Christ's righteousness pag. 38. ult Banner of Justification therefore it must justifie as an act which by God's ordination investeth us in the priviledges of Justification therefore in his judgment faith it self is our righteousness But I shall adde no more in answer to those men that hold That Faith justifies only as it applyes the righteousness or blood of Christ unto the soul for I have shewn at large above That faith justifies in other acts of it besides resting upon the blood of Christ I shall have only here to do with Dr More his Notion and it is Mr Smith's too of the righteousness of Faith or Faith its being reckoned or imputed for righteousness and indeed I am very sorry that I should have a word to say against the opinion of so worthy a man and one that labour so vigorously and successfully against all that effeminacy of notion in Religion which is found amongst the Antinomians or others Neither yet do I much differ from him in designe only I cannot be faithfull to my present subject if I should not take notice of his unhappy mis-interpreting those phrases of the Righteousness of faith Justification and Faith's being impuâ—â—td for Righteousness I shall first give an account of the Doctor 's opinion and expressions in this business and then shew the reasons of my dissent from him herein In the 380 pag. of that book which I have so often quoted to borrow some authority and assistance from in this Discourse I mean his Mystery of Godliness at the end of that page the Doctor commenting upon Rom. 4.24 25. To believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification hath these words In this verse are contained the two grand Priviledges of the Gospel that is Forgiveness of sins upon the satisfaction of Christ's death and the Justifying of us that is THE MAKING OF US JUST AND HOLY THROUGH A SOUND FAITH IN HIM THAT RAISED JESUS FROM THE DEAD I need quote no more to shew the Doctor 's notion and apprehension of the whole business but yet I shall ex abundanti quote some other passages The Doctor you see is of opinion That Justification signifies making us just holy and righteous and when we are made so then God looks upon us as so because he judgeth of things aright and because Faith makes us truly holy inwardly just and righteous therefore this righteousness by which we are thus inherently righteous is called The Righceousness of Faith For this see page 379. about the middle of it Abraham being not weak in faith considered not his own body now dead being fully perswaded that what God had promised him he was able also to perform and therefore saith the Apostle it was imputed to him for righteousness that is to say God approved of him FOR A GOOD AND PIOUS MAN who not confulting with the natural improbability of the thing but giving firm credence to the promise of God did that which was due to the goodness and power of God and BECOMEING A GOOD AND RIGHTEOUS MAN So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is NOTHING ELSE but to be approved as a good man or a doer of that which is righteous and good and that because he does that which is good and righteous And afterwards in the same page 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies any virtue or goodness in a man whatsoever with much more to the same purpose And at last adds in page 372. Sect. 9. This is the only warrantable notion that I can finde of being justisied by faith So Mr Smith of Cambridge as I shew above page 220. saith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Righteousness of Faith and the Righteousness of God is only a Christ-like nature in man's soul c. Having given an account of the Doctor 's judgment I shall now shew in how many things I agree with the Doctor as to this business and then where I conceive there needs some rectification of the Doctor 's notion And first of all I confess these are two GRAND PRIVILEDGES of the Gospel as the Doctor sayes viz. The forgiveness of sins and The sanctification of our natures which latter the Doctor as I doubt not mistakes to be meant by the word Justification in Rom. 4.25 2. I acknowledge that true Sanctification is produced only by faith purifying their hearts by faith Acts 15 9. no other principle will work holiness in the soul The Law made nothing perfect as to inward holiness 3. I grant that if true Sanctification should be wanting from Faith that Faith would not be a righteousness would not justifie Faith without works is dead 4. I allow that Works have some share perhaps a second place in the matter of Justification continued so saith Mr Baxter often and I think so saith St James Jam. 2.24 Yee see then how that by works a man is justified and not by faith only 5. I allow that Justification is attributed several times in Scripture to a Work the Faith not mentioned though the Faith is understood nay the chief honor belongs to faith and the crown is to be set upon Faith's head if we wili make a strict and right interpretation of that Scripture whatever it be Thus the act of Phineas in killing Zimri and Cosbi is reckoned for righteousness and yet no mention of his faith Psal 6.30 31. Then stood up Phineas and EXECUTED JUDGMENT and so the plague was stayed and IHAT was counted unto him for righteousness unto all generations for evermore So very many of the actions in Hebr. 11. which are there by the author of that Epistle reckoned to be the actions of Faith and in several places of that Chapter said to be imputed for righteousness verses 4 5 7. yet in the original places where their stories are recorded not a word mentioned of their faith Compare Abel's history Gen. 4.4 with Heb. 11.4 compare Enoch's Gen. 5.24 with Heb. 11.5 Noah's Gen. 6.13 22. with Heb. 11.7 c. There is not a word mentioned of their faith in Genesis but only of their works and yet their faith in those works is plainly said by the Author of this Epistle to the Hebrews to be a justifying faith Justification is indeed attributed to works the faith not mentioned And so sometimes pardon of sins and eternal life are promised to other graces besides faith Acts 3.19 Math. 5. from ver 3. to ver 11. for these two reasons 1. For that they have a share or a second place in the matter of Justification but 2. and especially For that they necessarily suppose faith as being the fruits and issues of a true and lively faith Yea. 6. I will allow that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Righteousness in the New Testament yea and in St Pauls Epistles signifies Holiness Rom. 6.13 18 20. and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies to be just Rev. 22.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
man hath made God himself his righteousness and Christ his righteousness and this is a glorious righteousness indeed far beyond the righteousness of a perfect and unerring obedience if a man had it for this see one proof out of the Old-Testament and one or two out of the New Isa 45.24 25. Surely shall one say in the Lord have I righteousness and strength even to him shall men come and all that are incensed against him shall be ashamed in the Lord shall all the Seed of Isral be JUSTIFIED and SHALL GLORY For the New-Testament I have often mentioned already that place Gal. 2.20 yet it can never be too often repeated I am crucified with Christ nevertheless I live yet not I or no longer but Christ liveth in me and the 〈◊〉 that I now lâ—ve in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God who lived me and gave himself for me Here St. â—aul had a glorious righteousness indeed for Christ was his riches and righteousness and dwelt in him by Faith that is he lived upon Christ by faith 't is true he had a Christ-like nature in his soul but this Christ-like nature was not the righteousness of faith or the righteousness of God or his Gospel-righteousness but a fruit of that Faith which was his righteousness All other glorying is excluded in the Gospel save crâ—ely to glory in the Lord Rom 3.27 2 Cor. 1.30 31. Of him are ye in Christ Jesus who of God is made unto us wisdom and righteousnesâ—y that according as it is written He that glorieth let him glory in the Lord. Now this making God and Christ a mans righteousness is that alone which commends the Gospel so highly above the Law sets up he second Adam above the first gives a just account of all those Elogies which the Apostle gives of the Gospel the way of believing above the first way of works which I suppose out of Dr Moor's notion would not arise at all For though the Drs notion should be true which I confess there is no contradiction in I have delivered some things above p 218 219. but a little too much in favor of it * I would have that expression p. 219. 〈◊〉 shall say something to the like purpose understood only thus Tha sanctification is the condition of our justification onely in the second place faith in the first I say suppose the Dâ—â— notion should be true That faith justifies us purely because it sanctifies us and that the holiness which arises from faith should be that which is called the Righteousness of Faith yet how could this ever advance the Gospel above the Law in the business of Justification If we take the Law not in the mistaken sense of the Legallist but in the proper sense of it For so the righteousness of the Law is unerring obedience and the righteousness of Faith in the Dâ—s sence is obedience full of defects Now comparing obedience with obedience and the righteousness of Faith with the righteousness of the Law how can the righteousness of Faith be preferred to the righteousness of the Law How can the second Adam in the holiness which he causeth be advanced above the first in his earthly righteousness That therefore which make the excellency and precedency of the Gospel to the Law is this that the righteousness of the Law was one 's own this of Faith makes God himself and Christ himself our righteousness by our living wholly upon them I have said as much as I intend to the Dr. s notion of the righteousness of saith and I do cordially profess That what I have spoken hath been meerly out of love to the truth and if the truth had not engaged and enforced me to deliver what I have I should not have presumed to encounter counter such a great man being my self not worthy to carry the Doctors books after him And I know the Doctors candor and ingenuity to be so great that he will give others leave as freely to differ from him as he takes to differ from others I shall shut up this Question with a grave admonition out of Mr John Goodwin in his Banner of Justification displaied pag. 32. That Faith justifies saith he is the constant assertion of the Scripture and the Architectonical doctrine of the Gospel Rom. 5.1 3 28. Gal. 2.15.16 By the way upon occasion of these with many the like passages in the New Testament wherein Justification by faith is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expresly affirmed I cannot but mention my dislike of their strein in teaching who lay down and deliver it to the people for a doctrine positively and plainly That men are not justified by saith or by believing Douotless it is not convenient or comely positively to deliver or assert that for a doctrine of truth which is so diametrally opposite to 〈◊〉 frequent clear and express words of the Scripture And again I judge it very incongruous for any Minister of the Gospel to seâ— up a doctrine as it were in defiance of or in conâ—â—st against any thing so frequently and so directly in terminis affirmed in the Scriptures as Justification by faith I do not â—â—â—â—uce this quotation to infirmate as if the Doctor did not hold that we are justified by the acts of faith as well as by any other good actions but for that I am sensible the Doctor intends that we are not more justified by the acts of faith than by any other good actions which if it were true I could not see how faith could be worthy of so famous attributious of justification to it in such an eminent manner when the Apostle is silent about other graces only here and there in some places where there is no such professed dispute he speaks wordâ— in Tayor of other graces and good works in the matter of justification I tome now to a fifth Question which is this How do good works justifie And in answer to this I must first premise That seeing the Scripture is so express in it that works to justifie Jam. 2.25 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified and 〈◊〉 by saith only I dare not pass over this Question without speaking to it But I shall need to speak the less to this because Mr Baxter and others have delivered so much upon it I shall first shew the agreement which there is betwixt St Paul and St James in this business and then shew how works justifie 'T is true St Paul assirms Rom. 3.28 chat we are justified by faith without the deeds or works of the Law St James saith that we are justified by works and not by faith only here seems to be a jarring and disagreement But they are to be reconciled by the observation of the several sorts of works that these two Apostles speak of St Paul speaks of legal works or works of the Law which contain in them an opinion of merit or debt as I have shewn above pag. 97 98.
and a man is justified without these nay he cannot be justified if he but pretend to these Therefore the Apostle James must speak of another sort of works which whilest a man doth he yet renounces merit in them and these works a man may be in part justified by without any prejudice to the doctrine of Justification by faith This is fully asserted by Mr Baxter Thesis 76. pag. 292. Neither is there saith he the least appearance of a contradiction betwixt this and Paul's doctrine Rom. 3.28 if men did not through prejudice negligence or wilfulness over-look this that in that and all other the like places the Apostle doth professedly exclude THE WORKS OF THE LAW ONLY from Justification but never at all THE WORKS OF GOSPEL as they are the condition of the New Covenant Works therefore justifie as a less principal part of the condition of the New Covenant I am not shy to speak in Mr Baxter's words since I intend much the same thing they do not justifie from their own merit so only legal works justifie but from divine promise and acceptance For proof of this that it is so that works do justifie in the second place besides the express words of the Apostle James I finde the same thing asserted by the Apostle Paul in three several Scriptures * Dr Hammond Par. All that is required to our justification is faith not all that is called by that name but such as is made perfect by addition of those duties which we owe to God and our brethren Gal. 5â— In Jesus Christ that is in the doctrine of Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing that is unto Justification 〈◊〉 uncircumcision but faith whiâ—â— worketh by Love Here faith indeed is â—aid to justifie but it is a faith which worketh by love a working faith But yet more plainly the same expression is used in two places to our present purpose Gal. 6.15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new creature that is saith Dr Hammond the renewed regenerate heart and it may be added a new life 2 Cor. 5.17 If any man be in Christ he is a now creature old things are past away behold all things are become new that is he lives a perfect new life and this new life only availeth unto Justification beyond circumcision or uncircumcision which are meer external Priviledges The third Scripture where the same expression is used is beyond all exception to our present purpose 1 Cor. 7.19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing these are of no consideration in the matter of pleasing God and obtaining his favour What then is why the keeping the commandments of God this is beyond all these considerations of bond and free circumcised and uncircumcised But these are the things with which he compares the new creature and good works he doth not set these above all when he compares them with faith in that place where he mentions faith that is set above works and other graces as the cause above the effect the principal agent above the instrument Neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncâ—râ—umbâ—sion but faith which WORKETH BY LOVE But in these Scriptures we see plainly that work have an influence upon our Justification they are of great availe in order unto it If it be objected that the first Justification passeth upon believing before works I answer with many others that there is in the first faith a rooted disposition unto an universal obedience there is the new creature or new man of the heart there and in continued justification there is the new man of the life and conversation Now the reasons why the Lord would have works in the condition of Justification though he doth not justifie for works only or chiefly may be gathered out of the Scripture to be these The first reason is this 1 Reas Why works are in the condition of Gospel justification For that without works faith it self cannot be accounted a perfect saith Now certainly if faith justifie it must be a perfect compleat faith not a maimed imperfect faith That without works faith is imperfect and by works it is perfected are the assertions of the Apostle James Faith without works is dead James 2.20 26 ver 22. Seest thâ—â— how faith wrought with his works and by works was his faith made perfect What an uselets imperfect dead thing is a power or faculty for action without operation What an useless thing would it be for a man to have eyes able to see only the man hath a continual blinde put before his eyes that he never doth see in all his life Why just such a thing were faith withour action of no worth or use What an imperfect faith had Abraham's been if his works and actions had not attended it Suppose we that when God commanded Abraham to offer up Isaac he had refused and said Lord how then shall there arise of him a great Nation his faith had been exceedingly discredited But when he resolves with himself I will offer him up for I know that God that raised him out of Sarah's dead womb can as well raise him from the dead after I have killed him and offered him up here was a noble faith indeed his faith was perfected by this work here that grace shewed what it could carry men unto When any thing attains its end it receives its perfection Here faith attained its end in carrying Abraham to do so great a work and therein was perfected and so obtained the compleat reward of Justification then the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God if works had not accompanied his faith it had proved but an imperfect dead faith the Scripture had not been fulfilled which faith Abraham believed God No artificer will own any thing to be a true and perfect piece of work which will not attain it's end serve the use it is made for so will not God own that to be faith which will not put us upon acts of confidence in himself and obedience to his commands be they never so difficult For though God knows the heart and so can see into the very principle of our actions yet the Lord is pleased to keep that distance of State and Majesty that he will not seem to know what he doth know till the outward man express what is in the inward man God knew before what was in Abraham's heart but yet he will not seem to know that he was so great a believer till he had put him upon this trial of offering up his son Gen 22.12 Now I know that thou fearest God seeing thou hast not with-heâ—â—â—hy son thine only son from me Now I confess what is here said of works in this reason That faith receives it's perfection from them can only properly and immediately be applyed to the works of faith to other works only remotely as faith may have some kinde of influence even upon all good works but however
Propositions thoroughly believed are the foundation of all true Religion By faith we receive the notion of God rootedly in our fouls and then all the discoveries of God in any the effects of his wisdome power and goodness in his Works or in his Word in his Works Heb. 11.3 By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear Whether faith takes this Proposition That the worlds were made by the word of God out of the Scriptures or meerly by observation from the works themselves it comes all to one as to my present purpose which is this to prove that it is faith that strongly and effectually in us ownes the being of God and the works of God Again it is faith receives all the revelations of God by any messengers that he sends unto us at any time * And indeed this is the most proper notion of faith viz. an asfent to testimony Who hath BELIEVED our report saith Isaias and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed Isai 53.1 If the arm of the Lord be not revealed to men in the preaching of the word it is because they do not rightly believe the report The word preached did not profit them not being mixed with saith in the hearing of it Heb. 4.2 3. and hence it is for that faith is the proper instrument of receiving the word of God that the Saints in the New Testament are called as often by the name of BELIEVERS as by any other name Acts 5.14 1 Tim. 4.12 and the word of the Gospel is called the word of Faith Rom. 10.8 Nay faith doth not only in the first place receive God into the soul then all the discoveries of God in his Works and Word but it pitches upon all the particular objects that are there discovered in the Word and brings them particularly into the soul faith doth not only receive the doctrine of the Gospel as true in the general and from God but because Christ is there revealed it receives Christ himself and brings Christ into the soul and so Christ comes to dwell in our hearts by faith Eph. 3.17 which is indeed a figurative expression there is faith in Christ as well as faith in God the Father and there is faith in the blood of Christ c. but of these things I have spoken largely above in the last character I bring them in only here as proofs of the excellency of faith in that it brings all spiritual objects home unto the soul that so the soul may converse with them in the exercise of all its graces and virtues In one word our whole life here at a distance from God must necessarily be a life of faith We walk by faith not by sight 2 Cor. 5.7 for till we come to the beatifical Vision of God we must see him and all his glories and excellencies by faith and our treatings with God the Father and the Son must be by faith I have a long time dearly loved that Scripture 1 Pet. 1.8 Whom speaking of Christ having not seen ye love in whom though now you see him not yet believing ye rejoice with â—oy unspeakable and full of glory Faith must come into set love on work upon an unseen Christ or else none of that glorious and unspeakable joy could arise to a Christian so that by what hath been said in this first particular Faith is the root-grace in this present state of things 2 Excellency of Faith But secondly Faith is not only the first grace in order and a root-grace but it is certainly productive and efficacious in the actuating all other graces and setting them on work when once saith hath brought all these glorious objects into the soul first God and all his glorious Attributes then his Revelations and especially Christ and his Blood and realized them all unto the soul it is almost impossible but all other graces should in their several courses and respects which they have to these objects move and work regularly and intensly Love we know is the fulfilling of the Law Rom. 13.10 in rational creatures it is the fulfilling of the Law perfectly even in degrees in broken creatures it is the fulfilling of the Law sincerely in its desires and endeavours Now this faith makes its great instrument to work by Faith worketh by love Gal. 5.6 and I shewed above how faith sets hope on work now these three Faith Hope and Charity are the three great graces 1 Cor. 13.13 all other graces are reducible to these three and of these three faith is the root-grace And therefore we finde often in the Scriptures that all Religion is put upon the bare assent of faith Rom. 10.9 If thou confes with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved 1 John 4.2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come into the flesh is of God Not as if a meer confession or profession of Christ were saving for there are many that do profess themseves Christians that shall go to hell But according to that in the Romanes if they did believe with their heart that God had raised Christ from the dead together with the ends of his death resurrection certainly all those other things which accompany salvation or have salvation annexed to them would follow because true saith hearty unseigned faith is a working faith it works by love to the making a man a new creature and to the keeping of all the commandements of God And according to this positioâ— I make no doubt that place in James is to be under stood Jam. 2. where there is a supposition of a superation betwixt Faith and Works that either that place speaks onely of a false and onely pretended faith and then indeed there may be such a Faith without Works a dead and unactive Faith that is the resemblance and appearance of Faith or else â—t speaks of a true Faith and then it is onely by way of supposition that the Apostle there speaks that upon supposition any one's Faith though it were the highest and truest Faith in the World should not be accompanied by Works it would not justifie and it is very true upon that supposition Because Works are as well required as Faith not but that where-ever there is a true and lively Faith there will be Works necessarily attending it and this I believe all will readily acknowledge Mr. Baxter is so much of this opinion that Faith is an operative Grace and puts the soul where it is upon gracious actions towards God that be puts works and obedience into the desinition or description of Faith In his Aphorisms pag. 279 Thesis 70. Faith saith he in the largest sense as it comprehendeth all the condition of the New-Covenant may be thus defined It is when a sinner by the Word and
Mayne's Treatise of Justification St Paul's Travailing-pangs With his Legal-Galatians OR A Treatise of Justification Wherein these two Assertions are chiefly evinced viz. 1. That Justification is not by the Law but by Faith 2. That yet men are generally prone to seek Justification by the Law Together with several Characters assigned of a Legal and Evangelical spirit To which is added By way of Appendix the manner of transferring Justification from the Law to Faith By Zach. Mayne M. A. My little Children of whom I travail in Birth again till Christ be formed in you Gal. 4.19 Tell me ye that DESIRE to be under the Law now after that ye have known God how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly Elements whereunto ye DESIRE again to be in bondage ver 21.9 I through the Law am dead to the Law that I might live unto God Gal. 2.19 Mirae quidem inauditae sunt istae definitiones quod vivere Legi sit mori Deo mori Legi sit vivere Deo Tu vero disce eas recte intelligere London Printed by M. I. for Ioseph Leigh at the upper end of Bazing hall street near the Naggs head Tavern and Henry Cripys in Popes-head Ally 1662. The Preface Courteous Reader THe Subject of this Treatise being the Justification of a sinner is very weighty the same things being made in the Scripture the conditions of compleat Justification and Salvation and yet this weighty subject is exceedingly controverted A thing of ill and dangerous consequence If I had therefore any thing to produce that was new and sound upon this argument which might serve for the healing of the breaches that are amongst us I might be very well excused for increasing the vast number of Books by adding one more There are no less then four several opinions amongst good men touching the matter of Justification or the condition of it two of which I may term extream the other two middle or moderate Opinions The first is that of the Antinomians who because the Apostle Paul disputes against Legal Works banish all consideration of Works though the most Evangelical and rightly principled from having any place at all in our Justification Amongst these Luther himself will be found to be a chief Leader though otherwise an eminent servant of God And that I do not accuse him falsly let such passages as these witness for me that are to be found in his Commentary upon the Galatians in which he layes that distinction of Righteousness into active and passive as the foundation of all his building in the doctrine of Justification and so makes the righteousness of the Gospel by which we are justified to be only a passive righteousness Pag. 10. of his Commentary printed at Wittenberg 1535. Ego non quaero Justitiam activam saith he deberem quidem habâ—re facere eam c. that is I seek not after active righteousness I ought indeed to have it and do it but if I had it c. therefore I cast my self rejicio me extra totam justitiam ablivâ—m meam legis divinae simplicietr illam passivam amplector without out of or beyond ALL ACTIVE RIGHTEOUSNESS both mine and that of Gods Law and I simply embrace a passive righteousness which is that of Grace Mercy c. in a word that of Christ and his holy spirit which we do not do but suffer to be done upon us quod non facimus sed patimur So again Summa igitur ars Cristianorum est nescire legem ignorare legem TOTAM justitiam activam that is It is the greatest art and wisedom of a Christian not to know or own the Law Works or any such thing as active righteousness in the matter of Justification Here you see he excludes all kinde of Works whatsoever So again pag. 11. Haec est nostra Theologia c. that is This is our Divinity by which we teach accurately to distinguish between these two righteousnesses active and passive that Faith and Manners may not be confounded Works and Grace But to mention no more see pag. 12. Nihil ergo facimus nos Nihil operamur ad hanc justitiam consequendam Respondeo nihil What then do we do nothing Do we work nothing towards the obtaining of this righteousness I answer nothing quia haec justitia est prorsus nihil facere nihil audire nihil scire de Lege aut de Operibus sed hoc sâ—lum scire credere quod Christus transierit ad Patrem jam non videtur that is Because this Righteousness this passive Gospel-righteousness is only to DO NOTHING to hear nothing to know nothing of the Law or Works but only to know and believe this that Christ is gone to the Father and is not now to be seen Here are indeed many good words and Gospel expressions That we must go to Grace and Mercy and that the Law cannot save us that we must not tamper with the Law in the matter of Justification we must ignorare legem nescire legem be wholly ignorant of and disown the Law in the matter of Justification These are all good expressions were it not for their companions such as these I cast my self extra totam justitiam activam out OF ALL ACTIVE righteousness meam divinae Legis that is All of one kinde or another Legal or Evangelical so it be active righteousness So again That I simply embrace a passive righteousness such as we do not do but suffer What will be said then to Faith it self Surely we act it not suffer it only and that is our Gospel-righteousness Again to shut out MANNERS out of Justification is strange But the worst expression of all is that last quoted What then do we do nothing Do we work nothing towards the obtaining our Justification I answer nothing Because THIS Gospel RIGHTEOUSNESS IS INDEED TO DO NOTHING BUT ONLY TO BELIEVE THAT CHRIST IS GONE TO THE FATHER c. Neither can these passages of Luther be interpreted of the first justification of a Sinner upon his first believing which I wish they could that there faith justifies without works which one ingeniously yet truly expresseth thus Fides foeta justificat ante partum that faith though it have only an obediential frame and disposition in it to do good works yet effectually justifies at first conversion before such good works are brought forth I say Luthers expressions cannot be taken in this sense for he manifestly speaks of the whole life and practice of a Christian or Saint of God in his treating with God for his justification and pardon at any time Ego non quaerâ— justitiam activam saith he that is I do not seek after active righteousness now at this time that I am a Christian that is I do not value it in the business of Justification not but chat he did seek after holiness of life as he saith himself Deberem quidem habere facere eam I ought indeed
