scholemen haue handled the matter lurketh a great and venomous subtletye whyche is in that vertue is made the genus or generall woorde vnto fayth whereby fayth should séeme to bée contayned in the predicament of qualitie whiche before is shewed false and therefore he had affirmed before in the. 27. distinction of the seconde booke that no qualitye in the mynde can be a vertue vnlesse by charitie it be there formed for thus he writeth there Charitas est spiritus sanctus quae animae qualitates informat sanctificat vt eis anima informetur sanctificetur sine qua animae qua'it as non dicitur virtus Charitye is the holy Ghost whyche charytie doth forme and sanctifie the qualytyes of the minde that by them the minde may be formed and sanctified without which charitie no qualitie of the minde is called a vertue Here shineth the cause of his former foundation in that they make vertue the genus or generall worde vnto fayth namely because he woulde expresse fayth to be a qualitie by charitie formed in the mind And forasmuch as all qualities of the minde be actions or workes therefore in that he imagineth the same charitie to forme fayth he thinketh him selfe to haue geuen a substantiall cause why fayth in our iustification should be considered as it is a worke and not otherwise So that all his course herein is runne onely to this end namely to teach that iustification consisteth in workes and that fayth iustifieth in respecte that it is a worke and not otherwise And that this is his meaning it is plaine by that question out of the aunswere whereof his forenamed authoritie was alledged which is this Cur ergo dicitur fides mereri iustificationem vitam aeternam ex ea ratione dictum accipitur quia per actum fidei meretur illa VVhy sayth he is fayth said to deserue iustification and eternall life it is vnderstand to be said for this cause because by the acte of beleuing it deserueth those thinges Now doth it euidently appeare why vnto fayth he applied that definition out of the discourse about the subtiltie wherof this one thing is gathered worthy the noting namely the ouerthrow of the scholemens owne smoky distinction of formed and vnformed fayth wherewith so greatly they please them selues for by thys definition it is euident that there is no other fayth but onely forined fayth But to know what hereby is ment it is necessary to note that that qualitie of the minde which by charitable workes expresseth it selfe outwardly to beleue they call formed fayth And againe that qualitie of the minde which likewise beleuing though by charitable workes it declare it not they call vnformed fayth which by the doctrine of this deceauer is euident to be no fayth at all For if it be fayth by hys definition it must be a vertue and if it be a vertue it must by hys forenamed authoritie be formed in the minde by charitie or els he affirmeth it to be no vertue Wherfore seing thys their qualitie is vnformed therefore by hym it is no vertue and being no vertue by hys definition of fayth it is no fayth and that thys is that which out of hys owne doctrine is to be gathered it also appeareth by this question which he afterwardes in the 5. question of the 23. distinction of the 3. booke putteth An illa informis qualitas mentis quae in malo Christiano est fiat virtus cum sit bonus VVhether the same vnformed qualitie of the minde which is in an euill Christian be made a vertue when the man is a good Christian Here you plainly see that he flyeth the name of fayth and calleth it an vnformed qualitie and not vnformed fayth knowing that that vnto hys own definition had ben a flat antithesis Thus is it euident both how their doctrine is at warre within it selfe and also that as the same is vtterly strange frō the true doctrine of Christ so are they driuen to forge termes of arte accordingly for the same such as the Scripture can not acknowledge the cause whereof may séeme to haue bene thys that for asmuch as the matter of iustification of workes which is the prowler for all theyr prouision is by the whole course of the Scriptures ouerthrowen and the office therof attributed to fayth Therfore sought they such blynd definitions of fayth as in reteinyng the name of fayth for fashions sake myght neuerthelesse reserue vnto workes the soueraignitie still Which beyng imagined there remayned this one thing behynd that for asmuche as their ende was to seke a generall gayne of all men aswell of the bad as the good by this their deuised Religiō it was of necessitie that this their fayth beyng one of the pillers therof should conteyne in it some such plausible proprieties as with pleasaunt allurementes and shewes myght minister matter both to good and bad to feede thē selues with opinion of the possession of true fayth vnder the couloure thereof For the doyng wherof it was necessary that it should conteyne in it two diuers kynds proportionall to the condition of the two diuers subiectes which should possesse the same namely the good and the bad And hence semeth their subtile distinction of formed vnformed fayth to haue growen Their formed fayth was onely perculiar to theyr good men such as by theyr charitable workes had formed the same and geuen it the true nature and forme Namely by offeryng at pilgrimages buyldyng chauntreis bying of pardons and such other stuffe And their vnformed fayth is a medicine for all hell houndes and rake helles for none cā be so wicked but if he acknowledge theyr Churche they will thus far comfort him that he may persuade hym selfe that notwithstandyng all hys vilanies yet hath he in him all good and true fayth necessary vnto saluation Mary they say yet it is vnformed Surely it is lyke to that which hath bene fayned of the Beares whelpe namely that it should bee whelped a rude lumppe without shape which the dame with the lickyng of her toung doth perfectly forme So the possessours of this theyr vnformed fayth by the lickyng the same not with theyr tunges but with the charitable workes of theyr pursse taught in the rules of their holy Churche may forme it at their owne pleasure yea if they lyst after the best fashion the more cost the more perfection Truly this semeth to to haue bene the grounde of theyr doctrine herein for what soeuer they say of fayth they meane thereby no other thyng but that a superstitious humblenes and blynde obedience to the penny prowlyng doctrine of their counterfeyte Churche is true and Christian fayth though the possessor therereof know neither how GOD wil be worshypped in Christ nor how by hym he is made gratious and mercyfull vnto hym This is theyr fayth to beleue nothyng determinately nor with assuraunce of knowledge but alwayes vnder this condition if the iudgement of their Churche so allow
brought in sinne and death 2. That that transgression made man an apt subiect for the two properties of God namely iustice and mercy to worke vpon 3. That for the manifestyng of maÌ„s subiection to both those properties the declaration of the law was nedefull wherein the condition of his estate might appeare 4. That the nature of the lawe is to be knowen and what is requisite to the fulfilling thereof and the contrarietie betwene the same the corrupt nature of man. 5. To what end the lawe should be geueÌ„ vnto man he hauing no power to satisfie any part of the same 6. How man regarded the lawe how in Christ the promised seede the couenaunt concerning mans restitution was consummate 7. How the obedience and death of Christ was a full satisfaction for the disobedience and deserued death purchased to al mankinde by AdaÌ„ 8. To enquire the nature of the new couenaunt what on the behalfe of maÌ„ is required to the atteinment of righteousnes in the same 9. To know the certaine tokens of that faith wherunto iustification is imputed the differeÌ„ce betwen the workes of the faithfull the workes required in the lawe 10. To know what iustificatioÌ„ or righteousnes it is which the scriptures attribute to works also what fayth it is against which S. Iames speaketh why iustificatioÌ„ is imputed to fayth and not to workes THE IMAGE of Nature and Grace ¶ That Adams wilfull transgression made him and his ofspring rebels to God and brought in sinne and death Cap. 1. THe eternal wisdome of God hauyng created Adam our first father after the excelleÌ„cie of his owne Image adorned naturally with iustice holines and all perfection to be vnto hym as it were the beauty and glory of all hys workes so aduaunced him by his creation aboue the rest of all his earthlye creatures that vnto him alone he gaue the rule and preheminence in nature to be their Lord and ruler That is to whome all they should obey and serue for the first taste of the which excellent dignitie and prerogatiue he placed theÌ„ all before him as before their soueraign Lord from his mouth to receiue seuerally their titles and proper names according to the whiche they all were called Then geuing Eua vnto hym for his helper he placed him in the garden of Eden the possession of all earthly delightes appointing vnto him the kéeping therof with frée libertie for hys reliefe and comfort to taste eate of all the excellent fruites therein the onely trée of knowledge of good and euill excepted of the whiche he forbade hym to eate affirmyng that what houre soeuer he tasted therof he shoulde dye the death Now forasmuch as the matters here spoken of namely the Image of God in man and mans originall iustice and perfection do iustly chalenge some explication therof as well that the excellency of Gods first benefites towardes man might after a certayne maner bée séene and the glorious estate of his former dignitie more gréedily thristed for agayne and also the outrage of his ingratitude with greater detestation abhorred and the filthines and foule corruption of his nature and miserye of his presente estate by vewe of his former perfection more perfectly paynted out And finally that the triumphe of Gods vnspeakeable mercy in Christe which notwithstanding so huge transgression hath not onely pardoned him but also adopted hym into the fellowship and libertie of his owne sonne that all these I say might be made the more apparaunt those wordes do iustly chalenge some explicatioÌ„ Wherfore where it is sayd that man was created after the image of God it is to bée vnderstand that he was created the most excellent earthly creature being made partener of the naturall goodnes and vertue of God namely holy wise iust pure good true immortall c. hauyng both power perfectly to know God also power and fréewil constantly to beleue him to serue him to obey him to loue him to feare him and to be shorte to perfourme such workes as aunswered to the image of so excellent a Paterne And therefore doth Tertullian writing agaynst Marcion moste excellently and briefly define the Image of of God thus Haec ergo imago censenda est dei in homine quod eosdem motus sensus habeat humanus animus quos deus heet non tales quâ—les deus pro substantia enim status exitus distant Therefore is this to be accouÌ„ted the image of God in man that the mynde of man must haue the same mouinges felings which god hath although not euen suche as God hath for as touching substance of state and ende they differ That is to say that is the image of God which naturally loueth that which god loueth hateth that which god hateth which of very nature iudgeth of all things according to the iudgemeÌ„t of God All which thinges were necessary to the duety of mans office for seyng God had made and created hym as it were his liuetenaunt or vicegerent ouer all his earthly creatures it was necessary that to their gouernement hys nature should participate of the excellent properties of God that thereby in the whole execution of his office hée might haue power not to swerue from his duty and obedience required in the same And hereby appeareth what originall righteousnes was in maÌ„ namely holines knowledge wisedome iustice purenes goodnes truth immortalitie loue temperance chastitie vnlust fréedome from sinne naturall and willing obedience to God hauing power to do good not to sinne not to dye c. and that he in respect of this excellente and glorious condicion of this original nature is called the image of god It is thus out of the Scriptures of God easily gathered Thus writeth Paul to the Ephesians Lay from you the olde maÌ„ which is corrupt through the deceiuable lustes and be ye renued in the spirit of your mynde and put on the new man which after God is shapen in righteousnes and true holines And again the same Paul to the Colos sayth Lye not one to another seyng ye haue put of the olde man with his workes and haue put on the newe which is renewed in knowledge after the Image of him that made him Now what the putting on of this new willingly forgetfull of his creator from whome he had not onely receyued hys beyng but also the prerogatiue of so excellent dignity He I say missed by deceitfull perswation neglecting the glorye of his creator rather gaue credite to the light perswasion of his wife then to the reuerend and dreadfull maiesty For his wife being deceiued by the serpent supposed the commaundemeÌ„t to haue bene geuen rather of subteltie to hinder their dignitye and as it were a scarcrowe to fray them from the tast of that fruite whereby their excellency might increase or as though God had rather not vouchsafed them that further good happe which by taste thereof was
