some kind of guidance vnto the true Church In the serious contemplation of which point I thought that the most assured course I could take herein was to lay downe such a direction as is approued both by the Church of England and by the Church of Rome and truly to examine some principall points of doctrine in question betweene the English and Romane Church by this meanes of triall whereunto if I should find either the first agreeable or the second disagreeable I resolued that I might haue a strong inducement to conclude which was the true Church of Christ and which the false whose doctrine might be esteemed Christian and whose doctrine Antichristian 2 By which inducement I was the more earnestly moued to make triall then by any other It is approued by Fathers for that I found the ancient Fathers very frequent in giuing of this marke of antiquitie for Tertullian saith By the order it selfe Lib. de praescrip aduers Her that is made manifest to be of our Lord and true which is first deliuered and that externe and false which is sent in afterward And in another place writing against Marcion he saith Lib contra Marcion I affirme that my Gospell is true Marcion saith as much for his who shall determine this controuersie betwixt vs but the difference of time prescribing authoritie to that doctrine which shall be found more ancient and adiudging corruption to that which shall be conuinced to be the later Saint Gregorie Nazianzen vrgeth the Apolinaristes thus Greg. Naz. epist 2. ad Cledonium Hieron epist ad Pamach Ocean de errori bus Origenist Hieron contra Luciferianos If the faith began but thirtie yeares since whereas there be almost foure hundred years from the manifestation of Christ certainly both our Gospell and faith were vaine and void for this long time And Saint Hierome questioneth with the Origenists of his time after this manner Why goest thou about after foure hundred yeares to teach vs that which wee knew not before The Christian world was without this doctrine vntill this day And against the Luciferians he saith I will declare vnto thee my opinion briefly and plainly we must remaine in the Church which being founded by the Apostles hath endured to this day and all others euen in this that they were instituted after shew themselues to be Heretikes Vincent Lyrinens in cap. 26. 27. With which Fathers Vincentius Lyrinensis accordeth when explicating that of Saint Paul O Timothie keep that which hath bin left vnto thee He saith This depositum is that which hath been committed to thee not which hath been inuented by thee that which thou hast receiued not that which thou hast deuised a thing brought vnto thee not vttered by thee in which thou must not be an author but a keeper not an instructer but a follower not a leader but one that is directed Now therefore thus finding so many ancient Fathers making antiquitie a neere adiunct vnto Catholike and Orthodox truth and noueltie to be the vsuall badge of Herretikes I began with great diligence and care to examine two maine points of religion now controuerted and much disputed on as well by the most learned of the English as of the Romane Church viz. of the doctrine of iustification by faith alone and of the imperfection of our good workes that being according to knowledge grounded in religion my zeale therein might be the greater and my assurednesse of a sound ground cause me to stand the more strongly and to labour in others spiritual profit with the greater constancy and courage as since it hath succeeded through Gods especiall grace to the vnspeakable comfort of my soule affording me grace and abilitie of bodie to performe this so profitable a worke begun and ended by him whom I do most humblie desire to be the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of all my endeuours 3 Now as I proceeded on further by degrees Antiquitie a good way of triall to compare the doctrine of the Church of England and that of Rome concerning the two points aboue specified with the doctrine of the ancient Church by this meanes of antiquitie I found the doctrines of iustification by faith only and of the imperfection and demerit of good workes as they are taught in the present Church of England most deseruedly to claime the priuiledge of antiquitie as taught by many both Latine and Creeke Fathers Iustification by faith alone proued by Greeke Fathers Ses 6. Can. 9. Origen lib. 3. Rom. 3. notwithstanding that the Church of Rome accurseth al that hold the contrarie in expresse termes saying If any shall say that a wicked man may be iustified by faith alone c. let him be accursed Against which definitiue sentence of the Councell of Trent I find first of the Greeke Fathers Origen to be most cleare who vpon those words of Saint Paul to the Romans We therefore thinke that man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law writeth thus The Apostle in these words saith that iustification by faith alone sufficeth so that a man onely beseeuing