Manent cuncta non quia aeterna sunt sed quia defenduntur cura Regentis Immortalia tutore non egent Haec autem conservat Artifex fragilitatem materiae vi sua vincens All things saith he continue in beeing as at first they were not because they are eternal in their own nature but because they be defended by the Providence of their Governour Things in themselves Immortal have no need of a guardian But those things are preserved by the power of their Maker which over-ruleth the weakness of the matter out of which they are made So that it seems by the Philosophie of this learned man that the creature is preserved from perishing not by any power which it hath in it self but by the power and providence of its Heavenly Maker And this no less true in the Divinity of the holy Scriptures How long before this present time had the unbridled Ocean overwhelmed the land had not God set bounds unto it which it shall not pass nor turn again to cover the earth What a combustion had the World been brought into long before this time by the perpetual jarring of contrary Elements had not GOD so disposed it by his heavenly Providence as to interpose this vast airy Firmament betwixt the Elements of fire and water and so to temper drought with moisture that neither should be able to consume the other How long before this time had those many millions of men which possess the World perished for want of food and devoured one another had not he opened his hand and filled all things living with plenteousness did not he give the former and the latter rain making the Valleys fruitful and so full of corn that they do seem to laugh and sing in the Psalmists language How long before this time had the race of mankinde been utterly exterminated out of all the world by those violent and consuming Wars which have raged in every part thereof since the times of Nimrod since men began to hunt after one another and made the sword the instrument of their lusts and cruelties did not he keep unto himself the Soveraign power of making wars to cease whensoever he pleaseth and sending Peace into our borders when we look not for it Finally not to instance in more particulars how long before this time had the World been emptied of Inhabitants and no place peopled but the Graves by the continual prevalencie of Plagues and Leprosies and other pestilent diseases which the intemperance of diet or the malignant influences of the heavenly bodies have so oft produced had not he given a Medicinal vertue unto hearbs and plants for cure of ordinary but contagious sicknesses and say to his destroying Angel that it is enough when the devouring Plagues do most fiercely rage That Pestilence which cut off seventy thousand men in less space then a day must needs have utterly destroyed all mankinde in less space then a year had not the Lord restrained the fury of it by his grace and goodness Look where we will cast we our eyes on every side upon all the creatures and we shall finde as much of Gods wonderful Providence in their preservation as of his mighty Power in the first Creation That he spake the word and they were made that he commanded only and they were created is the most notable effect of his mighty Power But that he made them fast even for ever and ever and gave them such a law for their rule and governance as shall not be broken is a more admirable effect of his singular Providence When therefore it is said in the holy Scriptures that God rested on the seventh day from all the works which he had made we are to understand it thus that he desisted then from adding any thing unto the work of his hands which he had finished and made perfect the six days before but not from ordering and disposing of it as he sees occasion which is a work as highly to be prized as the first Creation and from the which God never resteth no not on the Sabbath Sempër videmus Deum operari Sabbatum nullum est in quo non operetur in quo non producat solem suum super bonos malos Sabbaths and all days are alike in regard of Providence in reference to the universal government of the World and Nature Nor is there any day saith Origen whereon God doth rest from the Administration of the World by him created on which he doth not make his Sun to shine both on good and bad and makes his rain to fall on the just and wicked Pater meus usque modo operatur saith CHRIST our Saviour I work saith he and my Father also worketh to this very time By which our Saviour meaneth as S. Augustine notes that God rested not from ordering the things which he had created Nec ullam sibi cessationis statuisse diem and that there was no day whatsoever it was in which he tended not the preservation of the creature and therefore for his own part that he would not cease from doing the will of him that sent him Ne Sabbatis quidem no not so much as on the Sabbath It was the folly or the frenzy of the Epicureans that they robbed God of his Providence and made him nothing but a dull Spectator an idle and unnecessary looker on letting all worldly matters go as they would themselves Et Deos aut otiosos finxit aut nullos said the Christian Advocate The Stoicks saw this Error and took care to avoid it but then they fell upon as bad appointing that which they called Fate in the place of Providence and by that Fate so tying up the hands of GOD that he could do nothing but what was formerly decreed and resolved upon Which were it so Cur non illae potius regnare dicantur as wittily Lactantius scoffeth it why was not Fate and Destiny put in the place of God which even the Gods themselves are compelled to obey The Peripateticks therefore thought it to be better Divinity to grant to GOD the over-sight and super-inspection of all but yet ascribed so much unto second causes that they left little more to be done by GOD then to set the first wheel as it were on going and leave the rest to move in their course and order Which though it came more neer the truth yet it comes not home the Providence of God being so particular that the very hairs of our head are said to be numbred and that a Sparrow doth not fall to the ground without his knowledge and permission But leaving this discourse of Gods general Providence we will consider it at the present in these principal parts his goodness towards all his creatures his Iustice in the governance of humane affairs concluding this with that of Alexander Aphrodiseus a great Aristotelean who pleads thus in behalf of this general Providence Quod
dark as St. Iohn hath it or very early in the morning at the breaking or dawning of the day as St. Matthew tels us but that they came not to the Sepulchre till the Sun was risen Or else we may resolve it thus and perhaps with greater satisfaction to the text and truth that Mary Magdalen whose love was most impatient of a long delay went first alone for St. Iohn speaks of her alone when it was yet dark but having signified to Peter what she had discovered she went to make the other women acquainted with it and then came all together as the Sun was rising to behold the issue of the business As for the seeming contradiction in St. Matthews words we shall best see the way to discharge him of it if passing by the Vulgar Latine from whence the contradiction took its first Original we have recourse unto the Greek In the Vulgar Latine it is Vespere Sabbati in the Evening of the Sabbath and that according to the Iewish computation must be on Friday about six of the clock for with them the Evening did begin the day as we saw before But in the Greek it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we English in the end of the Sabbath and then it is the same with St. Marks expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when the Sabbath was past And this construction comes more neer to the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which points unto a thing which is long since past as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the hour being now a good while spent and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 you lost your opportunity by your tardy coming And so the word is here interpreted by Gregory Nyssen by birth a Grecian and therefore doubtlesse one that well understood the Idiotisme of his own language in whom the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in St. Matthew is made to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the very hour and moment of the resurrection Which ground so laid let us subjoyne these words in St. Matthews Gospel Chap. 18. to the last words of St. Lukes Gospel Chap. 23. and then this seeming contradiction will be brought to nothing St. Luke informes us of the women who had attended on our Saviour at his death and burial that having bought spices to imbalme his body they rested on the Sabbath day according to the Scripture v. 56. And then comes in St. Matthew to make up the story as all the four Evangelists do make but one ful history of our Saviours actions which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that when the Sabbath was now past and that the first day of the week did begin to dawn they went unto the Sepulchre as they first intended We have not done yet with the time of his resurrection although the difficulties which concern that time have been debated and passed over We finde it generally agreed on by all four Evangelists that the resurrection was accomplished 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon the first day of the week and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about the dawning of the day as St. Matthew hath it or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 about the rising of the Sun as St. Marke informes About the dawning of the day for certainly it was not fit that the Sun of Heaven should shine upon the earth before the heavenly Sun of righteousnesse Nay therefore did our Saviour