in the Psalme speaketh not of that righteousnesse whereby Phinehes was originally counted just before God for that was by faith because that without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11.6 but of that righteousnesse whereby Phinehes faith was declared and testified and so this his zealous fact because of his faith was counted a righteous worke But Moses here speaketh of that originall justice whereby Abraham was justified before God Like as S. Paul denying that Abraham was justified by workes Rom. 4.2 and Saint Iames affirming that hee was justified through workes Iam. 2.21 the first speaketh of justification properly before God the other of the same testified and declared by workes so Moses treateth of justice imputed by faith before God by an originall collation from God the other Prophet of justice imputed by a zealous worke by way of effectuall declaration before men And therefore Moses saith he that is God imputed Abrahams beleefe to him for righteousnesse But the other Prophet saith it was imputed to him for righteousnesse from generation to generation that is hereby Phinehes in all ages was knowne to be reputed and taken just before God the Lord rewarding the zeale of Phinehes with the perpetuall inheritance of the Priesthood Numb 25.13 4. Confut. Faith not the beginning only of justification FOurthly another point of popish doctrine is here overthrowen that a man is said to bee justified by faith because it is the beginning of salvation and â—donea praeparatio hominis a fit preparation of a man unto justification Perer. in 15. Genes disput 3. numer 42. But Abraham was not now only prepared or beginning to be justified for he had done already many excellent workes of righteousnesse acceptable unto God and yet being not now onely entred but set in the middest of his godly course hee is counted righteous by faith faith then is not the beginning only but the perfection and consummation of righteousnesse 5. Confut. S. Paul and S. Iames cannot be reconciled by popish doctrine FIfthly whereas Saint Paul proving Abraham to have beene justified by faith without workes Rom. 4.2.5 and S. Iames saying that Abraham was justified through workes seeme at the first shew to bee contrary each to other the Popish writers goe about three wayes to reconcile these places first the Rhemists note that Saint Paul excludeth Abrahams morall workes before faith annot 1. in Rom. 4. and by such workes they grant a man is not justified but by such as follow and proceed of faith Contra. Abraham before this time when God imputed unto him righteousnesse by faith had done divers faithfull workes as the Apostle sheweth that by faith hee when he was called obeyed God c. and by faith abode in the land of promise Hebr. 11.8 9. therefore the Apostle speaking of Abrahams justification by faith after he had done these faithfull workes excludeth even such workes also from justification And againe he saith to him that worketh the wages is not counted by favour but by debt but to workes done before or without faith no wages is due because without faith nothing is pleasing to God therefore he meaneth not such workes Secondly Bellarmine saith that Saint Paul speaketh de fide charitate formata of a faith formed with charity and furnished with good workes lib. 1. de justificat c. 23. and such a faith truly justifieth Answer True it is that Abrahams faith which Saint Paul so much commendeth was a lively and working faith yet it did not justifie him as it was active in bringing forth good workes but as it was passive in apprehending and laying on hold of the righteousnesse of God As the Apostle sheweth that Abrahams manner of justifying and Davids was all one but David declareth that man blessed to whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes Rom. 4 6. further Saint Paul thus reasoneth being fully assured that he which had promised was able to doe it and therefore it was imputed to him for righteousnesse c. v. 21 22. It was not imputed for the working of his faith but for his beleeving Thirdly Pererius useth a distinction of first and second justification the first is when a man of a sinner is made just the second when a just man becommeth more just disput 3. in 15. Genes numer 48. of the first they say Saint Paul speaketh of the second S. Iames. Bellar. de justif lib. 4. c. 18. Contra 1. The Scripture knoweth no such distinction of first and second justification that which they call the second justification is no other but sanctification which is an increasing and going forward in the fruits and further assurance of justification the Prophet saying blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven speaketh of that justification when a man of a sinner is become just before God which they call the first justification but to that blessednesse is promised and where happinesse or blessednesse is obtained no other justification is necessary wherefore the first and one justification sufficeth there need not a second 2. Further this distinction admitted Saint Paul rather should intreat of the second justification because he alleageth the example of Abraham who was called already and had done many righteous workes before the Scripture maketh mention of the imputation of righteousnesse unto him by faith and S. Iames of the first who bringeth in the example of Rahab the harlot now first called which had done no worthy workes before Wherefore thus Saint Paul and Saint Iames are reconciled if wee say that S. Paul understandeth that justification whereby Abraham was made just before God for he saith if Abraham were justified by workes he hath wherein to rejoyce but not with God Rom. 4.2 he meaneth then that justification wherein a man may rejoyce with God which is by faith But S. Iames speaketh of that justification whereby a man is declared to be just before men whereby our faith is justified to bee a true faith as hee saith shew mee thy faith out of thy workes v. 18. he urgeth the shewing and approving of faith so hee saith Abraham was justified thorow faith when he offred his sonne Isaak v. 21. yet before God Abraham was justified before by faith but by this his obedience his faith was approved unto God and made knowne to men Neither is it usuall in Scripture thus to take the word justified as wisdome is said to bee justified of her children Matth. 11.13 that is declared or approved to bee just Christ was justified in the spirit 1 Timoth. 3.16 that is as the Apostle elsewhere interpreteth declared mightily to be the sonne of God touching the spirit of sanctification Rom. 2.4 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. God amply rewardeth them that contemne things present Vers. 1. I Am thy exceeding great reward c. Because Abraham contemned the rich gifts of the King of Sodome the Lord doth promise more abundantly to recompence him therefore as Ambrose well noteth ne infirmos animos ob dilationem mercedis subeat
would make peace not to smite them or roote out the inhabitants but onely to make them tributary but they were charged that in the nearer Cities they should save none alive Deut. 20.11.16 and this might be the cause why in these remote countries they expelled not the inhabitants Againe because this large dominion by reason of the peoples sinnes continued not long this might be a reason why these countries were not inhabited of the Israelites who if they had obeyed the Lord he would have made it a firme possession unto them as the other of Canaan QVEST. XX. Of the country of the Kenites and Kenezites Vers. 19. THe Kenites Kenezites c. Here are ten sundry nations rehearsed whose countries are promised to Abraham whereas in other places there are but six named Exod. 3.8 in other seven Deut. 7 1. The reason thereof is not 1. either because here the countreyes were named given to all Abrahams posterity as to the Ismaelites Idumeans in other places those which onely belonged to the Hebrewes as Tostatus thinketh For every where under the name of Abrahams seed the faithful people are only comprehended that should come of Isaack 2. Neither is it to be thought that the names of these nations knowne in Abrahams time were after extinguished Perer. 3. Or as Augustine that these ten nations inhabited the large Land of promise which reached to the river the seven usuall the lesser countrey of Canaan for many moe nations inhabited on this side Euphrates than are here named 4. But I preferre rather Iunius opinion that three were the borderers upon the Land of promise which the other seven then possessed the Kenites on the South the Kenezites on the North the Kadmonites toward the East so that in this verse the Land of promise is bounded and limited 5. Therefore the Hebrewes are deceived that thinke these three the Kenites Kenezites Kadmonites to be the Idumeans Ammonites Moabites because Kenaz was the sonne of Eliphaz of Esau who though they were not subdued by Iosua should at the length be vanquished by the Messiah For 1. the Lord gave not a foot of any of these countreyes possessed by the children of Esau and Lot to the Israelites Deut. 2.5.9 2. they dreame of their Messiâ—h to be a temporall Prince and conquerour which is their errour 3. these nations might be subdued by Iosua among the rest though they are not named 4. Whereas the Cananites are here otherwise named then Gen. 10. their names might bee changed in processe of time or one might have two names Abâ—â— Ezra Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Of beleeving God and in God Vers. 6. ABraham beleeved the Lord c. in the Hebrew in the Lord yet that common distinction of beleeving God and in God though there be a difference betweene them is not grounded upon the phrase of Scripture which indifferently useth both these for one especially in the new Testament as Ioh. 5.14 He that beleeveth him that sent me hath eternall life 1 Ioh. 5.10 He that beleeveth in the sonne of God c. 2. Doct. That the starres cannot be numbred Vers. 5. TEll the starres if thou be able to number them c. Hence then it may well be enforced that the starres cannot be numbred as the Prophet Ieremy saith 33.22 as the army of heaven cannot be numbred nor the sand of the sea measured so will I multiply the seed of David the starres then can be no more numbred than the sand of the sea measured and therefore this is set forth as a worke peculiar unto God which counteth the number of starres Psal. 147.4 Wherefore Aratus and Eudoxus were deceived which thought they did comprehend the number of the starres and the common Astronomers that hold there there are not above a 1022. starres to bee seene in the sky for if it were so it had beene an unfit comparison to liken the multitude of Israel which amounted to more than 600. thousand Exod. 2.37 to the stars Deut. 10.22 August lib. 16. de civit dei c. 23. R. Levi thinketh that in Abrahams time the starres were not numbred but afterwards they were by Astronomers but neither then nor since could they ever bee numbred as hath beene shewed 3. Doct. Word and Sacraments must be joyned together Vers. 18. IN that same day the Lord made a covenant c. Here the word and promises is annexed to the signe preceding whereby we learne that the word and sacraments should bee joyned together Calvin 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Faith justifieth not meritoriously but by way of apprehension and application of the righteousnesse of Christ. Vers. 6. ABraham beleeved God and hee counted that unto him for righteousnesse c. First from hence that popish doctrine is confuted that faith justifieth not as it apprehendeth and applieth the righteousnesse of Christ but as it is a meritorious worke by the worthinesse and dignity thereof Remist annot in Rom. 3. Sect. 3. But the Apostle concludeth otherwise that to him that worketh not but beleeveth c. his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 where righteousnesse then is imputed and accounted there is not wrought or obtained by workes faith then justifieth not as it is a worke or meritorious but as an instrument in apprehending the justice of Christ which is imputed by faith 2. Confut. Faith a speciall application of the promises of God SEcondly Bellarmine collecteth out of this place that a justifying faith is not a speciall application of the promises of God in Christ but a generall beleefe only that whatsoever God saith is true as Abraham saith in this place was his giving of credit to Gods speeches that hee should bee the father of many nations lib. 1. de justif c. 8. Contra But it is otherwise evident out of the scripture that Abraham beleeved not onely Gods promises concerning his carnall seed but his faith reached also to the spirituall seed which was Christ as the Apostle applieth it Galath 3.16 yea Abraham rejoyced to see Christs day Iohn 8.16 as having a particular interest in him as his Saviour 3. Confut. That faith only justifieth THirdly this place strongly proveth against the Papists that faith only justifieth for whereas Abraham had shewed before this many excellent workes of piety in building altars in many places and calling upon the name of God of charity in seeking reconciliation betweene Lot and him c. 13. of mercy in redeeming Lot being taken prisoner c. 14. contempt of riches in refusing to take of the King of Sodomes goods yet none of all these workes are reckoned or imputed unto Abraham for righteousnesse but onely his faith Now whereas Perer. objecteth that place Psal. 106.31 that Phinehes work in executing judgement upon the adulterer and adulteresse was likewise imputed to him for righteousnâ—sse and so would prove that faith only is not imputed for righteousnesse but workes also Perer. in 15. Genes v. 6. Our answer is further this that the Prophet
onely laid up for him but unto them also which love his appearing 2 Tim. 4.8 where the same certainty of the reward is decreed the like assurance is not denied 4. Bellarmine answereth that hence it is evident that all beleevers are not sure of their justification seeing Abraham that had served God most faithfully before yet never till now was assured of his justification lib. 3. de justif cap. 11. resp ad ration 1. Contra. It followeth not Abraham was not alwayes assured therefore every beleever cannot be assured but it well followeth that as there was a time when Abraham had not such assurance so the faithfull at all times have not such perswasion and that we grant 2. It is untrue that Abraham had not this assurance till now when he offered up Isaack for the Apostle sheweth that then hee had this assurance when faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse Rom. 4.22 23. which was before he was circumcised Gen. 15.6 5. Bellarmine againe answereth that the Scripture commending the righteousnesse of Abraham and other Patriarks doth rather make us certaine and sure of their salvation than themselves ibid. Contra. No mans salvation can be better knowne to another than to himselfe for as the life of the body is more felt where that life is than of others that see the bodies to live so saith which is the life of the soule as the Scripture saith The just shall live by faith is better apprehended of those which have the possession of it than of such as onely behold it 2. Confut. The promises not merited by Abrahams obedience Vers. 16. BEcause thou hast done this thing c. From hence Pererius inferreth that Abraham Egregâ—â— illo facto meruisse Deserved by this worthy act that such promises were made unto him and that the Messiah should be borne of his stocke rather than of any other Contra. 1. The Apostle doth conclude the contrary that because faith was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse he was not justified by works Rom. 4.2 4. 2. These promises were made to Abraham before he had shewed any worthy worke even then when he was first called out of his Countrey Gen 12.2 they then proceeded from Gods mercy not of Abrahams desert or worthinesse 3. The Lord therefore crowneth Abrahams obedience with renewing his promises to shew us that they which are justified by faith ought to proceed and goe forward in good works whereby their faith is approved Muscul. 3. Confut. The assumption of the humane nature to the God-head in Christ not merited 4. BUt to say that Abraham merited that the Messiah should take flesh of his seed is not farre from blasphemy for then he should have merited more than Christ himselfe did as he was man seeing that the hypostaticall union of the humane nature with the God-head in one person was of grace not of merit as Augustine well resolveth Quod Christus est unigenitus aequalis patri non est gratia sed natura quod autem in unitatem personae unigeniti assumptus est homo gratia est non natura That Christ was the onely begotten Son equall to his Father it was not grace but nature but in that mans nature was taken to make one person with the onely begotten it was of grace and not by nature But now if the man Christ deserved not the assumption or taking of the humane nature to the God-head and yet Abraham merited that his seed should in the Messiah be united to the God-head it will follow that he merited more than Christ wherefore that is a sound and Catholike conclusion of Augustine Neque enim illam susceptionem hominis ulla merita praecesserunt sed ab illa susceptione merita ejus cuncta caeperunt before the taking of mans nature there was no merits at all but all Christs merits tooke beginning there 4. Confut. The Chalde Paraphrast corrupt Vers. 18. IN thy seed c. So readeth the Septuagint according to the originall in the singular number and this reading is approved by the Apostle Galath 3.16 Wherefore the Chalde Paraphrast is found here to be corrupt which readeth thus in the plurall number In thy sonnes shall all the people of the earth be blessed 5. Confut. Many in Scripture taken for all ALL the nations of the earth shall be blessed And Gen. 17.5 the Lord saith A father of many nations have I made thee we see then that in the phrase of Scripture sometimes many are taken for all by this place therefore that cavill of the Pelagians may be answered who because the Apostle saith By one mans disobedience many were made sinners Rom. 5.19 would inferre that we became sinners not by originall corruption or propagation of sinne but by imitation for then the Apostle would have said not many but all But the Apostle by many understandeth all as he affirmeth vers 18. That by the offence of one the fault came upon all to condemnation for they which are all may truly be said to bee many The like cavill in another question is urged by Catharinus a popish writer who because it is said in Daniel 12.2 That many of them which sleepe in the dust shall awake some to everlasting life some to shame collecteth that all shall not but that some as namely infants dying without baptisme shall neither be in heaven nor hell But this objection may receive the same answer that as in the promise made to Abraham many is taken for all so also is it in this place of the Prophet as before also is shewed the like use in the Apostle 6. Places of Exhortation 1. Observ. To beare the death of children patiently Vers. 10. ABraham stretching forth his hand tooke the knife c. Origen from this example of Abraham that doubted not to offer up his sonne perswadeth parents to beare patiently the death of their children Laetus offer filium Deo esto sacerdos anima filii tui Chearfully offer thy sonne unto God and be a Priest of his soule This is nothing saith he to Abrahams strength which bound his sonne himselfe and bent his sword Hom. 8. in Gen. 2. Observ. Confidence in Gods providence Vers. 14. IN the mount will the Lord provide c. We are taught with the like confidence when all other meanes faile to cast our care upon God as Abraham did for whom the Lord provided another sacrifice which he thought not upon in stead of his sonne Isaack Calvin Therefore it is said in the Psalm 68.20 To the Lord belong the issues of death he knoweth how to make a way for our deliverance though we at the first see it not 3. Observ. Gods voice must be obeyed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed because thou hast obeyed my voyce Whereupon Ambrose giveth this good note Et nos ergo audiamus vocem Dei nostri si volumus apud eum gratiam invenire Let us therefore heare and obey the voice of God if
