is now yours Also that we deny the Law abideth still a slander for which the Law is against you See the the ninth Commandment The Lord layeth it not unto your charge M. B. p. 52. The second interpretation is of the damnatory and cursing power of the Law the Law is not made to a believer so as he should abide under the cursing and condemning power of it Answ You might remember that right now you said The Law a believer is under hath no power to condemn and curse what need he or how can he then be freed from the cursing power See your own instance If the fire had no power to burn what need was there that God should hinder the act You would saign such a fire as is without all power to burn and tell us of such a Law as wanteth power to condemn who will now fear either or rather who can credit such vain words Your sword cuts the throat of the owner for from the removal or restraint of the act or operation the Argument doth not hold for the removal of the thing or the power to condemn but rather on the contrary it strongly and necessarily inferreth and concludeth that there is such a condemning power in the Law in that it is restrained and hindered from the actual doing of it But secondly here is no such miracle wrought upon the Law as was there upon the fire which kept it from burning the three worthies Dan. 3.23 25. though more abundant mercy be shewed for Christ was made under the Law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.4 Not to take the curse from the Law but to redeem us In what sense and to what end Christ was under as our surety in the same sense are we freed but he was under both the rule and raign of it Yet it will not follow that believers are in no state of subjection and obedience or being enlarged and set at liberty do not run the way of Gods Commandments For they do it though by another efficient from a new principle and for a different end then that of the Law Do and live They are under Christ and moved and led by his Spirit who is the head and husband of his Church But of this more afterwards M. B. Consider some parallel places of Scripture Gal. 5.23 speaking of the fruits of the Spirit Against such there is no Law the Law was not made to these to condemn them Answ And if you refer it to the fruits of the Spirit the Spirit produceth his fruits of himself and of his own accord no outward Law commanding and directing M. B. And if because the godly have an ingenuous free Spirit to do what is good he need not the Law directing or regulating it would follow as well he need not the whole Scripture Answ You would still bear men in hand that we are against the use of the Law which yet we do stand for if lawfully used as your Text requireth and that in all the Authority and Offices of it and this we can and are ready to make good upon occasion yet since this is so often inculcated by you I wish you would give satisfaction in these few things First If the Spirit make the will and affections free to what is good doth it alter and enlighten the understanding also to know what is truth and good and effectually encline move guide and lead aright without the direction and regulating of the Law doth the Spirit which is light and giveth all light and directive power to the Law need the Law in his work 2. You are to prove and cleer better then yet you have done that the Law is instrumental to the Spirit in the works and ways of sanctification 3. Where do you finde that the moral Law doth give help or power unto any jubet non juvat 4. Whereas you say we are flesh and not all spirit c. It may be replyed that by Scripture and all experience sin the wickedness of our nature is rather irritated and strengthened by the Law then weakned and mortified It is such a desperate disease that it makes head more strongly against any legal plaister and application Rom. 7.5 c. M. B. You say it will follow as well that he needed not the Gospel to call upon him to believe Answ Your reason is much unlike for first the Doctrine of the Gospel is not onely the object of Faith but the outward instrument and ordinary means the Spirit useth both to implant faith and to increase it to
regenerate to Faith Rom. 10. and to confirm and build up in that way which you nor any can truly affirm of the Law Now this your Rock is passed by without danger M. B. The Swinckfeildeans upon like ground deny the whole Scripture to be needful to a man that hath the Spirit and that which the Antinomian doth limit to the Law that it is a killing letter they apply to the whole Scripture and I cannot see how they can escape this Argument Answ I see with a little help the light may so shine forth that there is hope you will prove ours however we are not here non-plussed See the errour of the Swinckfeild and your own weakness first if we were perfectly holy and happy as in Heaven and Glory we should not need the Scripture no more then the Angels do 2 But we are so onely imperfectly and inchoatly so that the Scriptures are still requisite and needful that we may increase with the increasings of God Ephes 4.12 for the perfecting of the Saints Till we come to the unity of the Faith unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ 3 Again your friend the Antinomian doth not call the Law a killing letter as it is without the Spirit but as it is that instrument or the ministration the Spirit useth to kill and condemn as touching Conscience 2 Cor. 3.9 I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and I died Rom. 7.9 But this may serve now viz. The Law can but direct in the things of the Law where you can finde no Christian estate nature name way life faith nor hope of his Calling nor to speak properly any thing of Christianity How now shall your Law direct in these things M. B. The Law must needs have a directive regulating and informing power over a godly man as will appear by these two Reasons First we cannot discern the true worship of God from superstition and idolatry but by the first and second Commandment Answ Here is a large field Inopem copia facit this requireth a full Treatise it self as for the explicating it in such manner as may satisfie mens minds being concerning this full of darkness and doubts so for the general necessity of some cleer and special light to be held forth for the informing and directing aright a world of people going far wide through want of this true knowledge In brief thus for the present First God was not onely a God unto his people but had made known also himself unto them before the solemn giving of the Law and he gave not the Law that by the observation and works of it he might be their God and they his people nor yet that thereby they might know and conceive of him in their hearts according to that Law of works And therefore is it observable that he beginneth with these words Hear O Israel I am thy God c. Now as he became their God onely by Christ the promised seed in the face of whom the knowledge of his glory is manifested 2 Cor. 4.6 so his redeemed and peculiar were onely to take notice of him as God in Christ reconciling them to himself blessing all in the alone Messiah giving out all peace life through him and vouchsafing all favour and respect onely in reference unto him To this dispensation manner and kinde of revealing himself to mankinde according to that first promise Dem nisi in Christo suo coli aut cognosci nolit Calv. Gen. 3.15 The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpents head and in him shall all the Nations be blessed are all to attend for God will not be known nor worshipped out of his Christ Now mans heart naturally is a shop of idolatry infinite are the forms conceptions and images which we frame and have of God within us And as our inward Notions are under which God cometh to our understanding so we think of him worship him seek to please him and lay a foundation for expecting and receiving some good from him And what inscription the Athenians had on their Altar Act. 17.23 the same may be found on a world of our devotions all being to an unknown God For as Christ said to the woman of Samaria Serviunt Deo qui tantum opinionabiliter non natura est deus for the most part we worship we know not what Joh. 4. for he is onely a God in our opinion and conceit and not in truth and his own nature who accepteth respecteth loveth or blesseth any for any work worth or goodness of theirs but the true reason and ground of all favour is Christ Eph. 1.6 Nam verus naturalis Deus sic loquitur Nulla religio sapientia justiâ—ia c. nisi illa unica qua pater glorificatur per filium c. Thus he that in his thoughts falleth from that true knowledge of Christ and that in him he is well pleased with him pacified towards him receiveth loveth him without and before any actual holiness and work or performance of his he necessarily falleth forthwith into Idolatry because he cannot now but imagine such a God and frame him in his own minde which is nowhere to be found A God out of Christ without a Mediatour not satisfied reconciled at peace with us propitious to us Omnis lomo qui relabitus a cognitione Christi necessario ruit in Idololatriam c. c. but requiring and respecting some duty or holiness in us to move him to grant us access audience and all blessings needful an absolute God clothed with glorious attributes terrible to sinners and not justifying the ungodly through Faith in Christ nor loving us when we were enemies and so by his own hand and work reconciling us to himself without any of ours Rom. 4.5 Rom. 5.8 9. such a God do many set up in their hearts and they frame their devotions works and ways suitable with this their image seeking in their own righteousness and holiness to draw nigh and that some goodness or qualification of theirs should commend and ingratiate them unto him A Fryers Coul a Monks hood holy order pilgrimages a strict and Religious life must speak for one sort Alii â—eâ—unant orant c. his se deum placere putant student quaerut Luth. others Fast Pray Vow Reform c. thinking studying seeking by those to pacifie God and procure his favour Now as we may plainly see that the Preface of the Decologue relateth to the Covenant of Grace of Promise of peace and life in the Messiah in which God did commend and make known himself what a God he would be unto them in what way he would deal with them and give them all their peace so God to keep this light in them to suppress or prevent all Idolatry or spiritual and false conceivings and imaginations of him contrary to that his promise whereunto mans nature is
from it 2. As for your instance in the Magistrate I answer If the Magistrate have no power to punish he is no compleat Magistrate See Rom. 13.4 He is a minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil this is one maine part of his effice and as effential to it as it is to countenance and defend the innocent and good Also 1 Pet. 2.14 Governours be sent of purpose for the punishment of evil doers and for the praise of them that do well 2. Your other instance of confirmed Angels is as ineffectual They were under a law say you Answer Well it is true and those that fell are condemned by that law they were under And now suppose any of them that do stand should yet sin as did the other would they not fall into the same condemnation It may be disputable yet it is currant with most that the Elect Angels are confirmed by Christ now I would learn Whether the benefit they have by Christ is in that the condemning power is taken from the Law they live under so that though they fall it cannot hurt them or is it in that they are upheld and established in their integrity that they cannot fall as did the evil angels and yet the condemnation remaineth in the law still Who then do now need most rectifying I fear you wittingly do oppose the truth And your manner of replying doth confirme this my opinion If what is said be true and evident let it leave you satisfied and not go on against the clear light M. B. Every believer though justified by Christ is under the moral Law of Moses as also the Law of Nature Answ You are too bold and peremptory in your assertion For 1. If believers be under those laws then he is under their curse Sâ— judice nemo noâ—â—ns absolâ—itur Ascendet quisque mentis suâ—e â—â—â—bunale c. for both of them do curse and condemne all that any way disobey them but every one under them do many wayes disobey them Where is there any one if any stirring be in him but he may observe within his own thoughts and feel a sentence given out against him daily for one thing or other that he is found to be guilty of But is it not written that Christ was made under the law to redeem us from under it Gal. 4.4 again Rom. 6.14 you are not under the law but under grace whether now shall we believe Paul thus saying by the infallible Spirit of God or shall we credit you speaking contrary of your own head by a private spirit 2. You say though justified by Christ Now I here would aske whether by justification his condition or estate be not changed he was under the Law before and is he so still what availeth then his justification or where is his liberty wherewith Christ hath made him free Rom. 5.1 Being justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ by whom also we have access unto this grace wherein we stand This grace of justification is like the City of Resuge for the peace and safety of the soul unto which it betaketh it self