Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
work_n faith_n justifi_v justify_v 6,808 5 9.1273 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A89813 The plain mans defence against popery: or, A discourse, shewing the flat opposition of popery to the Scripture. By J.N. chaplain to a person of honour J. N. 1675 (1675) Wing N22; ESTC R9788 31,034 79

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

made righteous Rom. 5.19 Christ is made of God to us righteousness 1 Cor. 1.30 A man is justified by faith without the deeds of the Law Rom. 3.28 A man is not justified by the works of the Law but by the faith of Christ Gal. 2. ●6 By the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justified Rom. 3.20 By grace ye are saved through faith not of works lest any should boast Eph. 2.8 Where is boasting then it is excluded by what Law of Works nay but by the law of faith Rom. 3.27 see Rom. 4.2 3 4 5 6 7. Phil. 3.8 9. Note The Church of Rome by their false Doctrine in the matter of justification raze the very foundation of the Christian Religion Gal. 5.4 Note There is a new invention of the Papists of a first and second justification The first justification they call that when a wicked man is at first made holy having a supernatural principle of grace infused into him which doth inherently justifie him A second justification they call that whereby a man being already just doth encrease and grow in his righteousness and so is more justified The second justification they plainly acknowledge is obtained by our merits and the good use of grace already received St. Paul they say speaks of the first justification but St. James of the second justification Rom. 3.28 Gal. 2.16 Jam. 2.24 But this distinction as they explain it is reproachful to Christs righteousness and flatly contrary to the Scripture for both these justifications are built upon a false foundation viz. That our inherent righteousness habitual or actual is that which doth justifie us in Gods sight Now this is a palpable errour for 1. The Scripture doth exclude all kind of works from the business of justification as appears by the frequent disjunction or opposition of faith and works throughout the Scripture 't was the Errour of those against whom St. Paul dealeth in his Epistles to rest half upon Christ and half upon works 2. Our righteousness and best works are imperfect and therefore will not endure the pure eyes of God Hence it is that Gods Children so oft in Scripture disclaim the Plea of their own righteousness Job David the Apostle Paul Job 9.3 Psal 143.3 Phil. 3 9. 3. When we make our own righteousness and obedience the matter of our justification we glory in our selves and detract from free grace by which alone we are justified through the merits of Christ Note St. Paul disputeth how we are justified St. James how we shall evidence our selves to be justified he takes justification for the declaration and manifestation of it Jam. 2.24 Note When the Apostle Paul argueth vehemently against justification by the law he doth yet press the duty of the law Rom. 3.13 So then the Law continueth as a rule though not as a covenant by which we are to be justified though it be not appointed to ●ustifie yet it is commanded as the way we should walk in It is a dangerous Antichristian error when we do good works and endeavour to keep Gods Commandements that thereby God may pronounce us righteous and it 's no less dangerous on the contrary to neglect the doing of good works because Gods order is to Communicate the benefit of Christs righteousness to none but such as shall by faith receive him and walk obedientially in his Commands Note Excellent is the Doctrine of the Church of England which I wish were more carefully observed by some late learned writers of her own Christ is the righteousness of all them that truly beli●ve in him he hath paid their Ransome by his death he for them fulfilled the law in his life so that now in him and by him every true Christian man may be called a fulfiller of the low 2. Part of the Serm. of salvation because faith doth directly send us to Christ for Remission of sins and that by faith we embrace the promise of Gods mercy and of the Remission of our sins which thing no other of our vertues or works properly doth therefore the Scripture useth to say that faith without works doth justifie And therefore the ancient Fathers of the Church say only faith justifieth us 3. Part of the Serm. of salvation 38. Q. Can we merit and deserve Heaven and eternal life by good works done by us A. Eternal life is the gift of God Rom. 6.23 When ye have done all say ye are unprofitable servants Luke 17.10 If thou be righteous what givest thou to God or what receiveth he at thy hand Job 35.7 Note The Papists arrogantly hold that by good works we bind God to give us eternal life and that for the Dignity and Excellency of the thing done by us and that thereby we are worthy of everlasting life Note Christ alone is the Store-house of all our merits we renounce all merits of our own works and rest only on the merits of Christ Note The Doctrine of merits is most false and Antichristian for 1. The Scripture directly condemns it Eph. 2.8 10. Tit. 3.5 2. Our best works are imperfect 3. There is a vast disproportion between them and the glory to come 4. They are debts which we owe to God 5. As good they proceed from the Spirit of God 6. We do not profit God by them Note Reward is two-fold of Debt and of Mercy life everlasting is not a reward of debt but of Mercy Note Every true believer is worthy not by his own works but in Christ and by his merits and righteousness Note It is a Popish dotage contrary to Scripture to say that Christ by his death merited that our works should merit everlasting life this is to make our selves Christs Partners in the office of Mediation and so become our own Saviours and Redeemers Note The ancient Fathers by merits mean those good works to which God hath promised a reward but utterly disclaim all condignity in such works and with them to merit is only to impetrate and obtain how much they did abhor Popish merits appears by such speeches as these oft used by them If God should deal with men according to their Deserts all must be damned saith one Another holy Father speaks thus The mercy of God is our merit Another thus When the reward comes God will crown his gifts not thy merits Again the righteousness of man is the indulgence of God c. Note The meritorious works the Papists boast of are chiefly the obedience chastity wilful poverty of their Monks and Fryars and people were perswaded by them that to wear a Fryars Coat would deliver them from Agues or Pestilence and to be buried in it might save them and that the merits of these Monks did so abound that they were able to satisfie not only for their own sins but also for all their Benefactors and friends Now 1. For their obedience under colour of obedience to their Father Abbot or Pryor they freed them●elves from obedience to their natural Parents and from obedience to
