first and afterwards the efficacy of it And first in reference to the Necessity The first Reformers did not only allow the administration of this Sacrament in private houses but permitted it to private persons even to women also For it was ordered in the Rubrick of Private Baptism That when any great need shall compel as in extremity of weakness they which are present shall call upon God for his Grace and say the Lords Prayer if the time will suffer and then one of them shall name the Childe and dip him in the water or poure water upon him saying these words N. I Baptize thee in the name of the Father c. At which passage when King Iames seemed to be offended in the Conference at Hampton-Court because of the liberty which they gave to Women and Laicks It was answered then by Dr. Whitgift Archbishop of Canterbury That the administration of Baptisme by Women and Lay Persons was not allowed in the practice of the Church but enquired of and censured by the Bishops in their Visitations and that the words in the Book inferred no such meaning Against which when the King excepted urging and pressing the words of the Book that they could not but intend a permission and suffering of Women and private Persons to Baptize It was answered by Dr. Babington then Bishop of Worcester That indeed the words were doubtful and might be pressed to that meaning but that it seemed by the contrary practice of this Church censuring Women in this case That the Compilers of that Book did not so intend them and yet propounded them ambiguously because otherwise perhaps the Book would not have then passed in the Parliament But then stood forth the Bishop of London Dr. Bancroft and plainly said That it was not the intent of those Learned and Reverend men who framed the Book of Common-Prayer by ambiguous terms to deceive any but did indeed by those words intend a permission of private persons to Baptize in case of Necessity whereof their Letters were witnesses some parts whereof he then read and withal declared That the same was agreeable to the practice of the ancient Church as appeared by the Authority of Tertullian and of S. Ambrose on the 4th of the Ephesians who are plain in that point laying also open the absurdities and impieties of their opinions who think there is no necessity of Baptism And though at the motion of that King it was ordered that the words Lawful Minister should be put into the Rubrick First let the LAWFVL MINISTER and them that be present call upon God for his Grace c. The said LAWFVL MINISTER shall dip it into the Water c. yet was the alteration greater in sound then sense it being the opinion of many great Clerks that any man in cases of extream necessity who can pronounce the words of Baptism may pass in the account and notion of a lawful Minister So much for the necessity of Baptism And as for the efficacacy thereof it is said expresly in the 27. Article To be a sign of Regeneration or New Birth whereby as by an Instrument they that receive Baptisme rightly are grafted into the Church the promises of forgiveness of Sin and of our Adoption to be the Sons of God by the Holy Ghost are visibly signed and sealed Faith is confirmed and Grace is encreased by vertue of Prayer unto God and as expresly it is said in one of the Rubricks before Confirmation That it is certain by Gods word that Children being Baptized have all things necessary for their Salvation and be undoubtedly saved that is to say for so it must be understood in case they dye before they fall into the committing of Actual Sins 29. Touching good works and how far they conduce unto our Iustification the breach was wider at the first breakin gs out of Luther then it hath been since Luther ascribing Iustification unto Faith alone without relation unto Works and those of Rome ascribing it to good Works alone without relation unto Faith which they reckoned only amongst the preparatives unto it But when the point had been long canvased and the first heats were somewhat cooled they began to come more neer unto one another For when the Papists attributed Iustification unto Works alone they desired to be understood of such good Works as proceeded from a true and lively Faith and when the Lutherans ascribed it to Faith alone they desired to be understood of such a Faith as was productive of good Works and attended by them The Papists thereupon began to cherish the distinction between the first and second Iustification ascribing the first unto Faith only the second which the Protestants more properly called by the name of Sanctification to the works of Righteousness The Protestants on the other side distinguishing between Fides sola and solitaria between Sola Fides and Fides quae est Sola intending by that nicity that though Faith alone doth justifie a sinner in the sight of God yet that it is not such a Faith as was alone but stood accompanied with good Works And in this way the Church of England went in her Reformation declaring in the 11 Article That we are accounted righteous before God only for the Merits of our Lord and Saviour Iesus Christ by