as things historically recorded working up the man in whom it is unto a voluntary profession of that truth This though true in its kinde yet is not saving seing many may have this who are strangers to true saving Faith Simon Magns beleeved thus Act. 8 13. who yet was but in the gall of bitterness in the bond of iniquity vers 23. Many beleeved in the name of Christ when they saw the miracles which he did to whom notwithstanding Christ did not commit himself Ioh. 2 23 24. Christ had many disciples who professed the truth and yet went back walked no more with him Ioh. 6 66. This faith when it cometh no further is but such a Faith as devils have who beleeve there is a God tremble Iam. 2 19. This is the fruitless workless Faith that iames speaketh of Iam. 2 14. that cannot save which he calleth a dead faith vers 17 20. a faith that cannot work with works vers 22. There is a Temporary faith which whether we look upon as distinct from the preceeding historical faith or as an higher measure degree thereof the matter is not much is also different from far short of this saving Faith whereby a man cometh to live the life of Iustification though it hath some effect wrought upon the affections this is the stonie-ground that receiveth the sowen seed Mat. 13 20 21. These are they who hear the word and anon with joy receive it yet have no root in themselves but endure for a while only for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word by by they are offended 2. Every act of saving Faith is not the justifying act of faith or that act thereof whereby we are Justified before God Saving Faith hath many several acts as we may see Heb. 11. Though where ever there are any of the real acts of saving faith that man hath also acted justifying faith yet we may look on Justifying Faith or on the act of faith whereby the soul becometh Justified as some way distinct from other acts of Saving Faith Though by saving Faith we come to understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God Heb. 11 3. not in a meer historical manner but savingly yet that act of saving Faith is not the Justifying act thereof to speak so Though the same Faith by which the Ancients subdued kingdomes stopped the mouthes of Lions quenched the violence of fire c. was that by which they were justified yet these were not justifying acts of that faith that is in order to justification faith acteth in another peculier manner Though it be one the same saving faith whereby a beleever is united unto Christ in order to answer the Challenges Accusations of the Law to free him from guilt condemnation and maketh use of Christ's Right Strength Support c. in times of Darkness Temptations Difficulties yet these acts of the same faith are not the same but may be looked upon as distinct Faith acteth one way on Christ in order to Justification another way in order to Sanctification Faith acteth one way when it receiveth in and another way when it giveth out as it were Faith acteth one way on Christ as Priest and it acteth another way upon him as Prophet as King yet we would know that in all these actings of faith whole Christ is laid hold upon though more expresly explicitly in the uniting act whereby the soul is married unto Jesus thereby becometh one spirit with him There can be no use making of Christ for any end whatsomever untill the soul be united with himself and in every act of faith whereby Christ is made use of for what ever particular mercy the Beleever would have be it Pardon Light Strength Comfort or such like Christ himself is gripped to laid hold on for there is no separating of Him his favours yet the Beleever while gripping laying hold on whole Christ taketh him up under that Relation and eyeth that Office that most neerly answereth to and correspondeth with his present necessity and pointeth forth that good which he is now desirous of so acteth faith suitablie or putteth forth faith in suitable acts as for example when the beleever is troubled with conscience of guilt he runneth to Christ yet in a special manner he goeth to him as Priest eyeth that Blood that only can purge consciences from dead works Heb. 9 14. When he is troubled with Raging Corruptions would have them subdued or would have his hard Rebellious Heart made more soft pliable to God's will he goeth to Christ yet in special manner he eyeth Christ as a King acteth Faith upon him accordingly So when he is troubled with Ignorance Doubts and Darkness he goeth to Christ yet he eyeth him thâ—n especially as a Prophet accordingly acteth Faith upon him Yet we would know that when the Beleever acteth thus in this different manner upon Christ whether as a Prophet or as a Priest or as a King there is no exclusion far less any denyal of the other offices which cannot be because Christ himself consequently whole Christ is alwayes He to whom the beleever goeth though with a more express explicite special application to usemaking of that office work of Christ which most suiteth the beleevers present necessity Now though all these acts of faith be acts of saving faith yet they are not all that act of faith which is or may be for distinctions sake called the Justifying act of faith for this is that act of faith only which the soul exerteth in order to Justification and Absolution from the Curse of the Law 3. This Faith is no product of the power of Nature accompanied with all its advantages elevated to its highest pitch to the highest measure of accomplishments Nature as now corrupted depraved not only will not willingly complye with the designe of Grace in the Gospel but it cannot being nothing but pure enmity to the holy Wayes Counsels of God all its mindings are of the flesh and all the minding of the flesh or the carnal mind is enmity against God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can be Rom. 8 7. Persons deluded by Satan may imagine suppose with themselves that it is so wholly in their power to beleeve that they can exerte that Faith at what time so ever they will But howbeit out of their own mouths such unbeleevers stand convinced condemned for their not beleeving yet the mighty power of God's Spirit must be exerted ere they be brought unto a beleeving frame or their souls be made to look towards Jesus in earnest so as to lay hold on him by Faith Therefore is Faith called the gift of God Ephes. 2 8. There is the working of the might of God's power requisite unto beleeving Ephes. 1 19. Such then as have not the workings of the
one person should be reconciled are the Reprobate his brethen Ephes. 5 25 26. To what end did Christ give himself for his Church And all the world of mankinde belong not to his Church It was that he might sanctifie cleanse it with the washing of water by the word that he might present it to himself a glorious Church not having spotor wrinkle or any such thing but that it shâ—uld be holy and without blemish Is this a meer Possibility Then might Christ have died have no Church to present to himself faire spotless his Church might have remained full of spots wrinkles unholy full of blemishes yea should have been no Church Tit. 2 14. He gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purifie unto himself a peculiar people zealous of good works Do all the world belong to his peculiar people doth Christ redeem all the world from all iniquity Is all the world purified made zealous of good works Or is all this meer may be which may not be 2. Corinth 5. vers 21. He hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the Righteousness of God in him Was Christ made sin or a sacrifice for sin that all the world might possibly be made the Righteousness of God in him that is that possibly not one person might be made the Righteousness of God in him who can dream thus that God's intentions designes should be so loose frustrable that God should be so uncertain in his purposes Gal. 1 4. why did the Lord Jesus give himself for our sinnes It was that he might deliver 〈◊〉 from this present evil world according to the will of God and our Father This is no meer Possible Deliverance and it is such as was designed not for all the world but for the us there mentioned So Chap. 4 4 5. God sent forth his son made of a woman made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law that we might receive the adoption of sones This Real Benefite is manifestly here restricked Ioh. 17 19. for their sakes I sanctify my self that they also may be sanctified through the truth Christ sanctified himself to be an obâ—ation not to obtaine a meer may be but 〈◊〉 they for whose sakes he did sanctifie himself that is they that were given to him vers 6 9. and were his owne vers 10. were in due time to beleeve in him vers 20. might Really Actually be Sanctified through him Heb 13 12. wherefore did Jesus suffer without the gate it was that ho might sanctifie the people with his own bloud sure this is more