is iustified although he performe no worke And if an example be required who was euer that without good workes was iustified by faith alone I think that thiefe may suffice who crucified with Christ cried vnto him on the crosse Lord Iesus remember me when thou shalt come into thy kingdome Neit her is there any good worke of his described in the Cospell But for this faith alone Iesus saith vnto him Amen I say vnto thee This day thou shalt be with me in Paradise This thiefe therefore is iust fied by faith without the workes of the law because the Lord did not aske what worke hee did first neither did he expect what worke hee had done when he belieued but being iustified by faith alone when he was to enter into Paradise he tooke him for his companion and it is related in the Gospell according to Saint Luke vnto the woman without any worke of the law and for faith alone hee said thy sinnes are forgiuen thee And againe Thy faith hath made thee safe goe in peace And in many places of the Gospell wee reade that our Sauiour vsed this speech to shew that the faith of the beleeuer is the cause of his saluation Hitherto Origen Neither is Saint Basil of other opinion who writeth thus The Apostle saith Basil cōcione dehumilit he that reioyceth let him reioyce in the Lord saying that Christ is made vnto vs from God Wisedome Iustice Sanctification and Redemption that as it is written he that is to reioyce let him reioyce in the Lord for this is perfect and entire reioycing in God when a man is not exalted for his owne righteousnesse but acknowledgeth true righteousnesse to bee wanting in him and to bee iustified by faith alone in Christ And Paul reioyceth in that he despiseth his owne righteousnes and in that by
Christ he seeketh that righteousnesse which is of God Thus much S. Basil whose doctrine agreeth most plainly with the doctrine of England in this point 4. I finde also S. Chrysostome to bee most cleare for the same doctrine of iustification by faith only saying vpon those wordes Other Fathers Chrysost Coment in Epist ad Rom. cap. 3. Gloriation is excluded by what law c. In this place he sheweth the power of God not only for keeping him but for iustifying him and for leading him vnto glorie standing in no neede of workes but requiring only faith Hom. de Fide Lege And in an other place No man without faith hath had life for the Theefe beleeued and was iustified by the most mercifull God here say not vnto me that time was wanting that hee might liue iustly and doe honest workes neither will I striue about this but only this one thing will I affirme that faith alone of it selfe saued him Againe also in an other place Hom. 3. in Epist ad Tit. hee saith If thou beleeuest why doest thou inferre other thinges as if faith alone sufficeth not to iustifie a man Hom. 7. Rom. 3. He saith further But what is the law of faith euen to be saued by grace Here the Apostle sheweth the goodnesse of God who not only saueth vs but also iustifieth and glorifieth vs vsing no workes hereunto but requiring faith only Againe Hesichius saith that God hauing commiseration of mankind when he saw it weakned to performe the workes of the law Hesich commeÌ„t sup Leuit. l. 1. c. 2 he would not haue man to be saued by workes but by grace but grace through mercie is apprehended by faith alone not by workes Theophilact vpon these wordes of Saint Paul Because by the law no man shall be iustified before God Theophil Commenâ—â—n cap. 3. ad Galath saith That hee sheweth that by the law all men are made execrable and subiect to malediction and that blessings are heaped vp by faith now hee clearly sheweth that faith it selfe or alone hath power to iustifie And againe saith elsewhere Theophilact 2. ad Thes 2. For faith alone he is to giue eternall good thinges Thus it appeareth how the doctrine of iustification by faith only was taught by the ancient Greeke Fathers 5. Proofes of Latine Fathers Now if we examine the Latin Fathers wee shall finde them as plaine and copious in this point as the other for Hilarie speaking of the Scribes saith Hilar. in Ma. h. Can. 8. It moueth the Scribes that sinne should be remitted by man for they only beheld man in Christ Iesus and that to be remitted by him which the law could not loosE For faith alone iustifieth The same teacheth Saint Ambrose vpon the wordes of Saint Paul Being iustified freely by his grace saith Ambros sup Paul ad Rom. 3 They are iustified freely because working nothing nor yeelding requital they are iustified by faith alone through the gift of God And againe vpon these wordes sup Rom. 4. Beleeuing in him that iustifieth the wicked HIs wordes are these He saith this because if by the workes of the law vnto the wicked beleeuer his faith is reputed to righteousnesse as to Abraham how therefore doe the Iewes thinke themselues to be iushfied by the iustification of Abraham since they see Abraham not by the workes of the law but by faith alone to be iustified therefore the law