a remarkable place Gal. 3.29 if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams and consequently Isaacs seed and heirs according to premise so that the Apostle here doth instruct us that election consists of such a sort of persons so qualified the specifical seed of Isaac such a kinde of persons therefore might the Apostle well say Eph. 1.4 according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world that is in Christ 3. This truth is further confirmed if we consider that children of promise must suppose children of faith a promise requires believing Abraham believed Gods promise and it was accounted for righteousnesse so that we have Isaac here set forth as a lively type of the nature not the number of those who shall be Justified and saved as afterwards we have Pharach set forth as a lively type of those who shall be rejected by God namely such as slight and reject God and his long-suffering grace in the Gospel which ought and is expected to leade them to repentance Rom. 2.2 This Doctrine from hence may be observed Doctrine That God in choosing and reprobating man hath a special eye to qualifications Children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of faith in Christ not by number and name but species and qualifications Psal 4.3 God hath chosen and set apart for himself the man that is godly St. Jude tells us certain men were Ordained to that condemnation and he doth desipher them thus ungodly men turning the grace of God into wantonnesse and denying the Lord so that Ishmael and Isaac are made use of here but allegorically as they are Gal. 4. I shall speak but a very few words to ver 9. and winde up this context with a word of Use for this is the word of promise at this time will I come and Sarah shall have a son Isaac is judged a meet type of those who should be begotten by faith in the free and gratious promise of God in the Gospel we have in these words contained an explanation of what is spoken before Isaac was a significant son of promise therefore the Apostle recites the very words of the Original promise to Abraham Gen. 17.21 at this time next year will I return according to the time of life and Sarah shall have a son ver 14. at the time appointed I will return the Apostle changeth by these words I will come for God to come is understood two ways 1. To come in power to help rescue or deliver 2. Sometimes to come is to punish sometimes for God or Christ to come is metaphorically understood as Rev. 2.5 his coming is to remove the Candlestick to come ver 16. is to fight against them chap. 3.3 is to come as a thief with strength and resolution we have two things considerable in these words to Abraham recited by the Apostle 1. That Isaac's birth is the effect of Gods coming in power 2. That God in fulfilling this promise admits no delay at this time at the set time neither sooner nor later but at the set time as it was in the birth of John the Baptist Luke the 1. his mother went her exact time God makes his promise returnable at the set time so that Isaac's birth is the effect of Gods coming as to his birth and the time of it and also the effect of Gods free promise Isaac was the son of Gods word of promise I shall sum up all in one Doctrinal conclusion Doctrine That a true child of God and heir of glory is one as Isaac was begotten and brought Jorth by the strength of the free promise of God not of his own power strength or righteousnesse This our Apostle alludes unto Titus 3. and 5. not of works of righteousness that we have done I told you in the explication that Isaac's birth was an act of free mercy and speciall Providence for there was no strength in Abraham or Sarah to have a childe according to the course of nature nothing as they could lean upon so as to have hope in themselves therefore it is said Rom. 4. that Abraham against hope believed in hope vers 18. and being not weak in faith he considered not his own body now dead nor yet the deadness of Sarah's womb he staggered not but was fully perswaded that he that had promised was able to perform and this frame of spirit God liked well in Abraham and it was accounted for righteousness and hereupon he was called the friend of God James 2.23 Isaac's birth was the effect of a promise and faith in it so was John's Luke the 1. and what Elizabeth said to Mary is certainly true vers 45. blessed is she or he that believeth for there shall be a performance of what is promised a true child of God is begotten and brought forth of the promise of God in Christ therfore believing Holy S. Paul could say in the behalf of himself and the rest of believers we brethren as Isaac are children of the promise that is to say that as Isaac's birth was the product of the free promise of God so is our new birth and it is a truth that we are as weak and unable to save our selves of our selves as Abraham was to produce Isaac of himself without the mighty interposer for the promise gives a being to Christ and believing to be the means of salvation Gen. 3. Esa 55. I will abundantly pardon look unto me and be ye saved all the ends of the earth Esa 45.22 There are five inferences to be drawn from the promises 1. There is no ground from the rejecting the unbelieving Jews to conclude that there is a failing in Gods promises to Abraham and his seed because God did never intend a carnal seed in that promise but a spiritual and believing seed who should seek for justification by Christ alone forasmuch as Isaac's birth is a type of Gods method of saving souls in all ages 2. Learn from this context the indispensable necessity of faith in order to justification and salvation if Abraham and Sarah had not seconded Gods promise by faith in it they had had no Isaac therefore is the birth strongly imputed to the faith of them both Heb. 11.11 the birth of Isaac is not only a promise on Gods part but believing on their part 3. If the works of the law were rejected in point of justification which were so labourious painful and costly much less can gospel-works justifie which in comparison are no works Rom. 4.15 therefore lean not to them 4. If â—ods children are the children of promise that is begotten upon the promise then this doth instruct a gospel-minister his work and duty which is to lay before persons Gods free promises of life and salvation in Christ thus did Peter in his preaching Acts. 2. ch 3. ch 10. 5. Admire the sweetness of Gods nature to allure by promises to Obedience this was Gods proceedings with Abraham when God would have Abraham to obey him
