his supreme faculty in it's throne c. and saith that they suppose it is within the Power of a mans own soul always to keep Sin out of it self c. But can he think that these words suppose it when 1. Mr. F. makes holiness the effect of God's grace and Spirit not of a mans own power 2. When he doth deny any such thing as perfect holiness in this life p. 27. And 3. When he saith immediately after his Third description that so far forth as holiness is vigorous and predominant in men it causeth them to perform good actions and forbear the contrary All this lamentable stuff is in the two first Pages But I have something else to do than thus to trace him to the end for 't is all alike and therefore I can look for no other should I do so from all wise men than to be call'd fool for my pains I will therefore only take notice of those things that he builds most noise upon After a deal of hideous non-sense and running over the same things again and again he saith in p. 13. That this Righteousness as Mr. F. hath described it is not that which justifieth us before God Because it is our own and tells us that there is the righteousness of men and the righteousness of God But is that Righteousness our own that is wrought in us by God's Holy Spirit Is not that God's righteousness which is the effect of God's grace who sees not that it is And therefore his Citation of Phil. 3. 9. will do him no service for S. Paul meant no other there by his own Righteousness which is of the Law than that which consisted in the observance of the purely Jewish Law which he calls his own righteousness because he could obtain it by his own natural power it consisting of external performances And by the Righteousness of God by Faith in the next verse he means the righteousness of the new Creature wrought in him by God's Holy Spirit through Faith in Christ's Gospel And so the Apostle explains himself in the following words That I may know him and the Power of his Resurrection c. That is that I may know the power of his Resurrection in raising me up to newness of life and of his death in mortifying all my lusts And whereas he abuseth Rom. 10. 3. to the same purpose take notice that their own Righteousness there is no other than that the unchristian Iews gloried in as that by which alone they expected justification and eternal Salvation and 't is the same with that in the Philippians He saith The Righteousness Mr. F. hath described is the Righteousness of the Moral Law only But I say that his general Descriptions take in the Righteousness of the Gospel too 'T is said that 't is such a disposition and temper of the inward man as causeth men to be under the power of all practical principles made known by Revelation and all the Laws of the Gospel I hope are such And Mr. F. abundantly sheweth that this Righteousness is by the Faith of Jesus Christ that is by effectually believing Christ's Gospel in shewing what an admirable instrument the Gospel is to work this Righteousness And this is an answer to the text quoted out of Rom. 3. 21. Mark by the way I. B takes Faith still for nothing else but a bare relying on the merits or righteousness of Christ which any presumptious wretch may do but I will make it good against men of an hundred times his abilities if it be possible any such should be of his mind that the true Christian Faith is such a Belief of the doctrine of the Gospel as implyeth an hearty complyance with all its Precepts whereof that of relying on Christ's merits is one and but one He saith the Righteousness Mr. F. hath described can't justifie before God because of its imperfections and then follows another page within two or three lines spent in proving and Crying out of the corruption of nature in the midst of which he brings Gal. 2. 16. to prove that his assertion where he said 't is By the works of the Law shall no flesh living be justified But I have told the Reader already that Mr. F. never affirmed but absolutely denyeth justification by any thing but the Righteousness of Christ only as a meritorious cause and he holds the true living Faith to justify as a Condition without which no man by the Righteousness of Christ shall be justified And whereas the Apostle saith by the works of the law none shall be justified his meaning is that none shall be justified by the merit of them nor yet in any sence by them considered as opposed to the obedience of the Gospel He Saith the Righteousness which Mr. F. hath described can't justify because 't is not of faith This he proves from Gal. 3. 