3.1 Exod. 23.20 not of a created Angel for a created Angel did not redeem him from all evil as he saith there 29. Q. Should prayers and the service of God be performed in a tongue unknown not understood by the people what saith St. Paul of this A. Except ye utter words easie to be understood how shall it be known what is spoken how shall the unlearned say Amen in the Church I had rather speak five words to edification than Ten thousand words in an unknown tongue 1 Cor. 14.9.16 19. Note St. Paul in 1 Cor. 14. Throughout disputes against praying and speaking in a strange language in an unknown tongue yet the Papists will have their prayers in Latine though the people understand not one word of them Note The Papists themselves acknowledge that Christ and the Apostles and the primitive Church for more than six hundred years did not use prayers in an unknown tongue Note The Papists have a wicked design to keep people in ignorance and therefore will not suffer them to understand their own prayers 30. Q. Should we pray for the dead A. Now the Child is dead why should I fast and pray 2 Sam. 12.21 Blessed are they that dye in the Lord Rev. 14.13 Note They that dye in the Lord need not our prayers and they that dye in their sins can have no benefit by them Note The Popish Priests get so much money by prayers for the dead that they are unwilling to acknowledge it to be an errour Note For praying for the dead or praying to the Saints we have 1. No command from God 2. No promise to be heard 3. No example in Scripture 31. Q. Are aequivocations of mental Reservations good and lawful A. Ye shall not deal falsly or lye Lev. 19.11 Their tongue speaketh deceit Jer. 9.8 Let your Communication be yea yea and nay nay Matt. 5.37 He that hath not sworn deceitfully shall receive the blessing from the Lord Psal 24.4 An oath is the end of all strife Heb 6.16 Thou shalt swear in truth c. Jer. 4.2 Note If it be lawful to aequivocate if this be not lying as Papists teach 1. The Devil cant be the Father of lies for he could never want a mental Reservation 2. The Martyrs were fools and self murtherers in not saving their lives by this Jesuitical trick 3. There can be no such thing as perjury falshood in any but Idiots and naturals that have not wit enough to aequivocate 4. There can be no sincere faith or trusts in oaths covenants contracts promises leagues of agreement either publike or private for who knowes what secret evasions restrictions men may have in their minds 32. Q. Was St. Peter Prince of the Apostles or had they all equal power and Authority A. Jesus said the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion but it shall not be so among you Mat. 20.25 The Apostles sent Peter and John Act. 8.14 see also Gal. 2.7 2 Cor. 11.5 Gal. 2.9 33. Q. When Christ said to Peter Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church I give unto thee the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven c. Mat. 16.18 Was this spoken to the rest of the Apostles and doth it belong to them as well as to St. Peter A. Ye are built upon the foundation of the Apostles Eph. 2.20 The City had 12 foundations and in them the names of the 12 Apostles Rev. 21.14 Then Jesus said to them the Apostles whose sins ye remit they are remitted whose sins ye retain they are retained John 20.23 Mat. 18.18 Note St. Peter was never head of the Church or Prince of the Apostles But if he had been so how should the Pope come to be his successor where doth Christ give this power to the Bishop of Rome 34. Q. Is there no other head of the Church but Christ A. Christ is head of the Church Col. 1.18 God hath given Christ to be head over all things to the Church which is his body Eph. 1.22 As the Husband is head of the wife so Christ is the head of the Church Eph. 5.23 The head even Christ Eph. 4.15 Note If the Pope be head of the Catholick Church then 1. St. Paul was greatly mistaken 2. The Catholick Church must be the Popes body and spouse 3. The Church would have no head when there is no Pope 4. The Church must have two or three heads when there are two or three Popes as sometimes have been for several years 5. The Church should have an unsound head when the Pope is Heretical as sundry Popes have been by confession of their own Doctors Note Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles would not be called head of the Church because they thought that title Antichristian entrenching upon the right of Christ 35. Q. Doth the word justifie in Scripture signifie to absolve or pronounce a man righteous not to infuse or put righteousness into a man A. They shall justifie the righteous and condemn the wicked Deut. 25.1 He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just are an abomination to the Lord Pro. 17.15 Esa 5.23 Note The Scriptures speaking of justification makes it a discharging and acquitting from accusations and so doth legally make just not qualitatively as if to justifie were to make just holy as the Papists contend who confound justification with sanctification Note This is not a vain strife of words for the great Article of our Religion depends upon the right discovery of the use of the word if to justifie signifie to give us an inherent righteousness then by that we may appear before God but if to justifie signifie to acquit us being accused for sin through the grace of God and righteousness of Christ then we are to go out of our selves and to rely upon Christs righteousness nor can the Papists produce any one place of Scripture where the word justifie is put for making righteous by habitual and actual righteousness inherent in us as they would have it 36. Q. Is the Doctrine of imputed righteousness clearly taught in Scripture A. Blessed is the man to whom God imputeth righteousness without works Rom. 4.6 That righteousness might be imputed to them also Rom. 4.11 It shall be imputed to us also if we believe Rom. 4.24 Note Christs righteousness is made ours as our sins were made his and that is only by imputation 2 Cor. 5.21 Note We do not say that Christs righteousness is our formal righteousness but it is the matter whereby we stand justified fore God Note The Popish party flout at this Doctrine calling it the putative and chinerical righteousness and yet affirm that the merits of one Saint may be imputed to another 37. Q. Are we accounted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ applyed by faith and not for our own works and merits A. By the Obedience of one shall many be