Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
work_n cause_n faith_n justification_n 11,997 5 9.4732 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A93702 Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht: containing a confutation of the three degrees of popery, viz. papacy, prelacy, and presbitery; answerable to the triple crowne of the three-headed Cerberus the Pope, with his three fold hierarchies aforesaid. With a dispelling of all other dispersed clouds of errour, which doth interpose the clear sun-shine of the Gospel in our horrizon. Wherein the chiefe arguments each of them have, for the vindication of their erronious tenents are incerted, and refuted; with a description of such whem [sic] the true Church of Christ doth consist of: as also how, and by whom, they may be gathered, and governed, according to the will, and appointment of Jesus Christ, and his apostles, in the primative purity thereof. / By Iohn Spittlehouse, assistant to the Marshall Generall of the Army, under the command of his Excellency, the Lord Generall Fairfax. Imprimated by Theod. Jennings, and entred in the Stationers Hall. Spittlehouse, John. 1649 (1649) Wing S5013; Thomason E586_2; ESTC R203633 304,213 396

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

worthinesse in them but for his owne mercies sake And Moses telleth the Israelites that God did not set his love upon them because they were more holy then other Nations for saith he you are a rebellious people but because the Lord loved you therefore he hath done this unto you Deut. 7. 8. 2. Inst Neither did Joseph obtaine that great favour with God to have the preheminence over his Brethren by any merit or worthinesse in himself but of Gods meere mercy grace and favour towards him for as yet Joseph had not shewed his faithfulnesse and chastity in Potiphers house the purpose of God then to exalt Joseph revealed to him in his dreame Gen. 37. 6. went before any merit on Josephs part so also Gods free and gracious election in setting us apart to everlasting salvation is without all respect or workes in us as the Apostle toucheth Rom. 9. 15. 3. Inst Yea the Book of Exodus sheweth us on the one side the ingratitude and disobedience of the people of Israel and on the other side the stedfast love of God towards them which offereth unto us an evident argument of Gods free election without any respect to workes the Apostle likewise to the same purpose alleadgeth that notable Text I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy Rom. 9. 15. 4. Inst Neither did the Lord look upon us Gentiles in makeing of us his people for any worthinesse in us but for his owne mercies sake he hath called us to the knowledge of his truth for otherwise what we are in our selves the Apostle sheweth out of the fourteenth Psalm where it is said that they are all gone astray c. there is none that doth good no not one So then it is most evident that Gods election changeth not but Good workes is no precedent cause but a consequent effect of election whatsoever he hath decreed concerning any mans Salvation shall stand for the gift and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11. 29. And the Apostle sheweth us that the Lord hath chosen us that we should be holy not that because we were holy so that good works is no precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof CHAP. X. Treateth of their tenent of justification by faith and workes SECT 1. THe Popish tenent concerning faith is that it justifieth A Popish assertion not as it apprehendeth and applyeth the righteousnesse of Christ but as it is a meritorious work by the worthinesse and dignity thereof and that it is a presumption for any man to be assured of his salvation Ans Now that this their assertion is contrary to Scripture will thus appeare as Gen. 15. 6. where it is said that Abraham beleeved in God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse the Apostle also concludeth the contrary where he saith That to Faith justifieth not as a work but as it apprehendeth the righteousnesse of Christ him that worketh not but beleeveth c. his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4. 5. where righteousnesse then is imputed and accounted there it is not obtained by workes faith then justifieth not as it is a work or meritorious but as an instrument it apprehendeth the justice of Christ which is imputed by faith SECT 2. Faith a speciall application of the promises of God Object A Justifying faith is not a speciall application of the promises of God in Christ but a generall beliefe only that whatsoever God saith is true as Abrahams giving of credit to Gods speeches that he should be the father of many nations Ans It is otherwaies evident for Abraham did not only beleeve Gods promises concerning his carnall seed but his faith reached also to the spirituall seed which was Christ as the Apostle applyeth it Gal. 3. 16. yea Abraham rejoyced to see Christs day Joh. 8. 