Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
work_n ceremonial_a law_n moral_a 5,536 5 9.9611 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A14450 A learned and excellent treatise containing all the principall grounds of Christian religion Set downe by way of conference in a most plaine and familiar manner. Written first in French by maister Mathew Virell, after translated into Latine: and now turned into English for the vse of our country-men.; Religion chrestienne declarée par dialogue. English Virel, Matthieu.; Egerton, Stephen, 1555?-1621? 1594 (1594) STC 24768; ESTC S119631 209,162 292

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

not so much euill as we would Which howsoeuer they speake not they haue it in their mind As it is to be seene in drūkards theeues fornicators ambitious couetous persons whose lust cā neuer be satisfied Moreouer the wicked waxe euery day worse and worse contrariwise the faithfull make proceedings in goodnesse by the which notwithstanding they be but small it is apparant that sinne is ouercome of them Theoph. But how cōmeth it to passe that a beleeuer being regenerated and lightened with the holy Ghost cannot perfectly obey God Matth. Because our regeneration is onely begun in vs but in this life is neuer perfected For by that meanes the Lord will keepe vs in humilitie as also together with it giue place to his owne infinite mercie Therefore so long as we liue here as well our faith as our repentance be very farre off from perfection For there is still behind in vs some part of our corruption which the Scripture calleth flesh and the old mā it resisteth or standeth against the part that is regenerate which is called the spirite and the new man And all these things Paule notably comprehendeth in these words The flesh lusteth against the spirite and the spirite Gal. 5. 17. against the flesh and these be contrary the one to the other so as you do not the things that you would Theoph. The battell of the flesh and spirit Wherein standeth this striuing of the flesh and the spirit Mat. 1 The flesh is puft vp with ignorance loue of the world but the spirit is endued with the knowledge loue and feare of God 2 The flesh striueth to follow it owne pleasures and wicked affections for it is giuen vnto all sinnes but the spirit giueth it selfe to this one thing that it may obey God and set forth his glorie 3 The flesh is full of distruct and impatience but the spirit humbleth it selfe vnder the mighty hand of God resteth in his mercy fashioneth it selfe vnto his will Finally the flesh holdeth vs in these earthly things but the spirit lifteth vs vp into heauen Moreouer this contrarietie breedeth in vs a continuall warfare for the flesh alwayes stirreth vs vp and setteth vpō vs with so many entisements crafts that except we take diligent heed we be easily deceiued ouercome of it For this cause Christ warneth vs that we should watch Watch and pray least ye enter into Mat. 26. 41 tentation that is least you be ouercome of tentation the spirit indeed is ready but the flesh is weake Theoph. Doth the spirit at length go alwayes away with the victorie Mat. It doth indeede but not without great labour for the flesh many wayes woundeth vs for it causeth vs many times to fall into most hainous sinnes Moreouer although we do oftē ouercome it ceaseth not to renew the battell For the deuill the enemie of our saluation ioyneth himselfe vnto it who vseth that domesticall or houshold enemie that he may the more easily enter into out hearts and at length ouercome vs. For this cause Paul most feruently desired to be deliuered from it for he saith Rom. 7. 24. O wretched man that I am who shal deliuer me frō this body of death He calleth it death because he thought that continuall battell more grieuous then death it selfe Theoph. Now I will returne to the order of our discourse For I see that the faithfull cannot fulfill the law of God And this also I grant that the faithful cānot be altogether iustified by their works but may not this be done in part so as Christ supply that which wanteth Matth. I am 2. 10. This indeed cannot be for Iames saith Whosoeuer keepeth the whole law and yet faileth in one point is guiltie of all Therefore Paul intreating of the way whereby we attaine iustification and saluation excludeth works not in part but wholy As for example In the Epistle to the Romains after long disputation of this matter at length he addeth We conclude therfore Rom. 3. 28. that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law and in the Chapter following To him that Rom. 4. 4. worketh the wages is not counted by fauour but by debt but to him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse The same also he writeth in another place Ephes 2. 8. You are saued by grace through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God not of works lest anie should boast himselfe In which words he doth sufficiently Why we be iustified before God no otherwise then by faith declare that good works be of no account before God to iustifie and saue vs but that all is to be ascribed to the onely mercie and grace of God by faith in Christ Moreouer grace should not be truely grace in respect of God if it be not wholly and altogether free for workes it cannot stand together in the matter of saluation Theoph. Why so Matth. Because the one destroyeth the other as the Apostle testifieth to the Romanes in these words If we Rom. 11. 