than a may be Rom. 3 25 26. Why did God set forth Christ to be a propitiation It was to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sinnes that are past that he might be just and the justifier of him that beleeveth in Iesus a Certaine Real thing Many moe passages might be added to this purpose but these may suffice to discover the absurd falshood of this doctrine Adde 6. such passages as mention the Actuaâ— Accomplishment Effect of Christ's death where it will yet more appear that this was no meere may be or Possible thing but that which was to have a certaine Being Reality as to the persons for whom it was designed Such as Heb. 1 3â— when he had by himself purged our sinnes Can their sinnes be said to be purged who pine a way in hell for ever because of their sinnes could this be true if no man had been saved and yet if it had been a mere possible may be Redemption it might have come to passe that not one person should have been actually saved So Heb. 9 12. by his owne blood he entered in once into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption Is a meer possible Redemption to be called an eternal Redemption and was that all that Christ obtained Then Christ's blood was more ineffectual in the truth than the type was in its typicalness for the blood of buls goats and the ashes of an hiefer sprinkling the unclean did not obtaine a possible and may-besanctification and purifying of the flesh but did actually really sanctify to the purifying of the flesh vers 13. Againe vers 14. which also confirmeth what is now said how much more shall the blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God So that all such for whom he offered himself and shed his blood and none else have their consciences purged from dead works to serve the living God and who darsay that this is common to all or is a meer may be which the Apostle both restricteth asserteth as a most certaine real thing Againe vers 26. but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself So that he did Actually Really and not Possibly Potentially only put away sin the sin viz. of those for whom he was a sacrifice even of them that look for him and to whom he shall appear the second time without sin unto salvation vers 28. and sure no man in his wits will say that this is the whole world Gal. 3 13. Christ hath redeemed us from the Curse of the Law being made a curse for us 14. That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Iesus Christ that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith Here are three Ends Effects of Christ's Redemption mentioned which no Man will say are common to all viz. Redemption from the Curse of the Law and this was Really not potentially only done by Christ's being made a curse for us the Communication of the blessing of Abraham and the Promise of the Spirit which are ensured to such as are Redeemed from the Curse of the Law and to none else So Ephes. 2 13 14 15 16. But now in Christ Iesus ye who sometimes were afar off are made nigh by the blood of Christ for he is our peace who hath made both one and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us having abolished in his flesh the enmity the Law of commandements in ordinances for to make to himself of twain one new man so making peace and that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the crosse having slaine the enmity thereby To which adde the paralled place Col. 1 21 22. 2 14 15. was all this delivery from Wrath Enmity Law of commandements whatever was against us but a meer Potential thing and a may be common to all in whose power it was to cause it take effect or not as they pleased Esai 53 5. He was wounded for our transgressions â—e was bruised for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes we are healed with
his grace So likewise Col. 1 14. Now when sinnes are thus taken away they are blotted out not remembered Esai 43 25. Fer. 31 34. Heb. 8 12. Yea they are blotted out as a cloud and as a thick cloud Esai 44 22. So they are said to be subdued casten into the depths of the sea Mica 7 19. Shall we now say that Christ hath died to purchase this Redemption the Forgiveness blotting-out as a thick cloud and casting into the depths of the sea of sin and yet multitudes of those for whom this was purchased and that by the blood of God should never obtaine this benefire but have all their owne score This so pincheth the Adversaries that the best evasion they can fall upon is to say that none shall have Original sin charged upon them But the Scripture no where restricteth this Remission to that sin only Others therefore say That no sin now shall be be charged upon any but the sin of Unbeleef Then Iudas doth not suffer to day for betraying his master was it for this sin only that the Old World was drowned or that the Cities of Sodom are suffering the vengeance of eternal fite Iude seemeth to say some other thing vers 7. so are there other sins there reckoned up vers 8 9 10 11 12. to which is reserved the blakness of darkness for ever vers 13. But some say that these are all but pardoned upon condition Then the Redemption is neither Actual Real nor Compleat but a poor may be and a may not be and how can such sins be said to be forgiven or blotted out and casten behinde God's back and into the depths of the sea Did Christ know whether or not this condition would be performed If not then He is not the omniscient God If he knew that it would not be performed by the greatest part how can we imagine that he would notwithstanding lay downe his life to purchase a Remission for them And how 〈◊〉 we think that He should purchase a Pardon to all and let the event hang upon the pendulous tottering will of a sinfull creature But as to that Condition we shall Propose 9. this consideration The not performance of that Condition was no doubt a sin and if Christ died for all the sinnes of the world he died for that too And if he died for that too that is taken out of the way or there must be another Condition imagined upon performance of which that is to be taken our or the way and the non-performance of this Condition being also a sin our proposition will recurre upon this and so in infinitum but if this sin be taken out of the way it cannot prejudge them of the pardon of therest and thus all their sins being pardoned they must needs be saved and yet it is not so But it is said that Christ died not for the sin of Final Unbeleef yet it seemeth that it will be granted that he died even for the sin of Unbeleefe of all the world and for unbeleefe continued in until the last houre of a mans life but not for that last act which yet is but the same Unbeleefe continued in an hour longer and shall we think that Christ bare the Unbeleefe of 20 40 60. or moe yeers in his body on the crosse not the same Unbeleefe for one houre or halfe houre yea or quarter of an houre Who seeth not how little ground there is for such an imagination But the thing I would have mainly here considered is this That for whose sinnes Christ hath died he hath died for all their sins and therefore if he died for the sinnes of all the world he died for the Final Unbeleefe of all the world But this will not be granted therefore neither can it be said that he died for the sinnes of all men Whose sinnes he took upon him to make satisfaction for he left none for them to answere for for he is a compleat Mediator and is sole Mediator If he died for all the rest of the sinnes of the Reprobat and of the whole world why not for that also Sure when the Scripture speaketh of Christs taking away of sin and of the Redemption that is forgiveness of sins which people enjoy through him there is no sin excepted He was wounded for our transgressions he was bruised for our iniquitie Esa. 53 5. the Lord laid on him the iniquity of us all vers 6. or made the iniquitie of us all to meet on him there is no ground for any exception here when he was stricken for transgression vers 9. and his soul was made an offering for sin vers 10. is there any appearance of the exception of any one sin when he bear their sin and their iniquities vers 11 12. what intimation is given of an exception of any Yea if this exception was to be made which would null destroy all what consolation could the declaration of this Redemption remission of sins yeeld unto poor sinners Col. 1 14. Ephes. 1 7. When the Lord made him to be sin for us was it only in part how then could we be made the Righteousness of God in Him 2. Cor. 5 21 was the Lord in Christ reconcileing the world unto himself not imputing only part of their trespasses to them but the imputing of one sin would mar the reconciliation for ever Is not final unbeleef a dead work Doutbles yet the blood of Christ purgeth Consciences from dead works Heb. 9 14. Did the blood of buls goats so sanctify as to the purifying of the flesh as to leave the most defileing spot of all untaken away How could healing come by his stripes if he bear but part of our sins in his body on the tree seing final unbeleef alone would mar all for where that is there is no coming to God imaginable But moreover the Scripture tels us that the blood of Iesus Christ his Son oleanseth us from all sin 1. Ioh. 1 7. and that if any man sin there is an Advocat with the Father who is a propitiation for sins 1. Ioh. 2 vers 1 2. and so must be for all sins otherwayes there were little ground of comfort here And it was foretold by Daniel Chap. 9 24. that he should make an end of sin finish the transgression so bring-in everlasting Righteousness Doth this admit of exceptions and of such an exception as would unavoidably make all null No certanely But you will ask of me if I think that Christ did die for final unbeleefe I Answ. Not for I judge it is the sin only of Reprobates who hear the Gospel and I judge that Christ did not die for any sin of Reprobats But this I hold and have cleared That for whose sinnes soever Christ hath died he hath died for all their sins And because he hath not died for Final Unbeleef therefore he hath not died for any sin of such as shall be guilty of this and as for
