Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
work_n	effect_n	faith_n	justify_v	6,955	5	8.9340	5	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B00623	The peoples plea for the exercise of prophesie. Against Mr. Iohn Yates his monopolie. / By Iohn Robinson.	Robinson, John, 1575?-1625.; Yates, John, d. ca. 1660.; Brewster, William, 1566 or 7-1644, printer, attributed name.	1618 (1618)	STC 21115A; ESTC S94919	38,827	88

afterwards be called to minister And that M. Yates may haue for the caling of our prophets wheron to insist thus we practise After the exeercise of the publick Ministery ended the rulers in the Chur. do publikly exhort and require that such of their own or other Church as haue a gift to speake to the edificatioÌ„ of the hearers should use the same this according to that which is written Act. 13.14 c. where Paul and Barnabas comming into the Synagogue the Rulers after the work of the ordinary ministery was ended considering them not as Apostles which they acknowledged not but onely as men having gifts sent unto them that if they had any word of exhortation to the people they should say on M. Yates ARG. 3. FRom the true causes of prophesy in the new testament which are two either immediate revelatioÌ„ or imposition of hands the first is Act. 2.17 10.44 the second Act. 8.17 19.6 third cause of publick prophesy cannot be giuen therefore ordinary prophesy in publick out of office being neyther by immediate revelation nor imposition of hands is vnlawfull You may say the contrary but it will be without all warrant of the word ANSWER IN this Arg. are sundry errors Logicall Theologicall And first why doth he not make Christs breathing vpon the Apostles Ioh. 20. and the descending and sitting of the cloven fiery tongues vpon them Act. â—â€¦ causes of prophesy as well as imposition of hands Secondly imposition of hands is no cause at all of prophesy to speake properly as M. yates should doe affecting the name of a Logitian It is no naturall cause for to imagine that men tooke the holy Ghost in their hands and reached it to others were ridiculous neyther is it a morall cause as in which there are propounded no Arguments and motiues of perswasion It is ineeed no more then a signe denoteing the person not a cause effecting the thing Thirdly if it were a cause yet should it not be made the member of a division opposed to revelation but a cause or means subordinate vnto it as vnto the end since it serued to the conveing of the spirit by which spirit all reuelation is and by revelation all prophesy extraordinary by immediate revelation ordinary by mediate both which theÌ„ were in the Church as is the latter now euen in men out of office by meanes of their study and Gods blessing upon the same else could there never be lawfull office Pastor or Teacher chosen in the Church to the worlds end The gift of prophesy comes not by the office but being found in persons before makes them capable of the office by due means ARG. 4. M. Yates FRO Modistinction of spirituall gifts 1. Cor. 12.4.5.6 verse gifts administrations and operations All these are to be referred to that general vers 1. Gifts therefore in this place must be but one kinde of spirituall gifts and be distinguished from the other two The first then are meerly gifts the second gifts offices together the third rather the effect of a gift then the gift it selfe and therefore the Holy Gost knowing how to speak aptly gives more to the effect then the cause the worke then the worker for in truth miraculous workes exceede all the vertue that possibly can be imagined to be in a mere creature and therfore it is only a passiue beliefe or faith whereby man is rather a patient then an agent in the worke These 3. generall heads are deuided again or rather exemplified by many particulars first verse 8.9.10 all lay downe a kinde of spirituall gifts first a word of wisdome 2. a word of knowledge 3. of miraclous faith 4. of healeing 5. operations of great works 6. prophesying 7. discerning of spirits 8. of tongues 9. of interpretation That some of these gifts are extraordinary no wise man will deny yet that I may proue them all extraordinary coÌ„sider 3 things First the cause secondly the effect thirdly the subiect The cause without al doubt is the spirit yet question may be of the maner measure For maner whether the spirit alone or the spirit assisting our industry and pains I say alone because all these effects depend equally vpon the same cause and I haue no reason to say that prophesy should be more by my pains and industry then strange tongues or any other gift for then I should magnifie the Holy Ghost in one gift more then another That which is geuen by the sole operation of the spirit is more then that which is come by through ordinary paynes I Blesse God for his ordinary prouidence where my hand goes with the Lord in my ordinary affayres But wherin I find the Lord do for me where I had no hand there I ought to magnifie him much more so in these gifts if some were ordinary some extraordinary then the spirit should not haue equal praise in theÌ„ all The orator prouing Caesar to deserue more prayse for his clemency towards Marcellus then all his famous victories vseth the maner of the cause to shew it In thy warrs O Emperour thou hadst Captains and souldiers vertue and valour weapons and munition c. but sparing Marcellus thou alone didst it to thee alone it belongs and all the glory of it so if prophesy in this place aboue all the rest must come in for an ordinary gift then may I say O blessed Spirit Prophesy is thy gift yet do I acknowledge thy ordinary blessing upon my labours in this but as for strange tongues and the rest I acknowledge they are thy meere gift without all paine and labour of mine therefore the greater praise I giue thee Were not this to diminish prophesy in regard of the rest which the H. Ghost prefers before them all and therefore did shew as great power in that gift as in any other The manner theÌ„ being all one in giving the second question is whether they were given in the same measure I answer No Rom. 12.6 and hereupon the Apostle commanded that one Prophet should be subiect to another willingly yeeld place to him that had the greater measure I leaue the cause come to the effects which learned men cannot distinguish I will shew you my iudgement follow it as you please To the two first gifts is given a word by words we expresse our meanings therfore the spirit doth not onely giue a gift but an ability power to utter that gift for the greatest good of the hearers Brother it is the part of a divine to study for apt and fit words and indeed when God hath given us learning by exceeding great paines yet wee find great imperfection for want of words Now here I learne that the Spirit of God did extraordinarily supply this want by giving unto men excellent utterance of heavenly things The first two gifts are wisdom knowledge wisdom is a holy understanding of heavenly things with a prudent application of them to their severall vses Knowledge or