off their enemie Contempt which otherwise threatens to be upon them and make a prey and spoile of that which is honourable and might be usefull in them In the place cited the Holy Ghost prescribes unto Timothie this method for the healing of that weakness in men by reason whereof they were like to be injurious unto him and indeed unto themselves more in respect of his youth But be thou an ensample or the pattern 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of those that are faithfull in word in conversation in charitie in spirit in saith in purity meaning that by hearkening to this counsel he should impose a pleasing necessity upon men to make him his youth notwithstanding at least equall in honor reverence and respects with such persons who by maturity of years aâ—e invested with a natural right and title unto such Priviledges How the Author of the Discourse before thee hath quiâ—â—ed himself in the five particulars last specified by the Apostle Conversation Charity Spirit Faith Puritie in order to the vindication or balancing of his years I must referr both thee and my self unto those who have hâ—d longer time and more and larger opportunities to understand him in these then I have had although it be meet for us both 〈◊〉 judg that he hath seen Christianly provident even by these to way-lay that prejudice disparagement which his under-growth in age exposeth him unto But as farr as by word speech or writing a young man may secure his years from the imputation of inconsiderableness and purchase himself an equitable title to divide the heritage of Reverence and honor with men of a farr longer standing in the world he that hath befriended the world with the Treatise ensuing hath to the best of my understanding very substantially performed both Not to insist upon the stile which is grave and yet pleasant enough and at a due distance from affectation the argument or theme undertaken in the Book The Justification of a sinner is both of as important and necessary and of as sublime and difficult a contemplation at least in many of the veines or branches of it as any other subject within the circumference of Divinity or Christian Religion Yea whereas in the best and most serviceable of the years of my earthly Pilgrimage I have been by the providence of God occasionally engaged to wade somewhat farr in the deep waters of those two mysterious Articles of the Common Faith of Christians Justification and Predestination and so necessitated to inquire into and consider with the best of my understanding the respective natures of them both if I were now desired to give my sense concerning the difference between them in point of difficulty or whether of the two requires more of the reason and understanding of a man to come at any well-grounded satisfaction in all matters of moment relating to it I must award the precedeney herein unto Justification For though the Doctrines of Election and Reprobation be resented by many as points of a most abstruse and sublime consideration yet I really judge upon the credit of my unpartial diligence in making the comparison that the secret veins running along in and spreading themselves over the body of the Doctrine of Justification are both more in number and also of a more spiritual and hidden nature harder to be clearly opened than those that occurre in the other Doctrines Not having had time to peruse the Treatise since the printing of it nor any other knowledg of the contents of it but only what I gained by some broken communications about them with the Author when his leisure and mine could agree which was not very often whilest he was preparing it for the Press I am not able to give thee a steady account how farr he hath traversed his Subject or about how many of the arcana or difficult Queries relating to it he hath engaged his pen in the present Discourse I suppose it never came near his thoughts to interess so small a Tract in all the inquireable points about Justification nor do I know any man amongst those many that have served the Christian World in that argument that have raised the pitch of their Undertaking so high But I well remember he hath laboured very commendably and to the good contentment I doubt not of the consciences of those that shall conseientiously reade and minde what he hath written in sundry particulars very necessary to be understood by those that are desirous to know the whole counsel of God in that Great and most important Article of their most holy Profession I mean Justification He hath with a strong hand removed that stumbling Stone of Justification from eternity which the Spirit of Antinomianisme hath laid in the way of Christian profession and at which not a few learned and unlearned have stumbled This Error being so broad-fac'd and palpable had need have the countenance of some that are counted Pillars in the Christian Church to support it And were it 〈◊〉 so gross and easie of detection I might take the beldness with modesty enough to challenge and accuse it of a most malesique and dangerous influence upon the very life of Christianity For besides other threatning tendencies of â—t of this kinde both the face and heart of it are set to deprive the world of the spirit life and soul of all that the great Apostle Paul hath written in his Epistles in asserting the Doctrine of Justification by Faith against the Jews and all others opposing it which is a good part not to say the best or gredtest part of all the heavenly Legatie which he hath left in writing unto the world for that Love's sake which he bare in his life-time to the salvation of it For if the great contest between him and his Oppanents the Jews was not about Justification it self or about the means whereby it is to be obtained in the sight of God but onely about the manifestation or declarative of it and this before men which they must of necessity affirm that hold men really and actually justified by God from eternity then doubtless the Jews who pleaded for Justification by Works had the better end of the staff inasmuch as these have a greater declarative force at least in reference unto men of the state of Justification or of the acceptance of a person with God than Faith hath This not reason and experience onely but the Scripture it self supposeth from place to place still making waies and works of Righteousness and fruitfulness in well-doing the most unquestionable Characters and proofs of persons justified and in favour with God Places of this import and very pregnantly such might soon be drawn together in great numbers but I judg this needless by reason of the frequent and familiar occurrencie of such places Whereas Faith is here represented as in and of it self inevident and as standing in need of the light of Works to make it visible or manifest unto men Jam. 2.18 1
is also called the Promise Faith then is made void the Promise made of none effect Rom. 4.14 And lastly to mention no more the Promises is the Law then against the Promises of God Gal. 3.21 the verbs To him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted unto him for righteousness Having given this Muster-Roll as it were of both parties I come now to some other Positions the first was this viz. 1. That there are but these two ways imaginable of fication there are but two sorts of Righteousness and so but two ways by which men do or with pretence of reason can seek Justification in else there had been more mentioned by the Apostle The second position is this 2. That these two wayes are quite opposite one to the other and inconsâ—stent one with the other that is as to the Justification of the same man at the same time nay if a man doth but seek to be justified by the one he cannot be justified by the other at the same time This opposition I have argued out for me expresly by the Apostle Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace but if it be by works then it is no more of Grace oâ—herwise work is no more work Rom. 4.4 5. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of Grace but of Debt but to him that worketh not but believeth his Faith is counted for righteousness 3d. Position is this The way of works was once and still in its own nature is a way of justification Rom. 7.10 The Commandment was ordained to be unto life yea this way was the ancient and the first of the ways of God in his dealing with man and seems to be natural and necessary to the primitive Estate of mankind For God made made man upright in his own Image of knowledg righteousness and true holiness and gave him the Law though not written in Tables of stone yet in his heart which was better else it had not been sinne to have committed Murther Adultery Stealth false-witness bearing Perjury Idolatry and what not in the Estate of innocency for where there is no Law there is no transgression God gave man a Law and surnished him with ability to have hept it to a tittle so that if he would he might have had the works of the Law to shew for himself The way of Justification by the â—aw unsolded and aâ—gued to be the first natural way of juslification at what time soever the Creator should have called him to account and all the time he and others had kept themselves innocent and holy they must have been acceptable to God he would have had respect to them and their works and they would have obtained this Testimony from God that they pleased him which was all that Enoch who was too good to live in the World had to shew for his justification And this had been enough for Adam or any other man to have produced for their Justification if Satan had at any time turned Accuser And thus living according to the Will of God they should have continued in the favour of God and perhaps after some term of years have been translated to some more happy an estate Then they might have gloryed without sinning that is they might have pleased themselves with such thoughts and speeches as these Happy are we that we took heed and care to please God and kept our selves innocent for now have we obtained a glorious reward we might have ruined our selves as we see the Angels have done We had a Power to have started aside from God but we have kept our selves from that mischief Such an innocent glorying as this and no higher glorying can I imagine lawful even in such a state was not forbidden by the Law of Works it was not excluded Rom. 3.27 Thus we see Justification is a a thing feasible and attainable by works by the Law if a man have the works of it Our Saviour and the elect Augels were justified by the Law Yea our Saviour Christ had the Works of the Law and the Law justified him and the Angels that kept their first estate they were doubtless approved by the Law of their Creation and had all the Apostate Angels turned Devils and false Accusers of them as they are of the Brethren their Works would have justified them in the sight of God Not that the good Angels had no other reward but what a Covenant of Works would allow and before the world though I say not that the good Angels have no other reward but what a Covenant of works allots But I doubt not to affirm That the good Angels were justified and rewarded by a Covenant of Works in as much as there was a full trial made when the other Angels fell of their voluntary obedience So that the Law in it self hath not only a power to justifie and reward but hath actually rewarded the observers of it those that had the righteousness of it Yea all the Work of our redemption by Christ was brought about onely with the good leave of the Law Christ must make a recognition and publikely own the Authority and Majesty that was still remaining in the Law acknowledgement must be made how that that had been offended and some reparation must be made unto the glory of God which was much impaired as it is a revenue from us in the transgression of the Law And this was the onely way decreed by God that the Law must satisfie it self upon him whosoever would undertake our Redemption and then the Law must justifie him all which it did upon our Saviour Which proves the unquestionable Power and Authority that the Law had in it to justifie man had he but the works of it But now let any man or Angel but sin If the â—aw be once broken in a tittle it can justifie no longer and the Law can justifie him no longer if he have but the least failing in obedience the Law can onely condemn this person Man or Angel whoever he be but I shall limit my self to mankind For this take that Scripture Gal. 3.10 Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them So that if a man hath once sinned and yet seeks to be justified he must not seek justification by the righteousness of the Law any longer there comes a necessity of Grace Pardon Mercy which the Law hath not in it the Law hath no such thing as Grace or Pardon in it The Law onely saith He that doth them shall live in them and he that doth them not is accursed Now this Grace Mercy and Pardon which a man comes to have a necessity of upon his first breach of the Law is in the way of Faith which I have proved to be the opposite way of Justification to that of the Law It is of Faith saith the Apostle
the Law is manifested even the righteousness which is of God by Faith 24. Being justified freely by his Grace 28. Therefore we conclude That a man is justified by Faith without the deeds of the Law The 7th and last Proposition is this That de facto there hath been no other way of Justification which hath taken effect upon any sinful man nor any other way adhered to by any of the true Saints of God since the fall of Adam but this way of Faith And the Apostle takes this way of proof viz from the event For most people are more affected with Events then with Arguments from the nature and profound reason of the thing Therefore having proved it first from the nature of the law I come to examples and they shall be but two one plain the other mystical and lastly prove it from a Testimony out of David to this way of Justification by Faith herein following the Apostle in the way which he takes or rather herein onely marking out the way which he takes not imitating it in doing the like The first and onely-plain example which the Apostle proves Justification by Faith by is that of Abraham this example of Abraham the Apostle hath continual recourse to in his Discourses of this subject both in the Romans and Galatians and well might having to deal with the Jews and Jewdâ—izing Gentiles who gloryed in nothing more then to be called and accounted Abraham's Seed and the Apostle in his urging this Example plainly proceeds upon such a supposition as this Certainly your Father Abraham was justified in the right way and you will desire to be justified in no other way then he was Now He prove to you clearly that he was not justified by the law nor by vvorks but by Faith by the promise therefore justification is not by the lavv nor by vvorks but by Faith Thus the Apostle argues Rom. 4. Gal. 3. Rom. 4.1 What shall we say then that Abraham our Father as pertaining to the flesh hath found That is either Abraham our fleshly Father hath found or Abraham our Father hath found according to the flesh that is in the vvay of a fleshly righteousness VVhat hath he found Hath he found Justification by the flesh Shall vve say he hath It follovvs ver 2. For if Abrahaw were justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God that is but he hath not vvhereof to glory before God therefore he vvas not justified by vvorks For if he vvere justified by vvorks he might glory before God for the lavv of vvorks if a man hath these vvorks doth not exclude glorying before God But novv Abraham hath not vvhereof to glory before God therefore he vvas not justified by works v. 3. For what saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness v. 4 5. Now he that believeth as the Scriture saith Abraham did he worketh not that is seeks not Justification by works Novv see Gal. 3. vvhere the same example is brought in proof by the Apostle v. 6. Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him for righteousness v. 7. Knovv therefore that they which are of Faith and for the way of believing the same are the true Children of Abraham and the onely blessed or justified persons v. 18. For if the Inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the Promise but God gave it to Abraham by Promise therefore he had not the Inheritance by the Law nor the Works of it therefore we must not expect it that way for we must bejustified the same way that Abraham was Having given you the plain example I shal likewise give you the Mystical or Allegorical example which the Apostle produceth to prove this last assertion that de facto Faith hath been all along the way of Justification and it is safe using Allegories when the truth is once well established and I have heard it observed that the Jews were much taken with this way of Allegories The Allegorical example therefore is that of Hagar and Saraah The Allegory of Hagar and Sarah Isaac and Ishmael in Gal. 4. from the 21. ver to the end The substance of it is this Hagar was Mount Sinai in Arabia and that Mountain vvhich the Jews call Sinai the Arabians call Hagar Novv upon Mount Sinai or Mount Hagar vvas the Lavv delivered as much as to say Allegorically Hagar and her Seed are for Mount Sinai for the Lavv and the Works of it for justification But novv Sarah ansvvers Jerusalem that is above and to Mount Sion that is she vvas a Type of the Gospel-Church vvhich is for Justification by Faith Novv vvhat saith the Scripture v 30. concerning these tvvo Mothers and their Children vvhich was not onely true literally but is to be understood mystically and figuratively of the two Seeds of those two sorts of men that adhere the one to the Law for justification the other to the way of believing what saith the Scripture Cast out the Bond-woman and her son for the son of the Bond-woman shall not be heir with the Son of the Free-woman as much as to say Those that go to Mount Sinai to the Law for Justification shall never be heirs of God but only the Gospel-Churcch those that adhere to the way of Justification by Faith according to that Scripture Gal. 3.18 If the Inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the Promise but God gave it to Abraham and Sarah and her Seed by promise Abraham is the Father of us all Rom. 4.16 and Saraah vvhich ansvvers to Jerusalem that is above is the Mother of us all Gal. 4.26 Novv if any should object that this prove de facto onely since Abrahams time for all that vvould be accounted of his Seed I ansvver Let them look into Heb. 11. and there they may see a Catalogue of Saints from Abels time dovvn to the time of the Maccabees and in the end of that chap it is said These all obtained a good report through faith ver 39. I come novv to my last proof vvhich vvas to be from Testimony out of David vvhich the Apostle likevvise makes use of for an Argument Rom 4.6 7. vvherein the Apostle tells us there is a description of the blessedness of Justification and particularly that Justification vvhich is by Faith and give me a Scriprure-description this is Authentick and Divine Ver. 6. Even as David alsâ— describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom Goâ— imputeth righteousness without works This is purely a description of Justification by Faith Now what is it It follows v. 7 8. saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin Here David makes him the onely blessed man that is justified by Faith and what is this Justification other then pardon of sin forgiveness of Iniquity Mercy Grace a thing that the Law is not acquainted with the Law cannot
justifie the ungodly as Faith can Rom. 4.5 How Faith receives pardon and what this Faith is I shall have best opportunity to discover in the following part of this Discourse in the mean time I reckon that I have established these two positions in the general that the Law is now no way of Justification and that Faith which is the way of Grace and Pardon is the only way left us which sufficiently appears from Reason and Example the Reason is that of the fall and sinfulness of mankind The Example is that of Abraham which may serve instead of all and that which is of kin to it viz. the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah Isaac and Ishmael together with all the Saints of the Old-Testament reckoned up in Heb. 11. To which as an overplus I may adde the reason of God's approbation of this way of believing and preferring this way before the reviving the old way of Works again And this we have Rom. 4.16 The reason why after there was once a necessity of pardon the Lord was pleased to continue the way of grace altogether Therefore it is of Faith that it might be by Grace When once man had fallen and so brought on a necessity of another way of Salvation if the Lord wouldshew so much mercy when once the way of Grace became necessary the Great God liked this way of Grace altogether not to pardon man and then set him up a new in the way of Works and the Lord liked the continuation of the way of Grace rather then re-introducing the old way that hereby he might have a great revenue of Glory from his Grace which would be shown in this way the Lord liked not so well that his Creature should come and as it were challenge his Justification and Salvation as a Debt which in the way of the Law he might have done To him that worketh the reward is not reckoned of Grace but of Debt The Lord liked not that the Creature should glory and boast that it had saved it self as in the way of Works it might have done for glorying is not excluded by the Law of Works but onely by the Law of Faith whereas this way of Grace excludes glorying and that indebtedness of God to the Creature and holds the Creature in continual debt and obligation to God When Paul would have had the Thorn in the flesh the Messenger of Satan taken off from buffeting him the Lord teacheth Paul to be contented with this answer My Grace is sufficient for thee for my strength is made perfect in weakness 2 Cor. 12 7 8 9. This way of believing taught Paul to depend upon the Grace and Strength of God by which the Lord received an Honour which he should not have had if the temptation had been suddenly taken off And this we find to be the great Reason alledged by the Apostle frequently in this subject God in the way of his Gospel-Grace goes quite cross to that way which man would have chosen for this very reason to hinder man's glorying and boasting so we have it 1 Cor. 1.28 29. The base things of the World and things which are despised hath God chosen to bring to nought the things that are that no flesh should glory in his presence And in the 30.31 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus who of God is made unto us Wisdom Righteousness Sanctification and Redemption that according as it is written He that glorieth let him glory in the Lord So in Rom. 3. when the Apostle had shewed what God had declared to be his Righteousness even that of Faith Where is glorying then saith the Apostle It is excluded Again the righteousness of the Law and Works is called our own righteousness but Faith is called the righteousness of God Rom. 3.22 Now God will not allow that we should be justified by our own righteousness he will have another righteousness which is not our own that we may glory in him alone Having asserted and proved those two Positions That the Law is no way and that Faith is the onely way of Justification I come now to answer the objections that may be made against what I have asserted either in behalf of the Law or against the way of believing The great objection and that which contains almost all that can be mentioned is started by the Apostle Paul himself Gal. 3.19 Object Wherefore then serveth the law Wherefore then serveth the Law is the Law of no use then as you seem to make it For if it were once a way of life as you acknowledge and the Scripture affirms it was ordained to be unto life Rom. 7.10 and it be now no way unto life but the way of Faith onely is then you make it an old antiquated thing out of date out of use And the Apostle is sensible that this inconvenience would be objected Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law through Faith But the meaning of the objection in Gal. 3.19 is chiefly this Wherefore then serveth the Law that is To what end or purpose was the Law given to the Children of Israel by Moses You assert say the objectors that as soon as Adam fell the Law became of no use to him nor any of his posterity in the matter of Justification but yet we find that the Law was given by Moses 2000. years after Adam's fall and it was given in the most glorious manner with the most astonishing glory that ever God appeared in at any time unto the World it was delivered by Angels with the voice of a Trumpet with Thundering and Lightning and Earthquakes so that the whole Mountain was of a fire and all the people saw and heard the thunder and fire and the voice of Words Yea God himself is said to descend upon the Mount in fire and speak with Moses Deut. 4.17 18 19 20. Heb. 18.19 20 21. And say the Objectors Whereas you seem to say in your third Position That the Law was onely a way of Justification to Adam The Scripture makes no mention that ever the Law was given to Adam but onely to the Children of Israel and when ever you have a comparison made between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace or betwixt the Lavv and Faith it is the comparing still of the Covenant vvith the Children of Israel under the Old-Testament and the Nevv-Covenant mad by Christ vvith his people under the Gospel So vve sind these two ways compared in 2 Cor. 3. throughout the chap. and Heb. 8. throughout that chapter but especially from v. 6. to the end In 2 Cor. 3. there the Law is indeed called a Ministration of death but yet it is the Law of Moses for in the same ver it is said to be written engraven in stones which is plainly the Law of the ten Commandments and that when Moses brought them to the people his countenance had such a glory and lustre upon it that the children of Israel could not
world now the whole World becomes guilty before God by the law and every mouth is silenced and stopped by it I do not say that the law as given to the Jews by Moses had this effect upon the Gentiles to whom it was not given but the Apostle tells us Rom. 2.15 how this came to pass that the law though not given to the Gentiles in the same manner as it was to the Jews did yet convince and condemn the Gentiles as well as the Jews because the effect and substance of the same law that was written upon Tables of Stone by Moses was written in the hearts of the Gentiles so that their thoughts did accuse them when they did evil as well as excuse them when they did well Now hence I draw an argument a minorâ—â— If the law written upon the hearts of the Gentiles though obscurely had yet an accusing and condemning power in it to them how might it well have upon the Jews to whom it was delivered plainly written and engraven in stones with thunder lightning earthquakes as is before expressed That which I have to add upon the third great end of the Law it's being delivered viz. to direct and bring the wounded sinner to Christ O How 〈…〉 Christ is by way of answer to this question How did the Law lead to Christ I shall give several answers unto this question and first of all The Law was our School-master unto Christ A. â—â— as the Dispensation of the Law made way for the Dispensation of the Gospel Sowre things make the sweet more pleasant Darkness makes Light more desirable Slavery and Severity makes Liberty more welcom Quineseâ—t servâ—re nescit imperare the School makes fair way for the University This consideration makes the succession of the Gospel to the Law more comely and it is insisted on very much by the Apostle in Gal. 4 for the seven first verses Ver. 3. When we were Children we were in bondage unto the Law but when the fulness of time was come God sent forth his Son to redeem us into liberty and to give us the spirit of sons Gal. 3 23. Before Faith came we were kept under the Law and kept under by the Law shut up unto the Faith which should afterwards be revealed wherefore the Law was our School-Master to bring us unto Christ that we might be justified by Faith but after that faith is come we are no longer under a School-Master it would now be an incongruous thing to be under a School-master any longer as it was very convenient that before we should be and thus the Law was a School-master unto Christ as John Baptist was by its severities to humble us and break our hearts and to make us 〈◊〉 people ready prepared for the Lord. And the beauty great conveniency of the succession of these two Administrations of the Law Gospel each to other appears still in the great work of Conversion upon every sinners heart where the same method is observed first to humble the soul by legal convictions then to make a discovery of Christ the Grace of the Gospel And this our practical Divines insist much upon in their Sermons and Treatises giving us this account of the Work of Grace upon the heart that first there is conviction compunction and humiliation all yet a legal work then Faith or Conversion And I do verily believe that the Spirit of God doth use this method though as all acknowledge not with the same degrees in every work of Regeneration And again they observe that as after the Gospel and Faith is come it is absurd to return to the Law of Moses in the whole Dispensation of it so they apply that Scripture Rom. 8.15 Ye have not received the Spirit of Bondage again to fear to this purpose That after men have received the Spirit of Adoption which in some degree every regenerate person hath received they receive not again the spirit of bondage to fear which they take to be a spirit of legal convictions preparatory to the Work of Conversion and indeed according to the Calvinist-principles it must needs be true that after they are regenerate they can never receive a spirit of Bondage again because a spirit of bondage is not Grace but onely preparatory to it and therefore men that have once been regenerate can never return to this Spirit without being emptied of all Grace But here it may be further queryed Q How did the Law direct those to Christ that lived and lived before Christ came that indeed it is not to be doubted that the Law in the dispensation of it made excellent way unto the Gospel for those that were to live in the days of the Gospel as we find in the Analogical succession of Law and Gospel in the Work of Grace but how was the Law a School-Master unto Christ to those that lived in the dayes of the Old-Testament Who dyed before Christ came How were they directed to Christ by the Law The Law might perhaps be a Ministration of death and desperation only to them How did the Law witness the righteousness of God by Faith unto them In answer I shall first of all premise these two things and then answer more directly 1. Negatively that to these it must not come to destroy the promise and the covenant that was made before nor the comfort of it It must not come to hinder but they might have as true saving comfort from the promises as the Saints before the Law had or else the Law had been against the promises which the Apostle denyes with a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. It must preach Christ to them as truly though perhaps not so clearly as it doth unto us Thirdly and more directly The Law did preach Christ to the Jews under the Old-Testament these two ways 1. Virtually or consequentially 2. Formally and expresly 1. Virtually as it convinced them all of their necessity of some other besides a legal Righteousness as I have shewn at large in explaining the second end of giving the Law because of transgressions 2. Expresly as it made mention of Christ and this it did either improperly figuratively in types and shadows or properly in the prophecies and promises of Christ Or the answer may be better given after this distinction of the Law A different acceptation of the Law in the Scripture The Law in Scripture amongst the various significations of it hath these two very eminent 1. It signifies the strict and bare command and so is naturally a Covenant of Works that hath no mercy or grace in it can onely justifie the righteous and condemn the transgressor and in this sence it hath been taken by me for the most part hitherto in my Discourse I have produced several places where it is taken in this sence in the Scripture Take that for instance As many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse as it is written Cursed