of it This call they a fayth sufficiēt vnto saluation is not this a pestilent and wicked doctrine that such as haue no touch of godly feare nor any féelyng of true godlynes should be sayd to possesse all true faith necessary to saluatiō where it is proued before in the proffe of the true definition of fayth that one of the properties of true fayth is to purifie the hartes of all thē that possesse it Let this both touchyng the description of true fayth and the counterfaite faith of the Papistes suffice and let vs procede to shew in what sense the righteousnes or iustification is to be taken which fayth by grace apprehendeth For the doyng whereof it is necessary to shew how diuersly the word righteousnes is vsed Sometyme it is vsed for that common righteousnes whiche naturally cleaueth vnto man wherby euen in the heathen the opposition of generall vertues and generall vices was vnderstand and the contrary estimation of both therby generat And this righteousnes is common to all men In another sense it is vsed for that outward righteousnes which by the good fruites or workes of suche as bee already iustified is apparaunt in the eyes of men Therefore in neither of these senses is the worde righteousnes or iustification taken in this place wherfore that which here is ment may thus be defined Iustification is a frée remission of sinne imputation of righteousnes vnto man through fayth in Christ The truth of this definition is proued by these words of Paul Abraham beleued God and that was imputed to hym for righteousnes To him that worketh the reward is not counted of fauor but of duty but to hym that worketh not but beleueth on hym that iustifieth the vngodly hys faith is counted to him for righteousnes euen as Dauid describeth the blessefulnes of the man vnto whom God ascribeth ryghteousnes without deedes saying Blessed are they whose vnrighteousnes are forgeuen and whose sins are couered Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth no sinne by these wordes of Paul it is plaine that God iustifieth the vngodly whiche beleueth by forgeuyng hys vnrighteousnes and couering his sins and imputation of righteousnes vnto hym without deedes and that it is fréely done Saint Paule also declareth for all sayth hée haue synned and are destitute of the glory of GOD and are iustyfied freely by hys grace therefore is iustyfication ryghtly saide to bée a frée remyssyon of sinnes and imputation of ryghteousnesse vnto man through faith in Chryst Thus hauing declared what iustification or ryghteousnesse is truely gathered out of the scryptures of God I wyll also briefly note what the Papistes and Scholemen accompt it to be wherein you shall perceaue the building thereof to be wholy raysed from their deuysed grace whereof is sufficyentlye spoken Thus wryteth the mayster of the sentences Mors ergo Christi nos iustificat dum per eam charitas excitatur in cordibus nostris For the death of Chryst doth iustifie vs when as by it charitye is stirred vp in our heartes By whiche woordes it appeareth that hée affirmeth the death of Chryst no otherwyse to iustifie vs but by excitation or styrring of the mynde vnto good woorkes by them to bée iustyfied so that in déede they accompt iustificatyon to signifie nothing else but a certayne qualitie or vertue or infusion of a certayne habit into the mynde inclyning or mouyng the same to goodnes that by the workes thereby produced righteousnes may be attayned Whyche assertion of theirs affirmeth ryghteousnesse to come of oure selues through our owne woorkes onelye addyng thys exception that first through the merite of Chryst a certaine habyt or preuentyng grace doth inclyne the minde to the execution of those workes whereby iustification is attayned whiche is both by the true definytion of iustification false and also by the manifest woordes of Saynt Paule whiche so many tymes affirmeth iustification to consist in the free imputation of righteousnesse vnto man through faith Abraham sayeth he beleued God and that was imputed vnto him for ryghteousnesse It appeareth that these men accompt the generall power or vertue of God whereby hée produceth and conserueth hys creatures and whereby euen in the heathen certaine morall or ciuill good woorkes are wrought to further the doers thereof vnto iustificatyon Thus are some of them not ashamed to dreame that suche as bée not regenerate may do suche good woorkes as maye merite the first grace as they call it whereby the mynde beyng styrred hath by their doctryne frée wyll to admit the same whichebeyng once admitted certayne woorkes of suche perfection are thereby produced as in a sort bée acceptable to God and do meryte the fauour of Chryst and in a sort do iustyfie though not by full and exact worthinesse yet by a certayne conuenyencye or congruencye ay they call it accordyng whereunto they name these woorkes congruent merites That is to say suche merites as in equitie deserue fauour though they satisfie not the extremitie of the lawe And these first works they call preparing workes meanyng that suche prepare the doers vnto regeneratyon Thys their diuinitie séemeth to bée gathered oute of thys sentence in the ciuyll law Summum ius Summa iniuria extreme ryght is extreme wrong And therfore they wyll scan wyth God the equitie of the lawe inferryng thereupon that by the power of nature man is able to fulfill the commaundement in asmuch as appertayneth to the substaunce of the worke required therein though not fully in suche sort as the intent of the commaunder requireth that is though the doyng thereof procéedeth not from loue and the spiryte they bée able to satisfie the equitie as it were of the commaundemēt though not the rigor or extremitie thereof and hereby appeareth howe fully agayne they haue wallowed themselues from euill to worsse till at length they be perfectly tumbled agayne into a Pellagian heresie for by what soeuer good worke nature hath power and frée wyll before iustificatyon to meryte the first grace wythall seeyng by that first grace once obtayned iustification doth by their congruence follow it is of necessity that that first meritorious work is the cause of thys their iustificatyon and so nature hath of it selfe in equitie power to iustifye The horrible error of which doctrine is more then euident by that whiche hath bene shewed before aswell by the true definition of iustification as by the fourth and fifth chapters where the filthynes of corrupt nature is euidently declared Let thys touching the true signification of righteousnes or iustification and the errors of the Papistes about the meaning therof suffice Now resteth somwhat to be said concerning workes Wherefore in one signification workes are those thynges which by practice of arte are done and apparantly remayne as all thyngs wrought by any handy craft are called the workes of the doer In another signification workes are the actions of men produced by the willyng motion of the mind which
fable Forsoothe not without prouident consideration because if that bee taken a waye farewell all the fruites of penance which is one of the most profitable engines that their church hath and principall bailife vnder shirife their high Stuard for the marie and pith of theyr penaunce standeth in theyr satisfaction which is the last and golden part thereof and hath prouided for the building of many an Abbey Wherefore aboue all thinges theyr woorkes of supererogation was to be deuised for els coulde theyr satisfaction haue bene woorthe nothing vnto them which by this politicke prouiso hath made kinges fellowes of such as wythout the same coulde neuer haue bene able to haue maintained two beggers in an hospitall for before any man be able to make satisfaction of the olde debt to hys creditor it is of necessitie that first he be able to satisfie the dutie of the tyme present with an ouerplus out of the which excesse must be raised a sufficient superplussage to discharge the former daunger The wicked horror of all which theyr deuise of workes shal besides that which hath bene sayd already be also iustlye ouerthrowen hereafter where it shall appeare that no workes no not the workes of the iustified be able to satisfie the commaundement any other way then vnder the shield of mercy by not hauyng their insufficientie imputed vnto them but contrarywyse hidden by Christes innocentie from the sight of Gods iustice Let thys both touching the description of good workes and also the counterfeit workes of the Papists suffice Hauyng thus euidently shewed what these wordes grace righteousnes or iustification fayth and workes doe meane in thys matter I will now returne to speake of the nature of thys new couenaunt which as was sayd before iustifieth man fréely by grace through faith in Christ the explication or plain meaning whereof is by these definitions cuident to be this The new couenant doth assure man that hys sinne◠are fréely forgeuen and that righteousnes is imputed vnto hym by the frée beneuolence of the will of God through the ful assurance of the truth of Gods promises in Christ which vnto hym is geuen of God by the inspiration of the holy Gost wherby hys hart is purified and ciensed vnto good workes which righteousnes is imputed vnto hym without all respecte of hys worthynes or workes onely for the prayse and glory of the grace or fauour of god Wherby it is playne that vnto the attainement therof on the behalse of man thys onely thyng is required that he constantly beleue both seuerally touching him selfe and generally touchyng all the elect that euen as God hath fréely promised to accept the satisfaction of hys sonne Jesus Christ in full recompence for all theyr sinnes so assuredly he will performe the same Who soeuer I say hath thys vndoubted fayth he hath the true apprehension of Christ in the promise so that by fayth onely as is proued before iustification is attayned in the promise which fayth is the onely meane which by beleuing God may assure man of the frée fauour of God in Christ without suspition of incroching vpon any part of the glory of the same Which God hath reserued to hym selfe as the onely end for which he hath bestowed vppon man so riche a benefite wherunto as to the appointed marke or end all the Scriptures are directed whereof these authorities for the further confirmation of thys truth may séeme not vnseasonably rehearsed Beginning first with the wordes of our Sauiour Christ hym selfe he sayth thus And as Moyses lift vp the Serpent in the wildernes euē so must the sonne of man be lifted vppe that none that beleue in him perishe but haue euerlasting life for god so loued the world that he hath geuē his onely begotten sonne that none that beleue in him should perishe but haue euerlasting life Againe in the same place He that beleueth in him shall not be condemned And agayne He that beleueth the sonne hath euerlasting life And in an other place The Capernaites said vnto him what shal we doe that we might worke the workes of God Iesus answered and sayd vnto them this is the worke of God that ye beleue on him whom he hath sent And againe in the same chapter This is the will of him that sent me that euery man which seeth the sonne and beleueth in him haue euerlasting life and I will raise hym vp at the last day Agayne in the same chapter Verely verely I say vnto you he that beleueth on me hath euerlasting life And in an other place I am the resurrection and the life he that beleueth on me yea though he were dead yet shal he liue and who soeuer liueth and beleueth in me shall neuer dye And in an other place I am come a light into the world that who soeuer beleueth on me should not bide in darkenes Agayne Peter in the Actes of the Apostles To hym also geue all the Prophets witnes that through his name all that beleue in him shall receaue remission of sinnes Agayne the Gayler sayd to Paule and Barnabas Syrs what must I do to be saued and they sayd beleue on the Lorde Iesus Christ and thou shalt be saued and thy housholde Againe Paule to the Romanes Therefore by the dedes of the law shall no flesh be iustified in his sight for by the law cōmeth the knowledge of sinne but nowe is the righteousnes of God declared without the law hauing witnes of the law the Prophets to wit the righteousnes of God by fayth of Iesus Christ vnto all vpō al that beleue for there is no difference for all haue sinned are destitute of the glory of God and are iustified freely by hys grace throughe the redemption that is in Christ Iesus whō God hath set forth to be a pacification through fayth in his bloud to declare hys righteousnes in that hee forgeueth the sinnes that be passed which God dyd suffer to shew at his tyme his righteousnes that he might bee counted iust and a iustifier of hym that beleueth one Iesus Where is then the boastyng it is excluded by what lawe of workes nay but by the law of faith Therfore we gather that man is iustified by fayth without the deedes of the law and a litle after For it is one GOD which shall iustifie Circūcision which is of fayth and vncircūcisiō through fayth Agayne in the next Chapter for if Abraham were iustified by dedes then hath he wherein to boast but not with GOD for what sayeth the scriptures Abraham beleued God that was coūted to him for righteousnes to him that worketh the reward is not reckened of fauor but of duty but to him that worketh not but beleueth on him that iustifieth the vngodly his faythe is counted for righteousnes Euen as Dauid describeth the blissefulnes of the mā vnto whom God ascribeth righteousnes without