6. be saued by grace it is no more of workes or else were worke no more worke Where he sheweth that there is no place for the grace of God vntill we haue throwne away all trust and confidence in our owne works which thing the same Apostle testifieth that himselfe did For notwithstanding concerning the righteousnesse which Phil. 3. 6. is by the law he were without reproofe he esteemed all his good workes as dung that he might be found not hauing his owne righteousnesse which is of the law but that which is through the faith of Christ In another place also he warneth vs of the same thing Ye are made voide of Christ as many of you as Gal. 5. 4. be iustified by the law and are fallen from grace Now he speaketh to those that would ioyne the righteousnesse of the law with the righteousnesse of faith Theoph. But some do obiect that the Apostle when soeuer he saith we are not iustified by the workes of the law speaketh of the ceremoniall law that was then abolished by the comming of Christ but not of the morall law Matth. That is a vaine shift which also is most easie to cōfute by the order of the Apostles speech and first of all in the Epistle to the Romains before he draweth out this conclusion that is in the third Chapter By the workes of the law shall no flesh be iustified in the sight of God In the first Chapter indeed hee proueth that all the Heathen were full of all vnrighteousnesse fornication wickednesse couetousnesse other innumerable sins But in the second he sheweth that the Iewes notwithstanding they made a faire shew of outward holinesse yet were infected stained with the same sins they cōdemned in others Whereupon it is plaine that in that place there is only mention of moral works and
not of the ceremonial Likewise also in the Epistle to the Galathians where he doth especially entreat of the ceremonies hee alleadgeth both the sentences of Moyses namely the curse to those that fulfil not the whole law and life to those that keep it And in the former indeed hee teacheth that so many as trust to the workes of the Law to be iustified by them be vnder the curse because they cannot wholly and fully keepe it But in the other he declareth that there is so much differēce betweene the law and faith that if any man bee iustified by faith hee cannot in any sort obtaine it by the Law But it is certain that as well the curse threatned to the transgressors of the Law as the promise to eternal life made to such as fulfill it are not to be restrained to the ceremonies alone but also are to bee referred to the morall Law and that too by more right for as much as God as Hosea saith preferreth mercy before sacrifice Hos 5. 7. Moreouer after the Apostle in the secōd chapter of the Epistle to the Ephesians hath affirmed that wee are saued by grace through faith and that not of our selues he addeth but of the gift of God not of workes least any man should boast himselfe Which wor is do most euidently shew that the Apostle speaketh not of the ceremoniall works but of morall which giue men far more large matter of boasting then the ceremoniall doe Finally when he writeth to Titus Tit. 3. ● that wee are saued not by the works of righteousnesse which we haue done but by the mercy of God who seeth not that the Apostle doth especially entreate of morall works to whom the title of righteousnesse agreeth far better then to the ceremoniall Which things being so there is no doubt but that the Apostle whensoeuer he speaketh of the workes of the Law to proue that we are neither saued nor iustified by them doth no lesse meane the morall then the ceremoniall yea rather that he doth shut out both from the cause of saluation and righteousnesse Theoph. But why be they so often called of him the workes of the Law Matth. To teach that if the workes commanded of God and euen contained in his own law be to no purpose to iustifie vs that the works commanded and deuised by men are much lesse able and fit to do it Theoph. Why God gaue a Law that we cannot keepe Now do I agree vnto thee For I perceiue that we are neither iustified nor saued by workes neither in the whole nor in part as hath beene diligently proued by thee And verily vnlesse I be deceiued there is great iniury done to the glory of God while mē go about to darken the force power of his grace and mercie mingling the same with the filthinesse of our works But seeing the matter is so why did God giue the morall law Mat. Of the vse of the Law The Apostle witnesseth Gal. 3. 21. 12. that it was not to the end we should be iustified or saued by it For he sayth If there had bene a Lawe giuen that could haue giuen life surely righteousnesse should haue bene by the Law But the Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ should be giuē to them that beleeue Notwithstanding it is not vnprofitable to the faithfull nay rather they do reape a double commoditie by it wherein bee comprehended the ends for the which God gaue it vnto vs. I sayd to the The vse of the Law in respect of the vnfaithfull faithfull because it hath this onely worke toward the vnbeleeuers that their condemnatiō may be the more heauie for as much as comming to the knowledge of Gods will by it they do willingly run into the contrarie Theoph. Let vs consider of that double commoditie which thou saydest the beleeuers reape by it declare the first Mat. It is noted by the Apostle in the Epistle to the Galathians For after that he hath shewed that we can Gal. 3. 