Scriptural in the words and phrases of Scripture which is that the first Covenant the old Covenant or Testament is God's Covenant with the Jews by Moses the new Covenant is that made with the faithful by Christ and what others aim at in that other way of stating the Covenants may be attained without that confusion which they make Having made two as fair Concessions as the objectors can desire A. 2. I come now to the determination of the question or repelling the Objection after I have minded you of a distinction of the Law which I lately gave and it was this That sometimes the Law is taken strictly for the bare command with the threatning annexed to the breach of it and the promise of life upon the strict obeence of it So it is in Gal. 3.10 sometimes it is taken for the whole Old-Testament as Rom. 3.19 where the Psalms of David are made a part of the law sometimes taken for the five Books of Moses as in Luke 24.44 where the Old-Testament is divided into these three parts The Law of Moses the Prophets and the Psalms Now I answer Take the Law in the first sence for a Covenant of Works strictly and so it was not given for a Covenant to the Jews for then it must have come in against the promises or the Covenant of God in Christ that was made before But take it in the second or third sense either for the whole Old-Testament as we call the Writings of the holy men of God till our Saviours time or for the five Books of Moses the dispensation by Moses from the Mount and this I confess was a Covenant to them but then it was a Covenant of Grace and indeed contained in it all the promises that were given before it that traditional Gospel which Abraham and the holy Patriarchs before him were saved by is inserted in the Law of Moses else it had been a vain thing for the Apostle Paul to have undertaken to prove Justification by Faith out of the Old-Testament yea out of the Law of Moses for as a man cannot bring a clean thing out of an unclean so neither can he bring Gospel out of pure Law if therefore the Law of Moses had not been a Covenant of Grace the Apostle could never have proved Justification by faith out of it which yet he doth not onely by strained consequences but as there professedly Abraham believed God saith he and it was imputed to him for righteousness they therefore which are of Faith are blessed and justified with faithful Abraham Galathians 3. ver 6 7 9. which is as fair an Enthymema as can be and every Sophister can supply the Proposition that is wanting St. Paul proves Justification by Faith by two great Arguments out of Genesis the first Book of Moses viz by Abraham's Justification and the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah which I explained and urged before Nay the Apostle makes a great affirmation indeed which is this that even Moses himself the great Law-Covenant Mediator doth in his Writings give a clear distinction of the two Covenants of Works and Grace shews us the tenour of one Covenant and another When he had produced the Allegory of Hagar and Sarah out of Genesis saith he Alas Moses in this Story gives you Allegorically the two Covenants Gal. 4 21. to the 24. But the chief place for proof of what I have said is Rom. 10.5 6. for Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the Law That the man which doth these things shall live by them Lev. 18.5 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart who shall ascend up into Heaven c. and so goes on in the words of Moses Deut. 30.12 13 14. Here we see Moses in his Writings delineates and describes the two ways of Works and Grace of the Law and Faith and it is proved out of the same â—oses that the Law is no way to justifie sinners Now I shall but draw out the Apostles Argument which I suppose to be this Moses describes two ways of Justification that by the Law and that by Faith that by the Law Moses tells you is no way for sinners because you must continue in all things or you are accursed therefore certainly he described the way of Faith too that ye might betake your selves unto it for justification and life therefore the Law take it either for the whole Old-Testament or for the Dispensation by Moses and it was a Covenant indeed with the Jews but it was a Covenant of Grace for in it Moses describeth the way of Grace that his Disciples might adhere unto it But here you will object still Well 3 Object if Moses his Dispensation or Covenant which he was the Mediator of was a Covenant of Grace and not of Works for Justification why is it called a killing Letter a Ministration of Death a Ministration of Condemnation as it is 2 Cor 3.6 7 9. Why is the Lord said to find fault with it and so to abrogate it and make a new Covenant Heb. 8 7 8. By this it should seem to be a Covenant of Works for else God would not have found fault with a Covenant of Grace nor abrogated it To this I answer 1. Here observe That this 〈◊〉 no Jewish Argument for they would not acknowledge that their Law is a ministration of death whilest they seek life by it nor yet a ministration of condemnation whilst they seek justification by the righteousness of it but it is a cavil or objection against the Apostle Paul who calls the Law a ministration of death and condemnation and yet acknowledgeth that it was the Jews covenant and that Moses in it describeth the righteousness of Faith 2dly I answer That these two are very consistent it might prove a ministration of death to them and yet be a way of grace and life in it self so is the plainest Gospel in the World a savour of death unto the disobedient and unbelievers that yet is certainly in the great intendment of it a way of grace and life 3dly The Law proved a ministration of death to many of them because they mistook it for a covenant of works though it were not given with that intention they did not see the Grace that was contained in it There was a vail upon their heart and is to this day upon the hearts of many of the Jews their minds were blinded so that the Children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is alolished they could not see Christ the end of the Law 2 Cor. 3.13 14 15. 4thly There is thus much indeed to be said concerning the dispensation it self that it was dark and obscure the children of Israel had not onely blinded eyes and a vailed heart but Moses had also a Vail upon his face ver 13. which was one reason they could not see that Grace which was in his Dispensation Moses had a vail over
covenant for salvation that came to ask of him what he should do to be saved the place is Luke 10.25 26 27 28. And behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life He said unto him What is written in the Law How readest thou Christ sends him to the Law and you shall see it is not to the Law in a large sence as it comprehends both a covenant of Works and a covenant of Grace but to the Law taken strictly for a covenant of Works it follows therefore ver 27. The Lawyer answering said The Law saith Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbour as thy self And Jesus said unto him Thou hast answered right this do and thou shalt live which are the very words of Moses where he describes a legal righteousness From whence I conclude That the Covenant of Works is still good unto Justification the Covenant of Works is still in force else Moses would never have delivered it in that simplicity and with that Authority else Jesus Christ himself would never have directed one unto it to get eternal life by it I answer 1. That Moses indeed did deliver a covenant of Works to the people of Israel as truly as he did a covenant of Grace and that without any caution that I can find in the place where it is delivered and I think I may say also that our Saviour Christ did deliver a Covenant of Works too in that 10. of Luke above-mentioned And 2dly I may add There was very good reason why they might and why they did For that the covenant of Works is still in force all men by nature are under it for it is nothing but the natural law of our creation All men are naturally under a Covenant of works There was indeed a positive Law besides given to Adam but the observing of it needed not have created any trouble to innocent man All men are naturally under a covenant of Works for they are naturally under the Law of their Creation which is the covenant of Works Yea the Saints themselves are not freed from it any further then from the condemning power of it by Christs having suffered the penalty for them That all men are naturally under the Law or under a covenant of Works which are all one appears for that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law Gal. 4.5 which must be meant of the Law strictly taken for a covenant of Works for else none but the Jews and proselyted Gentiles were under the Law as delivered by Moses whereas in that Scripture it is plain that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law therefore it is meant under the Law as a covenant of Works Besides the Apostle in Rom. 7. the first six verses argues thus That the conscience or soul of a man must either be married to the Law as its Husband or to Christ as its Husband and till it is marryed to Christ the Law is its natural Husband but when it is married to Christ the law is its husband no longer therefore till a man come to Christ he is under a covenant of Works therefore all men naturally are under a covenant of Works for no man is in Christ by nature I answer in the third place That it 's true Moses and our Saviour both preached a covenant of Works as well as a covenant of Grace and well might because all men are naturally under it Yet neither our Saviour nor Moses did it with design to make men seek justification by Works but only to burthen mens consciences with insupportable loads of guilt that so they might readily flee to the hope that was set before them in the covenant of Grace which they had together with the covenant of Works in the same Dispensation That Moses did it with this design St. Paul asserts as I have shewn in several places the law entred that the offence might abound and so was a School-Master unto Christ And that our Saviour did it with this design the place quoted in the objection will sufficiently evidence Luke 10.25 to the 28.25 v. Behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life Here this Lawyer came not with a good intention for it is said he stood up and tempted our Saviour made the question rather to see what our Saviour would say then to get any satisfaction to himself and in the 29. ver it is said This Lawyer was willing to justifie himself Now how could the pride of this tempting Lawyer be better repressed then by sending him to the Law to a covenant of Works which if he would but set himself in earnest to keep would quickly prick the bladder of his pride and let out that wind with which he was so swoln as to dare come and tempt Christ and justifie himself But now our Saviour takes another course with the Woman of Canaan who after she was tryed with a knock or two with some harsh words so as to be called Dog yet continuing humble and submissive had her faith extolled by our Saviour and is strengthened with the highest consolations as we have the story Matt. 15. from ver 22. to ver 29. Thus God resisteth the proud he hath a Covenant of Works to oppose them withall but he giveth Grace and sheweth Mercy to the humble he hath a covenant of Grace to comfort them with Obj. 5 There is one objection yet more concerning the ceremonial law which I did not mention at the first and it is this Certainly it appears from the ceremonial law that the law of Moses was given to them for a covenant of Works else why had they such multitude of ceremonies imposed upon them if they were not to have life for the observation and doing of them together with the duties of the moral Law And it is very observable that in that place of Leviticus which the Apostle quotes as containing the righteousness of the law the ceremonies are as strictly enjoined as the moral duties of the law are with this badge of the law of works upon them The man that doth them shall live in them Lev. 18.4 5. Ye shall do my Judgements that is say Commentors my judicial Laws and keep mine Ordinances that is say they either moral or ceremonial so in ver 5. You shall therefore keep my Statutes and Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. Now hence I argue saith the Objector Here you have acknowledged is a covenant of Works described Now here is their whole Dispensation by Moses of laws moral ceremonial and judicial contained therefore their whole Dispensation was a covenant of Works besides if the Law moral alone which you have called the law of Nature he of it self a covenant
wits but will acknowledge that it is easier in it self to move a singer then to remove a Mountain The last objection is this But then you substitute Evangelical works in the room of Legal and so still you turn the Gospel The second objection answered which is called the Law of Faith into a Covenant of Works Now for this objection I confess it hath some weight in it though for those that make it they are usually soaring in high notions and strangely wedded unto their own apprehensions and are somewhat of an Antinomian strain yet I will acknowledge that it may be made by a sober man I should prevent my self in what I have to say in the following part of this Treatise if I should answer it at large in this place yet to give some taste of an answer here I make this distinction That there are indeed two wayes of running upon a Covenant of works either in whole or in part Two ways of running upon a Covenant of Works 1. Either upon a Covenant of Works purely and strictly so none durst touch or meddle with it 2. Upon it in part so as to mix it with the Gospel A. Now I answer therefore That indeed our great care is to be laid out about avoiding of these mixtures of legality in our treating with God for Justification and that is the great design of this Treatise to caveat us against these mixtures which we are very apt to be saulty in as I hope they shall see in the sequel of my Discourse that please to go on in it Hitherto we have seen that there is Gospel in the Law of Moses and what this Gospel in the Law is as also that the reason why it was delivered by Moses could be no other but to put his Disciples upon the way of believing for Justification There are many other places in Moses especially in the Book of Deut. that have much Gospel in them I shall onely add one Allegorical or Typical Argument which yet I think hath much evidence in it to prove that the Law of Moses had Gospel in it it is this That the Law of the two Tables when it was written the second time by Moses from the mouth of God or else by the singer of God himself are ordained by God to be put in the Ark and the Ark to be put under the Mercy-seat and Cherubims to cover the Mercy-Seat and the presence of God eminently promised to be found between those Cherubins Exod 25.21 22. Thou shalt put the Mercy-Seat above upon the Ark and in the Ark thou shalt put the Testimony that I shall give thee and there I will meet with thee and I will commune with thee from above the Mercy-Seat from between the two Cherubims which are upon the Ark of the â—estimony of All things c. Hence I frame this argument If the Law be hid in the Ark which alone seems to be an instrument of Salvation and this Ark placed under the Mercy-Seat the Greek word for which being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in Rom 3 25. applyed to Christ and translated Propitiation whom God hath set forth to be a Propitation through Faith in his Blood and the presence of God eminently promised to them upon this Mercy-Seat or Throne of Grace then the Law which was in its own nature a Covenant of Works and to sinners a killing-letter was yet to the Israelites shrowded and covered with Grace and Mercy Mercy rejoicing against or triumphing over Judgement Jam. 2.13 and they defended and protected from the wrath and curse of it by a gracious presence of God with them that Christ's offering was interposed betwixt the Law and them and that this was in some sort though more darkly then to us signified and discovered to them and so that the law was never given them with this design that they should seek Justification by it as a Covenant of Works I have done with the objections of the Jews which may be made against my first Position that Justification is not cannot be by the Law that it is and must be by faith all which were made by occasion of the Old-Testament Dispensation chiefly the giving of the Law by Moses I shall before I conclude the more Doctrinal part of my Treatise only mention an objection which might be made on behalf of the Gentiles against Justification by Faith and for Justification by the Law And it is this You have said that the Law of our Creation is naturally a Covenat of Works The objection in behalf of the Gentiles against Justification by Faith and that the Gentiles had the Law or the effect and substance of it written in their hearts and we read not of any Promises that they had therefore either they could not be justified at all or they must be justified by the law I answer 1. All are not of Opinion that the Heathens were in a justifiable condition till Christ was explicitely and plainly preached to them and for those that are not of it they will meet with no difficulty in this Objection for if the Heathens could not be justified at all it ceaseth the enquiry which way they were to be justified 2. Some are of Opinion That God never made any creatures under an utter impossibility of pleasing him and being made happy by him 3. Therefore in a consonancy to my preceding Discourse I say If it can be made appear that the Heathens without the law of Moses and the Scriptures tures of the Old-Testament could not discover so much of the Goodness Grace Mercy and Love of God to mankind as upon which to ground a lively hope an unfeigned and operative faith that God was ready upon their repentance and amendment of life to forgive their sins and to be at peace with them the second opinion is to be avoided and the first received For I do verily believe that if the Heathens were any of them saved or in a possibility to be saved and justified it must be by their treating of God in the way of believing for that the law was rendred utterly weak and unable to â—ustifie so much as one sinner Now because I do not think it convenient in this place to engage in that controversie Whether or no the Gentiles were in a salvable condition I shall neither produce the Scriptures which seem to prove they had sufficient Gospel-light to produce Faith which they must have if they were saved nor the others which would seem to prove that they had no such light Now to conclude this first part having proved it ex hypothesi on the Gentiles part that if any of them were saved it must be by faith and absolutely as to the Jews notwithstanding all the objections to the contrary that they were under a Covenant of Grace and that the law was never given to them to put them upon seeking Justification by the works of it The first great Propositions which were under demonstration still
stand firm and unshaâ—en That the law is no way to sinners for Justification That Faith is a way and the onely way and that God hath set up this way without which all mankind must have perished and that he hath led his people in this way throughout all ages before the law and under the law that as they were all under sin by the law so they were likewise under the discoveries of Grace for their Justification by Faith I come now to some more practical and experimental inquiries which I shall introduce with an use of Conviction and Reprehension from the Doctrinal part of the foregoing Discourse VVE have seen in the foregoing Discourse that there are but two wayes of Justification the one by Works the other by Faith that these two are opposite one to the other that the Law or Works is now no way to fallen man but Faith onely that all that ever were justified were justified by faith even Abraham and David and all the Saints of God under the Old-Testament all the Saints before the giving of the law by Moses and ever after yea the Gentiles themselves if any were saved must be saved this way An use Conviction and Reproof How greatly then are they mistaken that even under the Gospel will needs be justified by Works This falls with clear evidence of conviction and reprehension upon such a generation of men and yet such there are in abundance who would think it even at this day yea the greatest part of professors run this way Although man be turned out of Paradice which was his place of Justification by Works and at the door a Cherubin be set with a flaming Sword to dispute the passage yet they will needs enter again though they venture life and soul and all Though Mount Sinai be covered all over with smoke though they hear the thunderings see the lightnings feel the Earth quake at a distance and be forbid to approach the Mount yet they wiâ— make up towards a cousuming fire that wil certainly devour them Though one way of Justification be impossible so that the Apostle professeth That if there had been a Law given which could have given life verily righteousness should have been by the Law Gal. 3.21 I say though one be absoluteâ— impossible and the other way easie yet they wiâ— leave the easie way and take that way which is no passable way at all Yea though after they are entred upon that way they feel themselves lasheâ— and galled and stung as it were to death with fierâ— Serpents in a Wilderness and Labyrinth of guilts and pressures of Spirit yet they will not be beaten off from going this way but onely a very few of them They run still upon the Pikes and press upon the thick Bosses of God's Bucklers Yea â— thing stranger yet Though the law it self preach faith yet those that pretend to very great skill it the law and are called great boasters of the lawâ— they will not believe the law in this particularâ— though the law give witness to the way of believing yet they will understand the law as giving testimony rather to its own way of Justification Now to set home this Conviction and Reprehension Consider that there are these four great iniquities found in a legal Spirit 1. An horrible perversness and self-willednefs When God would have them go one way they will go another 〈◊〉 right cousness of God is revealed in the Gospel from faith to faith as it is written The Just shall live by Faith Rom. 1.17 And they give God the lye and say The Just shall live by Works and will go the quite opposite and contraty way 2. Here we see their intollerable pride which is the root of this self-willedness they will not be justified by Gods Righteousness but by their own Righteousness they prefer their own Way to God's their own dis-approved Works to God's approved Way of Righteousness 3. Here we see the sottish senselesness and brutish fool-hardiness of these men for in doing thus they are as a Ship that runs her self upon a Rock as a Moth that flyes at the Candle they perish every Mothers Child of them that thus steer their course 4. See the high dis-ingenuity that there is in this way of theirs What do they herein but spurn at the very bowels of their Heavenly Father When God had found man fallen by his own voluntary defection he might have left him as he did the fallen Angels to have perished for ever but he was graciously resolved not so to lose his creature but finds out a way how he might recover his creature Man again in which certainly there are most admirable contrivances of Wisdom Power and Mercy and he proposeth terms of Reconciliation he offers his Sons blood bids the sinner but come and humble himself and ask pardon and return to his Allegiance and trust in him for Pardon Grace and Perseverance to Eternal life No saith the Legal self-Justificiary I have never sinned I have deserved no anger no displeasure I need no pardon no mercy I have no need of the blood of Christ I say all this and a great deal more which were not fit to be expressed must lie as in the Seed and in the Root in a Legal Spirit though perhaps it may never come directly to such expressions nor actual imaginations for let any one but imagine what would be the Language of a sinner that seeks not Justification by Faith Grace and Mercy but by the Law which can justifie none but for perfect and unerring obedience and I think I may say it can be no other but such as I have mentioned or fat worse it must be onely a deal of blasphemy against the Grace of God as useless and needless against the person of Christ as coming into the World to save sinners when there was no need oâ— a Saviour c Now to have these things lye in his heart at the bottom though but as in a spawn not perfected or come to the birth how odious must it needs be in the eyes of God and good men And yet all this lies in a legal-Spirit for which they justly lie under a severe reproof from the foregoing assertions Obj. But surely may some say there are no such men as these you mention there are none that pretend themselves perfectly holy there are none but think they stand in need of pardon we all cry God mercy for our sins and why should you say that men are generally apt to do thus to seek Justification by Works and that most professors run this way I answer Ans 1. That it is true few men profess to go this way amongst us and perhaps few ever except those that do or have held perfection in this life and that as a thing necessary to salvation did profess to expect salvation by the Law as a Covenant of Works in the strict sense of it 2. That yet there are very many and as I
have said the most of professors are guilty of this folly yea we are all of us naturally inclinable unto it viz. To seek Justification by the Covenant of Works and in proof and explication of this second answer or assertion I shall do these three things 1. Prove that the greatest part of men and professors go this way 2. I shall endeavour to discover wherein their error or mistake lies that they should not dare to profess this way and yet be thus deeply guilty And 3dly I shall give some characters of a Legal and Evangelical spirit whereby we may discover if we are guilty and unto what degree we faulty this way The fâ—â—st particular in the convict onthaâ— very many are guilty of legality The first thing which I am to do is to prove that there are very many men yea many most professors that are guilty of this folly yea that we are all naturally inclinable to it and have been from the beginning If there had not been such a generation of men in the Apostles times all the Discourses and Argumentations of the Apostle Paul against this sort of men in his Epistles to the Romans and Galatians had been useless Now certainly the Apostle did not trifle so with the world as to set up Enemies in his own imagination and then sight with them And yet it cannot be denyed by any that the Apostle spends large Disco rses and Argumentations against such a sort of men Besides that the thing may be out of question that there were such men the Apostle Paul names them points them out with the finger lays hold of them binds them down with such Arguments as they can never dis-entangle themselves from He points them out they were the Jews they were the Galatians and others the Jews see Rom. 10.1 2 3. Brethren my hearts desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may be saved for I bear them record that they have a zeal of God but not according to knowledge for they being ignoram of Gods rightcousness and going about to establish their own righteousness have not submitted to the right cousness of God Here you see the Apostle draws up an high charge against Israel in the lump and bulk that is the people of the Jews in general it was a general mistake of theirs that they missed of God's righteousness that is as I have explained it the righteousness which is of God by Faith and went about to establish their own righteousness that is a righteousness of works of the Law they were ignorant of this that Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness as it is in ver 4. of that chap. The Jews they would needs be justified by works they are one sort of men named by the Apostle as guilty in this particular But which is yet stranger not onely the Jews but the Galatians who were Gentiles who had never received the Law and lived under it as the Jews had had onely been educated in Heathen Idolatries and filthiness till the Gospel came amongst them yet even these after they had received the Gospel had begun in the Spirit that is in the way of Justification by Faith in a Gospel way and had made publick Encomiums of the blessed Estate the Gospel had brought them into crying O the blessedness Gal. 4.15 They so loved the Apostle Paul for his preaching the Gospel to them that they could have pulled out their own eyes and have given them to him if it would have done him any good yet even these after all this they no sooner had some Law-Teachers come amongst them but they turn off from the Apostles Doctrine unto another Gospel not that there is any more then one Gospel but some under pretence of â—oining the Law to the Gospel to make them more compleat in their Christian Religion had perverred the Gospel of Christ instead of making a more compleat Gospel had reduced all the Gospel they had left under the service of the Law so that the Law was uppermost ruled in the great business of Justification yet these after they had thus sophisticated the Gospel had gotten the Galatians to be their admirers and followers which puts the Apostle upon strange admirations exclamations expostulations with his Galatians in his Epistle to them I wonder saith he ye are so soon removed from him that called you unto the Grace of Christ unto another Gospel Gal. 1.6 7 8 9. And where is the blessedness ye spake of when I first preached the Gospel to you Gal. 4.16 And again saith he certainly you are bewitched O ye foolish Galatians Gal. 3.1 And again O my little children of whom I travel in birth again until Christ be formed in you Gal. 4.19 He had travelled with them in the new-birth once already and Christ had been in some sort formed in them they had received the Gospel but they were now turned off to the Law and he was fain to travel with them again you may see plainly what their disease was Gal. 4.21 Tell me ye that desire to be under the Law they had a desire to be under the Law and in chap. 2.16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but by the faith of Jesus Christ even we have believed in Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the Law for by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified Here the Apostle mentions the Disease that they would needs be justified by the works of the Law and he proposeth his own and the other Apostles and converted Jews their examples for their imitation We saith he in ver 15. We who are Jews by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles that was the name they gave the Gentiles we knowing that a man is not justified by works have believed in Christ and if we have done so who had more pretence of reason to cleave to the Law then ever you had if we have quitted the I aw for the Gospel certainly we may well wonder at you that were sometimes sinners of the Gentiles and not Jews born that you should quit the Gospel for the Law So Gal. 4.89 Although then when ye knew not God were without God in the world as other Gentiles were Although then ye did service to them who by nature are no Gods that is served Idols and although this was somewhat tollerable then in the dayes of your ignorance yet now after that ye have known God or rather are known of God how turâ— ye again or back to the weak and beggarly Elements unto which ye desire again to be in bondage Not that they ever were in bondage before to the Jewish Ceremonies but they were in bondage before unto Idols and they had been freed by Christ and now fell back and desired to be in bondage again not as before unto their Idols but to Jewish Ceremonies and the keeping