prevent the sun by his early rising to teach us that the whole world is enlightned only by the beams of his most sacred Gospell and that he only is the light to lighten the Gentiles and to be the glory of his people Israel And there was very good reason also why he should choose the first day of the week to be the day of the resurrection more then any other that as God the Father on that day did begin the creation of the world in which we live the life of nature so God the Son should on the same day also begin the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in the souls of men by which they live the life of grace here and are thereby prepared for the life of glory in the world to come The sixt day in which our father Adam did begin to live was the same day in which the second Adam did begin to die And the seventh day on which God rested from his labours in the great work of our Creation was also rested by our Saviour in the far greater businesse of our Redemption Rested I say by him not sanctifyed For Christ did therefore pretermit and sleep out as it were the Iewish Sabbath that from thenceforth the observation of that day should be laid aside and that in that neglect of his there should no further care be taken of the legal Ceremonies And as God sanctifyed that day in which he rested from the work of the worlds Creation so the Apostles first as it was conceived and afterwards the Church of Christ by their example did sanctifie and set apart that day for religious offices in which our Saviour cancelled the bonds of death and finished the great work of our Redemption The Israelites were commanded by the Lord their God immediately on their escape from the hands of Pharaoh to change the beginning of the year in a perpetuall memory of that deliverance With very good reason therefore did the Church determine to celebrate the Christian Sabbath if I may so call it upon a day not used before but changed in due remembrance of so great a miracle as that of our Saviours resurrection from the power of the grave and our deliverance thereby from the Prince of darknesse The Parallel of the worlds Creation and the Redemption on all mankind by Christ our Saviour with the change which followed thereupon in the day of worship is very happily expressed by Gregory Nyssen in his first Sermon upon Easter or the Resurrection where speaking of Gods rest of the Sabbath day he thus proceedeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. By that first Sabbath saith the father thou mayest conjecture at the nature of this this day of rest which God hath blessed above all dayes For on this the only begotten Son of God or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as his own words are who out of a divine purpose of restoring mankind did give his body rest in the house of death and afterwards revived again by his resurrection became the resurrection and the life the day-spring from on high the light to them that sit in darknesse and the shadow of death Finally to insist upon this point no longer three days our Saviour set apart for the performance of this work and wonder of the resurrection and answerably thereunto the Church did antiently set apart three days for the commemoration of that work and wonder which was then performed In which respect the feast of Easter is entituled by the said Gregory Nyssen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the three days festivall The next considerable circumstance of the
it so doth it signifie their office for Angelus nomen est officii non naturae as the Fathers tell us which is to be the messengers from God to Man as oft as there is any important businesse which requires it of them to be the Nuncios as it were from Gods supreme holiness to manage his affaires with the sons of men And unto this the Apostle also doth agree telling us that they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or ministring Spirits sent forth to minister unto them that shall be heires of Salvation Spirits they are according to the nature in which they were made and Ministring Spirits or Ministers as he calleth them out of David v. 7. with reference to the office unto which designed We have their nature in the word Spirits which sheweth them to be pure incorporeal substances not made of any corrupt matter as the bodies of men and so not having any internall principle of being they can have none neither of dissolution and yet as Creatures made by the hand of God they are reducible to nothing by the hand that made them although they have not in themselves any passive principle to make them naturally moral It is the priviledge or prerogative of Almighty God to be purely Simple without composition parts or passion The Angels though they come most near him yet fall short of this Who though they are not made of a matter and forme and so not naturally subject to the law of corruption yet are they made up or compounded of Act and Power or Actus aud Potentia in the School-mens language an Act by which they are a Power into which they may be reduced And being so made up of an Act of being and a Power of not being though probably that Power shall never be reduced into Act they fall exceeding short of the nature of GOD whose name is I AM and is so that it is impossible that he should not be or be any other then he is God being as uncapable of change as of composition Nay so great is the difference betwixt their nature and the nature of God so infinitely do they fall short of his incomprehensible and unspeakable Purity that though in comparison of Men as well as in themselves they are truly Spirits yet in comparison of GOD we may call them bodies But whatsoever their condition and ingredients be they owe not only unto God their continuall being by whom they are so made as to be free from corruption but unto him they are indebted for their first original without which they had not been at all St. Paul we see doth reckon them amongst things created and so doth David too in the Book of Psalmes Where calling upon all the Creatures to set forth Gods praises he first brings in the Angels to performe that office and then descends unto the Heavens and the other Creatures O praise the Lord of Heaven saith he praise him in the height Praise him all ye Angels of his praise him all his Hostes Praise him Sun and Moon c. Then addes of these and all the rest of the hosts of heaven He spake the word and they were made he commanded and they were created This with that passage of St. Paul before mentioned make it plain enough that the Angels were created by Almighty God And to this truth all sorts of writers whatsoever which do allow the being of Angels do attest unanimously Apollo in the Oracles ascribed unto him having laid down the incommunicable Attributes of God concludes it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that such is God of whom the Angels are but the smallest portion Where though Apollo or the Devil in Apollo's statua would fain be thought to be an Angel and as an Angel would be thought to have somewhat in him which might entitle him to be a Godhead yet he confesseth plainly that he owed his being to the power of God and was to be obedient unto his commands Hosthanes one of the chief of the Eastern Magi not only did allow of Angels as the Ministers aud messengers of the only God but made them so subservient to his will and power ut vultu Domini territi contremiscant that they could not look upon him without fear and trembling A Creature therefore doubtlesse not of self-existence and a Creature of Gods making too or else what need they tremble when they look upon him Of Plato it is said by Tertullian briefly Angelos Plato non negavit but by Minutius more expressely that he did not only believe that there were Angels but came so near the knowledge of their constitution as to affirme that they were inter mortalem et immortalem mediam substantiam a substance of a middle nature betwixt immortall and mortall that is to say not so eternally immortall as Almighty God nor yet so subject to mortality as the children of men And herein Aristotle comes up close to his Master Plato affirming more like a Divine then a Philosopher that to the perfection of the World there were required three sorts of substances the first wholly invisible which must be the Angels the second wholly visible as the Heaven and Earth and the third partly visible and invisible partly or made up of both And this saith he is none but man compounded of a visible body and an invisible soul. The Angels then though reckoned amongst things invisible yet being reckoned amongst such things as necessarily concurred to the Worlds perfection must have the same Creator which first made the World and made it in that full perfection which it still enjoyeth and such as hath before been proved could be none but GOD. The matter in dispute amongst learned men is not about the Power by which but the time when they were created In which as in a matter undetermined by the word of God every man takes the liberty of his own opinion and for me they may Some think that their Creation is included in the first words of Genesis where God is said to have created the Heaven and the Earth others when God said Fiat lux Let there be light and that from thence they have the title of the Angels of light Some will not have them made till the fourth day when the Sun and Moon and others of the Stars were made whose Orbes they say are whirled about by these Intelligences Cum ab omnibus receptum sit ab illis Coelos torqueri saith Peter Martyr But that they were created in one of the six dayes is the received opinion of all late Divines whether they be of the Pontifician or the Protestant party If so I would fain know the reason why Moses writing purposely of the Worlds Creation should pretermit the Master-peece of that wondrous work and not as well take notice of the Creation of the Angels as of the making of the Heavens and the Sun and Moon or of the Earth and other sublunary Creatures I know the common
