meaning that it vvas in Ianuary past before he had seene my booke vvhich though he say not directly but that my booke was then sent to him yet he would haue his reader take it so that he might thereby and by that vvhich followeth gather vvhat expedition he had vsed in the answering of it wherein he giueth him vvrong to vnderstand For two monethes before that the booke vvas common to be had and great communication about the answering of it in the place of his abode and either he or one of his name had in short marginal notes assaied to giue answere vnto many points of the same epistle by that very Ianuary But admit that he saw not the booke before why did he not then goe in hand with it hauing receiued straight commandement from so high a personage to vse al expedition for the answering of it Forsooth the Barber-surgeon hauing his soare eies in cure would not giue him leaue to doe it Is it likely that the L. Archbishop was so euil informed of his estate that he would require him to make a speedy answere to a booke before he knew that he was in case to reade it But his Lordships letters perhaps found M. Abbot according vnto the season of the yeare frozen and could not as then vvorke in him any great resolution to answere but the spring following beganne to reuiue his drowsie spirits and in Iuly vvhen the heate of Sommer had throughly warmed him then â—â—e his affection to answere was so feruent and his disposition so fiery that he bestirred himselfe beyond al measure dispatching within three moneths not only this booke of thirty sheetes of paper but preparing also woofe and warpe as he speaketh for three hundreth more Surely this vvere vvonderful celerity if we might be so bold as to beleeue him but vntil he make better proofe of his fidelity he must pardon vs if in hast we giue not credit vnto him For vvho can perswade himselfe that M. Abbot being injoined to vse such expedition in answering would haue staied one yeare and a halfe before he published his answere vnto one sheete and halfe of paper for my Epistle containeth no more if he could haue sooner compassed it and who knowes not that a dedicatory Epistle vvhere matters are summarily touched only is none of the hardest partes of the booke to be answered But the man meaning in this Preface to commend himselfe aboue the skies saw that it was necessary to remoue this stumbling-block out of the vvay and before hand to excuse his extreame slownesse that it might not seeme strange how so admirable quicke a pen-man should be holden occupied so long time about so little I may not omit to note that vvhich now three times M. Abbot hath repeated to wit That the answering of my booke was committed â—o him from great authority vvherein he seemeth by his often reiâ—erating of it to take no smal pride that such a charge should be â—ssigned him from so high a personage But good Sir if my booke be nothing else but A fardle of baggage and rotten stuffe as you â—earme it it must needes redound rather to your shame to be â—hought a fit man to giue it answere For as euery man knoweth 〈◊〉 bald beggarly scholler is the meetest match to deale with a fardle of baggage But if there be more in my booke then you sometimes would haue people to beleeue they that haue a good opinion of it may hap to thinke that those graue wise-men in high authority fore-saw that it would hardly be answered by laying nakedly testimony of Scripture and Fathers to testimony and reason to reason vvherefore they thought it best pollicy to make choise of some jolly smooth-tongued discourser that might with a â—ufling multitude of faire pleasing wordes carry his reader quite from the matter and then blinding him vvith some colourable shew of learning lâ—â—de him into errour Proceede ROBERT ABBOT NOw the Treatise against which M. Bishop writeth is commonly knowne and entituled A reformed Catholike c. written by one M. Perkins since deceassed a man of very commendable quality and wel deseruing for his great trauaile and paines for the furtherance of true religion and edifying of the Church Against this booke M. Bishop so bendeth himselfe in his dedicatory Epistle as that with al he traduceth the whole doctrine of our Church and with such motiues and reasons as a badde cause wil afford him plaieth the part of Symmachus the Pagan Labouring vnder the name of antiquity Symmach relat ad Imp. Ambr. epistolarum lib. 5. to bring in Idolatry and to perswade his Majesty that that is Catholike religion which indeede is nothing else but errour and superstition In the due examination whereof waighing wel the sundry and slippery foundations wherevpon he buildeth I presume gentle reader that thou wilt be of my minde that he did not thinke hereby to preuaile any whit with his most excellent Majesty but only vsed the pretence of this dedication to credit his booke with them who he knew would take al that he said hand ouer head vpon his owne bare word Surely if he had not presumed of very wel-willing and friendly readers he would neuer haue dreamed to gaine any credit by writing in this sort What his Epistle is thou maist here see concerning the rest as yet I wil not say much only I aduertise thee and doe assure thee that if thou diddest like of M. Perkins booke before thou hast no cause by M. Bishop to dislike of it now Thou shalt see it assaulted with ignorance with impudency with vntruth and falshood with grosse and palpable heresie and that which he commendeth to be the marrow and pith of many large volumes thou shalt finde to be nothing else but a fardle of baggage and rotten stuffe For some tast thereof let me intreate thee to take wel in worth for the time this answere to his Epistle for the rest to haue me excused as yet both in respect of that weakenesse whereby I haue