the Law for a righteousness Here was a great mixture you see of Gospel with their way And in the 3d. ver of Gal. 5. we see they thought it was not their duty to keep the whole Law but that I have spoken to already in ver 4. You may see yet the strangest mixture of Gospel in their way which yet the Apostle calls Legal that can be imagined for they did profess themselves all this while they so cryed up the Law were such admirers of it and Votaries to it they did profess themselves to be under Grace to be in the way of Grace Gal. 5.4 Christ is become of none effect unto you whosoever of you are justified by the Law â—e are fallen from Grace that is from the way of Grace and Mercy to be upon perfect strict exact terms with God Ye renounce the Grace of God the benefit of Christ's death Christ can do you do good let your false Preachers call what they preach Gospel while they will and you may think you are removed to another and better Gospel then what you received from me chap. â— v. 6 7 8. But there is no other Gospel but what I preached Some indeed have perverted the Gospel of Christ and made it a mongrel thing but it 's Name now muse not be Gospel any longer but Law and Works not Grace and Gospel Here you have â—â—en that they did not only avoid the rigor of the Law in exacting perfect obedience to a tittle but did take in the Gospel-Principles into their way of Justification such as the Death of Christ and the Grace of God and yet these were legal all this while else the Apostle had disputed impertinently where he had no Adversary Now what was that which soured all their Gospel which made their Grace no Grace and their Christ no Christ and made them perfect Debtors to the Law thus unexpectedly to themselves but this that they went to make a compromise betwixt the Law and the Gospel in the matter of Justification they would join them together that were as irreconcilable as fire and water The Law is not of Faith if it be of Grace then it is no more of works otherwise work is no more work Now by reasoâ— of the incompossibility and incompatibleness of these two in their * For else as the Elements are said to be mixed in a natural body losing their proper forms so the Lâ—w and Gospel will well mix one of them viz. the Law losing as I may say its natural form of a Covenant of works may be well reconciled to the Gospel and mixed with it for the matter of it proper and precise notion and nature they that mix these two must destroy one of them they can never agree togegether in this business of Justification any otherwise then heat and cold agree in water that look unto what degree the one is there the other is expelled so much as there is of cold so much there is wanting of heat and so much as there is of heat so much there is wanting of cold so here so much as there is wanting of legality in any heart so much there is of a Gospel-Spirit é contra Now because these Jews and Galatians did more hanker after the Law then after the Gospel though they owned many Gospel-principles and durst not own the Law in the strictness of it yet their predominancy of inclination to the Law for righteousness justly gave them the denomination of Legal as the predominancy of cold in water justly gives it the name of cold water and the Evangelical or Gospel-like men and women though they have always had some Legal-mixtures in their obedience yet because Gospel-Principles are predominant they obtain the name of Spiritual and Evangelical And according to this representation which I have now given of Legal-persons that is that they are more propending and inclining to the Law then to the Gospel doth the Apostle be-speak them and speak of them he speaks to them so in Gal. 4.21 Tell me saith he you that Desire to be under the Law They were such as though they durst not quit the Gospel and come off wholly to the Law yet had a desire to be under the Law So he speaks of them Rom. 9.31 32. But Israel which followed after the Law of righteousness hath not attained unto the Law of righteousness Wherefore because they sought it not by Faith but as it were by the works of the Law And this though it were but anâ— as it were and a Desire yet it ranked them under a Covenant of Works and accordingly the Apostle useth such arguments against them as would have served any that had perfectly renounced the way of Faith and the Death of Christ and wholly betaken themselves to the Law of Works I have done with the second particular in the Conviction viz. the explication of the Legality which is so generally to be found and wherein the deceit lies that men who acknowledge themselves sinners and profess themselves Christians may yet set themselves under a Covenant of Works for their Justification They that wil after what I have said deny that there may be or hath been such a thing such persons to be found that did acknowledge themselves sinners and profess themselves Christians and yet sought to be justified by the works of the Law let them quarrel with the Scriptures and with the Apostle Paul if they dare out of whom I have so clearly described them and confute him if they can Again if any one questions that which I have asserted to be the manner how this comes to pass that these persons are justly denominated and reputed Legal self-Justificiaries viz. by the predominancy of their inclination to the Law more then to the Gospel let them shew a more probable way and I shall gladly quit this Now the explication and proof of this matter being the very great thing of all should not pass without some improvement or observation from it which I shall perform by and by in the mean time methinks a sober person might very well desire to be further satisfied in this great business viz. the explication of the nature of a Legal-Spirit I suppose it will be acknowledged that that which gives denomination to a Legal-Spirit is his greater propension to the Law then to the Gospel but yet it may be queried Wherein doth this propension exert and shew it self in what one word or more then one would you express it Now this I confess is the great difficulty hic labor hoc opus est this were worthy of the most excellent Saint and the most learned and accurate Head to discover I can do it onely after my manner that is rawly enough but would God I could provoke some able man to undertake it in the strength of God Very many of those that have medled with it have dealt rudely and yet saucily with this subject I mean the Autinomians They will express the whole
and ended immediately upon our believing but a continued act which though it be in its kinde compleat from the first yet is it still in doing till the final Justification at the Judgment day Pag. 303. Abraham was justified long before Isaac was offered yet Justification being a continued act God is still justifying and the Gospel still justifying and Abraham's Justification was not ended before Isaac was offered nor then neither and therefore was then in a proper sense said to be justified when he offered up Isaac these latter expressions which I add are full to Mr Baxter's sense in that place It is all one in my minde whether we use the word repeated or continued when we apply them to Justification for I think an act can be no otherwise continued but by repetition The best simâ—le of an act continued is a mathematical Line which they say is fluxus punctorum and yet points have no other continuity but by repetition I know a learned man that answers this by distinguishing upon Justification telling us that Justification may be taken either for Universal pardon of sins which is done at first believing or else it is taken for divine approbation the first he saith viz. General pardon is done but once but acts of approbation may be frequented as here they were upon Abraham and so he said to be justified twice though he kept his standing in grace betwixt the two acts of his Justification Now I do not deny that there are these two things in Justification viz. Pardon and Approbation but since pardon of particular sins is often repeated as well as acts of Approbation therefore methinks Justification may well be said to be repeated in both these parts of it though I alwaies hold that the first act of Universal pardon is the most famous Quest 2. about Iuâ—ification For what â—cts weare justified So much for the first Question about the time of Justification Now for the second Question proposed which was this For what act or acts is a person justified I answer first generally for the acts of faith primarily for the other good actions or good works secondarily but more particularly I shall answer first negatively 1 Negatively A man is not justified only for that act of faâ—th which respects the death and blood of Christ A man is not justified only for that act of faith which respects the death and blood of Christ and the reason is evident for that Justification in the Scripture is applyed to other acts of faith besides this Abraham was justified for his faith in the power of God that he would give him a Son when he and Sarah were both old Rom. 4.16 17 18. Who against hope believed in hope that he might become the Father of many Nations ver 21. Being fully perswaded that what he had promised he was ABLE also to perform and THEREFORE it was imputed to him for Righteousness So again there was another justifying act of his faith when he being commanded of God offered up his son Isaac that is did as good as offer him up shewed his true willingness and readiness to it the knise was at his Son's throat and this act of faith is said to be imputed to him for righteousness Jam. 2.23 Now neither of these acts of faith are said to be in the blood of Christ and yet are said by the Scripture to be justifying acts If it be objected that these acts of Abrahams faith had respect to Christ who was the promised seed as well as Isaac Object Abrahams faith had respect to Christ and that his sacrificing Isaac shewed his faith in the sacrifice of Christ I answer 1. I deny not but Abraham saw Christ's day by faith and rejoyced 2. How farr Abraham saw Chrift's death and offering I cannot say But 3. whatever was the knowledge or faith of Abraham concerning Christ these answers are â—at trivial in the present case for the Scriptures lay the stress of Gods approving or justifying Abraham upon his faith in the power of God at least they do openly referr Justification to this faith of his that God could give him a Son notwithstanding the deadness of his own body and the deadness of Sarah 's womb and then that he was able to raise him from the dead after that he had offered him up and so to raise a great Nation out of him Heb. 19.11 compared with James 2.21 23. which was only or especially an act of faith in the power of God and these men impertinently carry it to somewhat else which is uncertain if not untrue I shall insist only upon one more act of faith which was justifying and yet was not chiefly consisting of a respect unto the blood of Christ if it had that at all in it and it is the faith of Noah Heb. 11.7 By faith Noah being warned of God of things not seen as yet moved with fear prepared an Ark to the saving of his house BY WHICH he condemned the world and BECAME HEIR OF THE RIG HTEOUSNESS WHICH IS BY FAITH Here was a work of Faith in the threatning of a Flood and precept of building of an Ark and the stress of his Justification is chiefly laid upon his fear of Gods judgments and faithfull obedience to the command of building an Ark which proceeded from a firm belief of the threatning and BY IT is said to become an heir of the righteousness which is by faith I might likewise instance in the act of Rahab's faith which is said to be justifying James 2 8â— seems to have been only this as appears by the story that she received the Spyes and trusted in Gods power for their and her deliverance and in the faith of Phineas who had such a couragious zealous faith that he killed a Prince and a Princess at once with his own hand for committing lewdness and this is said to be accounted unto him for righteousness unto all generations for evermore Psal 6.31 but I shall mention no more But thus you see that there are other acts of faith unto which justification is imputed as well as the act of faith in Christs blood therefore that is not the only act of justifying faith as such If it be objected as it may well be that these are instances of justifying faith in the dayes of the Old Testament when faith in the blood of Christ was not so necessary but now that faith in the blood of Christ is necessary that is the only justifying act I answer 1. That for those men that are most zealous for the opinion That faith as directed to the death and blood of Christ is the only act of faith as justifying they hold that faith in Christ was as necessary under the Old Testament unto salvation as it is now and unto these I suppose the instances of faith as justifying in other acts prove pertinently enough That faith in the blood of Christ is not the only act of justifying faith 2. I affirm
we see that faith is not perfect without some kinde of works That is the first reason Faith it self would be an imperfect thing without works and so could not justifie The second reason why works are taken into the condition of Justification is Reason 2. For that it were neither comely no nor possible for divine approbation which I have often affirmed to be contained in Justification to pass upon any man without them I put these two into one 1. It were not comely What a strange thing would it be in the apprehensions of men if the great and holy God should own a company of persons in the world for his for certainly whom he justifies he will own for his that should only be though they really were believers but never do any service for him Neither plead for his honour when he is blasphemed nor own his servants when they are in reproach and distressed Not to mention their negative holiness which lyes in avoiding the corruptions of the world without which negative holiness if God should own them he would be thought the Patron of all Vice c. but I dare not express the uncomly consequences that would follow Now besides the impossibility that ariseth from this uncomliness there is also an impossibility that ariseth from the nature of the thing and that was the second thing I intended in this reason I say therefore it is impossible that God should approve of any person as just or take him into his favor and delights all which the Lord doth in the great business of Justification that is not a good and a righteous man God cannot justifie the ungodly whilest he remains ungodly he cannot love him nor delight in him nor approve of him because then he should approve of and delight in that which were contrary to his own nature viz. in a sinfull wicked person being himself an holy God 3. Reason 3. Good works do not justifie only negatively as without which faith would not be perfect and without which the object could not be beloved but good works do help justifie as that which after the intervention of mercy and pardon do render the object lovely to the holy God and do naturally conciliate the divine love and approbation 'T is true all our obedience while it is any way defective cannot constrain approbation and love from God nay our defects must needs bring a guilt upon our best actions if we are considered as under the law of our creation But now after that the good and mercifull God hath found out a comely way how he may shew favour to sinners it is certain that all their good actions though they are not immediate acts of Faith but of Love or Patience Justice or Temperance must needs be exceeding pleasing to him Gal. 5.22 23. The fruit of the Spirit is Love Joy Peace Long-suffering Gentleness Goodness Faith Meckness Temperance against such there is no law that is against such graces and actions or persons adorned with them there is no law This is but a meiosis for indeed such graces and gracious persons though but imperfectly furnished with them are yet for these things sake through his gracious acceptance of them highly pleasing to God For this see Heb. 13.16 Acts 10.4 And this is that wâ—â—â—â— Mr John Goodwin acknowledgeth who yâ—â— denyes that works procure Justification as Justification signifies remission of sins in the Fanner of Justification displayed pag. 48. 49. When Abraham is said to have been justified by works when he had offered c. the meaning is that upon this great testimony given by Abraham of the truth and effectualness of his faith God highly APPROVED of him and DEALâ— BY HIM AS BY A PERSON RIGHTEOUS AND JUST and CALLED HIM HIS FRIEND with much more to the same purpose by this you see how good works do highly please God so as to justifie us with an high approbation at least and I should think too even unto remission of sins so that if such a man that doth these works thus highly pleasing to God have sins upon him lately committed they should be forgiven him according to these Scriptures Dan. 4.27 Break off thy sins by righteousness and thine iniquities by shewing mercy to the poor Iam 5.15 If he have committed sâ—â—s they shall be forgiven him if it may be a lengthning of thy tranquillity or an healing of thine error as the margin hath it So Acts 3.19 Repent yee therefore and be converted that your iniquities may be blotted out Isai 1.16 17 18. Wash ye make ye clean put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes cease to do evil learn to do well seck iudgment relieve the oppressed judge the fatherless plead for the widow Come now and let us reason together saith the Lord though your sins be as scarlet they shall be as whiâ—e asnow though they be red like crimson they shall be as wool So lizek 18 21 22. Here you see that part of Justification which consists in the remission of sins is promised to good works as the Gospel reward of them and indeed I do not see how these two parts of Justification can be separated viz. Approbation and Pardon so as Faith should obtain the one and Good Works the other though indeed they may well be conceived as distinct parts of Justification I crave the pardon of that reverend person mentioned in that I take this liberty to express my self I shall conclude this Question with those words of Mr Baxter in his Aphorismes Thesis 73. pag. 289. 290. Faith ONLY doth not justifie in opposition to the works of the Gospel but those works do also justifie as the secoadary less-principal parts of the condition of the New Covenant I come now to the last Question which is this How comes faith thus eminently to intitule us to justification I have asserted Quest 6. that though works do justifie yet faith doth it so eminently as that gets the chiefest name of righteousness and works are never called our righteousness much less are they the righteousness of faith though it must be allowed as a good consequence that if we are said to be justified by works in a sense works are our righteousness because all Justification is by a righteousness But to let pass that that works are a partial secondary less principal righteousness The Question remains How comes faith to be so eminently our righteousness as to bear away the name so that our righteousness by which we are now said to be justified should be called the righteousness of faith in opposition to works that is legal works Now to this I answer in the general that the great reason of this must be the divine ordination and appointment It could not be meerly from the nature of the thing nothing in its own nature can justifie a rational creature but perfect righteousness unerring obedience Now the highest faith in the world can never deserve to be accounted
unerring obedience faith was but a part of our duty which we owed to God under the first Covenant that is relying upon the power goodness and veracity of God and therefore where-ever faith comes to be our righteousness or our chief righteousness it argues that there is a great deficiency in the creature that is so to be justified and accordingly the Apostle often glances upon this that glorying is in this way excluded not by the law of works but by the law of faith Faith therefore cannot justifie by any natural excellency that it hath in it for though all the men in the world being now sinners and obnoxious to punishment by the law of their creation should resolve of their own accord to believe that there is so much goodness in God that he will not destroy the work of his own hands so depending upon his mercy and therefore they will endeavour to do all those things which they think may be pleasing and acceptable to him why all this faith and confidence attended with the most sincere obedience will not extort a Justification from Almighty God except it be in his good pleasure to justifie such believers and such obedient persons because they were all obnoxious to punishment for the breach of his law Faith therefore cannot justifie but by reason of divine ordination and constitution that hath passed upon it such as this The just shall live by faith and That if thou confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Rom. 10.9 and for this reason I suppose it is so often called Gods righteousness Rom. 10.3 because it was a righteousness not in its own nature as works were but a righteousness purely of divine appointment This is Mr John Goodwin's notion of it Pag. 34. of the Banner of Justification displayed God was pleased to decree or make this for a law which the Apostle calleth the law of faith Rom. 3.27 that faith or believing in him through Christ should interesse men in the benefit or blessing of the death and blood shed of Christ that is in that remission of sins which was purchased by his death And in this consideration faith justifieth viz. by virtue of the Soveraign authority of that most gracious Decree or Law of God wherein he hath said or decreed that it shall intitle men unto or inright them in part and fellowship of that benefit of the death of Christ which consisteth in the forgiveness of sins or which comes much to the same as it is a qualification or condition ordained covenanted or appointed by God to bring upon those in whom it shall be found the great blessing of that pardon of sin which Christ hath obtained for men by his blood This is Mr Baxter's opinion too that is That saith justifies as it is made the chief condition of the N. Covenant Page 225 of his Aphorisms Thesis 57. It is the act of faith which justifieth men at age and not the habit yet NOT AS IT IS A GOOD WORK this is directly against Dr Moor's affirmation who faith that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing else but to be approved as a good man or a doer of that which is righteous and good and that BECAUSE he doth that which is good and righteous methinks here is a Justification for good works purely and if faith comes in here to justifie it doth it only as it is a good work Mr Baxter is of another minde viz. That faith doth not justifie only under that quaâ—enus or reduplication AS a good work Faith saith Mr Baxter in the Thesis quoted doth not justlfie AS it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But in the NEAREST SENSE DIRECTLY AND PROPERLY as it is the fulfilling the condition of the New Covenant c. But now though I have affirmed that it doth not justifie purely from its own nature Though faith doth not justisie purely from it's own nature yet it hath a great excellency in it self which might somewhat recommend it to this service but chiefly from the ordination of God and that it could not have justified without this ordination yet I shall adde that it had in its own nature a great fitness to be chosen of God for this eminent service to justifie men by It was the fittest medium that we can imagine when the first natural way of works failed to promote the honour of God and the good of the creature in Justification which consideration commends highly the wisdom of God in setting it apart for this use as the chief condition of our Justification To evince the truth of this let us consider a little the natural excellencyes that there are in faith And first of all faith takes in all spiritual objects 1 Excellency of Faith and represents them to the soul so that all other graces are beholden to faith for their objects Heb. 11.1 Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen hope could not be if faith did not give a real and evident being and subsistence to the things that we hope for as also to all other the invisible and unseen things which a Christian a Saint as such converseth with and lives upon Again ver 6. of that chap. 11. Without faith 't is impossible to please God For he that comes unto God must believe that he is Now it is by faith that we believe and know that God is ver 27. by faith Moses forsook Egypt not fearing the wrath of the King for he endured as seeing him who is invisible by faith Moses saw him that is invisible I will acknowledge that reason may finde out that there is a God but if a mans wayes please God his reason delivers over this observation to his faith which is an higher thing an higher principle in the soul then reason though it never contradicts true reason yet it is somewhat above meer reason * If any one here will say that faith in such a case as the belief that there is a God is much the same with reason or a rational conviction of the truth of such a Proposition I will not much contend only because here the divine Penman sayes it is by saith we believe there is a God and his assertion must have a truth in it we may distinguish Reason Faith thus That Faith is a more particular faculty or habit of divine principles such as respect God and Religion but Reason is a more general faculty conversant about all objects whatsoever and this consideration must come in That meer Reason only makes one a man but Faith makes a man a Saint and therefore this Faith must have a divine afflatus and spirit in it beyond meer reason It is by faith that we believe that God is and that he is a rewarder of all them that diligently seek him And these two