Faith and not for our own works or deservings Which Justification by Faith only is further declared to be a most wholesome Doctrine and very full of comfort for which we are referred to the Book of Homilies And in the Book of Homilies we shall also finde That we may well bear the name of Christian men but we lack that true Faith which belongeth thereunto For true Faith doth evermore bring forth good Works as St. Iames speaketh Shew me thy Faith by thy Works Thy Deeds and Works must be an open testimony of thy Faith otherwise thy Faith being without good Works is but the Devils faith the faith of the wicked a phantasie of Faith and not a true Christian Faith And that the people might be be trained up in the works of Righteousness it is declared in the 7th Article That no Christian man whatsoever is free from the obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral According whereunto it is ordered by the publick Liturgy that the said Commandments shall be openly read in the Congregation upon Sundayes and Holy Dayes contrary to the usage of all ancient Liturgies the people humbly praying God To have mercy upon them for their transgression of those Laws and no less humbly praying him To encline their hearts to keep the same So that though Faith must lead the way to our Iustification yet holiness of life manifested in the works of Charity and all other acts of godly living must open the way for us to the Gates of Heaven and procure our entrance at the same as is apparent by the 25. of St. Matthews Gospel from verse 34. to 41. 30. Which being so it may be well affirmed without any wrong
to Faith that good Works are necessary to salvation and not so only but that they are efficienter necessaria as was maintained publickly in the Schools of Cambridge though it was much carpt at by some men that did not rightly and distinctly understand the term And secondly It may be said without any wrong to the Free Grace and Merits of Almighty God that a reward is due for the Works of Righteousness proceeding from a lively Faith in a man regenerate not that the Church ascribeth any merit to the works of man which may deserve eternal life either ex congruo or condigno as the School-men phrase it for Deus non coronat in nobis merita nostra sed dona sua as the Father hath it No reward is due unto good Works ratione operis in reference to the work it self but ratione pacti acceptationis though Bellarmine be otherwise minded in respect of Gods merciful acceptance and his most gracious promise to reward the same It was his grace and goodness only which moved him to encourage our imperfect and weak obedience with the promise of eternal life yet having made the promise he became our debtor Non aliquid debendo sed omnia promittendo Deus se facit debitorem as St. Augustine tells us And most agreeable it is to his heavenly justice not to be wanting to his promise Such a Reward as this for the works of Righteousness as the Scriptures frequently do mention both in the Old Testament and New Gen. 47. Psalm 19.11 Mat. 5.12 and 10.41 42. Mark 9.41 Apoc. 22.11 so is the same defended in the Church of England And this appears first by the Athanasian Creed incorporated into the body of our publick Liturgy as a part thereof In the close of which it is affirmed That at Christs coming unto Judgemenr all men shall rise again with their bodies and give an account of their own works that they which have done good shall go into life everlasting and they that have done evil into everlasting fire And secondly It appears as plainly by the Collect for the 25. Sunday after Trinity where the Church called on the Lord To stir up the wills of his faithful people that they plenteously bringing forth the fruits of good works may of him be plenteously rewarded through Iesus Christ In which we have not only a reward for the fruit of good works but a plentiful reward into the bargain according to the quality of the work it self and the acceptableness of the person in the sight of God 31. Next look we on the Doctrine of Predestination and the points depending thereupon which have given matter of division to the Christian Church in all times and ages dividing between the general current of the Fathers till St. Augustines time and the learned men which followed him and his authority between the Iesuites and Franciscans on the one side and the Dominicans on the other in the Church of Rome between the moderate and rigid Lutherans in the Church Protestant between the Remonstrants and the Contra-Remonstrants in the Schools of Calvin and finally between the Sublapsarians and the Supra-Lapsarians amongst the Contra-Remonstrants themselves Of these the Sublapsarian Calvinists for of the dotages of the other I shall take no notice the Rigid Lutherans and the Dominican Friars pretend St. Augustine for their Patron and on the other side the Remonstrants commonly nick-named Arminians The Moderate or Melancthonian Lutherans together with the Iesuites and Franciscans appeal unto the general current of the ancient Fathers who lived and flourished ante mota certamina