beene so long withholden from the following of this worke as also for the care I haue as wel to giue thee ful satisfaction in the questions here discussed as to stoppe the aduersaries mouth that he may haue nothing further to reply I haue propounded to my selfe the rule of Tertullian in such businesses alwaies to be obserued Decet veritatem totis vti viribus non vt laborantem truth is to vse it whole strength and not to fare as if it had much a doe to defend it selfe I am loth therefore to come hastily into the field and with mine owne sworde only to make an vncertaine fight but to take conuenient time to leuy such troupes and bandes â—as that I may not neede to doubt of the victory and it may appeare vnto thee that notwithstanding the crakes and brags of these Romish sicophants yet the truth is 2. Reg. 6. vers 16. That they that are with vs are more then they that
Kingdome But now the * Rhem. Test Annot. in 2. Tim. 4. v. 8. ad Hebr. 6. vers 10. Church of Rome attributeth so great perfection of righteousnesse to good workes as that they fully satisfie the law of God and worthily deserue eternal life yea they affirme them to be so farre meritorious as that God should be vnjust if he rendered not heauen for the same chargeing the justice of God not in respect of his promise but in respect of the merit and desert of the workes WILLIAM BISHOP NOW that M. Abbot is driuen to flie to that most holy and renowmed Pope S. Gregory the great for defence of their doctrine he is like to speed wel no doubt for he was the first founder of the Catholike religion amongst vs English-men and a great maintainer of it al the world ouer as shal appeare to the eie of euery vnpartial man that wil but reade that little which shal by me hereafter be produced out of him First touching the merit of workes we beleeue the same that S. Gregory taught to wit That al the merit of our owne vertue al our owne righteousnesse that is al that vertue and righteousnesse which we haue by our owne nature or strength is rather vice and iniquity then vertue And therefore that vve had neede most humbly to sue and pray to God for mercy and forgiuenesse of our sinnes and for the assistance of his heauenly grace which is the roote and fountaine of al good workes and merits M. Abbot therefore mistakes S. Gregory grosly if he thinke him to deny any true merit or righteousnesse to be in a vertuous Christian for though he say that our owne to wit that which we doe by vertue of our owne natural power be nought vvorth yet he teacheth most expresly that good workes done by the helpe of Gods grace doe merit life euerlasting Thus he hath left vvritten vpon that verse of the Psalme I haue meditated in thy workes Gregor in Psal 141. He that acknowledgeth the riches of this world to be deceitful and doth through the loue of heauenly thinges contemne earthly that man doth meditate vpon good workes which when this life doth passe away shal remaine yeeld the reward of eternal life For we liue not here profitably Nisi ad comparandum meritum quo in aeternitate viuatur But to get merits by which we may liue eternally And vpon these wordes of the 101. Psalme Their seede shal be directed for euer Our workes are therefore called seedes saith he because like as we gather fruit of seede euen so doe we expect reward of our workes for the Apostle saith Gallat 6. Whatsoeuer a man wil sow that shal he reape He therefore that in this life soweth the seede of good workes shal in the life to come reape the fruit of eternal recompence And in the same booke of his Morals out of vvhich M. Abbot snatched his darke wordes S. Gregory declareth clearely Greg. lib. 4. Moral c. 42. That as there is among men a great difference of workes in this life so in the next there shal be as great distinction of dignities that how farre here one man exceedes another in merits so much shal be there surmount the other in rewardes If then according to S. Gregories plaine doctrine grounded vpon the Royal Prophets Dauid and the Apostle S. Paul good workes be the seedes vvhich bring forth life euerlasting If the merit of this life be that wherewith we must liue eternally hereafter If according to the difference of merits in this life we shal receiue distinct dignities in the life to come can any man of judgement doubt but that he most perspicuously taught both that there be true merits in vertuous and good workes and also that according vnto the different degree of merits distinct dignities of glory shal be rendred in heauen The most sweet and religious father S. Bernard is haled into this ranke of S. Peters successours against al due order because he was no Bishop of Rome but our prophane Abbot saith that the holy Abbot Bernard herein agreeth vvith the ancient Church of Rome How may we know that Is it because that godly and deuout man did in al points imbrace and follow the ancient Roman faith L. 2. de Cons ad Euge. In Vita lib. 2. c. 3. 