Gentiles as the younger brothers were preferred before their elder brothers the Iewes in Genes 48. Numer 7. Contra. 1. Iacob had no such intendment to prefigure the signe of the crosse but as the present occasion was offered because Ioseph had so placed his sonnes he could not otherwise but by crossing his armes lay his right hand upon Ephraims head so that Ephraim was not preferred to the right hand because Iacob would lay his hands acrosse but Iacob did lay his hands acrosse because Ephraim was to be preferred 2. Although the fathers did beleeve in the Messiah to come yet we finde not that they had so particular a knowledge as to describe the very fashion of the crosse on which Christ suffered 3. Confut. Against the invocation of Saints Vers. 16. LEt my name be named upon them This maketh nothing for the popish invocation of Saints Iacob meaneth not that they should call upon his name but should in the world be called by his name as the like phrase is used before vers 6. they shall be called after the names of their brethren as the women are said to be called by their husbands name Isay 4.2 Neither doe we reade that ever the Israelites made their prayers to Abraham Isaack and Iacob Mercer 6. Places of morall observation 1. Mor. God granteth beyond our hope Vers. 11. I Had not thought to have seene thy face yet loe God hath shewed me thy seed thus God dealeth most liberally with his children granting them many things beyond and above their hope Mercer as the prophet David confesseth thou did dost prevent him with blessings he asked life of thee and thou gavest him along life for ever and ever Psalm 12.3 4. 2. Mor. To submit our naturall affections to the will of God Vers. 19. HIs younger brother Although Iacobs naturall affection might be inclined as well as Iosephs to the elder yet he submitteth his affection to the will of God who had given Ephraim the Eldership so Abraham cast out Hagar and her sonnes because God so commanded although otherwise it was grievous unto him Genes 21.12 14. so we must learne to conforme our wills and affection to the will of God 3. Mor. Gods promise dieth not with his servants Vers. 21. BEhold I die and God shall be with you though Iacob died yet the promise of God died noâ—â— the death of Gods saints though it be grievous to the Church yet it cannot hinder Gods purpose Calvin but as it is in the Psal. instead of thy fathers thou shalt have children whom thou maiest make princes c. Psal. 4â— 16 God can raise up others instead of his faithfull seruants deceased AN APPENDIX OR ADDITION TO THIS SECOND BOOKE containing that divine Prophecie of IACOB in his last Will and Testament and the Historie of his solemne funerall and honourable buriall Dedicated To the right reverend Fathers in God TOBIE L. Bishop of Duresme and MARTIN L. Bishop of Elie. RIght Reverend Fathers among other honorable Friends whom I have remembred in this worke I thought it not fit in silence to passe by your Lordships of whose humanity humility and love especially toward Ministers and Preachers of the word as of the one I heare honourable report so of the other I have comfortable experience that unto you both fitly agreeth S. Pauls description of a Bishop that he should be gentle and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a lover of good men as Ambrose saith Episcopuâ— ut membris suis utatur clericis maxime Ministris qui sunt vere filii A Bishop should use Ministers as his members and Clergy men as children I have beene bold to ioyne you together in this Preface that as you were consociate together in your learned education in that famous college and are now still linked together in affection so I would not separate you in this dedication that as Ambrose saith Quemadmodum vobis ibi omnia fuere communia ita hic quoque jus dividuum nesciatis that as there you enioyed a certaine communion so here you should not have a division One of your Lordships hath an interest in me as being Patron of that Church to the which I am called the other hath an interest in this worke to whom one already a painfull and industrious man now as I heare with the Lord did dedicate his labours upon Genesis that which he begunne making but an entrance into this booke I have by Gods grace finished yet proceeding an other way than â—eâ— propounded to himselfe and as yet hath not beene attempted by any so that I may in some sort modesty say with Hierome Opus in manibus mauditim habeo non quod studium â—eum insolenter extollam sed quod sudoris conscius ad lectionem eorum pro vocem nescientes I have a worke in hand not heard of before noâ— that I insolently commend my study but only to provoke to the reading of that wherein I have so much laboured those which yet knew it not In this Booke of Genesis Moses the first and best Historiographer doth pen the lives and acts of the holy Patriarks Abraham Isaack Iacob Ioseph with the rest into whom God vouchsafed this great honour that so great a Prophet as Moses like unto whom there rose not up any in Israel should be the Chronicler of their doings Tullie in a certaine place remembreth of Alexander the great conquerour that beholding Achilles tombe he should thus say O fortunate adolescens qui tuae virtutis Homerum praeconem inveneris O happy young man which hadst Homer to be the setter forth of thy praise But much more happy are these fathers whose doings are commended and recorded by Moses The examples of these godly Fathers who practiced as they professed and so lived as they loved God whose obedience was answerable to their faith doe teach all Christians but especially us that are set apart to this function to beautifie and adorne our holy vocation with a godly conversation So Abraham is set forth in Scripture not onely as a faithfull beleever but as a fruitfull follower of good works by his faith he was justified with God by his works he is also said to be justified that is so declared and testified before men whose example we must imitate both for beleeving and living whose sonnes and daughters we are as the Apostle saith While we doe well Cyprian also well saith Nil prodest verbis proferre veritatem factis destruere virtuteÌ„ serm de mortalit altaribus placere debent qui de altaribus vivunt tales sunt sacrati qualia sacra sunt de singular Clericor It profiteth not in words to pronounce verity and in deeds to renounce verture they which live of the Altar must please the God of the Altar consecrated men should be like to the sacred things In this last addition to this booke I have explaned the divine propheticall speeches and bequests of Iacob to his sonnes and especially
of regality and principality 3. As for that heathenish conceit of the Philosopher that vertue is not properly said to be in women it is contrary to that position of the Apostle that in Christ there is neither male nor female Galath 3.28 the spirit of God can plant grace and vertue in the hearts of women as well as of men nay often the Lord chuseth the weake things of this world to confound the mighty things 1. Cor. 1.27 And the examples of so many vertuous and good women in the Scriptures of Sara Rebecca Anna the Shunamite and the rest in the old of Marie Anna Martha Lydia Dorcas and many other in the new Testament doe evidently confute that prophane paradox of the Philosopher 4. And to deliver the regiment of women from the Cardinals vile and impure slaunder this country and nation of ours as is hath found the government of a woman the worst in the late Marian persecutions when more good men and women Saints of God were put to death than in any three Kings reigne beside so have we seene it in the next change the best of all other Princes reignes that went before famous Queene Elizabeths government as for flourishing peace honourable fame and name enriching of the Land subduing of forraine enemies enacting of good lawes may be compared with the reigne of any former Kings So for the advancing of true religion increasing of learning propagating the Gospell none of her predecessors came neere her That as the refining of coine being reduced from base money to pure silver and gold was her honour in the Civill State so the purging of religion according to the purity of the word of God in the Church shall bee her everlasting fame in the world and is her eternall reward with God 4. Confut. That Christ shall have no Iudges under him at the latter day but shall be the only Iudge himselfe Vers. 22. LEt them judge all small causes Origen upon these words hath this private conceit Hanc sâ—guram Iudicum non solum in hoc seculo sed etiam in futuro servandam c. 〈◊〉 this forme of Iudges shall be observed not only in this world but in the next And then he alleageth that text Matth. 18.28 That when the Sonne of man shall sit in the throne of Majesty yee which have followed me in the regeneration shall sit upon twelve seats and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Whereupon he inferreth that Christ at the day of judgement shall appoint other Judges beside himselfe Qui judicent populum de mineribus causiâ— c. Which shall judge the people in smaller causes referring the greater to him The Rhemisnis and Romanistes whose manner is to scrape all the refuse of the Fathers affirme likewise That the faithfull shall judge and give sentence with Christ at the latter day wresting the same text in Matthew to the same purpose Contra. 1. The Apostles and Saints are said indeed to judge the world but not in that sense as Christ is said to be the Judge of the world but as he saith his Word shall judge them at the latter day Ioh. 12.48 that is be a witnesse against them so the Word preached by the Saints in their life and their conversation following the same shall be a witnesse against the world and so their condemnation like as in the processe of judgement here in earth the evidence that is brought in and the witnesses produced are said to condemne the guilty partie and to judge them though the Judge only give sentence Thus Ambrose fitly expoundeth this phrase Iudicabunt Sancti hunc mundum quia exemplo fidei illorum perfidia mundi damnabitur The Saints shall judge the world because by example of their faith their perfidiousnesse shall be condemned 2. For otherwise if Christ should observe the same forme which Moses did to appoint coadjutors because he alone sufficed not this were to derogate from his all sufficient power who needeth not as man any assistants or fellow helpers Vers. 22. Every great matter let them bring to thee Upon this president the Romanistes would ground the papall reservation of cases from whom no appeale say they is to be made as there was not from Moses Tostat. quaest 11. in 18. cap. Exod. Contra. 1. There is great difference betweene the reservation of matters to Moses and of certaine cases to the Pope for Moses was set over but one nation which at this time encamped together within the compasse of not many miles and so they might with ease bring the weighty causes to him But the Pope challengeth to be the supreme Judge over all the world and so without infinite trouble the greater causes cannot be brought unto him 2. Moses judgement was sought for because hee could not erre having often conference with God to direct him as the Pope hath not and this Testatus confesseth Romanus pontifex c. The Roman Bishop though he have great power sometime is not a man very vertuous and though he be because he hath not God present to answer unto all his demands facilius errare potest he may more easily erre therefore that is but a foppish and fawning conclusion of the Canonists that the Pope hath Omnia jura in scrinio pectoris All lawes in his breast 3. Whereas Iethro intended in this device the peoples ease not to goe farre for their causes and Moses ability to performe his office neither of these inconveniences is helped in making appeales to Rome for neither is the Pope able to amend all such causes and the people would be infinitely molested to be hurried to Rome 4. And if it were not for the advantage of the Court and Consistory of Rome they would desire to bee eased rather of than cumbred with such appeales But Moses herein only sought the profit of Gods people not his owne Simler 6. Morall Observations 1. Obs. To take heed of idle and vaine talke Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law c. Moses did conferre with Iethro about the wondrous workes of God which the Lord had wrought for them Vnde arguuntur hi qui vanis colloquiis delectantur They then are reproved which are delighted with vaine talke Ferus Which may serve as a good motive in our dayes to cut off idle if not very prophane conference when wee meet remembring ever that of idle words we must give an account B. Babington 2. Observ. Workes must be joyned with faith Vers. 12. THen Iethro tooke burnt offerings c. Having beene thankfull in words now he addeth deeds for S. Iames calleth that a dead faith where workes want if we joyne both these together as Iethro did we shall fully give assurance both to others and to our selves of our true faith B. Babington 3. Obs. That we should doe all our workes as in Gods sight Vers. 12. THey came to eat bread with Moses father in law before God Hereupon Origen well noteth Sancti manducant bibunt in
offend against this precept Qui Christi cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of
contrary things of life and death peace and terror love and feare for a Fountaine cannot make both salt water and sweet Iam. 3.12 But the law is the minister of death of feare and terror Ergo not of life and peace and so consequently not of the faith of the Gospell which bringeth all these 3. The same thing doth not both make the wound and give a plaister to heale it The law doth shew us our sinne faith by grace in Christ healeth it the law reviveth sinne Without the law sinne is dead Rom. 7.8 but we are dead to sinne and alive to God in Iesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6.11 The same cannot make us both to die unto sinne and revive sinne the law doth the one therefore not the other So Augustine saith Ad hoc data est lex ut vulnera ostenderet peccatorum qua gratiae benedictione sanaret Therefore was the law given that it should shew the wounds of our sinnes which it should heale by the benediction of grace August de poenitent medic 4. The Preachers publishers and givers of the law and Gospell are divers The law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Ioh. 1.17 But if justifying faith were commanded in the law then grace also should come by the ministrie of Moses that gave the law This is Bernards reason who further inferreth thus Venit prâ—inde gratia plenus veritate Dominus noster c. Therefore Christ our Lord came full of grace and truth that what could not bee done by the law might bee fulfilled by grace Serm. parâ— 28. 5. The qualities and conditions of the law and the Gospell are divers the law promiseth life to him that worketh Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse of the law That the man which doth these things shall live thereby Rom. 10.5 But the Gospell requireth not the condition of working but beleeving to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4.5 If then faith were commanded in the law to beleeve should also be a worke of the law then the Apostles conclusion were in vaine I conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the law But if faith be excluded out of the works of the law then it is not commanded or contained in the law for then it should be a worke of the law 2. Further the invocation of Angels and Saints which is commonly practised and stifly maintained in the Church of Rome is another apparent transgression of this first commandement because they give a speciall part of the divine worship which consisteth in prayer and invocation unto the creature First we will see and examine the arguments produced by the Romanists in defence of this superstition and then by other reasons out of the Scriptures convince and confute them The Romanists Arguments answered brought in defence of the invocation of Saints 1. THe Saints doe pray for us therefore we may and ought to pray them The antecedent or first part that the Saints doe pray for us they would prove by these places of Scripture Exod. 32.13 Moses thus saith in his prayer Remember Abraham Izhak and Iakob thy servants c. Ierem. 15.1 Though Moses and Samuel stood before me yet could not my affection be toward this people Baruch 3.4 O Lord God almightie heare now the prayer of the dead Israelites 2 Macchab. 14.15 And Onias spake and said This is a lover of the brethren who prayeth much for the peoplâ— to wit Ieremias the Prophet of the Lord. Answ. 1. As for the testimonies cited out of Baruch and the booke of Macchabees they prove nothing because they are no books of Canonicall Scripture 2. The other testimonies are impertinently alleaged for in the first Moses maketh no mention of the prayers which Abraham Izhak and Iakob should make for the people but of the covenant which the Lord made with them In the other of an hypotheticall and conditionall proposition they make a categoricall and absolute affirmation The text is If Moses and Samuel stood they inferre that Moses and Samuel did stand Simler But it may better be answered that if these were alive among the people to stand before the Lord for them in prayer c. as see the like Ezech. 14.14 Though these three men Noah Daniel and Iob were among them they should deliver but their owne soules by their righteousnesse 3. The Saints doe pray unto God by their generall wishes and desires as wishing that the Kingdome of God were accomplished as Revel 6.10 The soules under the Altar crie with a loud voyce saying How long Lord c. doest thou not judge and avenge our bloud But our particular necessities they are ignorant of and so doe noâ— make particular requests for us therefore the argument followeth not they pray by their generall desires for the Church Ergo they pray for us in particular 4. Seeing that the Romanists doe hold that the Patriarks and Fathers of the old Testament were in Limbo which they make a member or part of hell they doe contradict themselves in making them mediatours and intercessours in heaven 2. Argum. The Angels they say know our affaires and pray for us As Zachar. 1.12 The Angell of Iehovah answered and said O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou bee unmercifull to Ierusalem c. Therefore it is lawfull to pray to the Angels Answ. 1. That the Angels doe report our affaires unto God and so may make relation of our prayers and words also as of our other gests and acts unto God as the Lords messengers and ministers we will not denie but that they make any particular requests for men the Scripture no where speaketh and we are not bound to beleeve the relation of our prayers unto God is one thing and mediation and intercession is another 2. That Angell of Iehovah which prayed for Jerusalem was the Lord Christ who maketh intercession for his Church unto whom the rest of the Angels returne their message vers 11. who is also called Iehovah vers 20. 3. Neither doth it follow if it could bee proved out of Scripture that the Angels prayed foâ— us that we are to pray to them because they are not alwayes present to heare us and we are forbidden in Scripture to worship them Revel 22.9 and therefore to pray unto them which is a part of divine worship 3. Argum. The Saints that are living doe one pray for another much more the Saints being dead because their charitie is more perfect and seeing there is a communion of Saints as of the living so also of the dead which communion being not in faith and hope whereof there is no more use with them that are at rest it remaineth it is in charitie As therefore we may request the living to pray for us so we may pray the dead also to entreate for us Answer 1. The argument followeth not for the Saints alive doe one