16. as having a particular interest in him as his Saviour the fore-named place doth therefore strongly prove against that their assertion for whereas Abraham had formerly shewed many excellent workes as of Piety in building Altars in many places and calling upon the name of the Lord in charity in seeking reconciliation betwixt L●t and him Chap. 13. of mercy in redeeming of Lot being taken prisoner Chap. 14. contempt of riches in refusing to take the King of Sodoms goods yet none of all these workes are reckoned or imputed to him for righteousnesse but only his faith SECT 3. How Phineas zealous act was imputed to him for righteousnesse Obj. PHineas work in executing judgement upon the Adulterer and Adulteresse was imputed to him for righteousnesse faith then is not only imputed for righteousnes but works also Ans The Prophet in that Psalme speaketh not of that righteousnesse whereby Phinias was originally counted righteous or just before God for that was by faīth because without faith it is unpossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. but of that righteousnesse whereby Phinias faith was declared and testified and thereby his zealous act because of his faith was counted a righteous work The like is also where the Apostle Paul denyeth that Abraham Paul James reconciled was justified by workes Rom. 4. 2. and the Apostle James affirmeth that he was justified through workes Jam. 2. 21. The first speaking of justification properly before God the other of the same testified and declared by workes unto men and therefore Phinias fact is said to be imputed to him for righteousnesse from Generation to Generation that is in all ages he was known and reputed just before God and men And therefore the Apostle James saith Shew me thy faith by thy workes Jam. 2. 18. as if he should have said 'T is true before God it is thy faith only that justifieth thee in regard that he only knoweth thy heart but in that I cannot judge of thy inward affections it is requisite that I should discerne some actions from thee which may testifie to me that thou art godly and therefore our Saviour saith ye may know them by their fruits c. Albeit therefore the Apostle urgeth the shewing and approving of faith that Abraham was justified through faith in the offering up of his Son Isaac yet before God he was formerly justified by faith but by this his obedience his faith was both approved to God and made manifest unto men SECT 4. Foure sorts of faith Object WHat manner of faith is that which you terme justifying faith Ans For the better discerning hereof it is requisite to know the divers kindes of faith which are of foure sorts viz. 1. There is fides inissialis vel fundamentalis the faith of beginning The faith of beginning or fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Heb. 11. 6. He that commeth to God must first know that God is c. and this kinde of faith towards God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginning and essence of God in knowing him to be the only God 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the
of the Law and then the Apostles conclusion should be in vaine who faith I conclude that a man is justified by saith without the workes of the Law but if faith be excluded out of the workes of the Law then it is not commanded or contained in the Law for then it should be a work of the Law SECT 7. How the Popish writers would reconcile Paul and James NOw whereas Paul thus proving Abraham to be justified by faith without workes Rom. 4. 2. 5. and James that Abraham was justified through workes which at the first seeme to be contrary to each other the Popish writers goe about three waies to reconcile these places viz. 1. Say they The Apostle in that expression excludeth Abrahams Morall workes before faith and therefore by such workes they grant a man is not justified but by such as follow and proceed of faith Ans Before that God had imputed righteousnesse unto Abraham by faith he had done divers faithfull workes as the Apostle sheweth As that by faith when he was called obeyed God and by faith abode in the Land of promise Heb. 11. 8 9. therefore the Apostle speaking of Abrahams justification by faith after he had done these faithfull workes excludeth even such workes also from justification Againe he saith to him that worketh the wages is not counted by favour but by debt but the workes done before or without faith no wages is due because without faith it is impossible to please God therefore he meaneth not such workes 2. They say that Paul speaketh de fide charitate formala of a saith formed with charity and furnished with good works and such 〈◊〉 faith truly justifieth Ans True it is that Abrahams faith which Paul so much commendeth was a lively and working faith and yet it did not justifie him as it was active in bringing forth good workes but as it was passive in apprehending and laying on hold of the righteousnesse of God as the Apostle sheweth in that Abrahams manner of justifying and Davids was all one but David declareth that man blessed to whom God imputed righteousnesse without workes Rom. 4. 6. to which the Apostle addeth Abrahams full assurance that he that had promised was also able to performe and therefore it was imputed to him for righteousnesse Ver. 21 22. it was not then imputed for the working of his faith but for his bebeeving 3. They use a distinction of a first and second justification the first as when of a sinner a man is made just 2. When a just man becomes more just of the first say they Paul speaketh of the second James Ans The Scriptures knoweth no such distinction of a first and second justification that which they call the second justification is no other but sanctification which is an increasing and going forward in the fruits and further assurance of justification the Prophet saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered speaketh of that justification when of a sinner a man becommeth just before God which they call the first justification But to that blessednesse is promised and where happinesse and blessednesse is obtained no further justification is necessary wherefore the first and one