as 1 Cor. 9.24 where we are called upon so to run that we may obtain where we have obtaining propounded as the great encouragement to running So also Heb. 12. we are to have an eye to the recompence of reward to encourage us in our running and Paul himself was not willing to run in vain and we are called upon Phil. 2.12 to work out our salvation with fear and trembling I answer That in all these places the Apostle speaks to justified persons in order to perseverance not to such as are strangers to the ways of God and his Gospel as these in our Text were and all these endeavours are more properly aâ—… sanctification then after justification we are called upon to work out our salvation and to perfect our holinesse in so doing but we are never called upon to work out our justification that is only the effect of Christs death and sufferings without any other efficient cause or means all acts of holinesse in man is rather to declare his justified state then procure it Abraham in obeying and following God in those several steps which the Scâ—pture takes notice of did not thereby procure but demonstrate his justification and see how Alrahams obedience and faith centers in one to this end our Apostle saith that Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse thereby he was accounted righteous yet S. James saith our father Abraham was justified by works when he offered Isaac Jam. 2.21 that is he did declare or demonstrate it thereby Thus I have briefly run through the words by way of explication I now return to consider of them as they lie And before I proceed to those Doctrinal Conclusions which lyeth in them I shall briefly take notice of them as they are the Apostles Conelusion and result and inference from what goeth before for that they are as a conclusion they have the note of an inference or conclusion in this so then for so these words are used elsewhere See chap. 10.17 So then faith comes by hearing which words are the result from the former so chap. 8.8 so then they that are in the flesh cannot please God cha 14.12 So then every one must give an account of biâ—…self to God so 1 Cor. 3.7 chap. 7.38 thus we see that this kinde of speaking is used as a center to draw the precedent and subsequent matter to it so that this 16. verse is a result the Apostle in these words doth conclude and seal up the matter of this first argument in order to purging himself from the Jews false imputation of charging God with unrighteousnesse which they gathered from what he had said as is recorded vers 11. that God doth not justifie by works this result doth cast light upon the whole Context upon a three-fold consideration 1. As these words doth determine the nature and matter of the controversie between the Apostle and the Jews that it was about the terms of justification and who had right to make them both which are here resolved not of him that is most desirous and pursuing after it he has not power to propound but God who is the gracious donour of it 2. By the Apostles result in this verse he doth determine where the foot of the Jews objection lay which was from his interpretation made of these two instances of Ishmael and Esau as their rejection taught the rejection of works as to justification ver 11. and not upon the unequal proceedings of God with Jacob and Esau as some would have it for it will easily be granted that not of works and not of him that willeth or runneth are terms synonimous or of like signification 3. We must understand this conclusion and inference to be drawn from the words immediately going before Exod. 33.19 So then that is to say from hence it appears not to be of the willer or runner because God in shewing mercy is positively resolved in himself and from himself about it so that this conclusion concludes the propriety of Exo. 33. to this controversie and that God spâ—… the same in effect to Moses as here S. Paul spâ—… to the Jews that is to say that justification 〈◊〉 adoption is of free-grace and mercy and notâ—… works Thus much for the scope and explication of the words I shall now sum up the whole of this verse in these five doctrinal Conclusions From the nature of these words as they are a result or conclusion whilst S. Paul is labouring 〈◊〉 vindicate Gods righteousnesse and equity in this terms and proceedings with mankinde he arrives at great fatisfaction in himself The Doctrine is this That he that makes it his work to vindicate Gods righteousnesse in his proceedings with man prevaâ—… in his arguments The Apostle had no cause to be ashamed of his contest in this matter in asserting justification by faith in Christ without the deeds of the law though in so asserting he is charged for impeaching Gods righteousnesse yet he overcame and in vindâ—…ting Gods righteousnesse he vindicates his own doctrine So then it is not 2. Doctrine That justification is a prize worth the running for when once seen and understood The Apostle supposeth that these Jews had been willing and running after it as a blessed priviledge justification with God is very desirable but suppose you should ask me what it is to be justified I answer when a person is declared just upon the account of pardon and non-imputation of sin that is the blessed state which the Apostle speaks of Rom. 4.6,7,8 blessed is the man to whom God doth not impute sin but how may thee and I know whether we are in this blessed state I answer 1. If thou beest justified with God thou art acquitted in thine own conscience there remains no more conscience of sin this is that spoken of Rom. 5.1 being justified with God there is peace in thy conscience that is quiet it doth not condemn thee 2. If thou beest justified from sin thou doest experience strength against sin that sin which is pardoned we have a perfect hatred unto we have an eminent place for this 2 Corinth 7.11 there was indignation and revenge against it 3. Doctrine It is possible for persons cordially to desire and laboriously to pursue this mercy of justification and yet come short and not attain it This was the case of the Jews they were willers and runners they had a zeal a desire they sought after it verse 31. yet not attained it chap. 11.7 Israel did not attain what they fought after and why not because they were not elected vers 32. but because they sought it not by faith therefore this we may learn that in our zeal and running it is good to keep Gods line 4. Doctrine That persons to some degree righteous and obedient to Gods laws are very apt to challenge and strongly expect the great priviledge of justification as a debt for such their obedience or as a reward for such work Therefore the Apostle doth