heirs of God joynt heirs with Christ Rom. 8 17 and are discharged as Mr. Baxter granteth himself Confess p. 102. Concl. 9. from all guilt of Eternal Punishment yea of all destructive Punishment in this life Yea they are justified from all things from which they could not be justified by the Law Act. 13 39. They are blessed Rom. 4 5 6. And all this is so fixed that none can lay any thing to their charge Rom. 8 33 34. Yea they are said to have Everlasting Life Ioh. 5 24. Now seing all this is by Faith what necessitie is there for another Condition beside this same Faith keeping fast by Christ unto the Continuance of this State If it be said that notwithstanding hereof they are liable to future sins and these must also be forgiven and in reference to the Pardon of these other Conditions may be required in that respect these may be called Conditions of the Continuance of Justification 4. The answere to this will furnish us with another Argument for answere therefore I say That works are not the Condition of Pardon of after sins but faith going to Christ and washing in his bloud 1. Ioh. 2 1 2. If any man sin we have an advocat with the Father Iesus Christ the Righteous he is the propitiation for our sins Christ is here proposed to sinning beleevers in his Priestly office as the object of their Faith in order to Pardon And Mr. Baxter in the forecited place Concl. 11 saith that when ever the Iustified do commit any sin they have a present effectual certaine remedie at hand for their pardon that is the merit of Christ's blood his Intercession the Love of God the Promise of Pardon in which they have interest the Spirit to excite them to Faith Repentance No word of works of obedience as Condition here David in order to the obtaining of the pardon of his sin did betake himself to the free mercy of God that he might get his sin covered his iniquities forgiven and his sin not imputed unto him Psal. 32 1 2. and this was in Paul's judgment Rom. 4 6 7 8. a betaking himself to imputed Righteousness without works So he betook himself to mercy and withall he desired to be purged with hysope Psal. 51 1 7. which looked to the blood of Christ that only sprinkleth consciences Heb. 9 13 14 22. 5. If Justification be continued upon Condition of works we enquire what these works are Are herein comprehended all commanded duties or all that is required of justified persons by way of duty then a faloure in any of these whether by Omission or Commission should cause an intercision of that State and a breach of that Relation But this is utterly false Yea if so the justified should become Unjustified every day for no man liveth sinneth not The reason of the Consequence is because the non-performance of the Condition upon which the State Relation of the justified is continued must make a breach in that State If it be said That not every sin but only such sins as are inconsistent with the State of Justification will make an Intercision Then it must consequently be said that upon these alone or on the non-performance of these alone doth the Continuance of Justification depend as on a Condition And what be these David's sin I hope nor Peters sin were none of these And whatever they be I suppose it will be granted except by Arminians that there is sufficient provision against these laid-in in the New Covenant of Grace and that such as are justified indeed shal never fall into such sins And then what need it be said that the State of Justification is continued upon such termes 6. By this way Proud Nature should have occasion to boast and say It was of God's Grace Mercy that I was brought into a justified State had all my former sins pardoned but for my abiding continueing therein and for the pardon of all my sins that I have committed or do commit since I am beholden to my own Gospel-obedience immediatly for Remission is granted and my Justification continued upon Condition of my personal Gospel-obedience But how inconsistent this is with the whole straine of the Gospel cannot be unknown We no where read that our sinnes are pardoned or not imputed to us in or by our Evangelick Obedience but as we are justified freely by grace through the Redemption that is in Christ Jesus Rom. 3 24. so it is in through Him his bloud that we are washen our sinnes purged away Mat. 26 28. Revel 1 5. Ephes. 1 7. Col. 1 14. 7. The dayly experience of the people of God may cleare to us what that is upon which their State is continued and upon which they seek obtaine new Remission of their new Transgressions and shew us that it is not their own personal Obedience but the Grace Mercy of God in Jesus Christ for it is to this they betake themselves daily both in reference to their being keeped in the favour of God in reference to their getting new extracts of Pardon It is to the blood of sprinkling they goe dayly that there they may be washen cleansed from all their sins sailings It is to this fountaine opened to the house of David to the Inhabitans of Ierusalem that they run with their sins uncleannesses Zach. 13 1. For it is his bloud alone that cleanseth from all sin 1. Ioh. 1 7. And so they finde by experience that they stand only by Faith and that it is through Faith in this bloud that they are keept in the favoure of God get their sins pardoned These proofs may serve for confirmation of what we say Let us now see what Mr. Baxter saith for the contrary In his Confess p. 47 he adduceth three Arguments The first is this The word expresly constituteth these Conditions of our not-loseing our State of Justification or of Continueing it And this he tels us he hath formerly shewed in many Scriptures meaning I suppose the passages he had immediatly before cited on the margine But to these I Answere in general That not one of them maketh mention of the continuance of our justification or of our not loseing of it And therefore it cannot be said from these that the word expresly constituteth these Conditions of our not-losing Justification But we shall consider them particularly Mat. 12 36 37. speaketh not of justification whereof we are now treating but of the last judgment and we see no cause of confounding this Justification whereof we speak or its Continuance with the last Judgment as Papists do confound their second justification with this judgment and abuse the same Scriptures here adduced by Mr. Baxter the like to prove their second justification to be by works Jam. 2 24. speaketh not of the Continuance or not losing of justification but of the very beginning of justification
