Selected quad for the lemma: work_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
work_n	apostle_n	grace_n	justification_n	6,159	5	8.9380	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93852	The royal law contended for, or, Some brief grounds serving to prove that the Ten Commandments are yet in full force, and shall so remain till heaven and earth pass away. Also the seventh day Sabbath, proved from the beginning, from the law, from the prophets, from Christ, from his apostles, to be a duty yet incumbent upon saints and sinners. / By a lover of peace with truth Edward Stennet.	Stennett, Edward, d. 1690?	1658 (1658)	Wing S5402B; ESTC R184622	38,860	48

it 's very clear that 't is circumcision and the customes that 's here called the Law of Moses which the Gentiles were commanded not to keep but to think the Gentiles should be forbidden to keep that Law of God that was written in their natures is abominable and contrary both to Scripture and reason Obj. 5. But the Scripture saith Cast out the Bond-woman with her son for the son of the Bond-woman shall not be heir with the son of the Free-woman which Bond-woman was an Allegory of the Covenant from mount Sinai and therefore to be cast out Answ The Apostle is here shewing how impossible it is for works and grace to stand together in point of justification for this people were seeking to be justified by the works of the Law He shews the difference betwixt the two Covenants one of works gendering to bondage the righteousness of the Law being this that the man that doth these things should live in them Rom. 10.5 the other of grace or free promise without any respect to mans righteousness he shews the sons of the Covenants are like unto their mothers the sons of the one Covenant are born after the flesh the sons of the other by promise and that those that are born after the flesh persecute those that are born after the spirit Nevertheless what saith the Scripture Cast out the Bond-woman and her son For the son of the Bond-woman shall not be heir with the son of the Free-woman That is The Covenant of works with those that seek to be justified thereby Christ being the end of the Law for righteousness to every one that believeth Rom. 10.4 But if we should understand the Ten Commandments in themselves to be the Bond-woman then it is impossible for them that keep them to be heires or children of the promise but they must be cast out as children of the Bond-woman which is very erronious and contrary to the current of Scriptures For the doers of the Law are justified before God Rom. 2.13 though not for doing And mark how the Apostle forbids this notion Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law through faith God forbid Shall we continue in sin or transgress the Law that grace may abound God forbid Rom. 6. Is the Law sin God forbid Rom. 7.7 Was the Law which was good made death unto me God forbid 13. Shall we transgress the Law because we are not under the condemning power of it Christ having redeemed us from it God forbid Rom. 6.15 Certainly the Scripture did foresee how apt men would be to slight and make void the Law of God under specious pretences as their being believers and Gentiles which had not the Law given to them but that they are under grace and the like But if the uncircumcision keep the righteousnesse of the Law shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision Rom. 2.26 Consider these Queres 1. If the whole Law was done away by the death of Christ why did the Apostle spend so much time to prove that by the works of the Law none could be justified Gal. 3. seeing there was no Law to work upon Had it not been a nearer way to have told them that the Law was abolished 2. If the whole Law was done away at the death of Christ how can any part of it be now in force If it be said it is upon a new account shew me any one Law that Christ hath once destroyed and again revived seeing the Apostle saith if he should build again the things that he destroyed he should make himself a transgressor Gal. 2.14 3. What Scripture is it that proves that we have any one of the Ten Commandments given out upon a new account 4. If the whole Law be done away what Law is there for the punishment of evil doers theeves murderers and the like 5. If the Ten Commandments were to be abolished how is it that the Lord hath annexed so many great and precious promises unto the keeping of them and delighting in them as in Psal 1.1 2 3 4. and many other places which do of right belong unto such as keep the Commandements Rev. 27.14 6. How is it that the Apostle saith the Law is good if a man use it lawfully 1 Tim 1 8. if at the same time there was no Low 7. If the Law was done away at the death of Christ when was it given again upon a new account If before his death in the 5. of Matth. then how is it that the Law that was given on Sinai stood in force till his death Could they stand both in force at once If not till after the death of Christ then when was it given out seeing we find not any of the Commandements so much as mentioned for a long time after the death of Christ Can we think the Saints and the world were left without Law 8. How is it that we contend for Governors as at the first and Counsellers as at the beginning seeing there is no Law for them to rule and govern by if this doctrine be true that the whole Law is done away Thus I have endeavoured in a weak measure to prove that the Ten Commandments are not only in force to unbelievers but also to believers But believers are not under the Law so as to be justified or condemned by it not under it as a Covenant of works and ministration of death but under it as it 's a righteous rule of life a holy just and good Law so they are under it and do delight in it Rom. 7.22 Psal 119.70 72 97. 