12. The Law is not of Faith The meaning of that place is the law makes no account of Faith allows no justification but on condition of legal obedience as the following words shew but he that doth them shall live in them But now the Righteousness Mr. F. hath described doth make account of faith it causing men to comply with all Divine Revelations and therefore with the Gospel He saith p. 18. that there are three things essential to Gospel Holiness of which Mr. F's Descriptions are utterly destitute The Holy Ghost Faith in Christ A new heart The Holy Ghost But Mr. F. hath shewn that this Righteousness cannot be obtained without the assistance of the Holy Ghost But 't is false and nonsense to say the Holy Ghost is of the Essence of Righteousuess and therefore that he ought to be put into the definition of it He may as well say that a man is falsly described when he is said to be a Reasonable Creature indued with a Soul and Body because God his Creator is left out of the description As for Faith in Christ I have again and again shewed that it is manifestly contained in Mr. F's descriptions And then for a new heart and a new spirit What difference is there between these and Purity of nature and a Sound complexion of Soul and a Divine or Godlike nature doth not every body know that these are but several expressions of the very same thing P. 23 He inveighs against Mr. F's saying that it was Christ's main errand to effect our deliverance out of that sinful state we had brought our selves into and so to put us again into possession of the holiness that we had lost By this you see he was not ignorant that Mr. F. asserted the corruption of nature for all his base suggestions to the contrary Now saith he I would have the Reader take notice that in this last clause to put us again into possession of that holiness which we had lost is the Summ of all his large Descriptions and the Holiness he contends for is only that which
and Tongues leave to be such unruly evils and even helps to fill them with the most deadly poison That puts its professors upon thus persecuting Christ's Ministers for RIGHTEOUSNES sake for the sake of inward and real Righteousness without which nothing can commend a Religion let wretched Hypocrites think never so despicably and basely of it and inveigh never so villainously against those that promote it Thus thou hast seen Reader how this Raging wave like his fellows in S. Iude fometh out his own shame And let him take for an answer to all the same that was given to his Great Master that hath assisted him in this Employment by Michael the Arch-Angel Iude 9. But one word more to this sad object of pity and then I shall have done with him If your Pride and Stomack will not suffer you to make now an acknowledgement of your most wicked behaviour towards Mr. F. and his Treatise as open and publick as you have made your Sin do not so cheat your own Soul as to hope for forgiveness upon any account whatsoever at the hands of God which God for Christ's sake by first qualifying you for it bestow upon you Amen An Abstract of several of the Excellent Propositions contained in that Tract of M. Baxter's wherein he hath defended Mr. Fowlers Design of Christianity His 27th Proposition THe Sum of Holiness and Morality which is all one is the Love of God as God including absolute Resignation and subjection and the love of man and all things for God appearing in them and served by them His 50. Nothing is more sure in Christianity than that Christ came into the world to seek and to save that which was lost and to bring home straying Prodigals to God and to destroy the works of the flesh and Devil and to bring man back to the love and obedience of his Maker and to cure him of his worldly love And so that Holiness or the love of God is the end of our Redemption and our Faith Part of his 51 52 53. We are pardoned what is past that love may make us sin so no more and justification is an antecedent means to our fuller Holiness and obedience to God which I have largely opened in my Confession of Faith It is certain that justification and Sanctification go on hand in hand together and it is a notorious error of such as say that justification is perfect as soon as it begins And it is certain that Sanctification as it is the work of God is one part of the executive pardon of our sins because it is the taking off of a very great penalty which is the privation of the Spirit of Grace His 54. Nothing is more injurious to Christ than to feign that he is a Patron of Sin or came to excuse men by free justification from obedience to their Creators law of Nature or to make sin less odious to Mankind seeing he dyed to redeem us from all iniquity and to purifie to himself a peculiar people zealous of good works His 55. And it is an intolerable Blasphemy against God to imagine that Christ came to make the Divine Nature more friendly or reconcileable to sin or to love complacentially an ungodly person as if he were Godly as being such by the imputation of Christ's Righteousness to him and to repute any man to be what he is not to take a wicked man for a Saint because that Christ was holy for him whatever malicious Papists say the Protestants abhor such Doctrine Therefore John Bunyan is no Protestant His 56. And as far are we from believing that Christ was a sinner or that God ever supposed him to be a Sinner or hated or punished him as a Sinner or that ever our sin did really become his sin or that God reputed it so to have been For no false judgment can belong to God Part of his 57 and 58. But we believe that Christ dyed for our sins as a Sacrifice Ransom Propitiation Attonement c. And though we believe not that God doth judge us to have done all the Righteousness that Christ did nor to have possessed the same individual Righteousness that Christ had for God never erreth nor accounteth us as Righteous as Christ himself nor yet useth