of the faythful are such workes as proceede from a heart purified through fayth Now into the other Schole or ballaunce let vs lay the workes required in the law whose definition is thus gathered out of the iiij Chapter The workes required in the law are such as proceede from the full obedience willyng desire and naturall pronesse of the whole man vnto righteousnes Thus wayed in the ballaunce it is euident that euen the very good workes of the faythfull compared with the workes of righteousnes required in the law are founde farre to lyght to satisfie the same For asmuch as the law can alow none but such as procede from a full obedience willyng desire and naturall pronesse of the whole man That is to say the lawe can alowe no workes but such as should be wrought by naturall strength desire vnto righteousnes But the good workes of the faythfull bee not so but contrarywise they are wrought through the frée grace of GOD purifiyng the heart by fayth whereupon it foloweth that the good workes of the faythfull examined by the iustice of God are insufficient to satisfie the law and haue no strength but vnder the shilde of mercy So imperfect are the best and most purest workes of the iustified that being examined by the seueritie of the law they are vnable to abide the presence thereof Thus hauyng shewed the certayne tokens of that fayth whereunto righteousnes is imputed and the difference betwene the workes of the faithful and the workes required in the law it foloweth Cap. 10. ¶ To knowe what iustificatiō or righteousnes it is whiche the scripture attributeth to workes and also what fayth it is against whiche S. Iames speaketh and why Iustification is imputed to fayth and not to workes HOw diuerslie the worde righteousnes or iustification is taken in the Scriptures is by the viij chapter declared where it is euidently proued that iustification being taken for the frée imputation of righteousnes vnto mā wherby in the sight of God he is discharged of giltiship cōmeth onely through fayth in Christ without respect of mans worthines or workes by the frée beneuolence of the will of God to the prayse and glory of his grace And that the iustification or righteousnes of woorkes is nothing els but the declaration of the same righteousnes of fayth by the outwarde fruites thereof which aunswereth that which is first in this chapiter required Yet notwithstanding the ambitious pride of the aduersaries is neither ashamed nor afeard to hold plée as it were with God for a part of the glory of mans iustificatiō arrogantly challenging the same as a deserued duetie purchased by theyr workes The contrary wherof as in the viij chapter it is manifestly proued so is the feareful error thereof by the iiij chapter euidently disproued For it is there plaine that al the workes of corrupte nature are as direct contrary to the law as death vnto life darkenes vnto light or colde vnto heat And yet out of that hatefull hourd must they of force take their counterfeit store Séeing they wil néedes haue workes to iustifie for that enferreth that those workes must goe before iustification and so be wrought before the man be righteous which can be nothing but the fruites of a wicked man for vntill he be righteous he is wicked and by their doctrine he can not be righteous vntill the worke haue made him righteous therefore whilest he is wicked it must néedes be that he do the worke which shall make him righteous which is impossible as by the Scriptures doth euidently appeare Thus writeth Paul to the Phillippians That ye may be pure without offence vntill the day of Christ filled with the fruites of righteousnes which fruites are in you by Iesu Christ vnto the glory praise of God. Here in these wordes of Paul we may learne the efficient cause the formall cause the materiall cause and the final cause of good woorks by which causes it doth euidently appeare that before iustification no good workes can be wrought and that the ende of good woorkes is not to iustifie the doers of them but onely to the glory and prayse of god Wherefore let vs consider his woordes first in that he sayth that ye may be pure and without offence he sheweth what is the office of a christen man namely to labour for such pure and vnspotted conuersation as no offence may iustly be gathered by the same He sayth moreouer Vntill the day of Christ to shewe that the endeuour towardes goodnes must haue continuance through the whole course of the life Hauing thus shewed both the office of a christen man and the terme of his continuance in th execution thereof he goeth forward to shew what furniture is necessary in him to the performance of that office in saying Filled with the fruits of righteousnes Here he sheweth wherwith he must be filled that must be pure and without offence namely with the fruit of righteousnes that is with good workes And as he teacheth in these wordes that good workes are the furniture of a christen mā so doth hée also teache in the same woords both the formal cause the material cause of good woorkes for in that he sayeth wyth the fruites of righteousnes he sheweth that righteousnes or iustificatiō is the formal cause of them which as a good trée bryngeth forth her good fruite He also sheweth that the materyall cause of any good worke is that it is a fruite of ryghteousnes whereby it is clearer then the Sunne that there can be no fruite of ryghteousnesse vntill the brynger forth thereof be transformed into a trée of righteousnes neither can the material cause haue her being vntil first the formal cause bée generate for the trée must bée before the fruite And in thys place doth Paule open the wordes of Esay in the. 61. chapter where he sayeth they shall be called trees of ryghteousnesse whyche cause Paule doth insinuate by expressyng the effect in that hée sayeth filled wyth the fruites of ryghteousnesse which imployeth that the bryngers forth of those fruites must néedes bee tréees of ryghteousnesse whereby it is euydent that no woork is good but that which is brought forth by a righteous man seeyng that it is the fruite of righteousnesse but none is a righteous man vntill he be iustified therefore can none bring forth good workes but suche as bee alreadye iustyfied Wherupon it followeth that before iustificatiō no good woork can be wrought Paule goeth forwarde and sayth whiche fruites are in you by Iesus Chryst Here doth he euidentlye declare what is the efficient cause of good woorkes namely Iesus Chryst so that where before hee had taught iustification or righteousnes to bee the formall cause of good woorkes and the fruites thereof to be the materiall cause for that hée woulde leaue no doubt concernyng the effycyent cause therefore he addeth whiche fruites are in you by Iesu Chryst Where thys is also to be noted fully
discerne thynges that differ to iudge betwene good works and counterfeite workes betwene true religion hipocrisie that so through that knowledge they might haue iudgement how to lead a pure and Christian life which without the knowledge of the wyll of God is vnpossible And agayne the same Paule to Philemon See that the fellowship sayth he that thou hast in the fayth be fruitfull through knowledge of all good things which are in you by Iesus Christ Hereby it appeareth that without vnderstanding of the will of God no good workes can be wrought But Paul playnely affirmeth that all thei that be not already iustified in Christ haue no vnderstanding The naturall man sayth he perceaueth not the thinges that belong to the spirit of God for they are but folishnes vnto hym Then if he perceaue not nor vnderstand the thynges that please god It appeareth by that is sayd before that he can by no meanes do the worke that shall please god Hereby it both playnely appeareth that the knowledge of the wyll of God is required to good workes and also that none that is not iustified hath that knowledge Now touching that vnto good works there is also required in the doer affection delight towardes the same that is euident by the definition of good workes expressed in the 8. chapter where it appeareth that they be nothyng but an execution of the commaundementes whereunto the whole affection of man both body and soule is required as in the. 4. chapter appeareth which also is confirmed by the example of those of whose good workes the scripture beareth witnes Thus sayth Dauid If my delight were not in thy law I should haue perished in my trouble And agayne my delight was in thy commaundementes And agayne thy testimonies haue I claymed as mine heritage for euer and why they are the very ioy of my hart And agayne Lord what loue haue I vnto thy law al the day long is my studie therein And agayne my delight shal be euer in thy statutes And agayne for I loue thy commaundementes aboue golde precious stone Thys affection of the hart is required to the performaunce of good workes whereof how greatly they be short that be onely possessed of the naturall man and not iustified in Christ it is more then euident by the playne wordes of God hymselfe In Genesis he sayth thus my spirite shall not alwayes striue in man because he is fleshe And a litle after The Lord sawe that the wickednes of man was great in the earth and all the imaginations of the thoughtes of his harte were onely euill continually And agayne in the 8. chapter the imaginations of mans hart is euill euen from hys youth Here appeareth that the affection of the naturall man is onely this affection to rebellion desire so contempt and lust to disobedience Thus it is euident that in all those which be not already iustified in Christ their is neither vnderstanding how to please God nor affection thereunto And so consequently no good worke seing it is proued that no worke cā be good but where both they be ioyned together which also is euident by that which is sayde in the fifth chapter Surely if these men had bene as carefull searchers of truth herein out of Gods holy worde as they haue bene of mistes and clowdes out of Aristotles schole to darcken shadow the brightnes thereof they woulde neuer haue sought with so many subtil distinctions and false definitions without al ground of Gods worde to haue builded themselues the labirinth of errour maze of their owne confusion But woulde contrariwise haue humbled themselues vnto the spirite of God and haue considered the ende of hys purpose in mans saluation But they not considering that to be the prayse and glory of hys owne grace and enforcing the rigor of the outward sounde of some wordes in the scripture haue gathered workes to be the cause of mās iustification where if they more narrowly cōsidered they should see that faith is the onely meane by which workes are indued wyth the title of goodnes forasmuch as no good worke can be wrought but by a man alredy by faith iustified and appareled wyth the righteousnes of Christ by meanes whereof the blemishes and imperfections thereof are through mercy couered which otherwise if the same workes were wrought by an vnbeleuyng man they woulde appeare in the sight of God most filthy for of mercy it commeth in respecte of Christ that the most perfecte workes are not layde to mans charge for sinne Out of this ground gathered from God truth this rule of Christian religion is concluded that where soeuer righteousnes or iustification is in the Scripture imputed to workes it is not imputed to them as though they were the cause of righteousnes that is to sayas though they going before iustification did procure or purchase the same but farre otherwyse it is imputed vnto them as vnto the fruit of the righteousnes of fayth which after iustification doth witnes and declare that the doer is iustified by fayth by apprehending of Christ in respecte of whom mercy couereth the spottes of that worke from the sight of Gods iustice so that sinne is not imputed to man for the same Hic murus ahaeneus esto Let this to a Christian conscience be a wall of brasse Now this foundation layde let vs séeke by thys rule to vnderstand those Scriptures which the aduersaryes for theyr filpursse doctrine of iustification of workes haue forced into open combat both agaynst theyr owne naturall sense and agaynst the ende and scope of Gods purpose declared in the Scriptures touching mans iustification wherein to séeke to answere to all theyr subtill and shameles wranglings were more tedious then profitable And touching the multitude of wordes more paynefull then possible Though touching matter Gods truth being iudge inough hath bene sayd already where-fore to auoyde all extremities and kéepe my selfe within my power touching wordes and yet not to passe the reste with silence I will ouerlooke a fewe of their principall ragges which they call reasons wherein theyr errour being opened the smaller of them selues will drop a sunder vntouched Wherefore firste of all that playnnes might be ioyned with the breuitie for which I labor let the Scriptures which they make challengers in thys fraye be gathered together into these sortes In the first sort placyng those which promising reward to workes procure men to labour for the same In the second sort such as by the sound of wordes séeme to take iustification from fayth or geueth the same to workes And in the last sorte those Scriptures wherin the righteous thallenge at Gods handes reward of theyr innocency righteousnes Wherfore by examples of euery of these sorts let vs séeke truely to vnderstand them by theyr agréement with thē selues and the rest of the Scriptures that as of God there is but one spirite and one truth so the same truth by the consent
righteousnes vnto workes haue not we our iustification of fayth and workes and not yours of faith onely It is sayde of Phinées in the 106. Psal that his acte was imputed to him for righteousnes And likewise in Deutronomy of hym that deliuered his neighbors pledge that it shal be righteousnes vnto him before the Lord his god And likewise S. Iames saith was not Abraham our father iustified by workes in offering his sonne Isaac vpon the aulter Whereupon they conclude that as man is not iustified by workes so is he not iustified by faith without workes flatly agaynste S. Paule who concludeth playnely that man is iustified of fauour through fayth without workes where he telleth both the finall cause of that liberall gifte namely the prayse and glory of the grace or fauor of God and also he telleth the reason why he so vehemently excludeth workes namely least any man shoulde beast that is through blinde presumption should challenge any part of the glory of that worke which God hath reserued to himselfe for his speciall triumph Now if the aduersaries will néedes vrge that the worde righteousnes or iustification hath the same signification in these places by thē alleged that it hath in Paule Doe they not teare in sunder the spirite of truth and set him at warre with hymselfe forasmuch as by the rigor of wordes they be contrary Paule sayth fiatly and affirmeth it by manye discourses that faith without worke iustifieth and that by workes no man liuing shall be iustifyed but these aucthorities affirme the contrary that these men by workes were iustifyed Now if they will néedes affirme that both in Paul and in these places which they alledge the worde righteousnes or iustifycation hath one sense is not this a doctrine that eyther must accuse Paule of ignorance of the sense of the auncient scriptures or of error in his owne and robbe God of his finall triumph namely of his glorie and vtter spoylinge man of the assuraunce of Gods fauour in Christ for if his assuraunce therof bee once ioyned with the condition of hys owne desert or workes surely he falleth by and by into one of our Phisitions new found Agewes A triple tertian quotidian he can neuer know when he is without a fitte Surely it were to hard for Peter Lumbard him selfe with both his foundations of hope to spy out a time to finde him selfe cleare from a fitte if for one masse whyle on the Sunday his imagination coulde mocke him that he were créeping to godward The true testimony of his conscience might assure him that all the rest of the wéeke after he were gallopping to the deuilward The Lord hath blessed hys elect from such assuraunce Wherefore let vs now reuerently with Paule haue respect vnto the finall ende of Gods woorke in this cause Namely to hym onely to yelde all the glorie and to man assuraunce and vndoubted possession of his fauour in Christ And we shall easely sée in these places no contrarictie but most swéete consent Let vs follow the rule of the auncient fathers in serching the truth of doubtfull sentences Thus sayth Hillarius Intelligentia dictorum ex causis est assumenda dicendi quia non sermoni