and unregenerate are wholly sold over unto sinne and their very conscience is polluted Vrsin 4. In the glorious state of the Saints in the next life the obedience of the Saints shall bee perfect and they shall wholly be conformable to the will of God and then we shall be just not onely by the imputative justice of Christ sed propria essentiali justitia but by a proper essentiall justice and then we shall fully be made like to the image of Christ as the Apostle saith Rom. 8.29 Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like the image of his Sonne Marbach Now the contrarie objections are these 1. Object The works of the Spirit are perfect but good works in the regenerate are the works of the Spirit therefore they are perfect Answ. This argument proceedeth from that which is simpliciter simplie and absolutely said to bee of the Spirit to that which secundum quid after a sort is of the Spirit the works of the faithfull are not absolutely the works of the Spirit but they are so the works of the Spirit as they be also our works so they are pure as they proceed of the Spirit but impure and imperfect as they are wrought by man 2. Object They which are conformable to the image of Christ have perfect works The faithfull are conformable in this life to the image of Christ Ergo. Answ. The proposition is true onely of those which are perfectly conformable but so are not the faithfull in this life but onely in part as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13.12 Now I know in part and as our knowledge is so is our obedience both imperfect 3. Object There is no condemnation to the faithfull Rom. 8.1 therefore their works are perfect Answ. The argument followeth not for the privilege of the faithfull and their exemption from condemnation dependeth not upon the perfection of their works but upon the perfection of Christs righteousnesse imputed to them by faith 4. Object Christ at his comming shall render unto every one according to his works but it standeth not with Gods justice to give a perfect reward unto imperfect works therefore the works of the regenerate because they shall be perfectly rewarded are perfect Answ. 1. The obedience of the faithfull shall bee perfectly rewarded not according to the law of works but according to the law of faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is imputed and is rewarded in them being theirs by faith as fully as if it were their owne 2. Yet Christ shall judge also according to their works not as causes of the reward but as testimonies and lively arguments of their faith Vrsin 5. Object The Scripture ascribeth perfection to the works of the Saints as it is said of Noah Gen. 6.9 that he was a just and perfect man in his time so Hezekiah saith 2 King 20.3 I have walked before thee with a perfect heart Answ. 1. These and the like sayings must be understood de perfectione partium non graduum of the perfection of the parts of obedience not of the degree of perfection that is the faithfull doe exercise their obedience in every part of the law but not in a perfect degree or measure 2. They are said to bee perfect in comparison onely of such as were weake and imperfect 3. And further their sinceritie and perfection is understood as being opposite unto dissimulation and hypocrisie that their heart was perfect toward the Lord that is unfained without any dissimulation in which sense the Prophet David saith Iudge me according to mine innocencie Psal. 7.8 6. Object The Apostle saith Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1 Iohn 3.9 the faithfull then being borne of God sinne not Answ. The Apostle understandeth here not the dwelling of sinne but the reigning of sinne for otherwise he should be contrarie to himselfe who had said before chap. 1.8 If we say we have no sinne we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us They which are borne of God sinne not that is sinne though it remaine in them it reigneth not in them as S. Paul saith Though we walke in the flesh we doe not warre after the flesh Vrsin 7. It is evident then that the law was not given to justifie men thereby as the Apostle saith Rom. 3.20 Therefore by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne This then is the end and use of the law 1. It sheweth what God is one that loveth justice and hateth iniquitie 2. It is as a glasse wherein we may see that image after the which man was at the first created which now is defaced in him by sinne 3. It is a rule and line after the which wee should square out our life and actions 4. It sheweth the corruption of our nature and so is as a schoolemaster to bring us to Christ Marbach So Augustine saith Hac est utilitas legis ut hominem de sua infirmitate convincat gratiae medicinam quae in Christo est implorare compellat This is the profit of the law to convince man of his infirmitie and to drive him to seeke the medicine of grace in Christ Epist. 200. 6. Confut. That the Morall law nor any precept thereof may be by humane authoritie dispensed with THere remaineth yet one point to be discussed whether any of the precepts of the Morall law may be by humane authoritie dispensed withall wherein the Popes Canonists have heretofore given unto their terrene god an infinite and unreasonable power for these were their conclusions that Papa potest dispensare contra jus divinum The Pope may dispense against the law of God contra jus natura against the law of nature contra novum Testamentum against the new Testament contra Apostolum against the Apostle Papa potest dispensare de omnibus praeceptis veteris novi Testamenti The Pope may dispense with all the precepts of the old and new Testament c. But herein I preferre the judgement of Tostatus a moderate writer of that side who denieth unto the Pope any such authoritie and answereth the contrarie objections 1. Object As among men the Law-maker may dispense with his law so God that gave the Morall law is therefore above the law and may dispense with it and if God may dispense then the Prelates of the Church consequently may dispense because they are in Gods stead Answ. First to the proposition this may bee answered 1. That in humane lawes which tend unto the common good the preservation of the publike state the maintenance of peace and of justice the Law-giver himselfe cannot so dispense as to overthrow the end of those lawes as that it shall be lawfull to disturbe the publike state or such like for this were to evert the very scope and end of the law but yet in particular cases he may dispense as where an order is that every one shall watch
time though not now 5. Confut. Adams sinne pardonable 5. WHereas we say that all sinnes are veniall to the faithfull and elect Bellarmine replieth that Adam committed a mortall and damnable sinne because it was said vnto him in what day thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death lib. 1. de amiss grat c. 7. Ans. Wee say that though this sinne was damnable in it owne nature yet by Gods grace through Christ it was made veniall and pardonable to Adam unlesse Bellarmine say with the hereticke Taâ—iane that Adam was damned 6. Confut. Adam lost not his faith 6. BY this place also he would proove that Adam and Eve lost their saith because they beleeved not the sentence of God that they should die if they transgressed the commandement lib. 3. de amission great c. 6. Ans. This prooveth that they failed in faith not that their faith was utterly lost and extinguished for if Adam had no faith remaining to what purpose should God have propounded the promise of the Messiah to a faithlesse man Places of Exhortation 1. IN that God sanctified the Sabboth and rested therein from all his works he did it for our example that we therby should learne religiously to observe the Lords day 1. in abstaining from all bodily and servile workes 2. in keeping our selves undefiled and unspotted of all sinnefull works 3. in sanctifying it to holy exercises to the praise of God and our owne comfort 2 v. 7. In that God made man of the dust and put the breath of life into his nostrils man is here to learne humilitie by the consideration of his base and poore beginning and to remember how brittle his state is whose life is but a blast of the breath a puffe of the aire Isay 2.22 Cease from man whose breath is in his nostrils 3 Seeing that goodly garden of paradise replenished with such goodly plants and fruitfull trees is now destroyed and not to be found in earth we are taught to sequester our affections from all earthly delights and to seeke for a paradise much better in heaven 4 v. 15. Seeing man even in the state of his innocency was not to live idlely but God assigned him to keep the garden we are thereby admonished that now much more every man should occupie himselfe in some honest labour of a lawfull vocation 5 In that God made the woman out of man from whom shee had her beginning thereby is described the dutie of the wife to be obedient to her husband as her head and principall for whole cause shee was made 6 And seeing the woman is bone of mans bone and flesh of his flesh thereby the husband is put in remembrance to love tender and cherrish his wife even as his owne flesh 7. verse 18. It is not good for man to be alone in that God first taketh care to provide an helper for man before he saw his owne want and while Adam slept and thought nothing the Lord prepared him an helpe we see how Gods providence watcheth over us foreseeing for us many things which we see not our selves yea taking care for us while we sleep as it is in the Psalme Hee giveth his wel-beloved sleepe Psal. 127.3 Mercer CHAP. III. The Analysis or Method THis Chapter describeth the fall of man first his sinne and transgression from verse 1. to verse 9. then his punishment verse 9. to the end In their transgression is to be considered the tentation of Sathan verse 1. to verse 6. the seduction of the man and woman verse 6. thirdly the effects and fruits of their sinne verse 7 8. In Sathans temptation wee haue his subtill insinuation verse 1. the womans simple confession verse 2 3. the suggestion it selfe verse 4 5. In their seduction verse 6. first are set downe the inducements or provocation the goodnesse of the tree for meat the pleasantnesse to the eye the fruit thereof supposed to be knowledge then the pravarication or offence they did eat The effects of their transgression are shame which causeth them to cover their nakednesse verse 7. feare which maketh them to hide themselves verse 8. In the punishment there is first their conviction of the man and woman verse 9. to 14. then the malediction or curse denounced first then executed The sentence is denounced against the tempter or parties tempted The tempter is either the â—ccessary that is the serpent which was the instrument whose punishment is set forth verse 14. or the principall namely Sathan who is censured verse 15. The persons tempted first the woman is punished with sorrow in travaile subjection to her husband verse 16. secondly the man is judged the cause is first shewed his transgression verse 17. then his judgement in the cursing of the earth with thornes and thistles in cursing of man with misery in his life mortality in his end verse 19. The sentence lastly is executed in the expulsion of man out of Paradise verse 23. with the consultation going before verse 22. and his perpetuall exile from thence the Angels keepe the way to Paradise with a sword that Adam should not returne thither The difference of translations v. 1. the serpent was wisest S. wiser C. craftier than any beast cat heb gnarum subtill v. 1. yea hath God indeed said B. G. A. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quare wherefore hath God said S.H. it is true that God hath said Ch. quia because God hath said T.P. heb aph ci yea because Sathans abrupt beginning sheweth a long communication before and here hee giveth a reason as though God were not equall toward man in the prohibition c. v. 6. to be desired to get knowledge G.T.S. or to make one wise B. heb delightfull to behold aspectu delectabibile C.H. which was said before v. 8. the voice of the word of God C. the voice of God walking caet v. 8. in the coole of the day B.G. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at noone S. ad auram post meridiem in the coole aire after noone H. ad ventum in the wind or aire of the day T.P.C. heb lervach haiom the soft wind brought Gods voice unto them v. 11. unlesse thou hast eaten c. S.H. hast thou eaten caeter v. 12. the woman which thou gavest to be with me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 B.S.C. which thou gavest me G. gavest my fellow sociam H. allocasti didst place with me T. gâ—imads with me heb v. 15. he shall breake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 G.S. ipsa she shall H. it shall breake ipsum T.B.P. heb his it shall that is the seed he shall observe thee from the beginning thou shalt observe him to the end Ch. thou shalt lye in wait for his heele H. bruise his heele caet v. 16. thy desire toward thy husband T.B. subject to thy husband G. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thy turning to thy husband S.C. subpotestate under the power of thy husband H. heb to shuchah desire
Lamechs seven-fold punishment which should not in this case have beene omitted 5. Neither can this place be so taken as the Chalde and some Hebrewes expound which read those words with a negative or interrogation as though Lamech should plead for himselfe before his wives which intended to kill him that hee had not killed a man as Cain had and therefore they should bee more grievously punished that killed him 6. Further these words of Lamech are not uttered enuntiative as shewing that Lamech had committed any murther already nor yet interrogative by way of interrogation as if Lamech should say thus to his wives have I yet slaine a man in my wrath as Cain did yet he was privileged that none should kill him therefore ye need not feare that any such thing should happen unto mee that have killed none some read these words conditionally supposing Lamech to have beene a good man as though the sense should be this If I should kill a man as Cain did I should be punished more than he that should kill Cain because I did not take heed by his example 7. But the best exposition is with Ramban to expound Lamechs speech 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 potencially hee to reconcile his wives that were al enated from him doth boast of his strength and tyranny that this and this he could doe and that he would not take the least wrong at any mans hand Sicetiam Calvin Now concerning the occasion of these words of Lamech spoken to his wives 1. It was not by reason of any conspiracy intended by his wives against him and therefore hee should excuse himselfe that hee had not killed a man as Cain had and therefore they that killed him should bee more severely punished 2. Neither was it by reason of some brawle betweene his wives as Iunius and therefore Lamech threatneth them that should set any division betweene them and offer him the least wrong 3. Nor yet because his wives feared lest the sinne of Cain might bee punished in Lamechs posterity and therefore he maketh them secure in promising impunity 4. But the most likely occasion is this that wheras his wives feared lest because of his cruelty some evill should happen unto them hee boasteth of his strength that rather than any should doe him any hurt he would not spare to kill in his wrath QVEST. XIIII How Lamech is said to be avenged seventy times seven times Vers. 24. IF Cain shall be avenged seven-fold 1. Chrysostomes exposition is not here to be received who thinketh that Lamech confessed his sinne and condemned himselfe for murther committed Ipse sua lingua confessionem peccatorum facit poenam sibi definit he confesseth his sinne himselfe and defineth the punishment So also thinketh Theodoret for the Scripture propoundeth the example of Lamech not as of a penitent but a licentious disordered person who first presumed to breake the law of wedlocke in taking two wives 2. Neither is their conjecture of any weight that imagine Lamech to speake of his 77. children which hee had by his two wives as Iosephus writeth that they should bee punished for their fathers sinne 3. But among the rest Rupertus misseth the marke that by seventy times seven-fold understandeth a temporary by seven-fold eternall punishment this Cain had because hee repented not the other Lamech for his repentance for that 70. times seven is more than seven times our Saviour sheweth in the Gospell where he saith to Peter that he should forgive his brother not only seven times but seventy times seven 4. But the meaning is not that Lamech should be punished 77. times 7. times but hee that killed Lamech as he that killed Cain 7. times and so Lamech boasteth of impunitie that though hee committed murther as Cain did yet hee should be exempted from punishment as Cain was 5. To expound it of the 77. generations to Christ rehearsed Luk. 3. in whom Lamechs sinne should bee expiated is a forced and improper sense Quest. XIIII How the name of God is said in Enos time to be called upon Vers. 26. MEn begin to call c. 1. Neither the Septuagint here translate aright that hee 1. Enos hoped to call or as Hierome hee begun to call for neither doth the word signifie hope nor can it be referred to the person of Enos 2. Neither could hee be said now to begin to call upon the name of the Lord either as Cajetan thinketh because Enos first used to call upon the name Iehovah for Cain and Abel are said to have offered to Iehovah v. 3. either for that Enos was more religious and given to prayer than any before him or that he found out some forme or order of prayer as Pererius judgeth for it is not like but that Adam and Abel in the spirituall exercises of prayer and sacrifice were as zealous as any of the succeeding age 3. But now when as the worship of God began to be corrupted and prophaned in the wicked posterity of Cain then Adam Seth and other of the righteous feed began publikely to exercise religion and to have their holy meetings and assemblies for the service of God 4. Some read then the name of God began in calling upon to be prophaned as by giving the name of God to beasts trees and plants But here invocation is taken in the better part 1 and Moses describeth the practice of the Church and righteous seed in those dayes 5. Wee likewise refuse that sense that the name Iehovah began now to bee called upon whereas he was invocated by the name Elohim before for Cain and Abel offered sacrifice to Iehovah v. 3. 6. Wherefore the true meaning is as is before expressed that now the Church of God being increased to a full number did make a publike separation in their worship from the generation of the wicked and began apart in a solemne manner to worship God Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. A man is first accepted for his faith before his workes 1. Vers. 4. THe Lord had respect to Abel and to his offering hence it is inferred that works make not a man acceptable to God but first a man is accepted by faith and secondly his workes are respected as Gregory upon this place Deus non habet gratum offerentem propter numera sed numera propter offerentem Abel is not accepted for his gifts but his gifts because of him 2. Doct. Paradise planted in a knowne place 2. Vers. 16 CAin dwelt in the Land of Nod toward the east side of Eden Hence it is gathered that Paradise was planted in a known place contrary to the opinion of Bellarmine for Eden was the name of a knowne Country in Mesapotamia as may appeare Ezech. 27.23 Bellarmine answereth that Eden is here no proper name but a name of pleasure unlesse wee will say that Cain was punished to dwell in Paradise Cont. 1. Neither was Cain exiled into a place of pleasure 2. It is not