answer is that Moses did therein consult the frailty of the Iewes his Countrymen who having been very well acquainted with the Idolatries of Egypt might easily have been induced to the worship of Angels had they found any thing in Scripture of that noble subject or else because being acquainted with the things of God he would not trust them with a secret of so high a nature Angelorum non meminit quia scribebat rudibus Judaeis illius secretioris doctrinae parum capacibus saith Estius the Iesuite for the Pontificians That he did purposely omit it Peter Martyr granteth but saith that it was propter hominum proclivitatem ad Idololatriam because of their inclination to Idolatrie For my part I confess these answers do not satisfie me For neither were the Iews so untaught a people as not to have been told of those Ministring Spirits which did so frequently appear to Abraham Isaac and Iacob And if they were so prone unto Idolatrie as they say they were I cannot see but that the pretermission of the Creation of Angels might rather give them some occasion to commit Idolatry then any way divert them from it For when they found by reading in the book of Genesis that not only Lot bowed himself down before the Angels which appeared unto him but that the same reverence or worship call it which we will had been performed unto them by their Father Abraham and yet could not meet with nothing touching their creation might not they probably conclude that sure the Angels were no creatures but rather a nature so divine and excellent that it were no impiety to worship them with religious worship There must be therefore somewhat else which did occasion this omission whatsoever it was And why that reason may not be because it did not fall within the compass of the six days work which Moses only undertook to lay down before us I must confesse for my part I can see no reason That they were made before the fourth day is most plain in Scripture Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the Earth said God to Iob when the morning stars sung together and all the Sons of God shouted for joy St. Augustine hereupon inferreth Iam ergo erant Angeli quando facta sunt sydera facta autem sunt sydera die quarto Therefore saith he the Angels were created before the stars for other Sons of God there were none but they to magnifie and applaud that most glorious work Before the fourth day then that 's clear And I am apt enough to think till I see better evidence to the contrary that they were made before the first Certain I am the Tenor of the Greek Fathers went this way confessedly whose testimonies I would here produce to make good the assertion but that I have confitentem reum For Estius himself doth confesse ingenuously Quod multi Patres Graeci tradunt Angelos aliquandiu creatos ante Mundum corporeum that many of the Greek Fathers were of opinion that the Angels were created for some space of time before this visible and corporeal World And Estius himself for ought I can see is of the same opinion also who telleth it for a manifest truth in another place that the Angels did not fall from the love of God in the first moment as it were of their Creation Sed aliquanto tempore in justitia stetisse but that they did abide awhile in the state of righteousness though they did not persevere therein as the others did Assuredly had they been created in the six days work their continuance in the state of Grace had been so short that it could hardly have been called Aliquantum temporis But whether Estius might so mean I determine not The Greek Fathers as he saith for the most part did and so did many of the Latines Lactantius I am sure was of this opinion and thereby answereth the objection which Hortensius made touching the loneliness and solitude of Almighty God before the making of the World Tanquam nos qui unum esse dicimus desertum ac solitarium esse dicamus Habet enim Ministros quos vocamus nuncios How far this satisfyeth the objection we have shewn before but certainly it doth sufficiently declare his judgment that the Angels were created before the World The old Hermit Cassianus is more plain and positive and he a Latine writer too of approved antiquity Ante conditionem hujus visibilis Creaturae spiritales coelestesque virtutes Deum fecisse c. nemo fidelium est qui dubitat That God before the making of this visible World had made those heavenly and spirituall powers so he cals the Angels there is not any of the faithful who so much as doubteth In which it is to be observed that Cassian doth not only speak this as his own opinion but the opinion of all Orthodox and faithful Christians and an opinion grounded on the words of Iob before remembred by him alledged and applyed for the proof hereof Finally having cleared the received opinion from being any way derogatory to the honour of Christ by whom and for whom all things were created he doth again repeat what he said before though he differ somewhat in the words saying Ante istud Geneseos temporale principium omnes illas Potestates Coelestesque virtutes Deum creasse non est dubium This then was the opinion of the antient Church and it stood uncontrouled by any publick authority till the Lateran Councel about 30. years agoe in which indeed it was declared Omnipotenti Dei virtute mundum et Angelos simul ab initio temporis de nihilo esse condita that by the Almighty God the Angels and the World were both created together in the beginning of time This was indeed determined then But I ascribe not so much to the Lateran Councell or the decrees and definitions which were therein made was not the point of Transubstantiation first established there as to recede from the authority of the antient writers because Pope Innocent the third did not like their tenets especially when I have some advantage of the holy Scriptures to rely upon For when I find that David in marshalling the works of the Creation puts the Angels first not only before the Sun and Moon but before all Heavens I cannot think that he observed only the order of dignity but that he had an eye especially on the order of time And so the Angels being placed before Heaven must consequently be created before that beginning in which as Moses tels us Heaven and Earth were created But whensoever they were made it is out of question that they were all created by the word of God and that they were created both for glory excellent and for their numbers almost infinite Lactantius telleth us in general termes that they were innumerable and so no question but they were For besides those many thousands which fell from God
plundered of their books during the Babylonian Captivity and thereby disabled from finding out the true course of the Moon otherwise then by such conjectures as the Eye and their observations did afford them and consequently failing oftentimes in celebrating of the Passeover at the time appointed by the Law ordained that that festival should be kept two whole days together that if they chanced to erre in the one they might hit right in the other And these two dayes they reckoned but for one alone as do the Romans at this time in the observation of the Bissextile or Leap-year as we use to call it who according to the Calculation of Iulius Caesar reckon the two days of the Bissextile but for one alone and so 't is also in the estimate of the Laws of England to this very day Insomuch that February for that year by the decree of the said Iulius Caesar is to have no more then 28 days as in other years because the day added unto that moneth or the dies intercalaris as the learned call it is to be reckoned for the same day with the day before both of them being called the sixt of the Calender of March in which respect the name of Dies Bissextilis was first given unto it And on this ground it was resolved by Celsus that famous Lawyer that if a man was born on the sixt of the Calends of March which is our 24. of February it mattered not whether he were born on the first or second day of the two that year because both days were counted in the Law for one So saith he in like manner did the Iews reckon those two days in which they solemnized the Passeover but for one day only both of them passing in their computation for the fifteenth day of the month in which that feast was to be celebrated by the law of Moses This he confirms not only by the practise of the modern Iews who for the most part hold themselves to this observation fathering it on Ezra the Scribe as ordained by him but also by the testimony of Rabbi Rava one of the most famous Doctors of that Nation for the times he lived in advising them Ne deserant consuetudinem a Patribus observatam not to forsake the old Tradition left them by their Ancestors of keeping the great festivals two whole days together according as Ezra had commanded And this they also did saith he if the Passeover fell upon the Sabbath in which case at the instance and perswasion of Gamaliel a man both learned in the laws and skilful in Astrological supputations they did not only double or re-iterate the feast of the Passeover but that of the weekly Sabbath also Which gave saith he occasion to that phrase of speech used by S. Mark where he cals the first day of the week una Sabbatorum that is to say the first day after both the Sabbaths He addes as in the way of super-aboundance that it was affirmed in the writing of Theophilus Caesariensis a man exceedingly well skilled in the Paschal Cycles that our Redeemer suffered on the eleventh of the Calends of April which is to us the 22. day of March and rose again March 25. being the 8. day of the Calends of April which make up three days and three nights in