res sed reiest sermo subiectus The meaning of wordes is to be gathered by the causes of the speaking for the matter is not subiecte to the worde but the worde to the matter Agayne Ierome vppon the Epistile to the Galathians saith thus Nec putemus in verbis Scripturarum esse Euangelium sed in sensu non in superficie sed non medulla non in fermonum folus sed in radice rationis Neither let vs thincke that the gospel consisteth in the wordes of the Scripture but in the meaning not in the barck but in the pith not in the leaues of wordes but in the roote of the meanyng Wherfore let vs in folowing the Coūfell of these auncient fathers séeke such meanynges and sense of these Scriptures as may expresse their consent with the rest of the Scriptures And haue respect vnto the finall cause of Gods purpose Namely as I haue often said that vnto hys fauour and grace for this so frée a benifite all prayse and glory may redoūde That al workes wrought by man before iustification be nothing els but the euill fruite of an euill tree it is before euidently proued And so vtterly vnable to abide the presence of gods iustice Wherby it foloweth of necessitie that the woorkes alleged in these their authorities were not there meant for works going before iustification as causes therof but in déede for such workes as folowyng the same declared manefestly the righteousnesse which to the doers of them was offrée fauour through fayth imputed For that the workes of a man by fayth already iustified be in the sight of God allowed for ryghteous by not hauing sinne imputed vnto them it is not onely not denyed but most constantly affirmed For how can it be otherwise but that God in beholdyng in them hys owne moste glorious Image wherewith throughe grace in respect of fayth they be clothed He muste both acknowledge it and delight therin But that their spottes and blemishes are nowe couered wyth the righteousnes of Christe this commeth not to them either by them selues or in respect of them selues but onely by grace or fauour through fayth as is shewed before For they beinge the workes of a man already by fayth iustified and clothed in the righteousnes of Christ Therfore they thereby clothed in the same righteousnes hauing theyr spottes and blemishes through mercye therewith couered are acknowledged for righteous They are accepted for good fruite because they were brought forth by a good frée So that fayth by apprehendyng of Christ and his righteousnes in the promise through grace and fauour attayneth mans iustification So the workes or fruites of the righteousnes of the same faith do manyfestly declare and witnes the doer of them to be righteous That is as fayth apprehēdeth righteousnes in the frée promise for man so the workes or fruites of that righteousnes of fayth doe declare and testifie that hee is iustifyed Wherefore whersoeuer in the Scriptures man is sayd to be iustifyed by workes the meaning is that he is by workes declared and knowen to bée a righteous man And not that the workes were the cause of his righteousnes This being thus considered ther appeareth betwene Paule and the aucthorities by them alledged no strife but most swéete agréement For as Paule telleth the meanes howe a man is iustifyed so the other shew and declare howe man is openly knowne to bee righteous or iustifyed Now marke gentle reader how this doctrine tendeth fully to that end where unto Saint Paule directeth hys course Namely that the whole glorie may redound to GOD alone and that man may haue a sure possession of Gods fauour in Christ Firste in that by iustifycation of workes this onely is to be vnderstand that man
by workes is declared to bée righteous it concludeth euen as in the aunswere to theyr former aucthorities that all the world may acknowledge the performaunce of Gods mercyful promise in Christ towardes the electe Who by their workes are euidently declared to bée righteous And besides that it reserueth the whole glorye of that worke to GOD alone forasmuch as workes doe onely declare and witnes mans righteousnesse and challenge to bee no cause of the same Thus vnto God is his prerogatiue reserued vnblemished Namely all the glorie Nowe touching man in that they declare the certaine possession of the righteousnesse of fayth they witnesse in him the estate of a moste quiete and ioyfull conscience and that hée is through faith assured of the fauour of God in Christ Nowe it is apparant what righteousnes of the Scripture attributeth to faith and what to workes Namely that by faith man apprehendeth Christ in the promise by whome he is made righteous and by workes or frutes of the righteousnes of faith mā is declared and knowne to bee righteous and hath his conscience therby reposed in the sure possession of Gods fauour in Christ Thus hauyng shewed what iustification the Scriptures attribute vnto workes I thincke it also conuenient to shew what fayth it is which Iames disableth to iustification His wordes be these what auayleth it my brethren though a man say he hath fayth whē he hath no deedes can faith saue him Here euen at the first it is euident that S. Iames in this place inueyeth not agaynst faith in dede but against the bare name or title of fayth in such certayne licentious Iewes Christened as onely by the same séemed to challenge iustification For he sayeth not thoughe a man haue fayth without deedes But he saith though a man say he hath faith Whereby it is euident that hee onely enueyeth agaynst the name or title of faith which by them was applyed vnto them selues vnworthely and therefore in vayne And doubting that some men myght applye hys wordes agaynst fayth in déede hee maketh hys entrye warely not against fayth but agynste a vayne name or title of fayth in saying Thoughe a man saye hee hath fayth and not thoughe a man haue fayth whiche he might think sufficyent warnyng to all men that hée ment not to inueigh agaynst true fayth and therefore hée goeth forward labouryng agaynst that their vayne opinion vnder the same name or title which they attributed vnto it callyng it fayth as they dyd thynkyng that his former warnyng in the beginnyng in saying thoughe a man sayeth hee hath fayth and not though he haue fayth in deede had béene a suffycient warnyng that he ment not true fayth but onely a vaine opinion termed of them by the name of fayth and that now hée myght at hys owne libertie wythout suspicion of enueyghing against true fayth beat down that wycked opinion vnder the same name or title by whyche they termed it namely vnder the name of fayth and thereupon hée addeth can fayth saue hym meaning onely such fayth as they make their challenge by or as hée at his entrance enueighed against that is the bare name or tytle of fayth and that thys was hys meanyng it is playne by that whyche followeth in that he goeth about to open their errour as it were by comparison in shewyng how farre their vayne opinion whiche they called fayth dyffered from true fayth in déede in saying If a brother or sister be naked or destytute of dayly foode and one of you saye vnto hym depart in peace warme your selues and fill your bellies notwythstandyng ye geeue not them those thynges whyche are needefull to the body what helpeth it euen so fayth if it haue no deedes is dead in it selfe as though hée had saide vnto them Brethren what do you thynk of fayth do ye thynke that onely the bare name or title thereof is sufficient to iustification or doe ye thynke that true fayth can see the necessitie of their néedy brother or sister vnrelieued no no deceaue not your selues for loue charity and all good woorkes can no more be absent from fayth in déede then heate from fire and that faith which lacketh those fruites is no more fayth then a dead man is a man but is in déede dead and no fayth at all but onely a bare name or title of faith with the vaine cloke wherof ye beguyle your selues Do ye thinke thys vayne braggyng of fayth amongest your selues can iustifie you or doe ye thinke that because ye beléeue God is that ye therfore shal be saued nay brethren be not so vainely caryed away yf that might serue the tourne the deuils woulde be saued aswell as you for they haue that fayth common with you for they both beléeue that God is and tremble at him But shall I by example paint vnto you your vanitie whereby you may see that your bragging title of faith which hath no fruites nor workes to 〈◊〉 the same is but dead and no faith in deede Then compare it with the true fayth which in oure father Abraham was manifest whom the apparaunt fruites or woorkes of ryghteousnesse thereof euidently declared to bée a righteous man Hys fayth lay not lurkyng in him in idle name without fruite or woorkes no no his fayth had lyfe which by the fruite was made manifest in offeryng hys sonne Isaac beyng certayne that the death or sacrifice of hys sonne could nothing at all hinder the promyse of God but that notwithstanding God both coulde woulde performe his promise and worde Thus was hys faythe witnessed by hys woorkes And the perfectnes thereof made apparant so that the truth of the Scripture which sayde Abraham beleeued God and that was imputed to hym for ryghteousnesse was by hys woorkes made so euydent that hée was indued wyth the name of ryghteous and was called the frend of god Whereby it is euydent vnto you that by déedes as the fruites of the righteousnesse of his faith his righteousnesse was declared and hée knowen for a ryghteous man and not by the idle name of fayth onelye without workes which as I sayde before is dead and no faythe at all And likewyse Kahab the harlotte in lodginge the messengers of Gods people was declared to bée ryghteous Wherefore to conclude laye away your vayne bragges of your idle and bare name of fayth for as the bodye that wanteth spirite is dead so assuredly thys whiche you terme fayth hauyng no workes to witnes the same vnto you is dead and no fayth at all but a vaine or lyght opinion Thus to hym that with a single eye consydereth both the end of S. Iames hys purpose and also throughly the order of hys woordes it appeareth playnly that hée enueigheth not against fayth in déede but against a lose and licentious opinion which those Iewes vnto whom he writte had couered vnder the name or title of fayth Now touching their argument groūded vpon the .xix.
of Mathew VVhere a certayne ruler came to Christ and asked of him what good thyng hee shoulde doe that hee might haue eternall lyfe Christ aunswered if thou wilt enter into lyfe keepe my commaundementes here say they it appeareth that kéeping of the commaundementes whiche is but woorkes do iustifie That the kéeping of the commaundementes is able to iustify him that were able to obserue thē it was neuer doubted of For Moyses witnesseth that he that doth them shall liue thereby but that no man hath power to kéepe thē it is euidently proued already neyther by nature as now it is corrupt nor by grace in the .iiij. and .ix. chapters Wherefore gentle reader marke the circumstaunce first who asketh the question A ruler or Lawier who dreamed of nothyng but the outward obseruaunce of the lawe Secondly what is the question namely What good thing hée might doe to haue euerlasting lyfe Marke that this hys whole question was not otherwise to learne the waye to euerlastyng life then by déedes or workes in asking what thing he should do Wherefore what directer aunswer could be geuē then that which Christ vsed séeing the question was onely of woorkes namely kéepe the commaundementes séeing no other works could serue that turne But peraduenture some of them will say If Christ had not knowne him able to kéepe the commaundementes hée surely woulde haue taught him the way possyble to him Surely these be tender hartes that will teach the holy ghost to bée pitifull but Christ him selfe sayde he came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentaunce that is hée came not to call suche fellowes as woulde iustifie themselues but such as would humble themselues to hys iustyfication Wherefore Christ seing the filthy pride of his heart euen in the due aunswer of hys questyon offered hym the glasse of the Lawe whereof he bragged in hys heart to see his owne filthinesse therein that by the fight thereof he might haue trained him to haue framed a more humble question concerning the waye to heauen But what aunswer maketh he goeth he not on in the iustification of himselfe in saying Al this haue I kept from my youth vpward what lack I yet Then Chryste to open to his eyes the packe of hys corruption applieth to his verie heart a corsiue to teache him that the law is spirytual and challengeth the entire obediēce of the heart If thou wilt be perfect sayeth he sell that thou hast and geue it to the poore thou shalt haue treasure in heauen and come and follow me which when hee hearde hee went hys waye mourning because hee had great possessions So that it appereth by the whole course of the action that Christ enabled him not to the satisfying of the lawe but contrariwise by example of hys owne wickednes compared with the lawe he sought to teache him beyng a teacher of others how farre he him selfe was short from the vnderstandyng of the Lawe in supposing it to consist onely in outwarde action And to conclude Christ offered the law to this proude ruler to no other ende then before generally it was géeuen to all the Iewes namely to sée hys owne filthinesse thereby to be driuen to seeke reliefe in Christe and it was also the very direct aunswer to hys questyon Other of the aduersaryes cauyll thus In déed say they there bee two iustifications the one in regeneration or baptisme and that is fréelye bestowed vpon vs neyther is it needefull that any good woorkes shoulde goe before this iustification But nowe fallinge after thys regeneratiō it is needefull say they that to the iustification of vs agayne satysfaction by good woorkes must bee made The error and impietie of this doctryne is not onely manifest by that whiche is sayd before where it is proued that no workes but onely the woorkes of the iustified by fayth can appeare in the presence of God but also for that it fayneth Christ in respect of diuers tymes to bée a mediator of diuers power or abilitie For they confesse him sufficyent to restore man vnto Gods fauour and to iustifie him that is not yet conuerted but to restore him that after regeneration by filthinesse is fallen from God they make his power to weake and that porcion of power whiche in this case they take from Christ they attribute the same vnto that man which of all other may