Abraham as impatient of delay that God had not yet given him a seed according to his promise is bold to poure out his griefe before God that the Lord would hasten to accomplish his desire Calvin QVEST. IV. Of the divers acceptions of the word Meshek THe steward of my house according to divers interpretations of the word Mesech there are as many expositions 1. The Septuagint take it for a proper name as though Mesech should bee the name of Eleazers mother for so they read the sonne of Mesech borne in my house 2. Some derive it of the word shakah that signifieth to beare or minister the cup and so read the son of my cup-bearer or butler Aquila 3. Some of the word shakak that is to run up and downe and so Eleazer should bee as the steward or bay liffe that run up and downe the house Oleaster Mercer 4. Meshek signifieth an overseer so some read that he was the steward or overseer Chald. or the sonne of the steward Theodoret. Hierome 5. Meshek also signifieth a leaving or dereliction and so Eleazer is called the sonne of the leavings not for that hee only was left of Abrahams ancient familie as Cajetane or because he had left to him the care of his house as Vatablus But that he purposed to leave unto him the inheritance of all Innius And this seemeth to bee the most proper sense QVEST. V. Wherefore Eleazer is called of Damascus ELeazar of Damascus 1. This Damesâ—k or Damascus was not the name of his mother as some think ex Calvin 2. Neither was it his proper name as Hierome and the Septu translate of whom the City Damascus should be named Tostat for Damascus is held to have beene builded by Hus the sonne of Aram and to be a name more ancient than Abraham Genes 14.15 3. But Eleazer by his father was of that countrey though borne in Abrahams house and therefore hee is called Damascenus of Damascus sic Chald. Iun. Calv. QVEST. VI. Whether Abraham saw the starres only in vision 5. HE brought him forth and said looke up now to heaven c. 1. This was not done in vision only as Cajetane thinketh but as the words import Abraham having spent a good part of the day in prayer within now is bid to goe forth in the evening and is shewed the starres for his confirmation Iun. 2. Neither is this an allegory as Philo applieth it who saith that the soule of a wise man should bee like unto heaven But it is an history so verily done as it is rehearsed QVEST. VII What seed of Abraham is understood carnall or spirituall SO shall thy seed be 1. We neither thinke with Augustine that this is meant of Abrahams spirituall seed only magis videtur promissa posteritas falicitate sublimis that posterity seemeth to bee promised which is blessed in heaven 2. Neither with Lyranus that there are here two literall senses the one of his carnall seed the other of his spirituall for of one place there can be but one literall sense 3. Neither with Pererius that the literall sense concerneth Abrahams carnall seed the mysticall his spirituall 4. But these words have one whole and generall sense which comprehendeÌ„th both Abrahams kindreds for that is the proper and literall sense which is intended by the spirit now in these words the spirit intendeth both the carnall off-spring of Abraham as Moses expoundeth the Lord God hath made thee as the starres of heaven in multitude Deut. 10.22 as also the spirituall seed of the faithfull as Saint Paul interpreteth so shall thy seed be Rom. 4.17 and hence concludeth that Abraham is the father of us all that is of the faithfull QVEST. VIII Wherein the Israelites represented the people of God YEt we deny not but that in other places spirituall things are implyed by temporall by way of mystery and allegory as the Apostle saith the law had a shadow of good things to come as Abrahams carnall generation did divers wayes represent the spirituall 1. In their number 2. In their afflictions 3. In their passage thorow the red sea figuring baptisme 4. In being fed with manna a type of Gods word 5. In drinking of the water out of the rocke a figure of Christ. 6. In looking toward the brasen serpent 7. In their pilgrimage in the desert a lively patterne of our pilgrimage in this life 8. In their entrance into the land of Canaan under Iosua which signifieth our conducting by Christ to the heavenly Canaan QVEST. IX Wherein Abrahams faith consisted Vers. 6. ABraham beleeved the Lord c. 1. Hilarie noteth that this was singular in Abrahams faith because he doubted not of his omnipotency 2. Ambrose reputatum est illi ad justitiam quâ—a rationem non quaesivit this was counted to him for righteousnesse because he beleeved and required no reason 3. But there was more in Abrahams faith than onely to beleeve God and his promises to bee true for hee did trust in God Cajetan as the word bajehovah signifieth he beleeved in Iehovah Mercer and embraced God as his father Calvin 4. Abraham therefore did not count this to himselfe as a just thing to beleeve God as some interpret neither is it to be referred to Abraham that he counted it a just thing in God thus to recompence him as R. Levi and Ramban corruptly expound but God counted it to him or as the Septuag it was counted unto him for true justice before God because he stedfastly beleeved Gods promises and thus expoundeth Elias Orientall confuting Ramban QVEST. X. Why faith was imputed for righteousnesse to Abraham IT was counted to him for righteousnesse Not that Abraham beleeved not before or that his former beleefe was not also counted to him for righteousnesse But these reasons may bee alleaged why in this place first mention is made of the imputation of righteousnesse 1. Because in this place first one is promised to come out of Abrahams owne bowels hee considered not his owne body which was now dead as the Apostle saith nor the deadnesse of Saraes wombe Rom. 4.19 2. Because although Abraham had faith before yet it waxed stronger and stronger hee was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 3. At this time first Abraham made answer unto God and so it followeth in the same place he gave glory to God Rom. 4.20 4. The scripture doth not thus testifie of Abraham in the beginning of his conversion but even at that time when Abraham was full of good workes even then notwithstanding his righteousnesse should not be imputed to his workes but to faith Calvin neither this testimony of Abrahams righteousnesse is differred till he had received circumcision left he might have beene thought thereby to have beene justified Thom. Anglic. in cap. 15. Genes and therefore the Apostle of purpose observeth that righteousnesse was imputed to Abraham when he was yet uncircumcised Rom. 4.10 QVEST. XI That the asking of a signe proceeded not of any
little inferiour as it is in the Psalme 8. Thou hast made him a little lower than the Angels 4. But if man be compared with the omnipotent and eternall God hee is but as dust and ashes before him and indeed as nothing as the Prophet saith Behold the nations are as a drop of a bucket and as the dust of the ballance all nations are before him as nothing and they are counted to him lesse than nothing and vanity Isa. 40.15.17 therefore Gregory saith well Sancti quanto magis interna divinitatis conspiciunt tanto magis se nihil esse cognoscunt c. the Saints the more they consider the divine nature of God so much the more they acknowledge themselves to be nothing 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Angels are not to be adored or worshipped Vers. 2. HEe bowed himselfe to the ground From hence it cannot bee concluded that Angels are to bee adored and worshipped as the vulgar latine readeth for Abraham supposed these to be men and not Angels and therefore it is but a civill kind of reverence which hee giveth unto them otherwise though Abraham should have forgotten himselfe in yeelding unto them adoration yet would not they have accepted it as the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him Revel 22.8 Thomas Aquinas answer that Iohn would have given unto the Angell the divine and highest kinde of worship due unto God and therefore was forbidden is insufficient for this were to make so great an Apostle ignorant what duty was only to be yeelded to God and it is misliked by Pererius one of that side And whereas he findeth out an other shift that this adoration exhibited by Iohn was not unlawfull but inconvenient to bee done in respect of the great excellency to the which man was now advanced by Christ this is as slender an answer as the other for in that the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him because hee was his fellow servant it sheweth that it was not only inconvenient but unlawfull also for one servant to worship another Iohn then adoreth the Angell not of ignorance but of forgetfulnesse being in an ecstasis of minde and ravished with the glory of the Angell for if the Apostle had not forgotten himselfe he would not twice have failed herein Apoc. 19.10.23.9 2. Confut. The foresight of our obedience not the cause of the increase of grace Vers. 19. I Know him that hee will command his sonnes c. Pererius here noteth that God foreseeing Abrahams godlinesse and obedience doth bestow upon him these great benefits among the which was this revealing of his councell concerning Sodome whereas the onely reason as Vatablus well noteth why the Lord doth accumulate and multiply his graces upon his servants is his owne fatherly love toward them who having once made choyce of them doth for ever love them for what else doth the Lord here make mention of but his owne graces vouchsafed to Abraham it was not then any merit in Abraham that procured this increase of graces but Gods favour who leaveth not his but addeth graces upon graces till he have accomplished their salvation Calvin 3. Confut. Chrysost. Errour of freewill HEre further may bee noted Chrysostomes errour who saith that Abraham ex seipso scientia sibi naeturaliter insita ad tantum virtutis fastigium pervenit of himselfe and his naturall knowledge did attaine to such an high degree of vertue Pererius would thus excuse Chrysostome that by saying of himselfe c. he excludeth all externall helps by the instruction of other and not the secret revelation of Gods spirit and supernaturall gift of faith If Chrysostome could be so handsomely expounded for mine owne part I would be glad but who seeth not that his words carry another sense for the scripture useth to set these two one against another by grace and of our selves Eph. 2.8 By grace are yee saved through faith not of your selves if Abraham then was made righteous of himselfe it was not by grace The Scripture also sheweth that God first called Abraham from his idolatrous countrey before he did yet any commendable worke Gen 12.1 Wherefore all Abrahams righteousnesse depended upon the calling of God as Chrysostome in another place hath this sound saying quamvis fidem adducas à vocatione eam accepisti what though thou hast faith thou hast received it from thy calling 4. Confut. There is no preparation in a mans nature to his calling Vers. 19. THat the Lord may bring upon Abraham c. Hence Chrysostome noteth that Abraham primum in omnibus virtutis suae dedit specimen sic divinum meruit praesidium did first shew every where an example of vertue and so merited the divine assistance Pererius two wayes would justifie Chrysostome 1. he saith he speaketh not of merit of condignity but of a sufficient and fit preparation only unto grace 2. or hee meaneth not that Abraham merited the first grace of justification but onely the amplification or increase of it Perer. in 18. Genes disput Contra. 1. It is Gods mercy and love which first calleth us before we can be any way prepared thereunto there is no fitnesse aptnesse or congruity in our nature but all is of grace so Moses saith because the Lord loved thy fathers therefore he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 Gods love was the first motive for the choyce and calling of Abraham And againe seeing Terah Abrahams father was an Idolater under whom Abraham was brought up and by all likelihood infected that way before the Lord called him what preparation could there be in Abraham or provocation to his calling 2. Neither was the beginning only of Gods favour toward Abraham of grace the increase thereof by merit for Iacob being of Abrahams faith confesseth that he was not worthy or lesse than the least of Gods mercy Gen. 32.10 he confesseth that none of Gods graces neither first or last were conferred upon him for his worthinesse therefore Calvin well noteth that this word that consequentiam magis notat quam causam doth note rather a consequence than a cause Where the Lord findeth his servants faithfull and obedient he will increase them with further graces not merited by their obedience but added in mercy according to the gracious promise of God that vouchsafeth of his fatherly goodnesse so to crowne the faithfull service of his children For otherwise if our service and obedience bee weighed in it selfe it deserveth nothing as our Saviour saith When we have done all things which are commanded we must say we are unprofitable servants wee have dine that which was our duty to doe Luke 17.10 Morall observations 1. Moral The commendation of hospitality Vers. 2. HE ran to meet them from the tent doore Ambrose here well noteth non otiosus sedit Abraham in ostio tabernaculi c. Abraham did not sit idlely in the doore of his tabernacle sed longe aspicit nec aspexisse contentus cōcurrit obviam festin◠vit
because the King of Moab by their evill example did sacrifice the King of Edoms son as Burgens for no such thing is expressed in the text 2. Neither was this indignation conceived by the idolatrous Israelites against the rest thinking the King of Moab invincible because of this sacrifice Cajetan for this indignation was kindled not by the Israelites but against them 3. And for the same reason the common exposition seemeth not to be so proper that this indignation and griefe of the Israelites was for the horror and cruelty of this unnaturall fact which they could not endure to behold Tostat. for this indignation or wrath should not have beene against the Israelites but against the King of Moab 4. Therefore it seemeth more agreeable to the text that this wrath was on the Edomites part against the Israelites because it was their quarrell that brought the King of Edom to take part with them against the Moabites upon which occasion this hard hap fell out upon his sonne and upon this division they brake off and left the siege Iunius QUEST XXVI Of Huz Buz Kemuel Chesed the sonnes of Nahor Vers. 21. HVz c. and Buz. Of this Huz was not named the Countrey where Iob dwelt Iob 1.1 but of that Huz rather which was the sonne of Aram Genes 10.22 Hierome 2. Of Buz came the family of the Buzites of the which Elihu was Iob 32.6 3. Kemuel here mentioned was not the father of the Syrians as the Greeke and vulgar Latine read nor yet of Aram Naharaim as Tostatus or Aram Seba as Cajetane for the City of Nahor was in Aram Genes 24.10 This name and Countrey therefore was more ancient than Kemuel Nahors sonne and was rather so called of Aram the sonne of Sem Genes 10.22 4. Neither is Chesed here named the father of the Chaldees which was Abrahams Countrey and could not therefore be founded by his nephew 5. But these sonnes of Nahor were fathers of certaine families in Syria whereof there was some remainder in Constantius Caesars time as may appeare by the names of certaine townes Reman and Buzan remembred by Ammianus Lib. 18. ex Iun. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. How God is said to tempt Vers. 1. GOd did tempt or prove Abraham c. 1. God is not said here to tempt Abraham metaphoricè metaphorically as he is said to be angry to repent in a figurative speech as Cajetane but God truly and verily tempteth that is proveth and taketh triall of Abrahams faith 2. And God doth it Non ut ipse hominem inveniat sed ut homo se inveniat Not that God need to finde out man but that man may finde out himselfe as Augustine saith 3. God tempteth otherwise than Satan is said to tempt God properly is the author only of good temptations but Satan is the tempter unto evill Evill temptations proceed not from God effective sed permissive by way of action but by way of permission when the Lord withdraweth his sufficient grace and necessary helpe Gods tempting and Satans tempting doe diversly differ 1. In respect of the end Deus tâ—ntat ut doceat Diabolus ut decipiat God tempteth to teach the Devill to deceive as Augustine saith 2. In respect of the persons God tempteth onely the good to make their faith and obedience knowne sometimes the weake are tried that after they have fallen they may repent and be restored sometimes the strong that they may be more and more confirmed But the devill tempteth both good and bad the good to bring them into evill the bad that they forsake not evill 3. The object of good and evill temptations are divers good temptations are especially seene in outward things as in poverty sicknesse persecution and such like evill temptations are exercised in spirituall and inward evils as in evill suggestions ungodly thoughts stirring to evill desires and provoking to sinne Perer. 2. Doct. The grave motions of the spirit of God differ from the furious fansies of those led with an evill spirit Vers. 4. THen the third day c. We see a manifest difference betweene the furious and sudden motions of those which are possessed with an evill spirit such as Saul had who in his rage all at once cast a javelin at his sonne Ionathan to have killed him 1. Sam. 20.33 and the deliberate actions of those which are guided by the good spirit of God as here Abraham not suddenly is moved to sacrifice his son but after three dayes journey having thorowly advised upon it he obediently yeeldeth himselfe to Gods commandement 3. Doct. The obedience of the will is accepted of God for the deed Vers. 12. SEeing for my sake thou hast not spared thine onely sonne God accepteth the resolute purpose and will of Abraham for the done deed An obedient will then is accepted before God as the worke it selfe as the Apostle saith If first there be a willing minde God accepteth it according to that a man hath not according to that he hath not 2 Cor. 8.12 Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. By faith we are assured of our justification Vers. 12. I Know that thou fearest God It is confessed by our adversaries that Abraham at this time was certaine that he was in the state of grace but because it is their opinion that we cannot by faith ordinarily be assured of remission of sinnes they have framed divers answers to this place 1. Thomas Aquinas saith that this assurance that Abraham had was a particular experimentall knowledge that in this worke he feared God Thom. 1.2 qu. 112. ar 3. Cont. Abraham not onely in this particular was assured of Gods favour but was undoubtedly perswaded of the promise in generall concerning the Messiah as the Apostle saith Neither did he doubt of the promise c. but was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 And this is that which our Saviour saith That Abraham desired to see his day he saw it and rejoyced Ioh. 8.56 His assurance which he had of salvation in the Messiah procured unto him this great joy 2. The same Thomas saith Abraham illud cognovit per specialem Dei revelationem That Abraham knew this that he was in the state of grace by Gods speciall revelation Contra. This assurance that Abraham had was not by any particular or extraordinary revelation but by the proper and ordinary operation of faith as the Apostle saith He was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 3. Pererius answereth that this revelation was made to the Patriarks in the old Testament and the Apostles in the new which were as it were the founders of the people of God 10. disput in 22. cap. Gen. Contra. Saint Paul in the matter of faith maketh no such difference betweene the Patriarks and other beleevers as he saith Now it is not written for him onely that it was imputed to him for righteousnesse but also for us c. Rom. 4.23 And the Apostle saith That a crowne of righteousnesse was not