Pelagiana before the starting up of the Pelagian Controversies And to this general current of the ancient Fathers the Church of England most enclines teaching according to their Doctrine that God from all eternity intending to demonstrate his power and goodness designed the Creation of the World the making of man after his own Image and leaving him so made in a perfect liberty to do or not to do what he was commanded and that fore-knowing also from all eternity that man abusing this liberty would plunge himself and his posterity into a gulph of miseries he graciously resolved to provide them such a Saviour who should redeem them from their sins to elect all those to life eternal who by true Faith laid hold upon him leaving the rest in the same state in which he found them for their incredulity It is reported of Agilmond the second King of the Lombards that riding by a Fish-Pond he saw seven young Children sprawling in it whom their unnatural Mothers as Paulus Diaconus conceived had thrown into it not long before Amazed whereat he put his Hunting Spear amongst them and stirred them gently up and down which one of them laying hold of was drawn to Land called Lamistus from the word Lama which in the Language of that people signifies a Fish-Pond trained up in that Kings Court and finally made his Successor in the Kingdom Granting that Agilmond being fore-warned in a Vision that he should finde such Children sprawling for life in the midst of that Pond might thereupon take a resolution within himself to put his Hunting Spear amongst them and that which of them soever should lay hold upon it should be gently drawn out of the water adopted for his Son and made Heir of all his Kingdom no humane Story could afford us the like parallel case to Gods proceeding in the great work of Predestination to eternal life according to the Doctrine of the Church of England 32. Now that such was the Doctrine of the first Reformers may be made evident by the Definition of Predestination Predestination unto life saith the 17. Article is the everlasting purpose of God whereby before the foundations of the world were laid he hath constantly declared by his Council secret to us to deliver from curse and damnation those whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankinde and to bring them by Christ to everlasting Salvation In which Definition there are these things to be observed First That Predestination doth pre-suppose a curse or a state of Damnation in which all mankinde was presented to the sight of God Secondly That it is an act of his from everlasting because from everlasting he foresaw that misery into which wretched man would fall Thirdly That he founded it and resolved for it in the Man and Mediator Christ Jesus both for the purpose and performance Fourthly That it was of some special ones alone Elect called forth and reserved in Christ and not generally extended unto all mankinde Fifthly That being thus elected in Christ they shall be brought by Christ to everlasting salvation And sixthly That this Council is secret unto us for though there be revealed to us some hopeful signes of our Election and Predestination unto life yet the certainty thereof is a secret hidden in God and in this life unknown to us Nothing obscure in this Definition but these words Whom he hath chosen in Christ
amongst the People yet is but in one of our Authors neither who hath no other Author for it then a nameless Doctor And in the way towards so happy an agreement though they all stand accused for it by the English Pope pag. 15. Sparrow may be excused for placing it with Auricular Confession and Wâ—llâ— for for Penance Heylyn for Adoration toward the Altar and Mountague for such a qualified praying to Saints as his books maintain against the Papists If you would know how far they had proceeded towards this happy Reconciliation the Popes Nuncio will assure us thus That the Vniversities Bishops and Divines of this Realm did dayly embrace Catholick Opinions though they profess'd not so much with Pen or Mouth for fear of the Puritans For example they hold That the Church of Rome is a true Church That the Pope is Superiour to all Bishops That to him it appertains to call General Councils That it is lawful to pray for the Soul of the Departed That Altars ought to be erected of Stone In sum That they believe all that is taught by the Church but not by the Court of Rome Another of their Authors tells us as was elsewhere noted That those amongst us of greatest Worth Learning and Authority began to love Temper and Moderation That their Doctrines began to be altered in many things for which their Progenitors forsook the Visible Church of Christ as for example The Pope not Antichrist Prayers for the Dead Limbus Patrum Pictures That the Church hath Authority in determining Controversies of Faith and to interpret Scriptures about Free will Predestination Universal Grace That all our Works are not Sins Merit of Good Works Inherent Iustice Faith alone doth justifie Charity to be preferred before Knowledge The Authority of Traditions Commandments