of the flesh are understood to be such as look for justification and acceptance with God upon the account of the works of the law circumcision and Obedience to the ceremonial law this is plain for flesh and works of the law are often taken one for another and by this our Apostle Rom. 4.1,2 what shall we say then that Abraham our father according to the flesh hath found for if Abraham were justified by works that which is called flesh in the first part of the verse is called works in the latter part this is understood Gal. 3.3 of being made perfect by the flesh and so chap. 4.29 he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the spirit that is he that was born according to the works of the law and thus S. Paul must be understood Phil. 3. though he was circumcised and kept the law yet he had no confidence in the flesh now in this third sense must our text be understood the children of the flesh are not the children of God Adoption and heirship doth not come in that way they that have nothing else to plead must stand off let us take it in which sense we will the text is here the children of the flesh are not the children of God 1. Such as have only nature Nor 2ly those who live after the flesh though they profess to believe in Christ Nor 3dly those who are most circumspect as to the observation of the law except they believe in and obey Jesus Christ Secondly who are the Children of the promise unto whom these are opposed By children of the promise must be understood such as rest and depend upon the free promise of God in Christ for life and salvation believers in Christ who seek for acceptance and salvation by him alone such as are begotten to love and obedience by the power of the promises To this doth the Apostles words agree Such as are Christs are the seed and heirs according to the promises therefore doth the Apostle oppose the Law to the promise Gal. 3.18 For if the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the promises but God gave it to Abraham by promise So also Gal. 4.14 if they that are of the law be heirs their faith is made void and the promise of none effect the Gospel is a dispensation of promises and consequently of faith S. Paul calleth the Saints Heb. 6.17 the heirs of promises So also Gal. 4.28 We as Isaac are children of the promises So that when the Apostle saith here the Children are counted for the seed he intends not others then true believers in Christ Jesus Thus I have briefly answered these two Questions in order to the explication of the words I shall now summary the first part of the words into this Doctrine Doct. That the true seed of Abraham are not nor were not at any time estimated or accounted as they were found in the external profession or practice of Ordinances though of Gods own appointment but of such who under such Ordinances had the life and power of them in their hearts The true heirs of justification and salvation were in all ages intended to be inwardly and believinâ—…y children of God God did never accept of any outside professors since the beginning but as he was a searcher of hearts allways so he allways required heart and inside-worship he did always require to be worshipped with heart soul and strength In Abels time Cain was a worshiper as well as Abel but the difference lay in the inside of the worship therefore it is said Heb. 11.4 by faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice then Cain In the time of Circumcision God was not satisfyed with a fleshly circumcision only but God calls for circumcision of heart Deut. 10.16 circumcise therefore the foreskin of your hearts and we see the severe threatnings of God against Israel for the want hereof Ierem. 9. Inward spiritual worship was always required and much more in Gospel-days therefore Christ tells the Jews John 6.53 Except you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye have no life in you Rom. 2.28 he is not a Jew who is such outwardly God almighty was so cautious and careful lest men should bear upon works for Justification and acceptance with him thereupon that he declares Abraham justified before he was circumcised and that our Apostle takes special notice of Rom. 4.11 Abraham received circumcision a seal of the righteousnesse of the faith which he had being not yet circumcised to which agreeth these words verse the 5. now to him that worketh not but believeth in him that Iustifieth the ungodly his faith is accounted to him for righteousnesse so that it is plain that the spirit of God is greatly concerned in beating men off from bearing upon works of righteousnesse and we see the spirit of St Eaul to this purpose Titus 3.5 not by works of righteousnesse that we have done but according to his mercy he saved us This Doct. seems to discover to us a great mistake amongst professors in this day there are but a sew who do not erre on this hand to bear upon their external obedience to ordinances and raise their comforts and hopes from thence Is not this like the plea of the pharisee Luke 18. I fast twice in the weeâ— are there not many who bless themselves upon this account and this appears because your comforts are high and low according to your duties but some may say ought it not so to be I answer you must have a special care to keep allways in a clear sight and sense and assurance of your relation you stand in to God if you are truly regenerated persons and are begotten from above do not easily let go that hold it is the duty of a child to grieve that he hath offended his loving father but not to call in question his relation to him thereupon God doth not unchilde for every fault nor for many sins if they be not wilfully committed but I pray mistake me not I would not have Gods children passe lightly over their miscarriages against him nor their unanswerable returns to him but mourn cordially as David and Peter did not in slavish but filial frame of spirit but know this that our sanctification is not the ground of our justification but the Demonstration of it good works may demonstrate our justification 2. Let each of us be instructed from hence to have a special care that we do not bear or rest upon our Gospel-obedience for acceptance or justification namely our Baptism nor other gospelobedience in ordinances for this we may be assured of as a truth that if legal performances of Godâ— appointment were not accepted being only outward much less are gospel persormances in ordinances acceptable without the spiritual part of them Baptism hath an inside as well as circumcision which consists in two parts death to sin life to righteousness now if
