affirmeth that one Act of Volition or Willing in God should be the object of another and then by the same reason that again may be the object of another and so in infinitum This Answer unto this Objection concerning faith foreseen may serve in like manner for an answer unto the objection concerning works foreseen being the cause of Election As also unto that of sin foreseen being the cause of Reprobation Good works are the way to salvation not the cause of Gods Decree to save Sin â—is the cause of punishment which is the actual execution of justice for sin but not of Gods intent to punish sin Sin is the cause of damnation and consequent of reprobation Election is not without the sight of faith and new obedience nor Reprobation without the sight of sin yet faith though it be the instrument and means of the application of salvation following thereupon is the effect not the cause of Election and sin though it be the cause of the application of all the evil of punishment yet is it the consequent not the cause of Reprobation Obj. 3. If sin followeth necessarily upon the Decree then God is the Authour of sin But sin followeth necessarily upon the Decree Therefore God is the Authour of sin Ans This blasphemous Inference is in effect the same with what the ancient Enemies of the Doctrine of the Decree of old calumniated the Teachers thereof with thereby through their sides blaspheming the Scriptures and God himself So objected the Adversaries of this great Truth against Paul the greatest Preacher thereof amongst those that were but men Rom. 9.19 Thou wilt say then unto me Why doth he yet find fault for who hath resisted his Will i. e. If Gods Will determining the being of sin be irresistable then man in committing sin is unblameable Prideaux Lect. 1. de absoluto Decreto Bellarmine de Amiss gratiae cap. 4.5 6 7. why is fault found with that which was unavoydable So the Pelagians against Augustin An absolute Decree necessarily concludeth God to be the Author of sin So Bellarmine against Zuinglius Calvin Beza and other Orthodox Divines slandering their Doctrine of the Absoluteness of the Decree with these horrid Criminations viz. That thence it followeth that God is the Author of sin 2. That God sinneth truly and properly 3. That God is the only sinner 4. That sin is not sin For satisfaction of the Objection we must distinguish of Necessity There is a necessity of Coaction and a necessity of Infallibility Sin followeth not the Decree by a necessity of Coaction or Compulsion in which sence the Objection only holdeth but by a necessity of Infallibility which consisteth with and hindereth not the liberty of sin of which afterwards Hence the Decree though it be the antecedent that is the foregoer of sin yet it is not the cause of sin and sin though it be the consequent that is somewhat infallibly following upon the Decree yet it is not the effect thereof The day goeth before the following night and the night foregoeth the following day yet night and day are far from being causes one of another The diligent attending to the difference between an Antecedent and a Cause and between a Consequent and an Effect for the clearing of which sufficient hath been spoken before is of great use to unty many knots in this place But meeting here with this Satanical and abominable Sophism of imputing unto God the being of the Author of sin it will not be unseasonable to remove other Arguments disputing for the same Conclusion though not all of them upon the same grounds Arg. 1. If God hath absolutely fore-determined all Events then God hath willed sin if God hath willed sin then God is the Author â—f sin Answ Though sin as sin he evil yet the being of sin for a better end is good God doth not will sin as sin For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in iniquity neither shall evil dwell with thee Psal 5.4 yet God hath willed the permission of the being of sin for a better end In peceato actus volendi in Deo non transit in rem permissaÌ„ sed in permissionem Twisse Cr. 3. l. 3. Rivet disp 1. Th. 24. Cum dicitur Deus vult peccatuÌ„ esse hoc refugit pia mens non quia quod dicitur non bene dicitur sed quia quod bene dicitur malè intelligitur Vide Twisse Cr. 3. l. 2. The Jews Acts 4.27 did what God had determined to be done in his Decree when they did what he forbad to be done in his Command Those who give their Kingdom to the Beast Revel 17.17 in so doing fulfilled the word of the Decree yet brake the word of his Command The water whilest it runneth his own course serveth the end of the Artificer in turning about the Mill according to his intent For who hath resisted his Will In the mystry of sin the Decree of God saith a learned and judicious Author passeth into the permission but not into the evil that is permitted that is God willeth the permission of sin but he doth not will sin as sin That better End in order unto which God willeth the being of sin is the manifestation of his own Glory the glory of his Mercy upon the Elect the glory of his Justice upon the Reprobate The manifestation of the glory of God is a greater good then the transgression of man is an evil Had not there been sin there had not been a Gospel had not there been sin there were no need of a Saviour if there had been no sin Jesus Christ had not been Arg. 2. If God ascribeth unto himself the doing of actings that are sinful then God is the Author of sin But God ascribeth unto himself the doing of actions that are sinsul Therefore Concerning the selling of Joseph by his Brethren the Scripture saith It was not you that sent me hither but God Of the Egyptians hatred against the Israelites He turned their heart to hate his people to dâ—al subtilly with his servants Psal 105.25 Of the Incest of Absalom I will do this thing before Israel and before the Sun 2 Sam. 12.12 Of the Rebellion of the ten Tribes and Jeroboam This thing is from me 1 Kings 12.24 Of the cruel plunder of the Babylonians I will send them against an hypocritical Nation and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge to take the spoyl and to take the prey and to tread them down like mire in the street Isa 10.6 the like is to be seen in many other places Answ We must distinguish between the action and the evil of the action God is so the Author of the action Acts 17.28 as that he neither is nor can be the Author of the evil of the action James 1.14 It is impossible either that God should not be the Author of all good or that he should be the Author of any evil The act or effect hath
his ways dothneither good nor evil He doth no good therefore there is no Heaven because of a double incapacity First In respect of Nature he that neither understandeth willeth remembreth or is affected all those are action is uncapable of blessedness blessedness consisting in the vision and fruition of the chief good Secondly In respect of the way to Heaven namely obedience which man not being a subject of action is uncapable of without action there cannot be obedience and as he doth no good so neither doth he any evil therefore sinneth not therefore there ought to be no conscience of sin nor punishment for sin The Sum is from hence it followeth That man may do what he lists he neither sinneth nor obeyeth There is neither Heaven nor Hell without the actions of man there could be no obedience of man if there could not be the obedience of man there could not be the obedience of Christ who is God-man if there could be no obedience of Christ Christ could be no Saviour nay if there were no actions of man the very reasonable soul by just consequence supposing action it would infer that there were no man and consequently no Christ Christ being both God and man See then and be astonished at that heap of transgression and confusion in this opinion that denyeth the Efficiency of the second cause It is against all experience against the whole order of the creature it takes away the vegetative sensible and rational souls with all other operations it takes away all difference between creatures in those respects it alloweth man and devils to do what they will it denyeth that there is either obedience or sin Heaven or hell Sic itaque administrat omni â— quae creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios exercere agere actus sinat Aug. de Civit. Dei cap. 30. Vna est actio Dei creaturaerespeclu operis non aâ—tem modi agendi Alsted Tom. 3. Metaph Pars 1. cap. 16. or that Christ is a Saviour yea upon point it denyeth that there is either man or Angel yea or Christ himself Confusion be upon that Tenet that brings all unto such confusion What more frequent in the Scripture then to ascribe Efficiency unto second causes For we are Labourers together with God 1 Cor. 3.9 So doth God administer all things which he hath created as that he also suffers them to exercise and act their proper Motions Obj. 2. Some operations of the second cause cannot be ascribed unto God as faith repentance we neither do nor may say God believeth or repenteth but man belieheth man repenteth Therefore God doth not work all things Ans Actions are done either efficiently or formally The Work of repentance is wrought by God efficiently 2 Tim. 2.25 by man formally 'T is God that worketh repentance not man 't is man that repents not God the very formal efficiency of the second cause in man is the effect of the first cause The formal efficiency of the second cause being the effect of and in all respects essentially depending upon the first cause is so far from denying of or detracting from the All-efficiency of the first cause as that it much commends and sets it forth The reason why works wrought by God efficiently are yet ascribed unto man are first because man God not for want of power but out of abundance of goodness being so far pleased to make use of him co-worketh with God therein Secondly Because man is the next formal efficient cause viz. in respect of the order of the ascent and descent of the causes Thirdly Because many operations of the second cause note imperfection as faith repentance c. Obj. 3. If the second cause be determined unto its operations by the concurse of the first cause then the second cause is not free Ans 1. The Will cannot be compelled to say That which is done willingly is done constrainedly is to affirm a contradiction namely that which is willing is unwilling God can determine the Will Sic itaque administrat omnia quae creavit ut etiam ipsa proprios exercere agere Motus sinat quamvis enim nihil esse possit sine ipso non tamen sunt ulla quod ipse Aug. de Civit. Dei lib. 7. cap. 30. Pertingit autem a fine uno ad alterum fortitèr disponit omnia utilitèr vel suavitèr Sap. 8.1 and not prejudice the Nature of the Will because he is an infinite Cause God determineth the Will sutably and agreeably to its own Nature i. e. freely He so determineth the Will as the Will determineth it self God so determineth the Will as a first free Agent as that the Will determineth it self as a second free Agent The Efficiency of God offereth no violence nor changeth the nature of things but governeth them according to their own natures it reacheth from one end to another mightily and sweetly ordereth all things The external transient efficacious Motion of God upon the Will determineth the will with a real determination the Will so moved moveth it self with a real and formal determination The Will in the sence of Composition that is Voluntas codem instanti quo agit habuit potentiaÌ„ actum suum suspendendi in sensu diviso Twiss de permiss lib. 2. crim 3. considered as subordinate to the Decree and Efficiency of God cannot but act in the instant of the determining Motion The Will considered in the sence of division that is as in it self without its subordination to the Decree and Efficiency of God may act or not act in the instant of the determining Motion The Will placed under this determining Motion of God inclineth it self freely to the Act and to that only whereunto it would have inclined it self if upon a supposition of impossibility there were no Decree nor physical or hyperphysical Determination thereof by God Deus ita utitur voluntate ut ipsa voluntas sese electivè vitalitèr expractico rationis judicio agat Rhetorf de gratia excercit 3. cap. 3. Against the All-governing Providence of God If the Decree of God hindered not the liberty of the second cause as we saw before then the Efficiency of God hindereth not the Liberty of the second cause Gods Efficiency being nothing else but the Execution of the Decree If the Decree of God be so far from being a hinderance unto liberty as that liberty cannot be without it nay is the effect thereof as its first cause then the Efficiency of God being but the Execution of the Decree will also be found to be so far from being a prejudice unto liberty as that liberty cannot be without it nay is the effect thereof as its next cause Obj. The Disorder of the second cause is often such as seemeth not to consist with the All-governing Providence of God Divine Government would not order things so disorderly Ans Order is two-fold either the Order of the Decree or the Order of the Command the whole
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sicredideris particula si non est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Buc. loc 21. q. 3. In which respect we are said to be chosen in him Ephes 1.4 Ascribing due glory unto the Father takes not from but adds to the glory of the Mediatour That Name above all names given unto the Mediatour is Jesus Christ the Lord Philip. 2.9 10 11. Gods Name is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 1.3 Ephes 1.3 1 Pet. 1.3 Christ is all and in all Col. 3.11 God is all in all 1 Cor. 15.28 Christ is all and in all efficiently and meritoriously God is all in all essciently and originally Obj. 3. The active and passive Obedience of Christ is the condition of the salvation of the Elect Jes 53.10 As Adams personal and perfect obedience was a condition in the first Covenant therefore though grace be free in respect of election yet it is not free in respect of the Application of the good of Election Ans The Application both of grace and glory and all the good of the Covenant of grace are free to us though conditioned unto Christ Free-grace exciudes not Christs Merit but mans merit Obj 4. Faith is a condition though not of it self yet of salvation that in the Elect themselves therefore the Application of salvation seems not to be free in respect of the Elect. Ans A Condition is either a Condition properly so called i. e. an antecedent Condition Or a Condition improperly so called i. e. a consequent Condition A Condition properly so called is a Law or Observation annexed to a business the performance whereof lyeth upon the Covenant and accordingly the business becometh valid or null Such a condition was Works in the first Covenant If Faith were such a condition there would soon be an end of the Covenant of grace yea the Covenant of grace were indeed no Covenant of grace A Condition improperly so called or a Consequent Condition is such a condition whose performance by the Covenantee is absolutely undertaken for and irresistably wrought by the Covenantor and not left in suspence upon the Covenantee to be performed by his own strength Faith is a consequent condition not an antecedent condition So as this Proposition I will give Eternal life unto the Elect if they do believe is aequivolent unto this I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect Eternal life because I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect to believe The Condition of Faith depends not upon the Will of the Elect either to be or not to be but upon the absolute and gracious Will of God Obj. 5. Repentance and New-obedience are necessary to salvation Luke 13.3 Heb. 3.14 Therefore the Application of the good of Election seemeth not to be free in respect of us Ans Good Works which is also true of Repentance are necessary as the way appointed of God unto salvation but not as the cause this were to change the Covenant of grace into a Covenant of works Our good works are the effects of grace the reward of our good works is a reward of grace Good Works are necessary to salvation as the way not as an instrument or cause Faith is necessary as the way and as an instrument The term Special why diligently to be observed the active and passive Obedience of Christ is necessary as a Meritorious