possible to be kept That in Exposition of the Scripture they are by Canon bound to follow the Fathers And that the once fearful Names of Priests and Altars are used willingly in their Talk and Writings In which Compliances so far forth as they speak the truth for in some Points through the ignorance of the one and the malice of the other they are much mistaken there is scarce any thing which may not very well consist with the established though for a time discontinued Doctrine of the Church of England the Articles whereof as the same Iesuit hath observed seem patient or ambitious rather of some sense wherein they may seem Catholick And such a sense is put upon them by him that calls himself Franciscus a Sacta Clara as before was said And if upon such Compliances as those before on the part of the English the Conditions offered by the Pope might have been confirmed Who seeth not that the greatest Benefit of the Reconciliation would have redounded to this Church to the King and People His Majesties Security provided for by the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance so far as it concerned his Temporal Power The Bishops of England to be independent of the Popes of Rome The Clergy to be permitted the use of Marriage The People to receive the Communion in both KINDS and all Divine Offices officiated in the English Tongue No Innovation made in Doctrine but only in the qualifying of some Expressions and discharging some Out-landish Glosses as were put upon them And seeing this What man could be so void of Charity so uncompassionate of the Miseries and Distractions of Christendom as not to wish from the very bottom of his Soul That the Reconciliation had proceeded upon so good Terms as not to magnifie the men to succeeding Ages who were the Instruments and Authors of so great a Blessing But then admitting as we may That no such Reconciliation was upon the Anvil and that our two Discoursers have proceeded only upon Suppositions yet Canterbury had good ground for what he did were it no other than the settling of the Church of England upon the first Principles and Positions of her Reformation But he had further aims than so He had some thoughts and I have reason to believe it by Conferences first and if that failed by the ordinary course of Ecclesiastical Censures of gaining the Papists to the Church and therefore it concerned him in point of Prudence to smooth the way by removing all such Blocks and Obstacles which had been laid before them by the Puritan Faction He knew that from their Infancy they had been trained up in a Regular Order of Devotion and that they loved that Religion best which came accompanied with Decency and External Splendour That they objected nothing more against us than the Novelty of our Doctrine the Heterodoxies maintained in Publick by some of our Preachers the slovenly keeping of our Churches the Irreverence of the People in them the rude and careless slubbering over of our Common Prayers And what Encouragements had they for resorting to the Congregation when they should hear the Pope defamed whom they behâ—ld with Reverence as their Common Father their Ceremonies to be counted Antichristian their Mass â—â—â—latrous their whole Religion worse than that of the Turks and Moors conâ—ormity to whom in Rites and Ceremonies was held to be more tolerable by the Puritan Preachers than to those of Rome These â—ubs were first to be removed before they could have any thoughts of uniting to us And for the removing of those Rubs he â—â—ll up on the courses before-mentioned which being Renovations only of some ancient Usages were branded by the odious name of Innovations by some of those who out of cunning and design had long disused them Some zealous Protestants beheld his Actings with no small fear as byaâ—sing too strongly toward Rome that the Puritans exclaimed against him for a Papist and the Papists cried him up for theirs and gave themselves some flattering hopes of our coming towards them But the most knowing and understanding men amongst them found plainly That nothing could tend more to their destruction than the introducing of some Ceremonies which by late negligence and Practice had been discontinued For I have heard from a Person of known Nobility That at his being at Rome with a Father of the English Colledge one of the Novices came in and told him with a great deal of joy That the English were upon returning to the Church of Rome That they began to set up Altars to Officiate in their Copes to Adorn their Churches and to paint the Pictures of the Saints in the Church Windows To which the old Father made Reply with some indignation That he talked like an ignorant Novice That these Proceedings rather tended to the Ruine than Advancement of the Catholick Cause That by this means the Church of England coming nearer to the ancient Usages the Catholicks there would sooner be drawn off from them than any more of that Nation would fall off to Rome In reference to Doctrinal Points Heterodoxies and new Opinions and such extravagant Expressions both from Press and Pulpit he took as much