us in all respects as he would have done if we had been as Righteous as Christ himself nor do we think it a thing possible that the same individual Righteousness that was in Christ being an accident can be in itself and really given to us and made ours yet do we believe that his habitual perfection with his active Righteousness and his Sacrifice or Sufferings all set together and advanced in value by their conjunction with his Divine Righteousness were the true meritorious procuring cause of our Pardon Justification Adoption Sanctification and Salvation c. And thus Christ's Righteousness is imputed and given to us not immediately in it self but in the effects and fruits As a Ransome is said to be given to a Captive because it is given for him though strictly the Ransome is given to another and only the fruits of it to him His 59. Those Ignorant Self-conceited Contentious Teachers that seek the reputation of Orthodox zeal in the things which they never understood and instead of clear apprehending sound Scripture-doctrine and plainly expounding it to the Church do take on trust and for company false or insignificant confounding notions and proudly make them the instruments of their furious Censures and revilings and of dividing the Church by raising slanders against those that presume to be wiser than they and so by back-biting tell their hearers how erroneous and dangerous this and that man's doctrine is because they never had wisdom study and patience to understand it such I say are the men that in all ages have been the Fire-brands in the Church and zealously promoted Christ's Kingdom by dividing it and will hardly ever have peace here themselves nor endure their Brethrens or the Churches Peace His 65. Those Churches especially that lament the laps of Discipline and the confounding of the holy and profane and those that are constituted by unwarrantable Scrutinies after the holiness of Members beyond the test that was appointed by Christ should not dishonour themselves nor bring their doctrine or persons into suspicion by being the hasty Censurers and condemners of such writings as drive harder for the promoting of holiness than themselves His 67. He knoweth not the hurtful miscarriages of our times who knoweth not what the mistaken notions about free-grace have done against free-grace it self and how the Gospel hath been supplanted by an erroneous crying up the Gospel and crying down the Law and how justification hath been abused by mens seeming to extol it and sanctification injured by such pretexts And he that with one eye looks on that disease and its effects and with the other looks on the Book you tell me of viz. The Design of Christianity and such like will quickly see what Sore this Plaister was provided for and how much excellent matter there is in it which the aforesaid Persons and diseases need Part of his 69. And as to Mr. Fowlers Consectaries or Inferences ch 20. 22 23. what would you wish more accommodate to an honest concord which is our strength and beauty and to the healing of deforming and destroying abuses than the practising the motion that our union be placed in things necessary to holiness c. Whose judgment Reader dost thou think is to be preferred concerning these Inferences whether this worthy able Divine or poor J. B' s. who makes a very Turk of Mr. Fowler upon the account of them Part of his last Proposition To conclude undoubtedly Holiness is the life and beauty of the Soul The Spirit of Holiness is Christ's Agent to do his work in us and our Pledg and earnest and first Fruit of Heaven It is Christ's work and subordinately ours to cleanse us from all filthiness of flesh and Spirit c. Christ the Spirit the Word the Ministry mercies afflictions and all things are to bring home our hearts to God and to work together for our good by making us partakers of his Holiness Our Holiness is our Love of God who is most holy And our Love of God and reception of his Love is our Heaven and everlasting Happiness Thus thou seest Reader that if Mr. Fowler be so Devilish a wretch as I. B. makes him this Learned Divine may shake hands with him Matt. 23. 16 24 26 27 28. Wo unto you ye blind guides which strain at a gnat and swallow a Camel Thou blind Pharisee cleanse first that which is within the Cup and Platter that the outside of them may be clean also Wo unto you Scribes and Pharisees hypocrites c. Ye outwardly appear righteous unto men but within ye are full of Hypocrisie and Iniquity Matt. 15. 14. And if the blind lead the blind both shall fall into the diteh 2 Tim. 3. 8. 9. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses so do these also resist the truth Men of corrupt minds reprobate concerning the Faith But they shall proceed no further for their folly shall be manifest unto all men as theirs also was Read also the foregoing verses THE END ☞ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 1. * Observe that he chalengeth Mr F. to produce but one piece of a text that in the least looks towards a proof that christ came to restore the holiness we had lost p. 36. and I think I have answered his challenge 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 1. 2. 8. 9. 1. 2. 10. 1. 11. 12. 13. â—â— 14. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