cause The Reason why the term Special is diligently to be observed in this Proposition is That we may the more distinctly conceive of the nature of grace and both discern and eschew the errour of the enemies of grace who so affirm it as in effect they deny it and whilest they seem to stand for grace they indeed withstand and overthrow it either by an equivocation in or by a sophistical interpretation of the term Grace * Pelagiani naturae vim gratiae nomine nuncupare solebant quo sententiāsuā occultarēt offensam hominū de gratia Dei sanctè sententiā e◠commodiùs vitarent Twiss vind grat errat 9. Sect. 9. The Pelagians Semi-pelagians Jesuits and Arminians all affirm this Proposition viz. That Faith is the Effect of Grace but understanding the word Grace therein in such a various and graceless sence as followeth The Pelagians understand by grace only the grace of nature that is the remainder of the Image of God in man after the fall whereby the Will without any further help from supernatural grace is able to believe Thus the Pelagians confound grace and nature The Semipelagians or Massilienses men of much account for learning their time whom Prosper in his Epistle to Augustine calleth the Reliques of the Pelagians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace with free-will So as they both concure together as Joynt-workers and partial-causes i. e. fellow-causes in working of faith Which help of supernatural grace man according to them merits by the good use of his free-will The Jesuits understand by grace Facientiquod in se est presertim si vivat sub notitia Evangelii Deus non denegat auxilium primae gratiae Smising disp Theol. Tom. 1 Tr. 3. disp 6. Fidelis faciens quod ex se est ex congruo meritur gratiā justific antē idem 623. Justificatus potest de congruo mereri gratiam perseverandi idem 700. N. 518. Justificatus potest de condigno mereri salutem ibid. the conjunction of free-will and supernatural grace So as they both concur as joynt partial or fellow-fellow-causes in the working of faith Where also note That they understand not faith as we do but define their faith to be a general knowledge and certainty whereby they conclude the Word of God to be divine and true The Sum of their Doctrine comes to this To the natural man that doth what in him lyes especially if he liveth under the knowledge of the Gospel God will not deny the help of the first grace The believer that doth what in him lyeth merits with the merit of congruity justifying grace i. e. habitual grace according to them The justified person may merit with the merit of conguity the grace of perseverance The justified Person persevering may merit salvation with the merit of condignity The Arminians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace yet that is but supernatural common grace with free-will So as both concur together as co-working joynt partial or fellow-fellow-causes of faith as it is with a man and a boy drawing the sameship together So as the work is not wrought by grace alone without free-will nor by free-will alone without grace but by both together Whence it followeth according to them which they also affirm that as much grace on Gods part may be put forth upon one that finally resisteth the motion of grace as there is upon one that yeildeth obedience thereunto And that the last and conclusive reason in such a case why one believeth and the other believeth not is from the free co-operation of
the will of him that believeth Little upon point do they herein give to grace more then the Jesuits only they judge better doctrinally of the nature of the grace of faith The best of them make free-will and supernatural common grace i. e. Such as those who are not elected may be made partakers of to concur together as co-working partial or fellow-fellow-causes in the work of conversion A doctrine which overthrowes grace giveth unto flesh that is to man yet without Christ to glory as a party-worker of saith the total working vvhereof is proper unto Christ in the way of his special grace and is repugnant both unto saving grace and Salvation it self because the faith that is so wrought cannot save To the Orthodox this Proposition Faith is the Effect of grace And this Proposition Faithis the effect of special grace are equipollent By grace they understand grace peculiar and proper unto the Elect therefore flowing from Election and consequently from Christ as their Redeemer and designed Head absolute irresistable and effectual quickening the soul until then dead by infusing a principle of life whereby of unbelievers they are made believers and of unwilling vvilling in respect of which work the soul notwithstanding any supernatural common grace foregoing is meerly paslive having no more causal power thereunto then a dead body hath unto life The truth of this Proposition viz. Faith is the Effect of special grace appears in the proof of these three Conclusions 1. All the Elect first or last shall believe Concl. 1. 2. Only the Elect do believe 3. Faith i. e. Saving Faith is the effect of Election All the Elect first or last shall believe John 6.37 All that the Father giveth me i.e. that from Eternity are committed unto me to redeem shall come unto me John 10.16 Other sheep I have which are not of this fold them also must I bring and they shall hear my voyce and there shall be one fold and one Sheph. ard There are besides the people of the Jews others of his Elect amongst the Gentiles which must be gathered into the fold of the Church as certainly as those Jews which are already therein Rom. 8.30 Whom he did predestinate them he also called Hence Vocation is called Election The same work which the Apostle expresseth by the term Calling 1 Cor. 1.26 he expresseth by the term Choosing or Election ver 21 28. God hath chosen the foolish things God hath chosen the weak things things which are despised God hath chosen This also is further manifest in that the Elect before they do believe are described by such Names and Adjuncts as hold forth their special relation unto God and sure salvation by him in due season They before they do believe are said to belong to God Thine they were John 17.6 to be given to Christ John 6.37 to be beloved Rom. 11.28 As concerning the Gospel they are enemies for your sake but as touching the Election they are beloved for the Fathers sake To be reconciled to God For if when we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son Rom. 5.10 Christ calleth them his sheep though they yet believed not John 10.16 His people Acts 18.10 I have much people in this City The Corinthians whilest yet unbelieving Gentiles are here called the people of God They are called the Children of God Concl. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Spanh exc de grat Annot. in Sect. 21. Nulla vis infertur sacris literis verbis Christi Si quis dicat peccatuÌ„ Angelorum primum pâ—incipale fuisse quod voluerint acquiescere in veritate Evangelii de Christo proposito Zanc de pec lib. 4. cap. 2. Non dans prohibâ—â—s allegari non solâ—t ubi inquiretur in veraÌ„ râ—i causam Spanh exerc de grat resp ad erot 32. John 11.52 'T is as certain that all the Elect yet unbelievers shall believe and be saved as it is certain that they are saved who are already in Heaven 2. Only the Elect do believe All men have not faith 2 Thess 3.2 i.e. It is not given to all to believe The Election have obtained it but the rest are blinded Rom. 11.7 They who are not elected are not of God therefore receive not the word in truth Ye hear them not because ye are not of God John 8.47 And all that dwell upon the Earth shall worship him whose names are not written in the Book of life Election is the Book of life not to be written in the Book of life is not to be elected Revel 13.8 And whosoever were not found written in the Book of life were cast into the Lake of fire Because there is in the Reprobate a moral impotency to believe Moral impotency is a sinful inability As this inability is contracted by sin so it is sinful it being the duty of all that live under the call of the Gospel to believe John 6.65 1 John 3.23 2. There is also an enmity of malice of the Will John 5.40 And ye will not come unto me Rom. 11.28 As concerning the Gospel they are enemies John 8.44 Ye are of your Father the Devil and the lusts of your Father you will do he was a murtherer from the beginning and abode not in the truth Namely The truth of the Gospel concerning Christ as some have conceived As God in respect of his Decree freely so in respect of their sin he justly withholds from them grace to cure their unbelief Mat. 13.11 To them it is not given This final withholding of grace is proper to the Reprobate Moral impenitency and enmity or malice of the will are common to the Elect and Reprobate they being alike corrupt by nature Hence God is said to be the physical cause not of their unbelief but why their unbelief remaineth uncured As a Physician able to cure a disease which he is not bound to cure is the cause not of the disease but of the disease being not cured yet is he not the moral and blameable but the physical and unblamable cause thereof because he is not bound to cure it 3. Saving Faith as it is proper to the Elect Conclu 3. so it is the effect of election therefore called the faith of Gods Elect Tit. 1.1 both that gracious motion of the Spirit whereby faith is wrought which for distinctness sake was before called Saving Grace effectually and the grace of faith wrought by that motion proceed from and are the effects of election It is God that worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure Philip. 2.13 The gift of faith depends upon the will of God John 1.13 Jam. 1.18 Of his own will begat he us He hath mercy upon whom he will Rom. 9.15 It is according to Election Rom. 11.5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the Election of grace Twiss de permissione lib. 2 cr 4. Sect. 6. Redemptio est ex
nothing of any causal vertue towards the working thereof Contrary to the Doctrine of the Arminians teaching that Christ and Free-will are partial causes of Conversion No otherwise than as a Boy drawing of the ship with his father is a cause of the motion thereof whence according unto them like as Free-will without the grace of Christ is insufficient so the grace of Christ without the co-working of Free-will sufficeth not to the working of the grace of faith in the soul A Teret empty of Reason and full of pride making us in part our own Creators in respect of saving grace the most excellent creature a Tenet repugnant to the grace of the Gospel making us sharers with Christ in the work of Vocation the glory of the alone working whereof by vertue of his special grace is one of the Crown-Jewels of the Lord Jesus a Tenet fundamentally perillous unto souls directly tending to make them rest in a false Conversion and so without a new work fall short for ever of falvation Vocation Peter Mart. in Rom. 7. v. 4 Regeneratio fit in instanti Ames coron art 4. c. 4. Polon Syntag. Conversion or Regeneration is wrought in an instant God in saying Live makes alive In this respect it is in the first as it shall be in the second Resurrection In a moment in the twinkling of an eye whilst God speaks the word the dead shall rise Because Vocation or the infusion of Life is the introduction of a form which is done in an instant The form consists in an indivisibility it is an indivisible thing t is not infused successively Et quemadmodum in Christum credere non est motus successivus sed instantaneus ita insitio nostra in Christum non est motus successivus sed mutatio instantanea Twiss vind grat l. 3. errat 8. Sect. 1. Spanhem de grat vin resp ad exot. 28. n. 4. or by parts as natural life so spiritual life consists in an indivisibility i. e. it hath its being all at once and is uncapable of division into parts Because Vocation inferreth an essential change in the subject There is a change in a subject or of a subject change in a subject is either of quantity or quality this is called an accidental change Change of a subject is an essential change which in natural things is called Generation in spiritual Regeneration Now that every essential change whether Physical i. e. natural or spiritual is in a moment is thus evident Generation is taken improperly for the way and preparation or previous alteration which tendeth to the essence i. e. the union of the form with the matter so we say the Infant in the womb is generating some certain months space this is an accidental change or properly for the essential change viz. the introduction of the form so the Infant is generated in a moment after that the matter is now sufficiently altered and prepared to receive the form An essential mutation that is the mutation or change of the subject both in Nature and Divinity is wrought in an instant because it is rather the determination of a motion than the motion it self As Generation properly taken is a passive mutation of a natural body whence from the union of the form with the matter the body beginneth to be that which it was not So Regeneration is a passive mutation of an elect soul whence by reason of the union of grace with the soul the person beginneth to be that which he was not In that Generation is the acquiring of a new and corruption is the laying down of an old form therefore generation and corruption cannot be effected divisibly and successively or gradually otherwise it would follow that in the same thing and in the same instant there were either no form or two forms i. e. that some one thing were nothing or two things In the moment of Conversion God works that blessed work which shall never be undone that is wrought in an instant which shall remain for ever CHAP. XIII Of the Vnion of the Belcever with Christ FOr the better proceeding herein let us 1 Shew out of the Scripture That there is an Union between Christ and the Beleever 2 Consider what this Union is 3 The order of Union 4 The necessity of Union in order to Communion 5 The order of the dependence of Communion upon Union 6 The excellency of this Communion Of all other Unions three are most eminent the Union of the three Persons in one Essence this is the Mystery of all mysteries The Union of the two Natures in one person in Christ this is a great mystery 1 Tim. 3.15 The Union of a Beleever with Christ and in him with God This is a Mystery Eph. 5.32 The Union of the Mediator with the Father who as God is one with him both in respect of Essence I and my Father are one Joh. 10.30 and in respect of will Whatsoever the Father doth that doth the Son likewise Joh. 5.19 And as man is one with him in respect of their agreement as concerning the thing willed Not as I will but as thou will Mat. 26.39 is the example and pattern of Beleevers Union with Christ and in him one with other Joh. 17.11 That they may be one as we are one and verse 21. that they may all be one as thou Father artin me and I in thee that they also may be one in us Of this mystical Union between Christ and beleevers we read often in the Scripture sometime in proper and plain termes That they may be one as we are Joh. 17.11 He that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 Sometimes in elegant and lively Metaphors first of a Vine and branches Joh. 15.1 2. I am the true Vine and my Father is the Husbandman Every branch c. 2 Of Implantation Rom. 6.5 For if we have been planted together in the likenesse of his death we shall be also in the likenesse of his resurrection Christ here is represented under the similitude of a Plant for as a Plant that is set into the earth seemeth to lye dead and is unmoveable for a time but after springs up and flourisheth so as other Plants sprout forth grow up and are nourished thereby as we see in Ivie and Misselto So Christs body lay dead in the grave for a while but afterward sprung up and re-flourished in his Resurrection as that Plant of renown with whom we being planted together grow up by his grace 3 Of Ingrafting Rom. 11.17 19 23 24. where Christ is tacitly compared unto the Stock the beleever unto the Graft or Cyon for notwithstanding Abraham be the instrumental root good Olive tree and stock there expresly spoken of in whom his seed that is all beleevers for he is called the Father of all that beleeve Rom. 4.11.16 both the Nation of the Jewes first then the Gentiles and then the Jewes againe for the promise sake made unto him Gen.