1 Cor. 9.21 It is time for the Lord to work for they have made void thy thy Law Psal 119.122 Therefore I love thy Commandments above Gold yea above fine Gold vers 127. Therefore I esteem all thy precepts concerning all things to be right and I hate every false way vers 128. The seventh day is the Sabbath NOw if the Ten Commandments be in force every jot and title of them it must necessarily follow that the Seventh day is the Sabbath and is to be observed according to the commandment But because there is much opposition against this truth I shall offer something in particular to it which may tend to the clearing of it First it was instituted by God before the fall of man as appears in Gen. 1.31 And God saw every thing that he had made and behold it was very good But when men had sinned God changes his voice and then the ground is cursed for his sake Chap. 3.17 Further God was six dayes upon his work of creation and rested not until the seventh day now betwixt the end of the sixt day and the beginning of the seventh there is no interval or space of time Chap. 1.31 Chap. 2.2 then why should it be thought that the Sabbath was a shadow to hold forth rest by faith in Christ seeing Adam had not sinned and so had no need of a Saviour and why should we run into such

and think upon his name lye down at his feet and cry earnestly for his spirit to lead you into all truth that you may not kick against the pricks in this chastising day wherein the Lord is teaching his people out of his Law and fitting them for the Kingdom of glory which is at the door Now the Lord is discovering every part and piece of Babylon that the Saints may know the better how to reward her but because the Saints begin to own the Lord as King and Law-giver the Dragon is wroth and knows that this will destroy his Kingdom and so would endeavour to perswade persons that the Law of God is abolished well knowing that if he could perswade them to abelief of this they will soon say there is nothing to be done till Christ come in person I would not make too large a gate to so small a City but shall hasten to a conclusion with a word to the little remnant that keep the Sabbath according to the Commandement Precious Brethren you are under great and precious promises for your encoutagement though your opposers are great and numerous I think often of what is said of Asher Deut. 33.24 25. Let Asher be blest with children let him be acceptable to his brethren and let him dip his foot in oyl his shooes shall be Iron and Brass and as is his dayes so shall his strength be Asher seems to hold forth the remnant that the Lord will use in the latter dayes to tread down the wicked withal and Ashers bread shall be fat yea he shall yield Royal dainties Gen. 49.20 and if you my Brethren fulfil the Royall Law according to the Scripture ye shall doe well though your Brethren frown upon you at present yet you shall be acceptable unto them and what if your work be difficult if your strength be sutable you need not complain you may tread upon Scorpions if your shooes be Iron and Brass your feet will be like Hinds feet if they be dipt in oyl which will cause you to run without wearinesse and walk without fainting So he prayes Who is only through grace a servant of CHRIST though unworthy to be so called EDWARD STENNET Some Brief Grounds serving to prove that the Ten Commandements are yet in ful force and shall so remain till Heaven and Earth passe away FIrst The matter of the Ten Commandements was written in the Heart of Adam before his fall as doth appear Gen. 1.27 God created man in his own Image in the Image of God created he him Eccles 7.29 God hath made man upright but he sought out many inventions And the Apostle plainly asserts that the Gentiles which had not the Law in the letter of it did by nature the things contained in the Law which sheweth the work of the Law written in their hearts Rom. 2.14 15. Now if the Gentiles had the work of the Law written in their bearts in their sinful state doubtless they had it in more perfection in their state of innocency as considered in Adam for the letter of the Law was added because of transgression Gal. 2.19 Now if there were transgression before the letter of the Law was added that implies there was a Law before and in that the letter of the Law is said to be added it implies that the matter of it was in being before but much worn out by sin and that is one reason why the Lord was pleased to add the letter Let it be considered how it can stand with Scripture or right reason that Jesus Christ should abrogate this Law did Christ blot out this Law out of the hearts of all men by his death Rom. 2.15 then all men have not the Law of Nature