19. not attaine saluation by the Law he addeth wherfore then serueth the Law It was added because of the transgressions that is that by the helpe of it we might acknowledge our sinnes as the same Apostle in another place expoundeth it in these words By the Law Rom. 3. 20. commeth the knowledge of sin For if we do examine our works by that perfection which the Law requireth of vs then it shall appeare most euidently how manie waies wee be guilty before God and therefore what fearefull condemnation we haue deserued Theoph. But what profite haue we by that Mat. Much. For as a sicke man except he throughly feele his sickenes and perceiue present danger will not go to the Phisition euen so the feeling of our sins and the danger of eternall death which we see hangeth ouer our heads driueth vs to seeke for that true Phisition of our soules Christ Iesus from whome by faith wee may receiue the remedie offered vs in the Gospell which otherwise we would haue neglected Therefore Paul saieth The Law was our schoolemaister Gal. 3. 24. to bring vs vnto Christ And in another place Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse vnto Rom. 10. 4. euerie one that beleeueth And this is the first commoditie which we haue by the Law Theoph. Shew briefly the other Math. After that wee be regenerated and therefore made fitte to do good workes then the Law teacheth vs whatsoeuer is to be performed of vs that we may obey God For although we can not come to the perfection whereunto it leadeth vs yet we must set it before our eies as a marke whereat we are to leuell continually that daily more and more we may striue to hit it Hereunto appertaineth that exhortation of Christ Bee ye perfect as your father which is in heauen is Mat. 5. 48. perfect The Law therefore is as it were a glasse wherin we may behold the spots of our soule and so indeed be compelled by faith to wash them away in Christes bloud Moreouer it is a lanterne vnto our feete which guideth vs that wee goe not out of the right way from the path of righteousnesse Theoph. Seeing good works be not the cause of saluation it seemeth to follow that they bee altogether vnprofitable and therefore that we neede not to bee greatly carefull of them Matth. It followeth not For God hath deliuered vs out of the hands of our spirituall enemies namely the Deuill and sinne saieth Zacharie Luk. 1. 74. that we should serue him with holinesse and righteousnesse in his sight all the daies of our life Paul also cōfirmeth the same thing in the Epistle to the Ephesians Ephes 2. 8. 9 10. For after that he hath affirmed that we are saued by grace through faith and that not of our selues it was the gift of God not of workes presently he addeth For wee are his
deserue somewhat Matth. It followeth not For that reward proceedeth of his meere grace and vndeserued fauour without any desert of ours Theoph. Doest thou take from the faithfull all meriting with God Mat. Not I but the word of God wherein his owne mercie is established and merit is ouerthrowen euen to the very ground For these two can not stand together Furthermore if any a litle more diligently examine the nature of merit or desert he shall neuer find that it hath any place before God Theoph. Why so Mat. Because that we may deserue any thing this is 1 First required that we be nothing in his debt of whom we desire to deserue 2 Secondly that we bring him such things as be our owne 3 And last of all that that which we bring or bestow be equall or as much worth as the thing that we seeke to deserue If but anie one of these conditions fayle it can be no merit or desert How much lesse therefore if they be all wanting together But they be wanting in all our good works Theoph. Declare that vnto mee one after another particularly Matth. The examination of the merit of works First whatsoeuer good works may be performed of vs are due vnto God by a double right namely of our creation and adoption Hereupon is that saying of Christ warning his Disciples Luc. 17. 10. When yee haue done all the things that are commanded you say We be vnprofitable seruants for we haue done nothing but that which was our dutie to do Moreouer it is certain that whatsoeuer good thing can be done of vs is from God which worketh in vs both the will and the deede Phil. 2. 13. Therefore it was notably sayd of one of the ancient fathers God rewardeth his owne good workes in vs and not ours Paule also saith 1. Cor. 4. 