by faith that so it may finde rest and security by escaping the coademnation and danger of the Law when it is pursued by sin and the tempter Heb. 6.18 so that a Christian by his faith seeketh to be delivered from the law in the purest obedience and best works whereof the conscience cannot be secure nor dare not rest vae etiam laudabili vitae si remota sit misericordia Indeed faith worketh also by love in another sphere and consideration and here in love he is under the law serving his neighbour in the freedome and willingness of his minde Gal. 5.13 according to that exhortation Eph. 5.2 Walk in love as Christ hath loved us and given himself for us c. but this appertaineth onely to our conversation and the things of this life and is so perfect in none but that law he serveth under will finde matter and cause of condemnation so that still the soul elevated and kept above in saith by which it liveth Gal. 2.20 would be found in Christ having his righteousness which is perfect and everlasting and not having its own righteousness which is of the law Phil. 3.9 If there be no curse nor danger in the works of our own righteousness or of the law it having lost its condemning power as you affirme why should Paul be afraid to be found there But in temptation and the time of inward conflict the truth benefit and necessity of this will better appear and so be discerned and readily received and without temptation Christianus nullus est It seemeth your spirits live and abide under the law as under a quiet and peaceable government without sense or fear of condemnation and without inward molestation or chock of conscience in that you tell us of being under both the natural and moral law and yet free from condemnation of either And you would patronize D.T. Regula vitae and yet dare not nor cannot do planè plenè I finde you in doctrine agreeing with Doctor Laud who in a Sermon on Ashwednesday before the King his text being Jer. 6.16 said that the old pathes wherein we might rest were the Creed the Lords Prayer and the ten Commandments and added that the law was like unto a serpent at the hedge bottome which had lost its sting I believed him not though you do And so he told the King and the rest what a pestilential sect the Antinomians were and thus he did labour as you do to make the world believe that there are some abolishers of the law that these against whom you write and all others who go in the same way are such and so not to be tolerated in the kingdome And about the same time D. Gifford after many invectives against that sect and sort for it is spoken against everywhere Act. 28.22 in the closure he gave this wise admonition to his hearers viz. To repent to believe and to do as they should do and so he would warrant them to be saved Here was repentance faith and inchoate obedience as in your friend D. Tailer but in which will you place salvation In all you and these your complices do say and teach and then in none at all doth the truth of God say for If ye be circumcised Christ profiteth nothing Gal. 5.2 You cannot but see as D. Tailor in that his book so others of great note amongst you to preach and print many erroneous things and why do you not blaze or reprove those their assertions as being far more palpable and of more dangerous consequences then is the worst or weakest expression you can finde in your Antinomian authors Is it out of a pure zeal for God I doubt it or you come forth thus Goliah-like to shew your valour and to defie the family of faith And so to gratifie others you
are resolved to venture against the pikes of old tryed and pure truth innocency and a good conscience Well henceforth be better advised like one bemisted you have mistaken your way misrepresented your adversaries and run your credit cause and conscience into a great hazard and you may expect worse in all these without wise and timely retreat The counsel is good if it can be seasonably taken and it cometh from a friend and well-wisher M. B. page 63. This law of nature can never be abrogated And herein we may demand of the Antinomian Whether the law of nature do binde a believer or no whether he be bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience Answ If a man were not first bound he could not be said properly to be loosed or set free It is granted yet with much limitation and in some things only that every one is bound to obey the dictates of his natural conscience and it is as true to be granted by you also that in case he hearken not at some times or in some things or in case of defect and failing or imperfection this natural law will give out sentence of condemnation for the same as Rom. 2.15 from which it is the peculiar and continual office of faith to set free and secure the conscience So that you do very improperly demand whether the law of nature do binde a believer quatenus so whereas a man believeth that he may be set at liberty in Christ In whom he in his spiritual estate towards God in the things of his peace and life is free as Christ is free with whom by a true and real union he is become one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 And so is passed from judgement of condemnation and from death to life Fidei nil proponi debet praeter meramgratiam aâ—que haec est ejus objectum Calv. John 5.24 And here faith doth not stand bound to give ear to the voice of either implanted or moral law for the procuring or preservation of peace and comfort but turning from both and not regarding them doth direct and confine ear eye the thoughts and meditations of the soul to that alone simple object Christ and to what he speaketh in the word of grace and salvation whose blood sprinkled and shed for remission of sins cryeth for better things then the blood of Abel This is the proper office obedience and exercise of faith So in God will I praise his word Psal 56. here will I settle my thoughts and fortifie them against the dictates and accusations of a natural conscience sense of sin reason law Satan or whatever assaileth If faith give not an acquiescence and rest to the foul in that free and full atonement by Christ and the goodness and favour of God in him it is in danger to be lost for ever And as you have given me this fair occasion so for the more simple and weak Christians sake who is little versed herein and principled otherwise let me further add That although nature do acknowledge a God and that he is to be worshipped and served Nil magis adversatur fidei quam lex ratio Luth. yet this opinion which is also seconded and much strengthened by the moral law is not without danger and is repugnant to the doctrine and knowledge of faith for nothing is more cross to faith then the law and natural reason the maine battel and dispute in a believer is between the dictates of his natural conscience confirmed by the moral law and the principles of his faith and as the law of faith doth enter and prevaile so it captivateth razeth and expelleth the natural and legal knowledge and thoughts of God and imprinteth a divers from them only suiting to the Gospel or covenant of Grace for now since the death of the Testator the covenant is so ratified and confirmed with God that he remembereth the sins of his people no more but abides fully In illa gratuita reconciliatione per obsignationem spiritus acquiescit It a gloria datur Deo non considerat fides quicquâ—d in nobis vel aliis creaturis ei adversari videatur Olev and for ever pleased with them in his Son and through faith herein the conscience also is made to yeeld to it to receive and imbrace it and so is led and brought into this confidence of the quietness and peace of God towards us and hereby effecteth our assured rest in God reconciled for ever which is the true Christian Sabbath Thus every high thing exalting it self against the knowledge of God according to the Gospel is to be cast down and every thought to be brought into captivity to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.4 5. And by this is glory given unto God while one thing is felt or suggested within and another is believed Let this be well marked of great and continual use in every Christian that the law implanted by nature is ever contradicting and reclaiming against the testimony of God in the word of his grace whence ariseth the difficulty and impossibility of believing save by the power and operation of God Col. 2.12 therefore in the weighty things of faith to hearken to the natural conscience or moral law will quite overthrow whole Christianity and turn aside the soul to destruction The seeds of morality and remanents of the covenant of works may be found in nature but there is no sparke nor intimation of any pure Gospel In innocency Adam was not principled to finde and receive his righteousness peace and life in another out of himself M. B. Think not that because he Christ dyed to free you from the curse of the law that therefore you are freed from the obedience Answ And do not you think nor teach that Christ came to take away the curse and condemning power from the law contrary to his own express words Mat. 5.17 18. where he saith that every jot of the Law is imperishable and in his opening and applying it afterwards he doth as command so reprove threaten and condemne 2. You will not deny but what Christ hath performed for me as my surety that I am so freed from that it may not be required of me to that end as before 3. Christ doth free us that we by his Spirit may serve freely and cheerfully and without all fear in holiness and righteousness before God all the dayes of our life Luk. 1.76 Therefore are we taken into a New covenant that giveth power and fitness so to serve wherein he promiseth the law in our hearts to put his Spirit into us to give a new heart and a new way c. which the covenant of works could not do Jer. 31. Ezek. 36.27 c. M. B. Vse of instruction against the Antinomians who must needs overthrow the directive and obligative force of the law of nature as well as of Moses Ans This is but the old slander the same false charge so often repeated It is by this
mistakes First concerning the nature of the life of grace which is not in works nor the expressions of inherent holiness or sanctification for to move and walk in the law of works or of our own active righteousness is a legal life but that is the life of grace which reviveth quickeneth and comforteth the mortified Vita anima est sentire gratiam Dei mors animae est sentire iram Dei Scult dejected and distressed conscience which lay in extreme wo and in the shadow of death being apprehensive of the sentence of condemnation passed upon him by the law and the spirit of bondage If you know not yet what this life is and wherein it consists ask the condemned prisoner whose life is gone by the law and he will say his pardon would be his life which must come from the meer grace and mercy of his Prince Your great reading may tell you that when divinity was more pure and distinct then it is now repentance was said to have two parts Justificat vitae hoc est unde nascitur vita Pisc 1. Mortification 2. Vivisication and the object of both these is the man who is spiritually slain by the law as Rom. 7. and again quickened through the faith of the operation of God and so made partaker of the first resurrection Revel 20.6 hence it s said Col. 2.13 You hath he quickened together with him forgiving you all your trespasses and the efficient or worker of both these is God who killeth and maketh alive and man is the patient the soul receiving the pardon of sins hath entrance into the presence and favour also of God and in his favour is life and his loving kindness is better then life In his presence is fulness of joy saith the Psalmist Hence we read that justification is to life Rom. 5.18 and Christ is the bread of life whoever eateth of him shall live for ever John 6. and whosoever heareth his voice shall live John 5.25 Thus life cometh by believing but law is not of faith Gal. 3.21 If there had been a law that giveth life surely righteousness which is our justification should have been by the law Gal. 3.21 for righteousness and life come both one way but you confess our righteousness cometh not in that way of the law and so I hope hereafter you will say life cometh another way Here let me commend a sentence or two unto your self and the rest of the brethren yet for your sakes I will not English them Vos falsa imaginatione decipitis miseros homines quasi ex lege vivere debent eóque praetextu in lege ipsos detinetis Evangelio interea facitis invidiam quasi in nihilum justitiam redigat quam ex lege habemus atqui lex ipsa est quae nos sibi mori cogit Rom. 7. pulchre describit Paulus neminem legi vivere nisi cui lex est mortua hoc est otiosa fine effectu nam fimul atque lex in nobis vivere caepit jem nobis infligere lethale vulnus quo perimus c. ergò qui legi vivunt nunquam senserunt vigoram legis ac ne gustarunt quidam quid lex sibi vellet Calv. Paulus est hic haereticus omnium hareticissimus estque haereses ejus inandita quia dicit mortuum legi vivere Dēo Pseudo-apostoli docebant nisi vixens legi mortuus es deo hoc est nisi vixeris secundum legem coram deo es mortuus Panlus plane contrarium dicit Nisi fueris mortuus legi non poteris vivere Deo c. hanc doctrinam ratio sapientia humana non capit ideo perpetuò contrarium dicit scilicet si vis vivere deo oportet te legem servare c. Est que hoc principium