1. Cor. 8. 10. chap. 10. 21. the Idols table Therefore vntill they proue vs Babilonish and besides all that to be incurable their pretended grounds shall end in meeare conceits for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The last sort or sect that I purpose to meddle with who would faine seeke a staffe from Scripture to hold themselues by is the Papist One of their mainest grounds is in the Epstile of Iames 2. 24. Ye see then how that of workes a man is iustified Iam. 2. 24. and not of faith onely Here they ground their second iustification for Second iustification a mere inuention they would haue him that is iust to be more iustified although comparisons of greater and lesser do not make a seuerall kind but declare an increase in the same kind of iustification and not a new kind of iustification Now wheras the Apostles Paul and Iames may seeme to contradict and oppose themselues the one prouing so often in his Epistles that we are iustified by faith without the workes Rom. 4. 3. Galat. 3. 6. of the Law alledging the example of Abraham for iustification by faith whom the Apostle Iames here vseth for iustification by works We must therefore examine and scanne sundry necessarie questions for the reconciling of them as also for the remouing the aduersary from off his blind ground in this weighty point The first question to be scanned is what faith the Apostle Iames meaneth or speaketh of in this place the which he maketh so insufficient whether historicall miraculous hypocriticall or liuely and operatiue It is true that the Apostle Paul speaketh of the last as appeareth Gal. 5. 5. 6. Galathians 5. 5. 6. Circumcision auaileth nothing nor vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue But the Apostle Iames No opposition betweene the Apostles I am 2. 19. Great difference betwixt a liuing faith and a dead faith speaketh of the first namely historicall as appeareth in the 19. verse of this second chapter which he calleth the faith of diuels So then they both speake the truth the one that we are iustified by faith onely without workes speaking of a liuely faith the other that we are not iustified by faith onely speaking of a dead barren and counterfet faith The second question to be scanned is what iustification the Apostle Iames meaneth for there is a twofold iustification as there are sundry sorts of faith First therefore we are iustified before God of which iustification the Prophet Dauid speaketh Psa 32. 1. 2. Blessed is that Rom. 43. Psal 32. 1. 2. man vnto whom the Lord imputeth not his sinne Of which righteousnesse and iustification the Apostle Paul speaketh who saith That Abraham beleeued and it was Gods promise a sufficient ground for iustifying faith counted vnto him for righteousnesse The other iustification is before men which we haue by workes they being as euidences that we are righteous before God Of this iustification doth the Apost Iames speake for Abrahams offering vp of his sonne could not be the cause of his righteousnesse before God for his Rom. 4. 18. faith in the promise was reckoned vnto him for righteousnesse thirty yeares before he offered vp his sonne Therefore before God was his faith not made perfect through workes but before men Besides we reade of but few workes that the theefe on the crosse wrought Yet Luke 23. 42. 43. through faith was he iustified and the heauenly paradise promised vnto him The third question to be scanned is what works the Apostle Iames meaneth whether workes going before or after faith It is certaine that the Apostle Paul speaketh of workes going before faith which he denieth to be able to iustifie vs as appeareth Galath 5. 2. 3. 4. Behold I Paul say vnto you that if ye be circumcised Gal. 5. 23. 4. Christ shall profit you nothing for I testifie againe to euery man which is circumcised that he is bound to keepe the whole Law Ye are abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the Law ye are fallen from grace But Saint Iames speaketh of workes which follow faith as appeareth in the 18. verse Iames 2. 18. In nature causes of things go before their effects where he saith thus Shew me thy faith out of thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes Besides the author to the Hebrewes declareth that Abrahams obedience and sacrifice was a worke following faith for he saith That by faith Hebr. 11. 17. Abraham offered vp his sonne Isaacke Workes then that follow Iustification cannot be the causes thereof wherefore the Apostle Iames must needs speake of Iustification before men and not before God The fourth question to be scanned is touching the persons with whom they haue to deale a distinction is very apparent Rom. 103. The Apostle Paul was to deale with pharisaicall hypocrites and Iewish teachers who held and taught that vnlesse they obserued the law of Moses they could not be saued But the Apostle Iames was to deale with carnall libertines and Epicure-like professours who boasted of a barren faith and neglected to bring forth the fruits of righteousnesse Many there were that vpon the preaching of faith gaue libertie to the flesh and thereby became the seruants of corruption as the Apostle Peter witnesseth 2. Pet. 2. 18. 