Christ and seeking for justification another way namely by the works of the law 2. To convince the Jews that that way of justification unto which they did adhere was a way absolutely rejected and reprobated of God and that Gods purpose of election was not to stand or be founded upon that foundation but by faith in Christ 3. The Apostle doth labour to satisfy the Jews that this was no new Doctrine broacht by him but a Doctrine preach't by God to Abraham though to him more darkly in types and figures in the casting out of Ishmael and Esau from those priviledges which were external in these his lower passages he did teach higher things the rejecting the old covenant of works in point of justification and choosing the younger Gospel-covenant 4. It is the Apostles endeavour to convince the Jews that God had left himself an absolute and unquestionable right to propose his own terms and conditions upon which he will justifie and save without being imposed on by the creature and that this his way which he hath unalterably and peremptorily fixed and declared is the way of 〈◊〉 grace 5. The Apostle is labouring here to convince the Jews that their rejecting and casting off was no other then the fruit and effects of their rejection of this his way by Christ as is plain vers 32. because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law Now these considerations carried along in our eye will be a light and guide to us in the following subject We now proceed The Apostle having been in the former Uses labouring to certify the Jews of the eternal purpose and decree of God to elect and adopt for Abrahams children only such as should believe in Christ and to reject therefrom all others of what line soever descended who should depend upon works for that priviledge and in this doing he had been vindicating the truth of Gods promise to Abraham against their first Objection verse the 6th shewing them that the rejecting such a carnal seed of Abraham as they were did no ways cross much less make void the word of God or render it of none effect He now proceeds in these verses to vindicate the righteousnesse of God in these his proceedings in answer to their second Objection that God is not only just in decreeing this way of Justification but righteous in his prosecution of the same we may suppose that the Jews were satisfied that the Apostle had fully answered their first Objection and cleared the way as to the tight seed the Jews were ready to say Paul thou hast well salved the truth of Gods word of promise but now how can this comport with the righteousnesse of God and his equity whilst he is rejecting the greatest number of Abrahams seed who have been willing and running zealously labouring in ways of obedience to that law of God delivered to them and in the meanwhile receiving into favour the nations and sinners of the Gentiles either ignorant of or disobedient to that law and that only believing in another This saith the Jew favours to us of unequity and unrighteousnesse and thus the Apostles answer to their first Objection begetteth another Objection the answer to which is that which the Apostle is running at in the following verses namely to vindicate the righteousnesse of God The substance of the Apostles answer amounts to thus much that as Gods rejecting the Jews the natural seed of Abaaham did no ways intrench upon the truth of his word of promise to Abraham so neither doth his rejecting these who were zealous of the law intrench upon his Justice and righteousnesse so that God is righteous in his proceedings though the Jews are not justified by the works of the law Ver. 14. What shall we say then is there unrighteousnesse with God God forbid That the Apostle is here in these words replying to a supposed Objection is the received opinion of most that I have read as well Calvinists as others 2. That this Objection is occasioned by or from what goeth before is as universally granted the Jews did think by what Paul had said before that he had rendred the righteousnesse of God at least questionable I do confess I finde men much divided as to the spring rise and root of this Objection some think this Objection was raised from the Apostles quoting of Jacob and Esau with respect to the time when the words were spoken to Rebecea which was before they had done good or evil one to be hated and the other loved whereas they were both equally sons of Isaac in whom the promise was lodged some think that the Jews thought that Puul in this instance had at least implicitely rendred God unrighteous 2. Some think that the Jews took this advantage from Pauls interpretation of these Oracles and instances of Ishmael and Esau as thus that God in his proceedings with Ishmael and Esau did intend to declare his establisht purpose of election to be not by works but free grace ver 11. this interpretation the Jews quarrel at that Paul should in effect say that Gods casting out Ishmael and subjugating Esau typed out the casting off the Covenant of works for Justification this interpretation was very distasteful to the Jews who judged it to savour of unrighteousnesse for God to slight and reject the zealous Jews who were observers of the law whilst he received into favour the sinners of the gentiles as they esteemed them Now the Question is which of these two are likeliest to be the spring of this Objection I answer That it could not so properly be drawn from the first as the last of these foundations for these two reasons 1. What the Apostle speaks concerning Jacob and Esau was only what was recorded in their own Scripture and they dared not to quarrel at that they had the very words that Paul mentions Gen. 25. Malachi 1. 2. What Paul had said concerning Jacob and Esau and particularly concerning Esau or the Edomites that could not offend the Jews because the Edomites had been their fathers implacable enemies the Jews would hardly upon their account interpose or to charge Pauls Doctrine with imputation of unrighteousnesse to God they did not at that day bear any such love to Edom therefore the spring and rise of this Objection must stand grounded upon the Apostles conclusive inference from the premises Gen. 25. Mal. 1. that God had rejected that way of saving men on which they depended and chosen the way of faith this is that saith the Jews which seems to reflect unrighteousnesse upon God Now to take off this second Objection the Apostle addresseth himself in the verses following both in general and particular And first he denyeth the consequence drawn from the premises in general in these words God forbid let not this be so much as named it is in St. Pauls account abominable the Syriack reade God forgive implying the hainousnesse of the sin wanting forgivenesse it is a