séeme most hatefull vnto God namely vnto him that by cruell ingratitude and wycked contempte is fallen from the grace bestowed vpon hym preferring his condicion before the condycion of them that neuer were conuerted in geuing him power to woorke his owne iustification which they playnly confesse the other to want and yet is the condicion of the other in reason to bée preferred before theirs who by theyr cruell ingratitude deserue iustly the most abhorfull estate as the holy ghost beareth witnesse For it is not possible saith he that they which were once lightened haue tasted of the heauenly gift and were become partakers of the holy ghoste and haue tasted of the good worde of God of the power of the worlde to come if they fall away shold be againe renued vnto repentance forasmuch as they haue as concerning thē selues crucified the Son of God a fresh making a mocke of him And againe If we sinne willingly after that we haue receiued the knowledge of the truth there remaineth no more sacrifice for sinnes but a fearefull loking for iudgemēt violent fire which shall deuour the aduersaries And againe Christ himselfe saieth The seruaunt that knoweth his masters will and doth it not shall be beaten with many stripes This is the horrible estate of them that are fallen frō Christ And yet are the aduersaries nothing ashamed to robbe Christ of a péece of his power or honor or his office to painte vp thys their Isops crowe withall making the power of hys offyce or mediation in respecte of diuers times and subiectes greater or lesser But wel hath the holy ghost in the first Epistle of S. Ihon mette wyth thys wranglyng shift thus My lytle chyldren sayth hee these thinges I write vnto you that yee sinne not but if we do sinne wee haue an aduocate with the father euen Iesus Christe the ryghteous And hee it is that obtayneth grace for our sinnes By which words it playnely appeareth that when we fal after regeneration or baptisme Christ is our iustification euen as he was at the first and not our owne workes so that our fyrst iustification in regeneratyon and our latter with repentaunce come both by one meanes namely by the free gyft of God through faythe in Christe Howbeit in déede thys dystinction of theirs is more then wicked for whosoeuer is by regeneration once iustifyed hée can neuer agayne be vniustifyed for whomsoeuer God once loueth hee loueth hym to the ende for God is not mutable as man neyther can he deny himselfe Another of
the shiftes which these busie hunters to robbe God of his honoure haue found out is this fayth say they doth iustifye but fayth is a worke therefore woorkes do iustifye To whome wee aunswere that faith in respect that it is our worke expressed by our will or vnderstanding iustifyeth not because it is feeble and weake for no man beléeueth so assuredly as hee is bounde nor doth so earnestly assent vnto the truth of Gods promises as he ought to do Wherefore whersoeuer fayth is sayde to iustifye fayth is there taken for the obiecte of faythe Namely for Christ and the mercye of God in the promise And for asmuche as it is the instrument which taketh holde thereof therefore is iustifycation imputed vnto it According to Saynt Paules sayinge Abraham beleeued God and that was imputed vnto him for ryghteousnesse so that fayth is sayde to iustify because it taketh holde of Chryst in the promise who doth iustifye and not in respect that fayth is a woorke of ours Wherefore examining thys argument of the aduersaries you shall sée how finely at the first they foist in a fallax called of the logitians fallacia accidentis That is the deceipt of the accident Inferring that in the conclusion wherunto that worde whereuppon it is inferred did not stretch it selfe in the second proposition for where it is sayde faith is a worke to be a worke of ours is but an accident vnto faith in respect of iustification for iustification commeth not because fayth is a worke of ours but because the mercie of God doth in the promise fréely geue it to al beleuers So that faith in the first proposition is referred and hath relation vnto the obiect of faith namely Christ and the mercy of God in the promise And in the second proposition fayth is there otherwise taken namely as it is a worke of ours Wherefore fayth not béeing one in bothe propositions the conclusion is falselye inferred Or more briefely it is aunswered thus Faith in the firste proposition is a relatiue in the predicament of relation as in the 8. chapter is declared and in the seconde proposition where it is considered as a worke it falleth in the predicament of qualitie wherby the argument hauing fower termes the conclusion must needes bée false An other of the aduersaries argumentes is thys Saint Paule affirmeth that of fayth hope and loue loue is the greatest or most excellent and in that the fulfillyng of the lawe consisteth and therefore iustification is rather to be imputed to the more excellent then to the inferior That loue is most excellent of the three it is euydent for fayth and hope haue only continuaunce vntill the thinges that bée beléeued and hoped for bée fully in mannes possessyon At whyche tyme they both shall ende but loue doth continue and florishe through all eternity and that it is the fulfilling of the law is in the. 4. chapter euydent For who so loued God and his neighbour so muche as he ought to doe shoulde surely fulfill the lawe But now touching their argument that because it is more excellēt therfore it must iustify that is more then childishe The eare is a farre more excellent instrument or organ of the bodye then is eyther the hand or mouth for thereby we receaue the glad promyses of God touchyng our whole felycytie Shoulde wee therefore inferre because the eare is the more excellent Organ or instrument that therefore we shoulde receaue oure meate wyth oure eares and not rather with the hand and mouth whiche though they be meaner yet are they instrumentes appoynted to that vse And so fayth though it bee the meaner yet is it the instrumēt appointed to that vse An other of the aduersaries shifts is this works say they iustified not in respect that they be our workes but in respect that they be the workes of God in vs Here is the shew of a goodlye substaunce but launch it a litle and you shall finde it nothing else but an emptye bladder puffed with wind onlye Marke whose be the woorkes whiche here they alledge are they not the workes of God in vs Doe they not imagine God to worke in vs but as hath bene before euidently shewed God woorketh vnto saluation in none but in those that bée hys children that is to say iustified for they that are led by the spirite of God they are the children of God that is iustified Why if they be his children alreadye the questyon is ended for those workes that come after they be his children can not be the purchaser of that estate whereof the doer was possessed before they were wrought wherefore those woorkes doe not iustifie him that was iustified before euer hee wrought them for he was the childe of God before he wrought them for they confesse God to dwell in hym and woorke in hym but God dwelleth and worketh in none vnto saluation but in hys children that is in the iustifyed as it is sayde before Wherefore gentle reader that thou mayest bee hable to vnfolde all the subtyll shyftes of the deceytfull aduersaryes intricate snares of thys kynde kéepe thys for a generall and sure rule whiche can neuer fayle thee Marke diligently whether in that worke wherby they wil haue iustification obtayned they auouche God to be anye worker or no. If they auouche hym to be no worker then by the. 4. and 5. chapters thou euidently séest that the work is abhominable vnto him If they auouch him to bée a woorker as in thys argument which I am sure they must néedes do thē say vnto them séeing God woorketh in them to saluation they are before hand the childrē of God that is iustified already for the Scripture affirmeth that they that are led by the spirite of God are the children of God but none bée hys children tyll they be iustified and therefore these workes whiche they auouch are the woorkes of such as be alredyiustified which is not in question for those woorkes can bée no helpe to obtayne hym that estate whereof hée was possessed before they were wrought and wythout the possessyon whereof they coulde neuer haue béene wrought Wherefore if they will haue woorkes to iustifie they must alledge such woorkes as God is no woorker in for God worketh in none vnto saluatyon but in such as be already iustified for whosoeuer is led by the spirite of God he is already iustified for he is the childe of God as I sayd before Nowe touchyng these Scriptures whiche I put in the last sort namelye where the righteous challēge and craue of god the reward of their innocencye and righteousnesse and as it were offer the same to be examined before hys iustice of whiche examples there be principally in the Psalmes whereof I will rehearse one or two Fyrst Dauyd in the. 7. Psalme Iudge me O Lord accordyng to my innocency and according to the cleanenes of my handes in thy sight And
agayne in the. 18. Psalme God hath rewarded mee accordyng to my innocency and according to the cleanenesse of my handes hath he recompenced mee for I obserued the commaundements of the Lord and was not wicked against my God but I had al his lawes before me neither cast I his commaundements from me I was pure before him abstained mine owne wickednes therefore God hath rewarded me according to my innoceÌ„cy and according to the cleanenes of my handes in hys sight Who so considereth in the Scriptures the cause and the manner of the exclamatyon of the righteous in theire lameÌ„table calamitie vnder the cruell vniuste and mercilesse persecutions and afflictions of the wicked tyrannous oppressors shall foorthwith see the solution of these arguments namely that the righteous therein iustifie not themselues neyther auouche their innocencie in respecte of the iustyce of God but in respecte of the false vniuste and tyrannous wickednesse of the oppressor in respecte of theire most horryble iniurye and crueltye they maye wel auouch their righteousnesse and innocencye and therefore they flye for succour vnto the iustice of God who knoweth howe giltlesse they are touchyng the false accusation of theire bloud thirstye enemyes requirynge of God in that cause to be defended froÌ„ their enemies euen as he who knoweth theire conscyence could testify that they had not committed those euils for the whiche theire enemyes most cruelly pursued them as here in the. 7. Psal Dauid being falsely accused by Chus one of Saules kynsmen challengeth the iustice of God for the defence of hys innocencye in that case toward Saul desiring of God hys deliuerance according as he knew hym giltlesse toward Saul seing hys conscience could accuse him of no conspiracie or treason towardes hym In thys sort do the righteous somtymes in the scriptures offer the innoceÌ„cy of their causes before the iudgement seate of God not alledging innocency in respect of Gods iustice but in respecte of the false and wicked vntruthes wherwith theyr enemyes charged them Wherefore in the 18. Psalme Dauid being by the mercy of God setled in the seate of hys Kyngdome geueth thankes vnto God for that euen according to the innocency of his hart cleanenes of hys hands towards Saul he had rewarded hym in deliueryng hym from the daÌ„ger of so mighty and cruell an enemye reioysing in that â—he hauyng the lawe of God before hys eyes had withholden his hart handes from committing wickednes agaynst hys annointed Lord and king For such was hys innocency and righteousnes â—n respect of Saules wickednes that he â—ould nothing accuse hym self towardes Saule For in makyng hys mone to Ionathas Saules sonne thus he auoucheth hys innocencye What haue I done sayth he wherein am I faultie what is the sinne that I haue committed agaynst thy father that he seketh my life And anone after he sayth vnto hym If there be in me any trespasse theÌ„ slay me thy selfe Hereby ye may see the innocency and righteousnes which Dauid aueucheth in hymselfe was in respecte of Saules wicked and vniust crueltie and not in respecte of the iustice of god For where soeuer he handleth the cause betwene the iustice of God and hym selfe there he singeth another songe Then cryeth he Be mercifull vnto me O Lord be mercifull vnto me accordyng to thy great mercyes and according to the multitude of thy mercies doe away mine offences Then cryeth he Lorde reâ— proue me not in thine anger neitheâ— chastise me in thy heauie displeasure If thou Lord wilt watch what is donâ— amisse Lorde who shall be able to 〈◊〉 bide it Lord clense me from my 〈◊〉 crete sinnes and such lyke Then neither talketh he of hys owne innocencye or righteousnes he beasteth then of no righteousnes but of mercy Blessed are they sayth he whose wickednes are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth no sinne Here is all the righteousneshe knoweth of hym 〈…〉 when he hath to deale with the iustice of god Thus hauing briefly shewed by a fewe examples the true aunsweres of the principall obiections of the enemye of iustification of fayth and the sweete agreement thereby of the Scriptures in geuing to God the whole honour of mans saluation and vnto man a sure possession of Gods fauour in Christ I will now shewe why iustification is imputed to fayth and not to workes and so make an end Touching thys question there appeare two iuste causes thereof first for that fayth is the onely meane betwene maÌ„ and the promise and that which apprehendeth righteousnes and worl 〈…〉 are nothyng els but as it were an effect or fruit of the righteousnes of the same fayth Therfore iustification is to be imputed to that which apprehended the righteousnes and not to the fruit thereof Secondly and principally that forasmuch as the end of all Gods works is to purchase to hym selfe as of right is due all prayse honour and glory in the performance of his promise as hath often bene sayd as the greatest prerogatiue he challengeth froÌ„ his creatures Therfore it is of necessitie that no part of mans iustification should be imputed to workes as vnto any part of the cause thereof For that ambitious maÌ„ should haue no colour of title to any proportional part of the glory of the worke that no fleshe might boast in hys presence And thys is the cause which Paule him selfe sheweth to the Ephesians concerning the same For by grace sayth he ye are saued through fayth and not of your selues it is the gift of God and not of workes lest any man shoulde boast him that all the glory might redounde to God alone who as he saueth vs for hys owne sake so by him selfe onely hath he begonne continued and ended the whole worke concerning our saluation To whom through Iesus Christ our only and omnisufficient Sauiour be therfore all glory honour and maiestie kingdome power and dominion through all eternitie Amen ¶ A Correlary It is hereby manifest that forasmuch as the onely ende of Good workes is to shew mans obedience to God that God thereby may be glorified and to witnes and declare the possession of that true fayth whereby onely righteousnes is proper to the elect of God that by them maÌ„ may yelde a full testimony of his calling and election through Christ into the fauour or loue of god Forasmuch I say as thys is the onely ende of good workes therefore he that eyther teacheth or doth any worke hauing apparance of holines to any other end theÌ„ this namely in hope of any reward for the worthines thereof that worke what shew soeuer it hath of godlines is wicked and detestable in the sight of God in that it offereth a filthy price for that by the free gift whereof God séeketh honour That the price offered is filthy it is hereby apparant in that all workes not being of fayth are sinne