in this matter there is but a notional difference between these two it having been shewn that Christ as a Saviour designs our holiness his Salvation being chiefly that from the worst of Evils sin Canst thou think Reader that Mr. F. deserves to be accused as Popishly affected in this point Are all those Papists in the Doctrine of justification that deny a dead Faith to be the condition of it and doth not S. Iames say that Faith without works is dead And if a living Faith justifies is it Popery to say that it justifies as 't is a living Faith I am sure 't is non-sense to say otherwise Doth Mr. F. any where contrary to the Apostle Paul assert the merit of Works no he makes works or a working Faith only a necessary condition of justification as S. Iames doth and all the Apostles and Christ alone to be the meritorious cause of it And he must needs attribute our justification to the free grace of God in Christ when he makes also the condition of it Faith a free gift a grace of God's holy Spirit In short let the Reader consult Mr. F's Free Discourse between two intimate Friends p. 149. to p. 190. and there he shall see his full sense of justifying Faith and the notion given there of it sufficiently defended 2. The other notion Mr. F. in this inference saith the Design of Christianity will give satisfaction concerning is that of the imputation of Christs Righteousness viz. That it consists in dealing with sincerely righteous persons as if they were perfectly so for the sake and upon the account of Christ's Righteousness And he shews that the Doctrine of the Design of Christianity makes it impossible that any other notion of this point should have truth in it But mark what he saith in the close But because both these Points are discussed in the Free Discourse I have said so little of the former and will proceed no farther on this but refer the Reader thither c. Would any one now have imagined but that this I. B. had he the least spark of ingenuity or meant at all honestly would have taken occasion to inform himself throughly from that Discourse concerning Mr. F's judgment in these two points especially and to try the strength of the arguments whereby he there hath confirmed his Doctrine and if he had been sagacious enough to espy flaws in them to make a discovery of them but he takes no more notice of that Book than if there had been none such extant nay though Mr. F. doth several times in the Design of Christianity refer to it This is the Blade that loves to tell the world he is a lover of Truth but if she hath no sincerer friends than he makes it apparent by this and all his other practices he is her case would be most deplorable All that understand this man may safely conclude that he hath as little will as ability to find out and acquaint himself with this precious Jewel But to the next Inference The Fifth Inference chap. 20. That we learn from the Design of Christianity what is the great measure and standard whereby we are to judge of Doctrines both whether they are true or false and in what degree necessary to be received or rejected The Sixth Inference chap. 22. That the Design of Christianity teacheth us what Doctrines and Practices we ought as Christians to be most zealous for or against Those surely that are most available to the begetting and increase of true holiness it is our duty to be most concerned for and those that have the greatest tendency towards the endangering of it to set our selves with the greatest industry against The Seventh Inference chap. 23. That the Design of Christianity well considered will give us great light into the just bounds of our Christian liberty And that that being to make men holy it may safely be presumed that such things as have neither directly nor consequentially any tendency to the depraving our souls are left free to us by our Saviour And 't is shewn that this is only to be understood of such things as the Gospel speaks nothing particularly and clearly concerning The Eighth Inference chap. 24. That 't is a most unaccountable thing to do that which is essentially evil in defence of the Christian Religion or of any opinions presumed to be Doctrines relating thereunto I would J. B. would well lay to heart this I am sure if he had done so when he read it there would have been no occasion for these leavs The Ninth Inference chap. 25. That 't is most unwarrantable for the Ministers of Christ to prefer any design before that of making men really righteous and holy The Tenth Inference chap. 26. That an obedient temper of mind is an excellent and necessary qualification to prepare men for a firm belief and right understanding of Christ's Gospel The Last Inference chap. 27. That we are taught by the Design of Christianity wherein the Essence Power and life of it consisteth viz. in a holy frame and temper of soul whereby it esteemeth God as the chiefest good preferreth him and his Son Jesus before all the world and prizeth above all things an Interest in the Divine perfections such as justice and righteousness universal Charity Goodness Mercy Patience and all kinds of purity From whence doth naturally proceed a hearty complyance with