CYPRIANUS ANGLICUS OR THE HISTORY OF THE Life and Death OF The most Reverend and Renowned PRELATE WILLIAM By Divine Providence Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all ENGLAND and Metropolitan Chancellor of the Universities of Oxon. and Dublin and one of the Lords of the Privy Council to His late most SACRED MAJESTY King CHARLES the First Second MONARCH of Great Britain CONTAINING ALSO The Ecclesiastical History of the Three Kingdoms of ENGLAND SCOTLAND and IRELAND from His first rising till His Death By P. Heylyn D. D. and Chaplain to Charles the first and Charles the second Monarchs of Great Britain ECCLUS 44. VERS 1 3. 1. Let us now praise Famous Men and our Fathers that begat Vs. 3. Such as did bear Rule in their Kingdoms Men Renowned for their Power giving Counsel by their Vnderstanding and Declaring Prophesies LONDON Printed for A. Seile MDCLXVIII To the Honourable Sir IOHN ROBINSON Kt. and Baronet HIS MAJESTIES Lieutenant of the Tower of London SIR YOV have here before you the History of an Eminent Prelate and Patriot a Person who lived the honour and died a Martyr of the English Church and State for it was his sad Fate to be crusht betwixt Popery and Schism and having against both defended the Protestant Cause with his Pen he after chearfully proceeded to Seal that Faith with his Bloud Together with the Story of this Great Man you have likewise that of the Age he lived in especially so far as concerned the Church wherein you will find recorded many notable Agitations and Contrivances which it were pity should be lost in silence and pass away unregarded These Considerations towards a Gentleman of your worth Curiosity and loyalty are warrant enough to justifie me in this Dedication And yet I must not conceal that it belongs to you by another right that is to say the Care of recommending this VVork to the Publick was committed to a Gentleman who himself had presented it to your hand if God had not taken him away just upon the point of putting his purpose in execution So that it seems in me as well matter of Conscience as of Respect to deliver it wholly up to your Patronage and Protection since in exposing it to the world I do but perform the will of my dead Father and in addressing it to your self together with my own I also gratifie that of my deceased Friend The value of the VVork it self I do not pretend to judge of my duty and interest for the Author forbids it but for the Industry Integrity and good meaning of the Historian I dare become answerable And in truth I hope well of the rest without which I should not have made bold with Sir John Robinson's Name in the Front of it who being so nearly related both in bloud and affection to that Incomparable and Zealous Minister of God and his Prince cannot besides a Natural but upon an Honourable Impression concern himself in the glories or blemishes of this Character defective in nothing but that it could not be as ample as his worth And now having discharged my trust and duty as I could do no less so I have little more to add for my self but that I am SIR Your most humble and obedient Servant HENRY HEYLYN A Necessary INTRODUCTION To the following HISTORY BEFORE we come unto the History of this Famous Prelate it will not be amiss to see upon what Principles and Positions the Reformation of this Church did first proceed that so we may the better Judge of those Innovations which afterwards were thrust upon her and those Endeavours which were used in the latter times to bring her back again to her first Condition 1. Know therefore that King Henry viii having obtained of the Bishops and Clergie in their Convocation Anno 1530. to be acknowledged the Supream Head on Earth of the Church of England did about three years after in the 26 of his Reign confirm the said Supremacy to Himself his Heirs and Successors with all the Priviledges and Preheminencies thereunto belonging by Act of Parliament And having procured the said Bishops and Clergie in another of their Convocations held in the year 1532. to promise in verbo Sacerdotii not to assemble from thenceforth in any Convocation or Synodical Meeting but as they should be called by his Majesties Writ nor to make any Canons or Constitutions Synodal or Provincial without his Leave and Licence thereunto obtained nor finally to put the same in Execution till they were Ratified and Confirmed under the Great Seal of England Procured also an Act of Parliament to bind the Clergie to their promise Which Act called commonly The Act of the Submission of the Clergie doth bear this name in Poulton's Abridgment viz. That the Clergie in their Convocation should Enact no Constitutions without the Kings assent Anno 25. Henry viii c. 19. Which Grounds so laid he caused this Question to be debated in both Universities and all the Famous Monasteries of the Kingdom viz. An aliquid auâ—horitatis in hoc Regno Angliae Pontifici Romano de jure competat plusquam alii cuicumque Episcopo extero Which Question being concluded in the Negative and that Conclusion ratified and confirmed in the Convocation Anno 1534. there past an Act of Parliament about two years after Intituled An Act Extinguishing the Authority of the Bishops of Rome In which there was an Oath prescribed for abjuring the Popes Authority within this Realm The refusing whereof was made High-Treason Anno 28. H. viii c. 10. 