7. What hast thou that thou hast not receiued and if thou haue receiued it why dost thou boast as though thou hadst nor receiued it Therefore among men indeede there may be merit or desert For the husbandman after hee hath digged all day in the vineyard shall receiue his reward by desert But with God we can deserue nothing but that he should punish vs for our offences Theoph. The objectiō of the defenders of merit The defenders of the opinion of merits do obiect that good workes be not meritorious of themselues but in respect of the promise of God him selfe wherein he hath promised those things which otherwise were not due Matth. The answer to it They are not by this pretence acquit of sacriledge or robbing God For they attribute that to themselues which appertaineth to God alone For when God made that promise vnto vs hee did it of his meere grace and fauor and therefore merit or desertis shut out But I will make the whole matter plaine by a familiar example If any king should promise his bond-slaue an hundred thousand crownes vpon condition that he diligently do a businesse committed to him the bondslaue hauing done the commandement may require the gold yet not because he hath deserued it But we that haue not fulfilled the condition enioyned vs how much lesse haue we deserued the reward promised to our workes Theoph. What letteth that we fulfill it not when we obey the Lord from the heart Matth. Of 〈◊〉 perfection 〈◊〉 our workes The cause hath bin declared already before namely for that there can be no good thing done of vs that is not vncleane and defiled For as the most pure water if it run through an vncleane conduit is corrupted with the stincke of it so the good workes that God worketh in vs be soiled and stained with the filthinesse of our flesh Therefore euen as the promise of reward is altogether free and without respect of anie desert so is the fulfilling of that promise Theoph. Why therfore doth God promise reward to our works which he may by right require of vs Mat. That that promise may be as a spurre vnto vs by the which we might be driuen forward to the desire and doing of them and that indeed not without cause for we are by our nature verie slacke vnto them Theoph. There is one thing behind which I will demand of thee namely concerning that which was said of thee before that the obedience which is vndertaken vpon hope of reward is not acceptable vnto God Mat. This also is indeed true if that affection raigne in vs as it doth in the vnfaithfull Howbeit it shall not hurt so as the loue and feare of God go before if we be allured and drawen on to his seruice by the hope and looking for of the reward And on the other side be kept and held from disobeying him by the feare of the punishment that is of eternall death Theo. But ought not the loue of God to be sufficient to bring forth that obedience in the harts of the faithfull without borrowing anie other spur frō elsewhere Mat. If our regeneration were perfect as is the regeneration of them which liue blessedly in heauen we should know God perfectly whereby we should be stirred vp to obey him perfectly But because there is alwayes behind in vs something not regenerated which of it owne nature is in bondage full of ignorance without loue of God it is necessarie that we should be stirred vp to that obedience by the hope of reward and on the other side by feare of punishments be held backe and kept in obedience Hereupon it is that God both rewardeth our good works in this life according to his promises and also correcteth our slacknesse and insolencie by diuerse afflictions which hee sendeth dayly whereby it appeareth that he is true as well in his promises as in the execution of his threatnings But seeing thou hast nothing more to propound I would aduise that wee put of the rest of the disputation till another time for I see that it is now almost noone Theoph. I haue heard thy discourse of Good workes as also the exposition of the morall law with so great delight that the time of thy speech hath seemed to me verie short Mat. Indeed it is a most pleasant thing to intreat of Good workes so as it be done holily and by the rule of Gods word Howbeit that shall be litle except the practise be ioyned which verily getteth praise with men The vse of the doctrine of Good-workes pleasure to the conscience profit with God Therefore true and sound vertue is greatly commended before vaine pratling or the vnprofitable idle knowledge of it Theoph. I do remēber an excellent similitude which I haue oftentimes heard of thee and it is this As a precious garment shut vp in a chest is altogether vnprofitable but if it be put on it is honour delight and profit vnto vs so it is with Good works for the knowledge and vaine discoursing of them is of no vse except they be brought to practise Matth. It is
Let vs come to the third part of this commandement which is the threatning against such as breake it Mat. The third part of the third commandemēt It is conteined in these words The Lord will not hold him guiltlesse which taketh his name in vaine Whereby it appeareth that the transgression of this commandement is accounted a most hainous sin before God notwithstanding it be thought light of men and that therefore he will with grieuous punishment be auenged vpon such as be guiltie of it Theoph. Is there any thing that doth so much aggrauate this sinne Matth. Yea verily For there is no commandement in the breaking whereof there is seene such insolent contempt of God Theoph. Why so Matth. Because we are brought to breake the other commandements either vpon a false opinion of worshipping God as when we giue ouer our selues to Idolatrie and superstition or for our owne estimation when we yeeld our selues to reuenge or for our pleasure when we commit fornication or for our profit when we steale or for some feare as when we tell a lye but for the breaking of this commandement we can pretend neither the worshipping of God nor our profit nor our pleasure neither any feare Therefore the transgression of this commandement but especially blasphemy hath no other beginning but a most manifest contempt of Gods maiestie