to die for the ungodly Rom. 5 6. to be made a curse for us Gal. 3 13. and to be made sin 2. Cor. 5 21. and other expressions of the like Kind have the same import From whence it is evident that Christ took the debt upon him that was justly to be charged upon the account of sinners that he became one person in Law with sinners the principal debtor that he payed satisfied for all the debt and that in their room and place and that therefore all these for whom he died must certainly be delivered from the Debt and from the Charge Consequences thereof These things are manifest of themselves and need no further confirmation Now seing all are not delivered from the debt of sin nor from the punishment due because of sin we cannot say that Christ died as a Cautioner for all for sure his death was a compleat payment of all the debt he undertook to pay and to satisfie for Nor can we say that he died as a Cautioner for he knew not whom far lesse that he died as a Cautioner and yet none might possibly receive advantage thereby Not yet can we say that he died as a Cautioner and payed for some sinnes of all and not for all their sinnes for whom he died seing he was a Compleet Cautioner So then as Christ died in their roome stead as their Cautioner Sponsor for whom he died wrong should be done to Him if all these for whom he was a Cautioner should not at length actually be delivered out of prison freed from the accusation of the Law They for whom he died being in him legally when he died and morally virtually dying in him and with him must not in justice be made to pay their own debt satisfie the Law over againe Christ's stricking hands as the phrase is Prov. 22 26. and so putting his name in the obligation and accordingly making satisfaction the Principal 's name is blotted out and he free in the time appointed for he bare our griefs and carryed our sorrowes c. Esai 53 4 5. and by meanes of death he delivered them who through fear of death were all their life time subject to bondage Heb. 2 14 15. This matter will be further clear if we consider 26. How the death of Christ was a Satisfaction and none can deny this but Antichristian Socinian Others willingly grant that Christ did substitute himself in the room of sinners and was willing to undergo the punishment threatned in the Law against sin that the sinners for whom he undertook satisfaction might be freed So he bare their sins Esai 53 11. 1. Pet. 2 24. And he was made sin 2. Cor. 5 21. Hence he is called a Propitiation 1. Ioh. 2 3 4 10. Rom. 3 25. Whereby we see that Christ took upon him the whole Punishment that was due to sin and that God whom sinners had offended was well pleased with what he did and suffered according to that undertaking yea more pleased than he was displeased with all the sinnes of those for whom he suffered for hereby His Authority Justice was made to appear more glorious excellent How then can we think that many of those it may be all for whom he gave that satisfaction may notwithstanding possibly be made to make satisfaction for themselves as they may by our Adversaries way Was not his satisfaction full compleat Why should any then for whom he gave that satisfaction be liable to Punishment Is this consonant to justice Did not the Lord Jehovah send Christ sit him with a body for this end Psal. 40 6. Heb. 10 5. laid upon Him the iniquities of us all Esai 53 6. that He might make full satisfaction for them to justice suffer for them all that the Law could demand of them or they were liable unto by the broken Law Did not Christ do suffer all which he undertook to do suffer for this end And did not the Father accept of what he did suffered as a full Compensation Satisfaction And seing this cannot be denied it is manifest that this was done by Christ as a Cautioner Heb. 7 22. how can it be imagined that the Principal debtor shall not thereupon have a fundamental right to freedom pardon in due time after the Gospel method be actually Discharged delivered from the penalty of the Law Redeemed by the Satisfactory Price payed by the Cautioner accepted of the Creditour Doth not the denying of this certain infallible Effect call in question the value worth of Christ's satisfaction and give ground to say that Jehovah was not Satisfied with the price or that Christ made no Satisfaction Did not Christ make Reconciliation for the sinnes of his people Heb. 2 17 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Adde for a further confirmation of this 27. That Christ's death was a propitiating sacrifice He gave himself for us an Offering and a Sacrifice to God for a sweet smelling savour Ephes. 5 2. He offered up himself once Heb. 7 27. He is a sacrifice for us 1. Cor. 5 7. the lamb of God which beareth or taketh away she sin of the world Ioh. 1 29. He offered up himself without spot to God Heb. 9 14. he was once offered to bear the sinnes of many Heb. 9 28. we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Iesus Christ once for all he offered one sacrifice for sin for ever Heb. 10 10 12. Now as the sacrifices under the Law which were a type of this did not procure a General Possible benefite but did procure a Real favour only to the People of God for they sanctified to the purifying of the flesh Heb. 9 13. So certainly this Real Perfect sacrifice must have a Peculiar Real Effect sprinkle consciences from dead works to serve the living God Heb. 9 14. And this is not a thing common to all nor is it a meer Possible thing They must then do a great indignity unto the Sacrifice of Christ who speak of an Universal meerly Possible Redemption Adde to this 28. How upon this Sacrifice which Christ offered up in his death we read of a Reconciliation made Ephes. 2 16. and that he might Reconcile both unto God in one body by the crosse having sâ—aine the enmity by it or in himself 2. Cor. 5. 10. when we were enemies we were Recenciled to God by the death of his Son Col. 1 20. and having made peace through the blood of his crosse by him to Reconcile all things unto himself Therefore is he called our Peace Ephes 2 14. he maketh Peace vers 15. we have Peace with God through our Lord Iesus Christ. Rom. 5 1. Now this Reconciliation being of parties that are at variance must be a Reconciliation of both to other and so a mutual Reconciliation and Christ effectuateth both and both are purchased by
is with Him alone that the poor convinced wakened Sinner hath to do And this is the justification that we are most concerned to know the nature of to understand what way it is brought about or to be had This is the justification which the Apostle alwayes denieth to be by works asserteth alwayes to be by faith in opposition to works As for a justification of our selves against the false Accusations of Satan the unjust Surmises of our own treacherous Hearts mis-informed Consciences the groundless Alleigances of men judging not according to truth but according to their owne mis-apprehensions whereof Iob's friends were guilty in an high measure It is not that justification whereof the Apostle treateth And whatever Interest good works may have herein as real fruites of an upright working faith consequenly as evidences of our Interest in Christ of our being in a state of justification Yet they are utterly excluded from having an Interest in that justification which is before God in His sight here Christ's Righteousness Laid hold on by faith only taketh place The Argument whereby the Apostle disproveth this justification by the works of Law in the sight of God is in the following words where he ushereth-in the argument with an It is Manifest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to shew That the Argument was irrefragable that the truth thereby was certaine beyond Contradiction Now the Argument is taken from the opposition that is betwixt Faith the Law or the works of the Law in the matter of justification A ground whereupon the Apostle goeth in his whole Disput upon this matter as we see Rom. 3 27 28. 4 1 2 3 4 5. 9 32. Gal. 2 16. and therefore it must be a certaine truth That if justification before God be by faith it can not be by works consequently whoever assert justification by works destroy Gospel-justification by faith and hence it is also Manifest That justification cannot be by both together Faith works conjoined because what is of faith cannot be of works these two being here inconsistent Rom. 11 6. That Gospel-justification is by faith the Apostle proveth from that known sentence the just shall live by faith a sentence which the Apostle adduced first of all when he was to handle this question in his Epistle to the Romans Chap. 1. vers 17. saying for therein i.e. in the Gospel is the Righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith as it is written the just shall live by faith Where we see that this Sentence confirmeth the whole nature contents of the Gospel that is That the Righteousness of God i.e. the Righteousness which only will stand in Gods Court be accepted of him in order to the justifying of sinners which is the Righteousness of one who is God is revealed from faith to saith that is to say is hold forth to be embraced bysinners through faith first last this Righteousness thus embraced laid hold on by faith is the onely ground of the life of justification so that beleevers their living by faith saith their faith laith hold on the Righteousness of God revealed in the Gospel as the onely ground of their life As to the passage it self it is cited our of Habakuk chap. 2. vers 4. where the Prophet being told vers 3. that howbeit sometime would passe ere the promised delivery should come Yet it would come that therefore he all the People of God should waite for it live in the certaine expectation thereof addeth these words as being told him of the Lord that his Soul which is lifted up is not upright in him how variously these words are rendered by diverse we need not mentione the meaning is this That such as will not in faith patience waite with confidence upon the Lords promise that shall be made good in