una maxima omnium Theologorum vivens secundum legem vivit Deo Luth. Est omnino impossibile aliquem simul legi Deo vivere nunc cessante lege peccato morte adsit justitia Christi salus vita aterna Quicquid est in me gratiae justitiae vitae pacis ac salutis id omne est Christi haecn ipse mihi donat aboles legem damnat peccatum mortem mortificat ut ego vivam habeam in ipso aeternam pacem justitiam consolationem vitam Sed Christum intueor amplector qui crucifixus a me apprehensus mihi dat vitam sic viverit in me Christus Corn. He that hath any Christian experience knoweth that when the soul lyeth in death and darkness the apprehension and presence of Christ who is received and cometh into the heart by faith is the onely true light life peace and consolation of it What that law is David so commended to get life by is to be known hereafter together with your second mistake here viz. that the law is the instrument to beget life and to sanctifie for it is too irksome and vain a thing to speak to these every time you east them in our way M. B. p. 153. This is remarakble that though the former tables were broken yet now God enters into a covenant of grace with them as appeareth by proclaiming him self long-suffering gracious but yet God causeth the commandments to he written again for them implying that these may very well stand with the covenant of grace which opposeth the Antinomian Answ God entred into a covenant of grace with them not now but long before see Gen. 17.4 7. As for me behold my covenant is with thee and thou shalt be a father of many nations vers 7. And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee 2. Though God in great wisdom gave the ten commandments to Abrahams posterity for special ends and purposes as now also it is continued in the Church yet it is not joyned to the covenant of grace as if it should perfect or alter it or adde any thing to it It being intire of it self and distinct from the law their natures offices ends and effects so much differing one from the other Read Gal. 3.15 16 17. A place full of light and satisfaction Brethren I speak after the manner of men though it be but a mans covenant yet if it be confirmed no man disannulleth or addeth thereto vers 16. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made c. vers 17. And this I say that the covenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ the law which was four hundred and thirty yeers after cannot disannul that it should make the promise of none effect And note by the way 1. How the covenant or Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and promise are both one with the Apostle which you stumbled at elswhere 2. That there is not one word of truth in what you say to oppose your adversary but the text is directly against your self 3. Where you say the law may
is that the Hebrew word doth signifie largely any doctrine and so may comprehend the whole word of God Answ You say that others as well as they Antinomian take the law so largely so that you see your Adversarie is not single in his opinion as you are who can produce no Author but onely say It seemeth good to expound that phrase in such a manner And otherwise it seemeth it would cross your designe else I see nor you do shew no reason But Luther and some others upon that place Psal 19.7 do take the law for the moral law but I dare say you will not stand to their exposition of it Luther saith This is no absolute commendation of the law but it is to be understood legem talem factans esse per fidem non talia facit lex The law worketh not these it self but they are effected by the influence of the Sun of righteousness inwardly quickning reviving and comforting the soul through the faith of the Gospel The law giveth nor hath no such heat or vertue of it self but produceth contrary effects It may indeed saith he convert the eye mouth hand ears omnes vires sed magis avertit cor odio paenarum indignatione prohibitae concupiscentiae sed cor non est rectum spiritus non est fidelis In brief his judgement is that after the soul is justified and converted by the Gospel then it loveth the law which it hated before and now it doeth not avert or as being afraid she from God in his law but with confidence and delight draweth nigh unto him and observeth the things of the law because the Spirit of Christ in the Gospel maketh them sweeter to the soul then all the riches and pleasures of this life Thus it s the doctrine of reconciliation by Christ believed on that marvelously altereth the Christians heart causing it to convert and turn to God as being thereby able to abide his sight and presence and to love his saw Et Amans legem non potest eam satis landare adeo placet quae prius adeo displicuit You say nothing that hath any strength in it against the truth held out and maintained by us And by this you may see whence it was that David so commended the law strictly taken because his heart was so altered by the faith of the operation of God It is remarkable saith Luther that the way to love and keep the law is to believe and receive the Gospel from this belief issueth love and all true obedience and it is not bred and effected by the law commanding and requiring it By faith we establish the law Rom. 3. ult M. B. That opinion which would make Christ not take an instrumental way for conversion of men in his first Sermon wherein he was very large that must not be asserted but to hold that the preaching of the law is not a Medium to conversion must needs be to say Christ did not take the nearest way c. Answ You answer your self page 169. where your words are That our Saviours intent was only to explicate the law better then did the Scribes and Pharisees that so they might be sensible of sin and discover themselves to be fouler and more abominable then ever they judged themselves unto which let me add And that by requiring and so letting the hearers see a necessity of a more absolute righteousness then was held forth even in the doctrine of the Scribes and Pharisees he might so destroy all confidence in their own works prevent the establishing of mans righteousness and prepare and dispose them to hearken after his righteousness for he is the end of the law for righteousness to al that believe Rom. 10.4 And by this it may appear that he used the law preparatorily to justification and conversion as you in part are forced to grant it to be the opinion and doctrine of all Orthodox Divines and yet it is thwarted by you who love to have a way by your self M. B. If the law of God have that objectively in it that may work exceedingly upon the heart when set home by Gods Spirit then it may be used instrumentally as well as the Gospel but it hath c. Answ Here is nothing but the vain reason of man If God be otherwise pleased what is it how glorious fit and worthy soever it may seem for this in our eyes The Sun in the firmament is a glorious object to look upon when we have eyes but God useth it not therefore to give and restore the use of sight to those that be blind the seeing man findeth variety of delightful objects to look at among the creatures but they finde him not eyes therefore M.B. 5. If the law of God may be blessed after a man is converted to the increase of his grace and holiness why not then to the first beginning of it That it is for the increase of of Godliness appeareth by experience Answ Every Christians experience teacheth him that the more he inwardly seeth and feeleth that divine love that pardoneth reconcileth and preserveth the soul in that everlasting covenant of sure mercies and peace the more it loveth againe and in love hateth evil escheweth it doth good is every way cheerfully obedient I love the Lord saith David because he heard me when I called upon him in the time of trouble and delivered my soul from death my eyes from tears and my feet from falling What bred and caused love and gained the heart to God at the first that same is of continual force still to enlive and enlarge the affections towards him But because sins are forgiven it is said she loved much Luke 7. and if this Candle be put under a bushel if this Sun the light of Gods countenance do not shine forth upon the Solissequium the soul of a believer it will be dark dull and indisposed to whatever good you can propound to it therefore is it requisite that faith be nourished and ever operative and lively in apprehending and feeding upon that exceeding kindness of God in Christ that so it may be more quick and free in all holy expressions Faith works by love if faith dye or wax cold by which the soul liveth the law can but little work upon or affect the heart Besides as the Christians beginning so his building up and increasing is in another way and by other means then are meerly legal he lives and grows in the Vine Christ and thereby fructifieth M. B. It is hard to think that a Minister having opened any moral duty of the law may not pray to God to cloath that word with power to change the heart of the hearers Answ Why should man thinke it hard or be offended at any thing where he findeth it Gods will that it be so and no otherwise 2. If God reveal not his minde and willingness to put forth any renewing power in the law how can you then pray in faith to be
heard 3. True prayer is for the fulfilling of his promise in his own way and not in ours M. B. If the Ceremonial Law the Sacraments and Sacrifices were blessed by Gods Spirit while they were commanded to be used for the strengthening and increase of grace notwithstanding the deadly nature of them now then the Moral may be blessed c. seeing it stands still in force Answ While those ordinances were in use they were effectual to increase faith and so to quicken confirm and cheer the heart against inward temptations from sin Satan the fear of death of judgement c. for they were instituted for that purpose and fitted also in that they held forth and shadowed Christ Crucified the body and substance life and thing signified If you can prove that the moral law was either ordained or so fitted for that end you say something else water is not so weak as is this Argument M. B. Let the use of them be c. Answ The Lord let you see your error and failing and give you a right use of what is said Indeed the law is holy yet it is manifest that maketh neither heart nor life full of holiness though you abound in legal performances M.B. What is regeneration but the working of the moral law in the heart that is the Image of God Answ Regeneration giveth a new being birth and estate as well as a new Image It maketh us both Sons and also like our heavenly Father but the law is the instrument for neither but the word of truth which is the Gospel of salvation Jam. 1.18 as is cleared before You seem to have a zeal but not according to knowledge and so would lead and hasten on your hearers in a wrong way LECT XXI Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law c. M. B. Let us consider a great mistake of the Antinomian Author in the Assertion pag. 171. where he makes the very ground why they are charged with Antinomianisme to be because they do not hold the law to be used by God instrumentally for the conversion of men certainly this is a great mistake for there are many learned men who hold the work of the law to be no more but preparatory Answ Sir It is no mistake at all for both Dr. Tailor and many others upon that ground have so concluded and condemned us And if your words will sufficiently satisfie the world that this our Opinion and Tenet is so Orthodox and free from Antinomianism as you are enforced to do lest otherwise you should unavoidably as you see and say bring many yea all the learned into the same condemnation with us except your self who yet in so doing might put your owne neck into the coller I doubt not then but the truth will also clear and free us in all other out assertions And so in despight of all ill-will our innocency which hath so unjustly suffered and been so unworthily aspersed a long time by you and others will at last come to light and we shall mirabile dictu stand recti in curia Plead thou our cause O God of our righteousness M. B. Yet for all that they do peremptorily maintaine the use and obligation of the law in respect of believers therefore they are not in that respect condemned for that error Answ Surely if I understand any thing neither they nor yet your self will be so peremptory as to maintain the use and obligation of it to believers quatenus tales To faith or in the state or things of faith there is no obligation nor use of the law If the law be useful to the working Abraham as Luthers phrase and distinction is yet here they all and you also must do so at the last unanimously confess that the law hath power actually to condemn him in all his works and wayes so that by his faith he ever retireth in spirit and returneth to Christ his righteousness that so he may enjoy and preserve his peace freedom life and comfort your best performances need remission of sins much more you for these your Lectures Again if the learned be not condemned for this errour in this respect yet you account it an errour in them and cannot prove it so or else how is it so intolerable in us are you become partial and inequal judges M. B. The question is not whether by the power of the law we come to obey the law but whether Grace may not use the precepts or law preached for the inflaming of our