Theoph. Some are wont to excuse the matter by custome to cleare themselues of the sinne of the contempt of God Math. But I would demaund whence that custome sprong Did it not come from the very impiety mad contempt of God wherewith our mindes were wholly taken vp and possessed before For it is certaine when at the first the mind of man is lightened with the least sun-beame of the feare of God that that bad custome is presently changed howsoeuer it might goe about to defend it selfe by prescription of verie long time The fourth commandement Remember the Sabbaoth day to keepe it holy six dayes shalt thou labour and do all thy worke but the seauenth day shall bee the Sabbaoth of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt do no manner of worke thou nor thy sonne nor thy daughter thy man seruant nor thy maide seruant nor thy cattell nor the stranger that is within thy gates for in six dayes the Lord made the heauen and the earth the sea and all that in them is and rested the seauenth day wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbaoth day and hallowed it Theoph. The fourth commaundement of this first table is yet behinde to the exposition whereof that wee may make an easier way let vs see of how manie parts it standeth Matth. Of foure 1 The first containeth the summe of the whole commandement in these words Remember the Sabbaoth daie to keepe it holy 2 The second sheweth which that Sabbaoth day is when he saith Sixe dayes shalt thou labour and do all thy worke but vpon the seauenth day shall be the Sabbaoth to the Lord thy God 3 The third teacheth how that day is to be kept holy Thou shalt do no worke neither thou nor thy sonne nor thy daughter nor thy man seruant nor thy maide seruant nor thy cattell nor the stranger that is within thy gates 4 The fourth rendreth a reason why hee appointed the seauenth day rather then any other day vnto this rest For in sixe dayes God made heauen the earth the sea and all that in them is and rested the seauenth day therefore hee blessed the Sabbaoth day and hallowed it Theoph. These foure parts are to be followed of vs in order Declare therefore the meaning of the first Matth. When the Lord saith Remember the Sabbaoth daie he teacheth vs that this commandement is of verie great waight Which to be most true appeareth euen by this that the keeping of the rest of the commandements dependeth vppon the keeping of this In respect whereof the Lord euerie where by his Prophets obiecteth to the Israelites the transgression of this commandement when hee meaneth to signifie the breach of the whole Law He addeth after that thou sanctifie or hallow it that is cease and abstaine from bodily workes that thou maiest apply thy selfe earnestly to spirituall and heauenly Theoph. Which callest thou heauenly and spirituall workes Mat. Why the Lord vnder the Law commanded the sabaoth That we may vnderstand that point we must know that the Sabbaoth was commanded of God for two causes the first whereof was ceremoniall That ceremonie also is considered in two respects For by that bodily rest the Lord meant to warne the people of Israell to abstaine and rest from their owne workes being carnall and defiled that they might suffer the holy Ghost to worke in them This doth he himselfe witnesse in these wordes See that you keepe my Sabbaoth because it is a signe betweene mee and you in your generations that you may know that it is I the Lord which sanctifie you Out of which wordes it is plaine that that ceremonie was a type or shadowe of our regeneration Secondly that ceremony serued to signifie the euerlasting rest of the kingdome of heauen which was as it were a part of the former For that cause the Lord calleth the land of Canaan rest because it was a signe or token of eternall life according to the interpretation of the Apostle to the Hebrewes The other end of the bodily rest is this that we may wayte vpon the ministerie of the Church for that is established by God in this commandement Moreouer that we may meditate vpon his workes and dilgently applie our selues to the loue of our neighbour and the instructiō of our houshold familie These are the two endes of this bodily rest the first whereof together with the rest of the ceremonies is taken away by the comming of Christ which is the trueth of it But the other is perpetuall and to continue for euer Therefore that rest belongeth vnto vs and is euery weeke to be kept one day Theoph. Let vs come to the other part Mat. After that the Lord had commanded one day for rest now he sheweth which day he will haue kept and that is the seuenth namely the last of the weeke He doth also teach howe wee should spend the rest of the weeke namely in working that is in doing our earthly businesses to the ende we may be the fitter for the rest of the seuenth day and to the performance of such things as he him selfe hath commanded Theoph. Which was the seuenth day Mat. That which we do yet call Saterday For the Lords day properly is the first day of the weeke according to the distinction made by God himselfe But that seuenth day the Apostles changed to teach that the ceremonie was done away and the rest they put off to the Lords day vpon the which Christ by his resurrection had put an end vnto that ceremonie Theoph. How did Christ by his resurrection put an end vnto that ceremonie Math. Because by the vertue and