2. But this Exclusion of the Pope as it did no way prejudice the Clergy in their power of making Canons Constitutions and other Synodical Acts but only brought them to a dependance upon the King for the better ordering of the same so neither did it create any diminution of the Power and Priviledges of the Arch-Bishops and Bishops in the free exercise of that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which anciently belonged to them For in the Act of Submission before-mentioned there passed a Clause that all former Constitutions Synodal or Provincial which were not contrary to the Word of God the Kings Prerogative Royal or the Laws and Statutes of this Realm should remain in force until they were reviewed and fitted for the use of the Church by 32 Commissioners to be nominated by the King for that end and purpose Which re-view being never made in the time of that King nor any thing done in it by K. Edw. vi though he had an Act of Parliament to the same effect the said Old Canons and Constitutions remained in force as before they were By means whereof all causes Testamentary Matrimonial and Suits for Tythes all matters of Incontinency and other notorious Crimes which gave publick Scandal all wilful absence from Divine Service Irreverence and other Misdemeanours in the Church not punishable by the Laws of the Land were still reserved unto the Ecclesiastical Courts Those Ancient Canons and Constitutions remaining also for the perpetual standing Rule
that every man that could pronounce well was not found able to endite and every man that could endite not being to be trusted in a business of such weight and moment it seemed good in the Wisdom of the first Reformers to compile some good and profitable Sermons called by the name of Homilies to be read carefully and distinctly on the Sundayes and Holy dayes for the instruction of the people 11. Such course was taken for the peace and edification of the Church by the first Reformers not only in the choice of the men to whom they gave Licences to preach but in supplying the defect and want of such preaching by the Book of Homilies and they had as great a care too for the keeping the people in good stomach not cloying them with continual Preaching or Homilizing but limiting them to once a day as appears by the Rubrick after the Nicene or rather the Constantinopolitan Creed One Sermon or Homily in the mornings of Sundayes and other Holy dayes for the edification of the â—lder and Catechizing by way of question and answer in the afternoon for the instruction of the younger was esteemed sufficient Lectures upon the week dayes were not raised upon this foundation but were brought in afterwards borrowed by Travers and the â—est toward the latter end of Queen Elizabeths Reign from the new fashions of Geneva the Lecturer being super-added to the Parson or Vicar as the Doctor was unto the Pastor in some forreign Churches Nor were they raised so much out of care and conscience for training up the people in the wayes of Faith and Piety as to advance a Faction and to alienate the peoples mindes from the Government and Forms of Worship here by Law established For these Lecturers having no dependance upon the Bishops nor taking the Oath of Canonical Obedience to them nor subscribing to the doctrine and establisht Ceremonies made it their work to please those Patrons on whose arbitrary maintenance they were planted and consequently to carry on the Puritan interest which their Patron drove at A generation of men neither Lay nor Clergy having no place at all in the Prayers of the Church where we finde mention only of Bishops Pastors and Curates nor being taken notice of in the terms of Law as being neither Parsons nor Vicars or to speak them in the vulgar proverb neither flesh nor fish nor good red herring No creature in the world so like them as the Bats or Reremice being neither Birds nor Beasts and yet both together Had these men been looked upon in time before their numbers were increased and their power grown formidable before the people went a madding after new inventions most of the mischiefs which have thence ensued might have been prevented And had there been more reading of Homilies in which the Reader speaks the sense of the Church and not so much of Sermonizing in which the Preacher many times speaks his own factious and erronâ—ous sense the people might have been trained up in no less knowledge but in much more obedience then they have been in these latrer times 12. As for the Sacraments which were advanced to the number of seven in the Church of Rome this Church hath brought them back to two as generally necessary to salvation Baptisme and the Holy Supper Four of the rest that is to say Marriage Orders Confirmation and the Visitation though not the Extream