all the holy Precepts of the Gospel and sincere endeavours to perform all those actions which are agreeable to them are necessary expressions of those and the like vertues and means for the obtaining and encrease of them What thinkest thou now Reader canst thou fancy the Design of Christianity to be another Leviathan or rather art thou able to retain any tolerable opinion of that man that calls it so and represents it as such a piece of monstrous Devilism Nay can he himself have such a Brazen Forehead as not to be confounded to think what he hath done upon his reading over if he can be perswaded to it but this short account of that Treatise I pray God give him true Repentance and set home upon his Conscience what hath and shall be farther laid open to his view in this small Pamphlet which if ever he does I am sure he 'l acknowledge that Mr. F. hath given him as little temptation to accuse him so highly as did our blessed Saviour the malicious Pharisees to fasten upon him the imputation of as fearful crimes viz. profane company keeping Treason witchcraft and Blasphemy And who can be so blind as not to see that the only provocation I B. could have to exclaim at such a rate is this that the design of Mr. F's took is utterly to root out that doctrine which is the grand support of wretched hypocrites and which doth infinitely disparage our Blessed Lord Jesus and his glorious Gospel I mean that filthy doctrine of Antinomianism with which this man hath stuffed his sad Scrible and it appears not only
another thing in p. 70. that I 'le bestow two or three lines upon He there tells Mr. F. that he will have a little touch upon his Principle of Freedom which saith he you in p. 9. call an Understanding and Liberty of Will Observe his non-sense again But what is it Mr. F. there saith that offends this man 'T is this that he supposeth men indued with Understanding and Liberty of Will Now proceeds he there is no such thing in man by nature as liberty of will or a principle of freedom in the saving things of the Kingdom of Christ. But 1. Mr. F. saith never a word of liberty of will as to those things but only supposeth this in general that man is indued with liberty of will And this he himself supposeth in denying it only as to the Saving things of Christ's Kingdom 2. He limits that too and saith there is no such thing in man by nature as to those things will he therefore acknowledge there is such a thing in man by grace If he will not that limitation is ridiculous but if he will he is never like to have Mr. F. for his Adversary in this point nor any of his judgment He hath declared in the book several times cited p. 239. that the men of his judgment hold no free will that is opposite to free grace and acknowledgeth in the next page the necessity not only of assisting but also of preventing grace And now let the Reader judg whether Mr. F. hath written the least tittle contrary to any one of the 39 Articles of the Church of England and particularly to those there concerning Free-will Iustification and Works before Faith which in general terms he hath charg'd him with without shewing wherein he hath done it though I acknowledg if he hath not abused Mr. F's Book that his accusation is no slander But he is to his perpetual infamy most sensibly demonstrated to have bewrayed most woful ignorance and notorious dishonesty and ill nature besides the foulest erroniousness in what he hath published against The Design of Christianity But 't is pleasant to observe that this wretch who abominates any thing if one may judg by his rude behaviour that bareth the name of the Church of England should cite three of her Articles as main Orthodoxy's in order to the more effectual defaming of Mr. Fowler This is just like the Devils making use of Scripture to assist him in his malicious designs against our Saviour Lastly He falls to compare Mr. F's Doctrine with Campian's the Jesuite and Pen's the Quaker and makes a parallel between several of his Sayings with Seven of the former and Eight of the latter By the way take notice that this lamentable piece of work is the labour of more clumsy Brains than this poor I. B's For First How should he come by Sayings out of Campian but Secondly which is more considerable he hath a company of Terms and Phrases that he was never in a capacity of understanding as Commixed Radicals Abstract Replication c. derived from the Latin Again Characteristical Diametrical Parenthesis Paragraph c. borrowed from the Greek Language And he is up with his arguing from a thing to a thing habit and act which smell of one whose name hath had the honour to stand a little while in a Colledge Buttery Book and that had the luck sometimes to hear his Masters chopping Logick together For I 'le warrant him who ever was I. B's fellow-labourer in this worthy performance is a fellow that never was under a much higher dispensation And 't is he I presume that hath helpt our Author to his after-conclusions p. 9. as if there were fore-conclusions Thirdly The whole is a motly thing piec't and patch't together as if it were the product of not so few as two but a Club of Wise-akers But yet all that understand I. B's manners ability and temper will accuse me as