Spirit of Christ being throughly convinced of the righteousness of the Law the truth of its threatning the Nature and Offices Sufficiency and Excellency of Jesus Christ his free offer to all that will accept of him for their Lord and Saviour doth hereupon believe the truth of this Gospel and accept of Christ as his only Lord and Saviour to bring him to God his chiefest good and doth accordingly rest on him as his Saviour and SINCERELY though imperfectly OBEY him as his Lord FORGIVING OYHERS LOVING HIS PEOPLE BEARING WHAT SUFFERINGS ARE IMPOSED c. and all this sincerely and to the end This is part of his desinition of Faith Again Mr. Baxter in another place pag. 238. Thesis 62. according to this definition of Faith tells us That Faith may be called the onely condition of the New-Covenant for two reasons 1. Because it is the principal condition and the other but the less principal and so as an whole Countrey hath ost its Name from a chief City so may the conditions of this Covenant from Faith 2. Because all the rest are reducible to it either being presupposed as necessary antecedents or means or contained in it as its parts properties or modifications or else implyed as its immediate product or necessary subservient means or consequents And so full to the same purpose Thesis 73. pag. 280. Thus we see by Scripture and according to the opinion of a very learned and good man that Faith is not onely the first Grace in order but a very operative Grace and was in its own nature exceedingly sitted for that service which God hath in much Wisdom and Prudence appointed it unto But thirdly 〈…〉 there is yet a more proper reason then either of these why Faith should be chosen for this uses and that is for that Faith is a self-emrying Grace to live by Faith is to live purely in dependance upon God and Christ for every thing and what fitter instrument or condition of Justification could be chosen after the fall of man when it was most reasonable that if God would save a man he should have all the glory Doth not the Apostle insist mightily upon this both in his Doctrine and particular practice Justification now saith he is not of works lest any man should boast Eph. 2.9 But by Grace are ye saved through Faith So Nom. 3.27 Where is boasting then it is excluded By what Law Of works Nay but by the Law of Faith This is St. Paul's Doctrine Then for his practice For my part saith he I am crucified with Christ I am a poor dead thing Nevertheless I live yet not I or no longer I 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but Christ liveth in me and the life that I live is by Faith in Christ Gal. 2.20 Now that St. Paul is come to live the life of Faith he is nothing Christ is all he is dead and liveth not Christ onely liveth in him So that you see Faith besides all its other excellencies hath a peculiar fitness for this service of justifying a sinner and yet notwithstanding all these excellent qualities that are to be found in Faith it could not have justified without a Divine ordination and appointment Now for any to say as some do that Love justifies as much as Faith nay that God doth rather approve of a man for his Love then for his Faith is methinks very bold and unscriptural Divinity I shall onely adde a word of testimony out of Mr. Baxter to this last particular and so conclude the question and all the questions which I have to propose about Justification Pag. 231. of his Aphorisms he hath these words If God had seen meet to have stamped any thing else to pass for Justification it would have passed currantly yet take this Faith is even to our own apprehension the most apt and suitable condition that GOD COULD have chosen for as far as we can reach to know there cannot be a more apt or rational condition pag. 232. This is the most self-denying and Christ-advancing Work Nothing could be more proportionable to our poverty who have nothing to buy with than thus freely to receive c. I have now done with all the Questions which I thought any ways necessary to be spoken to for the more particular and distinct unfolding of the Doctrine of Justification and I might here shut up the Discourse with the Uses of the whole But before I come to the Uses I judge it convenient to add somewhat by way of Appendix concerning the means or way how Justification came to be transferred from the Law to the Gospel or from Works to Faith for that I have acknowledged that Works and the Law were the first natural way of justifying men but now that it is altogether brought about by Grace and Faith That which I have to say I shall introduce with this objection If we were all born under the Law Object and bound to obey it to a tittle upon which obedience it should have justified us but upon the least breach was armed with this threatning That we should dye the death and that we have all broken it how comes it to pass that we are not all the Laws Captives and Prisoners and condemned by it How came there such easie gracious terms to be offered us for our justification as Faith and sincere obedience that these shall be accepted instead of perfect unerring obedience How will this way be for the honor of God's veracity in the threatning or his holiness to take imperfect sinful creatures into favour Now in answer to this objection I shall not need to meddle with that question Answ whether it were inconsistent with the natural Justice or Holiness of God considered as antecedent to his threatning or Decree of punishing sinners with death for him to have pardoned sinners by an absolute Power and Soveraign Grace and so to have received them into favour upon their repentance without the intervention of a Saviour But in the first place seeing there was adecree passed In the day that thon eatest thou shalt dye the death Gen. 2.17 I see not how it was consistent with the veracity of God to remit the sinner without any consideration at all without a very considerable fulfilling of this threatning 2dly The threatning therefore was fulfilled these several ways 1. Upon man himself in a great measure for that presently upon man's fall insued his mortality and all the inconveniences and troubles which we meet with in the World which are the fore-runners and causes of our dissolution But secondly and especially the great God in infinite Wisdom and Mercy provided a Saviour one mighty to save that should come into the world in the fulness of time about the 4000th year of the World the World being to last but perhaps 7000. years in all and free us that were born under the Law and by our sins made obnoxious to the curse of it from the curse and power of the Law
out Rom. 11.33 2. 2 Use of Information of the perversness of man This discourse informs us of the strange unreasonable perversness of the sons of men That when God hath in so much mercy and wisedom found out and appointed such a glorious easie way of saving sinners they should yet generally dislike this way and take to a more ignoble way to wit their own righteousness and an impossible way to wit the keeping of the Law which I have proved above at large that they do and it acquaints us with the strange infatuations which pride leads us into for that is by the Apostle chiefly glanced at as the reason of so many mens adhering to the way of Works because they would establish their own righteousness which they prefer far before the righteousess of God that is that righteousness which he hath sufficiently manifested he will alone accept They that are for the Law are for boasting and glorying this humour of self-confidence and fleshly boasting doth so besot them that they run upon the most absurd and irrational designs in the whole world but of this enough above 3. 3 Use of Consolation There is great matter of consolation which offers it self unto us from what hath been discoursed above Is it so that the Lord hath remitted of the rigour of his Law nay that he hath taken off the Law wholly from requiring an account of those that are married unto Christ as being their Husband no longer Is the condition of Justification altered from unerring obedience to faith and sincerity in obedience then here is comfort for all faithfull sincere hearts Art thou honest to God hast thou no Delilah in thy bosome art thou faithful to the interest of Christ and his Saints thou art safe thou art secure it is not necessary that thou be in the highest form of Christians 't is true it were well if thou wert there and it is thy duty to endeavour it but it is not absolutely necessary to thy being a Saint or in favour with God There are of all sorts and sizes See more of this pag. 202 203. above of all ranks and ages that are accepted with God There are babes and young men and strong men and fathers there are lambs and there are sheep that are with young only without sincerity without a lively faith they cannot be so much as Christ's little ones Now this is a matter of comfort which we may often reflect upon it is ready at hand unto us Art thou in any distress or trouble at any time either from without from men or from within by the bufferings of Satan turn in presently upon thy soul and examine see how thou hast lived and what thy present frame of heart is 2 Cor. 1.12 Our rejoicing is this the testimony of our conscience that IN SIMPLICITY GODLY SINCERITY not with fleshly wisedom but by the grace of God we have had our conversation in the world Now if thou hast such a testimony as this from thine own conscience thou maist conclude thou art in the favour of God and that therefore all things shall work together unto thee for good but herein do not deceive thy self with an imagined honesty of heart to God as many do but deal faithfully with thy self in the examination whether thou have a sincerity or no. If I should here give all the marks of sincerity that I could finde throughout the Scripture I should not be impertinent in so doing but yet seeing that hath been done well by many I shall forbear I shall only say this that if thou settest thy self any boundary or stint to thy attainments in holiness short of perfection thou art so far insincere or if thou avoidest any opportunity which thou canst by any means certainly understand to be an opportunity of honouring God thou art so far insincere Lastly if thou givest way to sin in the little degrees or appearances of it thou art so far insincere and if the interest of the flesh or of the world prevail in thy heart above the interest of God and Christ thou art altogether infincere whatever good desire and good affections thou maist have in thy heart I might here mention the other more principal condition of Gospel-justification viz. Faith and bid thee if thou wouldest have comfort enquire if thou have faith this St James tells thee how thou mayest know whether thou hast it oâ— no even by thy works thou maist discover it both unto thy self and others by these Jam. 2.18 Shew me thy faith without thy works and I will shew thee my faith by my works For though I affirm that the Apostle James doth not speak only in that Chapter of the demonstration of Faith by Works but also of real Justification before God by Works as they are a part of the condition of Gospel-justification according to the 14. ver of that Chap. If a man say he hath faith and not works SHALL FAITH SAVE HIM yet it is certain that he speaks there also of the demonstration of Faith by Works and both these designes I think may be as we understood in that chap. of James as in the 24 of Mat. we may understand our Saviour speaking of the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the World But instead of giving marks and signes of true faith I shall rather proceed to an use of Exhortation unto the high and frequent exercise of Faith which when we are engaged in we shall have marks and signes enough to discover our faith by In the next place therefore I come to an use of Exhortation 4 Use of Exhortation Is it so that Faith is made the great and principal condition of our Justification that Faith bears so great a stroke in the business of Gospel-justification that the whole way should receive denomination from itâ— Rom. 4.14 If they which are of the Law be heires FAITH is made void Is the righteousness of God in the Gospel said to be revealed from faith to faith Is the Gospel-righteousness called the righteousness of faith nay is faith it self accepted as our righteousness then let this provoke us to the constant lively exercise of all the various excellent acts of Faith Let us do as all the Saints of old have done and if it be possible let us out-do them in believing By faith saith saith the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews the Elders obtained a good report so he begins the chap. ver 2. These all saith he obtained a good report through faith so he ends it ver 39. What that great good report which they obtained was he tells you ver 33 34 35. Through faith they subdued Kingdomes wrought righteousness obtained promises stopped the mouthes of Lions quenched the violence of fire c. My first motive that I shall begin with to quicken this Exhortation shall be from the wonderfull things that faith hath wrought and can work 1 Mâ—tive Faith hath a virtue in it
to have it and do it but when I have it I make no use of it in my treating with God for justification and to give one instance which must needs prove that he doth not mean it of Justification at first believing In pag. 10. he takes men off when they come to dye from taking their comfort or discomfort from their past life which if ever they were justifyed is the longest time after their first Justification without any distinction about it whereas we finde that when Hezekiah came to die and had the sentence of death passed upon him by God he presently reflects upon his past-life and hath a great confidence upon it nay and useth the holiness of his life past as an argument with God to spare him longer Isa 38.2 3. Then Hezekiah after he had received the sentence from Isaiah turned his face to the wall and said Remember now O Lord I beseech thee how I have walked before thee in truth and with a perfect heart and HAVE DONE THAT WHICH WAS GOOD IN THY SIGHT And so St Paul when he thinks of leaving the world he reflects upon his past life 2 Tim. 4.6 7 8. For I am now ready to be offered and the time of my departure is at hand I have fought a good fight I have finished my cours I have kept the faith HENCEFORTH there is laid up for me a Crown of Righteousness c. But that I may not do Luther wrong I shall quote the whole passage which I think hath great usef lness in it were it not almost spoiled by that Antinomiaâ— dead flie that may be found in it Ejusmodi est humana imbecillitas c. such is the weakness and misery of Mankinde that in terrors of conscience and danger of death we look at nothing else but our Works our own worthiness and the Law nostram dignitatem Legem Which when it shews us our sin presently comes into our minde our past life and then with great grief of soul doth the sinner groan thus thinking with himself Ah quam perdite vixi utinam liceret diutius vivere tum velim emendare vitam meam c. Ah how wickedly have I lived would God I were to live longer then would I certainly amend my life and live better c. Upon which he adds Nec potest ratio humana neither can HUMANE REASON a very vile thing with the Antinomians ita hoc malum est nobis insitum illamque infelicem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comparavimus so is this evil imbred in us and such an unhappy custome have we gotten that humane reason cannot ex hâ—c spectro justitiae activae seu propriae evolvere attollere sese get it self out of the sight of this Bug-bear or apparition called Active Righteousness or our own proper Righteousness and lift it self up to the sight of Passive Righteousness or Christian Righteousness but it simply sticks upon and rests in the Active Now I do really believe that when we come to dye we shall sinde great use indeed of our faith in the mercies of God and blood of Christ and a little comfort immediately vouchsafed from God by the lifting up the light of his countenance upon us will be better worth to us and of more speedy help in those bitter agonies we may be cast into than all the comfort we may be able to conclude to our selves from the imperfect obedience of our past lives But yet believe it he that then shall have the testimony of a clear conscience and the fair appearance or apparition of a good past life or active righteousness so as to be able to use the words of good Hezekiah unto the Lord Remember how I have done that which was goad in thy sight will have no occasion to turn from it as a foul spectre or ghastly apparition but he will rather welcome it as his good Angel and desire it's company with him into the other world for upon this account it is that they are blessed that dye in the Lord for that they rest from their labours and THEIR WORKS FOLLOW THEM Rev. 14.13 I might adde many other passages out of Luther and others but these may suffice to shew the first extream opinion in the business of Justification that Works of no kinde have any thing to do there at all The other extream Opinion of some good men is That the righteousness of faith is an holy temper of heart or a Christ-like nature in a man's soul which because it is produced very much by faith it is called the righteousness of faith Now certainly these bend the stick too much the other way for though Holiness be requisite unto Justification yet it is not the only requisite nor the chief condition of it upon which the honour is put by God Yet this Opinion I look upon to be much safer than the Antinomian Doctrine As for the two middle Opinions that hold the mean betwixt these two extreams they are that of Mr John Goodwin and Mr Baxter Mr Goodwin allowes Evangelical works a share in Justification but then it is only in that part or kinde of Justification which consists in the divine approbation but excludes them out of that part or that kinde of Justification which consists in remission of sins which yet he affirmes is the strict Gospel-justification and for this he makes faith alone to be the condition of it In the last place Mr Baxter makes Faith and Evangelical Works together the compleat condition of that Justification which consists in pardon of sins as well as of the divine approbation only that Faith is the principal Works the last principal condition and to this Opinion I must needs adhere Though for Mr Goodwins I look upon it to be sufficiently removed from the Antinomian in that it makes Faith as an act not only as a hand receiving Christ's righteousness as some Antinomians love to speak the condition of Justification and Works too to be necessary unto the obtaining divine approbation besides that he holds that the final Justification at the day of Judgment shall proceed according to Works And indeed I am so farr of his opinion that I think faith hath a farr greater share in our Justification than all our good Works put together yea that our good Works do chiefly justifye as they have faith in them and for the sake of that faith that spirits them of which I have given some proof in the ensuing Treatise pag. 270 271. out of Heb. 11. where the Apostle sindes out a faith in the actions of several of the Patriarchs and sayes it was by faith that they did this or that and were justified though their story mention nothing of their faith at all And it may be said as well that Works without Faith are dead being alone as that Faith without Works is dead being alone Now these four Opinions lying fair in view in all which there are good men engaged in some of them to a great
justified man is a just man in the sight of God To be justified before God or in the sight of God or by God are all one for it is the same phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places and the meaning is onely this that God must reckon that man just whosoever is justified according to that in 2 Cor. 10.18 Not he that commendeth himself is approved I may add not he whom all the men on earth or all the Augels in Heaven commend is therefore approved but whom the Lord commendeth This act or state of Justification is variously expressed in the Scripture I shall give just a taste of it The description of â—ustification vâ—ried in the Scripture In Gen. 4.7 It is called God's accepting of us If thou dost well shall thou not be accepted And again Gods having respect unto us in the same chap. v. 4.5 The Lord had respect unto Abel and unto his Offering but unto Cain and his Offering he had not respect Once more Justification is expressed thus To have a Tessimony from God that we please him Heb. 11.6 But I shall keep to my first description because that is especially made use of by the Apostle Paul in his professed Discourses upon this subject viz. That Justification is a mans being reputed just and righteous in the sight of God and indeed the Apostle Paul as a close Disputant keeps to his terms and rallyes all the terms of a sort together which in this business are these three especially 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Just Justice or Rightcousness and Justification Every â—ustified personâ—s reputed a just man by vertue of a Justice or Righteousness that constitutes him so or at least makes him a Subject immediately sit for this Act of Justification to pass upon him For Justification is a legal or judicial Act the Act usually of a Court. Now men in their Courts will not pronounce a man just when he is accused or is brought upon his justification except there be a righteousness appearing in him except there be something sufficient brought in his justification And do we think that God wil transact such a great business more slightly than we are wont to do Why this Justification of a mans person it is done in the sight of God and that I may a little illustrate it it seems to be done in the Court of Heaven before all tht Augels of God for they reâ—oice at the conversion of a Sinner and so at his Justification Luke 12.8 9.15.10 Therefore in the Court of Heaven when one is to be justified the great inquiry that is made is after a Righteousness And the Apostle Paul's Epistles when he treats of this subject ring of nothing so loudly as of a Righteousness No less then thirty several time doth the Apostle make mention of that Word Rightcousness in that one Epistle to the Rom. and and at least twenty of those times it is referred unto Justification therefore Justification must be by a Righteonsness The great Question therefore is this What is the Righteousness which if a man have he is a Subject capable of being justified that is reputed a just man in the sight of God Now the Answer to this Question cannot be made till I have established four preliminary Propositions The first position is this That there are only two kinds of righteousness imaginable by us or rather but two to be found in Scripture they are by the Apostle fairly distinguished each part of the distinction expressed in several synonymaes or words signifying the same thing There is the Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.5.6 The Righteousness of God and our own Righteousness Rom. 10.3 And as Righteousness is thus variously distinguished so is Justification which is the Reward of Righteousness said to be of several kinds according to the several Righteousness which it proceeds upon if the Righteousness be that of the Law by the Works of the Law then is the Reward reckoned of Debt if the Righteousness be that of Faith the Reward is in the nature of a Grace or Gift Rom. 4 4. Now to him that worketh according to the Law the Reward is not reckoned of Grace but of Debt and 〈◊〉 contra to him that believeth and is for the Righteousness of Faith the Reward that is Justification is reckoned of Grace not of Debt Having thus given a distinct account what Justification is how that it is the constituting a man just before God and what ground or reason it proceeds upon viz. Upon a Righteousness found with the person to be justified he hath a Righteousness to plead for him And having given you the onely distinction that there is of Righteousness it is of the Law or Faith however either part of the distinction may be varied in synonymous expressions and so the Justification following upon one of these Righteousnesses viz. That of the Law is of Debt upon the other viz. The Righteousness of Faith is of Grace I shall draw up the terms that belong to either part of the distinction whether of Righteousness or Justification together that so ye may see the Apostle is full of these two and only these two as also that the Scriptures may appear wherein this subject is touched at and so fall upon a fair dispute for the Cause which is this Whether of these two ways must serve us in the present state of things Which way of Righteousness which way of Justification we must betake our selves unto if we would be saved For without Justification no Salvation and Salvation at the day of Judgement will follow onely upon our Justification in this life God will then do that in the face of all the world in acquitting or condemning which now he doth effectually in a more covert and secret manner To draw up therefore these two parties into the field 1. The Law in its party or list of Synonyma's hath these severals The works of the Law 2 Gal. 1.6 The deeds of the Law Rom. 3.20.28 The Law of Works ver 27. By works without any addition of the Law If Abraham were justified by works he hath whereof to glory Rom. 4.2 Here glorying and boasting belong to this Tribe too as a consequent upon Legal-Justification or Law-Justification The Verb used is this To him that worketh I shall not instance in any further Synonyma's belonging to the Law such as this that it is called a fleshly way and flesh Are ye so foolish having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect by the flesh I come to give the synonymaes or conjugata that belong to the way of Faith The substantives are these 1. Faith alone Faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness The Faith of God Rom. 3.3 The Law of Faith ver 27. The righteousness of faith Rom. 4.13 Grace 't is of Faith that it might be of Grace Abundance of Grace and the gift of righteousness Rom. 5.17 It
is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Book of the Law to do them Gal. 3.10 2dly The Law is taken in a sence all as large as this is strict and that is for the whole Old-Testament So it is likewise taken in several Scriptures Gal. 4.21 Tell me ye that desire to be under the Law do ye not hear the Law For it is written that Abraham had two sons c. where the whole Book of Genesis is made a part of the Law again in Rom. 3. the Apostle makes the Psalms a part of the Law where having quoted a great part of the 14. Psalm in the 19. ver saith he Now we know that whatsoever things the Law saith c. and so in other Scriptures Now to apply the distinction in answer to the last query The Law strictly taken for a Covenant of Works did only teach Christ virtually and by consequence as it taught them that they could not be justified by its righteousness and thus for ought I know the Law in its accusations taught Christ to the Gentiles as it convinced them of the insufficiency of their own righteousness But now the Law in the second sense as taken for the Scriptures of the Old Testament taught Christ formally and directly though more obscurely then the Gospel teacheth him viz. in Types and Prophecies it were endless to reckon up all the Types Promises and Prophesies of Christ that are in the Old-Testament This way indeed the Law could not teach Christ unto the Gentiles who had not the Scriptures of the Old-Testament It is now high time and yet in this place seasonable enough to answer some other parts of the objection which I proposed at large some pages since which pleads for the Law its being a way of Justification unto the Jews at least before the coming of Christ if not to us now and something of that which remains yet unanswered Obj. 2. The Law was given to the Iews as their covnant is this If the Law was not given to be a way of Justification why is it called a Covenant the Old-Testament or Covenant 2 Cor. 3.14 and the first Covenant Heb. 7.8 expresly said to be made with the Children of Israel when the Lord took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Aegypt For whatever you have argued about Adam's estate of innocency that God made a Covenant of Works with him and that if he would he might have been justified by Works by the Law that since him all men have sinned and the Law was no way of Justification to them Whatever you have argued to this purpose say the objectors yet we find not that the Law was given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel by Moses and given to them as a Covenant therefore called the old Covenant or first Covenant in Heb. 8. out of Jer. 31.31 32.33 34. Therefore it was given them as a way of Justification for certainly the Justification that they were to seeke of God they were to seek in the way of a Covenant therefore in the way of the Law which was their Covenant To this I answer some things by way of concession A. 1. By way of concession in two particulars afterwards some things more concluding And first of all I grant that the Law is no where to my remembrance said to be given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel I am sure usually when mention is made of the giving of the law Where the law is said to be given it is to the children of Israel not to Adam Yet Adam had the Law and it was a Covenant of works to him 1. He had the Law it is likewise noted in the same place as given to the children of Israel by Moses so 2 Cor. 3 7. Heb. 8.9 1 Joh. 17. For the Law was given by Moses Gal. 3.19 Wherefore then serveth the Law It was added because of transgressions and it was ordained by Angels upon Mount Sinai in the hands of a Mediator viz. Moses Though when I make this concession that the Law is not said to be given to Adam but to the children of Israel by Moses I still think it may be easily collected from the Scriptures that Adam had the Law too and that it was to him a Covenant of Works 1. That he had the Law for 1. if Adam as a creature had not the Law written in his heart how came the Gentiles who had not the Law given them by Moses to have it written in their hearts 2. Else as I urged it before it had been no sin for man in innocency to have killed whom he pleased to have lyed forsworn himself to have defiled his own body by Adultery or other uncleanness for where there is no Law there is no transgression 3. If Adam had not the Law before his fall how came he to have it written in his heart presently after as it is certain he had for all other men have it so written and I cannot think that Adam alone wanted this excellency of all mankind neither do I think that he got this advantage by his fall to have the effect of the Law written in his heart which he had not written there before therefore he had it written in his heart before the Fall 2 It was to him a Covenant of works 2. It was a Covenant of Works to Adam in innocency For Adam then had no need of Grace or Pardon before his fall and I have proved that the Law is in its own nature a Covenant of Works and Adam had the Law therefore it was a Covenant of Works to Adam I deny not but Adam might have some positive Laws in his Covenant of Works as we find one viz. that of the forbidden fruit My second Concession is this That the Law was given to the Jews as a Covenant 2d Concession and where-ever mention is made of the Old-Covenant or First Covenant the parties covenanted withall are the people of the Jews So it is in 2 Cor. 3.6.14 in the 6. ver we have mention made of the New-Covenant which is that made by Christ in preaching the Gospel and in the 14th of the Old-Testament or Covenant which is that made with the Jews So in Heb. 8.6 7. the first Covenant is that which Moses was the Mediator of the second or better Covenant is that which Christ is the Mediator of this must not cannot be denyed and I have been often offended at persons that when they make a distinction of the Covenants a first and second old and new they make the first that with Adam in innocency the second the Covenant of grace made with the faithful ever since this though it may be true Divinity yet is not Scriptural or if it be somewhat Scriptural yet it is onely to be drawn by consequence out of the Scripture But there is another determination in this business that is more plainly