not subjectively that is such as remain ungodly when they are justified The Text saith not he reconcileth enemies according to the sense of those words in the former place He justifieth the ungodly But If when we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son mark the time of this Reconciliation was the time of the death of his Son not the time of our Conversion much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his life that is If while we were enemies in respect of our nature and state we were reconciled in our head i. e. our Reconciliation was actually purchased by and acknowledged at the death of his Son how much more being reconciled in our selves by the slaying of the enmity of nature through the infusion of grace and the changing of our estate in respect of our persons and actions through faith in Christ shall we be saved by his life he that hath done the greater with greatest difficulty he will do the lesse having overcome and triumphed over all difficulty past and proceeding being without all difficulty in respect of what is to come This exposition is agreeable to the Analogie of faith strengthens the Apostles arguing from the greater to the lesser and any shorter interpretation seemeth to straighten those words We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son Thus Dr. Amos and Dr. Twisse understand this place Medulla l. 1. c. 20. Twiss de permiss l. 2 cr 4. digr 10. Sect. 4. and Calvin seemeth very well to allow thereof nor doth Piscator dissent there-from as appeareth in his citation of this Text disputing with Vorstius There is remission of sins that is actually procured before we do beleeve Cham. Nobis persuasissimum est Calv. in loc Cham. Tom. 3 lib. 12. Sect 18. Perkins in Gal. 3.16 Medulla c. 24. 27. remissa esse peccata antequam credidimus Christ is first justified that is acquit of our sins and we justified in him Perkins There is a kind of previous application of Redemption to us in Christ The sentence of our Justification was pronounced in Christ our head rising from the dead Ames Transactio inter Deum Christum fuit praevia quaedam applicatio ad nos Sententia haec fuit in Christo capite nostro à mortuis jam resurgente pronunciata There is saith Mr. Rutherford Rhetorf exc 1. c. 2. a Justification in the mind of God Eternal and a Justification in time terminated in the conscience of the beleever Obj. But if it be yeelded that the grace of Justification be before Faith it will follow that in justification by faith there is nothing really and possitively wrought in the Soul but only a manifestation of what was before Ans Not so in the justification of a sinner there is that which is real and positive both on Gods part and on the Beleevers part on Gods part 1 An actual imputing of the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ to the Beleever 2 A transient judicial act of God whereby he declareth the sinner to be justified for the righteousnesse sake of Christ received by faith terminated in the Conscience of the Beleever upon the Beleevers part there is 1. An actual relying upon the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ 2. A renouncing of our own righteousnesse Obj. But if we yeeld a being of Iustification how doth the condition of an elect person justified by faith differ from his condition yet an unbeleever in respect of his Iustification Ans God hath absolutely decreed to justifie them before they doe beleeve their persons are beloved from eternity Jesus Christ hath actually and absolutely procured their justification before faith God hath accepted this Meritorious satisfaction of Christ before faith God never imputes the sins of the world of the elect to them unto Condemnation having already imputed them unto and being satisfied for them by Christ All which notwithstanding the condition or state of the Elect before faith is the same with the condition of those who are not elected we are the children of wrath even as others Ephes 2 3. guilty of sinne before God and therefore in respect of their estate obnoxious to Condemnation even as others Though their Justification be absolutely Vide Retorf ex 1. c. 2. and actually procured before Faith yet they are not justified until they doe beleeve now and not until now is their state changed now and not until now doe the effects of Gods displeasure cease towards them by vertue of the Promise He that beleeveth shall not come into condemnation now and not before are their persons accepted in themselves and consequently their actions capable of being accepted hence Albeit the justification of the Elect is absolue ely procured before they doe beleeve yet they have no consolation nor peace of Conscience till they doe beleeve Obj. Yee see how that by works a man is justified and not by faith only Jam. 2.24 Sol. That James agreeth with Paul concerning the Doctrine of Justification is evident in that the same Scripture Gen. 15.6 cited by Paul Rom. 4.3 is cited and acknowledged to be fulfilled by James 2.23 and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham beleeved God and it was imputed unto him for righteousnesse That Proposition of Pauls We are justified by faith without works and that of James We are justified by works and not by faith only are distinct but not opposite Propositions for Iames referreth not to the manner of our Justification of which Paul speaks but to the nature of justifying faith against such as boasted of such a faith as justifying which was without works Paul disputes against the Legalist Iames both against the Legalists and Libertines Paul sheweth the manner of Justification by faith Iames the nature of justifying faith Pauls conclusion is that We are justified by faith without works Iames's conclusion is that Faith without works doth not justifie Justificamur Effectivè à Deo Approhensivé à fide Declarativè ab operibus Prideaux lect 5. de Justificatione The objection also is further satisfied by distinguishing of Justification Justification is either of our persons before God so Faith only justifies or of our faith before Men so works justifie that is they declare our faith before men to be unfeigned I will shew thee my faith by my works Jam. 2.18 By works was faith made perfect ver 22. Obj. We are justified by faith Rom. 4.9 Faith is a work therefore we are not justified without works and consequently not by faith only Ans How Faith justifieth hath been spoken before that faith doth not justifie as a work is evident Rom. 4 5. But to him that worketh not but beleeveth on him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse God makes high account of that faith which accounts of its object as the matter of our Justification God makes no account of that faith which we account of as a work in the matter of our Justification the Beleever
is in this sense no worker working giveth glory unto man Rom. 4.2 beleeving giveth glory unto God Psa 20. None so unable to work as the Beleever legally and properly Justitia propria dicitur quia in illa acquirenda elaboratur propriis viribus homini à natura insitis Piscat in Phil. 3. none so able to work the work of new obedience that is to work Evangelically Faith puts on but doth not take one stitch in the garment of Justification it is as we saw before with the Beleever as with the Lilly which doth not so much as spin yet Solomon in all his royalty was not cloathed like one of them To work supposeth four things 1 That such an act be done by the principle of grace received in innocency i. e. by our own strength 2 That it be done by our own persons 3 That it be done exactly according to the Letter of the Law 4 That there be a reward due thereunto according to order of Justice To make Faith as it is a Work to be a part or whole of our Justification were to make a Covenant of Grace a covenant of Works and consequently to destroy the Gospel Rom. 4.14 Gal. 3.18 Justification by faith establisheth the Law Rom. 3.31 but Justification by works makes faith voyd Gal. 3.21 This Proposition We are justified by faith if it be understood Legally it is false and blaspemous if understood Evangelically it is true and giveth glory to God Obj. 4. It is true works that are done without faith can be no matter of our Justification but works done by the grace of Jesus Christ may which is so farre from eclipsing that it illustrates the glory of grace It is much more honour to Christ to merit that we may merit Ans Had the Papists not eyes to see saith Cartwright yet might they wel have groped the contrary of that is here cavilled Faith and Works are opposite in the matter of our Justification Rom. 4.5 Man is justified in such a way as giveth glory unto God and excludes boasting Rom. 3.27 But if we were justified by any works wrought in us we should have whereof to glory Rom. 4.2 Paul is afraid to be found in his own righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 viz. in that righteousnesse whereof he is the subject which justifieth according to the order of the Law A Meritorious work is such an act whereunto a reward is due according to order of Justice hereunto are required those fouring redients mentioned in the answer to the fore-going objection which cannot be found in Man since the Fall neither in the state of Sin Grace nor Glory not in the state of Sinne Fideles sunt vasa misericordlae ex omni parte praeparationis adgloriam imò in ipsa gloria sunt vasa misericordiae Bell. enerv To. 4. lib. 7. cap. 2. n. 8. Paraeus in Rom. 3.23 Heb. 11.6 nor in the state of Grace where evil cleaveth to our best actions Luk. 17.10 nor in the state of Glory wherein the Elect remain vessels of Mercy their actions fruits of thanksgiving having their acceptation from the righteousness of Christ To say that Christ merited that we might merit is to say that Christ who merited that we should be saved by his grace merited that we should be saved by our own works a contradiction in Reason and a notable Master-piece of the mysterie of Iniquity as concerning the doctrine of Religion it were to merit away the nature of Merit and to turn the Covenant of Grace into a covenant of Works In the way of Salvation Merit and Grace are immediate opposites Rom. 11.5 Had Adam stood in the first Covenant he had merited but the Covenant of Grace hath removed Merit for ever from Man to Christ under the Gospel Christ is the only Person of Merit The Angels are confirmed by grace Man whether looked at as a vessel of grace or as a vessel of glory is a vessel of Mercy not the very Angels much lesse Men though in glory have any matter of glorying The faithful saith Doctor Ames in the very state of glory are vessels of Mercy Neither the Angels Ames Paraeus ubi supra nor the blessed in Heaven have matter of glorying Paraeus Obj. Vnto Justification by Faith Faith is required which is an act of the Beleever how then can we be sayed to be justified freely Ans Justification is actually procured and hath its being in Gods decree and in our Surety before we doe beleeve Faith is no instrument or motive of Gods absolute decree to justifie nor is it any instrument of Christs satisfactory and meritorious obedience either active or passive or of Gods acceptation of that satisfaction nor of the imputing of his obedience unto the beleever but the effect thereof The actual declaration in the Court of Conscience of the Beleever to be righteous is by faith not for faith by faith as a band means or instrument receiving not for faith as a cause of that which is received The nature of faith is to receive acknowledge and accept Free grace to seal to the truth of Free grace Lastly this grace whose nature is to apprehend and apply Free grace is the effect of Free grace surely it ariseth from the mist of remaining legalnesse that our being justified in such a way whose very nature is to acknowledge the freeness of our justification should occasion us to think Justification in that respect not to be free Faith and Free Grace agree therefore it is of faith that it might be by grace Rom. 4.16 Many Mysteries of the wisdome of God shine forth in the doctrin of Justification Many depths of the wisdom of God to be observed in the doctrin of justification Justification is universal God forgiveth all sin sins past sins present and sins to come sins past formally sins to come vertually those in themselves these in the subjects of them Justification is an individual act it admits not of degrees it doth not receive more nor lesse though our sensiblenesse of it be more or lesse yet our Justification is the same perfect from its first instant and not gradual Paul a beleever was as justified as Paul in glory because the righteousnesse of Christ which is the matter of the justification of the Saints is the same for ever of like vertue whether our faith be weaker or stronger it is not such a degree but the truth of our faith that sufficeth unto our being justified a thousand pounds received by a Palsie hand is a thousand pounds as wel as a thousand received by a healthful hand He that looked on the brazen Scrpent though with a weaker sight was healed as throughly as he that looked upon it with a strong sight A touch cureth the Woman as wel as a ful hold Mar. 5.34 The sense of our Justification is according to the degree and exercise of our faith but the truth of our justification is according to the truth of our faith the justification of