injurious should I rob him of the honour of the down-right non-sense knavery Calumnies and vile language which make a very great if not the far greater part of the Pamphlet But to our business that is to the parallel between Mr. F's doctrine and a few Sayings of the Papist and Quaker set down by him to which I reply in a few words I know not whether this I. B. hath not as falsly represented these mens Sayings as it hath been proved he hath done many of Mr. F's I have neither of the Books to examine the matter nor have I ever read either and therefore I cannot accuse him but he hath been proved so very notoriously dishonest in this particular that he ought never more to be trusted upon his own word But suppose he hath not too favourably represented any of them the Reader will see if he compares them with the Sayings of Mr. F. set under them that he abuseth most of these in making a parallel between them as I would particularly shew but that it will take up too much time and any man of understanding that hath his book will immediately perceive that I charge him truly But Mr. F. I am sure will not stick to acknowledge that there may be put upon most of them such a sense as may speak them good and true sayings As where Campian saith that Faith justifies but not faith only this is no other than what S. Iames affirms in express words chap. 2. 24. And Mr. F's doctrine is that faith if it be taken for a mere relyance on Christ's Righteousness which is but one act of faith doth not only justifie but if it be understood so as to include the receiving of Christ according to all his offices or for an obediential faith so it doth only justifie That is as hath been shewn again and again not as a meritorious cause but as a condition He abhors to assert with the Papists the merit of works nor doth he affirm that works are a necessary condition of justification but as they are virtually in faith for he every where makes a true and sincere willingness to obey Christs precepts which is implyed in Faith the necessary condition of justification There is not an Heretick in the world but hath some good Sayings this I. B. himself as grosly erroneous as he is is not out in every thing And no wise man will love truth one jot the worse for hearing it from the Devils mouth And I freely declare that if the Papists and Quakers did assert no worse things than those I. B. hath cited and withal understood them as he by his parallel makes them to do I would as heartily defend the principles of both as I now oppose them Every body knows that understands these men that this I. B. and his Brethren joyn hands both with Quakers and Papists in not a few Opinions and Practices as they are enemies to the Church of England but doth he think himself and them one jot the more hereticks upon that account
him to be a publick Teacher he that so abuseth the most plain Scriptures in Print as I can shew he doth in a vast multitude of instances besides this what woful work may we conclude he makes with them in his ridiculous Preachments He saith that Adam in his best and most sinless estate was a Type and Figure a Type and Figure doubtless in his sinless and holy estate a Type or Figure of the Holiness of Christ. This must be taken upon his own word he saith doubtless 't is so but gives not one word of proof But suppose it were so it would be nothing to his purpose would this prove that Adams holiness was of a different kind from the Holiness of Christians or of Christ either but I say doubtless it is not so we only read that he was in his fallen estate a figure And that is in Rom. 5. 14. By Figure there is meant the opposite member in a comparison and there the Reader may see how Adam and Christ are compared He saith the holiness that was in Adam and we lost in him was such as stood in and was managed by his natural perfect complyance with a covenant of works On the other side of the leaf he would acknowledge no more than that Adam had the law written in his heart now we see he grants that he perfectly complyed with that law how thick is his ignorance that knows not the difference between these two But what again is this to the purpose Why 1. saith he Adams holiness was a natural perfect complyance c. But prithee I. B. is it ever the worse for being natural is not the holiness of the good Angels natural to them nay is not the Holiness of God natural to him or is it therefore of a different kind from the holiness of Christians because theirs is not natural I should affront my Reader should I go about to prove to him that the different manner of receiving these two doth not make them to be of a different nature Because Adam was created with his Holiness and the holiness of the Gospel is by regeneration or a new-birth are they not therefore of the same kind 2. He saith that the Covenant Christ brings in is a better Covenant than Adams a blessed Covenant of grace and he possesseth his children with the holiness and priviledges of that Covenant But I say the holiness that Christs Covenant of grace requires is of the same nature with that required in the Covenant of works but the difference is the condition of the former is true holiness and that of the latter is perfect holiness by