affections so in love with the things commanded that we are thereby made more holy And thus I interpret those Authors that deny the law to be instrumental to holiness that is not animated by Gods Spirit or separated from it An. Now you should address your self to encounter and you begin to shrink in diffidence doubtless of your cause which you perceive so unjustifiable that no advocate will be found to patronize it for did not you in pag. 187. say that you suppose Christ Jesus hath obtained by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth of the ministery that whether it be law or Gospel the souls might be healed and converted And now you seem to be no longer of that minde that by the power of the law we come to obey the law which as you mean it is all one with conversion If we come not by the power of the law to obey then it is by the power of the Gospel onely and so we agree If you reply You mean by no power inherent in the law I say There is no inherent or physical vertue neither in the Gospel to effect our conversion 2. Now the question must be onely whether Grace may not use the law c. This is the liberty you can allow your self to alter and to state the question as best liketh you If you misliked the form and terms wherein you found it why became you opponent And now your expressions in this be so uncouth and improper as that grace may use the precepts c. and your meaning in the residue so obscure and doubtful and I so unwilling to wrong you the least jot that I had rather forbear then meddle any further I shall deliver my minde how pertinent to your question or satisfactory to your self it shall prove I know not thus This word of God which revealeth the riches of grace and exceeding kindness in giving righteousness and salvation to the soul is the true and proper instrument for the inslaming of the affections in love both to God his law and all the things of God and the law neither maketh to love God nor its owne commands And here you so mince it that your expression onely is to make us more holy as if already you granted now that the law doth not instrumentally initiate or work sanctification at first but increase it afterward consider this well Lastly Those Authors you mean are not beholden unto you for your so gross and
inconsistent interpretation They say the law is not the instrument of sanctification Gods Spirit sanctifieth not by the law the law is the instrument of no good c. It is true you say and thus they mean that is the law not animated by Gods Spirit or separated from it Answ So neither do either they or any think Law or Gospel to be 2. If that be their meaning they might deny the Gospel to be instrumental also 3. But you read their words in the Assertion of grace to be that the Spirit doth not animate nor use the law in sanctification or conversion save onely preparatorily Now you must either grant us that these Authors unto which might be added all others of any special account are guilty of as much Antinomianisme as your adversaries are in this respect or that your quarrell is as weakly managed as it was causlesly undertaken yea and that you with your society have erred in opinion and practise I shut up all with that so pertinent and pregnant saying of Calvin on Gal. 3.19 Si quis excipiat cum lex regula sit pie recte vivendi cur potius transgressionum quam obedientia causa positadicitur Respondeo Vtrumque veram justitiam demonstret tamen in hac naturae corruptione nihil quam augere trangressiones ejus doctrina donec accedat Spiritus regenerationis qui ipsam cordibus inscribat hic autem non datur a lege sed fide percipitur M. B. I come to consider of those places c. I shall not take all because one answer may serve for many they being built upon the same ground Answ You are farre indeed from taking all but onely such by your perverse usage and wresting whereof you may more subtilly and easily elude and seem to evade M. B. First the state of the question is obscurely propounded by him for thus he saith The promise or the Gospell and not the Law is the seed or doctrine of our new-birth Assert pag. 163. Now here are ambiguities as first the promise or Gospell for by this he seemeth to decide a great question that whatsoever is a promise in the Scripture this belongeth to the Gospell but a command or threatning that belongeth to a law whereas this needeth a great discussion Answ You see a mote in your Brothers eye and consider not the beame in your own How changeable have you been in the assertion and question last discussed and handled you are so inconstant and mutable in your termes sence and scope that it is very uncertain and doubtful as yet what you are resolved to stand to But 2. where its said the Promise or Gospel and not the Law c. do you accuse this of ambiguity surely without cause except for your humour or to take occasion to trouble the simple with a dotage which none of mean understanding would ever question As for your so great question as you call it All the promises in the Scripture cannot belong to the Gospel for the law hath its promises Do and thou shalt live in them where life is promised conditionally of this is spoken before and it is of the By. 3. If the word promise were onely used yet being placed antithetically in opposition to the law who can doubt what should be meant by it Paul in Gal. 3.18 thus useth it If the inheritance be of the law it is no more of promise but God gave it to Abraham by promise Argumentum a contrariis Haereditas est promissione nempe nuda ac simplici seu gratuita non igitur ex lege i. c. promissiâ—ne conditionalis Piscat In Gal. 3. How often doth he in that Chapter as in Rom. 4. oppose law and the promise Also to avoid all ambiguity as much as was possible it followeth Or the Gospel by which it is easie to conceive what is meant by him who hath not a minde to cavil and seek a knot in a rush The learned tell us That in the Scriptures use and sense Testamentum foedus promissio pactum Evangelium ferè sunt Synonyma Well by promise then is meant the Gospel so that controversie is decided and there is no place for ambiguity And if you turne to your named pag. 163. the word promise is not at all in the proposition but a wanton spirit may finde himself sport at his pleasure M. B. 2. The State of the question is not about the Gospel or the law as they are both a doctrine but as the Spirit of God working by one or the other the not attending to this maketh the Argument so confounded Answ The proposition is formally this The Gospel and not the Law is the instrument of true sanctification What need these cautions and vain words as if none can speak plain English but you And as by your Predecessour Dr. Tailer so here we must be stiled and taken for confused men but you onely are distinct and seraphical M. B. 3. He saith It 's not the seed of the New-birth whereas conversion or regeneration is made the writing of the law in the heart and Matth. 13. The word of God in general is compared to seed sown Answ And he saith nothing but he may truely affirm it still 2. You put no difference between regeneration conversion and writing the law upon the heart which yet in propriety of phrase sense and use are distinct as is shewed before who now is guilty of confusion 3. And although the work you mean should be the writing of the Law in the heart yet it followeth not to be by the law for how then should the law in sanctification be established by faith Lastly It is not the word in general but with restriction the word of the Kingdome that is the Gospel that is compared to the seed sown see Mat. 13.19 M. B. The first instance is John 17.17 Sanctifie them c. I answer 1. The word Sanctifie when applyed to men doth not signifie onely justification or renovation but setting apart to some peculiar office or charge Answ The words in the Assertion are To Sanctifie in the sense of the Hebrews from whence it is taken is to separate any thing from a prophane and common use and so to consecrate it to God or to convert it to a sacred and divine use So that if you have learned men for your great and full Library may well exceed my poor and diminished Study who so take it that Christ prayed here for the fitting of the Apostles for their great charge yet that is of fishers to make them fishers of men and so to separate them from their former prophane and worldly calling and trade unto a sacred which thing my words do include and import also 2. But then to sanctifie them must be more then to ordain them for that function even to endue them with a great measure of holiness and gifts requisite for so high a calling Yet 3. All that I read do take the word as I say And sith Christ
the Law Rom. 3.20 Rom. 7.7 Also you are much deceived when you say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 See 1 Cor. 15.45 The first Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a living soul nor as if he could quicken himself or others for that is peculiar to God himself no man as yet quickned his own soul And the opposition in that place sheweth the great difference between those two words for it followeth The last Adam was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a quickning spirit in that he both quickned himself being dead and quickneth all his members Lastly see that place Gal. 3.2 If there had been a Law which could have given life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 righteousness should have been by the Law In which words Paul intimates that there was never Law given that could vivifie or which had any quickening vertue to impart or communicate unto any I will not trouble you with commentaries directly contradicting and overthrowing your exposition of that place because I perceive you so abound in your own sence that their judgement is not esteemed by you and you have greater store of them to satisfie you when you please then I have And lest you should be mistaken you adde Not that we could have life by vertue of any obedience but when we by grace are inabled to obey them c. Now I thought that you rather should have thus said as more pertinent to the question in hand But that they do instrumentally vivifie convert and give us life to obey them But in this saying of yours you grant as much as we contend for for if grace that cometh by the Gospel do inable us to obey the Law then it is not the Law that instrumentally doth convert and give life and strength to walk in it And your last clause is dangerously ambiguous seeming to import that Christ is not our salvation of himself without our works or obedience to the Law you will speak out more plainly and fully in some other place And you give us a poor reason why you inclined to this your opinion viz. because Socinians deny grace and justification under the Law or old Testament as if there were no middle way to take which could like you but either you must run on the rocks on one side or other Incidit in Scyllam c. Mr. B. And thus I come to another question which is the proper and immediate ground of strife between the Antinomians and us and from whence they have their name And that is the abrogation of the morall Law Answ Toto Coelo erras This is not the controversie except you mean that you do assert the Abrogation of it for it may sooner and more easily be concluded from your tenets then any of ours who hold the Law to be inviolable but this may appear afterward 2. If their name be from hence then if you prove them not guilty of the Abrogation of the Law you and others have falsly accused and standered them for Antinomians and now you for ever quit them from that aspersion I will be bold before the encounter if he that shall prove guilty of the abrogation of it in whole or in part shall be the Antinomian then mutato nomine de te narratur fabula look to your self Mr. B. Paul maketh an objection and he doth it for this end to take away the calumny and reproach cast upon him by his Adversaries as one that would destroy the Law Do we make void the Law Answ If you and your partners in your ministery did go with a right foot in the foot in the Gospel or tread in his steps the same would be charged upon you and you might be glad to pretend or wipe off such aspersions Hoc nomine pessime audiebat inter Judaeos non mode Paulus sed Dominus queque ipse acsi tota sua praedicatione legis abrogationem moliretur Nunquam tanta cautio c. Christ himself saith Calvin who is the wisdom of God could not so preach the doctrine of free-Grace but some took occasion from his words as you from ours to say or think he destroyed the Law hence was that prohibition Do not think I came to destroy the Law Matth. 5.17 Do you think your self more wise or wary in your Preaching then Christ or Paul was if not suspect your self in that you bear not the like reproach When innocency is thus traduced Presertim ver◠facile obtinet falsa hac imaginatio inter vos qui prepostera legis intelligentia c. Calv. and condemned quis stabit The Disciple is not above his Master if Christ and Paul were counted Antinomians Abrogaters of the Law who will not take up the same Cross And it is remarkeable by whom they were so opposed and aspersed even by the preposterous Zelots of Moses Law a generation which ever have and will hinder the free passage of the Gospel and disturb the peace of the Church like Cain Ishmael c. I thought here to have ended Sic ergo nes meminerimus Evangelium dispensare ut nostro decendi modo lex stabiliatur sed nulla alia firmitaetu quam fide Christi suffulta Id. but that in the closure I observe that you approve of Austins intepretation viz. The Law is established because by the Gospel we obtain grace in some measure to fulfill the law we obtain it not then by the Law and do obtain by faith in Christ still not by the Law then obedience in some degree to it Your eyes are strangely holden if you see not how this interpretation maketh fully for us and wholly against your self You adde Which obedience though it be not the Covenant of grace yet is the way to salvation Now there is nothing out of the covenant of grace can be proved to be in a strict and prosense the way to salvation Ubi ad Christum ventum est primum i◠eo invenitur exacta legi◠justitia quae por imputationem etiam nostra sit deinde sanctificatio qua sermantur cordae nostra ad legis observantiam c. Calv. To believe in Christ is the onely way to it Act. 16.31 Mark 16. Christ dwelleth in the heart by faith and he that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life Joh. 3.36 By attributing too much to the Law and our works you obscure the glory of Christ and of free-grace mingle Law and Gospel entangle and deject the hearts of the faithfull carry them from Christ and that union in spirit with him hinder the right exercise of faith and prayer c. for you teach that by the Law we receive grace conversion sanctification so that the Law enliveth filleth buildeth satisfieth It doth not make us poor feeble humble empty nothing in our selves that so we may seek out for all receive and live by faith in Christ our head grow up in him and so be built up in this way of