things to his glory and honour Mercy runneth down from God and begets peace of Conscience for peace of Conscience is nothing else but a solid taste of Gods mercy and peace of Conscience begets love by which we clasp about God again for love is nothing else but a reverberation or beating back of Gods beam upon himself or a return of duty in the sense of mercy * So in the Angels Song Luke 2.19 Glory peace and good-will All comes from good-wil that 's the first cause as God-glory 's the last end Under the Law the first and the tenth were the Lords the beginning and ending are his so that God is at the beginning and ending and either way is the utmost boundary of the Soul all things are from him and to him Secondly 1. Mercy Let me handle them particularly and apart and first Mercy which is the rise and cause of all the good we have from God The Lord would dispense blessings in such a way as might beat down despair and carnal confidence Man hath need of mercy but deserveth none Despair would keep us from God and carnal confidence robbeth him of his glory therefore as the Lord would not have flesh to glory so neither to be cut off from all hope Mercy salveth both we need not fly the sight of God there is mercy with him why he should be feared Psal 130.7 False worships are supported by terror but God that hath the best title to the heart will gain it by love and offers of mercy And we have no reason to ascribe any thing to our selves since Mercy doth all in the Court of Heaven and not Justice If you reckon upon a debt you are sure to miss 'T is a part of Gods Supremacy that all his blessings should come as a gift that he should act freely and entertain us as a King not as an Host Merit The event sheweth that Ioah should dye according as David had given order to Solomon 1 King 2.5 yet is this order of Davids no cause of that Treason for the commission of which Solomon justly brings down his hoary head to the grave with blood In like manner David had given a command to Solomon concerning the death of Shimei yet Solomon proceeds not to execution until Shimei by a presumptious violation of his confinement whereof Davids command was no cause had given Solomon cause to put him to death according to his appointment 1 King 2.18.40 Lastly God delighteth not in the death of a sinner So he testifieth of himself once and again Propos 5. and to this testimony subscribeth his Name For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dyeth sayth the Lord God Ezek. 18.23.32 yea to put it out of all controversie and to cleer himself fully in the hearts of all Elect and Reprobate both men and Angels he confirmeth this testimony with an Oath and giveth charge that it be made known to the House of Israel Say unto them As I live sayth the Lord God I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked but that the wicked turn from his way and live Turn ye turn ye from your evil ways for why will ye dye O House of Israel Ezek. 33.11 But it may be sayd The Scripture seemeth to speak otherwise elsewhere I also will laugh at your calamity Pisc obs in Ezek. 18. I will mock when your fear commeth Prov. 1.26 27. Answ Death is considered either as it is the destruction of the creature or as it is the execution of justice God delighteth in it as it is the declaration of justice but not as it is the destruction of the cteature of which more afterwards The sum of the Answer to this Objection is God being an absolute Lord having freely enabled man with power whereby he might have lived for ever and not have Sinned His Decree being only the Antecedent not the cause Man an Antecedent and the cause of Sin Sin the only deserving cause of punishment and lastly God not delighting in the death no not of Sinful man most unjustly and unthankfully do the non-elected complaine of God Because besides that power given them whereby they might have been happy He was not pleased over and above to bestow upon them that absolute-special grace which yet he was pleased to do unto his Elect whence they could not make themselves miserable and whereby he would make them happy The doctrine of the absoluteness Obj. 5. and necessity or infallibility of the Decree takes away the liberty of the second cause For answer to this Objection Ans consider these three particulars 1. Wherein the nature of Liberty doth consist 2. Partic. 1. That the same act in a diverse sence is both Evitable and inevitable 3. That necessity and liberty consi strogether The liberty of the second cause doth not consist in a power of indifferency to act or not to act independent of and not subordinate unto the Decree The second cause however it acts is subordinate to the first cause for notwithstanding the will is a free agent yet it is a second cause therefore must needs be an effect in respect of the first cause and consequently subordinate thereunto The will of man is a free agent but so as it is a second free agent not a first free agent The will is a free principle but yet it is a second not a first principle The will is its own free mover yet not its first mover 'T is true the will is the cause of its own acting yet so as it is also true that it is not the first but the second cause of its acting It is sufficient unto the being of humane liberty In creaturis est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 spontaneū in solo Creatore est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 spontaneū et independens Pareus in Gen. 45.8 that man acts without all constraint deliberately and according to the proper free-motion of his own will So far is the Decree which is an immanent act or the determination of the second cause in its working by the first which is a transient act from being a prejudice unto liberty that the second cause can neither be free nor act freely without both It is truth that the subordinate free-agent the thing being yet to do may either do or not do the same act Albeit which of the two he will freely incline unto is infallibly fore-decreed For example Thomas not yet being come into the house 't is a truth 1. That he may either come or not come into the house which he pleaseth 2. 'T is not a truth That he can both actually come and not into the house 3. T is a truth he will do that of these two freely which God hath decreed absolutely The same action in a divers sence is both evitable Partic. 2. and inevitable Evitable in a divided sence i. e. in respect of mans liberty Inevitable in a compounded sence i. e. in
that is of God the Creator to be the last End Prov. 16.4 Revel 4.11 Isai 41.4 and 44.6 and 48.12 Rom. 11.36 Rev. 1.8 11 17. and 21.6 and 22.13 This appears in that God hath all perfection The final Cause therefore being a matter of perfection God must needs be the final and universal End of all things The same is concluded from the imperfection of the creature the end perfects the thing if the creature were its own end Gods work should end in imperfection As it is impossible that there should be any creature that doth not depend upon the influence of God in its next efficient Cause so it is impossible there should be any creature not depending upon the intention of the glory of God so as to be referred thereunto as unto its last End otherwise there would be a progressus in infinitâ—m an End without an End The goodness of the creature is not placed in its own well-being but in the representation of the Perfections of God Vniversa creatura est speculum in quo reluceat gleria Dei Tho. p. 1. q. 17. Art 2. Twisse Cr. 3. dig 4. S. 11. iteÌ„ de Elect. d. 3. S. 1. Rhetorf de grat Ex. 2. c. 3. The goodness of the creature is considered either in respect of it self or in respect of its end viz. to be a glass wherein the Perfections of God shine forth If it be considered in it self so it might have been better with it then it is Mat. 26.24 It had been good for that man if he had not been born But if it be considered in respect of its last end the present administration thereof is best Obedience is better then disobedience considered in themselves but had there been no disobedience there had not been so great a manifestation of the glory of God had not any sinned there had been no Hell no Gospel no Jesus and albeit God had always been blessed for ever yet he had not been the God and Father of our Lord Jesus The Wisdom of God is a Justice whereby God giveth unto himself that which is his due and consequently orders all things so as may conduce most to his own Glory Cum necesse sit ut quicquid Deus agit ad extra id ipsuÌ„ propter se agat tanquaÌ„ fineÌ„ ultimum cuÌ„ ipse sit summe amabilis postulat justitia Dei naturalis qua sibi tribuit quod suum est ut Leus statuat de mediis maximè cingruenter ad finem c. Twisse de Reprob l. 1. p. 3. dig 1. Tho. p. 1. q. 47. A. 2. Dicitur justitia condecentiae sine congruitatâ— qua Deus quicquid agit agit convenienter sibi Seeing it is necessary that whatsoever God doth without himself he should do for himself as the last End the natural Justice of God whereby he gives unto himself that which is his requires that God appoint such means as most conduce to that End and dispose of them in such a way as is most suitable thereunto This Justice of God say the Learned is nothing else but his Wisdom according to which all things are ordered to their due ends The good of the Elect being included in the glory of God it followeth that God administring things so as serveth best for his own glory he administreth things so as serveth most for the good of his children The way of the Wilderness forty years about when as the Journey might have been gone in a few days there being but eleven days between Horeb and Kadeshbarnea Deut. 1.2 was their right way Psal 107.7 The reason whereof we have Deut. 8.2 3 16. That he might humble thee and prove thee and do thee good in thy latter end He hath made every thing beautiful in his time Eccles 3.11 And we know that all things workt gether for good to them that love God c. Rom. 8.28 God fits his dispensation to our spirits If thy heart be out of frame in thy present condition it would be worse though possibly at more ease in any other 8. Consect 8. Since all things are of God it follows that all things besides God came from nothing and are in themselves nothing God calleth himself I am Exod. 3.14 We saith learned and godly Mr Rutherford are created results of God bits of dependencies upon him Rutherford Survey of the Spirit Antichrist Time-accidents Yesterday-startups branches budding from our Mother-nothing by the alone Will and Pleasure of God Behold all Nations are before him as a drop of a bucket as the small dust of the ballance as a very little thing as nothing as less then nothing as va ity Isai 40.15 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beza in Luk. 2.14 As Creatures we are the effects of his good-pleasure as Beleevers we are men of his special-good-pleasure The difference between a Saint for ever and nothing for ever is the meer good pleasure of God 9. Consect 9. From the perfection of the first Cause namely the Will of God also followeth the universal dependance of the second Cause thereupon both in respect of its Being Conservation and Operation Hence Reason necessarily and clearly concludes every second Cause to be meerly passive in respect of its Being and that notwithstanding in respect of its doing it be active and not only passive yet so as that it is passive before it is active This truth as it holds concerning the whole creature so especially concerning the new-creature whose passive dependence upon its Creator and Actor is so much the more evident by how much it arising from the same nothing excelleth its fellow-creatures in being and doing The evidence of this truth from the doctrine of the Decree may be looked at as no small occasion of the enmity and exasperation of Nature especially of the Enemies of Grace against the preaching thereof 10. Consect 10. Hence we further see cause to sanctifie God in all our changes by the due acknowledgment of him and quiet subjection to the all-decreeing and all-disposing Will of God The consideration that God is God and that we are men should prevail with all men hereunto Man must not contend with God Clay must not strive with the Potter Nay but O man who art thou that replyest against God Rom. 9.20 As this consideration namely that such a thing is the Wil of God ought to still the heart of all men so it doth still the heart of good men Psa 38.13 14. and 39.9 I was dumb I opened not my mouth because thou didst it So now It was not you that sent me hither but God Gen. 15.8 11. Lastly Consect 11. Here we see the greatest cause of thankfulness unto God That common love of God to man whereby when we lay equal with the residue of the Creation in our Mother-nothing he freely gave unto us so excellent a Being after his own Image far above our fellow creatures was unspeakably above what is unspeakable But that special love of
Vide Epist ad Ctesiphontem advers Pelagium Item Dialog adv pelag librum primum Hiero Epist To. 2. as the wind is unto a vessel under sail and ready upon the motion of the stream to lanch forth as light is to an open eye yet in the dark The Necessity of the concurrence of the first cause with the second in the operations thereof appears thus All creatures depend upon God in respect of their Being Conservation and Operation For in him we live and move and have our being Acts 17.28 We have our being there is our dependance in respect of our Creation we live there is our dependance in respect of our Conservation we move there is our dependance in respect of our Operation Creatures depend no less upon God in respect of operations then in respect of their beings because the operations of things in both instants viz. both of being and of operation are equally beings of participation 2. From the perfection of the first Cause such is the nature of the first Cause being God and the nature of the second cause being a creature as that thence necessarily followeth the amplitude of Perfection in the first Cause and a universal and subordinate dependance in the second cause in respect of its efficiency In this regard Plato called the second causes the instruments of the first Cause which though in some respect it holdeth not Rhetorf Ex. 3. c. 2. de effi grat because instruments properly so called have no proper efficiency yet so far it is a truth as that every creature universally dependeth more upon God then any creature upon its fellow-creature 3. It implyeth a contradiction Omnia pendent a Deo essentialiter immediatè intrinsicè absolutè aeque ac aequalitèr that the creature should be able to act without dependancy upon the Creator 1. Because the agent being a creature is depending therefore its power to act is depending the power of acting holds proportion with the agent 2. Because the action proceeding from this agent is a being by participation it is impossible for the creature to have other then a depending being 4. As the conserving influence of God is unto the conservation of the creature so is the assisting influence of God unto the operation of the creature If God doth but meerly cease his conserving influence the creature ceaseth to be if God ceaseth his assisting influence the creature ceaseth to act The insensible cessation of the influence of the first Cause without any further violence or hurt done puts a period to the being or stoppeth the operation of the second cause respectively In the Concurse of the first Cause Of the manner of the concurrence of the first Cause with the second 1. Foregoing the influence or concurence thereof 1. Foregoeth the operation of the second cause in order though it be together with it in time The concurring influence of the Creator is the action of the first Cause the operation of the creature following thereupon is the action of the second cause and an effect of that concurring influence Now such an operation of the second cause must needs follow the concurrence of the first because of the order of Causes the first is before the second Of the dignity of the first Cause the first is more worthy then the second Of the dependance of the second cause the second cause depends on the first Of the essential subordination of the second Cause that which is essentially i. e. by absolute necessity of Nature subordained is consequent to that whereto it is subordained And lastly it is manifest in the operation of the creature as an effect thereof the concurring influence of the Creator is the first Cause the effect is after the cause 2. 