virtue of the former sincerity is accepted and by virtue of the latter nothing short of perfection and so the holiness of the one and the other differ only in degrees and the holiness required by the Covenant of works is so far from being meaner that 't is as much above that which the Covenant of grace accepts as perfection is above sincerity He saith the holiness that was in Adam and that we lost by the fall was such as might stand with perfect ignorance of the mediation of Christ for Christ was not made known to Adam as a Saviour before he was a Sinner What stuff is here again Doth this make the one and the other holiness to be of a different nature And was Adams Holiness ever the worse because it stood with perfect ignorance of Christ's mediation Nay it was therefore far better than we can attain to in this life because he needed no mediator He saith the Holiness that was in Adam was never given him through the promise nor incouraged by the promise Adam had no promise to possess him with a principle of holiness it came to him by Creation neither had he any promise to strengthen or incourage him in Holiness But 1. How doth he know he was not incouraged by a Promise if God did make him a promise was he bound to tell us so 2. There was a promise that if he did not eat of the tree he should live implyed in the threatning that if he did eat he should die 3. But suppose this to be true what is it to the purpose and what doth it make for him to say that Adam's holiness was not given him through the Promise but by Creation when as was said a different manner of obtaining a thing makes no change in the nature of the thing it self Lastly He sums up all this sottish prate together and thereby expresseth his brutish contempt of the Holiness we have lost In a word saith he it was a natural shadowish old Covenant promiseless Holiness such as stood and might be walked in while he stood perfectly ignorant of the Mediator Christ. You see Reader what a vile object of contempt he makes himself He next p. 26. quarrels with that Saying before the Descriptions of holiness namely that the holiness that 's the design of Christianity is not subjected in any thing without us nor is made ours by a mere external or outward application To this he saith That these words secretly smite at the justification that comes by the imputation of the glorious Righteousness that alone resideth in the person of the Lord Iesus and that is made ours by an Act of Eternal Grace we resting upon it by the faith of Christ. Here 's malice with a witness Does not he know that Mr. F. hath asserted the imputation of Christ's Righteousness and that the worst he saith is that 't is not the ultimate end of Christianity but that 't is designed in order to the promoting of inward holiness as all Christian Priviledges are And does he not therefore know that when Mr. F. saith that the Holiness that is the design of Christianity is such as he there affirms that he means by the design the chief and main or the design by way of eminence He that hath read but the Title page cannot but see this for he interprets there the Design of Christianity by ultimate End and grand intendment One may sufficiently understand the naughtiness of this mans Spirit by this one instance By the way I must tell the Reader that whereas Mr. F. doth somewhere in his Book call Holyness the onely design of Christianity he must needs be most disingenuous that can interpret that onely so severely as to exclude all other ends the whole business of the Treatise being to demonstrate it to be the ultimate or last end that is in reference to men and no man can think that he would any where assert more than he designed to prove And he could mean no more by onely than as in common Speech it is very ordinarily used that is for special or principal And so the Reverend and Learned Mr. Baxter hath expounded the word in defence of Mr. Fowler These are his words where he and others do say that Holiness is the only design of the Promises c. You must not interpret
invincibly defended by Abundance of the Orthodox Divines of the Church of England and by none more effectually than by Mr. Baxter in his Book against Crandon long since written and in many other of his works Which if it be possible thou shouldest yet be dissatisfied concerning it thou wilt do well to peruse and which if this I. B. had ever read or but anyone of them and had the wit to understand it he had never made himself so infamous as to publish to the world such filthy stuff nor brought out the worst of those woful arguments for the defence of his doctrine that have been answered a thousand and a thousand times In Page 66. and other places he makes woful work with Mr. F's saying that Christ trod every step before us of the way that leads to Gods Kingdom and cryes therefore he went to heaven by vertue of an imputative Righteousness and by vertue of his own intercession and faith in his own bloud and then Christ must come to God and ask mercy for some great wickedness that he hath committed But here he also discovers a most ill nature and perverse spirit for no man of any candour could otherwise have understood Mr. F. in those words than thus That Christ was an