Laudabile praise worthie si quis salva fide refugiat periâ—ulum instans If one not violating his faith doth shun the instant danger unlesse we will say that Christ when he escaped out of their hands that sought to stone him did it of feare Luke 4. But I rather preferre the 7. exposition before touched QUEST XXII Why Moses sufferings are called by the Apostle the rebukes of Christ. BUt seeing so oft mention hath beene made of that place to the Hebrewes it shall not be amisse briefly to shew the meaning of those other words of the Apostle vers 26. esteeming the rebuke of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt 1. We refuse here the exposition of Lyranus that he calleth the rebukes of Moses the rebukes of Christ because by faith foreseeing what Christ should suffer hee by Christs example was confirmed to endure the like for in this sense they are Moses rebukes rather than Christs 2. Neither are they called Christs rebukes because they were such as Christ commendeth Blessed are they that suffer persecution for righteousnesse sake Matt. 5. 3. or for that Christ was to come of that people and therefore their rebukes are counted the rebukes of Christ Cajetan 4. or because Moses was a figure of Christ and suffered the like rebukes because that as Moses left the Court and palace of Pharaoh to be partaker of the afflictions of his people so Christ descending from heaven tooke upon him our infirmities Oecumenius Theophylact. 5. But they are called Christs rebukes because he suffereth in his members and accounteth their afflictions as his owne in which sense the Apostle saith he fulfilled the rest of the afflictions of Christ in his flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Col. 1.24 QUEST 23. Why Pharaoh sought to slay Moses Vers. 15. PHaraoh heard of this matter and sought to slay Moses The causes why Pharaoh sought Moses life Iosephus alleageth to be these three 1. Because the Egyptians envied his prosperous successe in the warres against the Ethiopians 2. They feared him as like to be one that aspired to great matters and might seeke some innovation and change in Egypt 3. The Egyptian Priests did prophesie of him that he was like to prove very dangerous to Egypt By these meanes the King was incensed against him But I rather approve that which Philo writeth that Pharaoh was not so much moved against Moses for the death of one Egyptian as for that by this he perceived that Moses was a friend and favourer of the Hebrewes whom he accounted his enemies and an enemie to the Egyptians his subjects and friends Philo lib. 1. de vita Mosis QUEST XXIV The causes why Moses lived in exile and banishment 40. yeares Vers. 15. THerefore Moses fled Zeiglerus thinketh that whereas at the fortieth yeere of Moses age there were 390. yeeres expired since the promise made to Abraham and that tenne yeeres onely remained of the affliction of the people which was to continue 400. yeeres in one place and other Genes 15.13 Moses thought to prevent the time there being but tenne yeeres to come and therefore God punished his presumption with fortie yeeres exile But this cannot stand with the Apostles testimonie of Moses that by faith he forsooke Egypt if it were a worke of faith how could it be a punishment for his presumption Therefore the causes of Moses flight and exile are better touched by Ferus 1. That the people should not depend upon man but trust in God for their deliverance 2. That Moses might be weaned altogether from the pleasures of Egypt and delicate life in Pharaohs Court 3. That he might be taught that the deliverance of Israel should not be by sword or strength but by the spirit of God 4. To punish the peoples ingratitude for not more thankfully accepting of this benefit that God had stirred them up a deliverer for not onely this Hebrew whom Moses rebuked rejected his calling but generally all the people made light of it as S. Stephen sheweth Act. 7.25 QUEST XXV Of Midian what countrie it was and where situate Vers. 15. ANd dwelt in the land of Midian 1. This was the chiefe Citie of the Midianites so called of Midian one of the sonnes of Keturah by Abraham it was situate in Arabia upon the red sea as Iosephus 2. Hierome saith there were two Cities of this name one on the South part of Arabia by the red sea the other by Arnon and Arcopolis the ruines whereof were to be seene in his time 3. The whole Countrie was called Arabia where the Midianites Amalekites Israelites dwelt together Philo. And these Arabians were called Petrei of their metropolis or chiefe Citie Petra Borrh. 4. This Midian was not farre from Mount Sinai for thereabout did Moses keepe his father in lawes sheepe Exod. 3. and thither came Iethro with Moses wife and children and S. Paul placeth Sinai in Arabia Gal. 4. 5. The women of this Countrie joyning with the Moabites inticed the Israelites to commit fornication Numb 25. These Midianites oppressed Israel seven yeeres of whom Gideon slew 135000. Iud. 8. QUEST XXVI Rehuel Iethro Hobab whether the same Vers. 18. ANd when they came to Rehuel their father c. This Rehuel was not the same with Iethro as the Septuagint and Latine translator here read Iethro and as Hierome thinketh they were two names of the same man 2. Neither had he foure names Iethro Rehuel Hobab Keni as Thostatus Lyranus for Hobab was the sonne of Rehuel Numb 10.29 and hee was called Keni of his nation and countrey because he was a Kenite Numb 24.21 Iunius 3 Pererius also is deceived thinking that Hobab was not Moses father in law but his wives brother and his father in lawes sonne because saith he Moses father in law departed from them at Mount Sinai Exod. 18. but Hobab staied with them still and was their guide in the wildernesse Numb 10.31 But Pererius herein erreth also for these two stories of Iethro and Hobab Exod. 18. and Numb 10. must be joyned together they were both one man and hee tooke his leave of Moses as it is shewed Exod. 18. but he returned againe unto them before they departed from Sinai to be their guide as Moses requested Numb 10. and it is like he brought his kindred and family with him because the Kenites are read afterward to have cohabited with Israel Iudg. 1.16.4 Wherefore Rehuel was grandfather unto Moses wife called also their father after the manner of the Hebrewes Iethro and Hobab are the same for they are both said to be the father in law of Moses Exodus 18. and Num. 10.29 and Hobab and Iethro was the sonne of Rehuel ibid. Iun. QUEST XXVII Whether Rehuel were Prince and Priest of Midian Vers. 16. ANd the Prince of Midian c. The Hebrew word is Cohen which signifieth both Prince and Priest and one that is preferred or exalted in any office or authoritie as Davids sonnes are called
herein did not gesse amisse for he knew that they were a stiffe-necked people Ferus and he had already experience of their unthankfulnesse Simler Beside he considered that he was but base and contemptible and not of sufficient authority to bee respected Iun. and the power and tyranny of Pharaoh would keepe them backe from crediting him Borrh. and they would thinke it unlikely that God should speake to him whom never man saw Pellican 2. But it is more to bee doubted how Moses saith that the people would not beleeve seeing that the Lord had said before that the people should hearken to his voice chap. 3.18 Some thinke that Moses infirmity here strived with his faith against the word of God Borrh. Genevens But it is not like that Moses was so distrustfull or diffident noâ— to give credit to Gods word Other thinke that the Lord speaketh there onely of the Elders Moses of the people in generall Some that Moses meaneth not the people only but the Egyptians also that they would not beleeve Ferâ—s Some that the Lord spake before conditionally If they hearken to thy voice then thou and thy elders shall goe to the King of Egypt But Moses exception rather is here conditionall and he speaketh by supposition if the people beleeve not as the Septuagint then he desireth to know how he should perswade them so he doubteth not of the thing but desireth to be instructed in the manner Simler QUEST II. What the first signe meaneth of turning the rod into a serpent Vers. â— HE cast it into the ground and it was turned into a serpent 1. Aben Ezra by the rod turned into a serpent understandeth the cruelty and tyranny of Pharaoh by the serpent turned into a 〈◊〉 the abating of Pharaohs pride and tyranny when he suffered the Israelites to depart 2. Lyranus expoundeth it of the Hebrewes who when they were first afflicted became contemptible as a serpent creeping on the ground and occupied in base and terrene workes but afterward they obtained liberty and authority when they were delivered and so the serpent was turned into the rod. 3. Some referre it to Moses that he was as a serpent that is terrible to Pharaoh but he was comfortable to the people of Israel Simler 4. Augustine doth by way of allegory apply it to Christ hee is the rod turned into the serpent the rod of the Crosse which seemed base and contemptible unto the Jewes became the wisdome of the Gentiles 5. Rupertus another way doth interpret it of Christ The rod cast upon the ground was the Sonne of God taking our nature upon him it became a serpent so Christ was that serpent hanged on a tree by the serpent Christs death is signified because by the serpent death came into the world and by Christs death the serpent was overcome 6. Pererius here understandeth by the serpent cast upon the ground the nature of man corrupted by the temptation of Satan and restored by Christ as the serpent was changed againe into the rod. 7. Others doe expound it of the judgements of God which before they are shewed in the world are as a rod not felt but afterward they are fearefull and terrible even unto the children of God as Moses fleeth away at the sight of the serpent Ferus 8. But the best signification is this First in generall that these signes are terrible both to strike a terror in the heart of the Egyptians as also mystically to shew a difference of the Law the ministery whereof is fearefull and full of terror and the Gospell which bringeth comfort Ferus as also in particular it sheweth that the rod of Moses government should be terrible as a serpent to the Egyptians but as a rod and scepter of upright and lawfull government to the people Iunius QUEST III. What is signified by the leprosie of Moses hand Vers. 6. BEhold his hand was leprous as snow First some make the signification of this signe morall as that the leprous hand of Moses sheweth the workes of the Law that justifie not Ferus 2. Some make the sense thereof mysticall Augustine in the place before recited and Rupertus understand the leprous hand of the Synagogue of the Jewes rejected that are cast off as the leprous person was shut out of the hoste and the hand restored and healed betokeneth the Church of the Gentiles adopted in stead of the Jewes Pererius referreth it to Christ that he being the hand that is the power of his Father by taking our nature upon him became as it were leprous that is deformed and contemptible by his suffrings and passion but by his resurrection and ascension his glorie appeared 3. Some doe rather rest in the historicall sense Lyranus by the leprous hand understandeth the miserable state of the Hebrewes in the time of their cruell servitude who in their deliverance received their former liberty Theodoret thinketh the leprosie better to signifie the pollutions of Egypt wherewith Israel was defiled who being delivered were restored to the true and sincere worship of God Ferus doth thus interpret it that Moses at his first sending was an occasion that the Hebrewes were more cruelly handled for say they Yee have made our savour to stinke before Pharaoh chap. 5.21 but afterward his ministery and message wrought their joy and deliverance 4. But because the hand being the instrument of working betokeneth the ministery and authority of Mâ—ses the best application is that God would use a meane instrument to effect his will Moses in regard of his base and contemptible estate having lived a long time in exile and banishment seemed as a thing leprous and vile yet God should in this his service make him a glorious vessell and instrument sic Iuâ—iuâ— Simlerus 5. And this signe did both shew in generall that as the leprosie is only cured by God so their deliverance was only Gods worke Ferus and in particular to admonish Moses that he should not be lifted up in his minde because of the miracles wrought by his hand but be humled with the remembrance of his owne infirmity the leprosie of his hand Theodoret. QUEST IV. What kinde of leprosie Moses hand was striken with AS snow That is white as snow as Iunius see also Philo and Iosephus 1. This was the worst kinde of leprosie called Elephantiasis because it spotted the skin and made it looke like to an Elephants there were of it two kindes the common and generall leprosie and a peculiar onely found in Egypt which was incurable and commeth by contagion of the river Nilus as Luâ—râ—â—ius writeth lib. 6. 2. This white leprosie was of all other the worst when the body was all over spotted with white markes full of white scales and scurfe whereof there were two principall signes when the white spots did change the haire also white and were deeper and lower than the skinne Leviâ— 13. 3. With this kinde of incurable leprosie was Miriam striken being leprous white as snow and halfe eaten
in mind by this sudden sicknesse of his fault and spake or made signes to his wife to circumcise the child Aben Ezra Simler But the suddennesse and greatnesse of the sicknesse which made Moses altogether unable to doe it himselfe may be thought also to have given him small respite either to bethinke himselfe or to give notice to his wife 3. Some thinke that shee had heard before of her husband how straightly they were injoyned to circumcise their children the eight day and that of her selfe it came into her minde that they had not done well in omitting the childs circumcision Osiander But it seemeth by her words of indignation that shee had not so reverent an opinion of the necessity of circumcision as of her selfe to enter into an action so much displeasing unto her 4. Therefore I consent with Iunius that whether the Angell appeared in visible shape or no as some thinke yet by evident signes it appeared both to Moses and Zipporah that Gods wrath came upon him for that cause the phrase here used that the Lord occurrebat ei came upon him dimisit cum and departed from him doth shew that God after some sensible manner assaulted Moses that they both knew both from whence that sudden stroke came and for what cause QUEST XXXII Who it was that departed from Moses Vers. 26. SO he departed from him 1. Not Zipporah tooke her leave of Moses and returned to her father as Lyranus for beside that the Verbe is put in the Masculine gender in the originall it is more like that Moses sent Zâ—pporah backe than that shee first sought it 2. Nor yet is the meaning that Moses left him that is his child new circumcised and sent him backe to his father in law as Paulus Burgensis It should have beene said then that Moses left her which is his wife rather than him that is the infant that could not shift for himselfe Perer. 3. And to understand it of the disease that it left him is somewhat improper But it must be referred to the Angell for he departed now from Moses that before â—an upon him met him or assaulted him sic August q. 11. in Exod. QUEST XXXIII Of the mysticall application of this story NOw for the mysticall application of this story 1. That of Gregory Nyssen is somewhat farre fetcht that Moses married to Zipporah a Midianitish woman sheweth a Christian teacher addicted to Philosophie which he must circumcise and pare off many errorâ— from before it can bee admitted in Christianity 2. So is also that application of Pererius not so fit that as Moses was chastised because one of his children was uncircumcised though the other had received circumcision so it suffiseth not the judgement only to be reformed and circumcised but the will and affection also must be purged 3. That of Ferus is more fit that Christ may be said to be our husband of bloud by whose bloud we are purged And Zipporah betokeneth the Church which by repentance doth circumcise her children to make them acceptable unto God QUEST XXXIV What manner of faith it was which the people had in beleeving Moses Vers. 31. SO the people beleeved 1. Not all the people whom the Egyptian taskmasters would not suffer to intermit their worke Simler but a convenient number of the people gathered together with the Elders Pellican 2. These having seene the signes before mentioned as the Rod turned into a Serpent Mosâ—s hand suddenly to become leprous and to be healed againe and the water turned into bloud gave credit unto Moses and Aaron and beleeved they were sent of God Osiander 3. But this seemeth to have beene but a temporarie faith for a while after they are offended with Moses and Aaron when their affliction at the first was made more heavy Simler 4. And now they see the effect of Gods promise that the people should at the first hearken unto them Chap. 3.18 Borrh. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The use of true miracles Vers. 5. THat they may beleeve The end then and use of true miracles is to confirme faith whatsoever miracles are wrought to any other end as to perswade any false doctrine and to draw away the people from the true worship of God are false miracles wrought by the operation of Satan and are not to be regarded as Moses sheweth Deut. 13.2 Simler 2. Doct. Things by their nature noxious and hurtfull are subdued to the faithfull Vers. 4. HE put forth his hand and caught it By this that this Serpent is turned againe into a Rod and hath no power to hurt or harme Moses we see that by the power of God things by nature hurtfull yet to the beleeving and faithfull are not noxious or discommodious The Lions mouthes were stopped against Daniel the Viper that leaped upon Pauls hand forgat her kind This power and privilege floweth from Christ our head which as it is externally shewed in such miraculous workes so spiritually it is now seene in that the old Serpent the enemie of mankind hath no power to hurt any of the members of Christ. Simlerus 3. Doct. Temporary obedience doth often turne aside a temporary punishment Vers. 26. SO he departed from him c. Zipporah here not of any devotion but of necessity circumcised her sonne yet it pleased God so to accept of this forced obedience that he spared Moses so many times a temporary and externall obedience doth turne away a temporall punishment as Ahabs sackcloth put off the punishment threatned that it came not in his dayes So the Samaritanes corrupt worship of God delivered them from the Lions 2. Kings 17. Simler Piscator If God be so pleased sometime with outward service accepting the small beginnings of those that are comming unto him how much more acceptable unto him is the true spirituall worship 5. Places of controversie 1. Cont. Against popish transubstantiation Vers. 3. ANd it was turned into a Serpent This can give no warrant to the popish transubstantiation and that imagined conversion of the bread into the body of Christ for here both the Scripture testifieth that the Rod was turned into a Serpent and the sense discerned it but they can shew neither word for their devised change and sense also is against it Simler 2. Cont. Against the Arrians that Christ is a true God Vers. 16. THou shalt be to him as God The Arrians most blasphemously abuse this place making Christ no otherwise God than Moses is called God Cont. 1. Not the name Elohâ—m only is given unto Christ but Iehovah which is given to no creature 2. Not only the name of God but honour and worship are given unto him and to no creature beside Let all the Angels of God worship him Hebr. 1.6 Simler 3. Where the word Elohim is given unto men it is not properly attributed unto them but by way of comparison with others as here in respect of Aaron Moses is so called as by way of relation unto God because they