The grace of Christ commeth freely and not for merues sake August de câ—uitate dei lib. 14. cap. 1 August de spiritu et litera cap. 18 Ibidem Cap. 13. By fayth to Iesus Christ we are iustified IbideÌ„ in Psal 31. No merits but mercy preueâ—ed out iustification August in expositione 2. Psal 31. IbideÌ„ in Psal 18. We are frely iustified in the bloud of Christ God of hys owne mercy hath saued vs. IdeÌ„ in Psal 5. IdeÌ„ in Psal 142. God for the glory of hys names ake doth freelye sane vs by his grace and mercy Idem de teÌ„pore sermone 49. Ambro. de vocatio gent. libro 1. cap. 5. Ad valent epist. 46 Idem lib. 2. homiliarum homilia 14 Augustine calleth such heretikes as ascribe grace to merite August Sexto epist. 105. Aug. Valentino et fratribus epist. 46 Contra duas epist. pelagionorum Lib. 1 IdeÌ„ ad Sextum Rom. praesi epist. 105. Idem libro 3. contra pelag hipognast cap. 37. De compuâ—tions cordis The reasoning of the aduersarirs Man is iustified thorow fayth wythout workes Rom. 3. Gal. 2. 25y works no man liuing shal be iustified Peter Lom bard Hilla lib. 4. de trinitate Hier. in epist. ad Gal. Cap. 1. The 〈…〉 e of the scripture consisteth not in the wordes but in the meaning of the same Workes folow iustification Fayth apprehendeth righteousnes and workes declare the apprehension Good workes declare vs to bee righteous Fayth apprehendeth Christ by whom we are made righteous The meaning of S. Iames wordes Note here the maner of speaking of S. Iames. Fayth with out workes is a dead fayth True fayth cannot be without good fruites Abrahams fayth had fruites S. Iames enueigheth not agaynst a true fayth but against a fayned false fayth Math. 19 The keping of the commaundementes of God were hable to iustify vs if we were hable to obserue them Leuit. 18 No man hath nor can keepe the lawes as God requireth them to be kept A questyon moued by a lawyer vnto Christ Christes aunswer to the lawiers question Luk. 5. This is a hard speeche to the louers of the worlde An other argument of the Papistes The Papistes accompte Christ to be very weake that beyng able to iustif 〈…〉 a man before he was conuerted were not also able to restore him if he fell after he was regenerate Hebr. 6. Hebr. 10 Luk. 12. 1. Iho. 2 Christ is our iustification both before Baptisme and after An other obiection The aunswere Rom. 4. Fayth doth iustify because it apprehendeth Christes iustification 1. Cor. 13. Fayth hope and loue Obiection Aunswere Loue fulfilleth the law Fayth is the instrument wherby we receaue our iustification by Christ An other obiection Aunswere Our iustification is done by Christ before our workes God worketh to saluation only in his children that is in the iustified God by his owne working and not be ours maketh vs his children All good workes are wrought by God in them that are iustified by fayth Psal 7. Psal 18 The righteous being vnder the mercilesse persecution lament and 〈…〉 e. The righteous cry out that they are no such offendours as the wicked report them to be The righteous offer the innocency of their causes to the iudge ment seat of god Dauid reioiceth that he held hys hand and hart from committing of wickednes against Saul 1. Sam. 20. The innoceÌ„cy of Dauid in respect of Saules crueltie Psal 51. Psal 38. 130. Psal 19. Psal 32. God must haue the whole honor of maÌ„s saluation IustificatioÌ„ why it is imputed to fayth and not to workes Eph. 2. No worke may be don vpon hope of reward 1. Cor. 11. August in epist. 1. IohaÌ„ nis tract Aduersus Iudaeos erat one The Table wherein note these two letters a. b. a. signifieth the first side of the leafe and b. the second A. ABrahams faith had frutes 112. b Adam created 1. a Adam deceaued by Eue hys wife 4. b Adam accuseth his wife 6. a Adam the firste man made vs bond and thrall vnto sinne 44. a Adams disobedience hath corrupted all mankynd 12. a. b Anavaptistes Pelagians and Papistes 11. b Argumentes made by the Papistes of good workes aunswered 95. a. b. 107. a. 115. a. 116. a. b. 117. a B BLasphemye to Christes death and passion 68. a C CHrist onely taketh away the sinnes of the world 19. a Christe the sonne of God was made man and borne of the virgine Mary 42. a Christ was perfect God perfect man. 43. b Christe is very righteousnes it selfe 43. a Christ is our Aduocate to the father 44. b Christe is our iustification both before Baptisme and after 116. b Christe the seconde man hath made vs free froÌ„ sinns 44. a Christe became accursed to make vs blessed 44. b Christ had payd the full taunsome of mannes transgression 44. a Christe iustifieth vs before we worke 119. a Conflictes attende continually vpon true fayth 81. b Corrupte doctrine of the Papistes 29. b D DAuid reioysed in hys innocency 121. a. b Death hath power ouer the vnrighteous 7. b Death hath power ouer the whole nature of man. 7. b Death is dew to all sinne 17. a Death and damnatioÌ„ reigneth ouer euery man. 19. b Deadly sinne excludeth fayth 17. a Deadly sinne veniall sinne what difference 18. a DefinitioÌ„ of actuall sinne 16. a Definition of veniall sinne 16. b Definition of loue 25. b. 26. a Definition of the law 29. a Degrees of perfection 29. b Definition of habite 49 b DefinitioÌ„ of fayth 56. b. 57. a. b Definition of workes 65. a. b. DefinitioÌ„ of iustification 62. b Definition of woorkes of the faythfull 84. b Difference betwene originall and actuall sinne 19. a Deuill is the enemy of mans felicitie 4. a Deuill and God there is no middle estate betwene them 67. a Deuill an enmie to vertuous lyfe 81. a Duetie or debt hath two senses or meanynges 101. a E. EDen the garden wherein man was placed at his first creation 1. a Errors of Papistes about workes 66. b Eue the woman was goueÌ„ vnto man to be his helper 1. b Eue deceiued by the deuil 4. b Exposition of this place of Iohn we haue receued grace for grace 48. b F. FAyth and deadly sinne can not stand together 17. b Fayth onely apprehendeth the promises of God. 47. a Fayth diuerslye taken in the Scriptures 55. b. 56. a Fayth what the scholemen thinke of it 56. a Fayth onely attayneth instification 70. a Fayth onely iustifieth proued by the Scriptures and anâ— cient fathers 70. b. 71. a. b 72. a. b. 73. a. b. 74. a. b. 75. a. b 76. a. b. 77. a. b. 78. a. b Fayth is not the efficient cause of our iustification but God onely 78. b. 79. a Fayth is aceompanied wyth newnes of life 79. b. 80. a. b 81. a Faythe is made knowne by good workes 82. a Fayth hope and loue 118. a Fayth is the instrument wherby we receyue iustification 118. b
Fayth in Iesu Christ iustifieth vs. 103. a Fayth apprehendeth ent righteousnes 109. b. 110. a. b Fayth without woorkes is a dead fayth 112. a Fayth that is liuely cannot be without good workes 112. a Fayth iustifieth because it apprehendeth our iustification 117. a Flesh is but a masse or lumpe of iniquitie 8. a Fruites of sinne 20. a G. GOD abhoryed man and refused him for his worke 6. b God cursed all the earth for mans offence 6. b God in his creation of man conditioned that he shoulde not breake his to 〈…〉 ment 12. 〈◊〉 God commaundeth vs to loue him and our neighbor 24. b God cōmaundeth nothing impossible proued false 30. a God him selfe freely procured mans redemption 31. a God is true of his promise 32. a. b God gaue the lawe to the children of Israell 33. a God sent his prophets to declare the promised seed 41. b God trayned man by his prophers to take hold of the promised seed 42. a God loued vs first 50. b God by his grace is the onely worker of mans health and saluation 51. a God and the deuill there is no middle estate betwene them 67. a God for the glory of his name doth freely saue and iustifie vs. 10. 4a b. 105. a. b. 106. a. b God is the worker of all good workes in his iustified children 119. a. b God must haue the whole honor of mans saluatiō 122. a God wroughte in loue in sending Christ to suffer death to redeeme man. 124. a. b God the father a worker in the same deed that Iudas wrought in 124. Gods vnspeakeable mercy declared to vs in Christ 2. b 20. b. 21. a Gods iustice 20. b Gods creatures euery of them vnder heauen inuiolably obserue the lawe of their creation saung man onely 22. a 23. b Good workes are the feuites of good fayth 82. a Good workes are to be done of the faythfull but not as the price of our redemption 82. b Good workes are witnesses to good sayth 83. a. b. 84. a Good workes for owe our iustification 89. b Good workes two thinges are required in them 90. a 91. a. b. 92. a Good workes require affectiō of the hart 92. a Good workes declare vs to be righteous 110. b Grace hath saued vs through fayth in Christ and not of our selues 46. a Grace defined by the Papistes 49. a Grace of God is geuē vs freely and not for merites sake 102. b H. HAbite defined 49. b Holy water nor purgatory can clense vs of our sinnes 19. a I IMage of Nature and Grace 1. a Image of God what it is 2. a Image of God in man. 2. a Infantes haue no actual sinne of their own cōmitting 14. a Inward workes 65. a Innocency of man clerely lost 5. a Iudas wrought in treason 124. a. b Iustification commeth by faith and not by workes 47. a 48. a. b Iustification how it is vnderstand in the scriptures 62. a Iustification taught by the Papistes 63. a. 64. a. b Iustificatiō foloweth not good workes but good workes folowe iustification 89. b Iustification is often pronounced vpon workes for faithes sake 96. b Iustificatiō why it is imputed to faith not to workes 122. a L LAberinth of errour maze of confusion 92. b Lawe declareth them to be vnrighteous that haue lost originall righteousnes 7. b Lawe of God is spirituall 8. b Lawe had two offices 33. b Lawe why it was geuen to man. 30. b. 31. b. 34. a Lawe is able to iustifie a man if man coulde performe the righteousnes of the law 34. a Lawe is vnpossible to man to be obserued his nature being now corrupted as it is 36. a. b. 37. a. b. 38. a. b. 39. a. b. Lawe of God geuen to man in most fearefull and terrible maner 40. b Lawe bringeth terrour feare 41. a Lawe of God is the absolute rule of righteousnes 43. a Lawe might saue vs if we could obserue the law 113. b Lawyer moueth a question to Christ 114. a Loue fulfilleth the lawe 118. a Loue is the fulfillyng of the commaundementes of God. 24. b. 25. a. 26. a. 27. a. 28. a. b M MAn placed in Paradise 1. b Man made soueraigne Lorde euer all earthly creatures 1. a Man created to the excellency of Gods Image 1. a. 2. a. 3. a Man ashamed to confesse hys sinne 5. b Man and all his issue corrupted 7. a. b Man a masse or lompe of iniquitie 8. a Man by nature is the child of wrath 8. a. b. 9. a. b. Man in his first creation was without sinne 10. b Man by hys rebellion and sinne brought forth frutes of his owne choyse 20. a Man made an apt subiect for the mercye and iustice of God. 20. b Man in wicked estate 20. d Man of his owne nature hath affection to rebellion 92. a Man is iustified by faith without workes 107. a Man cannot satisfie the lawe 29. a Man is not myndefull of hys duety towardes God. 32. a Mans originall iustice 1. a Mans glorious state ouerthrowen 5 a Mans workes are sinnefull 9 a Mans corrupt nature 29. a Mans duety towardes God. 31. a Mans nature proue to rebellion and sinne 43. a Mercy and not merites hath preuented our iustification 103. a b. 104. a N NAture of mā is proue and ready vnto sinne 28. a O OBiectiōs with aunsweres 12. a 13. a. 35. a. 118. a Opus operantis 67. b Originall righteousnes 3. a. b Originall sinne and our most heynous infection 6. a Originall sinne defined 7. a Originall sinne defiled the nature of man. 10. a. b Originall sinne defined by the Papistes 11. a. 14. b. 15. a. b Outward workes 65. a P PApistes Pelagians Anabaptistes 11. b Papistes their vnformed fayth 61. a. b Papistes their formed fayth 61. a Papistes errours aboute workes 66. a Papistes builde a labirinth of errour and a maze of confusion 92. b. 93. a. b. 94. a Papistes Argumēt of workes 95. a. b. 96. a. b Papisticall doctrine 18. b. 49. a Pelagiās Papistes and Anabaptistes 11. b Pelagius heresie 50. a. 51. a Penaunce an apt and mete instrument for the Papistes 68. b Perfection denyed 29. b Peter Lombard 108. a Preparyng workes what they are 66. b. 67. a Purgatory nor holy water can not take away sinnes 19. a R RAhabs fayth had frutes 113. a Reward is not properly so called when it is payd to a labourer for his trauell but rather a duety 101. b Righteous persons complayn and cry to God. 120. b Righteousnes commeth not by the law 41. a Righteousnes how it is vnderstand in the scriptures 62. a Righteousnes how it is impu ted vnto vs. 69. b Righteousnes and iustification are diuerstye taken in the scripture 85 a. b. 86. a. b. 87. a. b. 88. a. b. 89. a S SAint James meaning of workes 111. a. b. 113. b Satisfaction is the best officer that the papistes can retaine 68 b Scholemen how they handle fayth 58. a. b. 59 a. b. 60-a b Scholemen what they say of veniall sinne 18 a Scholemē agree in error 18 b Scriptures that seeme to promise reward to workes are expounded 94 b Sense of the Scripture is not in woordes but in the meaning of the same 108 b Serpents kind to be weake and tame in winter 14. a Sinne that is to say euerye sinne that deserueth death is a deadly sinne 17. a Sinne triumpheth ouer man and driueth him from hys glorious state a Sinne the fruits therof 7 a Sinne by the offence of one man entred vpon al mē 8. b Sinne wherin two things are to be considered 11. a Sinne deadly sinne veniall are in diuers respectes but one 18. a Sinne deadly sinne veniall what difference 18. a Sin of man was so grenens an offence as coulde net bee cured but by the death and bloudshedding of innocente Christ the onely Sonne of God. 45. a Sinnes to say there are but. 7. that be deadly is false 16. b Sinnes by fayth are forgeuen therfore called veniall 18. a V Deniall sinnes 17. b. 18. a W WIsedome of God in his creation of man. 1. a Workes good are a testimony of mans election 66. a Woorkes taught by papistes 66 a Workes which the papists cal preparing workes 66. b Worke of the worker 67. b Woorkes of supererogation 67. b. 68. a Workes no not the workes of iustified are able to iustifie before God. 69 a Workes of the law 84. b Workes of the faithfull 84. b Workes of the faithfull are insufficient to fulfill the lawe 85. a. Workes are not the cause of rewarde but God for his own glory accepteth them 96. b 97. a Workes must be done for t 〈…〉 glory of God and not for 〈◊〉 wardes sake 97. b Worke what value they are accompted of in the scriptures 98. a. b. 99. a. b Woorkes when we haue wrought all that we can say that we are vnprofitable seruantes 99. b Workes of supererogation are the popes marchandise and are most superstitious and wicked 99. b Workes how they were estemed of the fathers 100. a. b Workes can iustifie no man. 107. b Workes declare a righteous man. 109. b Workes declare what fayth hath apprehended 109. b Woorkes folowe iustification 109. a Workes may not be done for rewardes sake 123. a. b. FINIS Faultes escaped in Printinge Fol.  