elswhere as well as here as I shall shew you from other Scriptures and it would reflect a clear light upon the context if the reader would take good heed of these words as an inference from what goeth before although I shall not deny but that the Apostle in these words may have an eye to the whole context yet I shall say he had a more special eye to the words immediatly going before cited out of Exo. 33.19 which he brings to discharge himself from casting any blemish upon Gods righteousness by his doctrine of justification by faith and consequently by free-grace the Apostle seems to argue thus if God have a sole and unquestionable right to shew mercy to whom or what sort of persons he will and upon what terms he please then adoption and justification doth not begin in the creatures will nor end in his own work It is not of him that willeth or runneth the great controversy between our Apostle and the Jews as you have here before was about the terms of way of Justification whether by the works of the law or by grace through faith in Christ that for which the Apostle incurrs the high displeasure of the Jews is for asserting faith alone as sufficient to justifie circumcision or uncircumcision that this was the Apostles Doctrine is plain if you reade this epistle with that of the Gallathians it was the preaching this doctrine that occasioned the Jews to charge him with impeaching Gods righteousnesseâ— now we may easily perceive that our Apostle 〈◊〉 these verses is upon his vindication and Justification from that false imputation and that which 〈◊〉 apprehended himself concerned to speak unto is still to stand by his interpretation of those two iâ— stances of Ishmael and Esau which two as he 〈◊〉 taught did loudly speak the purpose of God 〈◊〉 to be of works not of works but of grace to viâ—dicate which he before brings the saying of God of old to Moses as if he should have said this â—…terable purpose of God is contained Exod. 33.19 Or as if he should have said God is not unrighteous in such his proceedings with mankinde 〈◊〉 much as he hath an unquestionable right to â—…pound his own terms upon which he will juâ—… and save men and as equitable a right to propouâ—… his own terms upon which he will blinde and â—…den and reprobate men For thus much doth the Lord in effect speâ—… is his declaration to Moses I am resolved to adâ—…â—ustifie and save persons in what capacity and under what qualifications I please and will 〈◊〉 be imposed upon or taught by man what I have to do or what becometh me to do of this kindâ— This I say doth God with a very high hand 〈◊〉 sert to Moses in order to silencing him in his intercession for the sinful Israelits which if so then it follows in this 16 ver that the great mercy of Adoption and Justification as to the terms and conditions of it doth not arise nor is not at the will or contrivance of the most earnest desirers or most industrious persuers of the law much less of any other sort of men whatsoever but of God who is the sole founder of this mercy and the inviter unto this blessed feast of Justification of his own good will and pleasure This 16. Ver. well considered especially in conjunction with ver 32. of this chap. and chap. 10.3 doth let in a great beam of light to this whole context and doth to some good degree unty the knot of this controversy as it and they carry in them a reason why the Jews fell short of Justification not for want of willing or want of running but want of running in a right way ver 32. because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law chap. 10.3 they being ignorant of Gods righteousnesse or the way of Gods righteousnesse and going about to establish their own they did not attain to the law of righteousnesse which Calvin expounds thus they have not found the terms of Justification propounded and authorised by God so that this text considered with the fore-named doth undeniably prove and demonstrate to those who are willing to understand that the famous controversy between the Apostle and the Jews was not about personal and absolute election and Reprobation before time or power to believe but about the terms of Justification and adoption which way persons come to be legitimate children of Abraham whether by works or by saith which is answered negatively not of works noâ—… for our more orderly proceedings and to answâ—… the method of an exposition I shall first explain those words that want explication and afterwards observe what is doctrinal in them 1. I shall enquire into the subject here spoken of in these two words it is what is that he means it is not of willer or runner what is not the product of willing and running 2. What him is here to be understood twice exprest not of him not of him who is he that wiâ—s and runs in vain 3. What is this willing and running and why set forth by these terms 4. Why is willing and running opposed to God and mercy it is not of him that willeth nor of hiâ— that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy To the first as to these two words it is they are inserted in the translation as a necessary supplement though they are not in the original as we have the like supplement elsewhere as to the same words and that this supplement was necessary is of all granted and is necessary to fuâ—… the sence and set forth the subject of this speeâ—h to show that something was aimed at by these persons of whom we are speaking there are but two opinions about this subject that I know of First some tells us that it is election or power to believe which is here intented in this it is anâ— therefore some to gratifie such a notion do supply in the room of it is the word election it is 〈◊〉 of him that willeth or runneth but this is but to 〈◊〉 comodate their own private Opinion without and warrant from the Original as I have said before 〈◊〉 for there is not one syllable in the Original of election The second Opinion is that the it is intendâ— Justification and Adoption and those blessings belonging thereunto and not election or precedent or preventing grace and that this latter and not the first is here intended I shall offer my Judgment as followeth First the truth hereof appears by comparing the parallel places with this which if they should be read of election how incongruously would they sound and indeed without sence as for instance ver 32. because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law so Rom. 4.16 These places and indeed the whole context speaks of Justification and adoption not of precedent but subsequent grace But 2ly If we reade it and take it for