a commendation of himselfe But no such supposition iâ— here necessarie for Moses here ascribeth nothing to himselfe but onely sheweth how â—hey were set apart of God for this great worke neither is all kind of boasting unlawfull namely such as is referred to the glory of God as Saint Paul did say of himselfe that he laboured more than all the Apostles 2. As Aaron iâ— in the former verse set before Moses as having the preeminence of nature because he was eldest so here Moses is set before Aaron as having the preeminence of grace who was first called and from whose mouth Aaron was to receive direction and by whose hand Aaron was consecrated to the Priesthood Pellican QUEST XVI In what sense Moses saith he was of uncircumcised lips Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips and how should Pharaoh heare me c. 1. Whereas the Septuagint read of a small voyce Augustine moveth this doubt that Moses should be said to have so small a voice as though Pharaoh onely had not beene able to heare them quâ—st 7. in Exod. But this doubt ariseth upon ignorance of the originall for the true reading is I am of uncircumcised lips 2. As circumcision properly signifieth the cutting off that which is superfluous in the bodie and so consequently of any superfluitie in any power or facultie so uncircumcision signifieth the remaining of that superfluous part either in any part or power of the bodie or of the soule so because Moses stammered in his speech and so doubled many superfluous syllables in that sense he saith his lips that is his words uttered by his lips were uncircumcised Iun. But that which is uncircumcised is also taken for that which is polluted and defiled as S. Stephen saith Act. 7. that the Iewes were of uncircumcised hearts and eares Perer. But this is diligently to be marked that God notwithstanding Moses so oft complaineth of this naturall defect and imperfection yet would not take it from him but giveth him the supplie of his brother Aarons eloquence that Moses should not be sufficient of himselfe Perer. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Knowledge still increased the neerer they approched to the time of the Messias Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Lord did more fully reveale himselfe to Moses than to Abraham David saw more than Moses of Christ as it is extant in the Psalmes and evident by the particular prophesies of the Messiah Daniel saw more than David describing the very time of the Messiahs comming The Apostles saw more than the Prophets which desired to see those things which they saw and did not see them Matth. 13. Thus we see that still in processe of time knowledge increased and more still was added unto it and the neerer they came unto the time of the Messiah the greater was the light Gregor homil 16. super Ezechiel 2. Doct. God performeth his promises for his owne mercy and truths sake Vers. 4. AS I made my covenant with them The onely cause that moveth the Lord to be gratious to his people is the remembrance of his covenant which proceeded from his love there was nothing in this unthankfull people to procure the love of God toward them So the Apostle saith Herâ—iâ— iâ— love not that we loved God but that he loved us 1 Ioh. 4.10 Piscat 5. Places of confutation 1. Conf. Of certaine Hereticks that take exception to the authoritie of the booke of the Canticles Vers. 3. I Appeared unto c. by the name of almightie God Certaine Heretikes because God was knowne to Abraham by his name Shaddai to Moses by his name Iehovah and there is no booke in Scripture beside the Canticles wherein some of these names of God are not found have impiously taken exception upon this reason against this booke Contra. True it is that in the Canticles which are indited to set forth the sweet spirituall love betweene Christ and his Church the fearefull and terrible names of God are omitted in stead of omnipotent the Church calleth Christ her Spouse peaceable and lovely for Lord her Spouse her beloved for Iehovah that ineffable name she compareth him to a bundle of Myrrhe and to an Ointment powred out so Christ also giveth unto the Church amiable termes as Sister Spouse the Dove and such like and this is the cause why those fearefull names are omitted in that bookes Perer. And for the same cause Christ in the Gospell setteth not forth God under the names of Adâ—nai Shaddai Iehovah as in the Law but under the name of God and our Father because the Gospell bringeth peace and comfort not feare and terror sic Zeigler 2. Conf. Of the Iewes that attribute great force to the letters of the name Iehovah BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne The Jewes ascribe much unto this name affirming that by the vertue thereof miracles may be wrought and that Christ did thereby effect his great works they attribute unto this name power to cast out deuils to adjure spirits to heale diseases and hereupon Magicians in their devilish invocations abuse the names of God Elohim Adonai Iehovah Contra 1. Words have no vertue or propertie beside the signification If by words pronounced any thing bee effected it proceedeth of faith not of the sound of the words if any words of themselves wrought any thing most like the words of prayer yet not the words but the prayer of faith saveth Iam. 5.15 If it be answered that the uttering of the name of Iehovah to such purposes is with faith I replie that it cannot be because faith is grounded upon the word but they have no warrant out of the word that the syllables of the name Iehovah have any such force 2. Indeed in the name of Iehovah that is by faith in his name many great works have beene done but not by vertue of the letters and syllables As the seven sonnes of Sceva a Jew by the bare name of Iesus could doe nothing Acts 19.14 but by faith in his name were miracles wrought Act. 3.16 3. Christ wrought miracles not by words and syllables but because he was Iehovah the Lord of life and power himselfe he by his owne power brought forth these wonderfull works 4. Iosephus writeth that Alexander meeting Iaddâ—a the high Priest in his priestly garments having the name of Iehovah in his forehead did fall downe at his feet and worshipped But this was not done by vertue of those letters but by the power of God for being secretly asked of Parmenio why hee whom all men adored fell downe at the high Priests feet answered Non hunc se adorare sed Deo cujus pontifex esset honorem illum habuisse That he worshipped not him but yeelded that honour to God whose Priest he was 6. Places of morall use 1. Observ. The greater light of the Gospell requireth greater faith Vers. 3. BVt by my name Iehovah was I not knowne This then was a just rebuke unto the
else the miracle is in that out of the which a thing is made or brought forth as to make a thing of nothing to give fight unto a man that is borne blind and such like and this is the next degree of miracles 3. Or the miracle is seene in the manner as a Physitian may heale a man but not of a sudden or without mâ—dicine so the spirits may bring forth Serpents or other vermine out of wood but not immediatly Now the wonders wrought by Magicians are not properly of any of these sorts of miracles but they are either cousening and counterfeit trickes or procured by naturall meanes Ex Pererio QUEST XX. Of the difference betweene true miracles and false FOr the second true miracles differ from false these five wayes 1. In respect of the power whereby they are wrought for true miracles are wrought by the power of God in whose name the Prophets and Apostles and other servants of God did shew forth signes but Magicians doe bring forth their wonders either by the force of naturall things or by the helpe of Satan 2. They differ in the qualitie of their persons that are the agents and ministers for they which worke in Gods name are holy and vertuous men and if any of them doe sometime effect any miraculous thing they doe it for the confirming of the faith or to some other good end but Magicians and Sorcerers are most wicked and impure men 3. The third difference is in the worke it selfe for the signes and wonders of Magicians are either counterfeit or unprofitable but true miracles are done in truth and upon great necessity and utility 4. They differ in the manner of working for true miracles are done by lawfull holy and godly meanes as by fasting prayer invocation of the name of God but Magicians worke by inchantment by words and signes and other superstitious rites 5. The end also is divers for Sorcerers worke wonders either for their profit and honour to make the people seeke unto them as Simon Magus did in Samaria Acts 8. or to confirme the people in errour and superstition but the end of true miracles is to seeke the glory of God the edifying of his Church and the propagation of the faith Ex Perer. 6. Hereunto may be added the sentence and judgement of Augustine Aliter miracula faciunt magi aliter boni Christiani aliter mali Christiani Magi per privatos quosdam contractus boni Christiani per publicam justitiam mali Christiani per signa publicae justitiae c. Magicians doe worke miracles one way good Christians another and evill Christians another Magicians by private contracts with the spirits good Christians by publike justice that is by the power and authority of God evill Christians by the signes of publike justice As divers that followed not Christ nor yet beleeved in him yet in the name of Christ wrought miracles as evill and disordered and discarded souldiers may use the ensignes and banner of the Captaine to terrifie their enemies QUEST XXI Whether the sorcerers brought forth true serpents IT followeth now to shew whether these serpents which the Magicians made were true serpents or only counterfeited for the time 1. Some thinke that it was a true and reall conversion of the Magicians rods into serpents and that it was done by the power of God and that Satan did craftily challenge unto himselfe Gods worke Simler but the text is against this conjecture they are said to doe the like by their enchantments vers 11. but the power of God giveth no place to enchantments 2. Others thinke that they were true serpents so converted by the power of Satan so August lib. 3. de Trinitat cap. 7. and in other places and Theodoret quaest 18. in Exod. Thom. Aquin. Lyranus Thostatus Burgens Cajetane of the same opinion seemeth Philo to be lib. de vita Moses their reasons are these 1. Because the Magicians are said to doe in like manner with their rods and in the same phrase their rods are said to be turned into serpents as Aarons rod is 2. And againe afterward the Sorcerers could not bring out lice as they had serpents and frogs before their impotencie was not in not shewing shapes or shewes but in not being able to bring forth the things themselves sic Cajetan and Moses serpents devoured their serpents they were therefore true serpents if they had beene otherwise it is like Moses would have discovered their counterfeit dealing sic Perer. Contra. 1. They did the like in outward shew and appearance and the same phrase is used of both because to the sight and view they were so changed and the Scripture useth to speake of things as they appeare not as they are as he that appeared unto the witch at Endor is called Samuel yet being the Devill in his likenesse and habit 1. Sam. 28. and Daniel saith the man Gabriel chap. 9. because hee appeared in the shape of a man 2. The Sorcerers were restrained in their counterfeit dealing that they should not be able any more to deceive by their phantasticall and imaginary shapes 3. Rupertus doth gather the contrary that the devouring of the Sorcerers serpents by Aarons serpent sheweth that they were but counterfeit devorari ergo devorare non poâ—nerunt because they could not devoure but were devoured 4. And in this sufficiently Moses discovereth their sleights in that his serpent devoureth theirs Now further against this opinion this speciall argument may be urged that God only hath power to change and convert one substance into another especially a dead thing into a living body a peece of wood into a serpent as it was decreed in the Avansicane Councell in this manner Quisquis credit aliquid posse fieri aut aliam creaturam in melius aut deterius mutari aut transformari in aliam speciem vel similitudinem nisi ab ipso creatore qui omnia fecit proculdubio infidelis est pagano deterior Whosoever beleeveth that any thing can be made or any creature to be changed into the better or worse or transformed into any shape or likenesse but by the creator which hath made all things is undoubtedly an infidell and worse than a Pagan To this argument divers answers are framed 1. Cajetane saith that the Devill might use some naturall meanes secretly by the which serpents might be made out of those rods and all the time while the Sorcerers were called together Satan made a way for that worke and prepared the matter Contra. There is no naturall meanes to make a rod a serpent immediatly and especially to bring forth serpents at once of perfect bignesse neither was there any such preparation of matter for they were rods in the Sorcerers hands not changed into any other preparative matter fit to engender serpents 2. Cajetane answereth againe that although the rod of it selfe was no fit matter for such a worke yet by the excellencie of the agent and worker which were the spirits it
chap. 8 quest 12. and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such
are preserved from evill spirits hath no shew of any warrant at all in the Scripture which Pharisaicall superstition is reproved by our Saviour Matth. 23.5 for while their chiefe care was to bind such monuments unto their foreheads and hands in the meane time the law went out of their hearts The like superstition hath much prevailed in time past among Christians who by writing some parcell of Scripture as the beginning of the Gospell of S. Iohn and by hanging it about their necke or an Agnus Dei and such like thought themselves sufficiently garded against spirituall assaults Simler 5. Augustine is farre wide in the application of this ceremony for upon these words It shall be as a signe upon their hands thus collecteth Super manus id est super opera that is upon their workes and so inferreth hereupon that fides praeponenda est operibus that faith is to bee preferred before workes which assertion and conclusion of his is most true yet not proper or peculiar to this place August quaest 48. in Exod. QUEST VIII Of the redeeming of the first borne of uncleane beasts Vers. 13. EVery first borne of an asse c. 1. The first borne which were peculiar unto God were either of men or beasts the firstlings of the beasts were either cleane or uncleane the cleane were to be sacrificed the uncleane were either to be redeemed or else to be beheaded as the asse and other beasts of service but some could not be redeemed but they must be killed as the dog Simler 2. By the first borne of the asse all other uncleane beasts are signified this kind is put for the rest because there were great store of them in that country Iun. 3. The neck must be striken off lest that which was holy unto God should bee put to prophane uses Iun. and by the horror of this â—ight to testifie the ingratitude of the owner of the beast who had rather his beast should be killed than redeemed Pellican This breaking or cutting off the necke did signifie also the hard and stiffe necke of the people which in time the Lord would bend and breake Borrh. 4. God would have the first borne of uncleane beasts also to be peculiar to him although they were not ordained for sacrifice yet were they otherwise necessary and profitable for mans use and to let them understand that to God nothing was uncleane which he had made but he saw all things to be exceeding good Pellican QUEST IX Of the conditions required in the first borne of cleane beasts Vers. 12. THe males shall bee the Lords c. 1. Three things are required in the first borne of beasts which should be offered unto God 1. That they should bee of cleane beasts for it was not lawfull to present any uncleane thing unto God Vatab. 2. Then the first borne to acknowledge God the giver and author of all things which we have Pellican 3. They must be males because the best and most perfect things must be given unto God and this was a type of that perfect man Christ Jesus whereunto the Apostle alludeth when he saith Till we all meet together c. unto a perfect man and unto the measure of the age of the fulnesse of Christ Ephes. 4.13 Borrh. 2. Elsewhere in the law there are three other rules set downe to be observed in the consecration of the first borne as first that the first borne should bee seven dayes with the damme and upon the eight day it should bee given unto God Exod. 22.30 which time was set both to prevent the fraud which might bee used in offering things soone taken from the damme which were of no use nor service and so the Lord should be defrauded aâ— also in this perfixed time of 8. dayes there was a correspondency to the law of circumcision which was limited to the eight day Gen. 17.12 Calvin Secondly in voluntary oblations they were forbidden to dedicate unto the Lord any of the first borne because it was the Lords already Levit 27.26 which was to prevent and to meet with mens hypocrisie that would pretend devotion in offering somewhat unto God but yet would give him nothing but that which was his owne already Thirdly they were commanded Neither to doe any worke with the first borne bullocke nor to sheare their first borne sheepe Deut. 15.19 this was commanded to stay mens covetousnesse that although they would not defraud the Lord of his first borne yet would take so much profit of it as they could therefore they are charged to offer unto God his first borne without any diminution neither to present a first borne bullocke worne out with labour or a shorne sheepe Calvin QUEST X. Of the law of redeeming the first borne of men Vers. 13. LIkewise the first borne among thy sonnes shalt thou buy out with money 1. The reason of this exception was both because it was an impious thing to offer any humane sacrifice unto God Simler such were the impious sacrifices of the Heathen to consecrate their sonnes through the fire unto their abominable Idols which the Lord forbiddeth his people to doe That they should not give of their children to Moloch Lev. 20.2 Another reason was because the Lord had determined that the Levits should be consecrate to his peculiar service in stead of the first borne Calvin 2. There are two kinds of exchanges made for the first borne one was for that time only when the Levites were taken for the Lord in stead of the first borne as the males of the Levites from one moneth old being 22000. were given unto God out of all Israel for their first borne which came to 22270. persons and the odde 270. persons were redeemed for money every one being set at 5. shekels Numb 3.47 The other redemption was perpetuall which was made with money for every one of their first borne they were to give five shekels Numb 18.16 3. The first borne also were two wayes to be redeemed one was peculiar unto the first borne to redeeme them with money the other was common not only unto the first borne but unto all males which should be borne that the mother at the time of her purifying should offer a lambe or a paire of turtle doves or of young pigeons Levit. 2.6.8 but this offering served rather for the purifying of the mother than for the consecrating of the child Both these lawes were fulfilled in the birth of our Saviour Christ for both hee was presented unto God as the first borne and his mother brought an oblation according to the law Luk. 2.23 24. Ferus 4. There were also two kindes of consecrating the first borne the one wherein the Lord had a right unto them as unto the first borne of cleane beasts which were to be sacrificed in which case the first borne were to be redeemed the other when they were consecrate unto Gods speciall service in the tabernacle as Anna vowed Samuel unto God or to a more strict