His good time but in their pride impatience of heart will think to anticipate their delivery by sinistrous sinful meanes declare that their heart is not upright that they are void of true faith Upon the other hand it is said the just shall live by his faith that is Such as are real true beleevers will waite in the exercise of faith till God's time come by this faith trusting leaning to the faithful promise of God through the Messiah in whom all the promises are yea amen 2 Cor. 1 20. they shall have a life of it they shall be carried thorow supported strengthened comâ—orted And much to this same Purpose is this passage cited by the Apostle Hebr. 10 37 38. For yet a little while he that shall come will come will not tarry now the just shall live by faith c. of which we have spoken elsewhere in all these places the Apostle leaveth out the pronoun his which the Prophet useth but that maketh no great alteration the matter being clear that sufficiently understood The Septuagints make a great alteration when they render the words thus The just shall live by my faith The great difficulty is how these words of the Prophet spoken of such as were already justified beleevers his saying of them that they shall live by their faith for we need not owne that sense of the words which some think may not improbably be given to wit That he who is by his faith just or justified shall live can be applicable to the Apostl'es purpose to prove justification by faith Not to mentione what others say to this nor judging it very necessary to enquire anxiously into this matter seing the Spirit of the Lord 's moving inspireing of Paul to alleige apply this passage of Old Testament truth for confirmation of what he was about to prove may fully satisfie us as to its pertinency though we should not satisfie all by proprosing our thoughts concernin it â— Conceive the ground may be this That this being a general truth universally true that even beleevers who are already changed have a life begun in them must all their life long make use of faith gripping to the promises as yea amen in Christ promised come who is the Substance Kirnel of them all to the end they may be supported Strengthened Upheld carried thorow Difficulties Distresses Darknesses Temptations the like without fainting or doing what is unbeseeming a living Beleever in the day of trial so that their whole life even unto the end is kept-in continued by faith bringing new supplies influences from the head through the promises it will hence follow that without faith no man can at first attaine to this life change from death yea that in this case faith is much more necessarily requisite yea faith only without works is must be the only way to justification of life for if the progress continuance of this life or renewing of it after decayes be had by faith drawing
ever accuse a Beleever of not being a beleever as for Satans or others accusations of this kind a well informed conscience from the light of the word of the Spirit clearing up the work of faith in the soul the true real works of a lively faith will be sufficient to quiet the beleever stop the mouth of all these Accusers without the fiction of a new distinct Justification whereof the Scripture is silent But Mr. Baxter in his last reply to Mr. Cartwright explaineth the matter far otherwayes telling us pag. 46. and forward That the first justification is by God as Rector only by the pure Law of works as Creator the other by God in Christ as Redeemer Rector of the Redeemed world The first is conditionally past upon the whole condemned world that without any condition in man whether faith or works so it is both absolute conditional In the first the Father first condemned his Son as it were see pag. 52. after satisfaction given justified first him as Sponsor then the world for his sake thus God forgave those all the debt who yet perish by taking their fellow servant by the throat Here is a justification both absolute conditional Here is pardon no pardon Here is a justification of all the Reprobat Here is a justification of persons not in being prior to without all faith This therefore is not the justification whereof the Scriptures speak as himself proveth in his Confession CHAP. XX. The state of justification remaineth notwithstanding of after sinnes punishments FOr further clearing up of this life of Justification as to its Continuance we shall remove two objections that may seem to stand in the way of the truth hitherto cleared For it would seem that Justification is not such a continueing uninterruptible state as it was said to be upon this double account first That the sinnes which Beleevers who are justified do commit especially such as are of a more hainous crying Nature do break off this state of favoure reconciliation seing they deserve even the least of them God's wrath curse so expose the sinner unto the just revenges of God which seemeth not to be consistent with a state of Justification And then secondly as their sinnes deserve God's curse wrath so the many sharp sore afflictions which they are made to lye under both are effects of the wrath of God fruites of the Curse also would say that that state is such as can be broken off or at least is not perfect as it was said to be Now for clearing of the truth formerly asserted vindicating of the same from these two Objections to which all others may be reduced we shall propose some few things to consideration 1. None will say that every sin of infirmity weakness which beleevers commit doth or can cut them off from the state of justification for then they should never remaine one day to end in that state for no man liveth that sinneth not the Righteous fall seven times a day if the Lord should stricklymark iniquity no man should stand even the best of their actions are defiled with sin and they cannot answere for one of a thousand So that either it must be said there is no state of justification or that it is consistent with sin in the justified Justification though it take away all the guilt of by paft sins and free the beleever from that obnoxiousness to the wrath curse of God which they were formerly under yet it preventeth not all future sinnes not doth it put the beleever into a perfect sinless state nay nor doth it kill any one sin as to its being but only taketh away the guilt offensiveness the obligation to punishment or the reatus poenae whereby the sinner is bound over unto the Penalty 2. As for such sins as we may suppose if committed would ipso facto as they say forfeit the transgressour of the state of Justification destroy all interest in Christ in the Covenant of grace so transferre them into their former state of Nature while they were under the Curse as being sins inconsistent with a state of Grace Reconciliation with God such as the sin against the Holy Ghost or of full final Apolstasie as for such sins I say the faithfulness of God Mediation of Christ the Operation of the Spirit of Grace are as it were engadged to keep the Iustified from falling into them as all the Arguments proving the perseverance of the Saints do abundantly evince 3. Though every sin being a transgression of the Law of God which still remaineth in force to oblige the beleever as all others unto obedience in all points doth in its own nature deserve God's wrath curse according to the threatning penalty of the Law yet these sins do not annul the state of justification nor interupt it 1 because notwithstanding thereof all their former sins of which they were pardoned remaine pardoned do not bring them againe under the curse their Right to the Inheritance remaineth fiâ—me through Jesus Christ. 2 Because all these after sins were virtually pardoned their obligation to the suffering of the penalty upon the account of these virtually removed in their Iustification for therein was there a legal security laid down given that all future sins should not actually bring them under the curse or into the state of condemnation this is much more than what was before their actual closing with Christ being thereby brought into an estate of justification for though it may be said there was sufficient security laid-in in the Covenant of Redemption betwixt Iehovah the Mediator concerning the Non-perishing of the Elect Yet this security was hid under ground lying in the unchangable purposes of God in the Fathers Election of them giving of them to the Son to be redeemed in the Son 's undertaking for them in due time becoming sin a curse for them so taking on their debt making full compleet satisfaction therefore And this fundamental remote Right as it may be called could not be pleaded by themselves But after they have closed with Christ and are brought into a state of justification their Right appeareth above ground and the security is laid open in the Covenant of Grace whereby they are in case to plead their virtual pardon to be made actual the promises to be made good according to the Gospel termes after the Gospel-method And thus 3. Not only doth the law's threatnings speak to them as shewing what de jure only they may look upon us due unto them not declaring what shall eventually befall them or that eventually they shall fall under the eternal curse for in a sense that is true even of all the elect not yet justified as was said but they have a legal ground Right in the