justification sufficeth and so there needeth not a second Further this distinction admitted Paul should rather treat of the second justification because he alledgeth the example of Abraham who was called already and had done many righteous workes before the Scriptures maketh any mention of the imputation of any righteosnesse unto him by faith and James of the first who bringeth in the example of Rahab the Harlot who was called before she had done any worthy works so that the two Apostles must be and are truly reconciled as aforesaid And as to the assurance of our justification the same instance of Abrahams offering up his Son Isaac will verifie at which time the Papists themselves confesse that Abraham was certain of his salvation or that he was in the state of grace SECT 8. Beleevers may be assured of faith and salvation Obj. THe assurance which Abraham had then was a particular experimentall knowledge that in that worke he had pleased God Ans Abraham in this particular was not only assured of Gods favour but was undoubtedly perswaded of the promise in generall concerning the Messiah as the Apostle saith Neither did he doubt of the promises but was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4. 20. and this is that our Saviour saith that Abraham desired to see his day and saw it and rejoyced Joh. 8. 56. his assurance then which he had of Salvation in the Messiah procured unto him this great joy Obi. Abraham knew that he was in the state of grace by speciall revelation Ans This assurance that Abraham had was not by any particular or extraordinary revelation but by the proper and ordinary operation of faith as the Apostle saith He was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4. 20. Obj. This revelation was made to the Patriarkes in the Old Testament and the Apostles in the N●w who was as it were the founders of the people of God Ans Paul in matters of faith maketh no such diffence betwixt the Patriarkes and other beleevers where he saith Now it is not written for him only that it was imputed to him for righteousnesse but also for us c. Rom. 4. 23. and he also saith that a crown of righteousnesse was not only laid up for him but for them also that love his appearance 2 Tim. 4. 8. to whom then the same certainty of faith is decreed the like assurance is not denyed Obi. All beleevers are not sure of their Justification seeing Abraham had served God most faithfully before and yet never till then was assured of his Justification Ans It followeth not because Abraham was not 〈◊〉 assured of his Justification that therefore every beleever cannot be justified at all it doth only follow that there was a time that Abraham had not such an assurance for the dearest childe of God being naturally prone to sinne as the sparkes to fly upwards having committed some grievous offence doth after the act many times conceive in himself that he is the childe of perdition or otherwise he could not have been so forsaken of God Instance in David who had the testimony of the Spirit of God that he was a man after Gods owne heart and yet we see after his sinne of Murder and Adultery he conceiveth that God had forsaken him and therefore desireth the comfort of his helpe againe as though he had been utterly deprived of it and yet at other times both before and after he was fully assured of it as the Scriptures doe plentifully make appeare so likewise it is untrue that Abraham had not this assurance untill he had offered up Isaac for the Apostle sheweth that he had that assurance when faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse Rom. 4. 22 23. which was before he was circumcised Gen. 15. 6. SECT 9. The assurance
the Spirit ergo they are perfect Ans This Argument proceedeth from that which is simpliciter simply and absolutely of the Spirit to that which Secundum quid after a sort is of the Spirit The workes of the faithfull are not absolutely the workes of the Spirit but they be so the workes of the Spirit as they be also our workes so they are pure as they proceed of the Spirit but impure and imperfect as they be our workes Obj. They which are conformable to Christ have perfect works but the faithfull are conformable in this life to the Image of Christ Ergo. Ans The proposition is only true of those which are perfectly conformable but so are not the faithfull in this life but only in part as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13. 12. Now I know in part c. And as our knowledge so our obedience both imperfect Obj. There is no condemnation to the faithfull Rom. 8. 1. therefore their workes are perfect Ans The argument followeth not for the priviledge of the faithfull and their exemption from condemnation dependeth not upon the perfection of their workes but upon the perfection of Christs righteousnesse imputed to them by faith Obi. Christ at his comming shall render to every man according to his workes but it standeth not with Gods Justice to give a perfect reward unto imperfect workes therefore the workes of the regenerate because they shall be perfectly rewarded are perfect works Ans The obedience of the faithfull shall be perfectly rewarded not according to the Law of workes but according to the Law of faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is imprinted and rewarded in them being theirs as fully as if they were their owne 2. Christ shall also judge according to their workes not as causes of their reward but as testimonies and lively arguments of their faith SECT 4. Obj. THe Scriptures ascribeth perfection to the workes of the Saints as it is said of Noah Gen. 6. 