19 therefore there must needs be necessitie of their seuerall doctrine and no opposition in it the one being to deale with such as too much preferred workes the other being to deale with such as too much neglected them From whose examples People of different qualities must haue different doctrine preached vnto them the Ministers of the Gospell may learne that one kind of doctrine cannot be necessarie at all times in all places and to all persons therefore must they take heede to their flockes wisely and perfectly to guide by the rule of faith in the life of life for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Vse 5 The fift vse is an admonition against ignorance Our doctrine will not giue vs libertie nor licence to pleade for simplicity Knowledge very necessarie to the life of faith Christians may make some vse of Satan for he knowes much and laboureth much Pro. 8. 10. 11. for where there is blindnesse in the iudgement there cannot be but sin in the practise Therefore search we for knowledge as for hid treasures let vs make choise of wisedome before gold and preferre it before pearles But for our better proceeding consider we of some motiues and speciall inducements The first is the necessitie of knowledge Our grand enemy the Diuell is subtill and well practised in our manifold corruptions yea he vnderstandeth historically the Scriptures he rageth in these last and worst dayes insomuch that although he cannot hinder many from profession yet he keepeth many from sauing knowledge driuing men into extreames conceits and base absurdities Pray we therefore earnestly for a sanctified vnderstanding Secondly knowledge
is guiltie of impietie before God which is expounded in the words following because he eateth not of faith To conclude by an Antithesis in my Text Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Where there is not faith there must A wicked cause bringeth forth a bad effect needes be doubting and where is doubting there is sinne a miserable cause ordinarily produceth a lamentable effect for so much is verified in this conclusion Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne In these words are three things remarkeable The diuision 1 The generalitie Whatsoeuer that is anie actioÌ„ though not indiffereÌ„â— wherin is included thoghts words works 2 The cause Not of faith that is not assured in conscience vpon sound ground 3 The effect Is sinne that is impietie a breach of the Law of God It is not said That which is against The opening of the Text. faith but that action which is without faith displeaseth God whether greater or lesser matters either things absolutely necessary or casually indifferent Now There may be a conscience where there is no faith 1. Cor. 10. 29. some take faith for the conscience which cannot be for the weake may haue a conscience when they haue not faith as witnesseth the Apostle himselfe And the conscience I say not thine but of that other meaning the weake For why should my liberty be condemned of another mans conscience Secondly errour is not faith but the conscience is oftentimes erronious therefore the faith of heretiâ—kes is no faith but rather credulitie yet they haue a conscience Neither is euery opinion perswasion of the mind and conscience faith but that which is grounded vpon the word So then faith is a sound perswasion of Fides dicitur firma animi certitudo quae ex Dei veritate concepta sit à quâ— si minimum deflectit non iam fides sed incerta est credulitas vagus mentis error Caluin in lib. Instit cap. 5. The maine doctrine from the full scope of the Text. the mind conceiued from Gods truth the man that would do an acceptable worke with the Lord must worke it of faith that is as I haue partly said an assurance in conscience grounded vpon the word that it may be done or not be done For such things as are required in the Scriptures are pleasing vnto him wherefore where the word of God is not there is no faith The doctrine then to be examined and extracted from hence is this That whatsoeuer is done without knowledge and perswasion from the tenor of the Scriptures to be truth to them that do it that action is a sinne Many haue aduentured from their variable opinions and vanishing conceits to draw peremptorie conclusions and these in themselues haue carried a golden glosse and appeared as Cristall but when they haue beene laid to the touchstone of Gods sacred truth for further triall they were found to be but splendida peccata beautifull deformities yea meere fallacies not any whit auaileable to pacifie the minde or giue full and sound satisfaction to the conscience In what high esteeme and reputation Humane wisdome and carnall imagination not a sufficient guide in diuine and spiritual affaires among the people were the Pharisees phylacteries and what glistering shewes of an vnblameable profession did they make But when the day-starre arose and he who was brighter then the Sunne appeared their glorious profession is but like an house without a foundation yea as vaine as Agrippaes pompe or Herods apparrell Christ with his owne mouth giueth testimony of their folly telling them in plaine speeches that That which Luke 16. 15. is highly esteemed of among men is an abhomination in the sight of God Nay further what good intentions as they are called yet how naked without their garment of faith how slipperie for want of a stay taxed by our Sauiour and reproued in the disciples themselues Peter put vp thy sword into his place As if Matth. 26. 52. he should say Thy intent is good but thou wantest a ground for I must suffer How could I be deliuered into the hands of the Iewes but that the Scriptures Verse 54. must be fulfilled which say it must be so I haue a grouÌ„d for my suffering but thou hast none for thy striking Peter therfore put vp thy sword for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Iames and Iohn likewise are very peremptory Luke 9. 