6. Item lib. 4. cap. 4. Lib. 3. cap. 5. Serm. 66. in Cant. lib. Sententiarū non procul ab initio then it is a cleare case that the Bishop of Rome is supreme gouernour of Christes Church that the sacrifice of the Masse is a most true holy sacrifice and that the same body that was borne of the blessed Virgin Mary is really and substantially there present that it is flat heresie to deny either praier to Saints or praier for the dead that euery one must confesse his sinnes to a Priest that the vowes of Monkes and religious persons are most pretious jewels and ornaments of a Christian soule vvhereof he was so earnest a Patrone and perswader that in his * In Vita life-time he instituted 160. Monasteries Briefly there is no branche of the present Roman faith which may not be confirmed out of his godly and learned workes Wherefore if S. Bernard agreed vvholy with the doctrine of the ancient Church of Rome so doth the Church of Rome that now is But if M. Abbot wil say that in this point of merits only he jumpeth vvith the auncient Church though in none of the rest should he not rather haue proued it to be so then to haue taken it as granted Yes verily vnlesse he vvould be esteemed for such a trifler as ordinarily doth petere principium begge that which he should principally proue To the purpose then I say that neither the ancient Church of Rome doth deny the merits of good workes as may be seene in that question nor yet S. Bernard for when he saith That our merits doe not in justice deserue heauen he vnderstandeth that of our merits taken by themselues without Gods promise and appointment of heauen for the reward of them the which secluded excepted God should not doe any body wrong if he gaue not heauen for the same but Gods ordinance promise presupposed and the grace of Christ by which the merit is wrought then it doth euen in S. Bernards opinion of right deserue heauen and God should doe wrong not to repay it with heauen And this in effect doth S. Bernard himselfe teach in the second place cited by M. Abbot vvhere he saith That it is just that God pay that which be oweth De Lib. Arbitrio In fine but he oweth that which be promised the promise was indeede of mercy but now to be performed of justice which justice though it be also principally Gods because it proceedes from his grace yet it hath pleased God to haue vs to be partners of that his justice that he might make vs merit ours of his
A REPROOFE OF M. D OCT. ABBOTS DEFENCE OF THE CATHOLIKE DEFORMED BY M. W. Perkins WHEREIN His sundry abuses of Gods sacred word and most manifold mangling misaplying and falsifying the auncient Fathers sentences be so plainely discouered euen to the eye of euery indifferent Reader that whosoeuer hath any due care of his owne saluation can neuer hereafter giue him more credit in matter of faith and religion THE FIRST PART Made by W.B. P. and D oct in diuinity As Iannes and Mambres resisted Moyses so these also resist the truth men corrupted in minde reprobate concerning the faith but they shal prosper no further for their folly shal be manifest to al as theirs also was 2. TIM 3. vers 8. 9. ¶ Printed with Priuiledge Anno Domini 1608. THE PREFACE TO THE READER GOOD CHRISTIAN READER I doe voluntarily confesse that after I had seene M. Abbots answere to my Epistle vnto his Majesty I was a long time vnwilling to reply vpon it not for that I esteemed it to containe any such extraordinary learning as be too too fondly vaunteth off for I dare be bold to say that in a skilful mans judgement there are more pregnant proofes of their new doctrine in two leaues of M. Perkins booke then in tenne of his but cleane contrary I finde so little substance in his worke and so great store of impertinent and vile stuffe such superfluity of idle amplifications so many vnciuil and foule wordes that I could not thinke the time wel bestowed which should be spent in so friuolous and paine an altercation Notwithstanding being often admonished by my friendes that diuers Protestants much commended M. Abbots discourse some for the stile and his cunning and confident carriage in it others for that they saw it thicke interlaced with sundry ancient Authors sentences and thereby thought and gaue out that he refused not to deale with vs at our owne weapons Herevpon I resolued at length to afford it some answere specially for such good peoples sake who are desirous to bolt out that truth of God which only can saue their soules and are not willing to be deceiued with fine tricks nor doe wittingly suffer themselues to be carried away with faire glozing speeches or stout brags when they finde no correspondence of sound and wel grounded matter To giue the man his due I acknowledge that he inditeth not amisse if he did not defile and poison his penne with so huge a multitude of ougly venimous and vnsauoury tearmes But what account is to be made of choise picked and pleasing wordes when they be imployed not only to abuse and beguile simple soules but also to disgrace the sincere verity of Gods word surely for the debating of controuersies in religion plaine vsual speeches without painting or superfluity haue alwaies beene taken by the learned for most decent and expediēt according to that ancient Adage simplex est veritatis oratio the stile of truth is simple and plaine And where much colouring and flourishing is vsed there is no smal suspition of a badde cause and fraudulent dealing What neede bad M. Abbot to fil vp thirty sheetes of paper to giue answere vnto one sheete and halfe of mine doth it not argue to a man of vnderstanding that what he could not answere vnto directly in few wordes he would at least cloake with long circumstances and cast a mist before the Readers eies with gay glorious phrases that he might not see and discerne the truth Touching his frequent disgraceful and odious tearmes and most bitter rayling against the best sort of men on our side I would gladly learne how it can stand with Christian charity and modesty Sure I am that it consorteth ful euil with that sacred rule of the Apostle 2. Tim. 2. vers 24. The seruant of our Lord must not wrangle but be milde towardes al men apt to teach patient with modesty admonishing them that resist the truth And S. Peter telleth vs that the natural property of a true Christian is 1. Pet. 3. vers 9. To be modest and humble and not so much as to render euil for euil or curse for curse so farre off was he from encouraging any man to reuile and raile at them who neuer gaue him any one foule word in al their liues yea whome he neuer saw And he further biddeth vs to follow the example of