the full price of Redemption conforme to the Eternal compact betwixt Jehovah Him make an absolute actual purchase of all those that were given to him to be saved did buy purchase all the Favours Blessings Privileges for them which were afterward to be actually bestowed in the time after the way methode condescended upon by Jehovah the Mediator I am here speaking of such as came to have a being in the world after Christ had in the fulness of time come laid down the price not of those who lived before when Christ's death Satisfaction had only a Moral being yet full efficacie to produce the same saving effects on beleevers and though in this respect all the Elect may be said to have been virtually justified when Christ laid down the actual price and was justified from all the charge of their debt that was laid upon him as in some sense it may be said that all the Elect were virtually Justified in Him when he undertook to make satisfaction for their debt yet there is no actual Justification before Faith according to the Scriptures that speak of justification of adoption of Sanctification by Faith shewing that these Benefites Privileges follow Faith as to their actuall being though they were from eternitie decreed as was also Glorification were actually procured by Christs death in which respect as also in respect of Christs undertaking or substituting himself in the room of sinners they may be said to have been virtually Sanctified Glorified even then It is true that before Faith the justification actual of the Elect is every way secured all things tending thereunto are concluded firmly laid all the other anteceding causes are existent before Faith for Christ is appointed substitute Mediator Christ hath accepted undertaken the work of Mediation He is come in the fulness of time hath laid down the full price The Father is satisfied with the price paid The Father laid upon him the iniquity of all the Elect He hath born it made full satisfaction therefore he is accepted of the Father as Head of the Elect justified possessed of glory so as they may be said to be risen with him in heavenly places to wit virtually meritoriously all this before faith Thus God was in Christ reconciling the Elect world unto himself not imputing trespasses unto them because he imputed them to Christ made him sin who know no sin this before the word of Reconciliation ministred by the Ambassadours of Christ hath wrought them up unto God by faith 2 Cor. 5 18 19 20. And this I think was more then what Mr. Baxter saith confess pag. 225 226. to wit that he was providing a sufficient remedie for the pardon of it if they would accept of it freely given for the world here spoken of is the world of the Elect though he think otherwayes ibid. the Lords not imputing their sin unto them was more then his not dealing with them according to the desert of their sin but in mercy for as yet many of them had not a being and so were not capable of being dealt with according to the desert of their sin but it importeth what is more emphatically expressed thereafter vers 11. to wit that God was laying their sins on Christ ' and making him sin as to its demerite or guilt for them that they might in due time be made the Righteousness of God in him Yet notwithstanding of all this actual justification Reconciliation is not before 〈◊〉 as is clear from many passages of Scripture asserting our justification life to by faith Rom. 1. 17. 3. 28. 9 1. Ephes 2 8. Gal. 2 16 20. Ad it cannot be said to evite the force of these the like Scriptures that this is to be understood only of justification as to our feeling sense apprehension for the case which the Apostle proveth all to be into before justification in his Epistle to the Romans Chap. 1. 2. 3. is such as cannot consist with a justified state as to be under sin Rom. 3 9. to have their mouth stopped be guilty before God vers 19. But it is manifest that many who are now not under the Law nor under sin but delivered from under both yet may do want the sense feeling of their justification doubt thereof And beside this crosseth the whole scope of the Apostle in proving justification by faith which is to evince that justification is not by the works of the law or the works of Righteousness which we do so that the justification whereof the Apostle speaketh cannot be by works but by faith alone but the manifestation of justification to our sense consciences can well be by works as Iames sheweth proveth Chap. 2. Works can contribute unto this but not unto that justification whereof the Apostle speaketh in his Epistles to the Romans Galattans which is justification in the sight of God That justification is not before faith is manifest from the condition which the Scripture telleth us such are into who have not yet beleeved for if that condition be such as is inconsistent with a state of justification Reconciliation there can be no justification before faith now the Scripture telleth us that such as beleeve not are condemned Ioh. 3 18. dead in trepasses sins children of wrath Ephes. 2 1 2 3. Without Christ without God in the world strangers from the Covenants of promise Ephes. 2 12. have made God a liar 1 Ioh. 5 10. cannot please God Heb. 11 6. By all which many like passages that might be cited it is manifest that before faith there is no real justification Faith is required in order to adoption Remission of sins and therefore must be before justification Ioh. 1 12. Act. 10 43. Gal 3 26. Act. 13 38 39 of 26 18. But enough of this seing M. Baxter hath abundantly confuted it in his Confess pag. 229 c. Some move this Objection If we are justified by faith then faith is in order before justification consequently the act is before the object whereas on the contrary the act depends upon the object not the object upon the act Thus Bellarm◠de justif lib. 1. c. 10. disputeth against the assertion that maketh the special mercy of God to be the object of justifying faith wherein the ground of the whole debate lyeth in a mistake of that special mercy of God and whatever mistake may be at least as to expression in the assertion which Bellarmine opposeth yet Bellarmius Opinion can no way be owned who doth so defend the object of faith as that he maketh justifying faith to be nothing but Historical Faith Learned grave Mr. Norton in his Orthodox Euangelist Ch. 14. p. 314. in answering this objection distinguisheth betwixt the being of justification our being Justified or betwixt justification in
Righteousness imputed 2 It is also to be considered that in that clause Abraham beleeved God it was counted to him for Righteousness it is not said that Faith or his Beleeving was counted to him for Righteousness but that it was counted c. and that is not his Faith but the marrow of the Gospel which God at that time preached unto him and so there is nothing in this clause immediatly ascribed to this act but a third thing is understood Lastly he saith The righteousness of Christ is not the object of faith as justifying only the Scriptures propose his Righâ—eousness or obedience to the Law as that which is to be beleeved so it may be termed a partial object as is the creation of the world that Cain was Adam's son But the object of faith as justifying properly is either Christ himself or the promise of God concerning the Redemption of the world by him Ans. 1 Hereby we see that in stead of a justifying faith he giveth us a meer historical faith and indeed such as deny the Imputation of Christ's Righteousness must of necessity substitute a new sort of faith in room of that which we owne for the only Justifying faith But though justifying faith containe in it that historical faith presuppose it yet it includeth more hath other peculiar actings of soul upon and towards Christ his Righteousness which here we cannot separate far less oppose to other as our Adversary doth in reference to the mans liberation from the sentence of the Law the Curse due to him for the breach thereof now charged home upon him by the Lord an awakened conscience 2 By Christ's Righteousness we do not understand his simple innocency or freedom from the transgression of the Law but his whole Mediatory work in his state of humiliation as satisfying the offended Law-giver answering all the demands of the Law both as to doing suffering which debt we were lying under 3 Justifying Faith eyeth him thus runneth to him accepteth of him as he is thus set forth by God to