54. for want of entertainement among the Samaritans but Christ taxeth them of a preposterous zeale and an vnwarrantable assertion For he came to be a Sauiour and not a destroyer therefore at this time they want a ground for their rash purposes and indiscreete desires though otherwise they make neuer so goodly a shew in zeale and intention Num. 15. 32. Furthermore the man that gathered stickes vpon the Sabbath and Vzzah that put 2. Sam. 6. 7. Bare intentions and naked suppositions cannot be the ground of a sound faith foorth his hand to stay the Arke of God the open shaking it cannot be thought to want good intentions for that they enterprised yet because they went against the great command of that high Commander his direfull hand of iustice irreuocably subuerteth them for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The reasons follow First because without faith no action is not can be good or acceptable as witnesseth the Authour to the Hebrewes Without faith it is impossible Heb. 11. 6. to please God If God accept any worke it is through Christ◠〈◊〉 which worke there is required not onely the doing but the well doing vnto the which there is needfull sound maâ—er a right maner and a good end the Lord Iesus himselfe being not onely adiutor but also a Doctor to his Church The materiall tabernacle must be framed and fashioned and Exod. 25. 9. furnished according to the Lords owne direction there must likewise be neither addition nor abstraction from those ten words deliuered in the Mount as it is written in Deuteronomy Take heed therfore Deut 5. 32. that you do as the Lord your God hath commanded you turne not aside neither to the right hand nor to the left The Iew and Papist they worship the true God but Wil-worships were euer abhominable before the Lord. not according to that manner the Lord requireth therefore their seruices are not of faith and if not of faith not acceptable Christ and his Father are one so are their lawes therefore whatsoeuer we ask the Father in his name he heareth vs. Yea saith the Apostle whatsoeuer we aske we receiue of him because we keepe his 1. Iohn 3. 22. commandements and do those things which are pleasing in his sight but without faith we cannot please God therefore without faith there can be no acceptance for whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Reason 2 My second reason is taken from the infallibilitie and truth of Scriptures We haue saith the Apostle a most true word
of the Prophets which may appeare first from the Iâ—diâ—â—r For no prophesie in Scriptures is of any priuate motion but 2. Pet. 1. 20. verse 21. holy men of God spake as they were moued by the holy Ghost Looke we at Moses and the Prophets Christ and his Apostles and we shall finde their tongues to be Esay 6. 7. Scriptures without errour touched with coles from Gods Altar and the spirit of Elijah to be doubled vpon Elisha yea they were all filled with the holie Ghost and spake as the Spirit gaue them Acts 2. 4. vtterance What words of grosse impiety or rather blasphemy dare the Papists vtter concluding these sacred writings without the authoritie of the Church as not authenticall Yea they authorize Canons to be as orthodoxal as the Scriptures O palpable blindnesse nay horrible blasphemy But let vs proceed As the truth of Scripture appeareth by the Inditer so also by the matter it selfe there in The pure word of God surpasseth all humane learning That which man by his wisedome cannot do God by his word and spirit can do contained How doth it discouer sinfull mans particular thoughts lusts affections which humane reason was neuer able to discerne nor any Philosopher by humane wisedome able to declare Besides what articles of faith although not against reason yet aboue reason For in naturall vnderstanding God is not all iustice and no mercie but if there were not a Redeemer it should be so therfore although reason can teach that he must be God that must satisfie the infinite iustice of God for sinne yet that this Redeemer should be God and man is aboue reason For this cause is his name called Wonderfull Vnspeakeable was the Esay 9. 6. worke of creation and wonderfull the worke of redemption This is the Lords Psal 118 23. doing though it be maruellous in our eyes and Let him that glorieth glorie in the Iere. 9. 24. Lord. Besides nothing but this word is able to minister comfort and reliefe in all distresses of body and minde The sweet promises of the Gospell will onely reuiue and raise vp the wearie soule and giue it ful contentment and satisfaction Athanasius concludeth more perfection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athanas de Synod to be in the Scriptures then all the Synods he therefore that beleeueth God must beleeue the Scriptures for whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Reason 3 The third reason is taken from the sufficiencie 2. Tim. 3. 15. of them they being able to make a man wise to saluation through the faith which is in Christ Iesus But saith the Aduersary they are imperfect therefore they require a supply from the Apostolicall Decreâ—alls of the Church O proude Babel that dare offer strength to him who is strength and sufficiencie it selfe and prop his omnipotent power and incomparable worke with the reeds of Aegypt Basil saith that the Scriptures Scriptura coÌ„mune promptuarium bonorum documentorum Basil mag in psal 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iren. li. â— ca. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theod. dial â— cap. 6. are the rich treasury of the King of glory full of pearles and precious stones wherein the Christian may furnish himselfe with necessaries either for his general or particular calling Yea how haue the ancient Fathers Tertullian Irenaeus Theodoret Augustine made them their stay confessing them to be the vnmoueable ground of faith the pillar of truth How haue they commended them by their example doctrine to all succeeding ages as sufficient to make the man of God absolutely perfect vnto euerie good worke Nay further how haue they expresly published vnto posterities Hieronym in Mat. 23 Quod de Scripturis authoritateÌ„ non habet eadem facilitate contemnitur qua probatur that is Whatsoeuer is not authorised by the holy Scriptures it may as easily be reiected as receiued Wherfore although such Babylonish and Satanicall spirits in their height of pride dare atteÌ„pt to weaken that which the strength of Israel by his owne finger hath so confirmed and established to be both perfect and sufficient Psal 19. 7. yet let all that feare the Lord conclude with my Text that Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Reason 4 My fourth reason is taken from the present and future expectation of a blessing and comfort through faith in the promise from the worke truly and sincerely Faith onely the ground of sound assurance and comfort wrought the which cannot be truly and constantly expected of me without full assurance in my soule and conscience that I haue throughly endeuoured to obey God in all things according to his will being truly humbled at the sight of my manifold failings and imperfections For euangelical perfection consisteth in these graces faith vnfained humiliation with an earnest endeuour God in his Sonne accepting the truth of our endeuours as perfect works The which euidently appeareth by the testimony of the Apostle who although he delighted in the law of God concerning the inner man yet was he constrained to cry in the bitternesse of his soule O wretched man that I am Were our actions Rom. 7. 22. 23 24 perfect what necessitie were there either of humiliation or faith but Euangelicall righteousnesse requireth both humiliation to bring vs to faith faith for the apprehending of that imputed righteousnesse which is by Christ Hence then is disclosed the naturall estate of many who bragge of an endeuour to serue God but wanting the cleare sight No discerning of imperfection no endeuouring after perfection of imperfections in their best actions they come not to the grace of sound humiliation and so remaine carelesse neglecting the meanes of grace as constant hearing praying conferring meditating whereby more knowledge and greater strength is to be obtained they being ignorant of an vniuersall and renewed obedience enioyned the people of God Since therefore his will must be our will and his word an absolute rule for the squaring and ordering of our generall affaires in the courses of true pietie and vnmixed holinesse how fraile Hope with out faith but a vanishing shadow and comfortlesse is that vanishing hope which is not supported with this staffe of Faith What comelinesse were it to preferre the daughter before the mother but that groundlesse actions must needes end in fading vanities seeming shewes in base hypocrisie Now the Scriptures tell vs that we are saued by faith and vnto this grace belongeth the promises for that grace which bringeth vs Christ bringeth vs all things what then can surely Rom. 8. 32. be expected without the life of Faith Dauid therefore first layeth the ground and then applieth I shall not be confounded Psal 119. 9. when I haue respect vnto all thy commandements And Paul gaineth his assurance and triumpheth in his expectation from this vnmoueable ground I haue fought a good fight I haue finished my course 2. Tim. 4. 7. 8. I haue kept the faith from
more clearely the rotten ground-worke of this Romish building the Rhemists theÌ„selues comment vpon our text and tell vs that the proper sence is That euery thing that a man doth against his knowledge and conscience is a sinne but they shew the ground neither for knowledge nor conscience something must be vnderstood which is not expressed or else the consequent must conclude that a man can neither erre in iudgement nor conscience which well may be gathered from some of their propositions as namely this one Ignorance the mother of deuotion For it is neither against knowledge nor conscience when that faith will serue which is fixed vpon the Church although that Church be grounded vpon the diuell himselfe Againe other stones there are which Iustificatio est actus indiuiduus ac simul totus belong to this brittle foundation as namely that second iustification by workes as if there were a first and a last in the act of iustification whereas it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a free acceptation of a mans person yea a iustifying of the vngodly as the Apostle witnesseth But to Rom. 4. 5. him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse If any regenerate man might haue merited any thing in the matter of iustification it could not haue bene but Dauid and Paul who were so abounding in the worke of the Lord might haue gained something for themselues but it is farre otherwise as appeareth by their owne testimonies in facred Scripture Lord saith Psal 143. 