is not needfull when the wicked is iustified by faith alone with God And in an other place This is appointed by God that hee who beleeueth in Christ shall bee saued without workes De vocat Gent. Cap. 9. ad Rom. by faith alone and againe faith alone is appointed to saluation Primafins likewise sometimes an Auditor to S Augustine speaketh often of iustification by faith alone Sup illud ad Rom. 4. saying He iustifieth the wicked by faith alone not by the works which he had not And againe he saith Ad Rom. 5. Abraham before circumcision is iustified by credulitie aone And in an other place Thou liuest like a Gentill Ad Galath 2. not like a Iew. Thou knowest that hou hast had life through grace not by works but by faith alone Ad Galath 5. And againe Abraham beleeued God and it was reputed to him for righteousnesse so vnto you faith alone sufficieth to righteousnesse Which Author hath many other places to the same purpose Haymo sup Paul ad Gal. 3. Haymo who liued in the time of Ludouicus Pius the sonne of Charles the great saith The law was not fulfilled by faith but by worke but the Gospell is fulfilled more by faith then by workes because faith alone sauethl Sup. Paul ad Heb. 11. Againe in an other place saying If the Harlot that is an Infidell and an Idolatresse is saued by faith alone much more shall they be saued who haue not fallen into more grieuous crimes In Euâ—ng de Circumcil Christi Abacuc 2. Aug. l. 1. contra duas Epist Pelag cap. 21. So likewise elsewhere They shall be faued only by faith alone as it is written but the iust liueth by faith Saint Augustine also himselfe seemeth most plaine for this opinion saying Of what vertue soeuer thou shalt preach the Ancient iust men to haue been of nothing hath made them safe but faith And againe If any man after beleeuing shall forth-with depart out of this life L. 83. quaest q. 76 iustification of faith abideth with him without any precedent good workes because he hath not attained thereunto by merit but by grace 6. Which doctrine of these so Ancient Fathers Later writers euen the learnedst of the moderne Writers of the Church of Rome do approue and ioyntly allow of in their writings Thomas Aquinas their Angelicall Doctor writeth thus Rom. 3. Lect. 4. Gal. 3. Lect 4. Workes be not the cause why a man is iust before God but rather they are the execution and manifestation of his iustice for no man is iustified by works but by the habit of Faith infused yea iustification is done by faith onely Bonauent 4. d. 15. q. 1. nu 10. And Bonauenture the Franciscanes Seraphicall Doctor writeth thus For so much as man was not able to satisfie for so great offence therefore God gaue him a Mediatour who should satisfie for it whence it comes to passe that by only faith in his Passion all the fault is remitted and without the faith of him no man is iustified Saint Bernard also is most perspicuous in the deliuerie of the same doctrine saying Cant. ser 22. Whosoeuer is compunct for his sinnes hungreth and thirsteth after righteousnesse let him beleeue in thee that iustifiest a sinner and being iustified by faith onely hee shall haue peace from thee So that now it is apparant that the doctrine of iustification by faith onely taught in the Church of England is made good by the marke of
antiquitie and approued euen by some of the Romanists themselues against themselues Yea Vergerius a learned Bishop as my Lords Grace of Canterburie noteth but of Sledian intending to write against Luther in that argument Doctor Hils reasons vnmasked reas 8. nu 2. fol. 307. Sleid. lib. 21. was by trauersing of it caught himselfe And so by the discouerie first of one veritie at length grew to abandon altogether the Church of Rome as any whosoeuer shall read this Treatise may well doe I hope with satisfaction and comfort to his owne conscience 7 I further began also to make triall of the doctrine of the Church of Rome concerning good works by this marke of antiquitie which teacheth them to be so perfect About the imperfection of good workes that in some sort they are simply absolutely and perfectly iust and righteous further that they are merits that they iustifie a man and that they are not onely mereitorious for encrease of grace but also of eternall glorie which doctrine tendeth exceedingly to the engendring and nourishing of a Pharisaicall pride and presumption in good workes whereas the doctrine of the Church of England teaching imperfection to be euen in our best workes of the righteous that they are not merits that they doe not iustifie that they are not meritorious is a most holesome doctrine for planting of the true Publicanes humilitie relying wholly vpon Christs righteousnesse and the imputation thereof when he said Deus propitius esto mihi peecatori Lord be mercifull vnto me a sinner and so was pronounced more iustified than the Pharisie iustifying himselfe by his workes Luk. 18. vers 11. when he said I am not as other men are extortioners vniust adulterers