be a Propitiation through Faith in his blood Rom. 3 25. and as making Reconciliation for faith receiveth the atonement Rom. 5 11. and it receiveth abundance of grace of the gift of Righteousness vers 17. Justifying faith must receive him as the Lord our Righteousness as made of God to us Righteousness Therefore is this Righteousness of God called also the Righteousness of Faith or the Righteousness of God which is by faith of Iesus Christ unto all and upon all them that beleeve Rom. 3 22. A Righteousness which is through the Faith of Christ or the Righteousness which is of God by Faith Phil. 3 9. Thus have we examined all that this Man hath brought by way of Reason for as for Authorities on the one hand or other I purposely wave them in this whole discourse to prove that Faith properly taken is imputed for Righteousness that the tropical sense commonly received by the orthodox which we have also chosen to follow notwithstanding that there is another sense given of the words by some to evite in part this tropical sense and by which the Adversaries against whom we here deal can receive no advantage is to be utterly laid aside rejected in answering him we have answered others also who do but-urge the same things Yet if any should enquire If the Apostle doth not meane that faith properly taken is our Righteonsness is imputed to us accounted our Righteousness why would he say so plainly that Faith is imputed or counted for Righteousness I Answere The expressions which the Holy Ghost hath used should satisfie us though we should know no reason beside his good pleasure why he did express the matter so It is our part to search into his meaning according unto the surest rules of finding out the sense of the Scriptures among which this is to be reckoned as a â—â—ite one not to be rejected viz. to attend the scope with the connexion cohesion of the words as they lye contribute unto that scope together with the common plaine frequently reiterated expressions assertions of the Spirit of God in other places where the same matter is treated of for to the end that we may be exercised in the study of the Scriptures in comparing Scripture with Scripture for finding out the mind of the Lord hath he thought good to express the same matter in diverse places in various wayes in some places more plainly what in other places appeareth more obscure And it cannot be judged a saife way of interpreting Scripture to fix upon one expression give it a sense or take it in such a sense as tendeth manifestly to darken the whole doctrine of the Spirit of the Lord concerning that truth and to crosse the scope to mat the connexion and to contradict multitudes of other passages of Scripture It is not unusual for the Apostle to use several expressions in a figurative sense How oft is the word Law taken for obedience to the Law What sense could be made of Gal. 3 25. if the word Faith should be there taken properly not for its object as also vers 2 5. of that same Chapter And what sense shall we put upon these expressions They which are of faith Gal. 3 7 9. as many as are of the works of the Law vers 10. upon many such like if all these words must be taken properly Nay how little of this whole matter of Justification is expressed to us without Trops figures which yet do not darken but give a more special divine lustre unto the Truthes so expressed How oft is the word Hop put for its object for the thing hoped for And though this might satisfie us herein yet further if I might adventure to give a reason of this manner of expression here ot rather to pointe forth what this expression should signifie hold forth to us I would say That Paul is not handling this Controversie about Justification in a meer speculative manner therefore doth not use such Philosophical Metaphysical Notions expressions there about as some now think so necessary that without the same they judge themselves not in case to explaine the matter to the capacity of the meanest which would rather have darkened then explained the matter to the ordinary capacity of Christians as I judge the way that some of latetake in explicating this matter contributeth much more to the darkning of the same at least to me But the Apostle is handling this matter in a practical manner so as both such he wrote unto the Church of Christ to the end of the world might so understand this necessary fundamental truth as to put the same in practice And therefore doth say that Faith is imputed unto Righteousness to shew that it is not the Righteousness of Christ conceived in our heads that
this that there is nothing in Scripture giving the least countenance hereunto even as to words or expressions 7. If Repentance have such an interest in Justification as Faith hath then this must either be true of Repentance as begun or as perfected I meane as to pâ—rts But of neither it can be true not of begun Repentance for questionless there are some beginnings of Repentance before Faith taking Repentance largly as it is here taken as the womans change of her minde from other Suitors is before her closeing a Marriage Covenant with this man then it would follow that a man were Justified before Faith which I suppose will not be said Not of compleeted Repentance for that followeth faith for thus it followeth godly sorrow 2. Cor. 7 10. and is expressed by that Carefulness Clearing of ourselves Indignation Fear Vehement desire Zeal Revenge mentioned 2. Cor. 7 11. all which must follow Faith And repenting Ephraim Ier. 31 19. said after I was turned I repented after I was instructed I smote upon my thigh I was ashamed yea even confounded c. This being instructed being turned includeth Faith the rest that followed upon it are expressions of Repentance and hence it would follow if only compleeted Repentance be that Repentance that hath the Interest in justification that Faith hath a man cannot be said to be justified upon his beleeving no not untill Repentance be brought to this Perfection And then Faith cannot be the consenting act whereupon the bargane is closed 8. Repentance can bring nothing in that can stay or prove a support unto an awakened soul pursued with the sense of wrath for the breach of the Law nor can it present any thing unto God as a ground whereupon to be delivered from guilt wrath as Faith can do doth by laying hold on Christ his Righteousness an only sufficient ground whereupon the poor soul can have hope and with confidence can expect Absolution Therefore it cannot have the same interest in justification The antecedent is clear undeniable the Consequence is also manifest because this interest in the matter of justification must be estimate according to the ground of Hope that is yeelded thereby unto the poor vexed tossed soul the ground of Confidence that is had thereby of Acceptance of God 9. To say that Repentance hath the same interest in justification that Faith hath will prove I judge dangerous doctrine to many poor wakened sinners prove a meane to keep them off the Rock of ages and at least a meane to hinder or retard their motion Christ-ward in order to Peace Reconciliation with God for experience teacheth such as deale with wakened Consciences that the most of their work oft times is to keep them from resting on someting within themselves in order to Peace and particularly from relying resting upon some sort of Griefe Sorrow or Repentance which they conceive to be in themselves to bâ—ing them unto a cleanly resting upon Christ his Righteousness forsaking all other things And when now they hear that Repentance hath the same interest in justification that Faith hath how will they be fortified in their Resolutions so that all the labour paines of Ministers or other Christians may prove much fruitless unless the Lord come in a wonderful manner many others may perish in their presumptuous thoughts founded on their inward Sorrow Repentance as they supposed because they would never go out of themselves to leane to Christ his Righteousness It is true These of the contrary minde presse not Repentance alone but Faith Repentance together Yet by their way I finde not the right Gospel-exercise of Faith-pressed that is faith bringing in an imputed Righteousness or laying hold on Christ for Righteousness refuging the Soul in Him resting upon that as the only absolutly surest ground of Confident appearing before God and of expecting Pardon Peace but only such or such an act of faith pressed as being now under the New Covenant in the same place that Perfect Obedience had in the Old whereby as the Old Covenant is but renewed so the wakened or alarmed sinner is but taught to look after lean to something within himself as his immediat Righteousness upon which he must be justified 10. If the Surety-Righteousness of Christ imputed by God received by Faith be only that Righteousness upon the account of which the poor sinner is to be accepted of God as Righteous to be absolved from the Curse of the Law As we have above proved it to be then Repentance cannot have the same interest in justification that Faith hath because it neither doth nor can so lay hold upon this Cautionary-Righteousness as Faith doth Or we might frame the argument thus If Repentance have the same interest in justification that Faith hath Christ's Cautionary-Righteousness shall not be the only Righteousness with which the soul that is to be justified must be clothed because Repentance cannot put on Christ his Righteousness as faith doth But this last cannot be said for reasons given already 11. If Repentance hath the same interest in justification that faith hath then even by Gospel justification there should be ground left to man to boast to glory before men the reward should not be of grace but of debt contrary to Rom. 3. 