all but that his words were altered by Beda in his Translation of that piece to make it more conformable to the Tradition of the Church of Rome This is the sum of his discourse with which I must confess my self to be much delighted And were I aswell satisfied in the Allegation of Theophilus Caesariensis and the alteration made by Beda as I am in the residue of the proofs by him produced I might perhaps prefer this way before any other But being this depends on no other grounds then the bare ipse dixit or conjecture of my Author only I know not how to part with the Synecdoche commended to us by St. Augustine Hierome and others of the Antient Fathers and still retained and countenanced by so many men of eminence in all kindes of learning The Reader hath here choyce enough and may use his pleasure As for the difference which seems to be between the Evangelists touching the time of the day in which this wondrous work was wrought we will first lay down their several words and then see what is to be said for the reconcilement St. Matthew saith it was in the end of the Sabbath as it began to dawn towards the first day of the week that Mary Magdalen and the other Marie came to see the sepulchre St. Mark that when the Sabbath was past they came very early in the morning the first day of the week at the rising of the Sun St. Luke that having bought their spices on the Eve of the Sabbath they came very early in the morning upon the first day of the week And finally St. Iohn that it was early on the first day of the week when it was yet dark In which we have not only an appearing difference between St. Iohn who telleth us that it was yet dark and those who that say it was in the morning as the Sun was rising but a seeming contradiction also in Matthew who maketh it to be on the end of the Sabbath which was Saturday Eve and yet upon the dawning of the first day of the week which is Sunday morning To reconcile St. Iohn to the other Evangelists St. Ambrose and Eusebius were of opinion that there were two Mary Magdalens of our Saviours acquaintance whereof one came unto the Sepulchre in the night and the other in the morning But then assuredly the Scriptures would have given us some mark of difference as in the case of Simon Peter and Simon the Canaanite Mary the Mother of IESVS and Mary the Mother of Iames and Ioses Iudas who wrote the Epistle extant in his name and Iudas Iscariot who betrayed him Others conceive that St. Markes text hath received some alteration in setting down the time of his Resurrection as before we saw it was supposed in the time of his passion and that in stead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at the Sun-rising it should be read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sun not being risen But such corrections as we said in the former case are not only unwarrantable but unsafe And if such Criticizing on the Text of Scripture might be used with safety the alteration were more easie if in stead of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the second Aorist St. Mark might be supposed to say in the present tense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Sun was rising when first his beams began to dispel that darkness which we finde mentioned in St. Iohn But leaving this correction also as matter dangerous the safest and most probable way to atone the difference is that the women did begin to set forwards towards the holy Sepulchre whilest it was yet
all that required Baptism When first made part of the publick Liturgy and rehearsed by the people standing in what particulars discriminated from other Formula's The first objection that the Creed is no Canonical Scripture produced and answered An answer to the second objection about the variation of the words in which the Creed was represented Several significations of the Greek word Catholick and that it was a word in use in and before the time of the Apostles contrary to the third objection The last objection from the words of Ruffinus answered The scope and Project of this work The Authors appeal unto antiquity The testimony given unto antiquity by the Antient Writers and also by the Church of England Calvins Authority produced for the asserting of this Creed to the twelve Apostles closeth up the Preface PART I. CHAP. I. Of the name and definition of faith the meaning of the phrase in Deum credere The Exposition of it vindicated against all exceptions THe Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what it signifies and from whence it comes The proper Etymologie of the Latine fides Faith how defined and how it differeth from experience knowledge and opinion The grounds of faith less falliâ—le thâ—n that of any Art or Science Why faith is called by St. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the substance of things not seen c. The usual distinction between credere Deum credere Deo and credere in Deum proposed and explicated according to the general tendries of the Schools neither the phrase in Deum or in Christum credere and the distinction thereon founded so generally true as it is pretended Credere with the proposition in not so peculiar unto God as by some conceived No difference in holy Scripture between Deo and in Deum credere nor in the meaning of the Creed Of the faith of Reprobates and why faith hath the name of fides electorum in the Book of God The faith of Devils what it is and why it rather makes them tremble then serves to nourish them in the hope of grace and pardon The Vulgar distinction of faith into Salvifical Historical Temporary and the faith of Miracles proposed examined and rejected CHAP. II. That there is a God and but one God only and that this one God is a pure and Immortal Spirit and the sole Governour of the world proved by the light of reason and the testimony of the antient Gentiles THe notion of a Deity ingraffed naturally in the soul of man Pretagoras Diagoras and Euhemerus why counted Atheists in old times Fortune and Fate why reckoned of as gods by some old Philosophers Natural proofs for this truth that there is but one God summed up together and produced by Minutius Felix and seconded by the testimonies of Mercurius Trismegistus the Sibyls and Apollo himself confirmed by the suffrages of Orpheus and the old Greek Poets The beeing of one God alone strongly maintained by Socrates affirmed by Plato and his followers countenanced by Aristotle and the Peripateticks verified also by the Academicks the most rigid Stoicks and by the general acknowledgment of all sorts of people The judgement of the learned Gentiles touching the Essence and Attributes of God conformable to that of the Orthodox Christians The Heresies of the Manichees and the Anthropomorphites confuted by the writings of the old Philosophers A parallel between the Tutelary gods of the old Idolaters and the Topical or local Saints of the Pontificians CHAP. III. Of the Essence and Attributes of God according to the holy Scripture the name of Father how applyed to God Of his Mercy Justice and Omnipotency THe diligence of Iustin Martyr when an Heathen in the search of God The name IEHOVAH when and for what occasion first given to God in holy Scripture The superstition of the later Iews in the use thereof The Hebrew Elohim sometimes communicated to the creature The several Etymologies of the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The names of El Elion and Adonai what they do import Of the Simplicity Eternity and Omnipresence of God Of his Knowledge Wisdome and Omnipotency The name of Father Almighty given to God by the learned Gentiles God in what sense the Father of our Lord IESVS CHRIST and of none but him The preheminence due in that respect to God the Father the name of Father how communicable to the whole Godhead God proved to be the Father of all mankinde in the right of Creation and of his faithful people by the laws of Adoption Many resemblances between adoptions among men and mans adoption to the sonship of Almighty God The love care and authority of our Heavenly Father compared with that of our earthly parents The care of God in educating all his children in the knowledge of his will how far extended unto the Infidels and Pagans and how far beneficial to them The title of Almighty given to God the Father what it importeth in it self and what in reference to the creature to his Church especially CHAP. IV. Of the Creation of the World and the parts thereof that it was made at first by Gods Almighty power and since continually preserved by his infinite Providence GEneral inducements moving God to create the world An answer to that idle question what God did before the creating of the world The error of Lactantius in it God differenced by this great work from the gods of the Gentiles and that in the opinion of the Gentiles themselves The work of the Creation ascribed to the whole Godhead jointly in the holy Scripture Of the first matter out of which and the time when it was created The opinion of the worlds eternity refelled by Cicero why supposed by Aristotle The worlds creation by the power of Almighty God proved by the testimonies of Trismegistus of Plato Aristotle and others of the learned Greeks As also by the suffrages of Varro Tully Seneca and others of the principal wits amongst the Latines Why God did pass no approbation on the works of the second day and doubled it upon the third Probable proofs that by the waters above the Firmament mentioned in the first of Genesis Moses intended not the clowds and rain but some great body of waters above the Spheres The praise and honour due to God for the worlds creation The general Providence of God in ordering the affairs thereof asserted both against the Stoicks and the Epicureans Gods goodness towards all mankinde especially to his chosen people And of his Iustice or veracity in performing the promises made unto them Gods justice in retaliating to the sons of men and meting to them with that measure which they mete to other Vngodly men how used as executioners of divine vengeance That neither the impunity nor prosperous successes of the wicked in this present world are inconsistent with the justice of Almighty God CHAP. V. Of the creation of Angels The Ministry and office of the good The fall and punishment of the evil Angels and