or euen as this Publicane I fast twice a weeke I giue tythes of all that I possesse This obseruation I gathered by reading and diligently noting Bellarmines confused controuersies in the doctrine of iustification drawing the readers onely to a proud Pharisaicall presumption in their owne workes against whom I obserue many Fathers Our righteousnesse imputed first to account all our true righteousnesse to be Christs righteousnesse more than ours and ours onely by imputation and therefore our owne righteousnesse consequently very imperfect Saint Augustine hath in plaine tearmes thus Epist 106. ad Bonifac. The righteousnesse by which through faith we beleeue we are iustified that is wee are made righteous is the grace of God through Iesus Christ our Lord. In Enche ca. 41. And againe He is sinne and we righteousnesse not ours but Gods neither in vs but in him as he is sinne not his owne but ours nor in himselfe but in vs so therefore we are Gods righteousnesse in him as he is sinne in vs to wit Lib. 2. de Iacob vit beata by imputation S. Ambrose sayth As Iacob of himselfe deserued not the primogeniture who being hidden in his brothers apparrell and clad in his garment which yeelded forth the best odor did insinuate himselfe to his father that to his profit he might vnder another person receiue benediction so doe wee lye hidden vnder the precious puritie of Christ our first begotten brother that from the sight of God wee may giue testimonie of our iustice With the doctrine of which auncient Fathers holy Bernard agreeth as well as the Church of England Bernard Ser. 61. in Cantic Cant. saying I will remember thy iustice alone for it is mine to wit thou art made vnto me thy righteousnesse from God for how can I feare that one iustice may not suffice vs both It is not the short cloake which according to the Prophet cannot couer two thy iustice is iustice for euer and this large and eternall iustice shall couer both mee and thee together Whereby it is cleare that all our righteousnesse is none of our owne but Christs and therefore all our workes in respect of our selues are sinfull and imperfect 8 Besides the imperfection of our workes appeareth Works imperfect because they cause not saluation in that although they are necessarie for many respects yet are they not the efficient causes of saluation for Saint Ambrose sayth This is appointed by God Ambros in 1. ad Cor. 1. that he that beleeueth in Christ be saued without worke freely receiuing by faith alone remission of sinnes And Saint Augustine hath these wordes August in Psal 70. Thou art nothing of thy selfe call vpon God sinnes are thine mercies are Gods chastisement is due vnto thee and when the reward shall come he shall crowne his gifts not thy merits Saint Chrysostome also sayth Chrysost in cap. 3. ad Rom. Herein the power and might of God is shewed in that he saueth iustifieth and leadeth vnto glorie by faith alone without good workes Basil saith thus Basil in Ps 114. Euerlasting rest abideth vpon those that striue lawfully in this life not for the merits of their deedes but out of the most bountifull fauour of God in which they haue beleeued All which places doe argue against the perfection of workes for our greater humiliation and Gods greater glorie 9. Moreouer the learned Fathers doe further shew VVorkes imperfect because impure Hieron lib. 2. aduers Pelag. that the workes of the righteous are not simply and absolutely iust and perfect for Saint Hierome writeth thus If according to Iob the Moone doth not shine and the starres are not cleare in his sight how much more man who is rottennesse and the sonne of man a worme For euery mouth is stopped and euery cleane one is obnoxious vnto God because before him by the workes of the law all flesh shall not be iustified and there is no difference of persons for all haue sinned and are in neede of the glorie of God being iustified freely through his grace Saint Augustine speaking to Pelagius sayth thus Aug. li. de natur grat The Lord if he would might lift vp mortall men to Angelicall puritie and so cause that they might perfectly keepe the Law but hee neuer did nor euer will doe it Epist 29. Saint Hierome also speaketh as plaine to this purpose when he sayth The fullest charitie which cannot be encreased so long as man liueth here is not in any but so long as it can be augmented truly that which is lesse than it ought to be is of vice out of which vice it is Lib. de perfec iustit resp 18. Lib. 9. confes cap. 13. that no man doth good and sinneth not who further sayth It is sinne when either there is not charitie which ought to be or when it is lesse than it ought to be And Saint Augustine Woe also to the laudable life of men if without mercie thou doest discusse it Lib 9. Mor. c. 1. And Gregorie the Great in his Morals sayth The holy man because he seeth that all the merit of our vertue is vice if it be seuerely iudged by the inward arbitrer doth right well adioyne if hee will