of vvomens prophesying not extraordinary but ordinary In his third answer he dealeth vvorse then in any of the other in labouring to smother one truth under another For albeit the women of Corinth were become so mannish as that they would prophesie uncovered and without their veile the ensigne of their subjection yet doth not the Apostle meddle at all with that malady in this place but in the 11. chapter of the Epistle as himselfe noteth Here and in Tim. he simply forbids the thing there the manner of doing it Likewise for their being as forward to speake as their husbands and in their presence it may be true in part and in some But what then Doth the Apostle in these places onely forbid their speaking uncovered and permit them to teach so it be veiled or forbids he onely their being as forward as their husbands but giues them leaue to speake in the Church so it bee with good maners and after them which his answer insinuates Or is it not evident to all that will not shut their eyes that he simply and that severely inhibits them all speaking whatsoever in this exercise Are not the words plain enough Let the women keep silence in the Church for it is not permitted to them to speak but to be under obedience as the Law sayth And againe It is a shame for them to speake in the Church And in 1. Tim. Let the women learne in silence with all subiection And I suffer not a woman to teach nor to usurpe authority ouer the man but to be in subjection For Adam was first formed c. Do not all and every one of the Reasons binde women to all peace and deepe silence in the Church yea to such and so absolute as that they may not so much as aske a question for learning any thing themselues vers 35. much lesse teach others any thing I therefore conclude this as a most certain and undeniable truth that the Apostle speaks here of such a gift and exercise as women are simply forbidden to use in the Church and therefore not of an extraordinary gift or exercise which they might use lawfully and did both before and a long time after the writing of this Epistle His last answer now comes in consideration which is that the consequence is ill women are forbidden and therefore men are permitted to prophesie in the Church by an ordinary gift If the consequence seem not good why doth he so strugle as before otherwise to make an escape from the Argument let us coÌ„sider of the force of it which appeareth to me irresistable in these 3. things First the Apostle in and for this work opposeth the men to the women sex to sex so in prohibiting women he permits men VVhen the H. Ghost opposing faith and workes in the case of iustification denies that we are iustified by works is not the consequence good that therfore we are iustified by faith VVhere hee opposeth belevers vnbeleevers in the case of Salvation and teacheth that beleevers shall be saued doth he not teach consequently that vnbeleevers shall perish If these consequences be not good I must confesse my selfe farre to seeke both in logick and Divinity Secondly the reasons of the prohibition of women prove the consequeÌ„ce which are all such as prefer the men before the women subiect the womeÌ„ to the men in the Church in this very work of prophesy of which he treateth But now if in prohibiting women he gaue not liberty vnto men where were the prerogatiue of men aboue women which is the onely ground vpon which he buildeth his prohibition Thirdly where verse 34.35 It is not permitted for women to speak but if they will learn any thing to ask their husbands at home if their husbands might not speak neither nor any more then they what reason can be rendred of the Apostles so speaking Lastly M. Yates in denying this consequence sheweth that so he might deny something he tooke no great heed what it were The Apostle in this whole Chap. takes order for some to prophesy and debarring women therefrom either admits men to the vse of that liberty or els wee must haue some third kinde of persons thought of which are neither male nor female My fourth Argument is from v. 29. and 32. Let the prophets speak two or three and let the rest iudg and the spirit of the prophets are subiect to the prophets VVhence I affirm that the Apostle speaks not of extraordinary prophets or prophesying since they in their doctrines could not erre and so were not subiect to any such iudgment or censure of others He answereth roundly though breifly in this place that these prophets were not infallibly assisted and more largely in another place that such prophets as haue an infallible assistance are not subiect to this Rule but others that had but as the Apostle said Rom. 12.6 meaner gifts were to be examined according to the â€¦ portion of faith so that extraordinary prophets might mix some of their own with the extraordinary gifts of Gods spirit which was to be censured by such as had a greater measure for none are to think that all that had these extraordinary gifts were free from errour in their very doctrine We see the strange gift of tongues was abused and so might the rest be That one extraordinary Prophet had a greater measure and proportion of gifts then another I acknowledge but that any one of them could erre in doctrine or was not infallibly assisted therein by the spirit I deny as a most pernicious errour weakning the foundation of faith and truth of the word of God neither hath M. Yates so much as exterprized an Answ unto the Scriptures brought by me to prooue the contrary which were Eph. 2.20 where the Ephesians as the houshold or Church of God are said to bee built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets c. c. 3.5 where he speaks of the mistery of Christ which in other ages was not made known unto the sonnes of men as it is now revealed unto his holy Apostles and Prophets by the spirit VVhence it apeares that the Church is as well built upoÌ„ the foundatioÌ„ of the Prophets to wit extraordinary which then were for of them he speaketh as upon the doctrine of the Apostles and they as infalliby even for the very foundation inspired by the H. Ghost as the other So that if the Prophets could erre in doctrine then the Apostles if in doctrine taught why not written and if one alone why not more or all and if they might erre how know we that they did not erre If he say the meaner in gifts might erre but not the greater first the same followeth also touching the Apostles how much more touching the Prophets before Christ not comparable to those after him why then may there not be errors in the writings especialy of those of meaner gifts as without doubt some were in comparison of

Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Text snippets containing the quad