the consent or opinion of Divines as the best yea sole reason and warrant you have for this whereas you regard not their concurrence in other things 4. Your inference is as strange viz. That there must then necessarily be grace included in the morall Law for suppose your reducement be true yet the same grace was still contained and kept in the ceremoniall as before and it could import no whit of its native vertue or as a physicall ingredient infuse its spirit strength or force to alter and qualifie the Law of works for then grace were no more grace nor works no more works If you make the morall so capacious as to receive into it the other as a greater Orbe the lesser or as your Chest doth a box of oyntment or the Ark the Pot of Manna yet there is no necessity of any influence from one into the other or of any thing to be poured out of one vessell into another but all that grace of remission of sins c. was still preserved and kept in the ceremoniall Law and so no grace in the morall 4. If the Apostle did speak as much against the ceremoniall as morall Law was it not because the people had no further respect then to the act observance or thing done resting in the bare use without faith in Christ the onely treasure hid and propounded in and by them and so they made that to be worke which was grace and so no difference between ceremoniall and morall things Sincere accepâ—â— non sunt proâ—â—ie opera hoâ—â—num sed â—â—ei nam niâ—â—l agimus sed â—â—ferimus nos â—â—eo ad recipiâ—â—ndam ejus â—â—vatiam Cal. And being thus perverted the continuance and use of circumcision and the sacrifices did oppose Christ and grace though they did not so as they were instituted and commanded by God to be used Sacrifices and Sacraments be Gods Ordinances which rightly understood and taken and purely used are not properly mans works but Gods He propoundeth and commendeth thereby unto us his grace and the work of redemption by Jesus Christ the sole object that our faith is to look at and to be exercised about in the use of them If we handle them sincerely we bring no work nothing for acceptation with God but onely are receivers of what he freely giveth unto us It s an easie and too common an errour to turn all into works even Baptism and the Lords Supper whereby the simple nature and verity of them is extinguished and lost Christ profiteth none but such as despairing of Law and works do by faith she onely unto the promise of his grace If a man seek help or comfort in any one act or work he is then bound to seek the same in all the works of the Law and so is a debter to fulfill the whole Law and is quite fallen from grace so is it Gal. 5.2 3 4. Behold I Paul say unto you that if you be circumcised namely in that perswasion that that act will avail you any thing Christ shall not profit you at all c. 5. Lastly This say you hath been alway a strong Argument to perswade you c. And there appeareth no strength in it but it is as weak silly and poor as any and whereas you say alwaies I understand you thus viz. since you entertained that conceit that the Law of works is a Covenant of grace by a mistake herein you might be confirmed in that errour but what bred or occasioned that opinion at first And we now having the same morall Law how is it if the ceremoniall be included in that second Commandment that it doth not bind us also to sacrifice be circumcised c. as it did the Jews else we have not all in the Law Mr. B. This will appear from the visible seal to ratifie the Covenant Argn. 5 which was by sacrifices and sprinkling the people with blood and this did signifie Christ the Mediatour of this Covenant Answ Interpreters vary about the meaning of that Covenant-book or Testament that was sprinkled with blood Exod. 24. If you will contend it was the Law largely taken even for what was delivered on Mount Sinai In which large acceptation that Law blood of sprinkling and other ceremonies then used were typicall and shadows of future good things Heb. 10.1 then you exclude the Morall Law strictly taken as a rule of righteousness for it was not typicall And now what have you gained by making this a Covenat of grace which the Jews lived under or where or what grace is found in the morall Law But when Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people and said Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you Exod. 24.8 your Marginall note telleth you It was to signifie that the Law being broken by us could alone be satisfied by the blood and death of Christ Let Moses be typicall Mediatour yet it followeth not that it was not a covenant of works if you take it for the Law morall but contrarily that it was no other for a Mediator was therefore needfull because by the Law the people were convinced that there was dissention and variance between God and them in that they were proved to be transgressors of that his Law and the enmity was to be slain and abolished and a reconcilement made by a middle person Argn. 6 The residue of this Section I leave as dubious and obscure of whom you mean I know not Mr. B. If the Law was that same Covenant with that Oath God made to Isaac then it must needs be a Covenant of grace But c. Therefore God remembers what he had promised to Abraham Deut. 7.2 It shall come to pass if ye hearken to these judgements and do them that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the Covenant and mercy which he sware unto thy Fathers Answ Nothing is more evident by this place then that the Law requiring these judgements to be hearkened unto and done was a distinct doctrine from that Covenant made with them in their Fathers For 1. God requires of them the doing of the one but promises that he himself will keep the other the Covenant and the mercy so that this wholly rests and relyeth on him 2. He calls and commendeth himself first to be the Lord their God not upon condition of their doing or obedience but before he required it and as the ground of commanding it 3. The Covenant and mercy was made long before and confirmed by Oath in the dayes of their Fathers these stand all in that text fully against you and for us Yet he dealing with them as a Father with his Children is willing to manifest his faithfulness and love in keeping Covenant and promise made long before in that way of their obedience and dutifulness but that he made that Covenant the same with the Law is denied as utterly false If you say to your Child he shall find you a loving and kind
curse and condemn yet it hath power to rule command and direct 4. The Law with the preface and promise added to it was given as a Covenant of Grace 5. The Law is taken most strictly for that is meer mandatory without any promise at all 6. God doth use his Law as he doth his whole word to beget and to increase the life of Grace 7. While a Minister is preaching any commandment he doth thereby mould and new-frame the heart 8. I suppose that Christ hath obtained of God by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth in the Ministery that whether it be Law or Gospel the souls of men may be healed and converted thereupon 9. I cannot yeild to that that the Law worketh only preparatorily 10. There was never in the Church of God meer pure Law or meer pure Gospel 11. Onely two things go to the essence of a Law 1. Direction 2. Obligation 12. In the Moral Law is required justifying Faith Repentance and our Sacraments be commanded in the second Commandment 13. The Moral Law containeth more then the Law of Nature 14. Good works are necessary to Salvation in regard of the presence of them 15. Our holy duties have a promise of pardon and eternal life not because of their worth but yet of their presence 16. To every godly action thou dost there is a promise of eternal life 17. Goods works be conditions without which a man cannot be saved 18. Good works are in their owne nature a defence against sin and corruption 19. Our good works be a motive moving God as a King that preferreth one that saluteth him 20. The State of reparation cannot be absolutely said to be better then that in innocency 21. We are not by Christ more righteous then Adam was or imputed righteousness though infinite in Christ is only imputed to us for that we lost and ought to have and we need no more 22. The Gospel makes known Christ and then the Law thus as it were illightned by the Gospel doth fasten a command upon us to believe in Christ Mr. Rutherf 23. Gods decree of grace in the execution of it may be broken in a linke by some great sin but Christ cannot but soder the chain and raise the fallen sinner 24. The Law hath power to convert by the Spirit 25. Sinners remaining in that damnable state are not to believe but as thus qualified that is humbled wearied self-condemned onely 26. Yet though thou were upon the borders of hell the Gospel excepts thee not from the duty of believing and coming to Christ They that sin against the holy Ghost are condemned for unbelief 27. Saving humiliation is conjoyned with Christ Dr. Tayeler A man may get from under his dangerous state by the attaining and exercise of three saving Graces Faith Repentance and inchoate obedience Repentance wipes off old scores repealeth all the actions of the Law getteth all sins cast into the bottom of the Sea Inchoate obedience hath promise of acceptance and is accounted as full and compleat obedience to the Law The way to escape the yoke and coaction of the Law is to become a cheerful and free observer of it That these are not of the substance of the Law but circumstances appendce and consequences viz. 1. That the Law yoaketh every man to a personal performance of it 2. To exact personal and perfect obedience upon pain of eternal death 3. To urge and force it self upon the conscience with fear and terror 4. That no life or salvation must be expected by the Law but by keeping it wholly and exactly 5. That the Law arraignes and condemnes the sinner and is the Ministery of death Without the law no man can know what God is nor his worship nor how to perform duties Good works be conditions of blessedness Mr. Bedford Christ hath freed us provided that men by faith lay hold on Christ keep close to him and walk according to those rules of holiness that he hath prescribed for in so doing we obtain what the Law promised life and salvation Believers are not under that condition of full and perfect obedience but under a condition of sincerity of obedience The Law as circumstantial viz. as it is a covenant of life and death is abolishod Mr. Bl. in serm Christ came to save none but holy ones Setting up of Familiy-duties like the sprinkling of the blood of the Paschal lamb will keep out the destroying Angel Mr. All. sem As Christ was glorified because he first glorified his Father so we must first glorifie God by our obedience and serve him if we will be saved There is a general equity that if God save any he save them that serve him To be glorified of God is to be received into communion have acceptance peace of conscience joy in the holy Ghost Adoption and the inheritance these we shall have by honouring and serving of God here so that by honouring God we do good to our selves Mr. No. The law is the word of Grace that bringeth salvation Grace cometh by the Law as well as by Gospel And so expounded those Texts Tit. 2.11 2 Cor. 6.1 Act 20.32 Mr. H. God made man for happiness and the Law must be his rule and guide unto it The Covenant of Grace is not absolute and free but upon condition of our good works or works are considerations or Causa sine qua non as when a great treasure is promised for going a hundred miles The Covenant of works requireth perfect obedience and the condition of the covenant of Grace is at least a purpose and endeavour to keep the Commandments The Lord give us a good understanding in all things and make us rightly to discern between things that differ To God belongeth glory for ever Amen FINIS Monomachia OR A Single REPLY To Mr. RUTHERFORD'S Book CALLED Christ's dying and drawing of Sinners Vindicating and clearing onely such Positions and Passages in The Assertion of Grace as are palpably mistaken and perverted and so mis-called ANTINOMIAN Wherein also it appeareth that the Adversaries dealing is neither just nor candid By Robert Towne Luke 6.22 23. Blessed are ye when men hate you and when they separate you and revile you and cast out your name as evil for the Son of man's sake Rejoyce ye in that day c. for after this manner their fathers did to the Prophets Joh. 9 39. And Jesus said For judgement I am come into this world that they which see not might see and they which see might be made blinde James 3.14 15. If ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts glory not and lye not against the Truth This wisdom descendeth not from above c. Qui aliorum verba calumniantur illi arte alium fingunt ac formant sermonem quà m ab co quem calumniantur est dictus Moll Jac. 3.14 Aemulationem dixit amaram quia non regnat nisi dum veneno malignitatis infecti sunt ut omnia in amarulentiam