Rome relapsed to her antient Gentilism revived again so many of her Gods and Goddesses that both the Iews and Infidels may have cause to question whether she doth believe in one God alone or that he only is the Father Almighty whom the Creed here mentioneth Of which and other of the Attributes of Almighty God I am next to speak Articuli 1. pars 2da 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Patrem Omnipotentem i. e. The Father Almighty CHAP. III. Of the Essence and Attributes of God according to the holy Scripture The name of Father how applyed unto God of his Mercy Justice and Omnipotency BY that which hath been said in the former Chapter out of the Monuments and Records of the antient Gentiles it is apparent that they knew that there is a GOD that he was one only and that this one God was an Eternal and Immortal Spirit existing of himself without any beginning invisible incomprehensible omnipotent without change or passion In which description we have all those Epithels summed up together out of the works and writings of those reverend Sages which Ruffinus a good Christian Writer of the Primitive times hath bestowed upon him in his Exposition of the Creed Deum cum audis substantiam intellige sine initio sine fine simplicem sine ulla admixtione invisibilem incorpoream ineffabilem inaestimabilem in quo nihil adjunctum nihil creatum And though it could not be expected that the Gentiles guided only by the light of Nature should have said so much yet for the better knowledge of the Essence Attributes and works of GOD we must not rest our selves contented with that measure of light which was discovered unto them but make a more exact search for it in the holy Scriptures Concerning which there is a memorable story of Iustin Martyr which he relateth in his Dialogue with Trypho the Iew. St. Paul hath noted of the Greeks that they seek after wisdome and never was the note more exactly true then in that particular For being inflamed with a desire of coming to a more perfect knowledge of the Nature of GOD then had been generally attained by the common people first he applyed himself unto the Stoicks who by the gravity and preciseness of their conversation did seem most likely to direct him But this knowledge was not with the Stoick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor could he learn much there of the nature of God Next he betook himself to the Peripateticks men most renowned for their knowledge in the works of Nature and the subtilties of disputation But there he profited less then before with the Stoicks the Peripateticks being more irresolute and speaking less divinely of the things of GOD then any of the other Sects of Philosophie Then had he severally recourse unto the Pythagorean and the Platonist who were most eminent in those times for the contemplative parts of learning 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in the search of immaterials But true Divinity was not to be found in all the writings either of the Pythagoreans or the Platonists although these last did seeme to come more neer the truth then either the Peripatetick or the Stoick At last he was encountred by a Reverend old man a Christian Father and was by him directed to the Book of God writ by the Prophets and Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they which only knew the truth and which alone were able to unfold it rightly The counsel of which Reverend man he obeyed full gladly and profited so well in the Schools of CHRIST that he became a Martyr for the Faith and Gospel So we if we would come unto the perfect knowledge of GOD though we may sport our selves and refresh our thoughts in the pleasant walks and prospects of Philosophy must at the last apply our selves to the holy Scriptures where we shall be as far instructed in the things of GOD as he thinks fit to be communicated to the sons of men Now for our better method in the present search we will consider GOD in those names and Attributes by which he hath made known himself in his holy Covenants And first we meet with that of the Lord IEHOVAH which the Greeks usually called the Tetragrammaton or the name consisting of four letters for of no more it doth consist in the Hebrew language the Iews more properly nomen appropriatum gloriosum the most peculiar and most glorious name of the Lord our God appropriated unto him in so strict a manner that it was not lawful to communicate it unto any Creature By this name was he first pleased to make himself known unto Moses saying that he had appeared to Abraham Isaac and Jacob by the name of God Almighty but by this Name of Jehovah he had not made himself known unto them And in the Prophet Esay thus Ego sum Jehovah illud est nomen meum i. e. I am Jehovah that is my Name and my glory will I not give unto another Derived it is from Iah an old Hebrew root which signifieth ens existens Being or existing And hereupon was that when Moses in the third of Exod. v. 14. asked the name of GOD the Lord returned this answer to him I Am that I Am and thus shalt thou say unto the people I AM hath sent me unto you And hereupon it was that St. IOHN calleth him in the Book of the Revelation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is which was and which is to come Nor doth it signifie alone a self-existence by which he hath a Beeing in and of himself and doth communicate a beeing unto all the creatures but it is used in Scripture for a name of power by which he governeth all those creatures on which he hath been pleased to bestow a beeing And therefore if we mark it well though he appear unto us by the name of God in the first of Genesis when the Creation was an Embryo an imperfect work yet he is no where called by the name of the Lord Iehovah till the Creation was accomplished and his works made perfect The Fathers heereupon observe and the note is handsome that the name of GOD is absolute essential and coeternal with the Deitie but that of IEHOVAH or the Lord not used except in reference to the creature And it is noted by Tertullian in his Book against Hermogenes that in the first of Genesis it is often said Deus dixit Deus vidit Deus fecit God said and God saw and God created But that he was not called the Lord by the name of IEHOVAH till the second Chapter when he had finished all his works the Heaven and Earth and all things in the same contained and that there was some creature framed on which to exercise his Power and Supreme command Ex quo creata sunt in quae potestas ejus ageret ex eo factus est dictus DOMINVS for by the word Dominus do the Latines render
Some time then God thought fit to take for perfecting the great work of the Worlds creation six dayes in all of which the first did lay the foundation the rest raised the building The foundation of it I conceive to be that unformed matter out of which all things were extracted in the other five dayes which Moses first calleth the Heaven and the Earth because they were so in potentia but after telleth us more explicitely that that which he called Earth was inanis et vacua without forme and void and that which he called Heaven was but an overcast of darkness or tenebrae super faciem Abyssi as the Vulgar reads it Of which Chaos or confused Masse we thus read in Ovid who questionless had herein consulted with the works of Moses before his time communicated to the learned Gentiles Ante mare et terras et quod tegit omnia Coelum Vnus erat toto naturae vultus in orbe Quem dixere Chaos rudis indigestaque moles Nec quicquam nisi pondus iners congestaque eodem Non bene junctarum discordia semina rerum c. Which I shall English from Geo. Sandys with some little change Before the Earth the Sea or Heaven were fram'd One face had nature which they Chaos nam'd An undigested lump a barren load Where jarring seeds of things ill-joyn'd abode No Sun as yet with light the World adorns Nor new Moon had repair'd her waning horns Nor hung the self-pois'd Earth in thin Air plac'd Nor had the Ocean the vast shores imbrac'd Earth Sea and Air all mixt the Earth unstable The Air was dark the Sea un-navigable No certain form to any one assign'd This that resist's For in one body join'd The cold and hot the dry and humid fight The soft and hard the heavy with the light Out of this Chaos or first matter did GOD raise the World according to those several parts and lineaments which we see it in not as out of any pre-existent matter which was made before and had not GOD for the Authour or Maker of it but as the first preparatory matter which himself had made including in the same potentially both the form and matter of the whole Creation except the soul of man only which he breathed into him after he had moulded up his body out of the dust of the earth And therefore it is truly said that GOD made all things out of nothing not out of nothing as the matter out of which it was made for then that nothing must be something but as the terminus a quo in giving them a reall and corporeal being which before they had not and did then first begin to have by the meer efficacy and vertue of his powerful world And though it be a maxime in the Schooles of Philosophy Ex nihilâ— nil fit that nothing can be made of nothing that every thing which hath a being doth require some matter which must be pre-existent to it yet this must either be condemned for erroneous doctrine in the chaire of Divinity or else be limited and restrained