2. Co-working It is by way of Co-operation or co-working with the second cause in this co-operation Concurse as was now intimated is the action of the first Cause the operation is the action of the second cause from both conjoyned proceedeth the effect Though the effect wrought by means of the operation of the second cause and the operation by means whereof the effect is wrought are both the effects of the first Cause yet in the producing of such effects as are wrought by means of the creature as the second cause cannot produce such an effect without the first Cause so the first Cause will not produce such effects-without the second cause the conjunction of the operation of the first Cause with the second in bringing forth such effects is the co-operation here spoken of In this Co-operation of the first Cause with the second necessary it is that the co-operation of the second cause with the first which necessarily followeth thereupon is absolutely subordinate not co-ordinate with the first Cause A co-ordinate Cause worketh of it self not depending upon its co-working cause or causes A subordinate cause is that which dependeth upon its superior Cause in respect of its working as the Officer upon the Magistrate An absolute subordinate Cause is that which dependeth absolutely upon its superior Cause in respect of its working so all second causes depend upon the first Cause The concurrence of the first Cause with the second 3. Immediate is immediate both in respect of the immediation of its virtue and the immediation of his presence When we say the first Cause concurreth immediately with the second the meaning is that in the co-operation thereof it so works with and upon the second cause as it intimately reacheth it and so as nothing is interposed as it is with two things that touch one another between which there is nothing Immediateness of presence is when things so act one upon another as that the beings or substances of the things are present with one another and touch one the other So fire burning the stubble doth immediately touch it not only with the immediation of its virtue but also with the immediation of its present substance Immediateness of virtue is when notwithstanding the things that act one upon another touch not one another in respect of their beings yet the virtue of the one reacheth and as it were toucheth the other otherwise there could be no working of one thing upon another all acting being by contact i. e. mutual touching either really and virtually or virtually though not really So the fire that warmeth though it reacheth not him that sitteth by it with its substance for then it would burn him Deus agit indistanter Deus corporeus non est sed incorporeus Et ubique diffusus omnia penetrans ad omnē effectum non mod immediatione virtutis sed immediati ne suppositi pertingens Twi Cr. 3. l. 2. yet it reacheth him with its virtue otherwise it could not warm him Now though it be many times a truth concerning the working of second causes one upon another that they work immediately in respect of their virtue but not in respect of the presence of their
beings themselves as appeared but now from the instance of fire and may further be seen in the example of the Sun which whilest experience witnesseth to warm and heat us upon Earth with the presence of its virtue yet Sense and Reason shews to be far absent in respect of its body being in the Heavens Yet such is the nature of the first Cause as that wheresoever it worketh it worketh immediately both with the immediation of his virtue without which there could be no effect and with the immediation of his presence because he is in every place Although the first Cause worketh immediately in respect of the immediation of its being and virtue yet in respect of those things which it acts by means of second causes whether by the mediation of the beings themselves Ames Med. lib. 1. cap. 9. or of their virtues into which things the second agents do send their influence by virtue of their proper forms I say in respect of such things it worketh mediately whence the first Cause is said to be a mediate cause in respect of the order of the second causes Vna estactio I ei creaturae respectu operis sed non respectu modi agendi 4. Determining For though as the beings so the operations of the second causes are from the first Cause efficiently yet they are from their next causes formally God causeth the burning of the fire yet we do not say God burneth but the fire burneth God worketh repentance in the Soul yet it is not a truth to say God repenteth but man repenteth God is the next efficient Cause but not the next formal Cause 4. The first Cause so concurreth as it determineth the second cause in its operation This is readily granted in natural agents in free-rational agents it is proved thus If the futurition of the operation of the second cause is determined by the Decree of God then the operation it self is determined by the Efficiency of God 1. Because the Efficiency is adequate to the Decree 2. Because there can be but one absolute Determiner 3. If the operation of the second cause were not absolutely determined by the Decree God might suffer disappointment in respect of the Decree Either the Will is determined by God in its operation or else it would follow either that there were not an essential subordination of the second cause unto the first that is of man to God which were repugnant to the nature of the second cause it being imperfect and dependent or that the first Cause were subordinate to the second which were repugnant to the nature of the first Cause being perfect and universal If as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will then as often as it willeth any thing it therefore willeth because God hath determined that it should will But as often as the Will doth not will it therefore doth not will because God hath not determined that it should will Therefore the Minor appeareth in two particulars 1. As often as the Will doth not will God hath not determined it to will 2. The Non-determination or Suspension of the Determination of God is the Antecedanious Cause in respect of God this cause cannot be positive A positive cause cannot be terminated in a Non-ens such as mans Non-volition i. e. Not-willing is it must therefore be suspensive The meer Suspension or withholding of the Influence of God without any positive action sufficeth to the annihilation of the creature that is Twiss lib. 2. crim 3. therefore the Suspension of the Determination of God sufficeth to the preventing of that operation of the creature which yet is not Obj. 1. If All-efficiency be from the first cause Against the All-Efficiency of God then the second cause hath no efficiency it doth nothing neither good nor evil man neither sinneth nor obeyeth no difference between good and evil the high way to confusion Thus the Libertines Ans Causes are either co-ordinate namely such as in respect of their Efficiency depend not upon their co-working cause or subordinate namely such as in respect of their efficiency depend upon their co-working cause In co-ordinate causes the Argument holds but second causes in respect of the first being subordinate and therefore as in their being so also in their working depending upon the first cause the Argument is of no force To deny the Efficiency of the second cause Tho. Part. 1. q. 105. art 5. Calvin contra libert c. 13 14 15 16 Suarez Metaph Tem. 1. disp 17. S. 1. is to deny that which experience proclaimeth namely That the Sun shineth or the fire burneth The denyal of the proper and formal efficiency or working of the second cause is repugnant to the whole Order of Nature Things that have not life it depriveth of their first qualities which are nothing else but active principles as power to heat in the fire power to cool in the water It disinables us from collecting effects from second causes or second causes from effects because it denyeth all such causes and effects It makes void all those dispositions in several creatures that tend to action Vain is the disposition in fire to ascend or in the earth to descend if there be no motion of ascent nor descent by them It takes away all perfection from those creatures as also from all other which consists in action Lastly If action be only the first cause in the presence of such a creature and not by the second cause we can no better conclude that the fire is hot from its burning nor that the water is cold from its coolness then we can conclude that the fire is cold or that the water is hot from such operations of heat and cold The reason is the first cause can as well make hot in the presence of water or make cold in the presence of fire as the contrary It takes away all difference between things that have life and things that have no life that which takes away action takes away life Take away action from the second cause and you take away the vegetative soul and its operations from living creatures You take away the sensitive soul and its operations from the sensitive creature The reasonable soul and its operations from the reasonable creature There is no difference to be found between reasonable creatures and sensible creatures between reasonable sensible and those creatures which are vegetative only having life Between reasonable sensible and vegetative and those that are lifeless in respect of their formal and most noble difference which is a principle of action with the operations thereupon ensuing There remains indeed a difference between them in respect of their outward shape but not in regard of the respect fore-mentioned It takes away the distinction between good and evil actions for that which denyeth actions simply denyeth all kind of actions whether good or evil therefore man in all
ver 10. Had an high esteem of Jesus Christ ver 3.46 Those three thousand Acts 2. ver 37. were pricked in their heart ask what they shall do The like may be observed in the Jaylour Acts 16.29 30. Paul before his conversion was sensible of his sin and death Rom. 7.9 justifieth the Law ver 12. saw the loss of his own righteousness and his need of the righteousness of Christ Phil. 37.8 To this purpose we may read of others else where 'T is certain That many of those who have been converted have had experience of a preparatory work fore-going the conversion but it cannot be proved out of the Scripture That any who have attained unto years of discretion have been converted without some experience thereof Object 1. Objection satissied There is no use of preparatory work because there is no saving work to be wrought upon the Elect which God cannot work without it Answ Were this Objection good there would follow a total uselesness-of any second cause or fellow-creature towards the producing of any effect 2. Not God's Absolute but his Ordinate Power i. e. The common Course of his special Providence is the ordinarily Rule of his proceeding with man the Exercise of his Power is regulated by his Will God is Omnipotent he can do whatsoever he will but he is not Omnivolent he will not do whatsoever he can Obj. 2. Preparatory work seemeth to darken the freeness of grace Ans Preparatory works precede vocation in way of order not in way of causality God giveth Christ after them as the way not for them as the cause Preparatory work is the effect of free common grace as saving work is the effect of free special grace It can therefore be no more prejudice unto grace then a free way is unto a free thing whereunto it is the way No more then freedom prejudiceth freedom i. e. No more then a free act of an inferiour nature prejudiceth a free act of a superiour nature It doth no whit touch it in it self it in many respects cleareth it but no way darkeneth it unto us Obj. 3. The Corinthians 1 Cor. 6.11 that were Idolaters Adulterers Abusers of themselves with mankind received Christ yet we read of no preparatory qualification mentioned Therefore there was no preparatory work Ans It is not said so therefore it was not so is no good consequence 'T is a frequent thing in the Scripture to mention the thing done without mentioning the manner of the doing of that thing Psal 33.9 David speaks of the Creation yet is silent of the Order of creating Matth. 1.2 We read that Abraham begat Isaac but of the manner of his begetting him viz. By faith not considering his own body now dead Rom. 4.19 c. There is no mention Exod. 20.1 The Holy Ghost records the deliverance of Israel out of the Land of Egypt the manner of it namely by signes and wonders and by an out-stretched arme is wholly omitted 'T is in this case between the thing done and the manner of the doing thereof as between the Sacrament instituted and the Order of the institution The Sacrament is sometimes mentioned where the Order of the institution is not observed 1 Cor. 10.16 As therefore he that would inform himself of the Order of the Institution and Administration of the Elements in the Supper is not to learn it from those Texts where though the matter be recited yet the Doctrine of the Order is not held forth so he that would instruct himself concerning Preparatory Work in order to conversion is not to look unto those places where though the work of conversion be recorded yet the teaching of Preparatory Work is not intended but unto such Scriptures where the Doctrine of Preparatory Work is purposely taught Obj. 4. Jeremiah was sanctified before he came out of his Mothers womb Jer. 1.5 John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Ghost even from his Mothers womb Luke 1.15 when they were both uncapable of Preparatory Work Ans Jeremiah's Sanctification from the Womb may be understood not of any actual but only an intentional separation of him to office as Paul speaks in like manner of himself Gal. 1.15 If we understand it actually it seemeth to be but an actual separation of him to the Office of a Prophet By the Holy Ghost whereby John was filled from the Womb we may well understand not the gift of saving grace but eminent gifts of Office to fit this Eliah for that high service whereunto he was appointed Whether we understand by the sanctification of Jeremiah and by the filling of John with the Holy Ghost the grace or gifts of office or the gifts of saving grace The Dispensation of God unto them was extraordinary not ordinary and so teacheth not the question Only in John we clearly see God not only can but doth even in Infants work in a secret manner by his Spirit when he pleaseth CHAP. VII What are the Principal Heads whereunto the Substance of Preparatory Work in the full Extent thereof may be referred IN Answer to this Question Consider 1. What Preparatory Work taken in its Extent is 2. What Parts thereof are wrought by the Ministery of the Law 3. What Parts thereof are wrought by the Ministery of the Gospel 4. Some Cases of Conscience concerning Preparatory Work Preparatory Work taken in its full Extent is the whose frame of inherent Qualifications coming between the Rest of the Soul in the State of Nature and Vocation wrought distinctly and in measure in the Ministery both of the Law and Gospel by the common work of the Spirit concurring therewith whereby the Soul is put into a next disposition or Ministerial Capacity of believing immediately i. e. Of immediate receiving of the Lord Jesus Christ The Parts of Preparatory Work wrought by the Ministery of the Law are 1. Conviction of the Holiness of the Law 2. Conviction of Sin 3. Conviction of Guilt 4. Concluding of the Soul under sin and guilt 5. Conviction of the Righteousness of God in case he should punish us for our sins 6. Inexcusableness 1. The Conviction of the Holiness and Spiritualness of the Law is that Work of the Spirit whereby the Soul is enlightened to see the Conformity of the Command unto the Will of God whether we understand by command the Precept concerning the not eating of the Tree of Life or the Decalogue prescribed unto man in innocency as the rule of life and manners Therefore called the Moral Law or any other Commandement of God Ceremonial Judicial or whatsoever This conviction is called the coming of the Commandement Rom. 7.9 For I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandement came sin revived and I dyed It causeth a Doctrinal Approbation thereof The Law is h ly and the Commandement holy and just and good The Precept is holy the Curse is just the Promise is good I consent unto the Law that it is good 2. Conviction of Sin is the conscience