9. that he was a just man and a perfect man in his time Hezekiah also saith I have walked before thee with a perfect heart 2 King 20. 3. Ans These and the like sayings must be understood of the perfection of the parts of obedience not of the degrees of perfection that is the faithfull doe even exercise their obedience in every part of the Law but not in a perfect degree or measure 2. They are said to be perfect only in comparison of such as are weake and imperfect 3. Their sincerity and perfection is understood as being opposite to dissimulation and hypocrisie that their hearts were perfect towards the Lord that is unfainedly without dissimulation in which sence the Prophet David saith Judge me according to my innocency c. Psal 7. 8. Obi. The Apostle saith Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1 Joh. 3. 9. The faithfull being borne of God cannot sin Ans The Apostle in that place doth not understand the dwelling of sin but the reigning of sin for otherwise he should be contrary to himself who had said before Chap. 1. 8. If we say we have not sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us So they which are borne of God sin not that is sin though it remaine in them it reigneth not in them as the Apostle saith Though we walke in the flesh we are not after the flesh 2 Cor. 10. 3. neither was the Law given to justifie men thereby for the Apostle saith That by the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justifled in his sight for by the knowledge of the Law commeth the knowledge of sin Rom. 3. 20. this then is the end and use of the Law viz. 1. It sheweth what God is viz. one that loveth Justice and hateth iniquity 2. It is a glasse wherein we may see that Image after which man was at the first created which now is defaced in him by sin 3. It is a rule and line after the which we should square our lives and actions 4. It sheweth the corruption of our natures and so it is a The end and use of the Law Schoole-master to bring us unto Christ So that this is the profit of the Law First to convince a man of his infirmities 2. To drive him to seeke the medicine of grace in Christ CHAP. XV. Treateth of the Popes dispensing with the Morall Law SECT 1. ANother of the Popish Tenents is That the Morall Law or any precept thereof may be by humane authority dispensed withall to which purpose the Popes Cannonists doe give to their Terreine god an infinite and unreasonable power these being their conclusions viz. Papa potest dispensare contra jus divinum The Pope may dispence against the Law of God 2. Contra jus Naturae Against the Law of Nature 3. Contra novum Testamentum Against the New Testament 4. Contra Apostolum Against the Apostles 5. Papa potest dispensare de omnibus preceptis veteris novi Testamenti The Pope may dispence with all the precepts of the Old and New Testament and that for these reasons following each of which shall receive its answer their first reason being this viz. SECT 2. Obi. AS amongst men the Law-giver may dispence with his Law so God that gave the Morall Law is therefore above the Law and may dispence with it And if God may dispence then the 〈◊〉 of the Church may certainly dispence because they are in 〈◊〉 ●●ead Ans 1. As to that concerning humane Lawes which tend to The Law giver cannot dispence in human Lawes as to over throw them the common good the preservation of the Publique State the maintenance of peace and justice the Law-givers cannot so dispence as to over-throw the end of those Lawes as it shall be lawfull to disturbe the publique State or the like for this were to evert the very scope and end of the Law But yet in particular cases they may dispence as that where an order is that every one shall watch which is intended for the good of a City yet some may be dispenced withall and exempted from watching who may more necessarily be imployed for the common good for here although the letter of the Law be not precisely kept yet the intention of the Law-makers is observed which is to seeke and procure the common good So likewise universally the Lord neither will nor can dispence against his Law as to make it lawfull to have other gods to take Gods name in vaine and the like for this were for God to deny himself to be just 2 Tim. 2. 13. and to make it lawfull in generall to violate the precepts of the first and second Table were to deny his owne Justice and so consequently to deny himself for God is most true yea Justice it self and the Law is a perfect rule of justice yet in the particular determinations Exod. 3. 22. 22. 35 36. of the Law the Lord doth dispence as with Abraham sacrificing of his Son Gen. 2. 2. the Israelites
switch is not equall with him that striketh with a sword 6. Cum quem with whom the sinne is committed as fornication betwixt them that are married is more heynous then betwixt single persons 7. Vbi where in what place it is committed for it is more heynous to steale in a Church or Congregation of Gods people then in another place 8. quando when for it is more heynous to steale in time of Divine worship then at other times 9. Ad quid to what end for the end maketh a thing of it self lawfull or unlawfull Now to make an action lawfull or good all these things must concurre but it is enough to make it evill if it faile in any of them and this faultinesse of the action passeth with the action it selfe which is the subiect thereof and remaineth not 3. There is left behind a macula a certain stain or blot in the Soule whereby the Image of God is deformed 4. Besides this stain there is a guiltinesse of punishment 5. The punishment it selfe which is Hell Fire without true repentance SECT 7. Object VVHether doe we sinne of necessity or of a voluntary disposition for if it be of necessity it ceaseth to be sin and if it be voluntary it may be avoïded Answ Sinne is both of necessity and voluntary First it is of Sin is both of necessity and voluntary necessity in respect of Adams fall by which we became Bondslaves to sin and Satan Secondly in that we have originally a seed of that defect in us procured by him and so can will nothing but that which is evill that as the Apostle saith We are not sufficient of our selves to think any thing of our selves as of our selves 2 Cor. 3. 