as indeed it may conâ—idering from whence it came to visible and natural agents which cannot goe beyond the sphere of their own activity Invisible and supernatural agents are not tyed to rules no not in the production of the works of nature though nature constituted and established in a certain course work every thing by time and measure in a certain rule Now as the World was made of nothing that is to say without any uncreated or precedent matter which may be possibly conceived to have been coexistent with the God-head it self and thereby gained a being or existence which before it had not so had it a beginning too that is to say a time in which it first did begin to be what before it was not This Moses calleth principium a beginning simple In principio creavit Deus Coelum et Terram In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth which is all one as if he had said the Heaven and the Earth had a beginning and that this unformed Masse of Chaos was the beginning or first draught of them the first in order of time because made before them not in the way of causality as the cause thereof Coelum et Terra in principio i. e. ante omnia facta sunt as Simon Pottius hath observed in his notes or Scholies on St. Iohns Gospell So that whether we do expound those words that the Heaven and Earth had a beginning or that Moses by those words did mean that out of that which he calleth the Heaven and the Earth as out of the beginning or first matter all things were created it comes all to one because it is acknowledged that that first matter was created by God and therefore of necessity was to have a beginning Nor doth the Scripture only tell us that the World had a beginning but by the help of Scripture and the works of some Learned men we are able to point out the time when it did begin or to compute how many years it is precisely from the first beginning without any notable difference in the Calculation For though it be most truly said Citius inter Horologia quam Chronologia that clocks may sooner be agreed then Chronologers yet most Chronologers in this point come so near one another that the difference is scarce observable From the beginning of the World to the birth of Christ in the account of Beroaldus are 3928. years 3945. in the computation of the Genevians 3960. in the esteem of Luther and 3963. in the calculation of Melanchthon between whom and Beroaldus being the least and the greatest there is but 35. years difference which in so long a tract of time can be no great matter Now if unto the calculation made by Beroaldus which I conceive to be the truest we add 1646. since the birth of CHRIST the totall of the time since the Worlds Creation will be 5576. years neither more nor lesse And to this truth that the World had a beginning whensoever it was and was not of eternal being or a self-existency most of the old Philosophers did consent unanimously guided thereto by this impossibility in nature that any visible work either natural or artificial should either give it self a being or have that being which it hath from no cause precedent For from that principle Tully argueth very rightly that as a man coming into a goodly house in which he found nothing but rats and mice could not conceive that either the house had built it self or had no other maker but those rats and mice which were nested in it so neither can it be imagined that either this World should be eternal of a self-existency or was composed by any natural agent of what power soever And this is that which is more briefly and expressely said by St. Paul to the Hebrews viz. That every house is built by some man but he
derived from the natural seed of the body Quo quid perversius dici potest then which there could not any thing be said which is more perverse He that would see the judgment of the Protestant writers and how they do accord with the holy Scriptures expounded and applyed by consent of Fathers let him consult Calvin in his Comment on the Hebrewes cap. 12. Bullinger Decad. 4. Serm. 10. Beza in lib. quaestion et Respons Zanchius de operib dei part 3. l. 2. cap. 4. and Vrsin Tract Theolog. de peccato And for the opinion in this point of the old Philosophers that received maxime of theirs Creando infunditur infundendo creatur sufficiently declares it without further search But see how I am carried into this dispute ere I was aware besides my first meaning I am sure though not impertinently to the business of mans creation which is the work I have in hand For the accomplishing of which work being indeed the Master-peece of the whole Creation God did not only form the body and infuse the soul but he imprinted in him the impresse or character of his Heavenly image For it is said of man that God created him in his own image and that again repeated for our more assurance in the image of God created he him Gen. 1.27 About this Image of God thus imprinted in him there hath been much debate amongst learned men some placing it in Man himself others in somewhat adventitious and extrinsecal to him Of this last sort are they who place this Image of God in that dominion which God gave him over all the Creatures For so it followes in the Text Let us make Man in our image after our likenesse and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowles of the aire and over the Cattel and over all the earth And unto this the Poet doth allude in his Metamorphosis saying Sanctius his et quod dominari in caetera posset natus homo est that man who was to have dominion over all the rest of the Creatures was not made till the last But this if I conceive it rightly is rather a communication of some part of his Power then an impression of his Image unlesse perhaps their meaning be that God imprinted so much of his Heavenly Image in the face of man as to make all other Creatures stand in awe to him And if their meaning be no more then they come up to those of the other opinion who place this image of God in Man himself in something which is natural and essential to him which must either be in his body or his soul or both In one of those it must be there 's no doubt of that and little doubt in which of the two to finde it For certainly they look for it in a very wrong place who expect to finde it in mans body though of a gallant composition and erected structure The Heathen Oratour was able to inform some erroneous Christians one of whose many divine dictates this is said to be Ad divinam imaginem propius accedit humana virtus quam figura that man approched more near to the image of God in the virtues of his minde then the figure of his body I know a great dispute hath been also raised about this image of God in the soul of man that is to say in what it specially did conâ—ist and whether it were lost or not in the fall of Adam For stating of this controversie we will take some hints from the decisions of Aquinas who first declares that the image of God consisteth in that eminent perfection which is found in men expressing the nature of God in an higher degree then the chief excellencies found in all other creatures and secondly that this perfection is principally to be had in the soul of man Then he distinguisheth this perfection into these three conditions Creationis Recreationis et Similitudinis that is to say of nature grace and endlesse glory of which the first is to be found in all men and can never be lost the second is the portion of the man regenerated and the third is the reward of a soul in blisse The first consisteth in the largeness of the natural faculties of understanding and will not limited to the apprehension or desire of some certain things only but extended to all the conditions of being and goodness whose principall object is God so that they never rest satisfyed with any other thing but the seeing and enjoying of his blessed vision And this is that which is more briefly couched in those words of Augustines Fecisti nos ad te et irrequietum est cor nostrum donec requiescat in te O Lord saith he thou madest us only for thy self and our hearts are restlesse and unquiet till they rest in thee The second kind of this perfection in which the image of God is said to consist is supernatural when the soul actually or at lest habitually knoweth and loveth God aright though not so perfectly as he may and shall be known and loved hereafter And such was that perfection of the great Apostle who reckoned all but as dung so he might gain CHRIST who was so far inflamed with a strong desire of being united unto God that he desired to be dissolved without longer stay and such was the perfection of the holy Father who thought himself dead when he was alive out of a zeal of seeing the most blessed face of Almighty God Moriar ne moriar ut faciem tuam videam he dyed because he could not die to behold that vision The third and last degree of the said perfection is when the soul both knowes and loves the Lord her God in the fulnesse of happinesse And this is that whereof St. Paul hath told us saying that now we see darkly as thorow a glasse but then we shall see face to face Now know I but in part saith he but then shall I know even as I also am known These are the several perfections or degrees thereof in which Gods image printed in the soul of man doth consist especially according to the doctrine of the Roman Schooles and most pure antiquity and of these three the second is that only which was lost in Adam but partly though imperfectly renewed in the state of grace there being no man since the fall who either doth so perfectly know or so sincerely cherish the love of God in his soul as Adam did before it in his first integrity For when the Lord made Man in his first Creation he gave him such a clearness of understanding as was not darkened either with the cloudes of errour or the mists of ignorance and such a rectitude in his will as was not biassed unto evill by corrupt affections Perfectly good God made him but not good unchangeably for he was left in the counsel of his own hands as the wiseman