whose be the errours and mistakes Be thou wise and impartial and if any can in love clear them to be mine he may call for my retractation and have it The Lord keep us in that faith and love which is in Christ Jesus Farewel MONOMACHIA or A single Reply to Mr. Rutherfords book called Christs dying and drawing of Sinners vindicating and clearing onely such positions and passages in the book intituled The Assertion of Grace as are by him palpably mistaken and perverted and so miscalled Antinomian THe first Exception that I find is against this passage in Assert pag. 37. Holy walking and good works can no more be meanes or the way to the kingdom as Mr. Towne and other Antinomians say then motion within the City can be a way to the City in regard the man is in the City before he walk in it Reply If all must be Antinomians who so have held and said in our sense then you will condemn with us all the Orthodox But 2. If you can put a good construction upon their words why will not charity do the like for us will you be partial 3. Where is your confutation or conviction of errour 4. The kingdom of grace and glory is but one in nature and kind as all do assert the difference is in regard of degrees And the entrance into it is by regeneration Joh. 3.5 which is before all works therefore we do rightly teach that a man must first be in the New-Jerusalem the City of God before he can walk in it 5. If you will take the kingdom strictly for the future state of glory and felicity which you know your Antinomians do not in this their position yet even then it is the free gift of God without condition of our works as Rom. 6.23 The free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Neque enim obedientia nostra ant causa est aut conditio propter quam accepti coram Dco As the mean through which it can be received is Christ so faith is the instrument by which as a gift is received and taken by the hand from the giver Lastly There is one in your bosome will tell you that we are not against good works which God hath ordained that we should walk in amongst men onely as you grant them to be improperly conditions of life so we according to the Scriptures and the Orthodox do affirm that opinion to be false and dangerous from which it's most hard to withdraw mens minds and thoughts it is so naturall unto them and in the best construction it doth obscure the free grace of God in Christ Jesus Importing that Christ saveth not without works or faith cannot receive Christ in the promise for both righteousness and life but he is held forth for salvation upon condition and after our good works so that faith also must be kept in suspence and Gods promise too untill the end of our holy walking Mr. Rutherf Neither do these places make justification and regeneration all one as Mr. T. with other Antinomians do for we are not regenerated by faith but that we may believe but we are justified by faith 2. Regeneration putteth in us a new birth the image of the second Adam justification formally is for the imputed righteousness of Christ which is in Christ not in us Reply 1. You may see there pag. 78. that it is brought in as the saying of Melancthon whose words upon Joh. 3. are these Christus justificationem dicit esse regenerationem c. Christ saith that justification is regeneration this is indeed to mortifie the flesh and to be renewed in Spirit True mortification is the sence or feeling of death whereby the flesh is confounded and judged vivification is in that death a sense of life peace joy of heart c. As also of Mr. Fox who saith thus Regeneration is not a being altered into a new bodily substance from what we were but a being turned by reconciliation into a new state of grace so as such who were before dead to God and damnable creatures and children of wrath are now accepted purged justified from the malediction of original and actual sin they who were separated from God are restored again into favour and grace I could adde others of as good judgement and experience as is any adversary Your reasons are invalid for 1. If regeneration be to faith and so be before it then it followeth that either we come not to Christ and become one with him by faith which elsewhere you affirme as do others or else regeneration doth precede our union which is against the noon-light of Scriptures We are in Christ before we become new creatures 2 Cor. 5.17 Joh. 15.1 2. 2. Then regeneration is not the begetting of man again to God as Jam 1.18 but a begetting of new qualities or a renewing of Gods Image in him who as yet is a sinner in the state of nature a Child of wrath c. And so the accident will be before and without its proper subject there being found the likeness of a Sonne without the Sonship it-self Or at least by your opinion one may be regenerated and so the Child of God who is not as yet justified nor in favour and acceptance with God This is clear if regeneration be to faith And then we are to believe that we may be justified reconciled c. 3. Then also either the word is not the seed of our new birth as 1 Pet. 1.23 or else the word is effectual to regenation without and before faith But the word profiteth not without faith Heb. 4.2 And faith is first required to make us Sonnes of God as Joh. 1.12 The power to become the Sonnes of God is given to them that receive Christ or believe in him so Gal. 3.26 Ye are all the Children of God by faith in Christ Jesus If by faith then not before it Our second thoughts may be more satisfactory Mr. Rutherf pag. 257. Mortification and new obedience as Mr. T. and others say is but faith in Christ and not abstinence from wordly lusts that war against the soul Reply 1. Abstinence from worldly lusts cannot be mortification formally and properly so called for it is to kill and crucifie lust Gal. 5.24 that is more then to abstain from it 2. Your accusation is false for I say not so see the place again Mr. Rutherf pag. 272 To repent to mortifie sin is not to condemn all our works as Mr. T. saith Assert pag. 15 16. righteousness and judgement and our best things in us and then by faith to flee to grace nor is it to distrust our own righteousness and to embrace Christ in the promise Because 1. this is faith and we are justified by faith not by repentance and mortification neither receive we Christ by repentance Reply Your wrong is manifold for I confound not faith and repentance but say that they are inseparable in the subject and yet to be
distinguished as Mark 1.15 Repent and believe the Gospel 2. I do not make repentance and to mortifie sin all one as I there speak of repentance 3. Neither say I that to repent and to mortifie sinne is by faith to flye to grace embrace Christ c. The Law is against you as a false witness in all these And you cannot but perceive that I speak of that legal repentance and mortification which you with others so much stand for as requisite before faith Which is when a man is so laid open to himself so effectually convinced and wrought upon by the Law that he seeth acknowledgeth and renounceth all things in him and done by him as sinne and abomination before the Lord whatever esteem he hath had of them formerly or whatever shew they may make Yea and as sinne the sting of death appears and reviveth in all which is the very mortification the wounding and killing of the soul Rom. 7.10 so all these seeming excellencies and good things become mortified within him and his heart that lived and rejoyced in them now dyeth unto them finding nothing but vanity sin and death in all things out of Christ Thus he repenteth and changeth his mind with shame and sorrow that ever he so exalted and established his own righteousness of works as did Paul and those zealous Jews being converted to the faith And because we are necessitated to carry this body of death to the grave and therefore sin and death will ever and unavoidably be in us and all our works and we can by faith in Christ alone finde true righteousness life peace confidence joy and salvation hence Christ is our onely treasure who hath our hearts delight and all else are renounced and accounted as dung and dross Phil. 3.9 You neither may nor can rightly understand my words as spoken of that Evangelical repentance or mortifying of sin in life and conversation by the Spirit of which we read Rom. 8.13 Colos 3.5 Also you know that both in the Scriptures and Authors repentance is somtimes taken largely as comprehending faith also with the effects and fruits of it and so it is divided into mortification and vivification But fince all fulness is in Christ who is made unto us wisdom righteousness sanctification and redemption that all our rejoycing should be in him he that liveth by faith in him is the onely mortified man Psal 73.25 Whom have I in heaven but thee and there is none upon earth desired besides him Mr. Rutherf pag. 273. There be two things in the Law 1. The authority and power to command 2. To punish pag. 275. It s most false that Mr. T. saith To justifie and condemn are as proper and essential to the Law as to command 3. It s false that we are freed from active obedience to the moral Law because Christ came under the active obedience for law requires obedience out of love Reply These two authorities of the Law are repeated and inculcated by you and Mr. Burg. usque ad nanseam Dictator-like you still say It 's false it 's most false c. but where is there any truth or weight in what you say against me I can contemn your vain and reproachfull words and do account your self-coined distinctions as windy without warrant and weight You have a satisfactory answer in my former Reply I may challenge you to produce one syllable for a Law commanding without its condemning power Remember Matth. 5.17 18. 2. That the Law requires obedience out of love its true but we worke from self-love and for self-ends viz. that we may live thereby and not dye The first Adam by his obedience might have preserved himself in that life and state of holiness and happiness he had by creation but now in Christ our life and and felicity is attained and kept by faith we believe that we may live And we love and obey freely for no such ends as not standing and falling by our obedience or disobedience moral Also if our love be changed from legal into evangelical void of selfness Yet that altereth not the cords of the law nor the chaines we were in but Christ hath happily freed us from them The change is in the true Christian and in his estate but you can shew no change in the Law Neither do we destroy the Law as you slander us again but do establish it by faith Rom. 3.31 Where I see that Paul preached the same way that we do in that he was so put to clear and vindicate his Ministery as you do us This also will serve for that exception in pag. 275. where you set the same Coleworts before your Reader It is your constant doctrine that works have reward here and eternall life hereafter and that they be conditions and the way to life and glory how this will consist with faith and Christ let all judge Mr. Rutherf pag. 332. Town in Assertion pag. 56 58. A believer is as well saved already as justified by Christ and in him Divines say Our life and salvation is inchoate but they speak of life as it is in us subjectâ—è Quantum ad nos spectat or in respect of our sense and apprehension here in grace our faith knowledge sanctification is imperfect but in regard of imputation and douation our righteousness is perfect and he that believeth hath life not he shall have it or hath it in hope onely Answ If we have glory really actually perfectly but want it onely in sense we have the resurrection from the dead also actually we want nothing of the reality of heavrn but sense but we are not yet before the throne Therefore holy walking can be no way nor condition nor means of salvation c. therefore no wonder they reject all sanctification as not necessary and teach men to loose the reynes to all fleshly walking Reply Justification puts the soul into a present state of salvation The Scriptures are plain He hath saved us 2 Tim. 1.9 Tit. 3.5 Eph. 2.8 and These things have I written unto you that believe c. that ye may know that ye have eternal life 1 Joh. 5.13 This is the record that God hath given to us eternal life and this life is in his Son ver 11. and Ephes 2.5 God hath quickned us together with Christ and hath raised us up together and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus I muse you stumble in so clear light Hence saith Musculus Before God we are all that which he willed and also hath caused us to be Christ is not alone in his eyes but we also are conjoyned to him The Assertion doth present you with testimonyes sufficient you believe so farre as you see and feel If you deny our perfection in Christ our head In whom we are compleat Col. 2.10 deny also our union with him that we have received him have him are now the Sons of God 1 Joh. 3.2 Yea then deny that God hath given us as yet