to be our duty to believe as that the fault of our unbelief lyeth wholly upon our selves Sol. For the better removing of this objection there is need of a threefold Distinction 1. Distinguish between unbelief and unbelief not cured 'T is easie to conceive how a Physician may be the cause why such a disease is not cured of which disease it self he is no cause Unbelief considered in it self is simply a sin Therefore God is no way the Cause or Authour of it 2. Distinguish of unbelief not cured unbelief not cured is considered either Negatively for a meer absence of faith where the rule requireth it not to be and therefore is unblamable so it is in those that never heard of the preaching of the Gospel Or Privatively for the absence of faith where the rule requireth it to be so unbelief is looked upon in those that live under or hear of the Gospel 3. Distinguish between a Physical and a Moral cause A Physical cause is such a cause as though without it the effect cannot be yet it is no ways bound to produce such an effect thus the absence of the Sun is the cause of the night A Physician is the cause why that disease remains uncured which he can cure but is not bound to cure A Chyrurgion the cause why the issue remains unhealed which he is not tyed to heal Thus the King not giving a pardon is the cause why the offender is executed whom no Law obligeth him to pardon A Moral cause is such a cause wherein the Agent stands by duty bound concerning the producing or not producing of such an effect so as by omission of what is commanded or commission of what is forbidden there is a guilt incurred so mans will is moral therefore the blameable cause of unbelief Gods Will is the Antecedent not the Cause of unbelief the abuse of mans free-will in the fall is the cause of unbelief Unbelief not cured considered Negatively is in respect of the Will of God a physical and unblamable effect of a physical and unblamable cause but mans will being a moral cause unbelief in this sence cannot be the effect thereof Unbelief not cured privatively considered is in respect of God as a blamable Consequent of an unblamable Antecedent in respect of the will of man it is a blamable effect of a moral and blamable cause In Adam having received povver whereby vve might not have sinned vve sinned freely Unbelief is the effect of our sin in Adam God together vvith the Object of Faith tenders us means so far sufficient to the begetting of faith as leaveth us without excuse We love our unbelief and resist this means of believing John 1.11.5.41 Our contumacious opposition to the command of believing is the effect of our love to unbelief 'T is then but Justice in God to leave us to our unbelief in so doing he doth us no wrong being free to have mercy upon whom he will The Difficulty of believing The Difficulty of believing appeareth in three things 1. in the Special enmity of the heart against this duty 2. in the Eminence of the Principle requisite to the creating of faith 3. in the Greatness and largeness of the obedience of Faith 1. The Special enmity of the heart against believing appeareth thus there is no obedience that God and Christ love better 1 John 3.23 Or that the Spirit laboureth more in John 16.9 No obedience that either Satan or man oppose more Satan opposeth none more For as the Spirit of truth leadeth unto all truth but into none more then this So the Father of a lye opposeth all truth yet none more then this Men that finally resist believing in Christ by so doing do the will of the Devil do shevv him to be your Father John 8.44 Ye are of your Father the Devil and the lusts of your Father ye will do Vide Zanch. de peccat Angelorum lib. 4. c. 2. Theologitam nostri quam Pontisscis probabile aducunt Christum positum esse non modo in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 multorum hominum sed etiam in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ipsorum etiam Angelorum Twiss de Elect. l. 4. p. 1. To this purpose there is a good use to be made of Zanchy's Discourse concerning the Revelation of Christ's Incarnation and the Exaltation of the humane Nature above the Nature of Angels by vertue of the Personal union the Doctrine of the grace of Christ ncarnate being that truth or at least contained in that truth whereof Christ speaks John 8. in which the Devil abode but hated not from the beginning Many Divines are conceived probably to think That Christ was not only set for the fall and rising again of many men but for the fall and standing of the Angels Man opposeth no truth more John 5.40 And ye will not come unto me that you may have lise What is said of the Jews Rom. 11.28 is true of all As concerning the Gospel they are enemies A formidable curse vvhereby the soul is smitten with an enmity against the Gospel of Blessedness The Gospel of Christ is a Doctrine of Contradiction Luke 2.34 Behold this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel and for a signe that shall be spoken against A stumbling stone Rom. 9.32 A rock of offence 1 Pet. 2 8. A Doctrine of foolishness 1 Cor. 1.23 If he shall be in danger of hell fire that saith unto his brother Thou Fool What danger shall he be in that upbraideth the Gospel vvith foolishness They put it viz. the Word of God i. e. the Doctrine of the Gospel from them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 13.46 They do not only not go to fetch it but being brought to them they put it away from them The Covenant of Works we could much better close vvith then vvith the Gospel any other Gospel command then that of believing any other person to be believed in then Christ Jesus John 5.43 I am come in mine own Name and ye receive me not if another shall come in his own Name him will ye receive any other way rather then the way of the Gospel Jer. 2.36 Why gaddest thou so much to change thy way Acts 22 4. I persecuted this way unto the death Grace likes no vvay to life so vvell Nature dislikes none so much We are not by nature so averse to the Turkish Alcoran as we are to Christs Gospel 2. The Eminency of the Principle requisite unto the creating of faith The Apostle excellently sheweth Ephes 1.19 20. And what is the exceeding greatness of his Power to us ward who believe according to the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Where this truth is held forth 1. By a Gradation Power his Povver the greatness of his Povver the exceeding greatness of his Power 2. By a Comparison the Povver which God puts forth in the Work of faith being compared unto
the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Now Christ dying as a publck Person for the sins of the Elect and rising again as a publick Person for the justification of the Elect. It was more to raise Christ from the dead then it hath or vvill be to raise all the Elect from sin or then it will be to raise all the dead at the last day Hence in the working of faith in the soul God is not only said to move the soul but to dravv it None can come to me Except the Father which hath sent me draw him John 6.44 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dravving is an Act wherein the Agent putteth forth his might for us To believe is said to be the Work of God John 6.29 Emphatically so called not only because of its special acceptableness unto God but also because he is the Efficient of it and that with a preëminent efficacy of the Authour shining forth in this Work compared with his other works God is able to graffe them in again Rom. 11.23 in the ingenerating of faith in Christ and uniting of the soul unto Christ are manifested both the inability of man and the ability of God Here appears the Elects malice unto Christ and Christs love unto the Elect the evil of the spirit of corrupt nature and the good of the Spirit of grace Sarah her conceiving of Isaac whose birth was a figure of regeneration Gal. 4. was a great Work a Miracle Mary her conception of Christ by the Power i. e. by the Command and Blessing of the Holy Ghost was also a great Work a Miracle but for Christ to be formed in the soul by believing is a greater-Work Christ himself the Object of Faith is the greatest of Gods Works the Creation of Faith in Christ that is to make a sinner a believer may be reckoned amongst those that are next thereunto 3. Concerning the Greatness and Largeness of the Obedience of Faith consider that as in unbelief and its consequences there is unspeakable disobedience So faith besides vvhat is formally contained in its proper nature hath an influence unto all new obedience Amongst other notable Services implyed in Faith it necessarily presupposeth these great duties First The right discerning of its Object an Act of such high contentment unto Christ as that he professeth himself to be ravished therewith Cant. 4.9 Secondly The Denial of our selves in matter of our righteousness Philip. 3.8 9. Yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the Excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith Thirdly Denial of our own wills As the Camel passeth through the Needles eye so is the Will unravel'd littled nothing'd by being brought to faith in Christ Jesus Mat. 19.24 Fourthly The Denial of our own glory John 5.44 How can ye believe which receive honour one of another and seek not the honour that cometh from God only The Obedience of the Law vvas perfect and glorying giving glory unto man Rom. 4.2 For if Abraham were justified by works he hath whereby to glory but not before God The Obedience of the Gospel is perfect and humble giving glory unto Christ that is unto God in and by Christ Rom. 4.20 Abraham was strong in Faith giving glory to God Fides pro varia dispositione ipsi ad Objecta varia vir utes omnes habitus omnes boâ—os ia se continet tanquam proprietates in forma virtualitèr ab ipsa perdentes in actu secundo Ames de traduct peccat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Covenant of Grace makes man as holy as the Covenant of Works and more lowly And as Faith in it self necessarily presupposeth these high and supernatural Services so as was intimated a little before hath it also in relation to the exercise of all other graces an influence into universal obedience By Faith we are united to Christ Ephes 3.17 By Faith we are justified Rom. 5.1 By it we perform all duties of both Tables Gal. 2.20 By it we persevere 1 Pet. 1.5 And lastly By it we are saved Ephes 2.8 To shew the Eminence of the Obedience of Faith The Truth that is to be believed is called the Truth John 8.44 At least as some take the place the Witness That God gave of his Son 1 John 5.10 the Command 1 John 3.23 And to believe is called the the Work John 6.29 No marvel therefore if it be said 'T is easier to keep the whole Law then to believe Seeing by faith we receive Christ himself and from him legal obedience imputatively and assisting power in our ovvn persons practically to fulfil all new obedience Evangelically Because also there is more power required to make Adam a believer then either to have created or continued him in the state of innocency wherein had he persevered he had fully answered the Law The Grace of Creation confirming grace being superadded sufficed to that the Grace of Redemption is requisite to this Gods pleasure vvas enough without any cost for that but this besides the good pleasure of the Lord cost God his Son and Christ his Blood in that the Soul vvas a meer nothing and so could do nothing for it self yet being but a meer nothing it made no resistance but here besides the helplesness of a meer nothing there is also the enmity of a most corrupt thing The Believer obeyeth both Law and Gospel we obey the Law legally in our Surety the Gospel perfectly in our ovvn persons with the perfection of parts or sincerely in this life with the perfection of degrees in the life to come Believers obey the Law legally in their Surety Legi satisfecimus in Christo justificamur praedita eâ justitia quam lex à nobis postulat Piscat in Rom. 8.4 because in him vve obey the Precept Do this Levit. 18.5 and satisfied the curse Thou shalt dye Gen. 2.17 The believer hath satisfied the Law in Christ through faith in vvhom vve are endued vvith that righteousness which the Law requireth Rom. 8.4 and 10.4 Believers obey the Gospel perfectly vvith the perfection of parts The Gospel is the Law in Christ the Rule of Righteousness is the same both in the Lavv and in the Gospel though the manner and end of obeying are changed the manner of obedience under the Lavv was by the Grace of Creation the manner of obedience under the Gospel is by the Grace of Redemption i. e. by the Grace of Jesus Christ A great end of obeying under the Law vvas That vve might obtain life as due unto us for perfect obedience thereunto in a way of justice The great end of obeying under the Gospel is thankfulnese