his face so that they could not look stedfastly to the end of his Dispensation The fault of the first Covenant There was some kind of fault as it were in the Law it self so the Apostle tells us Heb. 8.7 For if that first Covenant had been faultless there should no place have been sought for the second What this fault was is commonly known and discoursed and it was the obscurity of it the promises of it were not so plain therefore it is said Christ is the Mediator of a better Covenant establisht upon better promises ver 6. There was a Covenant of works inserted in their Dispensation Else how could the Apostle give you a description of the righteousness of it out of Moses Which he doth both in Rom. 10.5 and Gal. 3.12 And no caveat entred in the place where the Covenant of Works is delivered 'T is true the same Moses describeth the righteousness of Faith too but an inobservant Reader might chance to mistake the Covenant of Works for his way to Heaven as well as take the Covenant of Grace for his way and they might keep in that way all their lives if they were not strict observers of the effects of that way upon their Consciences which was to gall and sting them and weary them out of their very lives till they came to the way of Grace And thus we find the generality of the Jews did mistake and ruined themselves by it so that unless God had by a wonderful hand as he plucked Lot out of Sodom and perhaps by irresistable illuminations and attractions brought a remnant to himself all Israel had been burnt up by the Wrath of God they had been as Sodom and Gomorrah Rom. 9.29 to the end Rom. 10.1.2.3 I might well transcribe every word of these eight Verses Now this was the fault which God found with his first Covenant that though it were a Covenant of Grace yet he is so gracious that he thought it was not plain enough to save the generality of them they would be still mistaking and misconstruing his Covenant it would not make them holy enough nor save enough of them and therefore this Fault the Lord amends in the second â—ovenant in the New-Covenant Heb. 8 9 For finding fault he saith Behold the dayes come saith the Lord that I will make a new Covenant with the House of Israel not according to the Covenant that I made with their Fathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the Land of Aegypt because here is the reason of the change because they continued not in my Covenant and I regarded them not It was a Covevenant which they brake with me and I brake with them upon there was a fault in that Covenant which seems to be this It had not Grace enough in it to hold them they continued not in it The fault is laid upon the Covenant not so much upon the parties covenanting though they were not free from blame God indeed was free he was ready to give his Grace and Spirit under the first Covenant but the Covenant was not a free channel for conveyance of this precious Water of Life for the Spirit runs freest in the clear promise therefore the Gospel which is full of rich and plain promises is called the ministration of the Spirit and called by the Name of Spirit whereas the Law of Moses was a dead meer out-side literal thing in comparison of it 2 Cor. 3.6 I say the fault was laid upon the covenant which yet was a covenant of Grace Now what other fault it could be then this that the Lord did not think it gracious enough I cannot imagine and I think that is the fault the Scripture pitcheth upon Now because Moses's Dispensation or the first covenant made with the Jews was thus faulty had a covenant of Works in 〈◊〉 and was mistaken by the Jews to be a covenant of Works it might well be called by the Apostle There was the same reason of the Gospel its being added to the Law that there was of the dispensation of Moses to be added to what they knew of God before a killing letter a ministration of death and condemnation and deserve to be abrogated and disannulled if the Lord will make a better clearer more gracious and saving and yet it can by no means be concluded hence that it was truly either in its own nature or in the intention of the Lord who gave it a covenant of Works nay the contrary hereunto is sufficiently evinced Ob. 4. But yet there is a very considerable Objection behind which is thus You have acknowledged that in Moses's Writings there is a covenant of Works described that St. Paul asserts now I will add saith the Objection that it is not onely there described but there commended to the children of Israel as a part at least if not the chiefest part of the Dispensation by Moses and it is given with as great Authority and hath as solemn a Sanction upon it as any part of the Law of Moses for in that place which the Apostle Paul quotes out of Moses viz. Lev. 18.5 for the description of a legal righteousness we have these words Ye shall therefore keep mp Seatutes and my Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. So in the fore-going verses 1 2. And the Lord spake unto Moses saying Speak unto the children of Israel and say unto them I am the Lord your God then follow the three verses wherein the covenant of Works is described ver 3. After the doings of the Land of Aegypt wherein ye dwelt shall ye not do and after the doings of the Land of Canaan whither I bring you shall ye not do neither shall ye walk in their Ordinancee Ver. 4. Ye shall do my Judgements and keep mine Ordinances to walk therein I am the Lord your God Ver 5. Ye shall therefore keep my Statutes and my Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. Here I observe 1. The simplicity and plainness of the delivery of these commands which contain the covenant of Works they are delivered without any caveat or caution to the Reader lest he should mistake this for his covenant which he should be saved by 2. I observe the Authority and Majesty they are delivered with even with this addition three several times in the compass of four verses I am the Lord and I am the Lord your God This doth not look like an old antiquated covenant made with Adam about 2000. years before and of use to him but onely for the strst day of his creation I conclude therefore saith the objector That it is a valid covenant and delivered with intention that men should be justified by it And besides I add that which hath great strength in it That even Jesus Christ himself repeats this covenant of Works in Moses his own Words and directs a man to this
of Works as it seems to have been to Adam who had but a few other commands besides viz. such as we call Positive and if every man by Nature be under a covenant of works though a stranger to the Old-Testament or New as having never heard of either being under the law of his creation how much more were the Israelites under a covenant of Works who besides the moral law had the judicial and ceremonial added for them to observe and altogether given them vvith this language of a covenant of Works these ye shall observe which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. I shal add onely one observation more to strengthen the objection and it is this That when St. Paul disputes against the Galatians for embracing a covenant of Works most of his Work lyes in beating them off from the ceremonial law vvhich they were exceedingly addicted to as looking upon the lavv of Moses to be very much of the nature of the covenant of Works and the ceremonial law as a great sign of it there being so much vvork cut out for them in it and verily believing that if they vvere pretty strict in keeping the ceremonial law God vvould justifie and save them Therefore it is very probable that the law of Moses was given to them as a covenant of Works for this reason as well as others that there were so many ceremonies appointed for them to observe most of which it is more then probable the greater number did not understand and so must take up und satisfie themselves with the Work done then which vvhat can look more like a covenant of vvorks for men to do a great many things which they did not understand meerly because God had commanded them Now for answer to this objection and I shall give it in several particulars A. 1 I confess that the ceremonial law proved a great snare and a stumbling-block unto the careless Jews and so to the Galatians for when they found such a great task of ceremonies set them they cared not much to study the meaning of them but took up with the doing of them which to do did not much trouble their hearts or consciences and so placed themselves by it under a covenant of vvorks in their treating with God for Justification 2dly I grant that the ceremonial law was a great burthen and an unsupportable yoke even to those that were good amongst the Jews Acts 15.10 and it is a great piece of the liberty of the Gospel to be freed from it 3dly I grant that the laws moral judicial and ceremonial were given altogether and are included in that place where a covenant of vvorks or the righteousness of the Law is said to be described by the Apostle and I grant in this particular that though the law of nature alone is a covenant of vvorks to those that are in a state of nature though they never received any positive law from God yet that it is possible for a ceremonial lavv or a law consisting of many ceremonies or positive laws to be a part of a covenant of vvorks as we find in Adam's covenant of works there was a Sacrament as some reckon it of the Tree of life and there was a positive law concerning the forbidden fruit which vvere neither of them branches of the law of Nature and he might have been as well forbidden as allowed all the trees save one if the Lord had pleased he might have had a systeme of positive and ceremonial laws inserted in his covenant of vvorks if the Lord had thought good and no wrong had been done him for he was able to have kept them 4thly Yet here I deny that the ceremonial law was any part of a covenant of works though brought in near that place where the righteousness of the law is said by the Apostle to be described and that for this reason which fully answers the objection That the ceremonial law did contain Gospel in it which cannot be said of any branch of the covenant of works I allowed indeed above that the law taken strictly for a covenant of works did preach the Gospel virtually or by consequence as it burthened the sinners conscience and so made him seek further for a righteousness but I said then it is the law taken in a large sence onely as it contains the whole Old-Testament or at least a considerable part of it that teacheth Christ and the Gospel formally and expresly VVhy now the ceremonial law teacheth Christ in many perhaps in all the parts of it if wel understood VVhat could the shedding of so much blood for remission of sins signifie but the shedding of Christs blood for them and us all which is the great mysterie of the Gospel Now if any say they understood it not and yet must do it and so it was all one to them as if it had not singnified any thing at all and therefore must still pass with them as a covenant of works I answer 1 in the words of the Apostle Rom. 3 3. What though some did not believe did not understand must their unbelief and ignorance make the Faith of God that Doctrine of Faith which the ceremonial law preached of none effect or signification But you will say they could not see the blood of Christ in the blood of a sacrifice having no clearer discoveries then they had of Christ I ans I confess I cannot say they could see so much though still so much was contained in it as now we well understand But yet if they could not see so much yet somewhat they might have learned for certainly God appoints no idle useless insignificant ceremonies in his Worship therefore I suppose they might have learnt thus much by their ceremonies and particularly by their sacrifices which I suppose was known even amongst Heathens in their sacrifices that when they killed a Beast for attoning the anger of God here life went for life and God might as well have taken their lives from them as accepted the life of that Beast and so by this they might see that their lives and salvations did depend purely upon the Mercy and Grace of God now this sufficiently weaned them from the law or covenant of works which had no Grace or Pardon in it it was therefore the grossest mistake of all to understand the ceremonial law for a part of the covenant of Works when it was greatly intended to be a Gospel to them 5thly and lastly If yet it were dark and did confound them with the multitude of duties which it imposed Why might it not herein do the good turn that a covenant of Works did for them Which was to make them study and search and long for the pure and clear discoveries of that rich Grace which we now see in the dayes of the Gospel I have now done with this objection also which I of purpose kept out from the rest in which I only considered the moral law as a
covenant of Works for these two reasons 1. For that the ceremonial law neither was nor could be a part of the covenant of Works which the moral law both was and is to all that are under a covenant of works 2dly and consequently I therefore kept off from any consideration of the ceremonial law in my discourses about the law its being given by Moses that so I might have my discourse run clear in the business of the covenant of works and draw a line in it from Adams estate in innocency to the very days of the Gospel which with any mixture of discourse about the ceremonial law would have been broken and disturbed VVhereas now you see the law taken strictly for a covenant of works might have justified Adam but could not justifie the children of Israel and therefore though added to the promise given to Abraham and that in the language of a covenant of works yet was never given with design that they should accept it for such unto Justification which appears from this double demonstration as I may call it a priori a posteriori A priori for that before the law was given there was a covenant of Grace which the law could not come in to disannul and a posteriori for that the very same Moses that brought their law from God out of the Mount did not more truly acquaint them with the nature of a legal righteousness then he did with the righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart c. being a text quoted out of the same Moses Deut. 30.11 which make this argument vvherefore should Moses first describe to you a legal righteousness and tell you as appears by clear consequence out of him that ye cannot attain unto that righteousness and then describe unto you the righteousness of faith but for this end that ye might forgo the one cleave to the other And there are infinite places in other Scriptures of the Old-Testament which give their testimony to Christ and the Righteousness of Faith which sufficiently argue that the Old-Testament never went about to establish a way of Justification by the Law And here I think it may be of great use to search into this place of Moses which the Apostle asserts to contain the description of the righteousness which is by faith that so we may find both that it is so and what this righteousness of faith is The place is Deut. 30.11 to 15. quoted and paraphrased by the Apostle Rom. 10.6 7 8 9. An inquiry into the sense of Deut 30 11 12 in Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend into Heaven c. clearly referring to Deut. 30.11 12 as any may see in the Margent of their Bibles Now let us go to that place in Deut. and see what Gospel there is in it and how evident it is that there is Gospel in it The words are these For this commandment which I command thee this day it is not hidden from thee neither is it far off it is not in heaven that thou shouldest say who shall go up for us to Heaven and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it Neither is it beyond the Sea that thou shouldest say Who shall go over the Sea for us and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it but the Word is nigh unto thee in thy mouth and in thy heart that thou mayest do it This is the whole Paragraph in which the covenant of Grace or the righteousness of Faith is described according to the Apostle Paul But how is the Gospel or righteousness of Faith described here First of all I must separate that which doth not seem to look like Gospel from that which is pure Gospel in this place And here we may observe That the matter of the Gospel spoken of is the law or commandment which he had delivered to them This Commandment which I command thee this day the same which is spoken of as I think there being no visible difference as to matter in Lev. 18.5 the place asserted by the Apostle to contain a legal righteousness it was for matter the law of Moses This Commandment saith he which I command thee this day Again I think it will appear to be meant of the ten commandments because it is added That Commandment which I command thee is not far from thee but is nigh thee even in thy heart and mouth Now the ceremonial law was not written in their heart neither had all the children of Israel nor the generality of them to whom yet this is spoken been taught the law effectually by the Spirit of God so as that should be the sense of these words This Commandment is in thine heart and indeed that is the promise of the new Covenant not of this by Moses but the effect of the Moral law was in their heart for it was in the heart of Heathens If it be objected as perhaps it may by some that the matter of the Commandment which Moses commanded them that day was not likely to be the ten commandments nor that chiefly nor to be the same with that in Lev. 18. because this is in Deuteâ—â—româ— which very word signifies a second Law or a second Edition and giving of the Law and had more Gospel in it then the Law in the first giving of it had I answer 1. by concession That there were indeed two several Covenants which the Lord is said to have made by Moses with the children of Israel Deut. 29.1 These are the words of the Covenant which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the Land of Moab be ides the Covenant which he made with them in Hoâ—eb which a as a Mountain adjoining to if not a part of Mount Sinat 2. That perhaps in this Deutetonomy or second Covenant by Moses there 〈◊〉 mâ—â—â— promises and more of Gospel then in the first Edition of the Law there was But 3dly This doth not hinder but the commandment mentioned in Deut. â—0 might be chiefly for matter of it the moral Law or ten Commandments 't is true there were promises added to encourage unto the keeping of them and there were also terrible threatnings unto the breaking of them all the twelve tribes being divided into two equal parts the one half placed upon Mount Gerizim to bless the people that were obedient to the Law the other half upon Mount Ebal to curse all that brake it Deut 27.11 12 13 But that commandment for the sake of which these promises and threatnings were added was the Law of the ten words or two tables which were twice given to Moses in Sinai and again repeated in this Covenant in the Land of Moab as we may see in Deut. 5. and the very word Deut. signifies a second Law or a second giving of the Law
and this was the Commandment which that day Moses commanded them Lastly Another thing in this Paragraph that will not seem perhaps to some to look like Gospel is this That all the comfort of this Gospel by Moses lies in Doing This Commandment saith he is not far off but in thy heart and in thy mouth that thou mayest do it and so obtain life and justification by it This seems to look right like that place in Levitious so often mentioned where Moses is said to describe a Legal Righteousness The man that doth them shall live in them And so in all the Chapter after there is blessing if they do the command and cursing if they do not this to some may not look like Gospel But yet here is the Gospel and therefore wherein doth it lie VVherein is the Gospel expressed in this place of Deut. or how will it appear I have shewed wherein it cannot lie or doth not seem to lie I will shew yet wherein it must be expressed and wherein it is visibly expressed and that is in that easiness which Moses doth so much insist upon in this Scripture of doing the Commandment The Commandment for the matter of it was perhaps the same with the Covenant of Works and Doing partly at least brought in the reward of it that is Justification But is this the Language of a Covenant of Works think you to fallen man such as the Israelites were The Commandment is easie there are no such difficulties in keeping it as you may imagine ye shall not need to climb as high as Heaven after it nor to coast all Lands and compass the Ocean for it propose no such vast undertakings to thy self for the accomplishment of it for thou needest not the Word is nigh thee in thy mouth that is near yea but nearer yet in thine heart that thou mayest do it and thou mayest do it with ease and sweetness No I have shewn at large that the Covenant of Works or the Law taken strictly as a way of Justification serves now to sinners onely to terrifie their Consciences with laying home its charge it hath no such comfortable words in it nay I shewed out of the Scripture that it is an utter impossibility that the Law should be done by a sinner so as to justifie him A man might as well climb up to Heaven or compass the vast Ocean yea to add another impossibility which the Apostle adds in his Paraphras upon this Text in Deut. a man might as well descend into the infernal Abyss and make a resurrection as be justified by the Law This therefore cannot be the Language of the Law But now take the keeping the Law in a Gospel-sence as perhaps that Rom. 8.4 is to be understood where the righteousness of the Law is said to be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit and then the Gospel in this Scripture is obvious it is easie to keep the Law now even that commandment which Moses commanded them even the Moral Law that is to keep it sincerely not exactly to a tittle but in the substance of it This Word therefore which Moses means when he says The word is nigh thee as the Apostle adds in his Paraphrase must be the word of faith which he preached The Word is nigh thee that is not the Word of the Moral law taken in its utmost exactness to be fulfilled to a tittle this is not nigh thee it is as far as Heaven further then either of the Indies further then Hell it self thou sinner canst never attain unto it to do it But yet the Word of the same Commandment in a moderated sense in the gracious acceptation of God where sincere obedience is accepted for unerring observance of it This Word is nigh thee even in thy heart and in thy month that thou mayest do it and it is saith the Apostle the Word of Faith which we preach this the new creature can undertake with the assistance of God even the keeping the Commandments of God in an Evangelical manner through Faith which works by Love Here thou dost not claim thy wages upon thy doings as if they deserved it or as if they answered the letter of the Law and so thou comest not to the Law for thy Justification but though the great Rule of thine obedience be the Law yet thou goest to the Gospel for thy Justification thou comest by Faith to the Promise and Goodness and Grace of God for thy Justification And indeed there is nothing but Faith will encourage thee in such a keeping of the Law as this is The Law strictly taken will dishearten thee that will thus reason the case with thee VVhat are all thy works what is all thy obedience so long as thoughast broken such and such a Commandment hast omitted such and such a duty What is thy sincerity good for What is thy good meaning and real intention worth I must have a full task performed I must have unerring never-failing obedience or else I must curse thee with all the curses which thou findest written against sinners Now the Soul by Faith thus answereth the Law 'T is true were I to stand to thy award it must be all as thou hast said but I am upon other terms with the Lord for my Justification I am upon terms of Grace and Mercy of which there are no footsteps in thy whole way of Justification and though I was born under thy power yet I have a Saviour that hath freed me from under it by suffering the penalty for my breach of it and now I am assured That if I walk faithfully and deal honestly with God endeavouring in sincerity to walk after the Spirit to do all the Wills of God from the heart my sincere obedience will now be as well accepted as unerring obedience would once have been Thus you see Faith bears off from coming to a legal-Justification and Faith bears up the Soul against all expostulations of the Law with it and against all the accusations of Satan in the Conscienc and yet doth keep the soul intent upon the design of universal obedience to the pure and holy Law of God Faith requires thy obedience to the Law the preaching of Faith doth establish the Law and yet the Law in this moderated sense onely observed requires thee to go or rather takes for granted that thou goest to Grace Mercy and Pardon by Faith for that thou art not an exact Doer of the Law So I have shewn how this place in Deut. seems to speak Law yet must be understood to speak Gospel and what Gospel that is which it speaks Yet I may not expect to go off without opposition in this interpretation and I am sensible that these two or three things will be objected against me 3 Objections against the interpretation of Deut. 30.11 12. 1. That I make Faith too easie a business as if those that could not keep the Law are yet able to
believe whereas some think it as hard a business to believe as to keep the whole Law 2. They 'l say That I make the Gospel but a Covenant of works in a new dress and substitute Evangelical obedience in the room of Legal as the matter of our Justification 3. They may perhaps add that I leave out the great Gospel-mysterie which according to the Apostle is contained in Deut. and that is Christ That which Moses expresseth thus the Commandment which I command thee is not in heaven that thou shouldst say Who shall ascend for us into Heaven bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it The Apostle Paul expresseth thus Who shall ascend for us into Heaven that is to bring Christ down from above or who shall descend into the deep that is to bring up Christ again from the dead But what saith it The Word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy heart and leaving out that thou mayest do it he addeth the Word of Faith which we preach that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus and shall believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved Here we see the Apostle sinds Christ in all that speech of Moses and it was Faith on him that justified therefore it was not a keeping of the Law according to sincerity instead of unerring obedience which Moses meant and so the exposition given of Moses is useless Now I shall answer first this last objection against the interpretation of Moses his Covenant of Grace and then come to the other two objections and I shall do it in the words of truth as I hope I am sure in the words soberness The last objection first answered 1. I do believe all this which the Apostle adds by way of Paraphrase to agree wel with the words of Moses 2. That yet I cannot believe that any ordinary Saint or any other then some mightily inspired by God like an Apostle could have understood all that in Moses his words when they were first delivered viz. That Christ should descend into the deep and after that be raised from the dead and ascend into Heaven because Moses sayes Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend for us into Heaven and bring the Word from thence that we may hear it and do it Or because Moses sayes Who shall go for us beyond the Seas and bring the Word unto us Neither can I believe that it was their duty in Moses's time to confess with their mouth the Lord Jesus or to believe in their heart that God had raised him from the dead a thing which was not at that time true I say I do not think it was their duty to believe it because to us it is contained in the Word of Faith to wit the Gospel which the Apostle preached Neither do I believe that it was a necessary duty of that time so much as to believe that God would raise Christ from the dead and that for this reason For all the Apostles in the dayes of Christ's Flesh were ignorant of this Mystery yea did not believe it or understand it after Christ had told them of it as is very plein in Luke 18. from 31. to 35. The reciting the words of that Text is plain proof enough without urging them by force of Argument 31. Then he took unto him the twelve and said unto them Behold we go up to Jerusalem and all things that are written by the Prophets concerning the Son of Man shall be accomplished Ver. 33. They shall scourge him and put him to death and the third day he shall rise again Now it is said ver 34. that they understood none of these things and this saying was hid from them neither knew they the things that were spoken Therefore certainly these things were not necessary to be known and believed in Moses his time And therefore though there be so much Gospel contained in that Text of Deut. to us now that the Apostle hath discovered it unless we will say they are additional glosses upon that Text of Moses which perhaps may prove no false Divinity I say Permit all that be contained to us in that Text of Deut. which St. Paul hath discovered in it yet by them under the Old-Testament as I think there could be no more understood then this That they were not to lay it upon themselves as absolutely necessary to salvation and so unto Justification to keep the whole Law in the strictness of it but that they were to minde the keeping of it from their heart to turn unto the Lord their God with all their heart and with all their souls and so to keepe his Commandments and his Statutes which are written in this Book of the Law as it is ver 10. immediately preceding those Verses in Deut. 30. where the righteousness of Faith is said to be described and this to do to keep the Law with all their heart sincerely they should find easie and pleasant whenas for a strict Covenant of Works Do this and thou shalt live they would find it an unsupportable yoke and burthen Now I come to answer those other two objections against my interpretation The first answered the first is this That I make Faith too easie athing in comparison of keeping the Law whereas many good men judg it a hard to believe as to keep the whole Law I answer 1. That indeed I do think the way of Faith to be an easier way in it self then keeping the whole Law For I ask any sober man Whether it be not easier to keep the Law in a sincere manner that is to guide my actions onely by the rule of it and honestly to endeavour toconform to it though in some things I fail if this be not easier then the exact keeping the Law to a tittle The question I suppose is answered as soon as made Why then I say I look upon the way of believing to be this Corning to God humbling my self for my sins addicting my self to his service and walking faithfully with him The description 〈…〉 and in this way of well doing seeking for glory honour and â—mmortality In one word It is an Honesty to God upon terms of Grace and I being honest and true to him doubt not of his faithfulness to me for pardoning my sins and providing for me here and saving me here after Erge if this be Faith for proof of which I refer to my interpretation and require a better or fairer in confutation of it I say if this be faith then the way of Faith is easier then keeping the whole Law 2. But yet I have not said that though it be easier yet it is in a mans own power to believe it is not iâ— a man 's own power to move a finger without God and it is equally impossible without God to move a singer and to remove a Mountain yet there is no man in his right