through Christ we have entrance unto the Father and Eph. 3.12 By him we have boldness and entrance with confidence by faith in him If Mr. Rutherf object But these are not in full and absolute perfection where yet true faith may be Who saith so or who but Mr. Rutherf would so closely pervert the truth that I may retort his owne words Being justified by faith we have peace c. In whom believing ye rejoyce c. God hath begotten us againe to a lively hope c. Rom. 5.1 1 Pet. 1.3 8. Nay saith Mr. Rutherf This is a close perverting of the truth for he doubts not but that there are many weak believers of a trembling timerous and troubled spirit whose faith is not yet able to over-master their fears which cause torment and disquietness but I cease And Mr. Rutherf hereby smels our faith Reply Naribus utilis yet no unsavory errour And know it that it is the effect of the law of works upon the natural conscience and the unbelief of the Gospel that keep the soul in bondage through that slavish fear Mr. Rutherf ibid. The covenant of grace commands faith and also good works as witnesses of faith but Mr. T. will have good works in any Notion of an Evangelick command to stand at defiance with the covenant of grace Repl. What contend you for if you grant grace to be the fountain-cause of all holy walking then not the law 2. If it be a lively and free fountain then doth holiness issue out of it as a pleasant stream and how now do good works stand at defiance with the covenant of grace Besides it is said Catachrestiâ—â—s abusively and not properly that the covenant of grace commands faith and good works for it promiseth to give both to them who have power to neither Lastly these works are not done as conditions to obtain eternal life for that is said passim to be by faith without works faith for salvation good works for conversation Mr. Rutherf ibid. The man under the law cannot give himself to be ruled by the law after the minde and will of God as Mr. T. saith except Antinomians be Pelagians Reply It s a palpable wrong I have no such words as that a man under the law can give himself to be ruled by it after the mind and will of God you have a strange conscience that no better bridleth you though your affections be void of love to your Adversary I might more truely reply by your doctrine That a man under the law can do it for you free none from under it or else you are not ruled by it after the mind and will of God And that is most propable who now is the Pelagian But to deal plainly what say you of Paul and many zealous Jews who in earnest applied themselves to do the things of the Law so that Paul saith touching it he was blameless and that before his conversion to the faith To do it after the mind and will of God is your addition Mr. Rutherf Paul speaks of a man under the Law in the flesh and in opposition to that under Grace married to Christ he that is dead to the Law married to Christ and serves God spiritually And it 's clear the Apostle counts it a part of deliverance from the Law and a fruit of our marriage to Christ that we bring forth fruit to God walk holily and serve in newness of spirit Reply Jam convenimus What contend you for all is granted that I desire or said for 1. then Christ and not the Law as a husband makes fruitfull 2. Then there was a serving of God under the Law in the oldness of the letter 3. Where or how then find you me to be against holy walking and according to the rule of righteousness Is not this your false slander Assert How can Christ redeem us from the Law except in the same sense and extent that Christ was under it Mr. Rutherf 1. Christ was under the Law of Ceremonies I hope Gentiles were not under that Reply The question is of the moral and you talk vainly of ceremonial Mr. Rutherf If Christ was under the Law as a rule to free us from it why commands he to imitate him Reply Christ was under the Law for life even to obtaine favour and salvation for us so he is in the end of the Law for righteousness to all that believe 2. It is by his spirit and power any imitate him walking as he did and so do keep the Law as he did freely in love not for self-life or self-ends for so did Christ who sought not himself Assert pag. Mr. T. hath a strange evasion The spirit is free why will you controle and rule it by the Law whereas the nature of it is freely to conforme heart and life to the outward rule of the law without the help of the law as a crooked thing is made straight c. Mr. Rutherf To do the will of God meerly as commanded from the power of an outward commandment is legal saith Saltmatsh and Mr. T. saith it is to controul the free spirit Three means saith T. are passive to hear read receive Sacraments are so many restraints laid on the free spirit Reply I say again If the spirit rule you according to the Law then neither Law nor you do rule it but the Law is onely the rule or pattern according to which the Spirit formeth you What can be more plain to him that will see and grant any truth And this makes no contrariety but a sweet harmony between the word and the spirit yea and establisheth the Law by the faith and Spirit of the Gospel And here you would range us among the old Anabaptists Enthusiasts c. and love to expatiate having burst the banks and bounds of charity and truth I am not more strange to you then this is to me That you are of such a spirit 2. Where say I that meanes are passive The Spirit is pleased to blow sweetly by all Evangelical meanes as Preaching Prayer Sacraments c. and we rightly using them do carry our selves passively that the Spirit may thereby breath and give life to our Spirits and that we may have it more abundantly Mr. Rutherf What T. meaneth in saying The spirit freely conformeth the heart to it Reply The sense is easie and plain if your mind were not finister Mr. Rutherf If the meaning be that the Law of it self cannot convert a man to God Antinomians father most falsly such dreames on us but if the Spirit conform us to the outward rule of the Law then must the Law be yet a rule to our obedience Reply When you please you can spell out my meaning But 1. Whether it be your dream or no I leave it Yet you know that your Brethren so hold and teach and may be forced to own this brat or novell-assertion of theirs 2. As if Mr. Rutherf were in a dream he in his other book would seem
contrary Yet that both Tree and the Fruit the believer and his work are acceptable in Christ is no new divinity but according to Scripture and all the Orthodox Tit. 1.15 To the pure all things are pure Your Scriptures 1 Joh. 1.8 Jam. 3.2 do speak of works as proceeding from us not as presented in Christ who justifieth and freeth us from all the evil and filth cleaving to them I retort If God can accept of us or our performances out of Christ what need we then continually to deal with God in Christ 1 Pet. 1.6 Heb. 13.15 By him let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually Whatsoever you do in word or deed Do all things in the name of our Lord Jesus giving thankes to God even the Father by him Colos 3.17 But this is open wrong which you do us in saying that we hold works perfect simply in themselves or to be accepted for any worth or inherent dignity in them which is your doctrine rather we teach That Abels sacrifice was accepted by faith that is by Christ believed on and not for any merit in it Heb. 11.4 The Scriptures and Testimonies of the Orthodox which you read in the Assertion might have prevented all this labour if you had been so advised Consider that of Calvin in that l. 3. cap. 17. sect 8.9 Qua jam sequuntur bona opera Sepulto etiam imperfectionis vitio quod bona opera fedare folet quae fiunt a fidelinus b. opera justa confentur c. c. Those good works which follow after justification are esteemed and valued otherwise then by their own desert or dignity for whatever imperfection is in them it is covered with Christs perfection whatever blemish or filthiness in them it is cleansed by his purity lest it should be questioned or examined before Gods judgement seat Therefore saith he the fault of all our transgressions being blotted out whereby men are hindered from bringing forth any thing acceptable to God and the imperfection and defect which is wont to defile all good works being buried all the good works of the faithfull are acknowledged to be just c. Thus may all see how palpably you have mistaken me in this as in the other passages And how indirectly and falsly you do inferre That we may be justified by works or we make them meritorious c. whereas we say plainly that the person is first justified without and before all works and that then they become accepted and pleasing by the same way and reason that the person came into favour For as God stands and appears propitious to us in Christ and so his works and dealings with us and disposals of us be pleasing and welcome to us even so we being received and accepted in Christ what we do through him is pleasant to God but not because of any formal and intrinsecal dignity in the work So that we study to deal with God onely in Christ and are now incouraged unto all good works for who can have a heart to do any good work till he by faith know that he pleaseth God by Jesus Christ So Christ alone is exalted and magnified Salus semel donatur ut oporibus acquirenda non sit To seek Heaven by works and deservings is to wrong yea to shame Christs blood and unto such it is shed in vain When the Gospel is preached unto us we believe the mercy of God and in believing receive the Spirit the earnest of eternal life and be in eternal life already and feel in our hearts already the sweetness thereof and are overcome with the kindness of God and of Christ and therefore love the will of God and of love are ready to worke freely and not to obtain that which is given already and whereof we be heirs by Grace freely Tindall Martyr A brief REPLY to the Exceptions taken by Mr. Rutherford in his Tryal and Triumph of Faith against the supposed Antinomian Errours 1 Exception THe first Exception is against the Assert of Grace pag 112 113. Where it is said That Christ onely did bear our sinnes and the punishment of them so that the justified are not punished for sinne Mr. Rutherf answereth with a twofold distinction 1. Of justice legal and sinne revenging 2. Of a mixt justice which is in a Father and so saith That the sinnes of the Saints are not onely against the legal but also a wrong done against his mixt justice Where God doth punish their sinnes though not satisfactorily to his Law Reply 1. To assert a mixt justice is to temper and mingle Law and Gospel without warrant and to hold forth God in a Covenant made up both of free-grace and works which yet be inconsistent Rom. 11.6 2. Our Divines distinguish indeed between punishment and chastisement and so call these corrections of Children and not punishment properly for that every punishment is in some sort satisfactory And so will that be inferred which by them is objected against the Papists viz. If the Saints be punished for their sinnes temporally then Christ satisfied for pounds and left us to satisfie for pence 3. The true and intrinsecal nature and property of all justice offended requireth satisfaction so that our punishments must be satisfactory also so far as the sinne deserveth else who or what satisfieth doth this mixt justice take its pennyworth and full due out of the flesh and bones of Gods Children so as God neither can cease beating till he hath given all the stripes the fault deserveth and when correction is past then the Fathers justice is quieted 4. And if you put them under the Government of justice tempered with mildness and mercy which is Law Evangelized a new crotchet and dream then the Law of strict justice which is the decalogue is no longer a rule our sinnes must be no longer examined and measured by it but judged as they are offences of this mixt and fatherly justice So now Christ may be set aside we shall no more need him for Advocate neither is there use of faith when we sinne but our sufferings must in this condition pacifie not Christs passion that onely was of use and efficacy to bring us into this state and under this Government Who now are become the total abrogators of the Moral and pure Law yea and as it is a rule to live and walk by Can you tell us how much of justice and what a measure of mercy is in this new rule and Government But the result is That our sins after justification have a double relation and had but one before one to the strict Law and that Christ contented the other is to a milder justice against which our stripes must be opposed that by them we may be healed It s granted during the Mosaical-pedagogie there was some shew yea ground for somewhat but not for all that here you assert for God did in that dispensation veil his Paternity which now in Christ is done away And your Scriptures