electione fides electorum tantū Spanh exer de grat resp ad erot 24. Nam in Dei Decreto haec reciprocātur Christus mortuus est pro credentibus soli sunt credentes pro quibus Christus mortuus est Rhetorf de grat ex 2. c. 2 Twiss de erratis lib. 3. errat 8. S. 2. that is in this present general defection of the whole Nation there is a remnant a portion of Jews made the people of God by effectual vocation according to the Election of grace Faith and vocation in which is faith are expresly mentioned as the effects of election And as many as were ordained to Eteraal life believed Acts 13.48 Called according to his purpose Rom. 8.28 Other faith will not save the many who are only otherwise called are not amongst those few that are chosen Gods willing the futurition of all things is the cause of all things therefore Election which is his will to have mercy of which mercy faith is a part must needs be the cause of mercy which is the whole and consequently of faith which is a part of the whole 1 Pet. 1.20 I obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful 1 Cor. 7.25 2 Tim. 1.9 Redemption is the meritorious cause of faith God according to Order of Justice hath bound himself for Christs sake to give faith unto the Elect Iesa 53.10 Because the active and passive obedience of Christ was not only satisfactory but meritorious both of grace and glory But redemption is the effect of election that which is the cause of the cause is the cause of the effect following from that cause In Gods Decree those two Propositions reciprocate that is they are true both ways for Wards and Backwards Christ died for believers and believers only that is such as are or shall be believers are those for whom Christ died The Elect and Believers are reciprocated that is All that are elected do or shall believe And all that do or shall believe are elected CHAP. XI What is the first saving gift actually applied unto an Elect Soul THe Person of Jesus Christ Mediator together with his Spirit whereof Faith is a principall part is the first saving gift actually applyed unto an elect person All Beleevers have received both the Person of Christ and the Spirit of Christ The Person of Christ Job 1.12 Col. 2.6 1 Joh. 5.12 Rom. 8.32 1 Cor. 6.15 Heb. 3.14 The Spirit of Christ Rom. 8.9 10. 2 Cor. 13.5 They receive not his Person without his Spirit nor his Spirit without his Person but both his Person and his Spirit together For the clearing of this Proposition consider 1 What the Person of Christ is 2 What the Spirit of Christ is 3 Why it is called the Spirit of Christ 4 Why Faith is called a principal part of the Spirit of Christ 5 What it is to receive the Person of Christ and what it is to receive his Spirit 6 The Arguments concluding the Proposition By the Person of Christ we are to understand God viz. What the Person of Christ is The second Person in the Trinity and man Mediator in one and that an increated Person By the Spirit of Christ What the Spirit of Christ is we are to understand the universal habitual created frame of inherent saving grace The whole body of renewed saving qualities The saving gifts of the Spirit And hereby we know that he abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us 1 Joh. 3.24 It is called life Rom. 8.10 The Spirit is Life because of Righteousnesse The Spirit of the command and promise is Life The Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 i.e. The divine qualities of the mind resembling the Nature of God The seed remaining 1 Joh. 3.9 The Image of God consisting of righteousnesse and true holinesse i.e. Of conformity of the understanding and will or the spirit of obedience unto both Tables Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 Created in the soul the second time The new man Eph. 4.24 The new creature 2 Cor. 5.17 Here distinguish between the increated Spirit which is the Author the created transient gracious motion of the Spirit which is the efficient cause and saving grace which is the permanent effect thereof It is called the Spirit of Christ Why is it called the Spirit of Christ First Because the Holy Spirit to which the work of saving grace is eminently ascribed notwithstanding it be equally wrought by all the three Persons of the Trinity proceedeth not only from the Father but also from the Son Joh. 14.26 15.26 Gal. 4.6 Secondly Because the motion of the Spirit upon the soul is from Christ as a Head the same individual action proceeds both from the three Persons whose works upon the creature are undivided and from Christ as a Head In the actions of Christ as a Head the whole person acts in way of office the Divine nature principally the Humane nature instrumentally Thirdly Because Christ hath merited the effectual operation of the Spirit Joh. 16.14 15. Fourthly Because the Spirit works according to the wil of Christ Joh. 5.21.26 Joh. 15.26 Fifthly Because the Spirit which we receive in measure is the same in kind with the Spirit which Christ as man received out of measure 1 Cor. 6.17 The soule by faith receiveth the person really and objectively but not personally it were blasphemy so to affirm that is How the soul by faith receiveth the Person of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it apprehends the Person of Christ the immediate object of faith is Christ himself the Divine nature is in the three Persons essentially The second Person of the Trinity dwelleth in the Manhood personally The Spirit is in the Beleever energetically or operatively that is by its saving effects That by faith the soule receiveth the Person of Christ appeareth thus from the nature of Faith whose very being consists in receiving of Christ To receive Christ Jesus as our Lord and Saviour is of the form of faith and principally differenceth it from other saving grace wherewith in respect of its next matter it agreeth we may as well deny a man to be a reasonable creature as deny that the soul by faith receiveth Christ hence faith is called a receiving of Christ John 1.12 Col. 2.6 As therefore by the act of faith the soule actively receiveth Christ so by the habit of faith the soul passively receiveth Christ This appears yet further from the nature of Relates Fides per se est qualitas sed ratione respectus ad objectum vecatur relatio Keck Log. Lib. 1. Sect. 1 cap. 12. faith and the object of faith that is Christ are Relates faith in it selfe considered is a quality but in respect of Christ the object thereof it is a Relate Relates necessarily affirm one the other they are together not onely in time and nature but in knowledge also the one cannot be known without the other as it is impossible to be a Son without an actuall respect unto a
only receiveth the impression of the Agent The Will in respect of this first reception of Grace hath neither the nature of a free Agent nor of a natural Patient but of an obediential subjection Obediential subjection is that capacity in the subject to receive an impression from the agent whereby as it remaines without ability in itself to put forth any causal vertue in order to such an effect so neither hath it any such repugnancy or contradiction in its nature whereby it is rendred uncapable of being made partaker of such an impression or effect by the power of a supernatural cause Briefly Impossibile Naturâ Naturae there is in such a subject in order to such an effect an impossibility by Nature but not to Nature i. e. an impossibility in respect of its owne power but a possibility in respect to a supernatural power this was the condition of those bones Ezek. 37. in respect of Life though there was in them a simple impossibility to live of themselves yet there was no impossibility but that they might be made alive by the power of God Power to receive a new forme is either Natural or Obediential Natural is in the thing or matter that is changed as in the seed of an Herb there is power to become an Herb Obediential power of a subject to receive a new forme puts not any causal power in the thing or matter to be changed all such power is without it viz. in the efficient there is only a power of reception in the thing or matter all power of causality being without the thing in the efficient So stones are in an obediential power to become men that is there is in them a subjection to become Men but all causality whence they doe become men is without them and in the efficient thereof namely God Obediential subjection is a capacity in the Creature to receive the impression of the first cause For the Soule then to be passive in the work of Vocation is for the Soule to receive the first saving grace and supernatural effect of the Spirit of Christ so as the Soule it selfe in this work is no way active from any such principle of activity as is of any power to produce such an effect no more than there is in a dead man to produce life Tho. 1 â—ae qu. 111. Art 2. in this worke the will is only moved of God but moveth not it selfe The Soule in this passive reception acteth not only it receiveth the impression of the Agent as Adams body was a passive receiver of Life inspired by God thereinto Gen. 2.17 formed and organized but yet life-lesse and breathlesse so were those bones Ezek. 37.8.10 and the body of the Shunamites childe 2 King 4.34 Hence the infusing of life into the Soule is compared to quickning of the dead Ephes 2. As a vessel is a passive receiver of the liquor poured into it the Soule is compared unto a vessel Rom. 9.21.23 and 2 Tim. 2.20 21. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And not only in the application of justifying grace is the love of God said to be poured out abundantly in our hearts Rom. 5.5 but also the creating of inherent grace in the Soule by the Spirit is compared to the infusion or pouring out of precious liquor thereinto God in effectual Vocation makes us vessels of honour In Vocation notwithstanding all preparatory work life is wrought by the quickning active Spirit of Christ Vocare est facere vas in honorem August Epist 105. Twiss vind grat l. 1. par 1. digr 8. S. 4. What the habit of faith or any other grace is in a dead passive Soule What the habit of faith or of any other saving grace is The habit of saving grave in general is an inherent and permanent frame of saving qualities infused into the Soule The habit of faith in particular is an inherent and permanent quality whereby Christ is received infused into the Soule by the Spirit in respect of which the Soule is only a meer passive subject and not any way an efficient The same habitual grace in several respects hath divers names Being considered as a potent quality that is such a quality as is predominant in the subject where it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non est ad malum qua tale coron Artic. quart de conversione and enabling the Soule through the concurrence of assisting grace to all duties and above all oppositions it is called a power Being considered as a causative quality that is such a quality as is not only first but hath the nature of a cause unto the consequent second acts following from thence it is called a Principle Being considered as an infused inherent and permanent quality disposing the subject to the second acts it is called a Habit. What the second act What the second act Life-operation or c. Life-operation or exercise of faith or of any other grace commonly called the Act is The exercise of faith or of any other saving grace is a Life-operation flowing from the infused power principle or habit through the help of the antecedaneous concurrence of assisting grace in respect of which the beleever is not only a subject but also an efficient co-working cause The just distinction between the habit The just distinction between the habit c. and the second act or exercise of grace is carefully to be observed The supernatural power principle or habit for all those termes mean the same thing is the first act the Life-operation is the second act The habit is the grace it selfe Pemble of grace and faith p. 84 or the nature of grace the Life-operation or Life-act is the exercise of grace The habit is conversion in the first act the Life-operation or Life-act is conversion in the second act The habit is actually or an active principle existing without its causes the Life-act is action The habit is an immanent act i. e. such an act as is inward and abideth The Life-act is a transient act that is such an act as passeth away The habit is the will it self the Life-act is the volition The habit is the inclining of the soule to the object of its action the Life-act is the union of the soule with the object In the infusion of the habit the soule acteth not but is onely acted Haminis vero primtsm passio quòa trahitur à patre deinde act io quòu tractus venit ad Christum Jun. de nat grat collat 11. l. 57. In the Life-act the soule being acted acteth The habit God worketh without us the Life-act God worketh with us In the habit of faith is the being of faith it self the Life-act of saith is the working of this grace now wrought The infusion of the habit is effectuall vocation The Life-act of faith is our answer unto the call of God Effectual vocation is called the drawing of the Father Joh. 6.44 our being taught of God our
in no respect active so the soul is not passive God doth not work savingly upon us as upon stocks or senselesse creatures or it is taken respectively for that which notwithstanding in some sense it be active yet in some it is passive the soule is passive in this latter sense it is active in respect of the use of means it is passive in respect of any saving efficacie by the use of means Sarah was active in respect of the use of means yet passive in conceiving by the use of means Rom. 4.19 Heb. 11.11 12. the Shunamites childe notwithstanding any natural heat and radical humor yet remaining in its dead body was passive in regard of the re-infusion of the reasonable soule 2 King 4.34 notwithstanding the noyse of the bones there coming together bone to his bone the sinewes and flesh coming upon them and the skin covering them yet those breathleffe bodies remaine passive in respect of life Ezek. 37.7 8. Though there be difference between Gods manner of working upon them who are dead spiritually Quamvis igitur discrimen sit inter modum agendi cum spiritualiter corporaliter mortuos in via ad vivificationem nihil tamen in eo reperiri potest quod in illis quam in istis effectum à Deominus absolutè pendere facit Coron artic 4 c. 4. and upon those who are dead corporally yet there can nothing be found which makes the effect of life lesse absolutely to depend upon God in those than in these We on the one hand against the Enthusiasts affirm not onely the power to use but the duty of using the means and on the other hand against the Arminians deny that man before grace can do any thing having the power of a cause so far forth as cometh from them in order to Life because we are reasonable creatures God proceeds with us in the use of means because we are dead creatures in respect of the efficacy of the means we depend wholly and absolutely upon God Obj. 2. Where there is a Physical or Natural motion of the will there the soul is not meerly passive but In Vocation or receiving the habit of grace there is a Physical motion of the will because there is a gracious motion which necessarily presupposeth a Physical motion Therefore in Vocation the soul is not meerly passive Sol. In the motion or act of the will in Vocation we must distinguish between the Physical or pure natural act of the will and the graciousnesse of that Physical act the soul is active in respect of the Physicall act Velle nob is est bene vesse à Deo Willer Syn. cent 4. error 33. but in respect of the graciousnesse of that Physical act the soul is meerly passive To will is in our own power to will as we should is of God Obj. 3. Conversion the same with Vocation is a Life-act to affirm the soule to be meerly passive in a Life-act were a contradiction therefore the soule in Vocation is not meerly passive Answ Conversion is taken in a double sense either for the immediate work of God infusing a principle of life Suffrag Brit. Thes 1. 2. and so regenerating the soule this is properly Vocation and in it the soul is passive or for the Life-act of faith c. whereby man being now converted converteth himselfe unto God Conversion in this second notion according to which the objection onely holds is not the same with Vocation it selfe but the answer of the soule to its call or some other action of saving grace So by Arguments the Authorities follow The will of man in Conversion Luth. cent 16. l. 8. c. 8. p. 899 is purely passive Luther Voluntas hominis in convevsione habet se merè passivè For faìth in respect of justification is a meer passive thing Calv. instit lib. 3. c. 14. Calvin Fides enim quoad justificationem est res merè passiva Truly man is dead Zdnch. Epist l. 1.94 and wanteth all sense and motion wherefore he can do nothing towards the making of himself alive Zanchy Homo certè mortuus omni sensu motuque caret quare ad sui vivificationem nihil praestat nihil agit In Regeneration we do not work together with God Beza thes theol c. 15. but are meerly passive Beza In Regeneratione non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Deo sed merè 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 habemus For we are all dead to sin Bucan loc 18 10. but he that is dead is no otherwise than passive to his being made alive Bucanus Sumus enim omnes mortui in peccatis mortuus autem ad vivifieationem non nisi passivè se habet In the beginning of Conversion Perkins of Gods Free Grace and mans free will p. 737. that is in the setting or imprinting of the new qualities and inclinations in the mind will and affections of the heart we are meerly passive not active Perkins Unto that work of Regeneration which noteth the immediate work of God regenerating man Suffrage Brit. art 3 4. man is passive Suffrage of the Britain Divines Ad hoc ipsum opus regenerationis quo denotat immediatum opus Dei hominem regenerantis habet se homo passivè Before Regeneration man is meerly passive Keck Theol. 