to guide them for we cannot be so gross as to imagine that the Law is put into their hearts upon a new account for that were to bring all men under the new Covenant 2. God spake all these Commandments unto the people and they heard his voice Deut. 5.22 23 24. with great Majesty and Glory and he added no more and he wrote them upon two Tables of Stone and delivered them unto Moses all which holds forth their perpetuity they are spoken by God they are wrote by him in Tables of Stone so was never any Ceremony Job desires that his words were graven with a pen of Iron and Lead in a rock of stone for ever Chap. 19.24 3. After the first tables were broke which I suppose did signifie the Israelites breaking of the first Covenant for Moses brake them upon that account Behold the Ark as it stands under the mercy feat they having made a Golden Calf and so had broke the Commandement Moses was then commanded to hew two Tables like unto the first and God wrote the same words again upon them Deut. 10.1 2 3 4. and they only of all the Laws were put into the Ark and when the Ark is set in its proper place between the Cherubims there is nothing in it but the two Tables 1 Kings 8.9 Now the Ark was a Type of Christ and the putting the Law into it did signifie the putting of it into the heart of Christ Psalm 40.6 7 8. Thy Law is in my heart and from thence they are transcribed into the hearts of the seed of Christ according to the new Covenant Jer. 31.33 Where God promises to put his Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts Now what Law is this that must be put in the heart when the Law of sacrifice is abolished Heb. 10.6 7 8 9. compared with that forementioned in the Psalmes that this is the Law that is here spoken of is manifest if we consider first how proper and suitable it is for the heart of a believer Paul calls it the Law of his mind Rom. 7.23 and in 22. he professeth he delights in the Law of God after the inward man and God saith he will put his Law in the heart and write it there 2 Cor. 3.2 3. both which phrases hold it forth to be the same Law that was wrote by God and put into the Ark mans heart is the Tables and God himself is the writer the matter written is the Law and hear what Wisdome saith to this Prov. 7.1 2 3. My son keep my words and lay up my commandements within thee keep my commandements and live and my Law as the apple of thy eye bind them upon thy fingers write them upon the table of thine heart Now what Laws are these but the Table-Laws which were then in being and Wisdoms son is to have them writ upon the fleshly Tables of his heart 4. When God promiseth to exalt his first-born higher then the Kings of the Earth and that his Covenant should stand fast with him Psal 89.28 29. and that his seed should endure for ever and his Throne as the dayes of Heaven yet he saith If his Children forsake my Law and walk not in my judgments if they

together on the first day of the week and did break bread and Paul taught unto them Act. 20. Answ This is all the meeting or preaching that ever we find was upon the first day except the disciples being together for fear of the Jews mentioned before that meeting was at evening so this seems to be because when they came together Paul preached with them and continued his speech until midnight it is not likely then that they observed the day and came together in the morning seeing he continued his speech so long And secondly as we have the cause of the disciples being together with their doors shut so we have the cause of this meeting Paul was ready to depart on the morrow vers 7. upon an extraordinary occasion Paul having many things to communicate to them as appears by his discoursing with them till midnight and talking till break of day vers 11. But that which makes the Objecters lay such stress upon this Text is because the disciples came together to break bread which they judge to be the Lords Supper Suppose it were so what doth this make for the observation of the first day more then Christs first instituting the supper upon the fifth day of the week as is generally conceived doth make for the observation of it But there is no proof that this was the Supper of the Lord that they came to pertake of but it seems to be such breaking of bread as the margin of some Bibles refers unto Acts the 2.46 They continued dayly with one accord in the Temple and breaking bread from house to house did eat their meat with gladnesse of heart So Luc. 24.30 35. And it is explained what breaking of bread it was vers 11. where it is said when he was come up again and had broken bread and eaten and talked a good while till break of the day he departed here is eating and talking it is not solemnized as the Supper of the Lord But some would have this common breaking of bread and the other in verse 7. to be the Supper it is very unlikely that here should be two sorts of breaking of bread at one time by the same persons and yet nothing spoke distinctly by which we might know the one from the other so that the most that can be said is but a supposition it cannot be proved that this was the Lords Supper And how weak a ground this is for the observation of this day as a Sabbath or more then any other day or to limite the