Christ our great master who did not reuile when he was reuiled but hath in expresse wordes forbidden vs to vse any contemptuous or opprobrious speeches against our bretheren assuring vs before hand that he Math. 5. vers 23. Who shal say to his Christian brother thou foole shal be guilty of hel fire This and an hundred times more to the same purpose being set downe in the diuine Scriptures against bitter and barbarous speeches yet M. Abbot a professed Diuine seemeth to take a special delight in them and to esteeme them no smal ornaments of a Diuines stile otherwise he would not so often vse them I wote wel that the most milde and sweet pen-men are sometimes through zeale of the truth or by the ouerthwart dealing of their aduersary moued to let slip now and then a hard word or two but ordinarily or vpon euery smal occasion to fal into a fit of rayling and to vomit vp most rustical and ruffianlike taunts cannot but discouer a very corrupt and venimous stomacke In this one discourse of M. Abbots a diligent scauenger may rake together wel-neare a tumbrel ful of them I doe intreate the gentle Reader not to be offended with me if I doe here for verification of what I say trouble him with the view of some few of them The Bishop of Rome is seldome called by his right name but Antichrist Page 118. 124 146. 150. 162. the man of sinne that harpie of Rome filthy harlot filthy and vnnatural strumpet the whoore of Babilon and such like Religious men he tearmeth idle lossels and filthy belly-gods swarmes of Locusts Romish vermine ful gorged Friers and so foorth My selfe and others my bretheren False harlots witlesse sophisters blind Doctors abhominable hypocrites lewd caytifs the seede of the Deuil vncleane beasts foule mouthed dogs like vnto other swine of his fraternity base fugitiues false traytors the villany of our profession and innumerable others which cannot but conuince and demonstrate M. Abbot to be one of them whome the spirit of God hath liuely described when he wrote Rom. 3. vers 13. Their throat is an open sepulchre with their tongues they deale deceitfully the venim of serpents is vnder their lips their mouth is ful of malediction and bitternesse their feete swift to shedde bloud destruction and infelicity is in their waies and the way of peace they haue not knowne there is no feare of God before their eies And if M. Abbot scorne to be aduised by me his aduersary to forgoe this rude rhetorike of brabling and scolding women in latin called Canina eloquentia let him follow
vphold another and he that hath vndertaken a badde cause must vse vvorse meanes for the maintaining of it He chargeth the religion established and professed by your Highnesse with heresies impieties blasphemies absurdities and what not that malice and ignorance can deuise to speake And this is the common stile of the rest of them vvho when they come to proue and exemplifie what they speake they shew themselues to be but sicophants and hirelings to the Pope for whose sake they must speake to gale and disgrace howsoeuer there be no truth in that they speake And if they dare thus impudently carry themselues in print and to your Majesty vvhat dare they not say in corners to the intrapping and seducing of simple and vnlearned men by which meanes many of your Majesties subjects are intangled in a misconscience of religion and thereby withdrawne from the true conscience of their loyaltie towardes your Highnesse their Liege and soueraigne Lord and are made but flaxe and tow for the fire of their seditious practises who haue beene bold already to tel your Majesty that if you wil not yeeld them vvhat they desire Sect. 34. of D. Bishops Epistle Aug. in psal God knoweth what that forcible weapon of necessity wil force them vnto at length therein verifying of themselues that which S. Augustine said of the Donatists their Predecessors Where they cannot by sty and wily cosenage creepe like Aspes there with open professed violence they rage like Lions WILLIAM BISHOP THAT dissentions doe sometimes fal among the best and most perfect Christians is not vnknowne vnto them that be conuersant in the Scriptures In the beginning of the Apostles gouernement Act. 6. ver 1. There arose a murmuring of the Greekes against the Hebrewes for that their widdowes were despised in the daily ministery Againe Act. 15. vers 39. There arose a dissention betweene two principal persons S. Paul and S. Barnabas about the taking of Iohn surnamed Marke into their company so that they departed the one from another Such dissentions as are without the breach of vnity of faith and religion are so incident vnto the diuersity of mens different judgements that no aduised creature ought to be scandalized thereat If then the Priests and Iesuites did disagree about the introduction of a new kinde of discipline and gouernement which neuer lightly hapneth in any common weale or company without some jarre and contention what just cause hath M. Abbot or his fellowes to declaime against it We doe not striue about the number and nature of the Sacraments as the Lutherans and Zwinglians did and doe we doe not disagree about the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy and the whole frame of church-gouernment as doe the Protestants and Puritans or briefly in any matter of faith or religion only the Priests found themselues grieued because in that matter of a new forme of gouernement to be put vpon them neither their aduises were heard nor their consent required vvhom it did principally concerne but al passed by the information and instigation of them as it was thought who would be wholy exempted from it At this manner of proceeding and at that which ensued of it they were not a little moued yet seing they orderly sought to their Superiors for