8. cap. ult unto special good Kockerman Post Lapsum ante regenerationem ad speciale bonum merè passive home se habet In respect of goodnesse inspired into our minds Willet Synop. err 46. p. 958 idem n. 35. our wils are altogether passive the freedome then of the will is the work and the effect of Grace ergo it is passive Willet The Free-will of a naturall man in respect of Gods working upon him is in some fort after the maner of a subject passively Leiden Divines Liberum naturalis hominis arbitrium habet se respectu Dei agentis Synop. pur Theol. Disp 17. ad modum quadantenus naturae subjecti 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 possivè In the application of the first grace man doth not act but suffers Ames In applicatione gratiae primae Ames de trapeccat ad vitam non agit homo sed patitur Our Churches conspire with Luther in that Article namely that in our first conversion we are meerly passive Dr. Twisse Nostrae Ecclesiae conspirant cum Luthero in isto articulo Twiss de errat 204. quod sc in prima nostri ad Deum conversione habeamus nos merè passivè In effectual calling man is altogether passive Assembly at Westminster being quickned and renewed by the holy Spirit he is thereby enabled to answer this call This Doctrine of the passivenesse of the soul in Vocation is a fundamental truth holding forth the Spirit of Christ in a way of special grace to be not onely the adequate but also the sole efficient cause of faith And therefore Free-will in a man yet without Christ partaker of what common grace soever can do
in that day that thou eatest therof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2.17 that is either in thy selfe or in thy surety therefore Christ performed both active and passive obedience If the Law requireth not only passive but active obedience and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the Law then he in whom they beleeve and that as the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience but the Law requireth active and passive obedience as is evident in the foregoing Arguments and the Elect by beleeving fulfill the righteousnesse of the Law Rom. 8.4.10.4 therefore he in whom they beleeve and that as he is the object of their faith hath fulfilled both active and passive obedience This further appeareth in that Christ was to answer the Law instead of the Elect and that the Law pronounceth every one accursed that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 If Christ had no done what the Command required of us as wel as suffered for our disobedience unto the command Obedientia Christi est una copulativa Alsted Theol Sect 3 loc 22 how wil it appear either that Christ is a perfect Saviour or that any man can be saved the whole obedience of Christ both active and passive make up one intire and perfect obedience why should any particle of the one or the other be excluded As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Rom. 5.19 It were too strait an interpretation to restraine the words to his passive obedience only And for their sake I will sanctifie my selfe Joh. 17.19 Obj. Justification is often in the Scripture ascribed unto the death of Christ Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Act. 20.28 Rom. 3.24 25. and elsewhere therefore not the active and passive but the passive obedience of Christ only seems to be the matter of our Justification Ans 'T is true that Justification is often ascribed in the Scripture unto the death of Christ but to his death as the Meritorious cause not as the material cause of our Justification neither yet is it ascribed to his death as the Meritorious cause wholly but partly a part being put for the whole viz. the passive for both active and passive obedience a trope often used in the Scripture and as in the places alleged the part or at least that which is as a part is put for the whole in respect of the cause so also is there a part put for the whole in respect of the effect of that cause viz. Justification which is but a part of the good of Redemption is put for the whole good thereof Take for example Mat. 26.28 For this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins by remission of sins which is but a part of the good of Redemption we are to understand the whole good of Redemption with the application of it Que. If the obedience of Christ be an ingredient into the Meritorious cause and be also the whole Material cause how then doth the obedience of Christ as it is an ingredient into the Meritorious cause differ from the obedience of Christ as it is the Materiall cause of our Justification Ans In the Meritorious cause it is considered together with the Person Office actual execution of that Office and Merit In the Material cause it is considered as distinct from all these They are distinguished as the cause and effect Obedience considered in the Material cause is in part the effect of obedience considered in the Meritorious cause they are distinguished as the whole and the part Christs obedience is but a part only of the Meritorious but the whole of the Material cause in the Meritorious cause it is both a Legal and Evangelical act Christs obeying the Law is Legal but his obeying it for us is Evangelical in the Material cause 't is only an Evangelical act it is given to us freely Willet Synops cent 4. error 56. qu. 1. in that it is considered formally in this vertually though Christ obeyed the Law formally yet 't is not the formal working of obedience or doing of the command but the good vertue and efficacy thereof that is imputed to the Beleever there it is considered as wrought by him for us here as applied to us there it is as a garment made here as a garment put on there it may be compared to the payment of the Mony by the Surety for the Debtor here to the Mony both payed and accompted unto the use of the Debtor The formal cause of Justification is by imputation The formal Cause Imputation is the actual and effectual application of the righteousnesse of Christ unto the Beleever To impute reckon or account in this place intend the same thing the same word in Greek being translated indifferently by any of these three To impute Perkins in Gal. câ—p 3. ver 6. is to reckon that unto another which in way of righteousnesse whether of Justice or Grace or both belongs unto him Imputation is either Legal imputing unto us that which we have done so the word is used Rom. 4.4 or Evangelical imputing unto us that which another hath done thus to impute is for God in his act of justifying a sinner to account the righteousnesse of Christ which is not ours formally not by debt to be ours by Grace as verily and really as if it were wrought by us and in this sense the word is used ten times Rom. 4. v. 3.5 6.8 9 10 11.22 23 24. The justification of a Beleever is either by righteousnesse inherent or imputed but not by righteousnesse inherent therefore by righteousnesse imputed The righteousnesse whereby man is justified before God is perfect but the inherent righteousnesse of a Beleever is not perfect It were destructive to the merit and righteousnesse of Christ to say we were justified by a righteousnesse inherent in us We are made righteous by the obedience of Christ as we are made unrighteous by the disobedience of Adam But this is by imputation therefore All justification of the ungodly that is such as are under the guilt and power of their-sins is by imputed righteousness but the Justification of a Beleever Justificat impios in sensu diviso non in sensu composito Trelcat sen Justificat impios antecedenter non consequenter Paraeus in Rom. 4.5 is the Justification of the ungodly Rom 4.5 therefore God justifieth the ungodly viz. objectively not subjectively that is such who were ungodly until they were justified but doe not remain ungodly being justified That Justification which is by the righteousnesse of another is by way of imputation but the justification of a Beleever is by the righteousnesse of another that is such the matter whereof is the righteousnesse of Christ as we saw largely in the Material cause of our Justification Paul calleth Sanctification his righteousnesse Phil. 3.9 for
first cause with the second c. 5. p. 106. 108. seq The necessity of the Concourse of the first cause with the second c. 5. p. 106 107 The manner of the Concourse of the first cause with the second c. 5. p. 107 108 The Concourse of the first cause with the second is mediate both in respect of its vertue and its presence c. 5. p. 109 The Concluding the soul under sin and guilt what c. 7. p. 154 Though the Decree be absolute yet the dispensation thereof in the Gospel is Conditionall c. 4. p. 85 86. seq Certain Condemnation without faith c. 9. p. 218 A Condition properly and improperly what c. 10. p. 227 A double Consideration of the second Person in the Trinity helpful to understand the Person of Christ c. 3. p. 36 Conviction of the holinesse of the Law what c. 7. p. 142 Conviction of sin what ibid. D. To justifie God is our duty but to be contented to be Damned is no where commanded c. 7. p. 151 Decree what c. 4. p. 51 The Decree is the antecedent not the cause of sin c. 4. p. 52 What order is to be observed in propounding the doctrine of the Decree c. 4. p. 82 83 se The Decree proceedeth according to the order of the end and means c. 4. p. 82. The Dependence of the second cause upon the first is universall c. 4. p. 98 The Determination of the second cause by the first hindreth not the freedome of the second cause in its operations c. 5. p. 114 115 The Disorder of the second cause not such as is inconsistent with the all-governing providence of God c. 5. p 115. 116 c. The Disorder of second causes no prejudice to the wisdome of God c. 5. p. 117 How a person is Distinguished from the Essence c. 2. p. 26 Things are Distinguished really rationally or modally and how ibid. Distinguish between the Doctrine of the Decree and the personal application thereof in respect of Election and Reprobation c. 4. p. 82 83 Vpon the instant of Dissolution the soul immediately enjoyeth blessednesse c. 15. p. 336 The Dominion of sin what c. 7. p. 144 The Duration of eternity eviternity and time distinguished c. 15. p. 348 E. The Efficiency of God what c. 5. 101 The distribution of the Efficiency of God c. 5. p. 102 The All-Efficiency of the first cause prejudiceth not the Efficiency of the second cause c. 5. p. 111 To deny the Efficiency of the second cause how unreasonable and abominable c. 5.111 112 113 The Doctrin of the Efficiency of God an Antidote against Atheism Epicurism Stoicism Fortune Libertinism and the corrupt doctrine of the Jesuits and Arminians concerning the concurse of the first second cause c. 5. p. 124 125 Gods Efficiency is answerable to his Decree c. 5. p. 126 No person can know he is elected before faith c. 4. p. 84 Election no part of the primary part of the object of faith c. 9. p. 156 All the Elect first or last shall beleeve c. 10. p. 230 The Elect only do beleeve c. 10. p. 231 Eminential continency or for the effect to be contained eminently in the cause c. 1. p. 20 The grace of Eminency in Christ what c. 3. p. 46 The special Eâ—mity of the heart against beleeving c. 9. p. 207 Eleven Gospel-Encouragements unto a soul under preparatory work before faith c. 8. p. 191 192 Encouragement from the sense of our inability to beleeve c. 9. p. 217 218 Eternity what c. 1. p. 7 Eviternity what ibid. Probable that the Saints in glory see the Divine Essence c. 15. p. 327 328 329 It is mans duty to sanctifie God in respect of his Decree and his all-glorious Efficient execution thereof c. 5. p. 127 F. Faith and Repentance c. how ascribed unto God c. 5. p. 113 114 Every one before Faith is under the Law the Curse and Sin c. 8. p. 173 The eminency of the principle requisite to the creating of Faith c. 9. p. 208 The acceptablenesse of the obedience of Faith c. 9. p. 215 Faith a condition improperly not properly c. 10. p. 227 228 This Proposition Faith is the effect of grace is affirmed by Pelagians Semipelagians Jesuits and Arminians but with a diverse sense c. 10. p. 228 229 Faith i. e. Saving faith is the effect of speciall grace c. 10. p. 230 God hath bound himself for Christs sake to give Faith unto the Elect c. 10. p. 248 The habit of Faith is not infused alone without the habits of other saving graces c. 11. p. 152 c. How Faith justifies c. 14. p. 307 308 Faith in our justification acknowledgeth three things c. 14. p. 311 312 313 Fear filial and servile c. 6. p. 138 Three things to be attended in the form of Vnion between Christ and the Beleever c. 13. p. 287 Four things wherein Christ and the Beleever are united c. 13. p. 287 288 G. God knoweth and seeth all things always c. 4. p. 94 Goodnesse of God what c. 1. p. 12 The Gospel propounded with a Command and a Promise c. 9. p. 215 The Gospel holds forth power for the enabling of us to beleeve c. 9. p. 217 Gods generall Government of the creature what c. 5. p. 103 In the government of the unreasonable Creature three things to be considered c. 5. p. 103 Gods government of the reasonable Creature what c. 5. p. 104 c. Free Grace both increated and created what c. 10. p. 223 The distribution of Grace with a description of each part of the distribution c. 10. p. 219 220 Saving Grace and common Grace how distinguished c. 10. p. 222 In an elect person yet an unbeleever there is no other qualification than what is the effect of common grace c. 8. p. 170 Perillous consequences from not distinguishing between common and saving grace c. 8. p. 168 169 Special or saving Grace proceeds from Christ as our Head c. 8. p. 168 169 Guilt what c. 7. p. 144 Conviction of guilt what c. 7. p. 144 H. What the Habit of Faith is or of any other saving grace c. 12. p. 259 Justification of the term Habit c. 12. p. 265 266 The Habit of Grace proved by Scriptures c. 12 p. 267 By Arguments c. 12. p. 268 269 By Authorities c. 12. p. 272 Some Objections answered c. 12. p. 270 271 The distinction between the Habit and second Act c. 12. p. 260 The Habit of Grace precedeth the second Act c. 12 p. 261 Some Objections thereunto answered c. 12. p. 262 263 Created Habitual grace is in Christ in its full Latitude c. 3. p 46 The happiness of the glorified body consists especially in two things c. 15. p. 349 The third Heaven what c. 15. p. 342 With its name place and excellency c. 15. p. 342. to 346 Holinesse in God What c. 1. p. 16 Hunger legal or preparatory before faith or saving after faith c. 8. p. 284 I. The Incarnated Idaea of all things what c. 1.