of to bee of this third kinde because hee thinketh that the law was not given by God himselfe but by an Angell representing Gods person and speaking in his name which is his errour that now followeth in the next place to bee discussed QUEST XX. Whether Iehovah Christ Iesus appeared not in the old Testament but only or usually the Angels TOstatus opinion is that this was not the Lord himselfe that came downe in this thicke cloud in the mount but an Angell in the person of God And he hath beside these positions concerning the apparition of Angels in the old Testament 1. Not only in this place but in all other where any act is said to be done by God we must understand that the Angels did it Nisi sit talis actus qui excedit potentiam creatam Vnlesse it be such an act which exceedeth the power of a creature 2. The reason why notwithstanding God is said to doe those things though they were performed by the Angels is lest the Hebrewes hearing that the Angels wrought such great workes for them as in bringing them out of Egypt in giving them the law and such like should have worshipped the Angels as authors of these benefits As in like manner the Heathen made them Gods that had beene meanes to bestow some benefit as Minervae for the invention of divers arts Ceres in Grecia for finding out the art of measuring Saturne in Italy for teaching of husbandry Phoebus for soothsaying Aesculapius for Physicke 3. Yet sometime the Angels are said to doe those acts when as either they are but small matters and not such admirable or great workes as when the Angel appeared to send Hagar home againe to her mistresse which was no great matter and when the Angels were sent to destroy Sodome which was no admirable thing to destroy a City or when the worke though it be a great worke concerne but a private person and not the whole nation as when the Angell came to purifie the Prophet Isayes lips Isay 6. 4. Yet sometime God is said to doe those things which were not in themselves so great because the persons were but weake with whom the Lord had to deale for the strengthning of their faith 5. Sometime great workes are said to be done by the Angels but then mention is made also of God in the same place as in the vision of Iacobs ladder the Angels are said to ascend and descend but God stood upon the top of the ladder 6. And though while yet the Hebrewes were weake and as it were in their nonage the greater workes done by Angels are ascribed unto God yet afterward Cum Hebraicus populus in cognitione Dei firmior factus est When the Hebrew people were more confirmed in the knowledge of God Angelus illa magnalia quâ— ad Deum pertinebant se fecisse dicebat The Angell is said to doe those things which appertained unto God as Iudg. 2. the Angell of the Lord c. said I made you to goe up out of Egypt 7. But concerning the law it was given by Angels as the Apostle sheweth Galath 3. they made the thunder and caused the voices in the mount they wrought the wonders in Egypt and brought out the people thence and conducted them in the wildernesse To this effect Tostat. quaest 6. 7. Contra. All these are untrue and uncertaine positions as shall be shewed in their order 1. S. Stephen saith that the God of glory appeared unto Abraham in Mesopotamia and bid him come out of his country Act. 7.2 This was a matter which exceeded not the power of an Angell to bid Abraham to goe out of his country yet was it done by the Lord himselfe and not by an Angell for an Angell without blasphemy cannot be said to be the God of glory Againe to appeare in the likenesse of a flame of fire in a bush and the bush not consumed is not an impossible worke to a created Angell yet it was God himselfe even Christ the Sonne of God that so appeared for he is called the God of Abraham the God of Izhak Exod. 3.6 which could bee no Angell And Moses pronouncing a blessing upon Ioseph saith The good will of him that dwelt in the bush shall come upon the head of Ioseph Deut. 33. 16. but God only hath the power and authority of blessing as Iakob also saith concerning Ioseph By the God of thy father who shall helpe thee and by the Almighty who shall blesse thee Gen. 44.24 To blesse then belongeth properly and originally for ministerially wee deny not but that both Angels and men may blesse to him that is able to effect the blessing but so doth only the Almighty to whom nothing is impossible But Angels are not omnipotent or Almighty It was God therefore and not an Angell that appeared in the bush Now then by these places given in instance it is evident that some things said to be done by God in the Scriptures not exceeding the power of Angels were so done by the Lord himselfe and not by the Angels And so the first position of Tostatus faileth 2. Neither is that a good reason why in the rehearsall of the great workes the name of the Angels is concealed and they are ascribed unto God lest the Hebrewes might have worshipped the Angels as their patrones and authors of those benefits 1. Because there is no such danger when as the Angels doe shew themselves to be but the ministers and messengers of God and speake in the name of God As Lot could make a difference betweene the Angels who were but Gods ministers as they say Iehovah hath sent us to destroy the City Gen. 19.13 and Iehovah himselfe to whom Lot afterward turneth himselfe vers 19. Not so my Lord c. whereas speaking before to the Angels he calleth them Lords in the plurall 2. Rather by this meanes if the Angels did the workes and the Scripture saith God did them they ignorantly should have worshipped the Angels in Gods stead knowing none other but that God himselfe appeared when it was but his Angell 3. And beside where in the same place mention is made both of the Angell of Iehovah and of Iehovah himselfe as Exod. 3.22 it is said the Angell of the Lord appeared who is called Iehovah vers 7. If it had not beene the Lord himselfe but an Angell this would have given them occasion to thinke that the Angell was the Lord. 3. It was Iehovah the Lord Christ and not a ministring Angell that appeared to Hagar Gen. 16. as it is evident vers 13. she called the name of Iehovah that spake unto her and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was the Lords worke wherein notwithstanding hee used the ministry of the Angels as it is expresly said Iehovah rained upon Sodome and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from Iehovah c. These places therefore are impertinently alleaged And further wee shall finde in Scripture that in small workes and such as concerned
usuall phrase in Scripture that the Lord speaketh of himselfe Tanquam de aliquo tertio As of some third person as chap. 19.11 The Lord himselfe saith to Moses The third day will the Lord come downe Lippom. 4. This further was admirable that all the whole host of Israel containing so many hundred thousand did at once heare and understand the voice wherein God spake unto them as Moses witnesseth Deut. 4.10 Iehovah spake unto you out of the middest of the fire and you heard the voice of the words I remember that Chrysostome in a certaine homily did gesse there were about 100. thousand that were then present to heare him but in the campe of Israel there being 600000. men of warre above twenty beside the young and old women and strangers which might well make five times so many toward 30. hundred thousand as Tostatus and others conjecture it was a wonderfull and strange thing that one voice should be heard of them all as Iosephus saith Omnes audiebant vocem sublimi descendentem ut nemo non intelligeret All heard the voice that came downe from above so that there was none which did not understand and as Cajetane saith Proportionata erat tam propinquis quà m distantebus auditoribus The voice was so proportioned that all heard both neere and further off And therefore it is called A great voice Deut. 5.22 5. And where it is said All these words the meaning is the ten Commandements only to the 18. verse of this twenty chapter for all the Judicials and Ceremonials following were not uttered by the voice of the trumpet but delivered to Moses Tostat. And these words were spoken in this order here set downe and as they were afterward graven in the two tables of stone Moses doth not set them downe altogether after the same manner Deut. 5. which hee doth as an interpreter and expounder of the law Iun. QUEST VIII Why it pleased God himselfe to speake to his people in the giving of the law NOw it pleased God himselfe to pronounce this law in the hearing of the people for these reasons 1. To win the more authority unto his Commandements that they should not contemne and despise them afterward Ferus As Moses afterward rendreth this reason vers 2. That his feare may bee before you that you sinne not Burgens 2. That they might afterward give more credit unto Moses the Lord speaking unto him in the hearing of the people So the Lord himselfe saith Loe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare whiles I talke with thee and that they may beleeve thee for ever chap. 19.9 3. That the people might know that the Lord was their Lawgiver that he and none other did prescribe them Lawes and that to him and none other they should yeeld obedience 4. The people hereby had experience of Gods mercy that vouchsafed to speake unto mortall men as they themselves confesse Wee have seene this day that God talketh with man and he liveth Deut. 5.24 Burgens QUEST IX Of the division of the Morall law NOw the Morall law is first divided according to the subject and matter into two tables the first comprehending those precepts which concerne the worship of God in the foure first Commandements the second those which command the duties to our neighbour This division is warranted by our blessed Saviour Matth. 22.37 dividing the law into two generall or great Commandements Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart c. This is the first and the great Commandement and the second is like unto it Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe Simler And the reason of this division is that by this order in setting our duty toward God before our duty toward our neighbour the greatnesse and eminencie of the one over the other should be manifest according to the Apostles rule It is better to obey God than man Act. 4.19 And therefore our blessed Saviour calleth the first the great Commandement Vrsin Iosephus then is deceived who putteth five Commandements to the first table making the fift Commandement of honouring the parents one of them But beside the former reason that the precepts onely commanding our duty toward God belong to the first table S. Paul convinceth him who calleth the fift Commandement the first with promise Ephes. 6.2 meaning the first of the second table but in Iosepus opinion it should be the last of the first table Simler Another reason of this division of the tables in setting the precepts first which prescribe our duty toward God is to teach us that no morall or civill duties as of justice chastity sobriety are pleasing unto God if they do not proceed from faith and from an heart setled aright in the true worship of God And therefore those glorious outward workes among the Heathen of justice fortitude temperance were not true vertues before God because they proceeded not from the knowledge and feare of God 2. Another division of the law is into the severall particular parts whereof it consisteth that is ten Commandements therefore called ten words Exod. 34.28 and Deut. 4.13 which are so many not because God delighteth in that number but because of the summe and argument of the things therein contained which are necessarily drawne to so many heads nothing being either omitted or superfluously added Vrsin 3. The law further in respect of the matter of the particular precepts is divided thus that generally in the morall law is contained the worship of God and the same either immediate or mediate The immediate which directly concerneth God is either internall both who is to bee worshipped prescribed in the first Commandement and after what manner with spirituall worship in the second or externall which is either private in not prophaning Gods name precept 3. or publike in the sanctifying of the Sabbath precept 4. The mediate service of God which indirectly is referred to him but directly and properly concerneth our neighbour is likewise either externall which consisteth either in speciâ—ll offices as of the mutuall duties betweene superiours and inferiours precept 5. or generall toward all sorts of men as in the preserving of our neighbours life precept 6. of his chastity precept 7. of his goods precept 8. of the truth precept 9. The internall is in the rectifying our very desires and inward affections toward our neighbours precept 10. Vrsin Which subdivision is very apt and fit saâ—ing that hee maketh all the law but one great Commandement the worship of God whereas our Saviour divideth it into two which division of necessity must be received Some concurring with Vrsinus in the subdivision of the first table doe otherwise distribute the second in this manner it commandeth either speciall duties of some certaine callings in the 5. or generall in the rest and that either in respect of our neighbour in the 6 7 8 9. or of God who knoweth the heart and so the very inward concupiscence is forbidden in
ages of the world the 1. from the creation to the floud the 2. from Abraham till the giving of the law the 3 from thence to Christ the 4. from the comming of Christ unto the end of the world which Christ calleth a generation when he saith this generation shall not passe till all these things be fulfilled Augustine not much differing understandeth these foure generations the 1. from Abraham to David the 2. from David to the captivitie of Babylon the 3. from thence to the comming of Christ the 4. from Christ unto the end of the world in the which fourth generation God visited upon the Jewes the iniquitie of their fathers and cast them out of their land August cont Adimant cap. 7. Contra. 1. But if these foure generations should be taken for the continuance of the world then what difference should there be betweene the third and fourth generation and the thousand generation limited for the Lords shewing of mercie 2. The generation that our blessed Saviour speaketh of was that present age wherein those things concerning the destruction of Jerusalem should be fulfilled 3. And lawes are made to meet with inconveniences following not alreadie past to what end then should the generations be counted which went before the making of the law And at the comming of Christ he found not the Jewes given to Idolatrie for the which sinne specially this punishment is threatned 4. Hierome maketh this allegoricall exposition thus mystically applying these foure generations to the foure degrees of sinnes the first in the thought the second in the will and purpose the third when the sinne is brought into act the fourth Si in tuis sceleribus glorieris if thou gloriest in sinne These two last the Lord useth to punish and not the former Hieron in Ezech. cap. 18. Contra. 1. If the third and fourth generation are thus to bee expounded then so must the thousand mentioned afterward but it will be hard to make a thousand degrees of vertue 2. Neither is it true that God onely punisheth the two last degrees of sinne the act and glorying in it for our Saviour sheweth that adulterie may bee committed in the heart Matth. 5. and Moses was punished for his incredulitie at the waters of strife which was internall Numb 20. 5. Lippoman hath this conceit that the third and fourth generation are to be put together and so they make the seventh generation and then this is the sense Deus tantae severitatis c. God is of such severitie that the punisheth impietie in the seventh generation when as it seemeth to be forgotten the posteritie being by so many degrees distant from their ancestors that sinned Contra. But Lippoman in the same place doth answer himselfe shewing out of Scripture that these numbers must be counted not as one added to another but as included one within another as Prov. 30.18 There be three things hid from me yea foure that I know not he meaneth not three and foure but foure in all as it followeth in the next verse 6. Therefore this is the best reason why the Lord nameth the third and fourth generation because men may live so long to see their offspring to the fourth generation as it is said of Iob chap. 42. Acacius Et sic mutuò videre possunt filii peccata parentum ad imitandum patres poenas filiorum ad dolendum And they may mutually see both the sonnes the sinnes of their parents to imitate and the fathers the punishment of their sonnes to grieve at Thomas 1.2 quaest 87. art 8. And two other reasons beside are yeelded hereof both that the parents by this long suffering of God in not punishing presently might bee called to repentance Vt ex hac punitione tolerationem divinam non parvi pendant patres c. That the parent should not lightly esteeme this divine forbearance Cajetan And beside to shew that if they cannot be wonne with this lenitie and longanimitie of God that they shall not goe unpunished Longanimis sum in parentes c. I am long suffering toward the parents and toward their sonnes Si autem nepotes majorum suorum peccata secuti fuerint ultionem infligam But if the nephewes doe follow the sinnes of their ancestors at the last I will inflict punishment Theodoret. QUEST IX Why mercie is promised to be shewed to a thousand generations SHewing mercie unto thousands 1. Augustine understandeth this of a thousand yeeres as if any of the seed of David love the Lord Quem constat utique ante mille annos fuisse who was a thousand yeares since for two causes God will shew him mercie Quia ipse Dei cultor est exejus semine qui amaverat Deum Because both he himselfe is a worshipper of God and of his seed that loved God Quaest. veter nov testam cap 14. Câ—ntra But it is evident by the construction of the words that in this clause must be supplied the word generations which is understood before the words in the originall are To the thirds and the fourths that is those which are in the third and fourth generation from their fathers and so must thousands be understood here now a thousand generations is more than a thousand yeares 2. Theodoret maketh particular application of this unto the calling of the Gentiles Quae per Abraha semen benedictionem divinam adeptae sunt Which through Abrahams seed obtained the divine blessing after so many yeeres But this is not fitly applied for here mercie is promised to a thousand of them that love God but the Gentiles were Idolaters before they were called to the knowledge of Christ therefore they are without the compasse of this promise It was rather fulfilled in the beleeving Jewes who while they followed the faith and did the works of Abraham continued the Lords people more than two thousand yeeres 3. Acacius expoundeth thus Interminatum tempus significavit in quo anima ipsa postquam ex hac vita transmigraverit indeficientem à Deo misericordiam consequetur Hee signifieth an undetermined time wherein the soule after it is passed out of this life doth obtaine mercie never fayling at the hands of God Contra. But this terme of thousands cannot be referred to the immortall state in the next world because hee speaketh of the time of keeping Gods commandements which is in this life and beside as the one part of the third and fourth generation must be understood of the time of this life so likewise must the other 4. Neither can it be taken literally for from the first man Adam to the last shall there not to be a thousand generations seeing from our blessed Saviour to Adam there are rehearsed not full out fourescore generations Luk. 3. and yet here it is said to thousands which cannot bee lesse than two thousand Tostatus 5. Wherefore the best solution is this that here poâ—itur numerus certus pro incerto a certaine number is put for an uncertaine Tostat.