example of all those vertues or graces that qualifie men for the Kingdom of God was he not an example of all those graces that together denominate a man pure in heart can he dare to say he was not Now doth not our Saviour say Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God But then faith he what say you to going to heaven by vertue of an imputative Righteousness and of his own intercession and faith in his own bloud I say all these are no other than going thither by Faith in Christ that being faith in his bloud and Righteousness and intercession but those that understand the Christian Religion will tell him that the obtaining of this purity of heart or the graces Christ was an example of is the end of this Faith So much the Apostle intimates in those words purifying their hearts by faith and it is the business of the Design of Christianity to demonstrate this So that 't is most true that whosoever follows Christs example shall see the Kingdome of God but we cannot follow it without faith in his merits faith in his power or in one word without effectual believing the Gospel which takes in the whole of the Christian Faith And whereas he saith that if this doctrine be true Christ must ask God mercy for some great wickedness committed by him how does that follow Christ ask'd God mercy for us and do not we do as he did when we ask it for our selves But then he monstrously foolishly proceeds and saith if this be so then we cannot come to heaven before we be accursed of God we must first make our body and Soul an offering for the sin of others then we must go to heaven for the sake of our own Righteousness And then he insultingly cryes O Sir what will thy gallant generous mind do here This might be a Sad nonplus indeed were Mr. F. a perfect Changling But observe did Mr. F. say that Christ trod no steps but those we must tread is this saying that he trod before us every step which he hath told us leads to the Kingdom of God or that we must go in to the Kingdom of God the same with this that he trode no other but those we must tread Can any man be such a sot as not to discern the wide difference between these two propositions By the way take notice that it is blasphemy to say that Christ was accursed of God in any other sense than this that he suffered such a kind of death as was by the law of Moses pronounced accursed So the Apostle explains his being made a curse Gal. 3. 13. Christ was alwayes Gods beloved Son nor was he ever more a darling of heaven than when he hung upon the Cross. And that the Reader may be truly informed in the Doctrine of Christ's Satisfaction false notions whereof make this I. B. talk most gross things I entreat him to get and carefully peruse the Learned Dr. Stilling fleets Treatise upon that Subject there you will find that Christ did not suffer the very same punishment that is due to sinners but that what he suffered for sinners sakes was as Satisfactory and answered the ends of Government as much as if all mankind had perished And thanks be to God that Doctrine of Christs suffering the very same is now generally exploded But to return observe but these Scriptures and you will then need no more than what hath been said to discern how ridiculously and wretchedly this I. B. talks in several places about the life of Christ. Luke 9. 23. If any man will come after me or be a Christian let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and sollow me 1 Pet. 2. Christ suffered for us leaving us an example that ye should follow his steps who did no sin neither was guile found in his mouth who when he was reviled reviled not again c. 1 John 2. 6. He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also to walk even as he walked V. 29. If ye know that he is Righteous ye know that every one which doth righteousness is born of him 1 John 3. 7. Little Children let no man deceive you he that doth righteousness is righteous even as he is righteous 1 Iohn 4. 17. Herein is our love made perfect that we may have boldness in the day of judgment because as he is or was the Analage of the tense being ordinary so are we in this world Now this I. B. saith p. 106. that our Saviours life in all duties that respected morals was not principally or first to be imitated by us but that the Law even in the preceptive part thereof might be fully and perfectly fulfilled for us Mark 1. he saith in all duties that respected morals what nonsense is this any body may see he does not know what Morals means 2. That our Saviours life in these duties was not principally to be imitated by us he dares not say not at all to be imitated though any body may see that reads his book he would be glad to say so with all his heart But what Scripture doth he bring for this none at all So that if you will not take his word for it he hath nothing to say to you 3. But saith he that the Law even in the preceptive part may be fulfilled for us was Christs principal design in living as he did What proof hath he for this Rom. 10. 5. Christ is the end of the law for righteousness the end saith he not only of the Ceremonial law but of the 10 commandments too but is he the end of both alike then we are no more now obliged to the one than to the other In