find also the wise Salomon to affirme that Gods words will make a man vnderstand righteousnes and iudgement and equitie and euery good path I find likewise in Saint Luke and other Euangelists Luke 1. vers 4. These things are written that we might haue the certaintie of that whereof we are instructed and that we might beleeue in Iesus and in beleeuing haue life eternall through his name I find further that Christ saith Search the Scriptures Ioh. 20. vers 31. for in them yee thinke to haue eternall life and they are they which testifie of mee as also in another place When one asked Christ what he might do to be saued Luk. 10. vers 26. he referreth him to the Scriptures for his direction saying What is written in the Law So did Abraham answere the rich Glutton They haue Moses and the Prophets Luke 16.29 I find also Saint Paul free from all exception herein saying The Scriptures are able to make vs wise to saluation 2. Tim. 3. vers 15. Vers 16. Vers 17. through the faith that is in Christ Iesus and are profitable to teach to improue to conuert to instruct in righteousnesse that the man of God may be absolute and perfect to euery good worke And in another place we may not presume aboue that which is written I find likewise Saint Peter to accord with Saint Paul 2. Pet. 1.19 when hee saith Wee haue a more sure word of the Prophets whererunto wee cannot take heed as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place till the day dawne and till the day-starre arise in our hearts Many more proofes would the canonicall Scriptures afford to the same effect therefore since by the premised places of Scripture I see that he that speaketh not according to the word of God hath no light in him since the Scriptures can make vs know righteousnesse iudgement equitie and euery good path since they were written that we might haue certainty in that we are instructed in and beleeuing haue life eternall since we are sent to the Scriptures by Christ since they are able to make vs wise to saluation since they are profitable to make vs perfect to euery good worke since it is presumption to go aboue that which is written since the Prophets be our light in darknesse what better rule can we haue of our faith what can excuse any mans ignorance that knoweth this or what an obstinate wilfulnesse were it for me that knowing these testimonies of Scripture shall not beleeue them or why should I not thinke that the Church of England hath not the best reed or mete-wand to measure the truth of her doctrine by when she teacheth Juel Apol. part 2. cap. 9. diuis 1. That the Scripture comprehended in the canonicall bookes of the old and new Testament is the rule of faith so farre that whatsoeuer is not read therein or cannot be proued thereby is not to be accepted as any point of faith or needfull to be followed 4 Which doctrine cannot be shaken or ouerthrowne By proofes of Fathers if we esteeme the authoritie of the learned who do most plentifully giue witnesse and vnanswerable proofes for the same S. Basil who liued in the fourth centurie after Christ saith Let the holy Scriptures be arbitrators betweene vs Basil opist 80. ad Eustac medicum pag. 334. and whosoeuer hold opinions consonant to those heauenly oracles let the truth be adiudged on their side And Optatus disputing against a Donatist presseth him thus Contra Parmem lib. 5. pag 393. We are saith he to equire out some to be iudges betweene vs in these controuersies The Christians cannot because both sides cannot yeeld them and by parts taking the truth shall be hindered The Iudge must be had from without our selues If a Pagan he knowes not the mysteries of Christianitie if a Iew he is an enemie to Baptisme therefore vpon the earth no iudgement concerning this matter can bee found the Iudge must be had from heauen but to what end should we kocke at heauen when heere we haue one in the Gospell Heere we see Saint Basil appeales for iudgement to the Scriptures and so Optatus likewise to the Gospell no acknowledgement here of other arbitrement vpon earth What shall I speake of Tertullion who is most plaine for me Tertul. contra Hermog calling the Scriptures the rule of faith The golden-mouthed Chrysostome will not heere forsake me who termeth the Scriptures Chrysost hom 13. in 2. Cor. Hom. 3. de Laz. A most exquisite rule and exact squier and ballance to trie all things by And also in another place saith God hath left vs the Scriptures more firme then any miracle And vpon the Acts of the Apostles discourseth very fitly to this purpose Chrysost hom 33. in Act. A Gentile saith hee commeth and saith I would bee a Christian but I know not which side to cleaue vnto many dissensions are among you and I cannot tell which opinion to hold euery one saith I speake the truth and the Scriptures on both sides are pretended so that I know not whom to beleeue to this Chrysostome replieth Truly saith he this maketh much for vs for well might you be troubled if we should say we