2. 1. Cor. 4. 4. Iustificatio exprimitur in Hebraico Hizdik Pro. 17. 15. in Graeco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dauid enter not into iudgement with thy seruant for in thy sight shall no flesh liuing be iustified The Apostle likewise saith I haue in all good conscience serued God vnto this day neither know I any thing of my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified Besides the word to iustifie is opposed in the Scriptures to condemning signifying an absoluing or imputatiue iustice It is God that iustifieth who can condemne Yea the blessed Apostle Rom. 8. 33. 34. Isai 50. 8. Act. 13. 39. Paul is noâ— aâ—â—aid to publish in the Synagogue of the Iewes at Antioch that From all things from which they could not be iustified by the Law of Moses by him that is by Christ euery one that beleeueth is iustified Well saith Bernard to this purpose Bern. in fest Omnium Sanct. Serm. 1. Vaehominum iustitiae quantumvis laudabili si remota misericordia Dei iudicetur that is Wo to the righteousnesse of man were it neuer so laudable if God setting aside mercy enter to iudge it For this cause holy Iob is not ashamed to confesse that if he would dispute with God yet Iob. 9. 3. could he not make answer vnto one of a thousand Thus you see with what rubbish the foundation of the Romish Church is laid of which a workman would be ashamed yea neuer aduenture so great a building with so slippery a ground-worker but that the prophecy must be fulfilled in them as well as in other namely Christ to be a stone to stumble at and a rocke of offence euen to them which stumble at Esay 8. 14. 1. Pet. 2. 8. the word being disobedient vnto the which things they were euen ordained Were it not so how could they withstand so plaine euidences of the spirit in sacred Scriptures as namely iustification only by faith without the works of the Law figured recorded by Moses the Prophets Christ and his Apostles Either it must be of grace or of debt but if debt then were Eph. 2. 8. grace no more grace In like manner they stand vpon Peters prerogatiues aboue the other Apostles which were a thing impossible to humaine reason were they not giuen vp to diabolicall delusions for no other Apostle we reade of that fell so often and grieuously as this man did They tel vs that he walked vpon the water so did none of the rest But what supernaturall act was this for herein by the testimony of the Euangelist he bewraied diffidence and much weakenesse and had not Christ caught him by the hand he had suncke What vnity Matth. 14. 30. therefore or vniformity can there be betwixt the Church of Christ and the Church of Antichrist when there is so Rome cannot stand for it wanâ—eth a sound foundation great difference in the principles Furthermore besides all this other stories there are or rather vanishing rubbish which prop and vphold this Romane Hierarchy neither of Christs or any of his Apostles getting or laying as namely that vngrounded doctrine of Transsubstantiation lately hatched and decreed at the Councell of Lateran being 1215 yeares after Christ vnder Pope Innocentius the third neuer taught by those Fathers of great antiquity namely Irenaeus Tertullian Cyprian Augustine Yea the Euangelists themselues Marke and Matthew are sufficient witnesses of Christs owne words who said that he would drinke no more of the fruite of the vine Matth. 26. 29. Marke 14. 25. which was not bloud but wine as Chrysostome and Cyprian both affirme These things being considered who can iustly Cal. lib. Instiâ— cap. 13. blame M. Caluin thogh he say the mother organ of popish traditions was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an erronious zeale and preposterous humour deriued from Satan the father of lies and vngrounded Axiomes And were not poore ignorant and deluded soules bewitched through the deceits of Satan and vanity of their minds drawne aside with those speculatiue shewes of Antichristian piety and withall blinded The doctriâ—â— of the Romish Church cannot be maintained by Scripture with those false perswasions of admired Cardinals how could it be but they should relinquish such impious falsities and counterfet holinesse grounded vppon nothing but mans inuention I could proceed in shewing the insufficiency and weaknesse of this declining Babell the head corner stone which should vphold the building being cast aside but their apparent folly I ceasse to speak of it being sufficiently manifested to the Church of God by the faithfull witnesses of the Almightie Let Iesuits therefore or rather He that preacheth Christ truly cannot but preach good workâ— Iebusites maintaine their faithlesse doctrines as of free will workes of superâ—rogation with such like yet let Sion fly to the Law and the Testimony and if they speake not according to this word it is as the Prophet saith because there is no light in them And although they falsely Esay 8. 20. charge the Embassadors of Christ as enemies vnto good workes let them set them no higher then the Scriptures and they shall set them no higher then we For we are his workemanship created in Ephes 2. 10 Christ Iesus vnto good workes that we should walke in them Besides The weapons of our warfare are notcarnall but spirituall mighty through God to cast downe 2. Cor. 10. 4. 5. holds casting