Justification then it doth comport and concur with the context currently we may easily see that Justification is the antecedents to this relation it is I need not bâ—…ng texts to prove that Justification was that which the Jews run for and mistt of that Justification was the subject of the Apostles discourse is plain we have these words justify and Justification and Justified above twenty times in Galathians and Romans 3. If the Apostle should here mean election power to believe or preventing grace there were no Argument in his words he did but fight against the winde to say that election before-time or power to believe was not of will or works defacto this none would oppose but it is certain that the Apostle was here saying something to his Antagonists the Jews who did seek Justification in matter of fact by their legal Obedience Gal. 5.4 So that if our Apostle should here intend election 〈◊〉 power to believe or faith it would have been altogether besides his present businesse with the Jews 4. If we take this it is for Justification and adoption and consequently subsequent grace thâ—… this was not of him that willeth or runneth theâ— iâ— runs in a strait line with other places of Scripturâ— see Rom. 3.24 justified freely by his grace ver 28. without the deeds of the law Eph. 2.8 not of works of righteousnesse Titus 3.5 So that Justification and salvation is not of the willer or runner 2. By way of explication what him is here to be understood which is twice exprest I answer That although the Apostle is principally speaking to and of the Jews yet it comprehends all willers or runners as well gentiles as Jews the whole species and kinde of runners such as propound believing as their own terms for faith doth not justify as the terms of the creature but as it is Gods terms no more then legal Obeâ—…nce as the healing the blinde mans eyes by clay was not by that simpathetical vertue that was in the clay but the power of God and the wisdome of God so it is not of him that willeth or runneth though by faith as his own terms to such an and but as he by believing doth humbly fall in with Gods means to such an end 3. Why willing and running I answer 1st Willing signifies strong desires to wish ask pray with great earnestnesse it is taken two ways 1st Sometimes authoritatively to will is to resolve or establish a thing I will have it so 2. Sometimes to will is taken submissively as in Christs prayer to his father John 17. father I will that is I desire it may be so and so willing must suppose a thirsting desire of having it to be so 2. By running is understood labouring pursuing taking pains running is a labourious work many interpreters would have this passage to allude to that of Jacob and Esau in person about the blessing nor in Esau's running for it but of the providence of God that confirmed it on Jacob but I am not of the minde that Paul looked so far back as this but he had his example before him it was a truth that the Jews with whom he speaks had deserved to be reckoned great willers and runners and as to such and of such he speaks chap. 10.1 I bear them record that they have a zeal of God here 's their will and desire see how zealous they were Acts. 15.1 they taught that except persons were circumcised and kept the law of Mosesâ— they could not be saved and this their zeal held after they believed in Jesus Christ see Acts 2.20 they had a strong desire to be accepted and justified of God they were these willers chiefly intended 2. They were also those runners as is expressed of them ver 31. They followed or pursued the law or terms as they thought would have justified them they sought Justification chap. 11.7 Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for so that the spirit of God takes notice in these emphatical words that the circumcised Israel were great runners and as the fruit and effect of this their runnings they did boldly challenge Justification and Adoption thereupon Now the Apostle to prevent them tells them in our text that it is not of him that willeth nor runneth but in God 〈◊〉 shews this mercy of Justification 4. Why have we here such a formidable oâ—…sition between willing and running and God 〈◊〉 mercy I answer These are opposed to set ford the inconsiderablenesse and successlesnesse of all the utmost endeavours of the creature though willing and running inward and outward for the procuring this blessing that so it might lay the creature low in all his endeavours knowing that he doth not receive Justification as a debt but as a grituity Rom. 4.4.5 willers and runners are apt to have their feet taken in that snare of prescribing laws to God 2. This opposition may be made to shew that propensity and readinesse that is in God to shew mercy It is not to be attributed to mans inward or outward endeavours but to God who is so ready to shew mercy 3. This opposition is made to shew the positâ—… rejection of works and all endeavours of men and the absolute and positive way of obtaining is by sitting still in believing as the Prophet faith in another case our strength is to sit still But against this there may seem to lie a twofold objection 1. If there be no profit in wishing willing and desiring nor in labouring running or pursuing after justification then to what end should our desires be enlarged and our endeavours be pursuing Shall we run in vain seeing it is not to be had that way then let us sit still and be only passive and leave God to shew his grace where when and to whom he please To which I answer 1. These Willers and Runners in our Text must respect the circumcised Judisaries who trusted to and boasted in their legal obedience to the Cerbmonial Law and their own Righteousnesse our Text doth immediatly concern them 2. If it be taken for Gospel willing and running to the highest strain it cannot be meritorious of justification because the bloud of Christ admits no competitor or co-partner in the point of justification See Rom. 3.20,24,28 cha 4. Gal. 3.16 cha 5.4 yet notwithstanding it doth not follow that the creature should fit still and cease all his desires and endeavours as thus because the pardon of a Malefactor ariseth freely out of the Princes breast and of his prerogative it doth not follow that he must sit still for although it is not in the power of the malefactor to merit a pardon yet he may sue it out as the grace of the prince It is our duty to hunger and thirst after the grace of justification as well as after sanctification and they are pronounced blessed by Christ who are so qualified 2. Object Doth not this seem to crosse some other Scriptures that exhorts to and calls for great industry