Lin.  3. a 14. wrieth read writeth 5. a 17. the read that 9. b  in the margine Luchirid read Enchirid. 15. b 3. perfection read imperfection 18. b 19. thy read they 20. a 10. diuiue nature read diuine nature 38. a 22. miserenitur read miserebitur 53. b 2. then read them 61. a  in the first note vnformed read formed    in the second note formed read vnformed 64. a 15. ay read as 76. b 22. am read tiam 77. b 3. iniquitaids read iniquitates 81. b 8. beway read bewray 97. b 1. shewed read sheweth 98. b  in the note Ier. 1. read Iere. 2. 100. a 12. iustitia read iustitiae 103 b 1 inferretur read inferreretur 104. b 1. of the punishemēt read of thee but punishment 106. a  in the note praesi read p 〈…〉 i. 107. a 〈◊〉 sayth read fayth Ibidem b 16. non medulla read in medulla 110. b 19. put out of 113. b 19. my commaund read the commaunde
also admit another deuision For some of them be onely inward workes or workes of the mynde as to beleue to hope to feare to loue and such like And some other are from the mynde produced into external or outward acte to geue geue almes to succor to preach to teach and such lyke All which be called outwarde workes And workes in both these latter significations be those whereof in thys matter is spoken but for so much as some of them be good and some euill therefore that the difference may appeare good workes may thus be defined Good workes are onely such workes as in the commaundementes of God be required or in any other place of Scriptures for the further explication of them expressed which tend to the true worship of God and outward witnessing of mans election in Christ The truth of thys definition is thus proued for the firste parte Namely that all the workes be good whiche in the commaundementes or any other place of the Scriptures for theyr further explication be appointed It is euident for so muche as hereby we know them to be good workes for that by God the doyng of them is commaunded Secondly that they tende to the true worshippyng of GOD it is thus proued by Christ hymselfe where he sayth Let your lyght so shyne before men he telleth the ende wherefore it should shine namely that others seeing your good woorkes may glorifie your father which is in heauen Here is the ende of good workes namely the glory and worship of god And for asmuch as God is not worshipped vnles he be truely worshipped for he is worshipped in spirite and truth therefore they onely be good workes which tende to the true worship of God which secondly was to be proued Nowe touching the last part that they be a testimony of mans election in Christ it is euident by these wordes of Peter Brethren sayth he be more diligent by good woorkes to make your election sure whereby it appeareth that good works are a testimony of the assurance of his election in Christ whereby the truth of the definition appereth and by this definition it is plaine that all superstitious workes of mans inuention be no good woorkes forasmuch as they tende not to the true worship of god Here resteth againe somewhat to bee opened of the erroures of the papistes aboute woorkes whereof they haue for their purpose deuised diuers strange distinctions as theyr preparing workes of congruent merite their Opus operantis or worke of the woorker their Opus operatum or acte of outward execution and their vndue woorkes or woorkes of supererogation Wherefore first touching their preparing worke of congruent merite wherof somwhat hath bene sayd before in the discourse about iustification first what they feigne them it appeareth namely the fruites of that theyr preuenting grace which they imagine to reduce a man into such a traunce as they faygne him therin as a man might say neyther dead in sinne nor aliue in Christ whereby all morall or ciuill woorks wrought though of nature they be not absolutely worthy workes to merite full righteousnes yet by a certayne conueniency as they terme it in equity they deserue fauour and so prepare toward the full attaynment of iustification and these be all the morall workes which be wrought by such as be not regenerate The error of which drowsie dreame is more then palpable for the scripture of God can acknowledge no middle estate betwene God and the deuill He that is not against him is directly with him he that gathereth not together letteth not thinges lye vntouched but he scattereth abrode He that is not aliue in Christ is dead in sinne S. Paule could paynt out no meane estate betwéene both he consessed all eyther quicke in Christ or dead in sinne The rewarde saith he of sinne is death And again You hath he made aliue that were dead in trespasses and sinne And agayne to the Colossians And ye which were dead in sinne and in the vncircumcision of your flesh hath he quickened with him so that there is no meane estate Eyther the woorkers of theyr preparing woorkes be aliue in Christ or dead in sinne But a liue in Christ they cannot be by these woordes of Paule for all before regeneration are dead wherefore euen as a dead man hath in him selfe no power at al to prepare himselfe towardes life againe so al being before regeneration dead in sinne haue no power at all to woorke any worke that may prepare them vnto lyfe or regeneration And for that cause doth Paule call them dead in sinne that they might know themselues as vtterly vnable to helpe towardes their own regeneration as a dead carcas is to helpe it selfe to the attaynment of life agayne Whereby the vilenes of this presumptuous inuention of preparing woorkes appeareth Now touching their workes called Opus operantis or worke of the worker after theyr meaning it is thys namely the acte and holy purpose of the minde wherewith the worker goeth about any worke which they counte holy and theyr Opus operatum or acte executed is the outward execution of the same woork Now touching theyr vndue workes or workes of superogation it is necessary for playne vnderstanding what they meane to rehearse the inuention of the forged fable thereof For the grounde wherof they begin wyth a goodly and bewtifull shewe of aduauncemente of Gods vnspeakable sauour towardes vs God say they who might haue prescribed vs such straight and seuere precepts to haue bene obserued as had ben vtterly to vs impossible hath notwithstanding delt more fauourably with vs and commaunded vs nothing but that which if we list we be able to perform and a great deale more And yet notwithstanding he demaundeth no farther of vs but to performe the same by the doing whereof we shall deserue saluation though we do no more But if any be towardes God so liberally minded that he will of hys francke disposition do more neyther shall he lose the prayse nor reward of the same And this ouerplus aboue the fulfilling of the cōmaundementes is that they call theyr vndew workes or workes of supererogation superabhominatiō I should say Who euer heard a more presūptuous blasphemy Doth not the commaūdemēt require a full obediēce willing desire natural pronenes of the whole man as in the 4. chapter is euidently shewed Now then if the whole indeuour of all the parts of man be thus tyed by iust bond of dutie vnto the cōmaundement from whence then commeth theyr ouerplus of vndue woorkes Nay is it not both there and in the v. chapter euidently proued that man is vtterly vnable to fulfill the commaundement and that the Lawe was not by Moyses deliuered vnto man to the ende he should enable him selfe to the fulfilling thereof but contrariwise by vew of his insufficiency to driue him to Christ But will ye know why these men inuented this
agréeing with that which is sayd already namelye that no good woorke can bée wrought but by him in whom Iesus Christ doth raigne that is by that iustified for hereby it is playne that no good worke can be in man onles it be by Iesus Chryste but Iesus Chryst worketh onely in the iustified for his spirit doth certifie their spirites in whom hee dwelleth that they are the children of God there is no condemnation to them that are in Chryst Iesu And in this place doth Paule also go forward in prosecutyng the woorde of Esay for where Esaye calleth them trées of ryghteousnesse that is to say the bringers forth of the fruites of ryghteousnes he addeth a plantyng of the Lordes to shew that their ryghteousnesse is the Lordes worke and that doth Paule open here where hée sayeth that good workes or fruites of righteousnesse are in vs by Iesus Chryst as though he had sayd Iesus Chryste hath made you to bée trees of ryghteousnesse that you myght bring forth the fruites thereof namelye good workes and so declare your selues to be a plantyng of the Lordes Thys beyng taught Paule goeth forward in declaryng the finall cause of good workes in saying Vnto the glorye and prayse of God whereby it is playne out of these words of Paules that Chryst is the efficiēt cause of good workes and that none can bée wrought but by hym in whom the spirite of Chryste dwelleth that is none can be wrought but by the ryghteous or iustified in that he saith whyche fruites are in you by IESVS Chryst Whereby it is playne that wythout Iesus Chryste they can not bée in them Where also is declared the materiall cause of good woorkes Namely a fruite of ryghteousnesse so that vnlesse it bée brought forth by a ryghteous tree it can bée no good worke hee also declareth that the iustification or ryghteousnesse of the doer of them is the formall cause of them in that hée calleth them the fruite of ryghteousnesse for that declareth the doers of them to bée trées of ryghteousnesse as Esay termeth them wherby also appeareth that no good worke can bé done but by a man already iustyfied hee also telleth the finall cause of them in that hée sayeth Vnto the glory and prayse of God concludyng euen as Esay in the fore named place doth For after hée had sayde that they myght bée called trées of righteousnesse a planting of the Lordes hée addeth for hym to haue glorye in so that the ende of good woorkes is not to iustifie the doers but to glorifie God for vnles the doers had bene iustified before the woorkes were wrought they coulde haue bene no frute of righteousnesse So that thys place of Paule is an openyng of the forenamed place of Esay for where Esaye sayeth that they myght bee called trees of ryghteousnesse Paule expoundeth that to bée that they shoulde bryng foorth the fruites of righteousnesse and where Esaye calleth them a plantyng of the Lordes that doth Paule open when he telleth that the fruite of ryghteousnesse must be in them by Iesu Chryst And where Esay sayeth for hym to glorye in Paule sayeth to the glory and praise of God. Thus by comparyng together these woordes of Paule and Esay it is more then euident that good workes bée so farre from iustyfiyng the doers that before iustificatyon no good worke can bée wrought And Chryst himselfe affirmeth no lesse when he sayeth that the tree must bee good before it bryng foorthe good fruite Euerye good tree sayeth he bryngeth forth good fruite So that first hée acknowledgeth the trée to bée good before it bryngeth forth good fruite And if the tree be euill he affirmeth in the same place It bryngeth foorth euill fruite concludyng playnely that no euyll tree can bryng forth good fruite Whereby it is euident that the man muste by fayth bée made good that is to saye righteous and iustyfied before he can bring forth any good woorkes So then the woorke is acknowledged for good through mercy which couereth the blemishes thereof in respect that it is the worke of a man by fayth already iustified and clothed in the righteousnesse of Chryste and not in respecte of it selfe which compared with the iustice of God is wickednesse as in the 9. Chapter was proued for wee bee all by nature the chyldren of wrath as Paule beareth witnesse And thus writeth Augustine Sequuntur bona opera iust fi atum non praecedunt iustificandum Good woorkes folowe hym that is iustified they goe not before hym that is to bee iustyfied Agayne the same Augustine Quid enim est boni operis ante fidem cum dicat Apostolus quicquidsine fide fit peccatum est for what good woorke is there before sayth seyng the Apostle sayeth that whatsoeuer is not of fayth is synne And Christ hymselfe sayeth wythout mee you can do nothyng whereby it is euydent that vntyll they haue the spiryte of Chryst they can woorke no good worke but none haue the spirite of Chryst but suche as bée the children of God for the Scrypture sayth these bee the children of GOD that bee led by the spyrite of GOD and none are the children of GOD tyll they bée iustyfied for to bée the chyldren of God and to bée iustyfied is all one thyng therefore none can woorke good woorkes but suche as be already iustyfied Agayne to the workyng of euery good woorke there be two thynges specially required namely vnderstandyng and affection So that the worke that must please God muste both bée ioyned wyth the knowledge of the wyll of God and also bée done wyth affection pleasure and delight in the same Touchyng that it shoulde bee done wyth knowledge thus sayth God by the prophet God desireth in man more the knowledge of God then burnt offrynges And before in hys fourth chapter where he geueth a reason of the destructyon of hys people he alleageth onely lacke of knowledge my people sayeth he are destroyed for lacke of knowledge And Chryst himself sayth do yee not therefore erre because you vnderstand not the scryptures And Iob affirmeth that to depart from euill is vnderstandyng Whereby it is playne that wythout vnderstanding or knowledge of the wyll of God no man can depart from euill and do that which is good And therefore doth Dauid crye Geeue mee vnderstanding and I shall keepe thy lawe O geeue mee vnderstandyng that I maye learne thy commaundementes And that good woorkes are wrought through knowledge or vnderstanding it is by the scriptures euident Paul to the Phillippians writeth thus And thys I praye that your loue maye abound yet more and more in knowledge and vnderstanding that ye maye discerne things that differ one from an other that ye may be pure and without offence vntill the day of Christ Here doth Saint Paule not only pray that theyr loue might abound in knowledge but he also telleth the cause of hys prayer namely that they might be able to