certaine place first to the Tabernacle then to the Temple of Salomon but now the worship of God is not tied to any certaine place as at Jerusalem where the Temple was Ioh. 4.21 3. Other Sacraments are instituted in place of the old as Baptisme and the Eucharist therefore the old are abrogated 4. The ceremonies did bind the observers to the keeping of the whole law and the rites thereof he which was circumcised was bound to keepe the whole law Galath 5.3 but we are not bound now to the whole law from which bondage Christ hath freed us Ergo. 5. The ceremonies were a wall of partition and distinction betweene the Jewes and Gentiles but now that distinction is taken away all being one in Christ therefore that wall whereby they were parted and distinguished is removed also Simler 2. As touching the politike and judiciall lawes of Moses neither doe they absolutely â—ind now 1. Many of these lawes were peculiar to the policie of that Common-wealth as the lawes concerning their inheritances and possessions which were not to passe from tribe to tribe and they shewed the fashions and manners of that countrie as in building their houses with flat roofes as Deut. 22.8 Of these positive constitutions there is now no use among other nations 2. The condition of all people is not alike some are more stubborne and obstinate some more civill and tractable and therefore some have need of more strict and severe lawes than others one kinde of politicke law then cannot serve for all nations 3. The Gospell which is perpetuall prescribeth not a certaine forme of government to all nations neither overthroweth their severall policies but in generall commandeth obedience to all higher powers Rom. 13.1 Ergo much lesse the law which was to be changed Simler But the judiciall law is not abrogated Quoad substantiam finem universalem â—quitatem In respect of the substance end and universall equitie which is in punishing of vice and maintaining of peace Bucanus See more hereof quest 4. general cap. 1. 3. The Morall law is not now in force quoad justificationem in respect of justification Rom. 3.28 A man is justified by faith without the works of the law but it bindeth quoad obedientiam In respect of obedience we are bound to keepe all the precepts of the law but yet quoad terrorem modum obedientiae in respect of the terror of the law and manner of obedience which was to be obedient and subject unto it for feare of punishment wee are freed now from it and therefore the Apostle saith The law is not given to a righteous man 1 Tim. 1.9 because they of love rather than feare do yeeld their obedience and so are a law unto themselves Simler But this is a privilege onely of the regenerate As for carnall and unregenerate men they are still under the curse and terror of the law according to that saying Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law to doe them Buâ—â—â— 2. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the particular contents of this precept THou shalt not covet First the things commanded here are these 1. Originall justice which is an inclination and desire of the minde to performe all duties unto our neighbour Vrsin 2. Diligent care and circumspection even to take heed of the smallest sinnes and to watch over the very thoughts Prov. 3.23 Keepe thy heart with all diligence for thereout commeth life Basting Secondly contrarie unto this precept 1. Is originall corruption which is the generall corruption and depravation of our nature and that evill habit wherein wee are conceived and borne as David saith Behold I was borne in iniquitie and in sinne hath my mother conceived me Psal. 51.5 2. All evill inclinations of the heart whereby it is sollicited to doe any thing against the law of God this evill concupiscent is of two sorts it either hath principium internum the beginning within as is fleshly and carnall desire or externum without by some externall object which are the concupiscence of the eye and pride of life as the Apostle calleth them 1 Ioh. 16. 3. And not onely these kinds of concupiscence but all other phantasies and cogitations of the minde which are contrarie to the law of God are here restrained Basting 2. Doct. Of the severall properties of possessions and goods and the distinction of callings FUrther in that the Lord forbiddeth to covet our neighbours house servant c. wee see the Lord establisheth and confirmeth hereby both the severall rights in possessions lands and other substance which right and propertie the Lord will not have violated so much as in the concupiscence and inward desire As also here it is evident that the difference of callings and distinction of degrees as betweene master and servant standeth with the will of God as our blessed Saviour and his Apostles also every where teach Simler 3. Doct. The difference betweene divine and humane lawes HErein also is set forth an apparent difference betweene the law of God and the lawes of men Lex humana judicat facta dicta divina judicat etiam cogitata Mans law onely judgeth doings and sayings but Gods law judgeth the very thoughts and the reason hereof is because man judgeth onely according to the outward appearance and evidence but the Lord seeth the heart Thomas And the perfection of Divinitie is hereby declared beyond Philosophie which condemneth not the inward lusts and desires of the minde neither holdeth a man for the same whether they bee good or evill to be worthie praise or dispraise But the law of God striketh at the very root of evill actions which is the inward concupiscence and corruption of the heart 4. Doct. Of the concupiscence of the soule and of the flesh IT shall not bee amisse here to insert Chrysostomes distinction of concupiscence As wee have two natures one of the soule the other of the flesh so wee have two wils one of the soule the other of the flesh habemus duas itas duas concupiscentias c. we have also two kinds of anger and two kinds of concupiscence one of the soule the other of the flesh the nature of the flesh cannot bee separated from all these Necesse habet irasci concupiscere c. It cannot chuse but to be angrie to covet because it is sold under sinne but the soule being created according to the justice of God potest non irasci c. cannot bee angrie nor covet therefore when wee are angrie and covet if wee displease ourselves and represse these passions it is manifest that our flesh onely is angrie and coveteth and not the soule Such kinde of passions then here are forbidden wherein the soule consenteth with the flesh To this purpose Chrysost. hom 12. in Matth. 3. Places of controversie 1. Conf. Against the Pelagians that denie concupiscence to be sinne FIrst we are here to deale against the Pelagians
foundation as there were two sockets under every boord by the bars are understood the Ministers and teachers of the Gospell by whose preaching the frame of the Church is held together 3. The two vailes did both keepe the people from curious gazing and bold accesse which admonisheth us that we must not draw neere unto God without great reverence 4. The large outward court did represent and prefigure the vocation of the Gentiles which should be called in great multitudes whereas the Church of the Jewes was straitned and pent up in a small corner Simler 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. There is no salvation but in Christ. Vers. 1. THou shalt make the Altar The Israelites had but one onely Altar appointed upon the which they were to offer all their sacrifices and therefore both Ieroboam sinned that afterward set up two other Altars one in Dan the other in Beersheba and Vrias the high Priest who to please the idolatrous King Ahaz caused a new Altar to be set up after the patterne of the Altar of Damascus This one Altar was a type of our blessed Saviour who onely satisfieth for our sinnes neither are we to use any other helpes in our owne works or in the merits or mediation of Saints beside Christ for this were nothing else Quam aliud novum Altare prater Christum instituere Then to appoint another new Altar beside Christ who onely is ordained of God to bee the Saviour of the world Marbach As S. Peter saith Neither is there salvation in any other for among men there is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved Act. 2.12 2. Doct. That all things should be done orderly in the Church Vers. 9. THou shalt make the court of the Tabernacle We learne by this that Nihil in Ecclesia confusum esse debet Nothing in the Church must be confused but all disposed in order as in the Tabernacle the outward court was appointed for the Levits and vulgar sort the holy place for the Priests the most holy place none could enter into but the high Priest So now in the Church of God all things should be done in comelinesse and order Our assemblies should be orderly and reverently set and disposed Distinction of degrees and persons to be observed not all confusedly shuffled together as now in many Churches men and women one with another are mingled together Oleaster This is S. Pauls rule that all things be done honestly and by order 1 Cor. 14.40 3. Doct. The mysteries of Christian religion are manifested to all Vers. 16. IN the gate of the court shall bee a vaile of twentie cubits Although the court were compassed about with curtaines yet Ostium satis amplum habuit It had a doore wide enough thorow the which they might see all the breadth of the Tabernacle and the Hebrewes thinke that the curtaines were made with holes Quibus ea quae in atrio agebantur conspici potuerint Whereby such things as were done in the court might be seene By the which is signified that the holy mysteries of the Church are not such as the ceremonies of Ceres of Eleusis which were not imparted to strangers or of Iuno of Coos unto the which servants were not admitted but the secrets of the Gospell are revealed to all the world Pelargus Lippoman As the Apostle saith If our Gospell bee hid it is hid to them that are lost 2 Cor. 4.3 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against free will in good things Vers. 4. THou shalt make unto it a grate like networke c. Beda thinketh that the fire was made under tbis grate and that thorow the holes thereof the flame ascended and consumed the sacrifice whereupon he giveth this note Nequaquam obduremus corda nostra more Pelagianorum c. sed liberè aperiamus c. Let us not harden our hearts and locke them up as the Pelagians against the grace of God but so open them that as thorow many doores in all things that we begin well the grace of God may illuminate us c. And he sheweth what the error of the Pelagians was Sâ—â—e gratia Dei se aliquid boni perficere posse praesumunt They presume they can without the grace of God doe some good thing And so they doe not set a grate before their hearts for the sacred fire of Gods Spirit to enter Sed quasi parietem solidum inter se ignâ—m Spiritus sancti interponunt But doe put a thickâ— wall betweene them and the sire of the holy Spirit lest they should be heated thereby and warmed with love With the Pelagians herein consent the Romanists whose assertion is this That a man naturally without faith both with speciall assistance from God and without it can performe some morall good worke if no temptation let Bellarmin But against both these may be opposed that saying of our blessed Saviour Without me can ye doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 43. 2. Confut. Against Altars in Popish Churches Vers. 7. THe bars shall be in the two sides of the Altar c. This Altar was a type and figure of Christ and it was to continue till Christ the true Sacrificer should offer himselfe upon the Altar of the crosse But now the Church of God knoweth no such materiall Altars as Rupertus well observeth this Altar was holy Antequam Christus qui per hoc promittebatur veniret c. before Christ came who was promised by it but after that he is entred into the most holy place Nunc reprobatum abjectum est Now it is repelled and rejected The Romanists therefore doe Judaize in retaining still Altars in their Churches Antiquitie knew no such Altars of stone as Celsus as Origen saith objected it as a fault among the Christians Quod nec imagines nec Templa nec aras haberent That they had neither images Temples nor Altars Augustine calleth it Mensam Domini The table of the Lord Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The holy boord Athanasius Mensam ligneam The table of wood B. Babing Neither have they any colour for their Altars out of that place Heb. 13. We have an Altar whereof they have no authoritie to eat which serve in the Tabernacle c. For the Apostle there speaketh of no materiall Altar but of the death and passion of Christ as it followeth vers 12. And Bellarmin forbeareth to urge this place because divers of their owne writers apply it to Christs crosse lib. 5. de miss cap. 9. 3. Confut. Against the setting up of candles in the day in popish Churches Vers. 1. SHall dresse them from evening to morning The lamps burned in the Tabernacle onely in the night and were put out in the day as is before shewed quest 21. which sheweth that the Romanists are herein more superstitious than the Jewes in setting up candles and tapers by day in their Churches Hierom saith Ceras non clara luce accendimus c. We
contented with those things which Moses had taught them must adde of their owne 3. Timiditas Aaronis the fearefulnesse of Aaron that durst not resist the people 4. A false opinion in thinking that whatsoever they did with a good intention to be pleasing unto God Ferus 5. Adde hereunto their impatiencie in not induring to stay any longer for Moses as Saul because the Lord answered him not when he would went unto a witch B. Babing QUEST IV. Of the divers faults and infirmities at once here committed by the people THe people gathered themselves together against Aaron c. The people in this their outrage doe offend diversly 1. In their violence the word signifieth super Aaron they came upon Aaron tanquam superiores potentiae as being mightier than he and so pressing upon him 2. They say make us gods Vide insaniam populi See the madnesse of the people as though God can be made with mens hands Ferus 3. There appeared in them levitas inconstantia great levitie and inconstancie that had not long before bound themselves by covenant to obey the Lords Commandements and so soone fall away Marbach 4. Their great forgetfulnesse also bewrayeth it selfe that had heard the Lord with his owne voice thundering out his Commandements whereof one prohibited directly idolatrie and yet they in despite of God do set up an idoll 5. Their ingratitude also is manifest both against God the author of their deliverance and Moses the Minister thereof and of many great works speaking of him contemptuously We know not what is become of this Moses Gallas 6. Their stupiditie was wonderfull that having the cloud before them an evident signe of Gods presence and the manna which fell daily of his providence they setting at nought such excellent signes figuram appetunt quae ipsorum vanitati respondeat desire a figure answerable to their vanitie Calvin Oleaster thinketh the cloud at this time was taken out of their sight but that is not so for it is said chap. 13.22 That he tooke not away the pillar of the cloud by day nor the pillar of fire by night from before the people 7. Thus the people at once sinned diversly 1. They sinne manifestly against the first Commandement 2. They offend in publicam ipsorum fidem against their publike faith given 3. They offend not onely in the outward worke but also impiissima opinione in their wicked opinion thinking hereby to obtaine remission of their sins 4. And they doe not onely transgresse against God but against Moses their deliverer and so they violate both the first and second table Ferus QUEST V. Why the people say unto Aaron Rise Vers. 1. VP or rise 1. Which is not so said as though Aaron did then fit when the people came unto him 2. Neither is it necessarily hence collected Quod matutinâ—s fuit hic concursus c. That this running together was in the morning as Cajetan thinketh and that they did as it were awaken and raise up Aaron 3. But this manner of speaking sheweth their importunitie that they would have him dispatch quickly and with all speed doe as they willed him 4. And beside they seeme to cast some good colour and pretence upon this their haste because they had expected and waited Moses comming downe a great while and therefore they would stay no longer Tostat. qu. 3. 5. Beside they seeme hereby to tax Aarons negligent administration that he was secure and remisse in the government and therefore in this manner rouze him up Osiander 6. This their speech also sheweth that they pressed upon him violently and urged him saying Surge Rise that is Age Goe to Iunius QUEST VI. Of the divers kindes of idolatrie MAke us gods 1. There are divers kindes of idolatrie which may be brought to these foure heads 1. When either that is worshipped for a god which is nothing such were the Idols of the Heathen the imaginations of their owne blinde hearts 2. When the divine honour is given unto any creature as to Angels or Saints 3. When any divine power is ascribed to the images of God or Saints 4. When the true God is worshipped but otherwise than he hath prescribed as Ahaz caused an Altar of a strange fashion to be reared up unto God and such were their traditions of the Pharisies Simler 2. Or idolatrie may be thus distinguished it is committed two wayes 1. When res extra Deum coluntur c. when things beside God are worshipped and that either externally by bowing unto them or inwardly in putting trust and confidence in them 2. Quando Deus aliter colitur quam ipse instituit When God is otherwise worshipped than he appointeth which is also done two wayes either when men devise unto themselves a forme of worship not prescribed such are the Processions Pilgrimages Vigils and such like used in Poperie or when the worship which God instituted alio fine observatur quam est institutus c. be observed upon another end than is appointed as thereby to merit at Gods hand as the hypocrites in Israel thought to please God by the externall act of their sacrifices and so doe now the Romanists by their idolatrous Masse Marbach The idolatrie of the Israelites was of all these sorts communicating with part of each for they outwardly set up an Idoll and inwardly put their confidence in it and did seeme yet in this Idoll to acknowledge God so worshipping him after another mannner than God himselfe had prescribed QUEST VII Why they say Make us gods not god MAke us gods c. The word is put in the plurall Elohim gods 1. Whereupon some of the Fathers doe gather that the Israelites here fell away into the idolatrie of the Gentiles who brought in a multiplicitie of gods But that is not so for they did proclaime an holy day unto Iehovah vers 5. 2. Gloss. interlinear giveth this exposition that although there was but one idoll made yet he that falleth to idolatrie doth fall into all vices tot diis daemonibus quot vitiis servit and so serveth as many gods or devils as vices But it is not put in the plurall number in any such sense because of that which followeth which may goe before us but their vices and corruptions could not be said to goe before them 3. Some referre it to the idols which they desired to have made they would have many but Aaron made but one neither is this like to be the reason for then Aaron should not have contented them In that therefore Aaron satisfied their desire it seemeth he knew their minde that one idoll would serve their turne 4. Some thinke that because Elohim in the plurall is taken for the true God therefore it is so used here Quia uni Deo hunc cultum instituerunt Because they instituted this service to the true God Simlerus But by gods here it is evident they understand not God himselfe for they were not so absurd to thinke that
silence confessed his errour and suffered himselfe to be reprehended 9. Controv. Against satisfaction before God by temporall punishment Vers. 28. SO the children of Levi did as Moses commanded c. The Lord was well pleased with this punishment which was inflicted by the Levites upon the idolaters yet we must not thinke that Gods wrath was hereby satisfied for God was appeased before by Moses prayer vers 14. neither was it likely that the punishment of a few could satisfie for the sinne of the whole host that the death of three thousand could make amends for the sinne of six hundred thousand Simler But ad exemplum profuit this punishment was profitable for the example of others and by this meanes castra purgata fuerunt the campe was purged of the ringleaders of this sinne Calvin 10. Controv. Of the corrupt reading of the vulgar Latine text setting downe 23. thousand for three thousand ABout three thousand The Latine Translater therefore here readeth corruptly 23. thousand as is before shewed at large quest 72. 11. Controv. All shedding of bloud maketh not one irregular and unmeet for the Ministery Vers. 29. COnsecrate your hands The Romanists observation therefore of irregularity is superstitious that allow none to be admitted to Orders which have beene shedders of bloud Lippoman one of their owne Writers giveth here a good note Non est ergo omnis effusio sanguinis irregularitatis nota All shedding of bloud is not then to be held a note of irregularity seeing the Levites thereby were consecrated c. Indeed manslayers and bloudy men are not easily to bee admitted to the Ecclesiasticall Ministery but one which hath served in the warres or had borne the office of a Judge being otherwise meet for his gifts is not for any such respect to bee debarred As Ambrose in the better times of the Church of a Judge was made a Bishop 12. Controv. Against the Romanists that thinke no man can be certaine of his salvation but by revelation Vers. 32. RAce me out of thy booke Procopius here well collecteth Ecce Mosi per omnia exploratum fuit c. Behold Moses did certainly know that his name was contained in the booke of life But Tostatus thinketh that this was extraordinary and that now Aut rarissimi homines aut quast nullus certus est That few or in a manner none are sure of their salvation Moses he thinketh had this by revelation and by his familiar conference with God and so S. Paul when he was taken up into the third heaven Tostat. quaest 42. Contra. 1. Moses was assured of his election even as other faithfull are God answereth him that hee which sinneth that is without repentance and recovery shall be raced out therefore he that sinneth not so but repenteth of his sinne is sure he is there written as the Apostle saith Hee that is borne of God sonneth not sinne doth not reigne in him and so againe it may be turned he that sinneth not is borne of God And S. Peter saith Brethren give diligence to make your election and calling sure for if yee doe these things ye shall never fall 2 Pet. 2.10 By good workes then as lively testimonies of our faith our election may be made sure 2. The ground also of S. Pauls confidence and assurance was not so much any speciall revelation as the common operation of faith in Christ he was perswaded nothing should separate him from the love of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord Rom. 8.39 Faith therefore in Christ Pauls Lord and ours assureth us of Gods inseparable love See more Synops. Centur. 4. err 25. 13. Controv. That God doth not only foresee but upon his foresight also decree the condemnation of the reprobate Vers. 33. HIm that sinneth will I put out of my booke Tostatus further here hath this observation that the reprobate are not predestinate of God as the elect are but praesciti tantum onely foreseene Solum cognoscit Deus quod iste vel ille homo erit infoelix non quod de eo aliquid statuerit c. He only knoweth that this or that man shall be damned and be unhappy not that God decreeth any thing of such quest 41. Contra. 1. This opinion is contrary to the Scripture Iudas is called the child of perdition Ioh. 17.12 Saint Paul calleth the reprobate vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Rom. 9.22 and Saint Inde They were of old ordained to this condemnation vers 4. These places doe evidently shew that the reprobate are ordained prepared and appointed unto condemnation 2. Otherwise if it were not so that God decreeth the end and condemnation of the wicked hee should be deprived of the one part of the office of the supreme Judge which is as well to decree punishment to the wicked as rewards to the righteous 3. Indeed a difference there is betweene the decree and foreknowledge of the one and of the other but not that which Tostatus imagineth As first God ordained both for the elect the end which is salvation and the way for them to walke in but God foreseeth only the evill wayes of the wicked but their end he both foreseeth and decreeth secondly the decree of election is only of grace without the foresight of the faith or good workes of the Saints but the decree of actuall condemnation in the wicked is upon the foresight of their sinne and misbeleefe as is elsewhere shewed more at large See more hereof Synops. pag. 822. 14. Controv. The punishment of sinne remaineth not after forgivenesse of sinne Vers. 34. YEt in the day of visitation I will visit them Ferus hereupon observeth that God many times dimissa culpa pâ—nam sibi reservat c. doth reserve the punishment the fault being pardoned As Adam and Eve had their sinnes forgiven upon the promise of the Messiah yet they both received punishment so Numb 14.20 God at Moses request forgave the sinne of the murmurers yet all their carkasses fell in the wildernesse Contra. 1. That which God forgiveth he perfectly pardoneth Ierem. 31.34 I will forgive their sinnes and remember their iniquities no more Ezech. 18.22 His transgressions shall be mentioned no more unto them But if the punishment should bee reserved still then after remission their sinnes should bee remembred 2. Wherefore their chastisements which follow after the confession of sinne as in the examples given in instance were rather corrections for their owne emendation or the example of others than punishments for sinne as Tostatus reasoneth that if sinne be directly punished nunquam daeretur ei temporalis poena sed aeterna it should never have temporall but eternall punishment it is therefore non poena peccati sed admonitio quaedam not the punishment of sinne but a certaine admonition Tostat. qu. 47. See Synops. pag. 653. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. The absence of the Pastor verie dangerous Vers. 1. OF this Moses we know not what is become Vides hoc loco absentia rectoris