the Law of Moses And this the Apostle aggravates so that he seems to make it a worse business in the dayes of their knowledge thus to go off to the Law then in the days of their ignorance to serve Idols Thus you have seen their Disease now for further proof yet that this was their distemper we may observe that the Apostle applies several arguments by way of remedy which were proper onely for this distemper in that one chap. Gal. 3. I shall observe mine several Arguments sive of which are contained in the first five verses of that chap. and are more particular and experimental for the conviction of the Galatians the minor of every ' yllogism being evident in their experience the major evident in its own nature or from Scripture the other four being sufficiently convincing to every man and of no particular concernment to them more then others in ver 1. Who hath bewitched you that you should not obey the truth before whose eyes fesus Christ hath been evidently set forth as if he had been crucified amongst you Makes this syllogism They who had Christ clearly preached to them so as if he had been crucified before their eyes should not for shame go off to the Law But you have had Christ thus clearly preached Ergo 2d Argument in the 2d ver Ye received the Spirit by this plain preaching of Christ which ye never did by your Law-Preachers This one would think was a mighty Argument to them This onely would I learn of you Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the preaching of Faith The Syllogism They that have received the Spirit by the preaching of Faith should not for shame go off But you have received Ergo 3d. Arg. in ver 3. Are ye so foolish having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect in the flesh 'T is a disgrace for wise men to begin in any way and alter their way at all before they make an end but it is a higher disgrace to begin in a better way and end in a worse to begin in the Spirit and to end in the Flesh As much as Spirit doth excel Flesh their Horses are Flesh and not Spirit Isa 31.3 so much doth the Gospel-way of Justification excel the Legal The Syllogism is this They that have once begun in a more excellent way then the Law is should not go off to the Law but you have begun in a more excellent way viz. the Spirit Ergo 4th Arg. from the 4. ver Have ye suffered so many things in vain if it be 〈◊〉 in vain They had not onely embraced the Gospel and begun in the Spirit to do something but they had suffered many things from the persecuting Jews for professing a pure Gospel-way and now would lose all their sufferings 5th Arg. from the 5th ver He therefore that ministreth to you the Spirit and worketh miracles among you doth he it by the works 〈◊〉 the Law or by the hearing of Faith The Law-Preachers could neither administer the Spirit to their Hearers nor yet work miracles in proof of what they delivered both which the Apostle had done and their present Minister Epaphrus did do and yet they were so mad upon the Law and the way of Justification by works that they were ready to shake off the Gospel for the insupportable burthen of the Law There are ye see at least five Arguments in the compass of five verses proper to them and all five proposed in the way of interrogation to express the Apostles vehemency his trouble at their desection his strange admiration at it his longing for their recovery all which this interrogation-form implies Then the Apostle proceeds to general and universal Arguments not of such particular concernment to them such as I have in my former Discourse urged viz. the example of Abraham from the 6. to the 10. from the nature of the Law requiring strict obedience or else accursing the sinner ver 10. from an express proof out of the Old-Testament Hab. 2.4 The just shall live by Faith therefore not by the Law saith the Apostle for the Law is not of Faith 11 12. And then comes in that great Argument which I have so largely insisted upon That there was a Covenant of Grace on foot before ever the Law was given by Moses which could not be broken therefore the Law came not in for a way of Justification else it must have disannulled this Covenant from the 15 to the 1. I now recollect and argue Here you see that not onely the Jews but the Gentiles desired to be under the Law would needs be justified by the works of the Law else the Apostle had disputed largely and strenuously against no Enemy Nay the Galatians though they never had had the Law before but onely first Heathen Idolatry and then a pure Gospel and received it with joy and admiration and great intensness of affection received the Spirit through the Ministry of it suffered much for the profession of it begun wel and did run wel yet though they had begun in the Spirit no sooner came the Law-Preachers among them but they turned from St. Paul who had called them unto Christ like fools and men bewitched unto another Gospel that is unto a Law-Gospel The Law-Preachers no sooner came amongst the Galatians but they turned the very Gospel which the Apostle had preached and they received into so much Law so that there ye might have seen Christians to be the pure Disciples of Moses nay far worse then the true Seed were in Moses's time Now from hence I infer the first assertion in the coviction viz. That there have been and therefore may be such a generation of men that notwithstanding the preaching of the Gospel nay and the profession of the Gospel are legal in the business of Justification followers of the Law seek to be justified by works and also that we are very apt to run into this way without much care and caution Who would ever thought that the Galatians that had so many reasons to engage them to keep in that way of Faith should ever have turned carnal and fleshly in the business of Justification Certainly this Apostacy of theirs argues a great aptitude in humane nature to this way unless you will think that the Galatians were of another make from all the men in the world I shall add somewhat moreof proof to this proposition and the parts of it by and by only I must first enter upon the explication of the 2d thing proposed viz. Wherein this legality lyes or wherein the great inistake lies that so many should seek to be justified by a Covenant of Works and yet acknowledge themselves sinners and in the explication of this there will new proof arise to the first Proposition viz. That men are generally addicted to the way of works 2dly 2d parâ—iculâ— in the conâ—iction viz. wherein 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I Negaâ—vel Therefore it comes to be explained wherein
business presently in one word and tell you that it is Doing So far as you seek to get life by doing you are legal they will tell you ye muâ—â— not act for life but from life a mighty distinction with them though quite false And for prooâ—â— they 'l bring you such a Scripture as this Mark 10.17 where the young man came to our Saviour and said What shall I Do that I may inherit Eternaâ— life Which is a question that I suppose might be asked by a good man though he was not good that asked it unless it be asked with such a design as if one thought that the doing good actions might merit heaven by this Divinity of theirs which they have of late spread far and near they have made their followers which I fear are very many think strangely of good works as if they had no influence aâ— all not so much as secondary to the obtaining oâ— our salvaâ—ion and so onely as matters of love and thankfulness from us but not as absolutely necessary unto the pleasing of God and continuing in his favour according to that of our Saviour Joh. 15.9 10. As the Father hath loved me so have I loved you continue in my love How may we do that ver 10. tells us If ye keep my Commandments ye shall abide in my love even as I have kept my Fathers Commandments and abide in his love Yet I would do the Antanomians this right to say that I think they have very many of them aimed honestly that they have lighted upon many Gospel-strains and have done very well in observing that there is a vast difference betwixt serving God with a Legal and with an Evangelical Spirit though they have not been so happy in telling us wherein the difference lies and for the difference which they make the Legal way to lie in Doing the Evangelical way in Believing I confess it hath a great countenance from Scripture as to the sound of words but as they explain their sense I reckon there is a great disagreement from the Scripture As to their sence of the word Believing I shal have some occasion to examin it anon but as to the word Doing in their sense I say at present That though the Scripture seems to express the whole business of Legality in that word Rom. 4 4. Working or Doing yet certainly in a far other sense from their explication of it For the Scripture in that place understands Working or Doing in a strict Law-sense so as to expect a Reward for it of Debt whereas they will tel you if you look upon Works as having any influence upon Justification let the works be what they wil you are so far Legal Now having proved as I suppose their exposition of Working or Doing to be but a false gloss I shall do my endeavour and no more can be expected to deliver the truth in this matter I suppose therefore according to that Text Rom. 4 4. where Legal Works or working are accurately described that Legality lies in Doing any work with this supposition or conceit in my mind that now I have justly obliged God not only by a Justice of performing promise but a Justice of strict distribution according to the natural desert of an action My meaning is best expressed in that commonly known word of Merit he that doth an action to God supposing that he hath now merited a reward from God by distributive Justice The reason why I make prefumtion of Merit the form of Legality is for that reward of Debt is the Characteristical note of a Legal Reward therefore the expectation or presumtion of such a reward ought to be in a Legal Spirit he is Legal in his action and none other It will bepresently said Then there will not be found so many Legal professors as you assert there are for that few amongst us if any at all acknowledge Merits I answer though they do not acknowledge it with their mouths yet this I suppose is the secret Language of their hearts and where it is not let them be free from the imputation of Legality for me I see no rule to condemn them of it though I wil add this I think many men may disown it in words nay and think they are not guilty of it that yet are extreamly guilty such a a secret unsearchable Disease of heart is this of Legality I have perfectly done with the explication or discovery of the Disease in its own nature I shall come anon to give some symptomes of it that are signs and effects of it in the mean time let us see what improvement what observations we can make upon that Anatomical Discovery which was made of the Galatians e'ne now And here 1 Obser first of all I shall observe the strange and unhappy disappointments that the Legal self-Justitiaries meet with the miserable cheat that they put upon themselves They think to mix Law and Gospel they dare not stand to the Law alone they would fain have a little help from the Gospel to eke out their defects in a Legal Righteousness and alas the Gospel turns them off with scorn to the Law onely to be tried and judged by it which wil certainly condemn and devour them 2dly 2 Obser I observe the strange absurdities and self-contradictions which these self-Justitiaries both Jews and Gentils run into in their prosecution of a Legal Righteousness There are no less then four contradictions which the Galatians ran into in this business 1. They would be justified by the Law and yet acknowledged themselves sinners which is a contradiction for it is obvious that the Law must condemn sinners 2. They would be justified by the Law and yet not be bound to do the whole Law whereâ—s the Law hath no other way imaginable to justifie any persons but when they have the works of the Law when they have done the whole Law He that doth them shall live in them 3. They would be justified by the Law and yet have benefit by Christ and his death whereas Christ â—ras not the Minister of Circumcision Christ came into the world and dyed because the Law was broken and could not justifie 4. See the greatest of contradictions imaginable They would be justifisied by the Law and yet profess the Gospel and the way of Grace therefore the Apostle convinceth them with this Argument If ye seek Justification by the Law ye are fallen from Grace Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works yet all these absurdities and contradictions the Galatians swallowed that they might go on with their way of Works which they were so greedy after and addicted to besides all those evident arguments both general and of more particular concernment to them which they went against though they had received the Spirit by the Gospel though miracles were done amongst them in confirmation of the Gospel neither of which attended the Law though they had done and suffered so many things
Abraham which worship God in the SPIRIT in a true SPIRITUAL way of Worship and rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no considence in the flesh which they the legal Worshippers have they are fieshly we are after the Spirit and worship God in the Spirit They have considence in the flesh we have none Now what is this confidence in the flesh which the Concision the Dogs and evil Workers had but the true Worshippers had not This the Apostle explains at large in the 4 5 and 6. verses For saith he if any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might TRUST in the FLESH I more What is that of the Flesh wherein he might glory if he would He tells us ver 5. I was circumcised the eighth day of the stock of Israel of the Tribe of Benjamin an Hebrew of the Hebrews as touching the Law a Pharisee or blameless so iâ— follows ver 9. as touching the righteousness which is in the Law blameless that is as touching the letter of the law Moral or Ceremonial This is the matter of fleshly glorying or boasting which you see is made up either of external Rites and Priviledges or the external obedience to the moral law That which he calls flesh is an external thing Now that fleshly and legal are Synonymous or words importing the same thing and so used by the Apostle is not onely clear in this Scripture but in other Scriptures for instance Gal. 3.3 Are ye so foolish having begun in the Spirit that is a Gospel-way are ye now made perfect by the flesh that is will ye end in a legal that is a fleshly way Fleshly and Legal are all one Now the way of the Flesh is an external way made up of outward Rites Ceremonies Priviledges and Performances therefore a legal way is a way in which men please themselves with external Priviledges and Performances I shewed before that those that are addicted to the way of works durst not pretend to an universal conformity to the law in a strict sense of it and yet do seek to be justified by Works therefore they must have some Works to glory in and to uphold their Spirits in a confidence of Divine acceptance Now therefore what can these Works be other then external conformities to the ceremonial or moral law and these ceremonies either as given by God or else superstiously invented by themselves I shall now a little further exemplifie what I then asserted and that by some assistance from the second thing premised in shewing that in all times the evil sort of Worshippers which because they are not Evangelical must be legal have done and do exceedingly please themselves in external Priviledges and Performances in doing which I shall avoid useless repetitions We find The first external priviledge which the Iews gloried in that the Jews who were as well to be condemned for Legality before the dayes of the Gospel as under it there having been always a fleshly and spiritual Seed were exceedingly taken with their being circumcised and of the Seed of Abraham and made a peculiar people to God in the Lump and Body of the Nation which did not hinder at all but for particular persons they might be wicked enough strangers to God and heirs of wrath Thus the Jews as Jews scorned the Gentiles called them Dogs and the sinners of the Gentiles or Nations whereas to be Jews born was nothing but an external Priviledge And therefore the Apostle when he comes to convince them of this folly and vain fleshly boasting he makes no more ado but to cut them off from this stump that they stood upon by that great distinction so frequent in his Epistles of Israel according to the flesh and the true Israel or the true Seed according to the Promise that is Believers All are not Israel that are of Israel saith he and he is not a Jew that is one outwardly neither is that Circumcision which is outward in the flesh but he is a Jew which is one inwardly and Circumcision is that of the heart in the Spirit and not in the Letter whose praise is not of men but of God Rom. 2.28 29. Now that which amongst us may answer to such a fleshly boast as this was of the Jews for I chiefly aim at the usefulness of this Doctrine to our selves may be this viz the Name of Christians and the general Baptism that all amongst us can pretend unto Though this cannot be accounted so great a Priviledge to us now that Christendom is so large as Circumcision and being natural or proselyted Jews was to them who were a single Nation chosen for a peculiar people to God out of all the Nations of the World I come therefore to some other things They gloried also very much in their Temple The second external priviledge the â—â—ws gloried in there is an eminent place amongst many for this Jer. 7.4 Trust ye not in lying words saying The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord are THESE that is THESE BUILDINGS THESE COURTS pointing as it were with their singer at the Buildings of the Temple as much as if they had said See! we have the Temple of the Lord with us and his Worship and Service amongst us and therefore no evil can come to us whatever these Fanatick Prophets threaten us with Now see what a strange infatuation and besottednesse these men were under for they were as wicked as men could be by oppression and blood-guiltiness yea Idolatry it self as you may see in ver 10. Will ye steal murder and commit Adultrey and swear falsly and burn incense unto Baal and walk after other Gods whom ye know not and come and stand before me in this House which is called by my Name and say we are delivered to do all these abominations It this House which is called by my Name become a Den of Robbers in your eyes Behold even I have seen it saith the Lord. Here is a crew of Legal-Worshippers of Carnal-Worshippers that certainly could not pretend to Justification by the strict Law of God yet trusted in the Temple and Temple-Worship ver 8. Behold ye trust in lying words that cannot profit and what those words are you have seen in ver 4. Trust ye not in lying words saying the Temple of the Lord c. No saith the Lord. ver 3. Amend your wayes and your doings and I will cause you to dwell in this place Here is Mercy Grace Pardon here they are put upon the way of believing ver 5 6. For if ye throughly amend your wayes and your doings and if ye throughly execute judgement between a man and his Neighbour if ye oppress not the stranger then will I cause you to dwell in this Land that I gave to your Fathers for ever and ever But else never think that the Temple or Temple Worship can save you or deliver you Ver. 12. Go to Shiloh go unto my place which was in Shiloh
kept themselves from Legal uncleannesses and from eating every thing that was unclean and placed too much in this whilst it was their duty to observe these things The Colossians erred but in making conscience of the Legal uncleanness of Meats Let no man judge you saith the Apostle in meat or drink that is value no man's judgement let no man abridge you of your liberty in it Now for our selves we are wholly free from Jewish Observations about meats and I think pretty free from any Religious Observations at all about meats and if we are forbid flesh in Lent those that are healthy yet the reason which the Law gives is civil and political for the breed of Cattel but if we should come to have our Consciences ensnared to think that flesh were not as lawful in it self all the Lent-time as at another time this were a symptome of Legality venting it self in superstition But now if we go over amongst the Papists what conscientious observations of Meats are there To eat an Egg in Lent is punished with imprisonment c. that upon a religious account which is a plain argument of legality amongst them very rise I might instance in Priests Vestments as I apprehend an high piece of formality very fit to please the humour of a Legal Spirit that for want of substance pleases it self with shadows shews and outsides but I shall not proceed further to touch at things he that hath an eye to see let him look into the Scriptures and he that hath an ear to hear let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches But we may speak freey of the Papists their Superstitions not onely in doing but in putting themselves upon needless sufferings What Pilgrimages and Processionings what Abstinencies and Penances do they put themselves upon wearing Sackcloath scourging themselves What crossings cringings and sprinklings do they impose upon themselves 't were endless almost but to name the kinds of their inventions Yea some of our own people will say over the Creed and ten Commandments for a prayer and when they come as beggars at your door they will say over the Lords Prayer as if it were a charm to the house from all mischief Now I look upon all Superstitions where they are with any seriousness practised as those things which do exactly sit a Legal Spirit for as I have several times intimated your Legallists cannot endure to come at the Law in the spiritual sense of it so none but a Gospel-Spirit doth it is Faith alone that establisheth the Law and obeys the Law Now because the Legallist cannot endure to come up to the true spiritual obedience of the Law and yet seeks to be justified by Works he is fain to find out a thousand things to please himself and satisfie his Conscience with whereby he thinks he makes God amends and we have seen in the instances before us how that though men are as wicked as they could be by lying swearing and committing adultry yea and Idolatry too yet they cryed The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord they thought God must love them because they were Jews especially when they brought him rich Sacrifices and burnt rich Incense and kept all their Festivals in the time and manner appointed Now what then their over-valuing the Commands of the Coromonial Law was that is Superstition to us now For not having such a Law left us by God we find out somewhat like it and place the same considences in it that they did in their Law onely ours is so much the worse by not being of Divine institution I have now only one particular more belonging to this Character of external fleshly service and that is an external partial conformity to the moral Law which is indeed the last and strongest fort of a Legal-spirit As for these external Priviledges or Ceremonies and Superstitious Performances which I have insisted upon they are a slighty thin covering if we come once to try it and rationally to examine it and though people wrap themselves in it yet they cannot bear out any rough argument from galling or pinching through it External conformity to the duties of the Moral Law What defence is it for an Harlot to say This day have I paid my vows to one that can convince her of being a common Whore Prov. 7.14 But now if men have lived in some conformity to the duties of the Moral Law as the young man in the Gospel had done All these have I kept from my youth saith he speaking of the commandments Believe it our Saviour himself shall not by an ordinary word perswade him that he lacketh any thing more Let us see the beld audacious Pharisee in the Parable that goes into the Temple to pray how doth he challenge his acceptance with God and upon what terms We have it in Luke 18.11 God I thank saith he that I am not as other men are extortioners unjust adulterers or even as this Publican I fast twice in the week I give tythes of all that I possess Really the man might well have thanked God as he did had it not been for two things 1. His making comparisons 2 His valuing those things which he mentions as a sufficient Righteousness It was good not to be an Extortioner Unjust an Adulterer it was good to fast and to give tythes of all and he might well bless God that he was enabled to do these things but this was but a partial holiness for all the Commands are not reckoned up here then perhaps it was but an external obedience to these commands that are referred to he was no actual Adulterer but might he not commit heart-Adultery He was no Extortioner or unjust person as he saith But if it were true at all it may be it was onely thus That he was not so in the highest degree perhaps what others accounted injustice and extortion he did not But I need not go upon a Perhaps I will lead the Reader to a certain place of Scripture where the Legallist prides himself and challenges acceptance from God onely upon a partial and external obedience unto some duties of the first Table it is Isa 58.2 3. In the 2d ver we have an high commendation as one would think of them They seek me daily and delight to know my ways as a Nation that did righteousness and forsook not the Ordinances of their God they ask of me the Ordinances o◠of Justice they take delight in approaching to God These are great matters and upon these the Jews grew high and argue the case with God for his acceptance they wonder when they are so good that God should make so little reckoning so small account of them ver 3. Wherefore have 〈◊〉 fasted say they and thou seest not Wherefore have 〈◊〉 afflicted our soul and thou takest no knowledge The Lord answers them in the same verse Behold in the day of your fast ye find pleasure and exact all your
need transcribe no more but if the proof of these Propositions that the Legallist is for◠external conformities onely in the service of God that he hath aflat and dead spirit in his service that he is proud and conceited and yet under a spirit of Bondage c. I say if the proof of these rested upon authority I might be furnished with abundant testimonies out of these Authors and I shall name no more hitherto therefore it is evident that I go not alone either in words or matter and design I proceed now to speak to the last character The last Character which is this A man is so far Legal as he is affectedly ignorant of Christ or acts to God without Christ in the daies of the Gospel Phil. 3.7 8 9. when the Apostle had there rekoned up his external fleshly privileges which if he would have had a trust and confidence in the flesh he might have boasted of with any Pharisee of them all these saith he were once gain to me I accounted them my riches and my treasure but now What things were gain to me these I counted loss for Christ yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him NOT HAVING MY OWN RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH IS OF THE LAW but THAT WHICH IS THROUGH THE FAITH OF CHRIST the righteousness which is of God by Faith That I may know him c. This which I have produced is evidently to the purpose for that the Apostle is opposing the two righteousnesses of the Law and Faith and the righteousness which is of God by Faith is all one with the righteousness which is through the Faith of Christ and therefore that which he presseth forward unto is to be found in him and to know him in the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto him in his death ver 10 11 12 13 14 15. But here I will mark before I go any further that there is an inseparable connexion betwixt the righteousness of Faith There is an inseperable connexion betwixt the righteousness of Faith and true holiness and the righteousness of Sanctification nay they seem in this place to be put one for the other for when the Apostle interprets his own expressions of counting all things losse and dung that he may win Christ and that he may be sound in him not having his own righteousness which is of the Law he speaks it in words that signifie sanctification immediately and properly But which is saith he through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by Faith What is that it follows that I may know him and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto his death These are expressions of sanctification so it follows ver 11. If by any means I might obtain to the resurrection of the dead Which is the highest expression of Sanctification in the whole Scripture or at least one of the highest and so to the same purpose it follows ver 12 13 14 15. * Vnless we wil say that the Apostle speaks of Justification in the 7 8 9. verand then without any formal transition passes on to speak of sanctification in the following verses Not but that there must still be a proper difference held betwixt Justification and Sanctification for they have proper different notions and conceptions Justification is an act of God without us Sanctification is an act of the Spirit within us Sanctification denominates the Person good Justification denominates the person accepted and well-pleasing to God But for any contradiction that there should be in this to say that the same inward holiness which is called our Sanctification may be the very condition of our Justification I profess I know of none not that I affirm that it is so for indeed I am somwhat shye of affirming in those very words though I shall afterwards have occasion to say something to the like purpose but if I should I were not alone in the opinion those two Authors above-named would abundantly supply me with testimonies for they frequently and strenuously assert That the great 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the RIGHTEOUSNES OF FAITH mentioned so often in Paul's Epistles is onely an INTERNAL HOLINESS for which I shall give you several quotations out of them and so proceed Mr. Smith in his discourse of the difference betwixt the Old and New Covenant he comes to speak unto this very Scripture Phil. 3. Where saith he The Apostle amongst his other Jewish privileges having reckoned up his blamelesness in all points touching the Law he undervalues them all and counts all but loss 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus in which place the Apostle doth not mean to disparage a real inward righteousness and the strict observance of the Law but his meaning is to shew how poor and worthless a thing all outward observances of the Law are in comparison of a true internal conformity to Christ in the renovation of the mind and soul according to his image and likeness as is manifest from ver 9 10 c. in which he thus delivers his own meaning of the knowledge of Christ which he so much extolled very emphatically That I may be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by Faith Where by the way wee may further take notice what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the righteousness of Faith and the righteousness of God is according to his own true meaning as he expounds himself viz. A CHRIST-LIKE NATURE IN A MAN'S SOUL or Christ appearing in the minds of men by the mighty power of his divine Spirit and thereby deriving a true participation of himself to them so we have it ver 10. That I may know the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto his death So far Mr. Smith I shall give now the same observation out of Dr. More and so proceed Pag. 387. of his Mystery of Godliness It is plain saith he from the constant scope of the Apostle both in his Epistle to the Gal. and every where else in extolling the righteousness of Faith that he does not vilifie true virtue and morality but drives at an higher pitch and perfection thereof and that the righteousness of Faith which he prefers to the righteousness of works IS NOT BY WAY OF EXCLUSION OF GOOD WORKS OUT OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH but of urging us to exacter and more perfect works of righteousness than could be performed under the dispensation of the Law And in pag. 379 where the Doctor professeth