Vnction of the Sick being retained under the name of Sacramentals in our publick Liturgy Of which the Book of Consecrating Arch-Bishops and Bishops c. is by the Act of Parliament 8 Eliz. c. 1. affirmed to be a Supplement or Additional only added put to and annexed as the words do vary to the said Book of Common-Prayer And of these four two are reserved unto the Bishop that is to say Confirmation and the giving of Orders the other two viz. Marriage and the Visitation of the Sick being common to both alike though executed in the most part by the Presbyter only Of those reserved unto the Bishop the one is so reserved ad necessitatem operis because it cannot be done without him the other ad honorem sacerdotii as the Schools distinguish because it cannot be well done but by him Touching the first we have the general consent of all ancient Writers and the example of Coluthus who took upon him the ordaining of Presbyters contrary to the Rules of the Church and the Canons of thâ— most famous Councils But when the business came to be examined his Ordinations were declared to be null and void because he was a Presbyter only and not a Bishop as is affirmed by Athanasius in Apol. 2. The other grounded on the 8th Chapter of the Acts as St Cyprian in his 73. Epistle tells us where Peter and Iohn are said to have laid hands on them in Samaria which had been before Baptized in the Name of the Lord Iesus that they might receive the Holy Ghost and that by laying on of their hands they did receive the Holy Ghost accordingly verse 16 17. Quod nunc quoque apud nos geritur c. Which is also done saith St. Cyprian and Cyprian flourisht in the middle of the third Century amongst our selves when they which be already Baptized are brought unto the Prelates of the Church Praepositis Ecclesiae offeruntur that by our Prayer and Imposition of our hands they may receive the Holy Ghost and be strengthened by the Seal of the Lord. Upon which grounds beâ—iâ—â—â—â—he great antiquity of it it was retained by the first Reformers as in the Rubrick before Confirmation in the Common-Prayer-Book And â—ad it been as diligently practised by the Bishops in the declining times of this Church as it was piously and religiously retained by them it would have much conduced to their saâ—e standing in the Church and procured a greater veneration to their Persons also The other two viz. Marriage and the Visitation of the Sick together with the Burial of the Dead and the Churching of Women after Child-birth are left to the officiating of the Priest or Parochial Minister unless the Bishop please to take that work upon himself in some certain cases 13. But as for Penance one of the seven Sacraments in the Church of Rome we must look upon in a double capacity First As it was solemnly performed on Ashwednesday as a preparative to the approaching Feast of Easter the people humbling themselves before the Lord in Sackcloth and Ashes whence it had the name And secondly As imposed on such particular persons as lay under the censures of the Church Touching the first it is related in the beginning of the Commination that in the Primitive Church there was a godly Discipline That at the beginning of Lent such persons as were notorious sinners were put to open Penance and punished in this world that their Souls might be saved in the day of the Lord and that others admonished by their example might be the more afraid to
themselves to perform that Office Others conceived that they had very well performed their duty and consulted their own peace and safety also by waving all Proceedings against them in their own Consistories wherein they must appear as the principal Agents and turning them over to be censured by the High-Commission where their Names might never come in question The like done also in transposing the Communion Table in which it was believed by many that they had well complied with all expectations if they did not hinder it but left the Ministers to proceed therein as best pleased themselves or otherwise to fight it out with the Church-wardens if occasion were And yet the fortune of the Church had not been so wretched if none of that Order had pulled down more with one hand than many of the rest had built up with both The Metropolitical Visitation being held in the Diocess of Norwich Anno 1635. Order was given by Brent as in other places for Railing in the Communion Table at the East end of the Chancel and there to dispose of it under the Eastern Wall with the ends of it North and South In order whereunto it was found necessary in many places to remove such Seats as had been built in that end of the Chancel for the use and â—ase of private Persons The Church-wardens of St. Mary Towres in the Borough of Ipswich a Town of great Wealth and Trade in the Country of Suffolk refusing to remove such Seats and advance the Table in their rooms were Excommunicated for their obstinacy and contempt by one of Brent's Surrogates for that Visitation The Church-wardens animated by some of the Town who had better Purses than themselves appeal unto the Dean of the Arches