relie vpon reason but seeing we take the Scriptures which are so true and plaine it will be an easie matter for you to iudge And tel me now hast thou any wit or iudgement Note this for it is not the part of a man barely to receiue whatsoeuer he heareth but if thou marke the meaning thou mayest throughly know that which is good when thou buyest a garment though thou hast no skill in wearing yet thou sayest not I cannot buy it they deceiue me but thou doest all things that thou mayest learne to know it say not then I am no scholler and will be no iudge I can condemne no opinion for this is but a shift and a cauill and let vs not vse it for all these things are easie There is nothing can bee more cleere for this most sufficient rule of faith then that which is written by this ancient Author of the imperfect worke falsely fathered as some thinke vpon Saint Chrysostome whom because he is often alleaged by the learned of the Romane Church I will also alleage against them this Author expounding those of Saint Matthew Chrysost opus imperfect hom 49. Then those that are in Iurie let them flie vnto the mountaines explicateth them thus that is they that are Christians let them repaire vnto the Scriptures The mountaines are the writings of the Apostles and Prophets and wherefore doth he at that time command all Christians to repaire to the Scriptures because in that time heresie hath obtained the Curches there can be no proofe of true Christianity neither can there be other refuge for Christians which shall desire to know the truth of faith but the sacred Scriptures Before it was many wayes shewed which was
striue with him he cannot answere him one for a thousand And againe Cap. 28. How much soeuer wee sweate in good workes we doe not apprehend true cleanenesse but we imitate it And in another place he sayth Lib. vlt. Mor. c. vlt. Our euils are pure euils and the good thinges which wee beleeue wee haue cannot bee pure good thinges With which auncient Writers verie well agreeth Saint Bernard Ser. 5. de verbis Isaiae saying If our righteousnesse be humble perhaps it is right but not pure vnlesse perhaps we beleeue our selues to be better than our fathers who said no lesse truely than humbly All our righteousnesse is like a filthie polluted cloth How is it pure iustice where sinne cannot yet be wanting By all which places I was enforced to conclude the acknowledgement of the imperfection of good workes with the Church of England to be much more agreeable vnto truth and more profitable for true Christian humiliation than an ouerprizing of our workes with the Church of Rome to puffe vp soules with vaine glorie and ostentation by the which manie are most lamentably let fall into the pit of Hell Tolluntur in altum vt lapsu grauiore ruant they are lifted vp on high that their fall may be the greater 10 Againe Imperfect because they cannot iustifie to demonstrate further the imperfection of our workes the auncient Fathers are most cleare teaching that they cannot iustifie a man in the sight of God Saint Ambrose sayth But that is auailefull vnto me Ambros de vit bon li. 1. cap. 6. that we are not iustified by workes of the Law I haue not therefore whereof to glorie in my workes I haue not whereof to boast my selfe and therefore I will glorie in Christ I will not glorie because I am iust but I will glorie because I am redeemed I will not glorie because I am void of sinne but because sinnes are remitted vnto me I will not glorie because I haue beene profitable but because Christ is the aduocate for me with the Father but because the bloud of Christ is powred out for me The same learned Doctor in another place sayth Vaunt not thy selfe for being styled the Sonne of God In Luc. cap. 14. grace is to be acknowledged nature not to be vnknowne neither mayest thou boast thy selfe for seruing well for doing what thou oughtest to doe the Sunne serueth the Moone obeyeth and the vessell of Gentiles chosen of God sayth I am not worthie to be called an Apostle And elsewhere shewing himselfe not to be guiltie of sinne he addeth but in this I am not iustified Saint Augustine further sayth Tract 82. in Ioannem This is glorie towards God wherewith not man but God is glorified if he be iustified not by workes but by faith And againe In Psal 30. You are saued by grace sayth the Apostle and this not of your selues but it is the gift of God not through workes as if you did well that you might be worthie to approach thereunto not through workes least perhaps he be extolled 11 Further Imperfect because not meritorious for proofe of the imperfection of our workes I finde the auncient Fathers to affoord me matter herein teaching them not to be meritorious for Origen was auncient and yet hee said Orig. ad Rom. li. 4. c. 4. I can hardly beleeue there is any worke that may require the reward of debt Saint Chrysostome is auncient and yet hee sayth Hom. 33. in Genes If any of our workes doe follow the free vocation of God they are