are onely of force for that and during Christ time 2 Exception 2 Against what is said to 1 Cor. 11. Mr. Rutherf saith Faith doth no more hinder a justified person to receive unworthily the Lords Supper then it doth hinder him to commit Adultery Reply It 's true faith is not alway effectual in all to hinder the doing of both these But what then Is it not for want of the exercise of faith in vigour life and perfection that these or any other sins are not prevented So if faith do not hinder what then can hinder what purifieth the heart and rightly principleth and disposeth the soul to all good actions but faith but not faith as a dead quality or habit lying still and idle within but as it 's lively and operative according to its nature and property 2. What else doth the Soul in eating and drinking the Lords Supper imploy or set on work but faith Nay is the act of eating and drinking formally any other thing but to believe So that if faith be not to be put forth and exercised and then where is justification there may be a bodily action in using the visible Elements which is unworthy indeed and not befitting a Christian but no spiritual eating as the Ordinance requireth You make your self sport saying Mr. T 's sense seemeth to carry That a justified person cannot sinne nor eat and drink unworthily because faith makes him worthy and if so the way is a wanton merry way Reply My words speak no such thing if you lift to spell them aright but if your ill-will suffer you not The Lord forgive and amend it Faith includeth all It presupposeth hunger and thirst before eating 2. a true and spiritual receiving 3. inward refreshing and satisfaction thereby whence 4. followeth love rejoycing with thanksgiving so that he who eateth and drinketh in faith cannot eat and drink unworthily The ground out of which all your seven Arguments grow and receive their supposed strength is that mixt-justice or that Mosaical-Government which we do not now live under And therefore that failing they will all totter and fall It needs then your second hand and labour to uphold and confirm it Moreover to the seventh and last requiring some more particular answer I say 1. That all afflictions are subservient to the Law and signes of wrath is no errour or position of ours neither is our assertion founded upon it 2. Yet as afflictions come from justice offended and provoked to inflict them for sinne so they are appendices of the Law and you cannot disprove it 3. You adde as a thing that we hold That as believers are freed from the ruling power of the Law so are they also from the Rod. Whereas 1. your doctrine by a direct and necessary consequence doth free the believer from the ruling power of the Law while you place him under a mixt-Government of justice and mercy for the Law is pure justice without mixture and a strict and exact rule without mitigation 2. It is false that we free believers from the Rod as your own eyes may witness while you read our positions for we do not cry down all Crosses and secure the justified from all affliction In this our way we have had and still expect many a scratch and prick from you and others and yet not for any desert or errour that all your diligence can finde and prove Your other pretended errour is cleared before Lastly though Christ paid for sins before yet the Law acquits them not nor conscience apperehends it not before actual justification 3 Exception is against the Covenant Mr. Rutherf Some teach this Covenant hath no condition so Dr. Crisp and other Libertines Reply We must have your lash and unworthy brand also You may sin and we are made to suffer but unless you bring in Free-will this Covenant of Grace will prove absolute no part of it lying on us for that presupposeth some power and goodness where is none for this Covenant is with man being fallen and so having lost all therefore it behoveth that it should be sutable to his broken state requiring neither promising no good conditionally where nothing could be first given by him 2. It is granted by all that all was transacted between God the Father and the Sonne from eternity and that the Covenant as it cometh and is commended to us is as the breaking up of that great seal the opening and manifestation of those secrets concluded upon so farre as they concern the raising of the Elect of God out of their sinful dust unto everlasting blessedness so that what is in the decree of heaven concerning them the same is contained in the Covenant then as God purposed to give repentance faith holiness so he hath included and promised all in the Covenant and these are truely parts and branches of it and not properly conditions Now we see that as there were thoughts of peace in God for us when we were in our lowest and worst condition and in what way and after what manner his mind is to recover our souls from their lost Estates and restore and give life favour and glory unto them so by this Covenant also he hath laid cleared to us a firm ground upon which we may with comfort and considence expect and wait for faith and all things to be given freely unto us This agreeth to the expressions of Zanchie Calvin Parous c. Indeed God observeth his due and set order in giving and working one thing before and another after so as a prius and a posterius is granted but the first suppose repentance or faith is not a condition of what followeth except with us and according to these Authors you will call it a condition of state that is Conditio statuâ— God bringeth the soul unto such a state or case as he humbleth it and then giveth Grace c. Thus many promises are with an if If ye repent if ye believe then thus it shall be unto you and denote onely order and consequence as Calvin saith not condition As a Husbandman soweth not his land till it be plowed and fitted if he be asked why he doth not commit his seed to it he will answer it must be prepared first but one part of his worke is not the condition of the other when the whole lyeth on him Again if the promise to give faith and repentance be not in the Covenant where is it to be found Is there any thing to be looked for not mentioned in the Covenant 3. You call it a Covenant of Grace now if it be of Grace then works are excluded yea repentance and faith as our acts and if it be free that necessarily fighteth against all conditions it cannot be free and conditional The more freely the riches of Gods Grace is held forth the more glorious and admirable is it in our eyes Besides it is your expression That Christ is a party contracting or a Covenanter undertaking for
doth include others also even all that the Father gave him in that prayer I still incline to their judgement 4. You say the word doth not onely signifie c. whereas the word onely is not there but now is foisted in by you 5. And your meer reason why to sanctifie cannot comprehend justification or renovation is because these cannot be applyed to Christ who saith For their sakes I sanctifie my self that they also may be sanctified through thy truth Answ This is much against you as I conceive For 1. did not Christ sanctifie himself viz. his humane nature that he might be the root cause and means of communicating righteousness and holiness both to justifie renew and change them 2. Neither will it follow on the other hand that a word of so extensive a sense may not as it is aplyed to Christ be taken more strictly or in one sense onely and to his Elect more largely as it agreed to their condition M. B. If sanctification do here include justification how by the Antinomian principle can our Saviour pray for the justification of them that were already justified Answ Answer your self how do you aske forgiveness of sins in the Lords Prayer and yet believe they are forgiven in your Creed 2. His prayer is extended also to all that afterward should come to believe through their word and ministery M. B. But in the next place grant sanctification for renovation how doth this prove that the law is not used instrumentally for our Saviours argument is universal They word is truth and may not this be affirmed of the Law as well as of Gospel Answ Our Saviours words be indefinite But why pass you over these words in that very place pag. 164. which be so material so pertinent and satisfactory to this your query viz But if we note well what this word of truth is it will be more evident for this end compare with this that place Eph. 1.13 and Col. 1. where the word of truth is said to be the Gospel of salvation and the Antithesis used in John 1.17 sheweth that it is a special and peculiar prerogative of the Gospel to be called by that name by way of excellency as also Calvin Piscator c. affirm Thus far in the Assertion unto all which you stand not onely mute without a word of reply but here you ask a question which they answered before you formed it and so would have prevented It s granted the Law strictly taken is truth but as it is observed by all the learned the Gospel in many like places is so called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 M. B. The next instance is Tit. 2.11 12. For the grace of God bringeth salvation teaching t is c. Answ All this may be granted and nothing maketh against this opinion for none deny the Gospel to be instrumental Answ But the place doth import it to be peculiar to the Gospel for that word of grace or the grace of God appearing in that word that bringeth salvation teacheth to deny ungodliness c. And I put not in that word effectually ambiguously as you charge me but to avoid and prevent all ambiguity for I grant the Law teacheth these same things materially but not with efficacy and success as doth the Gospel the Spirit being pleased to utter such divine force and vertue in that Ministery unto the Elect. M. B. But is not here a contradiction The Author before made the Gospel and promise all one whereas here it doth command holiness and godliness Is not this with the Papists to make a new Law let him reconcile himself Answ You are better skilled in tying knots then in unloosing any If the Gospel and promise be all one that is not of my making I found them so Gal. 3.18 as is shewed before and see that you both take and leave them so according to the true intent of Scripture 2. You say It commandeth but there is no such word in the text but teaching to deny that is instrumentally The holy Ghost is that spiritual unction that teacheth believers and doth it effectually by the Gospel Unctio docet vos Spiritus S. efficax est per praedicat Evangelii saith Piscator on 1 John 2.27 And this they receive saith he as the members from the head the branches for the vine But this is not wrought by nor effected onely by a literal and outward command The Spirit moveth and teacheth a spirit and cometh from the union with Christ I wish your Tenets did not more interfere with Papists But I forbear Now you may see how your thoughts need reconciling not my opinions the light by this hath happily done it Lastly do you deny that grace moveth or teacheth effectually because that all are not thereby effectually turned unto holiness then God worketh nothing effectually in any because he doth not in every one not in Peter because not in Iudas else to what purpose do you make this flourish M. B. Beside the Argument may be retorted upon him What word teacheth to deny ungodliness c. that sanctifieth c. but the law doth so Psal 119. A young man whose lusts are strongest c. may be cleansed by attending thereunto Answ But as it is retorted it hath no force in it for every word that teaceth doth not sanctifie therefore although the Law do teach it is no consequence your proposition is not universally true so you conclude nothing What say you of Philosophical precepts and instructions and of the dictating and teaching of every natural conscience do these sanctifie onely this word of grace that bringeth salvation doâ—â— so indeed if you mean Pharisaical washing of the outside onely as of hands cares eyes c. these laws have washed their disciples and hearers witness Paul before his conversion to the faith a man touching the Law blameless the whole generation of the Pharisees Aristides Socrates c. but what soul insides had they full of pride malice envy infidelity c. And many that I know of your legal stamp which like him that was born of the bond-woman condemn and persecute the children of the promise Gal. 4.29 That place in Psa 119. proveth no more but that a young man may be cleansed by attending to the word and who is against that or what maketh it for your opinion But that of Peter Martyr is most for our assertion for if the Law attain such effects onely when it is written in the hearts or bowels which cometh by the new Covenant Jer. 31. then it is not by the outward commandments or ministry of it And surely he could not conceive as you say that the Spirit doth use the Law to write it self in the heart but as both he and others affirm this is effected by the Gospel so Lex sola fide suffulta est The Law is established by the preaching of Faith which is the thing we contend for and you have brought nothing to weaken much less to overthrow