of the whole Scripture together may bee acknowledged For we may not wrest such sense out of the Scripture by vrging the outward barke of some particular places therein as shall set them at strife with all the reste of the body of the Scripture and so imagine the spirite of truth at warre with hym selfe Wherefore for the first sorte let these authorites serue Euery man shall enioye good according to the fruites of his mouth and after the workes of his handes shall he bee rewarded Agayne The sonne of man shall come in the glory of hys father with his angels and shall reward euery man according to his deedes And agayne God is not vnrighteous that he should forget your worke and labour that proceedeth of loue which loue ye shewed towardes his name in that ye haue ministred vnto the Sainctes and yet minister These examples may serue for their argument of thys sort Well say they seing that mans rewarde is accordyng to hys workes it appeareth that in workes there is merite and that to mans iustyfication woorkes are requyred Here I myght briefly aunswere that all these woordes are spoken of woorkes comming after iustyfication whyche is not the matter in questyon betwene vs for the question is about woorkes goyng before iustification for the purchase thereof But for their great ouerthrow Let it bée imagined that these promyses are made to woorkes goyng before iustification and yet get they nothyng thereby for we answere they reason from a generall to a species which in an affirmatiue concludeth fasly as for example If one seyng a liuyng creature shoulde reason thus yonder is a liuyng creator therefore it is a man For as of liuyng creatures there be diuers kindes wherof mā is but one so of rewardes there bée dyuers kyndes whereof merite or desert is but one For some rewardes are frely geuē of loue or fauor some through hope of further benefite and some of merite desert or duetie c. So that as vntruely thys is concluded that because it is reward therfore it is merite or duety as the other namely because it is a liuing creature therefore it is a man for in déede this rewarde is of grace or fauour and not of merites or woorkes As by these oft rehearsed wordes of Paule is euydent For of fauour sayeth he yee are saued thorough fayth and not of your selues it is the gift of God and not of woorkes least anye man shoulde boast hym And although thys well considered wyth the definytion of iustyfication in the. 8. chapter doth fullye expresse what sense in these authorities maye well bee allowed yet shall the same in more larger forme of wordes bee declared thus Forasmuche as mans iustificatyon is a free remission of sinne and imputatiō of righteousnesse vnto man thorough fayth in Chryst therfore that the ryghteousnesse of the iustyfied by this free grace might be declared and the bountifull liberalitye of Gods mercye made manyfest to the prayse and glorye of hys grace for thys cause is the rewarde declared vppon the outwarde worke as vppon the outwarde wytnesse of the inward righteousnesse of fayth to the open declaration of the truth of Gods promyses concernyng the womans séede namely Christ By the Prophet Esay hée sayth thus Hee shall iustifie the multitude for hee shall beare awaye their synnes And agayne the people shall bee all ryghteous and possesse the lande for euer The flower of my plantyng the woorkes of my handes whereof I wyll reioyce And agayne that they myght bee called trees of ryghteousnesse A plantyng of the Lordes for hym to reioyce in Wherefore for thys cause namely that the chosen myght bée declared to be ryghteous in the eyes of all the worlde and the triumph of Gods grace or fauour thereby celebrated by the open performaunce of these hys promisses that hée might be iustified in his sayinges and ouercome when he is iudged In consideration hereof I saye he openly pronounceth the fauourable rewarde accordyng to the open manifest works or fruites of the righteousnesse of fayth induyng them with the rewarde of righteousnesse whiche rewarde is of fauour in respect of Chryst apprehēded by fayth and yet pronounced vppon the woorkes as vppon that outwarde fruite whereby the inwarde righteousnesse of fayth is declared whiche hée doth to thys ende that the elect maye bee declared to be iustyfied and the performaunce of his promyses in Chryst made apparaunt so that for thys cause namelye to iustyfie Gods promyse concernyng thys free and mercifull deliueraunce in the sighte of all men to the encrease of the glory of hys grace that as all men heard the promise so all maye witnesse the performaunce thereof For thys cause I say is the fauourable rewarde pronounced according to the outwarde workes or fruites of the ryghteousnesse of fayth wheras if it had beene pronounced accordyng to the fayth no man coulde haue witnessed the true performaunce of the promyse And thys is the cause why the fauourable rewarde is declared vppon the woorkes And not that the workes are the cause of the rewarde For the only end of Gods actiou herein is as Paule testifieth the prayse of the glorye of hys grace whiche is also euydent by this saying of the Phrophet Ezechyell And ye shall know that I am the Lord when I shall doe good to you for myne owne names sake and not accordyng to your most wycked offences By whyche wordes it appeareth that God wyll not onely be ryghteous in the performance of hys frée mercifull promise but hée wyll haue all the worlde both sée and wytnesse the same for hée sayeth in thys promyse you shall knowe that I am the Lorde c. So that hereby God hath promysed to declare hys frée fauour in suche an outwarde subiect as man may bée able to sée and wytnes the fulfilling therof in that he sayeth ye shal know and yet therewyth all he geeueth a determinate caueat that that subiecte wherein hys goodnesse shall be declared shall not be the cause of his goodnesse expressyng playnely what shal be the cause thereof namely hys owne glory Affirming that it shall be for his owne names sake Not onely exceptyng workes from being the cause but also to expresse their great néede of mercye to couer their spottes shewed them touchyng their owne nature howe foule they bée in saying And not accordyng to your most wycked offences And in both the other places before rehearsed out of Esay where he promiseth to make all hys people ryghteous and that they should be called trees of ryghteousnesse This is specially to be noted that in both those places he affirmeth their righteousnesse shall bée the flower of hys plantyng the woorkes of hys handes and not of their owne addyng thereto the cause thereof namely for hym to reioyce in That is accordyng to Saynt Paules woordes For the prayse and glorye of hys grace And to thys ende are all the woorkes of GOD done that hee may
so by hys abondant mercy he rayseth vs vp agayne The mercy of God farre excedeth hys other works Iohn 4. Rom. 8. Gen. 3. All creatures vnder heauen reuerence God in their kindes sauing onely man. The Sunne The Moone Starres The Ayre Lightning Thunder Hayle Snow Rayne Wynde The earth declareth the magnificence of god Beastes Fishes Foules Birdes in the ayre Trees Plantes A glasse wherein man may beholde himselfe Rom. â— Act. 14. Gen. 3. Gene. 22 Psal 135. Esay 19. Exod. 6. Leuit. 29. Deut. 6 Leuit. 19 God commaundeth vs to loue him God commaundeth vs to loue hym Definition of loue What it is to loue the Lord our God. Rom. 13 Deut. 6 Math. 5 Deut. 6. Leuit. 19. Definitien of the law Mans corrupt nature Man can not satisfy the law A false and corrupt doctrine God freelyâ— and of hys purpose procured mans redemption Gene. 3 As God is true so did he bind him self to perform mans deliuerance God renued his promyse for the resto ring of mankinde Gene. 22. Gene. 28. Gene. 3 Gene. 22. To the children of Israell God first gaue the law Two offices of the law The outward office of the law The spirituall office of the law 1. Cor. 15 Rom. 3 2. Cor. 3 Rom. 7 Rom. 4 Rom. 5 Gal. 3. Rom. 7 Gal. 3. An obiection of the papistes An answer Rom. 8. Cor. 2. De spiritu lite Cap. 36. Lib. de bono mortis Cap. 3. Super cantica ser 50. Lib 3 contra duas epist. Pelag. cap. 2. De lit et spi ad Marcellinum cap. 17. Asollico epist. 200. Expo quarundam epist. ad Rom .x. In lib. exposit epist. Paulâ— ad Galatas Super Ioan. tracta 3 cap. 1. The law doth shew 〈…〉 nne but not take away sinne The geuing of the law was horrible fearefull Exo. 34 Gal. 3. Esa. 7. Mich. 5 Gen. 49. Daniel 9. Esa. 53. Zac. 9. Esay 62. Zac. 9. Christ is the full raunsome and reconcilement â—or mans trangression 1. Cor. 15. Adam the first man made vs bond to 〈◊〉 And Christ the second man hath made vs free from sinne Ozee 13. Col. 2. Christ is our Aduocate to the father Esa. 53. Eph. 2. By Grace we are saued thorough faith and not of our selues Only fayth apprehendeth the promises of god Sola fides Grace Fayth Iustification Righteousnesse workes Definition of grace 2. Tim. 1. Eph. 1. Rom. 3. Titus 3 Eph. 2. Grace defined by the papistes Definition of habit Pelagians hereby 3 Reg. 18. Lament 5. Ezech. 11. Psa 51. Ioh. 6. Fayth diuersly taken in the scriptures Math. 13 The definition of faith Ebr. 10. 〈◊〉 Ioh. 5 In Mat. 5. De spirit et litera cap. 3 Act. 15. The opinion of the Schoiemen and Papistes of Fayth Sent lib. 3 distinct 23. Cap 1 The vnformed fayth of the Papistes The formed fayth of the Papistes Righteousnes how it is taken in the Scriptures and also Iustification Definition of iustification Rom. 4. Iustification taught by the Papistes Definition of workes Inward workes Outward workes Definition of good workes Math. 5. Works are a testimony of mans election 2. Peter 1. The errors of the Pa 〈…〉 s abo 〈…〉 workes Preparing worke of congruent merite There is no middle estate betwene God and the Deuill Eph. 2. Coll. 2. The work of the worker workes of Supererogation Blasphemy to Christes death and passioÌ„ Penaunce Christ Satisfaction Rightcousnes is un 〈◊〉 unto vs by the f 〈…〉 〈…〉 o sence and good will of God. Onely fayth attey neth 〈…〉 cation Ioh. 4. Only fayth John. 6. Fayth Fayth Fayth Ioh. 11. Fayth Ioh. 12. Fayth Act. 10. Only fayth Act. 16. Fayth Rom. 3. Fayth iustifieth without the vewes of the law Rom. 4. Fayth Fayth Fayth iustefieth Fayth iustefyeth without workes of the law Faith saueth Fayth iustiuÌ„eth Rom. 11. Gala. 2. Gal. 3. Abac. 2 Gal. 3 Gal. 5. Fayth and not workes iustiuÌ„eth vs Titus 3. Augustide tempore serm 61 Solafides Faith alone Exclusa est gloriatio Solafides Rom. 3. Only fayth Sola fides Fayth noly Sermon 7. Sola fides Fayth only Serm. 8. Sola fides Chrisostom in priore ad Timoth. Cap. 1. Homel 4 Sola fides Fayth only Sola fides Fayth only Serm de fide et lege Sola fide Basilius homilia de humilitate Ambrosuâ— Roma 4. Sola fides Fayth only Sola fides Fayth only Rom 4. Sola fides Only fayth Rom. 9. Sola fides Only fayth Rom. 11. Solaf ides Only fayth Fayth only 1. Cap. 1. epi ad Corinth Sola fides Fayth only Sola fides Fayth is not the efficient cause of our iustification but God only Newnes of life Rom. 6 Rom. 6. Col. 3. Eph. 4 Col. 3 Eph. 4 1. Cor. 6. Titus 2. Col. 1 Eph. 2. Mar. 12. Luke 11. Gre. lib. 24 cap. 12. moralium The deuill is a great enemy to a vertuous good life Rom. 7 True fayth is knowen by good workes Tit. 3. Good workes are the fruites of good fayth Ephes 1. True fayth must be witnessed by deedes De vocatione gentium lib. 1. Cap. 8 Good workes Rom. 8 Good workes De 12. abusionibus Cap. 7 Definition of faythfull workes The good workes of the law The good workes of the faithfull Good workes follow iustification not iustification worke Eph. 2. Libro de fide et operibus cap. 14. In euangel Ioh. trac 86. Two thinges required to euery good worke Ose 6. Ose 4. Mat. 12. Iob. 23. Psal 119 we cannot leade a pure christian life without the knowledge of the will of god Phil. 1. 1. Cor. 2. Psal 119. Affection of the hart is required to the performaunce of good workes Man of his owne nature hath affection to rebession and Iust to all wickednes The Papistes haue builded a labirinth of error and a maâ—e for their owne confusion Such scriptures as promising reward to workes procure men to laboure for the same are aunswered and expounded An answer to the argument of the papistes Eph. 2. Esay 53 Esay 60. Esa. 61 Esa. 60. 61. Eph. 1. What price and value our workes is accompted of in the scriptures Gen. 8. Iob. 4. Iob. 25. Pro. 20 Psal 143. Iere. 1 Esa. 64. Iob. 15 3. Esor 4. Rom. 7. Rom. 3. Cardinall Caietan If no man can do that he ought I pray you what place leaueth this Cardinall to vndue workes or workes of sunetero gation Thus can God vse his enemies to make them sometimes confesse the truth agaist them selues Morah lib. cap. 28. The opinion of y fa. thes concerning merits Origenes Rom. 4. Augustin in Psal 30 We haue no fayth that can deserue grace for it is freely geuen vs of God. There goeth no merites of man before the grace of God. Dutie or debt hath two senses He that laboureth is worthy of his hire A debt that groweth of loue not of duetie Where this worde debt or duetie is truely vnstand there no desert is looked for De natura gratia Cvp 4.