administration of the Supper to this day I leave to the truly wise in heart to judge Obj. But the Church had their gatherings upon the first day of the week from which it appears that it was the day that they met together upon 1 Cor. 16.2 Answ The words are these Vpon the first day of the week let every one lay by him in store as God hath prospered him that there be no gatherings when I come Here is no proof for their meeting together but rather on the contrary every one of them was to lay by him in store as God had prospered him no publique gathering but private laying up but because the Apostle saith in the close of the verse that there be no gatherings when I come therefore it is thought the Scripture cannot be so understood because it would not prevent gatherings but is this fair when a Text of Scripture stands alone to put such a sense upon it as doth plainly contradict the very letter of it when it saith let every one of you lay by him in store then to say the meaning is to have publique gatherings and but one store and would not the end of the Apostle be fully answered namely to have no gatherings if each of them did lay by them in a store as God had prospered them in the world ready against the Apostle came they knowing of his coming and when he came was it not as easie to carry it with them to him as for us to carry our Bibles to a meeting and what need would there be then of gatherings And this way of giving would not be Pharisee-like but according to the words of Christ Mat. 6.11 Take heed that you do not your alms before men to be seen of them otherwise you have no reward of your Father which is in Heaven but when thou doest thine almes let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth vers 3. that thine almes may be in secret and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly ver 4. Obj. But John was in the spirit upon the Lords day and had that glorious revelation upon it which is conceived to be the first day of the week Rev. 1 10. Answ It is true John was in the spirit on the Lords day but the question will be what day that was if any one of the seven it must be the Sabbath for no other day is so called but it God calls it his Holy Day Isay 58.13 and Christ saith he is Lord even of the Sabbath day and if so then it is his day for he is Lord of it and that by way of eminency not as some would have it to shew that he is Lord of every day but as it is the Sabbath for so it is said the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath day So that this notion that the Lords day is the first day is meerly taken up on trust one from another without one word in the Scripture to prove it so Ob. But it wil be yet objected by those that are for no Sabbath from the words of the Apostle Col. 2.16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of a holy day or of the new Moon or of the Sabbath days which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ from whence it is concluded that the Sabbath was but a shadow The Apostle speaks here of such Sabbaths as were a shadow of things to come but the seventh day Sabbath was in commemoration of something past to wit the work of creation as appears in the Commandments and none are to be judged for not observing of it Answ There were Holy-dayes and Sabbaths besides the seventh day Sabbath or the Sabbath of the Lord thy God for so it is called in the commandment as doth appear in Levit 23.39 now because it is implyed in the words of the Apostle that Sabbaths were shadows and done away by the body of Christ doth it therefore follow that all Sabbaths were so any more then where the words of the Apostle implies that men shall be saved proves that all men shall be saved and if we consider the verses before it will plainly appear that the Apostle is not speaking of any of the Ten Commandments in the 15. verse the Apostle is speaking to the Gentiles shewing how they were dead in their sins and in the uncircumcision of their

flesh but now quickened by Christ and all their trespasses forgiven them In the 14. verse he shews what further benefit they had by the death of Christ bloting out the hand-writing of Ordinances which was against us and contrary to us he took it out of the way nailing it to his cross and the Scripture upon which the objection is bottomed hath its dependence upon this and comes in with a therefore let no man judge you in meats and drinks and so forth as though the Apostle had said forasmuch as Christ hath blotted out nailed to his cross those ordinances that were against you which are Gentiles you are not to be judged for the non-performance of them Now the Ten Commandments were never against the Gentiles nor contrary to them for the same Apostle saith the matter of them was written in their hearts as was said before and they did by nature the things contained in them and therefore they were not contrary to them but circumcision and other ordinances stood as a wall against the Gentiles which Christ brake down by taking them out of the way and nailing them to his cross having abolisht in his flesh the enmity even the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances for to make in himself of twain one new man so making peace that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the