redresse and referred the whole matter vnto their determination the dissention vvas but such as hath beene among the best Christians what great matter then can they make of this And did M. Abbot meane trow you by making me a special stickler for the secular Priests to picke a thanke at my handes for recōmending me thereby to his Majesty and the state vvho seeme to haue the Iesuites in farre greater jealousie for dealing in matters of gouernement then the seculars It is not likely because he foorth-with falleth to discommending me and my simple vvorke as much as may be wondering how I durst offer it to his Majesty being so ful of falshood and childish folly Is it not a farre greater wonder to see so industrious and learned a Doctor as M. Abbot vvould be reputed to be holden one yeare and a halfe about the answering of one sheete and a halfe of such childish follies nay is it not a wonder of wonders that he who taketh himselfe able to furnish truth with al it strength In his epistle to the King should notwithstanding confesse that he may not thinke himselfe to haue attained in this his answere to these childish follies vnto that that the matter doth require How hang these thinges together if you thought it pollicy to depresse and disable my booke as in effect containing nothing but toies and the rublish of old walles you should not so soone after haue declared in wordes and by long labour about it rectified in deedes that it required great ability and long time to be in any reasonable sort answered When you say that I charge the religion professed by his Majesty with heresies impieties blasphemies c. you in the waightier part doe falsly slander me Page 121. which I wil proue euen by your owne testimony For I say as it may be seene in your owne booke that I wil let passe their impiety that make God the author of al wickednesse and say nothing of their blasphemy who touch our Sauiour with doubting if not with despaire of his owne saluation In which my speeches I taxe by the way Caluin In the Preface vnto the secōd part of the reformed Page 124. Beza and some other vvhom I haue more fully proued else where to teach plainly those points of impiety and blasphemy But how doth that concerne the doctrine established and professed by his Highnesse seing that you your selfe testifie that you in your Churches and Schooles doe determine the contrary you your selfe then are my witnesse that I doe not charge the doctrine established by his Majesty neither vvith impieties nor blasphemies though Caluin and his complices stand justly chargeth therewith And you yourselfe though at the first you would seeme to dislike them yet draw very neare them for first you are not abashed to say Page 125. That God taketh occasion to prouoke a man to doe wickedly Now to prouoke that is to stirre vp and push a man forward to commit sinne is so euil of it selfe and so contrary to Gods wil and commandements that it cannot be imputed to God vvithout impiety vvho as S. Iames vvitnesseth Iacob 1. vers 13. Tempteth no man Further you say in the same section That the burden of Gods wrath lay so beauy vpon Christ our redeemer that it pressed him euen to the gates of hel and his estate for present feeling was as if God had abhorred his soule Page 127. Againe Christ according to his present feeling said my GOD my GOD why hast thou forsaken me which wordes signifie that our Sauiour both thought said and felt that his heauenly father for the time had forsaken him and did abhorre his soule which if it be not blasphemy I know
Christ our Lord but you M. Bishop tel vs That al who are of yeares must either by their good carriage deserue eternal life or else for their badde behauiour be disinherited WILLIAM BISHOP IN the same place you had a large solution of this objection but he that hath made a couenant with hel vvil not looke vpon that vvhich might helpe him to heauen We teach vvith the Apostle and vvith his faithful interpreter S. Augustine That eternal life is the gift of God both originally because we must receiue grace by the free gift of God before we can doe any thing that doth deserue the joies of heauen and also principally the vvhole vertue and value of our merits doe proceede of the dignity of Gods grace in vs which doth eleuate and giue such worth to our workes that they thereby deserue life euerlasting Notwithstanding if we take not hold on Gods grace vvhen it is freely offered vs and doe not concurre with it to the effecting of good workes we shal neuer be saued and this our working with the grace of God deserues heauen both which are proued by this sentence of the same Apostle Rom. 2. vers 6.7 8. God wil render to euery man according to his workes to them truly that according to patience in good workes seeke glory and honour and incorruption life eternal to them that are of contention and that obey not the truth but giue credit to iniquity wrath and indignation where you may see in expresse tearmes eternal life to be rendered and repaid for good workes to such men as diligently seeke to doe them and to others vvho refuse to obey the truth and rather choose to beleeue lies and to liue wickedly eternal death and damnation ROBERT ABBOT HE telleth vs againe and againe that Rom. 7. vers 7. 