5. it being proper to God alone to work in us both to will and to doe of his good pleasure Object The Apostle saith he would that which was good though he could not accomplish it Rom. 7. 15. Therefore man of himselfe can will that which is good Ans The Apostle in that place speaketh not of the Naturall man but of the regenerate for he addeth I am delighted in the M●n corrupt both in soule and body Law according to the inward man but saith he I see another law in my members resisting the law of my minde Rom. 7. 22. And it will fully appeare that we are corrupt in both parts viz. in soule and body For that which is born of the flesh is flesh John 3. 6. And to be carnally minded i● death Rom. 8. 6. And therefore in vain doe we seek in man either integrity understanding or the feare of God For the will is so fast bound by the slavery of sinne that it cannot move it selfe to that which is good and much lesse apply it selfe thereunto For such a motion is onely a beginning of turning unto God which is wholly attributed to the grace of God in Scripture as in Jer. 31. 18. where Ephraim is said to desire of God to turn him that he might be turned And the Spouse in the Canticles Draw me and I will run after thee with divers other The effects of Nature and Grace places of Scripture which doth testifie the same It is therefore proper to Nature to will that which is evill and to Grace that which is good whereupon it followeth that men are drawn unto evill by necessity of will and yet they are not constrained to commit it Again on the other side it commeth to passe through the the infinite goodnesse of God that godly men cannot doe evill through any forceable compulsion for otherwise the minde of man in its owne nature is voyd of all grace for which cause it is said that he that hath begun a good worke in us will also finish it Phil. 1. 6. 2. 13. as also It is God that worketh in us both to will and to doe of his good pleasure The Lord also speaking by his Prophet saith that he will give his people a new heart and take from them their stony heart and also put his Spirit in the middest of them and make them walke in his Commandements Ezec. 35. 26. by which it appeares that all the inclinations to goodnesse proceed only from Gods Spirit moving us thereunto secretly saying This is the way follow it Grace then goeth before every good work it doth not follow after but so that will and desire doth accompany it not lead it For the will doth worke by grace the Lord preventing him that is unwilling that he may be more willing and that he may not will in vaine so that there can no will be found which is inclining to good save in the elect but the cause of election must be sought without men whereby it is proved that man of himself hath not a right will but that it floweth from the same good Man of himself hath not a right will pleasure whereby he was elected before the Creation of the world as also that the beginning of willing and doing well proceedeth from faith and faith is the gift of God it must needs then follow that it is of meere grace when we begin to will that which is good being inclined and bent naturally to evill As also by the instance of David who desired the Lord to create in him a new heart Psal 51. 12. yea we are as prone thereunto as the sparkes to fly upward SECT 8. The Pelagians two-fold question answered THe will therefore is the Patient and not the Agent and therefore to resolve the Pelagians two-fold doubt viz. whether we sin willingly being made bond-slaves to Satan and whether in evill workes we ought to attribute any thing unto God we thus answer As touching the first we answer that mens wills may be compared to an Horse that waiteth his Masters pleasure and God and the Devill may be compared to Hors●-men or Riders but if the Devill possesse it he carrieth it head-long unto death as it were an Hunter over hedge and ditch as we may instance in that example of Job upon whom it was the Lords pleasure to exercise by calamity the patience of his servant but contrariwise Satan endeavoureth to drive him into dispaire Again the Caldeans study contrary unto equity to get gaine by that which was another mans in which passage one and the same act may be ascribed unto God Satan and Man but the variety in the manner and end maketh the justice of God appeare without any fault and in the other the wickednesse of Satan and Man is discovered to their perpetuall shame and reproach Obi. If it be not in the power of a Sinner to obey exhortations should be made in vaine admonitions should be superfluous and reprehensions rediculous Ans Our Saviour saith that without him we can doe nothing Joh. 15. 5. and yet notwithstanding he doth neverthelesse reprove those that did evill without him as we may see in his reproofes which he uttered against Corazin and Bethsaida Mat. 11. 21. as