law or other for the justification of the world and without the obedience whereof they could not be justified they are here to be understood the body of the rebellious Jews who were enemies to Christ yet these are said to follow after the law of righteousnesse these did eagerly pursue the law of righteousnesse or the righteousnesse of the law some by the law of righteousnesse do understand righteousnesse it self and so the same Apostle is understood chap. 7. that the law of the minde was the minde it self 2ly They thought this law or rule was that given on Mount Sinai in the external part of it and therefore they followed that law for it but they miscarried and did not attain to the law of righteousnesse that is they never came to understand and see and so not to pursue the right law wherein righteousnesse was to be had called Roy. 3.27 the law of faith so that here was the case though the Jews contended might and main about the observation of a law which they imagined would have justified yet they came not near unto the true law they did not take hold of that right law of righteousnesse nay which is yet more plainer the Jews did not attain to the righteousnesse of that law which they followed for whilst they observed some part of the law in the letter of it they were short in the spirit of it and inside of it as our Lord tells them Mat. 5. and besides they sought justification in a wrong way which God did never intend for that end and being in a wrong way the further and faster they run the worse So much for explication I shall only name those doctrines which doth offer themselves to our considerations from the words thus opened which are as followeth what shall we say then 1. Doctrine That it is a matter of great concernment for persons rightly to understand the right way and proper terms of justification The Apostle having been arguing till he is weary knows not what more to say yet he is not willing to leave a matter of such great import I know not what to say more yet I will give you the result of the whole which I have already said 2. Doctrine That God hath made provision for present grace and future glory for gentiles indefinitely 3. Doctrine That God affords a people a very choice favour when he sends the gospel amongst them By this it was that the gentiles came to attain righteousness the gospel coming into a house or city and salvation coming is all one and is taken one for another Luke 19. 4. Doctrine That God hath prepared and made ready the gospel dispensation for sinners Such as are far from righteousness these were the persons which S. Paul took notice of in his day to attain to righteousness in Christs time publicans and harlots embraced the gospel before scribes and Pharisees 5. Doctrine That persons justified and saved a gospel-dayes shall have no cause to boast but to attribute all to free grace Rom 3.27 boasting is excluded by the free-law of justification Ephes 2. not of works lest any should boast 6. Doctrine That the gospel is most readily and most sweetly embraced of the poor Poor dispisable gentiles first laid hold of it and the terms of it the gentiles were glad of the gospel Acts. 13. chap. 8. they rejoyced with great joy the gentiles by pursuing overtook and laid hold 7. Doctrine Faith is the true and ready way appointed by God to attain justification and acceptance with God The righteousness of faith is the only righteousness in Gods account Abraham believed God and it was accounted for righteousness and he was called the friend of God 8. Doctrine But Israel Doct. A people in covenant with God yet not tractably following God at the worst of people The gentiles though strangers to God yet following God tractably in his gospel-dispensation are preferred above Israel Israel is named by a term of diminution from this adversative but â—ut Israel the first are left upon this account by God 9. Doctrine It is possible for persons to be zealâ—… in a wrong way to a good end They aimed at righteousness and acceptance with God Rom. 10.2 they had a zeal but in a wrong way Paul was zealous in his persecution Phil. 3.6 Gal. 4. the goodness of our end will not excuse the badness of our way 〈◊〉 10. Doctrine Israel suffered a total disappointment in those things they expected though they painfully pursued hard after them They expected singular acceptance with God and in the room thereof met with rejection they expected justification but they mist it and lost their labour CHAP. XX. Calling for greatest circumspection because persons in a very fair and likely way unto salvation in their own thoughts may suffer disappointment it is very easie to stumble at Christ and his ways if careful heed be not taken Verr. 32. Wherefore because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law for they stumbled at that stumbling-stone 33. As it is written behold I lay in Sion a stumbling-stone and rock of offence and whosoever believeth shall not be ashamed IN which two verses we have contained the fourth and last head which head contains the more special and more singular and particular cause of their coming short of justification which we have under two circumstances 1. They sought it as it were by the works of the law 2. They stumbled at Jesus Christ the Apostle draws this 33. verse out of some passages in the prophesy of Esaiah chap. 8.14 chap. 28.16 and as the Apostle in other places and cases doth supply the Old Testament imperfections so here also he doth make these places more clear by evangelical light we have three amendments in these verses 1. He expoundeth the prophets indefinitely he that believeth by a universal whosoever believeth or every one believing which is more clearly in gospel-language exprest John 6.47 Mark 16.16 John 3.16 2. Whereas the Prophet exprest himself only thus he that believeth not expressing the person or thing to be believed on our Apostle in his citation of the words mendeth them and saith on him 1. Signifying that it is a person who is to be believed on 2. That this person is he that is compared to a stumbling-stone 3. Our Apostle expresseth the prophets will not make baste by will not be ashamed but to the words more closely which in these verses contain a double reason more particularly of the succeslesness of the Jews endeavours after justification that they did not attain though they followed after we have here a rational account in sight not supposed but exprest 1. They sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law 2. They stumbled at something that lay in their way they stumbled at that stumbling stone as the Apostle begins this chapter with cordiall grief and sorrow for his contreymens disappointment so he concludes