4. The Consequence is clear because Repentance acteth not on a Righteousness without us and can be considered no other way then as an act of Obedience in man and so as a work and Faith by this way goeth under the same Consideration is not considered as bringing-in the Surety-Righteousness of Christ and laying hold on it alone as it is by our way for both are looked upon as dispositive causes and as parts therefore of the material cause and as proper potestative conditions just as perfect obedience was under the Old Covenant And whatever difference be acknowledged to be betwixt them as to their Essence Aptitude whereby Faith is said to be an acceptance of the gift formally Repentance not so in its averting act as Mr. Baxter is speaking Cath. Theol. ubi supra Sect. XII n. 201. whatever it may be as to other acts yet they are both made formal Potestative conditions as is said so solely considered as works done by us and all such as was evidenced above make the reward of debt give ground of boasting because being our formal works they are made the immediat formal legal ground of our Justification being made our immediat formal perfect Gospel-Righteousness as was seen above 12. Adde to these That if Repentance have the same Interest in Justification that Faith hath God cannot be beleeved on as the justifier of the ungodly contrare to Rom. 4 5. for Faith Repentance are hereby made the mans personal Righteousness and Mr. Baxter tels us Confess p. 46. n. 38. that there is no such thing
must he said that by a work done long afterward men may see that the worker was justified But that should not sutte James's scope seing by this meanes they might think to delay for a long time their good works yet suppose themselves presently justified Ans. All this is but vaine language for it is all one to the scope of Iames whether this come to the actual knowledge of few or of many who they were to whose knowledge it came He is only shewing that such as had but a dead faith that brought forth no works of obedience when called for had no evidence or clear ground to assert their own justification seing Abraham's justification was thus declared by his signal obedience to all that came or ever should come to the knowledge of that act of obedience of his to the end of the world Yea had it been unknown to any yet hereby he had a sure proof to ascertaine his own heart conscience of his justification But say the Arminians Good works cannot be such a proof demonstration because it cannot be known to others whether these good works proceed from faith or not Ans. Nor is any infallible judgment here necessary or requisite nor doth the scope of Iames require any such thing who is only shewing that such as wrought not works of obedience when called for could not conclude themselves justified in a saife estate notwithstanding of all their faire profession Notwithstanding we cannot judge infallibly of principles motives ends of the good works of others yet by what may be seen of these God may be glorified Mat. 5 16. 1. Pet. 2 12. Thus we have seen that neither is that faith whereof Paul speaketh when he saith We are justified by faith without the deeds of the Law whereof Iames speaketh when he saith Ye see then how a man is justified by works not by faith only is not one the same Nor is it the same justification or justification in the same sense consideration that both the Apostles speak of And therefore how ever as to their words they seem to speak contrary to other Yet in their true sense meaning there is nothing but a sweet harmony agreement But now as to works whereof both make mentione the question remaineth whether they be one the same The forenamed Socinian Author saith that both do not speak of the same works and that Paul excludeth from justification only legal works not Evangelical And consequently that Iames must speak of Evangelical works only But sure we are Iames cannot be supposed to speak of Evangelical works in their sense seing they cannot say that Abraham's offering up Isaac or Rahab her receiving sending away the spies were Evangelical works James speaketh of works commanded by the Moral Law which he mentioneth both in general in its particular commands Iam. 2 9 10 11. And all the duties which he presseth them unto the sins which he disswadeth them from relate unto the Moral Law And what these works are whereof Paul speaketh we have seen before Others think that Iames by Works here meaneth a working faith so that his meaning when he saith that by works a man is justified is that by a working faith such as Abraham had a man is justified But though it be a truth that justifying faith is a working lively faith And that we are justified only by such a faith as is lively prompteth to obedience in every duty called for though this truth will follow by consequent from what the Apostle Iames here saith Yet I judge that both Paul Iames understand the same thing by works even duties of obedience performed to the Law of God that by Works here in Iames is not meant a working faith this not being the scope designe of Iames to clear up justification in its Causes or to shew by what meanes it is brought about but only to shew what way it is or may be evidenced proved demonstrated to ourselves or others so as we may not be deceived thereanent And real works of obedience as they evidence a true lively faith so they prove the reality of justification And the Apostles intention being to shew the vanity of that pretence whereby many deceived themselves thinking that their profession of the truth of the Gospel was enough to secure their Salvation to prove them to be in a justified saife state though they indulged themselves a liberty to walk loosly according to the flesh this acception of the word works in a proper sense is most contributive unto that designe no other acception how consonant so ever unto the Analogy of Faith doth so directly clearly contribute assistence thereunto Therefore he opposeth faith works denieth that to faith which he ascribed unto works though by consequence he put hereby a difference betwixt a dead faith a working faith Yet his principale Thesis vers 14. is that by works not by a bare profession of the truth we come to Salvation And the enquirie prosecuted is whether we have that faith that will indeed prove saving this can only be evidenced by works as his whole following discourse evinceth especially when he saith vers 18. shew me thy faith without thy works I will shew my faith by my works And vers 20. when he saith faith without works is dead vers 26. that it is as dead as a body is without breath or Spirit And this he fully confirmeth by the following instances of Abraham Rahab From what is said it is apparent how little ground there is to think that there is any real appearance of contradiction betwixt Paul James how needless it is in order to a reconciliation to say with Papists that Paul speaketh of a first justification Iames of a second or with others that Paul speaketh of justification as begun Iames of justification as continued or with Socinians that Paul denieth justification by the works of the Law James affirmeth justification by the works of the Gospel CHAP. VIII No countenance given to Justification by Works from Jam. 2 14. c. BEcause all who ascribe our justification in one sense or other all are not agreed in one the same sense unto our works seek countenance unto the same from these words of James Chapt. 2 14 forward notwithstanding that what was said concerning this passage in the fore going Chapter might be sufficient to discover the groundlesness of any such pretence where it was showen that the whole face of this place looked towards another airth and had not the least aspect unto any such conclusion Yet for a fuller Vindication of this place from this too ordinarie abuse perversion we shall examine every part thereof see what ground there is for any to alleige the same for confirmation of their particular opinions The Papists generally say that this place speaketh