8. concupiscence is sinne to lust is to sinne and that by the law it is knowne so to be vve say the same and you goe about to make vs beleeue that it is no sinne WILLIAM BISHOP THE Apostle telleth vs againe and againe that our Sauiour Christ IESVS was made 2. Cor. 5 21. sinne and yet no Christian is so simple as to take him to be properly sinne but the Rom. 8. v. 3. bost or satisfaction for sinne so vvhen the Apostle calleth concupiscence sinne we vnderstand him with S. Augustine that it is not sinne properly yet so called not vnaptly both becâ—use it is the effect and remnant of original sinne and doth also pricke vs forward to actual sinne but if by helpe of the grace of God we represse it we are deliuered from the infection and guilt of it Which S. Paul in the very same chapter declareth when he demandeth Lib. 1. cont duas Epistol Pelag c. 10. Lib. 1. de Nupt. CoÌ„cupis cap. 23. * Ibid. v. 25. Who shal deliuer me from this body of death he answereth presently the grace of God by IESVS Christ our Lord. And againe that profound Doctor S. Augustine argueth very soundly out of the same sentence vvhere concupiscence is called sinne but now not I worke it any more but the sinne that is in me that the Apostle could not meane sinne properly which cannot saith he be committed without the consent of our minde Lib. 6. cont Iulian. c. 23. but that had no consent of the minde to it because it vvas not the Apostle that did worke it Now how can that be the euil worke of a man if the man himselfe doe not vvorke it as the Apostle saith expressely not I doe worke it Lastly the same Apostle teacheth that sinne hath no dominion ouer them that are vnder grace which were false if concupiscence were properly sinne for that hath such dominion ouer euery good body that they cannot auoide the motion and sting of it No not S. Paul could be 2. Cor. 12. vers 8. cleerely deliuered from that pricke of thâ— flesh though he praied most earnestly for it vvherefore by the testimony of S. Paul himselfe concupiscence is not properly sinne no more is it to lust if lust be taken for the first motions of concupiscence But Iacob 1. vers 15. concupiscence when it hath conceiued as S. Iames speaketh that is by our liking beginneth to take hold on vs bringeth forth sinne yet but venial marry when it is consummate by our consent or long lingring in it then it engendreth death that is mortal sinne ROBERT ABBOT S. PAVL saith of the spirit of adoption the same spirit beareth witnesse with our spirit that we are the Sonnes of God but you say we haue no such witnesse whereby we should beleeue that we are the Sonnes of God WILLIAM BISHOP AND that vve say vpon good consideration for we must not beleeue with the Christian faith which is free from al feare any thing that is not assured and most certaine Now the spirit of God doth not beare vs vvitnesse so absolutely and assuredly that we are the sonnes of God but vnder a condition which is not certaine to vvit that we be the sonnes and heires of God Rom. 8. v. 17. Si tamen compatimur yet if we suffer with him that we also may be glorified with him but whether we shal suffer with him and constantly to the end beare out al persecutions we know not so assuredly because as our Sauiour fore-telleth Luc. 8. v. 13. There be some that for a time beleeue and in time of temptation doe reuolt Was it not then a tricke of a false marchant to strike off the one halfe of the Apostles sentence that the other might seeme currant for him now no man doth more plainly or roundly beate downe their presumption vvho assure themselues of saluation then S. Paul as in many other places so in this very Epistle to the Romans in these wordes Cap. 11. v. 20. Wel because of their incredulity they the Iewes were broken off but thou Gentil by faith dost stand be not to highly wise but feare For if God hath not spared the natural boughes least perhaps be wil not spare thee neither see then the goodnesse and seuerity of God vpon them surely that are fallen the seuerity but vpon thee the goodnesse of God if thou abide in his goodnesse otherwise thou shalt also be cut off c. Can any thing be more perspicuously declared then that some such who were in grace once afterwardes fel and were cut off for euer and that some others stand in grace who if they looke not wel to their footing may also fal and become reprobate the Apostle directly forewarning those men vvho make themselues so sure of their saluation not to be so highly wise but to feare their owne frailty and weakenesse least otherwise they fal as many had done before them If this plaine discourse and those formal speeches vttered by the holy Ghost wil not serue to shake men out of their security of saluation I cannot see what may possibly doe it ROBERT
v. 8. Rom. 16. vers 19. Your obedience is published into euery place But no maruaile to the vvise though he did not then make mention of her Supremacy for that did not belong to the Church or people of Rome but to S. Peter vvho vvhen S. Paul wrote that Epistle vvas scarse vvel setled there neither did that appertaine to the matter he created of Of pardons S. Paul teacheth in formal tearmes which both the Church of Corinth and he himselfe gaue vnto the incestuous Corinthian that then repented these be his wordes 2. Cor. 2. vers 10. And whom you haue pardoned any thing I also for my selfe also that which I haue pardoned if I haue pardoned any thing for you in the person of Christ that we be not circumuented of Sathan What can be more manifest then that the Apostle did release some part of the penance of that incestuous Corinthian at other mens request vvhich is properly to giue pardon and indulgence And if S. Paul in the person of Christ could so doe no doubt but S. Peter could doe as much and consequently other principal Pastours of Christes Church haue the same power and authority The last of M. Abbots instances is That S. Paul saith nothing of traditions wherein he sheweth himselfe not the least impudent for the Apostle speaketh of them very often He desireth the Romans to Rom. 16. vers 17. marke them that make dissentions and scandals contrary to the doctrine which you haue learned and to auoide them but the doctrine that they had then learned before S. Paul sent them this Epistle vvas by vvord of