and after exhibited a Bill in the Star-Chamber against the Surrogate but without remedy from either And on these terms the business stood when Wren succeeded Corbet in the See of Norwich and looking upon Ipswich as a place of great influence and example on the rest of the Diocess took up his dwelling in the same It was not long before he came to understand that a great part of the opposition which was made as well against himself as the Vicar-General about the removing and railing in of the Holy Table proceeded from a Letter written from the Bishop of Lincoln to the Vicar of Grantham which though it was written some years since and had long been dead yet now it was revived again and the Copies of it scattered in all parts of the Kingdom the better to discourage or discountenance the Work in hand but no where more than in the Diocess of Norwich being next neighbour unto Lincoln and under the inspection of a diligent and active Prelate Some of them coming to his Hand and an Advertisement withall That they were ordinarily sold amongst the Booksellers in Duck-lane in written Copies it was thought fit that an answer should be made unto it in which the Sophistry Mistakes and Falshoods of that Letter whosoever was the Writer of it might be made apparent Which Answer being made ready approved and licenced was published about the middle of May under the Title of A COAL from the ALTAR or An Answer to a Letter not long since written to the Vicar of Grantham against the placing of the Communion Table at the East-end of the Chancel c. As it cooled the heat of some so it inflamed the hearts of others not with Zeal but Anger the Book occasioning much variety of Discourse on both sides as men stood variously affected in the present Controversie But long it will not be before we shall hear of a Reply unto it a Rejoinder unto that Reply and other Writings pro and con by the Parties interessed But it had been to little purpose to settle a Conformity in Parochial Churches if Students in the Universities the constant Seminaries of the Church were not trained up to a good perswasion of the Publick Counsels Upon which ground it had been prudently Ordained in the Canons of the year 1603. not only That the prescribed Form of Common Prayer should be used in all Colledges and Halls but That the Fellows and Scholars of the said Houses should wear the Surplice at those Prayers on the Sundays and Holydays the better to inure them to it when they came to any Publick Ministry in their several Churches Many things had been done at Cambridge in some years last past in order to the Work in hand as beautifying their Chappels furnishing them with Organs advancing the Communion Table to the place of the Altar adorning it with Plate and other Utensils for the Holy Sacrament desending it with a decent Rail from all prophanations and using lowly Reverence and Adorations both in their coming to those Chappels and their going out But in most Colledges all things stood as they had done formerly in some there were no Chappels at all or at the best some places used for Chappels but never Consecrated In Sidney Colledge the old Dormitory of the Franciscans on the Site of which Friery the said Colledge was built was after some years trimmed and fitted and without any formal Consecration converted to a House of Prayer though formerly in the opinion of those who allowed thereof it had been no better nor worse than a Den of Thieves The Chappel of Emanuel Colledge though built at the same time with the rest of the House was both irregular in the situation and never Consecrated for Divine and Religious uses And what less could this beget in the minds of the Students of those Houses than an Opinion touching the indifferency of such Consecrations whether used or not and at the last a positive Determination That the continued Series of DIVINE DVTIES in a place set apart to that purpose dâ—th sufficiently Consecrate the same And what can follow thereupon in some tract of time but the executing of all Divine Offices in Private Houses the Ruine and Decay of Churches the selling of their Materials and alienating their Glebe and Tythes to the next fair Chapman It is therefore thought expedient to carry on the Visitation to that University and put such things in order there as were found in this But against this the University opposed pretending an exemption from his Jurisdiction by their ancient Priviledges and that they had no Visitor but his Majesty only But Canterbury who before had over-ruled the like Plea in the Bishop of Lincoln would not give way to this of Cambridge which caused the matter on both sides to be thorowly canvased But neither yielding to the other and the Earl of Holland stickling strongly for the University of which he had the Honour to be chosen Chancellor on the death of the Duke the deciding of the Controversie is referred to his Majesty On Tuesday Iune 21. they both appear before the King at Hampton-Court where the Counsel of both sides being heard it pleased his Majesty to give Judgment for the Metropolitan and to submit that