a retribution of debt but grace beneficencie and greatnesse of bountie are Gods gifts therefore not meritorious Saint Hilarie also sayth In Psal 51. That not the workes of iustice themselues were sufficient vnto the merit of perfect blisse vnlesse the mercie of God also in this will of righteousnesse doe not repute the vices of humane changes and motions Lib. 1. aduers Pelag. Saint Hierome sayth Now therefore wee are iust when wee confesse our selues sinners and our righteousnesse is not in proper merit but by Gods councell Lib. 4 de Ciuit. Dei cap. 20. Saint Augustine sayth Without the merits of good workes the sinner is iustified by faith and that alone De grat lib. arbitr cap. 9. And againe The Saints doe attribute nothing vnto their merits they attribute all to mercie O Lord. And againe elsewhere Wee must vnderstand that God bringeth vs to eternall life not for our merits but for his owne mercie Lib. 1. de vocat Gent. Prosper further sayth Therefore in the Parable of those that laboured in the Vineyard the same reward is giuen to the Labourers whether they labour much or little that those who haue laboured with much sweate and haue not receiued more than the last may vnderstand that they haue receiued the reward of grace and not of workes Yea and Gregorie the great Super Psal 7. Paeniten Bishop of Rome sayth It is one thing for God to reward men according to their workes and another thing to giue the reward for the workes themselues when the Scripture sayth According to our workes the qualitie of our workes is vnderstood and that the reward shall be his whose the workes are for vnto that blessed life wherein wee liue with God can no labour be compared no worke likened seeing the Apostle sayth The sufferings of this life are not worthie of the glorie of the life to come Which proofes of auncient Writers shew most clearely good workes not to be so perfect as the Church of Rome makes them and therefore I may well say with Waldensis He is to be reputed the sounder Diuine Sacrament ti 1. c. 7. p. 30. and the better Catholike and more agreeable to the Scripture that simply denieth such merit confessing that simply no man merits the kingdome of Heauen but obtaines it by the grace and free will of God that giues it 12 From all which authorities of the auncient Fathers Later writers proue the same Bernard orat 1. omn. sanct diuers wayes shewing the imperfection of our workes Saint Bernard seemed no whit to swarue saying But what can all our righteousnesse be before God Shall it not according to the Prophet be reputed as a filthie polluted cloth and if he be straightly iudged all our righteousnesse shall be found vniust and hauing too little What therefore shall be of sinnes when iustice it selfe may not answere for it selfe Therefore deuoutly crying with the Prophet Enter not into iudgement with thy seruant O Lord with all humilitie let vs haue recourse vnto mercie whihch alone can saue our soules And in another place If any be deuout if he be solicitous Bernard ser 3. de annuno Mariae if he be feruent in spirit let him take heede he trust not to his merits that he relie not vpon his workes All which though they make strongly against the doctrine of the Church of
Christs resurrection which the Angels reporting appeared in white garments The girdle Explicat myst sacr Miss The Girdle wherewith the largenesse of the Albe is tyed about signifieth according to Michael Suffragan of Mets that Christ often tyed his most high and perfect conuersation and so tempered it according to our infirmities and accommodated himselfe vnto our manners that by his actions we might be the better instructed vnto the knowledge of saluation And in another place sayth That it designes how wee ought to restraine the limbes of our minde least chastitie be dissolued with the prouocations of concupiscence Lib. 5. in Leuit. Isychius by the Girdle vnderstandeth fortitude therefore God said vnto Iob. comforting him in his afflictions Accinge vt vir lumbos tuos Girt thy loynes like a man The Manuplo Ibid. The Manuple sayth Michael the Suffragan signifieth the fruit of good workes wherewith we must be comforted when we are exercised with the calamities of this world And in another place hee sayth That it signifieth Christs immunitie from all peruerse and sinister actions But Iacobus de Voragine otherwise sayth De celebrat Missae it signifieth the buckler of faith And Bonauenture sayth The Manuple on the left hand signifieth the humilitie of Christ in this life In exposit myst sacr Miss or else the Manuple on the left hand noteth the combat of Christ for iustice sake The Stole Ibidem The Stole signifieth the voluntarie obedience of Christ as Michael the Suffragan of Mets sayth but Iacobus de Voragine will haue it meane a double-edged sword Iacob de Vor. de celebrat Missae lib. de sacra Altar cap. 10. In exposit myst sacr Missae The Vestment In exposit myst to out both with word and example And Stephanus Eduensis sayth