Gross having slain the enmity thereby Eph. 2.15 16. So that it is clear the Apostle is speaking of such Commandments as are contained in Ordinances and not those Commandments that are so eminently distinguisht from Ordinances but those Ordinances which were against the Gentiles and made them and the Jews two as meats and drinks New-Moons and Holy-dayes and Sabbath dayes Christ by his blood having taken these away hath made them one but that the Ten Commandments should be struck at there is no colour in this Scripture for it or that the Sabbath should only be taken out from them nailed to the Cross with New-Moons meats and drinks and other shadows and Ordinances which were against man when as Christ saith the Sabbath was made for man so that in this place there is no proof for the abrogating of this Command of God Ob. But how is it that the Apostle saith Rom. 14.5 6. that one man observes one day above another another observes every day alike and yet he doth not blame either of them Answ I make no doubt but if the controversie here had been about the Sabbath whether it were to be observed or no but it would have been plainly exprest and not past over so slightly but the Apostle is speaking of indifferent things which men were not to be judged for their doing or not doing and not of Commandments But because it is said that some esteem every day alike therefore some conclude that this takes in the Sabbath day but we must compare Scripture with Scripture and find out such a sense as may bring them into a harmony and sometimes interpret general terms by restrictive Scriptures for instance Christ bids his disciples go preach the Gospel to every Creature we must understand it thus to every creature that is in a capacity to hear the Gospel The Apostle saith that every Creature of God is good and nothing to be refused now some are poison and are to be refused but his meaning is every Creature that is eatable is good and not to be refused So here every day is alike that is every working day which God hath made alike but the seventh day he hath sanctified and made it a Sabbath of rest and so not like the other and this interpretation is according to the Scripture Exod. 16.4 Behold I will rain bread from Heaven for you and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day and in verse 12. They gathered every morning every man according to his eating yet on the Sabbath day there was none to gather And in our common speech it is so we call the six dayes every day men say we work every day or we travil so far every day when they mean only the six dayes that they count working dayes So the Apostle speaking to them that kept the Sabbath speaks in the same language and we have no ground to think otherwise for there is no Scripture that we find before this that hath any seeming dislike against the observation of the Sabbath but much on the contrary Obj. Ye observe dayes and years and times and months I am afraid of you least I have bestowed upon you labour in vain Gal. 4.10 11. Answ This cannot be understood that the Apostle here strikes at the meer observation of dayes a thing of such dangerous consequence for he would not have them judged that observed one day above another in Rom. 14.5 6. and in this place he himself judges these as persons that had so far degenerated that he was afraid that he had bestowed upon them labour in vain but it is manifest that these Galatians were gone back to circumcision so were debters to the whole Law seeking justification thereby Chap. 5.2 3 4. and so they observed days and years according to the Law that was a shadow of good things to come solemnizing the days months and years with those things that were appointed for them as burnt-offerings meat-offerings the waving of the sheaf the Passeover and unleavened bread and the like as you may see at large Lev. 23.8 9 10 11. and so on for they could not be said to observe times and months and yeers according to the Law except they did such service and this gave the Apostle just ground to fear that he had bestowed on them labour in vain But to imagine that to observe the Sabbath according to the Commandment or to observe a day voluntarily to the Lord is so dangerous is contrary both to Scripture reason Obj. We which believe are entred into rest which the Sabbath was but a Type of as appears by the words of the Apostle Heb. 4.3 Answ If eternal rest by faith be the Antitype of the Sabbath the Sabbath ceased to be in force to every man so soon as they believed which is ridiculous to think and contrary to the current of Scriptures but the Apostle saith We which do believe do enter into rest for he that is entred into his rest is ceased from his own works as God did from his vers 10. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest lest any man fall after the example of unbelief vers 11. Mind this Chap. well and I am perswaded you will see that the drift of the Apostle in mentioning the seventh day here is but to amplifie and set forth that perfect rest which they that believe do and shall enjoy of which the Land of Canaan was but a Type and to shew that Gods rest was before the Land of Canaan vers 4. and that yet there remains a rest to the people of God