wheresoever it may be elsewhere proved it cannot be proved from this text cited by our Apostle out of Malachi you cannot from that text understand a personal hatred for it is plain that what is said here is upon a national and plural account I cannot finde in all the whole Scripture where God is said to hate any one single person although I can finde where God hath declared himself to love a particular person as of Solomon and the young man Mark 10. God and Christ loved them 〈◊〉 text in Malachy will not prove that God ever hated a single person for there it relates to a prople upon a national account and to and of a people deserving hatred and indignation for ever 7ly Is Gods love and hatred unalterable and unchangeble and irrevocable when it is set some there are who would endeavour to prove the immutability of Gods love from Iohn 13.1 whom he loves he loves to the end to which I answer that if this text could be taken in the sence those persons would have it yet still we want a text that would say something like unto it that whom he hates he hates to the end also but for that text Iohn 13. it is plain enough that the end there spoken of is the end of Christs life he loved them as long as his life lasted and therefore would shew it in supping with them and washing their feet and advising them whilst he had any time so to do But that Gods love and hatred is not immutable I shall shew 1. Consider that God is said to love Iacob and Israel yet at some times he is said to hate Israel his Church Ier. 12. nay further he is said to hate the excellency of Iacob Amos. 6.8 and his hatred is taken off again Esa 60.15 whereas they weâ—… hated God loved them again so that God may love those at one time that he hates at another and therefore there is not that stresse to be laid upon what is here spoken as some would have Christ loved the young man but it will a be difficult thing to prove that Christ loved him to eternity seeing he went away from him Gods hatred of man is for the most part by way of retaliation as he threatens Deut. 7.10 he will repay hatred there are haters of God Rom. 1.30 Psal 139. hate them that hate thee saith David 8thly How doth this accommodate the Apostles designe in a further and fuller answer to their objection in reciting Malachi's words I answer the scope hereof tends to convince the Iews that all that descended from Abrahams loins were not intended for heirs of Canaan for here are some of Isaacs race are not only denied Canaan but therein lesse beloved then some of the same line your prophet Malachi saith Paul tels us Esau who was Iacobs brother was hated from whence I may conclude that you the unbelieving Iews may be hated also But I shall sum up the whole of what hath been spoken to this context under these three heads 1. That this whole passage respecting Iacob and Esau is not neither can it be understood as to them in their particular distinct persons but as to their posterity and therefore from hence cannot fairly be drawn personal election and reprobation neither did what was spoken by God take place upon their persons in their life time as appears plainly from this quotation from Malachi the hatred and love there spoken of is national therefore in this Oracle Iacob and Esau are only spoken as heads or tipes of two families that should afterwards arise 2. We have heard and learned that this Dominion and servitude love and hatred is not to be understood of election and reprobation to heaven or hell there is not one sillable that should incline us to such a belief neither from Gen. 25. Malachi 1. nor the Apostle here and it is strange that any from these premises should draw such a consequence as that Esau either in his person or posterity should be damned eternally or Iacob saved from these places but only that God hath left himself at liberty to dispence temporal favours to good and evil promiscuously on whom he pleases either with or without respect to works whether good or evil 3. The whole designe and scope of our Apostle in this whole passage â—f Iacob and Esau is to possess the mindes of the legal self-righteous Jews that God who had an undoubted and undeniable right to propound his own terms upon which justification should be had here utterly rejected the way of justification namely by works and elected or chosen the way of believing in Jesus Christ to be his way and that this purpose and designe of God was pointed out in rejecting Ishmael and Esau who were the elder children both of Abraham and Isaac also yet both exposed in their posterity to a state of less love and favour and are in effect shut out of the proper inheritance of Abraham that the purpose of God according to election might stand not of works but of him that calleth which is the substance of what Malachi hath written Iacob have I loved and Esau have I hated the spirit and meaning of which was I will reject works in point of justification and embrace faith in Christ Thus much for the Apostles answer to the Jews first Objection from verse the 6th to the end of the 13th CHAP. VII Shewing Gods unquestionable and absolute right to state and propound his own terms upon which his grace of justification and salvation shall be had and here determines it not upon the works of the Law but believing in his son Ver. 14. What shall we say then is there unrighteousness with God God forbid 15. For he saith to Moses I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion 16. So then it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy 17. For the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh even for this same purpose have I raised thee up that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throught all the earth 18. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will be hardeneth BEfore I proceed to these verses I judge it may not be amiss or needless to revive your memories with a few words of introduction you may remember that upon the first entrance upon this subject I desired you diligently to observe the main scope and designe of the Apostle in this Epistle chapter and context as that which would be of a most worthy tendency to the right understanding of the matter in controversy between S. Paul and his countrey-men the Jews consider what is the Apostles ultimate designe and scope to effect in this his labour which designe we may perceive was to convince the Jews in these five circumstances following 1. To convince them of sin in not believing in Jesus