look to finde it in any writings or records of the antient Gentiles So that we may affirme of the knowledge of CHRIST as Lactantiuss did in generall of the ttue Religion Nondum fas esse alienigenis hominibus Religionem Dei veri justitiamque cognoscere the time was not yet come in which the Gentiles should be made acquainted with those heavenly mysteries which did concern the Kingdom of our Lord and Saviour T is true the Sibylline Oracles cited by Lactantius and others of great eminence in the Primitive times speak very clearly in some things concerning the life and death of CHRIST in so much that they seem rather written in the way of History then in that of Prophesie And though the learned Casaubon and others of our great Philologers conceive them to be pious fraudes composed of purpose by some Christians of the elder ages and added as a supplement to the true Originals the better to win credit to the faith of CHRIST yet dare I not so far disparage those good Catholick writers as to believe they would support so strong an edifice with so weak a prop or borrow help from falshood to evict the truth Or if they durst have been so venturous how easie had it been for their learned Adversaries Porphyrie Iulian and the rest of more eminent note to have detected the Imposture and silenced the Christian Advocates with reproach enough Letting this therefore go for granted as I think I may that the Sibylline Oracles are truly cited by the Fathers and that they do contain most things which hapned to our Saviour in his life and death yet could this give but little light to the Heathen people touching CHRIST to come because they were not suffered to be extant publickly and consequently came not to the knowledge of the learned Gentiles till by the care and diligence of the Christian Writers they were after published For so exceeding coy were the antient Romans of suffering the Sibyls or their works to go abroad having got into their hands the best copies of them that those times afforded that they commanded them to be kept closely in the Capitol under the care and charge of particular Officers whom from the number of fifteen for so many they were they called Quindecemviri and to whom only it was lawful to consult their papers Nec eos ab ullo nisi a Quindecemviris fâ—s est inspici as Lactantius notes it very truly And it is also very true that many of the antient and most learned Grecians had a confused notice of a second Deity whom they called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Word making him aiding and subservient to Almighty God in the Creation of the world and therefore giving him the attribute of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the worlds Creator The several testimonies to this purpose he that lists to see may finde them mustered up together in that laborious work of the Lord du Plessis entituled De veritate Religionis Christianae cap. 6. So frequently occurs this notion in the old Philosophers especially in those of the School of Plato that Porphyrie an Apostate Christian and a Platonick in the course of his sect and studies blasphemously averred that St. Iohn had stollen the first words of his Gospel viz. In the beginning was the Word c. from his Master Plato And though the affirmation of that vile Apostata intended only the disgrace of the holy Evangelist and of the Gospel by him written for the use of the Church yet had it been a truth as indeed it was not it could have been no greater a disparagement to St. Iohn to borrow an expression from a Greek Philosopher then to St. Paul to use the very words of three Grecian Poets But the truth is that both St. Iohn and the Platonicks together with the rest of those old Heroes borrowed the notion from the Doctors of the Iewish Nation as Maldonate hath proved at large in his Comment on that Text of the blessed Evangelist who withal gives it for the reason why S. Iohn made choyce rather of this notion then of any other in the front or entrance of his Gospel because it was so known and acceptable both to Iew and Gentile Philosophos non dubium est ab antiquis Hebraeis hausisse sententiam vocabulum accepisse Proinde voluit Johannes accommodate ad usum loqui saith the learned Iesuite But then withall we must observe that though we finde such frequent mention of the Word or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the writings of the antient Gentiles yet finde we almost nothing of him but the name or notion nothing that doth relate to the salvation of man the taking of our nature upon him or being made a propitiation for the sins of mankinde That as before I noted was a secret mysterie not to be manifested to the sons of the Gentiles till CHRIST himself was come to make one of both and call them to the knowledge of his grace and faith in him Being so called they were no longer to be differenced by the name of Gentiles but fellow-heirs and of the same body whereof CHRIST is Head and as the members of that body to joyn in the Confession of the self same faith not only as to God the Father in the acknowledgement of which Article all the Nations meet but as unto his only Son IESVS CHRIST our Lord from whence the faith hath properly the name of Christian. Now that which we believe touching CHRIST our Saviour and is to be the argument of this present Book is thus delivered by the pen of our Reverend Iewell in the name and for the use and edification of the Church of England Credimus Jesum Christum filium unicum aeterni patris c. i. e. We believe that IESVS CHRIST the only Son of the eternal Father as it had been determined before all beginnings when the fulness of time was come did take of that blessed and pure Virgin both flesh and all the nature of man that he might declare unto the world the secret and hidden will of his Father and that he might fulfil in his humane body the Mysterie of our Redemption and might fasten our sins unto the Cross and blot out that hand-writing which was against us We believe that for our sakes he dyed and was buryed descended into Hell and the third day by the power of his God-head rose again to life and that the fortieth day after his Resurrection whiâ—est his Disciples looked on he ascended into Heaven to fulfil all things and did place in Majesty and glory the self same body wherewith he was born in which he lived upon the earth in which he was scornfully derided and suffered most painful torments and a cruel death and finally in which he rose again from the dead and ascended to the right hand of the Father above all principalities and powers and might and dominion that there he
on Penelope by Mercury And is it not recorded in their most authentick Histories that Romulus the first King and founder of Rome was begotten by Mars upon the body of Rhea a Vestal Virgin Romulus a Marte genttus Rhea Silvia as Florus summarily reports it Had not the Lusitanians a race of Horses which they believed to be engendred by the winde the fancy growing from the knowledge of their excellent swiftness At this Lactantius toucheth in his Book of Institutes and makes it a convincing Argument in this case against the Gentiles who might as easily believe the miracle of the incarnation as give faith to that Quod si animalia quaedam vento aura concipere solere omnibus notum est cur quisquam mirum putet cum Spiritu Dei cui est facile quicquid velit gravatam Virginem esse dicimus No question but the Spirit of God might be conceived as operative as the winde or ayr But leaving these Romances of the antient Heathens though arguments good enough ad homines and beyond that they are not meant let us next look a while on the blessed Virgin who questionless did somewhat to advance the work and left it not wholly to the managing of the holy Ghost But what she did was rather from the strength of faith then nature For had she not believed she had never conceived And thereupon it is resolved by St. Augustine rightly Feliciorem Mariam esse percipiendo fidem Christi quam concipiendo carnem Christi that she was happier by believing then she was by conceiving though in that too pronounced the most blessed amongst women Now in the strengthning of this faith many things concurred as the authority of the Messenger who coming from the God of truth could not tell a lye the general expectation which the Iews had about this time of the Messiahs near approach the argument used by the Angel touching Gods Omnipotence with whom nothing was said to be impossible and so not this the instance of a like miracle wrought upon Elizabeth the wife of Zachary almost as old but altogether in the same case with Sarah who had conceived a son in her old age beyond the ordinary course of nature And to say truth these arguments were but necessary to beget belief to so great a miracle to which no former age could afford a parallel though that of Sarah came most nigh it And if that Sarah thought it such a matter of impossibility then to conceive and bear a son when it only ceased to be with her after the manner of women as the Text tels us that she did how much more justly might the Virgin think it an impossible thing for her to be conceived with childe and bring forth a Son and yet continue still a Virgin But at the last the strength of faith overcame all difficulties and by the chearfulness of her obedience she made a way for this great blessing which was coming towards her Behold the handmaid of the Lord Be it to me according unto thy word Which whether they were words of wishing that so it might be as St. Ambrose Venerable Beda and Euthymius think or of consent that so it should be as Ireneus and Damascen are of opinion certain it is that on the speaking of those words