mouth and tradition for little or none of the new Testament was then written vvherefore the Apostle teacheth al men to be auoided that dissent from doctrine deliuered by tradition And in the Actes of the Apostles it is of record how S. Paul vvalking through Siria and Silicia confirming the Churches Act. 15. v. 41 Commanded them to keepe the precepts of the Apostles and of the Ancients Item vvhen they passed through the citties they Act. 16. v. 4. deliuered vnto them to keepe the decrees that were decreed by the Apostles and Ancients which were at Hierusalem and the Churches were confirmed in faith c. Where it also appeareth that those decrees vvere made matter of faith and necessary to be beleeued to saluation before they vvere written He doth also charge his best beloued disciple Timothy 1. Tim. 6. vers 20. To keepe the depositum that is the vvhole Christian doctrine deliuered vnto him by word of mouth as the best Authours take it auoiding the prophane nouelty of voices and oppositions of falsly called knowledge Againe he commandeth 2. Tim. 2. vers 2. him to commend to faithful men the thinges which thou hast heard of me by many witnesses Was not this to preach such doctrine as he had receiued by Apostolike tradition without writing And further vvhich suppresseth al the vaine cauils of the sectaries he saith 2. Thessal 2. vers 15. Therefore bretheren stand and hold the traditions which you haue learned whether it be by word or by our Epistle where you see that some traditions went by word of mouth from hand to hand aswel as some others were vvritten and vvere as wel to be holden and stood too as the written proceeding from the same fountaine of truth Gods spirit Thus much in answere vnto the instances proposed by M. Abbot vvhich he very ignorantly and insolently auoucheth to haue no proofe or sound of proofe out of S. Paul I could vvere it not to auoide tediousnesse adde the like confirmation of most controuersies out of the same blessed Apostle as that 1. Tim. 3. vers 15. the Church is the pillar and ground of truth vvherefore any man may most assuredly repose his faith vpon her declaration That Christ gaue Ephes 4. v. 11. 13. Pastors and Doctors to the edifying of that his mistical body vntil we meete al in the vnity of faith c. Therefore the Church shal not faile in faith vntil the day of judgement nor be inuisible that hath visible Pastors and teachers Also Hebr. 5. vers 1. that Priests are chosen from among men and appointed for men in those thinges that appertaine to God that they may offer gifts and sacrifices for sinne That Preachers and 1. Cor. 3. v. 9. Priests are Gods coadjutors and helpers and not only idle instruments That S. Paul and Timothy 1. Cor. 9. vers 23. 1. did saue other men and therefore no blasphemy to pray to Saints to helpe and saue vs. That S. Paul did Tim. 4. vers 16. accomplish those thinges that want to the passions of Christ in his flesh for Christes body which is the Church therefore Christes passion doth not take away our owne satisfaction That he a Colloss 1. vers 24. 1. Cor. 9. vers 16. gloried in preaching the Gospel of free cost which was a worke of supererogation That b Ephes 5. vers 32. Marriage is a great Sacrament That c 1. Tim. 4. vers 23. grace was giuen to Timothy by the imposition of the handes of Priest-hood vvhence it followeth that Matrimony and holy Orders be true and perfect Sacraments But vvhat doe I I should be too long if I would prosecute al that which the Apostle hath left in vvriting in fauour defence of the Roman faith This I doubt not wil suffice to confront his shamelesse impudency that blushed not to affirme there vvas not a vvord in S. Paul that sounded for the Catholike but al in shew at least for the Protestant As for S. Peter I vvil wholy omit him because the Protestants haue smal confidence in him Here I may be bold I hope to turne vpon M. Abbot this dilemma and forked argument vvhich S. Augustine framed against the Manichean Adimantus Lib. 1. cont Adimant Hoc si imprudens fecit nihil caecius si autem sciens nihil sceleratius If M. Abbot did ignorantly affirme S. Paul to haue said nothing for the Roman Catholikes what could be more blind then not to be able to discerne any thing in such cleare light if he said it vvittingly knowing the contrary then did he it most vvickedly so to lie against his owne conscience to draw after him selfe other men into errour and perdition ROBERT ABBOT WEL M. Bishop let vs leaue Peter and Paul for heretikes let vs see vvhether those that succeeded did al teach the same doctrine that the Church of Rome now teacheth Hollinshead descript of Britan. ca. 7. Eleutherius the bishop of Rome being sent vnto by Lucius king of this realme for a copy of the Roman constitutions for the gouernement of this new conuerted Church and of the imperial lawes for the better ordering of his common wealth about 150. yeares after the death of Christ for answere writeth vnto him Annals of England by Iohn Stow. That hauing receiued in his Kingdome the law and