That the Stole signifieth the obedience of the sonne of God but otherwise Bonaventure saith it signifieth the passion of Christ The Vestement saith Michael Suffragan of Mets hath two parts the first part which is the lesser signifieth the Church before Christs Passion the hinder part which is the greater signifieth the people of the Church vnited together after his Passion or otherwise he sayth that it designeth the charitie wherewith all the members of Christ must be conioyned to one the other But Innocentius sayth That the Vestement euery whit entire signifieth the vnitie of Faith Lib. 1. myst Missae c. 58. Germanus sayth it signifieth the Purple Garment which the wicked mocking Iesus put vpon him By these varieties of coniectures about the onely apparell of the Priests that must offer the sacrifice of the masse therein I obserued that there was no one true meaning appoynted by the Church for those ceremonies and that euery man may frame what symbolicall conceits they list vpon them therefore are they vnporofitable and rather to please the simple withshews than with any other assured sense so doth it appeare to be in other the ceremonies of the masse which as they are different in sense so are they ridiculous to practise or to behold The Introite signifieth the Fathers expectation of Christ as Michael Suffragane telleth vs Introite in explic mister mis or if we will beleeue Ioannes de Combis it signifieth the beginning of a good worke and it is doubled because in our beginning we must doe good and decline from euill or if we will giue credite to Germanus it signifieth the comming and entrance of the Sonne of God into this world The nine times repeating Kyrie Eleyson and Christè Eleyson is to the three Persons in Trinity as the chiefest of all prayers for the imploration of Gods mercy as Michael the suffragane of Metz noteth In explic myst sacr mis In comp Theol. verit li. 9. ca. 18. But Iohannes de Combis saith more that is That it signifieth the inuocation of Gods mercy whereof wee stand in neede many wayes the first three for remission of sinnes committed in heart tongue or worke concerning contrition confession satisfaction the second three waies for the grace of faith hope and charitie the third three wayes for glorification whereby wee shall reioyce in God aboue vs in our selues of our selues and for our neighbors about vs. Yet if wee may beleeue Iacobus de Voragine he teacheth that the 9. repetitions are in honor of the nine Orders of Angells In celeb Miss serm 2. which wee honor in such maner that we may attain vnto their societie which are distinguished into three Ternaries or Tertians and are sung 9. times because the Angells are distinguished into 3. Hierarchies or 9. orders Lib. 2. myst mis cap. 19. 4 part q. 37. offic mis 2. but otherwise teacheth Innocentius tertius and Alexander de Ales saying That they are said 9. times against 9. kinds of sins as appeares there at large Part 3. q. 83. art 4. yet if we please to credit Th. Aquinas saying thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is for the person of the Father thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is for the person of the Son then is added again thrice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the person of the holy ghost against the threefold misery of ignorance Fraction of sin of penalty Now as for the fraction of the hoast into 3. parts Iacobus de Voragine teacheth that this ceremony was ordained by Pope Sergius as Albert. Magnus also thought De celeb mis ser 2. De ritibus eccle cap. lib. 1. de frac sacr Host. De sacra alt cap. 18. but Steph. Durant affirmes that it was instituted long before now wherfore it is thus thrice brokē Steph. Eduensis saith That the heast dedicated to the holy Trinity is diuided into 3. parts wherof the one is put into the chalice and drownd in the bloud for that part of the Church being tossed in the storme of this world which is crossed with many afflictions the other two without the challice are for those whereof the one is of the faithfull which is in purgatorie tried with fire the other of Saints which raigne euerlastingly with Christ But Th. Aquin. otherwise teacheth Part. 3 q. 83. artic 5. that the fraction of the hoast signifies 3. things 1. the diuision of Christs body in his passion 2. the distinction of his mystical body according vnto their diuers estates 3 the distribution of graces proceeding from the passion of Christ Cap 3 eccles Hier. teacheth Yet otherwise may it be vnderstood if we wil beleeue Iac. de Voragine who teacheth that it is broken into 3. parts to shew it is offred to honour the B. Trinity or to shew that in Christ there were 3. substances he flesh the soule and his godhead or to shew that it is offred for the mysticall body of Christ which is diuided into 3. parts of those that are to be saued virgins continent persons and those that are maried Now it is here to be noted how this Author contradicteth himselfe