to explain the great term 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he tells us That 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies any virtue or goodness in a man whatsoever and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is nothing else but to be approved as a good man or A doer of what is righteous and good and that BECAUSE he doth that which is good and righteous Having made this great observation of which I shall make more use anon I shall proceed with my Character That an affected ignorance of Christ is an infallible Character of a Legal Spirit I have given a Scripture for it viz. Phil. 3.7.8 to the 15. upon which I have so long insisted I shall give now the reason of it which is this For that all pardon of sins which is the greatest thing in Gospel-justification was ever by virtue of the death of Christ All the symbolical and vailed-Gospel of the old Testament pointed though darkly unto Christ The rock in the Wilderness was Christ the Serpent was Christ the Manna was Christ the Scape-Goat was Christ the Paschal Lamb was Christ and in the fulness of time Grace and the Truth of these types came by Jesus Christ Therefore those that are affectedly ignorant of Christ are affectedly ignorant of all that looked like Gospel and so of Gospel-Grace it self nothing can be a plainer argument of Legality then this And indeed we may almost adventure to say That most men so far as they are ignorant of Christ in these days of the Gospel they are affectedly ignorant I deferred this Character till the last because I would first put all those Characters together in which the faith of all the Old-Testament-believers and ours did agree All the Old-Testament Saints were more for spiritual heart-worship than for the externals of Religion they were all in their degree humble and patient they were all in their degree quick lively and vigorous they had all a spirit of adoption in their measure they were all of a sweet meek and kind heart and spirit not of a persecuting principle but I cannot say they all knew Christ in his death resurrection ascension and intercession nay I should lye if I should say it these things are peculiar to faith under the dayes of the Gospel St. Peter and the other Apostles were all ignorant of these things Luke 18. from verse 31. to 35. Now I shall shew briefly the peculiar additionals of a gospel-Gospel-faith or rather a New-Testament Faith without which ours cannot be Evangelical enough and so not justifying and saving And without performing this part of my Work I should be guilty of a great absurdity for taking up so many pages in describing the Faith of the Old-Testament Saints or of justifying-faith which was common to us and them and in the mean time to pass by that which is proper to our selves and as necessary as any thing which hath been spoken to I affirm therefore that we are to know and believe in Christ as the PROCURING CAUSE of all our mercies and the DISPENSER of all good things to us These are the two great things which we are to know and believe concerning Christ to which we must add the meditation imitation of our Saviour as a pattern in his Life Death Resurrection and Ascension in all which our Faith hath a great usefulness and necessity and unless our Faith hath a great and very considerable respect unto Christ in all these three particulars we cannot justly put on the name of Christians That old Faith of Abraham and all the Saints of the Old-Testament which St. Paul disputes for and proves they were justified by it hath now a further Name and is called the Christian Faith having taken up that great Object Christ more explicitely and plainly then ever they received it I shall say somewhat but as briefly as I may unto all the three generals wherein our Faith is now necessarily to eye Jesus Christ that it may be of a right Gospel strain 1. We must believe in Christ as the great procuring cause of all our mercies 1. By his blood and offering Therefore a right New-Testament Faith eyes Christ as the procuring-cause of all our mercies and this in two respects viz. by his offering up himself a sacrifice and by his intercessions 1. By his dying for us and offering up himself he hath bought us Ye are bought with a price 1 Cor. 6 20. Thou hast redeemed us unto God by thy blood Rev. 5.9 His blood was the price of our redemption by shedding of this and offering it up to God he became a propitiation for our sins and we our selves are the purchase of this Price Acts 20.28 The Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood We are purchased and redeemed from the world Gal. 1.4 From our vain Conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 Yea Heaven it self is purchased by his blood for us for I doubt not but that is it which is called the purchased possession Eph. 1.14 Now see if we have not reason nay if there be not absolute necessity if we would be right Christians to know Christ and believe in him as the procuring-cause of all our Mercies and that by his Death and Blood and offering himself He hath by one offering perfected for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 Now our Faith as it eyes thus the death of Christ is called faith in his blood and Justification follows upon this Faith onely Rom. 3.24 25. Being justified freely by his Grace THROUGH THE REDEMPTION THAT IS IN CHRIST whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation THROUGH FAITH IN HIS BLOOD to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Rom. 5.8 9. But God commendeth his love towards us in that while we were yet sinners Christ dyed for us much more then BEING NOW JUSTIFIED BY HIS BLOOD we shall be saved from wrath to come I shall mention no more Scriptures to prove that Christ is the procuring-cause of all our mercies by his death and blood only I shall describe what this faith in his blood is and I shall express it thus It is a judging the death and offering of Christ either upon the Cross or in the holy of holies into which he entered by his own blood Heb. 9.12 to be the great propitiation of God who without this offering had decreed no◠to pardon sins by which he became propitious and appeased and for it receives all true penitents into his favour that is for the judgement or assent of faith to the dogmatical truth in this matter then for its affiance faith in the blood of Christ it is a not doubting but whilst I have the Gospel-condition of Justification what ever it be this blood will procure my pardon or thus in the way of holiness to rest upon God for pardon for the sake of Christ's blood-shedding and offering it to God Now this faith in the blood of Christ I look upon as an
Christ as the ultimate object of our Faith but only as he is the Mediator and great Dispenser of all things to us by a Power derived from the Father For this take that eminent place 1 Pet. 1.21 Who BY HIM that is Christ DO BELIEVE IN GOD that raised him up from the dead and gave him glory that your faith and hope might be in God This I do but touch upon here it would require a large Treatise to speak unto it as the subject deserves viz how we are to direct our Faith and applications to Jesus Christ in a different manner then to God the Father but this is that which I am upon That in the general we are to six our Faith upon Christ as the great Dispenser of all good things unto us if we would have it of a right Gospel-strain nay if we expect to be justified by our faith for if God set up a Mediator a Dispenser of all his bentsits as Pharoah pardon the allusion set up Joseph and required that all men should go to him for what they wanted will he think you take it well that you should take no notice of his Joseph his dearly beloved and onely begotten Son But come to himself immediately dare you do it Can you ever hope for acceptation in this way of addressing your selves to God Might you not justly fear that God will prove a consuming fire to you in in such approaches So much for the second general head in which our Faith is to respect Jesus Christ But 3dly there is something more requisite yet to be done by our Faith with respect to Christ than meerly to look upon him as the procuring-cause and the dispensing-cause of all our mercies if we would have it a right New-Testament-faith or a Justifying-Faith in the dayes of the Gospel our Faith must conform us unto Christ as a pattern and example Now there is a two-fold conformity unto Christ which our Faith effects one Proper the other Analogical that which is proper is to put us upon doing as he did to be as he was humble meek lowly c. Learn of me saith Christ these things and ye shall receive rest unto your souls Matth. 11.29 Phil. 25.6 Let the same mind be in you which was in Christ Jesus who made himself of no reputation c. Looking unto Jesus who Heb. 12.2 But then there is an Analogical conformity which Faith effects and that is an answerableness to some things in Christ which it is not our duty to imitate in a proper sense as now to be conformable unto Christ in his death burial and resurrection these we cannot in a proper sense be conformable unto him in except we be hanged upon a cross till we are dead then laid in our graves then raised by the power of God c. Now these things are not our duty to go about to imitate properly but only in some resemblance and likeness Our Faith must bring us to the cross of Christ and teach us the crucisixion and mortification of our old man with the affections and lusts of it it must bring us to the grave of Christ and we must be there buryed with him Rom. 6.1.4 We are buried with him by baptism into death and by this death and burial we must reckon our selves to be dead unto sin ver 11. He that is dead is sreed from sin ver 7. How shall we that are dead to sin live any longer therein ver 2. Yea our Faith must earry us yet further beyond death and the grave into heaven it self we must rise with him into newness of life For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection Ver. 5. And as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father even so we also should walk in newness of life Ver. 4. And we must sit together with him in heavenly places in our affections at least If ye be riser with Christ seek these things that are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Set your assections on things above not on things on the earth for you are dead and your life is hid with Christ in God Col. 3.1 2 3. Faith in the dayes of the Gospel carries us to the example and pattern of Christ conforms us to it both in a proper and Analogical conformity so that we have something in us that bears some Analogy and likeness to every thing that is to be found in Christ But because this third respect wherein our saith eies Jesus Christ looks more like obedience then faith more like sanctification than that by which most expect justification and seeing this is not the proper place to shew how far obedience and holiness and good works have an influence upon Justification I shall not insist more upon this contenting my self with the two other respects in which faith eies Jesus Christ viz. As the procurer and dispencer of all good things unto us which none can with any fair pretence deny to be necessary to our faith as justifying in the days of the New-Covenant Now to quicken and so to end this Character viz. That so far as we leave out Christ we are Legal in the business of Justication I shall represent the Reader with the example of St. Paul which I have glanced at already who was once highly legal end afterwards as eminently evangelical and that in the daies of the Gospel And I should think Solomon himself was not a fitter person to give an account of the vanity of worldly comforts than St. Paul was to acquaint us with that vanity vexation of spirit that there is in pretended legal righteousness as also with that perfect satisfaction which the Evangelical righteousness brings into the soul and 't is from him indeed and from his Epistles no doubt indited by the Spirit of God that this whole discouse hath been raised He was as to his descent 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Hebrew born of Hebrew parents both father and mother and of a special and beloved tribe and circumcised the eighth day exactly according to the Law for his profession of the strictest sect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in observation of the Law a Phaisee for his zeal in his profession it was exceeding great I prosited saies he Gal. 1.14 in the Jew's Religion above many my equals in mine own nation being more exceeding zealous of the traditions of my fathers And there was no greater argument of his being an high Legal list than this That he was a bitter persecutor of the way of the Gospel as he tells us in three several Epistles Gal. 2.13 Beyond measure I persecuted the Church of God and wasted it Phil. 3.6 concerning Zeal persecuting the Church 1 Tim. 1.13 You have his catalogue of privileges altogether Phil. 3.4 5 6 and there he makes a challenge to any Jew any Pharisee of them all to shew the same
convinceth of it yet I shall in searching out this distemper viz. Ignorance and neglect of Christ both in Ministers and People prove it to be a symptome of Legality from another character mentioned And truly I cannot guess what should be the reason of this ignorance and neglect of Christ so general and common even amongst those that are good but from a listlesness and irksomness to and weariness of the waies and knowledge of God Good people may chance think that they know a great deal of God already they know enough for their converse between man and man and for many duties of worship to God and they find this as much as they can attend together with their businesses and imployments in the world and so much they know of Christ that he died for their sins and intercedes with his Father for them and this is enough to satisfie them what should they trouble themselves any more about any Gospel Mysteries concerning Jesus Christ as his Mediatorial Kingdom and the like how God the Father orders and disposes of all things by him how they are to make their applications to him Now this listlesness carelesness I made before a plain symtom of Legality for the more Evangelical we are the more chearful we are in the service of God the more attentive to and inquisitive about any thing that he makes known to us especially concerning Jesus Christ every dust of this Pearl is precious I come in the second place to condemn predominant Legality from this Character Predominant Legality discovered from this Character 1. In the Jews and this wil convince two or three sorts of men of predominant Legality And first of all to be sure this convinceth the Jews of predominant Legality both those that were at the time of Christ's coming and have been ever since unto this day for that they denied then and still deny to receive Christ at all If they had been Evangelical under the Old-Testament they would gladly have received Christ who is the substance and spirit of all that Gospel which they had but darkly discovered in their dispensation They that love the dawnings of the day-light how much more would they be in love with the Sun of Righteousness but because their hearts were set upon the Law before Christ came therefore were they such enemies to Christ when he was come and there is no clearer proof of the charge which the Apostle oftentimes draws up against them viz. That they were legal than this that they are the great enemies of the cross of Christ and the same may be all applied to the present Jews that are enemies to Christ 2dly This discovers the Legality of the Modern Scribes and Pharisees and Zelotical Ceremonialists as Dr. Moore calls them those that are so much for the externals of Religion in the days of the Gospel that would set up a ceremonial Law again of their own inventing these argue their great affected ignorance of Christ and the Gospel by which these shadows are certainly done away for that the Body is come and this I look upon as a very shrewd sign though perhaps not absolutely concluding of predominant Legality But of these I have spoken largely already and therefore shall not enlarge further about them though they come here upon a new account to be convinced and reproved Lastly and so I shal end my Characters as I begun them vide pag. 117. the second observation premised to the Characters All those that have a zeal for God in the dayes of the Gospel and yet are not for a single Christ and for the purity and simplicity of the Gospel are legal for that all Religion which is not the right Religion is Legal The Jews corrupted the Gospel by adding the observations of the Law to it The Greeks and Philosophers destroyed the Gospel by inventions of worshipping Angels and other voluntary humilities Col. 2.8.18 Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit after the tradition of men after the rudiments of the world and NOT AFTER CHRIST ver 18. Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of Angels intruding into those things which he hath not seen NOT HOLDING THE HEAD both these forts the Apostle sets himself vigorously against in several places of his Epistles Now whosoever shall in a likeness to either Jew or Grecian Philosopher go about to destroy the simplieity of the Gospel or the simplicity that is in Christ as it is called 2 Cor. 11.3 let him have never so much zeal in his way is legal and the reason is this for that whosoever goes about to establish his own righteousness is legal Rom. 10.1 2 3. Now all those that destroy the simplicity of the Gospel yet have a zeal for God go to establish their own righteousness I have now done with the Characters Having discharged now after a sort these several great parts of my Work shewn first that the Law could not justifie and that yet men wil needs seek Justification by the Law and having given the description of their Legality what it is formally in it self as also by the several characters of a Legal Spirit wherein it discovers that distemper which is otherwise many times unsearchable I hold my self now to be a little at leisure to speak unto some things in general touching Justification which I had no sitter place to speak unto then this and wil yet I hope further conduce unto the clearing and explaining of the great subject that is before us There may be therefore these several questions spoken to about Justification 1. At what time or times a person is ustified 2. For what act or acts a person is ustified These two questions the first of which contains several questions in it I shall first dispatch and then speak unto some others that wil arise to be spoken to The first Question is this The first question about justification At what time or times is a finner justified At what time or times is a sinner justified This contains these two questions 1. Whether or no a sinner be justified from eternity 2. Whether if he be onely justified in time Justification considered as God's act be one or more that is be done once for all at his strst Justification or else repeated often upon the person justified according to the exigency of the person For the first Q. Whether Justification be from eternity or in time Now to answer and resolve this Question 1. I should not have made this Question at all but for that some have asserted that we are justified from Eternity and I have heard it openly affirmed several times that Justification is an immanent act in God like the eternal generation of the Son 2. Now for the actions or acts which we may conceive in Eternity they either respect God himself or the Creatures Those that respect himself are such as whereby he understood loved and enjoyed himselfe and
Dr. upon the next question The words are these But if the Spirit of him that raised up jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his spirit which dwelleth in you and if Christ be in you the body is dead because of sin but the spirit is life because of righteousness ver 10. His interpretation of the verse is excellent in my mind and it is to this sense as I apprehend it That when we are Christians and have the Spirit of Christ dwelling in us and the presence of Christ by his Spirit we shall be sensible how far yet we remain unsanctified and that unsanctified part in us which the Apostle calls the body of death and desires to be delivered from will appear as ghastly and deadly a thing to us as the dead body tyed by Mezentius to the living did to him because Christ is living in us But yet now our Christian faith teacheth us to believe that though the body be dead because of sin that is there be a great part of us yet unsanctified and dead because of sinful remainders in it and by reason of this unsanctified part or body of death in us we are exceeding heavy and indisposed to all holiness and goodness yet that the Spirit of Christ in us is life and righteousness and will by degrees qvicken those very dead unsanctified parts that are yet within us for if the Spirit of him that raised up Christ from the dead dwell in us he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken our mortal hodies that is that unsanctified part that is at present dead in sin by his Spirit which dwelleth in us Dr. More 's words are We finding a comfortable warmth in the grateful arrivals of the holy Spirit do believe That he that raised up Christ from the dead wil in due time even quicken these our mortal bodies or these dead bodies of ours and make them conspire and come along with ease and chearfulness and be ready and active complying instruments in alll things with the Spirit of Righteousness Which belief viz. that God will thus by his Spirit quicken our mortal bodies is saith he a chief point in the Christian faith and most of all parallel to that of Abrahams who believing in the goodness and power and faithfulness of God had when both himself and his Wife Saraah were dry and dead as to natural generation and so hopeless of ever seeing any fruiâ— of her Womb who had I say Isaac born to him who bears joy and laughter in the very Name oâ— him and was undoubtedly a type of Christ according to the spirit For Isaac is the wisedom power and righteousness of God flowing our and effectually branching it self so through all the faculties both of man's soul and body that the whole man is carryed away with joy and triumph to the acting all whatsoever is really and substantially good even with as much satisfaction and pleasure as he eats when he is hungry and drinks when he is dry And these now according to the designe of the Dis Discourse are acts of a Gospel-faith which justifie us as Abraham's believing in the power of God for a Son did justifie him I come now to another Question which is this How doth Faith justifie The fifth question of Iustification or under what notion and consideration doth faith justifie Now to this I answer that Faith justifies as our Righteousness It doth not justifie as some affirm only by relying upon the blood of Christ or apprehending the righteousness of Christ for I have given instances of several acts of faith which were justifying acts that had not this respect at all unto the blood of Christ at least not visibly and the reward of Justification was reckoned to them upon other accounts Abraham was fully perswaded that God was ABLE TO PERFORM and THEREFORE it was imputed to him for righteousness Rom. 4.21 22. Yea I have given instances of a faith in Christ that was justifying and yet was not directed to the blood of Christ by any thing that appears in the Scriptures quoted No faith it self is our righteousness faith in the power of God was Abraham's righteousness and faith in the power of God according as our necessities at any time require will be our righteousness But more especially faith in the power of Christ or in the blood of Christ is our Gospel-righteousness though as I affirmed before there cannot be true faith in God now in the dayes of the Gospel but it will turn into a faith in Christ as well as in God And for this Assertion that Faith is our Righteousness I shal give several Scriptures Rom. 4.3 What saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness that is his believing in God and relying upon his power and faithfulness for the fulfilling of his promise this faith of his was accepted so farr was so highly pleasing to God that God made him his friend Jam. 2.22 23. and reputed and reckoned him through grace as righteous as if he had kept the whole Law So Rom. 4. ver 5. To him that believeth in God that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted to him for righteousness What plainer expression can there be than this for our Assertion his faith is counted for righteousness to him or for his righteousness And for a little proof from the testimony of others for this Assertion I reckon is somwhat harsh see what Mr Baxter and Mr John Goodwin say upon it In his Aphorisms of Justification Thesis 20. pag. 108. saith Mr Baxter Our Evangelical righteousness is not without us in Christ as our Legal righteousness is but consisteth in our own actions of Faich and Gospel-obedience Thesis 23. pag. 125. In this sense also it is so farr from being an errour to affirm that faith it self is our righteousness that it is a truth necessary for every Christian to know that is Faith is out Evangelical righteousness in the sense before explained as Christ is our Legal righteousness And in the explication of this Thesis pag. 128. he hath these words Our Evangelical righteousness or Faith is imputed to us for as real righteousness as perfect obedience not that it is as much in true value yet it is so accepted because of the value of Christ's satisfaction Thesis 57. pag. 225. It is the act of faith which justifies men at age and not the habit yet not as it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But 1. in the nearest sense directly and properly as it is the fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant in the remote and more improper sense as it is the receiving of Christ and his satisfactory righteousness Mr John Goodwin likewise declares himself not to be of their minde who conceive or teach That faith justifies as it is an instrument receiving
He that is righteous let him be righteous still which two places the Doctor makes use of for proof But that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should have these significations where the Apostle is strictly speaking to the business of Justification I can by no means allow yea I think it most abhorrent from the Apostles designe in this business what saith the Apostle Rom. 3.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one here the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith Rom. 1.17 There is no other righteousness takes place here And to rip up the whole business again which here I am put upon by the Doctor 's assertion and interpretations though otherwise I might have gone on smoothly in my way First of all surely the Doctor will not deny that Justification and Sanctification have different proper conceptions and notions which they are to be understood by that Justification is God's pardoning our sins and receiving our persons into special love and favour that Sanctification is a mans likeness to God in his heart and life or if the Doctor should deny this there are several places will evidence it I shall name but two Acts 13.38 39. Be it know unto you therefore Men and Brethren that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins and by him all that BELIEVE are justified FROM ALL THINGS from which yee could not be justified by the Law of Moses That is saith Dr Hammond shall certainly be freed and purged from the wrath of God and the punishments attending sin in another world from which the Law of Moses could not by all its Ceremonies Washings and Sacrifices purge or cleanse us The other Scripture shall be that in Janes 12.24 Yee see then how that by works a man is justified and not by faith onely Take Justification here for sanctification and let any one see if he can make sence of it nay it is plain in that Chapter that Justification is taken for being highly approved of God and being made the friend of God ver 25. And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for righteousness and then as it were exegetical of that expression it is added he was called the friend of God But I know the Dr will allow of the particular without this proof That Justification and Sanctification have these different and proper conceptions mentioned 2dly Certainly the Dr. will allow that the Apostle Paul hath a mighty vigorous and curious Discourse concerning Justification in its proper notion or its foreusal acception as the Dr himself expresseth it pag. 379. ad finem The Apostle forms a professed Discourse nay a Dispute with the Jew and Judaizing-Gentile upon the business of Justification taken for Divine approbation they thought to obtain the favour of God one way but he shews them another These two particulars I shall take for granted Now I proceed 3dly The Apostle therefore being to remove one way of Justification viz. that of the Legallist and to set up another he makes mention of two Righteousnesses one of the Law the other of Faith That of the Law as I have shewed in the beginning of this Treatise is a perfect conformity to the Law perfect inherent righteousness unerring obedience this saith the Apostle no man hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is none righteous no not one and the Apostle in that third chap. of the Rom. by enumerating all sorts of sins which we are all more or less guilty of proves that no man can be jusâ—â—ed by the Law this righteousness therefore the Apostle having fully removed as an impossible unattainable thing he as a Messenger from heaven substitutes another righteousness which he calls Gods Righteousness in opposition to our own the righteousness of God is revealed that is that righteousness which God will accept and what is that why it is Faith The righteousness of God is revealed from Faith to Faith as it is written The Just shall 〈◊〉 â—aith Rom. 1.16.17 The scope of the Apostles Discourse I doubt not is this That God hath designed and determined that seeing men have lost their Original purity and to can no longer stand upon their own bottom he will take them off from it altogether and make them live a life of pure dependance upon himself and that is by faith which must have holiness of life attending it and those that come off to do this renounce themselves their own righteousness and all creature-dependencies and roll themselves and all their concerns upon him and upon his Son though their imperfections may be 〈◊〉 yet this their faith shall be imputed to them â—â—r righteousness which they may plead for their â—â—tilication according to the Law of the new Covenant and they shall pass for righteous men as truly iustified and approved as if they had perfectly kept the whole Law under which they were created especially since God had made provision otherways how thâ— honor of that Law might receive râ—â—â—ation viz. by the death of his Son upon the Cross And this I suppose is no santastical notion of Justification by Faith which I suppose the Dr. is chiefly set against and seeing how many wayer men had corrupted the Doctrine of Justification by Faith after he had solidly confuted their opinions betakes himself to that of his own which I dare say had no evil intention though I still affirm that it is most unhappily exprest and I cannot but read it with a great displeasure and indignation For to think that the Apostle should make so much to do to decry the design of a legal Righteousness which in truth was no other in it self but true and real onely it must be perfect holiness however the Legallists all along in their pursuit after the Righteousness of the Law minded nothing less I say for the Apostle to dispute so vigorously against a Righteousness by perfect unerring obedience under the name of one's own righteousness and to set up Faith as Gods righteousness and yet that this righteousness of saith should signifie nothing else but those poor inconsiderable effects of Faith in holiness of life which the greatest part of Christians attain unto onely this seems a mean business for the Apostle to labour about Alas 't is true Faith works holiness and all the great Legallists shall never attain by all their stir and ado to so much true holiness as the meanest believer attains unto but yet this which we attain though by faith is nothing to give name to a righteousness in the sight of God for Justification to be justified by or for our holiness of faith is a low and base expression of Gospel-Justification The righteousness of Faith is an higher thing when a man comes off from himself and from all Creature-dependencies and professeth to live upon the Power and Goodness and Faithfulness of God and the blood spirit of Christ alone such a