greedinesse and couetousnesse of their familiars their bretheren their nephewes vnder which name commonly goe their bastards but because they asscribe to marriage as the old Heretikes did Bellarm. de Cler. lib. 1. cap. 19. pollution and vncleanenesse which cannot stand with the sanctity and holinesse of the Priestly function WILLIAM BISHOP IF M. Abbot did not euery vvhere almost shew himselfe to be a shamelesse man and one that careth not how corruptly so he may somewhat colourably cite the ancient Fathers sentences this passage were alone more then sufficient to proue him to be no better then a cosening counterfeit In these few lines there are foure euident vntruthes vttered by him The first is that a man is not repelled from being a Bishop for hauing wife children but only for feare of dilapidation of the Church goods This is most euidently false for though the feare of spending the Church goods vpon prophane vses be one cause vvhy it is not expedient that a Bishop or Priest should be maried yet the more principal reason thereof is the purity of the single life and the freenesse of it from al such vvorldly affaires and temporal troubles as are necessarily linked vvith the care of prouision for wife children This you heard before out of S. Leo who was predecessor to Pope Pelagius the first by more then an hundred yeares These be also the reasons of S. Augustine and S. Hierome vvho vvrote thereof vvhole volumes against the Heretike Iouinian and were giuen first by S. Paul himselfe when he teacheth that 1. Cor. 7. vers 31. he who is without a wife is careful for the thinges that pertaine to our Lord how he may please God but he that is with a wife is careful for the thinges that appertaine to the world how he may please his wife and is diuided And Vers 32. Vers 34. the woman vnmaried and virgin thinkes on the thinges that pertaine to our Lord that shee may be holy both in body and spirit See the more special groundes of the single life of clergy-men wherevpon euen by the confession of M. Abbot himselfe Page 42. A law was made in the Church of Rome by Pope Siritius who was 150. yeares before Pelagius that al Priests and Deacons should either be chosen single men or else promise to abstaine wholy from the company of their wiues which is also decreed in the second Councel of Carthage holden about the same time where the holy Bishops there assembled doe say Canon 2. That we may keepe that which the Apostles did teach and Antiquity herselfe obserued giuing al men to vnderstand that the single and chast life of the Clergy vvas taught by the Apostles and obserued in most pure Antiquity It being then so notorious and wel knowne a thing that whosoeuer would be a Bishop must needs refraine from the company of his wife no caution was required for that by Pope Pelagius because there was no question or doubt of it And M. Abbot dealeth deceitfully to argue out of the not mentioning of that vvhich was vnderstood of al men as necessary to be presupposed and is in most of the Canons of the very same distinction Distinct 28. expresly deliuered and also in two other vvhole distinctions going next before His second false tricke is in the citation of the glosse and that a very foule one for he chops it off in the middest leauing out that which wil marre al his market The glosse saith vpon that caution against dilapidations that it is to be vnderstood when be that is chosen to be a Bishop doth loue his wife and children so tenderly that it is to be presumed he would for their sakes dilapidare the Church goods c. otherwise a man is not repelled for wife and children to wit for that point of dilapidations whereof the glosse there speaketh This to be the sence any vnderstanding man vvould easily perceiue if the glosse had gone no further But it addeth as it were to meete with M. Abbots cauil Dum tamen longa continentia praecesserit A man that hath a wife may be admitted to be a Bishop putting in good surety that he wil not dilapidare the Church goods yet with this prouiso That he hath long before liued continently that is refrained wholy from the company of his wife as it is before said in the Canon Priusquam of the same distinction See how expresly the glosse excepts that which M. Abbot auoucheth it to affirme His third false tale is That the Church of Rome now wil by no means admit maried men to be bishops priests which is not true for in those very cases vvherein they vvere at any time admitted before they vvould be admitted now that is If there were want of other able men and some such eminent learning and vertue in a maried man as were not to be found in a single then he might be made both Priest Bishop so that he and his wife would liu◠continently for there is no Canon of the Church to the contrary His fourth lie is a luculent and bright one That we forsooth asscribe pollution and vncleanenesse to marriage as the old Heretikes did for neither Cardinal Bellarmine vvhom he quoteth nor any other Catholike doth teach the act of matrimony to be the worke of the Deuil or damnable sinne as the Manichees and some other Heretikes did Nay he declareth there plainly that it may be without any sinne at al though most commonly concupiscence beare to great a sway in it both preuenting the rule of reason and somewhat exceeding the measure of it as a Lib. 14. de Ciuitat c. 17. Item lib. 5. cont Iulian. cap. 8. 10. S. Augustine testifieth and doth make a man more dul and heauy to spiritual exercises and not so pure holy as the office of a Priest doth require as b Hier. lib. 1. cōt Iouinian S. Hierome and c Chrysost l. 6 de Sacerdot S. Chrysostome doe witnesse And that a man thereby is made lesse holy and pure both in body and spirit S. Paules owne vvordes doe intimate ¶ 1. Cor. 7. vers 34. The woman vnmarried thinketh how shee may be holy both in body and spirit so that within the compasse of not many lines M. Abbot le ts flie two cast of lies and yet as it were not content vvith so few he interlaceth three other lies to furbish and smooth vp the rest The first is that now a daies married men are not repelled from Bishopricks to auoide dilapidations which is false For that is one cause as I shewed before and is also touched euen by that most renowmed Father Bellarmine euen in the same place cited by M. Abbot De Clericis lib. 1. cap. 19. in his fifth reason vvhere he teacheth That the marriage of Bishops and Priests doth hinder much that hospitality and tender care of the poore which men of the Church ought to haue for the