she did conceive Coelestial seed and in due time brought forth her Saviour As is affirmed by Irenaeus l. 1. c. 33. Tertullian in his book De Carne Christi Athanasius in his Oration De Sancta Deipara and divers others A work as of great efficacy unto our Salvation so of especial esteem in the Christian Church the day whereof called usually the Feast of the Annuntiation hath anciently been observed as an holy Festival as appears by several Homilies made upon this subject by Gregory surnamed Thaumaturgus who lived in the year 230. and that of Athanasius in the time of Constantine A day of such high esteem amongst us in England that we begin our year from thence both in the vulgar estimate and all publick Instruments though in our Kalenders we begin with the first of Ianuary according to the custome of the antient Romans But here it may be asked why CHRIST should not be called the Son of the holy Ghost according to his humane nature considering that not St. Luke only ascribeth unto him the work of the Incarnation under the title of an overshadowing but that it is affirmed by St. Matthew in tearms more express that she the blessed Virgin Mother was found to be with child of the holy Ghost And he by whom a woman is conceived with childe is properly and naturally though not always legally for Pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant as the Lawyers tell us the right Father of it A consideration which prevailed so far with some of St. Hieromes time that they began to stumble upon this opinion but with no better reason in true Divinity then Christ may be affirmed to be the Father Almighty intended in the former Articles because creation is the work of the Father Almighty and it is written by St. Iohn that by him that is to say the Son all things were made For all things were so made by the Word as the Word was made flesh or incarnate by the holy Ghost God I mean God the first Person here as generally the Scripture doth where it speaks of God without limitation or restrictions acting by them those two great works which in the holy Text are to them ascribed yet by them not as Ministers subservient to him but co-working with him God saith St. Paul hath in these last days spoken to us by his Son whom he appointed heir of all things by whom also he made the Worlds God made the world though he made it by his Son to the end that all things being created by him might be also for him And so 't is also in the work of the incarnation God by his Spirit fructifying the Virgins womb and sanctifying the materials with which the Word which in the beginning was with God was to be invested to the intent that the Spirit might bear witness to us that he was the beloved Son of God in whom his Father was well pleased And yet there is another reason why he should rather be called the Son of God then of the holy Ghost because he had a pre-existence before he was incarnate in the Virgins womb as he was the Word the Word which in the beginning was not only with God but was also God by an unspeakable way of emanation from the Father only as the Word is first conceived in the minde of man before it be uttered by the voyce For as the Son is to the Father so is the Word to the Minde The Son proles parentis the Word proles mentis saith the learned Andrews God therefore being an eternal everlasting Minde did before all beginnings of time produce the Word
But such was his unspeakable love to the sons of men that he disdained not to submit himself for their sakes to those low conditions as to be made man and to have a Mother a Mother which beyond example did bring forth her God and became the Parent of her Saviour Et mater sine exemplo genuit autorem suum as Lactantius hath it Born then our Saviour was of a mortall womb But the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used in the present Article tels us more then so and telleth us that he was not only born of the Virgin Mary but so born of her as to be made of her also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the word was made flesh Ioh. 1.14 God sent his Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made of a woman saith St. Paul Gal. 4.4 where the same word is used as here Made then he was as well as born of the Virgin Mary And made not convertendo not by converting the Word into flesh as Cerinthus nor converting flesh into the WORD as Velentinus was of opinion for the deity cannot be changed into any thing nor any thing into it Nor was it made conciliando as friends are made one or reconciled so as they continue two persons still and while the flesh suffered the WORD stood still and looked on only as Nestorius taught for that were not to be made flesh but made with the flesh not caro sed cum carne saith my reverend Author Nor finally was he made componendo by compounding two persons together and so a third thing produced of both as Eutyches for so he should be neither of both neither the word nor flesh neither God nor man But made he was as St. Paul tels us assumendo by taking the seed of Abraham Heb. 2.16 His generation before time as verbum Deus is as the enditing the word within the heart His generation in time as verbum caro is as the uttering it forth with the voice The inward motion of the minde taketh unto it a naturall body of Aire and so becometh vocal It is not changed into it the word remaineth still as it was yet they two became one voice Take a similitude from our selves Our soul is not turned into nor compounded with the body yet they two though distinct in natures grow into one man So Athanasius in his Creed For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man so God and man is one Christ. So into the Godhead was the manhood taken the natures preserved without confusion the person entire without division The fourth General Councell so determineth also Sic factum est caro ut maneret verbum non immutando quod erat sed suscipiendo quod not erat Nostra auxit sua non minuit nec Sacramentum pietatis detrimentum est Deitatis i. e. He was so made flesh that he ceased not to be the Word never changing what he was but taking that he was not We were the better he was never the worse The mysterie of Godlinesse was was no detriment to the Godhead nor the honour of the creature wrong to the Creator No wrong indeed it was no detriment to the divine nature of the Word to be made flesh and take upon him the infirmities of our humane nature but much to the advancement of our humane nature which he took upon him as many Kings and soveraign Princes have been made free of some particular Corporations under their commands without diminution or impeachment of their Royal Power and highly to the honour of those Companies or Corporations Mortalis factus est non infirmata verbi divinitate sed carnis suscepta infirmitate as divinely Angustine in his De Civit. dei l. 9. c. 15. And herein miserable man hath a great advantage of the Angels though made lower then they in his creation in that the WORD God for ever blessed vouchsafed to be made in such manner of our rank and order as he is not of theirs From the manner passe we to the time when this work was wrought which St. Paul cals plenitudinem temporis or the fulnesse of time that is to say when the time was come and fully accomplished which God in his eternall wisdome had fore-determined which he had also signifyed to the house of Israel by the mouth of his Prophets In reference to the civil Account it was at the time when Herod a stranger to the bloud-royal of David was King of Iewry and Augustus Caesar the sole Monarch of the Roman Empire The first having translated the Scepter from Judah and the Law-giver from between his feet made an apparent way for the coming of Shiloh to whom the gathering of the people was now to be The latter having the third time closed the Temple of Ianus and setled an universal peace over all the Empire made it the most agreeable time for the birth of him who being called the Prince of peace by the Prophet Isaiah proclaimed peace unto all the earth at the hour of his birth and left it to his Disciples as his last Legacie at the time of his death And it was also in the time of a general taxing as our English or rather of a general enrolment cum universus orbis describeretur saith the vulgar very answerably to the Greek Originals as the Rhemists read it A time when every subject of the Roman Empire was to repaire to the head City of his family there to list his name and to professe ut profiterentur saith the Vulgar or make acknowledgment of his fealty and true allegeance to the Prince in being A thing not done at random or by humane providence that by this means the Emperour might come to know quot civium sociorumque in Armis the strength and number of his Subjects as the Statists tell us but by the speciall dispensation and appointment of Almighty God Though Christ had been conceived in Nazareth a City of Galilee yet was he to be born in Bethlehem the City of David And thither was Ioseph to repair to be taxed or enrolled rather with Mary his wife that she being there delivered of her blessed burden the word of God fore-signifyed by the Prophet Micah might be fulfilled viz. that out of Bethlehem-Judah there should come a Governour which should rule over the house of Israel The shutting of the Temple of Ianus and this general taxing or enrolment under the President-ship of Cyrenius point us directly to the 35. year of Augustus his Empire in which CHRIST was born And if it were esteemed as it seems to be so great an honour unto Cicero that this Augustus was born when he was Consul Consulatui Ciceronis non mediocre adjecit decus natus eo anno D. Augustus saith the Court Historian how great an honour may we count it unto this Augustus that CHRIST the Son of God the very brightnesse of his Father was born when he was Emperour And as the year so is the